TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dakrys Archive

View 2 posts and 142 comments by Dakrys on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

baseless assumption Read that again for me please. Specifically the "baseless" part. Baseless: adj. without foundation in fact. You have no facts. Your claim that OP's scenario "happens" is the very definition of a baseless assumption. Let me give you some perspective on how this conversation has gone. Me: I don't think this happens. You: OF COURSE IT DOES! Me: Interesting, I'd like to learn more about that. You: YOU CAN'T BECAUSE THERE'S NO EVIDENCE CUZ REASONS! If you can't produce evidence wh…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 08:27 PM
1

Again, that's assuming that every incident is reported to the news. It seems more like a personal problem than anything. I'm assuming it's been reported at least once, which you have yet to prove. Honestly dude. Either back up your claims or admit you're wrong. There is no middle ground here. You're acting like it's never happened! I'm acting like there's no reason to assume this has happened. You're deflecting to "probably" reasoning which is some weak ass sauce. Especially in this day and age …
/r/MensRights14/08/15 08:34 AM
1

How the fuck would I know where to get private texts between people? You wouldn't. You shouldn't need to. If this "happens" like you're claiming, there will be news stories about it. At least from local news agencies. It's ignorant to think that this situation has never happened. Like, really really ignorant. I never said it hasn't. I'm just wondering if you can back up your bullshit. Look dude, you have no right to be defensive. I'm calling out bullshit. It's not your bullshit, and it's not eve…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 07:53 AM
1

Give me five sources from the last 10 years worldwide.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 06:44 AM
-2

I'm seeing an outright dangerously low count of posts calling this like it is - a fake screengrab. While it's great to hate on specific women who do awful things, it has absolutely nothing to do with this sub. This is the shit that feminists see and evaluate mensrights by. Way too many of you are willing to believe that this actually happens. Before I get spammed by all, like, three recorded instances of something similar - I'm positive that I will go my entire life without having this happen to…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 06:13 AM
6

Ok but does that excuse this transparent bullshit circlejerking? This is exactly why mens rights aren't taken seriously. Because it just devolves into this precise brand of edgy hatesturbating. Do feminists circlejerk over clearly fake exchanges like this? Probably. But they're already established as the socially/morally "correct" ideology. Be better than that.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 06:05 AM
182

I'd assume less overcrowded too.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 12:46 PM
3

I was using tumblr as a category not an origin story. Just the ridiculous shit they believe.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 03:43 PM
17

Less than 2% of rape reports are false accusations. OK. Quite possibly. What percent of reports are a result of tumblr feminism become law? "We were both drunk and I initiated sex without the ability to consent, therefore I have been raped." How many reports are gray area sexual contact (which happens to everyone and shouldn't be taken that seriously) and the accusation comes from spite or anger rather than actual fear or violation?
/r/MensRights25/07/15 03:27 PM
6

Classic.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 12:40 AM
3

My favorite appropriate word that sounds awful is spatchcock
/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:59 PM
45

From before that primordial moment when two gametes first formed a zygote, sex has always been a complicated morass of conflicting interests, confusions and, yes, predators. No law is ever going to fully resolve all the manifold difficulties. That's a really bad thing to put at the end of an article that's already going to upset feminists. They're going to read that as, "Men have no choice but to rape, because it's in our genes." I get what she's saying - that evolutionarily speaking, consent is…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 05:39 PM
5

I get that. I just don't like to say or type it. I don't care when other people do. Don't censor my censorship.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 05:36 PM
12

The thing is, the only people in the world who really like feminists are feminists themselves. Most other people feel socially censored by feminism, because feminists have taken it to the point where the only thing worse than saying "cunt" to a woman would be the N word to a black person. In terms of social crimes right now it's racism > sexism > homophobia > transphobia > religious persecution, followed by any kind of monotonous raging and shaming of any "protected" person. White people, men, s…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 05:19 PM
2

"My books failed because I'm a woman." Ok. To be perfectly fair, the biggest female author is probably JK Rowling and she went with JK because she specifically intended to write for little boys who think girls are icky.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 04:18 PM
2

Very well put.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:52 PM
1

Women aren't expected to shoot down the most attractive men.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 04:37 PM
-12

That's a pretty ridiculous thing to say. If feminists are female supremacists because they'd like to vote and avoid legally being fondled in the workplace, what does that make you? EDIT: I'm not saying feminists are right. I'm just saying they had a legitimate reason to exist in the first place. They've clearly overstayed their welcome and are clearly pushing for preferential treatment in a world that already treats women as precious commodities, but it wasn't always like that. That's all I'm sa…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 02:31 PM
1

It's frustrating to see things like this happen and live in a world where anything that isn't specifically feminist is sexist. I don't hate anyone, and I don't want anyone to have a less fulfilling life. Sometimes it happens to be men that are being oppressed, but people aren't willing to see them as anything less than the exception. It makes me sad.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 06:16 PM
12

Nah. It'll just get dismissed as a male fantasy.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 09:07 PM
5

It's kind of starting to occur to me that the recent redefining of the term "rape" comes from feminists outright valuing themselves more than men based on nothing but gender. Like the definition is more broad now, right? So if we're playing by the same rules, it's much more likely for a woman to rape a man. We're including all kinds of things like "withdrawing consent" and basic insecurity down to just straight up sexual awkwardness that's natural for everyone. That's fine. You can change the ru…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:12 PM
2

They already do.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 02:48 PM
33

This has been explicitly stated by feminists. They're willing to put innocent men in jail to protect teh wimminz from teh menz. Because who knows? You're a dude. You're probably going to rape someone later anyways.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 12:20 PM
20

TBH this is probably all that happened. Headline: Conflict Between Party A and Party B. Whichever party is deemed by SJWs to be more privilaged is guilty, and anything they say is lies.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 07:23 PM
2

To be fair, you don't really hear about fgm in the US.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 02:20 PM
1

I disagree. You do it because you love it and you work your ass off getting paid for it. If we're comparing it to an industry like food service, people get into it because it pays not because they love it. It's a completely different situation. I'm a musician. I'm not in it because I'm trying to get rich. Of course I'm trying to get paid doing it, but that's not my motivation for being involved in the field whatsoever. Writing music makes me happy. If I can make ends meet doing music I will be t…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:50 PM
1

Okay? I really don't know where you're coming from man. You seem to think this situation is ridiculous and I just kind of get it. I'm not trying to be a dick but I think you might just be missing the point.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 06:25 PM
0

I don't know man. I don't really think it's a big deal. Certainly not worth the outrage you're throwing at it. It was handled internally in the school system. That's the best case scenario for this kind of thing. School systems are able to operate independently from the law to manage their student bodies (and in this case their students' bodies lol) to keep some kind of order. It's not about the one case, it's about the precedent. It's not clear whether it was one kid or all of them sharing the …
/r/MensRights27/04/15 06:15 PM
0

Is that what happened? I don't think so. Someone sends me a picture I don't think I should have, I just delete it. Use some common sense man. Stop trying to make this something it isn't.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 05:56 PM
-1

I don't actually think they're punishing people for the distribution end. I think they're getting punished for the receiving. Which can be proven easily. There is no world where they get a lighter punishment for this. Involving the cops would scale it up and they'd have to go door-to-door telling people they are perverts. This is perfectly fine. Leave your torch and pitchfork out of arms reach for a few days.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 05:51 PM
0

I don't know. The way I'm seeing this situation, it's not really a "punish everyone because we don't know who really did it." It's more like, "Ok, we can either suspend all these kids who possessed these pictures, ignoring the fact that one of them uploaded it. No matter what way you want to spin it, this is much less than they would get had the school involved the police. Is it right that the girl who sent it in the first place just got a scolding? I don't know. She did get her nudes distribute…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 05:49 PM
1

Okay, so the alternative being the girl gets humiliated online and the dude/dudes responsible just get off because they can't afford to investigate it further? The only way to have any justice is for the cops to get involved on a distribution of child pornography charge which would inevitably get the person who did distribute punished more severely, but so would the other kids who were still in possession. I hear what you're saying man. But I don't know if colleges get to see reasons for suspens…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:50 PM
-1

It's not murder and jail time. It's a suspension. If the punishment was actually a big deal, I'm sure the police would be able to contract some IT people to figure out where the photo was shared from. Get over it. This girl had her privacy violated. This is not a mensrights issue.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:17 PM
6

I'm still not upset about it. Even if the girl sent the same images to a group of guys, once they're online and being shared by strangers there isn't a practical way to prove who actually did it. Nobody should be putting someone else out there like that.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 12:54 PM
9

That really sucks man. To be perfectly honest it sounds like you've got an anxiety disorder. Maybe talk to a therapist. I'm pretty sure you could get some kind of medication that would help you out. Your paranoia itself could be a symptom of something and I don't want that to go over your head.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 12:11 PM
34

My sister had a friend from middle school who came up to high school with her. I was in band with her for a year. Literally everything was contagious with regards to her. She caught scoliosis from my sister at one point. She once caught a sprained ankle and even once became concerned about pregnancy because that's what the other girls around her were going through.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 10:58 PM
6

Interesting. Are there other ways I can feel victimized and validated at the same time? Are their women wearing shirts with muscular men on them I can be upset about?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 09:07 PM
13

Oh god I just read that in Nancy Grace's voice. Taking a shower or cleaning out my ears won't help because it was all in my mind. I'm considering taking up black tar heroin.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:56 PM
7

Which, if we're being honest, is a super sexist thing to think. Women can do anything we can do. The average man might be a bit stronger than the average woman but I've personally dated a couple women who were as strong or stronger. Regardless, you shouldn't expect a man to easily overpower a woman who is trying to hurt him. You should reasonably expect that nobody is attacking anyone.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 08:13 AM
13

Probably because it's a woman being convicted of sexual assault of any kind. That rarely happens. Especially since the woman is trying to play the "pretend rape" card because she and the victim were both drinking when they banged. The court isn't taking that claim seriously and convicted her of sexual assault. Both are wins for the precedent that women are not above the law where sexual violence is concerned.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 06:36 AM
23

I am relatively wealthy. Isn't everyone? That's what I read.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 03:54 AM
1

Can we talk about that bit of, "consent can be withdrawn at any time"? If you're all up on me and you're trying to bone, so we leave and then bone, nothing is missed here. We're not talking about a woman who is so intoxicated that she cannot speak. We're talking about a woman who doesn't communicate in any way that consent has been withdrawn. Communication is necessary in situations like this. 99.999% of males would immediately cease any and all sexual contact if there was any sign that the woma…
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:57 AM
5

I just think the biggest problem is that feminists seem to think rape can be solved. Literally as I'm typing this, I glanced up to the TV to see a 16 year old boy and a cut to "It's On Us to stop sexual assault." It's one thing to blame a victim. It certainly happens and it's an evil thing. It's another thing entirely to stigmatize nearly half the population of earth as being essentially a rapist at default. I'm seeing a parallel to one particular argument in the gun control debate "It should be…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 06:55 PM
1

The first paragraph is saying that feminism as a concept is understood by institutions to be basically not radical. There are degrees in Women's Studies for fucks sake. We see feminism on reddit and in this sub specifically as a much more radical thing than it "is". The problem is that men's rights advocates have to actively fight the stigma of radicalism because feminists have a radical impression of us just as we have of them. But they're taken more seriously. So work with legitimate feminists…
/r/MensRights21/11/14 02:48 AM
2

Right. But the basis for what politically correct institutions consider "feminism" is a lot less radical in most places than what people here consider it to be. And while feminists aren't put in the position to constantly defend their ideas against radical perceptions, we are. MRAs already suffer from radical perception, so for this sub to be relentlessly attacking an ideology which is perceived to be reasonable, comments in this sub just reinforce that radical perception and further harm the me…
/r/MensRights21/11/14 01:48 AM
14

The radfems that piss us all off are the ISIS of western politically supported ideologies. They piss off "legitimate" feminists too, just as much as the ISIS people piss off islamics. And if we're being straight up honest with ourselves, there are plenty of comments in this very sub which are dehumanizing and outright sexist towards women. It's one thing to talk shit about the radical feminists, it's another to use the label of feminism to stereotype the entire ideology by the worst cases. But w…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 09:15 PM
4

Comments like this give the feminists a reason to hate any advocacy for men. You heard about something happening once, therefore we need to pretend like all women are capable of that kind of callous disregard for human life? A legal abortion is one thing, but people don't usually get pregnant on purpose before having one. Take a step back from the feral foaming at the mouth style of feminist, and consider whether your comment could be offensive to just like, regular women. Implying that "the way…
/r/MensRights19/11/14 05:26 AM
7

I don't know if enough women have had abortions purely on the basis of the child's sex where this can be considered a trend or a double standard.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 04:26 AM
87

Feminists are allowed to literally publicly express their desire to castrate all men at birth.... I know that's very few feminists, but if it was a dude was saying women should be circumcised....
/r/MensRights18/11/14 04:39 PM
-2

I just.... I don't know. I know the reddit pitchfork-holders think that persons who make false rape claims should sit in prison for the same length of a rape sentence. I just think that twelve years is way too long for something like this. I get it. You can potentially ruin someone's life that way. But I don't think your life will be quite as much ruined as a person who actually had been raped. The sentencing almost necessarily requires that the accuser admits to lying. Otherwise it could shut d…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:23 PM
1

Definitely not me, I'm a douchebag.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:46 PM
5

Everyone is lying about everything, I don't know who to trust anymore.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:36 PM
32

Alex from target was directed by a marketing firm as a demonstration that they could make anyone Internet famous. And they were successful. As far as the typical understanding of this and the social impact of it, you're straight up correct. This is overt sexual objectification of a person who clearly wasn't looking for it.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 12:49 PM
5

Sorry. No. I reported your comment. Just to let you know. This sub is not meant to be an echo chamber but you shouldn't come into a subreddit like this and try to marginalize real actual problems men face, which have nothing to do with women and make them about women. Yes. Every ideology is varied and everyone has their own takes. And every ideology has extremist idiots that don't know what they're talking about. And judging from your response, you're one of them. The difference is that extreme …
/r/MensRights17/10/14 03:30 AM
2

Which almost all of us do. There aren't many people on this board who genuinely have prejudice towards women. Many have prejudices towards feminists, but it's such a broad ideology that it's impossible to identify any one tenet to be disgusted by without being told, "That's not what real feminism is." "Real feminism" is as "no true scotsman" as it gets. It's like catching smoke. /r/mensrights and many MRAs have very specific goals and objections. The gender influence in criminal and family court…
/r/MensRights16/10/14 08:56 PM
2

Lol. I missed one. Thanks. It gets confusing when you're reading off of an image and trying to type like it's opposite day at the same time.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 08:47 PM
23

I'm a woman, and I need men's rights. Not "feminism." Men's rights. Here is why. Everything that feminists talk about that women can't do or are socially punished for arise directly and immediately from misandry. Not "misogyny." Misandry. Whether I am playing sports, joining the work force, grilling, having sex wherein I penetrate in any way, wearing the wrong color, talking the wrong way, moving the wrong way, being sexually harassed/assaulted, or paying too much attention to looking like I'm p…
/r/MensRights16/10/14 02:12 PM
4

Somebody got offended by a comment simply because the commenter simply mentioned transgenders. There was literally nothing to be offended by there lol. It was like I said "Freddie Mercury furthered the gay cause in a great way." and somebody was like "HOW DUDE YOU I'M GAY YOU HOMOPHOBIC MONSTER" Lol.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 03:52 PM
113

So... murder suspects... Women aren't murderers, it's against their maternal nature. Only men are violent and deranged enough to harm another human being. Sure some women have killed people, but they're good people who have made mistakes. Remember? Edit: Dear god people. Poe's Law. Except if you read the name of the sub you should be able to recognize sarcasm.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 05:28 PM
1

Damn dude. Nice.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 02:43 PM
4

I'm talking specifically about feminists addressing rape. Which is specifically about the men who commit the crime of rape. Feminists are happy to blame and ridicule a man who gets raped. "You should be strong enough to prevent it, you got hard so you must have wanted it, etc." Those situations are literal victim blaming and shaming, and are not at all what I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 06:14 AM
1

Which is honestly the same as the rape apologist victim blaming shit. "Hey, I'm really sorry this happened to you, but maybe don't put your drink down and not pay attention to it! " "Asshole! How dare you blame the victim! His parents should have taught him not to rape!" Aren't you just blaming the parents? Are they not victims of a sort, since their name would be dragged through the mud because of what their shitty criminal piece of shit son did? I'm not about to walk around in a bad area alone…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 02:27 AM
0

I disagree. While it does reframe a men's issue as a women's issue, it's completely true. Beyond that, that behavior is the same way feminists frame men's issues in their capacity to help men. If we parrot their techniques we won't be seen as such a sexist and destructive force. People see feminism as benevolent and mras as opponents to feminism, therefore malevolent. We need retracing to gain traction. We can use the language we want once mras aren't seen as evil, but in the meantime we must pr…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 09:50 PM
38

You're being downvoted because, I'm guessing, you're saying that pedophilia is similar to homosexuality. You're not wrong, but how they're similar isn't terribly clear in your post. They're sexual orientations. They are. If I'm attracted to trees, that's a sexual orientation. Same goes for everything. It's who a person is sexually attracted to. Now, when people are saying that they're "tolerant of people regardless of their sexual orientation," they're completely full of shit. Some people can't …
/r/MensRights02/05/14 09:32 PM
9

Nothing prevents women from proving they can be as successful as men in the world of business more than the belief that men can't be trusted with kids---whether that's fathers, men working with children or male airline passengers. This is the part that gets me. That should be in our sidebar. I love this quote.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 09:26 PM
5

Or you could do what everyone on the Internet does and pretend you made it up.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 07:38 PM
56

Exactly. That'd be like, "Racism isn't real, niggers are actually subhuman."
/r/MensRights29/04/14 12:43 PM
5

We don't have the felony murder rule in Michigan too. Fuck yeah, loving my state more and more every day.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 01:55 PM
15

...one out of 12 men admitted to fulfilling the legal definition of rape, but did not admit raping someone. This is what gets me. I have 2-6 drinks. My girl has 2-6 drinks. She initiates sex. We get it on. I raped her? Please. That's a regular occurrence. In fact, I've probably "raped" her dozens of times. We walked by a sign on campus yesterday that said, "Alcohol is the most popular date-rape drug." I mean, come on. We laughed about it. She told me, "Well, in that case, if you don't rape me to…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 09:22 PM
9

Can we just talk about how feminists use the phrase "slut shaming"? It seems like it's shooting itself in the foot. Sounds like, "Well yeah, she is a slut, but you aren't allowed to shame her for it." What?
/r/MensRights13/02/14 09:15 PM
-2

It's a funny joke, but I don't like it. Feminists like misandrist jokes like this too, and we all lose our minds because we can't tell they're not serious. I get that there aren't feminists running around in this sub (at least not real feminists who hate men). I think we can agree that we blur the lines between pro-men and anti-woman when comments like this run around. I'm trying to be as objective as possible here. These kinds of comments kind of discourage me to the idea of mensrights because …
/r/MensRights12/02/14 07:54 PM
2

You're absolutely correct. Thanks for catching that. My mind was on the suspect's perspective, not the victim.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 12:23 AM
5

I just think it's absurd that rape is literally worse than murder/torture/etc. with this logic. Like, hear me out. If somebody is accused of murder, the crime definitely happened, and there's material evidence which points to an alleged perpetrator. That perpetrator has the right to a trial by jury, because if the allegations are false, his life could be ruined. If somebody is accused of rape, the crime might not have actually happened. I don't think it's appropriate to say that the majority of …
/r/MensRights07/02/14 05:28 PM
13

There are a few guys that troll my campus saying things like, "Sign this petition if you hate war," or handing me flyers saying, "Help stop violence," among other highly illogical emotional buzzword bullshit causes. There are always a ton of idealist liberal pseudo-intellectuals rallying for those causes, but they're just ridiculous. Violence as a concept is something that donating five dollars to a charity will make exactly zero impact. I usually just say something like, "I'm pro-violence," or …
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:04 PM
-1

Edit: Am paranoid about opinions of anonymous people, regarding the deleted post which hides my username.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 05:26 PM
2

There's a delete button for that.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 01:34 PM
0

I think it's pretty sexist honestly. This is an issue that's faced overwhelmingly by women. Beyond that, it reads like, "Finding a woman with a destructive sense of self is a great way to find a woman who will serve you." All patriarchy nonsense aside, this article straight up says, "eating disorders are awesome, look at all the ways her suffering helps you out!"
/r/MensRights20/11/13 11:28 PM
0

Except when it is. This article makes light of a very serious issue that many women and some men face. Nothing about that will help them, and more likely it would be detrimental to any progress they have made to read it. Was the article hateful? No. You claimed the apology wasn't needed. Is your thinking that he's justified for both objectifying women and promoting a diseased sense of self? Or was it that advocating for that kind of self-loathing wouldn't be harmful to women with eating disorder…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 11:20 PM
-1

The post was about how debilitating mental illnesses which destroy the lives of many women can be used to serve men. What isn't sexist about that? Come on, man. I'm really hoping you're smart enough to see that.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 10:41 PM
4

Yet here we are...
/r/MensRights20/11/13 10:37 PM
-2

Because it doesn't read like, "Body image disorder patients are beautiful and should be loved." It reads like, "Destructive sense of self makes a woman serve you! Awesome, right?"
/r/MensRights20/11/13 10:35 PM
-4

Are you fucking joking? Attitudes like yours are increasingly convincing me that MRAs are hate groups. The way I'm starting to see this sub function, declaring MRAs as ignorant and ridiculous is kind of like saying that bowling isn't a sport. Most of the time, the statement is true. The problem is that people who are doing it right are the ones who get marginalized with that statement. I am an advocate for men's rights, but too many of you are certified card-carrying misogynistic assholes. I was…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 10:24 PM
1

Between something that is clearly ignorant dialogue involving how women can serve men through their eating disorders, and the current ranks of Men's Rights being labeled as hate groups, I don't think the association would be avoidable.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 10:02 PM
2

I'm associating it with the potential for progress, man. That's what the two ideologies are about. Feminists like to say that they're for men's rights, but it often misses issues that aren't related to women, e.g. prison sentencing, reproductive rights, etc. I don't see why we can't be for women's rights as well. Despite the bullshit that propagates on Tumblr, women do have legitimate and quantifiable concerns. I think failing to recognize those is a failure on our part. Why would they recognize…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 09:58 PM
-1

It's important because Feminists have an extremely poor concept of what mens rights issues actually are. You could say the same thing about 90% of MRAs as well. But the difference is that Feminism is the ideology that gets most/all of the institutional support. They're the ones that can stomp MRAs into the ground and define them as hate-groups when shit like this goes down. Think about that guy on your street corner who's out there gay-bashing and talking hellfire/brimstone. There's the obvious …
/r/MensRights20/11/13 09:35 PM
13

Which, if we're honest, is the same situation with reddit, only with guys.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 06:03 AM
2

"Feminism helping men" is second only to "men's rights are a hate group" when responding to MRAs. That's not an extremist view. It's fundamental. I don't know what to tell you. Google it if you don't believe me. If I was going to bring you a source, I'd just be googling it anyway.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 01:08 PM
6

No, I honestly mean everybody. I don't have a source, but if you google, "Feminism helps men" you'll have 12,948,723,512,630,596,123,405,671,293,571,923,875,971,235,982,837,156,821,375,872,365 hits. Feminist dogma at its very core asserts that the feminism movement will ultimately help men too, it's just more an afterthought. The idea is that breaking down gender barriers by having women CEOs and women just making more than their husbands in general, we would see men with closer to equal reprodu…
/r/MensRights31/10/13 12:42 PM
0

People never apologize unless they think they have to. If you're in a situation in which you have to apologize, you're probably already a piece of shit by nature.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 12:14 PM
6

Literally every feminist who wants to debunk MRAs.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 12:11 PM
12

The whole "male power fantasy" thing always struck me as ridiculous. Okay. So boys/men consume media which features burly muscular dudes as a reflection of what we fantasize to be our own power. Sure, I don't think that's unfair to say. When I reached the point in my maturity where I fully realized and accepted that I will never have superpowers, I was feeling a bit down for a while. My point is that I don't see how barbie isn't a personal image fantasy too. The point in which girls and women st…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:38 PM
4

There's nothing wrong with having strong feelings against a product that is not made or marketed for your demographic. I hate everything on Disney Channel and don't give a fuck. It's not for me, so of course I'm going to think it's not for anyone.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 04:24 PM
1

I mean, you're right, but Feminism should still be treated with respect. At least at one point in time, Feminism had a much needed role in society. It does still need to exist, just not necessarily to the extent which it wants to. It's one thing to question ideals, it's another thing to undermine those ideals and those who hold them.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:07 PM
1

I don't know if that's likely to happen ever, really. It's one of those things where people just see those types of jobs as less ambitious and profitable. The problem is that men shouldn't have to fight to get a job in, say, an elementary school. If they do, they might be labeled as a pedophile or something. Idk. It's something that would require more social adjustment rather than legal or financial. No amount of scholarships are going to make parents comfortable putting their 7-year-old kid in …
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:55 PM
3

I've read both of your comments and I can tell you that, unfortunately, you are a sexist. I'm all for Men's Rights, obviously, but there's a line where you start being preferential and/or discriminatory. Feminist groups get away with that shit because they're deemed necessary and liberal colleges and media won't question anything they say out of fear of being labeled bigots. Most women in the field don't belong? Are you fucking kidding me? This shit is supposed to be about equality. If you can s…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:47 PM
6

I truly don't see a problem with this. Women don't really participate in Science, Technology, Engineering, or Mathmatics fields by and large. This is something they're doing to correct that. I think it's awesome. If there was a program that focused on helping boys graduate high school and get a head-start in college, do you think feminists would be upset about that? Of course they would. Do you think they'd be right to do so? Of course not. This is another example of providing assistance to a si…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 12:24 PM
31

Don't forget though, people generally hate feminists too. They just tolerate the organizations out of a sense of necessity. Make a group, don't call it an MRA, discuss gender issues for both genders. That last bit is the most important. If you sit there talking about how hard it is to be a man in society, all it takes is one person who disagrees with your perspective to try to (and likely succeed in) shutting down your club.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 08:34 PM
7

That just makes assault seem like a law that exists purely to add charges to a single crime. I understand that you can have assault without battery, but can you have battery without assault? I can only imagine people who want to be roughed up in bed, but wouldn't that make that consensual sexual act illegal? That doesn't seem right either.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 10:14 PM
13

You're right. But isn't it also assault?
/r/MensRights08/10/13 07:13 PM
1

Men's rights. The only only subreddit about social justice in which disagreements pop up and people don't brigade either perspective. Fucking love that here.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 07:05 PM
24

Or that he was a cheater at all. Even in the article they say allegedly. We don't know whether that even happened.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 05:41 PM
73

"A cheater's punishment, Chinese style: Faithless boyfriend forced to kneel in the street while furious woman slapped him"
/r/MensRights08/10/13 05:09 PM
139

It's good that the girl got arrested, but can we just take note of how "Girl power" this article paints what is clearly assault?
/r/MensRights08/10/13 04:07 PM
0

Okay, but the fact that the motivation for their image is pretty clear and the motivation for the proposed image is only violent and destructive with zero social commentary makes it really quick and easy to curate as hate speech.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 07:22 PM
25

You're completely missing the point. The kid isn't being violent and there's nothing to suggest that playing as boys do will cause violence to happen. You're punishing normal behavior and that behavior is almost exclusively boy behavior. I see that as a gender issue. This kid will have violence on his record which never occurred. That's insane to me.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 05:55 PM
24

I disagree. This is behavior that typifies the quintessential prepubescent boy. This is equivalent to suspending girls for playing mommy as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 05:14 PM
25

The inequality is that boys are literally being punished for behavior which has been consistent in young boys for years and is not violent behavior in any way. Meanwhile, they are struggling with reading and are being held back for it. The education system is extremely friendly to typical girls' behavior, but is not willing to adjust to typical boys' behavior. In a truly equal world, boys and girls should be allowed to develop equally instead of being raised in a system which favors one gender o…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 04:13 PM
73

While I don't think this kind of action is made to target boys and inhibit their success, I absolutely believe that it's pathologizing boyhood. Boys do this. I did it, most of you did it too. I'd be willing to bet that 75%+ of boys played pretend sword and gun fights, karate stuff, etc., grew up to watch shows which use guns, then played video games that used guns, then probably even played paintball, airsoft, or nerf at some point along the way. This is unquestionably a majority behavior among …
/r/MensRights03/10/13 02:38 PM
-2

I'm not saying they're right about that, I'm just saying that the intention behind the image wasn't "we should actually murder men for saying dumb things." The rape scenario image does not even pretend to be cute, in the same way that the feminist image pretends to be cute. Posting something that is offensive for the sake of being offensive isn't going to prove anything.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 01:46 PM
-3

That doesn't even pretend to be playful or empowering. Those are the intentions for the first image, as misguided as they may be.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 03:57 AM
0

The only thing I would suggest is dropping the custody winner stat. While it's totally true, and it's totally bullshit, that will be seen by feminists as, "Male judges and courts propagated by the oppressors want us to be laden with children so we can't further our careers," or as, "This just says women aren't getting those high profile jobs that make child custody difficult. This is evidence that men are dominating in careers and women are forced to be the beasts of burden in childcare." Regard…
/r/MensRights26/09/13 11:54 AM
2

I've heard that some places define rape as "penetrating the victim." So if the woman is hijacking you off, she isn't penetrating you in any way and it isn't rape.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 12:10 PM
1

Also, important to note, they may or may not be the same countries in which women are imprisoned and beaten for being raped. All MRA circlejerking aside, having a traumatic thing happen to you that cannot be legally recognized is nowhere near as bad as being punished for it as well.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 12:08 PM
3

I'm way too cynical to hope the best for humanity. Even being a guy, I wasn't totally positive that an erection was totally involuntary. Nobody ever told me that. And I think I'm now remembering my mother telling me as a child that men can't be raped with that same shitty logic. My mom's not a terrible person and she's never been the type to cry out for "social justice". If anything she just really digs the traditional gender/family roles. She didn't have a family growing up. But the long and sh…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 12:04 PM
1

I'm giving you logically supported reasoning that shows you how women would be hurt much more by the prosecution than men would be without it. There's nothing to argue about. If women are prosecuted for false rape claims, especially when police or court are entirely not involved, fewer rapes would be reported across the board. If you see this as a victory in civil rights, there is absolutely nothing fallacious about calling you a misogynist. You're willing to let women as a gender suffer actual …
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:38 PM
0

Again, way too long, don't have the patience for biased and bigoted babble. I hope you learn basic reasoning skills before you're old enough to vote.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 06:25 AM
-1

Sigh, like I explained several times before. Little to no social financial or mental harm cam come to someone if there was zero follow through with the legal system in the case of a false rape accusation. It would make no sense to prosecute and imprison someone who wouldn't even cross the line to lie to cops. If a precedent was set, in which a rape claim without any perjury or legal follow-through resulted in a prosecution of the alleged victim, fewer rape claims would be made across the board. …
/r/MensRights09/09/13 02:18 AM
0

Because I read the first sentence and it's just more extremist sexist denial bullshit.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 12:56 PM
2

Guys are born naturally wanting sex True that. When the doctor spanked my ass moments after birth, you bet your ass I bit my lip and moaned a little.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 01:39 PM
1

True. I dated a girl who couldn't spare me 5 mins a day because she was studying. I was pissed and it didn't work out.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:51 PM
1

Idk, I find smart and success in a woman sexy. I had a gf in hs who failed math and I was like, "Oh..."
/r/MensRights03/09/13 04:53 PM
3

It's similar to the way feminism takes stripping from two different angles. "Men are objectifying her, poor victim!" "All she does is take her top off and she makes 65k a year, who's really being played? You go girl!" To be perfectly honest, I see little difference between crucifying a man for his "objectifying" of women and slutshaming promiscuous women. "How dare you objectify her" vs. "how dare you shame her for objectifying herself!"
/r/MensRights03/09/13 04:52 PM
6

I guess the point in posting this wasn't whether or not this was accurate, because it totally makes sense. The point is that the article portrays men as small people who must succeed over their partner to feel valid in the relationship. The problem with that being a male flaw is that it's derived entirely from the statistical fact that the vast majority of women wouldn't date somebody who was unemployed, regardless of their own employment or lack thereof. So instead of men being greedy domineeri…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 04:46 PM
16

Can anyone find an instance on which a guy punches another guy after a similar incident? I'm insanely curious to see what the reactions are like.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 04:02 PM
0

Too long. Didn't read. You're just angry and wrong. Have fun being a sexist. I'm a man for men's rights, and I'm telling you that you're taking it too far.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 04:24 PM
1

Nothing happened because she told the cops the truth. Only her friends and some random bar dwellers actually witnessed this. The negative consequences for women greatly outweigh the positive changes for men, in this scenario. Sorry. You're dead wrong. If you can't accept that, you're part of the problem where men's rights organizations are dismissed as hate groups. Take a chill pill and really think about it. Nobody knows what happened in a serious way. If it ever actually hurt him in any way, h…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:15 PM
-2

I don't know how you can say a false rape accusation can cause violence. My point is that, given this scenario, nothing fucking happened. If op was affected in any actual way from this, he sues. Putting this girl in jail only sets a precedent in which actual rape victims will worry about being imprisoned if they speak up. If you think otherwise, I kind of have to believe that you're a misogynist. Prosecuting someone who didn't even take it to the cops will hurt many more women than help men.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 07:29 PM
1

The point is, given this scenario, nothing fucking happened. she just be'd a bitch. There's nothing you can do except sue, and only if her actions caused legitimate and proveable consequences.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 06:51 PM
0

Right. But the point is she didn't take it to that step. You start prosecuting people for shit like that, you just reinforce prosecuting stupid kids on halo threatening to burn your house down or imprisoning people who say "I'm going to fucking kill Steve," without actual intent. She's just a bitch. But she shouldn't go to jail for it unless she took it to the cops, took it to court, was proven to be lying, then was prosecuted for it. But the problem with prosecuting fake rape claims is that the…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 04:17 PM
14

If she is willing to have sex with you to cheat on her boyfriend, the only question is whether you give a rat's ass about said boyfriend. Still, in this scenario, she didn't lie to the police. She just lied to her friends and boyfriend. That can't be made illegal. That only matters if important people (your friends, family, coworkers, future employers, etc.) heard and believe her. In that case, you can and almost should sue her tits off.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 01:35 PM
4

Thanks a ton! I didn't mean to come off as though I thought it was all bullshit, I just needed to make sure this information was useful.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 11:43 AM
167

I need to see sources for most of this.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 02:45 PM
0

You're right, but I'm taking a step back from there and saying that people have the right to a level of narcissism. All I'm trying to say is that they don't have the right to blame others when their self-absorbed values fail to please themselves. We agree, but we're doing so while arguing somehow.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:14 PM
0

Right, but you could. And there'd be nothing wrong with that. If there's a shirt you think makes you look attractive, there's no reason you shouldn't wear it. I've got a few shirts that I think make my waist look smaller and my shoulders look broader. So I feel more confident when I wear them. Cleavage or buttpants are something the woman chooses to wear. My point is that if it backfires on them (floppy boobs, cottage-cheese-butt), it was men who did this to them instead of women or themselves. …
/r/MensRights05/08/13 02:14 PM
5

It's interesting. If you ask any single woman why they dress up and wear makeup, etc. the answer is always to impress other women, not pick up on dudes. They should be able to wear low-cut tops because it makes themselves feel good, not for attention. But the second their self-esteem ploy doesn't work for them or fails to impress women around them, they're doing it for men to satisfy their objectifying lust for perfection. Total trash. There's nothing wrong with watching porn and objectifying th…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 01:36 PM
3

The problem with your logic from a woman's is that women can work just as effectively as men in most, if not many fields. Why should a woman who wants to work as hard as a man get paid less under the assumption that her value is popping out children? That's not fair. The biggest problem from a man's standpoint is that we have reproductive ability as much as women do. Sure, often the woman is the one who carries the child for 9 months. That doesn't mean that they should get to take full caretaker…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 01:22 PM
8

Okay, I want to make sure everybody has their facts straight really quick. I did some looking into Michigan law (I'm a Michigander, so it benefits me to know these things), and despite the fact that the age of consent is 16, she still could be guilty of sexual misconduct of the fourth degree. It's true that she's not an employee of the school nor the district, which helps her case quite a bit. But she is an employee of an after-school program. If you can prove that the after school program can b…
/r/MensRights31/07/13 02:00 PM
2

If you consider an after-school program to be a child care program, it absolutely is just as illegal as teacher-to-student sexual misconduct.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 01:40 PM
3

I don't think this has a place here. We'd be fucking livid if a feminist subreddit posted something similar, portraying a robot as a male rapist monster. Not cool, man.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 11:41 AM
3

This happens in bars and clubs because they're trying to balance the m:f ratio. They know that guys go to the bars to meet the girls, and if they let too many guys in, they'll label the bar as "full of dudes" in their minds and likely not return. I'm not saying it's right, but I am saying it's smart. It's to sustain their own business. You could call it sexist discrimination of men, but it's more or less for the men that they do that. I'm not convinced entirely that it has a place here.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 08:17 PM
0

The wrists thing is often for attention/release. Some people cut and it calms them down. I did it once. It was terrifying. Not because i didn't like it, but because I did. I got help after that and am fine now. Damn that was a wake up call.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:50 AM
6

My favorite one is the suicides one. It's accepted that men complete suicide 3-4 times as often as women do, but women attempt suicide 2-3 times as often as men. I've heard feminists talk about it and they highlight that women are attempting more, of course, and how it's men's faults. And of course, none of them are doing it for attention. When asked why men are successful at suicide more often than women, the response is generally "Well, men are stronger, so they're better at it." THAT is what …
/r/MensRights21/07/13 01:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter