TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DallasTruther Archive

View 1 posts and 237 comments by DallasTruther on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Social IssuesDallasTruther/r/MensRights11/08/15 08:22 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

So no, it didn't happen.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 11:23 AM
2

I mean there are 2 ways to answer that type of statement. Not all men. Not only men. Either works, for me.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 04:15 AM
1

Dude I wasn't talking about talking to police. You misunderstood me, or are trying to push a different point. effectively equivalent to talking to police. No.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 12:16 AM
1

I'm not talking about talking to police; I'm talking about talking about cases with people you know, or like this instance, a whole online community.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 06:46 PM
8

Why is it that people can't discuss facts of ongoing cases? I'm a little extra curious because my father did the same thing to me when I was a teenager wondering about why he was in trouble.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 04:38 AM
1

as they look to protect their young children for example against potential men who are definitely stronger than them. So men just, don't do that with their own children?
/r/MensRights13/11/22 06:00 AM
12

A woman was able to successfully inseminate herself with a used condom, and the man (who wore fucking PROTECTION) was STILL held responsible, because the semen he left in the condom was deemed a gift for her, one that she could use as she saw fit.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 02:35 AM
0

It's dark for men, women, and children, for both similar and different reasons.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:11 AM
3

A car is gonna crush your skull regardless of speed, if it runs over your head (inb4 examples of outliers). Hell, imagine her slowly cracking it instead of quickly getting it done with...
/r/MensRights10/08/22 05:24 AM
21

Why say "a year shy of 16" if "15" works? Especially if they're both within the range you yourself gave, of 13-17...
/r/MensRights10/08/22 05:20 AM
0

K. It's been decades since I've seen it.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 01:14 AM
25

I know you said woman, but there was a little girl who died in JP2, right? By the critters in the beginning?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:41 PM
172

Most times, you don't know garbage people (are garbage) until they rope you in. [just deleted mulitiple paragraphs] Trust me, I know. They can look perfect until they show that they aren't. And then you're caught unaware. I'm a gay man saying this, so I hope people don't think this is limited to women. Men can also be manipulative and act the victim and paint you as the problem.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 09:01 AM
0

Sight. Blurriness, black/white vision, all require sight. Changing "constant blurriness" into "black/white vs color vision" both are still talking about sight, and its constant loss of "something", and comparing it to being circumcised. But you extended that into "let's remove eyelids and see what would happen." Blinking doesn't obscure sight; most people barely notice it. I was focused on the vision aspect of the analogy, not the "removal of a part" because that was hypothetical, as in "whateve…
/r/MensRights07/07/22 05:47 PM
0

Please follow the [thread] that I was responding to. The [downvoted post], of another redditor, that I was defending was about the constant blurry vision part of the analogy, not about having the eyelid removed. You're throwing more details into something that doesn't need it. The [comment that I replied to] was still talking about vision vs circumcision. Constant blurry vision isn't the same as being circumcised, because you use vision pretty much as long as you are conscious, and you're not fu…
/r/MensRights07/07/22 04:51 PM
0

I don't know whether you're agreeing with me or not, but I knew someone would bring up sleeping to poke at the simple analogy. People aren't having sex every minute of every day, either. And constant stimulation can cause numbness, or an otherwise lack of sensation. But being sighted, and having your constant, conscious (awake), sight blurred, would be different than not experiencing sex fully "skinned".
/r/MensRights07/07/22 04:12 PM
2

These studies were conducted as part of the global effort against AIDS. Participants felt motivated to reduce their AIDS risk. Still, it’s not easy to persuade adult men to bid farewell to such a personal part of the body. It’s quite likely that the researchers reassured them that the surgery would not affect their sexuality, setting up an expectation that could have biased the study results. But these studies involved a total of 7,240 men—which, by research standards is a very large number. If …
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:43 PM
0

I think their point was sight is something you use literally constantly, as opposed to sex/masturbation.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:29 PM
5

As much as I hate "This.", the pedantic part of me wants to point out that this bot is assuming the redditor didn't also upvote along with his useless.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 02:10 AM
11

I mean I'm an alcoholic and admit it, but I didn't feel the need to oppose the guy bc I understood his general point and didn't feel offended or anything.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 05:44 PM
4

You didn't draw any similarities to the OP, except for the fact that someone got punched. Maybe "my buddy did about the same thing, and he had a knife pulled on him, but got sentenced blah blah"
/r/MensRights05/04/22 04:55 AM
1

I'm talking basic understanding of what was said, and by whom. Follow the trail of comments that this has been going down, from the beginning. That's the issue I'm trying to stay focused on. I start with "they never said that" You say that's exactly what they said, followed by something that ignores my written point Nothing about forcing her to keep it, while still absolving himself of responsibility. I remind you of the point. You want to continue this as another issue. Dude, I'm just here to d…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 01:07 AM
4

and then have no responsibility after that? Like I said, mixing up the 2 issues.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:44 AM
34

You're mixing up the 2 issues. They never said that. They said if she wants to keep the child. Nothing about forcing her to keep it, while still absolving himself of responsibility.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 11:17 PM
14

I was just thinking that surely, there'd be someone who knows a woman involved in at least one of those fields, and they'd feel the need to pipe up and impart their knowledge of a single counter-example, as if it disproved the whole point of the comment.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 01:54 AM
9

There are so so so many ways in which society, women, and other men value men You say that and yet offer no examples.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 01:51 AM
14

And did you think he'd say "yeah I did it," while the case is still pending?
/r/MensRights20/12/21 06:30 PM
13

Unrelated to assuming anything; that's a really fucking stupid question to ask someone who just said they were charged with something, especially a stranger on a public forum.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 06:01 PM
44

Then he can get a camera. I'm wondering why he limits it to just parents; if he's gonna do that, might as well require all female clients to require a friend in the room at time of service.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 08:14 PM
4

Oh no this is definitely emotional abuse. I just can't get out of it. I'm looking for low-rent apartments and a way to get out of this, but I don't have the money to do so, and I've also heard that's what he's looking for; me to leave. He's moved in two of his brothers from across the border, spaced maybe 3 years apart, while knowing (and hearing) that I didn't want anyone else living with us ("but they're family," I've heard from him and coworkers), the buddy was a druggie who dropped out of th…
/r/MensRights12/10/21 05:21 AM
19

It's not just women; gay men do it too. I've caught my (Mexican) partner talking shit about me in Spanish, and know he's made fun of my mental issues with other male and female friends of ours. He also knows that I have nowhere else to go (which a friend passed along to me), and whenever we have a major fight he tells me that I should just leave. Not to discount that women are/can be hurtful, but I'm the "papi" in the relationship, and he's the "mami," (we refer to each other as such and play th…
/r/MensRights12/10/21 01:19 AM
1

"why did you slap me yesterday, that shit wasn't funny. Don't ever do that again" Except she doesn't care, and already got laughs, so in her eyes it was funny. Going to the office isn't being a snitch; it's standing up for yourself and trying to get actual justice.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 12:09 AM
14

Nope, won't be all-women. They'll have conscripted those men/white knights who believe that one should never hit a woman onto their side. Those types will be acceptable as long as they can be manipulated. Hell, they'll probably want to be the only men left over.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 02:09 AM
5

Women don't have to be taught to not murder their children. In most cases there is something else wrong that makes it happen. That sounds like it's not their fault that they murdered their kids. it's that consent isn't taught or explained well enough to make men even understand that what they're doing is rape. Well that sounds like then it's not their fault that they raped those women. We can't teach women not to murder their children because it's not about that. So women will murder their child…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 09:28 PM
9

Okay, you keep arguing the current reality. You ARE stating facts, but you're either not seeing or are unwilling to see that others are arguing about how things SHOULD be, because of how unfair the current situation is. I see that you repeatedly fall back onto how things are, what decisions could have been made, who deals with what... but you're steadfastedly doing this with blinders on, and ignoring everyone's actual points.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 08:55 PM
0

Um, he wasn't hostile at all to you. In fact, he wasn't even addressing you. He even expanded on his point in his reply to you, and you then insulted him again. Wtf is wrong with you? *Oh, okay, you deleted your comment where you said (if i can get this right) "Well why didn't you just say that? You dick." And then made another comment, over 5 hours later (about 15 minutes before this edit of mine, where I can see your childish "stfu" response). Good job removing context from this conversation. …
/r/MensRights17/09/21 12:54 AM
1

It's literally not saying it. He's offended on behalf of his classmate, or at the unfair treatment displayed. Your point is incorrect. That's why he uses the term one, instead of me. Dude, you can be wrong, it's cool.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 10:34 PM
1

girls starting to say hateful things toward the one who criticized That's not him saying it. You inferred that. Couple that with the fact that in the original OP he mentioned a classmate saying it, that makes it incorrect.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 10:27 PM
1

I read the whole comment. He never said that he was the one to say anything.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 07:41 PM
1

In the (now deleted) OP, he said a classmate said something about a group of girls, and that they overheard. Not that they said it directly to them, even though that could be the case. But no, he outright stated it was a classmate.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 07:34 PM
1

Did he edit it, because I read that his classmate said something, not him..
/r/MensRights12/09/21 02:15 PM
5

In the original draft, sure, but you can find the director talking about the decision to change Ripley from a male character to a female. Sometimes it says it was his idea, but most say it was a.... I can't remember if it was a producer or someone else that suggested to him "What if Ripley was a woman?"
/r/MensRights27/08/21 03:47 AM
5

Replace divorce with Onlyfans in the first comment (the one he replied to) and you'll see that he's just bitching about Onlyfans streamers.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 01:08 AM
8

Yeah because Ripley was originally written as a man. The director chose to switch Ripley to a female character.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 07:38 PM
6

Both are so horrible that's it's pretty distasteful to argue one is worse than the other. Then one shouldn't say things like "It's the women who really bear the brunt of this," because that's downplaying and negating away whatever the men have to go through.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 02:49 AM
3

But the full saying is, "the blood of the covenant is thicker than the water of the womb." I used to believe that, but it's a myth/misinterpretation itself.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 09:40 PM
1

Then shouldn't we check to see their past income, when they left their careers, and such? The whole "lifestyle they were accustomed to" thing is really bullshit. I know you didn't make that claim, that's me talking. Also, AFAIK, these aren't people who've been by their partners through thick and thin, or people who've dropped their spouses once they hit it big; these are people with established...riches, who now have to pay those who lived alongside them while enjoying those riches. And for some…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 03:14 AM
7

If it's the same woman 10 times, or women against the same man 10 times, and they are all fully investigated and found to be blatantly false, maybe. But if different women are accusing different men 10 times, then investigating is the police doing their goddamn jobs.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:21 AM
6

The problem is you have to prove they knowingly lied with the intent to do harm. THAT'S THE POINT. You don't know what free speech means. So do you still think false accusations are covered under free speech?
/r/MensRights10/04/21 03:27 AM
5

Free speech does not apply when you intentionally lie in order to ruin someone's reputation. Is it really that hard to understand? I'm not saying if he was tried and found innocent then she would automatically have to be sentenced. But if there was evidence that she knew it was a false accusation, and that she lied in order to cause harm to his reputation, then OF COURSE "free speech" doesn't cover that. I'm tired of reading people you saying "free speech" when they you have no idea what they're…
/r/MensRights10/04/21 03:16 AM
9

Do you really think slander is covered under free speech? Lying with the intention of hurting someone's reputation?
/r/MensRights10/04/21 03:00 AM
1

If you are an employee refusing service to somebody, then yes, your employer can be held responsible, meaning you can lose your job because of your choice/actions.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 11:57 AM
9

Of course they don't have control, but they are the ones responsible for their employees' actions. Just as you can tell your child not to steal or your friend to drive carefully when using your car; if they fuck up, it's on you.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 03:54 AM
0

...you still know you were wrong. Yet tell me to fuck off. Very mature.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 03:25 PM
-1

No keep not arguing by arguing. Because that makes sense.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 05:11 AM
-1

Then don't argue, and use words (like literally) correctly. You know you can admit when you made a mistake and take the blame yourself instead of deflecting?
/r/MensRights25/02/21 04:48 AM
0

I'm not being a dick; you were ignoring literal definitions. That was the whole point.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 04:37 AM
-1

"In a sense of" isn't literally. I'm thinking about it and it seems to me like it's almost metaphorically, or symbolically... But again, when you have to say "in a sense of," it's not sticking to the "literal" identifier. This is absurd; she can't LITERALLY rape his finances, emotions, or mentality. The physical rape might be up to legality. Stop spouting nonsense.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 04:28 AM
2

I'm with you all the way, with the caveat of: you can't say literally raped and then give terms/restructuring the definition of how he was "raped".
/r/MensRights25/02/21 01:24 AM
2

Thank you. Also just the really not intelligent? Hmmm
/r/MensRights27/01/21 03:17 PM
1

Hey you're the one who brought LGBT into this.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 03:06 PM
0

So LGBT live peaceful lives without fear of persecution by ignorant people?
/r/MensRights27/01/21 02:37 PM
1

I never stated it was her student in her class. I said it was [a] student she targeted So she "raped" her 16 year old student He wasn't her student. I don't know why you had to type up two paragraphs in defense of the simple fact that he wasn't her student; he attended the same school, but she wasn't his teacher. "well it wasn't a student of hers that was in her special ed class. " I never said that so don't quote that bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/12/20 01:57 AM
2

The superintendent noted that the student was not in any of Lantz’s classes. If either of you had read the article then you would know.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 11:53 PM
0

The superintendent noted that the student was not in any of Lantz’s classes. Read the article. It isn't long.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 11:52 PM
12

Because she has to punish him somehow for her own wrongdoings. As long as she plays the victim she doesn't have to admit fault or beg for forgiveness.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 05:39 AM
-8

It's obviously very trans-phobic language.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 02:55 AM
-1

a man that turned himself into a woman Kind of insensitive there, mate.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 01:37 AM
0

I really shouldn't start this because this is so stupid and I KNOW you're gonna jump from topic to topic, without providing any real answers. Watch. Because all of what you mention is known to be dangerous. What question are you answering and explain how that is an actual answer to the question, instead of just deflecting. Because is not an answer. WTF is a porn addiction site, and how do you know young teens are on them? Porn is not "openly promoted without any consideration for the damage it d…
/r/MensRights30/10/20 06:32 AM
2

Meaningful is relative to each individual. Why are you choosing porn as the thing to cry out against? There's also alcohol, tobacco, drugs, gambling, graffiti, and (arguably) television and video games (and more). But why is porn what you're focused on? Let us enjoy what we choose to, without being judgemental of how we choose to enjoy our own lives. *You're a Proud Boys empathizer, of course you'd be against porn. I actually think some black people should indeed go back to Africa
/r/MensRights30/10/20 06:12 AM
0

I don't want to be good at watching other people have sex on a screen. The more time spent on something.. The better you become. Yeah but that's for actual skills, not a leisure activity like watching porn. All it is is watching vids. Are you saying you'd prefer yourself to be unable to make it through a porno, or somehow be made uncomfortable while watching one? How would one be not good at watching porn?
/r/MensRights30/10/20 05:47 AM
18

Yes, you know about bacteria and such, but tradition had them sucking on the penises of the babies.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 07:03 AM
36

And then throw in those who suck on the newly-circumsized to "heal" it. [1] [2]
/r/MensRights08/10/20 06:27 AM
-58

But he wasn't jacking it in the woman's locker room, which was my point. He didn't cross the bathroom gender-danger line that trans people have to fight against.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 06:01 AM
-46

I think if done while meaning to show off, it should only be done in a locker room where it's expected/ known to happen, not just any random gym an exhibitionist visits. If you're a new member, and you have no idea what the clientele are like, then it might be exciting for you, but you're risking your membership and standing if you just decide to pull your dick out.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 05:56 AM
17

No, because you're recording at your job, not during your bird-watching. You literally just told people to break the law (if they're not in a 1-party consent state) when you said to start recording before they go into the office.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 05:52 AM
-83

As far as your gym story goes, I have to admit that my first thought/reaction was to wonder if you meant a woman complaining about another woman, or a woman complaining about a man, because of your first paragraph. I think that any genders creeping in locker-rooms on any genders is wrong, but the "take it a lot more seriously" sentence urged me to ask for clarification. I mean, a guy peering or whatever in a room full of guys is one thing, but if you were a woman, were you actually... were you e…
/r/MensRights23/09/20 05:44 AM
18

Yeah, but 2-party consent states also exist.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 05:28 AM
4

MAYBE I'd entertain your idea on r/blm (I wouldn't but I need to allow that caveat, because it would make a hell of a lot more sense to see your bullshit there), but how can you act like this on a sub about mens' rights? You have a lot of hate and anger in your heart, or you're a troll... probably both. Either way, you want to spread hate and chaos, and your post history is definitive proof of that.
/r/MensRights17/09/20 05:55 AM
47

So you're still focused on the female criminal's well-being instead of the male victim's in this switched hypothetical?
/r/MensRights14/09/20 06:10 AM
5

...you either don't get it, or are willfully ignoring my point. "that's it's" makes no sense. Someone else made a your/you're mistake, and 3 minutes before you insulted them, you typed that "that's it's" nonsense. Most of your comments are downvoted and insulting, so I doubt you'll take this seriously, but I want this online so people can see how much of an idiot and hypocrite you are. No longer engaging. Cheers! *JIC his comments disappear, like his previous insults to the other redditor, it's …
/r/MensRights25/05/20 04:14 PM
7

3 minutes before your "allergic to stupid" comment: It's about the fact that's it's an online competitive game with no competition. "that's it's" And you want to call someone else stupid? Seriously, I thought I'd have to try harder but it was right there.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 03:59 PM
1

Nothing else gets a reset button for when the expected, known risk facepalm Your examples don't have a reset button. That's why it's a false comparison. I already said this, I think it'd be better if you said that we know about the risk, so because of that, it's on everyone. But that's not the same as consent. When you do risky things (bungee, parachutes, bulls), you're not consenting to harm. You're allowing the chance that it will happen. We're not talking about consenting to risky, bodily-har…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:19 AM
1

Dude why do you keep bringing up extra examples of new things instead of addressing what I'm talking about? I can be misdirected and talk about high school football consent waivers that the PARENTS sign, but no. And your misleading comparisons were a dog humping a pillow, and a person pointing a gun at someone. Stay on point, bro. You keep jumping to other shit so quickly, ignore my actual points, and your earlier comments have been rebutted totally (I mean threads other than mine, rebutted by o…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 06:17 AM
1

I have addressed most of what you've said well before you've said it. You really don't think that by saying that a man consented to a baby being made just because he had sex with a woman, you're not claiming to know what the man and/or woman agreed to or gave permission for? Because that's exactly what you're saying when you say they gave consent. Yeah, you're not really getting what I'm saying, and using misleading comparisons. You cannot tell someone else what they consented to when choosing t…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:56 AM
1

That's not what I'm arguing. I like how you jump around instead of addressing what I say. Totally arguing in good faith, right? Even if it was, sterile people can have sex. Wonder why they still copulate if they can't reproduce?
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:24 AM
3

The facts are that you're stating what others agreed to, when you cannot know what they actually wanted. You are literally telling us what someone's unstated position is. That IS you being inside someone's head. That's not facts; that's your opinion. No matter how bluntly you want to claim that if one has sex then one consented to a baby being born, it's simply not true. It's literally in the definition of consent. It's your stance, I understand that. But don't act like you're using logic to com…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:18 AM
3

You cannot tell someone else that they gave permission or agreed for something to happen. You're not in their head.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:02 AM
4

Consent. You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 04:45 AM
1

I would, though, if you were claiming the same theory. You're taking the framing of a photo and inferring an intention. I'm saying maybe not. Don't fucking tell me what I would or wouldn't do in some hypothetical act in your head. If I had to answer your bullshit hypo, I'd posit that the man wouldn't let the world see a scantily clad little girl in the publicly-posted pic.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 06:09 AM
1

I don't think that just because there's a child in the pic means that she's targeting kids. It's stupid of her not to crop it though.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 03:22 AM
3

Maybe something about castration, or prostate cancer?
/r/MensRights06/03/20 02:08 AM
70

There are more innocent hotel guests then there are traffickers. Employees should use discretion and judge the situation accordingly, and if they can't figure it out, they should pay attention but they should never interrogate innocent fathers trying to get a room. A lone man with a small child is not a red flag.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 01:40 AM
-5

I thought the hormone treatment started after age 18.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 01:12 AM
24

...scars are injuries.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 06:17 PM
2

It's still abuse of power, regardless of age. That's the meaning of the term.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 04:30 AM
15

Sit-down wees should only be done at home. And either when you're drunk, or you're too tired to deal with the light.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 07:05 PM
0

Wow. Define "normal guy standards", and explain how a gay person is expected to act in reference to those standards. Then explain how a straight person is expected to act. Then tell me the difference.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 05:48 AM
-5

Basically, if you present as gayer that Buttigieg you aren't held to normal guy standards (by and large). That's offensive. Can you see that? It's saying gay guys aren't "normal" guys. It's not a victim complex; it's literally calling gay guys non-men. He said it, I just responded. You don't count as a full man if you come off as a clearly gay guy
/r/MensRights01/11/19 04:41 AM
-2

I assume it too, but can't claim it's what he believes unless he has the balls to actually say it. Then I can talk about how fucking ridiculous that is.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 03:16 AM
-4

As for gayer than Buttigieg, you know what that means unless you're being deliberately obtuse for political reasons. Freddie Mercury of Queen was gayer than Mayor Pete. Mercury took everything to the next level, and that ended up including his look, his persona, his sexual promiscuity. So by "gayer than Buttigieg," you mean... I'm not being obtuse, not being political; I want you to state exactly what you mean by someone being gayer than another gay person. This isn't politics. I'm a gay man try…
/r/MensRights01/11/19 02:53 AM
7

I'm not sure what you mean. Did you just say I wasn't a man ("don't count as a full man" means the same thing)? On /r/MensRights ? I'm not "clearly gay," I'm a masculine man with a husband, if that clarification matters (it doesn't). But I don't hold back that I'm gay in day-to-day talk with people, if something relevant comes up. Gayer than Buttigieg? How is that possible? Also normal guy standards are something that we're saying aren't exactly universal. Are you kidding? I took the day off of …
/r/MensRights01/11/19 12:36 AM
17

Once, I hurt a female coworker because I unthinkingly pushed her away when she was trying to bite my taco, and ended up hurting her a little ("Ow" while laughing pretty hard, no lasting damage) because I pushed her glasses into her face. When I told my husband, he tried to slap me (not hard, not abusive, also I'm a guy too), and demanded I call her and apologize.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 09:03 PM
59

If a woman was laughed at, would that make it okay that a man was laughed at too? Aren't they both things that aren't supposed to happen? Imagine if a woman was laughed at? Response: To be fair, female rape victims do get blamed and laughed at Ok. So, how do you feel about that? "It happens, so it's ok?" Seriously? Let's go through this. Male tells his story of being raped, while in a group setting that his therapist suggested. Group laughs and dismisses it, and tells him he should have thanked …
/r/MensRights26/07/19 06:15 AM
1

Honestly though, how can you be sure that those who participated knew what you actually meant, instead of what you actually asked? *I'm picturing these questions being asked together. I'm not sure of the survey method that was used.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 06:52 AM
2

Why ask [girl vs man] and [boy vs woman], instead of using boy/girl or man/woman together? Are we supposed to picture a child hitting an adult, and whether or not the adult should hit the child back?
/r/MensRights25/07/19 06:16 AM
1

...when you're playing against teenagers, maybe the real goal isn't to give your all...
/r/MensRights12/07/19 01:33 PM
-8

What about when the Matildas lost 7-0 Honestly, I don't know what to tell you; I'm not a sports fan. At. All. Was just saying that just because this team was beat by teenagers during a scrimmage doesn't have to mean that they suck. I don't know their motivations, whether or not they agreed to let the kids have something they can brag about. The only reason I even know about this is because reddit. Maybe they did give their all...but I don't know for sure. Do you?
/r/MensRights12/07/19 07:16 AM
5

[Link] It was a scrimmage, not an officially competitive game. It's like a friendly practice. I'm not saying they let them win, nor that they were totally destroyed by little kids; I'm saying they had no real reason to give their all, competitively, against teenagers.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 06:47 AM
5

In this instance, I think a [source] would obviously be better than reddit's usual joke answer to someone asking for clarification.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 06:41 AM
1

you probably need to pay more taxes to make this happen. Or we can stop directing taxes towards wasteful things like military. But you get called unpatriotic, as if there's a reason to blindly follow everything your government does.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 01:54 AM
14

Yes, he basically sees no problem with what happened, I just wanted to see how he thought it was okay that someone just ignore crimes done towards themselves, especially those actions that were ignored by his employer.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 06:37 AM
22

Please explain your reasoning.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 05:46 AM
3

Why out of state?
/r/MensRights19/02/19 06:12 PM
6

To answer your question, sleeping with a 13yo doesn't make you a pedophile. It's a semantics game; it's not pedophilia, it's hebephilia.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 11:58 PM
-1

Are you suggesting that he shouldn't have suppressed whatever urges he had, just because he happened to be attracted to younger women? That what he did was ok?
/r/MensRights31/07/18 11:53 PM
4

Btw, is it legal if it's done by one of the two person who talks? Depends on the state they're in, and whether that state has a One-Party or Two-Party Consent law.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 05:24 AM
5

Oh shit, just binged the last season of AHS yesterday, thought it was just created for the show; nope it's a real thing!
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:43 AM
22

So then, how are the Girl Scouts lacking in those areas, and how can they remedy that, outside of injecting girls into male groups?
/r/MensRights05/05/18 11:42 PM
1

And then there's the bank saying "We'll give you $100 if you open a savings account, put $20,000 in it, and don't touch it for 6 months!!"
/r/MensRights26/09/17 05:55 PM
11

Not trying to be funny, but what exactly is a better life if not in a house, with a TV? One sentence you talk about saving up money and in the next you advocate spending huge hundreds per month on rent...
/r/MensRights26/09/17 04:48 PM
6

many people have their shit sitting in a savings account making 0.5% We put a couple thousand in our first savings account a month ago... Last week we got our first interest payment... We've made $0.02!! Truth.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 04:45 PM
0

Ok, you're not interested in actual truths, just changing the direction of the conversation.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 06:10 AM
0

Recap: Reminds me a lot of the white guy that sued Stanford university due to Stanford rejecting him in favor of a less qualified black student. The black guy lost his medical license... How on earth would he know that he was rejected for that specific other person? That black guy was the "least qualified student" that got in I assume. Was that certain student identified? Doesn't matter How does that make sense? OP of this convo started with details about the black student and his life. Pinpoint…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 05:56 AM
0

Was that certain student identified?
/r/MensRights03/10/16 04:33 AM
1

And I was taking that assumption one step further and asking how would that even happen.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 02:09 AM
-7

So he went through the grades of every student to come to the conclusion that the black guy happened to be the least qualified? No chance at all another white guy was even less qualified? *A quick web search found that Allan Bakke didn't claim he was rejected in favor of a certain student; just that the special admissions policy set aside places for black students, which may have caused him to lost his admission.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 12:56 AM
17

Cruz wants to win a civil lawsuit against the county so he can be repaid for everything he has lost
/r/MensRights16/08/16 05:12 PM
1

I wouldn't say especially because of that...
/r/MensRights27/06/16 05:37 AM
2

Chances are he meant minors.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 05:10 AM
1

But it works by a lottery system, based on age and birthday. So how would that bring about essentially putting the entire nation to war?
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:50 AM
1

I don't know why the creator used [this pic] when the dude friggin' exposed himself at a feminist event. Well, I know why (visual effect), but when you know the backstory, it might have been better if it hadn't been included.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 05:10 PM
-10

Please reevaluate your view on this. This isn't a mission statement of Humble Bundle saying that they're ignoring white men from here on out; this is HB choosing to include a charity for women and minority students as benefactors in one of their events. So the fuck what? If they said that they wouldn't include cis white men in any of their future endeavors, then you'd have an argument. But they chose to work with ESAF for this point in time, and it isn't HB being discriminatory. So what if they …
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:46 AM
21

Right. Since learning about that, I find that I can't take screenshots seriously anymore; there's that little seed of doubt inside. Of "that could easily be a fake."
/r/MensRights17/04/16 03:31 PM
95

Also, I'm pretty sure an extension like greasemonkey or just manipulating a page's source code could easily change what's shown on-screen.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 03:12 PM
2

So we have laws like this to protect minors; the abusers are supposed to be given a sentence that actually means something. And then shit like this happens.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:47 AM
2

Well, I have to agree with that. You can't, as an adult, have just a "sexual relationship" with a 10-year-old (in the same way you'd understand the term if the other party was another adult). You're taking advantage of him, no way otherwise. I didn't catch onto the lack of more inflammatory terms.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 02:56 AM
1

Closed this comment page and this occurred to me: Maybe the reason they didn't state that it was her son who was abused was because they didn't want to identify the victim, which is common in these types of cases. There's a reason why victims who are minors don't have their names released, and reporting the familial relationship would have been almost the same as releasing the name.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 01:52 AM
5

Begging the question is when you say something like "The studio's approach to women creates the idea that only young women are marketable. Why is that?" You start out with your assumption, and try to work backwards. You're begging people to accept your initial position, and you want them to answer your question with that same assumption in mind, as if it's truth.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:07 AM
2

Meh, the ending was in an amusement park, but the majority of the film wasn't.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:40 AM
0

Hopping on, I agree with you totally. It's disturbing to have to contact authorities, I agree. I also think that it's definitely going to be a cause of him having less sex, which I think is unnecessarily cruel. Scene: Man meets woman, woman is interested. Either/Both flirt. Desire of sexual contact is implied (verbally or non-verbally) by one or both. Now the guy has to decide whether to show his cards (tell her about the legal restrictions), or to pursue the interaction until she actually attem…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 06:56 AM
0

You misunderstand that saying. There's a difference between set free, and go free. The former is releasing convicted criminals, the latter is refusing to convict them in the first place. That's my one point, please don't twist it into another.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 07:51 AM
11

Dude, I'm not talking about whether or not a 30-year old can fuck a 17-year old. This is solely about child pornography, and what that means. Federal law. Not state.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 03:15 PM
10

I'm telling you regardless of age of consent, it's still child porn.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 02:31 PM
12

It's the age of consent, yes. Doesn't mean you can film a naked 17-year old, though. *or legally, be 17 and film yourself naked.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 02:16 PM
25

I even heard them bitching saying that they should be supervisors because women are better supervisors than men. Sorry to hop on, but drunk, and this reminded me of a couple of work situations. Elderly manager and 18yo female employees bitching about men. "Why don't they just listen? We're always right!" I point out how that's sexist. 18yo: "But for real, women ARE smarter than men." Older manager backs her up (recently divorced, cheated on, bitter, always biting at the chomp to talk shit about …
/r/MensRights06/01/16 07:51 AM
11

Anti-harassment purposes aside, from the sidebar: Facebook posts must be done w/ screenshot & blanked names.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 04:05 AM
2

Hell, I remember flipping open the phone book and calling gun stores because I thought I WAS READY 7 years ago, when I was 21, to finally do it. I was done, tired of this life. Ready to end it. I'd either go to a gun range and do it, or just buy a gun and do it. Wrote down addresses and prices, tried to plan it all out. But I didn't have a car, and hated public transportation. Not in that mindset anymore; started using a personal "high on life" tactic. The bf-turned-husband that I met a few mont…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:04 AM
3

Well, I would think that your hypothetical straight bar wouldn't have a problem with gay people drinking there. Which is kind of a problem I had with the video in the OP. The chick discussing when it's okay for straights to enter gay bars was totally "when we're asking for money (fundraisers, events, drag shows), feel free to show up and be sure to have cash, otherwise please let us be around our own kind" Paraphrased^ Annoying women would definitely be a problem in gay bars everywhere, but I fe…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:11 AM
2

Both of my parents were in the Air Force, met while on base together. My mother left while prego with me (+25 years ago), my father stayed on, was deployed in one of those sandy countries, until he left (+10 years ago) They are divorced... We've never actually talked about why they signed up. Shit. Since the military, my mom's worked as a lawroom stenographer, helped people get mortgages (I think, something like that, Fannie May might have been a part of it), and helped people applying for food …
/r/MensRights09/10/15 06:57 AM
1

Was that ever a plot point? I don't remember that one...
/r/MensRights18/09/15 03:21 PM
12

I'm not the person you're asking to rephrase, but I think I can do it for them.... Feminists complain about the "wage gap"/catcalling/misogyny/etc., and act like their lives are full of them being the victim, when apparently they don't have it as bad as they like to claim.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 03:18 PM
26

But in reality, no feminist is going to get up in arms and argue that this teacher should have been sent to jail. Seriously.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 03:14 PM
3

It's an actual quote made by the man. "I'm here trying to clear her name and let them know I consented to that, I just didn't finish the job as you could say," Palmer told News Channel 3.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 05:32 PM
2

It's the title of the article, and the first line It’s time we started, as a society, to view women as human beings, capable of all the good and bad in humanity. let's you know what's meant by "we". No need to fix anything.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 06:38 AM
-4

and if they consented it shouldn't be as dramatic See, there's your problem. They can't consent. Also, please try to phrase your comments so they don't have so many parentheses. it's like telling gravity to reverse itself (or stop working) -.-) It's actually making people responsible for their own decisions. What is -.-? Are you using emoticons in a serious discussion? How old are you? You seen to use it a lot.... After looking, wow, you...blame your parents for bringing you into life just becau…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 08:25 AM
2

Again, I don't want to make a mountain out of a molehill, but I can easily imagine certain people being mad if the boy was the one going "nope, she likes me" while the girl was obviously saying something else. *Plus, ending it with the girl just sighing, accepting it... then the "easy to swallow" wordplay...
/r/MensRights11/08/15 08:22 PM
1

I should have stopped posting long before, but the tequila I was drinking wouldn't let me.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 07:37 PM
1

...I feel strongly that I won't be found guilty? And let's continue the storm of downvotes....
/r/MensRights22/07/15 06:59 AM
3

I'm not taking your posts as arguing against mine, I think you're trying to explain, sure. I get that.... To them, rape isn't about the sex, it's about a demonstration of power, so it doesn't matter that you're not sexually attracted. ^ That's what I'm wondering about. I asked: what demonstration of power would they claim that I enforced? What would they say about me? I don't understand. I get that you're trying to explain something... how about answering those questions, though?
/r/MensRights22/07/15 04:34 AM
6

But what demonstration of power would they claim that I enforced? What would they say about me? I don't understand. As far as I know, I've been talking about myself and any situation I may find myself in, since my first post of: Shit like this makes me glad that I'm gay, because I don't have to worry about these types of problems. Seriously. But now I seem to have to fight off ideas of, "it doesn't matter if you're gay, you can fall to accusations" I don't see it. What I do see, is an idea, that…
/r/MensRights22/07/15 03:39 AM
-18

...I'm married to a man. I know what I can be accused of, but please drop the "any man is a opponent" type of rhetoric... Please stop. edit: I am a (born male) man married to a (born male) man.... If the downvotes (I'm at -14 as of now) are because people thought otherwise (like I was...in some other kind of pairing), I'm letting people know. If the downvotes are because of anything else, then even though I don't understand, okay. Again, being accused of something doesn't mean the accusation wil…
/r/MensRights21/07/15 11:22 PM
5

I'm not going to find myself in that situation, though. I'm gay. I'm out. People know. If a woman claimed I raped her, she's crazy for claiming a gay guy raped her. I don't know if I shouldn't be replying since I'm not a student, but I still feel really lucky as a gay man that my sexual life doesn't include these types of fears and probabilities.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 10:38 PM
1

I'm glad that if some random woman tried to say that I was creeping on her, then I can, without any doubt or question, say that I definitely had no intentions or even attraction to wanting to get intimate with her. I'm not a student, just another male. I see all of the outrageous stories on here about women just lying about rape, and no one can just call her a damn liar without the spotlight being held onto themselves. Thankfully, my husband can back up my preferences.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 10:29 PM
64

Shit like this makes me glad that I'm gay, because I don't have to worry about these types of problems. Seriously.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 09:38 PM
1

She judged men for not stopping her, then judged the one who tried to. Where did that happen? The article doesn't mention someone trying to stop her, nor judgment of him.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:55 AM
1

As far as this pamphlet is concerned, they didn't print variable options. They make one. And make a bunch of copies of it. For everyone. I don't know what the "dad" removal really removed except for that. I don't know what the inclusion of the word "mom" would need more of. I don't have a before and after, sorry. I read that the word "partner" was something that might have finally been introduced.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 10:07 AM
2

In this hypothetical, based on what I've read, I meant that the male couple would receive the normal pamphlet, which included the word "dad" and (since no mention of the word "mom" was mentioned in any of the articles of the removal of "dad") would not have seen the word "mom" anywhere. The lesbian couple would have received the same pamphlet. They didn't differ. It would have said "dad" in places where they felt like they should remove it. If the originals included "mom", and that was decided t…
/r/MensRights17/01/15 09:55 AM
1

That's what I was meaning. There's a difference between birth-father, and "dad." Or so I've understood, here in Texas. My sister and I have different fathers (never even thought to call her my half-sister until college, thanks to NOBODY in our families using the term, which was the best decision, IMO). Her father wasn't in her life, barring a couple of summers. My mother explained the difference between father and dad to us like I had said in my previous post. He was her father, but he was never…
/r/MensRights17/01/15 09:44 AM
3

It could be an issue of inclusion, I mean, you and your male same-sex partner might be okay with having the word dad in the pamphlet, how would you feel about your best lesbian friends receiving the same one?
/r/MensRights17/01/15 07:37 AM
4

What about two moms? Anyway, perhaps in the UK, the word dad literally means birth-father, and the whole "he may be your father but he was never your dad" (if you know what I mean) idea isn't prominent.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 07:35 AM
1

His point was in his first sentence. Well, second, actually. No. Two wrongs do not make a right. This is a disappointing comment to read. That's what he's arguing. That's why the tiny details don't matter.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 09:19 PM
1

Unless you're the type of person who actually thinks about the question instead of wondering "how many news segments have I seen on that?" What are your chances of getting killed by a shark vs by potato salad? I don't know, most people on tv have actually SURVIVED shark attacks, but the potato salad could be contaminated with something...or could have something I'm allergic to...We're talking about deathly hypotheticals, right? So there must be a reason shark is poised against salad...potato sal…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 08:39 AM
1

Sorry, I should have said extra. She was on an online short, and then she was on the show as a zombie/zombies.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 05:32 AM
2

It's the standing up for what is right part that is subjective, when you cross masculinity and femininity, at least as far as your comment goes. What feminists see as right...usually isn't, and when you describe something as right (as far as defining masculinity and what it stands for) there is of course going to be a group of people who won't see it as right, and who will have their own views on right v wrong. There could be feminists trying to better themselves, promoting the idea that drunk b…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:31 AM
4

society treats men differently in a way that makes them more likely to commit mass shootings That's something that stood out for me. Women murderers tend to be less conspicuous in their methods of killing. Working low-key is a better option; more likely for them to walk away without jail-time. Poison is a huge example. There's the Walking Dead actress who sent ricin to a mayor, as well as Obama, planning to blame it on her husband. Bet it was a surprise to her when her plan failed and she got ar…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:19 AM
-7

It's pink to purple, but mainly pink, which makes it seem really feminized.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 08:15 PM
-5

Yay for awareness, but the "let's make it pink so it'll be obviously for the ladies (to read)" thing makes me feel weird about the whole thing.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 06:10 PM
1

It's not a hypothetical question because you're using the question to provide your own answer, without any reason at all. You're providing a hypothetical situation of asking the question, giving the answer without a reason. A lot of gays have a troubled life because of their orientation. Which is, further, because of the way most of society views their lifestyle. That could be one reason why anyone would manufacture a straight child. There are also religious, traditional, or personal reasons tha…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 07:51 AM
1

Why would you want to control who your kid falls in love with? Why remove about half of potential mates just because you think it's your right to dictate who they'd be attracted to? I really don't understand your thinking. We put down parents who disown gay children. Who would think that we wouldn't do the same to parents who get fussy because their kid is straight? You shouldn't control your child's sexual orientation, either way.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:48 AM
3

I do think it's different though when it's both not growing in your body and not the result of trauma. Yeah he was statutory raped but that's not in the same league as being violently violated and then having something growing inside of you. Not by far. Rape is rape, no need to wonder how violent it was. I'd say the same thing if it was some 14 year girl who got tricked by a guy. If she wanted to have the kid the guy shouldn't get to veto. It has to be unanimous. This isn't about the rapist want…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 10:31 AM
4

A civil case for rape? I don't think that's possible, outside of the couple of articles I found from the '90's.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 10:19 AM
2

Oh, you get off on being rude, even when you're wrong. I got it. Do you think that I thought the author of ANYTHING agreed with the statement?
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:16 PM
1

You didn't cite anything, you assumed. And you were wrong. Did you think that I thought that the author of either paper agreed with that statement? How would you even think that? The whole point of the OP is pro-men's rights, since it brought this injustice into light. How about stop insulting and grow up?
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:16 PM
4

the courts declared I got that. But the way the comments seem to me, it's almost as if they think this is an example of the media thinking it's ok. I'm happy that it's saying it's not. People are quoting the article and picking out flaws in the justice system. I think the fact that this article exists has pretty much done enough of that. Basically: Yay, it's in the news?
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:55 PM
1

Yeah, Jimmy was wrong. Does no one follow links? The line I was talking about wasn't a quote it was a statement, and wouldn't you agree with it? Isn't it better for a child to receive financial aid from both parents? But the line wasn't quoting a judge. It was from a research paper linked in the article, a paper that talked about how it was wrong that a male teenage rape victim had to pay child support for his rapist's kid.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:46 PM
1

Um, your assumption is wrong. That quote was a from a research paper, it was a general understanding, not a judge's statement. It made sense to me because I actually read the line in the original article. From the same paper: The purpose then of this article is, first, to underscore the criticisms that other commentators have raised on how the strict liability approach poses a grave injustice not only to the men who are pressed into the obligations of fatherhood but also to society, which has an…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:39 PM
37

If this has gone over my head, than forgive me, but from the article In a case involving a 15-year-old California boy raped by a 34-year-old woman who gave birth in 1995, the courts declared, "Victims have rights. Here, the victim also has responsibilities." And the ending Male victims of statutory rape are thought of as culpable for child support because, as males, they are not seen as victims, but always as perpetrators of sex, no matter how young. After all, they were asking for it and should…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 08:59 AM
0

I have to mention that that line, was written by someone who ALSO disagrees with it.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 08:55 AM
0

Hate to say it, but that shit is too long.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 04:17 AM
1

Does every post end up in the queue until approved, or just certain "tagged" ones? Is it the same sitewide, or do subowners have options?
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:55 AM
1

So mods can override shadowbans? Is there an icon or something that lets you know a post/user was banned? Just curious.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:51 AM
1

If I can see his post how is that shadowbanned?
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:26 AM
2

BF Skinner, a famous behaviorist who did a lot of research on operant conditioning, discovered that reward is more effective in shaping behavior than punishment. Therefore the most effective way to create change is to dole out rewards, not punishments. It's also more pleasant so it's good all around. Yay gender neutral language, but thanking the author wouldn't be a way to pay it forward a la Skinner. Go ahead and give props to the author, make them feel good, but I mean, they included that lang…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:06 AM
1

So people disagreeing with me about a totally different point makes me a troll? Great way to make yourself feel better.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 08:27 PM
5

It's still hypocritical of her to say hey, we shouldn't say these types of things, and then say that type of thing in a different setting. But that didn't happen. She basically said don't talk shit while on television. You know you're doing an interview. If you say something to someone else, and they blabber, that IS a way of your opinion getting out, but it's not you trying to spread that around. The director was the one who put her private words into public space. You can say "the media should…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 08:32 AM
5

The lively hood of the club depends on having a good ratio of men/women so that everyone gets laid. So clubs' profits are solely from the promise of sex for all customers? Should they give a questionnaire to everyone to make sure that they're not sexually incompatible with everyone else?
/r/MensRights16/12/13 10:17 AM
2

I don't follow sports, myself. Was a band nerd. Can't even tell what make/model your car is unless it's a Montero Sport. Take my man card, I don't need it.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 05:50 AM
4

Yes they are, I'm not saying that they are not. They definitely entertain, but if "At the end of the day professional sports is about entertainment, it is not about who is the best athlete" is true, then we might as well script all professional sports events to increase tension and drama, and take away any chance for legitimate competition. Inb4 wrestling
/r/MensRights05/12/13 05:11 AM
-3

professional sports is about entertainment, it is not about who is the best athlete. Nope.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 03:22 AM
11

Search my heart? Then let's just get rid of the whole fucking human race. How's that for you? See how we, men AND women, treat each other? War, genocide, murder, rape, greed, random acts of violence? Might as well give up on everyone because a fuckton of us are fucked up. Right? Or we can avoid blanket statements and grow the fuck up.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 06:20 PM
18

They are monsters without conscience Taking it a little to far, bro.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 06:10 PM
1

Guess I'll have to save more money (and wait quite a bit longer) then. Shit man, thanks for the info.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:09 AM
1

(not electric instrument knowledgable here) If an amp/speaker is needed, would that mean that there's NOT a built in synth? I don't know what a synthesizer actually is.... Are there models that have their own 'speakers'? If those are what you were describing, then I will have learned something else today.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:01 AM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:44 AM
1

EWI Google: Electronic Wind Instrument. Keys configurable to different instruments. Youtube: Awesome videos. Me: SHIT definitely gonna save up for one. Anything I should know before deciding to buy?
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:40 AM
2

Subscriber here.... also looking for an oboe for cheap (dream on, right?) crosses fingers
/r/MensRights06/08/13 11:04 PM
1

He put the [pal] in it.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:57 PM
15

Morning: Have him do this, that, and give him the other project while he's still productive. Me: STFU lemme sleep (not even gonna touch the DEMANDING tone) Afternoon: Invite him to work.... Me: How about we hang out before I have to head to ACTUAL work later? We can go to a store or two, grab a DVD... Evening: Ask for a favor, or a raise, and GET HIM TO AGREE to anything you need a yes to. Me: Probably if I have time, DUDE YOU HAVE A JOB (plus I give you plenty of extra money when I feel like it…
/r/MensRights08/06/13 07:35 AM
7

The first paragraph specifies that this is in London, but thanks for assuming. You silly goose.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:15 PM
4

Excuse: Drinking. But looking at it, that def looks like a wart. Well. Thanks for making me remember my mother seeing a spot on my face, then giving me some of her genital wart meds. Awesome.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 08:33 AM
0

Gotcha. Who wouldn't want a few extra characters? ……………………………………….¸„„„„ …………………….…………...„--~*'¯…….'\ ………….…………………… („-~~--„¸_….,/ì'Ì …….…………………….¸„-"¯ : : : : :¸-¯"¯/' ……………………¸„„-"¯ : : : : : : : '\¸„„,-" .::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. : : : : : : : ¸„„-¯ :.' : : '\ : : : : : : : ;¸„„-~" :.:.:: :"-„""**/'ì¸'¯ :.': : : : :"-„ : : :"\ .:.:.: : : : :" : : : : \, :.: : : : : : : : : : : : 'Ì : : : : : : :, : : : : : :/ "-„::::_„-*_„„~"
/r/MensRights02/09/12 07:21 AM
3

Was it too hard to do [this]...?
/r/MensRights02/09/12 07:07 AM
17

I don't think there's anything wrong with anybody approaching a stranger's children as such... Parents never mind it, Bull. Shit. You are a random stranger, drawn by to their children because of a SMILE. Parents are the protectors. You draw the attention of their kids with a grin and 'hello' wave, and use that to come closer... wait. Do you really think that parents enjoy random strangers approaching their children, engaging the attention of said children, and having their own unsolicited "play …
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:44 AM
25

Another man lost in the system. Does anyone care about them? FTFY
/r/MensRights26/05/12 05:27 AM
3

(dbe didn't reply to you)
/r/MensRights08/05/12 12:45 AM
1

You're assuming that the kid was the one being bullied. If the teacher thought the hug deserved punishment, it would seem more likely that the kid was the instigator, and hugged the teacher mockingly. Creepy bully hugs me, I'm not gonna let him just smile and move on. A mark on the arm? He's lucky teachers can't spank students anymore. Loner kid hugs me, I'm gonna feel sympathy. Yes, I'm assuming as well, but remember not all the details are included in the article.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:09 AM
5

Scott Pilgrim film: Male v male fights through whole thing. Awesome. Scott was not in control of his limbs when fighting Roxie. When Gideon hits Ramona 3 times, BAD BAD BAD flashes on screen. I fucking love that movie.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 11:35 PM
1

Good idea, but I don't provide a minimum karma count in order to see a post. Maybe a sincere post got downvoted by SRS or just the present majority. It's the user's total karma that decides my position on their troll status. Again....Damn good idea. The only troll I can name now is Chaong...something. RES would help me recognize users like that in the future...
/r/MensRights26/02/12 09:27 AM
1

Well, it's a start. There's the total negative karma that shows them how 'infamous' they are. And there's the emotional replies of those who answer their posts, unaware that they are breaking down the difference between melody and harmony to someone who doesn't care about either, only that he disrupted your day.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 09:22 AM
1

If a troll account is recognized, wouldn't ignoring it be better than giving him another (negative) point to congratulate himself for?
/r/MensRights26/02/12 09:16 AM
6

Troll Account is a troll. Please upvote STT to counter troll-satisfaction. (...I mean, as long as my reply stays here as an answer to his post, it gives some reasoning to any mass-upvoting, instead of it looking like we agree...is this actually a viable response, or should we try to balance his karma to 0?)
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:29 AM
15

Dude's crazy, man, ignore him.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 07:49 PM
4

Do you get humor?
/r/MensRights30/01/12 05:31 AM
6

Equality isn't hypocritical. Reread the title. False Rape victims. The fact that you assume the accused are 'fucking scumbags' means that you don't get the point of this post, and didn't read the final quote.
/r/MensRights18/01/12 06:14 AM
0

American accents, pickup truck, Austin?
/r/MensRights20/12/11 10:03 AM
7

This subreddit needs to watch those.^
/r/MensRights12/12/11 09:04 PM
1

KingNick wasn't yelling about how circumcision was awesome or boasting...he was just saying he had no prob with his dick.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 09:03 PM
3

Well fuck me with a katana.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 08:13 PM
4

What's the fuck for? The article was about a teacher in Texas, and right above the links it reads "Other Texas female teachers featured in sex crime cases:" They weren't caught up with, or connected to this rape at all, except that they have been accused of committing similar acts.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 08:02 PM
6

I didn't downvote, just encountered your post right now, but reading your question, a possible answer popped into my head. How about adding some of your own commentary instead of quoting from the page that many of us just got finished reading? Just a suggestion.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 07:57 PM
2

Their whole plan revolves around him getting drunk. If he refuses to drink in the first place, all that would happen is a few minutes of flirting, the girls insisting, pleading that he have a few drinks. They're not going to invite him over if he isn't too drunk to drive. Props to the men who refused because they know they have issues; their sobriety would help them evaluate the motives of the flirty chicks better. Shame that the girls would probably give up when they see that he actually isn't …
/r/MensRights17/10/11 08:16 PM
2

Can you really picture a guy, drunk, getting hit on heavily by two girls, taking the moral high ground and saying "No, I am in no state to drive, I can't go and have sex with you two." ?
/r/MensRights17/10/11 07:44 PM
2

They are baiting drunk men with sex, the most attractive worm one could think of. Speculating here, but I'm guessing they used every excuse they could to prevent him from just riding along in the girl's car. I am very sympathetic towards those men.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 07:28 PM
1

Participants do not equal eyewitnesses to me. She then states that the other two men entered the room and asked for sex, but she declined, dressed, and left. ... this should have been decided in the men’s favor as there were four men stating that she provide consent and only her stating that she had not (80% of the eyewitnesses denied it was rape). Shit I hate that I have to say this but next time you want to rape someone, just grab a friend or two and they can claim that she was totally into it…
/r/MensRights11/10/11 06:37 AM
1

Not saying it's from /b/, I was just using a quote from /b/'s page to add some substance to regalnerd's assumption. People use different layouts/color schemes as they suit their own needs. I haven't seen a legend anywhere about what the different chan styles implied. Yotsuba B, by the way
/r/MensRights15/09/11 07:21 AM
25

From /b/'s page: "The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
/r/MensRights15/09/11 05:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter