TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dalrock Archive

View 12 posts and 25 comments by Dalrock on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Of course she is ready to stay at home now that she has earned her feminist merit badge.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:02 PM
3

What I argued is that unilateral divorce changes the balance of power in divorces for EVERYBODY towards a more equal playing field. It makes it easier for a disadvantaged party to negotiate the terms of their exit from a marriage, and that's it. What this prevents is the powerful party holding the other party economically and legally hostage until they get the settlement the powerful party desires. Note, this is unlikely to be a fair settlement. I think fairness is a good thing. In any given tim…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 04:40 PM
5

You don't deny that the intent with divorce reform was to change the balance of power within marriages on behalf of women and against men. You simply believe this is a good thing.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 09:46 PM
4

Thanks for the linkage. It truly is strange that people are offended by a post which simply presents the stats from the US Census in chart form. Another good reference in this conversation is this article from Seatle Weekly. Even the women who work in the field acknowledge the incredible bias: Rhea Rolfe, an attorney who once taught a “women and the law” class at the University of Washington, recalls sitting with a male client in a commissioner’s courtroom one day. There were maybe seven or eigh…
/r/MensRights07/08/12 04:57 PM
5

She thinks women are just as capable as men, except when they are more capable than men. And this is offered as the counterweight to militant feminism.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:19 PM
0

Thank you for the linkage.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:14 PM
3

When I asked why feminists are forced to resort to coercing facebook to put a woman on the board for a concept which didn't exist 10 years ago, you answered: Because we live in a situation where men are the vast, vast majority of CEOs, men control the financial world. Feminism is about equality. This perfectly demonstrates your confusion. Zuckerberg is CEO of facebook because he created it. He didn't create facebook because he was a CEO. This is exactly what is wrong with feminist thinking.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 04:14 PM
2

Which I completely don't understand. Why would they make their own organisations? These organisations are already in place, there's no need to create a special "for feminists" army, or science centre, or whatever. It isn't just the Army or a science center. Men have created all sorts of things since feminism came along, yet all women want to do is play me too. What aside from organizations about feminism have women created in the last 50 years? Why do feminists have to resort to coercing faceboo…
/r/MensRights11/07/12 11:14 PM
3

I wish it were true but I can't claim credit for Athol's work. Thanks for the compliment either way.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 08:12 PM
7

No. We are different. Athol is very good though. I highly recommend him.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 08:11 PM
0

They are expected to grow out of it in 15 to 20 years. Let them have their childhood. I hope you aren't a parent. You don't wait until the child has grown up to start teaching them how to behave. You can't teach them how to behave without calling out bad behavior, and tying yourself up in feminist language knots doesn't make it easier. Little girls will at times act bitchy. Feminists don't like the word because it suggests that men and women and boys and girls are different, which of course they…
/r/MensRights01/11/11 02:29 PM
0

I didn't call her a bitch. I said she was acting bitchy. I think the real objection here is that I didn't use an approved gender neutral term for bad behavior, like bratty. Feminists have convinced a surprisingly large percentage of the population that there is no such thing as bitchiness. That this is just a figment of patriarchal imagination, and that whenever someone says a woman or girl is acting bitchy they are really just being strong and independent. This only works if ordinary people fea…
/r/MensRights01/11/11 02:23 PM
-3

Are you unclear on the difference between a baby and a (roughly) 5 year old child?
/r/MensRights01/11/11 02:16 AM
-2

Ordinary people don't use absurd phrases like "kids, independent of biological sex".
/r/MensRights01/11/11 02:13 AM
0

Oh no! I've committed a thought crime. Bad man! Bad, bad man. Bitchiness exists. It describes something real. Denying it doesn't change this fact.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 10:23 PM
-6

kids being kids, independent of biological sex Reddit Mensrights has an amazing number of feminists on it.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 08:58 PM
5

I have some links to sources on this in my post: The blurry line between the welfare state and child support
/r/MensRights31/10/11 06:34 PM
2

Women live longer after divorce and have better health than men after divorce. Older men deteriorate rapidly after divorce unless they get remarried quickly. Older divorced women become like widows and live long lives by themselves. This doesn't show up in the US Census data image, source. The percent of divorced women drops dramatically as the age brackets increase. This isn't an artifact of changing divorce rates, because you can see the same trend if you go back in time. Divorced women just s…
/r/MensRights24/09/11 06:37 PM
5

Thanks for the link Bobsutan. No doubt some will be along shortly to accuse you of being mean. What is truly heartless however is the industry (and the individuals) telling women how empowering divorce is. Ironically the cheerleading only intensifies as women hit middle age and beyond.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:08 PM
2

From page 5 of Custodial Mothers and Fathers and Their Child Support: 2007: Custodial mothers were less likely than custodial fathers to be employed full-time, year-round (49.8 and 71.7 percent, respec­tively). Conversely, custodial moth­ers were more likely than fathers to be employed part-time or part-year in 2007 (29.7 and 18.4 percent, respectively). So women were less likely to work, and when they did work they were less likely to work full time. This is all custodial parents, not just thos…
/r/MensRights24/08/11 12:30 AM
1

I clicked on the link to the full article. I'm glad to see they posted a picture of the man she found. He looks an awful lot like a washed up lesbian, but hopefully he makes her happy!
/r/MensRights23/08/11 03:10 PM
1

That the system is rigged isn't in dispute. The question is why is the system rigged. If the congress was concerned about children, they would have crafted the law differently. But they weren't, so they didn't.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 05:35 PM
1

Great point. I think you are right.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 02:37 PM
8

Great comment. I agree that men can make all of the same bad choices as women, even though the courts tend to make this much less likely. What strikes me though is why wasn't the match.com article about "Sex and the Single Parent", instead of single mom? Can you imagine a column telling dads to remove all traces of their kids from their rooms, and advising them that it was fine to bring strange women home for sex so long as he kicks them out once he was done with her? It isn't just the courts wh…
/r/MensRights04/03/11 05:30 PM
1

New rule: Tickelfight after BJ.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 04:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter