DarkestSin Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	No means no, Feminists. It shouldn't have to be us vs them. That's what equality is about.	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 02:21 AM
2	No means no, Feminists. In all seriousness, why the fuck not? There are people killing each other left and right in this world over such stupid other reasons, why should anyone be treated any differently because they have a different set of genitals to the other guy?	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 02:11 AM
1	No means no, Feminists. Nah, I quite like being female. I don't have to worry about back hair.	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 01:48 AM
0	No means no, Feminists. Why not? Influential and popular groups can be terrible! PETA have influence in the world of animal rights, and everyone knows they're a crock of shit. I'm a woman, I'm for equal rights, I think that those statements are terrible. Nobody should be treated like that. Not a man, a woman, an animal, or anybody. There are plenty of women who feel the same.	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 01:36 AM
-3	No means no, Feminists. There are a lot of people who see these things and think they're bullshit. I for one would argue that this is radical feminism.	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 01:26 AM
-2	No means no, Feminists. Well I looked in a mirror today, actually... I generally call myself an equalist, and observe both sides.	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 01:02 AM
-7	No means no, Feminists. There are radicals on both sides. Mens righs is supposed to be about equality for the sexes, but fighting feminism only leads back to one group having the upper hand.	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 01:01 AM
-14	No means no, Feminists. Feminism isn't detrimental to men's rights! RADICAL feminism is detrimental, not garden variety feminism. Don't get the two confused.	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 12:57 AM