TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Daemonicus Archive

View 14 posts and 1,842 comments by Daemonicus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
41

GeneralDaemonicus/r/MensRights02/09/15 01:06 AM
39

Social IssuesDaemonicus/r/MensRights09/11/15 11:10 PM
38

FeminismDaemonicus/r/MensRights05/09/15 03:41 AM
28

Daemonicus/r/MensRights14/03/16 12:21 AM
19

Daemonicus/r/MensRights06/11/13 04:15 PM
19

Social IssuesDaemonicus/r/MensRights25/09/15 01:29 AM
16

Social IssuesDaemonicus/r/MensRights07/04/17 08:41 PM
14

Daemonicus/r/MensRights20/10/16 11:03 AM
13

Daemonicus/r/MensRights16/05/16 11:38 PM
10

Daemonicus/r/MensRights20/01/17 05:56 AM
9

Edu./Occu.Daemonicus/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:07 AM
9

Daemonicus/r/MensRights29/02/16 05:27 AM
7

Social IssuesDaemonicus/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:38 PM
4

Daemonicus/r/MensRights22/04/13 04:57 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,842 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Maybe you should embrace the meaningless hookups for a while. You don't have to immediately jump into a relationship, or try and force one. Just go with the flow, with whatever happens. Just hop on a couple dating apps, see how things go. Meet with people, see if there's a connection, and go from there. If it ends up just being a hookup, embrace it for what it is. If it develops into something more, than embrace that too. Don't limit your experiences, and don't unnecessarily force things to go o…
/r/MenSupportMen08/08/22 01:31 PM
1

and vegans who do it because of health reasons - and believe me, it isn't "pseudoscience." Sorry to break it to you, but that is 100% pseudoscience. I've looked at the mountains of evidence myself. I'm not saying some are "true" vegans or not, because they all call themselves vegans, but painting them all with the same brush is no better than calling all MRAs "incels." Sure, some are, but not nearly close to all. Their "mountains" of evidence mostly comes from Loma Linda aka Seventh Day Adventis…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 07:46 PM
1

There's a lot of overlap between the groups. They share similar ideological shortcomings. A lot of projection, moral superiority, propaganda, pseudo science, etc...
/r/MensRights01/06/22 05:44 PM
1

It's always a No True Scotsman, mentality. Just like vegans.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 11:16 AM
1

My ex, who has borderline, and other issues... Loves Drag Race, and would always talk about having a gay friend, as if gay men were an accessory.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 01:04 PM
1

OkCupid literally released their data on height selection, and how it affects dating. Most women do care.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 03:44 PM
1

It's 50/50 really. Depends how "woke" they are. A lot of female judges know all of the tricks like crocodile tears, and manipulation tactics. The others know, but side with the accuser to get back at men, as a whole. Some use their platform as a way to force "equality".
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/22 03:21 PM
1

Because she's not against the men's group, and is saying the double standard is with being against it.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 06:20 PM
1

Some of the dirtiest women I have been with, who loved to be degraded in the bedroom, were Feminists. They love being degraded. Slapped, spit on, called names, etc...
/r/MensRights26/03/22 01:42 PM
7

It's true though. It's basically men allowing themselves to be manipulated into being simps.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 01:41 PM
1

What about his choice to get a vasectomy? What about her choice to say no? Or other forms of birth control? Again if you consider abortion as a good solution for women you cannot be against vasectomy. Okay awesome. Who said I was against any form of birth control? Yes, women experience those too tho? Yes. you think only men carry the financial consequences? They're the only ones who are forced to. and only men suffer mentally from raising a child? You need to learn to read. Again you liretally t…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 11:05 AM
1

You cant take all responsibility from men just bc they do not get pregnant. When you remove choice, you remove responsibility. Simple as that. Men face no bodily consequences of pregnacy and as such women have the last word. Mental health, and being forced into economic slavery, don't have a physical burden?
/r/MensRights21/03/22 02:27 AM
2

I've been here for over a decade. Grow up. And what did I say that was a lie, exactly?
/r/MensRights07/02/22 01:13 AM
9

No, they called out an appeal to authority. Rightfully so btw. You should be posting studies, not tabloid articles.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 10:31 PM
3

So instead of admitting that you're wrong, and completely forgot what you were even talking about... You double down on the idiocy. Fuck off. At max they are doing 2 hours of actual work, including cooking, cleaning, and other chores. I also already stated qualifiers based on age of child/children. Which you conveniently forgot. Getting 4 hours to yourself per day, even with children, is fucking easy. Grow up, and understand that parenting isn't difficult. Nothing a stay at home parent does, is …
/r/MensRights03/01/22 01:40 AM
5

At what point was anyone talking about a single parent? We're talking about a stay at home parent, where the other works full time.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 01:35 AM
9

No time for yourself? That may have been true in the 1800s when everything was done manually. There is plenty of time for yourself during the day as a stay at home parent. Obviously the age(s) of the child(ren) matters... But for the most part, it's literally one of the easiest things a person can do. "Keeping house" takes like 60min max of work a day. Pleasing someone else (especially someone you love) isn't a chore, it's not work. It's fucking easy. You can easily get 4 hours to yourself, ever…
/r/MensRights03/01/22 01:23 AM
5

It's that type of extremist binary thinking, that harms pepole.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:52 AM
4

Don't disrespect actual heroes, people who have given their lives to protect you That literally hasn't been a thing for almost 100 years. Grow up. Nobody is being protected with war. Was the storming of Normandy "Noxious"? What about Iwo Jima? Should the Jews have been left to rot in the re-education camps in your opinion? You're being a jackass. Nobody is immune to criticism, or rebuke, because of past "victories".
/r/MensRights10/11/21 06:00 AM
2

Essentially, my military career was over, injections had too many risks of getting angry or getting depressed at either end of the cycle Because most Endos are morons, and don't know how to do a proper protocol. You need at least once a week injections. Most people do better with 2x or 3x a week. If you're in Australia... Good fucking luck with any GP, or Endo... They're all completely clueless. The issues with mood are because they pump you full of too much T, and then leave you to rot for 4 we…
/r/MensRights29/10/21 09:20 PM
1

That's good to hear. I would suggest you look into Stoicism, and spend some time reading about it. /r/Stoicism can help. They have a reading list.
/r/MenSupportMen27/09/21 08:09 PM
10

Trying to keep my mind off dark stuff, but crying intermittently. Don't ignore it. Process it. Allow yourself to grieve.
/r/MenSupportMen27/09/21 08:23 AM
-1

Dude, you need to get your head out of your ass.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 03:09 AM
-1

The pleasure of women is always front and center in porn movies. No. There's plenty of genres/videos that focus solely on the man's pleasure. Most videos are all about both of them. They both get to cum, they both get to have fun. Pretty sure double blowjob videos are focused on the man's pleasure. but I've yet to see a western porn movie about a woman who didn't have extreme fun during the act. Because it's a fucking act. It's fake. They are actors, putting on a performance. If you want to watc…
/r/MensRights24/09/21 12:47 AM
9

Save this for when any time someone mentions how Feminism helps men. Or how they don't actively protest against equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/21 09:56 AM
2

So have a sign outside your sign that says the house has surveillance, and you accept that upon entering.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 07:48 PM
13

You really shouldn't be downvoted. They are going way overboard with their comments, and you're trying to be more reasonable. Not every woman wants to control a man's life. Not every woman is just itching for an excuse to ruin a man's life. Not every woman is going to instantly call the cops on you if you make them upset, or don't meet their expectations.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 07:47 PM
2

Okay, so where do you get the resources to support them? And is it right to have resources go to them, when they aren't going to your own people?
/r/MensRights15/08/21 03:19 AM
2

So who gets a priority then? Your own countrymen, or people from other countries? Because unfortunately, when you point resources one way, it takes them away from somewhere else. There are people who served who have been completely shit on by the government. Where is their help? Why should non-citizens get help before your own citizens?
/r/MensRights15/08/21 01:37 AM
3

How about propping up, and giving a chance to the people who need it, in the country already? You know, the homeless, the poor, the unhealthy, etc...
/r/MensRights14/08/21 11:16 PM
3

Lifting. Stoicism. Epicureanism.
/r/MenSupportMen11/08/21 07:27 AM
9

I'm 40. Get erections throughout the day. Sitting down and then getting up to pee... erection. Hopping into the car after leg day... erection. Going down corrugated road... erection. Random friction... erection. If you aren't getting random erections, maybe you should get your hormones checked... Or stop smoking so much weed, because it increases estrogen.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 06:24 AM
0

Dogs are one of the few (if not only) animal species that can recognize the emotions in our facial expressions and respond emotionally to us. Because we made them that way. They aren't some "purpose built" tool, they're literally an extension of our humanity. Every breed of dog was "purpose built". That's literally how it's defined when you pick and choose which traits to carry over for specific breeds.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 05:12 AM
-20

Pets are being themselves all the time and people love 'em for this. That's the main point. How do you even define that? They were purpose built by humans, to fulfil human wants. They are literally man-made tools. There is no unconditional love for pets. People wouldn't love pets if they didn't either work, or make humans feel good/wanted/needed, etc... The difference is: almost every woman have a vagina and can give a birth to a child. It's not something that a woman needs to be trained in. Men…
/r/MensRights29/07/21 11:09 AM
-48

Women, children and pets are loved unconditionally.... The only people who are loved unconditionally are children. And even then, it's not always a thing. men are only loved if they provide some value. Pets are loved for what they do for humans. Whether it's work, or companionship. It's not unconditional at all. Women are loved for what they have/are just the same as men. They are just different things, because generally speaking men and women have some differing perspectives on what constitutes…
/r/MensRights29/07/21 10:07 AM
1

They were followed for more than 25 years and completed diet questionnaires every two to four years. Learn how to read/interpret studies, instead of blindly accepting garbage. Do you think you'll be able to remember everything you ate over a two year period, with any sort of accuracy? And that's even assuming they told the truth about their diets. Especially when veganism has the worse adherence rates out of any diet.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:14 AM
0

Yeah, it does. It causes many health issues.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 05:37 AM
1

And in a few years he's going to have a stroke.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 08:32 PM
9

Kevin Smith became a vegan because of his daughter, and has bought into all of the Hollywood bullshit that her generation are pushing, whole hog
/r/MensRights26/07/21 07:33 AM
10

No I don't agree. Even in the comments, people are saying bullshit like "Yes, women have always been and will always be valued just for existing."... Which completely ignores the critical part of your question... "Unconditional Love". Value is different than love. And even then, women are valued for things they provide, just like men. It's just different things that hold value to different people. We are only loved for what we can do for others or how we can make them feel, we aren’t loved for w…
/r/MensRights25/06/21 01:52 PM
7

Maybe stop visiting shitty subs? You're purposely viewing things that have a negative effect on you, so just stop it.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 10:48 AM
18

FEMINISM IS FOR EVERYBODY Anytime someone says this, or uses the BS tagline that Feminism helps men... Just bring up the fact that the second Erin Pizzey, tried to advocate for men as well, she was kicked out of the group she founded, and had to go into police hiding because of death threats. Look at how Warren Farrell was demonised after being a hero for Feminism. All because he wanted actual equality, and consistency.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/21 09:20 AM
1

You're a sad little man, and you speak like a backwoods, religious fundamentalist moron. If wearing women's clothes make you less of a man, then maybe you weren't much of one to begin with. But go ahead and ignore the message, and the spirit of support. Go ahead and focus on something that wasn't even the point. Go ahead, and keep yourself clouded in ignorance.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 09:47 AM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_skirts Seems like you need to pull your head out of your ass.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 08:02 AM
8

That's why you take them hiking, or some other free activity. It's more interesting than eating, and you are more likely to not get a cunt.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 12:18 AM
2

Think about it, you're mad at me for talking about lesbians who admit to being a high number of feminists. Posting pics of behavior they chastise men about. I'm not mad about anything. I simply pointed out that there are plenty of pictures of men doing what you said. You then said that Feminists complain about that stuff. Which is fine, because they complain about everything. So I simply asked if those same Feminists didn't complain about women doing it... And then that's when you went on your l…
/r/MensRights05/06/21 04:51 AM
1

It's pretty pathetic that your memory capacity is so bad, you have to continue to quote me and respond. It's so you can't backpedal, and attempt to gaslight, by lying about things you say. So now I'm RPing as a tough guy? Yeah, it's pretty clear. I mean, you made two separate replies, instead of just using a single one. This is a perfect example of the "impotent rage" I was talking about. You sound like a feminist. Cute. They are the ones who make accusations like that. What tough guy comments h…
/r/MensRights05/06/21 04:38 AM
1

Lol and yet, you're still unoriginal. So you claim to be a demon? You're a joke. You're the jester of demons. I seriously can't believe this is a real response to anything. It's like you're trying to RP as a tough guy. So you are afraid of me proving it? Lol figures. For someone who has "nothing to prove", you sure do love trying to prove something. Definition of Paper Tiger. You know what I am talking about. I do. You're a weak person, who is doing a laughable job of trying to act tough on the …
/r/MensRights05/06/21 04:07 AM
2

The Greek word is spelled Daemoniacus. So you are incorrect. It's spelled δαιμονιακός. But go ahead and explain to an actual Greek person how it's spelled in English. I was waiting for you to be predictable. And now I know who you are. You're really a stalker huh? You up for party chat little man? Replying to your replies is stalking. Got it. Once again, you're living up to your name. Actually, I am a Combat Veteran. You're a Paper Tiger. I have a few different ways to do video chat with you. I …
/r/MensRights05/06/21 03:48 AM
1

Toy Soldier relates to you, being a fraud. A cheap, and smaller, imitation of an actual soldier. My name actually comes from Ancient Greek. But it's cute how your assumption, just like your other replies, and apparently your entire identity... It's purely superficial.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 03:30 AM
-1

Since you didn't answer my only question, there's no point, I guess. You're really living up to your username.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 02:47 AM
0

I read what you wrote. It's retarded. And now you're just being a child.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 02:05 AM
-1

Are those same Feminists participating in Femdom, or are you just assuming they're okay with it?
/r/MensRights05/06/21 01:44 AM
6

Also take a look at the lesdom sub reddit and look at the pictures. They have pictures of women standing on another women's head with shoes on as a sign of domination. Imagine the uproar if a man was pictured doing that? Doesn't seem like you know what the "dom" stands for. There are pictures of men doing that. That's literally part of the kink.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 12:03 AM
11

Genuine question, here. Do you genuinely believe that someone who self diagnoses themselves as autistic, and lives in Britain, is going to seriously be so distraught over the death of Bud Spencer, that it would ruin any chance at intimacy? What part of the story actually seems plausible to you? In one case, I told a guy I had been hanging out with and also sleeping with that, yeah, he could come over, but my favourite actor had just died, so nothing was going to happen. He could watch some of th…
/r/MensRights25/05/21 07:41 AM
27

Do you think the sub markets itself as anything that it’s not? It markets itself as a men's rights sub, when it's clearly just a feminism sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/21 10:01 AM
1

So men only abandon their children because of the mother? Never for any other reason? It would help if you actually read my comment. Do some fathers run off? Yes. I then gave specific examples of different scenarios. The law is concerned with the kid's welfare No it isn't. The law is concerned with not having the state spend money. Child welfare is way down the list. There are countless examples where the mother is wholly unfit to be a parent, but the child is left in their care. Children can't …
/r/MensRights09/05/21 04:04 AM
31

Getting laid then disappearing when she's pregnant is a time honored tradition across the world. How is a woman obligated to "be responsible" by aborting/parenting completely alone, but a man doesn't have to be responsible by getting a vasectomy/paying support? You can't have it both ways. If it's solely a woman's choice, they are the one's solely responsible. In reality, it takes two to tango, but nobody sees it that way, or treats it that way. Men don't get a say. A mother can literally give u…
/r/MensRights08/05/21 02:49 PM
1

Absolutely. They will initially push back, that's normal. But you can dismantle them fairly easily. The second you respond like an ass, it makes it easier for them (and people reading) to dismiss everything you're saying. Yes, it's a logical fallacy, but that's just how humans are. He could have played into the fact he's passionate about the topic. Asked them to actually point out something he's said that is horrible, etc... As long as you're not actually a horrible person, then they have nothin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/21 11:45 PM
5

He said it in the comments, and his post history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/21 10:55 PM
11

Dude, stop. Yes, it's a double standard. But the people in that thread aren't Feminists™. Aside from the fake therapist, they're regular people who think Feminism is about equality. You don't win them over by acting like a moron. There are ways to call them out, without being an ass. And there are ways to call them out which paint Men's Advocates in a better light. Despite what you want to believe, Feminism is losing ground because the real world is biting them in the ass. Their tactics don't wo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/21 10:46 PM
10

You need to learn how to respond to people without inflammatory language. Unless of course you don't care about the people reading the exchange, and just want to "win". From the perspective of the people in the thread, you're just a bitter incel looking to hate on women/Feminism. Even if that's not true, that's how it comes across. You can promote something for men, without shitting on women, or Feminism. If someone responds with a distraction, whataboutism, etc... Then you highlight it by askin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/21 09:54 PM
76

What happened to strong, independent women? Strong, independent women keep their mouths shut. Just like men do. Bored, immature, and overly privileged people will complain about anything that isn't favouritism, under the guise of victimhood. Strong, and independent women understood what it took to make a family work. They understood what it takes to be happy, or at least, content. People will try and stigmatise "simple living", and claim that modern sloth, is progress. They have no chance to act…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 12:29 PM
2

Daisy dukes were referenced by the other person... Seems like you don't know how to read.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 12:23 AM
1

There is too much cringe in this post. Jesus Christ, how sad are you.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 09:25 AM
1

You're calling me puritanical because i think that women shouldn't shame men for viewing them sexually, when dressed sexually? No, you're puritanical for accepting the notion that teenagers shouldn't wear swimwear because of their male teachers potentially having sexual desires. You've got to be joking. Of course its sexual. The whole fucking thing revolves around looking sexy, thats why bikinis reveal as much as they do. It's to look sexy you clown. You think a girl picks out a bathing suit and…
/r/MensRights14/02/21 06:02 AM
-1

Yeah... I'm not talking about minors. Then you're missing the point, since the entire context revolves around teenagers in school. If they are not grown women, like you are saying, they shouldn't dress like grown women. They're not. Do you want them to wear burkas in Australian summer? I think bikinis in general are overly sexualized. How many men do you see wearing speedos on the beach? Barely any, because its fucking weird. Bikinis are no different. I think its weird as fuck to wear clothes th…
/r/MensRights14/02/21 05:23 AM
0

This is demonizing mens sexuality. No it isn't. Unless of course you think that sexualising a 15 year old student is part of men's sexuality. If a woman dresses sexually, ie showing cleavage and wearing booty shorts, you're obviously screaming for the male gaze. Sure. But that's not what's happening here. And adult men, should be able to control themselves around teenagers that they are responsible for. Your rhetoric is essentially: men should have the self control to not look at women sexually.…
/r/MensRights14/02/21 05:00 AM
-13

I'm a teacher. You'd be amazed at what kids don't know. They need guidance This doesn't just apply to kids. And letting kids decide what is best for them is asinine. It's amazing how quickly you jump to different points of their ability/capacity when it suits you. They shouldn't wear normal clothing, because adult men could look at them in a sexual manner. You seem to agree with this, which means that you view them as adults... But then immediately say that they are children who need to be dicta…
/r/MensRights14/02/21 02:17 AM
-11

The statement was literally about urges. "don't tell girls what to wear, teach boys not to stare" Is 100% appropriate in this scenario. Their clothing was appropriate given the context of the situation. If grown men can't control themselves around children, then they need to fix their own shit out, first. Pretty sure that a teenage girl who wears a bikini for a swimming carnival, isn't going to all of a sudden think it's okay to wear a bikini for an executive position at a corporation. But your …
/r/MensRights14/02/21 01:46 AM
-5

So it's okay to sexualise a teenager wearing swimwear at a swimming carnival? I'll say it again, if you can't refrain from certain urges because of clothing, then you have other issues to deal with.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 01:40 AM
-10

You use terms like "debate", yet look at the ridiculousness of your comment. This is about skirts being worn above the knee, not daisy dukes. If men can't control their urges around teenagers wearing normal skirts, then there's a larger issue here, with them... Not with the girls.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 01:20 AM
1

You do realise that this applies to students, and students are forced to do lots of things that they don't want to do. While their reasoning behind it is bullshit, and misguided, the act itself is pretty good. Physical fitness is important. Teaching it properly, early on in a person's life, would be nothing but a benefit.
/r/MensRights30/01/21 06:15 AM
1

There are multiple ways to die from a nut shot. This guy died because of his ruptured testicle getting a gangrene infection
/r/MensRights21/01/21 05:24 AM
23

Just so you know... Men have died from being kicked in the balls. It can cause a huge spike in adrenaline, and cause a heart attack. Also, any trauma to testicles has the potential to hinder, or destroy your natural ability to produce testosterone. If this were to happen, you would need to start injecting steroids (TRT) for the rest of your life, in order to feel normal again. Ignorance is not an excuse. Violence is not okay, regardless of how painful or not she thought it would be.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 09:27 PM
2

When confronted with the fact that women don't ask for raises... She immediately states to "stop telling women to fix themselves". Not only would it solve the actual problem, but it's literally the same rhetoric that they use against men.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 08:28 AM
6

She has a history of being a twat. Multiple DUIs for example. Also committing crimes while on probation. If she doesn't go to jail, she is escaping the law.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 10:05 PM
0

Almost everyone who has a YouTube "career" is doing it for personal gain.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 09:13 PM
1

You only made that distinction later. How is that an argument against anything? Regardless of when I made it, that's just the reality of the situation. Bringing it up later doesn't mean you get to simply dismiss it. Regardless, it’s still cloth. It's not. You're just trying to oversimplify for the safe of your argument. After all, Estrogen is just a hormone, it's not more feminine than Testosterone which is also just a hormone... That's the logic you're using. Distinction matters. Form/function,…
/r/MensRights27/12/20 04:34 AM
1

They may naturally be more likely to be feminine and desire such things, but dresses aren’t naturally or inherently feminine as it’s just a piece of cloth, it’s our society that decided they are. If you read what I said earlier, you would know the distinction that I made between "dresses", and feminine dresses. There’s no proof of that being generally true afaik. You sure? I mean behavioural psychology has been looking at this stuff for a while now. You may perceive it as that because of the nat…
/r/MensRights27/12/20 02:34 AM
1

I understand that for things that are naturally feminine and masculine, but dresses being feminine is just a social construct. Dresses aren’t naturally or inherently feminine. How do social constructs exist, if not for some inherent predilection for that construct? Also, you can’t just completely write-off the desire to wear a dress as a product of low T. I didn't. But what I said, is generally true. Dresses just look cool and are comfortable as hell. Dresses as a clothing form, for sure. There …
/r/MensRights26/12/20 11:24 PM
2

References for what, exactly? Testosterone levels have a huge impact on behaviour, and even preferences. This study shows that T levels affect perceived attractiveness in female faces. There are countless studies showing behavioural changes depending on T levels. Higher T levels, equates to more "masculine" behaviours.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 12:03 PM
2

You need to learn to read, champ. Low T causes men to engage in more "feminine" behaviours. There are many things that are at the root of low T levels. The desire to wear feminine clothing is a product of low T.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 05:17 AM
7

I agree to a certain extent. But we need to look at an actual pandemic of dropping Testosterone levels, and the normalisation of clinically low levels. Fix that problem, and then see how many of these men would actually wear dresses earnestly.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 04:27 AM
2

This is essentially Epicureanism. Epicurus actively recommended against passionate love, and believed it best to avoid marriage altogether. He viewed recreational sex as a natural, but not necessary desire that should be generally avoided.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 04:39 AM
2

The above charts go up to 2018. Unless there was a massive spike within a year, it seems like you're wrong. Can you link to anything that backs up what you said?
/r/MensRights24/12/20 04:05 AM
1

The same way that a lot of retired people are miserable when they don't work. Sexism, as archaic as it is, has general roles that need to be filled. There are jobs for each individual to accomplish, and when they are accomplished, both people are fulfilled (at least somewhat), and it makes everything else a bit easier. It's a few less uncertainties, and that structured routine is very helpful for most people.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 04:03 AM
-8

How the fuck is acting proper boil down to that culturally and racially insensitive word? Because white women have destroyed black culture, and replaced it with ghetto culture. They glorify single motherhood. Do everything in their power to disrupt stable family dynamics. And a whole lot of other things. The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations also applies to language. Black people obviously can't handle speaking proper English, so they get a free pass to use ebonics, and just general slang. This w…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/20 11:37 AM
26

What makes you think feminists are trying to block research into the nutrition of minors? Good question. Melinda gates donated millions of dollars to educate women about nutrition around the world since they are often the decision makers when it comes to decisions like food. And how much money have they put forward to push male mutilation? Also from their actual site... OUR GOAL: To ensure that all women and children have the nutrition they need to live healthy and productive lives. Not men as w…
/r/MensRights19/12/20 11:48 PM
9

Don't kid yourself... She's an SJW Feminist, and so is Cenk. They're both morons.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 06:22 AM
2

Would explain why you're still single.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 04:07 AM
7

Because it would promote vigilantism. It negates the privacy of individuals, and opens them up for a myriad of shit. The police deal with a lot of shit, and interact with a lot of different situations. Not everyone is a villain. And even if they were, they have the right to privacy. Public access to those recordings would expose people unnecessarily to the public. It would actually increase crime. It's an easy way to identify people, get addresses, to look into their homes, and plot crimes. It w…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 12:14 AM
2

It really shouldn't. Unless you want vigilantism to run rampant.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 12:10 AM
3

I think it would be an improvement if the video/audio is always on and making a record of what is filmed. I agree. Except that there should be a way to turn it off for privacy during breaks. To not only help protect the police who are most of the time justified in what they do but also give the public a transparent way of seeing it. The public should not have access to footage, unless they are directly involved.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 12:10 AM
20

should still always be on with audio and streaming the footage to a cloud database that the public has access to No, it shouldn't. That's fucking insane.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 09:51 PM
3

Jerry Lee Lewis, Bill Wyman, Don Johnson, Jimmy Page, Steven Tyler... The list is endless.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 09:11 AM
1

The title is such bullshit. There are plenty of examples (both ways) where adults get away with it, or are celebrated for it. Roman Polanski is a perfect example. Yes he went to court, but he's still winning movie awards, and is still a free man. Just because women usually get away with it, doesn't mean they're the only ones that get away with it.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 07:24 AM
2

Notice how none of the criticism is about him making fun of Rick Moranis being assaulted? I guess it doesn't count when a man is the victim.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 07:23 AM
1

Rape can cause irreversible damage to the reproductive system. Ill also add that, more than a lot of times, it isn't faked and can have catastrophic effects on a woman's life. Trust me, rape can cause a woman to be "sexually defective" as well, most commonly in the forms of infertility, gynecological injury, pregnancy, and STI's all of which can have life long effects. And I'm not even getting into all of the psychological trauma associated with rape. Getting hit in the balls can actually give y…
/r/MensRights05/10/20 06:05 AM
6

There's a difference between truth, and spiralling down into an echo chamber. There are a lot of posts here that have no business being here. They're hateful, attract hateful people, are sometimes outright fabrications, etc... There are echo chamberesque posts on here all the time, and they're filled with vile people.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 06:40 AM
1

It could take months or even years for a conviction of rape, and the majority of rape accusations (true or not) may never go to court. I don't see how that's relevant. The only way it would be, is if it caused so much trauma that they couldn't actually go to work. And in that case, they would just get welfare payments. There's no need for money. Doesn't matter how long court takes.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 06:30 AM
5

Oppression is too strong of a word for it.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 08:31 AM
1

Women are the ones who have to go through pregnancy and give birth. We're the ones risking our lives and destroying our bodies forever by carrying their child. So let's unpack this a bit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maternal_mortality_in_the_United_States Postpartum depression is widely untreated and unrecognized, leading to suicide. Suicide is one of the most significant causes of maternal mortality,[18][19] and reported to be the number one cause by many studies. So it's not even pregnancy i…
/r/MensRights04/09/20 11:54 AM
1

From my experience, people don't realize they stress-eat when they do it until much later, if at all. It's still a choice. Being in denial is not the same as absence of choice. PPARG is a known gene that converts food into fat deposits. LOL. You wouldn't be alive without that gene. Observational studies showing that it's active in people with health issues is meaningless unless they can actually derive causation from it. The protein encoded by this gene is PPAR-gamma and is a regulator of adipoc…
/r/MensRights20/08/20 04:13 AM
2

Not always. Unless you are taking medication which makes you gain weight (possible), then it's 100% controllable. Even with medication, you can stop taking it, and lose the weight. Some people stress eat because of trauma and can't lose weight Stress eating is a choice. There are different ways to deal with stress that don't involve eating. weight loss is also genetic No it isn't. Your statement doesn't even make sense, because it's way too broad, and means nothing. metabolism speed is genetic I…
/r/MensRights19/08/20 07:17 AM
2

It is possible. But like most communities on reddit, they devolve into shit storms of nonsense.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 09:12 AM
1

You obviously watched it, but it seems like you're too biased to be objective. Evil bonehead Lorca vs badass war criminal Georgiou (whose crimes are totally forgiven) They're both evil, and the show makes that abundantly clear. Her crimes weren't forgiven. They never happened in the prime Universe, so you can't really hold her to your rules, when you invaded her Universe. Not only that, but she joined a covert-ops group because she has the skills required for the job. Kind of like how Nazi scien…
/r/MensRights21/07/20 06:08 AM
14

All of those involve the 2 rules. If you can follow those 2 rules, you can escape most of that. The only one that would remain, is living by yourself = gay.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 10:33 PM
-1

There are as many things wrong with saying "All Lives Matter", as there are when you say "Black Lives Matter". It completely misses the reality of the situation, and you allow it to be stolen from you by extremists. "Black Lives Matter" is more about poverty, and gender, than it is about race. The intention behind it is okay, but it quickly got gobbled up by extremists, who want to push a shitty agenda. The inverse is true with "All Lives Matter". It's a rebuttal that's going to be gobbled up by…
/r/MensRights05/06/20 02:32 AM
1

The whole problem is that by saying "All Lives Matter", you essentially start a race war for something that has more to do with poverty, than it does race.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 02:28 AM
0

There's a difference between absolute, and relative.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 02:27 AM
-21

They're right. Saying "All Lives Matter" is not a proper response. It's retarded. Kutcher is a dumb twat for forcing his son to be a door mat, but that's besides the point. He's 100% right when he says that some people don't think Black lives actually matter. Yes police brutality is usually perpetuated against men, regardless of race, but Black men do have it far worse than white men in regards to how they are treated by police, and society overall. Stop saying "All Lives Matter". You sound like…
/r/MensRights04/06/20 09:58 AM
1

What's even better is that she wrote an article saying that these types of jokes are never okay. Here's a Twitter thread where she says things like: All men who participate in that minimising behaviour are complicit in violence. When speaking about making jokes/memes. But you know... She's a clusterfuck of a person, with severe daddy issues.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 12:31 AM
0

Their functional equivalents absolutely do exist (on spectra). Don't add "on spectrum". If it's on a spectrum, then it's not a somatotype. Skeletal etc frame differences that stack up to produce people with different potentials regardless of their height absolutely do exist That's not what it means. There are plenty of tall people with narrow shoulders and/or thin wrists, or small ankles, bad muscle insertions etc etc and they can absolutely have lower strength and muscle building potential than…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 10:03 PM
1

A tall ectomorphic body type dude certainly does not necessarily have more potential than an average mesormophic or endomorphic Somatypes aren't real. He claims... Your interpretation contradicts their point.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 02:04 PM
1

it’s unreasonable to state that people below 5’5” are incapable of developing the strength to do so. Incapable, no. Unlikely? Yes. Especially if they're a woman. Firefighter gear can weigh up to 75 pounds. Average weight in the US is 195.8 lb for men, and 168.4 lb for women. That's around 250 lbs (75+175). Then there's the fact that you need to actually walk with this weight, and not just do a squat for a few reps. I’m not sure how accurate your statement about being taller allowing for more mus…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 09:35 AM
4

Most "modern" women can't cook for shit anyway.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 09:56 PM
3

Red meat increases Testosterone. That's why they're against it. All of their justifications like the environment, health, sustainability, and morality, are objectively wrong. Veganism is a shit show of mental illness, just like Feminism, and just like religion. Just compare all 3 with each other, and you start to notice a lot of similarities in how they form opinions, how they fight for their crusade, etc... Stop apologising for eating the most nutrient dense food that exists. Stop giving conces…
/r/MensRights08/05/20 10:12 PM
4

This is the best... Anything that happens to a woman is because they're a woman, right? But everything that happens to a man is never because he's a man. It's like you put all of your character points into projection, and hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 09:39 PM
3

Keep in mind folks... That without the evidence he gathered, he would be totally fucked. Protect yourselves. Also, she basically admitted to being a stripper. lol.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 08:58 PM
-2

It's not a defence of her, it's an attempt to not turn into Feminists. Not to say that she shouldn't face consequences, but it's a fine line, and a slippery slope. What starts off as genuine empathy, and justice, can quickly turn into witch hunts. It's exactly how Feminists started getting away with their cancel culture bullshit.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 07:49 PM
4

If it was easy, they would do it. They already chop off their balls because of wrong assumptions. They think it will cure behavioural issues, when it actually makes them worse. Destroying the body's ability to produce their primary sexual hormone also leads to disease, and mental issues. But what do you expect from an industry that thinks a dog's diet should be primary carbohydrate based.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 02:26 AM
2

Yes making fun of incels is bullshit. It was, when they were a relatively benign group of men, who were just frustrated with their social standing. But not now... Now that group has changed, and not for the better. If you have no empathy for your fellow man (assuming you are a man) then why do you think you give a fuck about men’s rights? LOL what an asinine statement. The plight of incels is directly influenced by the destruction of men’s rights. No. Stop trying to portray them as victims of an…
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:07 AM
2

She has an agenda. Which would be what, exactly? She has proven that and she isn’t interested in a fair discussion. And anyone who doesn’t see that and harms his own side for the sake of a ‘fair discussion’ when it’s not relevant, is an idiot or has an agenda themselves. How has she proven that? By making fun of some incels? By pointing out how vile some of them actually are? That's not an agenda, it's the truth. Some of them are completely vile. Unfortunately you have not shown you have an inte…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 09:13 PM
0

Thanks for proving my point.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 08:51 PM
2

So shut the fuck up and stop demonising incels, and direct your anger towards the DOUBLE STANDARDS on display. Point out where I did any of that. Yes everything they say gets dismissed because this person has an agenda and isn't interested in the truth. Point out what they said that was wrong, and acknowledge the things they said, that were right. That's how you show interest in truth. What you're doing is committing the fallacy fallacy, where if they make one mistake, everything gets dismissed.…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 08:51 PM
0

Are you interesting in being insulting because that's just the developmental level you're at, or in presenting a more demonstrably sound argument? How was what I said unsound? I used an analogy, and you don't understand how analogies work. So I explained how they work. I didn't insult you in any way. Saying that you're wrong, isn't an insult. To argue effectively in the future, try focusing on just one of these, instead of multitasking and failing at both. Typical response when you know you're w…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 03:50 AM
1

You've just described equity, the idea that we should ensure equal outcomes. No. It's an analogy. Meaning that you don't ignore the general idea, in order to focus on the specifics. No. Bad. Yes, your reasoning skills are bad, I get it. The point of the analogy isn't to point out the outcome, it's to point out that even though two things can be literally different, they can have the same value.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 11:26 PM
4

Equal in value, not equal in specifics. Just like how both 2+2, and 3+1, both equal 4.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 10:07 PM
1

Look, I've been an MRA for a long time... You need to get your head out of your ass a bit, here. You immediately jumping to whataboutism is horeshit. Yes, people need to acknowledge that Feminists say/do that shit. But at the same time, you need to actually admit that some men are just as terrible. Incels as they exist now, are not the same as when they first came around. Yes, it's used as a general insult, just to shut down any discussion. But you can't just brush away the garbage, and say "wel…
/r/MensRights17/01/20 10:05 PM
19

It's obvious why you were banned. Hopefully while he's president he'll take notice of the need for men's rights as well, including reproductive rights. One day. You simply can't do that. Yes it would be nice if you could, but you can't. Too many people are just too retarded to treat it fairly. You need to bring up the individual issues (only a couple at a time, not a full list), and leave it at that. "Men's Rights" is a tainted phrase/concept. There's too much stigma, and too much ideology again…
/r/MensRights28/12/19 11:55 AM
1

Without the personal experiences of those individuals, how do you propose they do these studies, exactly? Studies with 0 sample sizes don't really give much info, do they?
/r/MensRights21/12/19 10:54 PM
1

Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross sectional studies. That's the context you gave. Which means that it involves people. Which is the context I gave earlier. Which means that it's not literally all scientific studies. It's the ones that involve people. So yeah... Learn to read, and then comprehend.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 04:20 AM
1

Scientific studies are not merely based on anecdotes I didn't say that. Learn to read. and your biased and low sample of anecdotes is not equivalent to them Have you ever actually done a study for yourself to even know how they are done, and their limitations? Period. Oh well then. I didn't realise you were such an authority over everything science. It's good to know that a tool (science) has a stalwart defender like yourself, who doesn't even understand it.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 02:09 AM
1

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-role-of-anecdotes-in-science-based-medicine/ in the context of medicine it often relates to an individual’s experience with their disease or symptoms and their efforts to treat it. That's how it's used in studies. Each n value is literally an individual's experience with their disease/symptoms, and their results to treatment. What science does is take all of these anecdotes, and puts them together to see if there are any trends, or if there is enough correlat…
/r/MensRights20/12/19 11:47 PM
1

Trying to rely on a google definition is pretty dumb.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 11:13 AM
1

Which all rely on individual responses to specific stimulus. AKA anecdotes.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 06:43 AM
1

No, certainly not all studies rely on anecdotes. Name some having to do with people, that don't.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 05:41 AM
1

Hate to break it to you, but all studies rely on anecdotes, and then compile them together by trying to control certain things. That's all it is. A study of n=30 is 30 anecdotes compared to each other. Sure, they control certain things when they can, and when the budget allows... But that's really it. Any time you're dealing with people, there's no ethical way around that.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 04:08 AM
2

How many anecdotes does it take to start being referred to as data?
/r/MensRights20/12/19 02:00 AM
1

It's not hard to understand at all. They all share the same mental roadblocks. Veganism breeds mental/physical illness, which is why feminists all have mental/physical problems. This lack of mental ability leads to some ridiculous notions. Like Greta blaming men, and meat, for climate change. Like religion, they attempt to shame you, and make ridiculous statements about their moral superiority, while being completely hypocritical.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 11:18 PM
2

They're all related. Feminism has taken religious ideology, and tactics, and used it to push their own agenda. The same is true for vegans. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/7/4/32/pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjvr56GhLHmAhWJwjgGHYb1DB4QFjADegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw3VGIbe1lAXo8pC_1wlcNde Moral perspectives line up. People who want to act morally superior like Greta, are usually Leftist, Vegan, and Feminist. https://recipes.howstuffworks.com/why-79-percent-u-s-vegans-…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 09:25 PM
4

Everything is possible but the whole thing is that people with Asperger’s tend be quite socially awkward. Have you heard her speak? I just think it’s a stretch to expect someone who also has OCD and selective mutism to be able to fake what she’s doing and be paid to read off a script? And why do you believe she has these other ailments? You have to admit, things don’t add up. Obviously. But not like how you think. Of course you could also believe that someone paid to get her those diagnosis so n…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 07:52 PM
4

People with Asperger's can't be paid to fake emotion, and regurgitate bullshit from a script?
/r/MensRights12/12/19 07:34 PM
4

She's not genuine, she's an actress. And she's also wrong about a lot of things.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 06:09 PM
-8

Are men popping out babies all of a sudden?
/r/MensRights30/11/19 07:35 PM
2

High quality butter is one of the best things for Crohns. If you look at the diet recommendations for Crohns, it doesn't line up with things you're trying to avoid... Crohns is an intense inflammatory response. Things like Fibre make it worse... Yet they tell you to eat grains, fruit/veg. If you look at a FODMAP list, you'll see that the most inflammatory foods all come from plants. They tell you to avoid Fat, but suggest you eat oily fish... These recommendations are just useless, because it's …
/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:42 PM
1

He's such a big cuck, he actually likes dick, lol. And you're totally right about saving his career. That's why he left that show, and made his own, on his terms. Jesus Christ, where do you people come from?
/r/MensRights24/11/19 12:28 AM
20

He cares so much, he's willing to help her save £500/month. He didn't ask her in order to squeeze her for cash. She was already looking for a place, and he offered a heavily discounted one.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:22 PM
2

Source would be that every study that actually looks at it. Most DV is reciprocal, and most of those are initiated by the woman. The police officer case is just a common scenario. What else are women going to start fights over, if you aren't home when they expect?
/r/MensRights13/11/19 11:09 PM
4

More likely it's due to the woman becoming abusive, because of the irregular hours. So any retaliation from the man, outside of complete servitude, is seen as abuse.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 07:27 PM
1

Being castrated at birth would make them more like women. Does she think women shouldn't be governing?
/r/MensRights08/11/19 06:07 AM
2

Most are, yeah.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 07:25 AM
0

This fetishization with Eastern women is just sad. They are way more rigid in gender roles than Western women. If you don't like being treated like an ATM, or any of the other negative things society tries to force on you... Then good luck. Because Eastern women are some of the worst, and most entitled women out there.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 09:52 PM
0

Sexually frustrated men in hopeless marriages, are usually the ones who post this shit. Oh, also idiots... Idiots who don't realise that the desires of a 40 year old man, are not the same as a 14 year old.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 08:40 PM
1

Excellent reply
/r/MensRights24/10/19 07:19 PM
1

The red pill exists.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 07:24 PM
-4

The red pill sub says equally retarded things.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 07:23 PM
5

Even lesbians don't like women... Which would explain the much higher rates of domestic violence among that group.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 11:17 PM
1

...
/r/MensRights26/09/19 10:02 PM
1

If your account wasn't so sad, I would have assumed that you were a Feminist troll trying to undermine the MRA.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 07:10 AM
1

Goats don't need positive reinforcement to be assholes, it's inherent.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 07:00 AM
5

Funny story... There was a bill put before the government, to actually have women sign up for the draft in order to gain the right to vote. Feminists protested it. It then changed into an automatic right. So even with their first battle, Feminism was never about equality.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 09:17 PM
34

It's nice that it has grown. But that growth has come with some bad things as well, just like with other subreddits. It's just like /r/atheism, where you get former evangelicals/extremists who "found the truth". They switch sides, but they never change their mentality/thought process. They get caught up in the same bullshit, and changing ideologies doesn't eliminate mental blocks. You see it all the time here. People acting exactly like Feminists, using the exact same tactics, using the exact sa…
/r/MensRights15/09/19 05:51 AM
1

You really need to grow up.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 01:34 AM
0

Oh I see... You're trying to play that card. Won't work. Stop being stupid.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 01:28 AM
0

Your reply is pretty retarded. And yes, man up still applies to you. The fact that you think gender/sex matters in regards to my reply is pretty moronic.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 10:41 PM
2

"A say" doesn't mean anything. They can offer their preference, and then like responsible, and mature adults they can go over it together. But ultimately it's her choice. By the same token, if they don't agree, it's his choice to financially support the child or not.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 08:56 PM
-4

Stop getting upset over karma whoring. It's a goddamn image macro... You gonna start crying about a Marilyn Monroe quote posted on Facebook, next? Jesus Christ, some of you really need to unironically man up.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 08:49 PM
1

The women that complain about toxic masculinity, are women that have never done a hard day's work.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:06 AM
18

They weren't always like that. They went downhill pretty quick though.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 03:42 AM
5

Dirty Rotten Scoundrels is a movie about men scamming women, and it's considered a classic.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 09:16 PM
6

Vegan, and Feminist... It's like winning the mental illness lottery, twice.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 01:03 AM
2

More likely that it would lash out at another person or dog.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 02:00 AM
1

This is true for anyone you are going against. You need to frame things from their perspective, in order to make some headway, and not be seen as an adversary. As soon as you present yourself as an enemy, people will be less open minded to counter ideas.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 11:35 PM
0

No, you were banned because you didn't offer any advice in a sub where you're only supposed to provide advice. Seems like you have a victim complex here.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 10:41 PM
1

No, it's justice. There's a difference. Revenge would be killing them for emotional reasons.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 07:38 PM
-2

Yeah, it's bullshit. You realise that my comment obviously insinuates the he should not have been punished at all?
/r/MensRights02/09/19 10:01 AM
-5

Revenge is foolish. Feminists want revenge for perceived injustices, and look how that turned out. The fact that my comment got downvotes, is pretty revealing as to the direction this sub is heading. It's sad. Being taken over by a bunch of anti-intellectual reactionaries is not good.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 03:13 AM
-13

Relax. It was a school yard fight. It happens. The girls should get detention, and probably have to sit in on some anti-bullying speech/course. That's all that's needed. There's no need to jump on the Feminism crazy train, trying to lock up kids for having poor decision making ability.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 02:19 AM
5

Her squat would be considered intermediate to advanced in terms of strength standards. And that's if it was her 1 rep max. If she was repping that weight, it would be higher.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 11:16 PM
2

/r/thathappened
/r/MensRights01/09/19 10:58 PM
-3

Pretty much standard practise for female groupies to do the same for bands. Are you all forgetting that rock bands exist? As long as it's consensual, there's nothing to get upset over.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:17 AM
0

The fact that you think this is complicated just shows that you're no better than Feminists. Nuance doesn't matter, right?
/r/MensRights28/08/19 11:08 PM
2

The comment not only pertains to you. You called me a hypocrite. I gave you a specific reason why it isn't hypocrisy. You pointed out a comment I made, and I explained it with context. Jesus Christ you're dense.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 09:24 PM
3

Learn to read. I never said that I detailed anything.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 09:16 PM
3

It's discrimination in the show. You do know that sitcoms aren't real, yeah? It's imaginary discrimination... What you just said is literally the same as a Feminist calling the rape in Game of Thrones "problematic".
/r/MensRights28/08/19 09:15 PM
1

How is that hypocritical? I didn't make a post detailing how a shitty character is somehow evident of discrimination. I gave an additional point about how the character is shitty.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 09:03 PM
0

Have you tried not being a whiny bitch? It's a TV show. Let them make their joke. You're under no obligation to laugh, or approve of it. Getting outraged over this tiny bullshit makes you just as bad as a Feminist. Grow up.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 08:34 PM
5

It's also important to note that even when trained somewhat by Yoda, Luke gets his fucking hand lopped off. Rey wins her first fight. It's insane.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 08:24 PM
1

You seriously want to play this dumb game? do know, because I checked just now, that google will report what you said above and source it from quora Quora isn't a source. urban dictionary, of course the meanings of such words are constantly evolving, but if you check entries there, noting dates, you will see even they have begun to catch up. Urban Dictionary is from 2016, and 2014, which predates the other definitions. If you look more closly at the deffinition that google serves up Google isn't…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 06:15 AM
-1

In reality a manlet is someone who is short, but also muscular. Another example of morons not knowing what words mean, and then trying to force others to accept wrong definitions.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 03:37 AM
1

Stop acting like a Feminist.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 03:03 AM
5

It's not sexist to have preferences.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 08:30 PM
1

That's appreciated. And yeah, it's pretty ironic when someone like them starts acting like the very people they hate.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 10:16 AM
1

So you have nothing of actual substance to contribute.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 03:01 AM
1

What exactly needs to be changed, other than your attitude?
/r/MensRights16/08/19 01:53 AM
1

You sound weak. I suggest you change that.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 01:32 AM
-1

Complete nonsense. Failings aren't internal perceptions. They are. The fact that you view them as a failing is a result of your perception of them. You don't have to view being short as a failing, you choose to do that. You're not god. Stop pretending everything is in your power. I don't pretend that everything is in my power. But I exercise control over what is, and ignore what isn't. The perceptions of others is not within my control, but how I perceive myself is. For example... If other peopl…
/r/MensRights16/08/19 12:48 AM
0

What's wrong with having excuses for one's failings? From a psychological view, a lot. Having reasons is a different matter. But an excuse is your way of blaming something external for an internal perception. Seems like a psychologically manipulative way to silence or dismiss legitimate grievances by appealing to people's egos. Coming from a 5'4" male... Stop being weak. Looking for excuses is weak. Looking for external reasons for your failings is weak. Look inside yourself if you don't like so…
/r/MensRights16/08/19 12:36 AM
-1

It's important to point out the double standard, but be careful to not take it too far, to where you're just constantly bitching about it, and using it as an excuse for your failings.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 10:52 PM
3

No... Attractive girls (just like guys) have it easier. Ugly girls know what's it like to be a guy, which is why a lot of them have great personalities.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 02:55 AM
2

Which doesn't make sense, because when you hyphenate two names together, you lose both names, and create a new one. The hyphenated last name doesn't keep each individual name where they are used separately. They are used as a singular new name.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 03:25 AM
1

Yeah, I know fried food is bad for you lol. It's only bad for you because of the oil. Every other ingredient is perfectly fine. I'm just saying that plant derived oil itself can be really good for you It never is, it's only less bad for you, than other oils. Anyway, red meat consumption at levels seen in America is also linked to poor health. Yes, linked in biased studies that had really shitty methodology. Those studies purposely separated non-meat diets into several categories, and anyone/ever…
/r/MensRights08/08/19 10:16 AM
1

EVOO is good for you because it's cold pressed, and high in Saturated Fat. And what do you think those fried foods are fried in? Veg oil. McDonald's used to use tallow, before the US started having obesity/disease problems.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 05:20 AM
2

The secret (apparently) is that veg/seed oils are the real cause of cardiovascular disease, Saturated Fat is good for you, meat is good for you, grains are mostly bad, and Americans just eat too much junk in general. The American Diet is mostly plant based, so don't try to vilify meat by looking at Americans. Hong Kong has the highest proportion of meat eaters, and are among one of the Blue Zones.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 01:36 AM
7

Let's hope you stay that way when you get more subscribers.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 09:55 PM
1

Debate? What debate? Other than crazies paid by the oil companies, there's no debate. Well, one debate is on the actual scale of human cause. Another is on the doom and gloom types overstaing their apocalypse predictions. In the sense that no one even Hitler is racist because he had a Jewish doctor, yeah Trump isn't racist. In every other common sense of the term, of course Trump is racist. It's easy to just say things. Much harder to actually show it. Like when people call him a rapist, simply …
/r/MensRights24/07/19 08:33 PM
3

Climate change is happening The debate is to what extent, and whether humans have as much of an effect as advertised. It's not so clear cut, so this is a bad example to use. Trump is racist. He's a lot of things, idiot is a prime example... But he's not racist. Pedophilia is wrong. According to what criteria? There's a difference between paedophilia, and sexual assault/rape. Saying that paedophilia is wrong is exactly like saying being gay is wrong. These people didn't choose to be attracted to …
/r/MensRights24/07/19 05:40 AM
3

It was most likely an attempt to get her to actually think about it on her own terms of female victimhood. It's useful to try and relate things to their perspective. If you're trying to explain something to a mechanic, you use car terms. If you try to explain the same thing to an IT person, you use computer terms.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 08:49 PM
1

would it be cool if someone made a slavery meme? or a holocaust meme? Yes. Happens all the time. Some of them are pretty damn funny. i mean some people might find it funny but i bet it wouldn't get 8k upvotes. They get way more. can we just stop mainstreaming body shaming please? it's only acceptable to men who are uncircumcised and short. As a short, intact man... Grow up.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 07:38 AM
2

Imagine if this was a meme about a girl who gained a few pounds and the guy then decided to dump her? There are hundreds of them. Sometimes a joke, is just a joke. You’d have the fat committee roll on you even if OP claimed he was overweight. Doesn’t quite change the overtones of the meme does it? It’s still a meme about body shaming isn’t it? Body shaming is a specific thing, and trying to hamfist a joke is sad. Look, the meme is not that big of deal, but it’s still saturated in hypocrisy and i…
/r/MensRights10/06/19 07:37 AM
3

It exists because weak men allow themselves to be manipulated by this behaviour. The more often that men call this shit out, and refuse to play the game, the better off we all will be.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 08:51 PM
-2

You should probably get that stick removed from your butt.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 12:41 AM
11

This is perfectly logical if you believe that women are not people, and have no agency.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 10:58 PM
2

Pregnant women need to exercise more anyway. Standing is good for her. And if she can't afford a car, then maybe she shouldn't be having a kid in the first place.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 09:35 PM
1

Her bmi is mostly contained to her ass and tits. It would be different if she was actually plus sized. Thus bullshit about impossible body standards is amplified with her body. She's not fat at all.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 08:54 PM
4

We treat things as they are, not what they could be, there is no reason to give a blob of cells the same rights as a human. Like I said before... It's still a human. That's not debatable. You can debate level of consciousness, and when pain is felt, and that would be legitimate. But as soon as those cells start to split, it's a human. If you truly believe what you say, then at what point does it become a human, that isn't arbitrary?
/r/MensRights28/05/19 08:55 AM
6

LOL did you seriously just say that the baby is forcing the mother to raise it? Come on now, that's just ridiculous. If anything, the mother forced her will onto the baby. This is getting too stupid to continue.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 05:45 AM
4

Would you kill someone on life support without their consent, just because they need assistance to live? Trying to act like abortion is such a simple thing, where there's an obvious right answer is not productive.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 05:37 AM
2

Not quite. Sperm needs an egg. By itself it's useless, and has no potential.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 04:17 AM
7

there is no reason to treat a fertilized egg as a human just because it has the potential to be a human. I have the potential to be the president, but oddly enough that's not a reason to treat me like a president now. That's unsound logic. They are human, just in the early stages if humanity. While you could be president, it's not something that is likely going to happen, therefore you should only be treated as such, when you achieve it. The baby is a human regardless of what stage of life it's …
/r/MensRights27/05/19 10:59 PM
7

He's a piece of shit. But he's still right. Nobody is all good, or all bad. This type of binary thinking is a mental illness.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 06:29 PM
5

All it is are children in adult bodies A lot of them don't have have adult bodies. Nutrient deficiency is a serious issue, and can cause all sorts of mental/physical ailments.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 06:28 PM
8

Practice (and verbalize) actual equality. For some people ridicule/laughter is enough. If someone says something stupid, just laugh as if you thought they were joking. If they push it, just say "oh, I thought you were joking", and then somewhat ignore them if they keep talking. It's enough to deflate some people, and enough to inflame the ideologues, who will just come off as crazy to any normal person listening.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:38 AM
6

That's done on purpose, so they can lie with selective statistics.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 05:08 AM
1

Social security could be from 50-70
/r/MensRights20/05/19 10:50 PM
1

I have this belief regardless of negative social problems thrown at men. It's better for the overall economy, and for individual finance. It's too much uncertainty for most people. It's why you see people who are 70 working at McDonald's. A lot of tax money gets wasted dealing with elderly people, and there's already a population problem. My proposal can potentially fix a lot of issues.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 10:21 PM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights20/05/19 09:22 PM
-3

It's easy. Kill yourself at 70. That way, not only do you know exactly how much money you need... But you also go out on your terms, without having to rely on shitty governments. You can retire at 50 or 60, and enjoy the last 10-20 years of your life, without worrying about anything else except for enjoyment.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 08:33 PM
1

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:23 PM
45

Hopefully this spreads to other schools.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 03:20 AM
1

If I'm fair to you on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, and unfair to you on Thursday and Friday, then in the aggregate I am unfair to you. I find your tendency to downplay and justify this unfairness troubling. I wouldn't say that you're an unfair person. I would attribute the unfairness to specific circumstances. For example, you treated me unfairly given this circumstance, yet treated me fairly given another circumstance. To say nothing of your seeming zeal to defend a woman who murdered an elde…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:29 AM
1

The study I linked you to references several studies, surely ALL of them cannot be faulty. All studies are faulty in some regard. No study is perfect. There's not enough money, or time in the world to do a perfect study. Every single study has flaws. Figuring out what those flaws are, and how to apply proper context is important. Just because they're flawed, doesn't mean they're useless, but it does mean that you need to be careful about what conclusions you make from it. And if you believe they…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:27 AM
1

I'll stop being stupid when you start being consistent. You're simultaneously saying that the justice system is both fair and unfair. Yes. It's not a hard concept if you actually think about it, instead of resort to knee jerk reactionary bullshit. Or maybe that it's fair in this one case. But generally, you are talking out of both sides of your mouth. Doesn't seem like you know what that means... Certain aspects of something can be fair, while other aspects can be unfair. How old are you to not …
/r/MensRights18/05/19 11:11 PM
1

I'm not cherry picking. Further down, if you read my comment properly (a common thing with you, isn't it?) I specifically point out that the other studies were not properly controlled. That next paragraph you're talking about, was only about Detroit, over a short time period, that had no proper controls. If you're going to talk about cherry picking, then you better make sure you know what that means. And you also need to learn how to actually read studies, and interpret them properly. Right now,…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 11:09 PM
1

You're saying "it just depends on the crime" like the justice system treats men and women the same. I really wish you would stop being so stupid. You've ignored this comment... Everyone knows that women get lesser sentences, and are treated more favourably in the courts. ...multiple times now. Stop it.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 10:45 PM
1

Studies examining for a gender effect on bail prior to 1984 have basically concluded that gender does not affect a judge’s bail decision after controlling for relevant legal and extra-legal variables The problem with most of the sources is that they didn't properly control for certain variables. This is something that the report specifically states. So trying to take this as an absolute proof of anything, is dishonest. You're flat out lying in order to push something that simply isn't known yet.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 10:44 PM
1

Maybe she should ask god for a firmware upgrade on the Mormon underwear to block "irresponsible ejaculations".
/r/MensRights18/05/19 10:35 PM
1

Reverse the genders. You seriously want to try and play this game with someone that's been in this sub for 10 years? Did you really think that was an actual argument? Go push a woman down a flight of stairs. See if they let you out on bail. I probably would. There are a lot of violent male criminals that get out on bail. Bail isn't about the severity of the crime, it's about flight (not literally flying, in case you get confused) risk. Also I bet her sentence (if any) will be less than a man. Wh…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 10:21 PM
6

Well said. Manipulative sluts are more entertaining to watch, than boring homebodies that actually know what respect is.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 10:11 PM
1

If a man did this crime to a woman I don't believe he would have been charged with involuntary manslaughter. There is more than one reason why he would have been charged the same. 1, crimes have strict definitions. 2, murder is one of the hardest crimes to prove because it's about intent. There are others, but these two should suffice. Murder is about premeditation. Even if this was the case for this woman, it is much harder to prove, and a lot of times prosecutors will choose a lesser crime in …
/r/MensRights18/05/19 09:57 PM
0

That her bail is only 100k for mudering someone is pretty telling. This is a lie, because the charge isn't murder. Her bail is appropriate for manslaughter, which is what happened. Men get denied bail all the time. So do women, it all depends on the crime. What agenda might that be? Men's Rights? Hardly, and that's the point. A random act of violence has nothing to do with Men's Rights. An accused criminal getting bail has nothing to do with Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 07:42 PM
1

What kind of bullshit argument is this? Of course it's a thing. Nobody said otherwise. But that's not what you said, at all.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 11:44 PM
0

I won't respect someone who purposely lies in order to push a shitty agenda. Everyone knows that women get lesser sentences, and are treated more favourably in the courts. But bail is a completely different thing. To say that men don't get bail, or are treated more harshly where bail is concerned is a lie. Even the title is a lie. OP is being retarded.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 11:04 PM
1

Doesn't seem like you actually know what bail is, and why it exists. You're being retarded. Men get bail all the time.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 10:50 PM
–

You contributed nothing to the conversation, so downvoting you is actually in the spirit (reddiquette) of how to use the voting system. Downvoting isn't meant to be a mark of disagreement, and upvoting isn't supposed to be agreement. It's about quality. Something that your post absolutely lacks.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 08:15 AM
-3

All people are like that, usually, yes.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 08:24 AM
0

For you to say "keep that one" is putting her on a pedestal, based on a single action, on a single day, and it was (presumably) the first time they met. This is just naive. She's not a good woman based on that act. She's a woman who did a good deed. There's a difference. Good people have a pattern of behaviour that warrants the label. For all anyone knows she very well could be a good woman. Or she could just be really good at dating, and is well aware of the manipulation potential that women ha…
/r/MensRights10/05/19 04:28 AM
10

Since they make a specific point for men to not buy them, it seems like they are literally just the example same ticket. Just buy it, and show up. They will have no way to verify who you are, or who bought the ticket.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 04:00 AM
-3

That's a 4D chess move. It's like showing up early at first, for a new job. Then once you have the reputation as the early bird, people will completely ignore/dismiss/forget the times you show up late, and are more likely to forgive you for it.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 03:58 AM
1

I really shouldn't have to hold your hand on this. You made a statement as if it was a fact, when no reliable data exists. The logic you used was flawed. I used analogies to point out how your logic was flawed... And you responded with a stereotypical dismissal, because you had no real retort. I even specifically explained why you not bringing up the topic, didn't matter, and I explained why I brought it up. Yet here you are, pretending like it came out of nowhere, for no reason.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 11:02 AM
1

Yeah, that's a typical response from someone who has no idea what they're talking about.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 10:35 AM
1

It doesn't matter that you didn't mention abuse. I mentioned it because it's something that people are commonly wrong about, because they feel it's right. Just like what you did, here. There are no reliable statistics on this, because women are not charged/convicted in the same manner as men. They are treated far more leniently. A women has sex with a 12 year old, it's a romp, or fling. A man has sex with a 17 year old, it's rape. A woman drowns her kids in a tub, and it's postpartum depression,…
/r/MensRights05/05/19 10:11 AM
3

People think the same thing about domestic violence, yet actual statistics show that women are aggressors/instigators at near equal levels to men. Also nobody brings up the fact that women are more likely to abuse/kill children. The focus is always on men being creepy around kids, and women being inherently more nurturing. What you doubt/believe is irrelevant to the truth.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 04:21 AM
1

Sure, but you also waste a lot of food to get them when you could just eat that food. Waste isn't the right word for it. And certain things happen in ruminant animals that make it more nutritious. They convert things that humans can't. It's not the same as getting it from plants. And, if that's the logic you want to use... Then how come vegans don't just eat dirt to get minerals? How come they don't eat shit to get B12? Better to save steps, and get it from the source, right? I'm not sure where …
/r/MensRights04/05/19 04:46 AM
1

The person that I was responding to, doesn't. So it seems like your reading comprehension isn't really up to par for this conversation.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 04:08 AM
1

So you think that a tourist will have more of an understanding of a city, over someone who actually was born/raised there?
/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:23 PM
1

Fair enough, but that's all I found googling Vegan and creatine. Reading your sources, I'm sold on the idea that people generally should probably consider taking this stuff. Looks like it's good for brain health generally. The only study on cratine I found was one I instantly discarded because there were only two or three vegans in it. They did say their levels were normal, however I see your point about blood tests. I appreciate that. And I will say that nutritional science is in a really bad p…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:55 PM
1

The money spent was budgeted, as per the mandate of the Government Of Canada. Again... Simply saying that it was budgeted is not an argument. That's how budgets work. They take money from one place, and allocate it to something else. Canada and Canadians budgetted for the investment. You have a really poor idea about how these budgets are formed, and who decides what. The populace did not decide how to budget. That's ridiculous. Investments in impoverished women create small businesses, farms, a…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:12 PM
1

The money spent was budgeted, as per the mandate of the Government Of Canada. ​ https://www.budget.gc.ca/2019/docs/plan/chap-04-en.html#Part-5-Canadas-International-Engagement That's a non-argument. That money was better spent elsewhere. It's impossible for it not to have been taken from somewhere else. Do you even understand how funding, or just money in general, works? The absolute best investment in humanity's future, and most necessary response to humanity's needs. Sure... Ignore all of the …
/r/MensRights30/04/19 11:51 PM
1

He specifically spent money we didn't have to give it to girls/women in developing countries, instead of investing in our own country first. You know problems like homelessness, and suicide, which predominately effect men, and have a much more negative effect on society as a whole. He also promotes forced diversity. And considering the scandals/investigations he's involved in now, it's just another example of the hypocrisy of SJWs (pandering or not).
/r/MensRights30/04/19 09:54 PM
3

He's the PM of Canada, and actively fights against men. Personally I don't think he actually believes this shit. He's just pandering to his market. But the end result is the same.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 01:32 AM
1

This post is just ridiculous to the point I actually can't be bothered, you're not even reading anything and are clearly just here to pick a fight and accuse everybody of being a feminist. Ironic. Yes, I think it's a bad thing to go around smearing people, claiming they're doing something when they're not and reacting in a way they're not without any proof. People like you are cancer to communities and I'm always glad when you give up and leave when you realise you aren't going to get anywhere. …
/r/MensRights30/04/19 01:23 AM
1

I think you're just trying to scream that anybody who doesn't agree with you is a feminist at this point. I think you just proved how stupid you are. If you have really been here as long as you say, then you're either the retard you're trying to claim I am, or you're simply being deliberately disingenuous about the other people in this sub because you would have to be to not notice the context of what is being posted. I understand the context perfectly. And like I explained, nobody gives a shit …
/r/MensRights30/04/19 12:58 AM
1

Unless you've got proof I think you're full of shit, because I've seen this countless times. You try and make claims about the sub, spend several posts arguing with me about it and trying to convince me I'm wrong then when you finally bother to post a link it turns out you're exactly like I thought you would be, full of shit. Are you even responding to the same person, or are you seriously this retarded? No, there aren't some people that have fallen into the same trap as feminists, otherwise you…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 12:36 AM
1

Why are you trying to apply a narrative to this sub which doesn't exist, seems to me you're more pissed off that we're pointing out feminists and women generally actually do pull this shit on a regular basis and then have the gall to complain about being treated that way themselves like they're the only ones who have to deal with it. I'm not painting any narrative... It's already there. There are some people in this sub who are falling into the same trap that Feminists have. It's wrong when they…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 12:30 AM
2

It's not a rule. Again, most people treat this type of stuff as a joke, regardless of the sex/gender. There are lots of jokes about woman's tennis grunting, and objectifying people like Anna Kournikova. Most women's sports deals with this. Male athletes usually have nice asses, and that's joked about as well. There is no issue, or problem here. This isn't a game where you need to match everything that moronic Feminists do. If you think their behaviour about something is ridiculous... It's also r…
/r/MensRights29/04/19 11:10 PM
5

Yes it would still be funny, and is treated as being funny... There are several image macros/memes with the exact scenario you're talking about. David Beckham, the kid with the concession girl, etc... Posting garbage like this takes away from actual issues, and it just shows that you're being petty. Stop being so fucking frail like Feminists.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 08:53 PM
1

That's a common myth. That's an opinion piece, not a study. Every study I've seen, even ones linked to me by vegans... Show that vegans are still lower than omnivores, but "normal" (more on this later). I have something with B12 in every time I eat. Most vegans try to. Meat eaters don't even think about if they are getting enough. Some meat eaters don't have to go out of their way to get it. Some are still low, because of the other shit they eat. And just because you can add up the values on pap…
/r/MensRights29/04/19 03:24 AM
4

If you know anything about developmental psychology, and dog training, you would know that there are lots of similarities between dogs, and children. Learning to treat a dog properly doesn't dehumanize children.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 09:33 PM
2

Vegan B12 is freely available. I take it myself. In actual fact, many meat eaters are low on B12. Vegans are chronically low in B12, even with supplementation. And yes, many meat eaters are low in B12 as well, because the Standard American Diet is plant based. Just because you're in the "normal" range on a blood test, doesn't mean it's optimal, and it doesn't mean that your levels are okay. Most people don't understand how RDAs, or blood results work. Including you, apparently. And unless she su…
/r/MensRights27/04/19 08:44 PM
4

Seems like the lack of B12 has made her retarded.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 12:46 PM
8

I'm friends with a family that used to live there. It's just as bad as it's portrayed (if not worse). Being a visitor minimizes the contact you have with the environment, and inherently makes it less likely for you to see how bad it actually is.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 09:53 PM
5

Why is that “feminine? And why is “feminine” a bad thing? which part is “implemented in a harmful way”? Feminine isn't inherently a bad thing, and I never said it was. It's bad in this context, because it specifically emasculates them. Like I said, just because they bought into the dogma, doesn't mean it's beneficial. They are using this as a bonding experience, and a way to open up to each other. That's not dependant on the cuddling. The men sought out the group, and since its free and not open…
/r/MensRights03/04/19 07:55 AM
15

Physical contact is literally a human need. It benefits mental health. Physical contact is not distilled down into cuddling for men. It includes many things. Men will hug each other all the time, they will participate in physical contact, all the time. Just because it's not done in a feminine approved way, doesn't mean it doesn't happen. No one said all men need to do this. It is a group for men created by men for those who might not get enough physical contact in their lives. Isn’t that a good …
/r/MensRights03/04/19 04:41 AM
1

Ok so by your own admission and links, nuclear family has not been the default globally and historically. I never said it was, that's just a strawman you created, because you can't read. So obviously the human race survived and developed without it for 200,000 years. I'm not going to argue about what is optimal, because that's a long topic but also irrelevant. It's directly relevant, since you said "they'll be fine". When in reality, mental illness, and general health problems continue to increa…
/r/MensRights02/04/19 11:08 PM
1

Obviously single-parenthood isn't "optimal" but in our society we have alot of that so we have to work with what we have. Cop out, goalpost moving. This is not related to what your original post was about, is it? And like I said, globally and historically, "the nuclear family" wasn't the norm, it might have been in the case in the US during the 1950's, but it hasn't been the norm globally and historically, where MOST fathers had to be gone for large portions of a child's life. I mean... You're j…
/r/MensRights02/04/19 09:35 PM
1

2 women is not "community"? 2 gay guys is not "community"? Only a man and woman is "community"? That's not what I said though, is it? Learn to read. I mean back in the day they had sailors going out for months/years at a time. Yeah, that's where the community part comes in. Every guy out there didn't come home for supper every night, it has always been primarily mothers raising kids, and this is no different. That's not how it was for the majority of families, at all. But the REAL reality is tha…
/r/MensRights02/04/19 08:48 PM
1

You're adorable.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 08:44 PM
1

No, not really. They're a moron. your kid can't miss what they doesn't experience This is a moronic statement. They miss it specifically because they don't have it, while they see others who do. There is no substitute for a masculine figure in a child's life. This is why it's so important for kids to have male teachers, and masculine (as well as feminine) parents. And if a child has homosexual parents, then they need to find a family member, or friend to fill the gap as well. There's a reason wh…
/r/MensRights01/04/19 11:33 PM
1

For all the faults women have, most of them are decent at parenting, and your kid can't miss what they doesn't experience. As a professional in the mental health field... I can confidently say that you're a fucking moron.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 11:17 AM
1

No, no, you don't follow. These people are saying an event happened to them, not their ancestors. How do you trick 600,000 people into thinking they all heard God speak? Surely, not a likely feat. Yes, yes, I do follow. Your comment, and my reply that you quoted is not talking about a present lie. It's talking about the past lie that Judaism is based on. And answering your question would actually validate my point to begin with. Do you not care to share the truth? I gave you information and a li…
/r/MensRights31/03/19 04:23 AM
1

Look at what you're comparing... Two comments. One with almost 1000 upvotes, and one with almost 650. You're trying to compare these to comments with 97, 28, and 25 upvotes. Are you serious right now?
/r/MensRights29/03/19 07:59 AM
0

I see lots of both. If you want to go ahead and tally all of them up, go ahead. But I'm not going to proclaim with any certainty that one exists in larger numbers than the other.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 12:25 AM
1

Canada is filled with SJWs, and ultra Conservatives. It's not an either/or scenario. There are plenty of posts/comments defending men, and plenty that are anti-male. And both sides scream about being "overrun" by "the enemy".
/r/MensRights26/03/19 09:45 PM
4

Well, when you put up the money for a campaign to try and get a domestic mutilator to be seen as a victim, this is the next logical step.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 09:20 PM
1

There's a difference between a subtle point, and no point. You chose the latter. And then got all MURICA butt hurt. You mentioned Europe. My comment was directly related to Europe. I made no mention about the US, and tax dollars. Learn to read.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 09:07 PM
1

You do understand there is such a thing as medicaid in the U.S right? Yes, most people know that. Has no bearing on what I said though, does it? According to the CMS website, "Medicaid does not provide medical assistance for all poor persons. Even under the broadest provisions of the Federal statute (except for emergency services for certain persons), the Medicaid program does not provide health care services, even for very poor persons, unless they are in one of the designated eligibility group…
/r/MensRights26/03/19 08:55 PM
2

Oh please, go ahead and lecture me about how taxes pay for healthcare access, and how some countries also support private healthcare as an option. I'm sure I know nothing about it, since I'm Canadian, and live in Australia... Two places with fairly common systems.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 11:02 AM
2

In every country but the US, yes.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 09:35 AM
3

They'll live for a long while because of medication, and medical intervention that generates profit for those selling it. They won't die in their 30s. They'll get a heart attack in their 40s, and then require constant medication, monitoring, tests/scans, etc... They'll end up dying in their 50s.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 08:24 AM
2

Anyone looking for info on cardiovascular disease, look up Ivor Cummings on YouTube.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 05:33 AM
877

I'll tell you why... It's the wrong way/time to make that statement. If gives them an easy out. It makes it easier for them to say that you're trying to steal their day, or you're being bigoted. What you (and everyone else) should do, is wait for International Men's Day. Wait for them to not do something, when they have done it for women's day. Point out the hypocrisy when other people can't easily dismiss it. If you post a comparison on Men's Day, they can't say you're trying to distract from t…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 03:31 AM
3

I don't get it... According to this lawyer's site However, combined with a DUI, the charge is elevated to Involuntary Manslaughter under K.S.A. 21-5405 and becomes a Level 4 person felony. Such a charge carries with it a prison sentence of anywhere from 38 to 172 months in prison. She plead guilty to both, and should, by default, spend more time in jail. She would also need to have her license revoked for a year, but that wasn't mentioned.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 09:45 AM
1

If you believe I'm naive for believing in God, all I can say is, good luck with graduating high school I'm more than 10 years older than you. But go ahead, and try to be more condescending, instead of addressing what I said. I hope life doesn't knock you around the way it has me. What a coincidence that the people who have had a rough time, are more likely to believe in god. Or better put... More likely to be manipulated into believing there is a god. Also funny how you think I have never been "…
/r/MensRights22/03/19 03:53 AM
0

Interesting. Have you considered that faith is the same thing as trust, and that having faith in something or someone is not, in fact, 'objectively' stupid. I have considered it. But that's not even close to being true, because they are two completely different concepts. Trust is earned with a history of evidence supporting it. Faith doesn't have that. You can't prove you'll still be alive tomorrow, but you're still planning to do things the next day. You can't trust that the road you're on was …
/r/MensRights22/03/19 02:35 AM
0

I most certainly do. Every religion is based on faith. Faith is by definition, the belief in something that you can't prove. That's objectively stupid. If I told you that I had a 3 foot long penis, would you take that on faith? No, of course not. You would expect some real evidence before you believed it. But if someone tells you a bunch of bullshit about a supreme deity that you could never verify, all of a sudden that's credible?
/r/MensRights21/03/19 11:17 PM
2

Yeah I wasn't trying to be combative with you. Every religion thinks they're the "right one", and all others are wrong. In their case, they chose Judaism.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 08:59 AM
2

You were clearly asking for a proof by counterexample. Yes. It would only take one example to disprove an 'all X are Y' statement. Should be simple, then.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 06:58 AM
3

Are you trying to say Jesus didn't exist? Christianity came to fruition after Jesus was around. No, I don't think the Jesus that was portrayed in the Bible actually existed. There might have been a person named Jesus at some point, but that's entirely different. And your response in no way addresses my point about forcing the Jesus story to fit in with Judaism's future lie. I don't care for who says it, I care for the points he's compiles. There aren't multiple points. There's just the one. A ch…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 06:16 AM
4

To answer your question, Judaism You mean the group that mutilates little boys for literally the stupidest reason? Yup, not stupid at all. Watch the video, address his arguments, and get back to me. Don't really need to, since I already gave an example of why it's stupid. But sure, why not, let's get into it.... His logic is terrible. He says that future lie could not work. Yet that's precisely how Christianity was started. They looked at the "prophetic predictions" from the Jewish texts, and fo…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 05:38 AM
1

That fallacy doesn't apply here. I'm asking to be shown a religion that isn't stupid. I already know there isn't one that currently exists. That doesn't mean that there can't be one, or that it's impossible. For the sake of brevity, I'm not going to go down a list of every religion pointing out how stupid they are. It's much easier for you to simply provide a single example. Also, from your own link... Using bad logic does not necessarily mean the argument is false (or true) But let's go down th…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 03:44 AM
0

Show me one that isn't.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 02:55 AM
-2

That is nothing more than your opinion. Yeah, not quite. Some aspects of religion aren't stupid. But some are... Like blind faith in the ridiculous. Also, my religion says it’s not nice to call people and their beliefs stupid. Checkmate. Well that's one of the things that it's wrong about. And I didn't say religious people are stupid, I said religion itself is stupid. There's a difference. There are lots of examples where smart people believe stupid things.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 02:05 AM
3

It's not bigotry to label religions as stupid. They are objectively stupid. Anything you could point to as a positive, is easily replaced with something secular, that doesn't force shitty, superstitious nonsense onto other people. I'm sure you're a good person, but you're good despite your religion, not because of it.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 11:51 PM
7

The purpose for both is religious bullshit, and/or profit.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 11:49 PM
9

Jewish lobby groups put a lot of money into keeping it legal, globally.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 11:47 PM
1

I don't watch movies because they're popular, or make money. Their profit margins have no bearing on quality. How are you getting this butt hurt over stupid superhero movies?
/r/MensRights19/03/19 12:04 AM
0

Using the word "genius" for Marvel movies is laughable. If that's your thing, cool. But most of them are just not that entertaining to me. And I've been a comic fan for a long time.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 11:28 PM
-4

It wasn't "rife" with it. They pointed out that women don't fly combat missions, but didn't make it into a big deal. And then there was the New Doubt song. Everything else was the most basic paint by numbers shit that 90% of the Marvel movies fall victim to.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:42 AM
2

Of course there's going to be cringe... It's a Marvel movie. Almost all of them have cringey moments.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:40 AM
-8

there's a scene where some dude on a motorcycle says "smile for me", she then steals his motorcycle. As if women being told to smile is a global epidemic and finally a woman got revenge. That's not an example of man hating. Every man in the movie seems to talk down to her in some way and she ends up kicking their ass. Do you mean the bad guys talk down to her? Because that actually makes sense, because it's not because she's a girl. And of course she's going to kick their ass, she's the hero ffs…
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:03 AM
0

So the man hating isn't coming from the movie at all, then.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 04:44 AM
4

Just so everyone is aware... More individual animals die due to plant agriculture (death by harvesting) compared to animal agriculture. This is especially true if you eat grass finished Beef. It's also because of plant agriculture that bees are dying, that the topsoil is deteriorating, and the destruction of local ecosystems is abundant. Vegans (and Feminists) suffer from cognitive dysfunction as a result of nutrient deficiencies. Specifically Vitamin D, B12, and Creatine. They are also chronica…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 12:11 AM
16

Just look at the shit show with Chris Pratt, right now. Even when there's proof he's not affiliated with the anti-lgbt church, people are still trying to crucify him. Just because Ellen Page made a tweet. A tweet that is railroading him for guilt by association, when she's been in movies made by sexual abusers. Which falls under her definition of "support".
/r/MensRights13/03/19 03:25 AM
1

but not mention of the extra cost of making it Budget is $300 million. It took in 1.3 billion at the box office. There was no "extra cost" in making it. or the cancellation of the other side movies (yes, a TV show is coming, but that's not comparable). You're an ideological idiot Obi-Wan was cancelled because Solo sucked. Boba Fett was cancelled because of Josh Trank. Yoda was cancelled because it was a stupid idea to begin with. They have confirmed another trilogy, and another series of movies …
/r/MensRights11/03/19 08:35 AM
2

You said that the movies (plural) did poorly because of the "backlash" of TLJ. Solo was the only one released, and it did poorly because it was shit. It had nothing to do with TLJ. And TFA would have killed any Star Wars "inertia", but TLJ still made over a billion dollars. And the 3rd movie is going to make over a billion too.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:59 AM
1

It's because Disney pushed the movie everywhere they could. They've marketing and pushed this harder than any other of their films in Disney's history. Otherwise, it would never have done as well. Yeah. That's usually how blockbuster movies work. Nothing different happened with this movie. Especially if the general public were aware of the shitshow of marketing surrounding it, including Larson's sexist comments. There's always shit that happens that the general public doesn't know about. And eve…
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:00 AM
0

People regardless of side, just love to get riled up about stupid shit.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 05:52 AM
2

Anyone they don't want to have an opinion can be easily labelled as a "bot", and have their review, comment, etc, vanished. Too easy. Yes. But just because that's true, doesn't mean that's exactly what happened. Cinemascore isn't immune from trolling by the Feminist SJWs. There's no way in a sane world that this movie deserves an A. Maybe a B- or something. The general public likes formulaic garbage. The movie is the epitome of formulaic garbage... Just like with most MCU movies. This shouldn't …
/r/MensRights11/03/19 05:08 AM
-4

You just got caught in a lie, and I'm the one who's delusional? That's funny.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:53 AM
-5

So it's impossible that they removed bots? It's impossible that the movie is getting good reviews, even though Cinemascore (which is people's opinions directly after watching the movie) is still A? Some of you people are just plain fucking stupid, and just as ideological as moronic Feminists.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:51 AM
-4

There was only one movie (Solo) that was released after TLJ, and the reviews (which were still mostly positive), weren't why Solo barely made money. And they're also making a Mandalorian TV series.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:46 AM
-10

...It made over a billion dollars, and retained a high review score? Because that's exactly what happened.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:21 AM
–

Ummm... It is doing well. It has an A Cinemascore, and it made a load of money. I personally thought the movie sucked, but don't lie in order to push a shitty agenda.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 02:50 AM
10

This is really a rhetorical question, but I see it a ton in education As a psychologist that works closely with schools, and educational staff on a regular basis... It's because most women just flat out suck at handling things. The women that can handle it are seen as cold, and stern. Yet they're the ones that are getting shit done... They're not gossiping all day, and crying in the break room because of some coworker drama.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 11:41 PM
1

Yeah it's pretty ironic. I have a couple physical deal breakers as well. Physical attractiveness is pretty important. And the whole "beauty fades" crowd doesn't realize that it's only applicable when you're elderly, anyway. That's a solid 30-50 years when beauty doesn't fade.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 10:10 PM
2

Aren't all of the clothes we wear made in sweatshops in third world countries by people with little or no power to elevate their status. Only if you choose to buy those clothes. You don't have to buy name brand shit, or things with memes on them. You can choose to not wear cringey clothing, or overpriced, exploitative garbage.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 08:52 PM
4

Reddit has better usability than dedicated forums. And it also has a higher population compared to similar alternatives. The trick is to avoid the bullshit subs.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 06:53 PM
3

/r/Stoicism /r/Epicureanism Good psychologists/psychiatrists (stay away from therapists) will actually take ideas/concepts/practices from these two philosophies, and teach you how to practice them. You can learn on your own, but it's harder to do so without guidance for some people. Some people might need medication temporarily in order to facilitate a change in perspective. Do what you gotta do to get better.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 03:55 AM
-6

Inconsiderate definitely. Bitchy, for sure. But I wouldn't go so far as to say abusive. Nobody knows much else about what their lives are like, to make that assessment.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:31 AM
2

Americans are over-medicated though. And this is one reason why. Because in capitalism, the product is worth what someone is willing to pay. These pills are pushed onto people who simply don't know any better, or are too lazy to change their lifestyle. These companies can't market to the rest of the World, because it's either developing/poor countries that could never afford it to begin with, or the government actually protecting their citizens from price gouging. It's not a mistake, or coincide…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 04:38 AM
-7

Depression can play a number on people. And I'm not excusing her behaviour, even though the morons who downvoted me think I am. Even something as simple, and quick as trimming a few hairs is just something that constantly slips by, because it's not important enough to make a priority, and it's not small enough to just get over with. It plays on her insecurities, so every time she has to deal with it, it makes her feel worse, even though she's actively trying to better her situation. And it just …
/r/MensRights27/02/19 04:02 AM
1

Sure, the opposition against Castor Semenya was because she's female, exceeding expectations and people's comfort level, and not because she's producing as much testosterone as a male and the competition isn't fair. Funny because the leaked reports state that she has intersex traits. The I.A.A.F. general secretary, Pierre Weiss, said of Semenya, “She is a woman, but maybe not 100 percent.”
/r/MensRights27/02/19 03:36 AM
1

I partially agree. It could have been a lot better if they didn't fall back on the gendered nonsense. Yes, when you smash your racket on the court, you're being hysterical, and irrational. John McEnroe was called all of those, and worse, when he did it. It's not just women/girls who hear that, when they get overly emotional. They pushed that BS idea that the world is against them because they're girls/women. What they should have done, is say that people are against them because they aspire to b…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 03:27 AM
1

This is a good time for people in Alberta to actually use this to bring attention to the issue. All of these animal procedures are bad (especially declawing), and should be banned, unless necessary (like a dog that keeps breaking their tail).
/r/MensRights27/02/19 03:20 AM
2

It's also unhealthy. Like do people really think it's a good idea to remove 90% of their primary sex hormone? Really?
/r/MensRights27/02/19 03:18 AM
-4

This doesn't have anything to do with fat acceptance. It's all about depression, laziness, and whatever else she's going through. She has a legit medical condition (PCOS), which can fuck with your body/mind in a number of ways. And almost everyone in that thread is supporting the guy. Tagging this as "Feminism" is inappropriate.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 01:56 AM
1

You raise some interesting points. But you're being a bit reductionist when you only look at drug manufacturing. There are lots of places outside the US that are pioneering new medicine, and technology. This is way better than just making pills. Pills are a management tool. Technology, therapy, and preventative medicine are cures. What the US is doing, strictly because it's capitalistic, is creating long term revenue, by treating symptoms (for the most part). A quote by the article you linked...…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 01:45 AM
2

What's even more hilarious is that women vote, and they are picking men to represent them. Yet somehow she sees this as a problem.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 01:36 AM
1

Or perhaps... Sarcasm isn't something that is translated well using text. Usually tone of voice is the sarcasm giveaway.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 11:06 PM
211

1 and 2: Perpetuating violent male aggression. 3: Applying toxic aluminum oxide onto baby skin. Terrible parent. 4: Pushing male child into already male dominated rock music. Toxic. Too triggered to even keep watching. /s
/r/MensRights24/02/19 08:55 AM
1

You're listening to the wrong people. Stop being swayed by the opinions of retards.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 04:11 AM
2

The only problem I have is that Tilly is fat, and yet managed to out run actually fit people, while in the middle of having a psychotic breakdown.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 02:51 AM
5

She was already set for life. Her parents are rich, she went to one of the most prestigious private schools before the movies.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 02:43 AM
1

The Australian court system is a fucking joke. Nothing to do with politics. It's just complete garbage. Because it's all about SJW bullshit. A Sudanese teen kicked a cop in the face while he was trying subdue on of his friends. The cop got injured, and the kid ran off, and got away. Here's the kicker... The kid was already on bail for other violent offenses, and a breaking and entering. He got no jail time, no deportation, nothing. 2 women attacked a paramedic and put him in the hospital. They g…
/r/MensRights20/02/19 02:41 AM
1

Don't take it out of office, unless you are speaking to a lawyer, or an arbiter. You need it for records. So if you need to go above HR's head (within the company) you can.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 07:55 AM
1

You can call people out without having a "movement".
/r/MensRights19/02/19 03:16 AM
1

I think you need to realize that this is the exact definition of empathy. If you had direct, and personal experience, it wouldn't be called empathy.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 02:40 AM
1

You use e-mail. They can delete it on their end, and pretend they never got it... But you have it saved (hopefully). You can also take notes whenever you speak with them in person. Either during the talk, or directly afterwards. Yes, this counts, especially if they have no notes whatsoever, or even deny ever speaking with you. You document dates/times, what was said, by whom, everything.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 02:30 AM
28

But as John spiraled downward, Lorena found strength in the scars of her ordeal. From IMDB plot summary. Fuck Jordan Peele, and the director. https://www.imdb.com/list/ls041427921/videoplayer/vi2332932633?ref_=nm_vd_sd2019_lor_i_1 Rage inducing video.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 10:17 PM
1

I don't think he's being pressured at all. He was an ugly fat ass, that used to get bullied. Now he's starting to get buff, and is doing BJJ. Seems like a former soyboy doing some major projecting.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 11:58 PM
1

I can’t find sex or relationships whenever I want. Yes you can. Seriously. Your standards are too high. You can lower your standards, and get laid whenever you want. A guy could literally walk up to a homeless crack addict, and still get rejected. I know girls who are virgins in their early 20’s not through choice. Standards.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 10:46 PM
1

It’s not by choice that was kind of my point. There’s a difference between just having sex and having a relationship. Then you're having the wrong conversation. Because that's not what we were talking about. Why do people always say woman get sex whenever we want? I personally don’t find that’s true. This is what you originally said. This is what I responded to. Trying to move the goalposts, and talking about relationships is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 09:40 AM
2

No shortage of fetishes? Like what? Women as fat as Tess Holiday are married, and popping out kids. There's no shortage of men who are into fat chicks. There's no shortage of men who are into nerdy girls. No shortage of men that will fuck a butter face. Trailer/ghetto trash, drug addict girls, etc... Have you ever been to a shitty strip club, or seen crack addicted hookers? They can all have guys if they just wanted some dick. No question about it. I went to uni with girls who were attractive an…
/r/MensRights12/02/19 12:58 AM
1

Why do people always say woman get sex whenever we want? I personally don’t find that’s true. I’ve been single for nearly 6 years I’ve have sex twice in those years. It’s just a stereotype. Some girls can but so can some guys. It’s not all women. Because it's true. There's no shortage of fetishes that a woman can use to attract a man. Men are limited in this way. Let's be real here... If a woman dropped their standards, they could easily get dick 24/7. If a guy dropped his standards, he would st…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 11:48 PM
9

Depends on the person. For some women, they want to feel "safe". They prefer taller men, because they think there's an inherent strength there. They fantasize about being man handled, and can't envision a shorter guy being able to do that. They also want to be protected (or most likely use the man as a tool of aggression) in case shit goes down... AKA when she acts like an asshole. Some women though, are just self conscious, and would feel odd walking around in public with a shorter guy. They wo…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 11:24 AM
18

Good thing socialism/communism isn't a male concept, right?
/r/MensRights09/02/19 05:04 AM
2

Seriously, how stupid are you? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_trafficking Human trafficking is the trade of humans for the purpose of forced labour, sexual slavery, or commercial sexual exploitation for the trafficker or others. You can't consent to being trafficked, since it's inherent that it violates consent. And it also has nothing to do with illegal border crossing.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 05:11 PM
8

"little people" is more offensive FYI. You're a complete moron. Also what's wrong with that is the whole thing of making a game out of someone's genetics is abusive. Explain how. You might be able to Stockholm Syndrome some into agreeing to it but that doesn't make the abuse ok. I don't think you know what that actually means.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 05:13 AM
17

How is that a problem? If they consent to being thrown, what's the issue, here? Are you trying to be outraged about something that the participant (pseudo victim) agreed to? Are you saying that little people (the fact you used midget, while trying to concern troll is hilarious) aren't independent enough to consent?
/r/MensRights06/02/19 03:36 AM
6

Stoicism, is the OPPOSITE of not giving a fuck. It's all about your duty (virtue) to yourself, and society. That person is a moron. Among the virtues some are primitive and some are derived. The primitive ones are prudence, manly courage, justice, and temperance. And subordinate to these, as a kind of species contained in them, are magnanimity, continence, endurance, presence of mind, wisdom in council... Sounds a lot like toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:45 AM
9

You do realize that I said he was inciting rape, right? Why do you lie? He is inciting violence, which is not a form of speech protected by the US's first amendment. This is what you said. And you're wrong about it.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:19 AM
2

Doesn't mean anything. He could easily say that he never touched her, but we don't know that. She could be covered in bruises or cuts. We don't know if they would be self inflicted or not. We literally know next to nothing about any of this. The only thing we do know, is that a guy recorded a video, accusing his girlfriend of domestic violence. That's it.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 01:52 AM
2

I'm on the guy's side, but honestly... The video shows nothing. You don't see her attacking his car, you don't see her attacking him, you don't see how he got messed up. It's literally the same level of evidence as a simple written statement from a single party.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 01:40 AM
6

Or how if a mother kills her child, it's infanticide, but when a father kills his child, it's murder.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 10:54 AM
1

Complain about it.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 10:26 AM
2

/r/Wetshaving /r/wicked_edge or /r/beards
/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:16 AM
4

/r/Wetshaving /r/wicked_edge
/r/MensRights15/01/19 09:10 PM
7

What about male teachers, A huge minority. aides Almost non existent. And an aide, in what field? "Aide" is vague, but it's literally an assistant, where men are also a minority. neighbors, grandparents, uncles, step-fathers The single mother problem is mainly a black community problem. The things you listed above, don't really exist, because single motherhood has been advertised as being positive, for so long. What makes it worse is that middle to upper class white women, have pushed this idea …
/r/MensRights15/01/19 07:26 PM
3

New Gillette ad Challenges Men to Shave Their ‘Toxic Masculinity’... While simultaneously encouraging white knighting, which is seen as Toxic Masculinity.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:45 AM
2

Fine, agreed for the most part, but there's been a lot more campaigning about men's mental health recently. So that's something good. And at least they're doing their job when it comes to taking abused kids away from their moms. Progress is good. But they rarely take kids away from moms. They will bend over backwards to keep kids with mothers, and bend over backwards to remove kids from fathers. I'm still torn whether this is good or bad, because the foster/orphan system is garbage. How do you k…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 05:47 AM
3

Ok, they have some flaws, but they are genuinely useful in many cases like in mental health, at least in some countries. Women get far better treatment, more services, and more campaigns towards awareness of a particular issue than men do. Even homelessness is really only portrayed as a problem because of the number of women it involves. Yeah some, not all. Again, there's a lot of overlap, but it doesn't mean it's most of them. In others, it's optional, and most women take those classes anyway. …
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:25 PM
5

Social services seem pretty decent and I don't know if they have an anti-male bias. They aren't, and they do. It's because of social services that the mother is considered the default parent, and the father is an accessory, especially in the eyes of the court. Just because there's a lot of gender studies people or feminists in psychology, doesn't mean that it's dominated by them or even the majority. What do you think the gender gap is in those fields? For some psych degrees, a gender studies cl…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:54 PM
6

They were married for 25 years. If it was just about the money, she could have left at any point, and be ridiculously wealthy.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:47 PM
3

Have you been watching what goes on in the practicing psychology world? Or human resources? Human resource staff almost always have a psychology degree. Same with social services, and schools. Look at how those things have been progressing, and you'll see that you're wrong.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:38 PM
5

No, the word I'm looking for is the one I used. There are a lot of men in psychology, but it's dominated by women. And I never said there was no value in psychology.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:19 PM
4

Psychology, and Philosophy are two very different things. One is dominated by women who are gender studies ideologues that actually needed to make money for a living. They try to make everything fit into their worldview no matter how distorted it gets. The other is a field dominated by men, that focuses on trying to find truth.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 07:56 PM
8

It is plagued in the same way. Just look at nutritional science and how it's practiced most of the time. The shit that Ancel Keys came up with was just bad science, but he was very convincing. 90% of nutrition science is based off of Observational studied that are meant to form a hypothesis for a proper study. But these groups use them as causal conclusions. It's absurd.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 08:23 PM
18

A kid has become a drag queen, and performs in gay bars with revealing clothing. He is pretty much being groomed by a man who is a convicted pedophile, and the mother is justifying all of it by quoting NY state laws about allowing minors into bars, and saying that his clothing is "appropriate for entertainment. RuPaul has even endorsed the kid, and said he's the future of America. Honestly, I never had a problem with the drag community until this shit storm. Thankfully there's a lot of people wh…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 08:18 PM
1

That's fair enough. My bad for not catching the sarcasm.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 08:13 AM
1

Are you talking about the wallet comment? Because that's rather benign, and not mocking at all.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 05:36 AM
2

GPs are glorified Wiki articles. Which means that they have decent general knowledge, and you need to double check what they say anyway, if it's important. They are also taught a lot of things in school that are simply wrong. They also don't have the time to keep up to date on new science/information. There's literally not enough time in the day for them to have a family, to take care of themselves, and then to try and keep up to date with every medical issue. Despite this though, the arrogance …
/r/MensRights07/01/19 05:31 AM
-1

Black women are the biggest pushers of toxic masculinity, and they were pushed into it, by middle aged, upper class white women.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 09:57 PM
2

It's not even worth talking to you about this. Your reading comprehension just plain sucks. The snake not being the devil, is theological back peddling. Unless you think that a serpent can actually talk. And you seem to think that knowledge is a bad thing. And that's sad. But let me ask you this... If god is all knowing (omniscient) how come he didn't know that adam/eve would eat the fruit? And if he's all powerful (omnipotent) how come he didn't create humans to be smart enough to not be deceiv…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 06:59 PM
2

So does the post office. The idea is he goes very fast. And that is still not the same. Standard Xtian logic. Moving the goalposts, when you can't admit that you're wrong. No shit the post office does it... They employ how many thousands of people? No. That is the context. "I'll write a letter to Santa!" is a classic threat. Seems like you missed that little joke. You know since Xtians love saying that exact phrase every time you bring something up that is a contradiction, or shows something the…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 08:43 AM
1

'Santa' is not so vast the universe cannot contain him, so he is not omnipresent - and there are literally zero examples of him being omnipotent. Well, he's has to be one or the other, since he can visit every house in a single night. The closest is omniscient - but even there it's not the case. Traditionally the parent writes the guy a letter or he spies on you with elves. That's been misinterpreted, and you're taking it out of context. He knows everything. And if punishing the bad and rewardin…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 07:27 AM
0

Santa is Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent. Rewards the good, punishes the bad. Parents teach their children these things in order to coerce good behaviour out of them. Seems very similar.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 07:10 AM
2

Okay, so you want to nit pick that one point, since you have no answer to anything else I said. Fine. At best, his discoveries would have been delayed by a decade or so. Which isn't really a lot. The whole point is that he wasn't some magical genius. He just put in the effort into something specific. There would have been several people in that era who could've done what he did. Just like with Hawking. He wasn't special. He had no unique gifts... He lost his mobility, and spent his time reading,…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 03:56 AM
1

Einstein would have been fine doing something else. He would have contributed in some other area, and someone else would have done what he did. People aren't special. There is no individual that isn't replaceable. You can on, and on about wasted potential, and that is a shame... But there's no way around it. The ones who wouldn't waste their potential, won't. There are no secret geniuses that end up doing roofing, because they couldn't get a break.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 03:46 AM
1

Calling it a religion gives it legitimacy. Only if you think Cloud Santa is real.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:48 AM
5

You're adorable.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 11:38 PM
5

Yup, and that's a shame.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 11:37 PM
23

So did Bill Gates, and plenty of other people across every industry. Having them flourish after their initial push is what matters, because a lot of the kids given the same advantages don't come anywhere close to that.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 11:21 PM
9

I know you're a moron. You've been proving it over and over in this thread. Here's proof... I'm making fun of your statement that you know all you need to know. I never mentioned anything about travel. I never called into question the places you have travelled to. The fact that your reading comprehension is this bad, means that there's more for you to know. Which makes your statement, and you, moronic.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 11:19 PM
8

i know all i need to know Ignorance is bliss, isn't it?
/r/MensRights27/12/18 11:14 PM
7

Jewish people in favour of keeping MGM are mostly Conservative. And outside of N.A., and Israel, you'll find plenty of Liberals who oppose it.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 11:12 PM
5

The very first thing feminists fought for, was the automatic right to vote. That right there, is nit equality, since the men didn't get that right. And when a bill was put forward to have women sign up for the draft, they fought it. So no... Feminism is not about equality. It never was. Otherwise they never would've split off from the Egalitarian movement.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 07:47 PM
1

I didn't call him a pedo. I said he was a rapist, that hangs around with pedos. There's a lot of overlap between the two groups.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 06:30 PM
1

A male underage teenager at the very least. Him and Brian Singer are part of that whole Hollywood gay pedo circle.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 09:34 PM
1

Rousey isn't a rapist (hopefully). So her doing a skit about rape, is like Kevin Spacey, who is a rapist, doing a skit about domestic violence. The point isn't about their crimes. It's about their actions, and then trying to joke about something just as serious, that is similar. It's in really bad taste for SNL, but they buy into the SJW shit.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 09:12 PM
28

That wasn't funny, at all. But then again SNL stopped being funny a long, long time ago. What I actually do find funny, is how Rousey is doing this skit, when she's an admitted domestic abuser. It would be like having Kevin Spacey in a skit about domestic violence.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 07:07 AM
2

Lots of drag queens fuck guys while in drag. Also, most drag queens have a history of trauma/abuse, which triggers/creates mental illness, and in some cases perpetuates the cycle of abuse. Grooming, whether it's intentional or not, is never okay.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 01:10 AM
2

That's one guy, who did something. The majority of US soldiers look the other way. Which means precisely, that they are "cool with it".
/r/MensRights17/12/18 01:06 AM
1

Clothes are a different thing, and would be misleading, not exactly false advertising. It's shitty either way.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 09:35 AM
4

The NDP died when Jack Layton did.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 07:08 AM
15

It starts off well, but she misses the mark at the end. I think it's a disgusting tool that has been weaponised, predominantly against women, and is responsible for so many more problems than we realise because we are blinded by the media, our culture and our society. The problem here, is that women are the ones who perpetuate its use. It's a lie to the consumer She's not wrong about any of the things she says about this. It should technically be false advertising. It's bad for the person being …
/r/MensRights02/12/18 07:04 AM
7

I disagree. She is still responsible for holding an opinion without any due diligence, in regards to research. I don't care about hiw she wad raised, or what society is saying. Yes, I can understand why her initial reaction would lean a certain way, but I will not absolve someone who doesn't spend 5min looking into something beforehand.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 07:21 PM
17

If she really cared, she would have looked into it herself. You're just playing her game, and because of that, you've already lost.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 12:44 AM
-2

Anyone that tries to push fruit as healthy, should be ignored.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 07:36 PM
1

http://sciencenordic.com/wealthy-women-voted-first As you can read, gender wasn't an important aspect. Class was, since different classes of women were treated differently.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 03:21 AM
34

Rich people, not just men, but women too. Anyone who honestly believes that these issues are based on gender, and not economics, is retarded. And just so you know, not every man was allowed to vote. It's fucking hilarious how Femimists always try to compare poor women with rich men. They never compare poor women to poor men, and rich women to poor men.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 11:27 PM
5

Current female population is: 3,794,429,138. If only 1% of them does this, that is 38 million people. That's a lot of people, and it's reasonable to say that it's an everyday occurance. And that's when you assume (wrongly) that it's only 1%. Emotional manipulation like this is a common trait in BPD. And that effects people at 2%-6% of the population, where most of them are women. So inherently, those numbers go up. And they go up even more, when you factor in other mental illnesses, that also sh…
/r/MensRights13/11/18 10:40 PM
4

The same Don Lemon that demonised Kanye West for speaking with someone The same Don Lemon that talks shit about Black culture, while perpetuating it by allowing people to call Kanye a token negro on his show? What a stand up guy.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 11:40 PM
2

The great majority in the US are poor. Compared to whom? And most everybody in the world has a home. So I think your definition of the 1% includes far greater that 1% of the world population and includes a great many that are poor. In short, it's bullshit. I love how people conveniently nit pick a single point, while ignoring the fact that you are supposed to take into account context. Pointing out that mist people have "homes", does not justify ignoring running water, medical care/medicine/food…
/r/MensRights02/11/18 03:36 AM
1

You never identified the exact parameters of being in the top 1%, and I'm not sure that living in a cardboard box (which is a home of sorts) really makes you a top 1%er. Don't pretend like there needs to be a scientific definition. Being homeless is mutually exclusive with having a home, and no, a cardboard box doesn't count. That fact that you're being this willfully ignorant is evidence that you have no retort, and are just stretching in order to continue arguing. The whole occupy wallstreet b…
/r/MensRights01/11/18 11:33 PM
0

Just because 1 person here, claims to be homeless, doesn't mean that you are. Also being homeless kind of disqualifies them, since they don't meet the criteria I used. Learn to read.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 09:30 PM
-1

You're a 1%er. The fact that you have Internet, running water, and a home (supposedly) puts you in that category. 1%ers aren't just parodies of the monopoly man.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 09:14 PM
4

Psychopaths are not inherently murderous. Stop using pop culture definitions that are not only wrong, but outdated.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 09:27 PM
2

I think you need to go back, a pay more attention to who was saying what, exactly.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 11:22 PM
2

TRP doesn't use benevolent sexism? Are you serious right now? The idea that women are weaker, and lesser than man, therefore they need to be helped and trained, is one of the core traits of benevolent sexism. And it seems like you struggle with reading... Again, at no point did I say they liked them. Which is what you asserted. I never said anything about my personal feelings towards them.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 09:50 PM
1

At no point did i say they liked them.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 01:13 AM
2

Okay fair enough, you're not the same person. So why would you respond so flippantly? You still have not said how it's goalpost moving.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 12:48 AM
2

You specifically asked, and i provided a relevant response. How is that goalpost moving? They can talk all they want about how bad it is, but actions speak louder than words.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 11:51 PM
0

Studies have shown that women, and even female feminists, like benevolent sexism.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 08:58 PM
19

They're just as bad, if not worse.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 04:31 AM
1

The religion of peace.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 09:19 AM
130

"My daughter is over there watching", and "You white piece of shit". Priceless.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 09:23 PM
-2

It's a video game. Not an educational tool to learn about historical battles/strategies.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 11:16 AM
3

The only thing that's stopping them from calling themselves "r/malefeminists" is that they think they'd offend feminists by calling themselves male feminists. I think it's because they wouldn't be able to point to it as a go-to sub for men on the default subs. Whenever someone asks about a place for mens rights, there are always people talking about how balanced, and fair menslib is.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:57 PM
2

Well POWs survivors now are different, than the ones in Pochahontas’ era. If anything, POWs were treated worse.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 09:21 PM
7

There's a reason why ton of people would rather see their perpatrator go to prison than execute them. There's also a tonne of people who would prefer the opposite. That's not a strong argument for either side. yes it is, For you, maybe. however you're still getting raped once a day or so, and you're literally a prisoner. Ask POWs who survived, if they are glad that they weren't killed.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 04:54 AM
13

That option is always available though isn't it? It's not like they were pulling out finger nails, and living out some Saw/Hostel scenario, on a daily basis.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 03:08 AM
18

Dead people can't escape. Regardless of the situation, one is inherently better regardless of the minuscule chance of the situation getting better. The point is that even a .01% chance of betterment is inherently better than 0%.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 02:42 AM
43

If it's worse than death, how come they're called survivors? That's like saying dying from cancer is better than beating it.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 01:09 AM
5

I wouldn't say so. Feminism is a product of humanity, and humans are much closer to chimps than bonobos. Chimps are violent, angry, territorial, etc... Bonobos aren't, and it's not because of "culture", or "social constructs". Feminism is the result of religiosity going away, without people becoming more self aware of their biases, and persecution complex. Your examples don't really hold up... [Female bonobos] make really strong friendships with other females. There is no equivalent in humans. W…
/r/MensRights23/09/18 12:57 AM
4

It's also not encouraging when a lot of doctors are simply incompetent. GPs are just glorified wikipedia articles. Most are only useful for referrals, and refilling scripts.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 09:38 PM
1

This would be true for men vs men. But it's not true for women vs women, or men vs women. Strength advantage is huge, and can easily overcome weaknesses in other areas of your game.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/18 04:10 AM
2

I find it hilarious how you ignore the actual point of the reply (which refutes your point), and focus on something that is already answered.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 12:05 PM
1

Stating an upper limit before it does damage, doesn't mean it's beneficial. It simply means it's not detrimental overall. Also that's 1 cup per week, not every day like OP suggests. Alcohol of any type is literally a poison. The studies that suggest it's good for your heart are not well done. For example... They didn't take into account the social aspect of drinking. This social activity would lower overall stress levels, which is what is actually healthy for your heart. Not the drinking.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 11:58 AM
6

Drinking post birth (in correct amounts- one cup of red wine for women of average size, 2 for men) is good for your heart and stomach. This is highly debated still.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 03:35 AM
2

Google it
/r/MensRights07/09/18 06:26 AM
6

What the heck is a circumcised "vaginas"? The issue here is that your reading comprehension sucks ass. Every woman I have been with has found uncircumcised penis unattractive and have even made fun of them. This is plural. My response... Every woman man I have been with has found uncircumcised penis vaginas unattractive and have even made fun of them. ...Is plural. Your response attempts to force singular onto plural, which is why it doesn't make sense to you. Are you talking about a labiaplasty…
/r/MensRights07/09/18 02:22 AM
–

Every woman man I have been with has found uncircumcised penis vaginas unattractive and have even made fun of them. Thank god my parents circumcised me. As someone who lives in the US Egypt, being circumcised is the norm. I have no issues with my penis pussy or sensation. This huge circle jerk for circumcision on men's women’s rights needs to take a different turn and call out hospitals/doctors for fucking up and not the circumcision itself. This is the exact same reasoning used by people who mu…
/r/MensRights07/09/18 01:41 AM
4

You didn't make a point that could be disproved. When you can actually formulate a proper opinion, then you can come back and ask a question.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:03 AM
2

Say if 1 woman fire fighter sucked - we'd all clamor to the comments and say, 'see? this is why women shouldn't dadadadada..' This is what you said... What you linked, doesn't support that statement. You literally did the exact thing you were complaining about.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 08:25 AM
2

Hate to break it to you, but you just proved yourself.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 08:22 AM
1

It is, but if you're concerned then alerting someone who's equipped to make sure the kids are safe is the right thing to do. Social Workers are next to last on the list of people that would keep them safe, unfortunately. The tweet is evidence of that. I've seen it an abundance of times. They simply don't give a shit about boys, and are all too happy to remove children from shitty homes, to just go ahead and place in a similarly shitty home with strangers.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 11:53 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:14 AM
5

To promote their social media accounts.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 11:49 AM
2

Authoritarian social/cultural/group pressure to conform, is not the same as an individual raping someone.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 12:14 AM
3

Now you're just being stupid. 80+% of the prison population grew up in a fatherless home. That's not a coincidence. That's a fucking catalyst. It's not even close to an assumption. It's as if you were saying that any child who grows up without a father is doomed to become a terrible person or wind up imprisoned when that isn't true. Yeah, you read what I wrote, but you didn't actually understand it, since you said the same thing again... And now, I'm 100% done, cause you're either trolling, or t…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 10:54 PM
3

You have inmates who can come from motherless homes or upbringings too who can turn out terrible. Why do you keep defaulting to this fallacious argument? I never said it doesn't happen. It isn't always a matter of having a mother or father present, it's a matter of having a good and caring parent present who raises you properly and sets you down the right path. And what do you define as "properly"? You can't always say coming from a single parent household is a blueprint for a bad life when you …
/r/MensRights13/08/18 10:38 PM
2

that isn't a catalyst for them turning out bad or down a bad path. Except it is. There's plenty of people who've grown up with both parents or had a priveleged life who still turned out terrible. That's true, but looking at it proportionally, it's not even close to being the same. It's all a matter of how the person is raised and treated when they're young that shapes them when they hit adulthood. Partially, yes. Genetics has a lot to play into it as well. Single parent or not, the way the perso…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 10:27 PM
3

Your anecdotal experience doesn't refute the facts. I never said all, or every person, did I? Fact is... That's predominately what happens. Most criminals come from broken homes. Your exception doesn't disprove the rule. It's never someone's fault if they have a bad other parent who isn't there to get them together as a family. At what point did I place blame on anyone? There's single mothers and fathers who go above and beyond for their kids when the other parent was never there for them. Good …
/r/MensRights13/08/18 10:07 PM
1

They're using IATs (Implicit Association Tests) for fucks sake. At best the results could state... "Word games make it seem like there's an in-group bias, but we have no fucking clue"
/r/MensRights13/08/18 04:28 AM
2

I can agree with that.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 03:39 AM
5

A lot of Conservatives talk about "family values", and how fathers are so important. But they take it a step too far, and take the religious idea of man/woman only, and that ends up hurting them. And they also take an archaic stance on crime, which ends up creating more fatherless families. Both sides are doing stupid shit that hurts their stated goals.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 02:20 AM
14

Because they don't connect those things together. Black people is mostly affected by men's issues, but the Left focuses on accessory problems, like crime, hopelessness, toxic culture, etc... They don't recognize that lack of fathers is the core of the matter.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 01:55 AM
34

There are plenty of Conservative types that care about the poor. They just don't agree with the Left about how it should be addressed.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 12:46 AM
1

So was I.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 10:34 PM
4

That's not really true at all. Internalizing negative emotions can cause acting out, or it can cause an internal self destruction. Neither of these are related to gender at all.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:35 PM
8

Nice dodge. I'll give you one more chance... At what age does it become inherently wrong, to where the child is inherently a victim. At what age, can a child consent to sex with an adult, in your mind. If you dodge it this time, I won't bother responding.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:17 PM
7

Again, right over your head, eh?. It's hard to tell if you're trolling. Just in case you're not, I feel sorry for your brain, and the shame your parents might feel for your stupidity. But the point is that we don't know the real perspective of the supposed victim. Even if we ask them directly, they may have been coached to imply or explicitly state how hard its been for them due to this incident. Do you not remember saying this? You're casting doubts that the kid is an actual victim. So I asked …
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:13 PM
8

But the point is that we don't know the real perspective of the supposed victim. Context is important, here... I don't agree that he's necessarily a victim This is what was said, and this is what I responded to. Let me talk down to your level for a minute. You're a complete fucking retard. Even if you ignore the trauma of being raped (which you seem to ignore)... He was 15, and she was 37. Go fuck yourself. In fact, that is what everyone around them (parents, teachers) will be telling them; that…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:03 PM
18

I love how your only knowledge of the legal system, and mental health is from The Simpsons... And then you try to pass that off as fact.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 09:41 AM
17

I don't agree that he's necessarily a victim and I don't agree with this payout. Okay, but... The financial award also reflected the jury’s consideration of the emotional damage and need for counseling the student experienced after Sutton was arrested, the report said. Seems like he was a victim since he needed counseling. And that's even if you ignore the fact that he was 15, and she was 37.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 08:34 AM
1

Whenever people encounter one of these bathroom situations they should tell the manager that they will no longer be giving them any business, and tell them why. If you're too timid to do it in person then send an email. Sometimes facilities have problems. If they had the "normal" setup, you would still have the same issue. These things are not instantly fixed. Like seriously, get the stick out of your ass. You can go up to a staff member and tell them you're using the woman's room, or just use i…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:50 PM
1

Your point is that you disagree with the research. I can't disagree with something that isn't posted. You didn't post research, you posted a shitty summary that doesn't show anything. My point is that this is what the research says, and I think I've demonstrate that already. It's what the summary says. What the research says is very different.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 01:04 AM
5

It's the same with hormone therapy. A woman can be given steroids (estrogen) simply by asking, and they will immediately get a script for birth control pills, or just flat out estrogen meds... A man has to jump through hoops, get multiple blood tests, have shitty alternatives like patches, and creams pushed on you. Even when the meds treat similar symptoms related to mood, depression/anxiety, body composition, etc... Unless you find a private clinic and pay out the ass for it, or go through the …
/r/MensRights09/08/18 01:27 AM
1

Men are more aggressive drivers, because Testosterone (especially in younger men) promotes risk taking. Increased risk taking behaviours while driving is dangerous. So men are more dangerous drivers. This is inherent. Black people having lower IQs is not a result of something inherent. It's a result of socio-economic status. The same is true for some criminal behaviour. That's the difference, here. If you want to start targeting Black people... Target them for better schools, and a cultural shif…
/r/MensRights09/08/18 01:17 AM
3

No, it isn't privilege. Stop trying to act like Feminists. You're using the term the same way they do. You're not even being ironic about it (which might be forgivable). You do not advance the legitimacy of Men's Rights by stooping to childish word games like them. These types of posts only serve to drag down the community to where it will eventually end up where Feminism is.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 12:41 AM
2

Making money as a fitness model, isn't privilege.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 12:39 AM
1

Nothing you listed refutes my points. You literally just posted another summary article that states the same things that I already replied to.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 12:34 AM
1

I don't know where you get your information, but the research says otherwise Not exactly. Four experiments confirmed that women's automatic in-group bias is remarkably stronger than men's and investigated explanations for this sex difference, derived from potential sources of implicit attitudes That's not what's actually happening, and this is why social science gets tossed aside as being bad science. In Experiment 1, only women (not men) showed cognitive balance among in-group bias, identity, a…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 10:55 PM
1

That's not a gendered issue, since it happens with men as well. And it doesn't happen based on gender, but other factors.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 01:11 AM
1

Male managers are easier to manipulate. Female managers know the tricks that women use, and don't fall for emotional manipulation as easily. Unless they're lesbian, they don't fall for the artificial sexual tension, either. Women can play up on the weak/naive angle depending on their male manager. Or they can play up the "hey you might just have a chance, if you treat me right", angle Or, they can resort to blackmail, and false accusations.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 11:35 PM
1

Most jobs have toxic environments. Men just deal with it better. Every woman that I've spoken to/treated that was in management, hates dealing with female workers.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:55 PM
16

They don't forget. It's a common negotiating tactic... They demand ridiculous conditions, and then when given something that seems more "reasonable", the side that acquiesces thinks they got a deal. It's elementary level thinking, and what's sad is that people let them get away with it.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:47 PM
21

You're clearly looking for something to be outraged about, mate. You said that women don't face any real issues, which is pretty fucking hypocritical given the context of the article we're talking about. The fact that you don't even recognize that I'm not OP, seems to suggest that you're the outraged one. By claiming that issues don't exist you're no different to Clementine Ford (or, at least, your interpretation of what you think Clementine Ford said). At what point did I claim issues didn't ex…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:41 AM
42

Are you seriously comparing violent crime between male and female victims, as if women have it worse? Really? Even the most retarded Feminist will admit that men are the overwhelming majority of violent crime victims. They will of course add on that men are the majority of perpetrators... But you even failed to do that, so where does that put you on the intelligence chart? You also make it seem like those crimes were inherently sexist, or about gender. They were not. They were the result of assh…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 04:28 AM
-11

The important thing to take away from this post, is that the comments were downvoted. This is a non-issue, non-post. How fucking sad has this place become where the majority of posts are social media screenshots? Stop being so sensitive to garbage people, and stop acting like Feminists.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:56 PM
5

The problem is the traits that make things like this (action in the article) possible, are the same traits that Feminists point to as being "toxic".
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:08 AM
1

And? More incel trash mentality.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 11:41 PM
2

Using the term "transgendered" is actually considered a slur/offensive, in the same way "Oriental" is to East Asians. They are not an object/thing. They are a person who is transgender. And "Transsexual" is a subset of Transgender. They are similar, but different, and you can't simply dismiss one while only accepting the other. It's funny how wrong someone could be on so many different things, while presenting it as the truth.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 09:27 AM
2

You can't trust women anybody though. That's the issue. Thinking that men are trustworthy, while women are not, is simply not true, and is incel garbage. Trust is earned.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 06:15 AM
2

It's not even just birth control, it's a lot of drugs that aren't disposed of properly.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 01:59 AM
7

More "happy wife, happy life" bullshit. Apparently men don't create anything of value.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 01:55 AM
7

If the author thinks he's being a good feminist by condemning and forsaking masculinity, he's mistaken. By doing so, he is being a good feminist. That's what Feminism is all about. They want to have all the power, without having the responsibility.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 11:58 PM
2

Sort of. I live in Australia, and you pay for basic insurance when you register your car. You don't have to get additional insurance through a 3rd party. It doesn't cover you for damage to vehicles or property. But it does cover all death, and medical costs of individuals involved in the crash. I pay $500 annually when I renew registration on my car.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:11 AM
2

I get that you want to try and justify bullshit, but I'm not buying it.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 04:21 AM
3

Their goal is to make money, not to be fair. Which is why I said it makes no sense customer wise. It's a scam industry, on the same level as banks that force conditions/fees on you, when they are using your money.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 03:39 AM
1

That's true, but still irrelevant. In the case of an accident, then go ahead and raise that individual's rates. It's literally price gouging. They're just as bad as banks.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 03:28 AM
2

If your zip code has a lot of accidents historically, why shouldn't it be charged more than a zip code that historically has fewer accidents? Because zip code is irrelevant to individual driving habits. Would you be happy paying a doctor more just because your neighbour is obese? I don't give a shit if 98% of the people in my suburb have been in accidents... Their rates should go up, not mine. I shouldn't be punished for the actions of others.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:44 AM
15

Having no driving record, is not the same as having a perfect driving record.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 01:19 AM
–

Insurance should be based on your history, not the history of others. It makes no sense customer wise to pay a premium because your neighbour got into 10 accidents over 5 years, and you have a perfect driving record.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:06 PM
5

Australia.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 11:19 AM
9

My partner is a teacher at a school for Autism. 90% of the students are boys. There are 0 programs tailored for boys, and there are multiple tailored for girls. You can't win, either way... They will say that boys don't need programs because they're in the majority. But if girls are the majority, you need to support that. But if boys are a minority, then it's not worth the resources for smaller numbers. But if the girls are a minority, then you need to double efforts to "make up the difference".
/r/MensRights25/07/18 04:45 AM
2

No, that sub seems too niche. But you can.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 04:38 AM
5

I'm not sure how rare it is. It's all newly recruited Hollywood SJWs talk about. These problems don't go away by ignoring. They go away with critical conversation.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 02:35 AM
3

Yes, and nobody batted an eyelid with the movies I listed, simply because they were female led. You are making the argument that they are "batting eyelids" because it's women in the movies, which is just false. They're batting eyelids because it's a movie that shits on an already existing property. Just like how people shit on the Old Boy remake, or the Akira live action movie, or any other movie that that is just another remake or sequel.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 02:05 AM
10

They're not criticised for featuring mostly women. They're criticised, because they're shit movies. Do you want to know why they shit on them for being forced? Because they're forced. It's not complicated. Instead of completely shitting on the inspiration, while trying to use nostalgia for ticket sales, they should have just made original properties. Find me one all female lead movie that doesn’t get shit reviews for being forced. The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants, Thelma & Louise, Bridesmai…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 11:22 PM
2

Wow, at first I thought you were just being obtuse. But you actually don't understand what I said. I never said humans shouldn't do something just because an animal does it. I said that just because an animal does it, doesn't mean we should do it.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 10:55 PM
3

It's not exactly false logic. Open system or not, it's still inside your body. And while it's not constructed out of thin air, your body is responsible for the transformation of food to shit. So just because a Lion will eat placenta, or a dog eats placenta... It doesn't mean that a human should. Lions eat their young, dogs scavenge rotten flesh. Not a hard concept to grasp.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 12:56 PM
-1

I can appreciate the fact that you're purposely being a twat. To go to this length to justify an appeal to nature is pretty funny.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 12:19 PM
-2

Way to miss the point... Dogs eat shit. They bury food in the ground so that it rots, and then eat it. Their stomachs are way more acidic than ours, they digest things differently than us. Just because we're both mammals, doesn't mean eat can do the same things and walk away fine.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 11:27 AM
2

Dogs can eat raw chicken without getting sick as well. An appeal to nature, doesn't make for a good argument. And just because it's inside your body doesn't mean it's okay to digest. Feces comes from inside your body, do you think it's safe to eat? Lots of other mammals eat feces.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 10:05 AM
2

A person with an IQ of 200 who never went to college, and spends their time whittling, is uneducated. A person who spent 10 years in university learning the intricacies of basket weaving is educated, regardless of intellect.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 08:21 AM
9

What metrics are you using? The literacy rate for women in Taiwan is 97.3%. It's 99.6% in the US, and similar with other Western countries. Only individual exceptions exist like in Korea. Here's a ranking based on women with tertiary degrees in the workforce. 11/12 are Western countries. Another ranking listing countries where women are more educated than men. 8/10 are Western countries. So I'll ask again, what metrics are you trying to use here?
/r/MensRights20/07/18 11:12 AM
20

Western women are the most educated women, globally. It's not even debatable. If you were to say that they squander that education, then that's something different. And you're right about them being oblivious to true oppression. But it's not because of what you said. It's because they're like anti-vaxxers, in that they are so far removed from it, they don't know what it looks like.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 05:34 AM
4

That is older things, though. If you're purposely being disingenuous, then yeah. Since everything is technically "older". But no, these are all fairly recent events. The scholarship happened a few months ago. At least things that more modern feminists don't count on anymore because we're on a more modern wave of progression. You're next deep in shit, and you're trying to sell me on the idea that it smells like roses. I hope for your sake that you at least realize how full of it you are. I would …
/r/MensRights19/07/18 05:24 AM
24

Interesting. Because alimony was never challenged or thought to be bad until women started to pay it. Prison sentencing was thought to be too lenient, until women started going to prison. Affirmative action was seen to be a good thing, until a single scholarship popped up offering help to men going into a woman dominated field.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 10:39 PM
6

Why not? I'm willing to listen. Just don't expect me to blindly accept what you say just because you say it. And how do you know what your son's "Jewish soul" says, if they can't speak? Are you able to telepathically connect to him, and understand his religious beliefs?
/r/MensRights18/07/18 04:01 AM
8

How so? When did your son elaborate on his religious beliefs before you chopped off part of his penis? If this occurred before he could speak, and they were the exact same beliefs as you... Then guess what? He's not Jewish. You are, and you forced your beliefs on him.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 02:02 AM
7

...That sounds like an opinion. You dog.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 10:41 PM
6

Just so you know... Forcing your religious beliefs on your child, is the same as Christians trying to force Jews into being Christian.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 10:36 PM
3

That would only apply as a legit defence if she tried to harm the husband, not the son.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 10:31 PM
16

Being promiscuous has nothing to do with cuckoldry. Being promiscuous simply means short term, and not overly selective with sexual partners. Cuckold women can be very selective, and have long term affairs. Whores are people who get paid for sex... Which is something that shouldn't be used as an insult in the first place.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 09:49 PM
4

Who says that? Lots of people, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 08:29 AM
2

They've already lost lots of funding in Australia that has been redirected towards Feminist charities/causes.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 01:42 AM
4

That said, the point is that we shouldn't expect women to conform to normal gender roles, just as we wouldn't want to be. Professional chefs are mostly men. The stereotype of women learning to cook comes from them being the ones that mostly stayed home... And... Cooked. Everyone should learn how to cook somewhat. It's generally seen as a required skill to have. So it's not right to blast people for asking women if they cook. They should be blasted for not asking everyone if they can cook.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 08:50 AM
1

Such a shame. They could have spent the article proclaiming just how awesome Rachael Ray is, for drinking the hot sauce with a spoon, and barely feeling the heat. But no... It had to be about portraying these strong women as victims.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 08:42 AM
5

Honestly in logical argument, circumcision is like getting a vaccine, it's just a good life choice. I myself am glad I am circumcised. Egyptian Muslim mothers say the same thing when they take their daughters to get cut.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 02:50 AM
-1

There are/were websites featuring clock that would countdown to when the Olsen Twins, and Emma Watson would turn 18. And yes, there are plenty of top comments on Social Media that are similar. Let's not pretend that it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 03:32 AM
3

Well they expect us to stay out of/support them in abortion debates, so it would be nice to see them support us when there's an injustice. It's too much to expect from parasites though. You're conflating Feminists with women. Don't do that. You should post that on r/jokes. There is no such thing, at least not to a level that would be significant enough to warrant trusting any of them. Grow up.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 02:45 AM
1

Those stories are all pretty recent. I didn't need to look far. I can nitpick stories with the genders reversed. It's easy when you actively go looking for something to prove yourself right. It's like that religious group going to look for the Ark, and then magically finding it in Turkey. That's true, except I'm just trying to prove the "women are wonderful" idea is bullshit. I agree with you that the myth needs to die, but you don't prove that, by stating a lie. The ones that show the dark evil…
/r/MensRights11/07/18 01:42 PM
0

I'm not going to bother ripping apart all of those links, because it would take too long and you don't deserve the effort... But I will mention the fact that pointing to single examples of women behaving badly, and then trying to generalize that to make it seem like all women are like that... Is exactly what some Feminists do to men. You have very simplistic thinking, and it's doing you harm. You are forcing binary (false dichotomy) positions where it doesn't belong. Like I said... leave your ec…
/r/MensRights11/07/18 01:12 PM
1

Leave the echo chamber for a bit, it will do you some good.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 12:32 PM
1

The host's voice wasn't much better. In fact, a lot of Aussie males have higher pitched voices, and the terrible slang they use makes them sound like children. Ironically hilarious that they try to make fun of someone else for how they speak.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:31 AM
7

That's already a label that gets thrown around, against MRAs. I don't think you understand how these things work. See, OP's pic is a response to what is already happening. It didn't just pop up out of nothingness. So your attempt to show the "other side" doesn't really work.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:37 PM
1

Statistics are different here. Her frame of reference is Canada/US. You can't go to Oz, and start talking about shit happening in North America. Who can she reference in Oz? What politicians, and media personnel, can she point to, and use for comparisons/examples, that she actually knows about? If she doesn't know anything about the people/mindset/culture in Oz, then she (and by extension the points she brings up) won't be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 12:30 AM
2

That's moronic. What does Karen know about Australia?
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:28 PM
1

And I said that you would need to compare it to something that was actually similar in complexity. For as shitty as cancer is, it's not as complex of a problem. There's a lot of problems with how mental health, and suicides are recorded/reported. Like I said, it's not as cut and dry as most diseases that have something tangible that you can point to, like a tumor, clogged artery, stroke, heart attack, broken bone, etc...
/r/MensRights03/07/18 07:27 AM
1

The fact that suicide rates are at a 30 year high despite the development of treatment programs like CBT and DBT, better access to care, more pharmaceutical options, etc. is meaningless? Why are you doing that? You are purposely taking my statement out of context. I said it's meaningless when you try to compare it to other conditions, that have little similarity. And I've literally already explained why it's not the only thing you need to look at, because so much of it depends on the person them…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 07:16 AM
2

Yup. It's also a pretty toxic environment in a lot of places, so the bad ones generally do better with it, and stick with it more.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 07:03 AM
-1

I could make the same point without reference to cancer treatment. You could, but it would be equally meaningless. Try comparing it to something more complex like Autism, and you would see several similarities. Is continuing further down the path we're on really the best idea? Maybe it's time to rethink the entire mental-health paradigm. How long do you think this subject has been taken seriously, compared to something like cancer? It's like comparing levels of financial success between a 40 yea…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 04:49 AM
0

i was going through tough times, pretty much begging my family for help. "but we don't know what to do! we're not experts!" yeah, and some kid who just spent 2 years in a grad program is, some person who can't even stay awake during the session is, some doctor who can't even remember who i am is? psychology is just outsourcing the job to a stranger who gets paid. 5-6 years of schooling is better than none. 2 years of specialized education is better than whatever bullshit a self help blog comes u…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 02:20 AM
-4

I personally know awesome female psychologists, and terrible male psychologists. It's not a gender thing... It's an issue with the fact that most people are average. And when it comes to something as important as mental health, being mediocre isn't good enough. Males don't have to have a male psychologist. It's all about finding someone that you can connect with, and someone who can be objective, while being supportive.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 02:08 AM
2

The last thing they need is a shit psychologist. A good one is hard to find, and can be invaluable. But this is true for everything. GPs, specialists, mechanics, etc...
/r/MensRights03/07/18 02:06 AM
2

A lot of Feminists don't think a woman should be responsible for drunk driving, either. In Australia, two drunk/high women assaulted a Paramedic on the job, and got away with a light sentence, because they were intoxicated. That was the defense used. The judge even said to the Paramedic, that she wished there was more she could do. But she didn't even follow the minimum sentencing required by law. She literally broke the law by giving these two women a pass. She completely misinterpreted the rul…
/r/MensRights01/07/18 01:06 AM
11

You would assume that they would know that hitting children isn't positive. But to suggest that not being allowed to hit them is causing aggression in mothers, is completely idiocy. They even have an easy scapegoat with Share Postpartum depression, but they didn't even try to use that as a defence. It's no excuse, but at least it's more understandable than "let me hit my kids or I'll kill them".
/r/MensRights26/06/18 12:14 AM
1

You’re missing the word ‘potentially’. Example: this person may potentially follow me off the bus. No, I didn't miss it. I purposely ignored it because it's irrelevant. A lot of things are "potentially" possible. Doesn't something needs to change in order to accommodate it. Stop and read what I’m actually saying and calm the fuck down acting like I’m a feminist and I’ll bother with a proper response. Ironic. Nothing in my comment suggests that I wasn't calm. Your's on the other hand, is quite re…
/r/MensRights26/06/18 12:11 AM
25

“We’ve created a culture where children can stand with their hands on their hips and say to their parent, ‘You’re not allowed to touch me. You can’t hit me.’ Parents feel powerless. They can’t cope and we see the result of that, but we’re not willing to talk about what we can do to help before it gets to breaking point.” A fucking psychologist said this. As someone who is in the field, this is exactly what is wrong with it... It's filled with morons like this who try to excuse the behaviour of s…
/r/MensRights25/06/18 10:27 PM
11

Society needs to address this also. It doesn't though. That's the point. Society shouldn't bend to the emotions of an individual. If you feel uncomfortable, then that's your problem to deal with. If there was an actual threat of something tangible, then yeah, something needs to be done. If that person were to start following you off the bus, or even start getting physical on the bus, then there should be a campaign for that, if it was a problem. But it isn't... And that's ultimately the point. T…
/r/MensRights25/06/18 03:39 AM
21

You don’t know what it is like until you’ve experienced it yourself You mean like having a guy staring at you, just waiting for you to say "stop", or ask him "what's up?", so him and his friends have an excuse to jump you? Also I have attractive male friends, and they go through the exact same thing attractive women do... Well, almost. See, thirsty women are much more "handsy" than thirsty men are. Because it's socially acceptable for them to be that way.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 03:18 AM
3

But what man wants to refer to themselves as curvy? Husky, pleasantly plump, thick, etc... Saying thin, and then saying heavy doesn't make sense. It's either thin and thick, or light and heavy.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 01:09 PM
15

Ranked 200th. From Wikipedia: Another event dubbed a "Battle of the Sexes" took place during the 1998 Australian Open[52] between Karsten Braasch and the Williams sisters. Venus and Serena Williams had claimed that they could beat any male player ranked outside the world's top 200, so Braasch, then ranked 203rd, challenged them both. Braasch was described by one journalist as "a man whose training regime centered around a pack of cigarettes and more than a couple bottles of ice cold lager".[53][…
/r/MensRights21/06/18 11:14 PM
2

They want other people to save them from a self imposed prison, with little to no effort on their end.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 10:53 PM
5

If those tables were turned no one would bat an eye at flipping this statement. Except for the whole Williams couldn't compete with men in tennis thing.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 10:42 PM
3

There's also the problem with memories being dynamic. Every time you access a memory, you change it slightly. Change it enough times, and it becomes different than the truth. Everyone does this to some extent. Memories aren't static, like accessing a file on a computer. Access it with a purpose, and you can alter it to a flat out lie, and have it be "real" to you. It's not just gaslighting.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 10:40 PM
2

So you refuse to actually answer my questions. Good to know. I won't bother replying to you.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 03:09 AM
3

Bullshit. plenty of people have similar relationships when they're chronological age equals. Dumb women (and men) of 80-90 IQ can and will often be slavish and follow their higher IQ partner's rules and words because they don't think they are correct since they know they are incompetent at real world matters. This has nothing to do with IQ. And cross-IQ relations really SHOULD be illegal if you really, really fucking believe in the concept of "power dynamic". If someone is mentally retarded to t…
/r/MensRights21/06/18 02:55 AM
3

So you can't explain it. Got it. And are you seriously trying to compare 15-18 year olds with 2 two 40 year olds? Really? And I'm pretty sure that Romeo and Juliet laws exist in most places. Which completely refutes your question. And the ones that don't have those laws are wrong for not using them. So if you want to try again, have at it.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 02:47 AM
2

Can you explain how the logic makes sense in the case of 17-18, but not in the case of 15-16? If you can't, then it's faulty logic.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 02:42 AM
3

Sex with a 17 year old that is nearly 18 shouldn't be a life destroying infraction. What is a couple of months of time worth? use common sense in this case, the spirit of the law. There's a completely different dynamic when it's a teacher (authority)/student. What is it with you guys in the U.S. and the inability to understand context? I'm not American, so don't try to be condescending for no reason. the way we do it in Mexico, with regards to this, is we use the context of the situation. Is the…
/r/MensRights21/06/18 02:31 AM
4

Excellent retort.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 02:15 AM
14

Don't forget the backlash against the guy at NASA that wore a shirt that was given to him by a woman.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 02:13 AM
7

Sometimes enough is enough... Different people have different limits. Would you stick around with someone who was that obese? Would you be willing to spend 10 years with them so that they were more healthy? That's a long time, for anyone. She left him because he was losing weight and getting healthy. I know nothing about who these people are. So I'm just taking what he said at face value. Do you have any evidence/proof to show her maliciousness? Because the way he speaks about her, she doesn't c…
/r/MensRights21/06/18 12:59 AM
6

Under normal circumstances it would be weird. But he mentioned his obesity, which may not be entirely his fault, but it is his responsibility. As far as alimony, according to him, she asked for less than half, and the lawyer told him to round it up to half to make sure he doesn't get into legal trouble. I mean, from how he speaks of her, she is a kind, and fair person. There's nothing really sad about this. Sometimes shit doesn't work out, and people split amicably. And that's what happened here…
/r/MensRights21/06/18 12:37 AM
4

I strongly disagree with either men or women being required to register as sex offenders for something like this. A 17 year old (especially one approaching 18) and an 18 year old shouldn't mark such a huge distinction in law. But it does make a difference. And a teacher should know better. You need to draw the line somewhere. What exactly can you point to that makes 17 and 18 so similar? When you do that, apply it to 17 and 16, and then to 15 and 16. You won't be able to stop until you get to 12…
/r/MensRights21/06/18 12:24 AM
6

The 30 days thing is a pussy pass. Flat out. She pleaded guilty (to 3 counts) to sexual battery, which in Ohio, is supposed to be at least 1 year in prison, and up to 5. If it included rape it's at least 5, and up to 11. The age of consent in Ohio is 16, but not when it's a teacher/student relationship. Then it's 18. She should have gotten at least 1 year in prison. This isn't a case of any adult having sex with an 18 year old. She was a teacher, and they were students. If you don't understand w…
/r/MensRights21/06/18 12:14 AM
1

Not for teachers and students.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 12:03 AM
3

If you ignore all relevant context, you would have a point... But this is just another data point among many. There are countless examples of this type of mentality. Don't pretend like this is just a one-off incident. Recently in Melbourne, a women drove her kids into water, to drown them, and the overwhelming response was all about her, and how a "tragedy" must have driven her to do this. Nothing about her being a monster.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 02:22 AM
3

That should only apply if a child was inevitable. Ever since abortion became legal, it shouldn't apply. Being responsible for A, does not automatically mean responsibility for B. That's insane. Using that logic, since you raised a child, you're then responsible for everything that person does. So if they commit a crime when they're 30, you should be punished for it. Doesn't work that way, for good reason.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:54 PM
6

You are responsible for the actions that you freely take. Not legally speaking. Not always. You don't need to be given any "certain" freedoms/rights. You decide to have unprotected sex you take part of the responsibility that the woman might get pregnant, even if you have protected sex you take part of the responsibility of an "accident". Part of that responsibility is deciding on your future actions. The end point isn't just "well she's pregnant". Timing of your decision matters. Of course, it'…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:46 PM
6

Are you a child looking for an authority figure to guide you? Either way, I'm done here. You've lost your entertainment value.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:26 PM
28

The fact that there is still a child, is not a "problem". It's the result from the decisions made by the mother. So if she decides to have the child, then she is responsible for her choice. She can abort it, she can adopt it out, she can legally abandon it, or she can keep it. 3/4 of those still involve a child. So I guess to bring it back to what you said... I'm not really understanding your point, either. So what if there's still a child? If woman fought to be thought of a strong, and independ…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:25 PM
7

Where did I say "punishment" it gets old talking to people who put words in your mouth. From the way you are phrasing things. I said responsibility, I think both and men and women should be responsible for what they do In order to be responsible, you need to be given certain freedoms/rights. If men have no reproductive rights, then they shouldn't be responsible. How could they? Biological reality is not needed in this case, since it's entirely based on economic reality. That's the only reason th…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:20 PM
9

So either make an argument against it, or don't bring it up. Right now, all of your comments have been pretty useless.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:14 PM
10

I'm curious as to why you think having a child is some kind of punishment that needs to be forced upon a person (or people) for making a mistake.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:03 PM
14

Seems like you're confusing infanticide with eugenics.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:02 PM
37

There is. But without her body there is no child, right? So while they are different, you can't separate the two, yet.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:01 PM
22

If you want to argue against infanticide, go ahead. There are plenty of philosophical schools of thought where it's perfectly justified. Making a stupid "hur dur Nazi" comment is not productive.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:54 PM
21

Sometimes accidents happen. Birth control isn't 100%, not even vasectomies are 100%.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:52 PM
13

And until artificial wombs can replace a natural womb, there's no ethical way around that.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:50 PM
50

That seems like the woman's responsibility. I mean, that's exactly what they fought for, isn't it? Their body, their choice. Why is the responsibility forced upon a man for the choice made by a woman? You shouldn't have it both ways... Either the woman is responsible for her body or she isn't.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:48 PM
1

I'm agitated because incels have come to this sub, and they say moronic things on a consistent basis. Woman hating isn't a positive thing for this sub, or life in general. To make such ridiculous claims such as the above poster, and then to try and discuss things logically is impossible. No logic can be used to debate with a person, that didn't use logic to arrive at their conclusion. I refuse to play nice with anonymous incels that are hypocritically, and ironically playing up their own victimh…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 09:04 PM
1

I'm well aware. Nowhere did I say women were incapable of doing this. I'm specifically refuting the claim that OP made where "men are more measured", and apparently women aren't.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 09:00 PM
-8

What's your point? I added it for flavor purposes. I thought that was obvious but I will try to be more clear in the future If it was for "flavour" you wouldn't have tried to condemn women as a whole. It could have been a personal story, and it would have stood on its own. Now you're just trying to hide behind it. You are either being unbelievably disingenous, or this has all gone over your head. In either case, there is nothing further to be said. The irony is pretty thick here. Your words spea…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:57 AM
-7

Last year... Meaningless anecdote. Arguments/stories like this are useless. And they become dangerous when you use them to attack an entire gender. It's literally what Feminism has done to men. This is not rare. I have observed that this is actually very common. Women at large Rarity has nothing to do with it. You're making it seem like only women do shit to those extremes. They aren't the only ones. I don't remember saying "men are always measured", nice strawman argument. "that's true, but the…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:23 AM
-7

I have never met a single man, even the psychos, that react the way the average woman reacts when her advances are rejected , I've been stalked, received myriads of death threats, had my place of work barraged with messages about me. Had my home staked out for who knows what..... Don't be stupid. Guys do that shit too. I always find it funny when someone says "men are dangerous when angry", that's true, but they're still measured. I find the opposite is true for women. Men aren't always "measure…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 03:51 AM
2

Those wouldn't be seen as benefits to them, would it? If they were to list those things as benefits, then they can't list them as negatives.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 12:56 AM
4

Ask them what the benefits of Patriarchy are. If they say there are none, then just walk away... Even Nazism had benefits, so if they think Patriarchy is worse than Nazism, there's nothing you could ever say to change their minds.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 11:26 PM
25

I don't see how. He has been, and still is pretty open about his Feminist bias. Or at least his Feminist pandering. Reporting on possible sexual misconduct isn't extreme in any way. It's holding him to the same standard he tries to force on everyone else.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 03:38 AM
3

That is India. The people doing it are Hindu. Brown=Muslim? It's Pakistan. Officially called... "Islamic Republic of Pakistan". Where 96% of religious people are Muslim. They havent shown the names of the victim, the perpetrator, or anything so I cant look at the facts of the case. I dont know if the people who did it are in jail or hanged or whatever so I cant comment. The 2nd and 3rd videos flat out state names. The third link is a Yazidi (Not muslim) A minor distinction that is irrelevant to …
/r/MensRights07/06/18 10:24 PM
2

Where did I say that. Explain to me the cycle that formed in your head to make you think that is what I said or meant. When you said this as a response to "there's a middle ground...". You blamed that behaviour on poverty, and lack of education. Then... You went on to say this: Now I am not saying that muslim countries are perfect. We arent. But most of us are poor, a lot of uneducation and there is some sort of war going in most of these countries. But your countries? You have no excuse. You cl…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 09:27 AM
3

Turkey, Malaysia... Pretty much every Muslim country has shit like that happen. They are complicit. Not only that, but Muslim immigrants do it in developed countries like Canada, and the UK. Don't act like it's only dumb fuck inbreds that do it. While it is a minority, it's not a small minority. And the "moderates" mostly condone those actions. But I like how to try to dismiss, or justify the sexual abuse because your country is poor. You're literally trying to equate family court rulings with h…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:06 AM
3

“It’s been incredibly disappointing to watch how few women-led businesses are getting funded,” Gates said. They're called "charities". Most charities are started by women who are looking for an easy paycheck (their own salary doesn't count as profit remember), and then don't put money back into the group by hiring capable staff, no, they rely on volunteers, who have zero experience, skill, or knowledge. “Ultimately, if we want more innovation and better products, we’ve got to put more money behi…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 03:16 AM
4

You know, there's a nice middle ground between radical feminist ideology, and killing a woman because she was raped.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 03:15 AM
5

"Dry humping" is what happens when clothing is rubbing up against your exposed penis, all day. But at this point you've become the "i troll u" meme, and it stopped being worth it.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:20 PM
12

It's not rocket science... It's quite obvious, and logical when you consider what happens, and the actual purpose of foreskin. It's the same reason why your finger tips, and feet are rougher than your inner forearm, and other parts of your skin. Here's a hint... It's due to abrasion. You ever seen the difference between a barefoot runner, and someone who gets pedicures?
/r/MensRights06/06/18 01:01 PM
13

According to your logic, women should have their breasts, and cervix removed so that they can't get cancer in those parts. Not really logical, is it? Also I'm assuming you're just parroting those "studies" that were based on a minuscule sample size of men, where the methodology was not the only thing flawed about them. Do you know why getting cut reduced the risk of STIs/STDs in that study? Because they had less sex, and raped less... Which is generally something that happens when you get a piec…
/r/MensRights06/06/18 12:42 PM
14

I'd rather have a soft and sensitive glans, then a leathery one. Plus, I assume you've never experienced the joy of someone using their tongue on your foreskin. Too bad, I guess. Way to live up to your name though.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 12:32 PM
1

You can't invoke the DSM, and then completely avoid it when it doesn't suit your argument. You implied that bumbling speech could be considered a disorder. In regards to bumbling speech, you said: On the other hand, if those things happen constantly and prevent them from living a normal life, then they do. That's a lie. Just flat out. You lied... Or don't understand psychology at all. And in the case of the latter, you don't invoke diagnostic criteria from the DSM to support an argument, and the…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 03:12 AM
1

I asked a question because I couldn't tell what you were getting at, and how on earth does the OP's post being low-effort make the thing he linked to useless? Lack of context means people are just talking in circles. Lack of context means there's no proper start point to the discussion. You can't find a solution if you don't know what the question is. There's a reason that the DSM definitions need phrases like "clinically significant" and "significantly increased risk". Show me in the DSM where …
/r/MensRights28/05/18 11:02 PM
1

So because the comic wasn't on the topic you wished to discuss, it's useless? I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, but when you make ludicrous statements like this, it makes it hard. The comic is useless because it's a low-effort, karma grab. OP added nothing to it. If they didn't care about the karma alone, they would have added text and would have brought up some points to get a discussion going. And I disagree. Nearly every mental illness you can name is just an exaggeration of n…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 03:14 AM
1

but it's shouldn't be a "call HR" issue. You're right, it shouldn't be. But it is, because perception matters. If she reacted socially (ignoring him, asking to be left alone, snarking "Nice vest, Dave.") then the comic would only be about rejection, but she reacted by calling people required by law to do potentially life-altering things - those aren't the same. Which is why the comic is pretty much useless, and was used as a low effort karma grab. And I completely disagree that it must be intent…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 01:32 AM
1

It's the idea expressed by a mediocre low effort comic, yes. The comic doesn't even need to exist. There are plenty of real world examples of this very thing. You say in your introductory paragraph to an essay where you focus on individual word choices. "Essay", cute. I'm not ignoring it, I'm fine with your choice to interpret if as a suggestive interjection rather than a pause, I'm even fine with you calling it creepy - I get that. I just don't agree that social awkwardness (which is clearly wh…
/r/MensRights27/05/18 10:50 PM
6

That is why abuse by Catholic priests was covered so extensively by the media. No it wasn't. It was because of the hypocrisy of pretending to be absolute moral judges, that speaks for god, while condoning immoral behaviour. Let's not pretend that the Catholic Church isn't a complete piece of shit organization. There doesn't need to be a feminist conspiracy involved when demonizing them.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 06:59 AM
1

It doesn't matter what they blame it on though. The end result is still the same.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 06:08 AM
2

So, the issue isn't the woman at all... It's HR not telling the woman to stop wasting their time with insignificant shit. This to me, is the actual issue. If HR/businesses stopped giving in to ridiculousness, then women would eventually get the hint. And even if they don't get the hint, then nothing gets done anyway. You don't blame a child for begging, when the parents give in to it every time.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 06:07 AM
2

Who cares? That's life. You'll never fix that, because superficial things matter for most people in relationships.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 04:22 AM
1

The subject is a mediocre low effort comic. Trying to take that seriously is moronic. Do you not even see the difference in the comic? There's a literal difference there that you're ignoring. When you start off your sentence with "mmmm" it becomes awkward and creepy. Creep shaming is usually overblown, but in this case, the neckbeard isn't going in with confidence, and simply giving a compliment. They are going in, and acting like a creep. " MmmmSusan is just so delicious, she must be mine. vs D…
/r/MensRights26/05/18 09:34 PM
1

That's true. But it's also easier for certain groups to view negatives about women in the same way.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 09:18 PM
-1

Because they don't have the same agency as men. It's how they treat children. They need to be taught many things, and their punishments are far less severe. They are delicate flowers in need of protection... Unless of course they are promiscuous, are seen as somehow being "against god". Then they are shunned and treated terribly. It's a complicated thing that dates back centuries. This isn't new, or even a revolutionary thought. A lot of the things that are spouted about in regards to misogyny, …
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:11 PM
2

Yeah, that's generally how it works. If Tess Holiday came up to you, and tried to flirt, you're telling me that you would indulge her, or waste her time thinking that she had a chance?
/r/MensRights26/05/18 06:57 AM
1

And? She's not allowed to say that?
/r/MensRights26/05/18 06:56 AM
-7

That makes sense though. It's tied to religious doctrine of women being weak, and lesser than men.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:30 AM
3

You don't need to tell us this. He's rich. This isn't a gender problem/issue, it's an socio-economic issue, like with most things.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 02:57 AM
-2

Here's a thought... If you're an ugly ass neckbeard with a shit personality... Don't try going after women out of your league.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 02:30 AM
0

But what about Ja? We need Ja, so we can make sense of all this.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 10:21 PM
46

They lack intelligence.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 03:03 AM
4

Suicide rates don't exactly go down after they go through surgeries. That's an invalid argument. Any stats for that? I would also say it's not different, it's quite similar if not the same. Not sure why you're being so stubborn. The only similarity is the need for a bodily change. By that same token, using your logic, a gun shot, and a splinter are the same, because they're both foreign objects that entered the body.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 11:33 PM
4

Body integrity, is different from self identity. There's "faulty wiring" in the brain that makes someone believe that they would be better off without a hand/arm. In trans people, their brains as a whole are structured differently compared to their body. It's a huge difference. Being in constant conflict like that is detrimental to mental health, to the point that it increases the risk of suicide greatly. Nobody killed themselves because they couldn't become an amputee.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 10:58 PM
12

A derogatory term for someone that doesn't match up to a classical definition of masculinity. Similar to neckbeard, Beta, cuck, etc...It's typically someone who is "too feminine" to be a man.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:22 AM
3

I assume by "full woman" they meant adult. An adult has certain responsibilities, and those types of Feminists don't want to be responsible, hence, not a "full woman".
/r/MensRights23/05/18 02:27 AM
8

Honestly, all you have to do is point out that in non-white countries, non-whites dominate the higher positions. Obviously it's not a race/gender issue. It's an economic issue. People with money/power will dominate the higher levels of society. Ingroup vs outgroup has its own hierarchy of importance, and money is at the top. It always will be, until money is no longer used. Not a single word about Black slaves in the Middle East. No articles about how racist China, Japan, S. Korea are. No editor…
/r/MensRights22/05/18 04:23 AM
6

However this tweet obviously would not apply to ugly women, so its definitely giving some false hope. Untrue. Tess Holiday is a perfect example. There's always going to be someone that accepts whatever deformity or ugliness a person has.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 04:13 AM
1

How do you think that discussion will go, honestly? There will always be people at the top, and at the bottom. That's a fact. It's literally impossible to have every single person on the exact same level across the board. Life is all about variables, and you simply can't control/regulate those variables in a way that eliminates the extreme outliers. Saying that doesn't mean that you approve of that. it simply means that you need to acknowledge it, and even if you attempt to help those at the bot…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:27 AM
1

This is the same backwards mentality that Feminists have. If the candidate is not perfect, then they are the enemy. It's stupid. I'm sure I could nitpick your stances on everything, and then use that to attack your character, to distance myself from you, and to label you as "them". But that's so self defeating. I would rather focus on what's similar, and build a relationship from that. Yes, his views might not perfectly line up with your views... But that doesn't matter. They don't have to.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:20 AM
1

Not bad. Too bad he blames men, and then goes on to say that he wouldn't let gay men go camping. Gay does not equal pedo. An absent father is not always the fault of the father. Although I 100% agree that you don't need to be part of that organization. You're better off starting something local, and maybe get some funding from local councils/government.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:08 AM
5

One of the reasons why Feminism was so successful is because housewives, trust fund princesses, and divorced women, had nothing to do during the day.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 09:16 AM
1

It's hilarious that you just double down on your stupidity.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 10:13 PM
1

LOL This is the most Orwellian thing I have read today from SJW crybaby idiots. I find this to be hilarious. In no way was my argument that criminal behavior in males is has a biological basis, wrong. I said you sourced the wrong thing. Which means that the link you provided was wrong. Learn to read. Your throwing up of barriers to a straightforward argument by analogy is childish. You did not lift a finger to find any facts. You just wasted everyone's time. The only thing wrong in this thread i…
/r/MensRights17/05/18 08:13 AM
1

Your initial response was wrong. You sourced something that was wholly irrelevant. Which makes it wrong. You were wrong. Someone asked why you got downvoted, and I replied by saying that the reason was because you were wrong. It's pretty sad that you're getting this triggered for being wrong, and then having it pointed out. But good job on finding a relevant source.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 08:03 AM
1

Seems like you're the princess for getting so butt hurt over a fact.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 07:55 AM
2

Well, it's wrong. Or at least not giving the proper context. He listed a source for the UK, when OP happened in Australia.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 03:01 AM
0

Melbourne is IRL Tumblr.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 10:26 PM
1

Free doesn't exist? Probably not how you think it does. I'm not even going to bother going over that here, because it would take too long. Feel free to read about it yourself though. You can look into Robert Sapolsky, and Daniel Dennett for an introduction on different views of it. That makes less sense than the diluth model. Which made no sense. If you've done zero reading/research on the subject, it's understandable why you would think that.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 01:06 AM
1

I didn't know it was for Mother's Day however, since we don't celebrate mother's day today, it's back in March. Also it is not mentioned anywhere in the image that it's connected to Mother's Day. May 10th is a common date for many countries. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother's_Day#Dates_around_the_world 2nd Sunday of May.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 12:33 AM
1

As long as you accept it, it won't change. You need to stop applying other places/events to what OP posted. This isn't an all or nothing thing. Stop taking the OP so seriously when you have literally no knowledge of the context. Take the legal system, for instance. Women get a huge bias (I've read it's 6 times the bias between black and white defendants), but I don't see any movement to fix that. I do see a lot of "Women are 8% of the prison population, and that's too much!" type articles. There…
/r/MensRights15/05/18 12:05 AM
1

"Single Mothers" is a phrase associated with children that have only one parent. I mean, it doesn't make sense if you read it grammatically. How does it not make sense? Not every kid has both parents alive or involved in their lives. It's also a charity ran event, but it only caters to a single gender, so it's a little exclusive. ...It's for Mother's Day. How are you not getting that? It reinforces the idea that single dads are not a thing. I'm not sure how you get this idea. If this same group/…
/r/MensRights14/05/18 11:56 PM
1

That's great, but what is it about the event in OP's pic that perpetuates stereotypes?
/r/MensRights14/05/18 11:04 PM
2

But it won't, and you're aware of that. We don't know that, because OP didn't give any context about this group, or region. Maybe they do something similar for Father's day. We simply don't know anything because OP is just trying to karma whore. So... What do? Tear down the bias, or accept it? I'm not denying that many places are definitely hypocritical. But it's better to fight for inclusion rather than to fight for dismantling. Single mothers deserve to be pampered. So do single fathers. You d…
/r/MensRights14/05/18 10:55 PM
1

Funny, the thread doesn't want to end this. That's what YOU take away. OP's account is days old, and has literally only posted this pic. It's reasonable to assume that OP has a problem with this. Usually when you have a problem with something you want to rectify that problem. There's no way to rectify this, without removing it. They also didn't attempt to compare it to Father's Day to see if these people, or locality offered something similar for Father's Day. The comments in the thread are not …
/r/MensRights14/05/18 10:48 PM
1

Why do you feel you should be able to define the motivations of the sub? Because I'm a member of it, and believe that positivity is better than negativity. If enough people agree, than that's the direction the sub takes. Personally, my main motivating value is fairness. I'd rather remove something from single mothers than tolerate double standards and sexism to exist on the actions of people who preach about how they're all about gender equality. Those are not mutually exclusive. You can let the…
/r/MensRights14/05/18 10:43 PM
27

It's really sad that some people want to take away things like this from people, instead of trying to add something like this to those that would appreciate it. This sub shouldn't be about negativity, and trying to remove things, or deny certain experiences. It should be about gaining things for men. This is a nice thing for single mothers. It should also be a nice thing for single fathers (during Father's Day).
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:34 AM
1

You see what I mean? You resort to mindless rhetoric. Your comments lack any sort of substance. Frankly, you're just not worth the time.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 10:16 PM
6

Doesn't matter what gender/sex you are. What does matter... Is that you're either a troll, or just a lonely person who lies, and attempts to belittle people Online, because you live a very sad life. Whichever the case, you should set aside some time for introspection. Seems like you're aware of the benefit, but you haven't yet applied it to yourself.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 10:01 PM
4

You're pretty boring. Is your lack of wit indicative of you being a woman? The humour found in your responses serves only to speak against you. You bring up lack of introspection as well... And when called out for it, you immediately attempt to use the white knight insult. You are exactly who Feminists speak of when they talk about fragile masculinity.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 09:47 PM
2

One moment they act perfectly normal and then when they see something they don't like or somebody messes with them the emotions literally 'switch on' which really creeps me out. I'm convinced they're that used to getting away with this sort of thing that they may well be acting it out, perhaps intentionally, perhaps not because they're so used to it, I'm no psychologist though so I wouldn't be able to tell for sure. Cluster B personality disorders, explain this fairly easily. It's not so much th…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:06 PM
2

Feminists: why don't you tackle the biggest cause of the problem before whining about men? For the same reason most people don't try and tackle black on black crime. They want there to be an easy scapegoat. With an easy scapegoat they can fool themselves into thinking that they have an easy solution. They lack the intelligence, and the education to see things with nuance. They want an identifiable enemy.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 10:18 PM
1

Because Borderline doesn't push them towards suicide.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 03:29 AM
7

If you're fine with it, that's great. But why allow the practice to continue for a newborn baby? "Just part of my culture" simply doesn't hold up to logic, or morality. So you can't really use that as a valid excuse/reason. And a lack of civility is somewhat expected, when we're talking about what is actually happening here. Newborn babies are having parts of their body removed because of religious/cultural reasons, and because of money. When someone is flippant about such a practice, it's kind …
/r/MensRights27/04/18 03:26 AM
0

Being paid more per hour is a casual/part time employee isn't a negative. They don't have the same privileges as full time workers. They don't get the same sick leave days, or holiday hours, etc...
/r/MensRights03/04/18 11:37 PM
1

Manspreading was made illegal in some places. It's not a mindless, and easy complaint to make... It's actually serious, and pointing out just how utterly stupid it is, should be encouraged.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 09:57 PM
5

It only counts as a mass shooting if is contained within a single day. 2000 gang related homicides within a year (5.5 per day, every day) is no big deal... But 86 deaths from two mass shootings (in 2017) is suddenly indicative of a major social issue that can be pinned on white men.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 09:39 PM
5

It really is an interesting thing... Doesn't matter if a single person kills 300 people a year, as long as it's spread out to almost every day. But if you kill 12 people at once, all of a sudden, it's a tragedy, worthy of analysis and condemnation.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 09:33 PM
3

They still require fresh foreskins, and these products simply add fuel to the mutilation train.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 11:11 AM
3

MGTOW used to be a lot better. But it turned to shit, pretty quickly.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 10:20 AM
9

This is a family cultural thing and not your decision. So was slavery, and female circumcision. Yet those are both outlawed now. And both used the exact same argument you just did in order to keep that tradition alive.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 12:30 AM
6

This wasn't affection. And to some people, a kiss on the lips is a very personal, and vulnerable thing.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 04:50 AM
0

I was called a blathering idiot in a comment on a different post, I really don’t know what they were trying to argue. Here is the link Jesus fucking christ... Seriously... One person, who nobody upvoted called you an idiot, and that's supposed to mean something? You are an idiot.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 10:28 AM
9

Strike. That's the only way to make real progress, quickly. Shut the World down for a few days, and see how quickly the government, or society will cater to certain demands. But good luck trying to get enough men on board to do that. Some men have very traditional values, and see their sacrifice as the proper way to live life. Some men will deny that a problem exists in the first place, and won't want to abandon their duties for the problems of other men. Some men can't afford to not work for a …
/r/MensRights26/02/18 01:23 AM
7

That means you have a legit reason to skip leg days.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 03:00 AM
2

Yeah, not quite.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:22 AM
2

Wow. This is like an amalgamation of all of those cringe subs, and r/iamverysmart rolled into one giant mental masturbation sushi roll. The funny thing, is that nothing you said could be considered intellectual.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:05 AM
2

What was made up, exactly? And it's not exactly a victim complex when you just want equal treatment. Either allow both, or disallow both.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 03:05 AM
9

You mean publications where the women consent to being objectified? yeah, totally the same thing. And just so you know, those magazines have been removed from a lot of stores due to "objectification", while at the same time allowing the women's magazines objectifying men. Pointing out double standards is important.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 02:03 AM
5

Nonhuman Personhood. I think dolphins, and whales have already been recognized as such in some places.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 02:20 AM
8

Look, to be successful in advocacy, you need to create a 'big tent' and thats not going to happen if people like you choose to make retarded arguments for retarded causes. How is pointing out your hypocrisy, retarded? I don't give a shit about "big tent" propaganda, or groups that become too big, and eventually become corrupt. I care about individualism. I care about rationality, objectivity, and personal responsibility. The feminists are successful and they work with conservatives on causes tha…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 06:03 AM
10

Because its my child, and my decision. You don't have a voice in the discussion. Concerning something that's almost always unnecessary, it's not really your choice to make. And while you may not think that I don't have a voice... Your son certainly does. And you don't get to eliminate that voice just because he can't articulate his wants. There is no reasonable argument you can make where you can involve yourself in my religion, or my family. There is actually. The abuse, and mutilation of a chi…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 05:32 AM
17

Do you hold the same beliefs when it applies to female genitalia? Would you prefer circumcised women over "natural" women?
/r/MensRights05/02/18 04:27 AM
9

A major tenet of my religion is to force other people to eat pork. Would you be okay with me practicing my religion if it affected you? Now, instead of pork, it's surgery. And instead of "other nameless people", it's your son... Why is it suddenly okay to force something onto him, just because of your religion? You also can't fall back on the he's my son, and I get to choose his religion for him argument. I understand how important religion is to Jews, but you know what? It's ass backwards. Chil…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 04:24 AM
1

Define unhealthy, and how is this related to sex addiction?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 08:39 AM
3

Not my scene. I guess I'm just not on the same level of retardation as you, to vilify someone for their sexual tastes.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 06:33 AM
1

So gay men aren't real men, according to you? Or at least, they don't count to you? Not really sure how this is contradictory when the point is: Sometimes it is great for some couples, but you have to be super careful how you go about it.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:06 AM
2

Why is this posted here? OP, are you trying to shame men for having a specific sexual kink/fantasy?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:34 AM
13

Man, it's depressing you all aren't ready to have this conversation yet so you deflect and pretend that behavior which is told to be bad and wrong is accepted, encouraged, and required in order for success. That seems like a lot of projection on something that I never implied. Simply presenting an alternative viewpoint isn't endorsing, or dismissing the behaviour of bad people. So you create this feminized false-reality ideal of a "nice guy" pushover who maybe respects women too much and doesn't…
/r/MensRights27/01/18 12:11 AM
39

Or... Now hear me out here... Those "other" guys aren't violent, and disrespectful? Maybe they don't just mindlessly give in to every whim, and request that the woman has? Maybe they have some self respect and will tell the woman a hard "fuck no" when she calls up at 3am requesting some dumb shit. "Nice guys" aren't respected by other people, because they don't respect themselves enough.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 10:02 PM
1

What are you even talking about? One was shown clapping, and both were shown nodding.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 01:46 AM
5

Men do use the tactic. It's not always with women, sometimes it's with other men. There's a lot of gay/bi men in Hollywood, and they aren't so prudish.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 08:25 PM
32

Bigots will always have an excuse for why their bigotry is ok, and everyone else's is hatred. I was told that Jews, and Greeks don't count as white people, after I referenced them being victims of oppression. I was then told that when talking about "white people" they meant North Western Europe types... Then I brought up Irish, and Scottish people (with examples), and then they called me a white supremacist that hated women.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 08:10 PM
11

It's not about what all Feminists want. There are too many different sects to flat out say what they all want. It's about what's being pushed by the ones that get shit done. The Feminists that promote/support/enact these biased policies are the ones that this sub mostly talks about. These are the ones with political/media influence. There may be some good Feminists out there that want true equality, but they don't speak up, and they don't have any influence over the media, or politics. Everyone …
/r/MensRights27/12/17 09:10 PM
2

Go tell your mother this and see how she responds. It's like you've never spent any time with a woman and talked to them about these occurrences. Yeah, except everyday. But you got me. I should just stop treating people who go through these problems just because you said so. Doesn't matter that I have a near perfect success rate... Some moron on the Internet doesn't agree with objective treatment protocols, so they must be right.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 09:41 PM
–

What is garbage? The part where your attempt to give best/worst case scenario involved no positive. It's inherently biased right off the bat, and you only stated it that way to promote a biased point of view. The great thing about selection biases is that a small minority can still be a big problem. I didn't claim otherwise, did I? In fact, I specifically mentioned that they should be dealt with bluntly, and seriously. It's a small number of the total population, but most of the total population…
/r/MensRights26/12/17 10:51 AM
–

There is value in your comment, but it's hidden under some garbage. At best, it's a positive experience that can leave you feeling good for the rest of the day/week, or even going out on a date with a great person. At worst, it's a potentially dangerous situation. For the people that don't take rejection well... You tell them that if they threaten or harass you again, you will contact the police, and then you actually follow through with that threat. Yes these people exist, but they are in a sma…
/r/MensRights26/12/17 10:00 AM
-1

Then you're just a sad individual.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 07:30 AM
8

It's doubly hilarious, because it demonises a sexual fetish that a lot of men engage in. So on a sub that tries to advocate for men, you have people that use that fetish as an insult.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 11:07 PM
1

Chinese people were treated worse than black people. They actually gave black people monetary value. Want to know the difference? Chinese parents hammered into their kids heads, the notion that they could improve their lives by going to school, and getting a good job. Whereas black kids are taught to seek escape through sports/entertainment. Something that less than 1% if them can achieve. The Chinese way has a far greater success rate.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 08:58 PM
1

This woman is completely obsessed about how other people view her and what they think of her. Most people in general are. This is why cosmetics exist, and why nice clothes/things are sought after. If this wasn't true, people would just wear whatever was most comfortable all the time.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 02:07 AM
17

Because a lot of women are always available, regardless of their relationship status. There's always room to upgrade. At the very least, they like to have the ability to make their men jealous. It's emotional manipulation.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 02:04 AM
1

The main character is batshit crazy. That's kind of the point. She's been raised to subdue her emotions, in favour of logic. But she's not a Vulcan, so she can't control her emotions as readily as a Vulcan. Now that she's been with her previous Captain for some time, she has learned to accept part of her humanity. She has trouble regulating her logic/emotions (just like every other human), but it's amplified simply because of how she was raised. In episode 6 however, all of her screw-ups are bla…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 01:55 AM
3

Holy Christ! Does anyone know the number of Franken's dealer? Whoever that guy he is, he's selling the good stuff. I don't think you interpreted that part properly. While I don't remember the rehearsal for the skit as Leeann does, I understand why we need to listen to and believe women’s experiences. This is simply a matter of perspective. He doesn't deny the actions, he is just pointing out the difference in perception. In his eyes, he doesn't remember it being a malicious "assault". But in her…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 01:44 AM
2

Yeah, we're done here. You're not even a clever, or entertaining troll. It's just sad.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 10:52 AM
2

What makes you think I'm not open to having my mind changed? At first, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt, and going from the assumption that you were willing. Now, it's pretty much guaranteed that you're just trolling. All you've done is ask leading questions and waste my time so far. If asking you to specify what evidence you're looking for is a "leading question", then you're not only a bad troll, bad a moron too.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 10:38 AM
2

Yes. If you're actually open to having your mind changed (like you're trying to portray), then I would need to present an argument that you are actually willing to listen to. You're looking for someone to convince you. I can't attempt that if you're completely unwilling to have your mind changed. And it's futile for me to individually work through each possible response.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 10:24 AM
2

Again. By what criteria?
/r/MensRights14/11/17 10:14 AM
2

I'm not going to answer your question, until you answer mine.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 09:57 AM
1

Well done.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 04:40 AM
1

What the fuck anyone who doesn't want equality isn't fighting for equality how in any way shape or form can you disprove that. That's not what you said. You said anyone who doesn't fight for equality, isn't a Feminist. This is factually wrong. Also, I'll state it again, since you missed it previously... Not every Feminist agrees with your definition of "equality", or even how to attain it. These are personal beliefs and I'm definetly allowed to have my own. You sure are. But you're not allowed t…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 04:19 AM
1

So you disagree that feminism/activism for men's rights(it is kinda stupid there's no mainstream term for this) is about equality for all regardless of gender? Yes I disagree with the notion that Feminism fights for both. I don't understand what you're arguing against. You said that a Feminist that doesn't believe in Equality for both men and women, is not a "true" Feminist. That's what I'm arguing against. They are Feminists. They just don't represent all Feminists. There isn't more definitions…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:34 AM
1

The majority of female educators, social workers, and mental health practitioners, that I have met are like this.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:29 AM
7

Just like Original Sin doesn't openly blame women for the failings of humanity. But it's highly implied, even if Original Sin also harms women as well. Original Sin vs Patriarchy: Something that you're born into, where you need to grovel for forgiveness. Something that is so vague, that you can literally attribute every negative thing to it, while at the same time every positive thing, depending on how the person wants to frame the narrative. But don't worry... People who claim to have moral aut…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:27 AM
3

Yes. But make sure that the hate speech posts are the ones that have a lot of upvotes. You can't point do a -10 post and claim that it represents the community. And then explain how each comment is actually hate speech. I can pretty much guarantee that those posts are not only in the minority, but they are also not highly upvoted. On top of that, it's also pretty safe to assume that the more positive comments that are rational are the highest upvoted ones.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:21 AM
2

The point you made, that you clarified here... Is exactly what I'm responding to. You're wrong if you think that a "true" feminist only wants Equality for everyone. There are different sects of Feminism that want different things, and they have different viewpoints about certain issues. There are even some that reject your notion of what defines Feminism. In what way am I "raging"? I didn't realize that specifying/expanding my arguments was "raging". I never asked you to argue about anything els…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:14 AM
3

They need complete and unfettered free speech to spread their nazi bullshit. No they don't. They need uneducated people to gobble it up like sheep. You don't counter what they say by trying to shut/shout them down. You counter it by being the more reasonable side, and by showing others how crazy they are. The vast majority of alt-right responses are downvoted here. The system works. The comments don't need to be censored. They are already controlled/denounced by the community.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:08 AM
2

Humans are responsible for it. Not just men.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:03 AM
3

There are literally two stickied posts. One talking about Male Genital Mutilation, and the other about supporting an organization that wants to open up a Men's Shelter. Most of the posts on the front page are directly related to Men's Rights issues.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:01 AM
2

I've given you multiple opportunities to actually address my points. You chose not to, multiple times. Don't project your failures on me.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 02:39 AM
17

Part of the problem is that too many teachers are female. And most of those, simply don't know how to relate/reach young boys. The video is spot on with everything it said, and lines up perfectly with what I have seen, professionally. Administrators, and teachers simply don't understand how to address these problems, because they are viewing them through a female lens. Just like how a man can't entirely understand what it's like to be a woman, the reverse is also true. I've said it before, but a…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 02:36 AM
2

Your response not only backs up what I said, but it's also infantile.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 02:18 AM
4

In what way did I complicate it? You're attempting to dismiss certain groups of Feminists by claiming they are not Feminists, in an attempt to make you, and people like you feel superior, or untouchable. That's not how it works. People do this when they read a story about someone who viciously abused a child... Saying that they are monsters, or less than human, or that no human can do that. Problem is... That's exactly what humans are capable of. This is also true for religious people as well, a…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:26 AM
15

That makes no sense. Women used to be property of men No. They used to be property of the rich. Just like men were. obviously they needed laws to redress that, since it would make no sense to include men in those laws. Yes they did need laws to address that. So did men. The problem is, when you introduce gendered laws in order to force a balance of something, it ends up inherently being unbalanced. Are you one of those people that thinks racial minorities should get no special help even though i…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 12:44 AM
4

You keep using the term "actual feminists". It's moronic. Read this so you can understand what my first sentence means. The core of it is equality just like the movement here, anyone who wants anything else isn't a "feminist" or any activist for any type of sexism or equality. The core has never been about equality. If this was true, then they would have never split off from the Egalitarian movement that was already established.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 12:31 AM
2

I will tell you exactly what has changed. It got bigger. And like with any sub that reaches a certain point, the content gets diluted in favour of easy karma. This happened with Atheism, and it happened with several other subs. The more people you have, the more it attracts the young, impulsive, and the easily driven to outrage crowd. The sub gets filled with low effort content, and gets more upvotes than anything else that might be more thought provoking. This is a phenomenon that happens with …
/r/MensRights13/11/17 10:12 PM
8

Yes, you can find individuals on Reddit, or Tumblr that are assholes... OP didn't do that. He pointed to a government official, and a leader of a Feminist organisation. You are attempting to equate those two, with random assholes on the Internet.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 10:04 PM
3

A No True Scotsman argument simply doesn't fly... They are Feminists. They are the ones that penetrate into the government, and media. They are the ones that are pushing sexist legislation, ad campaigns, and educational reforms that actively hurt men.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 10:01 PM
3

I expected someone to explain to me why it's mutilation. So far, no one has convinced me. What would actually convince you? Would a dictionary definition of mutilation be enough? Would you need a moral/ethical argument against it? Would you need a medical/scientific argument against it? Are you looking for a religious argument against it? What? What exactly, are you looking for that will convince you?
/r/MensRights13/11/17 09:57 PM
32

You realise feminism's stated aim is equality between the sexes right? Stated aims are far different than sought after goals. If what you said was true, then there would be zero legislation that has the word "woman/women" in it. Zero committees, zero groups, zero advisory boards. They would all be gender neutral. But simply isn't the way it is... Feminist groups actively campaign for "woman/women"... And never for everyone. Encouraging men to be primary carers instead of primary breadwinners. Me…
/r/MensRights13/11/17 09:47 PM
23

Part of the problem is that certain groups want to throw around terms like "victim blaming" without figuring out who the actual victim is, first.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 04:28 AM
2

That's awesome. It's nice to see some positive stuff in the sub.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 09:55 AM
7

Sub rules are vague so as to provide an easy escape route/justification for hypocritical mods. https://www.reddit.com/r/Showerthoughts/comments/6sd5wv/if_i_had_a_son_or_daughter_come_out_and_tell_me/ 9th top post. About a gay joke. It's allowed because it's the correct "Liberal" answer. And I say this as NDP supporter, which is more Left than the Liberals in Canada, and as someone who agrees with the message. https://www.reddit.com/r/Showerthoughts/comments/2ucx09/waterboarding_at_guantanamo_bay…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 03:41 AM
6

Under Do Not Post: Posts related to, or denigrating, any religion. We don't want to hear about Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc. Nothing about circumcision, churches, atheism, mosques, Muslims, etc.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 03:07 AM
13

https://www.reddit.com/r/Showerthoughts/comments/79xf90/halloween_would_be_the_best_day_for_the_jehovah/ That's a religion one on the front page. Still left up.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 02:17 AM
1

Look at the sidebar.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 10:15 PM
1

https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=hormone+replacement+therapy+transgender&btnG=&oq=hormone+replacement+therapy+trans
/r/MensRights29/10/17 10:13 PM
13

They've already had campaigns saying that the hijab is a feminist symbol. Give them some time, and they'll try to incorporate burgas too.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 09:56 PM
1

Is he literally telling them? No he’s telling you. He's attempting to play the "my way is right" game. And does it matter that he brings up things you decided not to address? He addresses them because the hold bearing to what’s being talked about. They're irrelevant to what's being discussed, and to what I specifically took issue with in his post. Bringing up things that I may agree with, doesn't really do anything to progress the conversation forward. And only serves as a distraction, red herri…
/r/MensRights28/10/17 08:16 PM
0

The fad of bashing "toxic masculinity", the war on boys, the lack of public support for men and boys, and countless other elements of far-left doctrine entering into politics tells a very different story. Did I mention any of those things? Did I state that "the left" doesn't also contribute to the problem? Sure, some men like big women or working women or women who like to get dirty on the job, etc. But these are by and large exceptions to the trend. No they really aren't. Back when "men were me…
/r/MensRights27/10/17 10:40 PM
1

See, men want women who are women, not women who are men. Here's the problem... Not every man wants the typical stereotype of what you may view as "feminine"... Whatever that is supposed to mean. Our best works are made when inspired and driven for the success of our families. Our best works are made when inspired and driven for the success of humanity. Religion may be the most vocal proponent of this, but even many right-leaning agnostics are starting to grow tired of this. The problem doesn't …
/r/MensRights27/10/17 09:56 PM
1

No. That's not how this works. You do the crime, you receive the punishment. Crime and punishment are not absolute. Context matters. If he is guilty of this, then his age, and mental health deserve to be taken into account.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 01:53 AM
4

Inuit.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 11:37 PM
5

She just explained the differences between the two. She didn't answer your question.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 12:44 AM
1

There's a difference between using it when you quote something/somebody, and when you say it as a part of normal conversation.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 12:22 AM
10

Your perception is not the responsibility of everyone else. Look to evaluate your initial reaction, first.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 08:46 PM
3

At least you got checked out. That's a good start. Far too many men simply refuse to get checked out for stupid reasons.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 07:56 PM
23

What you deem as being hate, is really just frustration, and confusion.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 07:52 PM
2

Maybe they should be telling these housewives to not use their kids as props. Maybe they should be telling these moms, that they need to find fulfillment in their own lives, instead of trying to force stardom onto their kids. Maybe they need to tell them that they shouldn't allow strangers, full, unchaperoned access to their children.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 11:03 PM
2

He, and everyone else in Hollywood can rot for all I care. They're worse than the Catholic Church when it comes to child molestation. The entire industry can crumble, and it would only serve to improve society as a whole.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 02:15 AM
1

I called it out because you sound like a lot of the parents I deal with on a daily basis... The ones that think they know more about children simply because they have them. It's akin to someone thinking they know more (or their opinion is equal to) than a dentist about dental health, simply because they have teeth. Or someone thinking they know more about agriculture, simply because they grow tomatoes in their backyard. Your attempted appeal to authority was trying to show that you know more abo…
/r/MensRights10/10/17 01:37 AM
5

The problem is with mass segregation, and not being able to socialize efficiently. Having gendered classrooms in a coed school would alleviate that problem. That way, you have the increased classroom performance of both boys, and girls, while still allowing them to develop proper social intelligence with each other.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 02:00 AM
2

I think that the key to consistently exercising is finding something that you enjoy doing that is also physical activity. Psychologically speaking, you're right. It makes a huge difference when you aren't dreading your upcoming workout session.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 01:37 AM
1

It's not about slowing metabolism. It's about changing what and how something is actually metabolised. Calories in vs Calories out is simplistic thinking, and completely ignores context, which involves a lot more than just calories. This doesn't mean that eating under your TDEE won't cause you to lose weight, it will... But a lot of things hinder that process.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 01:31 AM
3

You're adorable.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 04:30 AM
2

Yeah, considering that I have over a decade of professional experience dealing with children (mostly), and almost a decade in school, specializing in developmental/behavioural psychology... I'm pretty sure I know what I'm talking about. I know children better than their parents do. Give me 5 hours with your child(ren), and I would know them better than you.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 03:23 AM
2

If you're trying to make an appeal to authority, you're going to lose that one.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:29 AM
7

Then you're doing something wrong.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:01 PM
7

Bonding with your kid isn't worth the effort? Are you serious?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:06 PM
1

No it's not real. Watch the first two episodes and you'll see just how stupid this video is. Even A Voice For Man put out an article full of lies, where the author just wanted to piss all over a Sarkesian video, about the show. I really hate to say it, but among the stupidity of her video, there were some valid points made... But don't worry, the AVFM article daid that you didn't need to watch her video since he did... Never trust anyone who says that. For some reason, the show has brought out a…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:17 PM
1

And? It's been a sub for 3 years. Both subs are filled with similar garbage that obfuscate the underlying message.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 12:41 AM
1

Yeah that makes it really sad, and depressing, that this situation exists given that context. Thankfully there are step children that do appreciate their covenant fathers though. YouTube is full of those sappy videos where children ask their "father" to officially adopt them, and that's pretty great.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 06:03 AM
3

Teachers in Australia are actually decently. They are still underpaid for the amount of work they do, though. They can easily reach over $110K/year.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:37 AM
1

Blood is thicker than water. This doesn't mean what you think it does.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:17 AM
3

The original Reddit post is from 4 years ago.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:16 AM
2

It will only be a few more years before it happens to Bill.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 02:57 AM
1

That's the point though... Regardless of the outcome, it happened (maybe). OP is simply refusing to believe that it is even possible, and is making absolute claims about it, when even experts are in disagreement about it.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 01:14 AM
1

My argument is not the technical specs of the armour, alone. It's the usage of it as well. Who wore what, and when? My source (literally the only one provided in the entire conversation) states that armour was switched out, when needed.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 12:32 AM
1

Another example of you not knowing what you're talking about, and you attempting to refute something you never read. When they used Longswords, they had the shields on their back, or gave them to the baggage bearers. Not only did you not read the source, you didn't even read the quote that directly refutes your claim. This is simply not worth the time. You're trying to make absolute claims about something centuries ago, and literally offered nothing to back up what you're saying, while at the sa…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 02:53 AM
0

That fine. I was specifically talking about fighting in the front line of a shield wall. Which is what Shield Maidens did. Further down he says: The maidens I have named, in fighting as well as courteous array, led their land-forces to the battle-field. He also says: Beside men-warriors there were "women-warriors" in the North, as Saxo explains. He describes shield-maidens, as Alfhild, Sela, Rusila (the Ingean Ruadh, or Red Maid of the Irish Annals, as Steenstrup so ingeniously conjectures); and…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 11:52 PM
0

At no point did anyone say that the women were equally matched with men. There have been plenty of young teenagers in battle, even though they were no match for men. This is about the existence of female soldiers, which could be true, and is plausible.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 11:41 PM
0

No need to be a twat... This is something that happened centuries ago. To try and make absolute claims about events back then is moronic.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 10:30 PM
0

Now out of the town of Sle, under the captains Hetha (Heid) and Wisna, with Hakon Cut-cheek came Tummi the Sailmaker. On these captains, who had the bodies of women, nature bestowed the souls of men. Webiorg was also inspired with the same spirit, and was attended by Bo (Bui) Bramason and Brat the Jute, thirsting for war. Taken from this Danish History book, written by historian: Saxo Grammaticus. Women may not have the endurance, or absolute strength of a man, but that is an average. If you tra…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 10:29 PM
0

To be fair, it would be difficult to try and pick out genders when everyone is wearing similar armour, has long hair, and is trying to kill you.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 04:22 AM
1

Any suggestions on relevant subreddits this should be crossposted to? I am so fucking sick of r/relationships. People need to see what a fucking shithole it is. None exist on reddit. This is because you shouldn't be taking relationship advice from anonymous people on the Internet. If you want actual help in your relationship, see a professional.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 04:06 AM
1

Sure, and that's fine. But I don't think people should be trying to saying she's innocent, because she's quite clearly guilty of something. Hopefully, we'll find out if it's something minor like negligence/recklessness, or if it's more serious.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 03:12 AM
3

There's two sides to this story, so innocent until proven guilty applies to both... The man may or may not have been threatening... The woman may or may not have been defending herself. Facts: She shot him twice while she was in her car, and then drove off. That is not disputed by the father, or anyone. That fact alone is pretty damning. Shooting someone while you're in an SUV isn't exactly a life or death situation. Even if the homeless guy was sprinting towards the vehicle, saying he was going…
/r/MensRights13/09/17 04:34 AM
14

Some would argue it would be a dystopian world because it wouldn't be free in the present conventional sense. However that is misguided. It will be utopian because it will be a world almost without conflict where people cooperate and are treated properly within a well-engineered and long-forged system. If everything is great for almost everyone the point is null. Survival and socio-organic wellbeing are the most important elements in life. Diversity of principles and standards is only necessary …
/r/MensRights13/09/17 04:19 AM
4

I'm not talking about the school. I'm talking about the organization that oversees psychologists in the US. She would be required to become a member in order to practice. They have standards of practice, and she most likely violated them.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 04:13 AM
10

Then find out what organisation(s) she's a member of, and file a complaint.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 03:53 AM
16

Report her to her boss, or take it up with whatever board/group (in the US I assume) she is registered with. What she did is wholly unethical.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 03:30 AM
1

First of all you dont have to take my word. You can open the site i directed to you and try to refute ALL 37 brain studies by top research institutions like for example max planck institute and Cambridge University. I did go to the link, and looked at the studies. The page you linked to though, does a really shitty job at interpreting the results of said studies, and some of the studies are not well done. I'm not going to waste my time to refute all of them, when it's 100% clear you never looked…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 11:01 PM
1

Guys in adulthood would indeed produce more muscles if they took estrogene blockers. But only because their testosterone is already in the male range to begin with. Yeah, you have no idea what you're talking about. The main reason men do TRT, is because their Test levels are lower than normal. On the other hand Women in menopause (where their estrogene level drops naturally) don't just bulk up do they? Yup, now it's positive... You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Testosterone …
/r/MensRights09/09/17 09:22 AM
1

Blockers do not make you develop in the opposite direction. Whoever tells you otherwise is simply wrong. So guys that take estrogen blockers don't develop more muscle? Do you realize that one of the first steps in Testosterone Replacement Therapy is estrogen blockers? But as said elsewhere, he is the exception and not the norm when it comes to this. He's the exception right now, but what happens when this gets pushed on more kids? It will quickly become the norm. We don't make other treatments i…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:39 AM
5

Pornography addiction isn't real. Addiction is real, and porn is just a single way it can manifest. Anything you spend time on, daily, can feed your predisposition to addiction. Stamp collecting, model trains, work, etc. The difference here is... People don't view workoholics as having a problem with addiction. Not in the same way they view problems with alcohol, or heroin. Most of the studies linked on that site actually make the distinction that you don't. They call for the addition of certain…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:38 PM
2

But what about spiders? But they're so cute.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:23 PM
1

You're arguing about different things... OP said they would develop like normal, which simply isn't true. This isn't only about cognitive performance, it's also about physical features. You will cause someone to be shorter than they should be, which statistically lessens the amount of money they make, and how seriously they are taken by other people. For men, you dramatically change their "masculine" features. A perfect example of this, is Bailey Jay... She took Test blockers until she was 25. A…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 10:42 PM
2

as laid out in that article, is puberty blockers instead of hormone therapy, as they are safer, easier and allow for them to make a permanent decision later- as a more mature person. Once the blockers are discontinued, puberty resumes. Puberty blockers work the same way as regular hormones. If you were to take an estrogen blocker, it would be the same as taking testosterone. The mechanisms are different, but the result is the same. Puberty doesn't "resume" like normal. And you don't just fuck wi…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 10:04 AM
7

One doesn't choose to be trans. Good thing I never said it was a choice. The issue is with teenager confusion, and how easily they can be mistaken about things they can't really grasp. The studies show very clearly that the risk of mental illness is correlated with lack of family support. Correlation doesn't mean much. Gender identity doesn't have to do with familial support, it has to do with personal perception, and your individualistic identity. being confused about who you are, and your plac…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 08:12 AM
9

Don't try to twist the issue with emotive and pejorative language. We're talking about hormone replacement therapy, not "drugging children", as part of gender transition, not to "obfuscate their birth sex". So your solution is to allow children, who have no idea about the ramifications about their decisions, or about the severity of sexual identity, to make permanent changes to their body, and increase the risks of mental illness, and suicide later?
/r/MensRights08/09/17 05:38 AM
10

His average daily protein intake is about three times what's recommended for most people. 3 x 42 (their calculations) = 126. Lower than what pretty much any bodybuilder intakes, and is in the sweet spot of what is recommended for people strength training. Gyms like this are ground zero for our modern obsession with getting shredded and for the products that promise a surefire quick method: a galaxy of brands of protein powders, salts, fat burners and stimulants. But people that actually do stren…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 04:35 AM
6

My father died from brain cancer when I was still relatively young. The timing of it hurt me the most. Right when we were starting to have a relationship that wasn't antagonistic vs authoritarian, and was actually respectful, and friendly, he was diagnosed. I miss having a few drinks at a pub, and just talking with him. Some of my favourite memories were when I was a young kid we would watch those corny Shaw Brothers Wushu movies together.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:08 AM
6

All of these days are stupid. People shouldn't be forced, or socially guilt tripped into celebrating something so arbitrary, and meaningless, anyway. If you really cared about your parent(s), then you continuously show it, through words/actions. You don't save up so you can get them some shitty consumerist trash that you were manipulated into buying. Every consumerist holiday should be eliminated. Public holidays should be renamed into something divorced from all religious, political, or persona…
/r/MensRights04/09/17 11:25 PM
1

This is great. This is the type of thing this sub needs more of. Hopefully this can get added to the sidebar.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 07:59 AM
1

Pretty funny that the guy shits on the chef for saying "pikey", and that it's a pejorative... Yet uses "twat" as a pejorative. Too bad he didn't call him out on that.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 10:46 PM
3

What is the going rate for slinging burgers in Melbourne? $20+/hour.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 11:52 AM
1

Depends on what type of Christian she is. If she's one that looks for loopholes so that she can enjoy her life, then she'll just do anal, and still claim virginity. If she's devoted, and actually cares about her "relationship" with god, then it's very likely legit.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 09:03 AM
1

By your own numbers, 41% of gun owners are Republican, 23% are Democrat. That meets any definition of "plenty" of each party. Oh, so you're purposely being vague, and broad so as to not be wrong... A meaningless distinction. 41 vs 23 is a huge gap, and "plenty" just doesn't cut it for the narrative you're trying to spin, here. Feminists have consistently supported discounts for women. Just because they haven't commented on this particular incident doesn't mean you can assume their position must …
/r/MensRights29/08/17 05:56 AM
2

There are plenty of gun owners on both sides of the political spectrum. Not everything can be reduced to left vs. right. Except that according to official NRA numbers, you're just flat out wrong. Also, the "left" of the 1950s, when California's antidiscrimination law was passed, was a lot different from the left of today. Irrelevant. It's well known on this sub that feminists are generally in support of discounts for women. I can hear the arguments in my head: "women are paid 18% less than men! …
/r/MensRights29/08/17 04:11 AM
3

Out of all gun owners, 41% are Republican, 23% are Democrat. The NRA is notoriously Republican, and spent around $22 million during the 2016 election. 99% of it went to Republicans. So again, for the last time... This is Republicans being mad at equality laws that were introduced by Leftists. This is not irony, because Leftists are not the ones being upset over this. OP linked an article from Breitbart (right wing) that posted a angry response from the NRA (right wing)... Why the fuck would you …
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:13 AM
1

Did you even read the article?
/r/MensRights29/08/17 02:02 AM
1

Because you falsely said something was ironic. It would be irony if Feminists (who are predominately Leftist) were upset at something that was the result of their own doing. But this situation is completely different. Feminists aren't upset that a gun club doesn't have a ladies night. The Conservatives that go there, are.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 11:55 PM
1

To be fair, I doubt that many Feminists are going to be members of a gun club. It's not ironic that Conservatives are angry about something that Leftists did.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 11:42 PM
2

Every culture/ethnicity/nationality has people like that in it.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 11:38 PM
1

Having persuaded 243 men to smear their torsos with either a placebo or a testosterone gel (imagine the lead-up: “No, honestly, we’re not videoing this … No, that’s not a one-way mirror … No, we are not going to offer you a Diet Coke”), the scientists gave them a “cognitive reflection test” designed to assess their ability to answer tricky questions where their first, intuitive answer was likely to be wrong*. Those who had rubbed themselves with testosterone rather than the placebo answered 20% …
/r/MensRights28/08/17 11:31 PM
23

This is a perfect example of why marriage simply isn't worth it... Don't let society/family/friends pressure you into it, either. It's simply not worth it for men to ever get married. No matter how much you love someone, things change. If you seriously love someone, where you want to spend the rest of your life with them, then do just that. You don't need a ceremony, or legal documents validating your love for each other. No government bonus/tax break is worth it.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 02:22 AM
1

What's bullshit is the forced idea that it's a gender thing, and not a poor people problem. Just like today... Rich people aren't really convicted of crimes, except for rare occasion. Do you really think a Noble woman would go to jail for having an abortion, and be treated the same as some lowly maid?
/r/MensRights25/08/17 03:39 AM
1

I'm not sure of a quick fix to the colour blind issue, this might help? White text with a black outline. That fixes 99% of all readability issues.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 02:43 AM
1

Except that it simply isn't true. Individual men/women have been, sure. But as a group? Not really. It's mostly socio-economic based, not gender based.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 02:40 AM
1

Coercion forces consent. Which may seem contradictory, but it isn't. And again... Making poor choices can be coercion. I'm not going to bother responding to you, since you keep playing semantic games, and purposely ignore subtlety in the situation.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 06:05 AM
1

How are they though? If your argument is that it would have been something they otherwise wouldn't have done surely they haven't consented? If they wouldn't ordinarily do it, then consent isn't something that can be easily assumed, especially when drugs are involved. And its something they cannot control unlike their blood alcohol level, so surely they are less culpable? Your hormone levels are relatively constant. Your body is used to the levels they are at. Unless you recently started taking h…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 10:13 PM
1

What about coercion, manipulation? If only one person is drunk, you don't see how that situation is different? It's not just alcohol, this applies to other drugs as well.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 10:02 PM
1

Again, drunken sex can easily be someone else doing something to you. So it's not your own actions at all.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 11:58 AM
1

If you want to purposely ignore that they are different situations, be my guest. Seems like we're not going to come to an understanding here.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 11:26 AM
1

Sorry but with all due respect I think that's bullshit. If go through a dry spell and am unusually aroused and I then sleep with a hideous person that I would never sleep with when not influenced by hormones does that mean I have not consented. Hormones are different from outside drugs influencing your mind. And if two people are drunk have they raped each other? No, because they were both drunk. But if one was drunk, and the other person, sober, then... Maybe. It depends. I chose to get drunk. …
/r/MensRights22/08/17 08:41 AM
1

You can't have both. The point is, that you can have both, because they are different situations. Drunken sex directly inherently involves another person, drunk driving doesn't. Not every situation is the same just because drunkeness is a commonality.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 08:36 AM
1

Not necessarily. It would be your fault that you got drunk to begin with, sure. But that doesn't mean that while you're drunk, you can't be manipulated into doing something you wouldn't ordinarily do. In this situation, if you were coerced into sex, you wouldn't be responsible, because your judgement has been hindered by alcohol, and thus. In a case of drunk driving, you should be forced to take responsibility for your actions, because it's a failure on multiple levels. While sober, you didn't m…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 05:01 AM
0

There's a huge rabbit hole we could go down, here... I don't really want to go there over such a simple comment. The point is: Alcohol alters the way you think, it hinders your brain's ability to function. A person's personality does change, and in essence, they are not themselves. This can be considered losing the ability to think for yourself, when you are no longer yourself to begin with. One of the major things to be hindered is judgement, and when you are making decisions that you wouldn't …
/r/MensRights21/08/17 11:07 PM
3

Alcohol doesn't make you loose the ability to think for yourself. It does in a way.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 10:29 PM
8

The poster referenced in your email was created and distributed on our campus approximately 8 years ago and was very short lived ­­– long before other campuses our size were having in-depth discussions regarding consent. Since that time, the conversation with our students about sexual consent has changed dramatically. Currently, educational initiatives regarding consent on the Coastal Carolina University campus include extensive online and in-person education. The school doesn't say that the sig…
/r/MensRights21/08/17 10:28 PM
32

I've read cases where a woman received lesser charges for hitting someone while drunk driving, because she wasn't "in control". Feminists push for this type of special treatment in law, but then at the same time claim that the Patriarchy removes agency from women. This is why to some people, the poster makes perfect sense... They don't see women as having agency, while men do. Everything is enacted upon women, by men. Every instance of violence (animal/child/partner abuse) is justified by the ac…
/r/MensRights21/08/17 10:24 PM
1

I've already explained the response to your moronic question about a quote you purposely took out of context. You're not a very good troll.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 11:56 AM
0

I took the initiative to suggest that you weren't as stupid as you're appearing to be, by asking a moronic question. Especially after I explained in the original post what the cameras would pick up. I never said they would have direct video of the interaction (which took place inside the restroom). I said that they could use who entered, and when, to be able to verify OP's story. So, considering what I originally explained, your question is moronic, since obviously you were being sincere in how …
/r/MensRights21/08/17 11:49 AM
0

Not sure what you're missing here. Outside of the restroom, inside the office... You can see where people are, and when. Hence, it's fairly easy to see who is lying.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 09:46 AM
0

Outside. Yes.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 07:58 AM
-1

Your question was pointless considering I never said that exactly has happened. Who knows, maybe it has. I know that worse has absolutely happened for less. That's the point. Better safe than sorry. This is the type of hysteria I'm talking about. You're no better than the people that believe in micro-aggressions. Every place I've ever worked has had at least one women file a sexual harassment compliant at some point. I've bever been the victim because I AWLAYS protect myself and keep my distance…
/r/MensRights21/08/17 04:27 AM
-1

Nice attempt to dodge the question. Not willing to answer it? Fortune 500 company means that they would have security cameras. They would know that he went in first. They would know that she went in after, and whether or not she at least knocked. No claim she makes, would be taken seriously. And no, I'm not new here, but thanks for assuming. I've been here a lot longer than you have, and I'm actually active in my community. I've spent the last 10 years actively pushing for better treatment of bo…
/r/MensRights21/08/17 04:01 AM
-2

Worse has not happened, for less. Has there been a single case where a women walked into a men's room, and then won a case of harassment?
/r/MensRights21/08/17 03:52 AM
-7

Well then you have nothing to complain about, really. You should have made it clear that she is supposed to make sure nobody was in there before she just barges in. If you're so easily conditioned for something so trivial, then maybe you don't belong in the adult World. Your hyperbole is a little worrisome, and mirrors the ridiculousness of many Feminists. Edit: Keep upvoting hysteria. The fuck is wrong with you people? You seriously think a cleaner needs to be fired for not knocking on one occa…
/r/MensRights21/08/17 12:41 AM
-1

Did you say anything to her?
/r/MensRights20/08/17 10:49 PM
6

You can be racist, and still be for equal rights.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 11:30 PM
1

While shit like this might drive a small man to seek greater power It doesn't.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:14 AM
1

It sure is.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 11:47 AM
1

They justify it by saying the pros outweigh the cons. There's a difference.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:59 AM
1

It's funny how you're trying to argue with me as if I'm in favour of MGM. Yes, potential negatives is how they phrase it. This discussion is not about the accuracy of that claim.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:41 AM
1

A clitoris is considered "vestigial" in some cultures. Nice goalpost moving. You tried a medical viewpoint, but when that was shutdown you went for cultural. Sad. Depends on culture. Culture is irrelevant. A bit like in America, "medically" it is "claimed" that the foreskin has no function. No doctor claims that is serves no function.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:40 AM
1

Sensation. Erotic function. Arm hairs can convey sensation as well... Doesn't mean that they are "functional" (medically speaking) parts of the body. And if it had no function, it wouldn't be sensitive would it? What function does it serve? Do you even know what "vestigial" means?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:31 AM
1

Where do they say that exactly? At worst, you could say that they suggest the positives of the procedure, outweigh the potential negatives.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:30 AM
1

Hmmm. You could say the same about a clitoris, since it has no biological function No, you couldn't say that. No respectable scientist, or medical professional that has actually studied it says that. Maybe decades ago, you would be right. since it has "decided not to change" so to speak, and instead of turning into a penis, it remained a clitoris. That's not how it works. The penis starts off as a clitoris, and changes. This is due to some pretty basic Biology 101 where men are initially women, …
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:06 AM
1

What function to they serve? A vestigial tail is also sensitive to touch, texture, and temperature.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:00 AM
1

They have actual functions, and are fully fledged organs. Male nipples do not have actual function. A penis started off as a clitoris, but it developed further into its own unique thing. Male nipples started off as female nipples, but then decided to not change, or develop into something different. They are the equivalent of a tail. A reminder of something that isn't fully formed.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 05:34 AM
3

Remember... It's just a joke. But here's the thing - we don't have to laugh. Friends joshing and teasing each other is one thing, but being targeted by strangers or even acquaintances is another thing entirely. We don't have to play along when buffoons make 'jokes' that do nothing more than belittle people with less power than them. Claiming something is 'just a joke' might be a convenient way for them to justify their own intolerance and prejudice, but it's not actually an excuse. Nor is opposi…
/r/MensRights11/08/17 05:24 AM
1

99% of your skin can be an erogenous zone. There's nothing special about male nipples.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:33 AM
1

Spare me your BDSM fanboyism. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-do-men-have-nipples/ In a sense, male nipples are analogous to vestigial structures such as the remnants of useless pelvic bones in whales
/r/MensRights11/08/17 01:30 AM
3

About 12:20 into the video... "While he's sleepin, Ima cuttin." A doctor said this... As if the fucking kid is going to fall asleep, and not pass out during the procedure. The flippancy he has throughout the procedure is sickening. He notes the lack of bleeding, while the sanitary paper is covered in blood. Hilarious.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 05:24 AM
3

You know them best, and will know what type of argument you could use that would be meaningful to them. Do they care about personal freedom? Then consent is a big thing to bring up. Do they care about health? Then talking about the negatives associated with it, and how it's not necessary, is what you need to focus on. Do they want to do it for religious/tradition reasons? You can point out that a lot of old religious practices are no longer done by modern people, when modern ethics has shown the…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:09 AM
7

If they're unwilling to listen, there's nothing you can do. Trying to force them to not do it, will only alienate them. If they're open to having their minds changed about it... Then ask them if they would be willing to tattoo their baby. If they're unwilling to add something to his body once born, then they shouldn't be willing to remove something. Or you could ask them if they are willing to remove his nipples. Male nipples are literally worthless to men, and should be lower on the totem pole …
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:56 AM
1

Hopefully everything else in the relationship is alright. At least, I hope it's enough to outweigh the occasional hysterics.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 10:09 PM
1

It's illegal. And just some hipster business, in an especially hipster part, of a very hipster city. This isn't even all that uncommon in Melbourne.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 12:33 AM
1

You're not convinced it's entirely separate from what? I'm not convinced it's entirely separate from other conditions. Meaning: It's very plausible that ADHD is a result (group of symptoms) of something else. My experience doesn't include times when my clients were suffering solely from ADHD, but their own self reports indicate that they had the problems associated with it for as long as they can remember, and most can remember a time when they struggled with it and weren't depressed/anxious. An…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 04:03 AM
1

I'm not solely going off of the article, especially considering how notorious science reporting is. I do agree with the notion that certain ailments are being diagnosed with too broad a brush, sometimes. I also think that "Big Pharma" has a lot to do with this. ADHD is one diagnosis he feels is presented as though it has neurological underpinnings, but doesn't, and is really just something that can be treated with therapy. I agree with the first half, but not with the second half. I don't think …
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:12 AM
1

I think that's the point that Kagan is trying to make (or at least how I interpret it)... Because ADHD seems to always be co-morbid with something else, it could very likely not be a disease in and of itself. The symptoms associated with ADHD could belong to something else, entirely. It's pretty much exactly like what's currently happening with Sensory Processing Disorder. There is a push to get it recognized as an independent illness, rather than simply being symptoms for Autism Spectrum Disord…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:40 AM
1

And what else have you been diagnosed with? Edit: Don't downvote for no reason. ADHD is pretty much always co-morbid with something else. Which begs the question on whether it's an actual condition on its own, or if it's a broad selection of symptoms that belong to other illnesses. These are important question in the mental health field, and there is way too many people trying to segregate things in order to justify specializations (specialists make more money).
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:33 AM
1

Have you taken note as to how many of these people are co-morbid?
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:16 AM
3

ADHD isn't the only thing that would explain your past troubles, no matter how much you want to think you have it.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:12 AM
5

Well they lied, then. Which isn't exactly uncommon for people with this agenda.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 02:42 AM
10

You're right, it's not equivalent... Circumcision is worse than a nose job, or having tonsils removed. Usually if you want to throw out a term like "False Equivalency", you should at least know what it means. The fact that I used more favourable procedures in order to highlight my point, was actually being gracious, and merciful to your point. If you want to point out the actual, perceived error in my argument, do so. Otherwise, you're hiding behind the argumentum ad logicam. Which, if you actua…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 02:35 AM
1

You're right that it isn't doxxing. But humour, even done in bad taste, isn't a "bad thing".
/r/MensRights31/07/17 02:27 AM
5

It's the same thing that happens with nose jobs, breast enlargement/reduction, and pretty much every single voluntary surgery. Unless there's a medical need for it, it should not be pushed by staff, and should only be brought up initially by the parent/person themselves. Would you be okay if a doctor came up to you asking about giving your child a nose job, out of the blue? What about removing their tonsils? After all, many children have to have them removed anyway... Might as well get it done n…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 02:15 AM
3

Because Beauty and the Beast (2017 Directed by: Bill Condon Produced by: David Hoberman, Todd Lieberman Screenplay by: Stephen Chbosky, Evan Spiliotopoulos Notice something about the creators of the movie, that my comment covered? You can even look at Walt Disney, and Mandaville Films (studios involved), both of which have males for the majority of key personnel. Are you just frothing at the mouth so much that you didn't even bother to read my comment?
/r/MensRights31/07/17 01:58 AM
7

Jews used to stone adulterers. That was a religious tradition as well. Should we bring that back for the sake of religious freedom, or shall we try to progress, and modernise some of these ancient traditions? Your freedom of religion should stop when it meets up against another's individual freedoms. This includes your child. Parents do not "own" their children, and thus, are not able to do whatever they want to them (this is already a fact on literally every country/culture). Parents are suppos…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 01:49 AM
16

This is why it's a no go area, here. Because people to have claimed to look into it (like yourself), do Olympic level mental gymnastics to hate on one, while justifying the other. You're comparing the non-consent of what to feed your child vs permanent removal of a functional sexual organ. Think about that for a minute. Seriously. Would you be okay if I wanted to have my baby tattooed? After all, I'm not even removing anything. I'm adding art to their body. Should I be allowed to do that?
/r/MensRights31/07/17 01:45 AM
4

Most of those movies have male creators, and aren't even about "female" things. They're mostly about black people. They wouldn't classify as "female centered". Also, has Oprah campaigned against sexism in Hollywood? I haven't heard of her doing that.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 09:56 PM
140

I know Natalie Portman has a production company. Handsomecharlie Films. Lena Dunham started one. Jessica Chastain started We Do It Together, but I don't think they released anything yet. Meryl Streep tried to start an over 40 female screenwriters thing (Writers Lab), but I haven't heard anything about that since 2015.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 12:10 PM
375

Because they don't make money. Every rich actress that complains about not being represented, and sexism in Hollywood, has enough money to start their own production company... But they don't. They could... They could find all of the great female creators/artists, and bring them together to make a female centered movie, but they don't do it. The ones who have tried, have failed. They would rather complain about it, and hope that other people do it for them.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 08:30 AM
8

You can compare it to parts of the deaf community. Deaf parents who have a deaf child will refuse cochlear implants, because they don't want their child to be able to hear. They want their kid to be just like them.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 10:54 AM
1

In Australia they have recently made it more difficult for people to get on it. It's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 12:14 PM
1

Yeah TRT (for the most part) is great. And you're right, that some of the crazy doses that some people take can be pretty dangerous.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 04:52 AM
3

Do you have a source for this? What I have read states that heart disease increases because Testosterone naturally lowers as you age. This is one of the best studies around... It says: Contrary to fears of the potential adverse effects of testosterone on cardiovascular disease, there are over forty epidemiological studies which have examined the relationship of testosterone levels to the presence or development of coronary heart disease, and none have shown a positive correlation. Many of these …
/r/MensRights28/07/17 04:20 AM
4

Heart disease issues usually only occur when you abuse the drugs. Steroid use, specifically Testosterone, has been shown to be a "cure" for depression in some men. When taken responsibly, it has almost no negative effects.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 12:18 AM
1

He's received a lot of hostility, and blatant insults, for simply asking questions, and trying to point out something that he took issue with. That's not deserving of downvotes, at all. He's literally on the front lines of education, and things aren't always so black and white, when you're there. It's also not easy to do deep research on your own as a teacher, given how little time you have for it. Then factor in that upper management has been taught the same BS, and even in your personal develo…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 11:59 PM
1

The issue for me here is that the word boy-like behavior can be used for many thing. The article says that we should give boys more room, but that's a very broad statement. One could say playing rough is boy-like behavior and shouldnt be punished, but one could also for let's say arson. It's the generalness of the words used that make it hard to go 'yeah, you're right SIRE, tell the world!:". Maybe this is one of the points we'll still disagree on after this post, but I think, when talking about…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 11:49 PM
1

The movie isn't really SJW. There are a couple moments of "what is a woman doing here", but it's not really out of place considering the era, and the situation.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 03:15 AM
3

While the research you linked aspired to do many things, it did only one thing. It didn't aspire to do many things. It aspired to do one thing... Recent discoveries of cerebral structural and functional differences between male and female brains indicate that boys and girls are wired differently for learning. These differences have significant implications for schools and pedagogy. Several gender-specific methodologies from the literature are suggested for teaching boys and girls that incorporat…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 02:50 AM
5

I haven't read the site, because I don't speak/read the language. But I can tell you from a professional viewpoint, where studies back up my experience... Boys and girls, in general, learn differently. This isn't even debated in the field, unless someone is trying to push a political agenda. Basically, there are bigger differences between two boys than there are between a boy and a girl. No, there really isn't. The differences between the boys would most likely come to how certain traits are man…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 11:50 PM
10

Look at the shit show that spawned when Watchmen had some blue dong flopping around for a minimal amount of time. The movie was attacked by multiple sides because of it. It was both sexist, and gay, and thus, bad.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 10:40 PM
3

He's First Nations as well, which is a double hit in Canada.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:57 AM
3

Well obviously, as soon as you give birth, you're endowed with all of the knowledge required to be an absolutely perfect parent. You're so perfect that you can even handle both paternal roles, simultaneously. As a professional I've encountered parents (mostly mothers) who were 100% positive that they understood developmental psychology better than me. They knew exactly what their child needed, and I'm an asshole for even suggesting that they should alter their parenting style.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:34 AM
2

Woman wants to enlist and proves to be good enough? Accept her. Woman wants to enlist and proves to be not good enough? Reject her. Again, did you read the article? This isn't happening. Here's a video of a woman demonstrating a fireman's-carry... carrying a man. If you were asking for a proof that some women are able to do this, there it is. And there are tons of other youtube videos of women successfully doing the same things. Like I said. She is wearing zero gear. At this point, we're done he…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:10 AM
2

Even if women do get accepted under lower standards (which I don't approve of), those standards not lowered enough to compromise the military. Nobody would accept a useless woman to the military no matter their ideas on equality or feminism. The entire issue, which you have no tried to shift away from... Is that women are not physically similar to men. Modern combat doesn't mean no heavy lifting is required. Because it's expensive and time-consuming to train them and there's a limited amount of …
/r/MensRights17/07/17 10:27 PM
5

If women weren't capable of being in the army, they wouldn't get accepted, simple as that. Did you not read the article? It happens all the time. You're really overestimating the influence of feminism. I made no comments about Feminism. No military, even in the most feminist society, would intentionally sabotage itself in the name of false gender equality. Why would you think the government cares about its soldiers? Ever looked into what happens to vets? Here is one article detailing some of it.…
/r/MensRights17/07/17 12:21 PM
6

Reddit is primarily used by North Americans. It makes sense that anti-MGM comments would be downvoted. This is done by Feminists because you're talking about men, and supposedly taking focus away from girls/women. And it's done by men who were victims of MGM. They justify it because they don't know any better, or they can't accept it because it would cause too much trauma for them, psychologically.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 02:29 AM
9

Soldiers need to wear gear. Gear is heavy (around 90 pounds). Women can't hold all their gear, and men have to carry some of it for them. Men then get injured because of it. There have been some articles trying to dispel the argument that a woman can't carry a man if needed. This applies to firemen, military, etc. There are examples of women carrying men, but none of them show two fully geared people. It's usually a woman in a yoga outfit simply lifting a man on her shoulders. No walking, no gea…
/r/MensRights17/07/17 02:06 AM
7

I wouldn't really go that far. It's relevant to say that US women have made it that far, and that the stat the journalist quoted, isn't accurate.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 04:06 AM
9

Did he say anything that was incorrect?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 03:23 AM
4

Yeah it's getting a little absurd, and it reinforces shitty behaviour from shitty people on this sub, that only want to hate. We don't need this sub to become more of an echo chamber, that amplifies confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 11:06 PM
7

You lost me here, first, what is White Culture? It's the same as Black culture... Something purposely left vague, so that an individual can use it or dismiss it, so that it suits their narrative. Like how OP used Native American as a monolith of culture, when it strengthened (or so they thought) the point they were trying to make.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 01:41 AM
1

That's who I speak too. Those who are egaliterian, but don't realize it. Fair enough.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:41 AM
2

Again. You're doing this shit again. The person you're talking to, is on your side, and you're acting like a complete moron. Seek help. Talk to your doctor, and get referred to a psychiatrist. Seriously. This is not a joke, or a dismissal. Go to a psychiatrist, because you fucking need it.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 11:43 PM
1

It's for those who are egaliterian. You're not going to convert any actual Egalitarians with this. Egalitarians are not people on the fence, or people ignorant about the subject. You shouldn't even be trying to illustrate this type of thing to them, because they already get it. They've already rejected the Feminist label. It illustrates how wrong feminism is by applying the same theories / standards to women's behavior. That's fine. But since this is irrelevant to Egalitarians, it's becomes for …
/r/MensRights07/07/17 11:27 PM
1

The way to combat the idea of toxic masculinity, isn't by accepting it, and then pointing out toxic femininity. Doing this means you're playing the same, fallacious game that feminists play. It ignores truth.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:11 PM
-1

To be fair, someone who would do this, is most likely a victim of mental illness. I mean, really... we're all victims of of our brains, and have very little control over how they are developed.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 11:46 AM
1

They shot first. Telling you not to submit a post in all caps, isn't them shooting first. You can agree, disagree, or scroll elsewhere. What is this supposed to mean exactly? It almost seems like you're acting like a feminist. You CANNOT silence a victim of rape and mutilation in a Men's Rights Space and claim you have any integrity. Again, who is silencing you? Have any of your comments been deleted? Have you tried to submit your link without an all cap title to see if it would still be removed…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:06 AM
1

Which posts that used all caps were allowed to stay? Also, don't presume to know my opinions without asking about them first.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:04 AM
5

Gatekeeping. I don't think you know what this means. Censorship. It's not censorship if you can resubmit the link. Men attacking men in a men's space. You mean how you attacked first? And how you have attacked mods in the past?
/r/MensRights04/07/17 12:30 PM
4

If capital letters offend you Nobody said that they do. It's like you didn't even read my post. and the rape and mutilation of children is being overlooked, you've got seriously screwed up priorities. Seems like you need to prioritize reading comprehension. I think a post exposing the organ harvesting and organ trafficking behind male genital mutilation is deserving of an all caps title. How is the issue more deserving than the high male suicide rate? Some really weird "men's rights" space this …
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:46 AM
1

"Choice" is an overrated concept that most people simply have no understanding of.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:42 AM
7

But if its really even a bit harder objectively for a women depending on what field, why is that okay? What would your counter argument be? There are some careers where it's inherently/objectively harder for women. Anything physical is going to be harder for women, than for men. Is this wrong? It's hard to say one way or the other. I don't think you could realistically argue either way about it. It is what it is. Is it fair? Maybe not, but that's irrelevant. But by the same token... It's harder …
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:40 AM
3

If it gets allowed, then where do you draw the line? Pretty soon, every single post will be in all caps, because it will be something that the OP finds to be important enough to warrant it. Obnoxiousness isn't something to be ignored. It's not that they are offensive, it's that they lower the level of discourse.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:29 AM
5

That's evidence that the post should be deleted. It has an obnoxious title, and the OP is a moron. If it was posted again, with a proper title, it would have been allowed to stay.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:31 AM
3

It helps that your question wasn't adversarial to begin with.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:56 PM
-1

His entire M.O. is to show just how overly emotional women are. And she proved it for him here. He made some troll statements, and she overreacted. She's supposed to be a professional, and should have easily dismantled his bullshit. But she didn't. She fell into his trap. An actual intellectual wouldn't have fallen for that shit.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:29 PM
8

A tattoo is actually slightly better than MGM. At least you're adding something to the body, instead of removing it.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:41 AM
8

Side rant: "That's like comparing apples and oranges" is one of the most completely ignorant, and moronic things someone can say. The entire purpose of comparison is to compare differences between different things. And just because they're different, doesn't mean that there are no similarities.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:38 AM
13

I don't understand first (beyond religion and cultural tradition) why the foreskin is cut, second I would genuinely like to understand the issue from both sides. Part of it is like you say (religion, tradition), and part of it is money. There's a lot of money in the actual procedure being done, and then the sales of the foreskin to cosmetic companies that use it in anti-aging cream because of the stem cells in it. Someone already mentioned the bogus medical claims so I won't go into that. Some o…
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:31 AM
5

Yeah. Just look at N.Korea, Egypt, Iran, etc.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 10:35 PM
11

I was recently in an "discussion" talking about Clementine Ford. Apparently when she asks someone if they've killed a man, and if not, why not... That's just a joke, where the context is man on woman violence. When I pointed out to the person that she wrote an article saying that those jokes are never okay, they said "it's different".
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:55 AM
1

Or she'll cause him to commit suicide. If he's heterosexual, she could very easily try to force him into going against that.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 12:05 AM
3

DeMario would have been better. Mario is too vague, and will just cause confusing whenever you bring it up.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 12:01 AM
2

He went out of his way to harass people, some of which weren't even related to the original incident. He had no reason to enter the shop in the first place, let alone start yelling at people there, for no reason. Stop being a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 04:38 AM
1

https://definitions.uslegal.com/h/harassment/ "S 240.25 Harassment in the first degree. A person is guilty of harassment in the first degree when he or she intentionally and repeatedly harasses another person by following such person in or about a public place or places or by engaging in a course of conduct or by repeatedly committing acts which places such person in reasonable fear of physical injury. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/harassment the act of systematic and/or continue…
/r/MensRights28/06/17 04:37 AM
2

So if Person A went to Person B and said "I'm going to drug you and rape you and cut off your lips" you think that wouldn't be harassment just because they didn't repeat themself? That's a threat (legally Assault). Which is already illegal. Not harassment. Disrupting a business run by a shithead is effective and not moronic. Funny how they think the same thing, and do the same thing when it goes against their ideology, and people like you cry about it. It isn't stooping to their level because we…
/r/MensRights28/06/17 04:33 AM
0

You're still being a smug asshole. People aren't infallible, they make mistakes. And again... Congrats on being able to retrieve your kids before someone ran off with them. Not everyone is so lucky. There's a video online of someone trying to steal a baby from a shopping cart while the mother was reaching to grab some meat from the fridge. She didn't even notice until the person was almost to the door. Thankfully someone saw this, and intervened. But it literally happened in less than 5 seconds.…
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:56 AM
2

They do/did/should. That's why it became a word in the first place. Part of the problem is with the manipulative language that certain groups use, in order to give weight to their perspective. Someone saying "fuck you bitch" a single time, is meaningless. It's a simple insult. But certain people have twisted it using language, so that it is now seen as something that is a legitimate, and literal threat of rape, it's misogynistic, the cursing is offensive, bitch is dehumanizing, etc. Words have s…
/r/MensRights28/06/17 12:27 AM
1

But harassment is defined as something that is repetitive. Without repetition, it would be something else depending on context. An insult, flirting, racist, homophobic, cat calling, xenophobic, or whatever else.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 11:54 PM
2

Why would it be? Isn't that what we keep telling the feminists? You don't have many options here. You either accept that anything can be harassment, or you can define it to mean something specific. You can't chastise feminists for claiming everything said to them is harassment, and then turn around and act the same way.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 11:17 PM
0

Congrats. You were lucky enough to not have your kid sprint out of your range when you weren't looking. Not everyone is so lucky, and it's literally impossible to watch your kids 100% of the time when you're in public. Unless you had them all tethered to you at the same time. I can guarantee that you had your eyes off of one (or more) for at least 5 seconds. And that's all it takes. 5 seconds. Your smugness doesn't line up with reality, no matter how much you want to brag about it.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 10:21 PM
1

Stooping to their level isn't going to work either. Reacting in the same way they do, makes it so we can't call them out on their bullshit. This guy is acting like an asshole for no other reason, than to make a scene, and hopefully have someone assault him on camera.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 09:59 PM
2

Their was a reason. He was yelled at. His group was insulted. And? So what? Oh no... Someone said something, one time. How emotionally crushing that must be. The MRM makes a big point in countering that mentality, and not jumping on the emotional bandwagon when it's not warranted. You sound like someone who would blame a black person for going to confront a Batista shouting "niggers are stupid" Yes, I would blame them. Because simply saying "niggers are stupid" doesn't make it true. And everyone…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 09:57 PM
1

Saying something once, no matter how stupid is literally not harassment. And yes... You should let them sit in their "ivory tower", because that's the whole fucking point of Free Speech. What he did was harass them because he didn't like the message. He followed the guy to the coffee shop, and then started causing a disturbance in the place of business. Then wouldn't leave when told to do so. We should disrupt the business of bigots. They will definitely do that to us. The entire point is to not…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 09:52 PM
0

Yelling something once is still harassment. It literally isn't.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 09:49 PM
2

A one off comment is not harassment. Technically speaking, he was harassing them by not leaving them alone when told to do so.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 09:48 PM
1

Good question. I don't know. I guess that would be a mediator, or arbitrator.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 09:47 PM
3

Biologically, the basic brain functions are the same, have a look at artofmemory.com, it's a more than 2000 year old learning strategy / techniques for utilising the brain the way it was built to be used. It's completely irrelevant what gender you are, because our brains are still built around visual and spatial memory and interconnected association between those memories. It's physical, it's based on the entire neuron pathway structure of the brain. This is full on bullshit. You can read this a…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 12:34 PM
3

It's sad that you're being downvoted, because what you said is generally true. Exams aren't realistic, homework is only a bunch of checkboxes for the teachers; little actual learning or critical thinking This is true. Schools mostly teach memorization of irrelevancies, and very little work is being done on teaching kids how to think objectively, and efficiently. school hours are geared more towards the parents that need to be at work by a certain time rather than what's best for the kids and so …
/r/MensRights27/06/17 11:36 AM
2

You could always call one for a consultation. They can give you advice on what to do, and how to proceed. You'll want to know for sure if your ex is going to have a lawyer or not. If you can't get a lawyer, then you should start absorbing as much as you can about family law in Iowa, and what you are entitled to, or what is expected of you.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 09:14 AM
15

Get a lawyer. No matter what she says, or how amicable she is being, you still need a lawyer. You don't need to ask for child support if you don't want it, or need it from her, but you need to make sure she can't get it from you. A lawyer will also help you with split custody. It's easy for her to say that she's open to having equal custody. But that can quickly change if she decides it's too much hassle, and she would rather have full custody. The easiest way to move on, in a fair manor for bot…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:47 AM
11

He wasn't harassed. Technically speaking, he was harassing them by not leaving them alone when told to. By his own admission, someone yelled at him across the street, and then walked away. He then followed him, confronted him, and wouldn't leave him alone. He is the harasser in this situation. You people are fucking ridiculous. I've said it before, and I'll keep saying it... This sub is becoming more and more like /atheism. A sad group of sad people, looking to lash out and attack everyone that …
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:43 AM
1

But nothing happened. It would be different if the guy was following him, and actually harassing him. Then the video might have had a point, beyond clickbait.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:50 AM
6

You couldn't afford me, kid.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:16 AM
13

This is fucking stupid. Guy was looking to pick a fight, for no reason. Usually when someone yells shit at you from across the street, you don't go trying to antagonize them further. You drop it, and move on with your life. He wasn't the victim of abuse, or harassment, and he wasn't "attacked". One of the main aspects of the movement is to not act like Feminists do. This is exactly the type of response that they would have, and it's fucking ridiculous, and infantile. This video is on par with th…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 12:52 AM
2

Gay men are still men, even if they dress up, and act like Caricatures of women.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 07:27 AM
4

Just tell him to go fuck himself. A white guy like Courtney Act, can totally pull off fish, while someone like Kim Chi can't, and he does his own weird anime thing.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 03:27 AM
5

Talk to a lawyer. Setup a paternity test. Don't sign anything, especially at the hospital, or doctor's office, without a lawyer looking at it. If it's your kid, then you can look at trying to get custody. Talk to a lawyer. Talk to a lawyer. Talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 12:13 AM
2

Note that women almost never get called "autists" if they're shy, which probably leads to underdiagnosing of autism spectrum disorders in females, and overdiagnosing in males That's not what leads to it, at all. Shyness is not used as as diagnosis. How autism manifests in girls is very different to how it manifests in boys. It makes it much more difficult to initially notice.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:30 PM
1

Again, delusional optimism. This is really not the case. Talk to enough women about this and the unbudging group-think is undeniable. I have seen enough women flat out deny any chance to short men and write them off, because they were short, and no amount of smooth talking ever changed their minds. Well then you're not very good at talking to other people, as is evidenced by how you're responding to me. What an ignorant and completely insulting statement. Short guys don't just give up on self-im…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 10:35 PM
1

Not when it comes to height. Yes, even height. Obviously this isn't true for every woman... Just like it's not true that every man is willing to dismiss weight, or breast size. But seriously, being short can be overcome by personality, and other things that you can actually change, like fitness level. Height, for a disheartening amount of women(a strong majority) is a prerequisit. At first, sure. But women for the most part are willing to be proven wrong, if you give them something else they des…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:41 PM
2

Do you even know what you're complaining about right now? Most of the time personality, trumps physicality. You can't take someone as vapid as Swift, and use that as a template for relationships. Preferences can't be argued against, because they are personal, and people are allowed, and should be allowed to have them. You can't force women to date shorter men. You shouldn't even bother trying to. The goal is to change the perception of short men as inferior. But even if you do that, there will s…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:39 AM
1

They don't give a fuck.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 11:31 PM
0

Don't blame the sub for your own idiocy. The mod even told you to resubmit the link.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 03:27 AM
12

Like Bill Burr says: "Is this the line where I lose half my shit?" Yet he fell into the same trap with a woman who gaslights him.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 11:51 AM
8

I've known a couple women that have had children, and kidney stones, and would agree that stones are worse. Plus the female brain self medicates to a certain degree in order to manage the pain... The same is not true for kidney stones.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:09 AM
2

That's not what nuance is... Like, at all. For you to perceive it that way, is moronic. You're acting no better than the people you're supposedly against.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:46 AM
3

This is my first comment to you. Your definition of strawman is wrong. People like you actually hurt the movement, because you fail to understand, and refuse to see nuance in anything.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:34 AM
4

It is a strawman though. Contestants consent to being followed. Stalking is by definition without the other person's knowledge. You're using loaded words improperly in an attempt to strengthen your argument. It's dishonest.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:42 PM
1

Overpopulation isn't just about climate change.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 03:24 AM
6

It could be a slimy survival tactic, or it could be genuine. Or it could have started as slimy, but ended up genuine because of the reaction she's gotten from Feminists. Either way, it's good for others to see how quickly Feminists label you an enemy, no matter what you have done for them previously.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:22 AM
7

The good thing, is that she'll have to settle eventually. And by the time she decides to lower her expectations, she'll already be past her prime, and will hate the rest of her life. Good on you for avoiding that train wreck.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:15 AM
3

Well this kind of shows that some gender stereotypes aren't true. Like the women being natural caregivers, and nurturers thing. MRM isn't just about countering Feminism. Some gender norms hurt men as well, and it's good to shine light onto these things.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:08 AM
3

I just find it hilarious that she blamed a bunch of old white men, because she was fired... She was fired from CNN. One of the most anti-Trump companies there is. Says a lot.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:29 AM
1

She's supposedly using the same alias that her husband used while abusing the girls.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 03:59 AM
–

What do feminist care about Star Wars!? Rey is the biggest Mary Sue. It's everything they want in a main character.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 08:31 PM
1

I think an alive man with a snipped dick is better for society then a dead baby That's highly debatable, if you were to take into account carbon emissions caused by a single human, and the overpopulation problem.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 08:28 PM
1

Not what I said. Movies are downstream consumers of comics IP. You can't use what doesn't exist. Comics got pressure to introduce more female characters, but handled it poorly. Female Thor and Ironman, for instance. What evidence is there that these were created because of the movies? A lot of characters can manage their own title, though. Such as? Besides main characters, who has popular solo books?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:41 AM
1

Had some. Not many, and few sell well enough to draw a wider audience. So which characters were created by the movies that were forced into the comics? In fact, most fill out the ranks of team books, they can't stand on their own even in print. That's true for all characters.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 03:21 AM
1

Women and girls didn't keep WW in print. They don't buy comics in a significant amount. The folks that kept the character afloat, boys and men, got ignored in this. This is largely irrelevant. DC is trying to broaden their audience, comics have a demographics problem. Girls certainly buy manga, there is a potential market, but hero comics are a hard sell to them. Comics don't make much. They're labor intensive to create, low margin, and have to shipped. Before movies, they survived on merchandis…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:50 AM
2

The hypocrisy of the theatre should put a bad taste in your mouth. But I'm going to watch the movie, regardless of some douchebaggery from an unaffiliated organization. But... To be fair... WW is a feminist icon (despite the UN debacle that feminists protested against). So it's not an entirely bad thing to cater to women/girls. It would be nice if they did the same for men/boys though.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 12:21 AM
2

That's rather childish. All of because of a theatre (not the creators) acting like turds?
/r/MensRights29/05/17 11:00 PM
1

They're not inherently worse, or inherently better. A good leader plays to their strengths, and uses that to get the best out of their staff, followers, etc. Men, and women, generally have different strengths, and different people perceive them differently, so they need to able to use that.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 11:12 PM
2

The more subs this place gets, the more like /atheism it's going to become. It's sad, how easily some of these younger, angsty morons become offended. It's like they're trying to beat Feminists at their own game.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 03:13 AM
6

Guys night only to watch The Raid, or something similar would be awesome.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 03:07 AM
11

If something so trivial pisses you off, then maybe you're not ready to be on the Internet. What you're "doing wrong" is A, being so easy hurt by a stupid remark, and B, making a post about something so trivial. "Most" of reddit is not like that. That same pic is used against atheists, bronys, the guys with anime body pillows, etc. And if you would follow the discussions on The Red Pill movie that are posted outside of the gender subs, you'll find most people are in the middle. Most people view M…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 02:45 AM
-6

Stop it, and then grow up. Jesus Christ, some of you people are just sad. In an effort to combat misguided, and insane feminists, you're turning into them. That's just the wrong way to go about it.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 02:25 AM
44

It's also filled people who jerk off onto pictures of celebrities, and then post pictures of it. It's also filled with White Supremacists, and just Supremacists of every kind. It's also filled with pedophiles, rapists, misogynists, misandrists, gold digging whores (of both sexes), and just about every other label you can attach to people.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 02:18 AM
2

So to summarize, you're not wrong, but you are being an asshole. She should have done her research before she adopted a particular breed. My sympathy is with the cat in this scenario. Seriously. Far too many people treat pets as if they're toys. I will not apologize for saying that she was the cause of her cat's death, and it wasn't the Husky's fault.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 12:28 AM
1

It's impossible to say. I'm sure there are plenty of people willing to do it, but there might not be enough funding for it. All it would need to get started is a single study.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 10:04 PM
2

I also had an Ex who took in a rescue husky which within a few months, killed her cat, whom she had had since she was a child. That's her own fault.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 10:02 PM
8

You would have to take randomized people who were, and were not mutilated. Then compare things like instances of mental illness, criminal activity, abusive romantic relationships vs stable ones, IQ, level of education, career choices, income, suicide rates, homelessness, etc. You could also do brain scans to see if any differences existed, but would need to account for socio-economic status, diet, exercise, and things like that. You would need to develop methodology to make sure it was as precis…
/r/MensRights24/05/17 04:06 AM
1

You don't get to pick and choose which platform counts as a gaming platform, just to suit your narrative. They all count. The Mobile, and Web market is simply far larger than Console and PC. And they are all games.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 10:02 PM
5

You should probably make that a bit clearer, then.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 11:11 PM
8

If this was a social media post, I would agree with you, but it's from an actual, legit, paper.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 11:09 PM
5

It's because video games are overwhelmingly played by males rather than females. That's actually false. Women are the majority of gamers. This includes browser, mobile, pc, and console games.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 11:05 PM
1

Because this shit started in places like tumblr. No it didn't. Its this infantile, petty bullshit that gave the ideology its platform and led to the new wave rising in politics and academia. Wrong. Tumblr is an outlet for confused teenagers, and college kids. These people have had their worldview rocked by bullshit, and they have fallen into the deep end of the pool without learning how to swim. Without this petty, stupid shit, academics would still be batshit crazy, but it would be confined to …
/r/MensRights18/05/17 10:05 PM
3

And look at what happened to Bill Nye. Even long time supporters have shit all over his new show. He's become a joke. You combat that by pointing out the flaws, and the extremism. You don't take easy shots at easy targets. Tumblr isn't a platform that people care about. They literally have no power to do anything. Are you going to starting fighting with your grandma on Facebook every time she posts a chain letter? This is the same thing.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 10:02 PM
2

Easy jokes don't really belong on this sub, and it makes the sub look worse. While you are using it as an easy target, it makes this sub an easy target for people to point to. It's petty.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 09:59 PM
8

People who complain on Tumblr have no power... That's why they complain on Tumblr. You're another one that has failed to actually properly read my comment. I said: "Attack the people in academics, and politics. Not these morons." Why are you trying so hard to make it seem like people on Tumblr are a target worthy of attention? Efforts should be made to combat politicians, and actual activists that regurgitate lies, and spread misinformation.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 09:36 AM
1

That's fair, and I appreciate the honesty. If it works for you, that's great. You can still have that without the legal contract, and I would like to see religious people trying to untie a religious ceremony from government hands.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 08:28 AM
2

How does this Tumblr post have anything to do with that video? You're flat out ignoring what I'm saying. At no point did I say there was no overlap. At no point did I say you shouldn't criticise the people in that video. In fact, I'm pretty sure I said to criticise people like that. But a Tumblr post doesn't belong on this sub. If I called you a faggot, are you going to make a post about it here, saying that an MRA is proving Toxic Masculinity exists?
/r/MensRights18/05/17 02:27 AM
7

Because it's infantile, and only serves as something for others to mock about the MRM. You can't complain about outside people misrepresenting the movement when they point to outliers, when you're doing something similar. If you want people to take this group seriously, then you need to act in a more serious manner. You need to be able to understand nuance, and apply it properly.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 01:16 AM
15

No because I'm sick of the idea that people should stay silent about this kind of stupidity and aggression towards free speech. This is Tumblr. The place where people think they're oppressed because someone doesn't recognize their Dragonkin nature... Think about that for a second. Seriously. These are the people you're trying to defend yourself from? You don't like people talking about this? Go some place else, perhaps to a heavily moderated safe space. Attacking these people is like getting mad…
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:57 AM
177

Can people seriously stop posting shit from Tumblr, or any other social media site? This is the equivalent of someone claiming they're the victim of death threats, and homophobia when a 12 year old says "I hope you die, faggot" playing COD.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:07 AM
3

You need evidence before arresting, not proof. There's a difference. But proof is absolutely needed before conviction.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 10:05 PM
3

What does marriage offer that a long term relationship can't, besides tax benefits?
/r/MensRights17/05/17 08:48 AM
4

The problem is... People change. You can't predict what your brain does, or how the chemicals change over time. Since you can't predict it for yourself, how are you going to predict it for someone else? Impossible. This is true regardless of a shared crisis. Sure, you might have been able to get through it just fine, and your relationship becomes stronger because of it. But how long does that last? It doesn't mean that every crisis will be conquered. Even a lesser crisis wouldn't guarantee a pos…
/r/MensRights17/05/17 05:52 AM
5

His problem is actually very common with atheists. As an anti-theist myself, I've seen so many people drop the ideology of religion, and replace it with something else. I stopped visiting, and reading /r/atheism because of this. It becomes just such a bad place for actual discussion, and criticism. This occurs sometimes, because their exit from religion usually comes from shaky ground to begin with, and they don't attempt to fill the gap left, with something useful. In this case, it seems like F…
/r/MensRights17/05/17 05:44 AM
7

Don't downvote a genuine question, people. Asking for a source isn't a bad thing.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 04:44 AM
3

Apparently Jews don't know what it's like to be under attack.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 09:13 AM
2

Okay, congratulations. You've never made a mistake. Well done.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 07:16 AM
1

I don't go into an aviation mechanic's office and tell them how to do their job because I'm probably going to get it wrong. I won't tell people something when I don't have enough information on it. He didn't. He was trying to use a real world example in his class to help explain a certain aspect of a topic that he was covering. Very different scenarios. He didn't go to a MGTOW meeting and tell them what their movement stands for.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 03:28 AM
1

You can refrain from speaking about things you don't understand at all. Which part of my statement are you trying to refute here? The fact that the day is made up of a finite amount of hours, or the fact that nobody has enough time to research everything in existence? he read one little blip of MGTOW and then incorporated it into his class lectures. He used it as an example based off of what he had heard. Yes, he didn't do the proper research to understand the intricacies of the movement. Yes, h…
/r/MensRights13/05/17 12:37 AM
12

There's only so many hours in a day. Nobody can research everything.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 03:13 AM
1

That's kind of sad.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 10:00 PM
5

When a 1 month old girl is praised for being “pretty” while a boy the same age is praised for being “strong”, that’s just culture projecting prejudices onto them, there’s zero difference in prettyness and strength at age 1 month. Who has ever called a baby strong? Cute, adorable, handsome, sure... Strong? Really?
/r/MensRights11/05/17 04:37 AM
24

Cultural Appropriation only serves to keep people divided. You better stop eating pizza unless you're Italian, and noodles, unless you're Chinese. Also, stop going to University unless you're Greek. Stop speaking English, unless you're British. The usual defense is that Cultural Appropriation only works when it's against a marginalized group. Then they'll say that white people can't be marginalized, or oppressed. Completely forgetting the fact that Jews are white, and were a part of that whole H…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 04:18 AM
0

Reading your replies to people makes this pretty ironic. Because I could literally say the same things about how you don't get why this woman didn't notice these things. To me, it's obvious, yet here were are... You're questioning how she didn't understand it before, while at the same time not questioning how you don't understand her. Irony at its best.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 11:11 PM
14

It's actually Onhead. She's a weeaboo.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 11:03 PM
12

You usually need to train for pullups to be able to do them. A flexed arm hang isn't a pullup. There are a lot of potential failure points in a pullup. Grip strength, at the low end you need scapular strength, etc... If you don't train for this, you won't do it. It's like comparing someone who can leg press 800 pounds, but has a shitty vertical, vs someone who can only do 400 pound leg press, but has a great NBA type vertical.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:15 AM
17

Because there's a difference between relative strength and absolute strength. She can do more pullups because she weighs less (probably), and doesn't need to pull the same amount of weight. Also amount of pullups isn't a great indicator of strength, but endurance/stamina.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 01:32 AM
8

This wasn't a fictional segment on the show. The fictional character gave the real person an award for killing her pets, and abusing her husband. If this was to parody/satirize real life, they wouldn't have given the award to an actual abuser. They would have given it to another fictional character. By giving this award to an actual abuser, it legitimizes the abuse, and it stops being satire.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:21 AM
1

That depends what you consider strength. I know some people who would consider one's mile pace as an indicator of strength because it relates to cardiovascular strength. How is that strength, exactly? Just because some people may misuse a word, doesn't mean it automatically becomes correct. that's why there is no definitive figure for how much men are stronger than women. There is. It's just that there's several depending on how you're measuring it.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 08:00 AM
1

Pushups are relative to yourself, and your weight, so they're meaningless in comparing overall strength to someone else. Overall strength is what's being compared in men vs women. So by that metric, you use something objective like actual weight. A 100 pound female doing 3 sets of 20 pushups is not equal to a 220 pound man doing the same.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 07:00 AM
3

Are you able to actually refute anything from the source? Bates E et al. Women more likely to be aggressive than men in relationships. British Psychological Society's Division of Forensic Psychology annual conference in Glasgow.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 04:47 AM
5

Livestream on Twitch, or YouTube.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 01:19 AM
2

Another good one is comparing Patriarchy with Original Sin. Patriarchy paints men as the source of evil, eventhough it harms men as well. Original Sin was created when Eve ate the fruit, and gave it to Adam. Religious people have used this as a way to shame, and humiliate women. It paints women as bad, and makes them the source of all inherent evil that exists within humans.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 08:05 AM
4

Ask them if men can speak/know about a woman's experience. Ask them if a man should be the leader of Feminism. When they say no, then you just turn it around and say: "That's why there needs to be a separate movement." You can also say that Feminism has had decades to address men's issues, and over that time they have done nothing, or have only made things worse.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 04:27 AM
29

Everything needs to either be coed, or segregated. You can't have anything in between that without it not being fair to one group or another.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 10:31 PM
3

Disproving common social/gender myths is important. This one shows that female rulers aren't inherently non-violent. It points out that women can be war mongering, and just as (if not more) violent/aggressive as men. It's a counter to whenever someone says the World would be better off, and have no more war with women in charge. This also backs up a previous study that stated women don't do well with competition, and hold grudges for longer with someone who beat them. Men more quickly get over t…
/r/MensRights28/04/17 11:29 PM
7

United has nothing to do with this. It was a moron on the plane, and two government agencies that had to follow up. For anyone wanting to bitch about this... How would you feel if this was a mother that they let through that kidnapped her own kid in an attempt to leave the country?
/r/MensRights23/04/17 02:06 AM
2

I'm not sure what your title, and the content of the tweet have to do with each other. Are you saying that reverse racism actually does exist? Without context about who this person is, and what his views are, this becomes a shitpost. Also, a little clarification as to what exactly we should be discussing would help a lot.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:10 AM
8

I'm Canadian, and think the Monarchy, and all of their traditions are a bunch of bullshit. Knighthood is moronic. It's even worse than the celebrity worship that occurs, because they are given an official title. Knighthood is 100% a fucking joke. The entire Royal Family, and their institution is a fucking joke. They're a goddamn tourist attraction. That's literally the only reason they continue to exist... Because they generate more money than they suck up from tax money.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 02:25 AM
2

You are correct. He also talks about black cultural violence being endorsed and perpetuated by single black mothers.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 05:48 AM
1

Ha, okay. Cool story. I don't need a citation to tell you that you're wrong in attributing a morality component to something that doesn't warrant it. You're basically saying that these people are inherently wrong because they have a mental illness. That's the logic you're using. You're basically refuting the notion that mentally ill people can consent. Does that mean that anyone with an anxiety problem, or depression, can't consent to sex? Is it rape to have sex with someone who has depression? …
/r/MensRights30/03/17 11:28 PM
1

This is similar to how moral doctors won't perform elective surgeries to remove viable limbs; many people have issues where they believe their body parts don't belong to them and should be removed to feel 'whole,' but that doesn't make it normal, or right. You're right, it doesn't make it "normal". But you can't claim any morality position on this. It has nothing to do with right, or wrong. I completely sympathize with the idea that a person should be able to consent to and do anything they desi…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 09:24 PM
1

In what way, exactly?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 07:53 PM
0

I just haven't seen anyone in that community hold women to the same level of criminal accountability as they hold men. That's just my experience though. There are some, but I would agree that they are in a minority. It's a complicated issue though. Some of the defenses used for women can also be used for men. And some of the blame pointing used for men can be applied to women.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 02:00 AM
1

It's rather telling that you think a judge has any sort of psychiatric training at all, and that you are using his statements as if they speak for the psychological community as a whole.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:46 PM
1

So you contradicted yourself then.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 03:31 AM
1

Your reply doesn't answer my question, and really has nothing to do with what I said. Your infantile attempt to claim that I'm advocating for sexual abuse of children is asinine. I'll ask it again... No, people actually think that fucking a child, who's brain isn't fully developed, is rape (regardless of genders). The brain doesn't fully develop until the mid 20s. Are you suggesting that sex should be illegal for everyone under 26?
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:34 PM
7

As long as they were both adults, and consenting... Yeah, what exactly is wrong with that? If I want someone to kill and eat me, why is that anyone else's business?
/r/MensRights23/03/17 01:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter