TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dark_Moose Archive

View 7 posts and 268 comments by Dark_Moose on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I think that this incident goes further than you think. How one makes their money and spends their time should be up to them. If someone willingly goes into the sex work world, that is up to them. Most people don't care what I do to support my family and I don't care what others do to support theirs. How ever you support them is between them and those they impact. What I think is of greater impact is the fact that the rules of the club were violated not to ensure that people are safe, but to pus…
/r/MensRights27/04/19 09:43 PM
2

That was a mental image that I do not need in my brain...
/r/MensRights17/07/18 08:48 PM
1

I am just tired of bad zombie games. Zombies are nothing more than another adversary but I would love to see a new intrepratation or idea with them. I still love my Dead Space and my Stubbs, the Ghouls from Fallout are still awesome and the Rock and Roll monstrosities from Chainsaw are wonderful. Creativity is key and I don't mind buying a game with tired cliches if it is creative and fun.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 09:49 PM
1

Now that would be a interesting analysis and intrepratation. How did you come to that conclusion?
/r/MensRights04/07/18 09:40 PM
2

I thought the opposite of phallis was yonic.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 04:53 PM
1

So...kilts?
/r/MensRights04/06/18 04:54 PM
2

Ok, that was poetry...
/r/MensRights24/05/18 06:08 PM
1

Meh, I might get a copy. I liked Y's the Last Man. Not impressed by the art style though.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:45 PM
5

Will he have any avanue to be compensated?
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:50 PM
1

I am putting this here because while there are numerious replies, I feel that they all have the same theme - the ratio of education costs to cultural/social/business return. This is a overwhelmingly dangerous and foolish route to go down. Lets remove the female component and instead put in a neutral term - people. If we are are to do this, then the issue becomes this : If people are not utilizing the education and careers they strive for, then those resources are wasted. I am sorry, but that is …
/r/MensRights15/05/18 09:16 PM
2

I really don't understand why everyone is complaining. Education is something everyone should constantly gain and have. If people want to go to school then never use their degree or training or skill set, so be it. This article clearly showed a woman who had a goal, had a life change, adapted to it then rolled with it to become what she defined as a better person. I applaud her for her adaptability, same as if any guy showed the same degree of resiliency. If this is more about shreiking harpies …
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:57 AM
-1

I think most women don't want power over men in the most complete of definitions. I think most people only care about themselves and are trying to get as much as possible.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 05:02 PM
2

Something can be great and still be flawed. There is a difference between identifying the fact that people should have the right to live independent and be beholden to no one and the white feather campaign. Just because a number of people here support prior feminist goals and their stated objectives does not mean that we can not criticize them now. To put a limit on when we can point out flaws, is not only to "gatekeep" ideas but also foolish in that even things that are good in moderation can t…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 11:01 AM
1

I can understand the paranoia of the government, but I think most doctors asking this are honestly concerned about their patient. Additionally, that information is confidential. Lying would not be a good thing to start with your medical advisor anyway. If you are willing to lie about this, what else would you lie about?
/r/MensRights26/06/17 03:11 AM
3

Same here. It was some amazing advice from my father. My counselor was a guy, but said that a relationship is definitely a partnership and both have to work constantly on it.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 11:20 PM
1

This is just food with personality... /S
/r/MensRights07/11/16 02:06 PM
5

Probably something to lighten the mood here. Personally, I find the pictures funny and most guys I know do this joke.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 04:09 PM
5

I am confused. If women are the cure, why can't they handle threats to their safe spaces. This bothers me.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 04:02 PM
3

Sometimes it is less about Men's Rights and more about doing what is right for everyone, including ensuring that we have a tomorrow to change and hope for.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:46 AM
1

I read that as #snow pen is hate crime. I must be tired.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 04:36 AM
1

Female uniform differences in the US Navy are such that their bump in annual uniform allowance. A female dress uniform total comes to about 350 USD. Mine costs about 175 USD. Even the list for a seabag inspection are different with women having more to buy and maintain. All of this can be googled (on my phone. Sorry). This is not to deny the base idea of an imbalance of female economic earning power vs male economic earning power "paygap". It is that this example would not be the best one to use…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 06:03 PM
1

I kinda wanna see the source on this one.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 08:00 PM
7

This may be my medicine blurring my logic, but how does this test anything that the Men's Rights strives for? What principal or condition are we testing? On all levels that I can see, this seems more like either a seduction or dating technique. While they certainly have their purposes and places, I do not quite see their place on the Men's Rights agenda. If I am wrong, please tell me how.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 01:40 AM
3

I don't think this counts as a men's rights issue. It may be a cannon issue or a really bad film or the movie may have destructive philosophies. It may also fit perfectly with the previous two movies and stand beautifully on its own on its own merits and give good lessons. Until it is released, who knows?
/r/MensRights24/03/15 01:58 PM
2

I would be very cautious adding faith and religion to this conversation. Not because I do not believe in a higher power, but because it is adding a non-quantifible variable in the discussion. Most medical professionals operate from the standpoint that if someone is not overall improved by a procedure, then they not do it. One can judge nerve damage, scar tissue growth and surgical accidents. They can even do long term studies to compare the life styles and "happiness" of circumcised to non-circu…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 04:40 AM
1

That mental image keeps me laughing long after the rage from the topic has left. Hitler and Roosevelt coming at each other like two jousting rivals, one in a gray suit with a small american pin and the other in a black suit with a NAZI armband.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 12:28 AM
-1

TIL comedians are social geldings.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 11:49 PM
1

I like stellar cartography...
/r/MensRights22/05/13 02:08 PM
1

I am confused. Why does this link say that this is a male disease when the second to last sentence says it affects both sexes equally?
/r/MensRights22/05/13 01:54 PM
2

Best of luck brother. I know that the world is not fair, but if karma ever does roll back around, your daughter will realize the type of grandmother and mother she has and look to you to be the better role model.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:33 PM
1

Depends on who you ask. The egalitarian faction says when every person gets an equal opportunity to achieve their goals and take the responsibility of their actions. We will be to far when people are forced to be equal by mandatory laws.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:32 PM
1

Sir, you have made me smile. Have a up vote!
/r/MensRights14/03/13 02:03 PM
1

She knows about our mustache grooming sessions? Dang it! Gentlemen, we must change to beard trimmings at the next meeting of the Patriarchs. /s
/r/MensRights09/03/13 07:42 PM
1

I like the idea that everyone should have the opportunity to be whatever they wish.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 07:57 PM
1

I like this. Scientists, engineers, doctors (those who study and develop the sciences) should be recognized due to their accomplishments. I don't care that Enstein was jewish or male - I care that he figured out the relationship between matter and energy. I don't care about Issiac Newton's ideas about feminism, I respect that he developed the mathmatical field of Calculus. I can respect anyone for what they do. Who cares what sex someone is, what race they belong to, their religious backround or…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 07:46 PM
2

I am confused. If she has a decent arguments, a few new ideas and some fresh ideas that can be used in new game design that both create a more rich gaming universe, I say let the ideas come. I may think the base idea of the videos is poor, but if some amazing ideas come out of it, then hopefully it is worth it. On the otherside, if the videos are "Men are bad and their games prove it", then I still have ERB and Rage Quit to watch.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 07:28 PM
2

This is actually a interesting analysis on logic itself. I certainly like how it looks at each idea and while it is certainly against the idea of Patriarchy, I like how any idea can be either confirmed or ignored by this analysis.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 07:18 PM
21

I go to weekly potluck dinners..
/r/MensRights05/03/13 02:29 PM
1

Is there some further context to this?
/r/MensRights03/03/13 02:50 PM
1

There are times I can feel the back of my skull via face palming...
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:38 PM
1

Where did this come from?
/r/MensRights18/02/13 04:21 PM
3

Interesting perspective and analysis.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:21 PM
1

This would make a good title for a college rock band...
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:56 PM
3

Who would decide what is a small thing and what is not?
/r/MensRights10/02/13 07:55 PM
15

I must say, her indepth analysis as to why these elected officials oppose VAWA and her classy language clearly show she is a open minded and highly intellectual lady. /s
/r/MensRights10/02/13 05:23 PM
3

I am not entirely sure I understand what you mean by the "the military it sky rockets". Do you mean that rapes are more common in the armed services? As to men are paid more in jobs, there are plenty of sources listed in the sidebar to answer that one in a respectful and intelligent way. As for this person being a idiot, I will let /r/feminism answer that one: http://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/180apn/an_open_letter_of_apology_to_mens_rights_activists/
/r/MensRights06/02/13 08:54 PM
9

Sorry, here is the link. http://charlesclymer.blogspot.com/2013/02/my-open-letter-of-apology-to-mens.html
/r/MensRights06/02/13 07:47 PM
6

I am confused by this logic and reasoning. Why should we have to prove to them that we are not anti feminism? MRA's do not ask for feminists to prove they are egalitarian or fair. We do not ask them to cover all socio/political blocs or even all aspects of their splinter groups. No one does. Just as there are "destructive" Muslims (those who blow up schools for teaching secularism) and "constructive" Muslims (those who built up and run Red Crescent), destructive Christians (Christians who blow u…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 09:16 PM
5

This is something I never understood. I thought Jews were everything due to the disporia.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:17 AM
3

With friends like this, who needs news to have you lose your hope in humanity...
/r/MensRights02/02/13 12:34 AM
2

And that damn dog...
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:49 PM
1

This is a dark but intriguing satire. Hopefully a good Indy developer will make it. Something akin to Portal. Dark, subtle, that a hour after you beat it, then you get the whole story and it's message.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:38 PM
1

Flat sheet of paper, ink, a image and words.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:32 PM
2

If you go to Lifetime expecting gender equality, you are going to have a bad time...
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:23 PM
10

Indeed.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 02:29 PM
7

By the feeling that she would be betraying men by being found to be a woman or by women by finding out this man is actually a woman?
/r/MensRights13/01/13 02:27 PM
1

I am confused by this idea. Where in the biological sciences are there more than 2 species, let alone 5?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:22 AM
5

Not stone, merely dark ages. Tyranny, power and conflict were from the dark.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:01 AM
0

That whole human eugenics thing kinda lost...just saying.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:21 AM
1

I guess women studies does not require proper spelling. /s
/r/MensRights31/12/12 05:13 PM
3

Return to your underground farm?
/r/MensRights29/12/12 12:50 PM
2

I can agree with that.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 12:43 PM
2

This is a rather interesting study. Perhaps men are not bad nor women but rather people have the potential to be evil and therefore protecting one sex over the other is wrong.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 12:30 PM
8

If that is the case, I think they are achieving that goal.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 10:27 PM
1

Keep playing and when you get to the court scene, you will be taken with a interesting choice. Also, the comments on the page are a interesting read also.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 09:19 AM
1

What does this frighten you? While I may not think it is all that interesting nor artistic, I came from one of those screaming and bloody and will probably leave this world the exact same way.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:47 AM
3

Hopefully, they won't delete and it will generate a fair amount of conversation. Hopefully...
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:20 AM
2

I am confused. While highly respectful, how is this of interest to the men's rights movement? With that said, this man has a lot of respect from me and I like his respect to his subject matter.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:51 AM
6

My prayers are with the child and I pray he is in a more peaceful place. As for his parents, I don't know enough to condemn the father but if these facts are true, then the mother truly is a horrible specimen of the human species.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:46 AM
1

That's the NSA and Financial Wing of the FBI. CIA is more put you in prison and "talk" to you for a while...
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:59 PM
2

It is not the case of what StrayThott thought. I replied to the statement he wrote with hope and happiness and added a statement that I felt after reading the article.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 02:58 PM
5

I hope the latest husband does not snore...
/r/MensRights20/11/12 06:08 AM
2

I hope they do well and do something innovative and creative with their respective skills and wish you the same. I don't have an issue with differing viewpoints. I have issues with thinking you are better than someone in life because they have different body parts...
/r/MensRights20/11/12 06:07 AM
65

Why do so few women take STEM courses? Must be that we only want the best, and they happen to be men. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:18 AM
32

Men are told to grin and bear it. Men are never to complain. Men are always to bear any issue or problem without complaint. -do you see where I am going with this?
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:26 PM
2

Oh the burden for recognizing that they can do things. Perhaps they should use those opportunities to actually do something to make this world a better place for himself and others. He truly has some heavy and terrible first world problems.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:24 PM
-6

What is wrong with the user name?
/r/MensRights10/11/12 09:55 PM
1

This is the powerful moment that separates a feminist-nazi and a fanatical MRA from a moderate. One is able to see people as people with issues and conflicts and the other sees them as shades of a stereotype.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 09:52 PM
9

Reason and logic are bad things when the other side already has an answer...
/r/MensRights08/11/12 06:36 PM
-8

If the guy wanted to, he could walk away. The woman gave him the opportunity and he rejected it. The other man offered his support and it was rejected. The woman was complaining that she felt bad. She felt bad due to the fact that he kept bringing up the fact she cheated. Neither party wants to leave, neither party wants to harm the other and both kids will be looked after and protected. What greater issues are present that you think are of value to the Men's Rights community?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 01:57 AM
-15

Stupid people are stupid. These two/three are trying to make the best out of a bad situation. No overarching men rights issues here.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 11:50 PM
4

What is sad is that some will not see this as satire, but a true solution.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 04:54 PM
5

If you watch MTV expecting sexual or cultural equality, you are wrong.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 01:45 AM
1

Perhaps they do not see the masculine side because they don't know what to look for or how to see female superiority/male inferiority in the same light as feminism.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 07:39 PM
1

People are allowed to say profound things on Reddit. Stupid or wise, I go to Reddit for my thought provoking saying for the moment.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 07:30 PM
-1

To me, this new economic model seems a bit scary.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 07:12 PM
1

You could always ignore them or send a private message with facts and figures. It is not as glamorous as a Facebook throw down, but when people don't look like fools, they often times are more open to new ideas.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 12:59 PM
4

Funny, I could write those first two paragraphs about this article.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:23 PM
7

I am conflicted as to this. From the perspective that all violence is wrong and that it s funny that a woman beat a man, I do not like it. But there are other perspectives. The perspective that it was the man who solved the life threatening problem not only through sacrifice but also through creativity and wit. Not only that, but also remember that cartoon and video game physics/biology/chemistry/morality are a bit different than the real world. Personally, I would merely enjoy a great morally u…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:17 PM
9

Sir, I feel that you just increased global warming by that intense burn
/r/MensRights31/10/12 11:14 PM
3

This is not wise.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 08:02 PM
2

I am not entirely sure I understand what the motivation of that "registered sex offenders eliminators" is. If the purpose is to tell people there is an offender, that is one thing. To use threats and implications of lawsuits, intimidating messages to apartment renters and protesting to evict someone who is trying to move on with their life does not sound like a noble or virtuous life. It sounds more life a busy body with far too much time on their hands.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:55 PM
2

Positive Discrimination?
/r/MensRights07/10/12 02:38 PM
3

It is a interesting tactic and thought process. However, I think the reason should be more of wanting true equality and not wanting to attack feminism. I fully support the idea of raising standards for cops and military. Criminals can be fast, strong and smart and unless everyone is at the top of their game, the "bad people" will escape justice.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 02:25 PM
1

How would that have helped?
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:07 PM
1

During such experiment, ask the men why they do what they do. I do not deny men help women more than women help men publicly. I merely argue the reasons for said help.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 10:49 PM
1

How many white knights though consciously think those thoughts though? How many instead think: There is a woman who needs help and I can offer it. There is someone threatening her and I can protect her. I don't think most white knights do what they do to pick up women or attack men. I think they are trying to protect and help another person.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:58 PM
1

I do not know if that definition is clear enough. Men and women have property rights, legal protections from harm, military obligations (as much as you can in a enlistment society), free speech, freedom of religion, basic health rights, job opportunities, voting rights and educational opportunities. What is there beyond basic tweaking to keep differences to a minimum as they are now? I see certain things as getting out of hand and conflicts growing out of control and that is why I align myself w…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:34 PM
2

Are you Chuck Norris or Mr T?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:25 PM
1

How would you determine when society was equal or more balanced?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:20 PM
1

It is still a Utopian ideal though. I for one do not love many people and while I tolerate them, tolerance is not the same as acceptance. I have an ideal society where everyone is tolerant of each other and our differences, but use their misery, their want, their identification of wrongness and their desire to better themselves to shape society and themselves to a more ideal place. One is free to create a small group of like minded individuals but unless those ideas are propagated and spread, yo…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:58 PM
1

In practice, yes. I feel that philosophy though does not do enough though to the men and women who are disenfranchised or who are biased. Once your safety and interests are satisfied, what are you doing to assist those who need help? I am not saying that in a provocative way, because that thought is always in my own mind.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 09:58 AM
1

I do not know. If you are only concerned with the micro scale, then you will just have to convince those around you to put aside their respective philosophies and biases for as long as the group exists and meets. The same general idea exists on the macro and even "Mega" scale, macro being country wide and Mega being global scale. Since on those levels you can not dissolve the group and reconvene at will (society and global civilization) tensions tend to last longer. How big of a group are you ta…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 09:40 AM
5

I subscribe more to the theory that a true egalitarian society is in the same realm as a Utopian society. It truly hurts me to say that because I want it to exist for my children and their children, but I believe humanity is too conflict driven to peacefully coexist without the threat of a greater danger. I believe certain people have gravitated toward the idea of sexual inequality as a great and noble social cause and will advance their ideas of equality/supremacy despite the true result their …
/r/MensRights05/10/12 09:10 AM
3

With my Xbox and Netflix/Hulu, I made my own channel and I have to say, pretty good shows on.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:11 PM
1

I do not feel that this is violence. Abuse of trust and a major inconvenience, yes. But not violence. By saying that mental anguish is violence, and all mental anguish is violence, that opens a vast door that I do not think anyone wants to open.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:14 PM
3

Angry, petty, vindictive, stupid and vile? Yes. Is this violence and an assault on that person's being? No. As of mental attack, this is a sophomoric and vindictive attack that a high school student would pull, not the intelligent plan of a classy woman.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 12:02 PM
1

Dragon Cake?
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:01 AM
8

While I am sure that many would say that, I doubt anyone would actually do anything violent. Hence, why I really do not care what people say.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:00 AM
2

I hope that your past of struggle and trials gave you the strength, conviction and wisdom to both fight for equality and find peace and happiness.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 11:49 AM
7

Talk to your enlisted leader who took the e-7's place and let them know your concerns and worries. They will know more about the full situation and will help you out.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 04:36 PM
2

I feel as though this man wants to be the philosopher who wrote Civil Disobedience instead of his own philosopher.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:59 AM
7

At the bottom of the page is a link to his explanation to that blog: he apparently meant it as a type of roache test.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 07:08 PM
2

Are there any links to prove this? This idea of logic and science being gendered is a alien idea to me and extremely offensive on a number of levels.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 02:57 AM
3

It is hard to tell sometimes. I am a very straight forward person and things like sarcasm or subility are hard to understand for me. That's why I like science and math.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 08:06 PM
2

I am hoping that you are just joking. I have never heard that science nor scientific exploration/examination as a social construct. And if the scientific community is really so exclusionary, why do we celebrate the names of Curie, Goodall or Mayer?
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:48 PM
4

I did not see that comment in the same light. To me, she was making a observation that workplaces are dangerous and to a certain degree destructive to humans yet the male aspect is able to adapt to it quicker and easier than women. Possible reasons may be that men might have created the positions and responsibility of that position, the task may be easier for a more common type of man than a woman (steel worker on the smelter for example) or that since culturally in the West the man was up until…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:36 PM
5

Sir, you and your family are in my prayers and are a good example of why we fight not for supremacy of or race, our ideologies or our gender, but equality to make our goals and dreams possible.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:59 PM
-2

What is militant feminist science? I thought all science was subject to peer review, independent testing and constant experimentation. Does not matter if it is Soviet Nuclear Scientist, American Astronomer, South African Biologist or Taiwanese Mathematician. If the numbers are clear and the problem straight forward, the science works. Edit - Why is this comment offensive? I don't care about karma, but I am curious as to why this is being down-voted.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:51 PM
1

I really like this idea and am onboard with more people, both men and women, children and adults enjoying video games and interactive art. Am a bit cautious about the Jezebel link though and will wait until I can see the underlying philosophy and ideology.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:42 PM
1

I think that will be my next band's name : Boner-werewolf.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:38 PM
2

This is a interesting concept. If a wife does poorly around the house, they can be financially liable. If she can not save enough for her divorce, she can not take more because she already spent her "earned" value. I think that if certain organizations want to convert marriage and courting into a business, then the ramifications will be greater than even the most imaginative fiction writer.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:34 PM
6

True. We need the passionate, but not the stupid. We need the facts, not the conjecture or the stereotype. We can not fight deception with lies, nor bias with hated. Posters, protests, fliers, radio, YouTube, books and true research with a desire for facts both good and bad will help us more than this gentleman or people like him.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 05:54 PM
2

Funny picture.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:10 PM
9

I am confused by that last paragraph. If we do not like the current laws and social inequalities afforded to men compared to women, why shouldn't we form a MR group to combat or express change?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:03 PM
1

I am deeply confused by this. I have no problem playing with women on XBL or PSN. I have issues with this article not because his goal is not noble (treating people as people) but rather with his logic and reason. One - If you start charging people for "bad behavior", what is considered bad behavior? The person who caused a train of mobs that wiped out your party then ganked your gear or the person who called him/her out on it rather passionately? Two - it is not your game. You have bought a lic…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:41 PM
1

I am glad that your relationship is better with your wife and that you are happy. I do not know who removed your post and I hope that it was a case of button slipping, but I do not know if there is another agenda being played here. While it is sad that a lot of intolerance on the web and in basic human interaction, I am glad that at least in your relationships, there seems to be happiness and peace.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 05:48 PM
2

We can only hope that it is a mere joke. I rather like the idea most mothers would want the best for their children, not knowingly try to handicap them.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 12:33 PM
2

I think it can but it would have to become more of a relationship behaviour rather than a all encompassing expectation. If you are a person who actually enjoys acting and behaving with a sense of chivalry, and you are with someone who deserves your honor, respect, trust and protection, then there is nothing wrong with it. A chivalrous behavior to someone who does not understand that it is not about sacrifice for the woman for nothing but rather an act that requires a woman to fulfill certain rol…
/r/MensRights28/08/12 12:31 PM
2

I don't know if I should laugh with that bitter, sad laugh of watching someone foolish doing something that will ultimately comeback to bite her in the butt, or withhold food from her so that I don't feed the Troll.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 12:17 PM
2

Equal opportunity. People have different skills, interests and abilities. To force a outcome will eventually harm the greater society and prevent the group from seeing all the solutions which are present for every problem or opportunity. When we are able to mature and grow in the way that encourages all people to become their best, that is when I think we will be not only the most productive and powerful, but happiest.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 03:57 PM
1

This is a very true statement. I always saw feminism and the MRM as human rights issues. Generally, those who try to say stuff like that, are not interested in a actual exchange of ideas but rather reply to a conflicting idea with a stock response. It is frustrating, infuriating and reactionary. It is an entirety human response though
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:29 PM
3

I personally am more interested in making sure that everyone has a equal chance of a fair, just and successful life. I feel some of our goals are opposed by a very small yet vocal number of people and generally ignored by most because most people, men or women just don't care.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:01 AM
2

How does one earn mercy and compassion? I have been following and supporting the MRA/MRM/Egalitarian position for a while and on Reddit, we all hear a lot of stories of men who are abused and ignored. Some admit that they say stupid things in passion or that they made poor decisions and now need help. I do not know these men beyond what they state of themselves or their situation. I have no ties to them beyond the fact we are Redditors. Everything else; situation, person, time, user name, IP add…
/r/MensRights19/08/12 05:03 PM
11

I can fully believe that Chris Brown and those who express anger in inappropriate ways should receive help, as those who are codependent enablers should also. However, any act of compassion and mercy should be encouraged by society as long as it is healthy and motivates those people to become better. All too often, people want justice, pure and powerful but forget that unless it is tempered with mercy and wisdom, there is no way to move on or learn from any mistake. Should the abuser get help? Y…
/r/MensRights19/08/12 02:06 PM
0

I would disagree. It is progress of a sort. Just not the direction or progress I thought we would have.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 10:17 PM
1

By the Wikipedia entry, it seems as though she a female supremacist and not fighting for a equality or peace between the sexes. I can support and defend the fight for equality in almost everything, but not supremacy.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 10:09 PM
-1

A biological interpretation of our social and cultural drives is something I am inherently cautious about. While a lot of these ideas and theories seem sound, I do not know if they hold up under analysis. If every culture and society had something akin to this, it would seem likely that this was possible. But once again, you reach a point where you run into the question of did society create the role and reasons because of the gender or did the gender create the roles and reasons? How that quest…
/r/MensRights23/07/12 12:49 AM
4

The dangerous and destructive ones, yes. This person not only has the intelligence and cunning to manipulate power structures and relationships, but apparently no ethical, moral or philosophical guidelines that he has identified himself or subscribed to to direct his actions or energies. His selfishness and well being is apparently his only goal and as such, he has no reason to buildup, support or advance society.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 02:58 PM
2

It is so sad when our society loses someone to suicide. While I disagreed with the philosophy she posted online, I find myself upset that she is gone. May her family, friends and allies remember her fondly. Me, I will mourn the fact I was never able to understand why she wrote and believed what she did.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 02:11 PM
2

These are used by any people to argue with any ideological/sociological or philosophical group they disagree with. Gay rights, minorities, civil liberties, special need, worker rights, MRM or even feminism, ect... Heck, I have heard one person (a feminist with no sense of irony) use three or four of these statements against me in a discussion of rape culture, then I overheard her in a conversation in which she was being told the exact series of dismissive statements she used against me used agai…
/r/MensRights21/07/12 06:03 AM
1

That makes a lot more sense. I can agree with and support the idea of utilizing force equally. If someone utilizes violence as a solution, I have no problem utilizing the same against them, nor do I personally judge them less of a person.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 05:46 AM
-1

I have strong conflicting beliefs with this. If a stranger (male or female) tried to strike me, it would be on like Donkey Kong, no questions asked. If a friend struck me, I would immediately think something needs to be resolved, but I would try very hard not to hit them, but restrain them firmly. If my sister hit me, I know something is up and would take it because after it was out of her system, she would explain it and the underlying problems would be resolved when cooler heads prevailed. Tha…
/r/MensRights21/07/12 04:40 AM
0

Which belief? To tolerate those who are not at your moral level? People who hit and laugh but get upset when they are hit? People who hit men without a second thought but shirk at hitting women?
/r/MensRights21/07/12 04:00 AM
17

I'm the Juggernaut, bitch!
/r/MensRights21/07/12 03:45 AM
4

A lady would never give you a reason to strike them. Disagree, argue, cry, scream, laugh or anything thing else, but never strike in anger.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 03:44 AM
-5

I don't know if that logical path is one that the MRM should travel down. On a ethical and principled level, we should constantly strive for equality for everyone everywhere and more importantly encourage others to strive to live a life where people are afforded the same opportunities regardless of sex. That I can agree with. To attack someone because they have not yet realized that principle I feel is wrong. I don't have an issue with pointing out flaws, but do not fall into attacking others. W…
/r/MensRights21/07/12 03:41 AM
1

What is this meme called and where did you first see it?
/r/MensRights20/07/12 03:32 AM
0

Yeah, the statement above scares and bothers me a whole hell of a lot.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:19 AM
2

This is the core principle that separates the two movements. Female rights advocates (feminists) believe and rightfully so that there is inequality in rights, resources and opportunities for women, females and girls. Men rights advocates believe and right fully so that there is an equality in rights, resources and opportunities. Both sides advocate for a equality and a promote ways for this noble goal. Will either side agree with the other, perhaps. Negotiations, compromises and cool heads willi…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 10:18 PM
5

Your suspicion may be justified and and well deserved, but also remember to separate the title from the person. Her definition of feminism is already curious so before I am going to attack her or defend her, I will need to know what she believes and how she expresses it. It does not turn my stomach to hear your sentiment, I am sure many others who believe it. Just like how there are graduations of philosophies and schools of sexual equalities, racial equalities and even anarchist concepts.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 06:47 PM
4

I feel horrible for the woman, but am conflicted with the message. Either this is one woman's journey through abuse and how she managed to over come it (Classic Science-Fiction?) or this is a blanket statement on how men can harm women. 95% sure it is the first. I can see this being abused though by radicals on both sides.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 04:43 PM
3

It is certainly a interesting concept that forces one to examine their belief structure on chivalry,sexual customs, objectification vs personification and even dating among other aspects. Try posing this question on R/Feminism to see their response in addition to ours. As for my opinion, a woman who always makes the man pay, is either showing she willingly puts herself into a subservient position and not a equal partnership or that she does not consider my time worthy of the same level of respec…
/r/MensRights14/07/12 05:48 AM
8

I can make really great deserts and can grill and cook on a stove top like a frigging boss. My current girlfriend can bake, roast and cook cool/cold dishes that make me have to unbutton my pants before I even take the first bite. We have different skills and talents and together we make epic meals.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 10:08 PM
1

There is a difference between political/social/ideological activism and terrorism.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 09:58 PM
3

This is a definition I can support. I can respect all people and show said respect. Chivalrous behavior, that is more of a relationship behaviour where both parties partake of. I have called my SO's by the title of My Lady and they generally blushed and smiled and did something special for me. If there is no give and take, no warmth or emotions or meaning, they are hollow actions.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 09:52 PM
1

This whole situation and story hurts my heart and hope.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 01:33 AM
9

The part where she said she would not beat someone up struck me as a bit of a lie. She struck one person already. I hope that karma strikes everyone fairly in this situation, be it both good and bad.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 10:03 AM
3

Where does it state that women are more important? The article was on how a woman was shot then how some men cheered. It was an incident that showed the cruelty and violence of the Taliban. Should there be an article when men are tortured, blackmailed and forced to fight? Yeah I think so. But I can detect nor discern any outrageous claims of sexual inequality beyond a political/religious/philosophical movement that utilize the gun and the bomb and the threat to coerce the population. This is the…
/r/MensRights08/07/12 10:42 PM
8

I have severe issues with this. Not because of the title, but because of an organization that not only strips women of basic freedoms, but also terminates any person, man or woman who does not conform to their rules. Seriously, fuck the Taliban.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:19 PM
7

Violence is not the answer. It is not only morally reprehensible (which most people don't care about), but will only complicate and confuse the situation to outside judges. If anything, with no supporting documentation, it will seem extremely odd to me that she legally bought the vehicle with all supporting documentation.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 04:15 AM
1

I am not sure you recognize how ethically difficult that is nor how complex your solution is. For example, let's take fitness standards. There are multiple reasons why a police person should pass a standardized pt test. Some are exclusionary: you do not want people who can not run chase after a criminal for example. Some are inclusionary: being able to run and work out with your fellow service members may be a team building activity. To list out all the reasons for every law will only bring out …
/r/MensRights07/07/12 04:26 PM
1

Just because people are not strangers does not give people reason to my resources, especially if it is unwanted. I may not hate my boss, but that is no reason why I should help him stain his deck.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:58 PM
7

I don't know if Orwell would be proud or terrified...
/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:50 PM
1

So then how would you punish people who violate the spirit of the law?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:15 PM
2

If this is true, and I am putting it in the probably category of true, then I do not know how to change the feminist movement. If it was the fringe fanatical that we had to educate and "fight" with while merely pointing out gender inequalities that could be rectified with the mainstream, within a generation Feminism and the MRM could be the humanist/equality movement. If instead the mainstream movement is or has become inherently oppressive, how does one go about correcting or changing that?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 01:31 PM
1

For the same reason that moderates don't kick out the extremists in movements: either the moderates think they can use them when appropriate, or the extremist does not violate the letter of the law, merely the spirit of it.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 10:35 AM
1

But that is the root problem of both the darker aspects of the MRM and Feminism. It is saying that a significant population on both sides of the gender divide are inherently bad because they were born with the wrong crotch. That is why it upsets me so much that there is what seems to be a cultural double standard to men and women. Men are neither inherently bad nor inherently good. Women are neither inherently good or inherently bad. They are individuals first with a history and a psychology, th…
/r/MensRights07/07/12 10:02 AM
3

What roles would you consider specific and not to be crossed at any point?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 09:50 AM
3

That is an aspect of our current society that I don't know how to interpret. When those who are part of a group get a blanket stereotype, people out side of that group will first resort to that stereotype. For example: police are pigs, women are vulnerable, men are strong, soldiers are heros, government is corrupt. In the real world, it is alot more complex and nuanced. Most police just want to protect people and minimize damage, risk, harm and threat. How they do so not only depends on training…
/r/MensRights07/07/12 04:37 AM
3

The post is male positive as far as I see it. The guy who was deployed wanted to take care of someone who is special to him so he did something special. She wanted to bring attention to how thoughtful he was and how lucky she was. If anything, it is pro-romance, pro-couple and while at worse it could be karma whoring, it still made me smile at how happy they are.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 08:08 AM
2

Hooters guy. And yeah, I personally would not mind working there on the weekends personally. I am sure even bisexuals or homosexuals wouldn't mind looking at some decent looking guys if they like the food there.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 01:35 AM
3

Some may see that, but to me, a woman liar, cheat, lazy, glutton or overly emotional is not worth my time. Better to wait than waste time on someone not worth it.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 03:54 PM
4

Between STD, the rare injury, pregnancy and the financial burden, false rape accusations, misconceptions that result in bad times and drama, I am finding that few women are worth my time, let alone my money and body.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 03:35 PM
1

I agree that there is more to this story than is being said, but unless one is willing to do a full scale investigation, I doubt that anyone will get the full facts.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 04:35 PM
3

I think that is the major root of all the issues that MRA fight for. While both groups are striving for an idea of equality and respect, it is hard to have a intelligent discussion on both sides and achieve progress if mutual respect is not shown. This article both disheartened me by the subject matter but also gave hope because the author is not only female, but able to express what I can not.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 08:51 PM
3

Amen to that.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 01:17 AM
2

Just because it is a foolish thought, does not mean that people will take it seriously...
/r/MensRights17/06/12 01:56 PM
3

I can agree that he is not backing up his argument well, but the media has been rather open with the idea of women being the agressors and that false rape is used for various reasons. To get out of trouble: Brian Banks being falsely accused by Wanetta Gibson http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/27/brian-banks-exonerated_n_1548823.html To further their argument in family court: Daryl Ginyard being falsely accused by Amani Ginyard http://www.shrink4men.com/2011/08/16/man-awarded-852000-in-civil-c…
/r/MensRights17/06/12 01:54 PM
4

I agree that those who rape should be punished and those who have been raped should be empowered to speak and confront those who legitimately and truthfully harmed them. The only question I would ask then is would you punish those who falsely claim rape as harshly as those who do rape? Would you support a social system that assisted false rape victims as carefully and supporting as those who are rape victims?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 09:01 PM
2

While I can understand your passion, change the society constructively, not destructively. Hard to fight for a better future for our fellow brothers and sisters if we are mere radioactive dust.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 01:31 AM
0

I am going to name my next band Oppression Olympics.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 09:06 PM
-1

Instead of saying it doesn't, find some facts and let those facts guide your judgement. There have been conspiracies in the past (the assassination of Fidel Castro by the US government springs to mind) and if feminists are showing patterns of a conspiracy, then should we not explore it? If it turns out to be pointless paranoia, then it will be revealed as such.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 03:06 AM
1

I agree with the above sentiment. This subreddit was designed to be a place for healing, advice, understanding and learning. I despise those who use political correctness as a weapon to wield against those they don't agree with, but political correctness is not the same as asking for facts. Are there any census data, studies, or statistics that could back up these ideas? Personal stories are great in my literature, but I prefer facts in something as controversial as this.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 11:12 PM
5

This is a massive inconsistent standard I have noticed. How does one know if they are too drunk to choose? If one drinks one Coors, is that too drunk? It is the standard of "I know I was in the morning, because I would have never done that sober." If we are held to that standard, I should never watch TV because I only want to buy things I see on TV. It is such stupid rationale. Either own up that you the individual screwed up and move on or don't do mind altering drugs or activities...
/r/MensRights07/06/12 10:55 PM
3

Anyone who has ever been on the controversial or minority side of an argument/discussion then went home instead of prison or being beaten/shot or otherwise censored can not be allowed to say this. So stupid...
/r/MensRights07/06/12 03:46 AM
6

Brother, I do not know how the universe will turn this one. I do not know if you are Atheist, Christian, Buddhist or Pastafarian nor do I really care. I am going to recommend you look up the public defenders number then also call some lawyers and ask for pro bono work. Make sure you are covered legally and have some allies on your side beyond the anonymous words of the internet. Next, make sure your child is taken care of. The shelter will probably protect the mother and will stonewall you, but …
/r/MensRights03/06/12 02:21 AM
4

This guy certainly gets my hero of the day vote while the mom will have to be reminded of this for a little while by every person who watches the news. I am all for forgiving the mom due to a moment of stupidity and everything is alright now, but all is well that ends well.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 07:54 PM
2

The tone of the article reminds me of a patronizing mother. "Son I can see the reasoning of your arguments and why you say what you say, but I still will not fully side nor help you in all your fights, even if helping you ultimately helps me." That was the tone I got in the entire article.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 02:26 AM
2

Down range, life is very distant and alot of things happen to your and your shipmates/battle buddies that few if anyone will ever truly understand. I have seen people on both sides of the decision you were at and am deeply grateful that you stood down. Thank you for choosing to fight for another day and your happiness than surrender to the bad times.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 09:34 PM
1

An interesting article that highlights most of the Men's Rights Arguments. I could agree with her arguments on these five points at least.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 09:18 PM
3

I think it goes more into the role of human thought and our rank of priorities. If people were capable of removing our self identity and place the concept of our society above our own interests then we would be able to eliminate social ills more effectively. Reality is different however. In reality, we have our respective desires, lives, principles and philosophies that even if we say we believe in the same idea, we have different ideas of what those words mean and how to achieve them. This dive…
/r/MensRights01/06/12 02:06 AM
1

I think my brain broke when it saw that.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 12:08 AM
2

As a human being with intelligence, self esteem, self determination, emotional investment in the betterment of society and empathy, do you think you could identify every human who is abused? I sure as hell can't.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:20 PM
1

I don't know if that is a good thing that our society has developed such powerful technologies, effective technologies, such infrastructure that we need a small population to defend and protect our interests or bad that so few people serve and are willing to defend our principles and property.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 05:57 PM
9

I am happy that your separation was amicable but sorry that you were hurt by the people here. I think you are right in your conclusion. Both parties would claim a false flag attack and further fuel the fire of conflict between MRA's and Feminists.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 04:11 PM
1

This was on reddit earlier and was curious to know what you thought about it.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 02:59 PM
2

The site made to spoof the feminist one is actually really good. I am deeply confused by the intended reasoning of this site. If space is such a issue, are shopping bags, purses and back packs not allowed on seats or the floor?
/r/MensRights28/05/12 02:23 PM
1

My favorite was the person in my philosophy class that advocated killing all the war mongers and people with violent impulses to make a more peaceful world. I face palmed so hard that I felt the back of my skull.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 02:12 PM
7

A interesting experiment. I would recommended posting this over at 2X and see their response.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 01:49 PM
16

I don't think this is a war cry to the down vote brigade. Merely a point out how irrational a small section of humanity was at one point. I would highly caution making this a huge issue because this subreddit does sometimes show it irrational side also. Besides, do you really want to argue what people want to do in their bedroom?
/r/MensRights28/05/12 01:27 PM
8

The one thing that should be taken away was the money awarded to the young woman and that money should be awarded to Brian with interest. That would set a example for lying, a method of compensation for the victims and a deterrent to those who would do this.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 01:16 PM
2

I disagree with her vote, but only because I know how how bad the Enemy was. I fully support her reasoning though and her courage to stand for what she believed in. I would not mind giving her a gun and pointing her at the Enemy.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 01:05 PM
3

Please define the term "paid killer". If you mean mercenary or hit man/assassin, I can understand you. If you mean private security force, I have issues, but can see where you get your conclusions. If you mean the armed forces and the respective forces of the government, I do not understand. Less than 10% of the US population serve in the armed forces. Of those, even fewer are trained to actually fight. Most are support, administrative, logistical in support of those who actually do fight. By th…
/r/MensRights28/05/12 01:00 PM
5

This might be me, but I can see this show as a interesting source for a argument for the difference in females entering male entertainment and males entering female entertainment. I think that most people like to watch the show, both male and female, because it does have interesting stories, good visuals and animation , varied characters who are imperfect and work with their imperfections and catchy tunes. I am sure that there are people who find some sexual arousal in the ponies, but I find it …
/r/MensRights28/05/12 12:26 AM
14

I think I just meta-Sithed right there...
/r/MensRights28/05/12 12:16 AM
3

This strikes on alot of levels of -isims: classism, racism, sexism to name the top three I felt. It is so screwed up that the people who have such potential and drive are all too often screwed up by people who at least act morally beneath them. As someone who wants to be in the 1%, I pray that my children will be the smart ones. I don't have nearly the henchmen or cronies to gather information to make a clear, concise and intelligent decision.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 12:12 AM
-1

That is a theory I can agree with to a certain level. If a group is formed to oppose a injustice (first wave feminists fighting for voting rights and property, civil rights movements for getting same drinking fountains and treated "equal", etc) then it is something that can be opposed on a individual level. The point where civil rights must be totally united is where the power structure has not multiple views but where there is only one view and to oppose that view is destructive (Hitler's Germa…
/r/MensRights27/05/12 04:38 PM
6

I feel that the judge is screwed up for choosing this student as an example and I feel horrible that she is punished for taking care of her family. Nevertheless, I feel this is more of a stupidity and family issue than a Men's Rights issue.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 02:35 PM
16

This article made me rather emotional. Being blamed for social ills and for anyone to claim that we as men don't need a place to do when we hurt or that we shouldn't have a place to go/people to call when we need help. I don't have a support network to fall back on when I hurt so services like these are sometimes all I have between sanity and a really really bad decision.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 12:44 AM
5

All those women who mocked or laughed at seeing a man being beat just lost any pity I feel toward them in a Lifetime show.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 12:29 AM
1

I checked out her blog and was deeply confused by it. It seemed to be a combination or female superiority, Utopian society dreaming, male bashing series of blogs. There was a person who posted a great deal named GregW. who seemed to have deleted his posts after receiving replies, both derogatory and informative. All in all, I do not believe that this is a person who we should pay attention to only because the she does not seem to have the foresight necessary to create good ideas and therefor onl…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 07:50 PM
2

Children, handicapped and elderly I can understand. They are those who would have a very hard time swimming to shore or the closest ship. Women and men? We can take our chances and depending on the environment and situation, think we could make it in the water. If it were Arctic/Antarctic waters or Northern Atlantic waters, for example, everyone should have access to a life boat and be safe. As to the on the book rule of women and children first, it was a cultural rule to sailors. One did not fi…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 11:50 PM
1

Hilarious as Heck and very useful to the many Dads and Moms out there, but not exactly a Civil Rights or Gender Equality issue. The survival of a Furby is of more of a existential issue.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 11:55 PM
3

I thought the people who use maternity leave were paid for having kids.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:48 PM
1

You are welcome.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 11:51 PM
0

I always thought that the point of being moral was to make the world a better place. Therefore, if someone is morally superior, wouldn't it stand that they would be the ones trying to make the world better the hardest? As for /SRS, I do not understand that type of humor or attention gathering.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 10:47 PM
1

How sad. Controversy in the right hands can bring forth solutions to old and continuing problems and assistance to issues no one knows about. On the other side, controversy in the wrong hand is nothing but destructive and pandering for attention.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 10:09 PM
2

I think I just face palmed myself into a concussion.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 09:56 PM
0

Then we have to figure out ways to communicate with those who want to hear our message and make their own decision. I do not mind if people reject my opinions or my philosophies as long as they first listen honestly to what I state and ask a few questions before rejecting it. I may not agree with certain political parties or religions but I listen to what they say and ask their position on it before telling them I reject it and then why.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 09:49 PM
1

I don't drink beer nor alcohol but made it through some really hard times over a few Xbox live sessions with my friends and even a few strangers.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 09:43 PM
6

I am deeply curious about this theory. If this theory is extended on a rational level, wouldn't that mean that the greatest threat to that philosophy of feminism would be women themselves?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 09:24 PM
1

While I deeply admire this man's fight for that which he loves, I do not see this in the same category as children custody.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 09:17 PM
1

I think that this is a deeply ironic and foolish article. If the motive to write this article is to try to equalize the races, what new ideas does it promote to make others equal while not trampling on the rights or inciting rage and destruction/self loathing? If the idea is to promote equality between the sexes, what ideas are put forward to bring men and women together. Instead of being either informative, the goal of this author seems instead to belittle and shame a segment of humanity instea…
/r/MensRights18/05/12 09:14 PM
2

Funny but I think this would be more appropriate in /funny.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 08:54 PM
0

I am confused. If the victim gets protection and I believe that they should, should those accused also be given anonymous privileges until the could decided if the claims against them are valid or not. I can imagine alot of people who are damaged and lose opportunities due to false claims - either malicious or accidental.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:23 PM
1

Does this same logic apply if you switch the sexes in your statement?
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:18 PM
3

I have never heard that the respective title is by name sexist but rather how the principles behind the idea is expressed. I would rather Men's Rights and Feminism both were done away with in lieu of a combined human rights where all humanity both male and female can compete for rank, privilege, advancement and awards on a level playing field. For now, instead I will try to assist both men and women from this side of the fence and I am sure that there are feminists on the other side who are stri…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:10 PM
2

I can subscribe to this idea. I think all humans are competitive on some level so stating your victory over another is an aspect that while sometimes annoying and belittling, it is merely a part of our nature. Those who are not the victors are seen by those who care as losers. Those who don't care, just see a shirt. Honestly, while I am ultra competitive in my video games, trivia competitions and military evaluations, I could not care about who was hotter than who as long as they are treated fai…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:02 PM
1

Because even the x-men were hated by the normals...
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:39 AM
1

I am confused. I have not seen any of the MR movement personnel or feminist movement voices ever engage in victim blaming. If anything, some members of our communities have a tendency to raise the flag of war against those we see as the abuser. I am confused why she would think and write what she did.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:26 AM
2

That is really really screwed up...
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:33 PM
1

Or the 98lbs guy. Helga can also crush skinny Sam but I would get Hammering Helga on my Football team if it meant I would win.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 10:38 PM
2

I don't think a television show should be your example in this case. With that said, I can't think of a good example beyond casual athletes and passionate athletes. Women who constantly work out and are as driven with their sports and sports careers may be as good as men.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 10:25 PM
7

I think your younger sister deserves a better chance to grow up. Being a personal bank for a manipulative mother is not a good position to start life from.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 10:32 AM
1

It is apparently a place where people are trying to either act bad ass by hurting others, outraged that people would harm others or express anger at the other sides ignorance and rage. Not a place to think, express an intelligent ideas that could be explored and tested or hear a opposing construct that can lead to greater understanding.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 08:07 PM
1

28 and military
/r/MensRights10/05/12 02:33 AM
1

I pray that Steph Winter and Jill Santos are not brought to one of these boards and have to account for their whereabouts during a night with alcohol or where other people claim they were and what they did. I can see alot of space for abuse and while this would work in a more utopian society, I honestly fear this decision and fret about the respective consequences.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 12:16 AM
1

This is a very intriguing idea. I would support this with my money and my time.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 08:09 PM
2

I will probably be joining you there. If so, save a bottle of the cheap vodka for me and the opinion page so I have a blanket.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 05:15 PM
2

Of all the ways to piss people off, the bare and naked truth is generally the fastest and most powerful way to piss people off.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 05:03 PM
2

I can see where your analysis comes from and how historical precedents could support your theory, but I still would have to ask what you would do to combat this "threat". If we are to take the idea that organized feminism is by nature male oppressive and that most women can support the female empowerment but not act with the same fervor to male issues, I can see and understand that. But that is mere human nature. If it is not your problem, why should I worry about it? If you lost your job but I …
/r/MensRights06/05/12 04:58 PM
1

I don't know if this blanket statement will hold up under scrutiny. While most people have had one or two (sometimes many more) bad situations where people have flipped out due to a "shady" looking situation, I think in our typical day to day dealings with fellow men and women, all people are by and large just trying to survive with food in their bellies, cash in their wallets/banks, ideas in their head and a bed to return to. The people who want to make the world a better place will be the ones…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 04:42 PM
7

At the risk of offending people for pointing out obvious information, if you are going to avoid a subreddit because someone posts something offensive, controversial or perhaps even mean, then there are not many subreddits out in the Reddit for you to enjoy.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 09:35 PM
1

It is a interesting idea, taking a more Pavlovian approach to relationships. Has there been any research on this issue?
/r/MensRights05/05/12 06:39 PM
5

Best of wishes and my prayers are with you and your husband. Keep us informed of how things go or if there is donation site. I have this paged saved.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 05:27 AM
2

This sounds like a bad porno.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 05:16 AM
1

I think I would prefer the easy setting the first time then the insanity setting.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:32 PM
1

Where did that aggression come from? To be a person who is willing to be a activist and live by their principles and try to change the world is to learn to take a little criticism and perhaps be a bit cautious about the road you are wanting to take. Already you have lost those you called friends and have implied that it was a unpleasant experience. As humans, we typically avoid bad expierences because it is a survival mechanism to stay away from things that hurt, burn or exile ourselves. Men in …
/r/MensRights03/05/12 12:41 AM
1

Decent ideas and I like how justice should be done to those who pervert any judicial system but there is something I want to point out. Your idea of finding those who slept with the woman. I can not see how one could find one guy they spent one romantic night/boy toy/fetishistic evening. It is so difficult to find a person when one is searching for them and you know their name.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 02:17 AM
2

I think that the aesthetic penis though is a interesting argument though. My expierence in this is that most of the time, the mother chooses if the child should be circumcised. If she was raised up thinking that it looks normal circumcised or looks better cut, then she might choose to have it cut. Either way, it is a interesting interpretation on the information and issue. Can any woman give any feed back?
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:56 AM
2

How do you get that from the information given? Your idea is solid under other situations, but I do not think that this case holds up to this idea. People mature and hormone levels change with age. Stress, depression, physical trauma, disease and countless other reason can affect sex drive. Sex can be a weapon wielded by both genders. Men hold to the idea of nobility, chivalry and some to the warriors ethos of constant strength and endurance under all burdens. There is inequality between the gen…
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:43 AM
5

While there are some issues going on in this family, I don't see how this is a Men's Rights issue. The husband himself stated that he is trying to find a solution and there is a possibility it is a physical issue on her behalf. If anything, this is more of a relationship issue than a inequality of the rights and equality of the genders.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:00 AM
1

By that same law, if a man withdraws consent after the fact, does it still count?
/r/MensRights28/04/12 04:57 PM
1

Certain jobs though require you to yell and be aggressive. I can not imagine a construction job without a manager or a senior worker yelling to push their workers harder and faster so the early completion bonuses are paid. Coaches and weight trainers yell to motivate and pump people up and certain other people are constantly angry because that is the only way to motivate that group of people. The military is the most famous with this style and their reasoning is to break people down to build the…
/r/MensRights22/04/12 07:55 AM
2

I have had pet raccoons, a monocle cobra and at one point a nurse shark. Does that mean I am racist, venomous predator who enjoys attacking people? I don't think so. I think I am merely a person who has had alot of unique experiences and hope to have more.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 04:34 AM
3

I think the idea of too many rights as dangerous
/r/MensRights21/04/12 02:51 AM
1

I am grateful for all that was written. The post I made on the /feminism link also pointed out alot of interesting ideas. From both posts, I gathered that there is no hard and fast detonation. What it seems to be is a idea that there exists a culture where it is alright to use sexuality as a weapon. Be it a weapon to harm, control or dominate others or exalt, advance or promote oneself. I do not know if such a culture does exist. If it does, to me it would seem as though women who use sexuality …
/r/MensRights15/04/12 08:02 AM
2

Is there one that you believe? If so, why?
/r/MensRights14/04/12 10:58 PM
3

Wow. That idea scares me. Where did you get this definition?
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:36 PM
1

I agree in the context that working with women to eliminate sexual preconceptions, inequalities and biases: social, cultural, economic and in more ways than I have words. I have viewed this subreddit and others like it as mostly trying to point out problems and show where society and other philosophies are wrong. I have not seen a thread about someone wishing violence on another nor anything like that. We men (at least as I can tell) for the most part are stoic and are willing to carry a burden …
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:08 PM
1

We are men. We are the people who our sons have to look up to and our daughters model their future husbands after. While I strongly believe in an equality of the sexes, how we fight will be a stronger statement then the end goal. Using personal attacks, hacking accounts, making false statements are but three things that will advance our cause but destroy our reputation. I would recommended writing emails to the editors, stating our beliefs, giving our best evidence and proof that we stand for a …
/r/MensRights09/04/12 04:45 AM
6

Funny, there was a series of comics on the web comic that clearly did refer to a ranger character raping a snake character that caused a fighter to beat the living crap out said ranger character. If anything, I would think that would be the stance of the author and creator of the comics. My internet is spotty otherwise I would post the link.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 01:02 AM
1

So let me see if the gist of these articles is correct: male birth control is bad because it gives men control over their bodes and futures. Futures women want control over by controlling the children they have. Apparently sperm clinics, cryogenic facilities, adoption, and the latest advances in genetic sciences never existed. I think there is a slow adoption of male birth control in the USA due to few people thinking about it, members of this Reddit not included.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 12:40 AM
1

Society will change and alter as it did for when women use birth control however, not all change is bad. Control of who makes it, social encouragement to use it or controversy to stop it and countless other factors will ultimately direct the end result of any type of social change.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 12:16 AM
6

For the past hour, I have been trying to find something written by a confirmed feminist that they see male contraceptives as a threat. The best I can find is conspiracy talk.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 09:05 PM
2

This sounds a bit extremist for me in a way that defies logic, reason or sensibility. Why would the feminist movement seek to deny male birth control? It will not stop rape nor "social inequality." Male fertility does not effect social prestige nor wealth value. Even for the extreme believers in feminism, the concept of male birth control would not ease nor slow down their irrational and extremist belief structure.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 07:53 PM
7

I have been told many times that I could not cry. I just took that to mean I could never cry in public or in front of others. Funny though how I have often been called cold and emotionally distant by women. Meh, I cry in private and know that while stupid double standards exist, I will find someone who I can actually feel comfortable with soon.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter