DarkestTimeLime Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
6	Recommended People to Read/Watch for People that Believe Men Deserve Their Basic Human Rights.		DarkestTimeLime	/r/MensRights	11/02/17 08:21 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Feminists OUTRAGED At Scholarship For Men In Field That’s 78 Percent Women Nah, I'm just a hack but his last video was fucking spectacular.	/r/MensRights	12/02/17 02:45 PM
-14	Feminists OUTRAGED At Scholarship For Men In Field That’s 78 Percent Women How do you know what they meant? I don't and when I asked them to clarify they refused and booked it the fuck out of here. Mind your business, this is about me checking some punk that wants to turn this into some man vs woman shit. Until then maybe ask a question before making a claim, huh?	/r/MensRights	12/02/17 01:40 AM
-1	Feminists OUTRAGED At Scholarship For Men In Field That’s 78 Percent Women If you refuse to answer my question then perhaps I do.	/r/MensRights	12/02/17 12:10 AM
-1	Feminists OUTRAGED At Scholarship For Men In Field That’s 78 Percent Women I won't explain to you what you meant, since then your could stand defiantly on the hill waving your arms and calling yourself a strawman. You explain what you meant by your first comment and then we will see if you are able to justify the use of the buzzword 'projection' in a noninsulting manner.	/r/MensRights	12/02/17 12:02 AM
-4	Feminists OUTRAGED At Scholarship For Men In Field That’s 78 Percent Women The definitions of words can require many more than one word to encapsulate the definiton. Misanthrope is a perfect example. However your comment was intended you were either insulting feminists or MRAs, and this subreddit is not a place for insults to people. That is why I asked you to leave. If you're going to overreact demand that I react to your outbursts the way you want them to be reacted to then I'm going to reiterate my original point that misanthropes like you have no business here wher…	/r/MensRights	11/02/17 11:40 PM
-6	Feminists OUTRAGED At Scholarship For Men In Field That’s 78 Percent Women The word 'please,' the one I used when I asked you to get your misanthropy out of here, indicates that I won't be aggressive towards you, regardless of of how much you may try to bait me. I'm making a civil request, and if you react to a clarification of that request as impolitely as you just did again then that will reveal much more about your character than it will of mine or any of the MRA that congregate here. You can take that knowledge back to /r/latestagecapitalism and tell everyone there…	/r/MensRights	11/02/17 11:09 PM
-22	Feminists OUTRAGED At Scholarship For Men In Field That’s 78 Percent Women Please remove your red pill popping misanthropy from this thread. I, and the vast majority of MRA's, believe that people should be treated like people. To hold their genetics against them is a way of not only undermining those that have fallen prey to the feminist cult but to reinforce the man bad, woman weak paradigm, however oblivious the provocateur may be to their role in perpetuating this dilemma.	/r/MensRights	11/02/17 10:10 PM
146	Feminists OUTRAGED At Scholarship For Men In Field That’s 78 Percent Women This is the response to the cult of Men Bad, Women Weak; now it's Women Better, Men Weaker. These people won't believe that men are capable of emotional, logical, or ethical thought; they will emerge as ideologues that only see men as lessers that oppress them because of the society monster from forever ago.	/r/MensRights	11/02/17 08:27 PM
3	These guys, at the Superbowl. I got that info from another page and didn't see that, I only saw this info when I went to the FGM page. That sucks. So how much unneccesary baby mutilation and torture do you support? Edit: So I just skimmed through that WHO report that that citation comes from and nowhere does the report seem to say that Type I where only the skin is removed is rare. If you can find it that'd be great because right now I still don't have any evidence to support that claim from Wikipedia. Edit: nvm found it, it…	/r/MensRights	06/02/17 05:47 PM
24	These guys, at the Superbowl. FGM isn't just cutting off the clit, the vast majority of FGM is Type I, which is equivalent to a circumcision. Type I is illegal for women but not for men. Type IIa is removal of the inner labia; IIb, removal of the clitoral glans and inner labia; and IIc, removal of the clitoral glans, inner and outer labia (From Wikipedia.) So you see, comparing circumcision, or male genital mutilation, to FGM is absolutely like comparing apples to apples.	/r/MensRights	06/02/17 02:27 PM
1	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? If that happens then we fucking riot!	/r/MensRights	15/12/16 02:52 AM
1	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? That would be fucking cool. She definitely had that dark side look after she wrecked Kylo's shit. I just don't think Kylo can come back after killing Han.	/r/MensRights	15/12/16 02:07 AM
1	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? What the fuck, really?! But if that were true that would mean we're just doing something stupid like talking about a movie we like. How completely absurd that sounds.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 11:51 PM
1	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? It's a little more similar to someone sticking bamboo shoots under your fingernails while interrogating you and gleaning from that what questions to ask during an interview I think. I'm honestly going to laugh my way out of the theater when Luke is so like, totally, just like blown away by her gurrrrl power in the next movie.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 11:24 PM
1	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? Mind Trick, but she was exposed to that by Kylo. Force pull was pure J.J. bullshit because that shot is a complete parallel with looks first Force Pull.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 08:41 PM
1	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? I wouldn't say she mastered it at all. Luke used skills he was taught to use against Vader. The force jump was it actually. Rey was letting the Force flow through her as Yoda would say. I'll tie this back to KOTOR (I think that's the game it was from.) The mind trick is a primitive version of cumpulsion. She was only exposed to that one skill and that's the only skill she uses.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 08:10 PM
1	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? Why not? Do you mean using the Force or using it in the way Luke had to be taught to use it?	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 07:37 PM
3	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? I hope it's alright if I play the devil's advocate here. I'll set the scene. -Finn got wrecked by a stormtrooper with a shock baton/mace -Kylo got gutshot by a weapon that sends people flying -Boltcasters fire rods of metal, coiled in plasma, propelled by magnets. It's like a rail gun. -Kylo wrecks Finn's shit, but Finn gets a good hit in on Kylo's shoulder. That demonstrates that Kylo is far from 100% -Kylo is strengthened by the Dark Side in this fight because of his hatred of Finn. Remember K…	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 07:29 PM
2	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? It just showed him somewhere. There's not any evidence that he was at the temple in the vision, or if he was, that it wasn't after the attack but before he went into hiding. but are you really implying he just let his students die and did nothing to help. lol, I guess I am in the same way that we're both letting fish get eaten by birds 800 miles away and not doing anything to help. edit: this is just conjecture, but I'm fairly confident that the hand on R2 thing was a parallel to Leia loading th…	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 06:36 PM
3	Hmmmm. And really? "All the time"? As you typed that 500 women were killed. /s	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 06:22 PM
3	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? Yeah, that's the moment my immersion broke hard. Agreed, the "she read his mind" argument doesn't make any sense to me either. It's just too flimsy to hold up. If that's all it takes to learn these skills then there's no need to "train" a Jedi. Yoda could just say, alright younglings, read my mind and you'll be as strong as me. You are correct, but he did do it. Luke would not be beaten by a group of weak untrained force users. I'm pretty confident Luke wasn't there or he would have smashed thei…	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 06:10 PM
2	Interesting Well that sucks because I'm definitely not anti-women's rights, but I can't for the life of me think of a right that men have that women don't have but I can think of several that women have that men don't. When I'm attacking feminism it's because they've achieved political superiority, economic equality and social equality is just a buzzword that lets goalposts get pushed back forever, despite the fact that they've achieved their most important goals instead of focusing on the rights that men d…	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 05:58 PM
1	Interesting Howard Zinn That is the most fucking biased goddamn book you could have possibly posted. I've read it. It's shit. Get the fuck out of here. Edit: Don't believe me? It took two seconds, here's a professor from Stanford that says it offers "bad lessons in historical thinking" http://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/december/wineburg-historiography-zinn-122012.html	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 05:44 PM
3	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? You have evidence she couldn't? I mean, her first time flying a ship? Can I prove a negative you mean? haha, no I guess I can't. I highly doubt it though, that was just crazy immersion breaking. Kylo beat Luke and his entire school. It's pretty important to remember that he didn't do this single-handedly, maybe we'll see how that went down in VIII	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 05:35 PM
1	Interesting Nice strawman and ad hominems. I appreciate you saving me from having to actually address any of your stupid stupid shitty ideas since they're all just insults. Sorry to break it to you buttercup, but Feminists don't have a monopoly on human rights. You know how I know I'm not a feminist? I don't think women were unlucky to be born women. Chew on that for a little while, sunshine.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 05:30 PM
2	Interesting Alright, I already see a couple of issues with this so I'll point out the parts that are dishonest or misleading. I'll be starting with Victorian Era Lower Wages for Women From this there are two things: males in the family held the title of "breadwinners," and their income was regarded as more important All men were expected to work, so that's not institutionalized or systemic or anything. As more women entered jobs traditionally held by men for smaller wages, employers used them to undercut ma…	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 05:19 PM
4	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? Just three quick point: -I don't want a Yoda movie, that sounds lame. -Poe was supposed to get killed off in the first few minutes but J.J. wrote him into the script after Isaac asked him not to kill him because he kept getting killed in all his movies, the main cast was originally Ridley, Boyega, and Driver. -I'm not complaining about the female leads, but it's starting to look like it might be tokenism in order to ply women to watch more of these movies. As cynical as I think that is, it's not…	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 04:50 PM
1	Interesting You'll have to provide examples for this claim. The way I see it is that men have literally always protected women at the expense of themselves. *non-rich Men have built cities, fought wars, died on the seas trying to support and protect their women and children. Somehow people believe that despite this society hates women.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 04:39 PM
2	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? I'm talking about Rey and what's her face in Rogue One, the main characters of their respective films. The recurring male character will be Han Solo in the standalone picture coming out in 2018.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 04:36 PM
2	Interesting Oh arbiter of truth, thank you for totally explaining feminism to us poor fools. It's not like this isn't the same fucking thing we hear everytime we point out that feminism never practices what it preaches. Feminism is simply wanting to address and fix the problems that women face that vary per time, place, and culture. It doesn't care about mens' issues, you said so yourself. Thank you for completely justifying my hatred of feminism and strengthening my position as a mens' and womens' rights a…	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 04:33 PM
2	Interesting Did you actually just call them a misogynist because they said that they hate feminism? hahaha, wow...	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 04:28 PM
1	Interesting ok. Do you want to provide evidence, or do you not want to have this discussion?	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 04:19 PM
14	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? Well she wasn't better at flying the falcon than Han because Han was able to drop out of hyperspace in atmosphere (I think that, coupled with the blind side stormtrooper kill, is proof he's still force-sensitive like he was in the EU, but that another conversation entirely.) She was certainly at least as good at flying the Falcon as Lando was in RotJ, since she pulled off a mini Death Star 2 run. Agreed she's a Mary Sue though; everyone likes her, speaks every language, has every skill, has no c…	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 04:19 PM
10	Interesting That's fucking heartbreaking. I hope you guys' work that out. Sorry about your mom, too. My cousins' have a mentally ill mother, I think it's BPD because of the shit she's put them through, so I have only a faint idea of what that's like. Best wishes to you and your stepdad.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 04:09 PM
3	Senator Says Making Boys Pledge The White Ribbon Oath Is "Public Shaming Based On Gender" no problem.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 04:03 PM
37	Senator Says Making Boys Pledge The White Ribbon Oath Is "Public Shaming Based On Gender" Well you already got owned on your first 'point' so I'll own you on the second 'point.' btw, don`t forget who carried the baby into the world. So it's okay to beat a baby because the mother carried it. Nice logic; you're so progressive.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 04:02 PM
6	Senator Says Making Boys Pledge The White Ribbon Oath Is "Public Shaming Based On Gender" You forget this: Biological dads are much less likely to abuse or kill their children than biological mom, but stepdads are fairly high risk.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 04:01 PM
50	Senator Says Making Boys Pledge The White Ribbon Oath Is "Public Shaming Based On Gender" Statistically women are more violent towards babies than men, and violence towards babies is more serious. Babies need protection from women. for true equality we need to acknowledge gender differences, and hold women accountable for their sex.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 03:53 PM
3	Interesting I don't disagree with anything you're saying, but I'm not going to sit back and say nothing while feminists spread hatred and lies.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 03:39 PM
3	Interesting Yes, I'm saying that the feminist idea that men as a coordinated class have been intentionally oppressing women as a class throughout history because they viewed them as inferior is a fucking lie.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 03:38 PM
1	Interesting https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf pg. 38 OP's wrong though, there are some shelters that accept men, but as you can see from this list there are ridiculously few.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 03:34 PM
1	Interesting No thank you, I'd prefer my dignity.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 03:31 PM
3	Interesting It's not an extreme minority. If a feminist believes that women have historically been oppressed by men then they are following revisionist history. Feminism plays right into the hands of the people who have always been the ones in control. The rich. Those people are supporting a movement which says "men are the oppressor" and now they're piling on, kicking the shit out of the middle-class/poor man that the rich man has been kicking the shit out of for all of history. Feminism is a sexist hate g…	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 03:28 PM
3	Interesting Give me a break! Academic Feminism now focuses on patriarchy theory. "Men bad, women weak" is that doddering religion's mantra. Nice tinfoil, though. I love how feminists can never take responsibility for anything like what their own movement stands for. Did you listen to Emma Watson pitch #HeForShe, and could you not see how even that 'robust' idea boiled down to "men bad, women weak?" It doesn't even surprise me anymore how delusional the ideologues have become.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 03:18 PM
2	Interesting And who's stopping you from opening one? Feminists, for bashing the damn things every time someone tries to open one. The government for refusing to fund them despite men making up nearly half of domestic violence victims and reporting more intimate partner violence than women in the previous 12 months according to this CDC study: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf page 38	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 03:05 PM
5	Circumcision is Child Abuse and Torture I blame ideological subversion. The counter arguments are so weak: It doesn't serve a purpose besides sexual stimulation/lubrication. Even if this was true, which of course it's not, if their logic is going to remain consistent they have to include that they also support the removal of the clitoris since that actually does only serve the sole purpose of stimulation. They're too young to remember the trauma to it's okay. I won't even get into the can of worms that that opens up because it's disgu…	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 02:43 PM
7	Circumcision is Child Abuse and Torture Sure are a lot of people supporting baby torture in here.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 02:35 PM
5	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? This is just Disney doing Disney things. They assume men are going to watch Star Wars because it's an interesting setting and they're trying to expand their audience to women, the easiest way to do that is to plug women into the lead roles, hence why the first two main characters are women and the only announced male main character is just a younger version of an existing character.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 02:25 PM
8	Calling it now: the new Star Wars movie will be the story of how a woman was the real hero of the battle of Yavin, not Luke. Because how could we let people think men could take down the death star? That was from RotJ, the "many Bothans died..." line. The only reference was a minor footnote, but it was in the opening crawl. "Rebel spaceships, striking from a hidden base, have won their first victory against the evil Galactic Empire. During the battle, Rebel spies managed to steal secret plans to the Empire's ultimate weapon, the DEATH STAR, "	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 02:22 PM
6	Interesting hahaha bullllshit. Duluth model, allowing for the continued genital mutilation of boys, lobbying against all legislation that tries to bring balance to the broken family court system, pushing for quotas that disadvantage men in higher education, lobbying for changes in education that favor girls by disincentivizing testing, NEVER talking about the male suicide rape/Domestic Violence rate/ job fatality rate. Fuck feminism, all it preaches is "men bad, women weak." I defy you to find one argument …	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 01:43 PM
13	Interesting It's getting attention because that's what the most widely praised and respected feminists' teach. Feminism is a twisted ideology and it is absolutely not what it says it is in the dictionary.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 01:38 PM
2	Scam artist famous Brianna Wu aka @spacekatgal grabs 12,726 USD from 392 Kickstarter users, never delivers the project, only blocks anyone asking for his money back or talking about her mass fraud Zoe fucked a dude from kotaku and made the review higher bc of it and started a shitstorm You're ignorant, Grayson didn't review her game, he gave it positive coverage without disclosing the relationship. Quinn is a garbage person, but the blame lies with the journalist for not doing their fucking job. Don't co-opt a movement and lie about what happened to push your agenda.	/r/PussyPass	06/08/16 06:17 AM
2	Scam artist famous Brianna Wu aka @spacekatgal grabs 12,726 USD from 392 Kickstarter users, never delivers the project, only blocks anyone asking for his money back or talking about her mass fraud It was the Zoe Post, but for fucks' sake it wasn't prostitution. Stop it, stop it, stop it. Zoe was having sex with Nathan Grayson prior to him writing articles about her ggggggaaaaaaaaaaaammmmmmmeeeeeee but no one she has reportedly had a sexual relationship with reviewed her game. That's besides the point though. She may be a shitty person, which the Zoe Post's extensive chatlogs prove she is, but the journalist is the fuckhead that should have higher scruples. That's why Gamergate has always …	/r/PussyPass	06/08/16 06:15 AM