TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dangger Archive

View 8 posts and 69 comments by Dangger on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Funnily enough it toughens up the boys who make it and it weakens the girls. Obviously it also discourages some boys. Where is this finding in the report? I can't seem to find it. I do find that it increases school drop out rates, it's like in page 2.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 10:34 PM
3

As someone with a PhD in sociology let me tell you this: You would be surprised by how many male academics just repeat stuff like this in sociology departments around the world.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 05:06 AM
3

I know, and the guy you responded to said it was. I also don't think it was a parody.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:11 PM
1

You didn't know if the original was a parody or not. That's Poe's Law.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:01 PM
10

Poe's Law: Poe's law is an Internet adage that states that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, it is impossible to create a parody of extreme views so obviously exaggerated that it cannot be mistaken by some readers or viewers as a sincere expression of the parodied views.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:18 PM
7

Moreover, steroid use is not necessarily harmful, I suggest watching Bigger Faster Stronger. I guess the intention is to show that pressure for both groups exists but I don't think this is not a great comparison.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 02:42 AM
28

She is also a female! Take that other females!
/r/MensRights29/03/15 09:35 PM
1

The name of the campaign is 'Unite: Dialogue, respect and love. An alternative without violence.' It is a gender equality campaign.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:39 PM
10

This is very relevant. Basically, when domestic violence is perpetrated by a man against a woman no one is allowed to question the reasons behind such act. It is simply seen as something black or white with the woman as a faultless victim. Obviously there is a double standard and whenever a woman perpetrates violence against a man it is usually contextualized and the innocence of a man is most of the times under scrutiny.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:47 PM
2

I'm getting a 404 on the first link :C
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:32 AM
0

I can see you are very familiar with sociology. Great analysis.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:43 AM
-5

tldr
/r/MensRights12/06/14 07:25 PM
-1

In any case, the "surprise surprise" was the starting point of my questioning and so far no coherent argument has backed that up.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:22 PM
-10

Sociology is not liberal arts. Your ignorance and unfounded arguments baffle me. Good day.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:40 PM
-4

a sociology (surprise, surprise) What is this about?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:12 PM
1

You raise a lot of good points, however your argument is founded on a discourse of men vs women. I believe the point being made here is not men vs women but men's rights activists vs radical feminism. Moreover, your argument can be used in the same way to attack women rights. For example, who are the perpetrators of female circumcision? It's other women. Other women, usually the mothers and so on rip the child's clitoris. It's not men. Men don't do it. Where does this take us?
/r/MensRights01/05/14 10:55 PM
1

Not at all.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 03:45 AM
7

How did you select the samples?
/r/MensRights03/01/14 11:21 PM
4

That's true but the perpetrator's sex should not be a problem. After all, who carries out cliterectomy? It's other women. They rip out the child's clitoris. Men don't do it. These things are the product of a society, not the individual work of men or women as groups. Even in very macho societies women have a huge, if not the biggest role, in educating males. They educate them to be sexist and discriminate against females.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:01 AM
1

Good, I hope you moderate the tons of shit that hit the frontpage like you moderate my submission.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 06:11 PM
1

People from those disciplines who have confidence in themselves and their work, have little time for the affectations their profession displays at times When you have to fight for budget and the survival of your department then what the public thinks, what politicians and bureaucrats think, is extremely important. If I may ask you, where do all these researchers that you know get the money to do their research? If there is a streak of rejection to social sciences then money stops flowing to thei…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:43 PM
2

Now this is very interesting. You pose the question: Do sociologists consider themselves scientists? To which you answer: I assure you that the percentage who do not is far greater among sociologists than it is among physicists. Then you actually have a source to back up your claim. Thanks for that. It's actually quite interesting and I agree with lots of things that are being said there. However, this poses a greater problem, mainly in this claim from your quotes: " In sociol- ogy, I have the i…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:37 PM
0

I assure you that the percentage who do not is far greater among sociologists than it is among physicists. You are full of baseless claims. It's hard to argue with someone who is strongly opinionated about things they don't really have evidence for. Good day sir.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 12:12 PM
1

There is a hidden streak of an "inferiority complex" flowing through many social sciences. There is no inferiority complex, there is a struggle to educate the public. Have a look at the comments in this thread to get an idea of what people think of social sciences and then let me know if it's really a complex or an actual reality.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 12:10 PM
0

However, much in the same way as we use the standalone term doctor to refer to a medical doctor -- if you say someone is scientist, you are generally understood to mean a hard science. I think you are talking about your own perception, not really representative of anything else. If I hear that someone is a scientist I don't assume they are "hard science." In the context of this thread, it is unlikely that a sociologist who does not believe the scientific method to be a necessary component of the…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:10 AM
4

That's a very blurry distinction and it's actually just a colloquial term that science fans use (such as yourself I take it). I have been around many economists and they do consider themselves scientists and they also call themselves economists. Just like sociologists consider themselves scientists and sociologists. There is no contradiction.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 08:50 AM
0

I'd say the pseudo-sciences are as prone to this as anyone Don't try to undermine the problem happening in these fields, or eliminate the possibility for debate, by defining them as pseudo sciences. They are not pseudo sciences and you are doing a disfavor to the debate by trying to push this definition. In other words, the general consensus is that sociology is a science. Try to debate with facts, not with ideology and/or personal definitions of what is or isn't science.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 08:45 AM
3

The line that divides hard vs soft starts to disappear when you are actually working in any of those fields. In fact, the softness of hard sciences is what allowed sociology and other disciplines to become sciences.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 08:41 AM
1

Yes, why wouldn't they? Or did you think it was a humanity?
/r/MensRights26/06/13 08:34 AM
0

Do you realize that the is exactly my argument? What type of articles will it have? How accurate?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 09:07 AM
0

Well his "argument" was It's the daily mail; what do you expect? so you tell me.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 10:04 PM
0

So we take the article seriously but then disregard the comments?
/r/MensRights07/02/13 07:54 PM
5

Wow those ladies were incredibly condescending. Not only that, when showed hard facts they would just shook their heads in disbelief. Un-fucking-believable. I suppose cognitive dissonance is so strong that you need time to process information that states the total opposite of what you believe.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 03:27 PM
1

I see what you mean. I wouldn't consider it automatic winning though, it depends on the comparison I guess.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:49 PM
1

Seriously? This is the first time I actually hear this.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 04:08 PM
3

It's widely used because it requires no further explanation, represents normality and doesn't embarrass the guy hitting on the girl. It's very efficient.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 10:54 PM
1

me?
/r/MensRights17/09/12 03:13 PM
6

He is appealing to women's vote and a section of the male population that suffer from guilt. Overall a very effective discourse in pragmatic terms.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:34 PM
18

ass? more like vulva... Men also have ass so penis is not the equivalent of an ass.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 09:22 PM
3

They give those away like candy, so why not I suppose.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:37 PM
1

Whoosh you fucking knee-jerker. Shit like this makes me hate this subreddit, because instead of being a place where people can interact and learn in a nice discussion, stupid fucks like you come and downvote comments that are not in agreement with the current circlejerk.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 07:39 PM
2

That's an excellent point. Thanks for the input.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 07:23 PM
6

Does that mean that we should continue to ignore the gender gap in privileged positions just because women don't want to gap the divide in crappy jobs? EDIT: don't downvote me dumbasses, I'm having a very civic discussion.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 07:16 PM
4

Interesting, do you have any sources to support the claim that men in average want dirtier more underpaid jobs?
/r/MensRights12/01/12 07:11 PM
3

That's pretty interesting. I have never thought of that. I was always being presented female to male ratios in documents from the UNDP that relate only to government and corporations and of course, these documents say that this is a problem that needs to be corrected.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 04:57 PM
6

In the same vein, what do you think about the lack of women in high positions, both in government as in corporations?
/r/MensRights12/01/12 09:56 AM
1

hahah thanks anyway man!
/r/MensRights10/01/12 10:57 PM
1

Do you by any chance remember that podcast or the link? I'm interested.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 02:07 PM
1

What an uncomfortable moment to watch.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 02:06 PM
-1

What some argue is not that things got better for women, but that things got worse for men.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 05:03 PM
1

if you fall off your horse, get right back on
/r/MensRights03/02/11 09:53 PM
-2

All of my male teachers in elementary school were gays and one of them harassed me to the point where there was almost a lawsuit. Funnily enough I also ended up teaching a k-8 class for over a year. The hardest thing I've ever done.
/r/MensRights24/01/11 01:16 PM
4

Denial is international territory.
/r/MensRights29/10/10 03:56 PM
-1

There's no way of corroborating that you're not a fat Indonesian guy with his dick hanging out but I believe you because your personal story brings weight to the comment.
/r/MensRights31/08/10 06:40 PM
1

You have no idea how intense the social pressure to follow norms is in Japan. Definitely very hard. At least that's why so many teenage suicides occur. and the women don't even want to marry you unless you are making above average wages. Well I wouldn't want to marry a girl like that either. It's not even about parenting, even if he wasn't a shut in he would probably still be unable to financially support himself and live on his own. Yeah but not having an enabler might pressure you into finding…
/r/MensRights20/07/10 07:49 AM
5

where he ate dumplings, rice and other leftovers that his mother had cooked There's always an enabler and I bet the majority of the times it's their parents.
/r/MensRights19/07/10 05:45 PM
1

Oh right, nevermind.
/r/MensRights19/07/10 04:53 PM
1

Still I don't get the relation between having a kid and marriage, perhaps you're from a religious background? EDIT: Also, why would she be on the pill if you already have a vasectomy?
/r/MensRights19/07/10 04:45 PM
2

So you assume that: marriage is for procreation, thus having a vasectomy will make you ineligible for such contract? [honest question]
/r/MensRights19/07/10 04:29 PM
1

What does a vasectomy has to do with not getting married?
/r/MensRights19/07/10 08:27 AM
1

Yes I am speaking of physical violence, thanks for that. Wise response.
/r/MensRights16/07/10 06:36 PM
14

There's no possible way of corroborating that you're not a fat Indonesian guy with his dick hanging out but I believe that you're a girl because it gives your point more weight.
/r/MensRights16/07/10 11:02 AM
0

Hey guys, let's not oversimplify systemic inequalities. It's not as easy for men to be a stay home dad than it is for women, regardless of personal preferences.
/r/MensRights12/07/10 04:37 PM
2

50% of presidents of the world must be women, regardless of anything. We will achieve equality by law.
/r/MensRights12/07/10 12:57 PM
28

Better yet, get the hospital to sign something that states that you do not want to get your son circumcised.
/r/MensRights18/05/10 05:30 PM
6

This idea of what's natural and what's not drives me crazy. I mean, it's just absurd and it's used all the time to justify whatever people feel others need to comply with.
/r/MensRights02/05/10 03:09 PM
1

I doubt you are statistically significant.
/r/MensRights23/04/10 03:24 PM
5

It's the same everywhere.
/r/MensRights03/04/10 11:32 AM
1

Thank you for this!
/r/MensRights26/03/10 08:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter