TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DamnDatAssSoFine Archive

View 5 posts and 226 comments by DamnDatAssSoFine on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Lol just ignore. Then set conditions when she wants back
/r/seduction08/06/18 04:28 PM
1

Lol just give me the gist. Like even a couple of words per question
/r/seduction05/06/18 06:10 PM
1

I want you to tell me exactly what you mean. And no, I’m not trolling. You don’t have to answer if you don’t want to lol
/r/seduction05/06/18 06:01 PM
1

What’s this self-growth exactly? What use can you put that self-growth into (assuming you can give me a concrete definition of what it is)? What are these “personal limitations” exactly? Do you also hit the gym? Do you also study?
/r/seduction05/06/18 05:51 PM
1

Are you just trying to get laid? Want a relationship? Want to dominate women? What is it that you’re after lol
/r/seduction05/06/18 05:34 PM
1

And what are you after exactly, if you don’t mind me asking?
/r/seduction05/06/18 04:54 PM
1

how are you measuring improvements?
/r/seduction05/06/18 08:58 AM
1

Tl;dr: did u smash?
/r/seduction05/06/18 02:18 AM
1

oh no, what happened
/r/seduction31/05/18 05:31 AM
1

bro lets hang. You in Cali?
/r/seduction31/05/18 03:28 AM
2

Well, what I'm saying is that even if the girl doesn't seem down in the beginning, you keep pushing and pushing until she communicates a hard no. that pushing itself, or the "chase" as some would call it, is what I'd say the one of the hottest parts of it all.
/r/seduction31/05/18 12:33 AM
1

I agree with the first two sentences. If that's what mark meant, then I see no issue with that. With the rest, the issue is here. I didn't say "no choice"; I said minimizing it. For example, I set safe words. Then I do whatever I want unless the girl says that word. Does that make sense?
/r/seduction31/05/18 12:05 AM
1

Sounds good. So, in my experience, doing something for the girl to “see the value in you” and then cone fuck you is absolutely not reliable and puts too much choosing power for the girl. I’m proponent of escalate until you hear a fuck off (hard no) or fuck yes. I’ve had first date anals with this logic, and believe it’s applicable to life in general. That is, you push for what you want, however you like, until you hit a “hard no.” From my understanding and what was discussed in the book, “showin…
/r/seduction30/05/18 11:38 PM
0

Ok, go ahead and tell me what part of my understanding is wrong.
/r/seduction30/05/18 10:37 PM
0

50% of the book is the gayest advice I have ever read, particularly the part about vulnerability.
/r/seduction30/05/18 04:29 PM
3

😏 Gay and super gay?
/r/seduction27/05/18 12:16 AM
19

Still didnt answer my question bud 😊
/r/seduction26/05/18 04:52 PM
40

Im gonna be completely honest, and not an insult to the op himself, but the article was one of the gayest and cringiest things i have ever read.
/r/seduction26/05/18 04:12 PM
14

What’s your success rate with these?
/r/seduction26/05/18 02:10 PM
1

The stuff you cited can be used to find your “inner awesome.”
/r/seduction22/05/18 04:52 PM
-3

Uhhhhhhhhhhh, actually go out? Lol wtf
/r/seduction02/04/18 08:06 PM
-2

Tinder is dying, Brodie. Don’t waste ur time on it.
/r/seduction02/04/18 04:14 PM
2

I’m very tempted to sign up for a powerlifting gym, just for appropriate farmer walk gear
/r/TheRedPill15/03/18 08:00 PM
1

Would you say it’s the sorest they’ve ever been from an exercise?
/r/TheRedPill15/03/18 06:17 PM
1

After doing them, how do your traps feel?
/r/TheRedPill15/03/18 04:17 PM
1

Man, I’m gonna swear by zinc. Not just because it the T, but because it’s a goddamn miracle for your immune system.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/18 06:17 AM
1

Now, the question is this: What’s stopping that certain class of women from whining their way up in the managerial section, and then only hire women?
/r/TheRedPill04/03/18 05:24 AM
2

It’s implied that it’s in America; so I’m not sure what the point you’re trying to make is.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/18 02:40 AM
1

Please tell me more about this amused mastery
/r/TheRedPill25/02/18 09:09 AM
1

Lol, I guess the girl over there is pretty cute too. What gives?
/r/seduction08/02/18 01:36 AM
-1

“Hahaha, so anyway...” “Lol, that’s the best you got?”
/r/seduction06/02/18 08:44 PM
3

Are these women all land whales?
/r/TheRedPill28/01/18 06:25 PM
1

Umm, don’t we guys act the same way too? That, unless you’re exclusive, you can fuck other women while having varying levels of emotions for them? (Tho obviously, the stronger the emotions, the better the sex would be).
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 05:41 PM
–

Omg looool lets make a wish
/r/seduction25/01/18 05:28 PM
–

Classic shit test: pull back, watch TV while still teasing and flirting (you should feel turned on yourself) until you either feel like reinitiating or she initiates instead. And if you don’t feel it, you can just leave. Does that make sense or do you want me to further explain?
/r/seduction25/01/18 05:23 PM
1

My man, I don’t think you can unironically apply frame to shit you don’t stand for/are not convinced about. So, at some level, the merit of what you’re saying matters.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/18 02:45 AM
1

Well, in this case, what he said did actually matter (the logic stands on its own, at least at a superficial level).
/r/TheRedPill23/01/18 10:50 PM
1

I forgot to mention, but she also said that she can see herself getting jealous and she doesn’t want to get emotionally attached. To which I responded, to make it brief, that I’m enjoying my time with her anyway (true), if sex happens, cool, if not, that’s also fine. Which is why it was a bit distasteful that she cancelled sushi after we’d already put our name down; sex or no sex, that restaurant has damn fine sushi, and that’s coming from someone who’s been to japan lol.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/18 03:58 AM
1

I think your point is clear. Gracias amigo 👌
/r/TheRedPill23/01/18 03:54 AM
1

I appreciate you response, and your posts. For what it's worth, I generally like to take things slow not because I'm afraid of escalation (being afraid takes the fun away), but because I like to let my meat marinate, if that makes sense. Especially in the current climate, I really like to know the girl before I give her my dick. At the same time, your post got me thinking and the ideas are marinating themselves. So thank you again.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/18 06:51 PM
1

That makes sense. Thanks bud👌
/r/TheRedPill21/01/18 11:18 PM
1

Oh I see. That makes sense. Thank you. I’d also like to know what reasons you’re thinking about (for me to give).
/r/TheRedPill21/01/18 09:41 PM
2

Hey man, your critique is actually what I did once she told me that. So, I agree with what you’re saying here. I’m not interested in a quick nut; I haven’t been able to find pleasure and satisfaction in that. I guess it didn’t quite feel right to hard escalate (fingering) when I went on the second date, though with my perspective now, if the feeling comes in the future, I’m gonna hold back less ;)
/r/TheRedPill21/01/18 08:29 PM
4

Just checked it out. Thanks dawg
/r/TheRedPill21/01/18 08:02 AM
8

That's also what I was thinking. thanks mate
/r/TheRedPill21/01/18 08:01 AM
1

Thank you for the comment. You mentioned "hamster." Can you point me out to some resources that I can read about that?
/r/TheRedPill21/01/18 07:01 AM
1

I’m not quite sure what you’re saying here
/r/TheRedPill13/01/18 12:38 AM
1

“As men...rationally.” So, if I’m not comparing myself, I’m not a man?
/r/TheRedPill12/01/18 08:02 PM
3

I see. Back to the article though, I’d argue that expecting to be loved the way described in the article is wrong.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 02:25 AM
0

Well, I’m gonna share this with you, for what it’s worth. If “I must never show weakness and vulnerability” is what goes in your head, actually and unironically, when you’re with a girl, you’re not gonna have fun, or feel satisfied, REGARDLESS of how the girl responds (leaving you, cheating on you, or actually liking you more, etc).
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 02:14 AM
0

When you say “take advantage of,” what do you mean? For example, and as a surface example, I buy them gifts, and they reciprocate. Sometimes I buy them food, and sometime they, me. Both sides at least offer to pay. They respect my other activities (lifting, studying, etc.) and I respect theirs. If not, i tend to not spend time with them. As a side note, you talked about vulnerability. I become vulnerable when it gives me pleasure, and the women I’ve been with have only gotten closer to me. So, I…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 02:06 AM
2

To me, this is love: you have your life and are, at least, reasonably satisfied. I have my life and same for me. Together, we also create something pleasant and satisfying, which naturally comes with good/amazing sex.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 01:55 AM
1

Thank you for your response. For what it’s worth, I’d like to mention that what you’re telling isn’t quite matching my reality. The feeling I told you about persists even after the 2nd time I’ve fucked them in a row. Sometimes it’s there, and when it’s not, it could be a sign to move on to a different girl. When does it persist? When the girl and I go beyond just sex, and can actually hold a conversation, and enjoy our presence together. When both sides know how to flirt. When doesn’t it? When t…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 01:51 AM
1

I did, and I’m still a bit confused. It assumes that all men want to believe that they are loved and appreciated. By this definition, being loved = having your ego jerked off, constantly. That’s significantly different from my perception of love and being loved. Is that what’s it’s saying, or am I missing something here?
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 01:36 AM
-1

I’m a bit confused. When I tell women, whom I actually love, what loving them means to me, it’s usually a burning sensation in my chest and face, and sometimes, but rarely, my torso. It’s true, and it usually renders them speechless. When you say love is a contract, would you mind further clarifying your statement for me?
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 12:06 AM
0

My man, you do realize that the other possibility, among others, is that that particular girl was shitty in general? There are usually a multitude of facets to an issue. Just saying.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/18 11:57 PM
3

It’s a good book. To be completely honest, I can talk about the explicit things it teaches, though the bigger value lies in the implicit stuff. I also recommend the art of seduction by Robert Greene.
/r/seduction08/01/18 09:51 PM
0

Well, if objectivity and scientific approach is something you care about, making a statement like “I’m never gonna get married” based on a couple of cases (in which you were the observer from a distance) is probabye not gonna be in your best interest.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 09:28 PM
1

Tell me about your dates. As much detail as you think is needed to paint a coherent picture.
/r/seduction08/01/18 08:52 AM
2

Thank you for the post. How long have you been applying these principles to your goals, if you don’t mind me asking.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/18 08:50 PM
6

Jesus those stats are just sad
/r/TheRedPill02/01/18 08:01 PM
0

Thank you for sharing. For what it’s worth, I’d like to add that the advice your mom gave you could produce drastically different results depending on how you apply them. So calling something beta or alpha in absolute terms would probably make you inflexible.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/18 09:39 PM
-9

Thank you for sharing your experience. Though, for the sake of objectivity, I would refrain from the generalization “women are unfit for work” based on your single experience.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/18 09:34 PM
1

For what it’s worth, or to perhaps add a bit of hope (if you’d call it that), I want to point out something. If you come from a background of science, you’d realize early on your path that what is referred to as the “law of this” or the “law of that,” “nature of women,” as TRP likes to use, is never gonna be 100%; that’s not even the point. The point is to be able to enjoy your moments, knowing that you’re gonna be in control of YOU regardless of what facts are or aren’t, that you can always wal…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/18 03:29 AM
2

Well, why the fuck would you be interested in being superior anyway?
/r/seduction01/01/18 02:45 AM
2

Obviously, I never meant to say to stop posting these; I suck these up like a goddamn sponge
/r/TheRedPill31/12/17 09:46 AM
1

I definitely see the point in this, though of course there are subtlies.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/17 09:18 AM
1

I’m a little confused. Would you mind clarifying what you’re saying here?
/r/TheRedPill31/12/17 09:17 AM
1

You can do half of these points ironically for the amusement of both parties.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/17 08:37 AM
1

Don’t mean to necessarily cause you any cognitive dissonance, but many of these “absolutes” that you’ve mentioned directly negate the reality I’m seeing. I can’t help but feel that these “rules” will make for an inflexible man. Do you see what I’m saying?
/r/TheRedPill31/12/17 08:36 AM
-1

To bring some objectivity, to be fair, she’s not behaving that differently from, for example, trump did. It’s more or less a sexless issue to me.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/17 10:25 PM
1

see, this is exactly what I'd like to focus on right now. If you come from a science background, chances are, you're gonna realize one thing very early on. That what people call "the law of this" or "the law of that" really is only significant when it's relevant to you. It's factual nature can never be proven with 100% certainty; that's not even the point. Now, to think that such a thing exists as a single, unchangeable female and male biology is, in my opinion, a bit closed-minded, and doing so…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/17 03:06 AM
1

Thank you for sharing. But don't be hard on yourself for not internalizing stuff; it's not something you can force, as you really can't go against your internal logic without evidence, and the strength of your conviction would depend on the vastness of this evidence. What I would like to end with is this: that regardless of what seems to be factual or not, nothing says you can't have fun and enjoy every moment.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/17 02:48 AM
1

Thank you for the post, though if you don’t mind, I’d appreciate it if you could elaborate exactly what you found surprising/ affirmative of trp.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/17 02:05 AM
1

I agree with the part about doing such that you won’t get surprised when the worst case scenario happens; with regards to women and the method the OP suggests, I have to disagree. To put it briefly, and outside the context of marriage (which is a contract), your frame should be such that it wouldn’t even hurt you to know that she could be/is with someone else. If you’d like me to, I can explain further.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/17 03:42 AM
1

imagining the worst case scenario I guess can help you prepare for it, but that's when there's a concrete situation for which to imagine a worst case scenario. I can't seem to see any utility for imagining that for every girl
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 11:18 PM
1

Yeah #5 is like breaking your fingers every now and then so that when your arm breaks, for some fucking reason, you won’t “get hurt as much.” It’s flawed.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 07:22 PM
7

Im very inclined to say that 5 is unnecessary; she never is going to be truly yours, aka slavery. The whole thing is a fun play as long as it’s actually fun. You have your life, and she has hers.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 07:21 PM
1

Those, my mate, are classic signs of LSE, where she thinks the only value she has are her looks. I’d generally refrain from being around these girls.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 07:09 PM
7

Besides the generalizations, and even that for the sake of objectivity, I like this post. And I like your attitude. As long as you’re having fun ;)
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 07:47 AM
1

I’m gonna go ahead and say that if you take these advise quite literally and out of context, you’d probably be doing yourself a disservice.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 01:23 AM
4

This is a great post, though, for the sake of objectivity, I would recommend against making general conclusions based on a single girl. Still, obviously, thank you for sharing that.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/17 10:42 PM
1

You can entertain their ideas without accepting them. You’re still in control. Sometimes, the most bluepill people say shit that you might find surprising and relevant.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/17 10:55 PM
2

And a lot of hotter ones with good education don’t...
/r/TheRedPill26/12/17 05:04 PM
5

Or just don’t fuck anything that walks. Get to know them to see if they’re sane.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/17 03:52 AM
2

As long as you’re being satisfied and having fun, 👌👌👌
/r/TheRedPill24/12/17 11:10 PM
1

That’s all great. But here’s a thing, Is a girl like that really worth keeping around? When shit tests hit that level, it’s not fun anymore.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/17 06:15 PM
1

Got it. Thanks dawg
/r/askTRP19/12/17 05:38 PM
1

I see. Now, for the kegels, did you ever use weights?
/r/askTRP19/12/17 04:59 PM
1

Thank you, I understand, but how
/r/askTRP19/12/17 03:32 PM
1

I have. What have you been practicing btw?
/r/askTRP19/12/17 03:23 PM
1

Thank you. Did you just have it once, or have you figured out how to do it?
/r/askTRP18/12/17 04:29 PM
1

Thank your again. At you current state, would you say you've been able to achieve "dry orgasms"?
/r/askTRP18/12/17 12:15 PM
1

Yes, from the desensitization that follows.
/r/askTRP18/12/17 12:14 PM
1

so is Kegel training it, basically? Silly question: did you use weights?
/r/askTRP18/12/17 12:13 PM
1

Lol, when you say they’ve improved your dick, what do you mean exactly?
/r/askTRP18/12/17 08:59 AM
1

Thank you for your reply. How far have you gone in this, let's say, journey btw? Have you achieved that state? how's your progress been?
/r/askTRP18/12/17 08:43 AM
1

because if I fuck her as intensely as I want to, I'd be cumming in 1 minute. But I think I'm getting what you're saying here.
/r/askTRP18/12/17 08:42 AM
1

I see. Then the trick would be to do that while not losing immersion, right?
/r/askTRP18/12/17 08:37 AM
1

lol, my man, I've tried edging, but here are the problems: I tend to have to do it frequently, and the harder I'm going, the more I have to do it. I really takes me out of the immersion, and kind of doesn't let me fuck the girl as intensely as I want to, if that makes sense. What do you recommend I do? lol, did you have a training plan? Have you tried kegels? Thank you btw.
/r/askTRP18/12/17 08:16 AM
1

Thank you for your response. How do you know they're are real btw? Have you achieved it? if so, I'd appreciate it if you could walk me though.
/r/askTRP18/12/17 07:56 AM
0

Actually, science has nothing to do with this scenario here, though, out of your safety, I’d say that’s totally a reasonable assumption.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/17 09:22 PM
1

Yes. Now, given that not all sex is equal, women would be after great/exceptional sex. That’s where you and I can shine ;) It’s a win-win for everyone, basically. At least on a superficial level.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/17 05:13 PM
1

That’s a great post. As far as scientific approach is concerned though, I’d like to point out that assuming all women lie just from this one example is a far stretch. I do get your point though.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/17 05:43 AM
1

Yes, though sexual selection and natural selection can go opposite directions. So thriving in an environment would not necessarily be selected by females.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/17 04:33 PM
1

Yes, though I’d also add that you can’t just drop a statement like that 😂 You also gotta look at the extent at which either change. To my knowledge, the environment has changed my more slowly, definitely at a much slower rate than sexual selection operates.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/17 02:07 AM
1

The issue being that, ultimately, that should end in almost complete replacement of the “bad gened” ones. Which, I’d argue, isn’t the case.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/17 05:15 AM
1

Becoming the best person you can be is also not the goal. Being satisfied with life (short and long term) is the ultimate goal.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/17 07:55 AM
0

Actually, listen to any criticism you want, and then use your logic to interpret it.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/17 11:59 PM
1

That’s interesting. Would you mind explaining how they’ve changed?
/r/TheRedPill13/12/17 08:48 PM
1

And? Is your goal to never be “beta,” or actually be satisfied with life? Those two, at least from a definitional point of view, don’t always match.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/17 07:57 PM
-3

😂 Bruh. What are you looking for in a relationship? Kids?
/r/TheRedPill12/12/17 07:55 PM
1

Yeah man. The point of this whole thing is you enjoying yourself and having more satisfaction. If you wanna text girls about random shit, do it.
/r/seduction09/12/17 05:29 PM
1

Aren’t actual prostitutes more likely to fuck you up through? As in, more likely to bring you down?
/r/TheRedPill09/12/17 05:20 PM
1

Is this really surprising to anyone?
/r/TheRedPill06/12/17 09:20 PM
–

My man I feel you; navigating dating advice before a solid understanding of WHY you’re doing what you’re doing is gonna be a shit show. From one guy to another, I would definitely recommend that you search for the why behind what you do, and you identify the underlying assumptions. When you keep asking why, it leads to interesting, and often illuminating, places. I could share one of my experiences if you’d like.
/r/seduction05/12/17 06:22 PM
–

And I’m saying are you assuming that to be necessarily true? Cause it actually isn’t...
/r/seduction05/12/17 06:05 PM
–

Just to be clear, are you assuming that it’s necessarily going to be boring for her?
/r/seduction05/12/17 05:56 PM
–

“Frowned upon...” Ever stop to ask yourself why? That maybe you shouldn’t take advice for face value? Js
/r/seduction05/12/17 05:24 PM
1

It doesn’t scream lack of confidence wtf. Did you SEE him do the approach?
/r/TheRedPill02/12/17 06:01 PM
1

Go and try that. Chances are, it’s not gonna work, and that’s no how you deal with your “subconscious,” as you put it. When your subconscious has concerns, you consciously use logic to deal with those concerns/ mental ties. If you can’t, you get help.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/17 06:00 PM
2

I don’t see anything wrong with it, as long as you know what you’re doing.
/r/seduction02/12/17 05:49 PM
1

Exactly
/r/seduction02/12/17 03:05 AM
–

You WANT to make it happen;) Then just sit back and smile Like “yeah, I know. What are you gonna do about it, little girl?” Edit: usually I hold the convo for like 3-5 mins, talking about any random shit (mainly what I like), then cut, look at her, and wait. Field-tested, and also matches with my philosophy.
/r/seduction01/12/17 06:14 PM
–

One sentence: The silence is awkward if you make it awkward
/r/seduction01/12/17 03:57 PM
–

Have you field tested their effects?
/r/seduction01/12/17 08:04 AM
3

Now is time for the most important part... Field testing. Let us know how it goes
/r/seduction01/12/17 07:59 AM
1

So sorry, but your “green flag,” if you’re actually taking it as absolute, kinda screams insecurity to me
/r/TheRedPill01/12/17 06:26 AM
8

If she spreads her legs and asks you to fuck her, she probably, probably like you
/r/TheRedPill30/11/17 05:22 PM
1

Thaaaaaat’s not true You can crave it and have it at the same time
/r/TheRedPill29/11/17 11:48 PM
1

Exactly. Utility is the ultimate goal, bitterness is a little prick sometimes to push you there.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/17 09:12 PM
1

When I feel bitter, I see it as sign to refocus/reevaluate my goals. You feel bitter when you sense you're hopeless/helpless in some area. The discussion can go on for pages after this point.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/17 09:04 PM
1

are you saying that bitterness is the ultimate reactions, as in, your thinking has led you to conclude that living your life bitterly is the only rational solution?
/r/TheRedPill27/11/17 08:50 PM
1

Though if TRP makes you bitter, you’ve gone wrong somewhere. If you feel bitter after TRP, you’re still in your hopeless/helpless stage.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/17 06:41 PM
1

That's interesting. How noticeable was the impact?
/r/TheRedPill27/11/17 06:52 AM
1

if you can, I'd appreciate it if you could elaborate on those experiences. Are you sure it wasn't compounded by anything else (let's say your manners/attitude)?
/r/TheRedPill27/11/17 06:24 AM
2

Which CEO, Athlete, or Rockstar are you talking about here buddy? Listen, I agree with most of what you're saying, but you seem to be insisting on the fact that what I'm saying and you're saying have to be mutually exclusive. Tell me, let's say you're this perfect CEO you're talking about. You're walking down the street in a foreign country (lets say the UK), and you see this absolute stunner on the other side of the street. You got 15 minutes or so on your hand. You're attracted to her, and kno…
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 08:37 PM
6

So, from what I've been reading on the testosterone raise, 1) no study has actually shown a long-term increase in testosterone levels when you don't ejaculate and 2) it's more about re-sensitizing your dopaminergic receptors, and hence the euphoria one would feel. There are still issues here: The paper discussed ejaculation, not masturbation per se. So, one would rip the same "benefits" of no fap by also no sex. This wouldn't make any sense, because reducing testosterone seems like a biological …
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 08:28 PM
1

Like I said again, do you have any resources backing up what you said? I don’t care how beat or hopeless you are (from your posts). You’re truly weak and hopeless when you abandon logic and critical thinking, just so you know.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 07:52 PM
1

ah see, I'm not disagreeing on that part. If you're implying that women could pick up on your vibes (good or bad), I definitely agree. But to suggest is pheromone-mediated...that I cannot just agree with.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 01:56 PM
1

yes, BUT... (1) I'm not aware of any evidence that shows the difference is beyond anything psychological and (2) Even if it were to also be physiological, I'm not aware of any evidence that suggest a change in pheromone levels/composition and whether or not it could be detected by women. I'm not even aware of a hypothetical mechanism there, and I have a neurobiology and physiology background.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 01:22 PM
1

Hey buddy, I was actually trying to have a meaningful back-and-forth here. You seem to be taking it way too personally. While what you're saying sounds good on paper, that's really not what I'm going for. I have my life on the side, if I'm out shopping or taking my lunch break and I see a girl I find attractive, I approach her and talk to her. I can't seem to understand why you're so hostile to that idea. You explain to me this utopia of sorts where girls throw themselves at you, and while that'…
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 12:16 PM
1

I'm not disagreeing with you here. I understand that "thoughtful" could imply a response that takes time. What I meant to say is a response that's not just an impulse, though sometimes that could be the right response. I'm inclined to say that the kind of "power" that makes the room go quite is not the same kind that gets the girl wet, or you, hard. Though, at the same time, we could be a victim of communication here.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 11:47 AM
0

dude, how about you calm down a bit. I've gotten laid like this many times, found pretty cool and awesome women. let me give you a sense of proportionality. 15 minutes is not a waste of time. The only way you "have so many women" is when you actually have so many women. Approaching women is a waste of time to you? Do you have women you like throwing themselves at you wherever you go/ at your doorstep? If so, please elaborate. what are you even looking for? What's your end goal here? Maybe it's t…
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 11:41 AM
1

If I'm understating what you're saying correctly (with your version of power-display being a direct remark at the guy, be it sarcastic or not), then I disagree with your point here, both because of logic and personal experience. The personal experience one is obvious. But let's walk through the logic part. Let's start with a deduction. Lets assume that your ultimate goal in life is to maximize utility (pleasures of short-term satisfaction and long-term satisfaction, etc.). Sex, if done right, co…
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 10:09 AM
1

Very simple. From the get-go, when you’re interacting with them, act as if you own them; as if you’re their boss daddy. They know you don’t own them (lol, that would be slavery), you know you don’t literally own them. Then why do it? Because it’s hot. It’s arousing, for both you and her. Got it?
/r/seduction26/11/17 09:35 AM
1

Can you clarify the part about pheromones?
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 09:30 AM
1

There’s difference between a response and a reaction. One is thoughtful and with your utility in mind, the other is impulsive. There’s a difference. How about you go back to the drawing board
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 09:25 AM
8

Yeah. I mean you gotta ask yourself, “is there any utility in me fighting a dude for that? Are there alternatives with more utility?” 9/10 times, you don’t fight.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 09:23 AM
2

Even then, not necessarily (I’m understating what your saying to mean that you don’t need to approach girls once you’re “on your path.” If that’s what you mean, then it’s not the best course of action).
/r/seduction26/11/17 03:54 AM
–

Lol, not necessarily
/r/seduction26/11/17 03:35 AM
1

You have respect and equality for all, but yet act as if you already own the girl you’re talking too. Why? Cause it’s hot. For both you and her.
/r/seduction26/11/17 03:34 AM
3

So, if I’m understanding you correctly, what you’re saying is that if you see a girl you find attractive, you’re not gonna approach her because “abundance mentality”? Am I missing something here in your argument? Go back to your studies and try again, youngling
/r/TheRedPill26/11/17 01:48 AM
5

No. If I see a girl down the street, whom I’m probably never gonna see again, I literally run after her. And if you actually have any idea what you’re doing, there’s a very high chance it goes well (unless, as Mark puts it, there are ‘frictions’).
/r/TheRedPill25/11/17 06:14 PM
3

Lol this is so silly. You’re putting way too much weight on this without considering the context
/r/seduction24/11/17 06:16 PM
2

Come back for more when you’re ready, grasshopper
/r/seduction23/11/17 06:20 PM
2

Your “natural law” is not so mathematical, you didn’t do a good job of providing evidence for it, and most likely will turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/17 10:46 AM
-2

You’re taking this way too seriously, dawg. All of the alpha/beta social status shit definitely has a place, but you’re taking it way out of context.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/17 10:45 AM
3

Great start, youngling
/r/seduction23/11/17 10:42 AM
1

Lol, why do you care 😂
/r/seduction21/11/17 07:31 PM
10

Lol I thought you were like 50 at first. Keep it up, youngling ;)
/r/TheRedPill20/11/17 07:51 PM
2

Just the way you made this comment tells me that you’re still not passed your teenager stage...😐
/r/TheRedPill20/11/17 07:40 PM
0

Becoming ‘hot’ just to get girls is literally one of the worst sources to drive motivation from. You’re gonna hate yourself at the end of it, even if you do get more girls. It’s a lot more subtle than ‘just get hot.’ Spend a little time and actually think about it. Don’t missassociate the routes to your goals with the goals itself.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/17 04:45 PM
6

That such shitty advice at the end. Improving yourself because you don’t want your girl/SO to leave you is one of the shittiest places to drive motivation from. GL having a fun fulfilling relationship that way.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/17 03:33 PM
2

The ultimate goal is to maximize utility. These principles, like all other principles, apply as long as they maximize utility (pleasure, and more importantly, satisfaction).
/r/TheRedPill12/11/17 10:02 PM
–

Concerning yourself about what others mean: +2 satisfaction Not bad, definitely has its place. Looking to see what actually turns you on in seduction and capitalizing on that, for a utilitarian point of view: +10 satisfaction
/r/seduction11/11/17 06:13 AM
–

I feel you man. For one thing, read the subtle are of not giving a fuck. Again, here me out. There are two things I want to address about your concern about your reputation. 1) it’s mainly out of your control (unless we’re talking about it in a legal framework) 2) your associating it with a lot of utility, which it doesn’t necessarily have. Why would you concern yourself so much about something that wouldn’t give you that much satisfaction when there are other clear, concrete ways to get it?
/r/seduction10/11/17 07:58 AM
–

Again, see, that’s really non of your concern, because, again, it’s not much under your control. You’re in this life to maximize satisfaction. You have to see what turns you on, what parts of the seduction process you’re not deriving pleasure from (and why and how, if applicable, to change that). This needs research and experimentation. Or not, it’s your life.
/r/seduction10/11/17 07:01 AM
–

I’m getting it man. I’m asking you that to clarify something. Your concern in your original comment involved other men, and how the ones physically superior to you, in whatever way, easily get all the girls. But here’s the thing. What you described, however true, is mostly out of your control. From a utilitarian perspective, your focus should be on YOU, YOUR pleasure and YOUR satisfaction, at all times. This is a complex concept that also entails decency and integrity. If the pick up/seduction p…
/r/seduction10/11/17 06:29 AM
–

Why do you have that goal? What are you associating that goal with?
/r/seduction09/11/17 08:35 AM
–

why inspiration? is there anything else you'd also be looking for here? In other words, what's your end goal?
/r/seduction08/11/17 05:44 AM
–

I’d like to begin by asking you this (and be as specific as possible) why are you on this sub? I’m being serious, this is gonna clear up a lot bs.
/r/seduction07/11/17 05:26 PM
1

You can’t expect nothing. Just change your expectations to stuff that’s under your control.
/r/seduction07/11/17 11:06 AM
1

OP: why did you remove the post? I wanted to read the article
/r/TheRedPill31/10/17 04:44 PM
1

My issue was mostly with using metrics that are out of your control. For example, focusing purely on the number of girls you sleep with as some measure of improvement.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/17 08:22 AM
1

OP: what’s the point of this post?
/r/TheRedPill31/10/17 07:43 AM
1

Problem being that the metric for results that some people use is just stupid.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/17 07:24 AM
3

You might have showed her your emotions in a chodey way. Or that perhaps the problem is with her. 1 person is not a good sample size ma dude
/r/seduction27/10/17 06:03 PM
–

To some extent, it actually makes me feel alive ;)
/r/seduction27/10/17 08:24 AM
1

Correct pick up is supposed to be fun. Like, that should be the only reason to do it anyway: to see and learn what turns you on the most. I’d say if you’re not feeling this way, there’s a little knot somewhere you have to untie. For me, it was an immature sense of integrity. I knew it was illogical, but took me a while to begin solving it logically. How do you feel about this?
/r/seduction27/10/17 01:34 AM
1

The only thing I disagree with here is the apparent categorization of all women as illogical. The rest, you goddamn nailed.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/17 09:37 PM
2

Depends how you ask it/ if you're actually interested to know Except for the STD one. That one is meh
/r/seduction18/10/17 05:14 PM
-43

Though going for the girl and being aware at the same time is also super brave 😏
/r/TheRedPill16/10/17 03:29 PM
1

So if you live a healthy, happy life, would you expect sex/ do you feel entitled to sex?
/r/TheRedPill12/10/17 11:41 AM
1

No like literally, are you just looking for sex? Mind-blowing sex? Etc.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/17 03:42 PM
4

I'm gonna ask you a hard question. With regards to game, what do you want? What do you want, exactly?
/r/TheRedPill10/10/17 12:46 AM
13

Statements of intent. It ranges from "i think you're attractive and would like to get to know you better" to more explicit ones. What's very important here is your conviction behind what you say. How serious are you about her? How serious are you about wanting her? How confident are you in what you want?
/r/seduction16/09/17 07:58 PM
1

Do all women wanna enslave men? Or are you just being hyperbolic here?
/r/MGTOW26/08/17 05:36 PM
2

This. This right here
/r/seduction25/08/17 09:52 AM
0

I'm inclined to say honesty+calibration is an amazing combo. So tell her exactly what you have in mind ;) It might fail the first few times, but that's ok. Tell me if what I'm saying makes sense to you
/r/seduction25/08/17 02:06 AM
9

First i like to congratulate you for being honest with yourself, and command you on your self-acceptance. I would very highly recommend Models and The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fuck by mark Manson. I think it has the exact "inner game" shit that you need. Also, sometimes for very deep seated issues, therapy might prove the fastest/most effective.
/r/seduction25/08/17 01:56 AM
13

I'd say you can always interrupt and apologize, and then express your interest anyway. (socially aware+direct and honest=bravery, which is hot and feels fucking great even if you get rejected). You know what you want.
/r/seduction25/08/17 01:49 AM
1

And it's polarizing;) Not that that by itself is the end-all, but it's great anyway
/r/seduction23/08/17 01:04 AM
1

Just giving some feedback braj
/r/seduction22/08/17 11:36 PM
1

I'm inclined to say that, the reason you might be caring a lot about this, might be that you need other goals to focus on. Does that make sense?
/r/seduction22/08/17 04:42 PM
–

I firmly believe that going about this wanting to be like James Bond is probably wrong on many levels.
/r/seduction22/08/17 04:33 PM
1

Great question. Most important one I'd say is set up your goals and values. Very specifically. Mark also has a pretty good criteria to see if a goal is worth it or not.
/r/seduction19/08/17 06:53 PM
2

For sure man. Lmk how it goes
/r/seduction15/08/17 07:05 PM
–

Definitely begin with Models and The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fuck, both by Mark Manson. Then read Sex God to get some kind of a guide towards your sexuality. When say read, i mean critically read. How does the stuff in the book/chapter/ paragraph make you feel? Do you agree with what it's saying? Why or why not? How can you test it? Etc. Iron John and 6 Pillars of Self-Esteem are also great books. As it turns out (surprise surprise) the most reliable way to get laid and have great sex and at …
/r/seduction15/08/17 06:45 PM
1

For a better logic behind this, if that's also what you're looking for (and imo you should be), I would suggest Models by Mark Manson. Also his The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fuck. Foundational stuff.
/r/seduction15/08/17 12:58 AM
1

Of what exactly?
/r/seduction15/08/17 12:51 AM
–

No they're not 😏. Especially not to you, which ultimately matters the most at the end
/r/seduction14/08/17 11:36 PM
–

That instead of focusing most of your efforts on "looking" like an attractive man (which is empty and you'd feel like a fraud in the long-term, plus it rarely works), you can actually put effort into BEING an attractive man. It definitely has a lot of subtleties I'd say, at least to my knowledge and experience so far anyway, but that's basically the gist of it.
/r/seduction14/08/17 10:30 PM
–

Idk man, the further away from reality you go, the more respect you tend to lose for yourself
/r/seduction14/08/17 07:20 PM
–

One caveat i would add: usually, if you "play hard to get" as an excuse to actually hide your intentions/ sexuality, you're gonna be that player that rarely gets laid
/r/seduction14/08/17 07:19 PM
1

How do you suggest one develops personal ethics?
/r/seduction10/08/17 08:18 PM
1

Great post. Also seems to be pretty in line with Models
/r/seduction10/08/17 06:36 PM
1

It does matter, but nearly as much as you think. + it changes with time and across different girls
/r/seduction08/08/17 11:09 AM
1

Read sex God method. Again, these give you the raw material to work with. I'm sure you know, without self-reflection and actually going out to get feedback, it wouldn't be as valuable
/r/seduction31/07/17 07:20 PM
–

Off the top of my head, read models by Mark Manson. Seems like you also need to better develop your sexuality
/r/seduction31/07/17 09:49 AM
-6

Hiding your feelings/ intentions is a sure way to lose respect for yourself. Unless your doing it in a funny and ironic way
/r/seduction30/07/17 09:17 PM
1

👌👌
/r/seduction29/07/17 05:19 AM
1

when guys read books and "hide" behind them, as means to avoid getting "hurt" from possible rejections, they are fucking up.
/r/seduction28/07/17 10:35 AM
1

I agree; we're on the same page here
/r/seduction28/07/17 10:34 AM
1

That's ok; it might have sat well with me for many reasons. You'd be surprised, but you might read it a year from now and then fully get it;)
/r/seduction28/07/17 10:25 AM
–

thats why i said these books are just prerequisites;) so tone down on the cynical shit. Plus, coming from someone who's also well-informed about other dating programs (especially RSD, as I have Max's Natural top tier), the ideas in this book, particularly in the beginning, go way deeper than any other book/program I've had/experienced. Again, it's the synergy of a lot of different things and play in seduction/game/ whatever you wanna call it, but some of those stuff, like the books I referred to…
/r/seduction28/07/17 10:23 AM
2

Lol this was supposed to be a reply to another comment. My bad. BUT, While we're at it, was the girl actually pretty, or did you just say it?
/r/seduction26/07/17 08:24 AM
5

Lol try to not fucking fake anything. That will fuck your self-respect in the long run If youre not attracted to a girl, don't try to fuck her for "reference experience"
/r/seduction26/07/17 01:40 AM
1

Secret to staying calm in shit situation: you have a strong enough sense or identity that can put the situation in its "right" place, while still trying to solve the problem.
/r/seduction24/07/17 02:44 PM
2

Buy BecomingTheNatural by RSD Max. It basically covers everything you've discussed. Also read The Subtle Art of Not Giving A Fuck, Iron John, and 6 Pillars of Self-Esteem. Can you walk to any girl you seem attracted to and talk to her? Or just walk up to her knowing that acting on your fear is irrational? If no do what I said.
/r/seduction29/06/17 11:54 PM
1

You see that? That's called HONESTY. It's respectful to your integrity AND the girl, and perhaps one of the most attractive features one could have (of course don't be fucking naive about it)
/r/seduction27/06/17 06:25 AM
1

It could be both
/r/seduction15/06/17 08:01 AM
1

Emotions are not irrational; the just are. ACTING on them, however, could be.
/r/seduction15/06/17 08:00 AM
2

I guess one way to approach this would be seeing it as a shit test. The question you have to ask yourself is this: do YOU think you're cool? Do YOU think you're good enough? Because of you truly do, I would guess your frame wouldn't crumble in the face of girls saying shit like that. And once they see your frame is still there, and the others girl around also see that, your attraction goes off the roof. Now, what if you answered "not sure" or "no" to the previous questions? If you're anything li…
/r/seduction28/05/17 04:41 PM
1

👌
/r/seduction11/05/17 07:08 AM
1

Ma dude I'm in my twenties
/r/seduction11/05/17 07:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter