TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DaphneGrace1793 Archive

View 0 posts and 144 comments by DaphneGrace1793 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Don't try to persuade these people, they don't listen...
/r/MensRights20/08/25 11:30 PM
1

They were not drafted into combat roles.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 11:30 PM
1

Most of those women are doing it out of poverty, they're not OF wealthy women. What a horrible attitude.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 11:28 PM
1

No one should be pressured into marriage, male or female.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 11:27 PM
1

If Russia respects women so much, why is DV against them so bad there?
/r/MensRights20/08/25 11:26 PM
1

My mother took out the bins every night since my dad walked out when I was tiny. If a woman says she can't do it, mostly that's untrue.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 11:24 PM
1

This article, which I already linked, shows a 50% increase over the past decade, it wasn't just a pandemic thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 09:42 AM
1

You claim that women call themselves lesbian but still date men like Jojo, labels don't dictate their actions. Buy clearly many down-low men call themselves straight (even to hookups) but still have sex w men, (hence the use of MSM in health campaigns to stop monkeypox spreading) so labels clearly often don't dictate men's actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 03:40 PM
1

First things first- are you implying that men knowingly have gay affairs, while women don't know what they're doing when they have them? Sounds implausible.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 01:16 PM
1

But the adoption rate rose by 50% in 2023 in queer couples, as I showed by the article I linked. You claimed the adoption rate for them had not risen, which is demonstrably incorrect. And while most aren't raising children, your comment disregarded the many who are, dismissing them in a blanket statement as 'not growing or building anything'.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 12:15 PM
1

You clearly have some severe comprehension difficulties 🤣 It doesn't matter how women like Jojo 'justify their choice' or define themselves. Words have meanings, & they're not lesbian bc they are also attracted to men, they are bi. Just as 'straight' married men on Grindr are not straight, by definition, whatever they call themselves. Jojo may have felt pressured to define herself as lesbian & have relationships only w women. But a lesbian is not defined as a woman who only has relationships w w…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 12:05 PM
1

So you believe that women of whatever sexuality can't be happy unless their partner has a respected social status?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 12:03 PM
1

I'll address these points one by one. For one, if men don't mess around with their sexual identity, how do you account for the huge number of 'straight' and bicurious married men who mess around on Grindr, putting their wives' health & marriages at risk?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 11:58 AM
1

How fascinating..... .you believe that lesbians (or bi women, who you appear unable to differentiate from lesbians) can't be together solely or even partly bc of their mutual love for each other as women . It must be bc of disappointing experiences w men. Even though, by definition, a woman who turned to women after disappointment w men would be bi, as lesbians are women who are not and have never been attracted to men, only to women. Presumably you believe that men can be together solely bc of …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 11:14 PM
1

How exactly do you believe that 2 men or 2 women can't grow & learn together as a couple? I anticipate you'll argue that lesbian couples can't resolve conflict & divorce, & gay men can't remain faithful so open up relationships at a high rate (statistically true at 50-65%). Any other things you'd argue are signs of 'lack of growth and learning' due to absence of other sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 08:51 PM
1

Sure, gay couples are 'non-existent' when it comes to child-rearing'. 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 08:49 PM
1

I'll address your points one by one. For one, first you say they have the same hobbies & are too similar, then you argue butch/femme lesbians are too different to be compatible. These 2 arguments are contradictory, you can't assert both : which is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 08:43 PM
1

A lot of lesbians I know have negative views on men bc they have been harassed or assaulted after rejecting them due to their orientation. There are popular porn subs here like dykebreaking & dykeconversion where men fantasise about 'converting' lesbians via violent rape . Lesbians are statistically more likely to be raped as adults. Lesbian dating apps are clogged with unicorn hunters (bisexual women who pretend they want to date a woman but actually want to lure lesbians into a theeesome witho…
/r/MensRights22/07/25 06:32 PM
1

Have nothing to grow- you mean kids? But increasingly lesbian couples are having kids. Plenty of lesbian couples do have different hobbies : it's unlikely butch/femme couples would have identical hobbies, certainly. Besides, gay male couples are less likely to have kids, and they stay together the most. If nothing to grow is the issue, why is that different for gay male couples? Are you essentially saying that men have to scare their wives or their wives will get violent? What a depressing way t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 01:13 PM
–

So in the lesbian couples you've seen, one partner does most of the housework? You must have met some less usual ones, bc that's not the broad norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 01:10 PM
1

Yes, I mean in how many situations would a man actually need to defend his wife's life and his own? Not that it's not an important ability to have, you never know what could happen. Personally if I had a husband and we were attacked, I'd expect him to fight but I would hopefully have my gun on me & be able to fell the attacker.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 05:14 PM
4

What's your evidence Chopin denied his Polish origins mostly? That is incorrect. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=http://chopinwithcherries.blogspot.com/2014/04/chopin-and-polish-race-national.html%23:~:text%3DEven%2520the%2520second%2520half%2520of,Poland....%27%25E2%2580%259D&ved=2ahUKEwiJj7OHuc6OAxUUV0EAHahpAxgQzsoNegQIChAa&usg=AOvVaw0XRHzrrAaa_gvRbTz6sCvb https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.p…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 05:12 PM
1

Would you also write off Brahms bc he stayed single through his life? And Beethoven for the same reason? How about the poet John Keats? V similar life to Chopin, renowned today. Elvis & Tupac are highly regarded in their fields. It's weird to write them off like that. If you're so highly regarded in your field, do you expect to have reached Chopin's level of fame & acclaim at 39 then?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 05:08 PM
1

George Sand was famous for her MALE lovers, actually... And Chopin is v highly thought of. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fr%C3%A9d%C3%A9ric_Chopin
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 05:04 PM
3

If that were true we'd have no men in classical music, fortunately they're not all as stupid as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 05:03 PM
2

I accept the data isn't relevant for now as opposed to 2002, I should've made that clearer.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 04:08 PM
1

You could equally ask whether podcasters/Reddotirs etc who claim it showd lesbians are the most violent should keep citing it, given it's 23 years old. The data does need to be compared w more recent figures, definitely. I agree that 2002 data isn't reliable for now, for any group. So much has changed. I was simply critiquing the misinterpretations of the 2002 study on lesbians, which is the one people normally cite.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 03:08 PM
1

We're talking about the 2002 CDC DV data. At least, that is the study that's normally cited.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 01:12 AM
1

Reexamining the study showed the lesbian rates WERE comparable when relationships w men were excluded. Het women's stats were overwhelmingly from men. Bi women have the worst, w over 85% being from men. And 'it's not 2002 anymore- obvs not, but as you know, the CDC data being cited IS.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 12:45 AM
1

There are fem4fem guys actually. And actually in lesbian couples it's often the femme who has to be protective as the butch faces more prejudice. Some butches are protective but the dynamics are complex & don / fall into defined gender roles the way you imply
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 11:01 PM
1

It's not about not knowing they're attracted to women. Some lesbians have internalised homophobia & hope they can change their sexuality to at least bisexual. Esl as the idea was pushed a lot over the last 20 years that female sexuality is v fluid & that lesbianism is barely ever real, only bisexuality. lot of these relationships occurred during high school or college when people are still figuring themselves out & attraction can shift.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 10:08 PM
1

Lesbians are shown to divide chores more equally. Also few lesbians are housewives, where are you getting that from? Lesbians are less likely to have kids & more likely to have high level jobs, in fact, so they are more likely to earn higher wages. Bc the dating pool is small so they can't rely on a breadwinner. Your info is pretty inaccurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 09:09 PM
1

Yes, I agree, it's probs not a huge advantage...but what I do think is that it's one of the positions women can be competent in, so a good slot for them in the army. Articles on Ukraine & Israel that I read agreed that these were better positions for women. If a woman's brave & tough enough she should def be able to serve, it's just a question of the most pragmatic positions for that.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 07:33 PM
1

Agreed, sorry, I was just checking...I've seen some of your comments on here & you always seem v sensible & measured. I've seen a lot of that kind of stuff in various subs recently, I shouldn't have let it make me oversuspicious!
/r/MensRights11/07/25 07:25 PM
1

Agreed, jokes about poisoning are always horrible. We shouldn't have to say that! So many weirdos on TikTok tho, I wouldn't be bothered by it.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 12:44 AM
1

Is it betrayal for a Ukranian man to marry a foreign woman? Do Ukranian men own Ukranian women? Ibvs cheating is a different issue, vile...
/r/MensRights10/07/25 04:51 PM
1

I believe in a gender neutral draft unless there is no one to care for kids.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 04:48 PM
1

So in your view are men Supreme in every category of biological strength?
/r/MensRights10/07/25 04:47 PM
2

Yep, women are often good snipers or similar. I've read aboit Ukranian women who are doing that.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 04:46 PM
1

And they say this sub isn't misogynistic- look at your lovely username...
/r/MensRights10/07/25 03:56 PM
2

Ukranian culture is v trad. It's ingrained in these women that they need a man, any man. Many are nit like that, but it's awful for the husbands who are.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 03:53 PM
1

'These creatures' -charming. As if you think women aren't human... Many men abandon ill partners, shittiness is a human thing, not a female thing.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 03:48 PM
1

Some Ukranian women are fighting, helping the war effort or staying loyal. Yulia Mykytenko, Olesia Vorotnyk, Evgenia Emerald, Natalie Hrabarchuk are examples of women who've been fighting. Vorotnyk was a ballerina, Hrabarchuk a teacher, Mykytenko joined partly bc her husband was killed. Emerald has married a comrade in arms. But yes, unluckily many women are behaving v badly.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 03:46 PM
1

Exactly!
/r/MensRights10/07/25 03:43 PM
1

I agree the conscription is vile. I don't get the vitriol for single women getting new bfs as refugees. Families are not being forced to leave. But yes, either women should be made to fight (if they have no kids to mind) or no one should be. No one should be made to fight imo
/r/MensRights10/07/25 03:41 PM
0

The TikTok thing was a joke, surely? A vile one, but not seriously meant.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 01:17 PM
3

Yes, I def agree about sexuality being dimorphic. That's good you didn't mean Onlyfans for men would be a positive. Lack of that kind of sexualisation for men IS a good thing....I'm a feminist but I don't support misandry. Neither do I think it's a good idea if either gender tries to pursue equality by emulating the worst behaviour of the opposite gender.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 03:42 AM
3

Why is this so terrible tho? Bc it closes off one avenue for men to make money easily? I don't think that's a healthy way for anyone to make money. It's a sign of moral degeneration that Lily, Bonnie & their clients exist, not something to be emulated. Self respect & morality are worth more than earning a lot of money.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 03:31 AM
1

More progressive- it's just that some much dating advice seems to give this advice for men in general... However, I suppose the best thing to do is to try practical experience, since I'm frankly sceptical of a lot of dating advice given out now..
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 01:05 PM
4

As a woman, I agree! Yet I also see a lot of men saying they don't like women to take the lead, it makes them feel emasculated. I would love to do the asking out, but will many men respond well?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 08:21 PM
1

Well I think fictional characters & deities are a bit different. When I said that I was mainly thinking about celebrities. OK, I suppose parasocial relationships can be alright if they're kept at a controlled level. But I don't think it's fundamentally healthy to put a lot of energy into a relationship w someone who doesn't actually know or care about you, just wants you to pay them for the entertainment they provide. Parasocial relationships can be harmful for the celebrity too ofc. An extreme …
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/25 09:24 AM
-1

It makes sense in the context of a little look at your Reddit profile to get a bit of knowledge of your views. 😊 As you know very well.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/25 11:09 PM
1

Come on, you understand exactly why I made it and what I mean by it.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/25 10:51 PM
1

One woman dating one man doesn't say anything about either gender in general. Personally, I think both genders are equally terrible.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/25 10:49 PM
1

You mean what I said has nothing to do w your comment?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/25 10:46 PM
1

Where have you seen this?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/25 10:43 PM
1

Porn standards have caused a lot of hetero men to harass & humiliate lesbians. That'a no 'liberation'. Gay men don't need that from women.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/25 10:42 PM
1

Bi women statistically do report a sexual preference for men in studies I've seen. I'm bi myself, and 50-50, but this seems a bit rarer. Over 80% of bi women ate shown to end up men, though this could also be bc of there being few wlw overall, easier to meet guys etc as well as preference. The issue is that lesbians have a v particular experience in that they are 1% of the population & a lot of female social stuff & media etc is geared around straight romance, obviously. So it can be v isolating…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/25 10:39 PM
-1

Yes. I believe in the equal value and worth of men & women, and their entitlement to equal rights. I don't support misandry. Neither do I support abuse & sadism, whatever the genders of the perpetrator and victim.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/25 10:32 PM
-1

It's a good thing that sexuality is policed when some people take pleasure in dehumanising people out of sadism, (including some areas of BDSM like total power exchange intended to break people) . These should be condemned whatever gender or sexuality the sadistic person is.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/25 10:16 PM
2

Parasocial relationships are always unhealthy. Contextually, it's important to remember that lesbians growing up now, while they had growing media rep, were unlikely to know role models in real life who were lesbian (who are only 1% of the population) so makes sense they would be happy to see a celeb figure. Ditto in adulthood, as lesbian bars etc are scarce & it can be hard to meet others, depending on the area. So if it's difficult to see people like you irl, it's understandable to be happy wh…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/25 10:12 PM
2

Yes I am not a SAHM type myself but support thise who are. Why does it have to mean submissiveness and being led? It can also just mean shared power. I guess that's why I'll never be a RPW...🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 07:42 PM
1

True! It also feels weird that so many posters are saying Ukranian women who have moved abroad shouldn't date. Ukraine is in a horrible situation, I expect many want to settle permanently. Even if they don't, how would them not dating help anyone? Yes, you can argue it's cowardly to run and then date while men are dying for women and their country. But how would living a celibate life do the war effort any good? It's as if people see Ukranian women as being owned by Ukranian men, and that the me…
/r/MensRights09/06/25 03:58 PM
1

Nobody should be conscripted. It is barbaric.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 07:29 PM
2

Sensible opinion here for once.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 07:29 PM
1

A lot of wives have left but the husbands are compelled to stay. It's not just about protecting Civilians, it's about preserving the sovereignty of the country. Some men do want to fight, and it may not be a losing war. I agree tho that conscription is barbaric.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 07:27 PM
1

What do want to happen to them? Femmes tondues, like after WW2 in France? The Ukranian army is largely against conscripting women. Do you expect them to insist on being recruited into the army? What if the army won't take them? I agree it is disgusting the men were conscripted but two wrongs don't make a right. No one should be forced to stay in a war zone. I think people should try & stay to do something but no one should be forced by the government to risk their lives.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 07:25 PM
1

A lot of women left bc they have a husband and kids to care for. I don't believe anyone should be conscripted.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 07:21 PM
1

Vincent's case isn't simply a case of kool-aid. It's the difference between what many lesbians and what many hetero women want, too. Women who date women generally want feminine personal characteristics like emotional connectivity, regardless of whether the woman they're dating dresses in a masculine way or has masculine hobbies etc But women who date men generally want a masculine personality, so that explains the mismatch partly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 02:02 PM
–

I'm on a forum w mainly older female users and anyone who wants to circumcise their poor son gets jumped on sharpish.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 10:19 PM
–

The genitalia stuff is all horrible. I completely agree! But the driving thing : men are more likely to cause accidents. I don't view driving insurance as an essential the way health insurance is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 09:41 PM
2

I have a lot of sympathy for men who feel sexually pressured. No one should be pushed to engage in sex they really don't want.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 05:07 AM
1

Exactly. Women who want a dick will go & date someone w one, to be blunt. Yes, traumatised/fed up bi women do sometimes try & use butch lesbians as a man substitute, but generally they gets short shrift for that kind of behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 05:05 AM
1

The second link says it's been equal until recently, though mothers a bit increasing.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 02:44 PM
1

I'm sorry you guys are in this weird situation. Don't often date men but if I did I would def put in far share of effort for dates. This seems like the Disney spoilt princess generation- not what I as a feminist believe in. Don't settle for someone who treats you badly- no one should do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 07:43 PM
1

They may be happy, but in that case it's v unfair to their husbands to fake happiness & then swipe assets. They can't have been honest if their feelings are swept away by social media. Their husbands should not be blamed if decent, it id their fault!
/r/Divorce_Men06/04/25 02:24 PM
1

I see, I understand. The article I posted was about low conviction rates, arguing they should be higher. I didn't know there were allegations about fake info & Reuters. Thank you, I'll investigate further.
/r/MensRights02/04/25 11:12 AM
1

Hmmm.. I am not convinced that the problem is small. Point taken tho that it's not one of the highest. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.reuters.com/world/india/indias-struggles-with-high-rape-cases-low-conviction-rates-2024-08-15/&ved=2ahUKEwj_kvOjnLiMAxXBTEEAHenfF2kQFnoECB8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw3qC43XC12RhIW29p0E66DI
/r/MensRights02/04/25 01:44 AM
2

Hmm...interesting points. Is the Indian government v misogynist? I know India has a huge sexual assault problem, but I thought the government was trying to appear to promote women's status and employment? Whether they will actually do so is another matter. There's some interesting articles about how the BJP are relying on women's votes & encouraging women to run for office by framing it as a social service, not politics. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/04/how-the-bjp-wins-over-women?…
/r/MensRights01/04/25 09:18 PM
3

Alternatively, one could ask if the War in Ukraine could have been averted. There is probably more to it than the official narrative, and while I certainly believe Putin's invasion was totally immoral, I think this article is a more realistic summation of what course of action should be taken. https://braveneweurope.com/robert-skidelsky-were-not-helping-ukraine-by-continuing-to-support-a-war-it-cannot-win The War has been going on several more years than it was projected to. Huge numbers of live…
/r/MensRights01/04/25 08:53 PM
6

The draft situation is horrible for men, I'm really sorry as a woman. Would be happy to sign up. But otoh I feel the draft is amoral. What are opinions on abolishing it altogether? Would that work?
/r/MensRights01/04/25 07:14 PM
0

Hmm gay men are still men, but I understand the point you're making.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 11:33 AM
1

There are many reports of surrogate children experiencing extreme upset from the mother-child dyad being broken after birth. Plus a lot of it is a way for the rich to exploit poor women, esp as after birth hormones are crazy and many may agree to be a surrogate again when it is not in their best interest. The separation causes upset for the mother often too.. Egg donation is OK for the mother, but not for the child. Check out Them Before Us for the effect on children of donations and surrogates.…
/r/MensRights01/04/25 11:32 AM
1

What illegal means would you advocate?
/r/MensRights01/04/25 11:21 AM
2

That's terrible you were put on Ritalin.. In Elizabethan England, fir instance, boys who didn't listen in grammar school would be caned. No girls were allowed to go to grammar school then, so though gender comparison plays a role today the issue is deeper. Teachers have always used brutal methods to ensure compliance, but the issue now is that corporal punishment is banned & there are far more medical methods available, which in some ways are more damaging...
/r/MensRights01/04/25 11:19 AM
3

Terrible. Big Pharma is def v dodgy..
/r/MensRights31/03/25 04:17 AM
3

Also, what's this DES study he mentions? Can't find anything on the amphetamine craze searching online, v odd..
/r/MensRights31/03/25 04:10 AM
3

That's awful, I'm so sorry. Goggling looks like that's still used for ADHD- surely should not be?
/r/MensRights31/03/25 04:07 AM
5

Also, what was the amphetamine craze?
/r/MensRights31/03/25 03:53 AM
15

This is v shocking. What college was this? Do you mean they were literally advocating for abortion of male babies, or they were teaching a theory? Unreal. Can you provide a link of these events? Moreover I see you wrote an earlier deleted post about future risk of biowarfare. Could you poss expand on this? Hang in there. You have clearly met some vile people, but you obvs have a lot to offer & need to find people who value you. I see furthermore on your other post that you have autism. I have se…
/r/MensRights31/03/25 03:21 AM
1

Hmmm... that sounds rather a lurid title. I don't object to that kind of stuff per se, but using rape as titillation is v wrong. I don't know if Nancy Freund does that in that book or not tho, I haven't read it. Yes, different people have different thresholds. There's been a Vogue recently, at least on Bookstagram, for quite gross & quirky stuff, often by women authors. Stuff like Bora Chung, Jenny Hval, Ottessa Moshfegh etc But generally not sexual, more like gore or body functions. I enjoy som…
/r/MensRights30/03/25 06:49 PM
1

That is horrible, I am so sorry. For Bertrand, whilst what happened was awful, he had only met Colette a few days before, so it's not like she was acting as a mother figure...though officially she was. Obvs it was still vile- Bertrand always saw Colette as a great love, he never really broke out of Stockholm Syndrome ☹️. It was not statutory rape then as France only set an age of consent in 2015! Terrible...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 11:33 AM
1

Actually there was NO age of consent in France until v recently. Agree about US centrist. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://apnews.com/general-news-arts-and-entertainment-51dcc80f33394c86a655bf272ceb5599&ved=2ahUKEwj_4Zv52bGMAxW4QkEAHSDGBXkQFnoECCEQAQ&usg=AOvVaw076XvqXvyCqxlHz24O4GSm
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/25 11:30 AM
1

Oh sorry. I wonder what books he was thinking of.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 11:15 AM
2

I had a look at the thread you posted. I want you address thr responses in more detail in a bit, but for now I'll address the man who commented & woman who replied saying that maybe it wasn't grooming by the standards of the time bc people married younger then & she hadn't met him until a few days before. I know Colette's life & writing v well. She hadn't been allowed to meet Bertrand until a few days before bc of her scandalous reputation (I don't think his mum thought she would seduce him, jus…
/r/MensRights30/03/25 11:13 AM
1

Oh right- yes fanfic online esp can be awfully ridiculous. Pp said 'literary fiction' though. There's the Pisces about a fish, I guess that counts as depraved 🤣. There's quite a lot of erotically themed litfic out there but nothing I'd call depraved. Ofc I agree men should feel free to write that kind of stuff too, it's unfair if they are pressured not to. A range of views & choices is the ideal for publishing!
/r/MensRights30/03/25 11:09 AM
1

What female authors are obsessively writing about depraved sex?
/r/MensRights30/03/25 12:24 AM
1

Unfortunately in the 1920s there was no age of consent in France, so it woyld have been legal, though disapprove of. They only set one v recently, and it's only 15! There was no crime of statutory rape there for centuries... https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56413881.amp
/r/MensRights30/03/25 12:19 AM
2

I love Colette's writing but sadly, like Woody Allen, this is a really gross case & one where one has to separate the person from the work. Chollet has miserably failed to do this. In Colette'a case, some try & pull a similar defence to Allen : for Allen, they stress that Soon-Yi was Mia's adopted daughter, not his, & he barely saw her..until he did, ofc. Similarly, for Colette, defenders point out that the affair began within days of their first meeting (Bertrand's mother didn't want him to mee…
/r/MensRights30/03/25 12:16 AM
0

I actually think there's a third reason. Bi women mostly date men (around 80% or more) They have higher testosterone levels on average for women& are more likely to engage in risky more male-typical behaviour bc of this, eg. take drugs & alcohol & have more casual sex.. Also, some predatory men may have a bi fetish from porn, and target bi women bc of that. I have read articles where victims of violence mentioned being targeted bc of beliefs that their sexuality meant they must automatically wan…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/25 04:37 PM
-3

This woman is pretty right wing, writes for Breitbart etc. Not sure if she'd even call herself feminist. She is a combat veteran and is speaking purely from a perspective of military efficiency. I think you should read her stuff before dismissing. Judith Webb, a pioneer in Afghanistan as a high rank woman, agrees w her. I do NOT advocate conscription for any gender. But nature is unfair by definition. Only women can have babies. And men are physically best suited for combat. This is not to say w…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 07:51 PM
2

Thank you for the stats.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/25 07:45 PM
-8

You mean you think women should enlist and the men should stay w the kids? Women have just as much potential fir courage but are not as physically strong. This veteran lady's site is a v good explanation of why women are not an asset to lots of combat roles due to physical limitations. https://politicalanimalblog.com/women-in-combat/ https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-447215/Why-women-line-Major-Judith-Webb.html&ved=2ahUKEwi…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 07:44 PM
-7

If all those women w kids who fled also enlisted, who would care for their children? Esp if they ended up orphans.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 07:32 PM
-14

If all those women w kids who fled also enlisted, who would care for their children? Esp if they ended up orphans.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 07:31 PM
0

The stat was 43% - that leaves 57% who didn't experience DV. And I notice you've avoided answering the stat about bi women having the highest.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/25 09:51 AM
1

It's also a man's choice not to abuse his bisexual partner, yet they are the highest of all, and overwhelmingly by men- 90% of bi women in the CDC's study reported male perpetrators.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/25 09:34 AM
-5

Personal& online acquaintances, general knowledge, yes there are studies. I'll find. Also, there's straight spouse networks for a reason. Luckily much less common w Gen Z & Millenials to a lessee degree as homophobia decrease & people realised sooner.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 09:25 AM
0

It's your choice to be close minded.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/25 09:22 AM
0

It suggests that women's abuse is overlooked. As is female paedophilia & rape. From my own experience I suspect gay male abuse is overlooked as well. All types of abuse need to be investigated so they can be addressed. This should be a priority.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 08:01 AM
2

As a Gen Z woman I def agree. The only bit I would question is saying "strength and leadership' are by default masculine. But I assume you probs didn't mean that, but rather that men have been pushed away from trad masc values like that & that's bad, w which I totally agree.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/25 07:22 AM
-13

The first link is 12 years old bc that's the study nearly always cited. It is 8% higher in the study. However it is impossible to know which demographic has the worst until we know how many gay & straight men are underreporting. All abuse needs addressing, that should be the focus, alongside gathering info.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 07:02 AM
-7

Untrue. They tried to be straight and confirmed they were not attracted to men. Presumably came off as disliking sex, or else tried to enjoy the physical & zone out. Remember women's sexuality is often more responsive & it can take more effort to get aroused, so they may just think that's a normal difficulty. Similarly, you get gay men who marry (this is pretty rare now but exists, look at r/straightspouses ) & fantasise during sex to get hard. It doesn't make them bi, though some who claim to h…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 06:44 AM
-21

Here's a link. If you read it, it says approx 90% of bi women reported only male perpetrators. https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/media/releases/2013/p0125_NISVS.html Also, I fully believe that many men are abused by women and do not report it, esp as men are seen as never victims, wrongfully. I also believe this is true for gay men. I have quite a few gay friends and many have experienced downright abusive behaviour but have been encouraged to brush it off as common, and not abuse. According t…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 06:17 AM
-7

Many lesbians dated men before coming out in the 2010s- less common but still occurent today. Either trying to be straight, or hadn't realised.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 06:15 AM
0

What error do you see in the above calculations? Please specify.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/25 06:13 AM
-41

That study on DV is wrong.The CDC one. I couldn’t find any citation on total demographics of respondents so I used table 4.2 that breaks down female victims by reported orientation and gives estimated number of victims for each. The numbers are Lesbian - 714,000 ; Bisexual - 2,024,000 ; Heterosexual - 38,290,000. I added those together and got 41,028,000 which allowed me to derive the following percentages : Lesbian - 1.7% ; Bisexual - 4.9% ; Heterosexual - 93.3% Things are slightly complicated …
/r/MensRights23/03/25 03:32 AM
5

Exactly. I am actually bi. Most of this is just queer for clout. People need to stop panicking that no one wants to date men.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 03:31 AM
-3

They can't be w women unless they're actually bi. Are they? Most probs not. Kat Rosenfeld has the sensible take- it's just identifying, not reflected by actual relationships. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://airmail.news/issues/2024-4-6/the-view-from-here&ved=2ahUKEwjBm-SeoZ-MAxXoVEEAHYg6H2wQFnoECCMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1xm7BGI_E-stHdJiQoqz0b
/r/MensRights23/03/25 03:28 AM
0

Debunk. I couldn’t find any citation on total demographics of respondents so I used table 4.2 that breaks down female victims by reported orientation and gives estimated number of victims for each. The numbers are Lesbian - 714,000 ; Bisexual - 2,024,000 ; Heterosexual - 38,290,000. I added those together and got 41,028,000 which allowed me to derive the following percentages : Lesbian - 1.7% ; Bisexual - 4.9% ; Heterosexual - 93.3% Things are slightly complicated by the fact that this is total …
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/25 12:43 AM
0

That study on DV is wrong.The CDC one. I couldn’t find any citation on total demographics of respondents so I used table 4.2 that breaks down female victims by reported orientation and gives estimated number of victims for each. The numbers are Lesbian - 714,000 ; Bisexual - 2,024,000 ; Heterosexual - 38,290,000. I added those together and got 41,028,000 which allowed me to derive the following percentages : Lesbian - 1.7% ; Bisexual - 4.9% ; Heterosexual - 93.3% Things are slightly complicated …
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/25 12:43 AM
1

I couldn’t find any citation on total demographics of respondents so I used table 4.2 that breaks down female victims by reported orientation and gives estimated number of victims for each. The numbers are Lesbian - 714,000 ; Bisexual - 2,024,000 ; Heterosexual - 38,290,000. I added those together and got 41,028,000 which allowed me to derive the following percentages : Lesbian - 1.7% ; Bisexual - 4.9% ; Heterosexual - 93.3% Things are slightly complicated by the fact that this is total victims …
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/25 12:42 AM
1

I couldn’t find any citation on total demographics of respondents so I used table 4.2 that breaks down female victims by reported orientation and gives estimated number of victims for each. The numbers are Lesbian - 714,000 ; Bisexual - 2,024,000 ; Heterosexual - 38,290,000. I added those together and got 41,028,000 which allowed me to derive the following percentages : Lesbian - 1.7% ; Bisexual - 4.9% ; Heterosexual - 93.3% Things are slightly complicated by the fact that this is total victims …
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/25 12:42 AM
0

Please see my above reply. I appreciate your work fighting misandry, but these false stats are unfair to lesbians and often used by lesbophobes and misogynists. Please don't keep letting this be cited without correction if you see it again.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/25 12:41 AM
0

I couldn’t find any citation on total demographics of respondents so I used table 4.2 that breaks down female victims by reported orientation and gives estimated number of victims for each. The numbers are Lesbian - 714,000 ; Bisexual - 2,024,000 ; Heterosexual - 38,290,000. I added those together and got 41,028,000 which allowed me to derive the following percentages : Lesbian - 1.7% ; Bisexual - 4.9% ; Heterosexual - 93.3% Things are slightly complicated by the fact that this is total victims …
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/25 12:39 AM
-1

If you cared to Google for 5 minutes rather than spout ignorance, you'd find, esp in the years that study came from, it was incredibly common for a lesbian to date a man or two before coming out. They didn't 'realise they were lesbian' bc the men were bad, that's nonsense. No one is saying that, or shouldn't be. Their desire wasn't related to men's behaviour. Normally in these cases the woman already has suspicions but tries to date heterosexually, esp in the study time period when conversion th…
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/25 12:33 AM
1

Any DV is a vile problem. Posting these studies to dunk on lesbians in general is dumb & unproductive . If you read them, only some studies found a higher DV prevalence for lesbians. Others found an equal one. Bisexual women nearly always score higher than lesbians AND straight wimen, mostly w male perpetrators. Also, we know that men are less likely to realise they're being abused or report it. So hetero female-on-male DV might be much higher if it were reported, which would balance the numbers…
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/25 12:02 AM
1

Is it fake? Can you provide proof, please?
/r/EverydayMisandry22/03/25 11:35 PM
1

Any DV is a vile problem. Posting these studies to dunk on lesbians in general is dumb & unproductive . If you read them, only some studies found a higher DV prevalence for lesbians. Others found an equal one. Bisexual women nearly always score higher than lesbians AND straight wimen, mostly w male perpetrators. Also, we know that men are less likely to realise they're being abused or report it. So hetero female-on-male DV might be much higher if it were reported, which would balance the numbers…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/03/25 11:27 PM
0

Point taken. The issue tho is that the modern queer movement doesn't protest the fate of lesbians either : & I know people who've come here due to the charity Rainbow Railroad, women can absolutely be in danger too, tho men are overall more likely to risk violemce/ prison. They aren't interested in people overseas full stop, not just men. I mean the .modern queer movement, not individual queer people.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 06:49 AM
-5

As a bi woman, there's no way I'd date a man who accepts me bc of porn standards. & I would def date a bi man. But I know I'm unusual for wanting to date bi men, it's a shame.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 10:24 PM
-3

That's a myth. Generally tho women's sexualoty is seen as weaker & less threatening so ignored. Being dismissed isn't great but much better than violent persecution.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 08:38 PM
-11

In the West gay men receive much more media representation. Trans men don't harass gay men the way SOME not all, trans women harass lesbians.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 08:37 PM
-14

Lesbians are often in danger, though less so than gay men. A straight man can't face homophobia or sexusm- he might be worse or better off, depending on individual tho
/r/MensRights19/03/25 08:35 PM
2

Women tend to treat gay men better than men treat them also. As a bi woman, I woyld agree that generally gay men face more ciminalisation & violence. Otoh in v patriarchal societies a lesbian would basically have no choice about marriage, while a gay man might be able to avoid marriage more easily at least. Corrective rape is faced by many lesbians in places like South Africa.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 08:34 PM
2

As a woman, I certainly find male bodies a turn on if they're my type. This is a bit of a generalisation...look at tye way women fawn over Aidan Turner & Brad Pitt when they go shirtless. I'm on female forums & women discuss what part of their hubbies they find most attractive. Moreover, what do you mean women's fantasies are about nothing? By definition, a fantasy can't be about nothing... I would say though that fantasies tend to be about a man as a whole rather than specific body parts. Perso…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 01:18 PM
5

Ah but I'm still an optimist...it gets increasingly hard though w that kind of info.. Anyway humans all have bad impulses of one kind ot another... the important thing is whether people wallow in them or focus on better stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 01:18 AM
2

I doubt many people back thought control. If the guy isn't being gross ie openly leering or whatever, no one will know anyway..
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:40 AM
1

Yes, exactly. Tho if I was reading a book, say, & the guy had this fantasy, I woyld judge him! Sorry I know that's unfair...🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:39 AM
2

Hmm...you can be horny without being into weird stuff like feet. I always feel like that sort of talk is patronising to men- like they need women to keep them in check & can't do so themselves? Maybe I'm naive... But I've always had a better opinion of men than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:37 AM
1

Why say 'lesbosphere'? You can criticise without using slurs. I'm bi myself, and I hang out on both bi & lesbian subreddits. I def see thirsty comments, but generally anything graphic is kept to specific NSFW subs. There's def a lot of, ' I had sex for the first time! It's great!' Posts, or posts about favourite relationships etc, which can be a bit graphic, but generally I would say graphic descriptions of sex/sexual thoughts are not a major feature, certainly not ones about random women/wimen …
/r/EverydayMisandry03/02/25 12:53 AM
1

Where has this been claimed?
/r/MensRights06/12/24 03:41 AM
–

If push comes to shove, do men befriend women for the sake of it or to get sex? Can they have frmale friends they're not attracted to? That's the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 12:34 AM
–

Feelinfs can fade. Normally takes time though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 12:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter