TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dapperdan814 Archive

View 0 posts and 155 comments by Dapperdan814 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

How hypocritical Welcome to the trans movement.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:15 AM
5

We're past "arguments", there IS no arguing with these people. There's only standing up to them, wholesale rebuking what they have to say, the whole general public needs to be doing this all at the same time. Enough is enough is enough, debating with these people is not working, it's time to use the same Maxine Waters "get in their faces" tactics they love to use so much on everyone else.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 05:34 PM
10

You should aspire to be that brave. We all should.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 02:04 PM
9

Don't talk as if we're a bunch of programs that need to be re-written. That's a very quick way to make me not just throw out what you say, but side against you.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 02:02 PM
45

Optics over justice.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 01:56 PM
1

Whatever, liar.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 02:18 PM
1

Lying either because you know it's true and obfuscating, or fear it's true and so deny it. Either way, you're lying.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 02:15 PM
2

Wikipedia is run by people who agree with CRT and won't paint it in a true light.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 02:14 PM
2

Let's hope this shit doesn't leak out to countries other than the US. All the works CRT is built on are from French "philosophers". This is an ideology borne of the French Revolution which tried to spread its tendrils out everywhere, got a hold in Tzarist Russia turning them "Soviet", spread to China which then turned Maoist, and is now in the US infecting our core. Hopefully we can reach in deep inside ourselves and rip this cancer out of us.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 02:11 PM
2

Any "critical ___ study" is just indoctrination into power struggle politics. All it teaches is that "X has been at the top of society and thus society is created only to serve X and exploit Y, therefor X and their society must be removed for Y to succeed." What they don't tell you is that once X is gone and Y rises, Y becomes the new X and then the cycle repeats. That's what they mean by the revolution never stops, and it's why it's nothing but a death cult: the ultimate goal is everyone reduce…
/r/MensRights27/06/21 02:09 PM
6

Just be happy with the fact we piss them off that much that they waste time out of their day over it, and don't waste your's.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 02:38 AM
18

Man I hope so. But I just don't see it getting better until it gets way worse, something so egregious that the whole world takes notice.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:24 PM
140

Except the law's on their side, hence the thread. The law doesn't protect men.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:20 PM
2

You have no clue what the movement you believe in actually believes. You only see them as you want to see them. All you've accomplished is a demonstration of your programming.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 01:36 PM
2

and a great example to show how people choose different words for the same thing depending on what agenda they want to push. In other words "context", gomer. It wouldn't be making their point, it'd be exposing it.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 05:05 AM
6

I'm arguing word usage. Circumcision is objectively mutilating the genitals, hence genital mutilation. Claiming it's in any way different is like claiming the detention centers aren't concentration camps, no matter the negative connotation used. It's textbook definition: people concentrated into a camp. I used it as a comparison because, just like this story, it's a current hot topic, and a great example to show how people choose different words for the same thing depending on what agenda they w…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:19 AM
9

Actually it's a comparison, but one day you'll cry "strawman" and get it right, hang in there.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:06 AM
15

If the detention centers are concentration camps, then circumcision is genital mutilation. All different words for the same thing, and you don't get to choose the word.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 09:41 PM
2

Becoming more and more apparent that the only way this stops is WE make it stop, WE force it to stop.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 03:29 PM
33

Considering they don't care they're wrong, just as long as they keep getting kickbacks like this...
/r/MensRights09/04/19 02:54 PM
4

The biggest mistake was thinking they care about the real reasons behind the wage discrepancy. They don't. They think they should get equity regardless. It's what they want, so it's what they believe they deserve. Trying to explain it isn't giving them what they want, so how dare you.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 09:25 PM
2

Scary, innit? Sure will be nice once that pendulum swings back. Hopefully it smacks some people in the face on the way back.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 09:02 PM
7

If anything her social karma score just went up 10 points.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 08:24 PM
1

Never trust a group to describe itself in good faith when politics are involved. And feminism is a political movement.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 12:29 PM
4

A definition written by feminists.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 10:49 PM
14

Let's say women have 98 rights, men have 2. BUT, those two rights aren't part of the 98 women already have. "Equality" to feminists is making sure they also get those two rights, and shaming men for having something women didn't.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 11:56 PM
8

You've been tricked into accepting an evil thought, if that's what you truly believe.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 01:37 PM
29

Why are we comparing a 1,000 year old literary work to today's sentimentalities? Who gives a shit how people thought back then, it only matters what people think now. And right now, "a man would never been shown in a sympathetic light if he mutilated his wife even she did abuse him". Stop muddying shit up with stupid "yeah but this thing from our super ancient past that has no cultural standing today did THIS". That's what losers who can't make an actual point do.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 03:40 PM
24

they saying I'm a feminist hater So? Good. They can explain why feminism must be liked. If they use a buzzword, they lose.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:15 PM
23

I hope I never live in your world, where waiting for the bus with a smirk on my face is doing something wrong. People like you bring the mean global average of sanity down.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:03 PM
8

A number of worthy contenders That number being zero, apparently.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 09:37 PM
9

SubscribeStar, I'm assuming.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 05:56 PM
85

According to Patreon/Paypal/Stripe/Other payment processors that have blacklisted names, it was at the request of the bank (in the cases of those processors I listed, that'd be Visa/Mastercard/Citi/etc). Now of course Patreon/Paypal/Stripe/Others might be lying, but if these banks wanted to flex their moral muscle and (so far) get away with it, it'd be done through those proxies.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 05:30 PM
783

Now we watch and wait for Visa/Mastercard/whateverbank to pull processing business from Egard for "promoting hate speech and toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights21/01/19 04:11 PM
4

I'm not the one wasting millions of dollars in advertising to say men are a problem, I don't see how I could compete with how much worse they believe it to be. Nor am I the one wasting all this energy in a vain attempt to convince men that, once again, they're wrong about something. That ad must've spoke to you on a spiritual level.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:31 PM
5

So if we're now at parity, why is the problem somehow "worse" in the progressive's eyes? Or is it now that they have the momentum, it's time to take over? Honestly I always felt this had the whiff of "revenge politics" behind it.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:23 PM
11

Maybe in the 90s. That was 30 years ago now. Time to catch up with the years.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:16 PM
9

I'm one of those "the bullied". I can tell you a lot of it involved physical threats. That nothing was done when it became so is a failing of the system, not the failing of the other kids around. What kind of collectivist punishment bullshit is that? I never blamed the other kids around me for not jumping in, I didn't want them to. It wasn't their problem. But the authority in charge SHOULD have jumped in. That is where the failing is. Funny how, when you think about it, a lot of those currently…
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:11 PM
14

Pretty much! Not until it becomes a physical threat, like how it's worked for centuries/millennia. How people like you suddenly think you have authority to change that I'll never know. Pathological narcissism, I guess.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 04:59 PM
15

I don't want women to have to police other women not to throw their prom night babies in the dumpster either, because it's not other women's responsibility. The only one that needs to suffer any consequence is the baby-trasher. Same goes for men. Same goes for any individual. Who should police it? HOW ABOUT THE POLICE!? That's their job. YOUR job is to get your fucking business out of other people's business. Stop trying to live other people's lives for them, all it does is make people rightfull…
/r/MensRights19/01/19 04:51 PM
32

No, you're saying that. I'm saying it's not up to men to police other men. Someone else's decision is not my responsibility. And it is definitely not the responsibility of a corporation. The only thing toxic around here are people like you who think they can lecture how an entire half of a species is supposed to behave. The fucking gumption on you to think you or any other moralist puke needs to be listened to.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 04:42 PM
7

there are other jobs We'll only hire you once you sign a pledge to Social Justice and denounce masculinity.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 06:04 PM
21

There was just a story about a dead newborn found in an Amazon Distribution Center dumpster. Maybe Johnson&Johnson should make an ad telling women not to throw their babies away.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 05:44 PM
10

They don't think they're mistaken, they think you are. You WILL learn the lesson they're trying to teach. Resistance to it just means you're part of the guilty they're trying to expunge.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 09:33 PM
3

But they got males to buy into their mythos and propaganda No they didn't, they raised them into it. The feminists of the 70s-90s raised good feminist "ally" millennial sons.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 05:19 PM
2

Are they pushing it or just marketing to another demographic that could buy their razors? The point being, Dollar Shave Club isn't shaming men into getting their product, they're simply reaching out to another market. That's good business, regardless of how squirmy it makes you.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:32 PM
16

They don't, you're right. Still gonna judge em about it. They can keep living, yeah?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:16 AM
12

I'm not bullying, I'm judging. And I judge it degenerate and one of the lowest things a man could do to himself.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:04 AM
8

Someone asked what the joke is and I explained it. But thinking there's nothing wrong with this... let someone else knock up your wife ...is just degenerate. And one of the lowest examples of self worth a man can exhibit. No offense. But it is.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:01 AM
5

This is also not the definition of a cuck, marrying a woman who was in a relationship before which produced a child. You missed the "or", I take it. There I bolded it.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:53 AM
118

"My wife's son", as in not your son but your wife's, because you're a cuck and let someone else knock up your wife. Or you married into it and now take care of not your son.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:34 AM
6

You said it yourself, twitter and tumblr. Just because those are online forums doesn't mean they don't hold those same opinions offline as well. Does it only count if I can smell their breath?
/r/MensRights30/11/18 11:15 PM
18

i can't agree with the broad generalizations in the rest of your comment about these women. "THESE" women. Not all women, but THESE women. You even qualified it yourself. Any woman that actually agrees with this article (or the wage gap at all), is one of "these" women. Obviously women that are sane and rational and don't want this, aren't part of these women being talked about. It's only generalizing if you remove yourself from the specific context and assume it's global.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 10:06 PM
338

Its like they know why its happening but keep on acting like its because of some inequality. They do know exactly why it's happening. They think they should get a pass and free money regardless, because woman. That's where it's "unfair", to them. After all, "woman" is a full time job right? So they should be getting paid just for breathing.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 05:36 PM
3

This is the kind of abhorrent destruction of the individual that'll lead to the violent persecution of an entire political bloc (The "Left"). Just like what happened in the early 30s in Germany. The average citizen cheered for it then. They're going to cheer for it now. And the result will be the same. Things have the potential to go very dark, very fast, very soon, if these people aren't stopped. Stopped by using the highest levels of legislation. Stopped now.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:08 PM
4

This is why it's so hard to argue against these people. They're literally idiots, pushing an idiotic idea they think is smart.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 05:12 PM
3

They won't even make an excuse. They'll just say "The age of Man is over. The time of the Orc has begun. Get used to it, stale pale males."
/r/MensRights14/11/18 08:59 PM
2

Lol yeah that's definitely not a fight you want. Women can't even win sporting events against transexual men, what makes you think they'll win against actual men?
/r/MensRights08/11/18 01:30 PM
2

You weren't advocating for the vocal minority, you said anyone thinking people say that are "wrong". Can't both be "wrong" but also "well SOME people do".
/r/MensRights07/11/18 06:56 PM
2

People are capable of saying all sorts of shit, but no, that's not a normal thing for someone to say Depends on what "normal" is, to those people. Death to Infidels isn't a "normal" thing for someone to say either but there's entire nations of people that say it daily.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 06:49 PM
14

It's not wrong, people say shit like that all the time, everywhere. They're capable of saying even worse things. I'm capable of saying much worse things. You do know humans, right?
/r/MensRights07/11/18 02:27 PM
101

Gotta cultivate future harassers from an early age, otherwise in 10-20 years feminists won't have anyone to point fingers at. They're basically creating their own enemies to fight, starting at childhood. Like training an army of your enemies for a future war you want to fight.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:21 PM
2

You're right, that's the problem. That's not going to stop this going in that direction, though. Dark times, ahead. Well, darker than they are now.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 05:44 PM
3

The more they keep making that same argument, and the more they keep getting away with it, the more men are going to say "fine, fuck it, if all men are rapists then all women are whores". They make it this way. Hyperbole will be met with hyperbole. And the gender war keeps going apace, because that's what's desired.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 05:36 PM
3

And I have something called...A PHONE! What a marvelous modern age we live in. If you have one too, I suggest calling this number.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 09:31 PM
2

Isn't admitting to purposefully trying to destroy the nation treason?
/r/MensRights05/10/18 09:28 PM
3

Had to think on that response a bit, huh?
/r/MensRights05/10/18 09:24 PM
3

We do the same thing to everyone else, too. This is called "realpolitik". In a globalized society (which we're in, because that's what everyone wanted), everyone is in everyone else's business. I don't give a damn because this is how it's been for decades, this is just how the world works. Don't like it? Go change every single major power in the world, remove globalization, go back to pure isolationism among all nations. Good luck with that. OR, accept it, and remove some stress from your life. …
/r/MensRights05/10/18 08:34 PM
7

Once again, with feeling. So does China. So does Israel. So does the EU. Everyone involves themselves in everyone else's shit because they want the best outcome of foreign policy for themselves. Russia did it better than they did. That's why the left is pissed. That's the ONLY reason why they're pissed.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 08:26 PM
7

I need not go into details Because you don't know any.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 08:22 PM
6

Did what? Meddle in the election? So does China. So does Israel. So does the EU. Everyone involves themselves in everyone else's shit because they want the best outcome of foreign policy for themselves. Russia did it better than they did. That's why the left is pissed. That's the ONLY reason why they're pissed.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 08:18 PM
8

I hate them, I hate what Russia and the Republican party have done to this country If you're not a partisan then why are you spewing (not to mention believing) "muh Russia" liberal talking points?
/r/MensRights05/10/18 07:50 PM
33

Swung the pendulum so hard it'll smack them square in the face when it swings back.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 07:16 PM
7

So you argue against making a statement vs. an opinion by making a statement and comparing it to an opinion. Hah, wow. You just played yourself, buck-o. You obviously weren't paying attention in your English class.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 06:17 PM
5

"It's a job interview and one that he's failed" is a statement. If it's an opinion, mark it as such. "One that I think he's failed". Otherwise, it's just a baseless statement with no hard evidence to back it up (just like all the accusations). I guess throwing around baseless statements is in vogue right now.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 06:12 PM
3

I'm not the one making that final decision, and neither are you. So your entire argument about what I or you would do is pointless. What I or you would do means jack shit.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 06:07 PM
9

Innocent until proven guilty does not and will hopefully never apply to social repercussions You're a piece of garbage. You're guilty of being a piece of garbage because "innocence" doesn't apply to social repercussions. I guess that means I'm right and you have no right to refute the claim, you piece of garbage. Have fun being a piece of garbage.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 06:05 PM
14

it’s a job interview and one that he’s failed. And you're the one to decide that, huh? How deluded can you get?
/r/MensRights02/10/18 06:04 PM
6

They're all 30-40 year olds. That's not boomers, that's millennials.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:58 PM
8

How many times do you need to read shit like this happening before you realize the "source" is right in front of your face?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 12:16 AM
3

I wasn't the one talking about the fire alarm at all. Look at usernames.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 01:20 PM
4

so don't know if they deserve it or not If your default answer to whether or not anyone deserves that treatment isn't "no", you're the problem mindset.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 12:39 PM
18

With no proof it's the truth Virtually every recorded Jordan Peterson or Steve Crowder appearance at liberal campuses, one of which they were breaking the windows of the auditorium. Stop lying. Pretty clear whose team you enable. Let me guess though, they deserve it for peddling "hate" right, so those don't count?
/r/MensRights18/09/18 12:38 PM
11

No man shall strike his wife nor any woman her husband I mean did you read any further than you quoted? All you did was show that social shame was even a thing back then, not whether or not a law was gender neutral. The article says it was "vigilante" justice, anyway, nothing to do with the law as written.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 05:42 AM
3

It would also be useful for the Anti-Trumpers and Pro-Trumpers to remember that Reddit is International and that 'Murica only represents 4% of the global population. 96% of the World don't care for your arguments, so take them back to your 4% share of Reddit. 100% of the world shouldn't care for any internet arguments because a lot of the more vocal social media users are 14 year olds. The global population should stop taking its social cues from middle-schoolers talking as if they have a clue i…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 04:01 PM
17

Unless she was very attractive Narrator: she wasn't.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 03:47 PM
16

Nobody should have to worry about putting it "nice" enough. People can stop assuming everything's mean just because it's not candy coated.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 04:36 AM
5

Even if every other person not a far lefty dropped their subscriptions, there's enough far lefties keeping it alive and well. The NYT is their paper. The only way to beat them now is to find something they endorse that's beyond reproach, something that would turn the outrage machine on them like vultures to a carcass. Basically, you'd have to find the NYT singing Trump's praises, or an equivalent.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 04:03 AM
12

Yeah but she claimed it, so we must believe it.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 10:58 PM
17

The tweets are only a few years old, but even the age of the tweets isn't the point. The point is NYT says they "vetted" her before hiring and supposedly saw these tweets, and hired her anyway claiming "she was just responding to harassers at the time", essentially condoning racism as long as someone else starts it first.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 10:26 PM
1

A lot has changed in two years.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 06:34 PM
278

A lot of female teachers in the news lately would have a lot to say about that. Well no they wouldn't, cause they don't think they're wrong in sexing up their underage students.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 03:28 PM
19

Agenda'd writing. They know exactly what they're saying and what kind of spin they want people to read.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 07:03 PM
13

I always joked around that the alliance between feminists and these migrants/islam only made sense if you consider it as these women fulfilling some domination sex fantasy. It was only supposed to be jokes.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 01:24 AM
1

My problem is mainly with the commonly stated assumption that all women do these things. That's a hugely sexist assumption to make. Would it sit better if they said "within predominantly western and liberal cultures"? That should be a given, but if it helps then there you go. Of course it's not all women, but instead the culture and behaviors western liberal women have by-and-large adopted for themselves.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 03:51 PM
19

Feminists: why don't you tackle the biggest cause of the problem before whining about men? Because the feminists are the queen bees. Duh.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 03:48 PM
20

If you've been part of the feminist movement since the mid-60s, how have you missed how much the feminist movement has changed since the mid-60s? I think you need to step out of it for a sec so you can see how it looks from the outside rather than remaining blind to it from the inside.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 04:37 PM
2

A TWO YEAR OLD POST, PEOPLE. You're getting upsetti over something from 2016.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 09:54 PM
117

The problem is it's men saying it. They'll just respond with "well of course a MAN would try to defend his toxic man-ness"
/r/MensRights11/04/18 10:17 PM
1

The very cynical and fed up part of me (that's becoming most of me, these days) tells me the only reason they're doing this is because (and I'm really just assuming here) the majority of recent rape cases have involved migrant aggressors. So naturally we want to presume the innocence of these poor migrants. Maybe the women they rape shouldn't entice them with western hedonism so much.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 06:22 PM
5

Don't worry too much about it. At this point the general public isn't paying attention to these outlets anymore, poll after poll demonstrates that. By now they're only preaching to their own choir, making sure the zealots still feel good about their own indignation. It's essentially a SocJus call to prayer.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 08:15 PM
26

Good god. Where does it end? When the species is extinct. Seems pretty clear to me.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 04:02 PM
2

What your thinking of is far left liberalism with a feminist flavour Right, modern day feminism. Who cares about "traditional" feminism? That's not the feminism of today, it's the feminism of yesterday. The only thing that matters today is the feminism of today, and the feminism of today is far left liberalism with a feminist flavour.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 09:03 PM
1

They aren't the bulk of the movement But they are the face of it. That's all that matters.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 07:13 PM
4

Toxic Feminism is a culture that takes transitional aspects of feminity and reinforces the negative elements. Authoritarianism, neuroticism, hysteria, peer manipulation, simulated helplessness to further manipulate, etc. ...so feminism??
/r/MensRights07/03/18 06:50 PM
119

first published 2014 Yeah it's pretty obvious the wind has changed since then. TIME published this when TIME was still good, so of course it's positive about Christina Hoff Summers. If it was a TIME 2018 piece she'd be a Nazi. C'mon people, look out for this stuff. What they were saying then doesn't matter to how things are now. This article's sentiment should be from now. This is just reminiscing of a by-gone era.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:09 PM
46

When an ideology requires voluntary insanity, this is bound to happen.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:59 PM
2

You're supposed to listen to the guests, Joe's just there to get them talking.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:34 PM
2

The only way the "progressive" regressives can win any argument is by shoving words down your throat and then judging you when you choke on them.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 06:35 PM
3

Better to pass up 10 women for a date when just 1 of them is enough to ruin my life forever. Just like it's better to have 10 innocent men go to jail when just 1 of them could be a rapist. Might as well embrace retarded logic at this point since it's all that people are selling.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:04 PM
29

Google is the face of a company that allowed ideologues to gain control of it. All companies should heed Google as a warning.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 03:21 PM
16

That's called "white guilt" and it's disgusting to watch the behavior of those suffering from it
/r/MensRights04/02/18 03:19 PM
3

You are a malevolent monster A malevolent monster that doesn't defend a baby killer, at least.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:12 PM
3

You are the one in this conversation that suddenly brought up civil war and started accusing me, non sequitur, of homicidal intentions. I'm not the one blowing off baby killing like it's no big deal. That "oh bloo bloo she's depressed you guys!" Get fucked. You and your entire way of thinking is anathema to life, and has no place in a free world.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:02 PM
4

I don't want to kill anybody, I just want to defeat a terrible ideology from bringing the world into a collectivist dark age of identity politics.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:38 PM
6

that is because the War on Drugs is a sustained campaign of white fascism against people of color. Oh you're one of those useful idiots I keep hearing about. No wonder you don't give a shit about life. Your end game is to snuff out everyone who doesn't agree with your world view, like a good little religious zealot comrade. Jesus can't we just get this civil war started already?
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:33 PM
8

terrible rebuttal
/r/MensRights29/11/17 07:54 PM
7

If I'm wrong, then stop breathing. Your choice to keep doing so brings the lie to your own ideal. You don't want to be a liar, do you?
/r/MensRights29/11/17 07:41 PM
13

All the fucking time. How retarded are you? You can rot with her with such a disregard for the sanctity of life.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 07:21 PM
17

She spent 539 days in jail waiting for the trial, still has a year of corrections programming to do, and still has to live with herself for the rest of her life. Which she can do behind bars. No sympathy deserved.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 07:08 PM
2

Lacking respect for the opposing viewpoint is part of bigotry. Certain opinions are intolerable (legitimate neo-nazis), and deserve no respect. Feminism, even the crazy new wave feminism is not an intolerable opinion. You should respect their opinions and them (to some degree, such as benefit of the doubt) if you want to have a civilized discussion. And why should I listen to you when you say certain opinions are intolerable but feminism is not one of them? And why should I listen to you when yo…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 05:50 PM
1

...Uuh sure? Got a problem specifically with Christians or something?
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:53 PM
7

Arguably never really attempted in real life Arguably can never succeed in real life, either. At least on this planet with our current technological abilities. And with humans involved. A communist utopia can never happen so long as there's a human at the top, because human nature (see: the drive to kill) will always prevail given a long enough time period.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:51 PM
5

Do you know the song "Row Row Row...Row...Row Row..Row Your Boat"?
/r/MensRights23/03/17 08:28 PM
42

Notice how a lot of movies coming out soon (Guardians of the Galaxy 2, the next Fast and Furious movie) are pushing the "we're a family" message? Notice how it's not an actual bloodline family but rather a family of peers and fellows? In other words, the society and fellow citizens now equals the family. Sounds like that one ideology that is diametrically opposed to capitalism.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 08:24 PM
9

Go home and take an online course. That's the only way that argument can work. University is not your home. You are sharing it with thousands of other people.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 11:40 PM
49

A "Nu-male" factory. That's all this is.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 04:42 PM
6

So women are just too emotional to handle even taking a test? Is that really the message this article wanted to send?
/r/MensRights28/06/16 07:36 PM
2

Why should dangerous work be a different discussion? Because cherry-picking. These statistics only favor feminists with cherry-picking.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 05:54 PM
12

"How can we create a truly equal society when male-specific issues aren’t just ignored, but laughed at?" Her first mistake was believing feminism is for equality of all the sexes. They claim that's what it's about, the dictionary definition claims that's what it's about, but when put into practice and seen in action it's anything but.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:19 PM
30

That being said, you're right that they don't face any legal inequality. That's all your entitled to. The moment you start telling people that they must perceive you how you want them to, that's the moment we have problems. That's robbing people of having their own perspective.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 01:35 AM
8

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/02/13/clinton-in-nevada-not-everything-is-about-an-economic-theory/
/r/MensRights17/02/16 04:27 PM
1

Well, both have saddles, but only one's carrying any burden. So at least HE'S a pack-horse. She might just be a riding horse. Which still I argue would've made a great point, without the labels on the packing.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 03:22 AM
-1

It would, if they both weren't pack horses. If the male was a pack horse, and the female was just a saddle-less horse, then it'd make more sense. Or actually, just removing the text FROM the boxes would've conveyed the message just fine, because then it's a male horse carrying all the burden while the female horse carries nothing. Sometimes, less is more. Without labels on the boxes this would've been a lot more impactful.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 01:02 AM
6

Seriously, this. If there is a wage gap, then let's say, all things being equal, a woman pastry baker is making only 77% on the dollar than her male pastry baker counterpart is. That is a wage gap (and unless the employer's being a dick, isn't realistically happening). What's actually happening is different grades of pay dependent on responsibilities required to do said jobs (the difference between, say, an RN and a neurosurgeon...both medical field, but vastly different responsibilities), which…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 12:23 AM
2

That's exactly how it should be. The burden of proof is on the accuser, not the accused. If someone says you did something they better have evidence, otherwise as far as everyone else is concerned it's bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 06:28 PM
12

I like to hope (and it's a big hope) that it'll help them realize the logic is juvenile and imbecilic. Sometimes the best thing to do to bratty kids is to turn their brattiness back on them, to "see how they like it". And when they ultimately say "no", that's when you say "then why do you think it's okay for you to do it?" At that point they either learn their lesson, or everyone sees them for the little shits they are.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 07:07 PM
2

Damn, here I thought I was being clever :(
/r/MensRights27/12/15 06:42 PM
95

Femsplaining. Time to turn this retardation back on their faces. Tell them to stop "femsplaining".
/r/MensRights27/12/15 05:26 PM
5

Still waiting to hear how that's playing the "victim", especially with the "but we'll be fine" bit you so conveniently left out.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 01:34 AM
8

When you are brainwashed into believing "that's just the way the world is now" I think it's less brainwashing and more begrudgingly, resentful acceptance...
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:17 PM
6

Exactly. What, should we go about the entire relationship BARELY touching one another? Close intimate contact is integral to a healthy relationship!
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:58 PM
1

I think you just gave me cancer with that post. I know it's satire, but that's how toxic that was to read. I think we need to call the EPA.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 10:15 PM
8

Because, like it or not, they are the face of feminism now. They are the image people invoke when they hear the word "feminist". Is it warranted? Is it hyperbole? Doesn't matter, that's the reality of the situation. Feminism got usurped because moderate feminists allowed it to get usurped, and why wouldn't they? The crazies are doing all the heavy lifting but at the same time tarnishing whatever gains they've managed to get. So, great job, feminists! In your goal for equality you've allowed gend…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 05:30 PM
7

Because the "moderate, not all feminists" feminists still benefit from the skewed favoritism that the extremist feminists manage to get installed. The extremists are the grunts doing all the hard work while the more mid-line feminists reap the rewards. Why would they want to speak up too loudly against them? They're accomplishing exactly what they all want, deep down; superiority. S'gonna hurt like hell when that pendulum swings back into their faces.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 05:24 PM
1

Because video games are the cool new way to get politicized agendas straight into the minds of people, but the video game demographic as a whole is very resistant to such things and very often rails against it unlike the other creative media outlets. So when that happens, they try to destroy the credibility behind the apparatus, because what they can't use for their own gain then becomes a threat to them. It backfired on them with Jack Thompson then. It's backfiring on them with Anita Sarkeesian…
/r/MensRights02/11/14 07:41 PM
12

I remember seeing a few months back, I wanna say it was People Magazine, with Hillary on the cover and the title "It's time to break the ultimate glass ceiling." And that disgusted me. If people are going to vote for Hillary (that is if she officially runs) just for the sake of saying "Look we have a woman president, now!", then...I dunno. I'll move to Norway or something. But I'll never be able to take the US seriously ever again, short of a systemic regime change.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:12 PM
11

Isn't it, though? That's just how ass backwards this country is right now.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:30 PM
12

In the states, Socialist is to today what Communist was during the 60s/70s (depending on where you live, or in other words, anywhere that's not a big city on the coast)
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:26 PM
3

Well of course it is, but confronting her about it then would have done nothing but create more bad vibes. The dad understood that, and also understood that his child can't even grasp the situation. The only one affected in the end was the lady with the super inflated sense of ego that just got her balloon popped by a man who, instead of fighting back and gifting her a sense of vindication, gave zero fucks and watched as she stormed away flustered and furious. Kudos to the dad. EDIT: And kudos t…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:25 PM
4

kid's not even old enough to crawl Pretty sure the kid's not old enough to even be aware of what that lady was spouting off about, so I don't see how he could have been "compromised" in any way. As other people are saying, when the kid's older, THEN you can stand up and put people like this in their place, and then inform your child why you had to do it. If he had taken the bait with this situation then all it would have created are bad vibes, and THAT is something a child at that age can pick u…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:15 PM
5

You just recently changed your arguement from "stranger rapes are rare" to "VIOLENT stranger rapes are rare" when evidence to the contrary started being posted. You can't stand to be wrong so you instead change the rules of the game while the game's still being played. THAT'S logic failing. Like I said, you're done. Pick up your ball, and go home. I now wash my hands of this, because you're not worth it. Not like anything anyone in this thread will say will change your mind anyway, since you'll …
/r/MensRights04/09/12 02:42 PM
5

So someone finally posts concrete statistical data to show your "99% of rapes aren't stranger rape" is flat out wrong, and all you do is stick your fingers in your ear and go "NOPE NOPE THEY'RE WRONG I'M RIGHT NOPE NOPE BE ULTRA SPECIFIC NOPE NOPE!" You're done. Leave the thread. All you have left is petty bickering inside you until people relent on your point just to shut you up. You're better off just going to somewhere else, like /r/aww or something.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 02:29 PM
6

A mummer is a real world term, existed long before ASOIAF. It means "one who goes merrymaking in disguise during festivals" or "one who performs pantomimes in a broad fashion".
/r/MensRights17/08/12 09:05 PM
1

Fucking upvoted with my dick, because I'm a man and am not ashamed to have one!
/r/MensRights04/04/12 10:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter