TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Daniel_Kamil_Fudala Archive

View 3 posts and 67 comments by Daniel_Kamil_Fudala on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Is LatinX supposed to be pronounced like "Latin eks" or "Latinks"?
/r/MensRights25/08/21 11:56 PM
1

I'm not left leaning, I'm far left (anarcho-syndicalist). It's not hard to remain a leftist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/21 04:11 AM
1

It doesn't magically become a person at birth either. Not magically but it does. That's when it's not literally physically connected to it's mother, that's when it gains ethical consideration according to most people and society/most societies, our moral values are largely based on our society's moral values and are subjective. a new human life It's not about a new human life, it's about a new person, not just human, a person. a defining point for a new human life as a birth is, after all once a…
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/21 08:00 AM
5

You're an idiot. No, you are. Have you ever seen an ultrasound? Yes, that's irrelevant. They are people and it has been scientifically proven that they feel pain. No it wasn't, no almost anti choice claims have been scientifically proven except for the irrelevant ones that no one is debating about that everyone agrees on. Why are you even on this page? You definitely sound like a feminist. But I'm not a feminist, not every non feminist or anti feminist is an anti choicer.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/21 07:17 AM
2

Yes, I am stuck on the "murdering innocent babies part" Who cares what the situations are??? That baby has already been created and deserves a chance at life. It's not a baby. There are unborn animals in this country that have more rights than unborn human babies They aren't babies, they're ZEF's, they don't deserve or even need right's. And animal and human ZEF's are litterally fucking identical, you wouldn't spot the difference between the two unless you're an expert on this. And abortion has …
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/21 07:13 AM
0

child has now been created It's not a child yet, it's a ZEF, it doesn't magically become a person at conception, it's literally a cell at that stage. It's not a baby but smaller when it's a foetus or embryo, it's not even similar to a baby. created. You don't get to choose to murder it out of convenience. It's not murder, it's an abortion, it's not murder by definition. If you don't want the baby, you give it up for adoption. What if you don't want 9 moths of suffering and a short period of tort…
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/21 07:09 AM
-1

abortion is murder It's not though, by definition.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/21 07:05 AM
6

They should be.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/21 07:04 AM
-3

You need to go back to school because you know next to fucking nothing about this topic. They have heartbeats at 21 days. Completely irrelevant They have fingerprints Even more irrelevant. They have their own DNA. Irrelevant too, even dead bodies have fingerprints and DNA, any human or part of a human will have DNA, fingers will have fingerprints unless they're removed or something. Babies are alive. They're ZEF's not babies, and no one ever claimed that they weren't alive, they are alive but ar…
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/21 07:04 AM
-7

Foetuses aren't babies.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/21 06:59 AM
-5

A foetus isn't a baby.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/21 06:59 AM
7

Does anyone even believe in rape culture against women?
/r/MensRights06/05/21 12:59 PM
16

Women don't have it worse than men.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 12:57 PM
24

People do take rape against women very seriously. Rape culture doesn't exist, rape is not accepted in society. Rape against males is not taken seriously.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 12:57 PM
6

Raping a schoolboy, 14*
/r/MensRights11/04/21 02:38 PM
1

A male civilian can not be a threat to an armed trained soldier. A poor, untrained, unarmed, malnourished farmer is just as much of a threat to a soldier as his wife or children.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 02:55 PM
1

Through either revolution or protests and other peaceful means (revolution would be more effective but also more brutal).
/r/MensRights24/12/20 05:37 PM
0

socialism /ˈsəʊʃəlɪz(ə)m/ noun a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism. (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism. Tell me, how is this theft? Socialism is the MoP being owned and regulated by the people.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 04:14 AM
0

Socialism isn't supported by many because they're brainwashed by anti socialist propaganda, most people hate socialism and don't even know what it is. Socialism doesn't require the government seizing the MoP, it requires the people either directly or indirectly (through the government) seizing the MoP, it's not theft in any way. The capitalist boss does nothing compared to the workers, they work more and get paid almost nothing compared to the boss. Having your business is a dream, since it will…
/r/MensRights24/12/20 04:10 AM
0

It's not theft, capitalism is. Capitalism is when the MoP is privately owned, a capitalist bussinesessman boss does nothing but sit on his ass all day experiencing a flow of passive income while the workers work their asses off and only get a fraction of the profit they generate. In socialism the MoP is owned communally by the workers, they get exactly the amount of money they generate (maybe excluding some income tax for the community) and democtatically control the MoP. Socialism is only theft…
/r/MensRights24/12/20 02:42 AM
5

That's the experience most people had, whenever there is a thread about MRM the feminists saying that it's wrong, misogysnitic, reactionary, etc will have a lot of upvotes and their comments will not be deleted and anyone that is an MRA or tries to defend it their comment is deleted and they're possibly banned. The comment sections on these MRM related posts always have a lot of deleted comments, radical feminists talking about the patriarchy and how MRM is reactionary and will have commenting, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/20 04:23 PM
1

r/MonarchoSocialism Research a bit about it. Not every socialist is a Marxist, not every monarchy is hereditery and monarchy (even a hereditery one) doesn't contradict workers owning the MoP and large amounts of social safety nets. And monarchs don't need to own land.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/20 04:12 PM
1

A monarch can be an elected monarch (yes, elective monaechies of different kinds are a thing) and a monarch doesn't need to own land, he would have the same function and rights as a normal socialistic leader. Socialism itself is hard to achieve. A monarch (a constitutional monarch or a symbolic monarch) can act modestly easily, I don't see why that would be hard. The psychological aspect of the title and clothing and symbolism of a monarch as opposed to a president is significant and can be a ve…
/r/MensRights22/12/20 01:39 AM
0

r/MonarchoSocialism These things are compatible, I didn't make this ideology alone. Ask some monarcho socialists about it before you ignorantly and arrogantly dismiss it (no offence). Monarchy is a form of government while socialism is a form of the economy. The people will own the MoP and the monarch will own everything else. Plus, you do know that monarchs can be elected or even serve a fixed term? The only real difference between an elected monarch that serves a fixed term and a president is …
/r/MensRights22/12/20 01:11 AM
2

I was always left wing but progressively became more and more left wing. I went from a centre leftist to a monarcho-socialist over time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/20 12:54 AM
2

Ouch!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/20 12:19 AM
1

Well, socialism is different from communism.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 11:19 AM
0

Psychology and sociology are stem fields.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 11:18 AM
-1

What does BLM have to do with Marxism though? Black and white people aren't classes but races and people that are not economically Marxists are also members of it/support it. Doesn't a Marxist need to believe in class conflict theory and Marxist economics?
/r/MensRights13/12/20 11:17 AM
27

What?
/r/MensRights13/12/20 11:00 AM
5

The tools would be more expensive than a condom dispesor or whatever though. Buying a lot of condoms and putting one or two condom machines in a town would be less expensive than making a safe environment with safe tools.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 10:15 PM
7

The thing is, circumcision requires clean tools, clean water, a clean medical setting, good doctors etc. If these countries don't have clean water and money for condoms how are they supposed to be able to circumcise safely, if foreigners are giving them the tools, why don't they just give them condoms which are cheaper? A drunk old guy that hasn't washed is hands in clean water for months cutting of a child's foreskin with a rusty, dull razor that he found on the street in a non medical dirty se…
/r/MensRights05/12/20 09:10 PM
17

No, I'm not contradicting myself you moron, notice the speech marks around the word benefits. I know there are none but the things that people say are benefits are still outweighed by the costs. You're not worth anyone's time but I enjoy debunking the claims of idiots on the internet. You are very low hanging fruit though.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 08:18 PM
12

Interesting, many people that support FGM also claim that and show will "studies" (shitty studies). There are no benefits to mutilation and ending somebody's sex life before is begins.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 08:16 PM
21

You shouldn't have kids.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 08:14 PM
18

Sicko. It should be their choice, it's not your dick you emotionless piece of shit. You aren't a moral person if you mutilate someone's genitals without their consent.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 08:14 PM
16

There are none. The "benefits" are outweighed by the costs. It either decreases sensitivity or makes your dick too sensitive, can cause infection or complications (like all/most surgeries and removals of body parts) and is unnecessary. It's genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 08:13 PM
19

Your children will chose that, not you. Fucking sadist.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 08:08 PM
17

Nope, there's no benefits of circumcision.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 08:08 PM
2

Facts and logic definately isn't on the side of the Republicans.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 06:00 PM
1

Male breasts don't really have a purpose, and they're not organs. They're just tissues (organs are also made from human tissues but not all things made from tissues like muscle or skin are organs). The glands are organs and are slightly different. There's a reason why professionals in science and medicine seperate these two organs. Farewell!
/r/MensRights18/11/20 04:17 PM
2

No, they're not prostates, they have a different morphology/shape, probably the function is slightly different, it's classified and named differently too. Different gland, not a prostate.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 04:14 PM
4

Women don't have prostates. They have similar glands, but not prostates.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 11:07 PM
1

I probably have but I don't recall it (maybe not in the context of gender equality but in general). It's not outside of the realm of possibility.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 08:03 PM
5

Nope, wrong. We don't hate feminism, and we definately don't want a more male centered society.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 09:34 PM
4

MRA isn't anti feminist or supporting of a patriarchal society.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 09:32 PM
3

Men's Rights is a leftist movement/idea. Leftism is typically associated with equity and equality, if feminism is leftist then so is MRA because they're the same idea but MRA is more informed and typically more rational.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 09:31 PM
2

Women in the west are not opressed. They're right.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 01:50 PM
1

Wrong, women have more rights.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 01:50 PM
1

Nope.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 01:48 PM
1

There is discrimination in the education system against boys and women often are given lesser/no punishments for equal crimes.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 01:45 PM
2

No it's not.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 01:43 PM
5

Nope, MRA isn't about bashing feminism, that's not what MRA's do, it's what feminists think MRA's do. MRA is about male issues, and solving them. Stop using/quoting Wikipedia on things like this, it's reliable on maths, science or philosophy, not on MRA's or feminism. You don't understand MRA or what it does. You're wrong on every point.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 07:45 PM
5

No, you're not right. MRA is not a counter movement, and they don't want to break everything down that feminism has built. And I doubt that the Wikipedia moderators are fair. Feminism barely built anything, but the MRA's don't want to break it down you moron. 😂🤦 You're wrong and you don't even want to accept it, MRA isn't a counter movement, and it doesn't want to break anything down, they just want mens rights and equality.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 07:34 PM
7

Nope, everything or almost everything that you said is incorrect, in some circumstances Wikipedia is reliable, but not in this one, there are more feminists/pro feminists than MRA's, most moderators and writters would be biased against it. What you said isn't correct, it's not even wrong. It was NEVER about countering womens rights, it's not a reactionary movement at all. It is and always will be about male issues, and solving these. STFU, you're wrong.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 07:20 PM
8

Again, quoting Wikipedia, which says many scholars, not all scholars, on an issue biased against MRA's. Stop quoting ureliable sources, you're simply wrong. MRA is not a reactionary movement, it's a neccesary one, unlike feminism in modern times. STFU.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 07:09 PM
9

I've read some of your comments, how can someone be so wrong?! Seriously, every single one of your comments is the most wrong and incorrect it can be. And seriously, quoting Wikipedia, especially on this kind of issue?
/r/MensRights20/09/20 07:03 PM
12

No, MRA isn't a reactionary movement, lol. MRA's aren't against females or feminists, they're not the same thing as the "League of Men's Rights" was back then. It's a movement based around men's rights and problems. STFU, please, you don't know what you're talking about. "You're not right, you're not even wrong." - Wolfgang Pauli
/r/MensRights20/09/20 06:59 PM
17

Women don't suffer more than men though, and MRA isn't a reactionary movement, it is just focused on male issues (which are more prevelent and severe). Feminism is trying to year MRA down, they also have more influence and power. Please sir/madame, STFU.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 06:51 PM
7

SMV = Sexual Market Value?
/r/MensRights20/09/20 12:42 PM
2

So, you would agree that boys on average have more natural interest in STEM/STEAM, philosophy, physical work etc. And girls have more interest in social sciences, nursing, teaching etc. ?
/r/MensRights20/09/20 12:25 PM
1

Actually, the throw was probably like 10× more effective than a left cross.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 09:22 PM
2

Women can also do that, infact they're safer because most violent crimes happen to men, being safe on the streets in the night is a female privilage.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 09:07 PM
1

I'm pretty sure they have equal sex drives.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 04:32 PM
2

Women also have sex drives.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 05:52 AM
2

I voted on it's not well known to see the results.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 05:43 AM
3

Everyone always believes the woman even if she lied and if she did she suffers no consequences. People don't call her a whore they have sympathy and help her. No one believes the man, some believe that men can't be raped, the man is humiliated and not given any sympathy.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 05:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter