TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dante1141 Archive

View 1 post and 11 comments by Dante1141 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
44

Legal RightsDante1141/r/MensRights14/04/23 07:36 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

I mean, you could also be that when you're forced to interact with a particular demographic, you tend to become more sympathetic to them.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 03:28 PM
120

So men must be a negligible percentage of the homeless population, right?
/r/MensRights24/05/23 09:42 PM
5

Ah, that's a good point. If the mother doesn't actually have that choice, then it would seem that consent to sex really is consent to parenthood for both men and women... not that this is a good thing, but at least it's consistent.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 11:44 AM
11

Insofar as it takes two to tango, I can see the merit here, but that reasoning completely falls apart when it comes to child support for born children, who only the mother can choose to create (carrying a pregnancy to term). If we had legal paternal surrender written into law, then this bill would make sense: only holding men responsible for their own actions.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 03:25 AM
9

When you put it that way... good point. Guess it's kind of a no-win here.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 01:35 AM
15

The victim's family is going to try and get custody? That's... interesting.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 10:07 PM
2

That's a good point, although in most cases, they both caused the pregnancy. So, how about we hold the man liable for half the cost of either the live birth or the abortion? This way, he is being held responsible for the pregnancy he chose to create, but not for the fully-developed child whose existence he cannot choose to create. That seems fair, right?
/r/MensRights08/05/23 12:59 PM
26

Basically, yes: if a woman chooses to turn a fetus into a baby that needs resources for 18+ years, then she shouldn't expect the father to finance her choice. "If a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term, and the biological father does not, and cannot, share in this decision, he should not be liable for 21 years of support... autonomous women making independent decisions about their lives should not expect men to finance their choice." - Karen DeCrow, former president of th…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 11:50 PM
11

So basically, men are sexist jerks for daring to be unattractive to women. Yikes.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 04:15 PM
20

I don't think this is a particularly egregious example of men being left out: the context of where and when this bill is being proposed makes it fairly clear that it's those specific groups of people who are being targeted. Is it technically editorializing? Yes. Is it inaccurate? I don't think so.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 01:34 AM
4

I mean, gay vs straight? I think your issue is that "cis" is often used in a derogatory context in addition to it being relatively new to common parlance.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 07:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter