TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dapper_Apartment2175 Archive

View 1 post and 256 comments by Dapper_Apartment2175 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm not white, but this is ridiculous. I hope white men swerve her music since she has no respect for them.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 08:02 PM
1

At the dawn of man, I think it was likely that women had sex with multiple men consecutively, attracted by (multiple) orgasm, so the paternity of children was not known but also not cared about as men fathered children collectively and collectively received sex and a village did indeed raise a child. This was a necessity back then. These days, men don't have to put up with it because they have the means to know that a child is actually theirs. Society has changed many times since then, however I…
/r/MensRights28/07/26 12:05 PM
1

I think the issue Martin brought center stage with his novels that has unfortunately been near normalized today is paternity fraud, which is a near effortless crime that women routinely commit and society is loath to punish them for. In the show at least, the woman who committed paternity fraud was cosmically punished for it because all three of her kids ended dead.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 09:15 AM
1

One of my female friends actually used the phrase "It takes a village to raise a child!" to justify paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 09:10 AM
1

YES! That scene was so ham-fisted, there's no way that the show makers weren't trying to say something.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 09:00 AM
5

Over the years, the man, who Religion Unplugged is not identifying to protect his privacy, had decided to let it go — his Christian faith convincing him that if God had decided to give Joseph the honor of raising child Jesus in his own household, who was he to refuse? I don't believe in Jesus, but even if I did, how does this story help the average cuckold?
/r/MensRights23/07/26 10:48 PM
1

The real reason women don't want testing to be the default is that right now they can use custody as blackmail to prevent the man from testing. "If you test, I'm out of here" ok, she can certainly do that, but now if they are his kids, he can only see them half the time. When people accuse me of doing bad things that I haven't done, I get defensive. The problem is, a lot of guilty people go on the defensive, too.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 11:54 AM
2

As for those genuinely decent women who may still exist - it is unfortunate that they get caught in the middle. They need to call out thosewomen in the sisterhood who do and will knowingly commit paternity fraud, not the men who want to protect themselves from having to raise a child that is NOT theirs. From what I've seen, some feminists who are vehemently against paternity testing would rather see an innocent man get fucked over to prevent a unfaithful woman from having to face consequences fo…
/r/MensRights21/07/26 11:48 AM
1

Women are completely unable to empathize with men on this issue. They can’t understand that simply accepting her word is just not good enough when your investment of almost staggering amounts of money, time, energy and emotional investment hinges on whether or not the child is yours. They genuinely don't get it. The degree to which they don't get it is actually quite shocking. I was even discussing this a couple of days ago with one of my cousins. She was watching some movie in which a woman was…
/r/MensRights21/07/26 09:42 AM
3

That's fucked up. Small comfort, I know, but if video footage doesn't work with the law, at least it would shut up the people you actually know who would have cut ties with you.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 09:36 AM
4

You're actually right. The distinction would go over most people's heads, though. To them, a man who isn't interested in getting laid is almost as weird as a man who can't get laid.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 09:34 AM
48

If he hadn't been filming the incident, then she'd be able to tell the police all sorts of lies, and they'd believe her.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 07:26 PM
8

If "incel" just meant "misogynist", they would have called you a "misogynist" and left it at that. Mixing the ideological definition (hates wahman) with the literal definition (can't get laid) is a deliberate bait-and-switch tactic to try and manipulate you. Very true, plus they're saying the quiet part out loud. To my two cousins - and most women, probably - a harmless man who can't get laid deserves more contempt than a bad man who gets laid constantly, which, if they were being honest, is the…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 02:47 PM
5

Some guys blame their height. But wait a sec, there are men in the world who are a few inches above 3’, and are married with kids, so height ain’t the problem. So they say they it’s that they do not have enough money, but again, there are men homeless on the street who have girlfriends out there on the street with them. These are the best case scenarios, you can't make a point by using the outliers as an example.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:47 AM
8

Then the double entende occurs when actual incels are labeled as mysoginists because they are lonely and dont understand why theyre unlovable. People then ironically cite the connotative definition as reasoning for the denotative circumstance. I've heard this too many times. They say that these guys can't get sex because they're bad people, and the fact that they even see not being able to get sex as a problem makes them even more of a bad person, meanwhile men who actually are bad people get la…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:44 AM
17

Two of my female cousins tried to call me an "incel" because I expressed my dislike of this one female celebrity that they happened to be discussing. I was disappointed in them for throwing a term like that around without understanding it because I thought they were smarter than that. I said to them "An incel is a man who can't get a woman to have sex with them. Do you think that I can't get a woman to have sex with me?". They skipped the question, and tried to say that the meaning of words chan…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:35 AM
27

Yeah, some idiots will go, "There's no smoke without fire!". It always happens.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 10:02 AM
1

I almost feel sorry for her.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 09:38 PM
1

I've been following Crockett's takes on this case. She's an idiot. Her statements have been so stupid that I almost thought she was a comedian until I looked her up and saw that she actually is a lawyer. The internet is forever, hopefully this stuff will bite her in the ass.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 08:56 PM
3

Dworkin was just bitter that she drew the short straw in the looks department. She was basically the female version of a fat neckbeard guy.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 08:36 PM
1

As a child, I observed this in the Adam West Batman show. I noticed that the female criminals were almost always treated with more leniency than the males, as though it wasn't their fault that they were involved in criminal activity.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 08:32 PM
8

The "all men are scum" women are the ones that are telling on themselves because they're getting ran through by multiple men and can't figure out why. They know why. They don't want to hold themselves responsible for choosing bad men, so instead, they simply say that all men are bad.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 10:36 AM
7

If women were using AI boyfriends, men would be still be blamed. Fucking typical.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:55 PM
3

So a man could just call himself some made-up nonsense, and go to this gym? Okay then...
/r/MensRights21/04/26 10:10 PM
2

Do they seriously think they've won the argument when they resort to these sort of desperate measures?
/r/MensRights20/04/26 07:30 PM
1

It's a numbers game, true, in the grand scheme of things, I could be contributing to fatherless children raised by some man-hating feminist, but on the plus side, my lineage will continue for a few more generations. It's a numbers game.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 05:28 PM
1

I could probably write a book on all the examples of this sort of thing I've experienced. Here are a few: Derailing the subject: If they're afraid you're about to make a point, they'll interrupt to stop the point from being made. They'll also talk louder. Pretending not to understand perfectly clear analogies. Pretending to get upset. When this happens, the fact that you're right is no longer relevant, all that matters is her feelings. More effective if other people are present because it makes …
/r/MensRights20/04/26 02:18 PM
7

Yeah, it's weird. Here's an article about an English woman who divorces her Turkish husband because he was obsessed with cutting their sons' penises. I admire this woman for having the strength to defend her the rights of her sons. Her husband is a selfish man, like so many other cut fathers of sons, my own included. This man said that he felt as though his sons wouldn't truly belong to him unless they were mutilated as he was. It's a sickness of the mind that needs to be stamped out.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 01:01 PM
1

By "problem", I meant "responsibility".
/r/MensRights19/04/26 05:55 PM
0

Sad, but not the problem of the donor or the recipient. A lot of these "orphans" are actually the children of feckless people rather than dead people.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 05:19 PM
1

When I was donating, it was always a fear that my genetic offspring could end up being raised by some raging feminist bitch who, if I met her, I'd despise. I put my concerns aside, though. There's no point in borrowing trouble.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 05:16 PM
1

She'd probably argue that it should have been developed years ago.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 03:23 PM
12

How did Gillette think it would go? "Profits are about to go sky high! Our loyal customers, who we've pretty much just accused of being being bad people, are bound to buy even more of our products now!"
/r/MensRights26/01/26 04:04 PM
15

I don't understand how these companies can make such idiotic moves. Insulting customers isn't a good idea, that's just basic business.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 02:38 PM
24

Disney are cunts. I was disgusted when I heard they took legal action against the parents of a dead kid for putting one of their characters on the boy's gravestone.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 02:31 PM
6

Vote with your money. Use the nearest alternative place that has a better policy.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 07:29 PM
1

We're definitely looking for logic in the wrong place.
/r/MensRights15/01/26 03:06 PM
18

You fail by engaging at all. Facts mean nothing to them unless they support their position. When the facts don't support their position, you're toxic, misogynist or have internal misogyny, have been brainwashed by conservatives and/or the patriarchy. And then their catch all "systemic sexism." This. When they can't prove you wrong, they'll do their damnedest to prove that you're a bad person instead. I've seen this a hundred times before.
/r/MensRights14/01/26 11:11 AM
1

I don't know your friend but I assume she is lying and just saying what she thinks she has to say. When presented with a hypothetical scenario, she either lies, and gives the answer that makes her seem more virtuous, or deliberately misunderstands it. She said that I have a "very male view" on not wanting to be tricked into raising another man's kid, and that "it takes a village to raise a child". Now I think about it, this conversation started when she was talking about "misogyny", and men tryi…
/r/MensRights13/01/26 05:32 PM
4

I had a conversation on this topic with a female friend. She said that it doesn't matter if a man isn't the biological father of a child he's raising, even if he's doing so because he was deceived. I couldn't believe what I was hearing. I asked her to imagine if she were married, and her husband had knocked her and his secret girlfriend up at the same time, and she ended up giving birth in the same hospital as the girlfriend. What if the hospital accidently swapped the kids around? For the sake …
/r/MensRights13/01/26 02:04 PM
3

Heh, that'll teach me to pay closer attention.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 12:23 AM
4

I saw a female garage collector for the first time in my life a few months ago. I was genuinely surprised.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 09:37 PM
4

Whenever I see stuff like this, I think the writer is only pretending to be joking. Like most feminist fantasies, it doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Who would the women and girls in this scenario date, for instance? The writer is probably a lesbian who believes that all women in heterosexual relationships are coerced into them. Would the freshly-defrosted boys have to go to school, or work? How would they be qualified for any jobs if they've spent all that time in cryofreeze? Who would be doing the…
/r/MensRights01/01/26 09:27 PM
7

Wouldn't they still be 12, physically speaking?
/r/MensRights01/01/26 09:16 PM
3

People leaving it on as background noise must be what's keeping it going, because there's no way that many people are actually watching it.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 03:42 PM
3

Adolescence was worse, because people actually took it seriously. It was treated like a documentary.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 02:39 PM
3

That's too high in my opinion.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 10:52 AM
2

Congratulations on putting more thought into this fictional world than the writers. There was one male cop who figuratively a eunuch. Other than him, all the stuff you mentioned wasn't touched upon.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 10:52 AM
1

Yeah, the show has shitty worldbuilding. Instead of exploring all of this, we got to see women living it up in nightclubs, while all the men were sullenly looking out of their windows like naughty children who had been grounded. In regards to emergency services, there was one male cop whose job was to arrest the men who broke the curfew, which was actually pretty funny. Even a feminist utopia requires male force to function. That said, they deliberately chose a wet lettuce of a man to play the m…
/r/MensRights23/12/25 10:48 AM
1

I almost believed that the murderer would turn out to be a woman whose motives would expose the absurdity of this curfew, but the show chickened out and made a man the killer. Evidently, I gave the show too much credit for cleverness.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 10:34 AM
1

Here's my take on this ridiculous show All in all, it was pretty stupid. It made no sense. There is absolutely no way in hell that so many men in this country would meekly submit to being prisoners for 12 hours a day, but even assuming they would, the economy would fail. The show made a point of showing women in a nightclub, enjoying themselves whilst "safe" from men, but what happened to the men who worked at nightspots? What good is this arrangement for women who go out with express purpose of…
/r/MensRights23/12/25 10:27 AM
1

Women are shamed for abusing the ability to get sex easily. Men who can't get sex, are shamed for it. That's just the way it is.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 10:01 AM
3

When is the last time you’ve heard of a woman being kicked out of their parent’s house outside of cases where their behavior is so egregious it cannot be tolerated? There's a reason for this. All parents know that if they cut their daughter off, there's a short cut available to her, a short cut no parents want to even think about their little princess taking.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 09:56 AM
2

That's fucked up. I didn't even know The Simpsons was still on, but if I were still watching it, I'd have stopped after seeing that.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 09:44 AM
6

This person is an idiot. She seems to think that scientists have made a conscious decision not to work on those other medical problems she mentioned.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 06:20 AM
4

I guess they didn't consider that when they built the place. Personally, I'd have felt better if men and women were segregated to avoid any potential misunderstandings.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 10:06 PM
13

I could deal with this only if travel became cheaper for men. It's only fair that we pay a lower fare if we're essentially receiving an inferior service. That's how I felt about the gym I used to go to. It had an area for everyone, and another that was about half the size of the main area that was just for women. Women were basically getting better value for their money.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 03:18 PM
5

So someone can easily get laid by your own admission, but that doesn't count because he paid for it? Some people would say that paying for sex is cheating. Hahahahaha so the woman who's face is covered in acne, weights 350 lbs, and has a severe overbite has no problem getting laid? Lol come on brother. She'd have a significantly easier time than her exact male counterpart, that's for sure. Look at these reality shows about morbidly obese people. Almost all the women have boyfriends or husbands.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 05:45 PM
5

Not all women have an easy time getting laid. I disagree with this, unless you're conflating getting laid with getting into a relationship. The idea can easily apply to men. Most men can easily get laid too, just not with the women they want. No. Not unless he's paying for it. He has to have game, for one thing, unless he's just that good-looking. Women, on the other hand, don't need game to have sex.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 05:31 PM
4

Would you mind elaborating?
/r/MensRights25/10/25 05:09 PM
3

Women can't be incels. Any woman can get sex easily, just not necessarily with the men they want.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 02:33 PM
3

Fucking weirdos. Instead of building something, they want to break something that belongs to someone else.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 02:29 PM
3

Women with any self-awareness would be like, "Oh, shit! Is this what men have to go through when they pursue us?!". Those like this writer are upset that the men they want have an overabundance of choice, but what do they expect? Life isn't a romcom, or a fairy tale. The truly hilarious thing is that men are told to lower their standards. Most men have a realistic idea of what they can get in the dating market, yet men who have trouble finding girlfriends are told that porn has fucked up their e…
/r/MensRights16/10/25 10:29 PM
3

Bumble is ridiculous. I recall some article from a few years ago (I wish I'd saved the link, because I can't find it now) that was complaining about how Bumble's "women have to make the first move" feature was bad because it makes men feel like they're special, which makes them arrogant. What the author of this article failed to realise is that only a small number of men on the app will get this benefit. She was basically upset that a miniscule fraction of men have the sexual freedom that almost…
/r/MensRights16/10/25 09:40 PM
19

Apparently, this woman is dead now. In any case, why the fuck would she think about harassing men who just want to live their lives in peace? If I could, I'd ask if they're harming her by simply existing, but apparently, they were. She couldn't stand to see men having anything for themselves. If she knew how short her life was going to be, maybe she'd have thought about doing something more constructive with her time. Ah, well...
/r/MensRights16/10/25 10:06 AM
18

This is true. They'll always have excuses made for them.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 07:13 PM
129

The UK. We're pretty lax here.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 06:58 PM
447

This happened to a friend of mine. His ex-wife worked in a jail. She was smuggling in cellphones for the prisoners, and having affairs with the freshly released ones. She now has a child with a recidivist ex-junkie ex-con, who was inside for violent crimes against women. My friend is a good man who's never been in trouble with the law, yet he was put aside for a fucking lowlife. Looking back, I wish he'd told her bosses about the phones. If she'd been caught, she'd have done two years inside.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 06:34 PM
1

"Hah! He's defending himself from my accusations! That must mean that he really must be the thing that I'm accusing him of being!" Somehow, in their heads, this actually makes sense.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 11:48 PM
0

Yeah, men have fragile egos, because it's men who start crying when someone says something hurts our feelings...
/r/MensRights03/10/25 11:46 PM
1

If there are no children in the picture, then it's not even worth getting married if your wife won't be contributing.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 12:58 PM
30

On a subreddit about a TV show that I watch - that has a female protagonist, no less - I expressed my dislike for a female character who was created to be an asshole. Someone checked my history and saw that I post here, and thought they could use that as a weapon against me.
/r/MensRights29/09/25 08:47 PM
1

They don't need to be attractive.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:46 AM
6

I'll have to remember that "Subject-Object Dichotomy" term. It's far more eloquent way of saying what I've been saying for years. Even female criminals are considered to be victims. I recall seeing some appeal on social media a few years ago, to donate clothes to a charity for women in prison. I asked the person who posted it why the female convicts can't simply wear a standard uniform, like their male counterparts, and I was told that it's about "humanising" the inmates, which is ridiculous con…
/r/MensRights12/09/25 09:07 PM
1

But the woman you described can still find a partner almost instantly.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 11:30 AM
18

There are few, if any, social downsides for being a female loser, in fact they don't even get called "losers" A man who works an honest, but low-paid job, and lives in a modest abode that he pays for, is a "loser" in society's eyes, whereas, a woman can fuck her life up to a ridiculous level, and she's deemed a victim, not a loser. It's not her fault. Maybe something bad happened to her when she was a kid, or maybe she suffered domestic abuse. An upside to being female is that no matter how monu…
/r/MensRights12/09/25 11:24 AM
1

It happens. When I was last looking for accommodation, most of the affordable places would only take women.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 12:16 PM
1

It is what it is, I don't make up the rules. If someone wants to upset a man, they call him an "incel", even if he isn't. If someone wants to upset a woman, they call her a slut, even if she isn't.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 06:16 PM
3

Same reason why men are mocked for not being sexually active, whereas women are mocked for being too sexually active. While getting laid is seen as a challenge for men to complete, for women, asbstaining from sex is the real challenge.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 02:15 PM
4

Exactly. A lot of boys who'd attack other boys for no reason wouldn't dare harm a girl.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 12:18 PM
61

The only reason it generated so much press is because it's about a boy who killed a girl. If it had been about a boy who killed another boy, no one would have cared, which says a lot about the general public.
/r/MensRights10/08/25 12:33 PM
44

Very loosely based on a real thing.
/r/MensRights10/08/25 12:32 PM
2

The whole damn continent needs to get with the times.
/r/MensRights10/08/25 12:30 PM
1

If a kid decides he/she wants to do a sex change surgery and his/her parents agreed and the surgery turns to be botched then is it the kid's fault or the parents' ? Hard to say. I wouldn't want my kids going down that path, but if they insisted, at the very least, I'd make them consume every bit of material from people who've regretted making that choice that I can find. Listen minors do not know what's right or wrong . Circumcision should not be done on minors regardless whether that minor want…
/r/MensRights31/07/25 08:04 PM
-6

As disgusting as this is, these people made their own decisions. They weren't forcibly mutilated as babies, they chose this, albeit under cultural indoctrination. Despite knowing the horror stories, they still choose to risk their lives in such a stupid way. I call it Darwinism.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 04:14 PM
13

It's funny that this thing feminists insist hardly ever happens, seems to happen so often, isn't it?
/r/MensRights27/07/25 10:10 AM
2

It's not just a piece of skin, though. I suppose you have to rationalise it that way, though, because if you credit it with having any purpose whatsoever then you'd have to admit that your parents fucked you over. I've seen countless people on your side of the argument claim they'd have hated their parents if they hadn't cut them. Taking into consideration the fact that if the choice had been left to them, they'd be able to undergo the procedure whenever they want, who do you think has it worse,…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 12:17 PM
3

I'm glad you at least acknowledge that you wish you were given the choice.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 11:42 AM
3

Well, you sound like a petulant child who didn't get his way. He's a petulant child for caring about what was done to his own body?! There are many things in life we can't control. This isn't like a genetic dice roll, like height, or hair loss. Someone, namely his parents, actively made a decision to do this to him. That makes it worse. Get over yourself, dude. Someone should have told his father to get over himself.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 11:40 AM
4

You think it's gross because you have a vested interest in believing it's gross.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 11:35 AM
2

You just said that you're "so damn happy" that you were cut. Not even merely indifferent, but "so damn happy". That's a pretty extreme emotion. If you can feel that strongly about what was done to you, then why can't you understand that some people may feel the opposite way, PuzzleheadedUse5769?
/r/MensRights17/07/25 11:34 AM
1

This would be a dealbreaker for me before I have kids with a woman. A woman who'd do that to her own sons is no mother in my opinion, all her maternal instincts should tell her to protect her child.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 11:31 AM
5

Honestly, unless there’s some underlying medical issue or function issue with your genitalia causing your resentment I’d suggest you speak to a therapist. Does a man need an underlying medical issue or function issue to justify hating what was done to him, pierce23rd? Even if he did have these problems, a lot of people like you would either trivialise or outright deny them. There’s absolutely no reason to be this unjustifiably angry at your parents for getting you a common procedure. Even puttin…
/r/MensRights17/07/25 11:13 AM
1

This is a reason why I had misgivings about donating. The idea of my progeny being raised by some cunt of a lesbian bothered me.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 04:13 PM
1

I'm a donor. I figured I was never going to pass on my genes the normal way outside of a pregnancy scare, which I really don't want. Donation is how I'm cheating the system, I won't be financially liable for my progeny.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 03:53 PM
2

By all means, let adults do it to themselves if they want. Everyone should get that choice, though.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 01:11 PM
1

My memories go back as far as age 3. Why shouldn't this person remember being mutilated at age 4?
/r/MensRights25/06/25 01:09 PM
5

I'd give up my seat for someone of either gender who's elderly or disabled. I'm not giving up my seat to an able-bodied person just because they're female. The problem with these women who are complaining is that they want the good parts of both today and the old days, and none of the bad parts of either. It doesn't work that way, though. It can't work that way, it's just not practical.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 04:00 PM
11

They said the cause of the UTI was E Coli likely from his poop. So their solution is to create a bleeding wound that will be surrounded by shit in a warm, damp area?!
/r/MensRights17/06/25 02:55 PM
10

Gee, I don't know? Maybe because they wish their penis was still normal? So you're not mad that it was done to you. Congratulations. That doesn't mean other people shouldn't be. You act like it doesn't matter, but it obviously matters to the people who do this to their kids. Why shouldn't a man care about his own body?
/r/MensRights17/06/25 02:52 PM
5

Always with the shaming tactics. A take I've been hearing recently from feminists is that men who find younger (legal, obviously) women attractive are "mentally ill", which is fucking hilarious. Why wouldn't a man find women who are at the peak of their attractiveness, to be attractive? Of course, if a man finds older women attractive, they'd probably say that he wants to fuck his mother, or something. You can't win either way. I've even heard them say that men who date short women are nonces be…
/r/MensRights07/06/25 10:37 AM
3

As a non-white man, don't listen to them. Unless you have a rich daddy, everything you have is all you.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 11:37 AM
3

"Why do you care?" after you've just proven their argument wrong is hilarious. If they outthink you, they'll shame you for thinking.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 11:35 AM
2

Men's loneliness seems to get blamed on everything. "You just need to work on yourself!" Meanwhile, violent ex-convicts with no career prospects have several girlfriends at once, despite being abusive to them. Make it make sense.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 04:55 PM
5

Why do you think hypergamy is increasing? Because these days ugly women are as arrogant as only beautiful women were years ago.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 04:38 PM
2

They were actually clowning their genderflipped equivalents?! That's pure fucking gold. If they'd said "I'm not attracted to this guy because he looks like my brother", I could at least understand.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 04:35 PM
6

At this point, I must have seen a hundred videos of women, many of whom aren't even all that, listing the qualities they want from a man, and when asked what this hypothetical man gets out of the bargain, they always say "He gets meeeee!", while looking genuinely confused by the question. It honestly never occurs to them that the kind of man they're chasing could do better. They want him, and that's all that matters. It's like dealing with children.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 04:26 PM
2

Calling it a "thought experiment" suggests that some actual thinking was done.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 11:56 AM
42

With a female pilot, too.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 12:06 AM
154

"I don't feel safe". I don't care if you feel safe. I can't control your fear, but I can control my actions. I'm not going to attack you, but I don't owe you anything, either.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 11:43 PM
2

Thankfully, the UK isn't that far gone yet.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 05:31 PM
2

That was Australia, not here, but yeah. This is what happens when you get a degree in gender studies instead of business. A niche business isn't going to work simply because you want it to. The truth is that the proprietors of this place vastly overestimated the number of woke feminist weirdos in their district. Just the idea of a place like that is enough to put any right-thinking man off going there, and even a lot of women, for that matter. If they'd marketed themselves as just a normal cafe,…
/r/MensRights25/05/25 05:13 PM
10

Fine. Listen, in an ideal world, people wouldn't be mocking each other. This isn't an ideal world. A man receiving some mild mockery for having an unfortunate surname sucks, but I don't think anyone should have been fired over it. The truth is, I hold men to a higher standard when it comes to that sort of thing. I've seen grown women cry for bullshit reasons many times. I've even come to expect it from them. Men should be better than that, though.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 04:45 PM
16

Mr Deez, I presume?
/r/MensRights25/05/25 04:39 PM
18

The exception doesn't make the rule. Mr Deez, assuming you aren't joking, needs to toughen up, or change his name.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 04:21 PM
29

A man probably isn't going to start crying and try to get you fired if you call him an idiot, though.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 04:17 PM
3

It actually makes me laugh. I see far more bitter feminists than men, trying to restrict women's options, and infantilising them. If a woman makes a decision that a feminist doesn't like, then clearly, she's been coerced into it, or isn't in her right mind. It takes an huge amount of arrogance to act like they know what's best for everyone else.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 04:03 PM
2

I've seen more than enough videos of women with ridiculously overinflated notions of their own attractiveness. Discernment can be a good thing. The thing is, a lot of women are either too discerning, or not discerning enough until it's too late, and as a result, they end up ultimately fucking themselves over. You don't get to demand a top man when you're either old, and/or already have kids with some other guy, who's probably a scumbag. They just don't get it, though, they think that things shou…
/r/MensRights25/05/25 03:59 PM
3

Then they'll be able to blame their failure on "cis men". That's the problem with these weirdos. They don't understand that unless you have a dedicated customer base, you can't afford to alienate people. It's simple business.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 03:44 PM
3

When these things fail, as they almost invariably do, then it will be "cismen's" fault, somehow. I looked up photos of the people name on this flyer. My expectations were met, even exceeded. These people are supposed to be comedians, but their looks are probably the funniest thing about them.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 03:41 PM
1

Because they make for a convenient scapegoat.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 03:09 PM
31

They don't even notice the men doing the dirty jobs.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 12:50 PM
19

It's funny you mentioned Norah Vincent. In an argument with one of my feminist friends, she said that if I - a 40-something man - were magically turned into a woman a 20 year old woman, I wouldn't be able to last a day. When I asked if she was referring to periods, she said she wasn't, she meant in general. I said that if I turned into my exact female equivalent, I'd be reasonably hot, so that should make things somewhat easier. She pretended that she didn't know what I meant by my "exact female…
/r/MensRights25/05/25 12:48 PM
32

When arguing with feminists, it never fails to amaze me just how much energy they put into deliberately missing the point. It's exhausting. If they're not deliberately missing the point, they try to make analogies that end up making zero sense, or derailing the subject with something that's completely irrelevant, just to stop you from making a point. Their thought processes are actually crazy from my perspective.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 12:23 PM
29

I'm in my 40s. It cracks me up when it's framed as "You just can't get a woman your own age!". Getting a woman my own age would be the easiest thing in the world at this stage, so many of them are panicking that they've left things too late. Most of the shaming tactics are the result of envy and cope. Don't listen to them.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 10:55 AM
32

I once read an article about how it's sexist or something to be proud of yourself for making a woman climax. You can't win.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 12:17 PM
1

I was referring to Adolescence, the show that got everybody talking about "misogyny", and "toxic masculinity", etc. This is Criminal: UK. If you end up only watching one episode of this show, make sure it's this one. It's frightening how easily a man can be accused, and how the cops deal with it.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 08:51 AM
1

I've read about the concept, but I was surprised to hear one of my friends talking that kind of shit. She was talking like it's absolutely no big deal for a man to discover that the child he's been raising isn't his. She even dropped the "wHaT aBoUt AdOpTiOn?!" line that I always see in online debates on the subject. I told her that a man adopting a child is to being the victim of paternity fraud as giving money to charity is to being robbed. She said that my analogy made no sense, and I'd run o…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 01:17 AM
2

Cause here is the thing, for a woman her kid has her DNA no matter what. So it's not in her best interest for the father to know. Just that the man she calls father is around to do the male jobs she needs from him. It's instinct. It actually disgusts me that so many women think this way. This is theft. Theft of time, resources and affection. I'm extremely grateful to live in an era in which I don't have to simply take a woman's word for it if she says a child is mine. I'm also disappointed in my…
/r/MensRights12/05/25 08:03 PM
10

Yeah, she lies just to make herself seem more virtuous than she is. There's no way she wouldn't be pissed off if she were conned like this. She also called my feelings on the subject of paternity fraud "a very male way of looking at things".
/r/MensRights12/05/25 01:09 PM
9

I had a conversation on this topic with a female friend. She said that it doesn't matter if a man isn't the biological father of a child he's raising, even if he's doing so because he was deceived. I couldn't believe what I was hearing. I asked her to imagine if she were married, and her husband had knocked her and his secret girlfriend up at the same time, and she ended up giving birth in the same hospital as the girlfriend. What if the hospital accidently swapped the kids around? For the sake …
/r/MensRights12/05/25 12:44 PM
2

Yeah. People who watched this said the character was arrogant and entitled, but how do they think an innocent man would act under these circumstances?
/r/MensRights12/05/25 09:35 AM
12

The hell of it is, if he'd filmed her, then he'd have proof of his innocence as far as the rape allegations are concerned, but then they'd have made it about him being a "creep". There's no winning.
/r/MensRights11/05/25 07:29 PM
5

Yeah. A surprising number of people who watched this thought he was guilty, though.
/r/MensRights11/05/25 05:05 PM
13

It follows the usual format of the show, in which crime suspects are interrogated by cops, watched through one-way glass by some other cops, who offer the occasional commentary. This specific episode concerns Alex (played by Kit Harington, who is best known for his role as Jon Snow on Game of Thrones), an office manager who is accused of rape by one of his subordinates on a drunken night out with the work team. There was already a thread on this episode, created years ago, but few people comment…
/r/MensRights11/05/25 04:35 PM
2

False Rape Allegations - Man: “What if she falsely accuses me?” - Assumption: "Only guilty people worry about false accusations." - Effect: His fear is treated as suspicion-worthy, despite real cases of false accusations. Or when they go "Ummm, have you tried just not raping women?". Either way, when they get upset about men taking precautions to protect themselves from such accusations, what they're really saying is "How dare you not leave yourself vulnerable to any false accusations that may b…
/r/MensRights08/05/25 09:36 AM
1

I'm not saying it's selfishness, I'm saying it's unrealistic, and stupid to look at rich people, or people who got extremely lucky, and say "Well, they did it, so why can't I?".
/r/MensRights05/05/25 01:17 PM
3

They ALWAYS use extreme outliers and celebrities as examples!
/r/MensRights05/05/25 07:57 AM
2

It's actually worrying how many women don't take this sort of thing seriously. I've heard a few use various celebrities as examples for their argument. The problem is, these celebrities are rich as hell, and even then, if your time truly is up, all the money in the world can't help you. We only hear about the success stories.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 07:25 AM
1

These people don't know what they're talking about. Once on twitter, a "transgender man" called Ben Shapiro a "limp-dicked incel". Ben is married with kids, and loathe though I am to speculate on the state of his dick, he probably doesn't have a frankenstein arm-sausage between his legs, either.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 12:30 PM
17

His own son tried to pin that label on him, which is hilarious. Imagine being told that you can't get any pussy by a person who owes their very existence to the fact that you got pussy. I heard that Elon conceived all of his kids by IVF, but still, given how rich he is, my point stands. I've heard of Henry fucking Cavill of all people, getting called an "incel", proof, if ever it were needed, that this slur no longer has any meaning.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 06:30 AM
5

I saw this one video on youtube in which a guy's father refused to talk to him because he got that surgery.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 08:33 AM
11

Agreed. A lot of thugs who'd attack a man just for looking in their direction would never hurt a woman. Not all, granted, but still.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 09:05 AM
3

With good reason. What's one man supposed to do against three or more men?
/r/MensRights21/04/25 09:02 AM
5

What I find interesting is her choice to use the term "unfuckable". Typical shaming language. To her, the worst thing a man could possibly be is unattractive, so she uses this word to make men who, rightly or wrongly, may have misgivings about being in a big city at night feel embarrassed about their fear. On some level, she really does think that the prospect of being rejected by her is worse than being attacked on the street by hoodlums. She places too much value on what's between her legs.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 08:57 AM
7

They put that in to get a rise out of people. At least I hope they did, because if they wrote that line in earnest, then they're morons.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 12:43 PM
15

This assumes that those who wrote it were aware of what they did.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 12:33 PM
2

Perhaps I should have worded it differently; what I should have said was only women have the luxury of simply existing.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 11:36 AM
11

Sadly, men don't get to simply exist.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 09:44 AM
8

When a couple of my female friends were having the "Bear or Man?" conversation, I asked them to imagine the last concert they attended, and whether or not they genuinely felt under attack at said concert. They said no. I said "Now, replace every man who was in that arena on that day with a bear. Would you feel safe, then?". They couldn't give me a proper answer to that.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 11:36 AM
27

It. Is. FICTION!!! Being scared to have a son in case he grows up do what the young man in this show did is almost as stupid as being afraid to have a daughter in case she grows up to be a psycho like the woman in Gone Girl.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 07:04 PM
1

Yeah, and to make matters worse, a lot of them talk about their pets like they're children, which makes them hypocrites. I also don't like it when they laugh at people's fertility issues, and say shit like "IVF should be illegal! What about all the orphans?!?!". If you care so much about the orphans, then you adopt one, motherfucker.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 10:46 AM
5

Yeah, I keep seeing the childfree saying this. It's so stupid.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 12:08 AM
15

We have enough people as it is I've never understood this argument when fertility treatments are being discussed.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 08:40 PM
5

Your wife sounds cool. She's absolutely right.
/r/MensRights07/04/25 06:43 PM
4

More intelligent women were in fact invited on these podcasts.. and guess what? they agree with the men.. no just agreeing with men, but they were bashing the OF's and Goldiggers even more than Men did But they get called things like "Pick-Me" by other women.
/r/MensRights07/04/25 03:14 PM
8

Most of the opinions you get from these girls are things you can literally pull straight out of most female orinted day time TV shows like the view the only deference with these podcasts is that their guys their to provide counter arguments. This is true. On The View or whatever, they might say "Men are completely useless!" and cackle at their own perceived clevernness, with no one to challenge them. The guests on one of those podcasts who voice the same opinions will quickly be set straight, th…
/r/MensRights07/04/25 12:34 PM
6

Good. The knowledge that outside of your friends, family, and a few benevolent strangers, no one gives a fuck about you is actually quite liberating. You learn to expect nothing, and you realise that you don't owe anyone anything.
/r/MensRights07/04/25 12:22 PM
12

But a lot of things that are argued on these platforms don't require any in-depth knowledge of any kind, just common sense.
/r/MensRights07/04/25 11:47 AM
10

Here's the difference between a stupid man and a stupid woman; stupid though he may be, the stupid man has had his ass kicked by the real world enough times that he knows he's stupid. As a result, he has some grounding in reality. The stupid woman, on the other hand, has been coddled almost her entire life. Her lack of intelligence probably hasn't impeded her ability to earn money, and her views probably haven't been challenged much. On the rare occasions that someone tells her that she's talkin…
/r/MensRights07/04/25 10:35 AM
4

These shows like F&F, Whatever and Kevin Samuels are certainly educational. They serve to show that a lot of women live in a fantasy land, it's actually astounding to see how deluded they are. The hosts aren't making them look stupid, they must know what they're getting themselves into, yet they still do it. The craziest part is that some of these women with the most outrageous demands for a man range from medicore to outright ugly lookswise. I mean, do they see what the rest of the world sees w…
/r/MensRights07/04/25 10:22 AM
12

If you'd actually watched the video, you'd have seen that they were talking about the huge financial risk that comes with being legally married. But you didn't, did you, Frewdy1?
/r/MensRights28/03/25 03:01 PM
1

And who chooses to have children out of wedlock?
/r/MensRights28/03/25 02:21 PM
13

So you're disagreeing with what they're saying, simply on principle. Okay.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 02:04 PM
8

I would make the same argument about all the women with ridiculously high standards who end up regretting all the time they wasted.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 02:02 PM
24

These days, no one cares about that.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 02:01 PM
1

Once again, although showing the extreme and worst outcome/decisions that a young boy/man can make. Yes, it's the worst-case scenario, but to hear some people talk, you'd think it was a daily occurrence. I still do not think that the show in and of itself is a work of propaganda or fear mongering. Even if this wasn't the intention, a lot of people have taken it this way. If it was, they succeeded. It's gained so much attention that people in the government are talking about it. I can't remember …
/r/MensRights23/03/25 04:19 PM
8

But they never see it this way, though. To them, refusal to engage = a victory on their part.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 01:02 PM
1

No one should be surprised by that man's popularity. Boys today are constantly being scrutinised and vilified. They're being treated like criminals for stuff they haven't even done, so it's only natural that they'll gravitate towards someone who not only gives them some solid advice, insofar as physical fitness and finances are concerned, but seems to actually give a damn about how they feel. I'm not his target audience, but most of what he says is cleverly designed to cause publicity-generating…
/r/MensRights15/03/25 04:46 AM
1

It was a very pretty show, but ultimately, it was, predictably, just an exercise in scaremongering. I didn't think they'd go as far as to actually invoke the name of the officially designated boogeyman of the moment, Mr A.T., but they did. They actually went there. Using him and his ilk as convenient scapegoats was extremely lazy and disningenuous. I also didn't care for the way that in the episode with the shrink, the boy was made out to be some sort of evil schemer just because he revealed tha…
/r/MensRights14/03/25 11:42 AM
1

It was made well, and the acting was good, but the direction it took pissed me off.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 11:03 AM
1

Why is a surgeon doing a circumcision? Because that's the issue here...
/r/MensRights05/03/25 10:54 AM
14

What if he wants to be circumcised later on in the life? Then he can choose to do it "later on in the life". Why aren't you asking "What if the man whose parents forced him to be cut doesn't want to be cut later on in the life?".
/r/MensRights03/03/25 10:01 AM
2

(they even bring back the biblical Adam to apologize for toxic masculinity). So, listening to women is "toxic masculinity"?
/r/MensRights02/03/25 04:34 PM
7

No, it would be too little, too late by that point. The best we can hope for is a half-assed concession along the lines of "we were wrong, this time, but...". Then again, the show may surprise us. EDIT: Okay, I watched the show, it didn't surprise me at all, it was almost exactly what I expected it to be. I'm disappointed that the plot was so lazy.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 04:04 PM
3

This is probably the point.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:50 PM
16

I bet that this, like every piece of man-hating media I've recently seen, will avoid answering the question "what if we're wrong?". It would be more interesting if they subverted expectations, and had the boy be innocent, but somehow, I don't think that's going to happen. I'll be torrenting this show. I refuse to give anything like this any clicks.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:39 PM
25

I was once denied entry to a nightclub that let about 8 of my friends in. The bouncer tried to make up some nonsense about how he didn't like my coat (it was a simple black overcoat), and when he realised how flimsy that sounded, he said that I'm a known trouble maker there. I asked him when I'd supposedly caused this trouble, he said "Last month". I hadn't even set foot in that club for about 5 years, which was long before he'd been working there. Being pissed off about getting treated like shi…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 12:17 AM
18

The UK.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 12:12 AM
29

I used to get this all the time because I'm a man, and I'm black. It is what it is.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 11:10 PM
7

When I was 15, my little brother's best friend's alcoholic mother used to say slightly inappropriate things to me. It wasn't a big deal, I was more confused by her than anything else. My mother didn't like it, though.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 07:45 PM
1

True, but I mean the ones who are against slut shaming, like sex-positive liberal types who say women should be able to enjoy sex as much as they want and shouldn't be shamed are also the type to shame men if they want casual sex as perverted or objectifying women as sex objects, it's a flaw in their logic. They pick and choose when hookup culture should be celebrated and when it's a perverted thing. Of course. They don't mind double standards when it benefits them. One example is my sister is a…
/r/MensRights24/02/25 07:16 PM
3

Thanks for the link it was a great read. I've always said that Feminist and Redditors sound like the conservatives they hate when it comes to mens issues. "Stop blaming society for your problems, take some responsibility, pull yourself up by the bootstrap, you're not entitled to things, nobody owes you anything, instead of being jealous of those at the top getting what you can't maybe you just need to work harder" No problem. Yeah, this kind of thinking is what leads some guys to follow influenc…
/r/MensRights21/02/25 02:39 PM
3

It really should, although I don't doubt that many people will find a way to miss the point. Just look at the comment section.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 04:05 AM
6

The worst part is, they think they've won the argument when they do that.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 07:26 PM
7

So do I. It's just a pathetic shaming tactic. And the post I made that inspired that person to say that was simply pointing out that the ongoing TV show in question didn't push the gay storylines that hard until 10 years after it debuted. But because I post here, my point was invalid, right?
/r/MensRights20/02/25 06:43 PM
11

Both seem like a waste of time to me, especially for the straight women trying to get into gay events. Is it an ego thing, perhaps? Knowing that they can "convert" a gay man?
/r/MensRights20/02/25 05:45 PM
13

Many of the worst men I know are never short of female company, and have a bunch of babymothers, too. Some of these guys have literally spent more time in jail than at school, and their ladyfriends know this. These guys have no reason to change, though. Why should they change when their bad behaviour is rewarded? This article covers this better than I could have: https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/08/31/radicalizing-the-romanceless/
/r/MensRights20/02/25 03:21 PM
1

This is obviously fake.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 01:12 PM
22

Why the fuck would a woman want to attend a gay orgy? What does she think she's going to do there?
/r/MensRights20/02/25 01:00 PM
48

Being called an "incel" doesn't mean you can't get laid, it means "I don't like what you're saying, but I can't find fault with what you're saying, and I don't know enough about you to insult you properly". It's one of the holy trinity, the other two being "I bet you live in your parents' basement", or "I bet you have a small dick". Years ago on a sub about a TV show, I was called out for saying that I dislike a particularly unlikable fictional character from a TV show who happens to be a woman …
/r/MensRights20/02/25 12:58 PM
1

When Brittney Griner was incarcerated in Russia from bringing marijuana products into the country, I remember some reporter lady saying "If WNBA players got paid the same as their male counterparts, then Griner wouldn't have needed to play basketball in Russia for extra money!". I laughed my ass off at that. First of all, if you're making +200k p/a for playing a game part-time, you're not starving. You've got it better than a lot of people who had to study their asses off to get a job, as oppose…
/r/MensRights20/02/25 12:26 PM
3

This is why if I had my own company, I wouldn't hire women. Having workers who could cause catastrophic damage to my business by choosing to take offense to an innocuous comment is a liability I would not willing to deal with.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 04:14 PM
9

Men don't get to be "weird" unless they're extremely successful, then they're "eccentric".
/r/MensRights07/02/25 05:08 PM
16

Imagine the guy did jump in and he got stabbed to death. His girlfriend is distraught, his family and friends are devastated. Best case scenario is the woman on whose behalf he intervened...names her kid after him. All for whatever the contents of the bag were. Hardly worth it, is it?
/r/MensRights07/02/25 05:02 PM
2

That's because men don't feel the need to define their success by what a woman has done.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 04:58 PM
4

Exactly. Is comparing her to men the only way to legitimise her achievements?
/r/MensRights07/02/25 04:42 PM
4

If you forced me to sing any Taylor Swift song at gunpoint, I don't think I could. Not even the words, just the tune.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 04:35 PM
1

Some murder isn't gonna be like "Golly gee wilikers, I was gonna go do some killin' and murderin' tonight, but this darn curfew is getting in my way. Guess I'll stay home and watch Netflix" All men had tracking devices which summon the police as soon as a man breaks curfew. They haven't thought it through, though. If even a few hundred men had the courage to say "fuck the curfew", there wouldn't be enough police to handle them.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:47 PM
1

Make it a month, and have it so that every man who would ordinarily be working during those hours is still getting paid. I'd sit at home laughing my ass off, watching the country fall apart.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:44 PM
2

Even in that dumb sci fi movie a couple years ago with Chiwetel Ejiofor where artificial wombs are a reality, the man is treated pointedly as if he's unnecessary. Isn't the woman just as unnecessary? I liked that movie. I actually wish that technology was viable at the moment, it could help so many people.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 05:16 PM
1

You know damn well he didn't mean it like that. It's simple fearmongering. "Othering" men who are deemed too weak to fight back.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 01:52 PM
10

I just saw this on twitter: https://x.com/Blueblur2023/status/1882134599427567653/photo/1 That image sums it up perfectly.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 12:26 PM
1

Being a man is great because not living in reality just isn't an option for us. There's something quite freeing about knowing that nobody outside of my family and a select few friends actually gives a fuck about me. Several times, I've seen grown women be genuinely surprised when someone says "No" to them when they ask the other person to go out of their way to help them. It's actually a revelation to them that there's actually someone in the world who doesn't care about them, or their wellbeing…
/r/MensRights26/01/25 04:49 PM
1

I'm guessing you don't have a brother? If you did, he'd be the obvious choice.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 09:26 PM
7

That sounds pretty stupid. How would they even know?
/r/MensRights17/01/25 02:47 PM
5

My cousin is a typical woke Gen Z, but the other day, when I saw that the screen on her phone said "Ban Male Podcasts", I knew there's no hope for her. Such a pity.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 11:13 AM
3

I think it's crazy that this is going on, but the perpetrators won't be punished because people are too afraid of being called bigots.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 02:25 PM
2

It's disgusting what's been done this to these boys, but at least they have some degree of agency.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 02:18 PM
2

Feminists will say that men use it to fulfil sexual their desires. However, you can fulfil them by free porn, which is abundant online nowadays. I remember that the original argument in favor of OF is that it puts the money directly into the performers' hands, as opposed to the traditional setup in which the sites and the producers profit directly.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 02:10 PM
1

On just one chick?
/r/MensRights07/01/25 02:07 PM
3

Plus he's losing money, and she's making money.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 02:06 PM
9

This is why men need their own spaces, so we can talk candidly.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 06:43 PM
9

If people cared about what babies want, then hardly any men would be missing their foreskin.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 06:42 PM
11

They see absolutely nothing wrong in deceptions which consign a man's genes to history, while committing him to supporting a cuckoo in the nest for 18 years. When I was having an argument about this with a friend, she laughed at me for having a "typically male outlook" on the subject. She also said that "genes don't matter", and actually used the tired phrase, "it takes a village to raise a child" to justify a man being cucked.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 06:30 PM
6

I read this article years ago, and I'm still not sure whether it was meant to be a work of satire. Whatever the case may be, it disgusted me. The language in it was deliberately chosen. A man who does something that isn't beneficial, if not outright detrimental, to himself is called "decent". A man who wisely asks for proof of paternity before emotionally and financially committing to a child is called "ungallant". Typical shaming tactics. Uncertainty allows mothers to select for their children …
/r/MensRights05/01/25 06:27 PM
1

I get that, but that's what they'll say.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 07:18 PM
1

But it would be argued that these solutions wouldn't be in the best interests of the child(ren) involved.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 11:59 AM
1

Which is why I'd ask, "Can the man you screwed out of having a child of his own cut off your nose then? You've already defrauded two men in the completion of your goal of reproducing, and your beauty is valueless to men as a whole, worthless to your children in particular and damaging to both humanity and society This will get you called a misogynist or something. Didn't you know that anything men want is bad?
/r/MensRights30/12/24 11:15 AM
1

Whatever people think about Maggie, at least she was smart enough to start a family.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 01:04 PM
17

It amuses me that almost all these so-called "political lesbians" are ugly as sin. It's almost as funny as if some fat neckbeard dude with poor personal hygiene declared he was taking a vow of celibacy.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 01:39 PM
29

Yeah, it's funny how that works, isn't it? Meanwhile, a harmless, but unattractive man will set the alarm bells off. From what I've seen of "Women's Intuition", it's about as useless as Spider-Man's spider sense would be if it only warned him about dangerous people who were born in February.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:27 PM
61

It's funny how "The Ick" never warns them about the men who end up being physically or psychologically abusive, isn't it?
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:02 PM
9

What the fuck does Jesus - a man who, if he even existed, lived thousands of years ago - have to do with anyone who's alive today?
/r/MensRights04/12/24 09:56 PM
4

What I find scary is the number of women using celebrities who had kids very late in life as positive examples. The average woman doesn't have the same amount of money as a Hollywood actress or a pop star, and therefore won't have access to the same calibre of doctors. Even putting the financial aspect aside, they only hear about the success stories. There must be a shitload of rich women who've had to resign themselves to the fact that they left it too late to be mothers.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 01:42 PM
1

This "teacher" looks like he sits down when he pisses.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 12:33 PM
1

If I'm being honest, going over all the coworkers and bosses I've ever had that I truly hate, most of them would be men. I've had a lot more lazy female coworkers, though. I got along with them well enough, it's just I was getting paid the same as they were for doing more than twice the work. So much for the wage gap...
/r/MensRights19/11/24 09:58 AM
10

Good. If they're worried about what these guys are saying, that's basically an admission that they know the podcasts are telling the truth.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 11:10 AM
4

This makes me laugh considering how many women of all ethnicities vastly overestimate their looks.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 11:09 AM
1

In this case, "fertility" refers to the actual number of kids being born, not the ability to have kids itself. I was confused when I first heard the term used in this way.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 12:19 PM
2

Nothing, if you don't want kids.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 12:01 PM
2

A woman getting matches on Tinder is no real achievement. A lot of men on these platforms are just playing the numbers game.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 11:59 AM
2

The stuff they discuss might "trigger" some people.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 11:56 AM
2

I saw the topic being discussed on some video. This one woman's logic basically amounted to "If you get a test done, and it turns out you aren't the child's father, then you've just violated the privacy of a child who isn't yours by placing their genetic information into a database".
/r/MensRights31/10/24 10:31 AM
2

This normal for her, she's always wrong about things, but she'll keep on insisting she's right. During the above conversation, I wanted to remind her that her nephew exists because of fertility treatments. If genetics truly don't matter, then her sister should have adopted a kid instead of going through all that effort to have her own, but I held my tongue.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 11:17 PM
1

It certainly is. What's frightening is how common this response is.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 10:59 PM
2

The only reason women ever object to paternity testing is they want their cake and to eat it too Whenever I see this topic online, the man who got scammed is always shamed for having feelings about it. "It's still your kid if you raised it! What's so special about your DNA?"
/r/MensRights30/10/24 09:50 AM
2

I was actually having a similar conversation with a friend. She said that it doesn't matter if a man isn't the biological father of a child he's raising, even if he's doing so because he was deceived. I couldn't believe what I was hearing. I asked her to imagine if she were married, and her husband had knocked her and his secret girlfriend up at the same time, and she ended up giving birth in the same hospital as the girlfriend. What if the hospital accidently swapped the kids around? For the sa…
/r/MensRights30/10/24 09:08 AM
4

Okay, I just finished watching the show. While having a somewhat interesting premise, it was explored poorly, and there was too much about it that didn't make any sense. The killer's identity was disappointing, as was their motive. There was a subplot about the government hushing up crimes committed by women because it would be hard to justify a male-only curfew if women are just as bad as men, but that never went anywhere, either.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 09:32 AM
13

Who do they think fixes the roads, the sewers, etc., at night? The first time I ever saw a female garbage collector in my entire life was this year.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 06:04 PM
19

I've not seen this show, but the premise sounds questionable at best. First of all, the only way something like this could ever be put into place is if 90% of men became weaklings overnight and allowed it to happen. Secondly, how badly would it affect the economy if men were under curfew? Nightclubs, for instance, wouldn't survive, save for those that cater to a subset of women. Many jobs that are essential for society to function are done by men at night. Thirdly, who the fuck would be enforcin…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 06:00 PM
8

Last year, I was working as the assistant manager of a bar. Because I opened, I was done just as the night was picking up, so I was having a few drinks, and I'd gotten talking with a pair of ladies, who, as it happened, were a couple. They were really cool, we were discussing TV shows and movies. The main manager gave them and the rest of their group permission to use the private room, and they invited me to continue the conversation there. One of their friends, who, unlike them, looked like the…
/r/MensRights24/10/24 11:21 PM
3

They'd deny it if I asked them, but you're right. I don't see anyone telling their daughters, "Marry that broke dude".
/r/MensRights23/10/24 04:47 PM
10

Definitely. The internet hasn't helped things. I know young ladies who get messages from men in other countries, sending them money for nothing, offering to take them on vacation, etc. That, along with all the initiatives you mentioned makes it that much harder for normal men to compete. Men who just a few decades ago, would have been seen as good potential husbands, are considered mediocre these days.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 08:25 AM
11

THANK YOU! I was explaining this to some people the other day, but I got called a sexist. We were discussing whether it would be better to have sons or daughters. I said daughters, because it would be easier for a daughter to marry a rich guy and give me grandchildren than it would be for a son to become successful then find a wife. Maybe I didn't articulate the point as well as you, but to me, it just seems like common sense.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 08:11 AM
5

Which parts of the old days?
/r/MensRights15/10/24 07:03 PM
2

You too.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 07:31 PM
1

You're right about that, there was no need for the extra emphasis. My point stands, though.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 07:21 PM
2

It would be completely impossible for you to have heard of every single person who has ever achieved anything. That's not a reflection of their level of fame. It's not even really an indication of a how firmly your finger is on the pulse. It's just a fact.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 07:17 PM
2

It says who she is, and what she's done in the link. In instances like this, almost without fail, someone goes "Who?", as though if they don't know who the person being discussed is, then the person can't be all that famous.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 07:08 PM
1

Someone's always gotta say "Who?"...
/r/MensRights12/10/24 09:03 AM
3

Years ago, I didn't believe my friend when he told me his girlfriend actually blamed him because she had a dream that he cheated on her. I've since heard of similar stories, though. It's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 09:34 PM
1

Because even when women break the law, they're still victims? What nonsense.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 08:57 AM
1

If he did that, then the mother would tell the kid that their daddy ain't shit, that he doesn't care, etc.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 08:51 AM
8

So only she's entitled to downtime, then? Of course...
/r/MensRights09/09/24 05:32 PM
17

A woman on tiktok tried to explain why women hate gaming and she said "you could do so much more with your time. Like go work, take me out on a date, work out, be productive" and basically list stuff that only benefits her. And the comments were other women agreeing. All I could think was about the sheer entitlement in thinking even his downtime should be spent on you or benefitting you. Nothing more needs to be said. She could probably be doing more with her time than fucking around on social m…
/r/MensRights09/09/24 04:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter