TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Darktidemage Archive

View 0 posts and 168 comments by Darktidemage on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I'd love it if someone ordered my food for me (as long as they order correctly). Even if I still have to pay. Making that phone call is work.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/09/21 02:32 PM
1

why the hell is the first message incoherent? "We met again XXXX and XXXX wedding Saturday? WTF could those XXXs be that would make this shit read like normal language ?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/21 10:25 PM
0

Hold on, I never spoke of cheating. Last time I read the PUA books lying about marital status wasnt even a thing. are you aware of what thread you are commenting in or not? Nowhere did I say the average woman is equivalent in their use of deception to a male "pick up artist" This is 100% what your post is saying. If you don't understand what you are typing it's because you are a slow person or just a disingenuous intellectually dishonest individual when you take the comments, in context, in a ch…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/21 04:50 PM
0

It's gross that you are continuing to double down on your theory that your AVERAGE woman is somehow equivalent in their use of deception to a male "pick up artist" .... You want to see if I ignore obvious ones because I'm a simp in disguise? The ways women use "deceptive methods" are ones that are generally socially accepted, and understood to be happening. The average man in the bar can tell you he knows and expects the women are wearing bras, and make up. Those are the two that were named. Do …
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/21 03:36 PM
-1

Im not talking of sleeping around. I am alking of getting women to be interested in them that is not what a "pickup artist" is. If you fake confidence to get a woman interested in you then you do no automatically qualify as being a pickup artist. Also, modern women and feminists are pushing that women should sleep around as much as they can. no, they are not. lol wtf is this incel theory ? You maybe have confused "I saw someone do this" with the ability to claim "modern feminists do this" as if …
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/21 02:07 PM
-15

Yes, he is wrong. comparing lying to someone about the circumstances of your life with wearing a bra and makeup is a terrible, incel, comparison. A pickup "artist" is someone who goes around sleeping with as many people as they possibly can. Right? Like they are promiscuous , sluts, who convince someone they may be getting into a long term relationship - but then leave after the first sex. Right? How TF is that remotely akin to "wearing make up" ? Are you saying you find that to be a defensible …
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/21 01:15 PM
34

my work home ?? that's just called "work". You have your home, and you have your work. Calling your work "my work home" is a pretty immediate red flag that you're reaching, hard, for some random sympathy that is extra and un-deserved.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/21 01:20 PM
3

I think you mean "she" took it to mean that? because then they fired her. The job description was probably not "spread our version of hate" lol that's why they have job descriptions that say high level things, so then they can apply hindsight to your actions against your job description and make adjustments
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/21 01:18 PM
1

Ah yes, the mental gymnastics of correctly identifying the words I said, which are clearly visible to all. I even further clarified what I was saying "Ugly can recognize Ugly" You can disagree w/ this sentiment, but it's clearly wrong to tell me the definition of "ugly" as if I was using the word wrong, you are being weird, and calling it "mental gymnastics" for me to point out how you're fucking wrong to correct my use of ugly - which is BASIC reading comprehension and honesty at this point - i…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/20 02:08 PM
1

and CALLING someone ELSE ugly has nothing to do with how YOU look. Jesus. Like learn to read and quote people properly. Learn to be an intellectually honest person, because you are not one.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/11/20 12:38 AM
-3

Except calling someone else ugly has nothing to do with how you look. Ugly can recognize Ugly
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/20 02:26 PM
1

Maybe you're a total moron if you think these points are relevant?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 02:02 PM
1

I can explain the answer to this question. Abortions are not 100% the guys financial responsibility. Women pay for most of their own abortions in this world.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 01:58 PM
1

it's painfully obvious in the CONTEXT of this conversation that it's about why people don't jump in during these exchanges which is due to the women obviously not being a threat in the specific scenarios Unless they have a weapon they actually aren’t unless you’re a 130 lbs dork with no balls yeah. The answer to "why don't the men jump in here" is "the woman isn't actually a threat, unless she has a weapon" - in this video. And in the cases where the men don't jump in, which are being discussed.…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 02:18 PM
1

Why didn’t the teacher or simps step in when she was all in his face? this is the comment that started this chain of discussion though. like it's pretty easy to understand why people don't feel the need to step in to this guys aid at the beginning of this video , right? but do feel the need to save this chick from getting murdered when it's called for. People acting like this is all complex.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 04:58 AM
-1

I'm pretty sure the law states he doesn't have the right to keep being aggressive once he determines he isn't in danger. Which is basically right away at the start of this. You could pretty easily argue hitting the woman back here to this extent is beyond self defense. The man clearly has the opportunity to remove himself from danger and not knock the woman unconscious doing it.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 04:52 AM
1

does not mean that women cannon be stronger. No one said "women can not be stronger". THey argued if you see two people squared up you don't get particularly concerned when you can easily determine the less aggressive one has a MASSIVE advantage. . . reading comprehension and sentiment analysis are not exactly things many of the people in this comment section excel at though. like "OMG why didn't they react as strongly when the diminutive woman was being aggressive toward the giant guy with 40+ …
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 04:50 AM
1

does he have any physical damage from the hits Does she? reddit loves to point out how women do violence as often or more, but ignore how much damage that violence does.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/19 02:29 AM
3

We got to a point in our civilization where a whole gender is believed if they accuse someone of the other gender, no matter what, what a time to be alive. Well this is 100% false. You literally just posted this on the DAY a guy was accused of sexual assault and 51% of the senate said "we don't buy it - he's our guy for supreme court" and now he is on the supreme court. So. Premise ruined.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 02:32 AM
5

I've never ridden a motorcycle before and I would bet money on myself in that race.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/18 02:42 AM
-4

and is your roommates life literally ruined?
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:47 PM
1

The fact of the matter is both CAN. The fat guy just has to have money. the fat woman just needs to find a guy who wants some pussy real bad.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 05:07 PM
22

99% of the people saying the same stuff are not trans though. It's not a trans issue. It's an echo chamber thing. Try to have a reasonable discussion about "all white people are racist" with any group who spreads the idea, online or in real life, and you will quickly face violence and labels of bigotry, doxxing, and threats of repercussions.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 03:53 PM
12

How hard is it to do some basic test to find out of if your new spokesperson is a virulent racist like this one?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 03:52 PM
75

Also, "if black makeup doesn't exist ALL white people are racist" is still indefensible.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 03:50 PM
24

holy shit some people... you are black, you are trans, and you get a modeling career and you STILL THINK all white people are racist? How? Why? What?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 03:49 PM
1

I bet she becomes a rapist in prison.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 02:47 PM
3

showed the child was it his.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:43 PM
1080

The correct thing to do that point is to try to help the guy get back up and tell him it was an accident, not fucking wave your hands around trying to go back in time . . .
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/17 01:05 AM
0

I don't need feminism because I'm feminist, ASSUME everyone else is, and I don't believe in hardcore SJWism?
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:23 PM
2

There is no one standing in the picture, so .... who cares?
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:01 AM
4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Bergeron
/r/MensRights18/04/17 02:44 PM
28

20 years ago a woman who looked like that would be burned as a witch.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/17 01:35 PM
1

If life goes on without you showing up for work What? Life always "goes on".
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/17 04:36 PM
4

The issue is not her weight, it's her hypocrisy. So yeah, if she worked hard to be skinny she would indeed be quite possibly a far far better person even after saying she prefers taller guys.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/17 02:43 PM
69

I love how her reaction is HE ruined HER life for calling out her awful hypocritical shallow shit. Meanwhile, if she stops only going after 6 foot tall guys due to his enlightenment he potentially saved her from a life of misery. If she starts going to the gym due to his enlightenment he potentially saved her life. Literally saved it.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/17 02:40 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTr60WYjNM4
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/17 09:54 PM
1

Glad to hear it. If no morons were telling me i was a moron then I would know my post sucked.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 03:24 PM
1

dude, you already do. go tell off some noobs in a refugee camp.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/17 02:27 PM
1

I was sad I thought of the sign "Trump - you don't want to see the men's march against you" too late to actually bring it to the event.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 02:00 PM
2

The person responsible for plane seat design should be executed. They are literally the worst seats in the known universe. It's like someone explicitly had a contest to design the worst possible seat to attempt to sleep in that could theoretically pass.... and EVERY airline said "yes, that's our seat design" Fuck them all. Fuck all people even related to the airline industry by up to 4 degrees of separation. Only amazon rainforest villagers and current infants get a pass on how fucking bad airli…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 02:39 PM
4

No it isn't. You're just saying this. but in reality it's untrue.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:30 PM
4

But it's not a double standard. The post clearly illustrates that. If the guy had not responded to her that would be a double standard.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:08 PM
55

Who the fuck's mama has a bald head?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/01/17 08:58 PM
3

Never commit suicide. Always commit homicide. Otherwise you're just pushing your problems onto someone else.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 02:30 PM
1

keeps making point after point that keeps getting refuted by the data. name the point. I specifically named the flaw in the logic you have been using. You once again totally ignored it, and now are just saying I've been refuted. .. if I were refuted you should be able to point it out right? My point was there are a possible set of real world behaviors that COULD explain the data in a different way other than "women are more violent." Go ahead and explain how that's wrong. Don't just say "it's wr…
/r/MensRights16/12/16 08:19 PM
1

very point you've made, I've provided clear data that refuted it. dude, if you are failing to understand the data does not refute it wtf am i supposed to do except explain how? I gave specific examples of how "increased level of violence in group A as compared to group B" could not be only due to "group A is more violent than B' you did nothing to address any of those examples. The data point that you think is so valuable is that when men and women are in mutually abusive relationships the women…
/r/MensRights16/12/16 07:57 PM
1

he data clearly refutes every position you've taken in this discussion. That's where you are wrong. The data does not 'clearly refute" what I'm saying. You're just ignorant of what data means and how to properly process it. In mutually violent relationships women escalate violence. That's all we know. You're drawing the conclusion that proves women are more violent than men, ignorantly. We can go back and forth all day, i'm arguing with a brick wall who's only retort is "but the data" repeatedly…
/r/MensRights16/12/16 03:13 PM
1

The article clearly deals with the escalation of violence in reciprocally violent relationships. If retarded redditors aren't going to read the research being discussed, there isn't really any point in discussing it. I totally agree with you it shows escalation of violence in reciprocally violent relationships. It's thinking that proves what you think it proves that is wrong.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 02:57 PM
1

Domestic violence campaigns should focus on women not hitting men, for the safety of women. You're making the classic "correlation implies causation" retarded reddit mistake. Just because in reciprocal violence women are injured more doesn't mean if they stopped hitting back then their injuries would decline. It might also mean if they stopped hitting back then the stats would change and now non-reciprocal violence would have more inujuries than reciprocal. You've identified the fact "The worst …
/r/MensRights16/12/16 02:27 PM
1

Which table shows the number of injuries?
/r/MensRights16/12/16 05:28 AM
1

Not really interesting. Pretty obvious. Reciprocal violence leading to increased frequency of violence in women (but not men) is not proving to me that women are more violent. I just don't see the connection. logically - we can imagine a murderous psychopath and a nice school kid. We beat both of them mercilessly for a year. The school kid may have INCREASED in violence level by a larger % at this point than the murderous psychopath. That just shows he was the less violent one to begin with. You…
/r/MensRights15/12/16 09:34 PM
1

"Women are the more violent in reciprocally violent relationships. Data point." it doesn't say that anywhere. how are you drawing this conclusion? It says in mutually violent relationships the women escalate the violence more than the men do. That could mean the men begin with MAXIMAL FORCE and use it the entire time while the women ramp up from low levels to maximal force over time. To me that would mean men are the more violent. They begin with the more violent acts, the women have to work up …
/r/MensRights15/12/16 09:21 PM
1

A woman is safer if she does not get physically violent with a man. If that had been your statement I would have no problem with it. It's a dumb thing to think means women are more violent, or the larger part of the problem, or to even consider as evidence to support those ideas.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 09:07 PM
1

This means that if the women don't hit the men in the first place, they would not be in a violent relationship at all. Therefore safer. If you find a flaw in my logic, or my representation of the data, please feel free to point it out. The flaw is not all women hit the man first. You make a statement "Women would be safer" but it only applies to women who initiated violence. For example - A person who robs stores would be safer if they didn't rob stores. now - it's also true that sometimes when …
/r/MensRights15/12/16 08:09 PM
1

Clearly, the data suggests that the best way to keep women safe in domestic violence situations is to teach them not to hit men. Is this serious? I can't tell if you are attempting to make what you consider a valid point of if this is some type of gross joke. No, I don't notice "women are more violent when violence goes both ways" it specifically said in what you quoted " reciprocal intimate partner violence was associated with greater injury than was nonreciprocal intimate partner violence rega…
/r/MensRights15/12/16 07:59 PM
1

You didn't provide a link. You don't seem to know how sourcing something works. Do I just trust you or do I have to go dig to try to find that one detail somewhere? It's weird the CDC says • Women had a significantly higher lifetime prevalence of severe physical violence by an intimate partner (24.3%) compared to men (13.8%). • Approximately 2.7% of women and 2.0% of men experienced severe physical violence in the 12 months preceding the survey Stalking by an Intimate Partner • Women had a signi…
/r/MensRights15/12/16 06:55 PM
1

What is the source you provided?
/r/MensRights15/12/16 01:30 AM
1

I'll notice you ignored that part. Where was that part remotely mentioned? "70% of non-reciprocal domestic abuse was female perpetrated." That makes zero sense. You just said previously males represented only 44 % of victims with females being 56%. If you subtract reciprocals it should subtract equally from each side, it can't flip the percentages to the opposites direction of majority.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 08:38 PM
1

A feminist opened the first domestic violence shelter for women. She realized that the women were just as violent as the men and wanted to accept battered men as well Feminism isn't the cure, it's the cancer keeping it going. based on what you said this problem is some violent women - the cure is still also feminism. Note "a feminist" is the person that stepped up with a cure? The "furthermore" you gave is evidence against your position. The greatest incidence is reciprocal? ok. So if we factor …
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:23 PM
0

If it were random it would not be a 60-40 distribution. 60/40 is still extremely skewed toward you needing feminism. Women are abused a fucking full 50% more than men are. Not to mention "I don't need feminism because these are statistics, from right now, with feminism" is a completely dumb statement. How do you know what the numbers would change to without feminism?
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:54 PM
1

I was asking what the difference actually was. Others explained that SO..... just that second part then?
/r/MensRights12/12/16 03:21 PM
1

One means if you did the same thing you would get the same pay. Earning difference. The other doesn't. Wage difference.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 02:59 PM
2

"textbook fascism" is the best part.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/16 03:06 PM
-2

Yes I've heard of domestic violence. I've heard of men punching women and busting their face open, huge black eyes, bruises, etc. That all falls outside of the content of this video, and my comment. notice I said "damage"? "did no physical damage to a woman" Like what is shown in the video. yea, you've noticed that in the case of domestic violence when DAMAGE is done to the woman then the police act.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 06:11 PM
-2

Ironically an all out man hunt would be in place if the tables were turned, I'd love to see a situation where a man did no physical damage to a woman but an all out man hunt is in place. please.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 05:42 PM
1

I completely agree these cases are fucked up and the whole system is fucked up. The age in other countries is significantly lower than the USA, and they don't have problems. France for example. With all the internet communication you can have someone from France who just perfectly legally beat off to some attractive 16 year old in his own country and then jumped on a plane to the USA and here he would be jailed for YEARS and have his entire life destroyed by that. What I wonder is "if the logic …
/r/MensRights06/10/16 06:20 PM
1

I didn't say "punish him he's guilty!" i said "he MIGHT still be guilty" Jesus Fing christ. I described exactly how our justice system should work. You should have a trial and weigh each case individual on it's own merits. If the girl looks 5 ? What if she actually is 5? Does that change nothing? "she lied" . "she defended him from the start" "it was a dating app with minimum age restriction" those all apply equally well if she were a 5 year old and he obviously knew she was 5..... and he would …
/r/MensRights06/10/16 03:30 PM
-15

Look - I'm 100% sure it's possible this guy is innocent. It's also possible he's guilty as hell. "she lied about her age" could be something he knew was going on. You could have pimps that pimp out 13 year olds and say "all you gotta do is say you are 18, and the guy fucking you just has to pretend he believes you" and then he's legally protected (the john not the pimp). That's not a great idea.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 01:18 PM
-10

You know, if a man wants to keep his woman like a slave he just needs to be smart enough to report domestic violence, get a restraining order, and then keep her living with him against the order "if she wants to see her kids" Then he can at any time call the cops on her and get her arrested for violating the order if she does not obey his commands. I think that accounts for a significant portion of why 40% are men against women.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 01:04 PM
1

You aren't counting the time value of money at all.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 01:19 PM
1

There isn't a reason to hit back against a woman who is significantly physically inferior to you. Just leave the room. She can't physically force you to stay like a man can to a woman.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 05:05 PM
1

Or I'm right. And since you know I'm right I think we have it narrowed down quite a bit.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 12:48 PM
1

"getting whipped" ? Nah. I've been hearing from morons about how they disagree but have no points at all, just that they disagree. Kind of like your post. Meanwhile I got a lot of other people telling me they do agree with me. Yall are straight morons. Hearing you tell me I'm wrong is all the more reason to persist. It's ensuring I feel good about having done the right thing.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 02:06 AM
1

Since the situations are the same The situations are only the same in that "both put a picture up," but in every other metric I can think of they are different. "OP's picture shows an example" yes, where he got hurt. But could she hit significantly harder than that if she wanted to? probably not. If she kept hitting him, would he have died to her blows, or would he have easily been able to defend himself? Those are factors. you are proclaiming they were not weighed in, but it seems to me like th…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:43 PM
2

I would expect they be treated like scum. because the terror inflicted on the baby and the physical inability of the baby to stop the abuse are factors and they are the same in both cases, man slapping baby or woman slapping baby. And I think those same factors should be weighed, and rightfully ARE weighed, when dealing with domestic abuse between adults. I don't think they should just be ignored and we should treat all cases equally regardless of physical characteristics of the participants. I …
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:11 PM
-4

Yeah, i'm so dumb for thinking the actual terror instilled and damage done by an attack should be factors. It's so stupid for me to consider a physically superior person beating a weakling to be worse than the reverse. What a fucking horrible moron I am. At least i'm not the type to just throw bullshit like "moron" and have zero capacity to defend it.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:57 PM
-6

with those same injuries The same "getting slapped and suffering no physical damage" injuries?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:33 PM
-5

based solely on sex. Where did I say that? I asked questions. Who is physically dominant? Which case instills more terror? I didn't say anything based on sex alone. I said we should judge the specifics of each case by the physical characteristics of those cases. It's NOT the same when a man abuses a woman, because I said, in 99% of cases the woman is terrorized by it. She worries she may be killed. She feels helpless to stop it in that moment, making the situation decidedly different. You just c…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 03:34 PM
-4

Why does every single person on this thread have the same reading comprehension issues? Nowhere did I say it's "OK" for her to hit him. My point was simply when you judge an abuse case you SHOULD factor in relative sizes, you SHOULD factor in terrorizing, you SHOULD factor everything in . If the woman is an MMA fighter and she is abusing her 90 lb boyfriend that should be treated more seriously than if the woman is 90 lbs and her boyfriend is 300. Which is why all the stories on here like "a wom…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 03:08 PM
-21

nah. You are missing it. it's becoming more of a thing for men to cry that they are abused, and then pretend it's equal to when men abuse women. This story is just a great example of that. He says "beat the shit out of" despite that just being made up. She didn't beat the shit out of him.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:56 PM
-9

"Slightly more rare"? Lets just compare abuse that causes actual damage. Ok? So it's astronomically more rare then. There are entire countries where abuse is the norm. historically men abusing women was THE NORM. In whole states abuse is the norm, of men on women. 40% of male cops beat their wives. So not only is it INCREDIBLY more rare, lets move on to the second part of my point, it's also incredibly less serious. The man is physically dominant , he doesn't feel the same psychological terror a…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:53 PM
-12

I never said it was OK. your strawman bullshit has to stop. Stop putting fucking words in my mouth so you can win an unwinnable argument. "Only the one who hurts the most is guilty." Why would you say something so stupid? I said they are NOT THE SAME. it's not a double standard. I didn't say the woman is not guilty of anything and her behavior is fine. I am saying I think we should treat the two different situations differently.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:51 PM
-1

I'm 100% fine with saying it's an issue that we should worry about. I'm not gonna sit back and hear stupid shit like "it's just as bad as man on woman abuse" though. Some stuff is too stupid to tolerate.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:51 PM
-7

Nope. Is the man physically dominant in this story? yes. Could he easily have stopped the abuse? yes. Did he actually fear for his life? no. Is she controlling his kids and he feels physically incapable of taking them away from him so he has an impossible to escape from situation? no. Are you going to address the actual points I made instead of just ignoring them? It's a different scenario than if he hit her. The damage done by the one hit doesn't mitigate any of this. The man can stand up and t…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:47 PM
-3

I never said "it's fine" you are just making that up. do you do that often? Just make stupid strawman points up in arguments with people? because it's pathetic.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:46 PM
-1

is there a whole "Women STABBING men is not a big deal" or "woman beating a man with a pipe is not a big deal" camps?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:46 PM
-18

examples?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:44 PM
-10

Compared to men beating women it certainly is.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:30 PM
-2

I really don't think it is. There's way bigger actual problems to worry about.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:30 PM
-7

The funny part is we are in a "mens rights" forum so they don't give a shit about logic or being correct, they just want to spew any stupid shit as long as it's pro men. It's just like how we have democrats and republicans now so divided it's like 2 football teams. Doesn't matter HOW good of a point you make, or how obliviously true it is, some idiot is going to just stand up and spew rhetoric and talking points against it and every person on their side of the aisle will bluster and cheer about …
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:26 PM
-7

I "Literally" said that? Where? you have a quote? I said if a smaller person you can easily overpower hits you that is not as big of a deal as a larger person beating a helpless victim. Do you think they are equally bad? Like if I go pick a fight with a person my own age and size that is equally bad as if I go beat the shit out of an elementary school student? You can't see any difference? I should face the same penalty?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:24 PM
-10

You are missing the point. There IS a difference.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:24 PM
-58

Based on what? based on all the salient and true points I typed that you have absolutely no answer for? it's not a double standard. It's not the same scenario when a man hits a woman as compared to the opposite.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:21 PM
-10

I'm not saying it's OK. I am saying it should be treated differently than if you beat her. Because those are different situations.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:20 PM
-31

I didn't say it was OK to hit anyone. You have some reading comprehension issues.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:20 PM
-11

I didn't say it is "justified" I said it's different from a man beating a woman.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:19 PM
-45

Until all inequalities are addressed, no one will take feminism seriously. Did you fear for your life? Did she rape you? Did you have any documentation of the damage done to you when she "beat the shit out of you"? Not even one picture? Ok, describe it to us. How long did the black eyes last? Has your busted open bleeding face healed properly yet?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:18 PM
0

Because seeking charges is to prevent future abuse and you are more than capable of doing that on your own.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:16 PM
-21

Society has a general disregard for the lives of men, and it's impossible to ignore the fact that a women's life is valued to be much greater than a man's by default. This totally ignores that in 99% of cases of abuse regardless of direction the man is physically dominant. It may be a woman slapping a man, or hitting him, but it's almost NEVER actually doing damage. It's never a guy with huge black eyes, and broken teeth, broken bones, and busted lips. It's never a guy who fears for his life. It…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:15 PM
-5

for the simple reason that they consider a woman weaker and therefore at a disadvantage in a physical altercation No. It's because there is no "terror". There is no situation where a woman is abusing a man and he feels trapped, like he can't escape, due to physical differences. A lot of women in physically abusive relationships feel like if they try to leave and are caught the man will beat them, or kill them, or rape them. you try to boil it down to "physical damage done with one blow" because …
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:12 PM
-136

the double standards are on relationship violence. In my freshman year dorm I briefly dated a girl who slapped me, twice, in front of a bunch of other people. Estimate the damage done to your face by that slap........ that's why it's not a "double standard". Did you get a huge black eye? Did your lip bust open and bleed? Violence by men against women is an actual real problem, where the man can make the woman feel like she is about to die, or has no possible escape because he is so much more pow…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:08 PM
-14

That why we need to create support center FOR MEN! Because of this one case? Because you were in an extremely rare situation? No, we really don't. It's not an actual problem.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:05 PM
-21

she knows that if she hits me she's getting decked. And you know that would instantly end the fight. Which is why "A woman hit me and no one treats it the same as if I beat my girlfriend" is a pretty hilariously dumb thing to think of as a "double standard".
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:05 PM
-41

This is so god damn idiotic. People treat the situations differently BECAUSE THEY ARE DIFFERENT. not because of a double standard The guy is sitting here smiling. When she hit him, he did not fear for his life. He did not think he was going to wind up maimed, or raped. He knew he was quite safe. he knew he could easily overpower her. He knew there was not significant danger or reason to fear. That's why it's treated differently. When he dates a 400 pound beast of a weight lifter woman and SHE hi…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:03 PM
1

haha, well you need to be corrected if you think this is relevant. I can understand the difference. what I typed was that SOMETIMES making a personal attack against someone is the right thing to do. You need to be knocked down a peg, not just corrected. For your own good.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 01:16 PM
1

If you DON'T ever tell people they are wrong you were not raised right.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 12:26 PM
0

I don't enjoy it, but it's the right thing to do in this case.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 06:01 PM
1

You don't think you are better than anyone else? So sad.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 04:36 PM
1

My response is "your point is bad". No I was not "just asking a question". it was a weighted question, designed to show why your point was the type of point a low quality person would bring up. An unimportant and lame point, thought to be relevant to the discussion by the type of person who deserves sarcasm and scorn.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 03:04 PM
0

Asking a question is not a straw man. I was asking what your point was. Who cares about what you said?
/r/MensRights08/09/16 04:57 AM
1

9 months...for a charge that could lead to years in prison? Because a longer sentence would enable rapists, and cause more rapes.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 11:48 PM
1

The problem isn't that "i'm not seeing that" the problem is I'm seeing that and you keep insisting just because my opinion differs from yours I "must not be seeing that." It's a classic 2016 argumentation blunder It's fully possible to hold my opinion while taking that fact into account. See the criminal justice system and the decisions it has made for an example of this. We don't "have to find a balance" we already HAVE found a balance and you are trying to claim it needs to be changed when it …
/r/MensRights20/08/16 11:22 PM
1

The fear of being punished by a miscarriage of justice is always a possibility. Not just for rape. I agree. But for how many other crimes is it commonplace for the person reporting the crime to be questioned about things like "were you drinking?" or "did you ask for it and then just change your mind"? Those questions are very commonplace in rape reports. We already have a penalty for false reporting, what was being discussed was increasing that penalty up to the same size as the penalty for rape…
/r/MensRights20/08/16 07:31 PM
0

It's not a joke. It's called taking your position and turning it against you. Turn about is fair play. I said the penalty should not be JUST AS BAD as the penalty for rape, and you decided to assert I was saying there should be no penalty. That is a monstrous stupid distracting and quite likely "trolling" interpretation of what I said. SO, it's a negative, thus I suggested the penalty for (intentionally misinterpreting, or just EXTREMELY stupidity) should be equal to the penalty for rape. Becaus…
/r/MensRights20/08/16 05:15 PM
1

How about you scroll up and read about it instead of asking me to repeat it.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 05:12 PM
1

there MIGHT be some negative It's not a might. You can't change anything without causing an affect. It's a principle you learn in basic economics. The optimization spot is the intersection between two lines on a graph. You are trying to say you can raise one of those lines " the fear someone accusing someone else of rape fears in terms of their potential punishment for reporting" HIGHER but not change the spot it intersects with another unchanged line. That's not possible, it's geometry. Basic m…
/r/MensRights20/08/16 03:44 PM
1

I'm talking about intimidating the woman into not reporting. There doesn't need to be evidence. The woman just has to fear the criminal justice system may not be perfect.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 03:40 PM
1

it falls on the same category of sending innocent people to jail, so it should have the same burden of proof than a rape trial. Nope. It doesn't. Because the effect I am describing occurs outside of a courtroom. The effect is "does not report it"
/r/MensRights20/08/16 03:39 PM
1

I don't want to disenfranchise rape victims from reporting their rape out of fear this may happen to them. To me that should be factored in.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 09:58 PM
1

I don't want to disenfranchise rape victims from reporting their rape out of fear this may happen to them. To me that should be factored in.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 09:18 PM
0

No, I'm not very dense. It's not the same thing to say "the penalty should not be the same as rape" as it is to say "there should be no penalty" How the hell can you fuck up something that basic and then call me dense? I think if the penalty for this was made a lot higher it would discourage rape victims from reporting their rape. Do you not think so? You think you can move a bar on a graph like "possible penalty for the reporter" and NOT affect their behavior. That just means you never took the…
/r/MensRights19/08/16 09:16 PM
-1

You're a retarded person. Go question everything about your life. I'm arguing that the penalty for a false accusation should not be as high as the penalty for a rape. I even put it in HUGE CAPITAL LETTERS "just as long" "The jail time for lying about rape should be the same for rape." is the comment I posted under. That is what I am arguing against. Fucking idiots I swear. Interpreting things this stupidly should carry a penalty equal to that of rape.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 07:29 PM
-5

I'm not arguing against "the right to convict false rape accusers" dumbass. I'm arguing that the penalty should not be the same length for that as for rape. Jesus christ, learn to have a discussion with someone and not totally and completely throw out straw man arguments.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 07:28 PM
0

It should be the penalty for filing a false police report + perjury. It should vary depending on the allegation severity.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 07:27 PM
1

You may say, but what if a woman who was actually raped is accused and convicted of false rape report. no. I say "what if a woman is raped and then has to consider fear of miscarriage of justice resulting in her getting a long sentence, so does not report it"
/r/MensRights19/08/16 05:31 PM
-13

in any way related? If you want to accuse someone or rape you would then have to consider they may accuse you of false allegations. You can't get accused of false allegations if you don't accuse the person of rape. They can rape you, and then tell you directly to your face they will accuse you of false allegations if you go to the cops. The higher the penalty for false accusations the more effective that threat would become. They are directly related. That you can't see how this is true is ridic…
/r/MensRights19/08/16 04:35 PM
-1

when you are ok with people ruining other peoples lives just because they can. I'm "ok with it" because I argue the penalty should not be as high as the penalty for rape. Sure, buddy. That isn't a stupid straw man argument or anything.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 04:32 PM
-13

So. I rape a girl. Now if she wants to report the rape she has to fear she may not have enough evidence, or corruption may cause her to lose, and then she would go to jail for JUST AS LONG as if I got convicted? What? is this saudi arabia now?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 03:46 PM
4

Is the "intent to destroy your victims life" more important than ACTUALLY destroying your victims life?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 03:43 PM
-3

To me 38% of male tweeters using 'slut and whore" really indicates misogyny is a real problem. The women using it indicates some OTHER real major problem.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 05:56 PM
2

I think the best reply is "I'd keep trying to help you but you just insulted me for that so good luck" and then walk away.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/16 04:20 PM
17

It's random. Once I was smoking weed while driving, had a totally unrelated /s traffic accident. Crazy wind blew a bunch of snow into the road, it wasn't snowing, but I hit the drift and went into a small ditch, literally zero damage to my car but one of the powered wheels was up in the air and I was going no where. within minutes a cop pulls up. it was FUCKING WINDY. like hurricane. So... i walked over and got in the front seat of his car to talk. he immediately asked why I reeked like pot. I h…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/16 04:18 PM
105

he "mansplained" that shit. I'm pretty sure it means "when someone says something wrong and you explain it to them" They call it mansplaining because men are so much better at it than women.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/16 04:13 PM
13

Someone used "mansplaining" on me. She came across as the worst cunt I've ever spoken to.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/16 04:07 PM
1

show less? Sho'nuff!!!
/r/MensRights09/03/16 02:05 PM
1

And if the kid appreciated it.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 03:28 PM
2

It would be funny if they were like "well you made this doctor perform a rape kit on you for no reason. That's sexual assault".
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/15 01:42 PM
1

it probably doesn't affect your life very positively to go to jail for 9 months. Job lost, resume all fucked up, friends now know you are shady as fuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/15 01:42 PM
2

She was placed on the sex offenders’ registry for eight years
/r/MensRights14/10/15 05:51 PM
0

Go over it again. You think a pimp should be able to find an older looking 14 year old girl, have her lie about her age, and we shouldn't be able to charge any of the johns that fuck her with fucking a minor - even if they know - as long as they can testify that she lied to them. Right? that's the world you want to live in. I'm using your argumentation style now. "It's very clear to me you just want to fuck 14 year olds. you go to online dating sites all day and night looking for the 12-14 year …
/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:23 PM
0

therefore you think it's impossible to mistake any teenager for anything other than the precise age they are. I never said that. I said if you JUST MET SOMEONE you should get more than just their word for it about their age, otherwise you are taking a grave risk. It's extremely easy to say "lets hang out with your friends" or "lemme check your social media" or "lemme find out about your job" or "lemme find out about your past" No. I have no fucking problem at all with one night stands when a per…
/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:16 PM
1

NOTHING about "he asked her how old she was, and she said she was 17. She was listed under the 'adult' section of the app. The girl and her mother both testified on his behalf, and the girl admitted to everyone that she had lied." proves he didn't know her age. How about you read what I actually wrote or think about the story beyond just "someone testified so it must be the truth". "Before fucking someone it is probably indeed a decent idea to learn the first fucking thing about them" He didn't.…
/r/MensRights21/09/15 01:37 PM
0

Details? Regale me with the details I'm claiming special knowledge of .....
/r/MensRights21/09/15 12:33 PM
2

I always hear women complaining they can't find a guy to date.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 08:35 PM
-5

Or don't fuck 14 year olds you just met. Before fucking someone it is probably indeed a decent idea to learn the first fucking thing about them. yes. Good call.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 08:34 PM
-8

do you think a 14 year old could convince you to fuck her? I don't. I think it requires you to know something is wrong. I think this guy is a sex offender and he is getting extremely lucky that everyone is just focused on "she lied". She lied is something that may be true when the guy is STILL a predator. You realize that right? Go on a dating app like tinder. , OK cupid, whatever. you KNOW some of the girls on there are lying and are underage. You know that. You can't just fuck the ones that lo…
/r/MensRights20/09/15 08:31 PM
1

A guy who only sexually abuses farmers.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 08:30 PM
-4

Honestly he was 19 and fucked a 14 year old? I kinda do feel like he should be on the sex offender registry. It's totally plausible she lied and he didn't know. It's also totally plausible he knew, and knew she was lying. And it's totally plausible he knew and she knew he knew and they agreed to lie. It's WAY WAY WAY too easy for a pimp to start pimping out 14 year olds and have them lie and point to this case to make the clients feel fine. A girl can say "Im 18" and when a guy says "how do I kn…
/r/MensRights20/09/15 08:27 PM
24

"bullying and harassing" is worse. But to the "opinion" line a good response would be "I wouldn't think less of someone for stating a fact, only their opinion can make them look ignorant"
/r/PussyPassDenied28/08/15 04:06 PM
-2

unless they really really wanted to This is pretty well fucking covered by "wanted a relationship with the child" The fact you aren't considering all the guys who got a girl pregnant, and tried to tell her to get an abortion, but who SHOULD STILL PAY CHILD SUPPORT because you shouldn't start out with the assumption all women are down to get abortions. I mean. I can't even imagine being you. WOW. Are there a huge lack off swords or tall buildings in your area or something? No roads with fast traf…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:02 PM
0

is this really super complex? if you enshrine her quote into law or whatever then no man would ever pay child support unless they really really wanted to pay it. Any guy ever gets a woman pregnant he just would have to tell her not to keep it, then he wouldn't have to pay anything. that isn't a good idea either. you seem to be saying the current state of affairs is also bad, interesting point.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:25 PM
1

But.... according to her quote if the man just says "abort it bitch" then he is free and clear.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:24 PM
0

So men become 100% not responsible for child support as long as they all blanket state "don't keep it"?
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:18 PM
-3

doesn't mean its okay for every guy. BUT It does change how we should respond to a picture. Not "because I would" but "because I believe most people would".
/r/MensRights20/08/15 01:10 PM
-2

its almost like men and women are different.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 01:10 PM
1

why would the other inmates ever know the private things you tell the prison?
/r/MensRights08/08/15 06:32 PM
1

why don't they just say they are females then? Do they not let trans inmates wear their hair long? Then sue. because you're a woman!
/r/MensRights07/08/15 05:31 PM
32

clit cutters
/r/MensRights27/07/15 05:50 PM
2

I see you know large amounts about asia.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 06:38 PM
0

It's almost like men and women are different.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:26 PM
1

If that is the only thing you take away from this ARTICLE you DO have a serious fucking selection bias. Not sure if you realize, but that is precisely what you are doing right now.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:40 PM
1

But that doesn't mean you should not say the men used her
/r/MensRights14/04/15 12:54 PM
1

You can't read for shit.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 06:10 PM
-1

" I’m sad because you think so little of yourself that you’ve allowed these men to use you." The men certainly used her. That doesn't make them bad.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 06:10 PM
1

Why say "and yet". IF it was an accident we would expect the rates to be equal. Since it is a choice that EXPLAINS the 3x discrepancy. Usually you should say "and yet" when the next sentence doesn't make sense out of the first sentence.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 10:33 PM
1

Who does the most child abuse per hour spent with the child though?
/r/MensRights10/02/14 10:32 PM
5

Yeah fuck that sexism!! a 6 year old girl could easily be like "awwww yeah" too.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 07:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter