~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dont forget men are the ones shielding women with their bodiesNo one was sexist except for you based on your absurd comments. You should go back and read them again. You're trying to pretend like you're a rational person but clearly you're not because you blatantly blaming gun violence solely on men like that stupid article does. Apparently certain facts about this issue have gone over your head so you had to make up a bullshit argument and insult people. Stop talking out of your ass and get over yourself. | /r/MensRights | 06/10/17 02:32 AM |
| 7 | Dont forget men are the ones shielding women with their bodiesGuys, don't be so hyper defensive... Followed by you getting really defensive because people were disagreeing with your opinion. Stop being patronizing and falsely claiming that men are the problem. You have absolutely no basis for your assertions. Men aren't the problem, it's how society treats men that's the problem. | /r/MensRights | 06/10/17 01:54 AM |
| 1 | How fake news is created glorifying women. A female government officer was rescued by male police officers and photos reveal it too. But paid media glorifies the lady while berating the ones who saved her.Adding information and removing information are, by definition, opposites. And opposites cannot be the same. Yes, adding and removing information are opposites but they can be used for the same thing. Adding to or removing from something still modifies it so these opposites still serve the same purpose. Like I stated before, adding (fabricating) or removing (concealing) information, essentially changes the original information and makes the information false because it is not presenting all of t… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/17 05:31 PM |
| 1 | How fake news is created glorifying women. A female government officer was rescued by male police officers and photos reveal it too. But paid media glorifies the lady while berating the ones who saved her.Your examples had nothing to do with what I was talking about. You are wrong so swallow your pride and admit that. If you can't then I can't help you. Have a nice life. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/17 05:31 PM |
| 1 | How fake news is created glorifying women. A female government officer was rescued by male police officers and photos reveal it too. But paid media glorifies the lady while berating the ones who saved her.Propaganda presents true information in misleading ways. When someone presents true information in misleading ways to deceive the public into believing a lie then the information becomes false. It isn't a hard concept to grasp. When bridges collapse, North Korea starts spouting how our infrastructure is crumbling. Is that false? North Korea points out our homeless problem. Is that false? These examples really don't have anything to do with what I was talking about. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/17 04:59 PM |
| -1 | How fake news is created glorifying women. A female government officer was rescued by male police officers and photos reveal it too. But paid media glorifies the lady while berating the ones who saved her.Nothing is false in the photo. You look at the photo on the left: a man really did point a gun at another man's head. You look at the photo on the right: a man really did give another man water. That really happened. Neither picture depicts something that did not happen. In your previous example, the left and right photo are depicting only part of the story. If the whole image was shown to the public then the information wouldn't be false. Separately, they both clearly show skewed perspectives a… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/17 07:25 AM |
| -1 | How fake news is created glorifying women. A female government officer was rescued by male police officers and photos reveal it too. But paid media glorifies the lady while berating the ones who saved her.What makes propaganda propaganda isn't its truth or falsity, but its intent to influence opinion. You can use the same true information to influence opinion one way or another just by manipulating that information. You're statements are just not true. Manipulating the information and concealing certain facts doesn't make that information true, it makes it false. Public opinion can be influenced with true, objective information that represents all the facts but that doesn't make it propaganda. Pr… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/17 01:05 AM |
| 0 | How fake news is created glorifying women. A female government officer was rescued by male police officers and photos reveal it too. But paid media glorifies the lady while berating the ones who saved her.The definition doesn't need to explicitly state that the information is false. Propaganda presents false information because the information used is manipulated for an agenda. Propaganda conceals certain facts to encourage a specific emotional response from an audience. Manipulated information used to influence public opinion is false information. That's what propaganda means whether you believe it or not. I don't need to provide you with sources just to give you the correct definition of a word… | /r/MensRights | 29/08/17 10:14 PM |
| 1 | How fake news is created glorifying women. A female government officer was rescued by male police officers and photos reveal it too. But paid media glorifies the lady while berating the ones who saved her.No, propaganda is false or manipulated information. It conceals important facts from the public and it's used to influence people emotionally, rather than rationally, for a specific agenda. Definition: Propaganda is information that is not objective and is used primarily to influence an audience and further an agenda, often by presenting facts selectively to encourage a particular synthesis or perception, or using loaded language to produce an emotional rather than a rational response to the inf… | /r/MensRights | 29/08/17 05:45 PM |
| 1 | How fake news is created glorifying women. A female government officer was rescued by male police officers and photos reveal it too. But paid media glorifies the lady while berating the ones who saved her.No, propaganda is false or manipulated information, concealing important facts and meant to influence people emotionally, rather than rationally, for a specific agenda. Definition: Propaganda is information that is not objective and is used primarily to influence an audience and further an agenda, often by presenting facts selectively to encourage a particular synthesis or perception, or using loaded language to produce an emotional rather than a rational response to the information that is pres… | /r/MensRights | 29/08/17 05:33 PM |
| 1 | How fake news is created glorifying women. A female government officer was rescued by male police officers and photos reveal it too. But paid media glorifies the lady while berating the ones who saved her.No, propaganda is false information meant to influence people emotionally, without presenting any facts, for a specific agenda. Definition: Propaganda is information that is not objective and is used primarily to influence an audience and further an agenda, often by presenting facts selectively to encourage a particular synthesis or perception, or using loaded language to produce an emotional rather than a rational response to the information that is presented. Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wik… | /r/MensRights | 29/08/17 05:22 PM |
| 1 | How fake news is created glorifying women. A female government officer was rescued by male police officers and photos reveal it too. But paid media glorifies the lady while berating the ones who saved her.No, propaganda is false information meant to influence the masses with an idea through emotion, not facts, for a specific agenda. Here's the definition: Propaganda is information that is not objective and is used primarily to influence an audience and further an agenda, often by presenting facts selectively to encourage a particular synthesis or perception, or using loaded language to produce an emotional rather than a rational response to the information that is presented. Link: https://en.wiki… | /r/MensRights | 29/08/17 05:18 PM |
| 4 | Texas forces man to pay 65,000 USD for a kid that DNA tests showed is not hisBecause if she genuinely believed it at the time there's no intent, so it's not a crime. She insisted that this man was the father of her child knowing full well that she was making a baseless claim. There was absolutely no evidence to support her false claim, yet she still insisted he was the father. She clearly intended to lie and that's perjury. You can't just use the excuse that "she genuinely believed it at the time" because you're absolving her of any wrongdoing, which is completely absurd… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/17 09:42 PM |
| 1 | The beauty of fathersWhat does that have to do with someone responding to a false claim? Griever114's response wasn't negative, it was the truth. | /r/MensRights | 17/08/17 04:08 PM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingThen you should've said certain men or most men. It wasn't really obvious that you weren't referring to all men and there are easy ways to clarify that. If someone else said "Women are [insert stereotype]" then most people would be quick to correct that person and claim that their comment sounds sexist. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/16 06:53 PM |
| 6 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingPainting all women with the same brush is stupid. Your other comment painting all men with the same brush: as long as men sell themselves short with vapid bimbo's that's all they'll ever get. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/16 06:30 PM |
| 1 | I wish everyone knew this already...Just for stating my opinion? Reddit has become a fucking joke. EDIT: To the Reddit admins: Go fuck yourselves you smug corporate assholes. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/15 03:54 AM |
| – | I wish everyone knew this already...You didn't even answer the question /u/Endless_Summer asked you. EDIT: Inequality has nothing to do with the things you mentioned and radical Feminists would bring up the same sorry excuses like the ones you brought up to justify their pointless, hate-filled crusade for "equality" which means they actually want way more privileges than men, solely because of their gender. | /r/MensRights | 28/10/15 02:08 PM |
| 1 | Natalie Dormer says men are objectified tooSo why does she falsely assume she's being catcalled (harassed) when she clearly is aware that someone simply compliment her but still lies about her situation to make herself seem like a victim to her other friends? She can tell you one thing and then express a completely different opinion to others, which is what she's doing. I also understand the difference between having a thoughtful, unbiased discussion where both sides can agree on each others views (dialogue) and not listening to the othe… | /r/MensRights | 08/09/15 06:43 AM |
| 6 | Natalie Dormer says men are objectified tooI'm sorry but honestly your friend is being ridiculous. Compliments can come from strangers or friends, attractive and not so attractive men, it doesn't mean she's being attacked or demeaned. You should bring this to her attention and let her know that she's being a completely sexist hypocrite who doesn't really know what she's talking about. | /r/MensRights | 07/09/15 05:26 PM |
| 1 | Sarah Silverman Admits She Made Up a Wage-Gap Story, Then Calls Critics ‘Maniacs’Maybe it's more likely she wasn't certain about why there was a difference in pay and the club owner gave a snarky response that didn't clarify anything so she went away from that experience with her own assumptions about what happened. So because she was uncertain about something, it's ok for her to fabricate her whole story and falsely accuse someone of sexism without once considering using her common sense? Rational, intelligent people don't lie and make false accusations when they're not cer… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/15 12:54 AM |
| 3 | Sarah Silverman Admits She Made Up a Wage-Gap Story, Then Calls Critics ‘Maniacs’Again you're replacing the facts with your biased opinion to falsely absolve her from her actions. You're delusional if you actually believe she wasn't completely lying and that she "told the story as she remembered it" or, in other words, totally fabricated the story. She is well aware that she lied yet she's pretending like she didn't do anything remotely wrong. This is from the article in the link, This is what actually happened: In an April 6 wage-discrimination-activism video for Levo Leagu… | /r/MensRights | 17/04/15 06:49 AM |
| 8 | Sarah Silverman Admits She Made Up a Wage-Gap Story, Then Calls Critics ‘Maniacs’She certainly deserves some flak. Not so much for telling that story (which is probably how she remembered things), but for completely missing the point after being corrected. It's not how she "remembered it," she blatantly lied about the story and she clearly admitted it by saying that she would've gotten away with the lie if she didn't mention any names. She's just so delusional where she actually thinks her lie is still the truth. Stop trying to justify what she did to make her seem innocent. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/15 01:08 AM |
| 7 | Sarah Silverman Admits She Made Up a Wage-Gap Story, Then Calls Critics ‘Maniacs’Or we can have people like you quickly claim this is a "Witchhunt" to imply she doesn't deserve to be treated harshly when in fact Silverman is being ridiculed and scorned because she's a lying, sexist asshole who's clearly not sorry for her actions even after she was caught. Also, she's really not funny at all despite what you think. Her set mostly consists of shit, piss and vagina jokes and she mainly uses shock humor to get a few laughs. EDIT: It's amusing how some people always seem to gross… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/15 10:08 PM |
| 23 | Recently found out my wife was pregnant, went to the hospital for a check up, received this in the ''welcome pack''...and no, there isn't one for my wife.the advice doesn't seem gender specific. Yet it clearly says MR wrong and MR right, which is blatantly aimed only toward the male gender. It is geared specifically toward men despite the fact that women can also have any one of those negative traits. This is sending a very skewed message to the public that men are only capable of such negative behavior. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/15 10:02 AM |
| 1 | Jessica Valenti thinks no one will use Vasalgel, because *various anti-male reasons*.A letter to Jessica Valenti by Paul Elam, founder and publisher of A Voice for Men. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 01:16 AM |
| 6 | I saw this encouraging poster in the Indianapolis VA Hospital today.I just thought he was an idiot. My mistake. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/14 03:49 PM |
| 2 | I saw this encouraging poster in the Indianapolis VA Hospital today.Judging by SwaggingMyTail's comment history, I don't think so. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/14 03:18 PM |
| 0 | 23 yo female predator poses as a high schooler and rapes a 13 yo boy and the news titles it an "underage sex arrest"What pleasure do you get from being a self-important, self-righteous person by telling people how to behave? I was just stating my opinion like most people do. I'm not angry, I'm just irritated by your arrogance. Go away and preach to someone else. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/14 07:56 PM |
| 1 | 23 yo female predator poses as a high schooler and rapes a 13 yo boy and the news titles it an "underage sex arrest"What the hell do you mean where is the solution you self-righteous prick? Why do you keep insisting that I should come up with a solution? Haven't you stated an opinion before? I'm simply expressing my opinion and feelings on this topic like any other person and you keep making it about me, like it's my mess to clean up.… please, go away you're an irritating person. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/14 07:39 PM |
| 1 | 23 yo female predator poses as a high schooler and rapes a 13 yo boy and the news titles it an "underage sex arrest"What the hell are you talking about? Why would you assume I'm not thinking constructively? And how the hell is it my responsibility to prevent injustices like this when the justice system is so adamantly gender biased? I'm thinking and reacting exactly as I should to such an injustice and I don't need to pretend to be a better person like you're doing. A crime has been committed by a female pedophile who the court is being lenient with so how the hell should I not get upset when men in the same … | /r/MensRights | 26/03/14 01:56 AM |
| 1 | 23 yo female predator poses as a high schooler and rapes a 13 yo boy and the news titles it an "underage sex arrest"It's not about hating or fearing something that bothers me. It's pointing out who's responsible for a disgraceful act and not avoiding the truth of the matter. You're evading the whole point of this topic by coming up with irrelevant excuses to why people shouldn't be offended by this without acknowledging any of the facts. The woman is 23 years old, who posed as a teenager and went out looking for sex with teenagers, and the boy is 13 which makes her the adult in this situation the one solely r… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/14 08:36 PM |
| 3 | 23 yo female predator poses as a high schooler and rapes a 13 yo boy and the news titles it an "underage sex arrest"Are you being serious? The woman is 23 years old, who posed as a teenager and went out looking for sex with teenagers, and the boy is 13 which makes her the adult in this situation and the one solely responsible with the intent. If the roles were reversed and it was a man having sex with a 13 year old girl, he would be convicted with intent to have sex with a minor and to being a pedophile, He would be brought up on serious charges no questions asked. She knowingly went to the school posing as a… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/14 08:32 PM |
| 6 | 23 yo female predator poses as a high schooler and rapes a 13 yo boy and the news titles it an "underage sex arrest"Redirection to make someone offended?… oh, you mean downright manipulation by the media to blatantly call this incident "underage sex," which strongly implies it was the 13 year old boy's intent to have sex, when in fact it's actually child rape on the 23 year old woman's part. Tell me, what kind of critical conversation did you have in mind that would excuse this or convince someone to rethink being offended at this disgraceful act? | /r/MensRights | 22/03/14 02:23 PM |
| 4 | "Primary-school education is a crock, basically. It's oppressive to anyone with physical energy, especially guys," pointing to an obvious example: the way schools have cut recess. "They're making a toxic environment for boys. Primary education does everything in its power to turn boys into neuters."Teachers are the worst. No, your 8th grade teacher was the worst... Seems like your teacher had some personal vendetta against you for some weird reason… did your parents ever witness her cruelty towards you and confront her about it? Did you find out if she's still teaching or if she got fired for her unethical, unprofessional behavior? | /r/MensRights | 16/03/14 07:21 PM |
| 3 | Boy bullied at school for having a My Little Pony bag, school blames the victim and bans him from bringing the bag to school. (x-post /r/news)Exactly my point. Don't encourage assholes, don't tolerate assholes and teach the new generation not to be assholes. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/14 12:00 AM |
| 2 | Boy bullied at school for having a My Little Pony bag, school blames the victim and bans him from bringing the bag to school. (x-post /r/news)I understand bullying exists in society and that bag, for some ridiculous reason, is the main cause of the bullying. I'm not ignoring any apparent connection, I'm fully aware of it regardless of my moral sensibilities. I know it's an unjust world full of assholes who raise their kids to also be assholes. What I'm doing is expressing my strong dislike for people who enable and encourage bullying by letting bullies get away with their cruel actions. I'm not ok with that. My opinion on this issue i… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 09:00 PM |
| 4 | Boy bullied at school for having a My Little Pony bag, school blames the victim and bans him from bringing the bag to school. (x-post /r/news)The bag is not the trigger. The bully's irrational issue about the bag is the trigger, which in no way puts the blame on the boy with the bag. The hostility already exists in the bully's mind regardless of the bag. He chose to focus his hostility on the boy with the bag. This cruel kid and his parents should totally be held accountable for his behavior and he should be punished and taught by his parents to not harass kids for ANY reason. Justifying a bully's actions by saying a personal item bel… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 06:47 PM |
| 9 | Boy bullied at school for having a My Little Pony bag, school blames the victim and bans him from bringing the bag to school. (x-post /r/news)Cruel kids shouldn't bully other kids for any reason, period. It should avidly be taught in schools that all people should be treated kindly and fairly, be accepted for who they are and not be bullied and tormented for their differences. Focusing the blame on something as trivial as an effeminate bag shouldn't increase the boys risk for being bullied, In my opinion, the risk for being bullied for being different shouldn't even exist at school because we have the means to stop it. The bully is th… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 06:13 PM |
| 25 | Boy bullied at school for having a My Little Pony bag, school blames the victim and bans him from bringing the bag to school. (x-post /r/news)Because the bully is the trigger for the bullying. It's the bully's mentality that's the problem, not the bag. You're basically saying the bully wasn't responsible for his actions because the bag justified his bullying. Blaming the boy who was tormented and intimidated just for the style of his bag is absolutely ridiculous. If it wasn't the bag, that bully would've likely chose another personal item to bully him for. EDIT: The school is also at fault for being so stupid and careless for taking t… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 05:28 PM |
| 9 | Men shouldn't get cosmetic surgery because of how it might affect their wives. Article headline: "Would you let your husband have plastic surgery?"You completely missed the point. This article is aimed at married women and their "entitled" choice to have the final say in their husbands lives just so they can ease their own insecurities. It's not at all concerned with granting an equal choice in the matter for men. Nowhere did it state that women also have to get their husbands consent to get plastic surgery because nowadays women don't really think they need the consent of their husbands when it comes to most things. In this society men ha… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/14 06:01 PM |
| 10 | Tumblr Delivers Pt. 2Rational and considerate people who understand that everyone, regardless of sex or gender, should be treated equally and fairly. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/14 07:49 AM |
| 17 | This made me really sad.Your results are still mainly referring to abused women with abusive male partners instead of men who are abused by women. Your results and OP's aren't really different. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/14 05:15 PM |
| 1 | Women complain that men are failing to protect them from violent crimes.You're right, it's better if men just put their lives on the line for random women anytime they're attacked by a violent mugger because woman are too oversensitive and irrational to take care of themselves. /s | /r/MensRights | 20/02/14 05:41 PM |
| 5 | Women complain that men are failing to protect them from violent crimes.I suggest if these women are so concerned about being attacked, they should take some responsibility for themselves and sign up for martial arts classes or carry a small firearm, pepper spray or a tazer. It's not the responsibility of some random innocent guy to get in between a dangerous purse thief to protect some woman's belongings. If they really expect any man to just put their life on the line for them then they are seriously crazy. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/14 10:28 PM |
| 0 | Man sentenced to 13 years, eight months for slipping his girlfriend an abortion pillSo you're saying he has no say whatsoever about having the baby and he just has to "man up" to the responsibility against his will? And giving someone an abortion pill is much worse than dumping 3 newborn babies in a dumpster, killing 2 in the worst possible way? Gotcha. You make a lot of sense... Take care. | /r/MensRights | 01/02/14 01:23 AM |
| 2 | "Average woman will have lost $431,000 over her working lifetime because of the earnings gap"A few people made a couple of jokes and you're seriously complaining about it? Not all MRA's make bitter jokes, they actually care about real equality and want to make a difference. You stating MRA's as a whole are not being taken seriously based on a few people people who want to take a jab at how ridiculous radical feminism is is really not fair and not reasonable. EDIT: Feminism is filled with pretentious and proudly sexist people who falsely justify degrading and spitefully ridiculing all me… | /r/MensRights | 01/02/14 12:41 AM |
| 3 | "Average woman will have lost $431,000 over her working lifetime because of the earnings gap"You're right because Feminism is much better at not making hateful, bitter jokes towards men. So MRA's have to shut up or we won't be taken remotely serious. right? | /r/MensRights | 01/02/14 12:06 AM |
| 1 | Man sentenced to 13 years, eight months for slipping his girlfriend an abortion pillYour'e saying the judicial system is unfair yet he still got what he deserved? Are you kidding me? He got almost 14 years for aborting a fetus, an unborn child that hasn't experienced life out of the womb. This woman blatantly tried to kill all of her newborn babies by dumping them in the garbage, 2 died and all she got was 18 months. Really think about that before you stick to your opinion. EDIT: In this man's case, he shouldn't have gotten any prison time. He slipped her the abortion pill beca… | /r/MensRights | 31/01/14 06:17 PM |
| 1 | Man sentenced to 13 years, eight months for slipping his girlfriend an abortion pillThis woman dumped her 3 babies in a dumpster, 2 of them died and she only got 18 months, I repeat, 18 months... so you were saying? | /r/MensRights | 31/01/14 07:58 AM |
| -1 | Man sentenced to 13 years, eight months for slipping his girlfriend an abortion pillIn your opinion, is being sent to prison for almost 14 years a reasonable sentence for what he did? | /r/MensRights | 28/01/14 06:27 PM |
| -3 | Man sentenced to 13 years, eight months for slipping his girlfriend an abortion pillYou're right, I personally agree with what he did. I think that's also his right to decide if he wants to keep the baby or not instead of being forced by his girlfriend to support the child against his will. EDIT: The point I was making in my previous comment was that if someone didn't agree with what he did, he still shouldn't be sentenced to prison for almost 14 years for that. That's just absurd. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/14 06:18 PM |
| 1 | Man sentenced to 13 years, eight months for slipping his girlfriend an abortion pillYou completely missed the point. Calm down and try to actually understand. No one is asking you to agree with what he did but he definitely shouldn't get 13 years & 8 months for slipping his girlfriend an abortion pill. EDIT: The sentence is unreasonable and ridiculous wether you agree with what he did or not. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/14 06:03 PM |
| 1 | Part of an article in my school newspaper.I know it's hate speech. That's stating the obvious, I mentioned that this is misandry in my first comment. Also, I didn't post this so you should tell OP instead. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/14 11:27 PM |
| 10 | Part of an article in my school newspaper.Report this blatantly sexist bullshit immediately. This article is clearly promoting misandry and is apparently written by a complete idiot. This shouldn't be tolerated even for a moment. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/14 09:27 AM |
| 20 | Brutally murdered a 5 year old boy and attempted to murder a 9 year old boy and is labelled a "grieving" mother. A father would've been jailed for life.That shouldn't be a question, it should be a statement. | /r/MensRights | 05/01/14 09:35 AM |
| -1 | This is not funny.I see you like to use red herrings and totally make up a groundless argument based on your false assumptions. Casually brushing off the obvious sexism towards men in the media as if it's hardly a big deal isn't going to prove your argument. You're also twisting my words. I never said it's some taboo conspiracy in Hollywood among producers to make sexist movies. What I'm saying is that its an accepted social norm and blatantly sexist to harm men for whatever reason a woman sees fit in the media. … | /r/MensRights | 22/12/13 08:06 PM |
| -2 | This is not funny.No, it's not "just a movie" and it kind of irritates me how you're stating that so nonchalantly. If you think this movie won't have any negative impact on most of it's female audience then you're just being ignorant. All movies have a some influence on our society and which social norms are accepted. This movie only tell it's female audience that it's perfectly ok to attack and kill men if they do anything trivial that they might find upsetting or emotionally threatening in any way. Especially w… | /r/MensRights | 22/12/13 07:19 PM |
| 2 | This is not funny.It's still a movie. if the roles were reversed in the film and it was a bunch of men scheming revenge on a cheating woman, how do you think the majority of women would react? What would happen is an army of raging Feminazis would adamantly protest and bash the movie for how blatantly sexist it is in a split second. Because it's a guy who gets attacked by vindictive women in a supposed "comedy" (who apparently deserves the abuse coming to him because of his gender), you're basically saying men do… | /r/MensRights | 22/12/13 11:28 AM |
| 4 | Radical feminists steal $2,000 worth of calendarsWhat you just stated is the definition of being stupid.. blindly following other destructive, irrational, hateful idiots to ruin lives in the name of their "righteous" bullshit, hypocritical, sexism-promoting cause. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/13 06:44 PM |
| 14 | European Human Rights report says Israel killing Palestinians is bad 'because it creates widows, who then struggle' - no mention of the men, who are dead.It isn't digitally altered, she's just not attractive. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/13 09:38 PM |
| 1 | Because men don't have feelings right?And.. you know.. besides that, this FB post mainly makes the point that men seem like they shouldn't have strong feelings at all or they're perceived as less of a man. Women can have all the freedom to express their emotions while men have to hide and suppress their emotions for the fear of major intolerance and ridicule from people. I think that's an even more ridiculous cultural norm. I'd rather have people perceive me as a pitiful wreck and have the freedom to show my emotions rather than be … | /r/MensRights | 06/12/13 07:21 PM |
| 29 | At least one female gamer gets it....In my opinion, This is one generalization which is actually true in some cases, like this one. I think most women tend to be significantly more insecure about their body and how attractive they seem to others than men are. This strong insecurity translates to being irrationally upset, even offended, over a video game character that's beautiful, strong and fit. EDIT: It's like a constant blow to their self esteem that they're not nearly as "perfect" as they want to be but they don't realize they'… | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 09:10 PM |
| 1 | Disabled man beaten and burned alive by vigilantes after wrongly suspected of being a paedophile for taking photos of boys vandalising his gardenI'm not talking about legal do's and don'ts here. I'm addressing the fact that these people took the law into their own hands by blatantly attacking and killing a person, without any evidence, because their sole reason to do so was hate due to their ignorance. These people didn't even stop to think for a second to find out if this man was actually guilty of his alleged crime. You can speculate all you want by citing other legal factors but the reality of it is that their strong hate drove them t… | /r/MensRights | 01/11/13 08:46 PM |
| 0 | Disabled man beaten and burned alive by vigilantes after wrongly suspected of being a paedophile for taking photos of boys vandalising his gardenHate crimes exists wether you believe they do or not. Hate crimes are crimes committed against someone out of hate for their racial group, religion, sexual orientation or ethnicity. This is a clear example of that. Someone pointing out that this is obviously a hate crime is not the same as "hating the 'haters'" as you ridiculously believe. I feel pity for those who hate and harm others for their differences. Typing 4 paragraphs full of fallacies to try and prove why hate crimes don't exist doesn… | /r/MensRights | 01/11/13 04:55 PM |
| 7 | Disabled man beaten and burned alive by vigilantes after wrongly suspected of being a paedophile for taking photos of boys vandalising his gardenNeighbours accused Bijan Ebrahimi, 44, of being a pervert when he was seen taking photos of youths vandalising his hanging baskets. This is definitely a racial hate crime. I'm sure it wasn't just because he was accused of being a pedophile, he was clearly a middle eastern man and it's known that most British people generally don't like foreigners. In my opinion, him being a different ethnicity had a big influence in their decision to attack and kill him. If the victim was British, he would've ma… | /r/MensRights | 01/11/13 02:44 PM |
| 6 | Jets fan defends himself from attacking women. Video posted as "Jets Fan Punches Woman in the Face"Now I understand. Didn't know it was a quote, sorry. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/13 06:25 PM |
| 59 | Jets fan defends himself from attacking women. Video posted as "Jets Fan Punches Woman in the Face"She didn't "act like a man," she acted like a complete moron who thought she'd get away with hitting someone because she's a woman. EDIT: Not all men hit people when they get angry and violence is not exclusively a male characteristic. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/13 06:09 PM |
| 17 | Suck it up and payWhat do you think is the reasonable question? No one said anything about forcing a woman to have an abortion, even the post clearly explained it. Women can choose to bring another partner to raise the child with them without the biological father's consent, women can choose to keep the baby even if the baby is not in the best interest of both people, women can give the child to the state if she decides she doesn't want the child. Men by law can't do any of these things. Men are forced by law to … | /r/MensRights | 19/09/13 07:10 PM |
| 7 | Humor BreakAre we supposed to walk on egg shells because some people are humorless, blatantly sexist, hypocritical idiots that constantly make it clear that they resent men for no rational reason? People like that are always going to complain about something this ridiculous by using this comic strip as an actual excuse to get steadfastly offended by Men's rights. These idiots already have that hair trigger ignorant mindset ready to hate Men's rights at any moment. It's an inevitable reaction that is pointl… | /r/MensRights | 22/07/13 09:49 AM |
| 4 | 6 women use sticks and knives to force man to have sex with all of them. He dies in the process. "Some call it rape."This preferential treatment of women has been going on for far too long... I'm just so sick of this bias bullshit... | /r/MensRights | 05/06/13 10:51 PM |
| 1 | Is the word "female" really a derogatory gender slur?You're right, it is a choice to be offended at silly words. There are no evasive implications behind the word other than your negative perception of it. The word itself doesn't have a negative connotation unless you're ridiculously PC about every single word you hear. Being offended that easily over a word, which basically means feminine, clearly shows someone's level of intelligence. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/13 09:09 PM |
| 1 | I thought you all might appreciate this.Reminds me of the scene in 'Role Models' where Paul Rudd gets into a debate with the barista about calling a large coffee a venti. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/13 06:43 PM |
| 1 | Is the word "female" really a derogatory gender slur?It's hardly a rude term in my opinion and it's nothing to get offended over unless you take yourself too seriously, which would be silly. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/13 09:09 PM |
| 14 | Is the word "female" really a derogatory gender slur?No it isn't unless the person you're talking to is extremely politically correct and/or bat shit crazy. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/13 02:27 PM |
| 1 | Cold Hard TruthI'm not talking about being mocked for being promiscuous, That has nothing to do with the issue I'm talking about. Being called offensive names by people for a sexual act and having your life potentially ruined by a woman simply because your a man is completely different. The consequences for men are significantly higher when they're wrongfully accused of a serious crime by a woman. If a vindictive woman accuses an innocent man of rape or any type of abuse, who do you think the authorities and t… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/13 01:55 AM |
| 2 | Cold Hard TruthAre you that fucking oblivious? "Who gives a fuck" is not a point and it doesn't make the facts any less relevant. You not giving a fuck about an important issue doesn't mean no one else does. The point is men in general get accused of being complete scumbags. This message is stating women can be just as bad if not worse because society tolerates, even encourages, bad behavior in women without any severe consequences. You should "give a fuck" because it does affect everyone, regardless of what y… | /r/MensRights | 12/04/13 10:19 PM |
| -2 | Cold Hard TruthOk, what you said isn't thoughtless. Thank you for making me realize men and women are in fact different in every way. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/13 07:41 PM |
| -1 | Cold Hard TruthYou're hilarious. Clearly men and women do have their PHYSICAL differences. It's obvious that men are physically not equal to women in general. Any reasonable person can tell you that. Equality is not something you just base on the physicality of a specific gender. Equality means that everyone, men and women, have the right to live according to their own means and to be treated like human beings, regardless of something so trivial as gender. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/13 06:56 PM |
| -9 | Cold Hard TruthSo... let me get this straight. You want humans (male and female) to be equal but you don't believe men and women are equal? That's a completely thoughtless and hypocritical statement. I don't know how anyone upvoted you. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/13 06:19 PM |
| 4 | Cold Hard TruthIf you think that then you've completely missed the point. Men in general are always the ones who are accused of being sexist, perverts, assholes, deadbeats and idiots. It wouldn't make any sense to say "all people can behave badly" The point of this message is specifically an issue of how the false stereotypical behavior of men has been accepted as truth in our society and used as leverage against men, mostly by women, and less about simply saying "people shouldn't behave badly. The actual poin… | /r/MensRights | 12/04/13 06:05 PM |
| 2 | r/feminism banned me for a post I made in r/mensrights mocking the idea that feminists are open to discussion/debate.Making it a rule doesn't make it any less absurd. Banning someone for stating their opinion is hypocritical and childish. Feminists come state their biased bitter opinions on r/Mensrights and I've yet to see anyone one of them get banned. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 01:02 AM |
| 1 | r/feminism banned me for a post I made in r/mensrights mocking the idea that feminists are open to discussion/debate.So feminists can talk all the shit they want about men in general but soon as someone states their opinion on the irrationalities of feminism, they get immediately banned for being "offensive"? You call that reasonable? Please, get off your high horse | /r/MensRights | 02/04/13 11:16 PM |
| 7 | r/feminism banned me for a post I made in r/mensrights mocking the idea that feminists are open to discussion/debate.Are you actually being serious? | /r/MensRights | 02/04/13 11:06 PM |
| 0 | Facebook argument... I can't fault his reasoning.You're raging spitefulness toward men and your generalization of them is fucking laughable... FYI, women are just as capable of committing assault on men but the law is biased against men who claim abuse from their spouse because women are virtually always seen as the victim in any scenario. You're spewing complete bullshit and you're well aware of it. Self defense is self defense, if a woman is intentionally trying to harm a man for no good reason, then he has ever right to harm her back. And y… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 11:31 PM |
| 8 | Facebook argument... I can't fault his reasoning.Seems like you're too oblivious to comprehend the reason as to why people are downvoting you so I'll break it down: A bigoted feminist that says men are everything that's wrong with the world is just as bad as a male chauvinist who violently takes advantage of innocent women. You are wrong, You have no evidence to back up your bogus claim. IF a woman, or anyone else for that matter, tries to hit or fatally harm me in any way, then they will get knocked the fuck out. That was the whole fucking po… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 09:38 AM |
| 3 | Shaming tactics 101! Men who stare!!Fuck everything about this. It's basically an apology to ignorant feminists for having male instincts. It's demonizing men to please bigoted delusional supporters of feminism. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 09:46 AM |
| 3 | This is ridiculous.May? No, she DEFINITELY needs to calm the fuck down with her PC feminist bullshit. | /r/MensRights | 26/02/13 12:05 AM |
| 1 | Here you go.Where is your rabid opposition coming from? You're disagreeing with me on the grounds that you think words just appear out of thin air? Your argument is without basis, your pretentiousness attitude is ridiculous and it shows the demeanor of an unintelligent person. As far as who comes up with the definition, ultimately we do. It's clearly obvious that the people determine how we define the words we use but some of those definitions become modified to serve a biased purpose, which negatively affe… | /r/MensRights | 12/02/13 08:19 PM |
| 1 | Here you go.Mixed up? I don't think so. Yes, by "society" I clearly meant the speakers of the language. If the people of that society didn't speak the language then it wouldn't make much sense for them to try and change or misuse any of the words... I didn't once mention or imply a higher power determined how a word should be used, I don't know where you got that from. Words do have an correct definition (the original definition by which the word was intended to be used) Sometimes society, or "the speakers … | /r/MensRights | 12/02/13 01:23 AM |
| 2 | Sexism masquerading as wisdom?I understand that. My father taught me the same basic things too but I wasn't talking about just gold diggers, you missed my point... What I specifically stated was that abusive behavior toward men by women (both physically and psychologically) hasn't been firmly brought to public attention and is generally perceived as a laughing matter by society. It's not at all acknowledged as a serious issue in sociological discussions or that it even exists. It's this stupid irrational mindset that is nega… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/13 05:30 PM |
| 7 | Sexism masquerading as wisdom?Oh really? Then why don't we ever see bullshit sexist messages like this that tell parents to teach their sons to screen potentially destructive women? Because society doesn't believe women are a danger to men. That's why. If it's truly a double standard like you claim it is, then why all this sexist propaganda aimed at protecting women from men? This is the kind of unjustifiable, biased hypocrisy that drastically distorts the image of women into a gender that's always the victim in every situat… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/13 04:16 PM |
| 2 | Here you go.'To really know words is to become adept at their use.' Unfortunately, I think today's society isn't very adept at how to use those words correctly. The definition of a word is dictated by how it's used and misused over a certain period of time. People need to preserve the integrity of a language while still being flexible when it comes to unbiased change to it's vocabulary. A definition of a word is ultimately determined over time by the context it's used in today's society, which is a double e… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/13 03:08 PM |
| 3 | Here you go.'They play catch-up with the changing way words are used.' The definition of a word can change with the times depending on what context it's used in and whom it's used by for a certain period of time until the meaning of the word changes; that in itself is a double edged sword. So in reality, a definition of a word is dictated by whomever in society it's used by the most, which leaves any word open to biased interpretation and a eventually a biased definition. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/13 02:32 PM |
| 20 | Here you go.Which is very unfortunate.. society thinks words ought to be used by how they're defined but most definitions are a reflection of society's hypocritically biased nature. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/13 04:05 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter