TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DaVincitheReptile Archive

View 2 posts and 452 comments by DaVincitheReptile on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Do you honestly believe a layperson cannot deconstruct basic words? The word Nazi has only historical significance; as far as I'm aware the letters put together don't have morphemes. Feminism does.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 11:13 PM
2

Ok, so a name doesn't matter, it's shallow, really you have to look to the movement itself right? Hey guys I'm part of the Nazi party. I identify as that due to my heritage and upbringing. But I'm not anti-Jew at all. I just think appealing to the name under which I classify myself is silly. You should simply look at the way I act, which is kind and considerate, even though I still identify as Nazi. The fact is the name itself helps direct where the movement tends toward. If you can't admit that…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 08:12 PM
2

You really believe the name feminism has no effect whatsoever on people's biases when identifying as such? That it's literally just an arbitrary word at this point? doesn't hold that much value to anyone except children that have some visceral reaction to anything Have you even been paying attention? This is literally politics right now. The entirety of it. So you've basically undermined your own position.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 07:05 PM
2

A small fringe. Lol.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 07:03 PM
1

Oh so the origin is what matters then? I guess communism is the best system after all!
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 07:01 PM
4

Figures you'd eat that shit considering you're retarded.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 10:02 AM
2

Good on you, putting your pure idiocy right there out in the open like that.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 10:01 AM
1

You may have gotten good grades, but you clearly didn't learn anything if this is your attitude about the humanities. Duh STEM is difficult, but I'd wager quite a lot you'd have a hell of a time in a high level class studying Hegel or Nietzsche or the like and being forced to write a 15 page paper analyzing their system(s) of thought. So congrats you picked low level philosophy classes to fly by in, and that somehow makes you feel entitled to shit on others who may have struggled with it? Regard…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:33 PM
2

Do you not understand what a logical process is?
/r/MensRights06/06/17 06:42 AM
2

Do you think those experiences are somehow exclusive to the female gender? Your dad just sounds like an idiot though. I'd love to teach my little girl about computers, assuming she shows an interest.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/17 05:28 AM
-1

Elaborate?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/17 05:24 AM
1

And attempted. Each one of the fulfilled suicides is also an attempt. Not to mention every study that's ever approached the subject fails to take into account a person holding a gun/knife to their head/abdomen and then choosing not to go through with it. That doesn't count as an "attempt" but taking not-quite-enough-medicine does.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 07:06 AM
3

Yeah, he shouldn't have. But if someone's physically aggressive with you you don't always have the time, especially if you're just 15 years old, to determine what not to do. Could have even been muscle memory that kicked in. Of course men have far more agency than women so he should have simply realized he could just overpower her and hold her peacefully until she'd calm down! /s She learned an important lesson. Unfortunately nobody who witnessed it will learn it. It will remain exclusive to her…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 01:37 AM
1

Do you remember taking critical thinking in k-12?
/r/MensRights20/10/16 12:17 AM
1

Yeah I'm not too sure why I was downvoted. But I agree with you, it needs to be kept in mind. One of my best friends is not competitive at all even though he is great at certain things. The moment it turns into competition he just shuts down.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 11:45 PM
1

Wait what kind is that?
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:46 AM
1

Common core is the bane of psychological growth and education. It's honestly extremely surprising to me that more people don't see that. Kids have natural interests. What the hell. Obviously they're not "born" with them, they're entirely infants when they're born. It's after being exposed to the world a bit that they develop interests. If I have no fucking interest in the "History" that common core offers us (since it is extremely obviously biased in a certain direction, pure propaganda, "histor…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:42 AM
4

Mind linking to where this actually comes from? Doesn't make it look very real when it's just an imgur image. I have a feeling you'll tell me to google the symbol thing in the bottom right. To that I say this: I am lazy, and it is you who posted the image.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:38 AM
2

Haven't there also been studies which showed that teachers are more likely to grade boys much more harshly than they grade girls? If that's a common demeanor for teachers, which seems at least somewhat likely, then at least some part of the higher-achieving-girls phenomenon would be due to social attitudes and gender bias than to actual achievement... it just gets more fucked up. If you extrapolate that theory to a grander picture, it becomes obvious how oppressive it is not only to boys but to …
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:24 AM
1

So.. common core is exactly what he claimed then? Rigid? Because the "should" part of "what kids should learn in school" is entirely socially imposed and has little to no bearing on what a child should actually learn about, which is basically whatever engages, pushes, and interests them the most. All that happens when you force a kid to learn stuff he has no current interest in is you end up with a kid with bad grades, a losing mindset, and depression. For the kids that take an interest because …
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:20 AM
0

I think it's likely a little bit of both. But for a kid it can be much harder to realize what you need to do in order to make your life better. And you just spiral downward. Hell as an adult the same applies. But at least an adult has the experience to make it more likely that they'd be able to pick themselves up.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:17 AM
-3

Yes, the claim that "boys are naturally competitive" is borderline misandry. But I feel that view is mostly a reactive one to calling things misogyny that just have to do with evolutionary psychology and biology.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:11 AM
2

Truly sexism is the denial of those differences.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:09 AM
1

But your perspective. That's what I want to hear.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 03:28 PM
1

Would love to hear the full story.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 03:46 AM
2

Corporeality = physical existence.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/16 03:07 AM
1

Link?
/r/MGTOW29/09/16 07:59 AM
1

I know. I was just saying because someone else had said it would be the ordering officer's responsibility. But in my opinion that is a gigantic cop-out which is what I was getting at. "He ordered me to" is the baton pass.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/16 06:26 AM
2

That's right, it's not. That's why it would be murder by his hands even if he/she was ordered to do it. The baton-passing game of "accountability" gets old fucking fast. It's just another way humans justify atrocities. It's why you can't get fucking shit done when you're trying to take care of your account with Comcast. Everybody points the finger or says their behavior is justified because this and this.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/16 06:15 AM
3

Statement.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/16 05:41 AM
2

And why do you say that?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/16 04:01 AM
3

Yeah, that's bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/16 03:09 AM
3

Well enlighten me, how about?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/16 02:46 AM
1

what even is that sentence? can we even call it that?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:45 AM
1

It's more likely a combination of the two.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:44 AM
2

Can you source that claim? Not that I don't believe you, just would be nice to have it to reference in the instance I encounter another idiot.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:43 AM
1

Do go on, please!
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:42 AM
3

SERIOUSLY WHAT THE FUCK Two years ago I'd never see it now it's pretty much every single fucking time.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/16 02:32 AM
11

To me, this is the biggest reason this is a pussy pass. Mainstream media gives no fucks. All men are evil.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/16 02:25 AM
6

Does this mean a soldier can never be a murderer if he's ordered to kill innocents?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/16 02:22 AM
1

Sorry if I'm misinterpreting what you're trying to say, but it looks like you read "physiologically" as "psychologically".
/r/MensRights25/09/16 07:26 PM
1

People keep using terms like "obvious" and "definite" in this discussion. I don't think you guys know what those words mean. If that was word soup for you then you need to work on your ability to read. this has no relevance to what i said, i merely called out what i saw as an obvious falsehood. It actually does have relevance. You told me you believe I'm being dishonest (or rather implied it by asking me to "please be honest" as if I weren't already doing so). Usually people would be dishonest i…
/r/MensRights25/09/16 07:25 PM
3

Yeah because they probably heard somewhere that girls mature faster than boys and took it to mean mentally/emotionally where the original time they heard it it was only intended as physiologically. I'm not saying it isn't possibly a misconception, I'm just debating whether it is usually the case that people mean it in that way. I imagine the scenarios you are imagining are from experiences of yours when you were quite a bit younger. Because seriously, through my adult life so far, every time it …
/r/MensRights22/09/16 01:55 AM
1

Why are you trying to create an echo chamber where there shouldn't be one? I'm describing to you my experience. It isn't grasping at straws at all, it's actually totally reasonable. That is absolutely usually what is meant unless you're talking to a child or an idiot. I've already stated I have heard it to mean physically. In fact every single time it has been intended as that that I have heard it. What reason would I have to be dishonest, seriously? It's not like I'm against most of the ideas p…
/r/MensRights22/09/16 01:50 AM
-4

Yeah I think I may have heard the "emotionally" as well. But that isn't the same as "mentally". Also, it's entirely up for debate what "emotionally mature" means when some people say it. For me it means being able to handle one's emotions, but I can see how somebody might mean "begin to start having more complex emotions more often" in saying they "mature emotionally" more quickly. See what I mean?
/r/MensRights22/09/16 12:09 AM
–

Is it really so definite? Because every time I've heard it it was pretty clear they meant physiologically.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 12:07 AM
–

When people say that they mean physiologically. Not necessarily mentally, although obviously at least part and probably all of the mental is physical.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 09:24 PM
–

I did mention that to the user. Unfortunately I got banned from the sub-reddit for being rude (I asked the user if he or she was fucking retarded). When I subsequently mentioned to the mods that the user had legitimately offended me (which prompted me to ask that question) due to her extremely misandristic/sexist post (which is also against the rules), they told me to stop contacting them and I was muted. And that user was not banned.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 06:49 PM
7

That's fucked. Source?
/r/MensRights12/08/16 11:42 PM
3

First sorry about the image. You have to zoom in. I couldn't figure out how to make it more accessible as an image. Second, I made an image because I don't want brigading or witch hunting. I just thought this post by this particular user was a prime example of how feminists themselves have extremely deep prejudice against all men. I find it very strange that this person even used the word "fight" and still couldn't somehow consider that men have fought harder and far, far longer than women for t…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 11:41 PM
1

I don't know if I agree with thinking of it that way though. Because then you could say men earned anti-rape classes and such because historically they did do a lot of raping...
/r/MensRights13/06/16 08:29 AM
2

Actually isn't it the case that for such statistics they don't include fulfilled suicides? With that in mind men attempt suicide at a far higher rate than women, assuming that I remember correctly here. That was a little unclear: If women fail at killing themselves at such a high rate, then there would be fewer actual suicides contributing to the "attempting rates" statistic, if fulfilled suicides were considered/included. But since they are not included, one can easily see that the rate at whic…
/r/MensRights13/06/16 12:58 AM
1

Ok, yes. But males are not "privileged" as a gender any more than females. That's the main issue. Both genders have pros and cons, and while it is my opinion that men do actually have it rougher in more ways than women, I feel that it is irrelevant because there is a somewhat natural order to things that can't simply be ignored (biology).
/r/MensRights13/06/16 12:06 AM
1

Your post confuses me. Are you trying to make a point to me? Are you agreeing with me that men should be the ones drafted? I don't have a problem with women not doing the dangerous/shit jobs. Men are better at them in general anyway. It's when they turn around and bitch saying men have all the privileges etc. when the fact of workplace deaths and working those complete and utter shit jobs exists that really irks me. modern feminism is far more about not appreciating all the things men do for thi…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 07:12 PM
0

I don't think being immune to a draft is really a part of the MRM... if anything I think most men of the MRM would be of the opinion that if a draft is necessary then it should be the men that are drafted first. That is, at least, for the active combat roles, which is obviously what a draft would be instated for.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 08:55 AM
1

So the idea being that he asked a few girls that said no, then this girl said yes I'll go back with you to your dorm, then passed out along the way after they started making out or some shit? God this is all so fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 08:54 AM
2

Is that a fact though? Is that just what he said? I haven't been keeping up on the story.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 03:26 AM
1

holy shit my sides. nice post.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/16 02:19 AM
1

I think that's just his own personality coming through. Just keep it separated and know when that person is speaking vs. when his logically rigorous side is speaking. It isn't really that difficult. And to be honest with you I like that he lets his personality shine through like that. It goes along with the whole message of his position, that it's OK to be yourself, even or especially if people want to shut you down for it.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/16 01:53 AM
2

While watching I had this feeling that she actually liked being dominated logically. It's totally possible it was just me, but you can kind of see it on her face when Milo says "so he's right then...?" when she starts saying girls cry.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/16 01:51 AM
8

Chivalry historically comes from white culture. I think you're onto something.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/16 01:01 AM
5

There's no reasoning with them.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/16 11:06 PM
30

This is the biggest takeaway from all this IMO. This is about female superiority.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/16 11:05 PM
1

so do you have anything to say to /u/DaNiceguy 's analysis of your title?
/r/MensRights04/06/16 10:38 PM
2

You're onto something. It's somewhat understandable though considering how neutered male sexuality has become. It's a lashing out in response to the trauma of most men's metaphorical balls being chopped off.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 10:15 PM
3

Your first sentence there is so true. It's the puritanical status quo that causes the vast majority of trauma if not all of it. Being in the public eye for a period of time and knowing everyone is discussing you and your sexuality, either as a teen or adult in this scenario, is far more traumatic than physically engaging in sensuous experience.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 10:14 PM
2

At the very least it could not be called "rape" when it involves no violence whatsoever.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 10:10 PM
3

Obviously Bill's right but he seems to neglect to consider that the courts are stacked against men. He says once theyre convicted then go ahead and tar and feather them. Well, you obviously can be falsely convicted, especially when it comes to sex crimes and you're a male.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/16 05:55 PM
-1

Did you even read my post? I'm not offended for anyone. I'm not offended in any way shape or form. I was pointing out that it's understandable that someone had a reaction like that considering their perspective as an unrelated reader. Also I find it extremely strange that you said "don't take away her agency".
/r/MensRights14/05/16 02:12 AM
3

I mean to be honest the post is pretty intense over all and that's the thing you have to say... I mean to an average person that doesn't realize the relation you have with OP, it looks like you're just not taking it seriously at all. So a response like this is pretty fair IMO.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:26 AM
3

I point them out to men and feel like they want to call me a misogynist.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 11:34 PM
1

what a world we live in when there has to be a study done to determine whether or not sexuality on a person to person basis is extremely diverse.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 06:23 PM
1

Considering you're not a fucking retard (hence why you've subbed to this sub) I wouldn't believe that you do. The majority of people still do though. And they're just idiotic enough to be turned away from their chivalrous duties by the chance to win a material possession.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/16 05:52 PM
1

I just wanted to point out how the basic human's loyalties lie where they see that it benefits them the most. In most cases they've got nothing to lose to protect the pussy and potentially get laid. But in this case they do have something to lose and so don't protect it.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/16 06:05 AM
1

I'm not saying she didn't. I'm pointing out the order in which all the people in this video have their priorities.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/16 12:34 AM
3

That's exactly what it is. Modern US culture celebrates victimhood.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 04:38 AM
2

Thank fucking god. The last thing we need is more retards in office.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:48 AM
2

Please leave the planet.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:47 AM
3

Clearly she intimately feels the ancestral oppression of all her long gone sisters.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:45 AM
17

To be honest they wouldn't have to buy into traditional gender roles. They could be "progressive" and would still convict the boy.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:43 AM
20

I predict OP will disappear never to be seen again.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/16 09:13 AM
-15

Let's all take note of something here. If these people weren't in a contest where they basically couldn't move without losing their chance at winning a material possession they'd have been all over that dude in an instant. But because they are trying to win the car nobody moves to protect the chick. Let's let that sink in now.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/16 09:13 AM
3

Overall, it's usually better to be a man. nope
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/16 06:37 AM
2

SEXISM = POWER + PREJUDICE SHITLORD YOU ARE MALE THEREFORE YOU HAVE POWER. YOU CAN'T DISCRIMINATE BASED ON GENDER AGIANST MEN IDIOT
/r/MGTOW04/03/16 12:28 AM
2

Fuck!
/r/MensRights28/02/16 10:47 PM
-2

So at what point does the definition change? When you say so? Like a cult is enough.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 12:29 AM
-7

No but I think someone should copy-paste a more capable brain into you. One that could see similarities between things that aren't currently classified in a way perhaps?
/r/MensRights26/02/16 11:32 PM
-4

feminism does not have a central figure womynkind? it doesn't have religious beliefs or practices to consider as such. how doesn't it...? they preach to others in a very cult-like manner, they present irrational arguments as rational ones, and they yell and put their fingers in their ears when they're told why their beliefs are irrational/wrong. sounds like religious practices to me.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 10:46 PM
2

Please do!
/r/MensRights25/02/16 11:22 PM
20

you'd think in a society that privileges white males so heavily (the patriarchy) that everybody would immediately beat the living hell out of her. perhaps it's time to redefine the word privilege? you know, away from the bullshit definition that has been pushed for a while now?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/16 11:20 PM
0

Yeah, good. But you can admit that most people still would.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 10:24 PM
8

Uhhh? Surely you realize if the roles were switched you'd likely be agreeing that the 30yo teacher was a sex predator even though she was 17 and chose to fuck him (while at the age of consent)? And if you likely would not agree with that (which, I'd agree, it shouldn't be a huge issue for a 30yo to have sex with a 17yo), most people still would...
/r/MensRights25/02/16 10:34 AM
-1

No, but a big part of the point is... well you already know I'm sure.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 10:33 AM
1

naw I'm good.
/r/MGTOW11/02/16 01:11 AM
1

I just meant any actual events or turning points such as the one given in the original post.
/r/MGTOW10/02/16 09:09 AM
-1

I mean that was the type of summary I was trying to imply I already understood...
/r/MGTOW10/02/16 02:03 AM
0

just now learning about this case... anyone wanna summarize important plot points/twists i get that three women that he had sexual encounters with are accusing him of harassment/violence.
/r/MGTOW10/02/16 01:27 AM
3

Bigger man...? You realize conceding like that is the entire reason that throughout history the pussy pass has taken such strength?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/16 07:29 PM
1

can you inform me of any portion I missed?
/r/MensRights03/02/16 03:14 AM
1

So wait, really? The extent of this "controversy" is that he asked the reporter to go for drinks with him? Fuck this world.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 03:07 AM
2

I did actually. Thanks for letting me know.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 03:05 AM
1

Go on? Not in the know here.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 12:40 AM
0

Context? So are you backpedaling then to the position that it's implied and not stated? Because, often, when one invokes context, it's in an attempt to prove an implication. A statement is an objective thing while an implication is very often an interpretation which could or could not be right. Once again, I am not trying to be mean here, but I think you should probably take your time a bit more when reading. Especially if you're going to accuse somebody of being sexist. And with the source that…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 12:28 AM
0

Again I ask you to quote where he stated that all women on medications would not care about driving a man to suicide, since that is in fact your original position. stating that they would all be the same about driving someone to suicide because they're abusing (suckin' down) anti-depressants and xanax.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 12:24 AM
1

You linked a comment that has no statement such as they would all be the same about driving someone to suicide because they're abusing (suckin' down) anti-depressants and xanax. All he stated was that 50% of women are taking medications like that. You've extrapolated something out of a statement due to your own mind-biases. Honestly, I'm not trying to be mean here, when reading you should try to listen to and identify your mind's invasive assumptions regarding a person's stance. Try harder to be…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 12:19 AM
7

Nice. Good shit.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 12:14 AM
3

stating that they would all be the same about driving someone to suicide because they're abusing (suckin' down) anti-depressants and xanax. Please quote where he stated this. I am being 100% genuine.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 12:13 AM
7

Honestly I don't see how it's sexist at all, even if untrue, to claim that 50% of women in this country are on drugs like that... Care to enlighten me how it is/would be sexist?
/r/MensRights03/02/16 12:08 AM
1

..................................???
/r/MensRights02/02/16 11:27 PM
11

Let's wait and see if /u/mikespimpin has any sources.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 11:26 PM
3

Are there statistics on such a thing?
/r/MensRights02/02/16 11:26 PM
80

Men are basically playing a game of Russian Roulette while having sex even with a person not under the influence.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 11:25 PM
1

This sub reddit is actual shit at this point.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 01:35 AM
7

It isn't that the wage gap doesn't exist, it's that the wage gap doesn't exist in the way that it's commonly presented in academia and media. Read the comic again and try to figure it out.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 12:39 AM
2

You don't understand.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 11:43 PM
1

oh. how'd i miss that? i sorted by top all time...
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/16 01:04 AM
34

At first I didn't believe you.. checked his account and had a hearty laugh. Edit: Damn, his top comment of all time is at 0 points. I'm actually impressed.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/16 01:47 AM
8

timestamp?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/16 04:02 AM
1

Whether or not you are right, I appreciate that you're not immediately jumping on the bandwagon here. Speculation, even if wrong, is our duty.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/16 04:43 AM
1

How was the wife being coerced?
/r/MensRights23/12/15 01:34 AM
2

I find it somewhat hard to believe anyone would admit to believing that. Not that it isn't at least part of the reason women get such lighter sentences for identical crimes.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 01:32 AM
2

You're not alone. Been this way for a long time myself. I do sometimes hang out with people but somehow I still feel so disconnected that I just end up back in my room alone for hours and hours every day...
/r/MGTOW19/12/15 11:04 PM
3

They got there via the patriarchy they purportedly hate so well.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:25 AM
1

I can't either, but I know a few people who have been molested/raped and they've gone on to live productive lives and found ways to deal with the trauma. If you're dead you lack the ability to deal with any trauma...
/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:16 AM
3

They didn't forget. They just fail to think for themselves. Such a realization is plain as day simply by reading the words and considering their implications.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:14 AM
2

It's because of all the pushback they're giving just a little ground at a time because these fucktards are realizing how ignorant they actually are on these matters.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:13 AM
1

"many" is a vague term... how many do you suppose there are? 10? 100? 1,000? I'd argue it's at least high double digits.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:12 AM
1

Definitely have heard the argument made that rape is worse because you have to continue to live with the trauma... so fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:11 AM
1

"rape"
/r/MensRights03/12/15 05:55 AM
4

Keep this shit up dude. I'm too exhausted and apathetic about any of this shit to do anything except play music and video games (and work obviously). You're a hero.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 04:19 AM
1

How is that an undermining...?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 04:11 AM
3

Go on.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 04:10 AM
1

Yeah very strange. She kept asking everyone questions about their post history and prying for personal fetishes/beliefs. Super confusing and yes, very elaborate if a real troll.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 06:58 AM
1

She deleted both her youtube and reddit accounts. This was a troll. God knows what she plans to do with personal info(s) she obtained.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 12:57 AM
1

Look at this: This user deleted her account just as I suspected she (or he?) would, both on reddit and on youtube. This was an elaborate troll to get those of us that responded to open up about personal issues, perhaps to use as fodder later. That's why this person kept asking personal question after personal question, why she kept perusing every single user's post history and questioning (interrogating) them on it, and trying to get them to PM her about their personal fantasies and issues. Abso…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 12:56 AM
1

Thanks, you rule for doing that.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 11:13 PM
1

I'm sure he appreciated the apology.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 10:46 PM
1

Probably wise to at the very least hold off on giving people personal info on the internet... IMO if you wish to express something about yourself using truths about yourself, best to obfuscate a bit so it's not so obvious, i.e. if answering where you're from, just lie until you're more comfortable with a person...
/r/MensRights18/11/15 10:45 PM
1

The world is a scary place for those with controversial politics/ideas. I feel you there.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 10:43 PM
1

Alright thanks for the info. I sorta wish, even though it was only two of them, that my previous comment were not downvoted. I'm just trying to remain somewhat objective... Wouldn't feminists, though, want those names to be associated with feminism?
/r/MensRights18/11/15 10:42 PM
1

Are you trying to show you got banned from there just because you post here as well as there?
/r/MensRights18/11/15 10:41 PM
1

I don't think much of it. It's taken out of context so I have no way of understanding why that girl was quoted in that way. As far as the comments go, I don't really enjoy reading them and I don't really have an opinion. Again, MGTOW and that sub are for catharsis IMO. I don't think people necessarily believe everything they say on there; hell I definitely don't believe everything I say on here. It is the internet after all, the only actual safe space left for us to toy with ideas, offensive/cra…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 10:41 PM
1

There's something odd about this poster. It seems unfair to expose some of what you said to her in private...
/r/MensRights18/11/15 04:53 AM
1

I don't really think stereotypes of either gender are true. Is it you that's downvoting me here? Seems odd that it came so much later. If not I apologize for asking if it was you, but it wouldn't make much sense considering I was just trying to answer your question as best I could.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 04:37 AM
1

I guarantee someone somewhere did. Many people, in fact.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 01:29 AM
-1

Alright, it does appear that it does have something to do with feminism (i.e. feminists in government pushed the model). I glanced at the wikipedia article and upon reading the first two names mentioned and CNTRL+F'ing "femini", there were no results on either person's wiki page. Are they feminists? Seems like it would have the word somewhere in the article if they were...
/r/MensRights18/11/15 01:01 AM
1

Let us know.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 12:57 AM
1

I guarantee people cared about women's rights before feminism.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 12:56 AM
0

I think it would have been somewhat more appropriate for him to post stereotypes like that in the MGTOW sub-reddit. Not to say those stereotypes are absolutely true. I think MGTOWs are people who have been deeply cut by women in pretty harsh ways overall. I don't consider myself a MGTOW but I certainly understand where some of them are coming from. I think, for most of them, it's mostly a temporary thing. That is, that their minds generalize "female nature" and such. It's cathartic for them, whi…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 12:39 AM
-1

It was the stereotyping and sexism ala "female nature" that I had issue with. You may very well be doing what he is claiming, but the rest of the stuff is uncalled for. It would be more tactful to simply ask you for more specific reasons on why the comments are disabled. There definitely is not only one reason that people disable comments to videos. So it's unfair to assume you're doing it "because you're a woman". That type of shit makes us look bad, anyway.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:38 AM
0

A dystopian future ushered in by the will of the people themselves. It's easy to create a totalitarian regime when you've limited the things people can or can't believe (mind control).
/r/MensRights17/11/15 02:24 AM
2

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 01:59 PM
1

Definitely a bad comparison. Was there something in American culture in the 70s that made this shit more acceptable than now...? Like what the fuck, that shit is suuuuuuuper creepy. Was there some cultural difference in the 70s? Maybe he's just trying to make them feel good about themselves, i.e. to feel desired by a person in a successful position or something? Seriously is there any rational explanation to this behavior other than the (understandable) kneejerk reaction of holy shit this is cre…
/r/PussyPass11/11/15 10:29 AM
1

Concession noted.
/r/PussyPass11/11/15 10:22 AM
4

Wanna let you know I agree with you.
/r/PussyPass11/11/15 10:21 AM
3

Just wanted to hear more about these apparently true escapades... they sound interesting.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 03:38 AM
6

Go on?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 01:38 AM
1

There is a variance in the degree to which any person is naturally programmed to assert dominance. Honestly it has nothing to do with gender as this tendency is found within both genders (although who knows to what extent or how common in either. Some studies say almost exclusively men while others say women are more likely to behave in such a way). Women are very much just as predisposed to assert dominance as men are.
/r/PussyPass25/09/15 09:35 PM
18

I really wonder how members of the feminism sub would take those bolded sentences. How in the world can you be negligent to a 40 year old?
/r/PussyPass25/09/15 07:22 PM
3

Yeah, exactly. One of the quotes an article about the hashtag appealed to was some dude saying "fight me and we'll see who's fragile". The way the article talked about that tweet seemed to act as if all men are like that or something. Calling men and masculinity fragile is exactly the type of thing that created "toxic" masculinity to begin with...
/r/PussyPass25/09/15 07:08 PM
2

Yeah. It seems to amount to bullying and trying to subvert men as a whole. Not that that isn't common among the movement to begin with.
/r/PussyPass25/09/15 07:06 PM
2

I've only seen very little regarding that trending hashtag or whatever but I still don't get it. How does it make sense to attack masculinity as fragile when it's literally entirely society's fault that men feel the need to be overly masculine? I've been looking for discussions on it but I haven't really found any anywhere.
/r/PussyPass25/09/15 06:26 PM
1

Well, I understand not wanting to do it for a while so as not to be annoying, but it doesn't really prove much if you only provide two examples of the claim you make...
/r/MensRights24/09/15 11:08 PM
4

Such a good comment. I have consciously wished to be part of a tribe (as all men likely do) since being just a child. I think most people desire to be part of a tribe and develop those close bonds via challenges. It's actually no secret at all. The issue is that the society we've enacted over the past couple centuries comes at the absolute detriment to our inherent nature toward those things. I've always thought I'd be much happier being part of a nomadic tribe than in this shit society with its…
/r/MGTOW16/09/15 12:01 AM
1

Diogenes is a fucking badass.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/15 07:37 AM
4

Never heard of something that doesn't exist being bitter.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/15 07:00 AM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%E2%80%93slave_dialectic We're talking about a fact here, namely, one of interacting individuals. It's not counter-productive at all to suggest you stay a step ahead when you need to. And again, just because you're playing a step ahead of a person does not mean you cannot love them and treat them as an equal.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 01:29 AM
2

It's actually not. At all. To say that there's a problem with a father hanging out with his daughters is extremely wrong. But I will say that this isn't really domestic abuse at all. It's just classic unappreciative human nature.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 12:31 AM
1

Professional cleaners make $25-$35/hr This is such a ridiculous salary when one considers that there are laborious and dangerous jobs that pay barely higher than minimum wage (that almost exclusively men work). Sorry, it's just frustrating to read such a high number for housework.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 12:28 AM
4

Honestly, fuck that shit. I did family counseling when I was younger. My mom fully manipulated the therapist into being on her side all the time and I eventually just said I didn't want to go anymore because I felt powerless in that room as a child, especially when I could clearly see but not express the bias being presented. Personal counseling, though, is probably more likely to help. Just be sure to find a counsellor who doesn't immediately treat the female as infallible. good fucking luck. W…
/r/MensRights20/08/15 12:25 AM
2

Takes five seconds to realize that 99% of people would tell a man to stop wearing fucking sun dresses all the damn time, especially to his place of employment...
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:11 PM
-2

It seems a bit morbid to spin a seriously horrific triple filicide into a comment on gender politics, and some kind of warped lesson for feminists. It would be morbid if it weren't for the fact that this story, and subsequently your comment, have been posted into a sub-reddit whose focus is precisely gender politics...
/r/MensRights19/08/15 10:50 PM
-4

The fact that you think that answers my question shows how retarded you are.
/r/PussyPass19/08/15 09:31 PM
-9

Care to explain how this is pussypass? Did she get slapped with a mere fine? Or less than a year in jail? There are no comments on the "article", so clearly you're not expecting us to read a comment and figure out how it's a pussypass. So go ahead OP, let's hear it: How's this a pussypass? It's fucked up, for sure. But it's not been shown that this is pussypass.
/r/PussyPass19/08/15 02:31 AM
1

drinking so they have an excuse to like sex In your opinion, is this sort of sexual shame caused by men's "slut-shaming" in our culture, or women's "slut-shaming" in our culture? What I mean to ask is.. in your experience, which gender slut-shames more?
/r/MensRights09/08/15 09:04 PM
0

Cool, thanks. Do you plan on becoming a professor? What else is there to even do with a PhD in political science?
/r/MensRights07/08/15 03:12 AM
0

So that's what your dissertation would be on right? Does that mean that's what your PhD is in, or would you say to someone "I have a PhD in sociology" or whatever other subject?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 11:55 PM
0

Captain, I don't know how much more mad we can hold! armedburrito: CRANK UP THE POWER I TELL YA. WE GOTTA GIVE IT ALL THE JUICE WE CAN MUSTER!
/r/MensRights06/08/15 11:06 PM
0

Yeah, in general the easy thing to do is the wrong thing to do.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:55 PM
0

May I ask what your PhD will be in?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:54 PM
0

To be fair, you are mad that your logic fell apart.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:41 PM
0

Damn you're pretty upset that your logic got rekt eh?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:34 PM
0

I'll take this as an admission that I just rekt you hardcore using logic, something that you can only pretend to be familiar with.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:12 PM
0

That's not supremacy or dominance, though, because on rare occasions, there were consequences. This is the exact argument you were using regarding selective service though. You claimed that the fact that there more than likely would never be another draft instated was reason enough to disregard it as a potential form of oppression of men. And, it is a form of supremacy. You can absolutely use that word in the way that I have there. But I don't honestly care about that anymore. I'm more intereste…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:46 AM
0

Retard who thinks women gaining the right to vote is a form of supremacy, Quote me where I said this. asserting that men having the legal right to beat their wives is not indicative of the fact that men have historically dominated women. It isn't, because it was due purely to a technicality in the language of the laws that a person has "the right to hit their dependents" which women happened to also fall under back then. I guarantee you can find plenty of accounts or cases from 1700s and even ba…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 10:34 PM
0

yawn puttin words in my mouth. again didn't expect much else from ya.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:20 PM
0

Holy shit, do you honestly think the word supremacy is that far away from supremacist? I think you can use the term "supremacy" or "supreme" without automatically referring to a form of "Supremacism", yeah. Any half-intelligent person should be able to see that you can. Treated like property, as in beating your wife was totally legal for a good portion of American history. And because it was legal, it automatically means that it happened in a large majority of cases. You keep using that term "ph…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 06:36 AM
0

Wow. First, the term we were using was the word "supremacy" not "supremacist". I'm not sure what this fallacy is but you committed it. Next, in now realizing that you were conflating "supremacist" with "supremacy", I'm going to go ahead and disagree with your issue with the word. You can absolutely say someone is supreme or holds supremacy in one regard and not in another. Lastly, when you say "treated as property" you make it sound like they were kept in stables and fed hay. There's no way in t…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 06:26 AM
0

Sorry I was still under the impression we were talking about first world issues here. Because all those other issues are so damn blatantly obvious that it's almost ridiculous to cite them when the issue at hand is potential ways in which females are becoming supreme in the first world. As far as wasting your time, why, I'd imagine that if you actually had something better to do, you'd be doing that instead of replying to me at all to begin with. But you don't, so who are you kidding?
/r/MensRights04/08/15 06:05 AM
1

No kidding, which is how it is that men have never had supremacy over women. Going on a million tangents and trying to make a counter point to every sentence I make is fucking juvenile. Interesting, I always thought, personally, that juvenile was the sort of thing that you're doing; swearing incessantly and acting angry even though I took the time to try to state my thoughts (and in turn, I was hoping for decent counter points so I could better understand your position and perhaps change mine) o…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:43 AM
1

Ok, if that's the case, then men never had "supremacy" over women because they just had some things up and some things down as well... I guess I should have expected this sort of response. Welp I tried.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:38 AM
0

I don't know why it's easy to assume that one movement or another would inevitably result in supremacy. Is anyone assuming that? They're simply observing that it was the end result (insofar as what is currently happening is an "end"). you must concede that MRA is also subject to the same problems, yes? I'm 99% certain anyone around here would concede this. Equality is something that's been getting better all the time, for everyone, the average cis white man included. I think you're conflating "q…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:18 AM
0

Agreed you're probably right that the original movement wasn't about supremacy per se, but the end result would be a sort of supremacy of one gender over the other, wouldn't it? That is, assuming one does not wish to go off to war and die for some rich politicians. The right to vote without conscription is a form of legal superiority of one gender over the other, is it not? No need to immediately start calling me names and shit, I'm really interested in speaking reasoning with you.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 04:07 AM
0

I legitimately love your post.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/15 10:51 PM
6

It's not explainable. It's actually quite the opposite, for it is women who command the attention of men and act entitled to everything men have. I can't remember the last time I had a guy friend tell me about all the attention from women he was commanding. But I've seen countless examples of women not only commanding attention from countless men in a room, but fully taking advantage of that fact and exploiting them (i.e. when they are offered free drinks and shit).
/r/MensRights23/07/15 10:50 PM
56

But as I trudged home to face another evening of reruns of The Office and left-over sushi from 7-11, I wondered at what cost. Most days I felt unattractive, unwanted and worst of all, un-[male]. Interesting. She dislikes feeling this way, huh? Who would have thought that would be rough. This is exactly how quite a lot of the population of western men feel every single day within their own damn culture. If only feminists would take the time to try to understand and empathize with men like that.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 10:46 PM
0

I'm a man, i.e. only ever validated by what I provide for others in this society. I wish every single day that JUST ONE FUCKING GIRL would ever validate me by my appearance. But I will never get it. Because women are oppressed, right? That's why I'll never get validation for my appearance.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 06:43 AM
2

In general this is true, but let's not forget to honor both men and women who perform all the necessary yet laborious tasks that must occur in order for our society to continue to function/flourish.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 11:22 AM
0

Care to enlighten me on exactly what her response was? When I listened to it, even after the third time, I still had no clue how she had actually answered anything at all, other than reiterating that she disagrees with others that disagree with the bill...
/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:58 AM
2

Whoa really?
/r/MensRights14/07/15 08:28 AM
25

Gotta love how it's relevant to mention how fit she was more than once.
/r/PussyPass13/07/15 07:21 PM
0

Wow, I'm bad.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 06:28 AM
-1

Hey, could you provide me with sources on those figures? Especially the last one. I do believe you, I just want some reliable sources to give to others when they start spouting bullshit again.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:31 PM
2

100% agree.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:03 PM
2

Thanks for coming to this sub and voicing your opinion. We need more women to understand. IMO nobody of either gender deserves a sentence longer than a few days to a month and some community service for consensual sex.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 10:49 PM
4

Yeah but it needs to remain consistent. Any male in her position would have gotten a pretty harsh sentence as well... I agree with what you're saying, but there does need to be consistency across genders.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 10:47 PM
0

you were...? I see well reasoned arguments on this sub literally every time I read any comments section.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 10:44 PM
0

On the internet, sure. IRL, though, anytime I've ever heard the MRM brought up, it's with negative language toward it, saying its current form is disgusting, etc. Opposite with feminism brought up IRL.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 05:46 PM
-1

Please upvote this to the top. edit: ok, at the very least, this statement taken out of context is a good statement, even if the story that it is a response to isn't very relevant to it.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 10:46 PM
3

So, because other things were labeled as hate crimes, and actually weren't, then this should be too? Nope.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/15 05:34 PM
33

Often times white on black violence is considered a hate crime even if it wasn't.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/15 04:44 PM
9

But feminism was first! So clearly there's no need for a MRM.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 07:11 AM
-1

You've actually just proven that there is no gender bias against women in this society.
/r/PussyPass26/06/15 08:29 AM
-1

I dunno, two years in prison for manslaughter seems more than fair... considering it was an accident, yes in negligence, a man definitely doesn't deserve to die or have all his belongings taken or anything ridiculous. Even 2 years in prison would be a lot IMO. There was no ill will/intention behind this woman's negligence. $500 fine is less than a slap on the wrist, that's for sure, but even just a few months in prison or something would be plenty.
/r/PussyPass25/06/15 05:40 PM
1

Gtfo.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 05:34 PM
3

for some reason. Because men are disposable.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 05:30 PM
2

Isn't it illegal to drive with sandals?
/r/PussyPass25/06/15 04:50 PM
-1

You honestly believe it'd be the same sentence for a man?
/r/PussyPass25/06/15 04:50 PM
62

The instinct to protect all women runs so deep that even basic liberties like freedom of speech (or, more accurately, freedom not to be held 100% accountable to every little thing you've ever said in your life) lose out.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 09:00 AM
-2

No.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/15 04:58 PM
0

Was there something wrong with the way I expressed myself? I didn't dismiss anything. Well, except your ability to think. I'd have told you in person the same damn thing. Didn't do anything like in the comic.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 11:45 PM
2

You've got to be stupid.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:48 AM
-4

It makes me happy that you've been upvoted.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/15 08:00 AM
-1

Yet another example of what not to post in this sub since this isn't a pussypass being denied.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/15 07:59 AM
-6

Yeah what a deep scheme, going directly to him to talk about it. If only she had schemed better like, oh I don't know, actually just going and cheating and keeping it hidden from him. The dude's a fucking moron. That's not how you have a healthy relationship. He could easily have said no, I'm not into that idea, and the relationship would probably have been fine.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/15 05:53 PM
1

The behavior of pointing out there is more than one way to live a life? I have never had a polyamorous relationship, by the way. Seems like you're trying to assign a viewpoint to me and then are saying I'm attempting to spread that viewpoint... I'm not doing that. You really don't know anything about my views. Well, except I guess you could figure it out if you weren't already convinced you know what my views are, since I've actually expressed them in a subtle way earlier in our conversation.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/15 12:05 AM
2

If you define "good" as following archaic religious tenets while being an atheist, then sure.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/15 07:37 PM
2

I think it's not unreasonable to ask about it if it's something that's been on your mind and you are in love with and can fully trust the other person. It would be wrong for her to go and cheat. Simply asking about the possibility isn't the same as cheating at all.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/15 01:16 AM
-5

Damn my assumptions were wrong. Then again so were yours.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/15 12:16 AM
-2

The part that's absolutely crazy to me is that they can't even understand that the point some of us are trying to make is that there was a massive communication failure, not that we're all advocating him being in a relationship he doesn't want. Lol...
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 11:12 PM
-1

Who said I was polyamorous? Pretty sure you made that up to make yourself feel better in the face of someone questioning the way you were raised. You're basically a bible belt Christian.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 11:11 PM
1

Yep, it's going to shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 03:59 AM
3

I wonder if OP will post instances of him getting logically destroyed...
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 03:54 AM
6

To be more clear: ONLY POST IF A WOMAN ATTEMPTS TO USE HER GENDER TO GAIN ADVANTAGE/AVOID REPERCUSSION, AND IS DENIED THAT ADVANTAGE. Random man vs. woman catfights where a pussypass is not clearly defined will be removed. Please report if you see a violation of this rule. The mods in this sub appear to be fucking retarded. Or at the very least Mustaka.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 02:31 AM
-2

You must have a very shitty definition of "clearly defined". To be more clear: ONLY POST IF A WOMAN ATTEMPTS TO USE HER GENDER TO GAIN ADVANTAGE/AVOID REPERCUSSION, AND IS DENIED THAT ADVANTAGE. Random man vs. woman catfights where a pussypass is not clearly defined will be removed. Please report if you see a violation of this rule. This shit is not clearly defined at all. A man could ask for an open relationship too, and be denied not at all because of his gender.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 02:31 AM
-2

People like me? People of reason? I'm a regular lurker here and I enjoy quite a few of the posts... so clearly there's some overlap here. I don't see how this Great thing about being a mod in a sub like this connects to this is when the community unites in telling people like you to fuck off... they all tend to be on point. One doesn't lead into the other. The statement seems to be indicating that since you're a mod, people in the community tend to be on point. That is a total non-sequitur. Coul…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 02:26 AM
-7

How in the world is it a betrayal to ask if he'd be into that idea? The betrayal is if she actually cheated. And yeah, I am defending her, but not because she's a chick. Instead, because she expressed herself, and got shat on. I'm a believer in open and honest communication, especially with a significant other, and that there is nothing inherently wrong about talking about certain ideas. So it'd be a penis-pass if a man felt that he loved a woman but also really desired other girls as well? This…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 01:45 AM
-4

Just one: At what point do you realize that your acknowledgement of the pussypass has actually turned into genuine prejudice against women for any and all things they do? She expressed a desire to her significant other, the person she should most be able to trust. A mature response would be for the man to explain he's not into that idea at all but still really loves her. He did not do that. This isn't a case of pussypassdenied. She wasn't trying to utilize the pussypass to get her way. She never…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 01:12 AM
-2

When did I insult you...? Maybe she didn't want such a thing at the beginning? 5 years is a long time, people change. At least she hadn't changed to the point where she was saying she doesn't want him anymore.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 12:42 AM
-6

Her saying she's interested in an open relationship is just about as honest as you can fucking get. You're clearly a teenager. Get some wisdom and until then please quit posting. If there's more to this story, then that's one thing, but since all we have to go on is what was originally posted, there's no indication that she hadn't been honest with him since the beginning. The fact you consider it dishonest to come out and communicate a desire proves my point: Emotionally you're a child.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 12:37 AM
2

The exact same audience that claps for his point is the one that laughs to begin with. There's a fucking mind-fuck for you.
/r/MGTOW05/06/15 12:33 AM
2

The attacks on men are countless. This feels like a bunch of men got baited and then they singled out one guy to send a message that they're on a tight rope when it comes to their bodies.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 11:30 PM
-11

It's a gigantic problem in the USA man. People don't know how to think critically. At least 75% of the population looks at two bandwagons and jumps on one of them that is diametrically opposed to the other. They simply don't know how to dissect each bandwagon to observe their intricacies. It's not really their fault though. It's been governmental policy for a while to discourage critical thought and analysis in public education systems.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/15 11:09 PM
-6

Really? You'd be devastated? As in break down crying for three weeks? As in grieving over a beloved member of your family dying? There's emotionally healthy and emotionally unhealthy. You are the former if you would be devastated by your SO simply trying to communicate a desire to you.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/15 11:04 PM
2

You're stupid, straight up. It wouldn't be a penis-pass if the dude asked for an open relationship.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/15 11:00 PM
-30

It isn't cheating if it's agreed upon. She's not asking for permission to cheat, she's asking for permission to do things so that it won't be cheating. There's a gigantic difference. And just because she asks for it doesn't necessitate that she will go and cheat. In fact it makes it more likely that she won't, as otherwise she would have just cheated and not ever inquired.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/15 10:59 PM
-22

Spot on. The only person(s) getting "rekt" in this entire situation are the man-children trying to spout off that her trying to openly communicate is somehow wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/15 10:58 PM
-3

Lol and you get downvoted. The pussypass is a real thing, no doubt. But there's also such thing as man-children. All you did was say you agreed with a post and you got downvoted yourself. Clearly a misuse of the downvote function, as it is simple reddiquette not to downvote because you disagree (which is pretty much the only possibility for downvoting you here).
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/15 10:55 PM
-1

Sounds like something that would happen.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/15 07:02 AM
-39

The dude sounds like a fucking moron. She's better off without him honestly. This isn't pussypass material at all. This is a case of a girl trying to communicate with her partner and her partner ditching out because of insecurity.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/15 07:00 AM
3

Why the fuck is this even an article?
/r/MGTOW28/05/15 09:57 PM
1

Nice post, but sub-come? It's succumb...
/r/PussyPass26/05/15 01:24 AM
1

Gotta love how they ask him if he has a girlfriend, as if that's somehow relevant. Oh wait, it is relevant. Here's how: They're committing exactly the crime he speaks of, i.e., denigration of men in mass media. Oh what's that you don't have a girlfriend? WHO WOULDA THOUGHT!?? HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. The implication here very blatantly being that he is worth less due to his supposed inability to have an intimate relationship with a woman.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 10:25 PM
1

See my edit. Your parents came from communism? Surely they've taken issue with authority before, then... do you have no sympathy for them?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/15 09:38 PM
1

she was lucky to be let go with an apology. suddenly her attitude was fixed. And he was lucky to be born into a position in which he can come to power in such a way. That is my point. The bend over and take it comment was related to this in that, at some point in your life, I'm sure, you've been oppressed by an "authority figure" who got there solely based on who their family is, or what genetics they were born into which allowed them to reach such a position, i.e. luck of the draw. edit: To be …
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/15 09:34 PM
1

Maybe just try thinking about it a bit harder? Don't know what to tell you.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/15 08:57 PM
0

I don't even think you know what we'd be disagreeing about.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/15 08:48 PM
0

The point: you missed it entirely.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/15 08:31 PM
0

She sounds so damn nervous... as if she knows she's in over her head.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/15 07:36 PM
0

Shit sorry didn't realize you were gonna give me a nice job with a company car and 401k. I guess I should have figured though, considering you were likely born into such a powerful position.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/15 07:21 PM
0

You're clearly an idiot.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/15 11:50 PM
1

Yeah let me know if you think of one.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/15 10:23 PM
0

What's this from?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/15 09:04 AM
0

Bend over mate, I think someone who was born into wealth and power has something for you.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/15 08:51 AM
0

Agreed man.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/15 08:50 AM
0

I mean that was pretty good, but you can do better, especially with the stupidity Mustaka oozes.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/15 08:49 AM
0

It is when you have power hungry fucktards like that judge up there. She literally said adios, who gives a shit how her demeanor was?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/15 08:48 AM
8

Fuck man that is so fucking annoying. Be a guy and shred on guitar, make plenty of youtube vids, get little to no exposure as there are shit tons of guys doing this, welp shit man time to get a job. Be a girl, shred decently, all of a sudden HOLY SHIT you are FUCKING amazing and BEAUTIFUL to boot! You should be making hundreds of thousands of dollars babe!
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/15 07:15 AM
5

nah they'll probably call her in for an interview and ask her about the charge. Then they won't hire her when she tells them she legitimately raped a guy in his sleep.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/15 10:19 PM
47

Nobody will take it seriously when she tells them she's a sex offender, though.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/15 05:25 PM
3

Nevermind the shit she's saying (not that it isn't abhorrent), she straight up looks fucking insane, with that constant smile with seething anger behind it. Jesus christ.
/r/MGTOW22/04/15 11:24 PM
-1

at least gyms have a weak argument in favor of them. There are women out there who are embarrassed to work in the presence of men, because they have body shame or don't want to be seen sweating or whatever. Yeah, that is a super weak argument, not just a regular weak argument. Because plenty of men feel exactly that way when they work out at the gym too. They have women-only poker tournaments too, and the top female pros refuse to play in them. I did not know this, and it is super admirable.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:25 AM
0

So... we're all beginning to sound like that, whereas you've clearly always sounded like a dipshit retard? I can accept that.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:16 AM
1

Ah, my mistake.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 01:57 AM
1

I am also not struggling in anyway cause I have a dick and balls. I've had to deal with some serious shit because of my gender, ??
/r/MensRights17/04/15 01:45 AM
0

I don't see how that's relevant at all to my response.
/r/MGTOW17/04/15 01:44 AM
1

Nobody who upvoted that comment believes it to be a great contribution to the conversation. They see it as an accurate depiction of the viewpoint you hold when you farfetchedly claim that, somehow, having to deal with bleeding from a vagina once a month is a massively oppressive thing that all women have to deal with. The "struggle" you allude to that women might have to face due to their menstruating is, quite simply, another aspect of the victim-complex that is women crying and moaning about h…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:54 PM
2

I'd much rather have a period than be seen as fucking disposable in all regards, than to feel like I can't be myself nor express myself out in public for fear of being called one of a multitude of things, such as: Pedophile, Misogynist, Pervert, Dumbass, Worthless, etc.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:29 PM
6

It's the same with just about any other person arguing that there exists a wage-gap.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:25 PM
0

I doubt that there is any philosophy that argues you should use people for your own personal gain. Well, LaVeyan Satanism, for one.
/r/MGTOW16/04/15 10:13 PM
-3

Well, I'd agree, but usually a person making a claim should source it, especially claims which are often seen as controversial (not that I believe them to be, necessarily), and even more especially if probed for it.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:45 AM
-2

So... source(s)?
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:04 AM
2

Most people in this thread are saying that if the women can fulfill the same standards mentally and physically as men, that it would be just fine to have them in.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 12:10 AM
-4

The average healthy young male has the capacity to be conditioned to compete with the most elite female athlete in most physical tasks. Source?
/r/MensRights08/04/15 12:04 AM
0

I said "You should be shot" which is not at all a threat of violence. The ban got overturned after I pointed this out and other mods got involved.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/15 07:40 PM
0

It's because I expressed my opinion that somebody should be shot. That's not against any of the rules in the sidebar. The mod that banned me said he didn't care about my opinion but that I "Threatened violence". I find that quite hard to believe.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/15 05:34 PM
4

I got banned from /r/videos for commenting on this video and I didn't violate any of the rules in the sidebar. Pretty sure one of the mods didn't like what I had to say.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/15 08:05 AM
6

Yeah but at least those dudes had the privilege of coming to her aid. That poor oppressed woman, how could she be expected to do manual labor similar to that which causes the deaths of so many men each day/week/month/year? She might break a nail doing it herself.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:36 AM
-1

You should leave.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 05:59 AM
1

Damn nice post although, I know nothing about children, so it could be that you're just entirely wrong, from my perspective anyhow.
/r/PussyPass13/02/15 07:42 AM
2

.../s?
/r/MensRights26/01/15 04:34 AM
6

You ever visited /r/PussyPass?
/r/PussyPass23/01/15 11:35 PM
-2

How about "human being"?
/r/MGTOW05/01/15 07:03 AM
3

Someone explain to me how this is relevant and why it's wrong that she slept with 10,000 men? thanks.
/r/MGTOW03/01/15 06:15 PM
8

That's weird, I just got laid this morning. And I did it without sucking up to pretty girls and compromising my dignity. Funny how that works huh? You believe nobody here gets laid because they don't do it how you do it...? i.e. submit to the cultural/social norm that women can do and say whatever they fucking want?
/r/MGTOW25/12/14 11:13 PM
23

It's fucking 4chan. It's an opportunity to make an offensive joke and the guy took it.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:05 AM
4

Maybe you'd get it if you actually thought about it critically for more than a few minutes. Of course you're probably ~17 years old and went through America's shit education system where they destroy your ability to do such a thing, so I suppose it's pretty understandable that you can't. I won't hold it against ya.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 06:34 AM
12

You did some of this in front of your daughter, and that's what caught the attention of CPS. Yep. It was only bad once a young girl was seeing it happen. Before it was just a woman hitting a man.
/r/PussyPass25/09/14 09:48 AM
1

Get away.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 12:26 PM
7

Provide sources please.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 02:17 AM
1

too lazy to read link. ELI lazy?
/r/PussyPass12/09/14 08:12 AM
1

yawn Thanks for offering a new and interesting perspective rather than the same old rehashed, predictable perspective that atheism has offered us all in the modern age. Get back to me when you are a tad innovative with your thinking.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 03:52 AM
1

Yeah, it was conjecture. I even admitted it, hence the use of the word "venture". The problem is that "well educated" is often synonymous with information retaining. But anyone can retain information; it doesn't make you an intelligent person to be able to do so. Here is the original comment I responded to: there is research showing that indeed, the most educated people about religion are atheists. The researches that deadalnix is referencing almost certainly defines "most educated" as "those wh…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:28 PM
1

Absolutely. Don't get me wrong, religious nutters are far worse at critical thinking than atheists, so I suppose I misspoke when I suggested that atheists are dead last in terms of metaphorical thinking. However, it is simply frustrating to me that so many atheistic minds have such prejudice in them so as to prevent them from the actual understanding I am speaking of. I don't find it likely that I would be able to hold a conversation about any sort of complex ideology with an atheist, as I've ne…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:22 PM
1

Yeah. It means you can't even mention the words Heaven or Hell without prejudice overtaking their originally intended meanings. It means that simply knowing what words are in a book is not the same as having any sort of actual understanding.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:12 PM
0

As far as understanding any sort of complex symbology, metaphor, or allegory, however.... I'd venture to say atheists are dead last.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:58 PM
0

Well then, don't rock the boat... or do...
/r/MensRights01/09/14 01:26 AM
0

Thanks. Are you out of there, or still there after the first week? You should probably gtfo of there.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 01:21 AM
0

Sorry if this has been answered, but which Uni is this?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 01:12 AM
1

Please do elaborate!
/r/MensRights01/09/14 01:11 AM
3

Is it pretty in the land-of-no-logic?
/r/MensRights03/08/14 03:57 AM
26

OP meant examples where women try to utilize the pussypass but get denied.
/r/PussyPass26/07/14 10:36 PM
-4

It's the same logic as saying twelve hundred. It just doesn't sound correct to people who aren't used to it can't think for themselves.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 07:26 PM
0

Please for the love of god I hope you give a good response to "TheVTM" because I've been dying to read something like that.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:21 AM
2

It's not a quote, I was just paraphrasing the article. My bad.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 01:32 PM
–

They're not even paid accordingly. I worked as a flunkie seasonally at a mill for one summer, and hung out with a veteran of that job quite often. He had worked there for 15 - 18 years or something (started when he was 18, he was now 33) and still only made 12 an hour. One day I fucked up and he almost fell off the train car I was supposed to be on. He could have died, easily, that day. Manual labor jobs like these should pay way more. It's pretty despicable. I probably don't understand economic…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 10:17 PM
0

I don't believe men have ever been told they needed to take self defense classes to avoid being raped by women (or other men). So where are you getting "men have been told to decent themselves for hundreds of years"? Rape is a part of a spectrum of violent crime. Men are by far victims of violent crime more often than rape. Due to this, throughout history, men have learned how to defend themselves. It has nothing to do with "defending oneself against rape". It has everything to do with "defendin…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:45 AM
1

but I don't think it's fair to be telling one gender that they need classes to defend themselves against another. Life isn't fucking fair and men have been learning to defend themselves and others for countless centuries, but nobody was crying "it's not fair! we should just teach everybody not to attack each other!". In the modern age, women, who should be seen as equals in every way to men (and the other way around), would do well to learn self-defense just as men have had to do throughout hist…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:47 AM
0

Actually I saw some posts that I replied to get deleted the other day by a mod... not that I disagree with anything else you're saying, I'm just saying censorship does appear to happen here, but only if someone is being a gigantic douchebag.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:38 AM
22

The point is that if you're a woman, it's a whole lot easier to get sympathy and therefore get out of a situation like getting a ticket. It's about the overall perception of women in our society. Yes, it's the cop's fault to an extent, but the cop is also acting under cultural norms, of which one major one is "women are weak and need to be protected". And so the cop actually believes he or she is fulfilling his or her duty by giving the woman a freebie.
/r/PussyPass12/06/14 12:18 AM
1

Did the professor act as if he or she (who am I kidding, she) agreed with that tenet?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 08:50 PM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 08:14 PM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 08:04 PM
3

It really depends how you define "more oppressed". Also this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%E2%80%93slave_dialectic
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:18 PM
3

My...God.. Irrefutable proof. Surely she took it back and changed the paradigm in the SRS sub?!
/r/PussyPass21/02/14 11:12 AM
2

It's because they have tits and a vagina and most people in positions of power are fucking retards who can't get past their base instincts.
/r/PussyPass20/02/14 11:07 PM
8

And then if you say "maybe you shouldn't have been in that neighborhood" you're blaming the victim.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 09:37 PM
14

Mike_Facking_Jones meant that he was dressed like a thug because he wore his black skin that day.
/r/PussyPass19/02/14 09:35 AM
2

Doublespeak.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 11:06 AM
4

Yeah, all the women would be off dying in wars, dying at work, being ridiculed for being emotional or crying, etc. Damn the world would be so much better if women had not been oppressed for so long (read: protected).
/r/MensRights08/02/14 10:56 PM
3

I think this is just a narrative given to us by distorted truths about the past. Sure, there were women whose husbands were extremely abusive and basically "owned" their wives, but there were plenty of good men in those times who still did not see it as "owning" the woman. Perhaps even the majority of men, considering that womens' protection and well-being have, throughout history, basically been the "prime directive" of society ("Women and children first!" has gotta be one of the oldest customs…
/r/MensRights08/02/14 10:53 PM
-11

This is pretty clearly a troll post, a person with an agenda who made up some fiction.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 10:50 PM
9

Except a man would get years in prison.
/r/PussyPass01/01/14 08:03 AM
0

OP nowhere to be found on the top rated comment given 5 golds.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 02:58 AM
4

Your posts are pretty difficult to understand, just saying. You might try writing a bit more clearly.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 09:43 AM
4

What's it like having no education past middle school?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 08:06 PM
1

Wow... those facebook comments on that page...
/r/MensRights15/10/13 08:04 PM
3

"Just because she's wet doesn't mean she wants to fuck!" Imagine that being posted to /r/funny. It would get downvoted, people would say how unfunny it is and even how offensive it is. Do you see what I'm getting at? It shouldn't make you happy to see it on /r/funny, it should make you frustrated, because it is frustrating.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 11:05 PM
1

I'm having trouble understanding what all of this has to do with her pushing him off a cliff and killing him. How does the way he acted in the relationship have anything to do with this incident?
/r/MensRights14/09/13 02:28 AM
1

uhh...
/r/MensRights08/09/13 08:55 PM
1

You linked the same image twice. I was very interested in the response.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 08:06 AM
1

There's no "our cause" because you clearly don't understand men's rights. Here's a hint.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 07:59 AM
8

Except the war on drugs is working perfectly, exactly the way it was intended to work. So it's a bit different.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:42 AM
8

It would still be statutory rape depending on the state you're in. The idea behind statutory rape is that the minor is too young to consent because they don't actually know what they want or what's good for them. I don't know if I personally agree with this, but that's the argument people would make if a 15 year old girl consented to sex with an older man.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 10:27 PM
1

The issue has nothing to do with whether or not someone writes well or poorly. The issue is that it's completely acceptable to imply that all men have shitty handwriting and you are therefore an exception. Although in my experience that does appear to be true. But the majority of my experience is my own handwriting, which sucks.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 07:50 PM
0

Thanks. I guess I'm really high, because I don't see how those pictures confirmed that it was a joke. It looked to me like one guy got his buddy into the contest because he knew he legit loves Taylor Swift... I wouldn't really describe that scenario as a mere 'joke'.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 08:19 AM
1

source?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:48 AM
2

no.. not really, not in my experience.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 02:36 PM
1

I just want to say, I agree with TeamAwesomePanda, and think that him being downvoted as much as he has been goes extremely against the general policy here. I didn't subscribe to this sub to laugh at four panel comics that are reposted from another site for karma. That's not at all what this sub should be about. It's about open discussion about men's issues, and the fact that TeamAwesomePanda was downvoted so heavily indicates that there's an issue with the way those downvoters are using this su…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:39 AM
1

When children are molested and sexually abused at a young age, they often grow up and have major psychological issues and trauma. Surely you can understand that? So while it doesn't make it ok that she molested a 13 year old boy, and it doesn't make it excusable, at the very least it makes her behavior more understandable, dealing with psychological trauma like that can be extremely difficult, and any psychologist will tell you that for people with that sort of trauma, they often seek out to ree…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 11:39 PM
2

the judge didn't cry...
/r/MensRights17/07/13 11:34 PM
3

As I understood it, your argument is if the sentence is overly harsh the defendant should walk, which is patently ridiculous. he or she was saying that if the only options are for the defendant to walk free or to have a life sentence, that he or she would let that defendant walk free. I too would personally. I agree with you, there needs to be some punishment, but if the only punishment to be considered is life in prison, for something as silly as fondling a breast, then it's obvious the system …
/r/MensRights17/07/13 11:30 PM
2

wait, it's not a valid point? just wondering...
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:15 AM
4

That's just a word that pedophiles use to not feel bad that they're fucking big minors, as opposed to fucking little minors. no, actually it's the word used to describe what ephebophilia is.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 09:10 AM
1

I'm really not being nitpicky here, but "than" is the one you were looking for in "then the percent of of men" etc. It took me a minute to grasp your meaning.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 09:08 AM
17

Yes, I'm not blaming you, I'm simply pointing out that even a person in the mensrights sub-reddit can still be guilty of holding very subconscious prejudices. I personally felt it was an extremely good point for pentestscribble to point it out when he did. It shows that many if not the majority of people still see young men as "wanting it", basically blaming the victim.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 01:37 AM
40

Most feminists would point out that the very "poor choice of words" that you used is indicative of a much larger problem in the way that certain types of people are viewed and treated. They would not accept "it was a choice of words at the moment" as indicating anything and would take your very initial way of phrasing it to be the end all. The first day of my feminism class taught me that.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 01:03 AM
1

What? Except just one of many double standards is pointed out in the title of this very post: "victim named in article". I do believe you're ignorant on this matter, no offense. Girls who consent to sex with older men are considered violated, boys who have sex with older women are considered sex fiends that either got lucky or didn't mind doing it one bit.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:21 AM
1

Apparently you've missed my point because I don't really believe there's anything wrong with a 16 year old and a 30 year old being together if they're both able to show that they're able to consent to the relationship without being coerced.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:16 AM
1

it's fine to observe that as meaningful. Unless it's a 16 year old girl with a 30 year old male teacher. Then it's not fine at all, and you're a gross pedophile, and he should be locked up.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 06:03 PM
30

Yeah, he did enjoy it, but I bolded that part because I simply imagined a commenter saying the same sort of thing for a 25 year old male teacher having sex with a 16 or 17 year old girl... "she enjoyed it" would not be nearly as socially acceptable. It's the fact that people will make a comment like that and cannot see the obvious double standard.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:57 AM
55

A comment from the bottom of the page: msiletta17 days ago She's a good looking woman, even with battling lymphoma. Most male students would not have "complained" about her trying to pick them up for a sexual romp. They'd bang her good, then file a complaint of sexual abuse? The case should have been never made it to court....the kid enjoyed it. Wow.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:12 AM
4

Are women's studies majors really being taught shit like that...? Or is it just a coincidence that your ex is a prejudiced idiot and also happened to get her degree in that?
/r/MensRights23/06/13 02:22 AM
3

I think the word you meant was extent, not extant. I too applaud you for breaking it off with her.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 11:32 PM
-1

This is misandrous and also misogynist. He's an idiot.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 10:57 AM
2

On a planet where the things which are prized are being graceful and elegant, for example everything that being a woman embodies.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 09:37 PM
4

holy fuck exactly.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 09:31 PM
3

yeah actually it does
/r/MensRights31/05/13 09:29 PM
-2

I have long hair and I'm a man. I put on chapstick in the morning. It gets stuck in my chapstick and I break my hairties. Oh look those problems aren't at all exclusive to women. Oh no, all my controllers are tangled up in a big mess! How annoying, let me add this to my list of things that are annoying in being a man! /firstworldproblems Did I mention how my head hurts cause my ponytail has been up all day? It's really hard to shave balls and very scary let me tell you. Woe is me, my life is so …
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:09 PM
2

Do you mean it's fake?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:01 PM
3

How is it that woman's fucking business what time the kid goes to bed? She isn't the parent and it's irrelevant to what he's calling about. The fact that she's asking that bullshit further shows the prejudice against men, that they're somehow incapable of parenting children effectively. edit: oh is this call staged or not real?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:00 PM
5

Gosh, you know, it's ridiculous, I've always been conscious of it, of being so hyper-self-conscious around kids, yet I never saw that feeling I had as being the product of perhaps years of being indoctrinated into a certain way of thinking, i.e. that men are bad for kids and women are good for kids. I wish I didn't feel so uncomfortable around kids, but I just get this huge amount of anxiety, and it makes me feel extremely unnatural and uncomfortable because I have no idea what I could do that m…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:54 PM
14

My god something is truly going wrong with men! They can't write cursive, arguably the most arbitrarily taught form of writing there is! Us girls have such elegant and graceful handwriting, and we are perfect! Clearly there's a link between mens' suicide and handwriting. I'm a clinical psychologist and I have a PhD so anything I theorize and say has validity. btw where are the statistics showing how many male suicides are divorce related?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:44 PM
2

The attitude of male disposability which allows for such laws is still highly prevalent.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:59 PM
2

The tone of your post before made it seem like, when you said "...50 years ago" that it was somehow not legitimate evidence of oppression of men if it weren't still continuing today. It was a mocking tone that I interpreted. Was I wrong in my interpretation?
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:09 PM
3

I would use the past drafts as examples of oppression of men as a gender because it specifically targets men. However this is largely in response to the accusations by the 'underprivileged' that men as a gender are living life 'on easy mode'.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 02:44 PM
3

Could you rephrase your question? I'm having a hard time understanding what you're asking.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 02:32 PM
3

It's the fact that you'd make such an ignorant and mocking insinuation in your post when you are clearly not informed that bugs me. I don't care if you don't know the law of the US.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 02:23 PM
10

I think they're referring to the draft. Of men. ...50 years ago. Considering the tone of your post I'm not surprised you're ignorant, not to mention that if someone used that argument against womens' rights ala "Oh yeah, women are oppressed in this or that way ....50 years ago" you know for a fact it would be socially unacceptable and you'd be SRS'd for making a mockery of womanhood. Viva la double standardoa.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 01:58 PM
55

allowed to serve ... allowed to serve
/r/MensRights28/05/13 10:56 AM
3

alluded not eluded. sorry.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 01:04 AM
20

That's some fucking 1984 shit, where any and all interactions which might involve emotions between the two genders of the human animal has become outlawed.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 12:10 PM
2

The definition of heterosexuality is the following: "sexual feeling or behavior directed toward a person or persons of the opposite sex." taken from dictionary.com. Let's see if you can successfully answer your own question. I'd love to learn more about your below average IQ.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 08:00 AM
7

so is it impossible for women to be gay since, you know, they can't get erections around each other while naked?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 05:25 PM
10

Okay, yeah, it's probably true that if it had been a woman they probably wouldn't have even begun to act aggressively toward the person, probably just hold her back and incapacitate her... so in that way it shows a large cultural problem of men being seen as disposable and generally unimportant... but on the other hand you can't just find an article about a man being beaten to death and make it a gendered issue out of the blue. i didn't read anything about "witnesses: They would have stopped if …
/r/MensRights14/05/13 09:33 AM
0

yeah that's how i felt too
/r/MensRights14/05/13 04:42 AM
6

Clearly they are oppressing women because they don't respond in a way which justifies the womens' positions!
/r/MensRights14/05/13 04:16 AM
-1

You're right, he did. Some of the comments here were just bugging me. I don't think he's wrong, he might just be a bit misguided. The general issues he's talking about are universal for men and women. But I still agree, he did fail to mention women being abusers of young children also.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 04:38 AM
2

No he wasn't... he was talking about men being generally the ones who are in the position of perpetrator, but he was also talking about, at least it seemed to me, the environment that young men have to grow up within which pushes them toward aggressive behavior, or boys who have been sexually abused themselves turning into sexual abusers. I thought he was mentioning that they are products of their environment just as much as they are perpetrators.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 04:23 AM
5

He also did say at one point that the woman can be a perpetrator. Why do you fail to mention that part?
/r/MensRights06/05/13 04:21 AM
3

I see exactly what you're saying but I fail to see how this happens overwhelmingly in the talk that was posted. Like I pointed out, he does make it appear that violence against women is far more common because he references it more, but he did at one point acknowledge that men can be victims of domestic violence as well. Whether or not it's more common that men are the victims of domestic violence, he's still acknowledging that it happens and is therefore taking a step in the right direction, is…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 11:03 PM
2

well, I know that was part of the problem with his talk, but the fact is that some men do commit violence against women, just like some women do commit violence against men. So I don't see how it invalidates his entire talk when it's a fact that men do commit violence against women....? thanks for the info, though, on GWW.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 10:35 PM
6

Can somebody explain why this guy's talk is "bad" or "wrong" from an MRA perspective...? I thought he made some good points. Granted he still kept perpetuating the "men's violence against women", and although he did mention that men can be victims often, the amount of times he mentions DV against women by men misrepresents what (supposedly) statistics have shown (that is, that women are just as often perpetrators or even more often of DV than men). also who is GWW?
/r/MensRights05/05/13 10:13 PM
8

why?
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:21 AM
1

Maybe if you took the time to actually read then I wouldn't call you dumb. Or if you took the time to actually find the tweet which clarified. I found it without even looking for it. It's not about winning for me, as I was not arguing but merely pointing out that you completely misinterpreted what Rogan said, but you're certainly losing.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 11:56 PM
0

You're just plain dumb then. Sorry.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 11:02 PM
2

It's only on there for seven years? Does that mean that my name is taken out of the selective service lottery now that I'm 26 and I signed up at 18?
/r/MensRights07/04/13 08:46 AM
1

It's in the thread topic. Have a look around, it's been posted a few times. But really all you have to do is take a look at the original tweet that you're criticizing and look for the difference between what you quoted him as saying and what he actually said.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 08:41 AM
4

Anyone who equates women that choose not to have children with "shit-eating dogs" is on my personal fuck you list. He didn't say that actually and he tweeted again to clarify.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:45 AM
1

So to you it's not racist to say "all asians are smart as hell". ?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:37 PM
1

I just mean it is oppressive in that the applications of the laws are formed around the ideal that women have a lesser agency than men.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:08 PM
1

Honestly it seems to me he should just go to his daughter's concerts. Are they actually going to be able to find out?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:14 AM
3

Sorry, you're going to have to organize your thoughts more clearly if your desire is for me to understand your point. All I can detect is this angsty sarcasm with plenty of anger behind it as if I said something which is contradicting your beliefs somehow. I'm pretty sure I agree with the things you're saying, but I still just have no clue precisely what it is you're trying to say.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 06:03 AM
13

To me the fact that a woman gets the 'slap on the wrist' screams that women have a less powerful 'agency' in the eyes of society. So really it's an oppression of women that they don't have equal punishment for such a crime. But you won't hear any women complaining about that, even though it's just as, if not more, oppressive than many of the "inequalities" that supposedly exist.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 12:08 AM
-13

FAKE. SO OBVIOUS.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 02:04 AM
3

Wow. Losing faith in this sub-reddit. You ask for proof, and even say "if true, I'm very sorry", but just asking for proof is enough to get you downvoted to the bottom. To me, when reading the post, it reeked of troll. And the "edit" even further reeks of troll. The whole "enabled by feminism" thing makes the post reek of anti-feminist garbage. I dislike feminism as much as the next guy, but come on. You all eat up this shit? If it's true then there needs to be some sort of proof given. Otherwis…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 02:03 AM
1

hey man my pleasure, it's actually /r/askphilosophy not /r/askreddit. I musta been too high earlier.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:11 AM
2

Hey man, this thread just popped up on /r/AskReddit philosophy. it's great for understanding further what my point generally was. Thought of all this when I found the thread. Peace.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 03:58 AM
2

They probably thought I was trolling or being unreasonable in asking that question, as if it is entirely self-evident. It's not to me, legitimately.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:31 AM
1

Cool, thanks.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 04:42 AM
-1

So they don't count.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 01:47 AM
1

coming into contact with positions people cannot justify, that affects their lives even though they don't hold to these beliefs. I'm going to go ahead and assume that personal experiences/revelations don't count for you right?
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:59 PM
1

No one should ever believe something without evidence. You got any evidence to back up that I should not believe in anything without evidence?
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:58 PM
0

No, I'm not. I never defined "god" and neither did he or she. Instead, we all started throwing around the word as if we were actually making communications. That's the entire point that I am making. I didn't "move" god at all. It was never defined to begin with, and so instead of ask for definitions, people already had a definition in mind which they have this and that preset argument for. It's really conducive only for the opposite of having actual discourse. The definition of god has been chan…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:32 PM
2

Reframing the definition is an example of moving the goalposts, Oh, sorry, I hadn't realized that the definition of God has been consistent for all of human history. Basically people invoke "moving the goalposts" whenever they realize that they didn't consider that the term hadn't ever been defined, as it hasn't been in our conversation whatsoever. So since you don't want to move the goalposts, should we go ahead and use the most archaic definition of god, which would be simply that of an effici…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:30 PM
-3

You are acting like your point is somehow novel or worthwhile. It's not, it's exhausted and irritating actually. There are many definitions of God. If you cannot stop thinking of "God" under one definition, then it is you who is close minded.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:08 PM
0

No. I'm fairly young, I haven't seen much of the world at all.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:57 PM
3

You're right, I was referring to it in the 'militant atheist' cultural definition, not in the literal definition of atheist, which I have absolutely no problem with (why should you..?).
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:56 PM
-1

You're right, atheism is better defined as the lack of belief in a deity. When I used the term, I was referring moreso to the general attitude of the movement, which is not a passive "lack of belief" but rather an attack on all those with belief. I disagree about faith being the "single greatest evil". You're talking about the cultural "faith" which is associated with organized religion. I'm talking about "faith" as in what it actually is before it's corrupted by cultural influences (i.e. blindl…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:54 PM
-7

Please look up the definition of dogmatic. Atheism is hella fucking dogmatic man.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:45 PM
-12

It's because it's just a gigantic hate all religion circlejerk with very little philosophical considerations taken. Truthfully atheism is a faith. That's the thing that really strikes me as contradictory about it. Honestly I think it's the worst position to take of the three (atheist, theist, agnostic) because along with atheism comes criticism of faith in a higher being, but atheism is the belief that there is no God. There is no way to prove if there is or is not a God. Therefore atheism is a …
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:45 PM
11

That's not theists. That's people.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:43 PM
1

Whether she gets an abortion. I'm not saying 50/50 here, certainly the woman has more right to her body in general than the man. But at a certain point it isn't just her body anymore because it's being shared by another living creature (again, at a certain point). Regardless of that, however, I think it would be fair that if the man has been providing for the woman with a fulfilled pregnancy in mind, that it shouldn't be entirely up to the woman. He has invested in the pregnancy in a certain res…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:35 AM
4

Then men shouldn't be required to pay child support when they didn't want the baby and had it signed and in writing as soon as the pregnancy began (and was found out), assuming it's been within a reasonable time period.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:35 AM
-1

I think the man should have at least some say, legally speaking, when he's the one who produced the pregnancy, just as the woman should.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 04:43 AM
2

if I were him I'd have poked a half in it.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:13 PM
5

Dear god.. the logic...
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:10 AM
1

Well, I think you have a point, because what you're describing is what extremist feminism ended up doing, and I know a lot of people involved in MRM don't want it to become that. Not saying that's what's happening with the OP here, but people in MRM definitely should keep their attitudes in check about this stuff (not that I've really seen it happen a lot). basically, if there were a chance the two of them were joking somehow, OP should have hesitated to post that. but I'm pretty sure OP knows s…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 09:06 AM
3

damn you sound like extreme feminists. get a clue. i find it especially hilarious that you called out Smokeya on being respectful when he was very clearly respectful in his initial reply. it was you in response to him that the situation became very disrespectful. seriously your attitude is identical to the feminist attitude that most sensible/rational people, especially people around this subreddit, claim to despise. i think the fact that you are opening your mouth (typing your thoughts) while s…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 04:26 AM
0

Totally agreeing with you. Then again wthis is /r/mensrights
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:58 AM
0

That emotional irrational reaction in people is a huge barrier for the MRM to deal with. ftfy. How can a person claim to know what is and isn't right if they can't even remain rational about a particular topic?
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:47 AM
0

Isn't this a sort of smoking gun against many feminist issues...?
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:45 AM
1

Agreed with most what you said until the 'smarter' part. When talking about intelligence it's most often the capacity that we are talking about, and there isn't any less capacity for intelligence than in a man, as evidenced by my many friends and colleagues (I have not a scientific study to cite, if there is one let me know). A higher capacity for physically strength, yeah men are generally, and maybe even emotionally, maybe. But I don't really believe that men have a higher capacity for intelli…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:40 AM
-1

No it didn't.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 01:34 AM
3

This isn't a men's rights issue. She thought you were cute, so she kept looking. She's not a creep, and neither are you if you are looking at a woman. I guess if you make no breaks between "stares" then you're creepy, otherwise you are just showing interest. Any girl/guy who gets creeped out by a person showing interest in them is just insecure as fuck.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:32 AM
-2

/r/stonerphilosophy
/r/MensRights17/09/12 03:03 AM
3

on the basis of appealing to the narcissism and Disney princess fantasies of their female customers. blamo
/r/MensRights14/09/12 12:35 AM
2

Who is that? Can't find a wiki on anything that seems relevant.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:51 AM
1

So parents can't make their 15 year old daughter get an abortion against her will?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:13 AM
0

Female and male circumcisions are clearly entirely different things. This is a weak argument, because "circumcision" is simply the label we've used for these two things. They are both "genital mutilation" in a sense, but the genitals are vastly different, and female circumcision is a far worse practice than cutting off a bit of foreskin.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 04:42 AM
0

Probably at the exact same moment that you realize how terribly weak the "NO CIRCUMCISION!" side of this argument is. You can't just abolish all circumcision sort of like how you can't just abolish all abortion.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 03:08 AM
0

It's frightening how many people think it's a good analogy..
/r/MensRights28/08/12 03:06 AM
-2

Nope. I am happy that my parents had me circumcised. The OP's argument is a terrible argument, and this isn't an issue of men's rights at all. If it's any sort of issue, it's an issue of human rights, as people are pointing toward consent being the problem; but even this is a very weak argument, as children do not need to give consent for particular actions to be taken.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 03:05 AM
1

This whole fight against circumcision is really only making this sub-reddit look bad IMO.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 03:03 AM
16

...why? It is a sign of sickness when a society's taboo is their own bodies.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:01 AM
6

would they step aside when feminism is shown to be detrimental to the existence of society? It hasn't been shown. And it can't be, as I thought we had established. You are pretty much spot on with the "excesses of society" being the thing that brings down the society, luxury if you will. But feminism would then be an effect of the cause (luxurious society) and is therefore not the cause itself of the collapse. And it looks like you agreed on that being luxury. So whether or not, if it were someh…
/r/MensRights30/07/12 10:58 AM
17

Then why do you make the claim "if women are in charge, the society crumbles"...? If you know that all we have is correlation... It may just so happen that feminist philosophy is only capable of existing in a society that has already passed the 'tipping point' and thus has nothing to do with the fall of society.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 08:28 AM
16

From the "evidence" that that author speaks about, all I see is a correlation and no direct inference of a causal link between feminism and the fall of Rome. Help me if I'm missing something please.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 07:43 AM
0

Considering the daughter would probably model after the mother, she would likely end up believing the exact same things that her mother taught her to believe/believes herself. She won't even be able to see the oppression of her father.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:48 AM
0

The "proof" you posted doesn't prove anything and all the people around here who buy it are just suffering from confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 11:00 PM
-19

Why does this feel like a completely contrived picture and post all for the sake of rallying the mensrights troops. I just find it so hard to believe that anybody say "pretty much yeah" if they actually intended on accusing him of rape. It's obvious he would have it on facebook messages...
/r/MensRights23/07/12 09:28 AM
-4

Wow you're just a sexist aren't you! How dare you suggest that different genders or races could have different innate characteristics!
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter