TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dancing_Anatolia Archive

View 0 posts and 382 comments by Dancing_Anatolia on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I mean, obviously not. It's not rape, or even sexual assault, if no sexual action occurred. You can promise anything, but if you don't do anything, then nothing happened.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 09:58 PM
1

Narcissism is a mental illness. That's not a fragile male ego, that's a fragile Narcissist's ego. Oh, and women can be Narcissists too by the way.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 07:10 AM
16

I mean, I don't think so? Drugging people is awful, but I definitely consider theft to be a lower crime than rape. Unless I'm missing something, it seems like general criminal scumbaggery. It's intolerable, and she should be punished for it, but I don't really consider robbery to be a viscerally disgusting crime.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 06:54 AM
10

I believe it's better to have shitty equality than to have severely unequal QoL. If one people can destroy lives with a single lie, then everyone should have that power, until a systemic change could prevent it in the first place.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 06:14 AM
6

Words are only as harmful as the person who hears them, yes. But this woman and the Title IX inquisitors committed an action. They affected his life in a way that made him feel the only way out was death.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 05:57 AM
3

No, Captain Mar-Vell (the original dude one) was invented to copywrite the name. Carol Danvers is Miss Marvel.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 09:13 AM
6

It doesn't have to be about diversity, the lead actor and the writers just explicitly told us that they made it that way.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:07 PM
2

He meant "miraculously".
/r/MensRights26/02/19 04:23 AM
6

My biggest problem is how she comes off in the trailers. She looks like she's related to Plank from Ed, Edd, and Eddy.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 04:21 AM
1

Arkansas and Kansas are the names of one tribe in two different languages.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 05:11 AM
2

The strongest women aren't stronger than the strongest men. That's just how human biology pans out. It's also why most sports leagues aren't co-ed (e.g. Men's Basketball teams don't play against Women's Basketball teams). You can call yourself whatever you want, and wear whatever you want, but all the belief in the world is not going to change the fact that you have a Y chromosome.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 08:37 AM
2

Shit, I probably should've done that. I just answered like the word "Feminist" was there instead.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 06:30 AM
1

I remember that scene from the bible where they circumcised a whole city of men. So apparently it's okay to do it as an adult.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 01:46 AM
1

She got reparations from the school district. Apparently (according to another commenter) she currently has $750K of the 1.5 Million they were going to give her.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 07:30 AM
5

What he said was a typo. He probably meant "living with my buddy today".
/r/MensRights20/01/19 02:58 AM
29

Stop both people. Make sure the situation is what you think it is. Don't assault people who are pinned to the ground. These things are legal actions that don't aid and abet a kidnapping.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 12:15 AM
11

It could. If something is legal, far less people would go to illegal sources (e.g. who would by weed from a dealer when they can just go to a store?). And when illegal businesses are driven out of business by legal companies, due to generally having higher standards, as well as the inability for the consumer to be arrested, crime of that nature should be slashed. If crime doesn't pay, pimps won't do it.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:13 AM
1

Societies aren't hard sciences, like physics. When you make some mathematical equation that states gravity repels objects, that's when you know you did something wrong. But when you make a study that says "men and women's lives in Saudi Arabia are equally shitty", you have to actually start breaking down the facts and start using your brain.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 09:21 AM
0

This is equality. In a democracy, the majority is the most fearsome opponent. Every philosopher since democracy was invented knows that without checks, a tyranny of the majority will eventually destroy itself. The Electoral College is that check in the United States. Also: we're not a regular "country" like Britain. We're a federation, so that means the states do matter. We share power with the federal government.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 07:06 AM
1

Yeah, and the people don't all live the same way. Most people are urbanites, as opposed to living in Rural areas. Why should the rural people get completely stomped on because they have a different way of living?
/r/MensRights06/01/19 07:01 AM
1

No, only people who live in the most populous parts of America would run America. California alone has a bigger population than 22 American states combined. If California voted one way, it would take nearly half the country to balance out just California.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 10:55 PM
1

In a direct democracy, no one but the people who live in that region would ever get a say. This is why Direct Democracy is a load of bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 08:09 AM
5

You don't need nuanced opinions on evil. A system where anyone can go to jail on trumped up charges because innocence is not presumed is an evil system that needs to be destroyed.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 01:02 AM
6

Uh, isn't that the point? Every rights movement boils down to complaining about life being unfair.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 09:58 PM
1

There is no functional difference between censorship and not providing a platform for discussion. If I were dictator of Whocaresistan, and free speech was banned, I'm not gonna get rid of what you don't like. I'll get rid of what I don't like. I'll tell newspapers and websites that they can't publish your ideas. By destroying your ability to speak, get this, I ruin your power of free speech.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 07:50 AM
8

I mean, it really doesn't apply universally. It only applies to the minimum, most singular units of reality (or "quanta") and how they function. But once you start adding enough of the quantum units together, they stop being quantum, since they're now always bound together with other shit, which means they're now constantly being "measured". And once things are measured, they stop doing the whole "uncertainty" thing, and that's when Newtonian physics kicks in. That's why the whole Schrodinger's …
/r/MensRights23/12/18 10:17 PM
2

But in most cases, reality is binary. It's the Law of Non-Contradiction, one of the Laws of Thought, the very axioms of logic in general: something cannot both be and not be, in the same sense and at the same time. You can be something, or you can be it's opposite, but you can't be both at the same time. And, generally, that's how the universe works. You can't be a tree and be an animal at the same time. You can't be both "here" and "there" at once. You can either be a positive, or a negative. T…
/r/MensRights23/12/18 09:58 PM
1

That's how it was in Greece. In Greece sex wasn't always heavily tied in with love, and in many cases was more of a power thing. Ancient Greeks humped their subordinates, much like domestic dogs.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 07:03 AM
5

We're not anti-woman, we're anti-Feminist. One is a chance of DNA and birth, the other is a choice to join a hateful ideology. It's totally reasonable, if not good to hate those who choose to be/support bad people.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 01:29 AM
2

Omission of a relevant fact is a lie.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 01:38 PM
2

Maybe that's the window dressing they want the world to see, but that's not how they act. They pass revanchist laws that aim to oppress "historically privileged" groups, even though the people alive, right now have nothing to do with them. The people who create a broken system are the only bad guys: the people who unwittingly benefit from it are victims, as well as the people that are oppressed.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 03:53 AM
3

Liberals care about equality, but progressives don't. It's a subtle difference.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 03:16 AM
1

Yeah, teenage brains are underdeveloped and thus makes them stupid. They're still children. I say this on authority, as I was a teenager once.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 03:52 AM
2

Except basically everything useful is made by humans though. Clothes, houses, Domestic animals, domestic plants, any form of cooked meal, Western medicine, logic, the scientific method, the computer you're sitting at... get off your high horse. As far as I'm concerned, humans are where we are in spite of nature, not because of it.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 03:50 AM
1

I mean, that shit's in the fucking Bible, people have known that this happens for millennia.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 08:27 AM
3

Well, it was written by the woman who made the very first Gender Studies class, so it would have to be really deep satire, considering she built her entire career around it.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 08:19 PM
1

All kinds of "energy" food turns into fat if you don't use it, duh. That's how fat works. What I'm sure he meant is that it's better for burning existing adipose tissue than eating sugar or fat.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 04:41 AM
1

No it's not, it's based on the severity of the risk. If there was a 99% chance to get a papercut while giving someone CPR, I'd take those odds at any opportunity. Despite the likelihood. But when it's something that can destroy the only life I have, I am less inclined.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 08:30 AM
18

Except it's actually a massive risk, and you're terribly minimizing it. A heart attack can kill, but a false allegation can destroy someone's entire life. Sort of the difference between getting the chair, and sitting in a drab prison cell for 60 years. That's the kind of shit that happens in societies that don't enforce Good Samaritan laws. Like the Peng Yu incedent in China. 7 years later, there was a case where a two-year-old toddler got hit by a car, and 18 people saw and ignored it, because …
/r/MensRights09/11/18 11:49 PM
29

Ultimately, the list goes: Numero Uno>people you care about>strangers. Sometimes the first and second one can be rearranged, but never the third one. It seems like it's becoming more and more likely that the patient would go to the news, tell everyone that you used her episode as a chance to assault her, and then you're the bad guy everywhere forever. It's great to help people, but sometimes it's just too risky.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 11:12 PM
1

Not all Muslims are terrorists. But all members of Al Qaeda are terrorists.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 05:14 AM
1

You can use alcohol properly. Our bodies have evolved to process it. You just can't abuse or misuse it, like any other drug.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 06:49 AM
0

That just makes you sound like a Scientologist.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 06:47 AM
1

Actually, it was Neil Patrick Harris, and he put her on the spot while he was a guest on The View. Although specifically, she said she wanted to do it 10 years from when she asked.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 06:31 AM
1

Are you saying all men who got married were willing and adult at the time of their marriage? For most of history in most places, marriage was essentially a deal brokered between both party's parents, with no say for the people getting married. Dating and marriage for love is an entirely recent concept.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 01:10 AM
1

He said in most countries women weren't forced out of their jobs by returning men, because many men didn't return.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 01:05 AM
2

Should we not convict burglars, because the next hundred thieves won't confess? Or how about we take it to it's logical extreme: Should we not convict murderers, for all of the other murderers who will suddenly get cold feet about confession? Most serious criminals have no sense of guilt or shame; they'd never have come forward no matter what. The only way to save these people's lives is to treat false accusation like a crime, to deter these animals who can only learn like dogs: through rewards …
/r/MensRights10/10/18 03:45 AM
1

What are you talking about "The USA ever". This place gets better every year, and you just have to look at the past to see it. Just because we aren't perfect doesn't mean we aren't among the most free, highest quality of life places on the entire planet. We never had to have some foreign power pressure us into doing the right thing, we just eventually get fed up with human rights abuses.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 10:10 PM
1

There's a heck of a non-sequitur. You asked what a fine was, so I answered you.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 09:37 PM
3

A sum of money that you are forced to pay for breaching a rule. Example: Serena Williams got fined for breaking the rules during a tennis match.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:51 AM
14

I think you mean WASP.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:47 AM
5

Well, I guess I'm not sure if it's real legal jargon, but it just seems fitting, considering it's called the Age of Majority.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:41 AM
1

We can keep Burn Notice. Just turn Florida into the US territory and Puerto Rico into the state.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:52 AM
35

Couldn't they just allow you to, you know, get circumcised as a major? I'm pretty sure you can get any number of other elective surgeries at that age.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:39 PM
12

He's saying that feminists pretend like women were the only people on Earth who didn't get to vote when that's simply not true. Most people didn't have the right to vote, and they got their enfranchisement, what, about 20 years after men did? That's not the centuries of struggle they like to imply. It wasn't an issue of men vs. women, it was an issue of democracy vs. oligarchy.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:20 AM
6

Exactly. People who've been oppressed is often less based on gender, and more about whether you got pushed out of the right womb, or if your sperm came from the guy in charge.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:15 AM
4

Why not ship the Aztecs over there? That ought to teach 'em a thing or two.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:29 AM
1

Yeah, but not all Muslim states follow Sharia law. It's not an issue of religion, it's an issue of lawmaking thugs who don't understand that humans discovered better ways to live.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 05:46 PM
0

Nah, Islam hasn't, just countries that follow Sharia law. It would be like if a Christian country cut off kid's hands for lying to their parents, or some other horribly extreme biblical punishment.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 05:33 PM
15

Plastic Surgery in general just rubs me the wrong way. Like, if you're not a burn victim or some other injury-afflicted person, why pay a bunch of money to make yourself look weird? It seems really vain.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 05:27 PM
1

Yo dog, we can't allow children to see such glorious nips; they just aren't ready. It'd be like the climax of Raiders.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 09:42 PM
1

Yo man, if that actually worked, I wouldn't hold that against the women. You can't emotionally manipulate nature, but if you can do it to others in a survival scenario, go for it.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 09:23 PM
8

Did you reply to the wrong comment? I didn't say anything about racism.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:35 PM
11

Yeah, and a machine is amoral. And so are statistics and numbers. All of these things can be used for evil or good. Amoral =/= immoral; when something is amoral, it's up to the people using it to apply their own ethics. It's not capitalism's fault, it's a human's fault. And, to play this card, it's not like anything else ever worked better. Perfection is the enemy of the good.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:18 PM
7

Capitalism seems pretty Christian to me, granted that it was invented by Christian countries.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:57 PM
31

You know, some of my best friends are white.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:53 PM
35

Aren't women the slight majority? I thought it was more of a 52/48 type of split.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:50 PM
3

Well, there was the Paraguayan War, in which an astounding 70% of the male population died. Paraguay's not exactly a rich country but... it still exists, I guess?
/r/MensRights30/07/18 07:08 AM
2

Speaking of saints, Saint Olga, the queen of Kiev, is most famous for brutally butchering multiple settlements of the tribe that killed her husband.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 05:06 AM
14

Here's an online article about it. Unfortunately the source they use is behind a paywall, but it is linked in the article itself.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 01:37 AM
1

Do you live in Saudi Arabia, perchance?
/r/MensRights23/07/18 11:13 PM
2

Yeah, the Pope has a huge science institute, right in Vatican City. And it's led by a Protestant, oddly enough.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 11:05 PM
1

Yeah, but that's different. A family is expected to be a loving environment; the military is expected to be a well oiled machine, where the soldiers understand they're just a small part of a larger whole. It is my understanding that real life militaries have been moving away from the whole WW2 movie trope of "My troop is my family" because they're afraid that developing bonds that close will badly affect the soldiers during wartime.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 05:16 AM
2

As I recall it was created almost explicitly as a result of this, where they used remaining silent to hold someone in Contempt of Court and trap them.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 05:08 AM
2

I believe everyone has the right to be safe, not to feel safe. That's just a Herculean task to accomplish. We aren't living in The Matrix, where the government can tailor reality to fit what we want, we just have to accept that some things make us uncomfortable without being dangerous.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 04:44 AM
4

Well, it is in Thailand...
/r/MensRights21/07/18 10:26 PM
5

That other guy is right. You're not a psychic. What if I get lost in thought and just wind up in your path of destruction? How are you supposed to know that me staring isn't "obviously intentional"?
/r/MensRights21/07/18 07:39 PM
6

I always believed in Horseshoe Theory. Right or Left doesn't matter, all extremists want the same thing with a different paint job.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 10:05 PM
1

HPV makes it real easy to develop cancer. It was previously believed to only cause cervical cancer (and thus, a waste of money on boys), but is now known to cause cancer in men too.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 07:55 PM
2

Western society is just any country descended from the Ancient Greeks.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:31 AM
2

As a CK2 player, I prefer to think of them as vassals.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:27 AM
1

I feel like there aren't many wars that can fit a fast-paced shooter, but not be declared offensive or overly-patriotic to produce. You can't go much earlier than WWI because the guns were slower, and people still have sore feelings over wars like Vietnam, the Persian Gulf, etc.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 07:42 AM
0

You know who believed that The Odyssey was historically accurate? The Greeks and Romans. You shot yourself in the foot by bringing up a story that was significantly altered that people genuinely believed.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 07:37 AM
1

You said the word Bourgeoisie and Proletariat, and went on a tirade about how rich people are the bane of our existence. Saying that that's not Communist/Socialist is like saying "I believe in Shiva, and Brahma, and Vishnu, but I'm not a Hindu."
/r/MensRights13/07/18 05:16 AM
0

Are you on the right sub? This is Men's Rights, not Socialist Pit.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 10:35 PM
5

No, I truly believe that everyone should have equality. I also believe that Communism is about as workable as beating someone with a leaf. The only real way to affect change isn't to protest the government, it's to become the government. We're a republic, it's possible. And if no one votes for you, it's all the more proof that no one believes in your cause. Destroying the pyramid structure of society just means someone else will recreate it, and as any anarchic period in history will tell you, i…
/r/MensRights12/07/18 08:00 PM
7

Communism isn't the solution either, because it can't be done. I wish we could all pack our bags and live on Jupiter, but it's just not feasible.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 07:34 PM
3

And that has been the best 5 percent, when we weren't scratching our asses, chasing mammoths, and smashing rocks together to make sharper rocks.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 02:58 AM
3

Well, you know, in Japan there was a time when laws were unenforceable. Things were so bad that people hired a bunch of dickheads Samurai to protect their stuff. Then the biggest baddest samurai of all said "Hey, there's no laws, I bet I could run this place". And that's how Japan had a military dictatorship for hundreds of years.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:09 PM
2

She didn't "broaden" anything, she went completely off track, by conflating money with personal value. Perhaps I'm biased towards Churchill-like comebacks, but he was totally justified with his smartass remark.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 03:46 AM
0

Not everything that points out flaws in your argument is a strawman. It is extremely obvious from the context of the post that "Worth" in this situation is monetary value, not someone's worth as a person. You're using Equivocation, so your argument is essentially as valid as saying "If feathers are light, then barbells are dark". You don't understand the premise because you're not arguing the same word we are, you're arguing with a homonym. So yes, if someone makes less money than someone else f…
/r/MensRights11/07/18 03:14 AM
0

We can't argue with you because you fundamentally misunderstand the premise. Something something axioms.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 01:54 AM
5

I guess they're just expecting you to drive all the way down to the beach and go in the ocean.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 07:37 AM
1

I never got how "homophobia" is supposed to be a measure of masculinity. I mean, gay men are sort of the epitome of masculinity; they don't factor in women at all.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 07:27 AM
2

That's why I went for The Orville instead.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 04:25 AM
6

Yeah, victim blaming is only bad if you don't also blame the perpetrator. Telling somebody what they did wrong is the first step to not letting it happen again. Better yet, telling them what other people did wrong can make it so that it never happens to them in the first place.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 09:33 PM
1

Aren't butts inherently sexual? I believe that it's some evolutionary hold out from some apes who use their butts as a mating signal.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 08:34 PM
1

But MRA's "using" Gays would be like the NAACP "using" black people. They're not being used, because they're a part of us.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 04:10 AM
18

And urinals are convenient. It's possible that if all bathrooms become unisex, urinals might get the axe.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 05:05 AM
1

Logic doesn't work if it's inherently wrong. You can spend all day trying to give me "Facts", but it won't matter if you have an incorrect starting position. How about you try reading through this.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 04:31 AM
1

But that isn't what race is. People rave on and on about race being a "social construct", and that's what it is. Ethnicities are not race.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 04:19 AM
1

Race is a combination of your skin color, and the skin color and geographical location of your ancestors. People from Europe are white. People from the Americas are American Indian. People from the Middle East and North Africa are either Middle Eastern, or white depending on your viewpoint. Subsaharans are black. Lighter skinned people from Asia are Asians. Dark skinned people from Asia are Negritos. Polynesians are Polynesian, and Aborigines are Aborigines. Any person who is noticeably descende…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:13 AM
1

But I'm not talking about biology; I never was. I'm talking about race. If a fully white person and a mixed person had a kid, the kid would be mixed. If two mixed people had a kid, the kid would be mixed. If two Asians had a kid, the kid would be Asian.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 12:50 AM
1

If two mixed race people have a kid, the kid is still mixed race. So if two Mestizo people had a kid, the kid would be a Mestizo. In that way, Mestizo is a race, the same way being Half White and Half Black would be a race.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 12:24 AM
1

Yeah, Mestizo is Half White, Half American Indian. That would make Mestizo the race (a specific subset of Mixed) and Latino the culture.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:55 PM
1

Well, Hispanic is an ethnicity/culture, not a race, as an American would traditionally define it. You can be a White Latine, Mestizo Latino, Chinese Latino, whatever. They don't need to know who you are, they just need the color of your skin to define you.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:19 PM
1

You know, Iran is actually pretty accepting of trans people. What a progressive country!
/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:11 PM
2

The only good bias is in electric circuits.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 06:14 AM
2

Girl Scouts should be fighting tooth and nail against that. If girls can join Boy Scouts, would anyone still be in Girl Scouts?
/r/MensRights31/05/18 07:36 AM
3

And did you know that you can move from Texas to California without a passport? And from Alberta to Toronto? And even, get this, Durango to Mexico? Of course intra-EU countries don't need passports, that's the entire point. You would need ID to immigrate from an EU country to a non-EU country, and vice-versa.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 04:58 AM
4

That's why it's so important to crack down on illegal immigrants. Look what happened the last time a bunch of people immigrated to the United States.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 02:36 AM
27

To be fair, he's absolutely right. This was barely a step above letting his daughter throw a rock at a sleeping grizzly bear. You never leave a child with someone who tried to murder you. Sure, the man's story is tragic, there's no denying that. But his daughter is the victim, not him.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 02:31 AM
1

I never said that 13 Reasons should be different. I'm saying it's trash that fails at what it sets out to do. Artists can make art as terrible as they want, just as long don't pretend that it's good.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 09:29 PM
0

It is not obvious. People need to criticize things, that's literally the entire god damn point of free speech. But you don't understand that. You think that criticism leads to censorship, when it doesn't. Criticism maintains free speech, it doesn't destroy it. That's why the Founding Father's put the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 07:51 PM
0

Except, it doesn't though. As I have said many times. Again, you seem to be the one for censorship, as you appear to hate critical opinion.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 07:19 PM
0

Except it isn't though. There are literally thousands of things that people in the USA think is immoral, but still exist. That's what the First Amendment is all about. There's a difference between asking the government to censor something, and telling other people that something isn't worth watching. It's the difference between turning into Fahrenheit 451, and saying that Batman vs. Superman wasn't worth the ticket price. If somebody decides that something is not worth watching, then chooses not…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 06:03 PM
1

Except it isn't though. You're the one who seems to call for censorship, seeing how negatively you react to the shows criticism. Calling something out as stupid is not the first step to censorship.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 07:50 AM
1

Again, maybe Australians have different grammar or something, but it was impossible for me to not interpret that 'homeless' was a proper noun or something. It really ought to be "We became homeless"; as it stands it hits the ear the same way "We are Legion" or "We are the Justice League" does.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 10:33 PM
1

I would be glad to support any children I created, come what may. Unconditional love and all that. I wouldn't, however, want to support my ex-whatever, who took both my money and, in this hypothetical, my children. If there were some way to pay for them, and not her, then it would be entirely reasonable.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 10:11 PM
2

You shouldn't censor bad art. You should lambast it for being sensationalized, exploitative, pretentious bullshit, that does more harm to society than good. That's why everyone makes fun of the David Cage games, not demand that they be taken off the shelves. That's what free speech is all about.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 09:59 PM
1

Would they? Dying broke in Indiana sounds nearly as bad as it can get.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 01:18 PM
1

Except I never said I hated women though? That's a pretty wild jump in logic. What I'm saying is that patriarchy is total baloney. Men didn't oppress shit, because most men were also oppressed at any given time or place in history. When people say that women got the vote hundreds of years after men, they actually mean that they got the vote about 20 years after men. That's a pretty god damn big difference. Struggling together, and whatnot.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 01:16 PM
8

You know who else didn't have the right to vote in most countries for the majority of democracy's history? Most men. Something about having to own property, or else you're a member of the unwashed masses who's unfit to help run the republic.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:44 AM
27

Hmm. Do you know R Kelly by any chance?
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:34 AM
1

Hard Left? I prefer liberalism, not the leftist version of fascism.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:14 AM
2

Incorrect. The G in gif is pronounced like the J in Jean Claude van Dam.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 01:16 AM
2

I know it's a pretty common fact that many African cultures don't see breasts as sexual. They laughed and called Europeans giant babies (literally) for being so in to them. Now, legs on the other hand, you better cover those up pervert.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 03:29 AM
6

Everyone is Jesus in Purgatory.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 09:47 PM
1

Well, the Iroquois weren't exactly socialists. They were highly domineering, militarily powerful, and made many trading deals with native and colonial powers. A prime example is the Neutral Nation, who was able to keep out of the Huron-Iroquois conflict by virtue of living on flint-rich land. After the Hurons were destroyed, the Iroquois destroyed the Neutral Nation, too, because they weren't allies.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 11:34 PM
6

But all of the American Utopian ideas always collapsed, or ceased to be Utopian. When your society, merely the size of a city, can't last for more than 50 years, you might have an unsustainable ideology. And of course, the only reason the Amish or Quakers are still around is because we actively protect their right to exist, and don't let them get ravaged by gangs or conscript them into warfare. So that argument seems to imply that communalism can only work as a protectorate of a bigger, capitali…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:05 AM
0

Altruism is sacrificing yourself for the good of others. It is selfless, but it has it's benefits. For one thing, it tends to be really gratifying, because being nice makes people feel good. Secondly, spending a few hundred dollars at your own expense can buy you a million dollars worth of goodwill to others. In a rational and social species, like humanity, altruism builds a whole lot of trust between people. And from a biological standpoint, having more than you could need doesn't help anything…
/r/MensRights17/04/18 07:10 AM
2

And that's honestly not even conjecture, that literally happened to a country in the last 200 years. In just under 6 years, 70% of Paraguay's adult male population died in a war with Argentina and Brazil (and Uruguay, but that's barely important).
/r/MensRights17/04/18 07:02 AM
1

In the West it is. In other cultures around the world, homosexuality has been treated in various ways, from toleration to outright acceptance. Even in some places in the west it was accepted, like Ancient Greece. Hell, there have even been historical evidence of love letters between monks in Christian Monasteries (because it's okay if they don't have sex). And also, what you suggest has been tried before, and people tend not to like it. It's called Eugenics.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 03:47 PM
9

There have literally always been gay people though. It's not a new thing. Hell, homosexuality occurs in almost all animals too; it's just a natural part of animal existence. And birth control and In Vitro fertilization are in no way biological evolution. They are merely technological advancements that run counter to what humans do by nature. We still have the desire to do these things by nature.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 06:22 AM
2

Maybe we got time warped to Mongolia 200 years ago, the only place where this shit could ever happen.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 04:59 AM
14

But that's not at all how evolution works, Lamarck. Sexual reproduction is the dominant reproductive strategy, and it'll stay for a long time to come.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 04:47 AM
1

That's exactly why it's wrong. You can predict their behavior to a T, because they're a mass of hormones. Children are easier to manipulate than clay, which is why predators seek them out.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 06:29 PM
2

Well, it depends. Ashkenazi and Sephardi hews are definitely white, but Jews from, say, Ethiopia are black, and people from Isreal are Middle Eastern. So yes, some Jews aren't white, and some Jews are.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 10:35 PM
8

There weren't any white people in the Americas before Colombus came along (ignoring Leif Erikson). He was just helping to spread diversity over to The States!
/r/MensRights01/04/18 10:31 PM
1

Often times, the more opposite two groups seem to be on paper, the more similar they are in practice. For instance, did you know that Black nationalists and White nationalists oftentimes agree, and occasionally even ally with each other? They both want complete separation of the races, so despite being 'enemies' they actually work towards exactly the same goal. Sometimes you have to look past what people tell you they are, and look for their true motives.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 01:12 AM
3

That's not what Feminists believe. According to intersectionality, everything has to do with everything else, and if you are against one type of person, you're against all 'related' types. Like how all MRA's are apparently white supremacists. I will concede, however, that his incessant copy-pasting of the same thing over and over again is annoying as shit. At least find new words to put your concept into.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 08:20 AM
3

Well, it depends on who's doing the immigrating. Like how the first wave of Cuban immigrants were mostly middle-class hotshots, because they were all the rich people running away from Castro. If it's the same type of people leaving Nigeria, it's totally reasonable that they do better than the average American.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 08:18 AM
3

It's easy. They can do it when they're 18. Or whatever the age of majority is in Iceland.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 05:49 AM
3

It is a space for intelligent discussion. Don't blame us because you have nothing intelligent to say.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 06:04 AM
1

Okay, so the left doesn't win because people don't want it. That's what your "Overton Window" is telling me.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 04:32 AM
1

No, it's CIVIL RIGHTS that always wins in the end, not the left. That's why we aren't in hovels eating borscht right now.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 11:40 PM
3

Well of course. How is not wanting to sleep with women NOT misogyny?
/r/MensRights11/03/18 11:35 PM
1

Being 'tough' doesn't mean you have no emotions. It means you have supremacy over them.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:09 AM
3

It's because of a decently large sentiment (which I semi-agree with) that Feminist lobbying and activism often includes suppression of fairness/men's rights, like with Affirmative Action, or family court rulings.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 02:43 AM
1

But Eastern Europeans are white.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 10:43 AM
6

It's pretty much a classic bigoted conspiracy theory. Except instead of Jews running everything on the entire planet for the benefit of Jews, it's men running everything for the benefit of men.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 02:58 AM
2

If you think that's surprising, then you might also be surprised to hear that Switzerland basically rigged all of the roads and bridges in their country to explode during the Cold War. They also have a rather extensive past as a mercenary breeding ground.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 07:04 AM
1

And in this case, she committed the act of lying about a crime that never happened.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 10:21 PM
1

You know, Fraud isn't an act. It's just talking about something, and money suddenly goes where it shouldn't belong. Ergo, fraud is not a crime.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 10:09 PM
1

Then you presumably have never seen this either.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:04 PM
1

I know some people thought the the prequels had anti-semetic characters. But I may be thinking of this guy.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:44 PM
1

People thought Jar-Jar as a character was antisemitic, right? So in reality, liking him would make you the supposed antisemite.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 08:51 PM
6

Is it? When nearly every serial killer gets love letters from hundreds of women, there's something to that. These guys didn't all live in the same place: it's not the same women sending the letters to all these men. Added to that, they're all from different cultures; whatever drives these women to seek psychopaths isn't cultural, it's something common to them as humans. Most young women are attracted to 'risky' men, these ones just amp it up to 11. Stop cherry-picking all your data. Oh wait, you…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 01:30 AM
3

What about all those women who have the hots for literal convicted serial killers? As displayed here.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 01:03 AM
4

Having others do what you want them to do is pretty much the definition of domination. Whoever initiates is casting their will on the other person, and as it turns out, society expects the initiator to be a dude.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 01:01 AM
1

Bro, how could you not post this.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 08:02 AM
1

I'm talking about America, which is more of a white plurality country, not white majority. Japan or Norway are homogeneous, the USA is not.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:20 PM
7

That's because people who make movies now were trained by people who made movies when only men made money. The assumption (which is also the theory behind white protagonists) was that the average white-dude moviegoer wouldn't be able to feel represented in the movie if it didn't have a white-dude protagonist. And that's exactly what people feel like now, what with all the arguments over 'representation'.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 07:24 AM
9

But you assume that having a special word for women would be derogatory. Perhaps it's not that women are sub-normal, they're beyond normal. That's why they get a special word, all to themselves, while men share their noun with something that's also gender neutral.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 07:19 AM
1

But we can all trace it back to those Indo-Europeans. Maybe.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 07:14 AM
11

It's about context. If I get called a great man, it's probably referring to my gender. If I get called the Fisher of Men, it's probably about humanity as a whole.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 05:15 AM
1

Dude, I'd wear a cup to a chess match. I'm paranoid about injury, so I'd definitely do it if I were on an 80 mph sled.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:24 AM
1

Pull a Bavarian Fire Drill, and see how far you can make it as a campaigner while calling yourself Feminist. Of course, you'll have to be propped up against a bunch of MRA's calling you idiots, to rally others to your side.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:20 AM
0

Yeah, then you literally need to prove why you think your semantics are correct. Words aren't always pedantry; if it's definitions you're arguing, you're going to need to back them up.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:05 AM
1

So when a baby is born, it magically ceases to be a parasite, by your definition? What is the difference between a baby sucking milk, and a flea sucking blood, then?
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:40 PM
9

It wasn't the Catholic Church, not in America. It was John Kellogg, a devout Protestant.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 08:02 AM
3

Yeah, English used to be a totally gendered language, like Spanish. Pretty much everything was male or female; nowadays we just whittled the list down to pronouns.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 05:42 AM
15

Sudanese speak Arabic. If you're going whole hog, choose an ethnic group in the yellow zone.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 10:30 PM
1

America was founded by Puritans. So you're totally dissing on my heritage right now.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 06:57 AM
16

Except Feminism is a chosen ideology, while being a man is a genetic whim. Hating one is clearly worse than hating the other.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 08:37 PM
4

Well, I can think of one war, entirely religiously motivated, that killed at least 20 million people alone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiping_Rebellion. Now, I hate Marxism as much as the next guy, but religion was the sole cause behind the deadliest war in all of human history.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 06:20 AM
1

Obviously, the correct answer would be to shut the door in her face (assuming she took the time to bitch before stepping inside), and let her open the door for you.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 06:36 AM
2

Discrediting those who hurt your cause helps your cause. Think of it like getting rid of a tax. You aren't actually gaining more income then you used to, but your net gains increase, because the drain is lessened. If people start to think critically of the people obstructing your cause, you gain some considerable power. Like how Ghandi discrediting the British helped India's independence, because people stopped rooting for the English.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 06:32 AM
3

I can't have my knees snapped together. I need, like, a 10-30 degree angle, but most bus seats are pretty thin. It seems like to give everyone enough personal space, the entirety of my legs have to be touching each other.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:13 PM
7

And yet you're still here.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:55 PM
9

But it kind of is uncomfortable to have your legs fully closed. I'll do it if I'm asked, but I don't want to be impotent by the time I'm forty. And the only way to make it non-painful (by 'readjusting' yourself) is uncomfortable in a whole other manner.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:39 PM
2

Yeah, but Capitalism itself isn't bad. He's just whining on a sub that isn't about Communism.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 07:54 AM
1

Yeah, the individual-based wage gap theory is stupid. If businesses were legally allowed to pay women less than men, men would never be hired again.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 09:52 AM
1

That's crazy. My AP Lang class was basically an entire year on rhetoric. It was boring as shit, and we always wrote essays about how people said things, as opposed to what they said, but I guess if it makes teens more worldly...
/r/MensRights24/01/18 09:38 AM
1

Then there's Hamad bin Muhammad bin Juma bin Rajab el Murjebi. It wouldn't feel so ridiculous if his second name wasn't as simple as Tippu Tip.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:48 AM
4

And I mean, it's not like he's a cop, or a doctor, or her employer. He's a god damn comedian. How would he hold power over anybody?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:21 AM
5

If we lived in a society where being accused of kicking the shit out of someone would make you blackballed everywhere for life, then yeah, I might consider it.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 01:34 AM
1

No, I'm saying they should have the chance to win. Isn't equality of opportunity what we're all about here?
/r/MensRights08/01/18 06:11 AM
1

That's what I'm saying too. That's what the whole "holding the right belief" thing was. In a true democracy, all minorities are crushed, regardless of what form of minority they may be.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 05:07 AM
1

So, you're saying that minorities should have no voice? If you weren't fortunate enough to be born the right person, or to carry the right set of ideals and beliefs, you shouldn't get to have a say in our government? Minorities deserve rights, even if they aren't like us.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 04:12 AM
0

Yeah, it does. It's supposed to, so it can allow them to keep pace.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 03:06 AM
1

But that's the thing; it doesn't shift things to the other side. It balances it out. The majority still wins sometimes, but under true democracy, the minority would never win.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 01:36 AM
0

Well, unlike you, I believe that all people deserve the same basic respect. They can get more when they earn it, not when they have an innie or an outie.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 12:05 AM
1

However, if the minority had no weight assigned to them, they would literally never win, ever. Sure, sometimes the minority beats out the majority, but that just proves that the system works. Mob Rule is never good, and that's what Absolute Democracy creates. Let's think about the USA. In this system, everyone who is non-white, non-protestant, and wealthy, would have no voice. That's not the vision our Founding Fathers had, they feared absolute democracy as well. That's why we have the Electoral…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 12:01 AM
0

Because otherwise, their votes would be worth nothing. In an absolute democracy, with everyone's vote being the same, cities would dominate the voting process. The Electoral College was designed to protect a specific minority: rural farmers. Without it, for instance, Wyoming would be the least powerful state in the union, and California would be the most. It's basically Affirmative Action, but instead of equalizing the outcome of jobs, it equalizes the outcome of the voting body. Maybe I'm in th…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 06:55 PM
0

You're the one who's being illogical here. I respect anyone who shares or is above my skill level. If they have the same job I do, they must possess similar skills as me, so they deserve my respect. Like, 8 year-olds are stupid. But if an 8-year old was in high school, they'd deserve respect for having obvious amounts of skill and talent. But, according to your logic, they do not deserve admiration because most 8 year olds lack skill.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 06:41 PM
-1

I respect women. So I guess it's not a fact, then.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 06:27 PM
1

Well, the Electoral College is important, and it's certainly not "The Republican party's".
/r/MensRights07/01/18 06:26 PM
-1

Sorry, I couldn't hear you over all of the bullshit.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 05:57 PM
8

And the special before this one even has a joke about the last time he got extremely misrepresented in media. You know, "Ardent supporter of Trump".
/r/MensRights04/01/18 07:32 AM
3

Man, thanks for reading the posts, to form a well reasoned argument. Sarcasm aside, you would realize that all of those posts take rants against men and replace them with a more untouchable minority, like Jews or Blacks.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 10:51 PM
6

No, but it certainly promotes never jailing or socially marring female sex offenders. It doesn't promote kid rape, just when it's not done by guys.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 11:09 PM
2

Yeah, that's the whole "Moral Relativity" thing people don't like thinking about. In the Middle East, they think that we hate women for allowing them to have as much freedom as we do, while we think that they hate women for oppressing them. There's no culture on Earth that doesn't love women, just some that have funny ways of showing it.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 04:19 AM
2

Don't make fat jokes unless they're actually fat. Then it just makes no sense.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 09:40 PM
8

That's the problem with intersectionality, it makes an attack on one an attack on all. I'm against feminism, for the most part, but because they're 'allied' with racial and orientation-equality groups, being anti-feminist suddenly also makes me racist and homophobic, despite being neither of those things.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 09:39 PM
2

I object to Marxists. We just need a mixed system that nationalizes public services, like hospitals, while general entrepreneurship is still rewarded by merit, in classic capitalist style.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 04:10 AM
12

They used to be about the Sexual Revolution, but that was so last century. Now they just vaguely pretend to fight for what their forbears did despite wanting something entirely different.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 04:02 AM
10

An all female Lord of the Flies, huh? I hope the director isn't a wuss about getting women beat up, because that film will have a lot of it.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 09:49 PM
3

Though, to be fair, Maleficent is awesome. It's not that people think she's sympathetic, it's that she, as a villain, is just cool. Like how people like Dr. Facillier from The Princess and the Frog. Hell, even just effective villains can be fun, like Frollo.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 09:34 PM
5

I don't know, for me it was just comedy that made me conscious of it. I love Bill Burr, George Carlin, and Dave Chapelle, and as pretty socially inclined comedians, they might really make someone think.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 03:09 AM
1

The reason there isn't any wide differences is because, by this point, the entire planet is basically Western. Most other forms a gender roles kinda got crushed and replaced, for better or for worse.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:56 AM
1

But the thing is, the proletariat use their victimhood and proclivity for pity to turn themselves into the bourgeoisie, without giving up the facade of still being victims. For the more fanatical ideologues, I'm not even sure they themselves realize it.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:34 AM
1

I suppose it's up to the listener to make the distinction, but it'll at least put the idea in their head that some people are just after sex and money; not everyone is a saint, and you gotta find out who's who.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:25 AM
1

I do believe that grace is important to a cause, but I believe that making examples is of equal importance. If someone clearly did something wrong, they shouldn't be let off scot-free because the crime was 'systemic'. Just because someone tells you to do something doesn't mean you need to do it, something something Nuremberg.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 05:23 AM
1

You know, considering your username is Gerhard, that shouldn't have been super hard to figure out. Well, you could also be Austrian, but whatever.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:54 AM
1

Something tells me you're a Scientologist...
/r/MensRights15/12/17 03:38 AM
44

Because, even if it wasn't technically a criminal act, she directly got him murdered. She lied to her parents maliciously (there was no good reason to say that he got her pregnant) and he died. She's culpable for his murder.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 03:18 AM
1

Maybe it'll be the tonic they need to realize that being SJW isn't a reason to have bad writing. You know, when they suddenly stop rolling in cash.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 07:22 AM
2

Yeah, they're a few ethnicities away from turning Star Wars into Captain Planet.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 07:15 AM
2

America would be 20 times worse than Iraq or Vietnam. Those guys were fighting with technology decades behind contemporary standards. And, the USA is massive, with lots of places to hide dissidents, as well as a strong sense of national pride. Trying to keep us down would be impossible.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 02:44 AM
1

Don't even get me started on 40 Days and 40 Nights, the movie where the 'comedic twist' at the climax is that the main character's Ex-girlfriend raped him so he wouldn't get a million dollars (for not nutting for two months).
/r/MensRights30/11/17 03:51 AM
3

I might ask, if we're in such a 'patriarchy', how did any feminist law get passed at all?
/r/MensRights29/11/17 06:44 AM
1

But what ethnicity? Ashkenazi, Sephardi, Ethiopian?
/r/MensRights26/11/17 11:00 PM
-2

That's ridiculous. Some Jews are POC (like everyone from Beta Israel) because religion isn't a race.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 07:41 PM
2

At least go splitsies.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 09:04 PM
2

I'm okay with people who are vegans for health reasons, whether proactive, and especially if reactive. I don't feel any guilt for eating meat, so that's at least one theory in your chain of events that's wrong.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 07:55 AM
83

Huh, I guess every day really is Men's day. Pack it up boys, we've won!
/r/MensRights20/11/17 07:34 AM
2

I think the lie is implied to be "I didn't get assaulted".
/r/MensRights19/11/17 08:57 AM
1

The Ancient Greeks were well-known to be terrible. These are the people who would throw babies off a cliff-side as a form of Classical eugenics, and who would banish people from their city for literally any reason, if enough people agreed to. What we learned from the Greeks was logic and mathematics. If we maintained their outlook on sex with children, we'd still have sex with children today.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 10:52 AM
1

Yeah, but those are Muslim Americans. When they join the Melting Pot, they become Americans, so of course they're nothing like Afghans, or Omanis, or whatever.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 10:30 AM
4

The fact that you used the words "sick" and "deplorable" means that we know it's wrong if someone does it over here. It's a question of the ages, but it's one worth asking: how far do you have to be pushed to admit that there are some parts of 'culture' too vile and beast-like to be tolerated?
/r/MensRights18/11/17 10:17 AM
1

Hey, I like men, I just wouldn't want one of them dating my children...
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:06 AM
2

I'm like, 90% sure Yoga was invented by men anyway. And I'm pretty sure men invented theater, too. So we're all men, on this blessed day.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 05:55 AM
2

Toxic Masculinity, Caustic liquids.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 03:01 AM
1

Yes Piccolo, all of them.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 03:06 AM
1

At least, don't move to Australia. Unless you happen to be allergic to video games and good internet, then you should be fine.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 07:52 AM
3

It's just because it seems like somebody posts this exact same comment on every thread, and every time we give them the same answers, because it's obvious. It just gives you a hair-trigger after a while.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 02:17 AM
6

Yeah, with Mars you'd have to create an artificial atmosphere, but the only spacecraft that ever landed on Venus melted.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 06:42 AM
1

Pure democracy is 100% garbage. If it's direct, you couldn't have a country of our size. Even if it isn't direct, nobody who isn't in the majority could ever get anything that they wanted.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 06:38 AM
1

Yeah, but you live in a place that isn't America. We have two parties. For our entire existence, we have had two parties. It'd basically take governmental reform to get to 3 parties, let alone 8.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 06:35 AM
1

I don't think that's how black holes work.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 03:00 AM
1

They 'handle' it in that they get over it. Everyone feels anxious sometimes, but if you feel it all the time, or for no discernible reason, or the anxiety makes your brain scramble like an egg, then you might have an Anxiety disorder.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 06:27 PM
1

But humans are animals. We didn't pop out of a storybook, we got to where we are as a species by evolutionary means.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 06:23 PM
1

You do realize that people aren't supposed to fall off catwalks? That they're supposed to take small steps? It's the company's right not to install railings on ledges.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:22 PM
1

That's more of the realm of things like leopards and badgers. Humans aren't solitary animals. If you try to live like that, you'll probably go insane in very short order.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:43 AM
0

Nah dog, you got it reversed. People don't become extreme from religion, they use religion as an excuse for their extremism.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:41 AM
1

I don't know, I think that might just be the cultural influence of How I Met Your Mother.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:35 AM
4

I think I have a decent theory on why younger women are so much more receptive of all this. Politics tends to be like a pendulum; it swings right to left, but it'll never swing one way forever. Politicians and celebrities are always annoying, and that negatively shapes the opinions of young minds (negative meaning 'opposite' in this scenario). When conservatives are annoying douchebags, the next generation might be more liberal, and when its the liberal's turn to be annoying douchebags, the next…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:33 AM
2

I really hope that people like that love sports. Then I can just come over to their houses, just waiting until a close game starts brewing. Seconds left on the clock, the ball is moving across the field... and I turn the television off. It's just a game.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:27 AM
4

No, they don't, not without telling their customers. At least, they shouldn't have the right to. They served her something she was supposed to drink that was so unreasonably hot that it completely mutilated her. Keep in mind, your insides are MUCH more sensitive than your outsides, that shit had the potential to ruin her for life. I mean, she didn't go to a blacksmith and get molten iron poured down her pants, she went to a restaurant to get coffee.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:47 AM
8

Drugs don't walk up to people and inject themselves into their bloodstream. They don't roll themselves up and immolate each other. She chose to get drunk. The responsibility is entirely on her.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:38 AM
15

Honestly, they're just doing /r/menkampf a favor. At this rate, they don't even have to work for it.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 05:35 AM
1

Aversion isn't a synonym of hatred. I avert Dr. Pepper for my health, but holy god I love the stuff.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 10:32 AM
2

I certainly wrestled/fought with my friends, but pee games? And they were, and I say this with affection, total rednecks. If we didn't have literal pissing contests, I can't imagine who would.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 06:43 AM
1

It's so weird man. Every day I think I just get closer to believing Horseshoe Theory as an absolute. The Left is just the Right with a new coat of paint.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 07:47 AM
1

Correcting a negative is a positive.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 07:30 AM
1

Yeah, but they called themselves communists. So I guess the Soviets knew what they were least of all? Sounds kinda like a No True Scotsman fallacy: "What? Communism's never worked? Well, that wasn't real communism, so it doesn't count!"
/r/MensRights07/09/17 10:44 AM
2

Please tell me you pulled your shirt up and flashed your chest at him.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:29 AM
2

Oh, some monsters will totally string men along for their entertainment.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:26 AM
1

Just carry around a tape recorder until the sex starts. Surely whatever crime that may be, if any (I'm no lawyer) is easier, in both punishment and social stigma.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:01 AM
1

I walked to school every day when I was a kid, but I was like, 10. That's just not cool.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 07:41 AM
1

Yeah, plenty of times. And they were all autocratic shitholes, because humans don't work that way. It's like trying to make ants democratic: it's never going to work (among other reasons), because ant society isn't designed to have coagulated power.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 07:29 AM
7

I find anything within a 10-foot pole of necrophilia disgusting. This is like, 7 feet deep in that radius.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 07:24 AM
1

No they don't. "Helping" men with their problems isn't going to change society's perception of them as disposable and hyperagressive.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 06:46 AM
3

Okay, so they should be fighting against areas in which women beat men out. Like family courts. True Equality means that, sometimes, you have to shoot yourself in the foot. Supremacy has no such restrictions.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 06:05 AM
3

Sure. But just make them say they're fighting for women, not for equality.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 05:19 AM
1

It makes perfect sense to me. You have to let kids believe that things exist that they can't perceive are real, because there are real things that can't be sensed. It's prepping them so that they can think in abstractions. You know, like humans do.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 11:09 AM
2

And what of the societies that were literal matriarchies? Did they just hate Africa or something? These feminists need an outlook on history that isn't so blank.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:39 AM
5

Something the US is better than Canada at besides force of arms? Every victory brings us a step closer to superiority.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 09:37 PM
4

Generally 'Asians' means East Asians. It's only confusing because the specific term for them, Oriental, had become offensive some time ago.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 09:30 PM
1

Yeah, let's through our big, green wads (of money) at the problem. That's something those Fascists/Communists will never understand.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 09:26 PM
5

I guess it really is just a sub for women, not nutjobs.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 09:23 PM
1

Yeah, just like all those Christian women who seclude themselves from society for a week after having their periods, since the Bible tells them do. Get over yourself.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 02:15 AM
3

Ah, thank you. No comments, how unfortunate.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 08:38 PM
1

Where is it? I can't see it.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 08:35 PM
1

If you're gonna discriminate, just be honest about it. "White Men need not apply."
/r/MensRights26/08/17 08:10 PM
2

Oh, I thought they were talking about, like, Italians or something.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 08:08 PM
1

It was the story with Potiphar. Joseph became a household slave to some powerful Egyptian dude, and his wife asks Joseph to bang her. Joseph says no, so she tells her husband he attempted to rape her. He's imprisoned, yadda yadda yadda, becomes the Pharaoh's top spiritual adviser.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 06:58 PM
0

Isn't this satire?
/r/MensRights25/08/17 06:14 AM
13

I mean, a false rape-accusation is literally in the fucking Bible, people should understand that it's a thing people do by now.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 10:25 PM
1

Punishment is a real part of the human condition. When shitty things happen to people who do shitty things, it encourages both them and the people who know them to be better people. It is the most simple style of morality.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 08:44 AM
2

I mean, it's at least Fraud, right?
/r/MensRights20/08/17 05:05 PM
2

Ooooh Sugar-snap peas.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 05:04 PM
2

Pfft, freakin' Marx.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 05:01 PM
6

That's because lot's of comedy is from exaggeration. Back in the day, that was exaggerating.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 05:56 AM
1

Motherfucking [insert Greek playwright].
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:13 PM
1

Yeah, Queen is way better. Queens have power, and authority, and above-all, responsibility.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:00 PM
0

Obviously they are to Americans. If said reports happened in other countries (by non-American news networks), then it would just be weird.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 06:39 PM
1

Mud people seems rather offensive. Americans can be of any race.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:06 AM
1

I already did defend it. Two people can't rape each other at the same time. The reason it's not okay with an age-gap is because having sex with someone before they even know what sex is (prepubescence) is a deplorable action. You're using someone to gratify yourself, like they're a toy. Generally, not treating humans like they're humans is a crime.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:42 PM
1

No one does. Two minors (within a certain age range, no 17-on-12 year olds) are okay, just as two majors are okay. It's more nuanced than you're making it out to be. Two people can't rape each other at the same time.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:33 PM
2

Wait, I thought that was assault. Battery is hitting someone with a baseball, assault is threatening to hit someone with a baseball and making them fear for their safety.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:30 PM
1

Yeah, we need to castrate more boys to gather the necessary data.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:00 PM
1

Pointing out what they have highlights what we don't have. You can't fight a problem you know nothing about.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:52 PM
2

Don't forget that they slashed fitness requirements down to levels a 5-year-old could double. On an unrelated note, isn't imperialism great? Sydney, USA has an amazing ring to it...
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:37 PM
1

Yeah, that's pretty reasonable. I always forget about the logistics...
/r/MensRights14/08/17 01:21 AM
2

See, in ancient China, there was this guy named Confucius. He created a religion-esque life philosophy, that stated (essentially) that a good life is built upon good morals, and good morals are built upon knowing your place. The lowers suck up to their betters, and the betters protect their lowers (e.g. the relationship between a peasant and the emperor). He claimed that husbands and wives had this better-lower relationship, which created some pretty fierce gender-roles that are often practiced …
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:35 PM
3

Although, to be fair, by that point China had also been a technologically stagnated hellhole for a couple of centuries. Though Opium was still a tactic that made the war easier, I'm pretty sure China's only real advantage against Britain was it's sheer size.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:28 PM
2

Rights didn't have to be a zero-sum game. But that is the world we live in now.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:15 PM
18

I really hope it's a legit ad. If not, it'll probably get legally taken down.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 05:56 PM
2

That always kinda disappointed me. I'm a decently liberal guy, and I'm all for having people on my side, but not if we're douchebags about it. It seems very... disingenuous, to support equality, but then say "anyone who has ever been historically oppressed by anybody should be a Democrat". I mean, just let them make up their own minds.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 05:43 PM
1

So what, you're a Hindu?
/r/MensRights12/08/17 07:35 AM
1

Hey, I don't mind being a Morlock...
/r/MensRights12/08/17 07:08 AM
4

So my anti-German Swiss Chocolate factory was never going to fly?
/r/MensRights08/08/17 12:57 AM
3

That's weird, considering there are a shit ton of Black Jews.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 11:31 PM
3

Actually, that's a lie perpetrated through Cultural Appropriation. It's actually called Club Soda because Canadians would bring it on sealing trips.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 11:27 PM
2

That sort haircut, shaved on one side... man, why can't you find straight woman who wear their hair like that?
/r/MensRights06/08/17 11:25 PM
-1

Land of the free bro. Just because it's part of someone's culture doesn't mean it's not worth criticism. In places like Italy, the legal drinking age is 16. So, as an American, I exercise my right to call them savages for ruining young adult minds with alcohol.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:53 AM
2

Yeah, it's like every female lead is Steven Seagal.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 06:38 PM
1

But you gotta remember, Korea is super sexist. They're still caught up in that 'only men can do men jobs/only women can do women jobs' Neo-Confucian crap.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 06:36 PM
2

Native American scouting units. Though I guess we do get a fair amount of American Indian representation in war films, what with our almost worship over Code-Talkers.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 06:05 PM
1

But... Australia is the perfect place to hold a Kangaroo Court.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 07:25 PM
11

I think the primary issue with the college example you gave is that they're both drunk as shit. Did he violate her consent, or did she violate his? Basically, unless there's an extremely creepy third-party thing making both do it, I believe two people cannot rape each other at the same time.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 05:28 PM
1

How are they going to be affected by anything if they're dead? Checkmate.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 05:17 PM
2

That's when we flip the tables, and turn their feminist weapon against themselves. Deadliest is the sword that cuts on it's own...
/r/MensRights29/07/17 04:19 PM
1

I think you got the wrong guy there bud...
/r/MensRights29/07/17 04:06 PM
2

The squeaky wheel betrays how shoddy the train is.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 01:11 AM
2

Well, how black does he mean when he says 'black'? Someone should tell these Britons that in that time period, being African meant you came from around Libya. And you were just as liable to be a Hellen/Roman as you were Berber. Who aren't black.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 01:05 AM
2

Yeah, I thought I was a pretty good man, but I don't hate the gays, so I guess I'm androgynous.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 12:54 AM
5

Lawyers might be snakes, but they're snakes who help you from time to time.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 05:33 PM
2

Matronizing.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 05:19 PM
1

They have perfume, we get Axe. Eye for an eye.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 05:15 PM
3

It's fraud. He was extorted for cash on completely false pretenses.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 04:53 PM
1

Yeah, we've been teaching them, but I think Europeans still haven't weened off of doing crazy shit.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:47 AM
0

Really? My assumption was that this series of events took place on the Moon. Then you saved Aslan and killed the Jabberwock.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 03:28 PM
2

I believe it was more of a "I can't give a rat's ass" statement.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 11:19 PM
6

I gotta agree with the other guy. When it's an article or something, explanation is key. But dissecting a joke is like dissecting a frog: you just end up with an unappealing, dead mess. You know, because dissection involves the removal of organs, which would kill the organism those organs belong too, just as explaining a joke makes it not funny.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 04:51 AM
1

Well, it truly depends. Insanity is a pretty arbitrary word, you know. Not very well defined. I'd consider depression to be insanity, for instance, but I'm not sure about Autism.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 10:38 PM
1

Being of an abnormal state of mind.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:41 PM
0

Eh, I'm enough of a spiteful prick to be fine either way.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:31 PM
2

I prefer terminate. Makes me feel like a robot assassin.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 03:16 AM
21

You know what else passes the Bechedel Test, if memory serves? The music video for fucking Baby Got Back. Is that not proof enough that the test is bullshit?
/r/MensRights16/07/17 11:48 PM
1

Well, there are different degrees of murder. 4th degree is more commonly known as Involuntary Manslaughter, and is murder by complete (yet avoidable) accident. 3rd degree is a Crime of Passion, where the court agrees that you were in some sort of mentally-compromising state of frenzy. 2nd is on the spot, but done with malicious intent, while 1st is planning the whole thing out ahead of time, then acting on it.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:01 PM
2

Hell yeah. Sometimes you just gotta love hopeless darkness for the sake of being hopeless darkness. Incidentally, I'm glad that they're making the Tau bigger nozzles than they once were.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 03:53 PM
1

Oh, of course it's an add, businesses are inhuman machine's designed to maximize profits. But that doesn't mean they can't melt a stony heart, every once in a while.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 03:52 PM
2

Eh, personally, I prefer to give some 'UMIES A REAL 'EADBANGER, RIGHT BOYZ!?
/r/MensRights16/07/17 03:43 PM
1

I guess it takes a manly company who sells manly products to speak to men in a way that doesn't make them feel like douchebags.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 03:36 PM
1

Just copy it, change some words, and paste it somewhere else. Be the change you want to see in the world.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 03:29 PM
4

That's because strength and intelligence are too broad for categories. I think one of the biggest aspects of being a man is protecting who and what you care about. Someone else might say being a man is about having better muscle tone than Ares. Both of these are strength, yet they're both radically different concepts.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 02:30 PM
3

Suffer not the Xenos to live.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 02:23 PM
1

I'm appalled that you see nothing wrong with slicing off a part of a child's genitalia. Different strokes, I suppose.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:05 AM
1

What I'm getting is that you think a woman's womanly parts are sacred, while you couldn't care less about throwing a man's manly parts down the garbage chute.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:12 AM
2

Really? I recognize the name, but I thought Boko Haram was a dude. Like, the leader of the terrorist group.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:08 AM
1

Man, I love Bill Burr. He reminds me of George Carlin: combining sense and hilarity seamlessly.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:52 PM
3

Don't you know that there were no kids born in America between 1941 and 1945, because every single man went off to Japan? It was a dark and staggering moment in our history.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:23 PM
2

I guess it depends on if you're talking about societal infrastructure (which would go down either scenario), or physical infrastructure, like roads and buildings.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:21 PM
2

My best friend is a guy!
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:18 PM
1

I'm sorry, I thought you cared about her health. I mean, who cares about lopping off body parts, as long as it has a minute effect on their long-term health? Humans aren't lizards, bro. Anything you cut off will never come back. You shouldn't get to make the decision that will impact your child until they die. If some dude is over 18 and decides he doesn't want his foreskin, more power to him. But doing it to a baby... that's like castrating a dog; doing something they don't even understand, for…
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:13 PM
2

Oh yeah, no argument there. If you can consent to it, you can do it as far as I care, no matter how bone-chilling I think it is.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:05 PM
1

Yes, of course it's mutilation. It's the permanent removal of a body part. If you want to get part of your dick sliced off, do it when you're 18, rather than letting someone make the choice for you when you're less than one.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:02 PM
1

Good practice. Retarded counter-attacks sharpen your senses for approaching intelligent ones.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 06:20 PM
3

Ah, so the court takes the UN approach on punishment?
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:07 AM
4

Good sarcasm needs no explanation. Now, I am off to dinner, as I hear my friend has procured a nice, plump Irish baby at the market.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 03:32 AM
1

That's not what significance means. FTFY
/r/MensRights04/07/17 03:29 AM
1

Yeah, I'm afraid that if I went out with a runway model, I'd be torn apart by her teeth and claws.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:33 PM
1

I don't. Egg, and my face, are in alignment.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 07:07 PM
25

Low key, I'm pretty sure the only thing I've ever seen that showed a male suffering from an eating disorder was American Dad. Now that's saying something.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 11:28 PM
1

Alright, so imagine a guy who commits fraud. He gets craptons of money. Did he deserve that money? After all, he DID commit a course of actions (fraudulent business) that would lead to getting a lot of money.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 08:23 PM
1

If you don't think it's a good thing, use a word other than Deserve. It's just a semantics issue: deserve means, and it always means, that it's good. A guy who stabbed someone in an alley then ran away and got hit by a car got what he deserved. A 10 year-old exercising their dumbassitude, running in the street and getting hit by a car, did not deserve it.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 08:14 PM
1

Then that's pretty messed up. Saying that the guy deserved his Korean death is saying that it's a good thing that it happened.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 08:03 PM
1

Actions have consequences. They are not inherently deserving of one.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 07:54 PM
1

That's not what 'deserve' means. To deserve something, it is just, good, and morally right when something happens to you. A murderer deserves to be thrown in jail. Walking around the wrong side of town at night doesn't mean you deserve to be killed, even if there's a high chance you will be.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 07:40 PM
2

He didn't deserve to die, but he clearly had a reckless/stupid grasp of his own life.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 04:39 AM
3

No, all kids are stupid. It's a fact. They're irrational, because their brains aren't finished yet. It's almost like, to not sugar coat it, a 24-25 year long period of insanity that you eventually get rid of.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:23 AM
1

Uh... it's that thing that comes out of machines that goes onto the whiteboard?
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:14 AM
18

And those words exist to denote a specific meaning. Statutory meaning "having sex with anyone below the local age of majority is rape." You know, because children, even teenagers, are stupid. Sub-developed brains, and all that.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 12:58 AM
13

That's why they call it Five Guys Burgers and Fries. The fries are so good they have title recognition.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 12:52 AM
22

Have you ever heard the word "Statutory"?
/r/MensRights25/06/17 11:56 PM
1

A 16 year old is a teenager, not a kid. A kid is like, 2-10, where half the time they're irrational, and the other half is being incoherent.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 05:33 AM
2

Oh, I'm sorry, they merely intend to cleanse out people who don't believe in the state ideology. Excuse me for my poor diction.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 05:25 AM
1

I lived in Oklahoma for 7 years. Nothing is hot or cold to me anymore. 100F summers, 0F winters. And at least one tornado wherever you live, every year.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:48 AM
2

No, it's not okay to suppress a kid's gayness. It's also not okay to punish people for having a certain belief. I mean, I was led to believe that Canada was just America's Mimi-Me, how could they do something so backwards-assed? As it turned out, no one expected the Canadian Inquisition.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:12 AM
2

You can commit genocide against followers of an idea. Pol Pot killed mostly Cambodians, all because they were deemed too "Western". No ethnic or religious reasons, and it's still a genocide.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:10 AM
1

Australia is fucking nuts. It has like, 60's-70's levels of Moral Guardianship.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:58 AM
1

Yeah. Smart feminists would've just tried to sweep it under the rug as much as possible.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:07 PM
11

No, the landing went sub-optimally. He still put a damn lander on a comet, which is certainly more than I've ever done.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 05:42 PM
1

If they firmly believe they should be in a better college, they should firmly get better grades.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 11:44 PM
2

Here's how I see it: Female discrimination is more... potent(?) than male discrimination. More serious, perhaps. However, the thing about discrimination about males is that no one cares. Society doesn't care about you if you're a dude. Men get drafted into wars, on sinking ships men are the last to get life boats (women and children first), and in family courts men are the ones who lose out the most. But nobody cares, because US society mainly focuses on how events affect women. To apply this to…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:04 PM
2

You know, that's fair enough. I believe mental issues shouldn't just be swept under the rug, particularly because they're so hard to spot ( and thus can fester), but men 100% beat women more often than women beat men.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 11:31 AM
7

To your first point, probably not. They say that abuse occurs in cycles, and that's because abusive people don't change. A moment of clarity is followed by months of asshole-ishness. I think the people who created this website betray what they truly think of men. That women can't abuse us, because men aren't abuse-able. Well, to give you a little fact, women can abuse men. And hell, I'm not even considering gay relationships, wherein a man abuses another man, or a woman abuses another woman. Whe…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 11:00 AM
11

Then put it on a website that deals with anger issues. To me, this says "If you're going to an abuse hotline and your a woman, you're being abused and need help. If you're going here as a guy, you're a fucking asshole who needs to be stopped". That doesn't paint a very secure picture for men who need help. In fact, I'd say it might drive away someone who truly needs help.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 10:48 AM
10

Of course, obviously it's alright for men to be beaten and emotionally traumatized and never get any help, because we're all expendable savages.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 10:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter