TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DarkGamer Archive

View 0 posts and 189 comments by DarkGamer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

These are all terrible ideas
/r/seduction17/10/19 02:04 PM
1

So you read the paper in the last 30 seconds, or are you just repeating things you heard as an excuse not to expose yourself to evidence that might contradict what you think you know? You're arguing from a position of ignorance, and you're advocating violence over it. Don't you want to see all the evidence before literally encouraging others to kill people? It appears your downvoting of my replies has given me a 5 minute post reply delay, so this will be my last response. I've tried to reach out…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/19 04:32 PM
0

Fetuses are sentient. No they're not. Not before 24 weeks, anyway. I just linked a medical paper that proves they're not. here, I'll link it again. Maybe you'll read it this time and learn what the hell you're talking about before you advocate killing people over your medical misunderstanding. Vegans don't eat eggs for a reason. OK, what is that reason and why is it relevant here? Its not forcing them into reprocustions they dind't have. Its not allowing them to kill a baby Once again, babies ar…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/19 04:19 PM
0

An Appendix doesn't have the possibility to be a human. With cloning technology, it could. We have been able to make many types of human tissue into stem cells which could then be implanted into an embryo. For the sake of ethical discussion, let's assume this technology has been perfected. Are appendixes sacred now and we should kill doctors who remove them? What about all the skin cells we scrub off in the shower? Those could similarly be made into living beings one day. What about mastrubation…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/19 04:07 PM
0

There's an important difference between life that was never sentient and a life that was and will be again. A better analogy to terminating a pregnancy would be removing an appendix. It's human life, but it's not sentient. It won't survive on its own outside the body. If we took a sample of its tissue perhaps we could clone it into a fully sentient being, but we don't give it ethical consideration because this has not yet happened. You're being hypocritical referencing the ethical cost of life c…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/19 03:56 PM
0

Fetuses are not capable of sentience before 24 weeks. Connections from the periphery to the cortex are not intact before 24 weeks of gestation. Most pain neuroscientists believe that the cortex is necessary for pain perception; cortical activation correlates strongly with pain experience and an absence of cortical activity generally indicates an absence of pain experience. The lack of cortical connections before 24 weeks, therefore, implies that pain is not possible until after 24 weeks. Even af…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/19 03:21 PM
3

Thank you. People have to understand what terms mean before they can legitimately criticize them.
/r/MGTOW24/01/19 05:49 PM
-14

His stance is ridiculous. No one is going to accuse him of sexual harassment for just playing fortnite with women. Yet, every up-voted response is celebrating his sexist self exile. These comments are the last straw for me; this sub has become toxic. I'm off to other subreddits that care about men's rights that aren't so misogynistic, like /r/OneY and /r/MensLib I really hope that this can one day once again be a place that Men's rights can be advocated for in constructive and inclusive ways. It…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 05:22 PM
2

there are biological differences between the rights of men and women Differences between men and women, or between the rights of men and women? It's plainly obvious we're different physically, but that does not necessarily mean the rules regarding acceptable behaviors should be different.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:58 PM
7

You made the right call, circumcision is genital mutilation
/r/MensRights22/07/18 01:28 PM
10

Garrison Kealor(sp?) for example. He put his hand on a women's back during a mutual hug and lost his show. That is what today's men are facing. That's not entirely accurate, apparently there was more to it than that.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 03:07 AM
3

You are taking this way too seriously. It's a game. It doesn't have to be historically accurate. It just has to be fun. People don't buy this game in order to pay homage to WWII sacrifice. They buy this game to pwn noobs on the other team and teabag their corpse. Do you also get pissed off that female characters don't have strength scores that are 40% lower in every RPG ever? Let people have their escapism and pretend to be whatever character they want to be in a system of fun game rules. Making…
/r/MensRights13/07/18 03:06 PM
5

I was doing deadlifts at the gym last week and a woman approached me unsolicited and gave me some tips on my form, (apparently I was rounding my back.) I didn't mind though, she was being helpful and friendly.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 03:12 PM
1

Understandably so, when working with isotopes that lend themselves to weaponization failure is catastrophic and long-lasting. I'm excited by the prospects of Thorium salt reactors that fail safely when things go wrong.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 04:21 AM
8

I thought gas plants could also be fired up rapidly as needed and polluted a lot less than coal. Battery technology combined with solar may make this problem obsolete very soon.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 04:59 PM
2

And the very last lines discuss the differences by province. Are those incorrect?
/r/MensRights29/04/18 04:08 PM
1

There's a big difference between supplementing a labor pool with migrants and crafting a worldwide conspiracy to impose racial hegemony via eugenics.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:47 PM
0

You don't appear to understand what communism is, no one is credibly advocating for that in America. Such hyperbole just makes you seem ignorant.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:14 PM
-4

It's troubling to me how much overlap there is between men's rights and alt-right conspiracy theorists. It's really toxic to the whole movement.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:11 PM
8

9 US states and Washington DC have common law marriage as well.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:10 PM
1

It says that at the bottom. It seems like no one actually reads the links.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:04 PM
3

If you'd read the material you'd know it said that emotional support and going out together in public is enough in some provinces.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:03 PM
9

It says Quebec is an exception at the bottom of the infographic. Read the whole thing.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:02 PM
2

Suddenly, conspiracy theories… I'm concerned you're watching too much Infowars.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 11:58 AM
1

Human shittiness is not bound by gender, it just manifests slightly differently in each.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 03:20 PM
9

Toxic femininity?
/r/MensRights16/04/18 09:08 PM
7

Ah, yes. That is a frequent misinterpretation of the meaning.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 05:16 PM
16

Unfortunately the concept seems to be unique to men, as there isn't social pressure for women or children to suppress emotion and act tough.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 05:02 PM
71

Is that bad tho? Nothing worse than a dude acting like a diva bitching about petty shit. Have you heard the term "toxic masculinity" before? This is the clearest example of it I've seen in a long time. Expressing emotions is healthy, even ones you consider petty. Men should not have to be stoic beasts of burden to fit in socially.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 04:42 PM
12

I'm starting it right here, right now: I accept you bro, men come in many different sizes and shapes, and you are an awesome manly man. Be proud of who you are! Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Those who hate just make themselves look shallow and prejudiced, and people of value like yourself have no time for assholes like that.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:35 PM
16

I love intelligent women, but this lady sounds like /r/iamverysmart material.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 02:42 PM
19

Shkreli was put in prison because he violated parole by asking people to steal locks of Hillary Clinton's hair over social media, otherwise he wouldn't have seen any prison time.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 07:58 PM
215

You'd think someone who cares this much about racism and sexism would know what the terms mean.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 04:25 PM
8

I think kids are great and lots of fun, but I would never talk to a kid who is not mine. If I found a lost kid at the mall I wouldn't engage with them at all, I'd walk over to a security guard and tell them. What I wish people realized is that this irrational fear is in fact isolating their children from society, there are tons of male role models who will never ever step forth because of the irrational fears parents harbor regarding their children.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 02:47 PM
11

if I understand correctly, to be prosecuted for the crime he was sentenced for they had to designate a hug as a "prohibited sexual act." That is the issue here. Hugs are now prohibited sexual acts in Iowa, and adults can be punished for hugging minors just as severely as if they committed other sexual acts. People can be put in jail for years for persuading minors to hug them.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 02:36 PM
8

"It is important to note that nothing should prohibit teachers from hugging students for reassurance, comfort, or in congratulation without putting themselves at risk of being charged with the crime of sexual exploitation," Justice Bruce Zager wrote in the court's opinion And yet that's exactly what this ruling will accomplish. Although there were other mitigating factors, like flirty Facebook messages, if not for the "prohibited sexual act" of hugging, this man would not be in prison for this c…
/r/MensRights31/03/18 02:32 PM
3

I think an important part of being masculine is not letting other people define what masculinity is or should be. It's up to the individual. What's toxic is letting others set the bar and determine the metric.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 11:51 PM
5

To be fair, the WNBA may have a smaller fan base, but the fans they have are really into it.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 06:34 PM
115

Sure is.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 02:25 PM
5

Judaism.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 05:42 PM
6

He could've been set for life, made millions upon millions. And most of all, lived out what I'm sure his life long dream was, and been a star NFL pro bowl line backer It's terrible what was taken from him, however it's worth noting that 78% of NFL players go bankrupt within 2 years of retirement. It's not a golden ticket to financial success.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:21 PM
12

"I want a refund for our wedding."
/r/MensRights30/09/17 04:36 PM
1

My point is we shouldn't want to be at replacement levels, we should want fewer people because that means more resources per person. There is no need to import people from elsewhere to make up the shortfall, this is especially true going forward as fewer people can be far more productive than in the past.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 07:28 PM
3

Not at all it is true. Falling birth rate, well below replacement level. Look at Japan, Italy, Hungary or any western country. Contracting western populations. We should be celebrating this. It is fallacious to think that we cannot have more wealth per capita (thanks to less population pressure) or diminished productive capacity (thanks to automation) with a reduced population. Reducing population means there just might be enough resources per person to sustain this planet; it happens naturally …
/r/MensRights24/08/17 06:03 PM
4

Oh please. Hyperbole much?
/r/MensRights24/08/17 04:55 PM
7

What a horrid bunch. They deserve everything that's coming to them. I'm surprised she only got 5 months considering the damage they did.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:36 PM
2

Doubling down on ad hominem attacks, eh? Maybe one day you'll learn how science works. Hint: it's not about "winning," it's about getting as close to objective reality as possible. Some times that means swallowing your pride and preconceived notions and actually reading and learning about a topic. It means using data to find out if you're right or wrong and not your gut feelings. You are the problem with our society. Fucking read something before you bitch about it.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 10:18 PM
3

I could go make a study that says women get turned on by eating licorice and publish it right now dude. Its some back alley study hosted by a bunk source for shock value and traffic. Use common sense, please. Drop your cheap "im an intellectual" act (I can tell you love it by the way you type) and let think for a minute. Men love sex... Oh shit cant believe I said that on this meninist(?) sub. I could grab any one of my buddies and be like "yo this chick is a 4 but she's dtf" they'd be all over …
/r/MensRights13/07/17 10:10 PM
2

I won't give milo the traffic, so I went directly to the study and read it. It seems to be rather full of citations to other studies with significant sample sizes. I haven't followed every link to check methodology, however. Have you even read it? Here's that link again for you. I look forward to your analytical critique.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 09:51 PM
5

Your emotional instinctual reaction isn't as compelling as data, nor are your insulting characterizations. Have you read the study? On what grounds do you refute it?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 09:47 PM
0

Indeed. If the study is relevant, link to the study. I don't want to support this alt-right scum.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 09:40 PM
84

Huh? Why can't men collect child support in Utah?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:10 PM
17

I don't watch basketball but if I did I don't think I'd care if the players were convicted criminals, why would I care about baseless accusations? That's like saying you can't enjoy a book because an unethical person wrote it.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:19 PM
2

The internet has given a megaphone to everyone, regardless of competency. I was once hopeful that this democratization of information would lift us all up and educate us. Seeing what has happened to the discourse here as access becomes wider and the accessibility bar becomes lower makes me concerned that instead Internet will suffer from eternal September in a race to the bottom. We need to educate people systemically because they aren't educating themselves.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 06:26 PM
-1

Those incentives need to be fixed, too.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 11:06 PM
-1

Her apology doesn't matter anymore though, the 4 years is up. He already went through it. "Sorry" won't give back half a decade of solitude, being shamed by his family, and being scarred for life. True, however isn't 4.5 years better than >7 years; what he was originally sentenced to? I'm less concerned with the apology than I am the systemic incentives to do the right thing.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:38 PM
7

Equivalency aside, at least she experienced guilt and came clean. If she didn't feel that way he'd still be in prison. A harsh penalty in this case would serve to discourage other false accusers from coming forward. That being said, when false accusers don't come forward and admit the lie, throw the book at them.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 07:06 PM
6

I'll just leave this here. And she's from Camden no less.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 04:08 PM
1

Quite a straw man you're building there. This is a college indoctrinated leftyland site. Slicing, dicing and stuffing genitals all over the place is paramount to the believers around here. Independent thought is highly frowned upon. Now if you were promoting little boys being dressed up in short, frilly skirts the leftist gang around here would lustfully applaud your actions. No, freedom is tantamount to many of us here. That includes the freedom to dress how one wants and behave in non-harmful …
/r/MensRights07/03/17 10:07 PM
1

I encourage you to watch this and then tell me that transgendered kids are abused or broken or coerced in some way. These kids know exactly who they are, and many of them are healthy and happy. (Apologies for the weird video, apparently this is the only way it can remain on youtube without DMCA takedown)
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:59 PM
1

Further, you reference the APA yet ignore the fact that many Trans campaigners openly disagree with them. I referenced that to counter your implication that becoming trans-gendered was harmful and parents supporting it tantamount to child abuse. "Many ... agree with them" sure, but those are weasel words. This is not, by any means, a consensus as you seem to be implying. Many, even today, agree the world is flat. It isn't. ... you start talking about 'climate deniers' ... This is also why I made…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:49 PM
2

That's an extremely long way of trying to hide the fact that you are unable to counter the basic commonly known fact that it is liberals that are responsible for this. That doesn't mean we should hate on them. But it IS a fact that must be acknowledged in order to understand and move forward with a serious plan to change things. Sure, liberals fight for the rights of trans people more than conservatives. What this video lacks is discussion of the issue of whether trans rights should be supported…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:26 PM
4

Er, Liberals are specifically the ones at the forefront of pushing transgender issues around children. What evidence do you have that says otherwise? No doubt. Despite the existence of two major political parties, there are many with diverse opinions on issues. For example, I'm a pro-guns progressive. I'm sick of conversations about the rights of others becoming a finger pointing exercise in scapegoating liberals. It does an injustice to the matter at hand to dismiss sapient points and rather in…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:23 PM
7

What is this garbage? This video like Poe's law, the personification of everything opponents of Men's rights accuse us of. Highlights: Scapegoats liberals for fighting for transgendered rights Calls opponents retards Accuses parents of transgendered kids of abuse Tells them they should "kill themselves" Take your bigoted crap elsewhere. Also, I encourage you to watch Louis Theroux's transgendered kids and try and tell me those kids are being brainwashed. Some people know things about themselves …
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:02 PM
1

I'm a feminist. Egalitarians diminish the female experience and struggle for equality by calling it something else. They're dividing us in what is a united fight. I believe terms like feminist and masculist are divisive. If we really all want the same thing we need to define what we're going for in a way that's inclusive to all. I see your point in honoring women of the past who called themselves feminists, however I can't help but think that many of them probably wouldn't want to ally themselve…
/r/MensRights26/02/17 07:41 PM
3

You're right, we've made a lot of progress, but there is still tons to be done, specifically for women of color. I agree progress has been made, but there's a lot more to do, including the struggle that many men face because of gender norms. I'm curious, what challenges are you referring to that women of color experience relative to other women and what is it you are suggesting be done? I appreciate that, at least in the western world, gender norms are going the way of the dodo among younger mil…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 09:56 PM
10

Violence and abuse is never OK. I'm sorry you had to go through that. Make sure it ends with you.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:23 PM
14

Feminism is about equality, trying to change gender norms so men can cry in public and women can be CEO's, or vice versa. Feminism wants to provide rights for men, to get full custody of their child, to solve the rising suicide rate among men, and to encourage men to not have to hide their emotions if they don't want to. Feminism wants to destroy the patriarchy that keeps us all in these dumb boxes where men have to provide and work, while women stay at home. Feminism wants to allow people to ch…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:16 PM
3

Good point; there are asshats on both sides, that's why I'm for a rebranding. Instead of masculism and feminism I identify as egalitarian. There's less room to argue for supremacy by anyone under such a definition.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:06 PM
5

Fuck those helicopter parents. Kids have never, ever been safer than they are today. They need to stop acting like little Timmy will spontaneously combust if out of eyesight for a moment, it will only serve to make him a codependent infantile adult.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 09:48 PM
2

There's not much legal backing for that if one is not married and does not cohabitate.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 12:38 PM
8

This misses the point so severely it's tragilarious. Equality means not codifying differences between the sexes in the rules and laws of a country. Men and women should be educated the same, be treated the same by government agencies, and have the same legal opportunities and rights. They're portraying a system where men have different inherent opportunities than women because of some "good old boys" network. This will breed resentment, and I don't find it to be true. Women are very public about…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 05:35 PM
3

This perception is furthered by zealout neckbeards who loudly proclaim on TV "America is a christian nation!" Although it's completely wrong and shows a lack of understanding of history.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 06:01 PM
11

It's AAVE now; what happened to ebonics?
/r/MensRights25/04/16 04:29 PM
1

Sounds like the only thing you have to fear is fear itself
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:59 PM
7

Life's simpler when one doesn't have to introspect or grow and can just blame others when things don't go one's way.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 05:05 PM
3

I predict bad things for the greater Flynt area.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 04:45 PM
7

For me the ethical line is drawn at sentience and the capacity for suffering, of which a fetus has none.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 05:30 PM
1

The child has no choice and has to be taken care of. Doesn't matter what either parent did or didn't do. We can't have a system that punishes children for their parents mistakes. That's the system we have now: Parent fucks up > CPS takes child > child placed into foster care. I'd even go one step further and fix the parent if they are not responsible enough to terminate a pregnancy they cannot afford. (I recognize this is an unpopular belief.)
/r/MensRights11/03/16 10:27 PM
1

At the same time, no child should be forced in to poverty. Just want to point out that this isn't a black and white issue. People focus too much on the parents and not on the child, which is what this is really about. The system is designed to be fair to the child, not the parents. Choice comes with responsibility and consequences. We have sufficient technology now that unwanted children need never be born. If one births a child they cannot afford I consider that to be child abuse. Under such a …
/r/MensRights11/03/16 08:23 PM
16

Something similar should be implemented here. I look forward to a day that freedom of choice exists for everyone. No one should be forced to become a parent against their will.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 06:53 PM
7

Yes and even if unlikely it can happen, which is why I believe it was treated differently and punished more severely historically. Also it was screwing with lineage and inheritance which was a big deal back in the day.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 08:34 PM
6

I absolutely do. Some people overcome trauma and some dwell in it. I also have a close family member who was raped and she moved on and is quite emotionally healthy today. It is violence, I consider it to be akin to assault, which can fuck one up psychologically as well. Assault doesn't have the same social stigma though.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 07:44 PM
16

Yeah; Murder > Maiming > Rape Especially since women (for the moment anyway) have access to the technology to not carry the rapists' baby to term. At one time it was akin to maternal enslavement by forcing them into motherhood and ruining any chance they had of finding a mate, back when people cared if a woman was chaste. Now it's closer to assault, and any physical effects are treatable. No one is expected to be a virgin anymore. I think we react to it differently than assault because we're con…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 06:23 PM
1

For someone that appears to care a whole lot about racism and sexism, she doesn't even know what those terms mean. All it takes is one dictionary look up to prove those definitions wrong.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:05 PM
22

Find a sharpie, cross out "men", write "human". Then write "I'm confronting sexist peers" at the bottom.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:17 PM
13

Remember to bring a notary public on your next date to officiate the consent to physical intimacy forms, your consent to drink alcoholic beverages without waiving intimacy consent, and your during and post-coitus consent forms to ensure that sex didn't change into rape midway through or afterwards.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 04:17 AM
19

I never really understood the rationality of criminalizing prostitution. It almost seems like a lot of women don't want men to have an alternative to monogamous committed relationships. Having easy access to a sexual outlet would certainly flip the balance in many relationships.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 05:46 PM
20

Marriage is a sucker's bet, I'm amazed anyone gets married in Florida if that is a possible outcome.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 05:25 PM
1

I wish we'd stop addressing our problems by which race is affected most. It reinforces grouping people this way and addressing problems racially. I wish people would speak for socioeconomic groups and regions instead. We can't move past it if this is how we frame our problems.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 10:31 PM
1

Someone needs to buy your professor a dictionary.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 09:25 PM
1

Apathy regarding outcomes is indistinguishable from confidence
/r/seduction02/10/15 04:45 PM
3

It's the only way to be sure
/r/MensRights16/08/15 02:23 PM
2

Why pay for your own vacation when you can fuck a patsy and make them pay for it? Sad.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 02:20 PM
1

Well trolled, 5/5.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:26 PM
3

I'm more of a fight fire with fire type of person. Not a good policy if preventing fires is your goal.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 02:46 PM
1

What's the solution? ಠ_ಠ Publicly shaming anyone who condones rape.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 02:17 PM
3

Shouldnt have cencored the names. I'm sure there's some sick fucks around here who wouldnt mind doing some revenge rape on these bitches. I'm all for equality so when they release their story I will gladly laugh at them. Take that shit out of here. Be part of the solution, not the problem.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 02:00 PM
11

Happened to a friend of mine. Called the cops because his wife was hitting him, had to fight her off while on the phone, got thrown in jail. Liberty and justice for all indeed.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:20 PM
3

If only there were a ubiquitous and easily available machine that did simple arithmetic for us...
/r/MensRights12/07/15 04:45 PM
2

pretentious Yankee writing Ya done writ wit them big words and sassed meh with yer "casual clothes," yer are lucky them yankees took away mah right to dispense 'yall some education behind the shed. *spits chaw in spitoon*
/r/MensRights12/07/15 04:43 PM
1

I know what it means, and ain't nobody got time for that.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 05:53 AM
1

You make a very compelling point.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 01:33 AM
3

She was transferred because of it so I'm sure it was a consideration.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 01:01 AM
17

Think of it this way: if a law is tyrannical to 100% of the population it has a much higher chance of repeal than a law that is tyrannical to 50% of the population. Also it's worth noting that this isn't the first offence for her; she also had a record of impropriety with an 8th grader at her former school and was transferred. Her sentence seems less harsh if you take that into account.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:38 AM
9

Fair enough, let's do it as a ratio. She was ~176% their ages, so she has sex with three 53 year olds.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 11:10 PM
8

She was 30, 13 years older than her partners... so... we get three 43 year olds to have sex with her. An eye for an eye a fuck for a fuck?
/r/MensRights03/07/15 09:54 PM
40

The law may be overly severe, but at least it's starting to be applied similarly to both sexes.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 09:51 PM
0

Talk to the next girl that interests you. You have 5 seconds from the moment you notice her to do this. If you don't make that window, move on. Think of it like the high-dive. If you stand there peering over the edge it's easy to freeze up, if you jump before you think about it you'll emerge amazed how easy it was.
/r/seduction28/06/15 03:00 PM
6

Went to find who she supported. Was not disappointed.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:04 PM
1

If your wife chooses to stop contributing to the marriage and just live off of you, then it's time to consider divorce. ... It's entirely up to you. You can choose to end the relationship and choose to not be financially responsible for another person. To avoid alimony the only recourse when a married person isn't contributing enough financially is immediate divorce... that sounds broken to me. We should incentivise family units to stay together. No. If alimony went away tomorrow, couples wouldn…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:46 PM
2

When one spouse makes a lot more than the other, it makes no sense for the other spouse to work 40+ hours a week to increase their combined income by only 2%, especially if you spend most of that income on child care and takeout food, etc. If you remove alimony, that means no lesser-earning spouse can dare be a stay at home parent, because they're risking being divorced at age 60 with no savings, no retirement fund, no career, no work history, no employability. That would be an unfair situation.…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:56 PM
2

We need alimony reform and divorce court reform, but getting rid of alimony completely would be wrong. Why? Please elaborate.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:31 PM
5

If our society believes in justice and equality, this needs to happen.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 01:22 PM
2

Equality, ladies and gentlemen.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 08:46 PM
3

It's strange to think about a gender swapped version, like a banner celebrating guys are knitting and being nurses and working as seamsters. The whole things seems rather pointless and patronizing.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 04:41 PM
1

Then revoke it should they experiment in college?
/r/MensRights14/03/15 03:49 PM
-2

Maturity doesn't happen at some magical cutoff date. I always found the concept that one is not responsible for one's own behavior or capable of making decisions until this time to be especially odd. I resented this when I was a youth.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:34 PM
6

I agree, except for the whore part.
/r/seduction14/09/14 11:55 AM
3

A female friend called me a feminist because I push for equality. I no longer appreciate this label, the problem is that many who call themselves feminists are pushing past equality to legal superiority. Egalitarianism is the goal.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:36 PM
6

This is funny. You're saying that women's tendency to wrongly justify (or have justified for them) their own actions based on the actions of others, is itself justified based partly on the actions of others (movie makers, in this particular example). No that's not what I'm saying at all. I used movies as an example to show how our culture finds women to be more sympathetic than men. I believe this portrayal is symptom, not a cause. You might be on to something with the life-imitating art-imitati…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 03:28 PM
5

if the mother can prove you are the biological father, you're most likely going to be bound to pay alimony. Alimony is a payment to the partner with less income to maintain their quality of life. You're thinking of child support.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:57 PM
9

Oh yeah. In the US, If it's your kid, or even if it just says it's your kid in the paperwork you're liable for child support until the he/she's 18. Depending on where you are, you might have to pay way more than what it actually costs to raise a child. If you don't pay, you can be thrown in prison.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:52 PM
13

Women seem to garner sympathy more easily than men do. I think it might have something to do with the way we're wired mixed with them seeming more physically vulnerable. Every movie depicts women as something to be protected, the deaths of women are scripted to be more emotionally impactful than the death of men, who it's fine to kill en masse for cheap entertainment value.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:39 PM
4

Rape vs. being forced into financial bondage for 18 years... the rape sounds better, at least it'd be over quicker.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:22 PM
27

Good on you for recognizing that she should not be punished for the mistakes of her mother. You sound like a good Dad.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:18 PM
91

^ and in one fell swoop equality can be restored. If women get the unilateral choice whether to keep the baby or not, men should get the choice whether to be legally be a parent or not. A decision that important and life altering needs to be voluntary.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:14 PM
21

Everyone justifies their actions, even when immoral. This is not limited to women.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:11 PM
7

That chart can be easily explained. No fault divorce began in the US right before the peak in the divorce rate. Before then you had to prove your spouse cheated on you or was somehow no good.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:40 PM
2

Thank you for supplying hard evidence for something that many of us suspected but could offer no proof.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 05:26 PM
9

These events are not unrelated. Without financial problems largely caused by alimony payments, Williams might still be with us. Sometimes it takes a tragedy for the public to take notice and I want some good to come from it.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:58 AM
127

In terms of physical strength [men and women] are not equal. Therefore when a weaker man hits a stronger woman she should not hit back? How do they not see the sexist double standard they are promoting?
/r/MensRights29/07/14 01:07 PM
24

Mandatory means interest is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 03:01 PM
2

Rape is never funny unless you're being raped by a clown.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 11:12 PM
2

Want to be sexually active in NZ? Break out the consent contracts and webcams. How romantic.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:33 PM
14

You'd never know incidents of rape are at an all-time low. The problem is getting better, why are we subjecting kids to this fear-mongering horse shit?
/r/MensRights30/06/14 03:30 AM
2

Hasn't happened yet.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 03:44 PM
4

How about we fire the faculty member who required a law for this we're at it? They have no business being an educator.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 04:54 PM
1

That's troubling.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:26 PM
2

I wish I'd done that :)
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:49 PM
1

At a rave I once got some water for a woman who was throwing up at her request. Luckily, I'd brought a plastic cup for myself so I could drink tap water and save money. Her friend was surprised when I returned with cup and not an overpriced $5 bottle they were selling at the venue; she looked at it and said, "I'm sorry but we don't know you." I realized at that moment that she assumed I was trying to drug her already violently ill friend. It saddened and disgusted me that someone would presume a…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:28 PM
4

Egalitarianism shouldn't be so hard to promote among those claiming to strive for equality.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:12 PM
3

Good advice. I'm sorry you had to go through this and thank you for sharing your experience so that others may avoid the same hardship. Your kid is lucky to have a dad who will fight for them despite all adversity.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 02:44 PM
4

In hindsight, before things got bad were there any signs of this vindictive and destructive behavior?
/r/MensRights28/03/14 02:15 PM
5

What the hell is wrong with this gal?
/r/MensRights28/03/14 02:03 PM
0

Oh, auto insurance. For some reason I thought health. You don't have to worry about that :)
/r/MensRights15/10/13 11:23 AM
1

Your insurance is > $3600/yr?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 11:21 AM
2

Sexism is equality?
/r/MensRights14/05/13 12:05 PM
1

Your constant references to abortion as murder are fallacious. Neither the courts nor medical professionals consider it such. Additionally, you cannot murder that which is not sentient. Thanks to birth control technology, sex no longer necessarily means procreation nor should we expect it to. Participating in sex is not consenting to have a child. There are many forms of birth control, I have never heard of anyone using abortion as a primary birth control method. You are making up a story about …
/r/MensRights08/05/13 07:04 PM
5

Are you talking about abortion? Abortion is a medical procedure, not an act of violence. Fetuses are not babies. There is no murder involved. As for what the answer to unwanted pregnancy is, both parties should get to opt-in to becoming a parent. A woman should have the choice of whether to carry the pregnancy to term or have an abortion or adopt, and a man should have a choice of whether they want to become a parent with all of those responsibilities or not. I don't think women should be forced…
/r/MensRights08/05/13 04:43 PM
2

What violence?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 04:28 PM
3

The difference between responsibility and slavery is consent.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 11:04 AM
-3

Ask them what their favorite superhero/childhood idol was, then write it on the shirt. Call them by that name.
/r/seduction19/09/12 02:07 PM
1

Marriage: not even once
/r/MensRights05/09/12 08:41 PM
4

Wow, this is the fist time I've heard someone else advocate this... people usually react to me like I'm nuts when I tell them something similar IRL. This makes me feel good. Edit: I'm not being sarcastic, I'm just glad that taking government out of our relationships is now a thing.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 12:19 AM
2

I don't understand what's offensive to you here. It seems like the artist is making a statement against gender roles for both men and women.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 06:09 PM
3

$50!
/r/MensRights19/06/12 10:00 AM
4

Her name is Wanetta Gibson. She got a $1.5mil settlement for the false rape, which she has since spent. Here's the story of how a PI got her confession.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 09:30 AM
1

Living in exile just to impregnate and skip out on someone he doesn't like? This doesn't sound "smart" either.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 02:06 PM
1

Becoming a wanted criminal for this does not sound "smart" either.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 01:46 PM
1

Dumb girls will get used by assholes who know how to manipulate them, and they'll get dumped the moment a baby comes along. Such a guy will be legally forced to pay this girl to raise his baby. He doesn't like her enough to stay but his kid will be stuck with her as a mom. This doesn't sound smart to me.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:29 PM
5

Toastmasters is great for learning to communicate in front of a large group. Most do weekly meetings. I recommend anyone that needs practice speaking look up their local chapter.
/r/seduction01/05/12 03:27 PM
1

Fucking brilliant. Thanks for linking that.
/r/seduction26/04/12 03:41 PM
5

I got one shortly after making this post. I must say, this is one of the most childish things I've ever seen done on reddit. If they can't win an argument, make a straw man subreddit and keep the those you are degrading from responding in it. It really just makes the ones doing it look bad.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 11:23 PM
7

Too bad the cops don't feel that way. ~10 years ago I had a friend who was being assaulted by his wife so he called the cops on her. What did they do? Threw him in jail overnight.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 07:10 AM
10

What the fuck does that have to do with post-modernism?
/r/MensRights12/03/12 03:49 PM
0

That only works if he makes more than she does.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 05:19 AM
7

It's the difference between desperation and confidence.
/r/seduction05/03/12 09:14 PM
2

What's wrong with women not wanting to marry? I am against the institution of marriage, so it sounds like good news to me. It means I'll be able to find suitable partners throughout my life without having to stay in a miserable relationship for the sake of money/kids/a legal contract. Lacking the desire to own and support someone else so they can pop out babies does not make one a slacker.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 03:38 PM
2

You cannot think that one sex is inherently better than the other and be egalitarian. The self-identifying feminists I know do not believe one sex is inherently better than the other, nor do they vilify men in general. When men and women fight for their rights to be the same as that of the other sex, it is egalitarian. It doesn't matter what banner they wave. When one wants rights that exceed that of the other sex is when problems occur.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 05:16 PM
1

Some women see men as walking wallets which provide personal safety and comfort. Some women see men as horn dogs to be manipulated for personal gain. Some women see men as raw materials for procreation with free child subsidies should they be impregnated. These views are every bit as dehumanizing as the example you cite. The very premise that men can objectify and women cannot is sexist; I see a lot of dehumanization, stereotyping, and generalizations from both sexes.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 07:35 AM
3

/r/tall sent me. Get some tailored clothes, bro. They will cost a lot more but they will fit you properly. You will look better. They will give you confidence, and you will be glad you did it. Get someone to do your measurements and check around online. Pull-ups for posture. If you hunch over forwards this is what you need to do to fix it. Since you are a tall dude they will be more challenging (mass cubes as you scale up, linear strength like muscle squares) and you may have to work up to them …
/r/seduction02/03/12 05:33 PM
5

I am keenly aware of this.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:44 AM
6

This is why I have no interest in marriage or kids, I realize just how stacked the deck is against you as a man.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 08:01 AM
1

The issue here isn't ogling, actually! The way men are "objectified" is into models of power and agency--which by definitions means that they are not actually made into objects. If women want men because of something they can do for them rather than who they are, I consider that to be every bit as much objectification. It need not be sexual or physical. the idea that women are attracted to highly muscular men is, frankly, false. Sure, there are some women who do... Not every man wants a rail-thi…
/r/MensRights01/03/12 07:39 AM
1

As a man, I try to imagine what it would be like. I guess it would be like if 95%+ of all the men on TV and in the movies (The ones considered 'attractive' by society) were bodybuilders. And many shows on TV geared toward me were about how to bulk up. And many of the movies geared toward me had a plot that was basically, If I am big and cut enough to look like the incredible hulk, I will get the attractive girl and live happily ever after, otherwise I have failed. I would be screwed if women exp…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 04:54 PM
1

I just don't see it, maybe it's just me. I would hope that the average guy had more respect for himself than to far for such manipulations. You'd be surprised. There are a lot of places in the world where people are far less introspective and erudite than reddit.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 04:41 PM
1

Objectification is looking at someone like a portable and insatiable wallet; looking at someone like their sole purpose is to lift heavy things or protect you from harm; or looking at someone like they are your transportation device. Yup Seeing people as utilities is objectification and sexual attraction, or sexual desires, are not even close to being the same thing as seeing someone as a utility; sex is not "using someone" or a burden, it is a mutually beneficial and natural act/desire. I'll ha…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 04:33 PM
1

Thinking someone is sexy is not the same as objectifying them. When one doesn't care about another as a person but rather only cares only about what they can do for them, that's what I consider objectification. Both men and women do this. When we're discussing fictional characters the argument breaks down a bit though since they are by definition archeytpes, objects, and not people. Archetypes of sexuality are important in stories but women seem to take issue when that is all the characters are …
/r/MensRights27/02/12 04:14 PM
0

I actually only recently subscribed to r/mr, so I haven't seen that article. Do you have a link? It's my understanding that at one time although women were targeted in advertising, men made the money, so expensive things were assumed to be the man's decision while everyday purchases were the domain of women. I did not mean to imply that women were not large consumer group that was targeted with advertisements; it's hard to generalize since each product has a different demographic. My main point …
/r/MensRights27/02/12 03:54 PM
2

I haven't seen anyone suggesting censorship.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:51 AM
9

Well the characters are not people but they do have personality. They are highly sexualized yet they exist only to do your bidding and kick the snot out of your opponent. They are by definition avatars, closer to objects than people. The thing with objectification of men is that, frankly, it almost never happens...Because it inherently relies on the man's agency and humanity to even be possible. I don't understand what you mean by this, when women ogle men it's because of agency and humanity but…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:47 AM
6

"personhole" instead of "manhole." Or the "personperson" who delivers packages.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 01:30 AM
5

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:06 AM
5

the male gaze is catered to the vast majority of the time. That's not really cool. It wouldn't be cool if it were the reverse either. We're seeing a bit of social legacy there. At one time most products were targeted at men because men were assumed to be the breadwinners. This has changed. Women have increased their economic power. If our purchasing habits become equal, so will the targeted marketing that drives it. However, I wouldn't hold out hope that we will do away with showcasing the beaut…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 11:49 PM
22

I think this mostly has to do with market forces. The primary consumers of fighting games like street fighter are young men, who appreciate female sexualization. Where women comprise the target demographic they are catered to and men are more sexualized (romance novels, diet cola ads.) There is also some conflict present in how the sexes prefer to objectify each other: men like visual objectification of women, women prefer emotional/demonstration of affection from men. Each reacts a little negat…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 10:52 PM
8

Oh, didn't realize I had misspelled it. Thanks for the correction.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 07:42 PM
136

Feminism, and masculinism for that matter, should be about equality for all and not placing the rights or wishes of one sex above another. I never understood the objection to objectifying sexuality, I support the rights of both women and men to watch/create sexualized media. If one wants to abstain from creating/consuming such media that is their right but kindly get off everyone else's backs about it. Sexuality is an important part of the human experience and as such it has always been featured…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 06:29 PM
3

Yeah dude, totally! (I kid, I kid...)
/r/MensRights18/02/12 02:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter