TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Darkwolf90 Archive

View 10 posts and 660 comments by Darkwolf90 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

No? That's not how it works. You're taking the game but ignoring arbitrary rules, others try to demand you play by, despite them having 0 authority to do so.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 12:21 AM
0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game\_theory
/r/MensRights29/06/23 01:28 AM
7

https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9v6tqj/a\_list\_about\_feminism\_misandry\_for\_anyone\_who/
/r/MensRights19/06/23 08:12 PM
5

https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9v6tqj/a\_list\_about\_feminism\_misandry\_for\_anyone\_who/
/r/MensRights19/06/23 08:10 PM
-11

Way to be just like a "feminist".
/r/MensRights19/06/23 07:53 PM
6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation\_bias
/r/MensRights09/06/23 12:07 AM
0

I may have misunderstood your point and replied to the wrong person but no, Men =/= penis and woman =/= vagina, that's how it usually happens but Man = Human male gametes/sperm, Woman = Human female gametes/eggs.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 03:46 PM
-6

No; you and yours are just being pointlessly and tyrannically censorious federalist POS. I don't care who/what you are or look like, your life is your life and mine is mine. I've ben friends with Trans but that won't stop me from building a throne of skulls from you and yours if you think you can deny my basic human rights.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 03:03 PM
1

Does being asked if your a stripper count?
/r/MensRights02/06/23 07:52 PM
3

https://law.duke.edu/sports/sex-sport/comparative-athletic-performance/ I'm not going to dig for relevancy, search engines are your friend.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 04:46 PM
60

I've had long hair since I was ~6. Fuck that noise.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 08:49 PM
3

The part that people try to sweep under the rug is the dark side of female nature.... Women overwhelming trend towards narcissism, they tend to never be happy; as they are constantly stuck on their own version of the "grind". You are not their end goal just a step too their wanted nirvana, reality, rationality and self-awareness/control be damned.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:29 PM
3

It's a violation of what is supposed to be the most important contract for most people to sign. Cheating is fraud. Your invalidating the time and effort put into you as opposed to someone who would abide by the terms of a marriage contract, no fault divorce is bullshit. It makes marriage a bad idea as it adds financial benefit to con artist women.
/r/Divorce_Men02/04/23 06:14 AM
2

You think an ignorant insult actually defends you opinion as opposed to showing how little rationality and intelligence you likely have? FYI that first part is how my first son was born. Though if you'd like to demonstrate your sexist trolling ineffectualness go right ahead.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 10:08 PM
2

The ones that can and have had holes poked out of them or been fished out of the garbage later?
/r/MensRights26/02/23 04:50 PM
1

An objective deity that served the purpose of deciding on child custody
/r/MensRights21/02/23 03:46 PM
9

Okay? Well congratulations to your colleagues for living life as they want and finding collaborative partners but you understand why anecdotal evidence, while being evidence, doesn't make any real statement? Your 2 colleagues are not stereotypical for the discussion of the literal millions of people we are discussing? If you can specify and reduce the needed/relevant generalization here, then please do. The more answers we have the better solutions we can think up. However given that this sounds…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 02:41 PM
3

Reduce the supply and raise the demand for men seeking jobs, while also exacerbating the goals of men; thereby keeping us running in the wheel.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 10:27 PM
2

This is a complicate issue in which men and women trend towards certain pros and cons. However it is almost entirely trends where the only unique behavior is in the extremes. We've gotten far too caught up in correlation, the reality is that women and men as categories are not the same. However this being said men are not all the same nor are women all the same. Men and women shouldn't be forced into anything, if they wish to be "feminine" or "masculine", then that should be their choice. Howeve…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/22 11:15 AM
4

“The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/blog/updated-definition-rape#:~:text=%E2%80%9CThe%20penetration%2C%20no%20matter%20how,the%20consent%20of%20the%20victim.%E2%80%9D That's a rather conveniently narrow definition using a word that many assume means forcing someone to have sex.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 10:01 AM
15

Rapists are less then 2% of the population, the average rapist creates 12 victims. Being convicted also doesn't mean they were actually guilty. Proven beyond a reasonable doubt is the standard in the U.S for a reason. There should always be an acknowledgement of doubt, otherwise your being an idiot committing willful ignorance. Rape has also been proven to have more false accusations then other crimes, we act as if men are rapists despite nearly equal numbers between the sexes and the reality th…
/r/MensRights07/11/22 08:34 AM
30

Fear? No, I'm not sure they'd like the standard masculine response to a fairly obvious threatening presence.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 08:26 AM
3

We're men, everything is always our fault and we always think with the wrong head. /s
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/22 11:14 AM
1

It's standard issue of the "left" or to put it in a more precise les esoteric term progressives, We deal with theoretical, what ifs?; This leads to a lack of concrete, shared goal where as conservatives already have something in existence. Conservatives don't have as much multilateralism to contend with. This is kind of good as not all change is positive. Though not everything should stay as it is, particularly since our environment doesn't stay the same. This leads to traditional policies that …
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/22 09:24 AM
3

Technically it is sexual harassment, not from the men but from management. If they were to properly hold people accountable it would be the men who keep thinking with the wrong head. I get tired of this shit. There is far too little nuance and your perpetuating the us v them fallacy. Thanks for further reinforcing my misanthropy?
/r/MensRights18/10/22 06:43 PM
1

Your a patriot? Are you a nationalist or an American patriot who opposes nationalism? A libertarian socialist, who's main foe is federalists; you hate both DEM and GOP? Family values? What version of family values? How do you define family? Community? You statement of them being liars and cowards carries a lot of presumptions. I'm not terribly fond of defending a category of people I do not like, but when you make sweeping statements like this your literally a bigot. Seriously, you likely have a…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 04:54 PM
1

lit·er·a·cy noun the ability to read and write. Why do men care so much about social status? Companionship does not require the opposite sex. Not even in the slightest. It's irrelevant to this topic. Two straight men can have companionship, even 12 individuals. It wasn't misleading, you made an assumption that I made a statement by not making a statement. This line of logic would mean that I effectively said everything I didn't say.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 04:44 PM
1

Tell me your illiterate without saying so, You literally just reiterated part of what I said with different words, while attempting to claim I'm incorrect? "Women want resources, men want women, men gain resources to gain women, women gain men to gain resources."
/r/MensRights16/10/22 10:53 AM
1

This attitude is exactly why. When you treat the world as your enemy, guess what happens? They treat you as an enemy because you act as their enemy. You are "digging your own grave". You perpetuate the very problems you claim to hate. Your attitude of hostile disempowerment is the very reason plutocrats encourage your kind mentality. You don't have to fight your enemies when they are fighting themselves.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 10:50 AM
2

Your conflating interconnecting symptoms, is Feminism the root cause? Technically no, as Feminism is an ideology being pushed to serve other ends that many see as tangential. This is about money and control. This is the effect of capitalism and the removal of environmental pressures on our species. This is the result of self-centered groups of individuals seeking to line their own pockets from the sum of standard male and female behavior. Women want resources, men want women, men gain resources …
/r/MensRights15/10/22 09:57 PM
2

genocide gen·o·cide noun the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group It's not adjacent, it fits the actual definition. This is to highlight a very real problem. Calling them Feminazi's isn't just some insulting candor, they are very literal Neo-Nazi's. People forget that Nazi's weren't entirely about killing Jews nor was this even a thing the vast majority of Nazi's were aware of. Nazi's were fascists…
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/22 09:41 PM
1

For the copy pasta approach it could be a simple image of the GFM page, uploaded to a publicly available image. This way the information can be spread with a right click save image, then image posting. As far as exposure goes, take note as to the audience of the forum your using. Twitter followers, Facebook friends and groups etc. . Make note of ones with incredibly high audiences and repeat a post, without over doing it. Once or twice a day at most, for twice I'd have it at different times to c…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 07:46 PM
6

It's a frustratingly common problem. The Dunning-Kruger effect; creates an issue where the less people know, the less aware they are of how little they know. You kind of just need to treat people by their actions. Society is decent at establish intuitive biases for us, but a bias becomes bigotry when one holds to this bias despite evidence to the contrary. Correlation =/= Causation. As far as the family goes, if they do not even attempt to fulfill a family role, then don't feel obligated to retu…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 06:54 PM
8

This is infuriating, irrationality of self-centered behavior that Humans have only partially evolved out of. People tend to see themselves as if they are some unique isolated individual. The reality is however... Nothing is that simple. We as human beings are not a single living entity, we are made of around ~27.2 trillion living organisms, our cells, that work in conjunction and are specialized to degree's that often prevent their operation individually. There's also pro-biotics, so our bodies …
/r/MensRights15/10/22 05:43 PM
1

What you are ignoring is that your overgeneralizing for confirmation bias. Your one of those idiots that seem to think that you can ignore the fringe as if it doesn't change the "rule"; when in fact it does. If your "rule" is proven wrong in even small minority of case then your rule has been proven wrong and it opens up that there is a more fundamental cause. What is a feminist? Do we define it by it's dictionary def.? We could define it by the actions of those who call themselves feminist but …
/r/MensRights15/10/22 01:32 PM
2

It isn't. They try to conflate it with social constructs of gender roles when femininity/masculinity are merely the average behaviors of a sex. Masculinity is defined by the average of men, femininity by the average of women. Are these constructive ways to address social roles? No. However people like to simplify the discussion and pretend as if it can be/is dichotomous relating to ones sex/gender.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 01:23 PM
2

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/No_True_Scotsman https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Selective_attention https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sophistry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathy_gap A point that I would like to make though is that many of these articles are blatantly misandric and positive misogynistic(Prejudice against a sex when it paints that sex in a "good light"). This is something that we need to do something about. Men need to understand that i…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 12:38 PM
6

It depends as they need to have specific policies literate that are publicly accessible. I would address this with those who run the business. This certainly at the very least speaks to their incompetence in communicating policy. If there is some form of policy writing, I'd read it to know what by their own words, they are contracted too. Make note of it's vague and contradictory policies. This is often used for sophistry, where they can cherry pick which rules they wish to enforce and which the…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 11:25 AM
2

Something that I have noticed since COVID, is that women or at least those that display themselves as women, have ramped up scam attempts. Don't, just don't trust anyone or anything. If you don't know them, you don't know them and they likely don't know you.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 07:05 AM
3

The draft is an unnecessary ineffective solution to this. We already have military reserve forces and the national guard. The main issue is mostly how despite spending more then the other 9 in the top ten military spending countries, our soldiers get paid sub min. wage to an absurd degree. To put it bluntly people don't want to actually pay for people who risk their lives to kill. It's always seen as a hypothetical that may or may not happen, while dismissing the fact that our military has and c…
/r/MensRights13/10/22 06:59 AM
11

It's useful to have a term to differentiate egalitarians that are focused on women's issues from those that call themselves feminists, pushing misandry and female supremacy. I do not like feminism but not all feminists are the same and if they fit the dictionary definition then, I not only don't have a problem with them, believing they deserve praise. The fight for rights is a multifaceted one, we can't be everywhere doing everything. We can at least defend each other's backs in this fight.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 05:11 AM
2

Socializing is a trade, your time and thoughts for their time and thoughts. Not wanting to be around shitty family doesn't make you "anti-social". Set your boundaries and force them to deal with the reality. Though women will often get angrier/more aggressive if ignored, so the only real trick I can give to you is find a "happy place" in your own mind and go there whenever your forced to deal with them.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:59 AM
6

It isn't all about education. While process certainly matters and is what we have the most control over(though not nearly as much as we often delude ourselves into believing), Nurture's outcome is dependent on the nature of the object being nurtured. Swinging a noodle will have very different effects then an axe; even if you put the same amount of strength into it. You just as wrong as biological essentialists who think that genetics hard codes humans. When all evidence shows that humans became …
/r/MensRights10/10/22 01:08 PM
0

Did you know that discussing a problem that a demographic generally faces isn't prejudicial? Maybe you can take your head out of your ass; so shit stops coming out of your mouth and you can eventually say something constructive.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 01:39 PM
1

Sort of? Men can take stoicism too far but most women need to develop the basics of stoicism. As with many things, the correct solution lies somewhere in the middle. The simple reality is that crying is a fairly pointless expression of emotion that serves no purpose outside of being a biological communication. It's not really about crying so much as that men tend to not have safe places to talk about their vulnerabilities and women tend to be self-destructive in "damsel in distress" ploys were t…
/r/MensRights09/10/22 01:06 PM
10

"the practice or state of having a sexual relationship with only one partner." It literally isn't monogamous and requires a redefinition of marriage into.... an open marriage, or a non-monogamous marriage. She is demanding monogamy without returning monogamy. Is she allowed? Yes. Is it likely she will have success? No. Does it come off as entitled to complain about people making choices about their life based on choices you've made in yours? Yes.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 12:58 PM
8

monogamy mo·nog·a·my Learn to pronounce noun the practice or state of being married to one person at a time. "Judaism has journeyed from polygamy to strict monogamy" the practice or state of having a sexual relationship with only one partner. "younger men were more likely to stray, saying monogamy was outdated" ZOOLOGY the habit of having only one mate at a time. "monogamy is rare in most animal groups, but is common among birds"
/r/MensRights09/10/22 12:42 PM
16

This is a selection fallacy. He didn't say all or only. There are correlative differences to the genders at a genetic level, that is further exacerbated by socialization or nurture. This is a pure numbers game, the vast majority of women compete with each other for the top >~20% of men according to their uninhibited, unexamined instincts which society reinforces this "fae" attitude. You've also added no real argument other then attempting a lazy poor ad hominem. You've also made an argument agai…
/r/MensRights09/10/22 12:24 PM
1

Except it isn't unique to dating apps. It's a common woman behavior.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 07:25 AM
1

technocratic Technocracy is a form of government in which the decision-maker or makers are selected based on their expertise in a given area of responsibility, particularly with regard to scientific or technical knowledge. It was relevant to you asking how to change something that is a behavioral consequence of the human genome. I don't really disagree with you, the old adage "Rule for thee, not for me." These people tend to not understand the inevitable consequences of competition in a negative…
/r/MensRights09/10/22 06:59 AM
1

$/hr isn't really a good metric for that line of work as most of it is sole proprietorship, It depends on supply, demand and competition. The earnings will generally be of a wide variety of amounts with a few being high, some medium and most being low.
/r/AntiFeminists09/10/22 05:58 AM
1

You can't? Unless you'd like to institute a technocratic communism with legal eugenics, the average human is too arrogant and stupid to identify their own fallacious intuitions and even when they do, the vast majority of us are sophists and see a debate in a win/lose orientation rather then a mutual sharing of information and hypotheses in order to create a more accurate understanding of objective truth. Though my original point was that context is important; as an informal fallacy, the no true …
/r/MensRights09/10/22 05:50 AM
1

It's an informal fallacy. It can be a fallacy but isn't always. The vagueness of a lot of our languages creates problems. What does one mean by Scotsman? Scottish heritage? Scottish citizenship? A Chinese man living in Canada isn't a Scotsman as he wouldn't fit the definition. Is a man of Scottish heritage living in Canada a Scotsman? A Chinese man living in Scotland? It depends on what kind of Scotsman your referring to, as lineage and citizenship of the country carries the same title yet one d…
/r/MensRights09/10/22 01:36 AM
1

Paper abortions for both genders. Child support only payable if the parents were married. Mandatory paternity tests at birth. Default 50/50 custody in event of divorce. Guaranteed recognition of pre-nups. Have fun with your illiteracy.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:03 PM
4

If you could stop repeating your provenly false claims in order to parrot feminazi talking points, that'd be great. Your literally shooting yourself in the foot as with every argument you present, its one that many of us have heard a thousand times and is filled with inaccuracies and logical fallacies. Fuck off you feminazi. Ohh and I use the term feminazi instead of feminist because some of them actually fit the dictionary definition and don't perpetuate the misandry and female supremacy.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 01:28 PM
3

It's the conflation of a inherent problem with hierarchical structures with male behavior. Men and women's behavior has been shaped by the Pareto distribution, the 80-20 rule, which is more complicated then many who use this term like to admit as they tend to use it to justify their confirmation bias. It applies to any hierarchy and a hierarchy will have sub-hierarchies, it also tends to speak more towards perception of productivity rather then the reality. Reality is convoluted and interconnect…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:05 AM
2

It isn't "liberal" media, I get tired of this kind of garbage. They do not meet the definition of liberal; In fact they meet the definition of the exact opposite of liberal, authoritarian. However frustratingly our "conservative" party/media does as well. The majority of Dem.s and Rep.s and many/most other left and ring wings around the world, fail to live up to even a close approximation of American values, liberal values. The reality of the situation is that there isn't a simple solution. It r…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 10:45 AM
5

This is cherry picking ignoring the already stated solutions to this potential issue. Strawman to a degree that any objective, rational argument would be a condescending restatement.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 10:14 AM
3

This is incredibly wrong, One on one? Sure, debating sophists serves no real purpose but people tend to forget what the public forums of the internet allow the "average Joe"; an audience. Your don't try to convince someone who isn't going to change their mind, you argue to change the minds of potentially hundreds of people who will see the post. You rely on the cascading ripple effect where ones words can change 1 or 2 minds then those minds can speak words that change 1 or two minds and so on a…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 10:10 AM
1

This whole "western culture" thing is an oversimplification of an emergent problem with Human social behaviors. To put this in an easily identifiable quote; Women= All for one, Men = one for all. Effectively we evolved social behaviors that understood reductionism, that a sum is a component of it's parts, in order to change the sum one must change the parts. Hence the seeming paradox of individualism vs collectivism where we and most other animals not only compete for resources for their own pro…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 08:15 PM
2

I mean, I'm in sort of a weird spot here. If your not willing to help others at your own risk, you can't claim to not understand why no one comes to help you. Someone should have put a stop to this, not according to a gender role but just as a decent human being. That entire car should have gotten up and put those leotard POS's in the floor.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:55 AM
-1

If it doesn't fit the definition of the concept the word is referring to then they can but it isn't, they are making a false claim. I can tell the world I'm a female reptilian alien but that doesn't change reality, I am what/who I am. If anything this shows how people like to abuse language. Trauma is a complicated subject and I'm sure you don't want to hear how a large part of trauma is a social construct. That would mean your fear mongering and insistence it is trauma is why some human brain p…
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 05:36 AM
5

Sexual assault is an assault sexual in nature. However my guess is you don't know what an assault is. An assault isn't a battery. It wouldn't surprise me if it were called sexual assault is due to the confusing and conflicting definitions in a English dictionary vs a legal dic. To be quite frank I'm done wasting my time on trash like you.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 01:20 AM
8

Then Fucking prove it you entitled dipshit. Stop moving the goalpost you confirmation biased idiot. "Believe all women Every women has been raped several times apparently" So instead your going to broaden the topic, making it less specific while hoping it will carry the same emotional weight.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 12:26 AM
6

Prove it then. Show me studies that substantiate your claim. https://www.rainn.org/statistics/victims-sexual-violence This site posts a 1 in 6 claim, which is far from most or a majority.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 12:13 AM
7

Most insinuates a majority, +50% and while it is higher then we should be comfortable with its at best it's been claimed at ~30%. It also doesn't discuss why even the inflated statistics estimate about 6% of men are "rapists"(This term has been abused and redefined so many times it's practically useless) That somehow so many women claim to suffer this. It's almost like women need to be adults and stand up for themselves and get justice in order to prevent this negative feedback loop. Though give…
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/22 11:46 PM
1

Trauma? It's a fucking dick. A piece of a human body that's not really all different from seeing a hand or a foot. Sure seeing a dick can lead to rape but seeing a hand or foot can lead to murder, so most of the fear is purely imaginary paranoia. That ~47% of the human population see's every time they take a piss. Feminists have a strong correlation with sexual predators and often directly support/legalize women sexual predators. Being a feminist, means literally nothing atm. Feminist is a self …
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/22 09:17 PM
1

Fear is a cognitive reflex of avoidance. It indicates that a negative consequence is potentially coming. However, Fear can kill you, so can lack of fear. It isn't as important as your making it out to be as it's effectively nothing more then a biological response to begin cost/benefit analysis's. We exist today precisely because many of didn't fear dying for a cause we viewed as greater than ourselves.
/r/AntiFeminists04/10/22 09:34 PM
3

I think that there is a simple answer they won't like. Anger. Anger is by far the most important as it is a call to action. It's your brain literally preparing your body and cognitive system to change/affect your current circumstances.
/r/AntiFeminists04/10/22 09:13 PM
3

I find it funny that women tend to not realize that "patriarchal" society is what it is because of how women have mate selected in our species. It's like watching someone crying, throwing repeated vomiting, yelling "Why won't this stop!" while they are opening a 3rd bottle of vodka. There are a number of things that need to be changed; however one of, if not the worst things feminism has done is use pieces of truth for sophism and lies of omission. It's become almost impossible to have a rationa…
/r/AntiFeminists04/10/22 08:04 AM
12

No, your fucking mental. Trying to rationalize and justify the government literally threatening men with guns and prisons to give the quantification of there life based on the word of a women. Your trying to ignore the very obvious problem in this situation because it shows just how delusional you are and how your kind are sick parasites, portraying a very poor example of women.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 07:51 AM
14

I was clearing up the debate, as both of you were and are wrong. It isn't technically illegal but your entire point is delusional and yes it is illegal to perform unless the government does it/gives permission. So the reality is that while you were technically right, your effectively more wrong then he is. Why don't you go fuck off. Disgusting entitled bitch. Your literally trying to argue that your defended committing fraud to enter another into a form of indentured servitude. I tell you to eat…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 07:09 AM
9

DNA paternity testing is solely performed on decision of a judge in case of a judiciary procedure in order either to establish or contest paternity or to obtain or deny child support.[17] Private DNA paternity testing is illegal, including through laboratories in other countries, and is punishable by up to a year in prison and a €15,000 fine.[18] The French Council of State has described the law's purpose as upholding the "French regime of filiation" and preserving "the peace of families."
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:55 AM
17

paternity tests illegal Under the Gene Diagnostics Act of 2009, secret paternity testing is illegal. Any paternity testing must be conducted by a licensed physician or by an expert with a university degree in science and special education in parentage testing, and the laboratory carrying out genetic testing must be accredited according to ISO/IEC 17025. Full informed consent of both parents is required, and prenatal paternity testing is prohibited, with the exception of sexual abuse and rape cas…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:54 AM
2

"Right now capitalism is authoritarian/oligarchic feudal mass indentured servitude."
/r/MensRights01/10/22 06:22 AM
3

"That's it, it's vague and spreads a wide umbrella. You can have socialism under capitalism" It can be? Right now capitalism is authoritarian/oligarchic feudal mass indentured servitude.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 04:34 AM
4

Men act they way they do because these are the behaviors that succeeded in genetic heritage in a dichotomous, sexual reproducing species dictated by natural selection. Women's biology has more demand due to pregnancy, hence Men having far superior physical performance and higher mental performance heights. This led to us as a social herd animal to specialize in correlation to gender/sex. Men compete in a materialistic hierarchy to obtain control over the most resources, women compete over social…
/r/MensRights01/10/22 02:34 AM
6

I agree with most of what you've said here but that isn't socialism 101 by a longshot. At best it's pseudo-intellectual Marxist 101. Socialism is an economy with democratic control. That's it, it's vague and spreads a wide umbrella. You can have socialism under capitalism, as America did and the direction it is going with unions and how utilities and public services once worked, were because they were paid for by the public, they were owned by the public.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 02:20 AM
1

In a public forum, yes. Be as polite, ration, specific as you can. Just because you can't convince that one person; They aren't the only on hearing the words. Allow them to spell out their own irrational bigotry and supremacy. They may or may not change their minds then or later but when you have an audience, you can play the numbers game and create a ripple effect.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 01:09 PM
10

They aren't calling them literal Nazi's. Nazi has become a vague phrase for any supremacy organization. Hence Feminazi being a good term to use as it differentiates feminists who try to uphold the dictionary definition from those that call themselves feminist but in reality are man hating woman supremacists.
/r/AntiFeminists17/09/22 01:50 AM
2

To mind my mind and what I would like to see is Reductionism based on the philosophy of science. Reality is convoluted, correlation =/= causation. To solve a problem one has to understand the problem. To dismiss ones ignorance, is to become arrogant and wallow in it. We are not omnipresent nor omniscient, everything we think we know is little better than an educated guess. It's effectively, in simple terms, how do we attain the future we all want? That which desire and obstacles are irrelevant a…
/r/MensRights16/09/22 09:23 PM
17

Because your less likely to be killed by police if your demographic is the fictional racist "black" as opposed to "white". "Blacks" commit more crimes, are more hostile to police, interact with police more, in more hostile environments, yet police brutality is described as a "black" problem. I'm not fond of police brutality but the current narrative is RACIST, false and divisive. Rather then actually dealing with the problem, it's one color of racists yelling at another color of racists; while a…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 12:55 PM
2

Exactly, a devil's advocate is generally who corrects you when your wrong and refines your opinion and ability to communicate it when your right. This is a public forum so I try to remember to not leave open questions for people to make assumptions in order to ad hominem me and attempt to strawman my imaginary opinions. XD
/r/MensRights15/09/22 11:44 AM
3

By the same token, how are we to know the girls weren’t flirting with the guys to try get them to buy cigarettes and then got met with some lewd comments? Nice deflection, trying to move the goalpost and rewriting the hypothetical being discussed in order to create a strawman and reaffirm your confirmation bias. As far as to what happened? IDK, hence I don't really have a concrete opinion on that topic. Neither should you, there isn't enough substantiated data for a constructive debate on the re…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 11:40 AM
1

I'm not exactly proud to be lumped in with a manipulative POS like him. He can join the same liars of omission and agenda driven manipulators in his fictional hell. Just because one part of what someone says, doesn't mean everything they say is true, a hypothesis can be experimented to show accuracy yet be presented with a false conclusion.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 11:35 AM
4

A living organism who's body is built with the intention to produce female gametes or ova/egg cells.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 07:20 AM
4

Your rationality here is ass backwards, The boy didn't ask and didn't do anything to bring the outcome, the girl engaged in illegal behavior and used her sexuality to manipulate these men. She literally was asking for it. XD Then your ignoring the fact that this was a hypothetical after they said they didn't know and as such didn't have a concrete opinion on the subject.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 07:14 AM
6

It's a difference in hierarchies they (Usually, Humans are possibly uniquely divergent even within it's own species, we're adapted to adapting and have used socialization as an accelerated form of evolution, engineered selection if you will) compete in, men in a materialistic, women in social. Materialistic is simple, who has owns the most things. It's easily quantifiable. Social is abstract, subjective and arbitrary, and is about having control over the most people. Control over people = contro…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 06:55 PM
1

Sort of? Relationships fail because people tend to forget that is isn't about 2 lives, it's about a life. Treating your spouse like shit is the same as treating yourself like shit. That goes for both sides, though in modern times this places the fault largely at women's feet, though I tire of misogynistic idiots using misandry to justify their sexism and giving men a bad name. You'd think that by now we'd have learned what prejudicial supremacist beliefs leads too? Nope XD. Women are only now be…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 04:59 PM
1

I agree but most humans don't care about meeting anyone needs but their own and even then we tend to care more about preventing others from meeting theirs. Particularly here here on the internet where the vast majority of people are passive observers and that is only a fraction of those who even engage with the medium in the first place. Men will likely compete and refuse to work together, while women will trend towards an in-group bias, aka misandry even when confronted with the reality that it…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 04:39 PM
1

This was just copy pasted from the article.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 03:23 PM
13

Remove blame – from both sides It's time now to stop labelling each other. This is essential – and much easier to do once you've established some ground rules. Him wanting sex more than you doesn't mean he has a problem; you desiring sex less than him doesn't mean you have one either. This is a challenge you face as a couple. If the two of you join as a team and work together, you'll get somewhere in solving this. A lot further than calling each other names like 'sex pest' and 'frigid'.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 12:35 PM
1

I don't and refuse to, If I said it; that means it's something I'm willing to stand by. I'm not always right of course, my opinion can and does change over time but to project infallibility is narcissistic egotism.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 09:38 AM
4

Way to demonstrate conformation biased sexist ignorance in order to feed your ego; likely due to insecurity. Please stop giving sexists just like you examples to reinforce their conditional fallacies on.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 09:27 AM
7

It isn't that simple, average IQ between sexes is functionally the same, the main difference is distribution. The dumbest and smartest people in a room are incredibly likely to be men. A analogy would be that the average of a 4 and 6 is 5; a 1 and 9 is also 5.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 08:57 AM
1

Thank you for demonstrating your lack of literacy and that you'll construct me and my words as a strawman to argue with. Your speaking to someone that has literally been stabbed and beaten for the defending others, men and women and having put a stop to 2 attempted rapes. One of which was by my "lefty" "friends", whom I have no respect for now; The other was on behalf of three teenagers being threatened with rape, assault and murder by 3 wannabe gangsters who thought outnumbering me and their "b…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:13 AM
1

I am an object, you are an object, every discernable thing is an object made of objects. You are straight up delusional and disregarding even the basics of reality. Women are not some perfect godly saints; nor are men. Reality is convoluted; as any OBJECT interacts and redefines it's environment and is in turn redefined by the environment. An autonomous human being is an object, you clearly are attaching things to the definition of that word, you are saying something that the word does not mean …
/r/MensRights02/09/22 12:38 AM
8

Women ARE more empathetic; it's mostly a common misunderstanding of what empathy actually is. A psychopath is dangerous because they are capable of empathy but lack sympathy. The entire reason that we face a crisis now is due to women's average ability at understanding, manipulating and abusing peoples emotions for their own personal gain with little regard to the cost to others or considering the cascading effects that turn what they thought would be a net positive into a net negative. em·pa·th…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:02 AM
1

It's always a transaction, love/affection is always conditional. I get really tired of all this deluded non-sense. To make it clear, Even if you love your children regardless of what their actions are, that is still on the condition of that person being your child. con·di·tion·al /kənˈdiSH(ə)n(ə)l/ subject to one or more conditions or requirements being met; made or granted on certain terms.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:45 AM
1

object ob·ject noun /ˈäbjekt/ 1. a material thing that can be seen and touched. "he was dragging a large object" 2. a person or thing to which a specified action or feeling is directed.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:39 AM
5

Everything in reality is a matter of economics, the interaction and exchange of property between differing objects. Even us humans are the result of the economical exchange between ~27.2 trillion cells and each cell is the exchange between ~300 trillion atoms. It goes even deeper then that. No one and nothing can be observed or functionally exists in isolation. He also didn't claim that women were business models, only used it as an metaphor to help describe the conscious and subconscious reason…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:34 AM
1

Sort of? My POS ex-wife is an OF "model" and nice Homophobia loser. Being upfront(Something I agree with) is entirely different from shaming and literally being socially oppressive to any demographic. I stand by humans you literal supremacist piece of trash. Keep talking and see how shooting yourself in the foot and being a hypocrite just like feminazi's have/are and see how that works out for you.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:21 PM
17

I'm not sure why you care so much what another person chooses to do with their body? Your allowed to have your own standards, however I get really tired of the authoritarian puritanical fucks that claim to be MRA, when all they do is give it a bad public image. Your doing the same thing that feminists are and should be derided for, gendered supremacy and demanding that people stay in some subjective, largely arbitrary "lane" they were born into. They shouldn't feel shame for posting on OF or bei…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:05 PM
2

I'd love it if that test existed, I'd be able to throw it the face of every lying cheating b**ch that's tried to accuse me of pulling their own "sins". (BTW, Before my divorce at 27 I hadn't been single for longer then a month since I was 12 and every girl but 1 that I broke up with after ~2 weeks cheated on me; I learned the hard way to not trust women any more then you'd trust a man and even that takes a stretch as my experience has shown they deserve even less trust.)
/r/MensRights31/08/22 07:29 PM
2

Why do you not grab a knife by it's blade? Why is a knife a knife? How do you distinguish the difference between a blade and a handle? " It isn't all women or most but it's far from fringe." Are you illiterate or just a wannabe oppressive toxic individual attempting to shut down women getting the social they've earned? Thank you for clearly demonstrating that regardless of what I say, you'll continue to argue with the imaginary construct of me in order to strawman.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 09:29 PM
2

No, your out of touch with reality. It isn't all women or most but it's far from fringe. I get tired of feminazis so blatantly doing the very thing they complain about when men's issues or rights are brought up in the discussion of women's. Your literally attempting to shame men for bringing up an all too common socially encouraged/dismissed misandry. As much as I'd like to take you on good faith; experience has taught me that trusting women to do anything other then feed their ego and whatever …
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:07 PM
2

Karma -1 Cake day August 23, 2022 Mods; I'd recommend banning this account.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 09:59 PM
2

It's not as if your clearly demonstrating sexism? Committing the same "sin" many of us are angry at the majority of feminists for? You are little more then a minute cancer, that if the community has any principle, will cure or excise if you refuse to be anything other then a parasitic growth.
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/22 09:26 PM
2

Which then creates a lack of communication and understanding creating a void of empathy that can easily be manipulated. Which the creates a negative bias leaving men with a motivation/rationalization to not open up. Where/why it started is almost entirely irrelevant to solving the problem. The simple fact of the matter is the answer is to "man up" and provide a good example; influence society in a moral, rational direction while accepting that it will be a long, painful road.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 01:43 AM
2

Yes, as sexism is a bias for a dichotomous categorization making a bias against a group at minimum partially define a bias against the other group. So to boil it down; Misandry creates misogyny and misogyny creates misandry. Hate breeds hate due to the inaccurate/limited measurement, finite recording, processing and perspective inherent to our limited existences. It makes sense for a brain to pre-construct and over time reinforce a bias against an easily identifiable category that has a net bene…
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 12:57 AM
1

It sort of makes some twisted semblance of sense. It's a classic chicken or the egg problem; Asking a fairly irrelevant question that requires monumental time and effort to determine that has negligible bearing on finding a solution to the problem at hand. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken\_or\_the\_egg The chicken or the egg causality dilemma is commonly stated as the question, "which came first: the chicken or the egg?" The dilemma stems from the observation that all chickens hatch from eg…
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/22 10:18 PM
14

I wonder when it will dawn on them that misandry often creates and exacerbates misogyny. When you dehumanize men and promote/encourage men to be tools of violence on women's behalf, is it all that surprising when they give you a taste of your own medicine?
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/22 06:37 PM
10

XD
/r/AntiFeminists12/08/22 12:58 AM
3

Go and place a restraining order and file a harassment complaint with the police. You don't have to file charges just establish evidence to make it harder for her or anyone else to paint a false narrative.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 06:40 PM
-3

Messages that are purely for insult or hate purposes will be removed (eg "black people are lazy"). Alternatively, messages that discuss a person's opinion, or argue for a point, may not be removed. Serious misogyny or misandry will be removed - this doesn't include posts about general traits of women/men, but attacks on either gender as a whole. For example, "all women are whores" is unacceptable, but "women who marry men only for money are whores" is acceptable
/r/MensRights09/08/22 05:34 AM
3

The only way to assure defeat is to surrender.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 03:05 PM
2

That's a sexist over-generalization that is not constructive and portrays this stance in a negative view. Your enabling a strawman, please don't.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 01:52 PM
13

This is an important step in the right direction and need to support the overturning of affirmative action but we need to ensure that the problem that caused this discriminatory legislation is then addressed. We need to live up to our words and fight against discrimination and insist that people are judged by who, not what they are. We must take these opportunities to help the world understand that rights do not belong to a specific demographic, that they and we should not be in this fight alone…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:33 PM
0

10. Racism and other hate speech restrictions Messages that are purely for insult or hate purposes will be removed (eg "black people are lazy"). Alternatively, messages that discuss a person's opinion, or argue for a point, may not be removed. Serious misogyny or misandry will be removed - this doesn't include posts about general traits of women/men, but attacks on either gender as a whole. For example, "all women are whores" is unacceptable, but "women who marry men only for money are whores" i…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 11:24 AM
1

op·pres·sion /əˈpreSHən/ Learn to pronounce noun prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control. "a region shattered by oppression and killing" Similar: persecution abuse maltreatment ill treatment tyranny despotism repression suppression subjection subjugation enslavement exploitation cruelty ruthlessness harshness brutality injustice hardship misery suffering pain anguish wretchedness Opposite: freedom democracy the state of being subject to unjust treatment or control. "a response to collecti…
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:12 AM
3

The draft should be elective with training and compensation akin to national guard or military reserves to any and all who chose to do so. Your rights should not depend on whether or not your willing to be the fed's slave. Even a tax deduction would allow for compensation that doesn't require increased taxes to finance the payment.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 07:58 PM
3

I was willing to engage with you up to when you listed all those topics you believe feminists and mra's are concerned with . So your attempting to have a conclusive opinion on something you didn't even read? Sorry I can't lend you a shovel for that grave XD
/r/MensRights31/07/22 03:56 AM
15

As far as blaming things on alcohol, people don't want to admit that its main effect is diminishing your inhibitions, you act on impulse and in a weird way become a simpler "truer" you.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:07 AM
1

It perpetuates a pendulum of the impression that this is a zero sum conflict. It will be better until it begins to swing to far right, and will come back to a more moderate "middle" then we will arrive right back here where we started. The optimal solution is to accept the correct, substantiated theories of both sides and move on with a more truthful concept of reality while promoting the fact that actually being right is more important then the social perception of being right.
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/22 12:39 AM
3

Time, education, not backing down and calling out toxic biased people attempting to use MRA as a façade. Learn from the flaws of feminism and not wait till we are dying to deal with cancerous cells. It's not going to be fun or quick to do this in a proper moral way, which is why we need to take advantage of the average male cognition and be stoic, be patient and stand our ground.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 07:34 AM
7

https://www.reddit.com/user/Spiritual\_Stretch\_35/ This account has been suspended . GO HOME Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. ©2022 reddit inc. All rights reserved. REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 08:33 AM
2

Yes? However it kinda speaks to how our "modern" prison systems perpetuate criminal behavior rather than rehabilitate. It's not an excuse but locking someone up while debilitating effective ethical, legal way of living afterwards isn't helpful, neither is not actually treating the cause of the behavior and blindly hoping it went away after x amount of time.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 06:45 AM
2

No problem, I spent ~15 min of my own free time. It was almost literally the least I could do while still claiming I did something.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:00 AM
1

"Moving the goalpost"? I'm not sure what the word for abusing the need to substantiate your opinion on an opinion in a debate by creating arguments that on a surface level seem relevant but ultimately are not relevant in order to avoid debate on an actually relevant topic.
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/22 11:13 AM
5

patriarchy does not equal men, and men today didn't establish it, aren't the ones to blame for perpetuating it( certainly not more than women, we all contribute lightly, without knowing really) and men today won't be able to just fuck up this system. Now furthermore, patriarchy hurts both men and women, in similar ways. I would say that men suffer more harm because of the current patriarchal system in western countries than women do. This is obviously diffrent in 3rd world countries, Islamic cou…
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/22 04:01 AM
2

Vox/PerryUndem Poll
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:16 AM
4

It's unconstructive and your both instituting the positive feedback loop of hostility. It's either worth adding a possible solution, pointing out the problem or not wasting your breath exasperating the problem. Anger is a call to action but you should realize that your anger will likely be responded to by anger.
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/22 01:02 AM
3

The average number of victims per rapist is ~12. Rapist are an incredibly small portion of the population and one of the difficulties is that the best way IMO to reduce rape is to support those who come forward and stop it at 1 attempt, but this requires what often derided as victim blaming, which TBF sometimes people do victim blame and it's unfair, unconstructive criticism. I personally stood up to my "friends" to stop a woman from being raped while WE WERE ALL drunk, The main perpetrator? A s…
/r/MensRights26/07/22 01:52 PM
1

I mean that's the point of being libertarian, We defend each others rights to lead life as we choose from those who want to choose for us. Outside of that, your life is your life and mine, mine.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 01:17 PM
2

My current focus has been on, my admittedly meager, support of the forward party as I see ranked choice voting as a paramount. It would destroy the common false narratives of electability and politicians shoving the "lesser of two evils" down our throats. I wish our country would wake up and realize how cancerous the decades of "creeping" federalism has been.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 12:40 PM
2

https://twitter.com/OrdinaryGuyUK/status/1551870992095518720 UPDATE: Rob u/DABSupport has made contact to somebody within the DA peer group to advise SAFE & WELL, but that he will be retiring from DA causes for MH reasons. u/metpoliceuk u/MetCC FYI if not already aware, please update case 25/07/22 ref CAD2998.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 10:11 AM
3

Vote republican? No, thanks. I'm not going to trade a blue turd for a red turd. Your position is how we ended up here. You want to support sexist, regressive, authoritarians rather than sexist, conservative, authoritarians?
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 03:34 AM
2

The difficulty is that all things are relative and "modern" feminism has little difference from it's sexist, eugenicist, supremacist foundation. However it was the case of women not having equal rights in many cases and the old trope of "The enemy of my enemy, is my friend.". However much of the "oppression" they faced was leftover traditions from benevolent sexism that didn't fit the modern environment. Leading to the classic problem of being so focused on your "enemy" you ignore the cancer eat…
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 12:59 AM
2

They refuse to accept the reality of being an accomplice.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 12:49 AM
3

However if you talk about feminism or any other group many abuse the use of pedantic arguments to prevent criticism and absolve them of accountability due to the plausible deniability of group action. They try to argue that they had no hand in the actions of others despite giving those others the support and power to do as they did.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 12:48 AM
1

The reality most people don't want to face is that the vast majority of self-described feminists are not feminists as it is defined as female focused equalitarianism.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 12:46 AM
1

It depends on whether your talking about its definition or those calling themselves feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 12:44 AM
7

Sex is dichotomous in our species, creating a situation were having a bias against a sex creates a bias against the other. What you are defines what you are not and what you are not defines what you are. Unfortunately our cognition operates on bias so the only really measure is to be aware and attempt to make your bias to be more specific and less generalized. Treating people not according to the color of their skin, sex, geographical birth etc. but rather by the content of their character. The …
/r/MensRights25/07/22 10:24 PM
12

Incel? Incel is an un-gendered term so it applies to both sexes.
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/22 12:46 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMIc0\_8TXMA
/r/MensRights25/07/22 10:55 AM
1

Facebook link is down as well.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 10:50 AM
2

http://www.d-a-b-s.co.uk/ Templates Wix.com Looks Like This Domain Isn't Connected To A Website Yet! Is this your domain? Connect it to your Wix website in just a few easy steps: Go to Wix.com > Subscriptions > Domains Click Use a Domain You Already Own Follow the steps to connect your domain to your website
/r/MensRights25/07/22 10:46 AM
1

I tried wayback machine, is there any record of this deleted account?
/r/MensRights25/07/22 10:43 AM
6

The reason why humans have succeeded to the degree we have is due to our enormous malleability as well as highly developed cognitive functions. IQ rises with age due to the restructuring and growth of the brain during the ageing process. People often think that a human is whatever it is born as, however Humans more so then any animal, is soft coded rather than hard coded. Most of our genetics create selective processes rather than a simple conclusion. Just because your a dumb kid doesn't mean yo…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 08:35 PM
4

I am a reductionist; that's actually a compliment rather than the insult you seem to think it is. My pet peeve is people like you who think generalized oversimplifications are reality. Who are arguing a sex/gender version of race realism and espousing irrational talking points that have won you social brownie points in your echo chamber; While ignoring my statements and continue to attempt to deny the current substantiated objective reality by intentionally manipulating the subjective nature of …
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 11:24 AM
6

You seem to be confused as I've repeatedly stated that sex doesn't speak to anything outside of what gametes your body is intended to produce. While failing to realize your operating under the same logical fallacies that helped rationalize the very things you claim to be against. I'm not against trans people, however the reality is that we cannot change our sex/gender currently. If anything there should be support for the gene therapy to make it so that we can actually transition people in more …
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 10:21 AM
4

Ohh yes the standard ad hominem attempt that doesn't argue against any of my statement and rather attempts to belittle and disregard my person while relying on the vague, subjective nature of language rather than the objective concept we are discussing while continuing to beg the question.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 09:40 AM
5

Not all species reproduce through sex, thereby making the categorization inapplicable to some, The traits that are common to the sexes are generally correlative particularly in our genus.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 09:34 AM
3

I'm literally arguing that your body doesn't justify a judgment on your personality and ethics. If you want to castrate yourself and have breast implants and go through hormonal therapy that's your right, however it should be explained to you that much of that is superficial and what the actual symptoms the hormonal therapy and removal of one of your primary hormonal glands will have while ensuring that your are of sound mind.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 09:30 AM
3

It's not transphobia. I'm not opposed to body modification however I don't support deluding them and feeding them false sexist propaganda. You clearly don't understand informed consent in medical contexts. Human identities have correlative relations with sex/gender, however Being a Man or being a Woman says nothing about who you are or what you should be. It only describes your Genus and Sex Role. A man can be "feminine" and a woman can be "masculine" and as long as they do so in constructive et…
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 09:25 AM
8

Your overcomplicating a simple categorization and applying biased correlation. Male and Female are non specific terms for all species.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 09:11 AM
5

man /man/ noun 1. an adult male human being. wom·an /ˈwo͝omən/ noun an adult female human being.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 09:10 AM
17

Being a man or woman begins and ends with having male or female gametes while belonging to the homo genus.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 08:32 AM
-2

I'm not sure why your insinuating a deterministic intent behind the desire to understand another's experience while dismissing any other potential constructive intents. You Sex/Gender says nothing about who you are or who you should be personality wise. It's simply a categorization dependent on what form of gametes you have in sexual reproduction in our species.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 06:05 AM
2

I agree with this, though I'd say that it leads to the terms to being vague to the point of uselessness and perpetuating the stereotypes that there is 1 defined, correct way of being a man or woman and demonstrates your lack of empathy skills which is deconstructing your own experience to reengineer a rough concept of a communicated experience of another.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 05:27 AM
1

Okay; define those terms, why it's related to sex and why sexes should be autocratically held to different cognitive standards without regard for their wants and goals.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 05:11 AM
4

Go for it? Though it's difficult to balance this with being an independent self-sufficient person. Demonstrate your abilities, and communicate what you bring to the table and what you need brought to the table.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 04:31 AM
7

It's currently a fairly pointless and arbitrary term? I mean there might be a good reason to create a utopian ideal definition of masculinity and femininity but to actually force and expect those behaviors from a particular sex is toxic, biased nonsense. If a women wants to be masculine then she should be allowed and taught how to be properly masculine just as a man should and the same goes for a man that wants to be feminine.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 03:55 AM
1

It's not a "waiting game". Your agency is being denied by your own inaction. Don't fall into the same fallacy trap of feminism and place you own self in cuffs out of fear blaming those who had nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 10:30 PM
0

Fear is the path of becoming your own worst enemy though inaction. Your literally telling the world to not demonstrate the positive aspects of masculinity. If you want to be a scared pos, then fine but keep quiet and don't encouraged cowardliness.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 10:27 PM
4

The patriarchy theory blames men for any and all problems and absolves women of any wrong doings, therefore feminism has encouraged women to act maliciously while expecting no consequence. Of course this may not directly have anything to do with feminism but your response is a good example of someone not being angry at the malice and outright greed and theft that is being displayed with the amount of social backing that's being demonstrated.
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 03:41 AM
–

2. No bigotry of any kind. This includes misandry, misogyny, transphobia, racism, homophobia, ableism, etc. 6. Post must be men's rights/anti-feminist related. Topics should in some way relate to disadvantages or discrimination facing men (and boys), or factors that cause and perpetuate those issues, such as feminism. Off-topic posts are deemed as spam and can be sanctioned with a ban.
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 08:04 AM
7

I dislike the habit of them making female "heroes" not actually heroes and glorifying tyrannical, supremacist, self serving behavior and calling it heroic when a woman does it. It's fairly telling that modern culture now defines good and evil by sex/gender with little to no regard as to the persons actions and intent.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 12:14 PM
5

AHAHA your words not mine!
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 01:51 AM
13

My guess is your uselessly attacking men and defending women because your desperate for some pussy, likely cause you haven't gotten any and while this isn't something I think should be an insult your a gynocentric idiot that will take that way, Incel.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 02:17 PM
1

So everyone is going to argue philosophy over the internet and not actually begin to take action?
/r/MensRights11/07/22 09:47 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXsQAXx\_ao0
/r/MensRights11/07/22 09:25 PM
1

It would also likely be constructive to create a system for public speaking.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 08:57 PM
1

https://headwaterseconomics.org/public-lands/protected-lands/public-land-ownership-in-the-us/#:~:text=Nearly%2040%25%20of%20the%20United,areas%20and%20was%20recently%20updated. Of course if there is anyone who has private land that would also work, or we could establish a charity with a contractual obligation for how the money is spent in order to rent private land. This would require the charity to establish a legally binding contract with every donor.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 08:56 PM
1

Anyone want to establish a congress and "man up"? Rather than do the toxic feminine act of demanding that someone else shoulder our burdens and oppose our enemies? We have a forum here that could establish an event calendar and we could use pole voting to determine a month and day for our meeting.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 08:50 PM
5

I didn't call you stupid as that would be a generic unconstructive insult. In the past women did not have certain rights and it was good for everyone to fight for them and feminists were a part of that. However, much like planned parenthood which was established to literally push minorities into self inflicted eugenics to create plausible deniability; There are good reasons for allowing access to PP programs. That doesn't justify nor even attempt to consider the flaws the intent behind its creat…
/r/MensRights11/07/22 07:58 PM
3

No, not all of them which is why I specifically made a discretion between feminists and self-declared feminists, stating that calling oneself a feminist doesn't make you a feminist as feminism doesn't fit its own definition. However that reality is concerning and why as an egalitarian I'm opposed to feminism. I judge people by their actions not their words.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 07:45 PM
1

Please don't assume I'm as illiterate as you and attempt to create a false narrative based on assumptions of my opinions regardless of my statements.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 07:41 PM
10

No, feminism has always been a racist, sexist supremacy organization. In the past the context was different and they had legitimate claims, however that doesn't excuse their motivations nor means. Not all self-declared feminists are feminists as they purposefully borrowed the definition of egalitarian, without their movement actually fitting that definition. This complicates discussion as it now requires using the same word to refer to differing people with differing morality and opinions.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 07:10 PM
49

Fuck you, you rape apologist piece of shit. I don't give a single fuck what your sex/gender/skin color is, defending a piece of shit makes you a piece of shit. And no I won't be kind here, you don't deserve kindness.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:28 AM
0

It depends? Which I'm sure will receive a negative response but sending nudes to another without an established contract means those nudes no longer just belong to you. You want the right to privacy? Then exercise that right and keep your privates private. hehe.
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/22 08:02 AM
6

A female supremacy movement. The main reason that this is in contention is due to the radically different context between its beginning, modern times and the whitewashing of its actual history.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 04:44 AM
5

Sexism isn't appreciated here regardless of which sex your targeting. Please stop giving feminists easy targets to construct a false narrative with by conditional fallacy. Besides as a father with daughters, insulting them is far more offensive then insulting me.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 02:15 AM
25

They often claim it's because of "toxic masculinity" despite data showing the vast majority of suicide is done by those who had sought help.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:02 AM
1

While ignoring the sexual dimorphism of male and female cognitive functions and the rise of herd animals, our existence as a herd animal and the self-control, sacrificial, protective nature that many men have.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:46 PM
-2

I am discussing the concept of libertarianism not the self-identifying libertarians. Calling yourself something doesn't make you that thing. I find it funny that you have no realization that your doing the same feminist tactic of abusing the subjectiveness of language to claim others are saying what you want them to say while also saying something without saying anything.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:40 PM
3

Thank you for creating another blatant example of why these spaces are necessary and just how idiotic and biased detractors are. At least here even if what you say is stupid and sexist your still allowed to say and generally their is an attempt to educate you on why your wrong.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:29 PM
3

It's deliberate; as those who stand at the top of the social hierarchy want us to be fighting over scraps rather than dealing with them, who are responsible for us only having scraps without enough to go around.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:24 PM
-1

In reality, it is. Your committing a nadir fallacy by cherry picking a certain set of right ideology that fits your wanted narrative. Again your pulling the same bullshit that many leftist do, of attempting to argue a utopian, unrealistic version of your ideology. I get sick and tired of this bullshit of just how arrogant and delusional our entire species is thinking that there is a simple answer in a convoluted reality that we've yet to even fully understand; while ignoring the limitation inher…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:21 PM
-4

Your conflating liberalism with anarchism. You can, though it's delusional to assume that an authority is interchangeable rather than it simply being your turn to not be oppressed.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:16 PM
13

IMO It's a lie of omission or half truth that dismisses the growing discontent in women and growing unhappiness as women now have to "man up", while the oligarchy is manipulating their discontent to control us through social engineering.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:10 PM
2

I whole heartedly agree as establishing a bottom up libertarian government as intended by America's founders would create a situation in which there would be a clear example of what actual equality and denial of any form of sexism would look like. What I mean by bottom up is by starting at a local level and working our way up the legislative/judicial/executive hierarchy.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:58 PM
1

Yet going right and reinforcing hierarchies is by definition authoritarian as you place more power at the top of the hierarchy while reducing it at the bottom. There isn't a simple solution which is the benefit of libertarianism as you have more power to decide the politics of your environment while imposing it on as few people as feasible. 1 vote /3 votes > 1 vote/6 votes.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:54 PM
5

I'm not sure what comment your referring too, I agree with you but Rightism isn't the solution either, people don't seem to understand that extremes are well... extreme. You can't build a perfect construct from imperfect parts and attempting to do so will result in structural failure. Don't get caught up in a utopian delusion while rightly pointing out the flaws of utopian delusion of others.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:35 PM
1

Libertarians seek to maximize autonomy and political freedom, and minimize the state's violation of individual liberties; emphasizing free association, freedom of choice, individualism and voluntary association. So your arguing you want to fit the definition of a libertarian without being labeled as a libertarian?
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:27 PM
5

This is fairly common as libertarian is neither left nor right, and the terms left and right are generally useless to actual paint your political stance. I'm a "lefty" as I'm a libertarian socialist, Decentralized government that is held to the purpose of government, being a union to stop monopolies, trusts and the natural hierarchies involved from creating authoritarian influences on all of society. Libertarians seek to maximize autonomy and political freedom, and minimize the state's violation…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:26 PM
4

I appreciate you actually asking a question and giving me a chance to better communicate my opinion.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:24 AM
11

No, there are women I've talked to who claimed they were feminists that after a discussion realized that feminist theories and organizations don't fit the definition that feminists wrote for their categorization themselves, I can say I'm God. My name is Yahweh, you don't know what my legal name is so you'd be forced to refer to me as Yahweh, a god or you would be able specifically refer to me but that doesn't mean I meet the definition of a monotheistic deity. (I realize that in this context you…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:17 AM
1

Your right, it's not 1+1, it's more something like 1+1+1+3+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+2+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+3+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+6+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+6+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+4+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+9+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+8++1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 etc... You are not a god, you only have so much power and control even over your own self. To be so arrogant as to assume complete control over yourself has the result of reducing the control you have over yourself.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:09 AM
1

So your attempting to respond to "rationalized" sexist immorality is with "rationalized" sexist immorality? If you'd like to understand how feminists can rationalize their misandric BS, look in the mirror.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 05:47 AM
6

It's an all too common human flaw of arrogant supremacy where we like to imagine we are the best human regardless of the reality to the point it's not uncommon for us to knowingly lie to our selves in order to rationalize a false perception of reality.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 05:34 AM
2

Because that's how the physics of your hormones and nervous system interactions function. You clearly don't even understand the basic concept of reflexes so I'm done here.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 05:31 AM
9

It's deliberate social engineering by separate independent conspiracies who abused feminine cognitive weaknesses for self serving ends. It's not so much idiocy as it is that given our biological processes and the results of natural selection has left women in particular vulnerable to false narratives, Their opinions don't seem to make sense because we don't completely understand their warped perception of reality.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 04:59 AM
15

This is a pointless argument of semantics that makes it difficult to actually discuss the issues that need to be addressed, the theoretical categorization of feminism =/= feminist as self-categorization is inherently subjective due to the limits of our cognitive abilities. No not every feminist is intentionally a misandrist, however this is why it's important to actually explain and call feminism out for it being a gynocentric Nazi like cult. Though it would be helpful for us to establish a slan…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 04:53 AM
18

em·pa·thy /ˈempəTHē/ noun the ability to understand and share the feelings of another. My answer is yes but that doesn't mean forgiveness and it's entirely possible for empathy to raise your disgust and disdain rather than sympathy. Understanding another's feelings or experience doesn't mean to agree with their decisions.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 04:46 AM
8

That's not how emotional responses work, of course we can be stoic, control, and choose our actions on or despite those feelings but you can f off with your ignorant BS.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 03:42 AM
1

Do it!
/r/MensRights09/07/22 02:40 AM
1

At the age of 17 I got kicked out of my parents house, ended up finding a place I could sleep at, met a girl at a party and convince her to ask if she could stay as well given her situation. She had 2 kids, no job and was homeless, I decided to attempt to help reunify them spent ~2 years doing so, she ended up pregnant because allegedly she sabotaged my condoms(I didn't want to but made the mistake of being overly generous to her morality and she wouldn't listen to me unless I had sex with and b…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 02:08 AM
1

Bump
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 05:41 PM
7

Seriously? As this is your only post, f off likely rage baiting troll.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 08:54 AM
15

​ From week seven of pregnancy through the first trimester, you can get a noninvasive prenatal paternity test. During this test, DNA is collected from the mother by a blood draw and from the father with a cheek swab. The samples are analyzed to compare the baby's and possible father's DNA.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 08:52 AM
2

Kang2112 commented on This is the first time I show my face. Please be niceimgur.com/a/Cvn0... Sissy Chastitynsfw •r/chastity •Posted by u/MaddySi69 Kang2112 1 point · 1 month ago I'd take you to bed. I'd even let you cum in my mouth a couple times a month. If you could produce on demand..! Reply Give Award Share
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 03:59 AM
1

Kang2112 commented on on ur knees waiting for me... don't worry we can cuddle afteri.redd.it/jr9tcq... spoilernsfw •r/Femdom •Posted by u/switch-s1ut Kang2112 0 points · 23 days ago So Glad you're cuddly, I accept! Reply Give Award Share
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 03:55 AM
2

Kang2112 1 point · 6 days ago I'd be happy to be a closer target! Absolutely no need for your squirt to cross the room - My mouth and tongue would be ready to receive! Reply Give Award Share
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 03:55 AM
2

Kang2112 0 points · 4 days ago Nice bush! Thanks for sharing! NOW SIT ON MY FACE! Reply Give Award Share Kang2112 1 point · 4 days ago I'm sorry! I blame wishful thinking?!? Reply Give Award Share
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 03:54 AM
3

Kang2112 1 point · 4 days ago I'd love to test your smother box! Are you in the Pacific North West by any chance? Reply Give Award Share
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 03:54 AM
5

If your still married, I'm sure your wife would be interested in your infidelic antics on reddit and you obviously are too idiotic to even address a simple picture. No I won't shut the fuck up, you idiotic piece of shit. Come at me bro XD. The more you open your mouth the less confidence people will have in your intelligence. It's rather entertaining watching you dig your own grave.
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 03:32 AM
-1

I'd suggest brushing up on your literacy then, as nothing you stated was something I disagree with outside of your overgeneralization and is a personalized reiteration of my statements. Your not understanding that your overgeneralization is effectively "preaching to the choir" in which your not convincing anyone on the fence or the other side, your just scoring social brownie points from those who already agree with you. I'm not trying to be insulting but I would like for someone of your capabil…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 02:29 AM
11

It's literally under the heading of military service and declaring the rank of military spouse. Your claim is so inane, that anything I can say would likely be taken as insulting. Your likely to convince more to oppose your opinion regardless of the actual validity of your previous statement.
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 02:02 AM
1

You'd think that being here you'd understand the dangers of bias stemming from confusing apex and nadir fallacies with a universal truth of a categorization. Your part of the very problem you seemingly want to address. We are done here as anything more I'd have to say to you would come of as insulting, regardless of its deservedness and accuracy.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 01:26 AM
5

At least the cases in which fathers are murderously violent towards their children is so incredibly rare that trying to bring it up in an argument would highlight just how un-socialized women can be and currently are and would paint just how murderous mothers can be.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 01:06 AM
1

Not addressing the nuance and generalizing people, judging them regardless of their actions is what leads to the current dysfunction and polarization in my country, the USA. Being rich doesn't make you a sociopathic thief but it makes it far more likely. Pulling down those who morally attain their wealth perpetuates our current problems and fails to address the systemic problems that encourage and allow destructive sociopaths to attain wealth and power.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:54 AM
-1

It's more complicated then that, which they abuse to deny their conspiracies, it's not a single illuminati so much as separate groups of conspirators that sum to a net negative on liberty and a net positive on corruption. It's competing, corrupt, self-serving groups that while they work against each other, they still work towards the same end, 1-3+5 = 3, just because they have a negative influence due to competition doesn't mean the net result in their actions is a reduction in corruption as the…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:43 AM
3

We need to stick together not to excuse our BS but to protect ourselves from the BS of others. First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me. This isn't even just about men or women, the only people that really…
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 09:21 PM
2

So your argument of the commonality of nadir fallacy is another nadir fallacy? That dismisses the actual agency and power of "feminist" organizations, While I would agree that most women that Identify as feminists are egalitarians that is not the effect their political organizations have, and their founding and subsequent theories are blatantly misandric and often sexist as they have bias towards both sexes. You are also conflating correlation with causation.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 07:12 PM
4

Using half truths, lie of omissions and deliberately engineered definition of false allegations and extending the definition of rape to include acts that people would not define as rape to give a wanted small answer with no discussion of margin of error. Like in my case where it doesn't count because she didn't actually bring her accusation to a legal court. They also purposely don't discuss the actual context of rape, as that would show that rapists are an incredibly small percentage of our pop…
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 06:54 PM
5

I agree with a lot of this, however it isn't that simple. I'm currently "MGTOW" as women have far too much legal power and social enforced delusion to even trust the good women. However if your willing to marry into that family and understand the burden your shouldering, all power to you, this consistent over-generalizing being talked about as if it was a universal truth is bullshit.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 02:14 PM
10

I'm a libertarian socialist that hates communists more than most "liberals" or "conservatives"(I use quotes because I'm discussing self-identifiers who don't fit the definition.). The Nazi party ended up as a German branch of communism, that used a façade of socialism to gain power then instituted a dictator, Fuhrer Hitler. The difficulty is most people don't understand how social engineering is causing us to believe in apex and nadir fallacies either directly or indirectly in order to line corp…
/r/MensRights07/07/22 01:44 PM
14

What's done is done, sympathy while cathartic isn't the main point to me sharing my story, it's a cautionary tale, an indication of the wrongs society does and If people actually care about me and my experience then I'd like for something to be done to prevent it from happening to others. I am who I am because I don't want others to live through what I have.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 01:27 PM
79

It's incredibly common, the definition of false is fairly self-explanatory, however there are good reasons as to why a dismissed rape charge =/= a false allegation. The difficulty is, that for instance in my case, I was never charge in a legal court, she simply told my HS that I had repeatedly raped her which led to isolation and repeated assaults and attempted murders that only stopped because that wasn't even close to my first violent encounter. even to this day the response is almost universa…
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 12:49 PM
8

It's not as if your ignorant response was likely a lazy attempt at an ad hominem that doesn't realize I went through your profiles history before responding to you while simultaneously judging me on the words and opinions of others? At least here it's a toss up here whether or not their is a positive response to me calling people on their sexist bullshit and its far from being universal. You however are an Idiot, who hasn't actually thought out their own beliefs and are merely parroting what soc…
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 09:55 AM
7

At least this sub doesn't shut down and ban criticism. The only real option is to point it out and hopefully make a positive impact on its direction or just ignore it and go on with your own life.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 05:35 AM
8

Fuck off unconstructive troll. This doesn't paint your own bullshit any better.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 05:32 AM
6

Credit is deserved by intent otherwise an accident is an accident.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:33 PM
1

The less to gain and the more to lose, the more stability and personalized risk vs reward behavior of any form is encouraged. Though there's also the problem that our current judicial system is financially incentivized because it's legal to still own slaves if they've been sentence to prison and they have a vulnerable, technically foreign population.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:56 AM
0

I'm getting furious that any and every were I go, humans cry and demonize the acts they themselves are committing/supporting. Feminism is misandric and this Anti-feminists sub is overwhelmingly misogynistic. No wonder my battle with misanthropy is a long hard road. You support traditional gender roles? Shut up, Man up, Grow some balls. Stop being such a pussy and do your duty and defend women. /s
/r/AntiFeminists03/07/22 12:25 PM
2

Current legislation makes it so that I have no rights as a father and are degrading women's rights, as much of a "horndog" as I am and I could potentially find a women that is as she says she is and could be the "one" there is too much risk. Common law marriage makes it so I'm not willing to even cohabitate.
/r/AntiFeminists03/07/22 09:43 AM
2

Since I was twelve its been several times a week, when married it was daily, when I got divorced I got laid 3 times in 5 years and now I intend to be celibate.
/r/AntiFeminists03/07/22 09:14 AM
1

Is there a time frame for this? My distribution is incredibly skewed.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/22 09:21 PM
3

No problem. I think we agree that masculine and feminine roles are good and should be taught to our children but disagree as how to determine who to teach these roles to as a priority. Thank you for helping me refine my own thoughts on the subject and developing my communication skills.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:38 AM
4

That gender is an appropriate way of determining a persons strengths and weaknesses, They are likely to fit stereotypes but treating it as ubiquitous is nothing less than willful ignorance. That's before we even get into how inaccurate many of these stereotypes have leaving people to functionally be delusional perceiving the world in ways that it isn't.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:31 AM
3

A self-sufficient individual is a good spouse and member of society as they lessen the burden on society and are capable of giving more than they take from society.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:16 AM
7

If your son doesn't understand or want to recreate social interaction and see it as something of no value that's willful ignorance, a weakness. If your daughter doesn't understand or want to involve herself in physical conflict and see's it as nothing of value it is a weakness. We all have weakness's and Society exists because it allows us to specialize and delegate tasks. It's not entirely imagined or artificial it's an oversimplification that is no longer required in the modern era.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:15 AM
5

You observe their behavior and put them in different contexts and encourage them to develop their strengths while teaching them to overcome their weakness's. Correlation means that there is a relation but it's at a deeper more fundamental level.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:56 AM
10

Its a conflation of correlation and causation. Men and women on average are different but that's an oversimplification as the reality is men and women are only unique in the extremes. There is far more overlap than difference. Treat a person as they are not how you've arbitrarily decided they should be irregardless of their capabilities and desires.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:21 AM
39

I am an egalitarian and participate in MRA because it focuses on men's issue without inherently pulling the superiority bullshit of feminism. We all face issues and it isn't a contest to fight over who has it worse. We should listen and help each other climb the mountain. If your not an egalitarian then you don't belong in MRA. 10. Racism and other hate speech restrictions Messages that are purely for insult or hate purposes will be removed (eg "black people are lazy"). Alternatively, messages t…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:14 AM
8

The roles are important, necessary ones, however they should not be gender roles. If you want to be the stay at home dad then fine, "breadwinner" mom then fine.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:55 AM
34

If she can do the work and wants/needs to, then shut your mouth and let her. A woman's place is where she has earned a place like the rest of us.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:43 AM
1

Communism is deceptive given it sounds good in theory but depends on selfless authoritarians who act on behalf and for the benefit of the people however the probabilities involved with achieving authority and power cause the majority of those who attain power to be those who seek power and those who seek power tend to do it for their own interests. However that's hardly a unique problem as the vast majority of our species is self-interested and doesn't understand that conflict is a negative to p…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:38 AM
4

Ehhh, that's kind of right but also wrong. We tend to have more body mass but there is a difference between fat loss and muscle loss. It's the entire reason women have higher body fat percentages is that given the female sex role they hard cap a communities ability to reproduce hence less disposable and why men tend to have higher performance bodies as it allows... higher performance and they are more "disposable". This is all in purely biological non-moralistic terms where natural selection doe…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:27 AM
2

Sex may be a good rule of thumb but a more appropriate measure would be metabolism, Men and women require different amounts of calories even within their own sex. So I'd say that given the health risks involved, using sex for first response is adequate then while providing them with check ups, identifying their personal needs and creating a more accurate dispensing of the rations would be the way to go.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:22 AM
1

Ohh yes because being apathetic and scared to act and attempt something is the more rational choice to ascertain a goal. /s
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:54 PM
-4

No I'm not going to calm down. Nice literacy though, It's not as if my comment was straight forward or anything. It's not as if your blatant inability to read basic English despite that being the language you write in has anything to do with my anger.
/r/AntiFeminists01/07/22 06:32 AM
9

That's the tragic flaw of our entire species we can see the flaws in others while denying our own as it inflates our ego. The reality is the only person you need to compete with is yourself. Be better then you were yesterday.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 09:13 PM
2

Women are defined as Human Females. Femininity is the average behavior and thought of Women. This just further reinforces my supposition that one of the main issues we have in modern times is deliberate engineering of language in order to prevent effective communication.
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 01:11 PM
1

Can't see the forest for the trees.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:05 PM
2

The whole Trans debate is complicate and much of it is filled with conformation bias and lies of omission. The reality is that sex you are born with is not currently changeable and then there's the abuse of the word gender which at one point was a synonym of sex however the desire to feel comfortable in your body is something that deserves support.
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 12:05 PM
1

While I agree with your statement, this was not the appropriate place to bring this subject up in this manner. If your going to be a unconstructive narcissist who isn't going to further the discussion go elsewhere.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:00 PM
2

My advice, get divorced but write up a roommate contract after discussing this with your children. Don't "blindside" them, ease them into a major life altering transition however your both parents and it's not exactly fair to separate the kids from the father or mother. Even if you divorce you'd both still be their parents and living in different domiciles would cause a situation were even in a 50/50 split, while technically true, It's more of a situation where the parents are a lone parent taki…
/r/Divorce_Men30/06/22 09:57 AM
1

While useful, do not conflate correlation with causation. More likely? Yes, however using this one metric to decide outcomes is effectively ignoring the technical details. It's likely due to humans being humans with less "socialization" in modern western cultures for women. We tend to take when we can get when we want something. For women there is little to no pressure placed on them for promiscuity and they have been deluded to think as though they have no agency aka accountability. Don't overs…
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 09:50 AM
5

She's likely a Feminist going by its dictionary definition. Egalitarian is a likely good categorization for her, that would attach less of the manipulative supremacists who haven't bothered keeping tabs on the acts of feminist theories or thought on the "feminist theories" and call themselves feminists. Of course that's pedantic.
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 07:15 AM
0

Or you can just not care about the unsubstantiated opinions of immoral idiots? They'll suffer the consequences of not benefiting from the labor of those willing to labor. Nothing exists in Isolation go your own way, hold women accountable in the ways you can and maintain appropriate standards for your personal community. Let them suffer for your absence, they'll learn their lesson or perish in misery.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:27 AM
10

Good, "man up", don't complain about a problem; Solve it, though that includes opening and asking for advice about how to solve it. Your doing the right thing though I would get consolation with a lawyer about what charges and the potential "hills" to climb.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:51 PM
1

It's men being men and putting in the effort the goose is worth and not falling prey to the fallacy and fear of it being "a wild goose chase" and instead focusing on the eventuality of achieving our goal. WE ARE MEN AREN'T WE?
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:17 PM
16

That was kind of the point. Men and women don't owe each other anything but that isn't how society is constructed. Traditionally that was the way it worked but now, It's assumed that men owe women the world while women owe men nothing but scorn.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 09:51 PM
2

There are lots of problems with actually establishing a good generalized answer to this question but it's likely a combination of humans aggressive nature combined with a lack of "socialization". The main issue with much of the modern debates surrounding minorities is that them being minorities or that "race"(I hate the term race, its an ill defined useless categorization) has little to do with the problems they face and it's more about them being place in more vulnerable environments to univers…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 09:22 PM
12

I learned a good "trick" to deepen research was to use the wiki page to point me towards more in depth sources that would be trusted more. Even if I used the page itself as a source, I could just use the sources for the page as the stated source.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:28 PM
24

Ehhh Wikipedia is a "reliable" source however that's dependent on checking the sources of the wiki page itself.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:52 PM
11

That is in fact relevant as it points towards communities attempts to engineer a stereotype in order to discredit an opposition to their ideology without having to make a rational argument. While some of this was fair your beginning to demonstrate that your attempting to "beg the question". To the point that I would guess it's pointless to debate with you as you've already assumed the "truth".
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:48 PM
9

People are afraid of social reprisal, we are a herd species with the most evolved sense of social construct. You have to be willing to sacrifice your safety for the hypothetical safety of others. The main advantage in most men's forums is that free speech is a fairly universal, strictly upheld rule, allowing those who have questions or see bias can speak and continue to speak without fear of isolation.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:43 PM
7

It's a long game, One step at a time. Bias of all kinds is common in our entire species. The fact that you can speak here and while you'll sometimes see a negative response, that your allowed to speak is a sign of a step in the right direction. You substantiate and provide a rational argument. You do it again and again and eventually you'll create a ripple effect were you might have convinced 2 who convinced another 2 and so on and so forth.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:39 PM
2

Your the idiot conflating correlation with causation and using bias to make an unsubstantiated claim.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 06:49 PM
3

And people wonder why ardent tribalistic opposition a.k.a bias occurs when all it would take is self-reflection.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 05:55 PM
2

I agree however to what degree of risk? If its any degree of risk then you would have to accept that women have the right to abort at any point with no restriction. And then there's also the issues of privacy involved in having to require a women to substantiate a risk, which I think she should have to as she's the one with agency in this context. And none of this is actually substantiated as a constitutional right meaning that leaving the states to legislate it can lead to some states denying w…
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 02:32 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/vmhkg1/when_opportunity_arises/ I attempted to get a discussion going to form an organized plan. I don't care if I get credit, if there is already an attempt I would like it to be pointed out to me.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 02:13 PM
8

Each side has points that should be addressed, the mother, the father and the unborn child are all humans whose right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness should be addressed and respected. However due to the biological realities of pregnancy it gets complicated. Many pro-lifers effectively discuss it as if you shouldn't even be allowed to kill for self-defense. However pro-choice often ignore the mothers agency and accountability while denying the father and child's rights.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 02:07 PM
4

His push for ranked choice and open primaries is so important for this country that I don't care about any other of his policies, though most of them I like as well. Ranked choice voting and open primaries mean that even if he/party disappoint us it would be easy to replace them with those that are more trustworthy.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:59 PM
4

If you were to actually pay attention to how often this is said, You might realize this is likely a self fulfilling prophecy.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:55 PM
1

https://www.forwardparty.com/platform
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:54 PM
8

That's the point, A woman failing to understand that a man being circumcised is a legal, socially acceptable method of genital mutilation is either a disingenuous manipulator or un-empathetic who hasn't/can't think deeply on the subject. The reverse is also true. Hence, it's constructive to point to them who complain and don't understand socialized FGM to how MGM is. The discussion can be telling of who it is your actually having a debate with and whether there was a point in debating or you nee…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:25 PM
9

That's a failure of empathy, I'm not attempting to be insulting btw. Genital or body mutilation are generic non-sex specific violations of body autonomy. While it can be expressed differently depending on the genitals of the person it can still be deconstructed to a generalized fundamental experience to help you understand the feelings and thoughts of another based on the shared aspects of what on the surface seems to be unrelated, unshared experiences.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:20 AM
0

Who cares? Why does her appearance matter more than her words? Your committing the same "sin" as feminists justifying your sexism with their sexism, perpetuating the conflict rather than being constructive and helping find a resolution. IDGF what you categorize yourself as, you define yourself by your actions. This is a good example of the pot calling the kettle black.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 09:06 AM
4

Humans in general are so self-centered and arrogant that they'd rather constructed and enforce a false narrative on reality than understand reality itself. Reality is convoluted and once you began to think about it you begin to realize you can't "know" anything. Any knowledge you have is a best guess that can be supported by experimental measurements however it's entire possible that while your theory makes sense in documented measured experiments, that in different context it shows that somethi…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 05:34 AM
2

I'm tired of everyone's bullshit, I'd hoped I could escape feminisms sexist Idiocy here but nope. ~99% of people are mentally handicapped, self centered assholes regardless of age, race or gender.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 04:34 AM
1

"then why can't you abort something that ain't conscious?" I apologize if I overestimated your grasp on the concept of relevancy and context in communication.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 05:45 PM
1

It isn't just a part of you, it's another separate, distinguishable, entity that's a part of you and I never stated that abortion should be illegal. It would be appreciated if you'd stop arguing with an imaginary construct of me in your own head and "putting words in my mouth". Your demonstrating how little of this you actually understand and instead your regurgitating the words of others you think are intelligent.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 05:39 PM
1

I'm not a pacifist you, there's self defense and it's alive but it is in fact a part of you. Your allowed to amputate are you not?
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 05:26 PM
0

The possibility of life starts at the moment two things exists. Life itself exists the moment an interaction occurs that express the function of life and yes a fetus has a parasitic relationship with its host.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 05:14 PM
1

Cancer is alive, however its a genetic mutation of your own cells that exists in a parasitic relationship with its host. Life starts at conception as it is a function with the purpose of developing a life however abortion can be justified for the same reason self-defense can despite killing being killing.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 04:48 PM
-1

I agree but I don't intend to sit idly by and possibly have my children subjected to the same gallows I was.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 04:13 PM
1

That's what I thought but thinking about it made me realize that the consequences for her are more severe and the process could be abused by dragging it out in court. We already know what happens when you have easily abused loopholes written into the law.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 03:17 PM
1

Thinking on it, the Father should have a more constricted timetable to enable windows of informed consent on the woman's part. So if it's restricted to 1st and second Trimester then it would be restricted to first and 1/2 of second for the father to sign away rights and responsibilities. I would say the father doesn't have a say in whether the child is born post conception, however the woman is held accountable for signed contracts and her medical requests are taken on "good faith" to prevent ba…
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 03:11 PM
1

The approval requiring the signature of the mother? With allowance that would end in charges of murder and fraud if the fathers signature was not attained or sought after in a substantiated way? Woman are taken on good faith to avoid forcing poor outcomes in crisis situations while holding them accountable if they lie or do so without consent? If the father signs away his rights and the mother is the sole custodian of the "baby" then she has sole discretion. Fathers would likely need to predeter…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:15 PM
1

I'd like to consult with lawyers in order to construct a legally viable document then have the signing be organized state by state so that it can be used in state specific context while also being used in national context.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:53 PM
1

I'm not a well educated in a medical context so I'm open to debate but my presupposition is, Allowing abortion in physical terms for women and legally/financially for both, while holding both accountable for signed contracts. 1st and 2nd trimester you restrict it to something akin to liable or slander (relative to the standard burden of proof) and restrict the charging of a crime to the parents(legal representation of a minor) that is legally require to be identified. 3rd trimester you create a …
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:47 PM
1

An amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both Houses of Congress, or, if two-thirds of the States request one, by a convention called for that purpose. The amendment must then be ratified by three-fourths of the State legislatures, or three-fourths of conventions called in each State for ratification. So I'd say the best course of action would be to put pressure on Congressional elections while also placing it on the state legislature, a bottom up reformation where we win over as man…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:41 PM
4

I'm not a well educated in a medical context so I'm open to debate but my presupposition is 1st and 2nd trimester you restrict it to something akin to liable or slander(burden of proof) and restrict the charging to the father(legal representation of a minor) that is legally require to be identified. 3rd trimester you create a default of the state charging the aborter, We can even create an easy, specialize court for these cases in which the signing of 2 psychologists and 2 OBGYN's who actually i…
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 01:14 PM
2

It's an impact of how and why our constitution was written in the way that it was and the impact the American revolution had on the world. Being an actual western "conservative" is being a paranoid, wary progressive and the fact that authoritarianism is disallowed in concrete terms held faithfully by many, forces our cultures to push forward but restrains it's momentum from carrying to far.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:24 PM
0

If you'd been in the middle of scoring a "home run" with a woman you'd been lustful for for ~5 years and the idiot son of a local biker gang chapter master was there with 3 of his buddies threatening to rape and murder someone and their friends, what would your response have been? Ohh and why should I take your direction as to what my priorities are? Would you care do demonstrate how your actions speak louder than your words? Though thank you for informing me of this organization. That's constru…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:08 AM
7

If they wanted equality in this specific context there would be more restrictions placed on women. I'm against a total ban on abortions, however I'm not going to fight for their privileges, denying me and my sons their liberty nor am I willing to be quiet on the liberty of my daughters being denied.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:44 AM
1

That's the reality, 2 steps forward and one step back is still going forwards. Don't get hung up on isolated cases of failure.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:31 AM
7

I find it "hilarious" that it's common for them to complain about MGTOW and often decry them as terrorists, which admittedly there are some; However any categorization has outlying cases, particularly decentralized ones that are entirely self-selecting, yet they are effectively calling for the same.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:03 AM
4

One of the hardest/most regretful parts of my history was it took me years to realize that I wished I was gay because the person I trusted/loved the most was a gay man. It really drove home how frustrating and complicated it must be to exist as a sexual minority. If I could go back I'd have an honest open discussion with him and despite me not liking it in the butt, he still would have been worth "learning" to like it. Sex is a part of a romantic relationship but it isn't the only nor even the m…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:02 AM
1

We feel, respond with thought and act. Crying solves nothing unless you have too much salt, water in your body or have debris in your eye.
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 08:26 AM
1

"parole would be more than good enough or if she is actually attempting to make up for her wrongdoing an actual trial in which she was pardoned and was found not guilty would be fine too." I didn't claim she needed much if any punishment, nor do I say anything about her sex. I don't need a "gotcha" when your capable of demonstrating your idiocy with out my help.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:50 AM
1

You should practice what you preach and think before you speak Idiot. Or are you going to substantiate your attempt at constructing an ad hominem and how this baseless attempt at an insult is relevant to this discussion at all?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:23 AM
2

I agree and this should be held as an example of what the illegalization of the sex trade causes, They've restricted supply while the demand remains the same, increasing the profits for those willing to defy legal authorities in context that denies the "workers" access to their rights.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:49 AM
1

It is the same as job compliance. It's not as if some consideration for the extreme circumstances she was in shouldn't be taken into account, however that doesn't mean that just because she was a victim that she did not help victimize others, My intuition says that parole would be more than good enough or if she is actually attempting to make up for her wrongdoing an actual trial in which she was pardoned and was found not guilty would be fine too.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:46 AM
2

Welcome to Divorce_Men. This is a sub where we can discuss the legal, financial and social issues men face in divorce. Maybe you can take your illiterate, idiotic, self-centered head and shove it up your ass.
/r/Divorce_Men23/06/22 12:04 PM
1

You think on and state her participation on the problems you both face and issue an ultimatum while talking to a divorce attorney in order to prepare for a likely outcome. She's an adult capable of making choices. To put it bluntly, You are already fighting for "her". Though "her" seems likely to be an imaginary idealized concept of her rather than who she actually is. Discuss the current problems and the possible outcomes with your children, giving her a chance to participate however don't "pul…
/r/Divorce_Men23/06/22 03:50 AM
2

You don't "make" no human is capable of understanding the intricacies of reality to the point of being able to engineer an outcome. My guess is what they mean is stating an ultimatum.
/r/Divorce_Men23/06/22 03:39 AM
0

Do you really need to have it explained to you just how toxic your sexist BS is here? Do everyone a favor and shut your idiot mouth.
/r/Divorce_Men23/06/22 03:37 AM
9

This should be reported to legal authorities, the owning of child pornography itself is illegal regardless of whether they are the creator.
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/22 01:10 PM
1

I didn't specify evolution in the specific context of our genus let alone species? This is why I said male and female rather than man and woman.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:26 AM
2

I apologize If I came off as insulting, I appreciate and condone your explanation. The issue with the feminist model of "relationships" is that it's not a relationship. Feminists attempt to claim that women are owed ownership of a man. While also managing to "animalize" both sexes by stating that "feelings" are more than a cognitive reflex and attempt to dismiss the entire reason our species became the dominant one on this planet. Masculine and Feminine are useful terms, with some baggage. Howev…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 12:31 AM
2

It conflates the two, Equality is same opportunities, Equity is the same outcomes. It seems to not understand the basics of cause and effect. Throwing a beach ball at your face and a knife at your face will not have the same effect, They like to imagine that each and every human is indistinguishable and has no pros/cons. They are attempting to hide the fact that authoritarianism is required for equity where your outcomes are decided for you rather than leaving you to your own devices. They don't…
/r/MensRights21/06/22 11:22 AM
2

Your misunderstanding the complexity of gender roles and reinforcing one of the justified complaints feminists have. Male gender role is not about "leading", Male and female gender roles have evolved to cooperate and benefit one another through behavioral specialization. A simple way of saying this is men=risk v reward, women = stability. However this the sum of actions and behaviors, "groups" don't actually exist, they are an abstract conceptualization of reality that make it easier for us to u…
/r/MensRights21/06/22 10:40 AM
1

Equality =/= equity.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 10:30 AM
4

That has far reaching consequences there are good reasons as to why sexual reproduction became the primary form of reproduction. Genderlessness sounds great until you realize that reality often require differing perspectives and behaviors in order to come closer to an approximation of truth/accuracy.
/r/AntiFeminists21/06/22 10:08 AM
2

This is likely not to occur given the standard feminine tactic of being the shadow or consul of the ruler, They are getting frustrated mostly due to their own idiocy and not realizing that reducing male power is reducing their own power. This is further exacerbated by MGTOW, they are being denied the role of power management/directing that our species had "negotiated".
/r/MensRights21/06/22 02:26 AM
2

Again assumptions, assumptions, assumptions. This was constructive criticism, It wasn't fair for another to assume you were categorized particularly since in our modern context categorization has effectively become meaningless. Is a feminist those who claim that title or those who fit its definition and which definition? Does a categorization define you or are you a factor in the categorizations definition? The entire reason I called you a dingbat was to create an empathetic response where you u…
/r/AntiFeminists21/06/22 02:21 AM
1

That's a fairly rude assumptive response that is un-constructive.... Dingbat. My suggestion would be to improve your reading skills and given the fact that his own words were limited to a statement of them quoting another if you had questions ask. Rather than responding in insulting hostility.
/r/AntiFeminists21/06/22 01:10 AM
1

Sucks to be you lol, as a fellow contrarian, having freedom often leaves you feeling aimless.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 04:21 AM
1

Many/Most Women wanted the benefits of being masculine once birth control largely eliminated the downsides of the inherent and defining female sex role without losing the benefits "they" "negotiated" over time, This is an example of how many women are falling into the trap of and encouraging "toxic" masculinity while largely erasing positive femininity and promoted its toxic aspects.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 01:21 AM
13

Okay? I don't think he was being literal, which to be fair to you, people should avoid the exaggerations in "figures of speech". A more apt description would be the majority of women treat men like some people treat dogs. They see men as useful tools or cute play things not worthy of empathy and demand obedience with threats, acts of violence, replacement and withdrawing psychological/biological acts of affection. This isn't uncommon nor is this an issue unique to woman. They just make up more o…
/r/MensRights18/06/22 11:09 AM
1

fault /fôlt/ noun 2. responsibility for an accident or misfortune. Technically speaking a victim is inherently at "fault" which means this term is over general and doesn't have the specific connotation people think it does. For your claim ,the victim to not be at fault, would require it to be define as a F(fault)=>C(cause)%. Infantilizing others and not educating them as to ways they can control and improve their life and instead attempting to.... what? Moralize the Immoral? "victim blaming" Is …
/r/MensRights18/06/22 07:05 AM
19

Nice, half telling a truth, to lie by omission and assume he was speaking of all women, or is that a way we have to change language, a new form of verb that directly indicates the expression of the average of a categorization? Ave-Noun? You may not be that way, but you are not all women and not all women are you.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 06:44 AM
14

There are multiple factors that convolute the issue at hand, though, that's typical of the reality of our cognition operating on the relativity of measurement. Speaking on a group is speaking on the average or sum total of that group, it is a generalization. A group is constructed by a set of individuals, yet the total of the groups actions are intentionally a sum of their actions. So a "group" is an emergent phenomena that both does and doesn't exist. In the case of feminism, it is not an "outl…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 06:45 PM
1

Mathematics is an abstraction of cause and effect. reality can be explained in mathematics. I concur however it is difficult to be specific on topic of a group, do you go by the actions? self identification? objective property? Is feminism diverse? are all feminist bad? Are all feminists good? What makes a feminist a feminist? I concur that we should create more define public categorizations and that public awareness would be beneficial but any "group" is inherently a generalization.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 01:39 PM
0

Yeah that's kind of my point, The assertion that there is "a" or a few reasons as to why reality is the way it is, is nothing short of ignorance, If any one here can substantiate the discover or draw a rational hypothesis on what/were the center of reality is, I'm all ears. These social reforms are ways of investing in your community and as capitalism operates on the basis that a free market will on average create win/win scenario's, He's dismissing the simple fact that it takes money to make mo…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:47 AM
3

https://www.youtube.com/c/breakingpoints , I'm unfamiliar with the term kimmelism, Most of his comments on flaws of "manosphere" are similar to the flaws in any equality movement, drawing people who seek to use it as a facade for personal benefit and attempt to establish supremacy for personal benefit in order to "rectify" victimization perceptions, real, imagined or influenced. He made consistent accusations of intent where none was stated nor implied and failed to elaborate many of his supposi…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:32 AM
6

I concur but I find it encouraging as this was a source posted by Breaking Points, We're finally getting the beginning seeming begrudging acknowledgement from media. Much of his criticism was deserved if over exaggerated and as long as we speak up and do not allow easy lies of omission, it makes me feel somewhat confident that well conducted debate can and will be had, particularly give much of the reactionary nature of MRA involvement, as well as indicating there may be productive "PR" and goal…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 01:01 AM
-1

That's a ignorant oversimplification, what's the economic status as well as perceived security in said status relation to crime, violence, mental health problems? Healthcare? Financial security aka pension? Why is capitalism such a good economic structure?
/r/MensRights08/06/22 12:51 AM
1

Tl:DR? Skipped through and yet you claim capable of substantiating how little he said? I wonder where we've seen this lackadaisical attitude elsewhere and its predictively destructive ends......
/r/MensRights08/06/22 12:00 AM
2

Not always but it's a useful narrative for them to use to manipulate others
/r/MensRights01/06/22 07:48 AM
2

Have her face the cam and state "I ______ consent to _____." Like to see the courts state that it wasn't consensual and try to worm out of the fact that you have recordings of every moment speaking with her, you could also just shut them off if you want to risk it.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 03:29 AM
4

Having body cams? You'd have recordings of any and all interactions in public that belong to you, which eliminates attempted obstruction.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 10:32 PM
6

It's not just feminists nor is this unique to them, they are just one of the latest extravagant publicly supported version of self-centered, conformation biased, supremacy moral grandstanding organizations. Feminism is a very modern relevant example of how seductive and damaging supremacy can be, it's often a response to victimization when they begin to raise their voice and realize they do have power, people forget the context of Nazism, Germans became a republic after being encouraged by the e…
/r/MensRights31/05/22 08:28 PM
2

I don't 100% disagree with you, nothing exists in isolation, better himself, his Girlfriend's life and families life would dictate careful consideration as revenge begets revenge, We aren't capable of reading minds making intent rather subjective to our own perception, as well as the general human lack of self-understanding. His cousin will likely continue to play a role in their lives and him discussing and being open to his girlfriend, as to how he would help literally teach her a lesson, woul…
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:44 PM
2

My point was that, as many masculine people understand, that help isn't always kind. Is he supposed to educate himself on psycho-therapy, offer her services for free, while also devoting what would likely be a large portion of his life to her, thereby denying that percentage of his life to others? Or to "teach her a lesson" through reserved thoughtful means and not treat her like a child incapable of understanding the world, making her own choices and needing a custodian?
/r/MensRights28/05/22 05:41 AM
3

It's a toss up, reality is that growth is spurred by witnessing or more often the personal act of overcoming obstacles, so while I agree our prison system is atrocious and ineffective not demonstrating her violent abhorrent behavior has consequences for herself will likely lead to her continuing this behavior. Forgiveness is the opposite of helpfulness, your allowing them to continue their delusional perspective of reality and stifling their growth potential and it's likely that others will reci…
/r/MensRights28/05/22 05:12 AM
-12

Ohh yes, because your going to do the reverse of feminism and use misandry of one to justify misogyny against another?
/r/MensRights28/05/22 05:05 AM
2

I concur, I should have expressed my agreement more clearly.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 03:39 PM
3

If they actually gave a shit about the physical strength they'd have something akin to a bench press test in interview and have a non-gendered threshold however this completely ignores the fact that strength has very, very, very little to do with violence and in fact if you look at murders and serial assaulters in general you'll see a common theme of them being physically inferior to the average for their environment and often it's the bulling and social derision that they almost universally hav…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 01:45 PM
1

Y=1, X=3, X+Y=4, X+X=6. Its incredibly simple differing components result in a differing outcome.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 03:08 AM
0

Yes? Though this is a complicated question because as a man I am defined by the genes that make me a man, so being a women would make me not me anymore.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 11:35 PM
0

I didn't whine nor did I make a claim other than "Ehhh, its hard to have an opinion".
/r/MensRights25/05/22 01:07 PM
4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07PZ6fyS\_Bo
/r/MensRights25/05/22 12:47 PM
0

In wales? How the fuck am I supposed to know the laws in wales? Is a US citizen allowed to access this? Don't bother answering, Idgf Wow, It's just great seeing MRA sub falling to the same faith based, ideological, irrational shit swallowing of feminism. Not one actual substantiated argument just attempts to hurt my feelings.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 12:46 PM
61

I heard a good point that someone else brought up, this is good for any and all DV victims as it paints light on the degree of gaslighting and projection that abusers commit against the victim. The entire sexist painting of DV was absurd and has resulted in fraudulent, inaccurate and lessened research into the issue. While I understand and support our focus on Men's rights, (it's in our name lol) It's important that breakdown of the absurdity of bigotry happen and be addressed. The continued iso…
/r/MensRights25/05/22 12:04 PM
0

1.But how much effort was put into making travel less effort? The difference being the source, You should be your own authoritarian leader not allowing others or simplistic animalistic parts of your neurology to be your authoritarian leader.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 05:21 AM
3

Your both right? There should be research done, both quantifying this taking sex into account and not into account and then having the studies be related to each other to further specify and deepen accuracy on why people don't take accountability so we have an objective accurate answer to this question.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 12:34 AM
1

That first woman is a fairly good example of what the consequences of self-improvement tend to be and why masculine men and women need to be reached out to and given help, though there also the fact that feminine men and women need to know the consequences of their own way of thinking.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 12:27 AM
1

If laziness is the drive, care to explain why the compression of energy expenditure in an act results in more acts being added?
/r/MensRights24/05/22 02:55 PM
0

The logic of your rationality is questionable as focusing on the steps in front of you is identifying that the big picture isn't just a thing, it's made of smaller more manageable parts. Its not intentional so much as an emergent phenomena of our cognitive function. Also the past context is why humans main 2nd genetic superiority is in distance travel, most species cannot travel over land anywhere close to the distance we can. Our Neurological system is also incredibly malleable and we developed…
/r/MensRights24/05/22 01:06 PM
1

I realize this is a joke, but January 29, 1886 was when the car was invented, our "species" (we are in fact a hybrid species) has existed for ~300,000 years. This only proves my point, it took a long way to the car; If they'd gotten obsessed with the struggle of literary walking from continent to continent we'd still be stuck in central Africa in small numbers if we even still existed.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 11:53 AM
1

I somewhat concur? Though I detest the current law structure being company ownership of employees, its effectively a form of slavery where you get to choose your owner. He didn't speak on behalf of the company nor did he "represent the company" given he owns no part of it despite being responsible for creating its product/service.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 11:21 AM
3

Probably, all we can do is keep pushing forward, getting one step closer or sit down, cry, and waste away accomplishing nothing. It is constructive to set an example and educate, even your tragedies are warnings. Perfection is an infinite distance away but every step forward brings us closer.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 09:29 AM
-29

Ehhh, its hard to have an opinion from a economically outrage incentivized media outlet that has an unknown, unmeasurable "telephone" problem. From the article it's likely however that would require context as to who and how this information was attained.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 09:21 AM
4

Never forgive, never forget. Even now, while they may not have been responsible for the entirety of my suffering, the compounding and isolation they enforced on me and became reinforced as I realize just how pointless it was to wait or even ask for help from even my parents... was.. eye opening? However it was also the driving force behind why I intend to never allow another to experience that Isolation. Now, despite my Ex-wife's lack of accountability and attempts to alienate me from my childre…
/r/MensRights24/05/22 07:26 AM
2

We're are already beginning to see a shift, while it is now negative for us, they are beginning to awaken and understand the basic reality of cooperation, we can accomplish more together than what we can apart and each accomplishment makes future accomplishment easier allowing a choice for greater accomplishments or more lackadaisicalness and the only real demand should be participation.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 05:20 AM
3

No, in order to create a zero sum game we'd have to increase our own contribution to the problem, hence why I approve of MGTOW, let them suffer the inevitable consequence of creating a negative sum for society while focusing on ourselves, effectively creating our own society.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 05:16 AM
6

Thank you for educating me on the definition of the terms, it explains some of the confusion I've had in communication.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 04:23 AM
-11

Misogyny doesn't require the intent of hate, it's a bias on women. Though this is complicated by the fact our neurological system functions off bias. He should have been fired as an employee, he is a part of the company, the rule was already stated. He is part of the companies definition, however he should have the right to free speech and he has started a valid conversation however his bias should be addressed. If he had started off with this video I'd be against his firing as while technically…
/r/MensRights24/05/22 04:01 AM
15

Which just shows an example of just because one facet of your logic is flawed doesn't mean the entirety of your logic is flawed; hence the importance of freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 03:21 AM
-4

He does have a good point though he had a poor expression in the tweets and made the mistake of assuming wants based on gender. His argument is solid and beneficial for both sexes.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 03:19 AM
1

Yeah, lets not make the mistake of feminism, Nazi's, KKK etc. and attempt to make the ignorant claim that this is an us v them, zero sum game.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 03:15 AM
2

It's hard to quantify and would require data collection that wasn't and isn't done to create an object relative measurement. Side note- This sub doesn't believe in censorship asking questions is generally appreciated as it helps us discuss our own thoughts and also gives us a more clear understanding of external thoughts as well as refining our own stances.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 03:08 AM
4

If its 100,000,000 steps to your destination, don't obsess about what's left. Every step forwards reduces that number. Take joy in every step closer "you've" gotten.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 02:57 AM
4

Yep, particularly since wealth itself is a relative concept. The hilarious thing is the entire reason why women tend to place so much emphasis on wealth is because they have developed biological desires for it and have evolved to seek it from men who evolved to attain wealth to attain women.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 08:17 PM
12

Thank you for showing me and others that this isn't a hopeless cause, though I would say not all privileges are given, they can be earned. The fact that you care enough to talk this way and are concerned on rights that are not directly your rights shows an amount of morality you should take pride in.
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 07:14 PM
8

Power is a fairly generic term for having more leverage in a context.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 06:56 PM
12

He's a blatant misogynistic asshole as well as an idiot.
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 04:34 PM
6

It's not that simple, there are no simple answers. That isn't how reality works. Even the historical, literal patriarchies, in which the name of the child was handed down from the name of the man, were born from the negotiated socialization of men and women. The main issue now had is that women on average due to the paranoia derived from their neuroticism, have begun to see the benefits of risk taking behaviors of men on average, while wanting to renegotiate gaining the benefits of this risk tak…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 04:34 AM
4

Choo! Choo! motherf*cker! lol
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:19 AM
3

It's not that nobody wanted that. Femininity is the average of psychological traits of women, masculinity the average of men. The "simple" reality is its not simple. There are men and women who would like to be the classic stay at home "wife", and men and women who want a stay at home "wife". Its destructive and immoral to base anything on an egregiously ignorant biased concept of a group. There are women who see it as beneficial to give men authoritarian control, and those who want to be the au…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 12:23 AM
3

Its also possible your service provider has a log of ip request/transactions that could prove your communication.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 12:07 AM
4

Do you back up your communication attempts? To at least ensure you can prove attempts to communicate? Having a third party server saving the code involved with an email as well as Ip connections/requests may be beneficial.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 12:01 AM
8

This is a chicken or the egg argument not understanding that's is fairly irrelevant to matters at hand. Masculinity is what it is because of femininity and femininity is what it is because of masculinity. "Men" are the center of the world because that's what women demand of them. Women want "real men" and yet want to be absolved of the of responsibility and outcomes of the negatives this sexism creates. Your deluded and participating in self-sabotaging inconsistent, disproven theories with dire …
/r/MensRights22/05/22 11:18 PM
1

The point was to make you "roughly" experience, what I experienced lol.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 10:02 PM
3

Feminist theory is contradictory and denies reality, and what little substantiation it does have is based on confirmation bias, the simple fact is that breasts are sexual, and natural selection has led to it being desirable to men and a source of envy/competition for women and due to it being a physical property related to procreation, regardless of your "feelings" or thoughts, your brain is literally wired to pay attention to them.
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/22 09:54 PM
1

*That is one run-on sentence you have there, bub.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:45 AM
5

Likely both? There are reasons moral grandstanding is a common behavior amongst our species.
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/22 07:04 AM
9

Its attention grabbing
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/22 06:16 AM
22

It's the classic "woe is me, we are weak powerless woman, please save us!" ploy.
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/22 06:12 AM
3

Your doing it now, your questioning your actions and thoughts and considering its effect on your goals/morality. Keep at it. Find places/people that are willing to listen to you and not presume and reiterate the abuse you've faced.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 02:07 AM
2

My supposition would be that asking "What influence do involuntary celibate(this reduces the influence of slang) communities have on hate crimes?" would be appropriate. It's an open question that doesn't suppose its answer.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 01:21 AM
2

Use specific non-manipulated terms that you've laid out and defined. Substantiate your hypothesis, your answer is only worth as much as your question. Its difficult to point towards a group given your and others conflation of incel and hate groups, the relation is correlative not causal, and the term has been intentionally manipulated and generalized to a point of meaninglessness. Don't assume a conclusion that's not how the scientific method works. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bia…
/r/MensRights22/05/22 12:40 AM
2

No wonder you've been unsuccessful with women, I'm sure that's not the only kind of isolated loneliness you experience.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:41 PM
-2

That's largely anecdotal. I'm literal I said what I meant and meant what I said. Use a dictionary for words you don't know or ask questions. Reality is incredibly convoluted.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 01:53 PM
-1

faith /fāTH/ Learn to pronounce noun 1. complete trust or confidence in someone or something.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 01:46 PM
-7

It's complicated? Its not direct hate most of the time so much as natural selection creating dehumanization of men being standard(male disposability), It's not uncommon for women when given a chance to realize the sexism they've based their opinions on. The hard part is women on average are better at manipulative facades creating difficulty in identifying women wallowing in negative femininity. Combined with the influence culture has on them given the heuristic and bias reality of our cognitive …
/r/MensRights21/05/22 12:44 PM
7

https://www.schlissellawfirm.com/prostitution-charges-against-sixteen-year-old-dismissed-2/
/r/MensRights21/05/22 05:10 AM
1

It's CT's and no, I'm sure there are cases of active discrimination however this more a consequence of Feminism's effect on culture, law and the way they determine pay incentives. This is a consequence of the collectivist thinking of feminism in which a group defines individuals rather than the reality of individuals defining a group. They are literal Neo-Nazi's who see consequences and justice only in group terms, justifying discrimination and violence to better their group. While also not unde…
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/22 11:04 PM
3

10+-5+-8+-1+-4= -8 there may be positive aspects of this equation but its sum is still negative.
/r/AntiFeminists19/05/22 10:01 PM
4

Btw if you find what I said insulting and choose to dismiss it, that shows a lack of self-reflection and thoughtfulness that leads to lack of accountability and inferiority. You don't need to have faith in my words but I'd like to remind you the Nazi's main goal was to better the lives of Germans. However that isn't what they were remember for and it's telling that the complicated factors that lead to their rise and the acceptance/hidden realities of their atrocities isn't taught and the "histor…
/r/AntiFeminists19/05/22 09:58 PM
4

My parents, News, Feminist organizations, My ex-wife, Democratic party, "friends", classmates, family court, DCF, teachers etc. I realize not all feminists fail to live up to their own definition however this leads into the issue of feminist propaganda and the intellectual flaws of our species. The fact that it hasn't dawned on you personally shows that you've buried your head in the sand or willful ignorance.
/r/AntiFeminists19/05/22 09:52 PM
5

Nice narrow-minded view, It's a product of more than toxic masculinity. And "feminists" are largely racist, sexist, collectivist garbage idiots. They don't even fit their own definition, the claim of equality goals is little more than a facade, they are literal groups of neo-Nazi's who place their supremacy concepts on women rather than Germans and view men as inhuman animals. They are an epitome of toxic femininity, self-center, self-aggrandizing, generalizing, manipulation of language, social …
/r/AntiFeminists19/05/22 08:30 PM
3

It's a good place to discuss Men's issues which isn't considered a zero sum game. The main source of conflict is feminism being sex oriented Neo-Nazism. It's not that woman are bad or that feminism hasn't done good for women, it's just that it didn't consider consequence of its sexist supremacist ideology and propaganda. We(at least I do) try to maintain a focused equalitarian stance. If anything it would be nice to influence feminism and have it live up to its own definition, rather than confli…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 09:51 PM
2

Hmmm, I wonder where we've seen these actions before and what eventual results where?....
/r/MensRights18/05/22 08:08 AM
1

This is a recap of 1920's-1980's, a triangulating conflict between Authoritarianism, Collectivism and Libertarianism. We are headed for WW3 and unfortunately battle lines are largely being drawn in regards to sex. Not all woman/feminists are deluded ignorant collectivist authoritarians, however my main worry is the US once the bastion and initializing force of libertarianism has largely become authoritarian and collectivist in attempts for the oligarchic realities of our limited, degrading democ…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 06:44 AM
4

It technically exist however its use in general is so vague and subjective that its effectively meaningless. Its generally a shaming tactic as well as "marking" you as a target for society.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 05:00 AM
1

No? You shouldn't hate anyone. My definition of hate is willingness to suffer to inflict suffering. Hate leads to hate, it becomes a feedback loop of were you become an example/justification of the very actions you hate and encourage your the continuance of what you hate. Though in this case I merely meant a generic version of hate that means anger inspiring. They shouldn't be given quarter, delusional collectivist who don't understand a group collective is a theoretical simplification built out…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 05:52 AM
7

Playing word games on a subjective topic is unhelpful. Your committing the same irrational unconstructive bias "we" tend to dislike feminists for.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:19 PM
0

This is an example of how self-centered capatalistic goals encourage discrimination, to reduce the influence or power of a particular group in the community, making them relatively weaker enabling greater exploitation. We've been done this road once before, let's not let it get to the point were violence is the most constructive response again. (Im not against capitalism entirely, in general it's a sane market policy, however nothing is perfect and refusing to address inherent problems opens it …
/r/MensRights05/05/22 03:43 PM
0

authoritarian au·thor·i·tar·i·an /əˌTHôrəˈterēən/ adjective favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority, especially that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 10:24 PM
0

Reread my statement. When did I proclaim advocation being authoritarian? Did I dispute the reality of the necessity of social contracts that are commonly referred to as laws? I was disputing where the focus on the issue should be; My hypothesis on why and a solution. I can't argue with someone who's attempting to argue with an imaginary fictional version of myself.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 10:21 PM
-1

Law is inherently authoritarian. Of course it unavoidable given the imperfection of our species, it denies the the unrealistic utopia of anarchy. I was in fact pointing towards a likely reaction and stance. You also didn't address my statement of your suggestion is functionally temporary. I realize my solution is not 100% in success rate however I can really think of anything that actually is given the sheer convoluted calculation needed. I also did not state that you were entirely wrong only an…
/r/MensRights30/04/22 06:56 PM
-2

It's feeding into a feedback loop, by forcing your concept of morality on others your encouraging and setting example for others to enforce their concept of morality. I am an agnostic atheist however a simple description of my sense of morality is "Do to others what you want them to do to you." Revenge from your perspective drives a desire for revenge from another perspective. I realize your conclusion of the necessity of law change is sound however it fails to consider the source of current and…
/r/MensRights30/04/22 07:21 AM
-1

Well it's the standard benefit of specialization, differing skills are more or less applicable in differing contexts. It's not strictly about a man and woman, more of a "masculine" or guardian and a "feminine" or nurturing figure build a life together. Of course evolution has create a differing distribution for these traits. Meaning the straight relationship, a man and a woman is an easily understood, simple approximation to what is actually at work. Of course I'm not discounting your position m…
/r/MensRights30/04/22 06:17 AM
2

Care to explain why?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/22 12:18 AM
2

We should be more concerned with abolishing the draft than pushing an evil to address an evil.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/22 10:24 PM
-2

I am going my own way, I will not commit violence, I do not wish to be god-king as its counter productive towards my goal of human "ascension". Its why I spend time talking to people and attempt to refine my own ideas and theirs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/22 06:18 PM
0

An organization is not the fundamental unit of measurement for our species. The individual isn't either however that's convoluted and suffers from diminishing returns where increased accuracy of understanding requires more energy to process thus also requiring more time. I am not opposing the organization of men to advocate for us all. However feminism has already displayed the trap and problems of the collectivist thinking, has when it comes into conflict with reality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/22 06:17 PM
0

I never made a ludicrous demonstrably false claim to the effect of "feminist" groups living up to espoused and scribed definition of the word. You guilty of the same wordplay bullshit many hate Feminazi's for.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 04:12 PM
0

Could you be more specific? I say what I mean and mean what I say. A synopsis would be that in order to tackle men's issue we need to address bias in psychology, to ensure that your treated as you and that your path and destination in life is ultimately up for you to decide.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/22 04:07 PM
-1

Okay given our understanding and accurate assessment of atomic mechanics, Why can we not measure every atomic particle involved in the construction of a human body and calculate the theoretical interactions they would have with it's environment? We have ~37.2 trillion cells and every cell is made of ~300 trillion atoms. Atoms aren't even the fundamental components, there are atomic particles such as the proton and neutron; Then there's the electron which thankfully manages to fit inside a thresh…
/r/MensRights29/04/22 05:22 AM
-1

Fick du, collectivist idiot. You and I are x/y yet we are ourselves and not the same??? You realize that this framework is far more convoluted than your understanding? It's also possible for 2 things to match in every dimensional measurement yet be different objects due to a single differing measurement? Then there's the issue of whether or not that is a fundamental(indivisible) measurement. Your full of bullshit, no-one is a blank slate but humans benefit greatly from being far more of a blank …
/r/MensRights29/04/22 04:09 AM
-1

You are not defined by an organization you participate in, you become a factor in the organization's definition. It's so nice of you to be guilty of the same ignorance based sexism of self-proclaimed feminist groups.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 03:51 AM
-1

conflagration *Conflation. We can work with each other; Particularly since masculinity and femininity are averages of sexually defined categories. It's more of a needed realization and acceptance of a feminine person being more suited to certain tasks and masculine for others. And not applying a sexist bias, instead judging a person by their actions not the actions of others. I will accept no sexism regardless of direction or source.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 03:05 AM
-5

I was arguing the success our species has experienced is largely due to the success of feminine and masculine thinking/personality traits. So an argument that men and women can't work together is ignorant. As well as pointing to your conflagration of correlative and causal relations.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 02:35 AM
-5

It's not as if us becoming a dominant species via natural selection largely due to our specialized and convoluted cognitive functions and sexually structured reproduction worked better than asexual reproduction while retaining large overlaps making the main to nearly entire difference a question of probability has been a consistent success including our own success...
/r/MensRights29/04/22 01:53 AM
-16

What do you mean by man and women? People often tend to attach correlative probabilistic properties to a fairly simple largely overlapping concept. In humans it's by evolutionarily "engineering" "design" we tend to be X/X or X/Y. X/X is what we call women, X/Y is what we call men. Full stop, there are very few unique exclusive genetic expressions. Gender advocates tend to make the mistake of attaching gender to sex, there is a correlative relation due to sex being a categorization of chromosomal…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/22 01:28 AM
1

If she's unwilling to actually accept her power which is fundamentally limited by our existence and to ourselves; given our inability to calculate all of reality to engineer reality via it's seeming deterministic nature by the currently universal observation of cause and effect; Then unless you can understand the fundamentals of your own arguments and she is unwilling to understand her and takes things on faith than you can't argue with her. Her beliefs will be inconsistent and she is completely…
/r/MensRights29/04/22 01:03 AM
1

I'm not meaning to be insulting, merely sharing my own opinion on the subject. I thank you for putting light to a potential, ongoing reduction in sexism in psychological medical aid. We have a sex independent measurement structure of personality, The big 5 model that can be further broken down, though I don't remember exactly what It was called so I'm certainly not the greatest source. It speaks to being unconcerned with the correlative aspect of sex and discover exactly what internal personalit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/22 07:43 AM
1

Idk, I've only read a few and developed a wiki addiction XD. I enjoyed the horus heresy series and gaunts ghost, the grey knights and the space wolves omnibuses were also quite enjoyable.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:32 AM
1

Its a good example of humans doing what they think is right and good out of percieved necessity on an individual scale; That strengthens the very enemy it fights. The warp being a reflection of the collective psyche of all living beings. They are what they are because they are defined by everyone's thoughts and actions. Anthema being a good example of the imperfection inherent in cognition, imperfection of any path being a "trap", to simply see a flaw in the path forward is not automatically pro…
/r/MensRights27/04/22 01:23 AM
0

Yeah he's probably the best example of what I was referencing. My "flowery casual" explanation didn't or at least wasn't intended to assign blame; However I edited in order to make that more clear and I appreciate you pointing that out.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 12:22 AM
0

Thank you for more or less reiterating my statement? I agree with what you've stated; However the issue I take is your statement would have to be taken on faith as it's a conclusion with no reference to how you came to that conclusion. I could tell people what to think but that's fairly unhelpful unless I'm anointed god-emperor, I can at least provide an example of how to think.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 11:52 PM
1

Okay, explain to me how you decide what should be done without knowing the truth of the matter?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 11:17 PM
0

I'm not entirely sure which instigated which, however I'm fairly confidant both are rooted in the same fundamental ignorance. Reality is "complicated", You a human are made of ~37.2 trillion cells, which each cell is made up of ~300 trillion atoms. Its fairly "simple" however that's a lot of interactions to account for. If your confused on what a word means and what concept I'm attempting to communicate; There are online dictionaries available. I perhaps should have been more specific to avoid t…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 10:37 PM
-9

Ohh well, thank you? Of course everyone is perfect; My misspelling of a word that's pronounced the same as what I typed, is incredibly indicative of my intelligence. There's only a singular possibility as to why that event occurred as it did. I also couldn't have possibly thought you were calling me an idiot. Making a truthful statement is a boast? Of course I'm unwilling and unable to present "proof" at present or in reality a demonstration of the accuracy of my statement to factual events.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 10:27 PM
-1

?? Is this a reference to anything in particular? Does it make a statement?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 09:26 PM
-12

Very explanatory, would your care to debate the value of the 138 iq score I got in the 3rd grade? Unfortunately I've yet to get my updated cognitive/psychological tests. So I can't claim a more recent measurement of my cognitive function.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 09:24 PM
-9

Sex in human is dichotomous, its reference to one of the two standard "non-mistaken" structures of chromosomes. To be misogynist is to be misandric and vice versa. You seem to be confusing correlation with causation. I also wasn't speaking to what instigated the sexist attitudes of society mere pointy to the feedback loop the Us v Them mentality causes. I'd also advise not pulling the stupidity of many self-proclaimed feminists of putting words in my mouth and arguing against an imaginary concep…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 07:19 PM
-26

Its not that simple and fundamentally its not about men, so much as men are convenient targets of oppression due to our species ignorance. Men can "justifiably" be enslaved, due to people not really understanding the basic concepts of morality and that revenge is appealing yet a continuation of a feedback loop. People are far too overly concerned with emotions, they have these mystical "metaphysical" concepts of what amounts to cognitive reflexes. Widespread misogyny begot widespread misandry, v…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 03:52 PM
3

It is literally slavery, conditional sure. Just because your willing to fight for this country in emergency situations doesn't give you the right to force others. However the state believes it has the right to your life and death for its own cause. It would be "nice" if our country actually held to its principles. However this requires a lot of work and restructuring many things towards already existing goals. Decentralization, to create a bottom up form of Government. Your mayor/town council sh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/22 03:29 PM
26

You realize this justifies treating blacks as racist, violent murders and whites as moral saviors? 🤣
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/22 06:10 PM
3

So your argument is that a proper reaction to their illogical toxic "crimes" is to do the same? You'd like to become a male version of the very "evil" we are opposing?
/r/MensRights25/04/22 03:26 PM
1

Its fairly simple, its an entity working to the same goal that's open to debate. No one's perfect so assuming your way is perfect and can't be improved in any way is arrogant ignorant denial of reality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/22 03:07 PM
1

What a pile of sexist bs
/r/MensRights25/04/22 04:30 AM
-6

Tbf if you'd like to reconstruct anothers experience you have to communicate and then deconstruct your own experiences to reconstruct an approximation. It's also ignorant when you differentiate experiences by group categorizations. You need to break it down to shared fundamental universal components. Sexism=Racism etc fundamentally its the same, a bias. Being judged not on your actions, who you are but by the actions of others that belong to a group they conceive of you belonging too while them …
/r/MensRights25/04/22 01:57 AM
1

I appreciate any and all honest debate. I am not capable of conceiving everything, to answer a question I have to ask it first😂
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/22 05:00 PM
1

Tldr-If your a Christian you'll recognize the line of "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Is an objective logical conclusion to the question, what is morality?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/22 02:12 PM
2

I did, nice reading comprehension.biff there's anything I'd need to reiterate for tour understanding please ask.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/22 01:50 PM
1

That may have been its attempt but an object is and only can be differentiated by the differing abstacted quantities of its measurable properties. Its logical conclusion is that no one is exactly the same and therefore you cannot apply the same basic attitude/concept towards a person without gross innacurate oversimplification. A Black person is not just a Black person, this hypothetical person may be a black woman but ahe is not juat a black woman but a Nigerian black woman.. etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/22 07:52 AM
1

I agree with this ,the questions were mostly rhetorical. We are capable of understanding and applying the universal fundamental concept of cause and effect. Capable of applying subjective purpose to our existence when objectively we are nothing more than complicated constructs. each and every human is essentially a metaphorical neuron of reality. I wish to live as I wish to live. Yet I am a single human in a universe so large we cannot even interact with its theoretical end due to the speed cons…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/22 07:41 AM
1

We are "robots", constructed mostly out of carbon, though I'm not all that knowledgeable on the average nor mode atomic structure of a human; with incredibly complicated and trial and error produce programming. Emotions are incredibly generlized inaccurate cognitive reflexes that are useful tools for establishing cognitive direction on us however to imagine that they are some magical or mystical thing is absurd ignorance. When i saw ignorance I do not intend to be degrading, I myself am all "too…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/22 06:01 AM
1

The only things I can say is to be as self-aware as you can, while developing a concrete goal. What is it about women that your afraid of? What could you have done to prevent your victimization? Is it women your afraid of or is it just a bias on women your own experience has placed on you? Attempt to communicate and be rational and open to experiences with what you have an irrational fear of, it's likely to reform the neurological reflex caused by your object of fear.This is all rhetorical so yo…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 03:39 AM
2

Why are emotions important outside a rational understanding of them and of using them to form a rational conclusion?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/22 02:57 AM
4

You'd have to fundamentally change our education system or at least social parenting advice, encouraging self-awareness and teaching people their feelings are essentially the animalistic part of their consciousness. Women often fall into an issue where they lie to themselves and the world what it is they are looking for in a romantic partner while simultaneously giving too much importance to a generalized, biased, evolutionarily sculpted neurological reflex, their emotions. Women in paticular te…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/22 02:42 AM
-3

Its a description of the complexity of reality? Any object is only an object due to the personal defining of its relavance to your specific description of an object in the context of your communication. You are a human, you are ~37.2 trillion cells, you are ~372,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 atoms. All of these are accurate however non-descriptive. Intersectionality is technically accurate however its often abused and generally suffers from conformation bias in order to justify sexist and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/22 01:43 AM
1

Yep. Thats how it works you can only be accurately described by adjectives and nouns you fit the definition of. Ohh in case your unsure, Fck those misandric sexist sht bags.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 01:18 AM
1

What is does is the only relevancy... I am an egalitarian btw so yes I am a feminist, as well as an MRA. Your quite literally being an idiot or intentionally using word play in order to obfuscate your irrationally and/or intent. I wonder what movement is commonly decried for its manipulation of words in order to justify and rally support for immoral acts? I stated that many self proclaimed feminist movements were not in fact feminist movements. I can't really make it any simpler than saying a wo…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 11:50 PM
1

Feminism is a noun.. a word. Defined as a movement for the equal rights for women. Your buying into the BS. Feminism has an objective definition in the English language, to use that word is to reference that paticular concept. I understand being angry at the sexist authoritarians that abuse the facade of feminism to obtain their goals but you declaration is irrational and leads to language being entirely pointless. For example I could call myself a just man but does that make me just? The simple…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 11:09 PM
1

Is this sarcasm or should I explain that a "word" without an objective definition is a pointless uncommunicative sound?
/r/MensRights21/04/22 10:46 PM
0

Its a losing game for them 🤣They use objective logic and data to support thier goals however it becomes readily apparent that when holding them to thier own standards they are more villians in this story. Its fairly constructive and righteous to have people speaking on behalf and helping ensure the self-determination rights of women, however this should not and cannot be done at the cost of rights to men. To commit evil is to encourage evil, no one, nothing exists in isolation. To take revenge i…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 04:38 PM
3

It's why I attempt to educate people on the realities of math. An average is the meeting point of a paticular set, a mode is the most reoccurring number in the set. The set itself is largely irrelevant to any individual "object" being measured. It's simply a way of constructing a "rational" bias. Your a woman, however that only speaks as to what your chromosomal structure is. You could be one of the rare X/X with a penis or you could be an incredibly masculine woman, your personality traits are …
/r/MensRights20/04/22 10:45 PM
0

Just because they call themselves feminists does not make them feminists. Otherwise I could.. idk.. start calling myself an attack helicopter and poof I am one. To put it bluntly your arguing that feminists that don't meet the definition of feminist are still feminists? So words mean nothing? I understand that it's how we generally have to refer to them given a lack of better terminology, though the old feminazi meme is starting to grow on me.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 10:34 PM
2

Its refreshing to see an actual feminist and not a female supremacist attempting to abuse a facade.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 10:22 PM
2

Feminism can be boiled down to its core principle, a belief in equal libertarian rights for women. The hilarity ensues when you realize most who call themselves feminist are not feminists🤣 Feminazi become a popular meme for a reason.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 08:18 PM
3

It's complicated? Do you mean the movement itself? The label? Or its individual " components" a.k.a people? Feminism as a movement doesn't fit its own definition as a misandric and misogynistic organization, labeling oneself a feminist is just fine as it's a focused subset of egalitarianism. Most feminist are largely ignorant and have been spoon fed egregious amounts of propaganda while also lacking empathy, largely due to misogynistic views on women's empathy and a fundamental misunderstanding …
/r/MensRights20/04/22 08:06 PM
2

It somewhat reminds me of when in high school a girl I'd been dating, after getting a gay man drunk and "raping" him(I'm not entirely sure how unconsenting the situation was) decided to accuse me of rape and sexual assault to society, never brought any legal charges thankfully. The hilarity of the situation is her closest friends turned on her and became my best friends, however I was treated with a casual default of disdain and threat. Many guys assaulted me out of white knighting attempts. Tha…
/r/MensRights20/04/22 04:57 PM
22

Censorship does not silence opposition, it forces your opposition into subterfuge.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 03:15 PM
12

I'd also like to point out that if you intend to, in a rational constructive manner call out and fight against misogyny... please do, sexism is not welcome here. People are people and should be judged for who not "what" they are.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 03:14 PM
2

It frames it in the fact that it's consistently demonstrated that a man asking for help just ends up "asking" for abuse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/22 11:10 PM
7

To declare another as an enemy is to create an enemy. Learn from the flaws of feminism, call out those you label themselves as feminists without attempting to live to the standards of a feminist not out of anger but out of theirown good and yours. Do the same with those who would falsely label themselves as MRA. We are all egalitarians, we have specific focuses but it's a simple matter of choosing a starting point. If you can't argue for your own point you haven't thought about it enough and you…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 03:32 PM
2

Narrow interpretation is the point, the more you break something down and explain its components the more accurately you describe the "object" your discussing. You seem to have a narrow minded stereotypical ignorance of what socialism actually is, to put it bluntly a publicly traded company is a form of socialism, where any and all who are invested in the company are entitled to act as an "owner". I wasn't discussing the oligarchy as if it was a dictiorial system, it requires flex in its members…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/22 02:08 PM
6

Welcome to the dangers of "religious" tribalistic ideological unsubstantiated thinking. Faith tends to dislike rationality.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 11:35 AM
2

it seeks to enable more oligarchic power of what amounts to our corporate shadow council. Enabling market freedom while not dealing with and continuing its defense and enablement of the monopolistic authoritarian nature of our economic system is a catch 22. Particularly since we have more direct control/power over the limited democratic nature of our government.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/22 11:28 AM
1

Progressivism is a desire to change a currently existing system, Republicans do not like the current one and are rather ubiquitous in lying about the past in order to paint a picture of the "good ol' days" despite Us constitution being structured as a progressive document; Most our founders hoped we could change issues they felt they couldn't in their current situation and the American use of conservativism is contrary to its actual definition. Progressivism and conservativism are not inherently…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/22 01:21 AM
3

The left vs right thing is largely pointless, its more of accounting for anarchism vs authoritarianism and progressivism vs conservativism. This being a place that is fairly leaning towards anarchy progressivism places it in a comfortable "left" place. Feminism tends to be just like the "right". Authoritarian with little care towards progressivism vs conservativism. At least here in America, Democrats are actual Authoritarian Conservatives, they've just managed to fool the "left" to work against…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/22 09:31 PM
24

1 step forwards is still a step closer to your end goal. Your activism is inspirational, I wish I wasn't so anxious, overthinking and eclectic🤣 👌👏🤴
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/22 09:01 PM
2

Sure but the effects of hate speech is mostly in my control, not thiers. Besides race is a rather simplistic inaccurate understanding of genetics.If they were to commit crimes based on my "race" then there are already and should be laws regarding those crimes in a universal sense. And besides while I see it as wrong, I don't think its worth consequences that require state action. I nor "you" have a right to determine how I live my life, this goes full circle where the limits imposed on my action…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 08:48 PM
3

Staring and hate speech are not, I'm an American with mostly Norwegian and German heritage, my grandparents on both sides came here shortly before ww2, yet Im constantly referred to as "white" with the connotation that my ancestors had something to do with slavery despite Norway being the first European kingdom to outlaw slavery and its tradition had restricted it to indentured servitude. Germany is often regarded merely for the rise of Nazi despite that only being ~18 year period and Anti-semit…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 08:14 PM
2

A bribe to not do your job is not a crime due to paying another for their labor, it's a crime for encouraging/committing a breach of contract. A breach of contract is theft, you took payment for work you didn't do. Manipulation is fine, it's a simple reality of how we interact with reality. For example, technically I'm manipulating you and any who read this because I'm hoping my words have an effect on your choice of actions. The main thing in my viewpoint that differentiates "good" and "bad" ma…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 07:28 PM
2

Its wrong for them to attempt manipulation from my viewpoint, however your also the one allowing it. You could simply ignore them, deny the reaction thier attempting to get and get on with your life irregardless of an inconsequential act. Stoicism is something that needs to be taught systematically to both men and women, the simple reality is that iutside of violence we have no power over others and even that is limited to a small portion of the physical kinetic reality. To allow your basic emot…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 07:07 PM
2

Mental harm is not harm done to you by another, it's harm done to you by your own self. Your thoughts are your own. I'm against any censorship laws, that doesn't mean there aren't things I don't like hearing but I refuse to give an external force the right to determine the validity and morality of my or your speech. Particularly given it's tendency to be unconcerned with intent, leaving it open to subjectiveness on the "victims" part. It's a opening, a intentionally created loophole in the funda…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 06:25 PM
1

Push for legalized prostitution? I mean this is something that benefits women too, particularly existing black market sex workers, so we could end up with Allies that create good PR given the current misandrist, pro-woman misogyny state of society. Also men need to learn casual sex is just a "high end" version of masturbation, women tend to be incredibly bad at intercourse so by probabilistic standards they are probably getting better by themselves 🤣
/r/MensRights18/04/22 06:09 PM
3

Its patently absurd, authoritarian to an extreme degree, staring is a harmless act, they are attempting to justify through unsubstantiated correlative harmful acts? This is an attempt to give the government to try any and all for crime for ulterior self centered motives. If you honestly think you or anyone else has a right to determine what someone see's and how long the see it, your an enemy plain and simple your tyrannical disposition cannot be tolerated. The UK in particular seems to be losin…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 05:49 PM
2

Well they can, it's a lot of high hurdles to climb, however the supposition that they've surrendered their own power and fallen into the perpetual victim mentality points towards them not being capable of doing so nor a want to. If anything this points towards educating people to not be preoccupied with obstacles, reality isn't fair, the price isn't entirely up to you, your one small factor in a mind bogglingly large equation, you get to choose whether to pay it or not, your attempt is the only …
/r/MensRights17/04/22 09:59 PM
4

This is likely due to a child's need for a guardian/guide as well as a nurturer, someone to help show them paths forward, make them feel safe in travelling a path and someone to develope their confidence in choosing and pursuing a path. It's not about raising a kid with a man and a woman, that's just a lazy over simplified "good enough" way of handling it. It fairly rare for somone to be capable of both, as well as it being incredibly time consuming for a single person to handle everything. Two …
/r/MensRights17/04/22 06:02 PM
2

I agree with the fundamentals of your statement, I'd push for a more localized or decentralized form of government where voting for your mayor or town council would be taken to the degree of severity we currently place on the president. This would of course "require" something akin to creating local militias that are I think could effectively be both police and military, having contracts to work out organization at a "federal" level. This enables the federal government to not have any inherent p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/22 01:24 AM
6

Ehh, it's in our best interest, in the sense of community and individually, after all a community is a group of individuals in a specific environment. The only line I would draw is when my self-determination directlly violates anothers and vice versa. If I'm allowed to violate yours how can I justify/ask for the defense of my own in a universal way? Self-centeredness is irrational, if we all just looked out for ourselves our species would have already gone extinct. Not to mention the fact that i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/22 10:34 PM
13

I agree, Its the issue of how complicated reality gets. Racism, sexism, bias "isms" generally aren't started or perpetuated due to race, it begins generally as an easily applied, superficially "rational" way of oligarchies to promote an antagonistic, confrontational relationship between two "groups" to distract the more numerous, more powerful community; Making them easier to manipulate while also diminishing the reaction to their malfeasance. We need to push for critical thinking skills in educ…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/22 07:10 PM
17

This is the absurdity of their equity arguments, there are women who can and should be allowed to be engineers but to claim sex is a reason for ignoring thier individual capabilities leads to these kinds of bias reinforcing events. Though this is the issue of perato distribution in any organization, they're failing to rein in the irrational sexist extremes of feminism. This also leads to people having a bias against feminism, those that engage in online discussion or write articles tend to be a …
/r/MensRights16/04/22 02:51 PM
1

Its disturbing how common delusion is.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 08:33 PM
1

If i made a mistake, sorry, excellent sarcasm lol
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:02 PM
1

I can't see other comments for so reason, however my response was due to you saying you weren't being sarcastic, and i also advise not using sarcasm without any indication on the internet as there's no tonal or body language to get an indication from. /s is my go to.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:21 PM
2

No. I ended up falling into the issue I was attempting to avoid. I was told by her best friend years later when they had a falling out that this girl had been sabotaging my condoms with a needle before I had the time or money to be focused on it.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:11 PM
2

I ended up getting blamed for my sister's stupidity, she beat up an uninvolved person at school for calling the cops on her friends bday party were there was drinking and my parents response was to kick me out of the house. I had only managed to talk to ~2 doctors at that point. Life has a while of piling on problems when your in the middle of trying to solve some 🤣
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:02 PM
1

Sure, tell that to the woman i saved from being drunkenly raped costing me my supposedly lefty "best friends", or the man who i saved from being raped by stopping getting laid with a girl I'd be attracted to for 5 years by threatening 3 wannabe gangsters; the leader of which was a local chapter master of a biker gang. Fuck off, you sexist, misandric, self-centered, empathy devoid piece of shit. I'd talk to about my complicated pro-choice stance but you blantantly lack the critical thinking skill…
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:54 PM
-5

False equivalency, is it so wrong to be given the choice to sell your labaor as you wish to those who wish to buy it? Fuck off with you "moral" grandstanding, you'd fit better in with the feminists given your lack of critical thinking. You dont wanna be or have a prostitute? You do you, your life but stay out of other people's lives.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:10 AM
17

Tried that, got denied by multiple doctors telling me I needed my wifes consent... i was 18 and unmarried.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:58 AM
5

Tbf, misogyny isn't acceptable, neither is misandry. Being a butthurt sexist is wrong morally and rationally incorrect regardless of your sex and the sex you have a limited, ignorant concept of. Even a 99% accurate bias will still fail you 1% of the time and that depends on the distribution, just because its overall 1% failure case in your specific individual case it could be the opposite, having a 99% failure case. If you dive deep into sexual differences in personality you fins the averages ar…
/r/MensRights13/04/22 03:25 PM
2

Its ironic just how blatantly; a claim you lack empathy shows thier own lack of empathy
/r/MensRights10/04/22 11:13 PM
2

The issue with false accusations is there's quite alot that isn't immediately obvious, they don't have to go to the police it's common for you to be tried in the court of public opinion, in my case, i was physically assaulted multiple times, a few cases of attempted murder, attempted rape, social isolation, thankfully her/our friends ended up taking my side so I was completely alone, I attemptex suicide, verbal harassment, paranoia about when you may have to deal with police and legal court, alc…
/r/MensRights10/04/22 02:06 PM
2

Don't be, your you, not them. You're allowed to feel differently about topics.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 02:00 PM
12

Its because people are willfully ignorant and attach emotional baggage to words while demanding your telepathic and your own emotional experience be the same as theirs.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 01:58 PM
1

He tries to teach people NOT to latch on to him or anyone else. He has personal opinions some if wich I vehemently disagree with, but to put it simply he tries to explain how opinions are like assholes; everyone's got one and some of them are shitty.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 12:30 PM
2

Initialize a question, contact them and ask what/how they can help you, pay attention to "red flags", if they think they have an objective answer to the meaning or goal of your life that's a red flag.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/22 06:47 PM
58

The great thing about Jordan Peterson; is if you're actually listening to him than you'd realize not to treat him as an ideologue...
/r/MensRights08/04/22 10:06 PM
2

So you suggest the response to them engineering obstacles is to not attempt to move forward? Sounds like making their work easier 🤣
/r/MensRights08/04/22 04:01 PM
3

Even a planck step forward is still a step forwards
/r/MensRights08/04/22 03:21 PM
1

Bias is inherent to our conscious experience of reality, it's how we interpret cause and effect from similar objects, ei you don't grab a knife by the blade because you have an idea of what a "sharp" object will do to your palm, the main issue is willful ignorance combined with unfounded irrational socially constructed bias.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/22 12:16 PM
8

My largest issue in attempting therapy is they are generally ideologically driven, they make no attempt to help create the you, you seek to create. They are largely ignorant and lack any real philosophical thinking and think that them being taught how to effectively brainwash people gives them a right to because it's for "the greater good". If you're looking for therapy find someone who's open to discussing your destination and will educate you on how to get there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/22 11:59 AM
1

Privilage is defined by being treated according to a group identity rather than by who you are. Masculinity is defined by the average personality traits of men. Ergo the general bias towards men is defined by masculinity. So masculinity privilege?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/22 02:45 AM
1

No, I don't know if either is the cause given that's a question of temporal order, It's more a statement on my thinking being that you can't permanently eliminate either without eliminating both. This is more of a correlative relation, occurrence or severity of misogyny doesn't directly impact the occurrence or severity of misandry. Misogyny or misandry impacts social structuring which impacts the occurrence and severity of both. This leads to the occurrence of over time the existence of one imp…
/r/MensRights05/04/22 03:20 PM
2

It's hard to make a statement on such a broad generalization but generally I think yes. Given the competitive nature of any numerically limited position masculine traits will give you an edge though that's not the whole of it. It makes it even harder just how pointless masculine and feminine categorizations are. Extraversion, agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism being the 5 fundamental psychological traits would paint a clearer, more accurate picture when compared to the d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/22 02:12 PM
3

Sort of? but not. It's a circle, There are 2 sexes in human beings. Bias against or for one sex can only be held by comparison to the other, So if you think women are better then you think men are worse and vice versa. It ends up being a feedback loop where the underlying logic of justifying one kind of sexism helps reinforce the concepts that can/are used to justify the other.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 01:58 PM
5

Thank you for responding.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 09:28 AM
3

Has she discussed what she desired from becoming or being recognized as she? Is there data on the concepts of sexual identity in trans people? Is there any data on what desires drive sexual transition? Is there a more "appropriate" place I could ask these questions and discuss this?
/r/MensRights05/04/22 09:00 AM
1

Congratulations on showing off your stupidity and sexism, You've provide an example that will be a net negative for the positions your attempting to defend.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 08:46 AM
3

Idk about that, from what I'm seeing the most likely direction is, while the timetable is debatable, a self-correction of Feminism to actually hold itself true to it's core principle, MRA to become a widely accepted concept and a loose alliance of various Equalitarian Movements that have their own localized focuses in order to protect and empower themselves. Essentially borrowing the initial US federation structure. If you look back in history revolutions of any kind weren't all that clean or al…
/r/MensRights05/04/22 08:14 AM
0

[It isn't constructive criticism, ever and you can't have it both ways. You can't say women have to be situationally aware, take responsibility for what they wear, how much they drink and responsible for their safety at all times.] Welcome to being a "man" in the role of a man. Only your not just responsible for your own self but everyone's, regardless of distance or personal ability. I'd also like to point out the absurdity of your statement effectively claiming a female victim is an inanimate …
/r/MensRights05/04/22 06:18 AM
43

Don't feel bad being here, if you believe in gender equality then welcome! I personally run into an issue with trans people because of how I define sex's and as a cis-male I don't really understand nor have I been given a chance to discuss it with a trans person. It's frustrating but I also realize it's not entirely their fault, I'm a naturally inquisitive over thinker so I enjoy debating, I need to remind myself that they have their own life and like mine, there are many complications and strug…
/r/MensRights05/04/22 05:51 AM
8

It's especially infuriating for me because Feminist support was largely co-opted for oligarchical purposes, "Gender Equality" is a very American idea(not claiming uniquely). It gave oligarchs an excuse and justification to abuse, manipulate, and control men for financial gain. I wish America would be more American.... What happened to, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these…
/r/MensRights05/04/22 05:28 AM
2

It can be overly harsh and intended to dismiss or disparage someone but it can also be constructive criticism, It's not her fault, at least not entirely, but If I, as a what is commonly referred to as a "white" man had a pistol permit and had a legally owned open pistol walking downtown in Hartford CT and got shot despite not drawing my weapon, Is it all that constructive to say, "It's not your fault, there was nothing you could do about getting shot."
/r/MensRights05/04/22 05:17 AM
1

Bias is inherent to how our consciousness works. We judge an "object" by what behavior we attach the that "object". Bias is generally anecdotal due to it being an evolutionary function developed in our neurological system, however in humans as a "highly developed" or specialized, neurologically speaking, herd animal various social pressures can lead to exaggerations of these biases in a negative or positive direction. In short it's complicated and there isn't 1 or 2 reasons.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 05:08 AM
2

There is? It's just far more complicated than what's being discussed which leads to your own absurd claim. Masculinity being the traits related to the average traits of a male, so its defined by average male traits but not exclusive to males, there is good and bad there. There's also the complication that more is not always better and in some context its good to be aggressive or protective but if your directing these behaviors according to your fondness of cookies, then we've got a problem.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 02:20 AM
2

Progressives tend not to be progressive, conservatives not conservative and liberals not liberal. It's almost as if the entirety of our political association and advocacy is based on self-centered profit(monetary and social though capitalism makes the distinction blurry) gain.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 01:58 AM
19

I hate being called white, I'm not white, I'm Norwegian and German. Both of my Grandfathers came here shortly before ww2. Norwegian's are not Vikings and Germans are not Nazi's, yet somehow it's claimed that as a "white man" I cant be empathetic towards "blacks" and the imposed erasure of their heritage, the generalized inaccurate biases or intentional manipulation of the history of their heritage?
/r/MensRights05/04/22 01:52 AM
1

Thank you, I haven't found any myself, so I may have been wrong. I found data to back your claims, though given that the state is not a singular entity and tax money is money collected from the people, it leads to the same ends just through skimming tactics as well as increasing the total cash flow they are capable of directing for corruption. An individual incentivized systemic flaw, not a conspiracy so much as encouraged by the structure of the system. Fixing it would be more complicated than …
/r/MensRights04/04/22 04:12 PM
1

I need to speak to my own son and explain to him that the only opinion of himself that matters is his own and that he should be open and honest; otherwise the treatment from others will never be in response to the real you, leaving you learning less about yourself. I've been in that situation of it being difficult to be true to yourself while being accepting of another's self. Particularly with Family.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 03:58 PM
5

Emotions are not your "soul" they are a subset of you, Being angry about something tells you a bit about what's going on but it certainly doesn't tell you what to do nor everything that's going on. Expressing vulnerabilities in a relationship IS good however doing so is generally punished by women. It does the opposite of connect you with them, it causes them to justify looking else where. Of course that's not all women just most meaning women who understand the importance of honest communicatio…
/r/MensRights04/04/22 12:36 PM
10

this is an example of why unrestrained "laissez faire" capitalism is a giant mistake, capitalism isn't perfect though its the best we've got right now however it's important to understand not the entirety of child support goes to the mother, the government takes a fee making it in their capitalistic interest to levy child support. The entire justification of a government is it's a form of insurance, a way of establishing stability by distributing the cost of extreme situations over all possible …
/r/MensRights04/04/22 07:26 AM
10

Welcome! Sorry the male "dorm" is still under maintenance XD
/r/MensRights04/04/22 12:17 AM
1

I got caught up in other predicaments and ended up suffering my fear already, my first son was from a woman who allegedly had been poking holes in my condoms with a needle
/r/MensRights03/04/22 10:16 AM
1

It's not law but a general societal attitude.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 09:42 AM
1

USA
/r/MensRights03/04/22 05:46 AM
2

No, but law is generally how people default on morality. It also requires time, effort and cooperation to change law which many take as an indication of logic or correctness. You can't and shouldn't force everyone to think the same in the same way but we can create a ripple effect in social thinking that will not only benefit us men but also women and any other category you could think of by reinforcing egalitarian ideas.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 03:10 AM
6

The doctors kept telling me I was too young, didn't any have kids yet, and was unmarried.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 08:47 PM
4

I was young, didn't have kids and I didn't have a spouses permission XD
/r/MensRights02/04/22 08:42 PM
-3

This is a fair, accurate assessment. Don't stress on misogynists down voting you. They're incredibly ignorant and don't understand the logic behind "An eye for an eye will leave the whole world blind"
/r/MensRights02/04/22 11:27 AM
22

Yes, I tried to get a vasectomy when I was younger since I thought it was worth the ~20-30% of irreversibility simply to prevent any women from "sperm-jacking". I wanted to be a father more than anything really but I wanted to choose the mother of my child. I was denied by all the doctors I went to see despite being a legally recognized adult. This would likely have less sever potential consequences yet serve to the same result.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 10:18 AM
7

It's not always fair though calling it unpaid work is sexist, a husband(spouse) is generally paying for their wife's housing, security, access to assets, transportation etc. It is fair to say that if your both working that a non-traditional agreement should come about, however I find it funny that many women are starting to realize that reality wasn't fair and they weren't the ones who got the short end of the stick in a lot of cases.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 01:01 PM
3

The hard part is that statistics have an inherent flaw, You only get answers to questions you ask. You have to consider the distribution of masculine and feminine traits among the sexes and determine the effect they have on statistical choice and ability, This typically becomes even more "problematic" when discussing "elites" being the best of the best is an extreme, where it's not just about how and what you do but also what you started with since your being measured relative to others.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 12:52 PM
4

You don't have much control on the difficulty over your chosen path only your determination in overcoming the obstacles. A blacklisting or banning isn't an end, just a complication.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 01:39 AM
4

When your confronted by a wall, go around or over. Otherwise your choosing not to reach your destination.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 01:24 AM
6

My own internal reassurance? Pep talk? "You are the one you have the most control over, Be your future. If your right others will eventually follow if not maybe you helped someone think of a better path." Besides, why would you wanna deal with internal thoughts of what a p.o.s. you are?
/r/MensRights01/04/22 12:13 AM
12

We could use technological advances(Social media) to congregate and discuss how to deal with our issues. The main problem is that many "men" feel and act in isolation. This is worsened by world wide attempts to prevent X/Y's to group together and overcome the engineered manipulation they're victim to. This could even be made far more effective by joining actual feminists, pro-black movements etc. (Egalitarians focused on over coming a particular subset of bigotry) and saying we'll fight back to …
/r/MensRights31/03/22 11:46 PM
14

Something akin to a "women" who wants to be seen as a "man" but fears transitioning due to "her" recognizing the trials that would face "her".
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:18 PM
17

Combine the two, take a socially recognized problem combined with a socially created problem and force people to face their inconsistency in principles.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:16 PM
82

Speak up when you see it. Make your community realize your loss is their loss.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:50 PM
2

classic trap of wanting to have your cake and eat it too, Want to be successful in a career? Learn to be more masculine. Of course this is another end of a spectrum so you'll be less feminine. Unfortunately at our size we aren't capable of superposition.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:03 PM
12

Warning to any and all this post is most likely a troll "fishing" attempt.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:43 AM
1

the hard part is in almost every dimension sex is a lazy oversimplified way to categorize a group. I agree with part of your statement on trans, our current medical tech is not capable of sex transition in anyway other than largely superficial ways. Though this leads to issues with the number of correlative traits we attach to our concepts of men and women.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:25 AM
4

I understand reasons for wanting a draft but a draft in all reality it is akin to handing a random passerby a butter knife and pushing them into in a gunfight. I feel it would be far better to loosely follow Nordic Council precedents, make military training a part of public education, with options for non-violent positions without making any sort of discriminatory measures. Then make it so that you can only be drafted if you've signed up for it; of course there would have to be a democratic deba…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:13 AM
10

At least you'll have the last laugh when the business pays for it's stupidity. Stoicism is something everyone of any gender should be taught. Use this place or other private areas to air grievances, get b.s. off your chest without having to worry to much about "recompense".
/r/MensRights30/03/22 08:03 PM
2

I'd avoid the vast majority of our species in that case. When it comes to discussions about privilege one of the issues of contention is generally average opportunity v personal choices v extenuating circumstances. Anything and everything is complicated, nothing in existence is identical to anything else. There's also the issue of starting factor as well as growth metric involved. We have limited time to exist we can't do everything so we have to chose what we pursue and with kids we have a resp…
/r/MensRights30/03/22 07:04 AM
4

Do you have any data to back this up? What do you mean by "a lot"? 1.This is a generic human thing. We want control over ourselves and our environments and our current environments have a lot of people and a romantic partner is someone who is given control over your life? How are egos developed? Measured? How is the average male ego constructed? See 2. Are you afraid of running into traffic because others tell you not to or because it's likely to result in your fatality? Is that traffics fault o…
/r/MensRights30/03/22 04:53 AM
4

It's the typical issue surrounding language, #allmen etc. They most likely aren't talking about all women; just referring to averages relating to sex. You certainly should be shown respect for the work you do. Though I'd like to point out that you being a female construction worker doesn't/shouldn't earn you more respect, though there may be correlative choices you do deserve respect for.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 04:44 AM
6

Do you acknowledge the probabilistic differences in temperament between sexes? Do you acknowledge a difference in "masculine" and "feminine" traits? Which trait is more suited to competing for a leadership job that is incredibly limited in volume?(e.g. 100 people having to fight over 1 seat)? Women who succeed in becoming CEO's, are they primarily masculine or feminine in temperament? Are people given psychological training to develop proper temperament for their desired field? Does affirmative …
/r/MensRights30/03/22 04:37 AM
0

It's a general "lazy" description of bipolar genetic structures; (In my view)a "man" is x/y; a "woman" x/x in humans. Those that scream about trans fail to understand how ignorant and sexist their own concepts are nor take into account the issues involved in surgical procedures and cases of "trans regret". Belonging to either gender does not determine your personality/role and holding to that is denying some their self-determination. A feminine straight man if interested in marriage should look …
/r/MensRights29/03/22 05:00 AM
5

You let the justice system take care of it. Two wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 04:47 AM
2

apex fallacy nadir fallacy
/r/MensRights29/03/22 04:43 AM
4

It's hard but you need to accept that she likely wasn't the woman you loved, don't hold on to the hope that the concept of her you loved might be "real". Judge her by her own actions, Her life is no longer any concern of yours. She decided you were her enemy, she made a declaration of "war". This was likely not your fault, don't take responsibility for an outcome you took little to no part in and likely acted to avoid. If you want what's "best" for her, let her experience an education of the "do…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:52 AM
4

It's an illogical manipulation tactic that can be summed up in the phrase "Damned if you do, damned if you don't." You can attempt to point out their personal inconsistency or you just ignore them, Why attempt to play a game you literally cannot win at?
/r/MensRights27/03/22 03:46 AM
1

Hmmm this sounds familiar...
/r/MensRights26/03/22 07:28 AM
-1

I'm not confused to anything, It's very telling you claim virtue signaling as if you are aware of any of my existence outside of this comment section. I did not claim he nor anyone else owed anything to anyone other than themselves, I merely stated to be aware of consequences as taking action without thought of repercussions is stupidity. You could stop arguing with your imaginary enemy and putting words and beliefs into my "mouth", I get the feeling you already know what its like to be treated …
/r/MensRights25/03/22 05:08 PM
-1

?? I'm not being condescending I genuinely am confused.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 01:58 AM
-4

That's your own opinion, Hence why I stated do as you will. "You" are "you" but your life does not exist in isolation, every action has consequences, cause and effect. If you don't want to deal with negative consequences of your choices then choose differently. I agree with everything but the last part of your statement. I may be in hell but I won't become a demon just like so many others. It's rather pointless to complain about actions you perpetrate(Who's at the very least partially at fault w…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 01:57 AM
-4

What a sound argument, very convincing.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 12:57 AM
-30

Your justifying your actions by same actions you accuse them of. Do as you will but your continuing the cycle. To put it plainly humans are not all that dissimilar what do you think their general justifications are? Do what you will but do it considering consequences.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 10:29 PM
3

To reiterate: What structure is responsible for doing any and all monetary work? Ohhh... it's your body, you trade time with your body for money. So demanding money... is demanding the product of ones body? Why does that sound familiar? So what your saying is.... ? XD Thanking for providing an example of what the conclusions to applying the logic behind the treatment of men would be if applied to women. I wonder when it'll dawn on you that I am in fact pro-choice and simply attempting to convinc…
/r/MensRights24/03/22 02:48 AM
3

bodily autonomy - is the right for a person to govern what happens to their body without external influence or coercion. Laws are processes declaring how society should conduct various actions. Who is it that can chose to or not to place man's name on a birth certificate that then demands compensation (child support) which is influence/coercion on someone to produce an income from their work and to demand a portion of that income. Why is it that a woman can decide whether or not a man is to be h…
/r/MensRights24/03/22 01:40 AM
7

What structure is responsible for doing any and all monetary work? Ohhh... it's your body, you trade time with your body for money. So demanding money... is demanding the product of ones body? Why does that sound familiar? I'm not conflating the 2, legal fatherhood is designed behind the concept of what a biological father owes his child. A woman has the power of legally defining who is a father while also giving them a rightful power to choose whether there is a child to be a parent to in the f…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 11:54 PM
10

The Woman has the right to her body and the man to his. If she wants to keep the baby after a "paper abortion" that's her choice, she doesn't get to decide his future any more than he should hers. I understand your point however my supposition is that your intentionally ignoring the part where the state held someone legally obligated by defining them by a biological relation without any actual evidence and the only way one could prove otherwise require consent of the most likely party outside of…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 10:39 PM
7

It's sort of a detached issue, I would be surprised if feminism attempted to create such a blatant example of their inconsistency. It's more that Feminism places blame solely on men and ignores this behavior in women. It's the disturbing common fallacy of trying to stop an effect without dealing with it's cause. MRA/MRM shouldn't be Men v Women nor Feminism Women v Men, just focused equalitarian movements working towards the same goal/s. Currently it's fairly common when you oppose someone who i…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 12:10 AM
0

Your treat individual examples of cause and effect and treating them as if there's no differing context. Rich people are not "communist" they do not all work together under a singular direction to a "greater good"; Which is part of the issue ; why I deemed it necessary to outline a difference, if we punish or eliminate one group it'll simply open an opportunity for a similar group to take its place. If I misunderstood part of your statement then explain yourself or your not communicating what yo…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 07:39 PM
10

That's an incredibly ignorant generalized statement, "America" does not have government control over media, the federal and state governments have large influence; yes. You talk as if these symptoms are derived from a symptom. The main "fundamental" issue is the influence money has on politics and the resulting influence on economic standards, it isn't as if there's the Illuminati doing this, its multiple independent conspiracies working towards similar goals achieving similar outcomes in a syne…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 07:16 PM
1

That sounds fair to me. After all just because we don't have self-determination rights doesn't mean women should be denied it.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 03:24 PM
0

em·pa·thy /ˈempəTHē/ noun the ability to understand and share the feelings of another. Your completely dismissing the commonality of existence between men and woman. Your speak as though our lives are "alien" to each other to the point there is no shared approximate conceptual basis for their experiences. You refuse to place yourself in context that's roughly(non-exact) the general default for another. Biological failures, any failure of a biological system. Cancer, rare genetics leading to non …
/r/MensRights21/03/22 01:42 PM
1

Electrons do not no orbit an atomic nucleus as an discrete determined object but rather exist in what can only be described as a probability cloud derived from the Schrödinger equation due to their superposition inherent to the observation of particle-wave duality. Look I presented you with FACTS!!!! Why don't you agree with me? XD
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:10 AM
1

Danke
/r/MensRights20/03/22 11:59 PM
0

It's telling you couldn't actually answer any of those questions and are instead relying on me to. While pretending as if you could by giving a generic, general answer to 2 dimensional questions despite that not being the reality of my questions.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 11:53 PM
1

You're ignoring all factors involved in my example that do not support your stated position and the most likely reason for why is because to do so would be detrimental to your presupposition. And No, I'm talking about those who were born with X/Y chromosomes yet where born with what is typically female genitalia and while rare in an already rare case; Some of these people have gotten pregnant and given birth.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 11:48 PM
1

My guess would be that your personal definition of sex is in relation to genitalia. Are you aware that humans of both X/Y and X/X can and have given birth? According to your logic we can and should treat others based on their sex? The literal definition of sexism? To be honest these words aren't necessarily for you. Your immorality, stupidity and fundamental inconsistency is blatant to a point attempting to convince you would be "difficult" and requires manipulation rather than objective logic t…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 11:41 PM
1

Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms or supports one's prior beliefs or values. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias To answer your question Yes "men" have. Though that depends on what your definition of a man is.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 11:11 PM
2

What year are we currently in? Is every law universal? What would my default geo-graphical reference be? If you felt the need for specificity then why not ask? What's the current situation? What year is it? What is the average and mode of abortion laws? Why are you arbitrarily assigning a "conclusion" to me that I did not state and would vehemently fight against for the sake of my daughter let alone the many women who would suffer from an abhorrent law attempting to deny one self-determination? …
/r/MensRights20/03/22 11:05 PM
2

I don't have any disagreement with this.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 10:48 PM
2

Okay, if your statement is in fact correct; What relevancy does it have to this discussion? Does pregnancy increase risk of homicide? What's the overall rate of mortality in pregnant people? What's the distribution of perpetrators relative to pregnant individuals? What's the general intent? Degree's of murder these homicides involve? What's the specific probability of a pregnant person being the victim of homicide?
/r/MensRights20/03/22 10:44 PM
2

No but the vast majority of "men" are, and some women are forced into surrogacy due to biological "failures". Your a prime example for mistakenly attaching the much vaunted feminine trait of empathy to "women".
/r/MensRights20/03/22 10:35 PM
1

You realize your demonstrating conformation bias? Providing an example in how my metaphorical example differs from a specific situation I'm referencing and failing address the commonalities. Given the contractual nature of marriage; can abortion be criminalized via pre-nuptial contract or through the default marriage contract written by the state? Or what if I wrote a general contract and had my sexual partner sign it?
/r/MensRights20/03/22 10:31 PM
2

Even just an elective version would be fine by me. Though Something akin to that could be set up as a private institution. Following in our forefathers footsteps and doing that which must be done despite the governments protest.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 10:04 PM
6

It's particularly frustrating since it isn't defaulting to an outlaw of privatized insurance and since it's paid for by taxes, most are still paying into this insurance as well as the outcome being a severe reduction in those who cannot pay into the insurance due to not having an income source. While also reducing a litany of other tax related burdens >.< You'd think my country, given its seeming obsession with economics, would understand basic investment theories.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 10:01 PM
2

People confuse being patriotic with supporting the government despite it being stated in unequivocal terms that it is Un-American to do so.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:47 PM
4

I made an a statement in which I assumed authority and judged another based on their sex? Your argument hold no logic, no consistency to the point it becomes self-defeating. Its possible that you misread what I said which indicates a lack of care, precision and blatant impulsivity you should address.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:41 PM
4

Imagine your infertile and wish to have a child, you hire a surrogate mother and then she aborts "your" baby created from your egg... What's your feeling on this situation?
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:36 PM
4

Nice of you to attempt to disregard any discussion of nuance and go to an extreme situation to justify your conclusion in all situations.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:31 PM
3

There might be a line to be drawn. Were a woman would be responsible for legally justifying her abortion given the inverse is true. I, as a man, am not trans but wish I'd been born as woman almost entirely for the fact I'd have complete uncontestable control of reproduction.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:28 PM
4

No, hence violence and abuse laws? If she's not willing to accept responsibility for herself then sucks to be her. Responsibility is chosen not given, otherwise abortion would be illegal and disallowed given she would be deemed responsible for the child in a motherly role whether she liked it or not.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:23 PM
4

Why don't you fuck of with your bullshit, dishonest, malicious re-interpretation of his statement in order to create an easily defeated straw man?
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:19 PM
2

That why you reduce concepts to a fundamental level so you can maintain consistency in differing context. It still is an equality issue as Women get to self-determine their future yet this is not allowed for Men. A woman gets to determine if a man is beholden to the responsibilities of a father or not. If there was gender equality and the standard towards men was still held as it is now, then it would require both the father and mother to sign off on an abortion.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:17 PM
3

If your concerned you could always use current tech to create an insemination sample? tube? vial? (I'm not sure what the term is) and hire a surrogate mother. Of course that doesn't change the issues surrounding the lack of rights we have when it comes to children. In fact I think given current circumstances it makes sense to store sperm in a bank and get a vasectomy to ensure self-control of reproduction. Though there are potential consequences so I'd talk to doctor's first.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:10 PM
2

Ahhh, see we both agree to a point I personally won't give ground on. It's their choice; Your allowed your own personal opinion on the matter and I mine. I for one think the argument we've had is far more empowering and educational than either of our conclusions, we've given others more data to construct a hypothesis and hopefully come to a personalized conclusion. Though I'd have preferred it if you'd realized how useless our current definitions of man and woman are and that when it comes to ma…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 03:24 PM
1

Your falling into the classic trap of averages and treating probabilities as if they are both deterministic and not deterministic depending on your internal context. While also failing to understand that any probability is dependent on how you constructed that question. How did you define success, failure, what were the dimensional limitations you put on determining the instances you drew from ?Why are divorce rates ~50%? It's fairly explanatory that our current construction of society has influ…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 06:36 AM
1

It's fairly telling that despite the "knowledge" you've gained, it still hasn't dawned on you how little you know. Why does science work? Why is it that science can, has and should be allowed contradicting conclusions? Why is it that limit of a scientific claim is called a theory? It's entirely possible that reality is deterministic and any control over myself and my thoughts is an emergent phenomena of the complexity of our nervous system and I am me for no other reason that I was constructed i…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 06:05 AM
1

It's all relative? If a man doesn't marry in a literal or figurative sense then he spends his life alone, pursing his goals alone, doesn't have an avatar to act and speak on his behalf, allowing him to effectively "cheat the system" and be in two places at once. He's also "half-brained" having one a single brain to have thoughts and come to conclusions. You ever argue with yourself? It's not as if internally we instantaneously come to choices nor do we like all of our internal feelings. Your ent…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 07:21 PM
1

Thanks for making a stupid semantic argument that your incorrect in? "Nothing in life is certain, so why waste your time on things that proven to ve uncertain (like marriage)..." You realize that by your own logic that would make anything and everything in life pointless? Why breath, eat etc.? Why waste your time? Why is it the think it isn't a waste? I don't disagree that many legal changes need to be made surrounding marriage but as a divorced man who's been through multiple custody battles, I…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 05:30 PM
1

I mostly agree with this, stereotypes exist because objects constructed of the approximately same materials, in approximately same way can only be described as being the same. After all given the fact that a human has 30 trillion cells, each cell of 100 trillion atoms each occupying a different coordinate of space/time, Just the term human is an approximation of the matter and processes that construct that entities being. However the issue comes from the ignorance of assuming it to be anything o…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:38 PM
0

A contract is a legal statement... Nothing in reality is certain, so if your saying to all take certainty then you'll accomplish nothing. However there's a reason misandrists refuse pre-nuptials. Pre-nuptials should be a discussion we have with our children, should have been discussed with us. Legal marriage isn't even the only option. I realize that the legal system tends to be sexist, hence my draw towards this community and why I believe we should speak out on it.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:27 PM
-1

That's a a rather broad brush, you seem to make the mistake of treating the whole of a group by it's averages. You cannot appeal to any individual as you would any other. Your literally being sexist in response to sexism, your thinking Misogyny is justified by the existence of Misandry, while the excuse much of society makes is Misandry is justified by Misogyny. I wonder if you can spot the issue of using bigotry to justify a bigotry? Your every bit as disgusting as a Feminist.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:13 PM
1

Habba84 · 2 days ago (Conscription of any; is inherently authoritarian.) In that sense, all laws are authoritarian. Nobody likes to live in a total anarchy. (If it's elective to sign up for registration; Essentially being a form of U.S. army reserves, then that's perfectly fine but to threaten violence on anyone who is not willing to commit and face violence on your behest, to your goals...) This shows you are not in tune with Finland's policies. We are all in reserve, and are not required to pa…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 04:33 AM
1

It's fairly simple; don't worry about traditional roles, Look for what you need out of a relationship and discuss it with them. It's entirely possible and even intelligent in many cases to get legally married to the same sex even if your not Homosexual. You'd simply discuss what the rules around sex would be and work together towards signing a pre-nup to better define the rules of the marriage. While still retaining the legal benefits of marriage. Marriage isn't about sex it's a legal statement …
/r/MensRights18/03/22 09:56 PM
1

Reinforce the fact that the only opinion that matters is their own. Being a Man doesn't mean anything other than the chromosomes they are constructed of. They are responsible for holding themselves to their own concept of the best version of themselves. It's likely at times it'll hurt but "ups" and "downs" are an inherent experience in life, we are all different. Learning is important but also to take facts with a grain of salt, knowledge/facts is only a generalist reference to it being perceive…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 11:38 PM
10

I'm not sure if we interpreted his statement differently or each others statements differently but We don't have an argument here. I agree with you mostly. Though I speak of fundamental concept because without referencing it; anything can mean anything. A whole is defined by what it is of and how it is constructed. A Cause has an Effect. An Effect has a Cause. I'd also like to point out the entire point of language is to make a sound with "universally" agreed upon definition, unfortunately nothi…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 10:59 PM
25

No, its referencing the fundamental concept of Feminism. Your reference to nuance is akin to surrendering ground. The simple fact is that many of the self-proclaimed Feminists I've met are not Feminists they simply have assumed that Feminism is a call for female equality. MRA at least should and mostly has stood as a sub-set of egalitarianism. We call for equality of all, we're just focused on the category of men since many claimed egalitarians ignore or outright call for misandry.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 08:16 PM
5

"True" Men's right actively opposes misogyny, We say one should not be judge by their sex. To be misogynistic is literally supporting misandry, your essentially buying into the Us vs Them mentally saying its justifiable to act they way I do because you do without realize that in turn by their own "logic" justifies their actions.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 05:36 PM
2

I am largely ignorant of Finland, If your statements are accurate, Finland > USA. It's not as if I don't understand that citizenship is essentially a contract and to receive benefits; its fair to ask for defense in emergency situations though I find the sexist ways this is generally done distasteful and quite wasteful. Finland manages to be more "American" than America. I concur with your last statement personally. It's also nice that some else seems to understand that Utopia is anarchy yet Anar…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 02:56 PM
5

How many positions of power are there in relation to the population these positions of power draw from? What traits do most population desire from a person in the position of power? What traits give an advantage when competing for a limited position? Is there any relation to Masculine and Feminine traits? What's the relation of masculine and feminine traits to sex?
/r/MensRights17/03/22 04:57 AM
5

Do you have any advice for some one who's being alienated? My ex-wife seems to be attempting to use my coma as a chance to separate me from the kids.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:15 AM
1

Then my opinion of you is roughly the same as my opinion of a feminist.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 11:17 PM
1

I don't disagree, I'm simply acknowledge my lack of omniscient. I'd certainly try to educate them on the potential consequences. We are in fact "robots"/"machines" Complicated? Yes, thanks to ~300 million years of R&D thanks to natural selection. The main conceptual distinction has more to do with the elements that construct our being. Your "feelings" most likely aren't magical; they are neurological responses to a wide range of interactions with your environment. Adding 2+2 and adding 2 to 2 a …
/r/MensRights16/03/22 05:42 PM
1

You cannot define a term with the term itself the limit of responsibility is irresponsibility? So the limit is it's own opposite? We agree on this. Though many attempt to enforce their concept of responsibility on others which is what I tried to point out you engaging in. We personally agree, though again I'm trying to point that responsibility is mostly subjective and the common denominator I see is understanding consequences of actions and being consistent in what consequences you are and are …
/r/MensRights16/03/22 04:58 PM
1

To be better than them, Why allow them to have any influence over who you choose to be? Why allow them an an example, justification for their B.S. Why stoop to their level? I say nothing about playing "nice" with female supremacists but if you have an issue with all woman you are POS sexist, you are what you claim to hate. To be blunt your essentially saying that you are fundamentally no better than a feminist and your insisting that because we both have X/Y chromosomes I should allow you the sa…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 02:21 PM
0

MRA is not a single entity, let alone a an organized collection of individuals though its starting to get there. I don't understand why you feel the need to "preach" to me? I made no statement that I was against attempts to fight against female supremacy nor denied the misandry we face. My hatred for female supremacists does not mean that I'm going to ally with male supremacists, misogynists, conservatives, religious organizations etc. I would describe myself as a Fundamental Egalitarian Agnosti…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 02:25 AM
-1

MRA is not a single entity, let alone a an organized collection of individuals though its starting to get there. I don't understand why you feel the need to "preach" to me? I made no statement that I was against attempts to fight against female supremacy nor denied the misandry we face. I'm a man who suffered false rape allegations in HS, been blamed for my sisters idiocy resulting in homelessness instead of graduating HS or joining the Marines as an Officer level Server Technician. Had 2 childr…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 02:02 AM
0

My opinion is that obligations are for no one to determine but themselves regardless of identity. I'm far from supportive of "feminism" which I believe in modern times is a bait and switch tactic for female supremacists. The main issue I have is that it seems many MRA's haven't learned from feminism's fundamental mistake of "win at all costs" and "the ends justify the means" which is leading to backlash towards deserved progress due to unwillingness to acknowledge or acquiesce past relevant priv…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 12:40 AM
1

I don't need nor aim for "privilege". I'm asking if I can haggle and determine whether I sign what effectively amounts to a contract. Partially to help myself and others come to a satisfactory conclusion by sharing data and hypothesis's. Also... some self-serving here as I am contemplating going "home" I'm ~ 55% German and ~ 45% Norwegian. Mostly debating whether I want to go to Nordic Council or EU. I'd like to call a place I'm willing to lay my life down for home.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 12:09 AM
3

What limit? Decided by whom? How do you define responsibly?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 11:00 PM
2

provably, not probably https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/provably Sorry not attempting condescension just clarification. If she allows it then yes; You nor I have any "right" to deny her self-determination. That's a fundamental aspect of my concept of morality, Freedom to act begins at self-determination and ends where it determines present/future for others. You don't have to like or approve but it's not your decision to make.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 10:59 PM
2

Fair enough, were would one go if they wanted only the benefits and responsibility of themselves? Are you allowed to wave benefits to wave the responsibility associated?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 09:28 PM
-2

Normalizing the discussion of a sexual fantasy =/= Normalizing the act of the fantasy. You cannot find answers without asking questions. For example if this was not on a "youth culture" site, would you have been prompted to raise any questions? Would you have consider how and why you feel about this situation in the way you do?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 09:17 PM
-4

Any and all should be allowed any fantasies that tickle their fancy :) To find something "sexy" is fundamentally different from acting on it. Creating an environment in which their own personal sexual feelings are forced into isolated denial tends to lead people to act it out. Though a personal caveat would be "speech" encouraging the acting out of a "harmful" fantasy. All are allowed to find castration, rape etc. sexy as long as they understand why they can't act it out in reality without unequ…
/r/MensRights15/03/22 08:50 PM
-15

As long as it remains a fantasy and any actions taken are provably consensual; mind your own business. You don't get to define what is and isn't acceptable outside of yourself. Way to be the MRA version of a toxic feminist supremacist.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 08:11 PM
-3

Yes because you can 100% unfailing prove your correct in your assertion and you can define necessity for another regardless of their circumstances, goals and personal concept of morality.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 08:04 PM
2

So your stating that ends justify the means? You don't draw any connection to your statement and thoughts to how we got in this mess in the first place?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 07:59 PM
6

Conscription of any; is inherently authoritarian. If it's elective to sign up for registration; Essentially being a form of U.S. army reserves, then that's perfectly fine Your feeling of safety does not give you the right to demand the action and thereby freedom of another and you'd think you'd have picked up on me not attempting to make assumptions on a topic that I admittedly am ignorant on the specifics of or the fact that if what your saying is true then the only fault of Finnish emergency m…
/r/MensRights15/03/22 05:55 PM
6

And your personal, biased, generalistic opinion is worthy of my personal deference for what reason?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 05:23 PM
1

It's for complicated, multifaceted, ignorant reasons that can mostly be attributed to peoples misconception of probability being deterministic. A result with 99.999999999999999999% isn't guaranteed, one would have to be omnipotent to discern a probability with unfailing accuracy and that would require reality to be non-deterministic; and the jury is still out on that one. It's also inherently taxing to support another; leading to it generally being avoided and there is a litany of socially const…
/r/MensRights15/03/22 03:38 PM
8

Why voluntarily fight for a country that attempts to punish the inherent freedom of choice reality itself gives you? When you could just run; you even have a convenient decoy!
/r/MensRights15/03/22 02:57 PM
3

Why? One does not describe a 3D object with 2 measurements. Pick as many or few as you wish, if you can provide logical disagreement to any degree I'm always eager to learn.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 02:36 PM
1

My suggestion would be you make "conscription" voluntary, in a state of national security I volunteer to be consider a part of the military while also initiating training for said volunteers. You make military training without the possibility of deployment a default part of education regardless of gender around the ages of 14-16 till they graduate. At which point they would have the option of voluntarily signing up for the military and at least would have training in self-defense techniques as w…
/r/MensRights15/03/22 02:13 PM
2

My argument is that I do not judge the life of most animals consciousness to be of the same value as most humans. Slavery can be "justified" for the simple reason that all of reality is relative, I'm not omnipotent; I cannot say with certainty that slavery is "wrong" since "wrong" is an entirely subjective concept. I will state that I'm fairly confident that slavery is "wrong". My main argument against it is that any justification I could use against others could be used against me or mine with …
/r/MensRights15/03/22 01:53 PM
3

Sort of? Their species likely came into existence due to this use and their continued existence is largely to wholly dependent on this use. This use is also not "enjoyment", much of the particular plant life require to create a balance vegan diet is only available recently, this also fails to account for people who cannot consume necessary vegan foods due to "abnormalities" in their digestive system. Particularly as a man of Norwegian heritage I find any and all who claim that eating meat is une…
/r/MensRights15/03/22 12:28 PM
38

Conscription of any; is inherently authoritarian. If it's elective to sign up for registration; Essentially being a form of U.S. army reserves, then that's perfectly fine but to threaten violence on anyone who is not willing to commit and face violence on your behest, to your goals... If they are so concerned with National security then why not produce a Nation that more people believe is worth defending? Why allow the government to make decisions taking consideration for their ability to force …
/r/MensRights15/03/22 11:43 AM
1

It's stems from the fact that people are overwhelmingly self-centered and movements form at "lowest common denominator". Almost every movement has ended up being directed by people who sought to create an environment best suited to them due to the way that seeking power as an action itself "filters" for those who can successfully manipulate and corrupt; Isn't "power" generally what one seeks from their leader? People who genuinely wish to help "their people"; Realize the whole "rule for thee but…
/r/MensRights13/03/22 04:40 PM
-2

Selective service here shouldn't be a thing. In a self-proclaimed Democratic nation the Idea that you can leverage the Government threat of violence to leverage the actions of others into a kill or be killed situation regardless of their own will on the matter? What are those words in the American Constitution? "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness"? Isn't that were liberties, freedoms are supposed to end? Were yours denies others? To Make this a 3 sided argument is inane; This is a thing …
/r/MensRights10/03/22 12:14 PM
1

They tend to abuse; without understanding, the Relative nature of reality and the general, "innate" distaste people have for having to face the overwhelming probability that they are not the center of the universe. In this particular case one of the confounding, continuous issues with communication is that if I say "Kid" and you say "Kid" we are expressing entirely separate concepts that may or not even be entirely accurate to what our own internal concepts are. You saying "Kid" can only mean to…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 06:41 PM
10

feminism - the belief in full social, economic, and political equality for women. Why aren't women being drafted!!! Were are all the outcries??? It's almost like its a bunch of sophistry to give a better general view of a superiority movement...
/r/MensRights08/03/22 07:23 PM
1

If there is a lesson to be learned from feminism and myriad groups that at one point were viewed as being "Pro", avocational, It's the simple fact that us vs them is; In my view at least, is the principle at the heart of the very oppression and maleficence they/we seek to dismantle. In almost every circumstance reality is give and take. Feminism is reeling from them gaining rights they sought with no realization that these restrictions were the largely agreed upon price for their privileges caus…
/r/MensRights08/03/22 01:25 PM
20

Yes because it's incredibly "manly" to care about unfounded, arbitrary opinions of others. /s Besides being male is quite literally a description of what chromosomes construct your genetic code; a homosexual person who likes makeup, dressing, wants to be what is commonly referred to as a "housewife" with Swyer syndrome is still a "man". Genetics in reference to "sex" is merely probabilistic in nature, as well as there being few select expressions that are more or less only expressible with a y c…
/r/MensRights06/03/22 11:04 PM
4

Treat "men" as people; hold them to the same standard you treat "women" to. Make your opinions base not on your conception of "male" and "female"; make it clear that you judge others based on their own actions and not the actions of others whom you conceptually relate to them.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 05:45 PM
9

Ohh yes because a unproven claim to know the source of creation and his/her/it's words; gives someone justification to determine the future of another's body. Do you have any conception of how hypocritical your statement is? You start affirming one's freedom/self determination while stating others can't.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 03:58 PM
6

Of course! An Average is determinate for all relative objects involved. A 2 sided outcome with one of the outcomes having a 1% probability would never occur /s; Would you happen to have evidence of either of you hypothesis's?
/r/MensRights04/03/22 03:28 PM
1

The difficulty they are facing is the fact that there are attempting to encourage the "masculinity" of "women" while encouraging the "feminizing" of "men"; without dealing with the fundamental issue of binary directionality, in order to be more "masculine" requires you to diverge from what we categorize as "femininity" without addressing the actual issue that while there is a statistical correlation with the chromosomes one is constructed from; is not exactly determinant. These words themselves …
/r/MensRights02/03/22 11:55 PM
1

I have, I had previously seen him ~2.5 times a month for weekends; I had an agreement where I'd get the kids every weekend but he had a choice to stay with me or go to his grandparents.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 05:32 PM
1

He is her biological son; He had just turned 2 or was about to turn 2 when we got married. We got divorced on 05/04/2017; got married on 9/21/2013.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 04:17 PM
7

It would be nice If people finally begun to see how subjective statistics are, to think there is a conclusion to be based of such a simplistic study is egregiously idiotic, it points to a problem so the only logical conclusion is an attempt at figuring out why is needed. To put a clear blunt example; research has shown that men and women have similar average I.Q.s with women coming out slightly on top; however when you plot it out on a graph you see that simply taking the average tells you very …
/r/MensRights02/03/22 12:41 PM
3

If you'd like a plain example of why you are in fact the idiot here failing to advocate your "own" purposed concept; If I have 3 Chickens and my friend has 800/200 Cows how many Pferde do we have?
/r/MensRights25/02/22 04:35 PM
10

Anglos ohh yes because racism is so helpful in the fight against sexism. /s
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:36 PM
1

You'd think given the commonality of the fair; accurate, "not all men" response to misandry; self proclaimed "men's rights" advocates wouldn't pull the same shit.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:30 PM
4

This is entire anecdotal but the few false allegations I've seen and my one experience with it; was that it was never reported. They simply told people and encouraged "white-knighting", depending on the court of public opinion so to speak. It's kinda insane being hunted down and attacked by people you've never met.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 06:34 PM
3

As you pointed out many of the rape statistics bandied about by pop "feminism" are incredibly misleading and poorly done. Obfuscating the issue where a small minority of perpetrators who tend to victimize the same subset of people. The "average" rapist victimizes ~14 people. http://www.ncdsv.org/images/RapeFactSheet-UndetectedRapist.pdf Meaning not only are rapist much rarer then they say but the number of victims is lower; while the victims tend suffer more than some would guess. https://slate.…
/r/MensRights21/08/20 06:24 PM
6

My first real experience with this was having an unsupervised visit with my son at the local library when a lady straight up tried to kidnap him because she assumed I was a pedophile. While the most egregious example this far from an isolated case, it got to the point I was paranoid about going out in public alone with my kids and because I enjoy participating in play activities with my children I tend to get swarmed by other children who wanted to play with us and I felt the need to distance my…
/r/MensRights21/08/20 01:01 PM
21

It's especially infuriating coming from feminists because it detrimental to women; some of them think they want to be career focused without fully understanding what that entails. Leading to incredibly unhappy women who would have chosen differently or would been much more successful at building their careers given proper guidance.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/08/20 12:42 PM
7

Sexist shitheads like you are exactly the kind of person they trot out as examples to justify their own shitty behavior. On behalf of all reasonable, moral people, shut the fuck up.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/08/20 12:33 PM
6

There's a difference between saying you believe something and actually thinking things through from first principle to have a logically consistent moral compass. There are a lot of things people say or believe that they never really think twice about. This isn't a "feminist" issue so much as a psychological one that tends to be prevalent due to underlying assumption that anything "feminist" is inherently good and critiquing of its ideas is sexist. I put it in quotes because feminism has such a w…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/08/20 12:30 PM
8

Patriarchy in its strict technical non-feminist definition 100% exists or at least it did and you don't seem to recognize the amount of progress made and the fact that a lot of men have grown up being blamed for "patriarchy", being expected to accept the responsibility inherent in its hierarchical structure with none of the benefits while a large number of "feminist" continue to reinforce those responsibilities and refuse to accept them their selves. Your point could easily be mirrored to show h…
/r/MensRights19/08/20 08:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter