TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dabaozi Archive

View 6 posts and 76 comments by Dabaozi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Any chance you can dig that up? I'd love to have that saved.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 03:09 PM
4

It's really no different than the MAM (military-aged male) standard the military had. When counting casualties in Iraq/Afghanistan, any male between like 18-50 (not sure the exact range) was considered an insurgent target. Unsure of the source bias, but here is something information on it. So yeah, just more of the same, really.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 05:01 PM
6

White feather anyone?
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:37 AM
0

The fact that it was defeated in the Supreme Court by, as you put it, "very flimsy" legal precedent only serves to validate my prediction. If equality was ever the goal, women were more than able to be drafted into logistical or support roles, fulfilling their obligation and freeing up men to be sent into whatever meat grinder awaited them. The fact that they latched onto whatever meager justification they could for their hypocrisy leads me to believe they will do the same this time around. Furt…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 12:49 AM
4

It's a nice sentiment, imagining that an equal draft will happen, but it's one of the biggest pipe-dreams circulating the MRM. It's been shot down before via the first suffragettes and the failure of the ERA, and there is no way in hell the current socio-political climate would ever allow for it.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 12:24 AM
6

Remember, any issue men face will never be addressed until it happens to women.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 10:07 PM
24

Fear not, alimony will eventually be reformed in some way or another once a greater majority of women are affected by it. You can already see the outrage bubbling from the few cases at present; all it will take is reaching the tipping point. Remember, it's only a problem worth addressing when women are the victims.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:09 AM
3

You've heard of He For She, right?
/r/MensRights29/09/15 09:39 AM
0

A bit apocalyptic, eh? Even if that were a likely outcome, wouldn't trying to avert the end of humanity/civilization be reason enough?
/r/MensRights18/09/15 11:49 AM
2

/r/femradebates isn't much better.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 10:29 AM
19

The feminist narrative that women were oppressed slaves at the mercy of the all powerful men and malevolent Patriarchy is one of the most enduring facets that has infected the public zeitgeist, akin to school children being taught that Columbus was the first man to believe the world was round. Removing this fallacy from society should be of critical importance, as it is the basis for Feminism's supposed legitimacy and justification for the idiocy they try to bring upon us all. Unfortunately, des…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 01:23 PM
5

It can definitely happen. My point was however, that this perception of women being rendered completely helpless when given any alcohol at all is a result of the aforementioned campaign. This campaign ignores the possibility that a woman is herself choosing to get drunk, and instead plays up on the fear of evil men plying women with so much alcohol they get pass-out drunk, and then raping them, portraying this as ubiquitous instead of merely one particular circumstance. The movement then gets a …
/r/MensRights11/08/15 12:10 PM
12

It's absurd, but remember that they misdirect people from the fact that she chose to get drunk, and instead frame the narrative as he got her drunk, then they had sex. They do this on purpose, so that whenever they're promoting these bass-ackward laws, the situation that comes to mind is some evil frat boy getting a poor, innocent girl drunk, and then carrying her upstairs while he has sex with her unconscious body. Then she gets slut-shamed. And cancer.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:31 AM
17

Mainly infantalization, or the belief that women are less than men. For all their preaching about women being equal to men, they really have a funny way of showing it. Example: Man and woman are both drunk, but if they have sex, the man is raping the woman, because she is somehow less responsible for her actions than the man, like a child is less responsible than an adult. There are so many more examples of this. Just look for any time Feminism demands some special treatment for women; it can us…
/r/MensRights08/08/15 09:42 AM
6

Well yeah, it's literally the foundation of all Feminism. All the benefits with none of the responsibilities and no compromise. I mean, it goes back to the very beginning, when you had the suffragettes campaigning (and succeeding) for women to get the vote without having to register for the draft, while simultaneously handing out white feathers to men (who couldn't vote at the time, by the way) to shame them into dying in a tench.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 07:27 AM
26

If only she had a daughter, then people might care whether or not the child's genitals were mutilated.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 07:22 AM
3

Well, I don't know your wife, so I can only speculate. Things that probably contributed to it: She has a history of abuse and violence, which gives her a confirmation bias when she hears things that reinforce her experiences. Related to the first, but the ratio of abusive/dangerous men to caring/positive men is skewed, so again, her perception is based on personal experience. Maybe she just wants to believe it. She has this fear from prior abuse, and she naturally wants to feel like her fear is …
/r/MensRights01/08/15 08:45 AM
14

You can't win. This is known as the appeal to emotion fallacy, with some anecdotal thrown in for good measure; she is rejecting reality (men are in fact more likely to be victims of a violent crime than women) in favor of how she feels about the situation (I'm scared all the time so therefore my fear is justified). Any attempt you make to reason with her or any evidence you show will do nothing because it can't change her feelings. In other words, feelz > realz. Edit: For the part about brainwas…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:38 AM
1

Feminism props up a completely incorrect and disingenuous framework, and then demands you argue within their warped reality. It is impossible to win in this scenario because the very setting prohibits you from doing so. The only way to address the root of the problem is to tear down the faulty framework (which inevitably involves attacking Feminism/Feminist ideals) and analyze the situation from there. Feminists will naturally fight tooth and nail to prevent this, as a shift in perception will r…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:06 AM
2

Universities are pressured by the government, through Title IX, the media, and the public to hold their own "tribunals," using the preponderance of evidence standard. This outcry is heralded by claims of "campus rape culture" coming off the back of bogus statistics (e.g. 1 in 4 college women are raped) and high profile (false) rape cases (e.g. Duke Lacrosse, Rolling Stone, mattress girl). The point being argued is that the legal system is too ineffective (read, innocent until proven guilty, stan…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 08:57 AM
3

This perfectly reflects my sentiments, dismay and all. It is impossible for women to be treated equally in situations like these; she will fall victim to the same traps faced by every other woman in "male-dominated" fields. She is not a referee, she is a female referee, and any criticism (or praise, to be honest) will be portrayed not as a reflection of her actions, but because she is a woman. I wish her the best, and I hope she can stick with it, but I predict she's one questionable call away f…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:14 PM
1

I would encourage everyone to listen to this video. It provides an excellent and in-depth analysis of the damage done to boys when they are abused by women, so often swept under the rug or derided. Hopefully this will help you get a better understanding of why this is such a problem, and provide a counter-argument for those who attempt to dismiss these incidents as "He's so lucky," or "He's a male, he'll be fine with it."
/r/MensRights16/06/15 08:56 PM
9

Why would anybody ever start with "I'm so insecure in my masculinity?" At least try to be realistic. Whoooooosh. The kid seduced the teacher, not the other way around. Stop pretending like he was taken advantage of. Yes, and it's the woman (i.e. the perpetrator) who's alleging that, kind of like how other rapists try to justify their actions with lines like "they were asking for it," or "they really enjoyed it." News flash, sexual predators make up all kinds of reasons to excuse their actions or…
/r/MensRights03/06/15 06:13 AM
14

Hey, look everybody, I'm so insecure in my masculinity that I need to deride boys who are raped by their teachers! Those pussies don't know how lucky they are, a real man (like me) would totally be all up in that. I'm of course basing this off nothing more than some fantasy I have, but trust me, a male student being taken advantage of by an adult in a position of authority over him is exactly the same as all other sex. Again, if the boy had any problems, he's either faking or just a pussy. Not a…
/r/MensRights03/06/15 04:31 AM
1

There's a difference between the two, which is what I believe led to the excommunication of the aforementioned "all PIV sex is rape" woman. The draconian rape laws being pushed are centered around how the woman feels about the sex, with her decision (before, during, or after) defining whether the sex was consensual or rape. This allows women to engage in as much "consensual" sexual activity as they want, as well as giving them to convict a man of rape whenever they so choose. So in summary, all …
/r/MensRights25/05/15 09:29 AM
5

That sub has been neutered so completely that it's impossible for any real discussion to be had.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 09:24 AM
20

It's simple really. Step one was to frame the narrative as women are disadvantaged to men in every facet of life (due in no part to their own life choices or preferences, but rather from the all-encompassing Patriarchy), e.g. the pay gap and STEM field discrepancies. Paint the system as rigged against women and favoring men, so that any time a man succeeds it's because of privilege, and any time a woman fails it's because of oppression. Once you've cemented this perception into the mind of socie…
/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:05 AM
20

Kinda ironic how much this resembles sharia law in Saudi Arabia. There women need to be constantly escorted by a male to look after them, which is the same direction crap like this is heading: women need men to take care of them because they're incapable of doing it themselves.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:36 PM
12

I'm surprised nobody's said it yet, but a huge one in the U.S. is the draft. Men are unable to vote, work for the government, or receive government aid without being registered for the chance to be forced to fight and die in war. Women have no such requirement. There's no real justification for having a draft for only one gender, and the fact that this keeps flying under the radar whenever people discuss gender equality is incredible.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 02:43 AM
5

Would you label a feminist that fights for men's rights an MRA? Possibly. It really depends on how they go about it. If they try to argue to He-For-She line of "by fighting patriarchy and focusing exclusively on sexism against women, we'll end sexism against men," then I can really see it working. Would you label an MRA that fights for women’s rights a feminist? No, I'd label them a women's rights activist, or an egalitarian. Does labeling yourself as Egalitarian make you a feminist and a MRA by…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 09:32 PM
24

I wonder if now that she's a humanist she'll still be in a rush to "ban bossy". Celebrities like this just whore themselves out to whatever label is trending at the time. Feminism is becoming a dirty word in everybody's mind, so now she's a humanist. More will follow; it's just rats deserting a sinking ship.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 09:18 AM
3

It's the same old apex fallacy. A few men have power and wealth, and are generally better off, so they extrapolate that out to say all men have it great. It's a perfect copy of the male privilege malarkey they push in western culture. They focus solely on the CEOs and politicians while ignoring the sewer workers and garbage men.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 04:12 AM
10

As a disclaimer, this is about China again. As I said, it's a fusion of Chinese traditionalism and the One Child Policy. In China, having a boy has been about more than just carrying on the family name, it's essential to your survival in old age. There's a Chinese saying, 养儿防老, which translates to "raise boys for old age." The best analogy would be that a boy was your retirement plan. Chinese parents don't invest in a 401k or put money away for the future, they "invest" everything they have in t…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 04:18 AM
24

There seems to be some outrage over this, but you can't simply deny the problem on the basis that it sounded slightly offensive. If we disregard the presentation or who was delivering it, there is still a core issue that is quite troublesome. I'll focus on China, since that's an area I'm more familiar with. Due to the combination of Chinese traditionalism and the One Child Policy (itself a fascinating topic that brings a whole host of consequences besides the gender imablance), China is now faci…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:20 AM
14

Ah, this argument again. Feel free to look at the sidebar, the wiki, or the content here for examples of how Feminist theory has had horrible consequences for men, as well as how feminists nowadays, particularly on the organizational and political level, are working against boys and men. Here is a starting point. But even if you want to argue that it's the ideology that's benevolent and the actions that have betrayed the "true Feminism," I'd still have to call baloney. Feminism has always been a…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 12:34 AM
7

The problem isn't necessarily that it's a horrible thing that happened to him, but moreover the complete and absolute double standard whenever the genders are reversed. Everyone assumes that a boy is "lucky" and "happy to get laid," while if you even suggest that a girl could have consented or was anything but a victim, you are derided and ridiculed. Again, the biggest outcry here is that males are considered always horny and lucky to get anything (be they boys being taken advantage of by adults…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 11:26 PM
1

I don't understand what you're trying to say, but as it is you're not adding anything meaningful to the discussion here, just making general, vague statements without any substance.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 12:20 AM
1

There never was a "true Feminism," at least not the kind that advocates for true equality between the sexes. Feminism from it's inception, going all the way back to the suffragettes if you want to tie them in, has been a movement solely for the benefit of women. Now, in my opinion there is nothing wrong with this concept, as each gender should have their own advocacy movement, but for some reason everybody got it in their heads that Feminism was the only gender movement we need, thus shutting me…
/r/MensRights01/10/14 10:16 PM
1

So there is no sexism in video games... I gave this as an example of manufacturing controversy. Shills like Anita Sarkeesian are drumming up controversy to finance their bottom line. Her videos have been debunked by many, many people. ...domestic violence is lie... This I labeled under skewing statistics. I was never denying that domestic violence exists, but rather pointing out how Feminism has bastardized the data. Men are always painted as the aggressors and women as the victims (look up Dulu…
/r/MensRights01/10/14 06:02 AM
9

Well, here are a few reasons Feminism has become synonimous with the Left. Feminism is generally espoused by Democrats, who are considered to be on the left. Feminism shares several ideaological tenents with social marxism, which is again considered "left". Feminism co-opts other movements, such as the LGBT and racial equality, which are, once again, considered to be on the left. Feminism often pushes for more government intervention/spending in support of women, which goes against conservative …
/r/MensRights30/09/14 06:45 AM
5

Have we reached gender equality in the west? Do you also believe racism is dead? Is this that "intersectionality" thing where Feminists try to couple their dying movement with other, more viable ones? It's fairly obvious that Feminism has been running out of battles to fight for a long time. They have been reduced to skewing statistics (77 cents on the dollar myth, domestic violence data, etc), manufacturing controversy (sexism in video games), co-opting other movements (racism, LBGT), or flat o…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 05:47 AM
85

This shit just keeps getting weirder and weirder.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:24 AM
9

I think you are dead on: it is based in a power imbalance, specifically that in society's eyes women generally occupy a status of less agency than a man. I'm at loathe to concede a point to Feminism, but it was right when it argued that women are very often infantalized in the minds of men and society at large (Feminism, of course, has done nothing to remove this perception, and in many cases exacerbates it). Women have managed to find a specialized niche for themselves where they are strong and…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 12:57 AM
-1

You guys come off as hating women way more than you seem to care about mens rights. If you are unable to discern between a calm discussion about the event in question and hatred of women, that's really your own problem. We are in no way obligated to censor an otherwise rational discussion about circumstances leading up to the incident, as well as drawing parallels between this and others and comparing the public reaction/fallout simply because people will be offended that we aren't regurgitating…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 09:08 AM
2

This picture is hilarious to me simply because it so perfectly illustrates just how little feminists think of women's capabilities. They are essentially arguing that in the same way a short person needs extra help to see over the tall fence (because of their natural height inferiority to the taller person), so too do women need extra help in all other areas (education, job placement, etc) due to women's innate inferiority to men (be it ability to succeed in school, finding a job, etc). Basically…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 08:11 PM
13

No, the point was that Joss Whedon is a fool for supporting Anita Sarkeesian's attacks on gaming (as well as defending her by calling the criticism she receives "misogyny") because Anita's analytical process is so intellectually dishonest and cherry-picked that if Joss Whedon's own work was subjected to a similar analysis, it would be deemed just as misogynistic, if not more so, than the video games themselves. The criticisms of Joss Whedon's work were never intended to be serious, but rather an…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 10:21 PM
11

There was a 2xchromosomes post by an admin that basically revealed a good portion of the rape/death threat claims were bullshit. Anita has also had some of her "threats" debunked, so at this point these claims should be disbelieved until verified.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:58 PM
15

Let him go, it's a common defense mechanism, a projection of exaggerated machismo. Also, notice how he qualified it by saying 25 year old, hot female teacher. Apparently the degree of malpractice is determined by attractiveness; it's only a bad thing if she looks like Shrek.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 06:07 AM
6

Going a step further: 1900s: boy and girl each have one toy they can play with anywhere, while the boy has 2 more toys, but on the condition that he work every Saturday cleaning the house; if he doesn't, no toys. 1990s: 2 more toys are given to girl, but she doesn't have to clean the house like the boy does - no condition put on the toys 2010s: boy wonders why he still has to clean the house for his 2 other toys
/r/MensRights27/08/14 08:45 PM
3

Congratulations. You have just displayed why it is that Feminism and the MRM will never have any kind of reconciliation, and moreover why Feminism is ultimately detrimental to egalitarianism as a whole. You are arguing, using your own specific, vague definition of Patriarchy, that all of the problems for each gender stemming from societal roles and expectations have been caused by men. Everything is men's fault. Sure, women sometimes help "perpetuate Patriarchy", but ultimately it was men who fu…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 08:21 PM
2

You're falling victim to what is know as the apex fallacy, or rather believing that because a few men were in positions of power, all men held power. Also, don't believe that just because the leaders were men that they ignored women's demands or had the best interests of common men in mind. Was it beneficial that men were conscripted to fight in wars while women stayed behind? Was it beneficial that men were held accountable for the criminal actions of their wives when the wives broke the law? W…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:23 AM
2

In your post, you claimed the problems stemmed from Patriarchy, not gender roles. The wordage is important there, primarily because of the points about Patriarchy I mentioned in my post. Also, using the term "patriarchal gender roles" implies that it was solely men who constructed, enforced, and manupulated the aforementioned gender roles, which is patently untrue and incredibly misleading.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:07 AM
6

First off, check out our sidebar. It has information that you'll want about the MRM from the source. Second, I don't really understand how you can be skeptical of what the MRM is fighting for. Patriarchy aside, the issues the MRM is fighting for are pretty solid. Child custody, female-on-male rape recognition, domestic violence, resources for men's health and shelters, male suicide, diminishing male performance in education, it goes on and on. Thirdly, this Patriarchy argument is old and tired. …
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:47 PM
30

I'm glad to see you wrote this. I'm sad because stuff like this only ever seems to be accepted when it comes from a woman's lips.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 11:24 PM
16

No, you're looking at this the wrong way. "Womanliness" is bestowed on a woman just by virtue of having womanly parts. A girl becomes a woman when she has her period and is able to have children, and thus society's determination of her womanliness is not judged by her actions, but rather by her biology. It doesn't matter if she wears pants or a skirt, her femaleness cannot be taken from her by her actions because it is based instead in her biology. (Side note, this biological basis for femalenes…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:42 AM
3

Define loud. Of course somebody like Paul Elam is going to get the spotlight just by virtue of his style, especially when somebody is trying to paint the MRM/Paul Elam badly. Also, our detractors will often fail to bring up the other icons when discussing Elam, so there's a bit of confirmation bias there. Now look at the others. Dr. Farrell and CHS have written books on men's issues, which Paul hasn't done. GWW and Dr. Farrell both attend conferences and speaking engagements about men's issues i…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:04 AM
6

The problem is, there's no Dr King offering a more reasoned and palatable view of the same issues. Really? Christina Hoff Sommers, Warren Farrell, GWW, these spokespeople of the MRM are perfect counterweights to Paul Elam's in-your-face style.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:12 PM
6

What? Where are you getting this notion that women were ecstatic to assume responsibilities and hardships, and that it was big bad men who denied them this opportunity? Have you ever heard of the White Ribbon Campaign? Women shaming men into jumping headfirst into the WWI meat grinder while staying nice and cozy across the channel. What was stopping them from campaigning for the right to fight alongside men in the trenches just as hard as they fought for the vote? What about alimony? It is essen…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:16 PM
20

I disagree that feminism has ever been about equality, or at least equality in the true sense of the word. Feminism is, simply put, a female advocacy movement and has only ever cared about grabbing as many goodies for women as possible. Going all the way back to the suffragettes, those early feminists fought for the vote, but refused to take on any of the accompanying responsibilities that men were subjected to, such as the draft. Later on, feminists fought for women to become normalized in the …
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:04 PM
6

Seeing comments like this, I can't help but feel incredibly sorry for the women creating them. If they are actually feeling even a quarter of the fear they describe due to this warped perception of , every day must be absolute hell for them. To be so utterly beholden to such irrational paranoia....it's really quite pitiful. All the terrors of Hell cannot compare with the tortures of the mind.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 09:46 PM
4

Equality was sexist when women clamored for the right to vote while eschewing the responsibility of being drafted for service.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:55 AM
7

There is no greater enemy to female agency than feminists.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 02:48 AM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 10:07 PM
5

Do you have any links or other information about that AIDs study? I would like very much to have it tucked away for future debates.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 12:18 AM
47

On the plus side, we have a lot more paraprofessionals working with children with disabilities at the school. This means that the schools are becoming more inclusive. We include children with severe mental and physical conditions in the classroom. This is very un-PC, but why is so much money being funneled towards those with disabilities, namely mental? I recall in my school there was the "special" class with several kids who mostly just sat there and colored. Why bother with an academic setting…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 07:00 PM
31

I like how you happily exclude the summary "From 2010 to 2011, the observed increase in the rate of serious violence for males from (6.4 to 7.7 per 1,000) was not statistically significant." Again, from page 5 of the study I linked, i.e. the summary you are quoting: Males had a higher rate of total violent victimization than females in 2011 (table 5). The rate of violent victimizations for males increased from 20.1 victimizations per 1,000 males age 12 or older in 2010 to 25.4 in 2011. No change…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 02:19 AM
145

US Department of Justice Crime Victimization for 2011 The information you are looking for is on page 5, table 5. Men were victims of a violent crime at a rate of 25.4 per 1000 (over 12 years old) compared to a rate of 19.8 per 1000 for women. For serious violent crimes, men still come out ahead 7.7 per 1000 over women's 6.7 per 1000. The numbers for 2010 and 2002 are also listed, and they follow a similar pattern of men being at greater risk of being victimized for a violent crime.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:38 PM
24

"Where are our men? Why are they not protecting us?" Sanchez continued, her voice full of frustration. "Men are failing us. I feel as though we are not being protected." So much for that fish-bicycle argument.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 11:48 PM
10

From the comments: I am a feminists and I believe in equality between everyone, but ever since I had a son I started to realize that we aren't fighting for everyone's rights, we are teaching girls to be powerful and boys to treat women right, instead of teaching ALL our kids to treat everyone equally. A feminist waking up to the vitriol of the movement now that she has a son to care about. Sounds oddly familiar.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 10:34 PM
1

Are there any statistics about this website? I'd be curious to see how the numbers broke down as far as how many messages women were sending, as well as how condensed these messages were (like if only a few men are getting the majority of messages). Given the passive role most women take in courtship, I'd be very interested to know how similar or dissimilar their active courtship was from men in an online setting.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 03:05 AM
3

Two things of note in the article. The first is the fourth paragraph down, reading: The women's rights provision is No. 45. It would have to be implemented by a later electoral law, and it might be interpreted to require parity in resources, candidates or even election results. Also, in the next paragraph down: Before the vote to adopt the parity provision, one woman, an assembly member from the Islamist Ennahda party, railed against the proposal, arguing that positive discrimination on behalf o…
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:01 PM
110

Transcript of the website Want To Be A Good Dad? Support Mom And Avoid Father’s Rights Groups By Trish Wilson Reprinted with permission of the author Over the past decade, fatherhood has been all the rage and dads are naturally the talk of pundits on Father’s Day. So let’s say you’re a divorcing dad and you’re having trouble coping. You look for help on the internet and discover the father’s rights movement. Be warned – avoid father’s rights groups like the plague. According to the pro-feminist …
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:45 PM
2

Given that the court system seems to favor women over men, it would be only natural for the MRM to discourage men marrying women. The MRM is also an advocacy group for men, so when it comes to marriage, MRAs naturally point out the inequalities men face in comparison to women. It is impossible to determine gender inequality in regards to two men marrying, so a similar comparison is more difficult to make. That being said, I would caution gay men from marriage for some of the same reasons I am ag…
/r/MensRights27/12/13 04:40 PM
5

Feminism and the MRM are not similar in the regard you are mentioning. Off the top of my head, there are three big, general reasons why feminism is bad for men's rights, while the MRM is not incompatible with women's rights: Feminism claims to be an egalitarian movement to suppress men's movements, but then refuses to work for or acknowledge men's issues. Feminism suppresses and ignores data and statistics of men's problems, either through omission or outright lies. Domestic violence statistics,…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:56 PM
13

I'm going to go against the anti-AVFM vibe here and try to reason out why the author would make a statement like that. I'm going to give the author the benefit of the doubt and assume he's not a raging misogynist who wants to make it legal to rape your spouse, nor that he is trying to convince us that marital rape doesn't exist, and instead explore the possible reasoning behind his comment. To begin, the whole tone of the article is that marriage just isn't worth it. The main theme is primarily …
/r/MensRights11/12/13 11:00 PM
4

Not to sound too burtal to future men, but when a male pill comes out and an "accidental" pregnancy happens, any man taking contraceptives would have to be an idiot not to immediately request a paternity test, stigma or no. I realize it would be awkward to demand something like that from a person you cared about, but given a choice between an awkward conversation and 18-21 years of child support, any man should choose the latter. Unless you're in France. In France you're screwed either way.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 02:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter