TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DarkLordTK Archive

View 0 posts and 59 comments by DarkLordTK on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

They're not "targeting" minors. It's not predatory. They have the bad incentives everyone else has.... clicks and views matter. Frankly, they're not any different than CNN and Fox using inflammatory intros to articles.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 12:56 PM

If anyone really believes this, go watch the videos that exist of this exact thing. Watch the women's world cup team get clowned by a bunch of high school boys. Watch the candid videos of guys getting slapped until they finally lose their shit and unleash. Look up the world record divide that exists between the genders. Watch the videos of average male soldiers stepping in a ring to fight the semi-pro females that train every day. Yes, there is an overlap between the strongest women and the weak…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 06:19 AM
20

I have never witnessed someone spell "intents and purposes" that way. Fascinating. And I mean honestly that makes sense. No shade sir.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 10:28 PM
6

The problem here is statistics. When everyone is talking about themselves, everything is perfect. However, when you look at divorce and infidelity statistics, when people are cheating, it's normally with a human that both partners in a couple know. It's statistically WITH friends. That's why it's a problem. Because statistically, it's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 02:00 PM
3

It's all possible. When people are talking to me about dating, especially early in (especially when using apps) I have them make a list of three things they "must have" and three deal-breakers. (There's nothing super special about the number three, it's arbitrary) But the biggest point is that people often date people who they know have deal breakers, and they just pretend it's not true and hope for the best. A common one is children. If you want children, and the person you're talking to doesn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 05:25 AM
0

No I am not. And also, you are still using a negative viewpoint to frame all of this. How about this...... the whole tone of this post seems to suggest that MOST people in the world have satisfying relationships that check all of their boxes. And people who "settle" are letting items slide. And your viewpoints aligns with that, and suggests that letting those things by is some form of immoral, dishonest, etc... is that fair? Or at least close enough?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 08:24 PM
1

My thesis is that this entire thread is posed as an incredible collection of negatives, and that doesn't have to be that way, is NOT an absolute truth, and that most of this could be re-framed in a much more positive light.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 08:04 PM
3

Ahahahahaha! Nice one!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 07:44 PM
1

To be clear, couldn't you also see the scenario above, but all in positives skews? Knows they did it, but appreciates you anyway? Feels like their decision means something and sticks to them? Is actually loyal? That's what I mean. You're making all negative assumptions for outcomes and a person's outlook. If all of your assumptions are negative, maybe you've been through some shit? Hence the question is a light-hearted but also slightly serious and hopefully mildly comical way that in no way sho…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 07:42 PM
4

Wat?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 07:28 PM
2

Feel like you're making a lot of assumptions there my friend! And pretty negative ones! Are you okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 07:27 PM
1

I propose to you that "settling" is a terrible and incorrect term that is our buzzword. People change what they are looking for all the time based on their circumstances. We never call that settling. Settling has become a toxic meme that we use to defend boundaries that are otherwise difficult to defend as far as I can tell. "Settle" is used to defend some immutable ideal or objective truth that we hold dear. It's wrong and fake.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 07:06 PM
5

The simple answer to this question is... Yes, and usually, and of course.... It depends. The real answer is that the answer varies as much as the people sitting in front of a therapist vary. And it's complicated. And I could write an entire book here on this answer, just based on anecdotal experience. For what it's worth, I am a therapist. I'll try to keep this short, (which is possibly already too late, lol!) with just a few of my first reaction thoughts...... Someone already nailed it with the…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 07:00 PM
3

Lol!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 05:52 PM
4

OP.... I think you find yourself falling into a common trap. You're defining average using your own anecdotal experience and the ideas you get from social media. There is one massive upside to the internet, however.... demographic data is some of the most available data there is because it can be measured objectively. I can assure you that your idea of average is hilariously skewed. Just do the tiniest bit of math when it comes to statistics and realize how flawed your math is. What you claim is…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 02:04 PM
1

What about the kids, actually? I have various opinions about the male/female relationship here, but at the end of the day, the lies fall on the children. False hereditary data is a problem. Honestly this is probably going to take care of itself. As we continue to do more and more testing and work on DNA stuff prenatal, it's going to be more and more of a thing that exists anyway. Additionally I do find it amusing that most of the debates are from the point of view of us not doing it and whether …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:16 PM
-4

Yeah, but the species would end. The only reason dating happens at all is because of men's sex drive!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 02:16 AM
1

Why even ask about virgins, as there's probably not a valuable reason to sort out what would always be a very low percentage group? I'm inclined to believe the percentages would change drastically if you made 3 piles.... virgin, low body count, and high body count, or left it to just "low" or "high". In turn that would change your whole premise likely to... male obsession with "low body count" is overrated. And I believe THAT is where you'd have a debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 02:17 PM
10

Additionally, that advice was solid, actionable, and data driven.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 10:52 PM
1

Look, I get it. When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. And you're right, you can assume anything you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 05:49 PM
1

You can't infer that from the information we have. If you want to puck that apart that literally every part of his story is suspect. Which is probably true in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 03:57 PM
1

It's his girlfriend, it's ABSOLUTELY his circus and monkey!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 09:46 AM
2

This seems super complicated. First and foremost, you need to have superhuman patience about this. Second, she needs to talk to someone about this. Maybe a friend of family member to start. Hopefully that person can see her and check that she's OK. Third..... and this is tricky. My gut tells me something is off here. Like, who has some guy come in and assault them. Why did you wait that long to check? Does she work? I mean just literally none of this makes sense. This story has a thousand detail…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 05:09 AM
2

I propose to you that men have to make these choices as well. I will also propose that they are probably more likely to choose freedom as one of those options, and whatever fallout that leaves.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 05:34 PM
1

An example used by OP early on is doctors dating Starbucks employees. I mean, I switched my example to "baristas" because I'm not a barbarian, but you know, when in Rome....
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 01:51 AM
17

Holy shit, dude. That leaky bucket metaphor is fucking breathtaking!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 10:33 PM
1

I got it in one!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 10:27 PM
1

I used to work at a hospital. If a doctor marries Tiffany the barista, she immediately is a Doctor's wife. It's also then not advertised. And in fact it becomes sort of a dirty little secret. I didn't work at that hospital very long, and I can think of 4 or 5 examples of this (or something similar), and those are just the ones I had heard about. I heard about them because hospital administrators would use those secrets to poke fun at them, probably because their wives (with degrees), looked like…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 10:09 PM
3

Is it true that belief in astrology both serious and casual is overwhelming the purview of women? To me, anecdotally, that seems true. But is it actually? Is data available for this?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 05:54 PM
4

I'm gen X, and gen is our kids. If all of this is true, there's a lot of blame to go around.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 12:27 PM
1

When you say it that way, it makes me feel like you don't know how statistics work.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 11:36 PM
2

They still literally are what you're working with. No one thinks they're a Stat, but 100% of people are.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 03:25 AM
0

If this is true for you, so be it, and congratulations. But I hardly think you're representative. You're obviously an outlier in many ways. Outliers existing doesn't make a claim bullshit. His claim is one of statistics, not absolutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/21 04:05 PM
1

I believe it is mostly because of the word "date-down", or "settle", as I more commonly hear. It should be reframed to "what percentage of your idea of a perfect spouse do you need to hit to be happy?" Anyone who says they need 100% of what their idea of perfect is, would be laughed out of the room, but when people say they don't want to "settle", that's exactly what they mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 10:24 PM
12

She violated a law and is being punished for it.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/12/20 05:23 PM
9

Now go ahead and read the article and her relatives reactions. What a bunch of shitheads.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/20 06:39 AM
18

You both have fair points here. There's nothing that explicitly proves that she thought she could get away with it specifically because she was a young female. But I tend to agree with trolls assessment here. I think you could make money all day betting that subconsciously she thought that she was a young white female, she would probably get off light. If that was something we could prove.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/20 07:50 PM
2

No kidding? I'm not sure I would've guessed that one.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/20 06:17 AM
93

Yeah, I'm not sure this fits here, if this was a dude he would've gotten triple!
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/20 07:37 PM
2

Lots of people can't work dollface.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/20 07:22 PM
1

Lol!
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/20 05:17 AM
1

Look, you hate everything, I can see that from your comments, but it's already happened. "Nothing" is changing because selective service has been a useless endeavor for almost 50 years. So no, you won't "see" anything because a draft will never happen again, but these cases still matter. They set precedence for future cases. This is a big deal.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/20 07:04 PM
184

A more appropriate response would them all be sitting in stunned silence because they realize they're part of the problem.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/20 07:00 PM
1

There must be something coming eventually. These things are slow. It could still be in appeals. Regardless, it's some progress.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/20 03:00 AM
4

It's a mostly new test, so it's tough to compare, but they added a portion where you have to do a pull up, which is actually one of the greatest weaknesses for any female. There are some estimates that 80% of the women currently in the Army will not be able to remain after this is implemented. It will virtually eliminate women in combat arms positions (like infantry). I know this sounds too good to be true, but it's very real. I have several female coworkers in the military (and I used to be) an…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/20 04:23 PM
69

Additionally, the army is making a change to their PT test in the Fall. Everyone will be held to the same standard.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/20 04:16 AM
123

Texas federal court actually made a ruling on registering with selective service only for males as unconstitutional. Not sure what repercussions that's had so far
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/20 04:15 AM
105

You guys are going to have to make more nazi posts. I don't remember seeing any and I don't want to disappoint.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/19 06:36 PM
-4

Does this belong here? Aren't we normally mad at young women who hit the wall and do this? If she's 46 she kinda HAD to have a kid if she wanted one.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/12/19 07:26 PM
3

Lizard brains
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/19 06:39 PM
3

While I agree with you in theory, this is a tough one. All of my instincts tell me she was lying. If it was legit for sure, I agree, but these days, it feels like it's a safe bet it wasn't.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/19 06:31 PM
4

This doesn't belong here. There's no satisfaction.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/19 08:49 PM
1

This guy gets it... ;)
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 04:28 AM
43

Isn't this already a thing? If you have a debilitating physical issue, you call in sick, regardless. If a dude has terrible stomach cramps, he can call in sick, and should probably see a Dr. Isn't this already available if you're experiencing debilitating cramps from PMS? But that's not what this is about, is it? This is about some lazy entitled person who just wants a free pass to not work. It's like it was fucking MADE for this sub! Some dumbass trying to use her gender for special treatment. …
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/19 04:44 AM
-3

This doesn't belong here. This isn't two women behaving badly and expecting special treatment. Flashing happens ALL. THE. TIME. And frankly, from both genders. Them being banned from baseball is not only extreme, it feels arbitrary? Like, why now? Why this?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/19 04:29 AM
-5

Again, not equivalent
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/19 04:22 AM
1

Concise, but also an excellent point.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/19 08:46 AM
2

I think your counterpoint is fair, but your conclusion is even better. In other words, even if you want to split hairs over motive, it all kinda fits in the end.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/19 08:45 AM
7

I believe that distinction doesn't exist. The "aggressors who just happen to be women" still think that they will be taken easy on. That, or wokeness has been so engrained in their head that they no longer believe there's a physical difference between men and women.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/19 08:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter