TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DarthOvious Archive

View 39 posts and 1,230 comments by DarthOvious on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1258

SatireDarthOvious/r/MensRights26/03/15 10:58 PM
290

FeminismDarthOvious/r/MensRights30/03/15 09:02 PM
129

DiscriminationDarthOvious/r/MensRights23/04/15 09:06 PM
108

DiscriminationDarthOvious/r/MensRights18/04/16 09:46 PM
35

DarthOvious/r/MensRights20/04/13 10:56 PM
26

DarthOvious/r/MensRights01/08/12 02:57 PM
26

DarthOvious/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:30 PM
25

DarthOvious/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:47 PM
25

DarthOvious/r/MensRights07/06/16 09:23 PM
21

DarthOvious/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:39 PM
19

DarthOvious/r/MensRights25/08/12 07:39 PM
16

DarthOvious/r/MensRights18/04/12 01:38 PM
15

Social IssuesDarthOvious/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:08 PM
14

DarthOvious/r/MensRights29/11/11 01:18 PM
14

DarthOvious/r/MensRights26/04/15 09:40 AM
12

DarthOvious/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:34 PM
11

Men's Rights NewsDarthOvious/r/MensRights16/04/14 07:14 PM
8

GeneralDarthOvious/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:53 PM
8

DarthOvious/r/MensRights20/09/12 09:44 PM
8

Social IssuesDarthOvious/r/MensRights12/04/16 08:11 PM
8

DarthOvious/r/MensRights14/03/12 12:27 PM
7

DarthOvious/r/MensRights15/08/16 08:55 PM
7

GeneralDarthOvious/r/MensRights31/01/16 10:32 PM
7

DarthOvious/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:10 AM
7

DarthOvious/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:28 PM
6

WBBDarthOvious/r/MensRights19/04/15 07:37 PM
5

DarthOvious/r/MensRights03/08/12 05:35 PM
5

DarthOvious/r/MensRights24/07/13 09:28 PM
5

DiscriminationDarthOvious/r/MensRights23/04/15 09:47 PM
4

Social IssuesDarthOvious/r/MensRights26/08/16 11:43 AM
3

DarthOvious/r/MensRights25/07/14 08:43 PM
2

DarthOvious/r/MensRights06/02/12 11:43 PM
1

FeminismDarthOvious/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:47 PM
0

DarthOvious/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:25 PM
0

DarthOvious/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:51 PM
0

DarthOvious/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:16 PM
0

DarthOvious/r/MensRights01/05/15 03:43 PM
0

DarthOvious/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:07 PM
0

OutrageDarthOvious/r/MensRights20/07/14 12:43 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,230 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Posted this myself a couple of days ago. Completely fucking mental. He's not even allowed a tattoo. That's how controlling she is.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 09:41 PM
1

Thought I would post this since it's pretty much restrictions of his freedom of association. I can understand she doesn't want him chatting up other girls but telling him he isn't allowed to drink too much and he's not allowed to even talk to the other girls that his friends are interested in. For fuck sake.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 11:45 AM
3

My wife is Thai and she is a far better woman than most western women. Our son comes first with pretty much everything and she acknowledges my importance as a father. She loves me to bits also which is great. Not saying it's a perfect relationship but it's still far better than what I would likely get from home.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 09:13 PM
1

Ah, of course. Those magical vaginas.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 05:31 PM
4

14 days later? Something smells fishy here. You don't normally find out you're pregnant within that amount of time.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 05:23 PM
32

I actually deleted my twitter account because of this sort of attitude. My Facebook account could be next if this keeps up.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 12:38 PM
27

You PC Bro?
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:44 AM
2

It's back up now, but it was taken down. It must have been sorted out.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:07 PM
3

We alk know where that leads to. Already been done and already failed.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 09:09 AM
1

Gotta love Butters. Go to your room young man. You're grounded.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 06:57 AM
1

Wat?
/r/MensRights31/05/16 06:52 AM
5

So instead of making their own character then want to hijack a male one instead. Shocking. I didn't see that one coming /s
/r/MensRights24/05/16 12:06 PM
2

What you have discovered is that it's the radicals who are more active and thus vet themselves into the positions of power, in this case it's the mods. The moderates don't really have any influence at all.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 11:49 AM
-1

So I worked it out and it now means that women make up 58% of this years applicants. Astounding. At this rate most men will be inexperienced, jobless and thus homeless in a few decades.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 11:49 AM
2

All men are to go to jail. Do not pass Go and do not collect $200.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 12:39 PM
1

I quite enjoyed that actually.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 08:23 PM
2

“The Women’s Equality Party is a non-partisan political party and the issue of Sharia councils is a partisan one so we do not have a party line.” Oh but they do have a partisan position where gender is concerned so their spiel about being a non-partisan party is a pile of shit.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 07:40 PM
3

There is a LOT of projection in that article.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 11:54 AM
2

If you're still on friendly terms then that is a better position to be in. Hopefully you'll be ok. My brother has to still deal with his cheating ex and thats a nightmare but he still gets to see his kids often.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 11:48 AM
48

That is what happens when you pay less productive people more money for the lesser work they do over those that are more productive.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 11:40 AM
2

And it won't be long till you'll have to pee sitting down.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 03:02 PM
2

Absolutely disgusting.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 08:25 AM
2

What the fuck did I just watch?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 06:33 AM
1

Thats an insult to insects.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 07:31 AM
2

A young boy ended up dead here. His right to life was taken away from him. Also two other boys were abused all through this situation.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 07:29 AM
35

Domestic abuse requires one to have actual institutional power. Without that you cannot abuse someone. Using this logic it's impossible for men to be abusers since they have no institutional power really. All the laws favour women. The man can always leave the home. Lol, no he can't. I'm sensing a lot of projection here in this post. The man is the worst off when trying to leave. He will lose access to see his kids. He will lose his house/money in the divorce. He will have threats thrown his way…
/r/MensRights18/04/16 09:58 PM
2

I guess I'm questioning what the fuck is going on here. What is wrong with these girls? Such a big outrage over these sort of crimes and yet these girls are pretty much lining up to try it on with him.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 09:51 PM
1

So basically Adam Johnson is serving a prison sentence for grooming and sexual activity with a 15 year old girl, disgraceful if you ask me and he is being sent revealing photos while in prison from female fans. Not to mention he was caught with animal porn on his laptop as well. Eughh, disgusting.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 08:11 PM
1

No, because then they would know where he lives. I'm sure he just wants to keep his distance away from them now.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:51 AM
1

Oh well your post has been deleted now.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 12:57 PM
1

I suggest Thailand. My wife is from there and I've been several times myself now. Safe for women but also I didn't see any feminism there.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:54 AM
2

Seems to me to be a call for attention really.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 07:55 AM
3

They can't exactly tease men over "man flu" if they are going to be getting this now. Can they?
/r/MensRights03/03/16 11:32 PM
14

Met on tinder for sex - check Had excuse to provide her own "protection" - check Had sex with her only once - check Contacts you two months after to inform you of pregnancy - check Specifically states she doesn't want you involved other than child support - check Sounds like a case for asking for a paternity test to me. Looking for sex online is certainly not a good idea. You don't know who is at the other end and what they actually want from you. For instance you could have got mugged instead a…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 07:06 PM
3

The signs are actually all there. Just count them. 1) They say at the start they are letting their son wear what he wants but later her ideology is shown when she says "In the hope that Max will grow up having a better understanding of women". In other words this is actually about her ideology. 2) Notice that when she puts the hair clips on, Max then takes them out again and she continues on regardless i.e. ignores the fact that her son doesn't want the hair clips. 3) Notice the choice of femini…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:00 PM
1

a lack of evidence that he raped her? I guess her word alone isn't enough, right? No it's not. A persons word alone is all it took to cause the Salem witch trials. Many innocent people were burned at the stake because of "a persons word".
/r/MensRights20/02/16 08:31 PM
1

Yes, because if you tell women to be abstinent then you'll get a face full of slober as they spit over your face while shouting at you.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 05:57 PM
1

I thought your point was that men are expected to be abstinent if they don't want to be parants.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 07:37 AM
1

Abstinence is a stupid and unrealistic means of birth control. Well it is the only 100% guaranteed method to not produce a child or get a STD but your right that society doesn't treat men and women in the same way on the issue.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 08:15 PM
1

The sad state of affairs we find ourselves in today.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 07:58 PM
2

We're linking to him are we? Really? 1) He has trashed MRA's several times in the past with his articles. 2) Most recently he has tried to piss us off by claiming that he is a MRA just to get us into trouble with the media because he took a hissy fit because we didn't support him and rightly so because he wrote some stupid shit, which brings me to...... 3) He wrote an article saying that rape should be legalized on private property. I really don't give a shit if people think it was satire or a t…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 07:27 PM
1

Really says a lot that they want to compare abortion i.e. killing another human life to the decision of using Viagra. Just shows you how insane they are.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 09:00 AM
2

Can I ask why an achieved article has been posted? The article seems reasonable in it's reporting and we should want these types of articles to get the traffic.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 08:56 PM
1

Donotlink to the original article. http://www.donotlink.com/framed?848899
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:53 AM
25

There were no witnesses and no forensic evidence. The actress failed to pick out Mr Pearson in an identity parade of video images. She couldn't even pick him out in an identity parade. On what basis was this guy even arrested? I mean, how did they even find out who he was? Upon reviewing the video footage how could they even think it was him she was talking about? Afterall she described being assault for 3 seconds and this guy didn't even stop he just walked past her. I would have just said "you…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:47 AM
5

Any reason why zero (0) isn't an option since I don't hate women. I think you've been misinformed about what this sub-reddit is all about.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 04:47 PM
5

My point was in regards to the "thought experiment" part of what was said. It's not a thought experiment, it was a stupid thing for him to say. Has Roosh actually been shut out of any places yet? Genuine question because I honestly don't know.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 10:20 PM
4

A thought experiment? When feminists do thought experiments we don't like it because it shows their prejudice. How about the feminist who came up with the thought experiment of jailing all men within a seven mile vicinity of a rape crime? Quite rightly we thought that was bullshit and Roosh's "thought experiment" is bullshit too.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 09:03 PM
1

I can see what you mean.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 10:35 PM
2

Not really, just saying the topic has popped up quite a bit. Perhaps just having the one article about it would be enough. The guys an idiot and he doesn't really deserve the attention.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 10:23 PM
1

I'm seeing it on my facebook feed too. One of my relatives has been advocating protests and petitions against him.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 10:19 PM
1

It would be entertaining to watch just as long as nobody gets hurt. I'm hoping for another big red moment or something that I can laugh at.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 10:16 PM
3

At the end of the day they are just giving him the attention he wants within the media spotlight. I do agree that there is potential trouble at these meetups. There is a chance of things getting ugly.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 10:11 PM
1

Can you give me gold instead? Looks like I've been down voted twice. Perhaps you can offer an explanation why?
/r/MensRights03/02/16 10:01 PM
2

Basically this is in regards to Roosh. He was stupid enough to write in an article of his that rape should be legalized on private property. Quite a puzzling sentiment considering he admitted in his article at the start that rape was bad and wrong. However he made some mental gymnastics to conclude that doing this would somehow magically make rape disappear. That's like saying that you're against murder but how about we legalize it and that should make it disappear. However violence is not the a…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 09:45 PM
1

Five steps to kiss someone without sexually assaulting them This article is just another step in making sure men don't date women in the first place.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 09:41 PM
7

Exactly what I was thinking. This is very baffling and can only have backlash from the parents.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 07:47 PM
6

I can't even begin how they even reason this to begin with. Even if you did believe in the wage gap high school kids get their money off their parents anyway and don't earn their own money with the exception of perhaps having a paper round. Surely the parents must be angry over this.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 07:45 PM
3

Not according to the book of Luke. Luke 1:38 - “I am the Lord’s servant,” Mary answered. “May your word to me be fulfilled.” Then the angel left her. Think what you want about Christianity but Christians believe that Mary accepted becoming pregnant with Jesus beforehand as shown above. It doesn't do anyone any good to misrepresent peoples positions.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 08:37 AM
1

So what if they ask for tea and drink the tea but then afterwards the next morning they decided they didn't want tea afterall and claim that you forced them to drink tea?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 07:37 PM
13

Well this lady deserves to lose her job after this. Lets just hope that happens. As for the passer-by he is obviously an idiot.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 07:04 PM
20

Perhaps now BBC producers will realise the hardships that some men go through and actually report on it.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 05:31 PM
1

I just used the title that came with the picture. It's not my imgur image. I found it posted on r/tumblrinaction
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:30 PM
0

I just used the title that came with the picture. It's not my imgur image. I found it posted on r/tumblrinaction
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:30 PM
2

I suppose in these kind of situations you're caught between a rock and a hard place. I only suggested what I said because we all know about primary aggressor laws. Doesn't matter who calls the cops, they always come and arrest the man.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:29 PM
3

Thanks for the link. I was unaware that the organisation was led by a feminist, but I suppose at least she is being active in something that men suffer from, so it's a good start even if her views are not all there.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 06:51 PM
12

If it's a girl that you're dating it might be best to wait until she goes home for the night and then just never contact her again afterwards.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 06:04 PM
2

Apply for it anyway and if they question you just say that you identify as a woman. Lets see if they deny you if they think you are trans.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 04:23 PM
3

Your right, I linked this article because this is the one I came across but I'll keep in mind in future that I can always link the source if needed instead.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 06:07 AM
1

I wasn't aware of that actually. Nice to know they have to invite them to the debates.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 11:30 PM
6

The BBC certainly did start the trouble, but at the same time they are not going to invite him back if they know he isn't going to stick to the format. The format was predetermined really and I don't really consider it to be an unfair one since the questions could have been answered with men in mind.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 11:20 PM
5

I think it would have been better to answer the questions posed since he would have least got the airtime to speak. It seemed it would have been a good opportunity since each member actually got space to talk without being interrupted too much on the basis they kept on subject. The question on education he could have even answered from the male perspective in regards to boys under performing at school.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 11:05 PM
6

Listening to the debate now. I'm not liking the tactic that Mike isn't answering the questions being posed. He could have even answered the education e is only going to look like a trouble maker after this.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 11:02 PM
1

I would love that.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 08:00 PM
5

She claims that this has been a process of 5 months yet she has only been married to him for a week. Why marry him in the first place if this is what you're going to do to him.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:57 PM
0

I think you must be talking to someone else because your comment here can't be addressed to me as it has no relevance to what I had said in my previous post. That "last comment" makes no mention of him raping her and is a vague statement that also means he didn't rape her even if we ignored the rest of the girls comments saying they were going to set him up. You did read what I said didn't you? I actually agreed that she herself probably wasn't raped and that she is probably making a false accus…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 10:49 PM
2

I made no comment on wither the allegations were true or false. Just that they were more serious that what is being given credit for here. He has been accused of raping 13 girls. The article posted in this thread gives social media messages from 4 of them. The article I posted cites this: Deputies spent April tracking down victim after victim, coming up with 13 by Monday and then an additional five after the case against Kost was publicly announced. It is possible that some of the allegations ma…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:29 PM
0

The allegations are quite serious here actually. Here is another newspaper report on this. http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-arizona-teen-serial-rapist-18-girls-victims-police-say-20140502-story.html
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:57 AM
1

lol, he is still butthurt then.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 08:29 PM
2

Like I said to someone else in this thread. Wargame4life is a troll so don't expect any reasonable answer from him.
/r/MGTOW03/04/15 08:27 PM
2

for those [laying at home: I actually replied to another person he was talking to in order to warn them of his stupidity. The fact he has put me on ignore is a badge of honour in my opinion.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 08:16 PM
4

You don't want to get into a conversation with him. He is a troll who insults people and ignores the arguments you make. I would just leave it.
/r/MGTOW03/04/15 12:21 AM
1

a sphincter says "and still it goes on, despite none of them being read and him being told about it, he still takes the effort. moron of the year!"
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:57 PM
1

a sphincter says "and still it goes on, despite none of them being read and him being told about it, he still takes the effort. moron of the year!"
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:53 PM
1

Wargame4life is a really nice and he certainly doesn't insult anyone. :)
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:47 PM
2

I think Wargame4life is a really nice guy. He is fantastic. :)
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:42 PM
2

I'm still replying? So is he. It's driving him nuts that he doesn't know what I am saying.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:34 PM
1

Lol and you still replied even though you said you wouldn't. You really are dizzy. Up is down and left is right. I'm not sure how this troll tactic of ignoring me but not really is going to work. People will just look at you like a nutter.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:16 PM
1

Now you are just plain in denial, there is absolutely no question that you were the retard who compared your work costings being off by 6% to a customer as a "big deal" as somehow proof 6% is significant in a completely different situation (Total population difference). Don't forget, not all Frenchmen speak French and this apparently proves that a % difference in voting patterns is not a big deal. lol. Keep up the good work I think you would make an excellent poe around here. now its just depres…
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:28 PM
1

may you never overdose on vitamin A or vitamin C by even as much as 6% because in your world that a crisis since obviously if your brain was 6% bigger than your skull that would be fatal, hence by the same logic any discrepancy of 6% in any context is also crisis----THIS IS WHAT DARTHOVIOUS ACTUALLY BELIEVES Classic strawman argument However this is a little bit too obvious. If you want to be a proper poe then I suggest you improve on this. Anybody can see that I didn't argue this or even mentio…
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:23 AM
1

Now its actually becoming pretty sad, its actually is like you have really bad mental health problems. I thought you were going to stop talking to me? The fact you think my argument is that "in all contexts any 6% difference is meaningless" is actually quite terrifying. That is indeed what you argued. You said the following: LOl this is hilarious you don't understand statistics or precision and orders of magnitude and this: waaa waaaa, he said 50% but its not exactly 50% hence his entire point i…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 10:26 PM
1

Are you determined to show the world you really cant understand context. No but you are. A 6% swing in politics is a very big deal. If you had any intelligence you would know that. I am starting to think you might actually have a genuine mental disability since you think a claim about percentages in one context has relevancy in another. So hang on, you have been arguing all this time that this is too small a difference in percentages to make a difference yet you agree that in the case I cited 6%…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 09:40 PM
1

shall we add that to the list of things you don't understand (IQ tests). So says the guy who says he isn't going to talk to me anymore yet continues to talk to me. Lol, how much of an idiot are you. With you up is down and left is right and yet you continue to insisit you are right about this. lol I would bet heavily that not only am i more qualified than you, that its in a field more "respected" for its difficulty and comprehension. I very much doubt that. You keep telling me you don't have the…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 08:13 PM
1

i didn't even bother reading that reply, because you have clearly demonstrated abysmal intellect and your inability to comprehend principles is fucking shocking. You didn't bother reading it but you know I am wrong. Lol how much of a dumbass are you to disagree with someone without even reading what they said. as much fun as it is walking some dipshit through basic reasoning and how to actually apply judgement, its not something i am prepared to do for free. It's you who needs the logic training…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:43 PM
8

After having a look you could be right. Apparently it was attributed to her in an issue of playboy, but she denies saying it. Could be something stirred up to wreck her credibility since she did a lot work on anti-pornography campaigning.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 10:17 PM
1

"men are oppressed because they are a political minority" --- This is what Darthobvious ACTUALLY BELIEVES!!!! And you believe the opposite which is what is hilarious. Yes, men are getting screwed over by society and you think it's because men have a political monopoly. How stupid are you exactly? As i have stated i have no interest in walking you through how to apply appropriate judgement, because someone so stupid who thinks 50% gender split in the context of political power and representation …
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:16 PM
1

Oh look more arguments about how your uncle who is holidaying in France doesn't speak french to refute someone saying "in france everyone speaks french". "Your statement above is very absolute and you can't claim any shenanigans to say that you were giving ball park figures or anything" lol Do you seriously have autism? have you ever been tested? Oh look another round of insults with absolutely no reasoning or logic whatsoever. That's because you wouldn't know logic if it came up to you and smac…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 12:40 PM
1

as I stated, I have no interest in walking you through your stupidity, I am not wasting my time explaining and pandering to someone clearly incapable of understanding basic statistics especially when they use logical gems like this: In other words you can't explain it to me because you know you're wrong. Gotcha. Your original post was quite clear but now you are trying to say that you were not being specific as you actually were. for evidence that men are a political minority (and conveniently i…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 09:20 AM
1

There is absolutely no back peddling here, my statement i stand by wholeheartedly with its entire intention (you are just too dense to comprehend it) Your statement was absolutely clear and I pointed out exactly what you were saying. It's not my fault that you don't understand why you are wrong. It has been explained in length even using the French example and you are still so retarded you don't understand. You mean the French example which has nothing to do with what we are talking about? How i…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 12:22 AM
1

Once again Einstein (how can you really be this stupid?) Trust me, I'm thinking the same about you. The context of your post was clear. It's you that is trying to change and back peddle. That is not my problem. Your original post in full is this: While obviously satire you must be sure you are not so retarded you don't understand the difference between a minority and an equal force. In society in general men are not a minority they are 50% of all votes and 50% of all voices. the reason we are pa…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 10:41 PM
1

Once again this is what you said. In society in general men are not a minority they are 50% of all votes and 50% of all voices. Once again this was not only proven wrong but it was explained that men do not have an equal voice like you claimed. It's not my fault that you do not understand this. Once again I do not care for your insults. I care about logic and reasoning and once again you provided none. All you have is ad hominem attacks. This is your problem, not mine.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 10:27 PM
2

This is what you said. In society in general men are not a minority they are 50% of all votes and 50% of all voices. It was proven wrong. We do not make up an equal voice as stated. The majority of voters are female and by a good number I may add. The fact that you need to insult me actually proves what I said previously. You are a hypocrite who moans and complains about moaners all the while moaning yourself. At the end of the day I do not care about your insults, I care about reasoning and log…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 07:01 PM
3

waaa waaaa, he said 50% but its not exactly 50% hence his entire point is invalid waaa waaa im so oppressed waaa waaaa women are running society and opressing men waaa waaa I find this extremely ironic since moaning is the very same thing you are doing in your posts but let me guess you are allowed to moan whereas others are not.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 06:38 PM
2

First one comes from here by the looks of it. http://stereolights.tumblr.com/post/89784353856/queer-authors-make-all-your-characters-queer
/r/MensRights27/03/15 04:28 PM
2

I just asked the guy who posted it on facebook. He is unaware of their source as well. I recognise some of them myself. One of them was the hashtag "Kill All Men" on twitter.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 04:24 PM
6

To be fair your statement was still wrong. We are under 50% of the population, especially when it comes to those eligible to vote. This means that political parties can target the female vote in order to get themselves elected and is what is actually happening. Sure the hate you talk about is very unlikely to mean that all men will be put into gas chambers, however we still get laws passed against us and that are not in our best interests.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 04:17 PM
5

Unfortunately not, it was posted on my facebook wall by someone else. I just thought I would share it.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 07:02 AM
2

Personally I don't like this advert. It gives the idea that partners are just there to be thrown away when you get "dissatisfied" with them instead of caring about them and actually talking about their concerns. I think this is the deeper issue here. Sure it is a women pretty much discarding the guy because he happens to actually have feelings but I wouldn't want it the other way round either.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 08:23 PM
5

The room was equipped with cookies, coloring books, bubbles, Play-Doh, calming music, pillows, blankets and a video of frolicking puppies, as well as students and staff members trained to deal with trauma. Is it just me or does this sound like a room for young children to play in?
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:54 PM
1

That's because many men are now complicit in their own emasculation, and you can't blame women for that. Oh yes you can, it's called indoctrination. Well in concerns to the feminist women I mean.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 08:05 PM
1

You are off topic, but I will respond anyway. The fact you think I am off topic is quite revealing. I was giving you a reason as to why women earn less than men and it comes down to women working less than men because they don't need to work as hard. The reason that women make 80% of purchases is because they generally do the household shopping. This is groceries, drug store items, household items like the stuff you buy from Walmart or Target, clothing and items for children, dry cleaning, pet s…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 07:10 PM
3

When you look at wages, men don't appear to be discriminated against. Well there is your problem. You are too busy looking at the wage gap, however if you look at the spending gap then you will see that Women make about 80% of the purchases. The reason for this is because women get money from men, hence they don't need to work as hard as men. It is not a position of oppression if you get money without having to work for it. Lottery winners aren't sitting in their house complaining about how oppr…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 09:12 PM
1

Also to add to the other reply that you received. The guy wasn't even served. So he didn't even know that there was a claim against him. The server lied annd said he had served him but in actual fact he was in prison at the time and he wasn't served at all.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 08:37 PM
0

I guess this is how we get a reduction in the male population by 90%. Through selective abortions. Expect the radicals to be push this in future.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 08:53 AM
20

Well you see, this is the trick. The definition of rape gets expanded in order to claim more women as victims' by saying that women can't consent under certain circumstances, therefore their consent is invalid. At the same time feminists argue that women should still be able to go to these "rape pits" by arguing "Locking up women as if they are the ones causing rape merely by existing is not the way to handle the problem of sexual assault". The result is a massive increase in rape claims, which …
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:38 PM
1

Reading things today has made me think that I need to consider leaving this country. First it was the decision that the police should handle rape cases with a guilty until proven innocent attitude and now it's reading this where women just shouldn't be punished for any crimes they commit. I really don't give a fuck about the slippery slope argument being a logical fallacy. I think it's really evident now that what we have here is a slippery slope and society is going to be fucked in the UK in fu…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 06:01 PM
10

The new guidance also covers domestic violence situations and those where “the complainant may be financially or otherwise dependent on their alleged rapist”. So basically if the man of the house just so happens to be the bread winner then he is a rapist? I can see a lot more innocent men going to prison now because of this.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:14 PM
1

If you can put up stupid posters in the dorm at your college then check your privilage.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 07:15 PM
1

I fully understand where you are coming from but you could still have an issue over how much a person gets paid for the work they actually do. I know that the 78% number is actually bullshit and isn't actually real but I think the feminists stand point after an article like this isn't that companies should hire more women because they are cheaper but that they should hire woman at the same rate that men get paid. Like I said, not my position because I know that the figures used to support it are…
/r/MensRights25/09/14 06:18 AM
3

The new bill in California is an example of what he is talking about. The law has been changed to say that enthusiastic consent is required when having sex. Apparently the law states that this enthusiastic consent needs to be present all during intercourse. Here is an article in regards to the bill but I'm sure you can find more in regards to it. http://www.saveservices.org/2014/06/but-rape-culture-lame-excuses-for-californias-affirmative-consent-bill-on-campus-sex/
/r/MensRights25/09/14 06:07 AM
3

At the end of the day if a woman tries to attack me with a knife I am going to defend myself. I am not just going to stand there while being stabbed to death.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 04:23 AM
8

Saw an advert on this last night. "Do we live in a sexist society?" To which my house mate replied, "Yes, women get everything".
/r/MensRights23/09/14 04:14 AM
32

True, however she didn't post that in her article. Instead she blamed men and their mothers for some strange reason.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:44 PM
13

They got it from their mamas Eh no, we got it from feminist dogma which is what in reality scares the hell out of us. We don't ask you for your phone number because we don't want to be asked questions by the police for being "creeps".
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:19 PM
2

"These dads are a group of folks that needs to be heard," said Kay Cullen, spokeswoman for the National Child Support Enforcement Association. "But their anger may very well deafen the ears of those who might need to hear them." Angry? Oh ghee I wonder why someone would get angry about their kids being kidnapped away from them and having to pay for that privilege. No, I can't imagine why anybody would get angry over such a thing. /s
/r/MensRights09/09/14 09:18 PM
0

Posted above but I'll post it here too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6exm2Hi28Xw
/r/MensRights08/09/14 06:55 PM
2

You just reminded me of this. Lol. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6exm2Hi28Xw
/r/MensRights08/09/14 06:48 PM
5

Anything less would be sexist, so she claims. Getting rid of her out of our parliament would be just be good common sense.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 10:14 PM
2

This isn't about revenge. Its about justice and changing attitudes. It is not just to sink that same level.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 10:37 PM
13

Don't advocate killing people in this sub reddit. We're not murderers you know. So you can take your trolling elsewhere.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 12:03 PM
5

Oh well, we now have a list that tells us when we should suspect our SOs of cheating. DO NOT LET HIM COME TO YOUR PLACE: So if this happens to you then it probably means they are cheating.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 08:38 PM
2

Batman does hit girls. In one episode of the animated series when he finds out that Red Claw is a woman, he says that he is an equal opportunities crime fighter. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9MNZHF9o20
/r/MensRights24/08/14 11:11 PM
6

Indeed, this woman is being held back from becoming an engineer or mathematician because this $5 million will prevent her from working. /s
/r/MensRights15/08/14 07:19 PM
1

Obviously this is going to hurt falsely accused men really bad but it's also going to completely destroy the education system. I can see the number of false accusations rise but then I see the number of men going to University/College dropping dramatically.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 06:28 PM
2

A startup in San Francisco called ManServants aims to give every woman exactly what she wants: a man who does exactly what she wants. What a woman says she wants and she actually wants are two different things. I don't think this will take off to be honest.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 07:37 PM
4

That's fucking insane man. Basically they refused to even take note of anything which proved the mans innocence. Quite literally any guy can get thrown out of that University even with the most evidently false accusation made against him. What do you think is going to happen when some female students learn they can get any male student thrown out the University while at the same time being open to the police that they lied about it? They can have the satisfaction of getting "revenge" on a guy bu…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 07:03 PM
1

I think they have. Someone said it was linked on AMR (against mens rights). A pretty pointless post to link from here if you ask me since it's pretty obvious that this article is pretty bad.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 06:40 PM
4

I have a feeling this article has probably been seen before but I thought I would post it anyway. Basically the entire article pretty much sums up that feminist men should just shut up because they are not allowed an opinion. Most of the phrases used there I would also say were probably started by feminist women and they are just being repeated by the men.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:33 PM
3

Domestic violence law planned, says Labour's Yvette Cooper Oh right, she is fucking at it again. What is this? Is she trying to prove that she is more of a feminist crazy nut bag than Harriet Harman?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 08:32 PM
1

Depends on what standard is good enough to convict someone. If you have several eyewitness accounts all saying pretty much the same thing then that's good enough.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:08 PM
1

How do you feel about her posting on Reddit to make complaints about it? Are you one who thinks that private laundry should not be shown in public or are you OK with it and think she was looking for advice rather than ranting?
/r/MensRights26/07/14 07:23 PM
3

Thank you. Ransom_Stoddard can now offer you a reply if he wishes. I just wanted to explain your position rather than just using an ad-hominem attack. Yes, you can call me a logic Nazi if you wish.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 11:56 AM
2

Wow, what insightful criticism you have there. Perhaps you like to elaborate instead of just using an ad-hominem attack consisting of "You're nuts".
/r/MensRights26/07/14 10:56 AM
2

Eyewitness testimony is used in every type of criminal case. There is no way we should stop using it. I absolutely agree that we have other methods of collecting evidence and I also understand that the main issue in this case was the untested rape kit. However there is no reason why we shouldn't have eyewitness testimony if it's independent and largely unbiased.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 09:48 AM
1

I labelled it with a reverse genders tag for a reason. "our marriage broke up because the (wife) wouldn't sleep with the (husband)" when, really, the (wife) stopped sleeping with the (husband) because (he) was an unhelpful, mean, selfish baby jerk, and cemented the deal by complaining about sex. I see what you did there. :) If this was the other way round the man would still be to blame for being selfish and by not having sex with his wife.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 09:33 AM
1

Lets say that Anita Sarkeesian was kidnapped by terrorists and locked in a cell and the S.A.S. or Marines were sent out to rescue her and they just so happened to be all men. Do you really think she is going to stand there in a cell and refuse their help because they are all guys doing it? Of course she isn't. Other the hand, Princess Peach is rescued by a couple of plumbers, yes plumbers. Plumbers with no combat training of any sort but somehow it's their responsibility to go and rescue Princes…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 09:24 AM
2

I think you're right in saying that it wasn't the best time to present it. I just thought it was interesting to post as a double standard sort of thing because if it happened the other way round then the guy would be shamed for not having sex with his wife.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:37 PM
1

Thanks, now I don't need to get the link :)
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:35 PM
3

Pretty much why I posted it as a reverse genders tag.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:35 PM
3

I'm assuming everyone here has heard the story of the guy who was sued by ex-wife in France for a lack of sex and had to pay a fine in regards to it.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 08:45 PM
23

I have to say that I liked it. A more realistic image of what a dad would be.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 09:03 PM
1

And you know what's worse? This is the company that is now making the Star Wars films. Be prepared to see in episode VII Luke Skywalker being domestically abused by Mara Jade only to have look like a joke.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:10 PM
2

The woman, who can't be identified for legal reasons Yep, but somehow the guys name is all plastered on the article.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 08:40 PM
5

We are open to cis women and trans folks only. You're a fucking bike shop, what possible reason can you have to refuse to sell to men?
/r/MensRights21/07/14 08:31 PM
1

And let me guess, it was you who down voted all my comments in this thread for that one sentence in one comment?
/r/MensRights21/07/14 07:35 PM
1

You are right. In this instance one man was a victim and it's just a case of keeping tabs on the news so to speak just to make sure we are paying attention to what is happening. I've seen that episode of the view as well and it was something that was very chilling to me. I just couldn't believe the lack of sympathy that was being shown and Sharron Osborne's comment showing that she admitted that she didn't know what happened in this incident but she was thought it was fabulous anyway. I think th…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 06:30 PM
2

Which of course would still be stupid anyway.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 01:11 AM
1

Okay, I guess not everything needs to be an "issue." Sometimes it's just something men might want to know about. Gotcha. In order to know what issues we have we first need to identify what happens in the first place. Hence all the news stories of bad things that happen to men. Remember a lot people in general aren't aware of some of the bad things that happen to men and that's because it gets swept under the rug and not talked about. i.e. Domestic violence I'm just putting the shoe on the other …
/r/MensRights20/07/14 01:09 AM
2

I honestly don't know how this could possibly happen anywhere in the world whatsoever. How on earth can a 9 month old boy be held accountable for murder? How can a 9 month old boy possibly even commit such an act?
/r/MensRights20/07/14 12:45 AM
1

Its not uncommon for women to get light sentences for killing men. Part of this sub-reddit is to highlight that men can be victims too and thus we are obviously going to show cases where this happens. The man in question was killed but was also a victim of abuse. I'm not sure how much more Mens Rights you can get than this. Yes it's bad and I'm sure that a lot of people agree it's bad but this sub-reddit is here to discuss these bad things that happen to men and to also discuss the culture aroun…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 12:40 AM
1

It sounds like from what you are saying here is that you believe she will get life in prison for her part in this (or the appropriate punishment you believe is warranted at least). Perhaps others here are less hopeful that she will punished for her crime in an appropriate fashion.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 12:24 AM
2

"We either take them through the criminal process or we do nothing. Well, I don't think doing nothing is acceptable given we have a fundamental responsibility to prevent crime." Interesting, since it is the polices responsibility to prevent all crime (not just crimes in progress they are witness to) then does that mean we can blame the police for all the crime that happens? So if I get assaulted in the street by somebody does that mean I can sue the police for not preventing it ipso facto?
/r/MensRights20/07/14 12:00 AM
2

No, you didn't sound like a cock. I was giving a genuine answer. If a man losses his life then he has still lost his right to life. It's up to us as the Mens Rights Movement to monitor this kind of incident and make sure that people (including women) are being punished adequately for the crime of taking a mans right to life. The attitude of the person who did this was one on entitlement. They thought they were entitled to treat this man this way and of course she isn't and shouldn't be.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 11:51 PM
5

Which is of course never, because they'll keep inventing new problems so they are never done.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 04:09 PM
2

Ah OK, I see what you mean there.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 03:33 PM
1

Because men also deserve the right to life and this guy had his life taken away from him. Just a thought.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 03:31 PM
4

After reading the article I was left wondering why this was even posted here. Man walks in to find his child being sexually abused and he stops the abuse by beating up the person who is doing it. Now I'm no rocket scientist but I fail to see here what no normal person would have done.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 03:14 PM
2

This is from the other piece linked to that was written at daily dot. http://www.dailydot.com/opinion/how-conor-oberst-became-mra-icon/ To be sure, you can’t help but feel at least somewhat bad for Oberst here. As an outspoken feminist, the guy likely has no wish to be associated with men’s rights activists, and this is a bad situation for him all around. Yeah funny that, yet its the MRAs who stick up for him and agree he should have issued a lawsuit for defamation while feminists like him are t…
/r/MensRights19/07/14 10:35 AM
1

Some of the comments on that article are unbelievable. I wish people would actually think before they started spouting nonsense.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 09:27 AM
2

You should have just stayed and told her you were there first and that your nephew wants to play on the swings. in a few years your son(she thought he was) will be coming to this school.. and you wont want some strange man there while hes playing in the playground. I would have asked her why she thought you would begrudge any male parent from taking their children to the playground.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 06:34 AM
2

We urge all such men – young and old alike – to contact the helpline for help to stop their illegal and harmful behaviour. Apparently paedophile women can just continue with what they are doing.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 09:52 PM
3

A New York man is the victim of domestic violence, but when he sought help, police falsified evidence and charged him instead. Why? Really why do the authorities do shit like this. What on earth do they possibly gain out of it other than a bad reputation. I really can't fathom this kind madness, it makes me feel really perplexed.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 09:39 PM
1

I think you're forgetting the possibility that fewer men applied because they got lower grades and were unable to apply. I would have thought this was the obvious consequence of girls getting better grades than boys in the first place. It would mean less spaces for boys going into higher education.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 11:27 AM
1

Considering that in the past men obtained degrees just fine without much in the way of problems would suggest that you're wrong.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 07:11 PM
1

OK, I was genuinely unaware of this. What is the typical sentence for something like that?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 04:32 AM
1

I'm a bit puzzled. The legal age for consent in the UK is 16. I understand that she would lose her job but I'm not understanding the legal implications. Can someone genuinely please explain this one to me?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 10:19 PM
3

No offence but it doesn't actually state in the article what evidence was used to convict him. Sure there is a bit on the accusation but it doesn't list everything.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 05:46 PM
1

What sort of things? Charities that help men and other organisations to raise awareness of issues affecting men. For instance Mankind in the UK. http://www.mankind.org.uk/ I am beginning to wonder if people realise how long ago it was that Erin Pizzey set up her shelters. There seems to be a feeling that because Erin Pizzey's attempt to set up a shelter for male victims failed there's no point trying again, As I said, she eventually set up the shelter, so it is up and running. The trouble is get…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 10:02 PM
2

Thanks for replying. Well as a movement we are trying to set up facilities for men in order to help them. Erin Pizzy did manage in the end to set up the domestic violence shelter for male victims in London. However its only one shelter. Unfortunately the clients who had the money to fund the shelter that she set up for female victims didn't want to fund one for male victims. A large part of what the MRM does is to raise awareness. The more people who understand the problems that men face then mo…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 07:47 AM
1

as far as i'm aware, muslim men do not wear veils. But Muslim men can still be victims of violence. So what we have here is a case of a "end violence against women" campaign, ignoring the fact that Muslim men can also be victims of violence. Go back and read my initial statement.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 07:38 AM
16

And feminists wonder why more and more women are not joining their movement. What a disgrace.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:24 PM
4

There are plenty of feminists who think that the MRM shouldn't exist and that Feminism will deal with men's problems. However I've yet to see any great attempt to do so. For instance this guy at about 2 minutes into this film talks about how he lost his two friends to suicide and that's why he wanted to attend this event. One feminist there then tells him he can to turn to feminism for support because somehow feminism is the answer to his problems. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0 So …
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:20 PM
4

Erin Pizzy did and she was harrassed for doing so. Here is an interview with her. From about 2:40 she talks about the harassment she received and the bomb threats she got. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhliqceyoL8 Also note that Erin Pizzy is responsible for opening the first domestic violence shelter for female victims in the UK also. So its not like she was trying to favour men over women.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:07 PM
1

Lol. Be careful, you might start growing red hair soon.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:24 PM
1

So do you notice how SRS ban Feminist MRAs yet we don't? What I think this shows is that they don't want any oppossing ideas because they are afraid of them while we will accept opposising ideas because we can answer them.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:22 PM
4

Oh I see, what you're saying is a different person from these two guys sexually assaulted her? In that case then you you're right.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:51 AM
3

Actually she willingly sucked these guys dicks at this concert. I'm not sure how she is even able to claim sexual assault here when there was a crowd of people watching her while she was doing this.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:44 AM
7

Women are disadvantaged in the workplace, are paid significantly less than men Not really, it's only because of childcare responsibilities and job choices that mean you earn less than men. do the bulk of childcare If childcare responsibilites are such a discrimination against women then why do the National Organisation for Women still oppose joint custody legislation? http://www.fathersandfamilies.org/enews/cv/enews-20120614.html http://www.now.org/nnt/03-97/father.html Notice that they oppose t…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:13 AM
11

I see, and so what do you think of the situation where Erin Pizzey tried to set up a demostic violence shelter for male victims in the UK and was then subsequently harrassed and bullied by feminists until she had to leave the country? Also note that they killed her dog in the process.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 10:17 AM
4

She was a victim here, because the guy was not cyberbullied like she was. Give it time. I'm sure the feminist establishment will find out who these boys are and shame them somehow.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 10:11 AM
9

For once a boy is doing well in the field of reading and this is the attitude that is shown. What a fucking joke.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 10:08 AM
4

Oh well guys. If you're looking to get married you now have this womans position to not buy a ring. If you're finacee then asks you about it then just point to this. We'll see how long this one lasts. Lol.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 08:45 AM
12

I know how you feel.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 08:44 AM
1

Nothing really. It does say that you need to install the app on your partners phone though. The free version shows the icon on the front screen while the paid $2 a month version hides the icon from the front screen.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:34 AM
18

You could try A Voice For Men. There is also A Shrink For Men and perhaps The National Coalition For Men might publish it (Not sure on their article style though).
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:31 AM
1

Why was the violence in the article only specific to Muslim women? You're answer is most likely only because that particular incident that was mentioned happened to a Muslim woman. In that case particular incidents that happen to Muslim men must be violence against Muslim men using this same logic. The fact is the reporting itself is specific to gender, but there is discrimination against Muslim men as well. It is not just Muslim women who get assaulted.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:09 AM
37

Anyone want to have a go at a girlfriend tracker? What do you mean that would be disrespectful?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 02:19 PM
1

I wasn't really pointing anyone else out in particular, just the other cultures that have birth rates higher than ours.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:12 AM
1

OK, show me the article that talks about discrimination against Muslim men in particular.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:09 AM
2

They only reference Muslim women, not Muslim men. So I guess violence against Muslim men is OK in their eyes. Let me show you. The "hijab outcry" campaigners urged the government to "ensure that Swedish Muslim women are guaranteed the right to... religious freedom". and The campaigners said they wanted to draw attention to the "discrimination that affects Muslim women" in Sweden. So the big question is What about Muslim men? Are they not discriminated against as well for their religion? Or perha…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:48 PM
1

The "hijab outcry" campaigners urged the government to "ensure that Swedish Muslim women are guaranteed the right to... religious freedom". The men however can go and fuck themselves.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:27 PM
-1

You're a man. Thats the only reason they need.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 12:37 PM
2

It won't be long until they state "Every man abuses every woman every second of the day".
/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:33 AM
2

The stats being cited here come from a study which defines smacking your daughter for misbehaviour as physical abuse. Thats why the number they get is so high. Of course I've yet to see their study for boys using the same criteria.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:31 AM
11

Lol, the obvious reply to that is "If I'm such an unattractive loser that I can't get an American women then why are you so concerned about it?".
/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:11 AM
3

I think he is talking about American culture. Lets be fair here. The media doesn't give us any respect. Its a sense of indoctrination and both men and women pick up on this. Men learn they are shit and women learn that men are shit and they are better than them and deserve to treat men like shit.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:02 AM
1

Yes, and I swatted flies before I was married. How barbaric am I? :)
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:53 AM
2

In what way do they say it though? I bet they tend to be more understanding?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:52 AM
4

Lol. Thats like telling you not to talk to Catholics when you live in the Vatican.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:51 AM
3

Good for you mate. My wife is Thai and she is pretty much the same kind of woman. Now I'll have a go. •She just wants citizenship! - Well my wife could have picked other guys besides me. Also my wife was a virgin before we met and I was her first. So she isn't the kind of women to jump into bed with men for frivilous reasons. •She just married you for money! - My wife is more educated than I am and has a PhD. :) •You just want a submissive woman! - Same here, I'm not allowed to kill any bugs. Sh…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:49 AM
2

Well I suppose thats true. Some of those pregnancies might not really be unplanned, but I believe that some of them are at least.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:20 AM
2

I agree with what you're saying, but my point is regarding that unplanned pregnancies should go down even further in the case of male contraception getting a much needed boost. I also wonder what the unplanned pregnancy figures were like over 100 years ago as well. Were they lower than todays rates or higher?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:18 AM
3

Unfortunately not when its concentrated in the same place. No point in the western world struggling to meet population demands when the rest of the world continues unabated. It just means that we collapse while everybody else takes over.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 06:42 AM
16

Japan is in the shit because they clearly overwork their men and now men are saying "No thank you".
/r/MensRights21/08/13 06:37 AM
7

You're correct. Something like 50% of pregnancies are unplanned in he UK.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 06:36 AM
10

Exactly, otherwise there could be a split second there that you're raping the man.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 06:19 AM
1

Obviously not. Remember, a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle /s
/r/MensRights21/08/13 06:01 AM
1

I'm going to go with sociopath. If she felt any remorse at all she certainly wouldn't do an interview concerning her behaviour.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:59 AM
38

Violence against women is a workplace hazard. Are they fucking serious? Do they really think there is an epidemic of women being attacked within their workplaces? If so, they must be fucking stupid. Now I know you might get the odd incident or two but there is no way it happens enough to warrant this kind of sign. The people in that workplace must think its a fucking joke.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:14 PM
2

I didn't lose my virginity until I was in my twenties, that doesn't mean I would accept this. In fact I wouldn't, I would have probably kicked her out the house.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:09 PM
17

Well she did lie about everything else.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:05 PM
2

Perhaps, unfortunately not everybody spends their time on the internet. If her husband is highly successful then he probably works full time and then some.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:05 PM
4

Probably, the courts are so biased against men.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:01 PM
3

I would be surprised if he didn't. It's not just the cheating but the deliberate lying to have him raise kids that are not his.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:01 PM
1

My mistake.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 08:59 PM
43

Exactly, and people like that deserve everything bad that comes to them. My one wish for this women is to be exposed and shamed, all the while hoping that people see her for the user she actually is. Unfortunately I don't think it would happen but we can all dream.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 04:41 PM
12

Certainly fight against paying it. However you know the courts will blah, blah and try to make him anyway. In that situation you can either pay it and keep a relationship with kids or skip the country to avoid paying it. Options are not great for men who fall victim to this.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 04:39 PM
1

Not really, when Charles becomes king then he will be on the note instead of the queen. I don't think that means we need to bend over backwards to then make sure the other side of the note is always a woman when that happens.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 04:34 PM
24

Yeah, thats looks like a good example of someone you should not talk to.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 04:32 PM
3

They did actually say the words "other than the queen" when they protested this about this.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 04:27 PM
6

From most people, probably but at least then her husband can divorce her and give her the metaphorical boot.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 04:25 PM
1

Will she go to jail this time or will she be offered yet another plea bargain for her to ignore?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:44 PM
12

You said it.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:33 PM
1

It just goes to show their activity is going up though or at least the reporting of their activity is going up. I don't know how many times I've read about feminists in the last few months in the Uk trying to change things.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:55 PM
247

Quite simply this woman is nothing but a complete user. She uses her husband to provide for her while she bangs other men behind his back out of disrespect. She has the cheek to say she wanted her children to have the "best genes" but fails to recognise that IT IS HUSBAND who has provided for her because HE IS A SUCCESSFUL man. She is complete trash and I hope that one day she is exposed for the user that she is.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:50 PM
8

Feminists seem really busy in the UK recently. There was the whole thing with automatically banning porn on peoples internet, there was the kerfuffle with the lads mags and the censorship to do with that and also the whole "we want a woman on bank note" protest. Now we have this. I guess I'm also missing some instances so feel free to give more examples.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:28 PM
1

Best advice is to make sure you get to know a girl first. Don't get too involved at the start but also be honest and let her know that you are just getting to know her first. You are taking your time to see if you are compatiable. This is what I did and now I am married and have a son. Its the best way to see what her characteristics are like and although all couples will have arguments, what happens afterwards is the key. What made me comfortable was knowing that even though we did argue someti…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:25 AM
5

Wish I could contribute something but I'm pretty tight until I get paid at the end of the month.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 03:25 PM
1

Next on the agenda is to burn all mens eyes out with red pokers so we don't see breasts while out in public.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:59 PM
2

This is the mountain we need to climb. For years boys have been falling behind without any care or initiatives coming from people at all and now the mere insinuation that boys have pulled it back by a tiny bit is enough for them to start demanding more preferential treatment for girls. How can we make progress for boys in schools when things like this will incite groups to outrage about "how poor girls are doing", when the reality is that boys are getting shafted on a daily basis?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:42 PM
2

Fuck Matthew Good was right. Its Advertising On Police Cars. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8M1b8SzusA
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:23 PM
2

Understand that I was only pointing out one piece of reasoning of what you said to the other person you were discussing this with. I am not against what you are arguing for per se. i.e Why are you taking/allowing your children into a shop that sells porn if you don't want them to see it? I was just saying if it can so easily be classified as porn in the first place then thats good enough reason for Co-op to say they don't want to sell it because they want to be a family buisness and not drive aw…
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:13 PM
29

But..... But... where have the good guys gone? Answer: They are not talking to you because they are shit scared of being labelled a harrasser.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 12:48 PM
2

If this is ever put into practice then the churches will remove their involvement in state marriage, which is exactly what I want. It's a shame that it has come to this but churches have supported marriage 2.0 for a long time now when there is no reason for them to.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 12:29 PM
5

Fair enough, my mistake. I thought you were coming from a point of view that lads mags shouldn't be covered in the shops.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 12:19 PM
3

Why are you taking/allowing your children into a shop that sells porn if you don't want them to see it? No offence but your reasoning here means that the Co-op can stop selling it since they want more customers to come into their store without "viewing porn". You're probably better off sticking to an argument that says that it is not porn in the first place.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:56 AM
2

He’s a crappy partner, not just in bed. He’s in denial about something — whether it’s his sexuality, past abuse, childhood trauma or a medical obstacle to healthy sexual responses. So she admits he could be a victim of past abuse but still calls him a crappy partner? What a bitch.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 06:15 AM
2

In order to spice the hotpot of temptation, these profiles were sprinkled around the five most unfaithful cities in America And then of course they come to the conclusion that men want women who cheat.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 11:59 AM
4

Sorry I will explain my context a bit more clearly. I was talking in connection about this article which was linked here in another post. http://money.cnn.com/2013/08/13/news/economy/women-work-force/index.html?hpt=hp_t3 I think its more to do with women choosing not to work rather than women not having a job because they can't find one. However my comment before didn't really give context so you were right to question me on it.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 11:24 AM
18

And they wonder why 20 odd percent of American women don't work.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 09:15 AM
2

Looks like the guy is back to his normal douchebag self. I think its fair to start criticising him again.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 06:37 AM
2

So, technically, I haven't stopped beating my wife. What? So you still beat your wife? See, we can misrperesent what you say too, so how about you stop calling us woman haters when we're not.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 01:25 PM
1

Well, pretty much. There figure is 320,000 people overall, so if we assume a population of 65 million in the UK then it would come out at 0.49%, which I'm assuming is how you got the 0.5% figure. Of course they may be wrong in their numbers I havn't seen what their research says but I am glad they highlighting that it is not just big nasty men who do these things.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 11:57 AM
0

No, Wikipedia indicates that a person with bi-polar may experience psychosis. I would really like to request that you quit trying to link feminism, or any other political belief, with mental illness. Thats not what I said at all and I clarrified that in my last post. Please read again. One of my favourite music artists (Matthew Good) has Bi-Polar Disorder as well and before he was identified with it he was slightly extreme in his beliefs as well. Once again http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Bipolar-d…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 11:51 AM
1

So is Wikipedia wrong in this instance? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bi_polar_disorder At the most severe level, individuals can experience very distorted beliefs about the world known as psychosis. Obviously I wasn't arguing that feminism and Bi-Polar Disorder are exclusively linked, but Wikipedia here is indicating that you may be extreme in the beliefs that you do hold.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 07:08 PM
2

Can't really say. All I know is that just because only 2% of registered sex offenders are women then that doesn't mean the 64,000 number that is given are all registered sex offenders. They are just a estimate of how many actual female sex offenders there are. The article does say this though. Donald Findlater, director of research and development, said results indicated that up to 20% of a conservative estimate of 320,000 suspected UK paedophiles were women. Edit: So the 64,000 number they are …
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:32 PM
1

Well the stat is that only 2% of sex offenders that are registered are women. This doesn't equate to how many actually are sex offenders. The 64,000 number given here won't all be registered sex offenders. Essentially what is being said is that a man is more likely to be registered a sex offender than a woman but we already knew that.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 11:02 AM
1

I was only pointing out that the Bi-Polar Disorder could be linked to his mistaken beliefs. Yes, he has not been a nice person over the years but as I've said before there is a time and place for war and this isn't it. We are talking about a guy who his off his meds and feeling suicidal. Just saying "fuck him, he deserves it" isn't productive, we don't say that to prisoners who get raped, so why should we say it here?
/r/MensRights12/08/13 09:10 AM
1

I understand what you're saying about people who do wrong should be punished and thats fine, but there is a difference to handing out punishment and showing compassion to those who are having problems. i.e. Having a mental breakdown and feeling suicidal. Afterall we show this same compassion to prisoners who suffer prison rape, we don't just say "fuck them, they deserve it for breaking the law". Justice is about punishing people when they merrit it. What punishment do you want of Hugo? His wife …
/r/MensRights12/08/13 09:06 AM
-1

You are completely missing the point. I'm not suggesting anything about vengeance, merely the idea that sympathy and help for wrong-doers is insulting to the innocent. Just like I would want rapists to be punished not shown pity and love, I would want someone who contributed to society's problems like Schwyzer to not be given all this love and forgiveness crap. He is not a rapist though. He is a feminist blog writer with a mistaken opinion which is quite common. If this wasn't about vengeance th…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 08:32 AM
1

You're correct. They took advantage of his mental illness for their own benefit. I think he was only recently diagnosed with Bi-Polar Disorder but he was diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder earlier in his life so either way they were parading him as the "male example" we should all follow when in reality he wasn't in his right frame of mind.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 07:49 AM
1

Well that's part of having Bi-Polar Disorder. I'm seriously getting sick of the number of people who don't see this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bi-polar_disorder As mania becomes more severe, individuals begin to behave erratically and impulsively, often making poor decisions due to unrealistic ideas about the future, and may have great difficulty with sleep. At the most severe level, individuals can experience very distorted beliefs about the world known as psychosis. Bi-Polar Disorder is not…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:40 PM
1

But of course, you're the professional here aren't you? Well that piece of paper that that doctor has is a hell of a lot more than you have.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:36 PM
1

Well that's your opinion, but not one which I share.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:35 PM
0

It explains quite a lot of it actually. Plus if this was any other guy you would show your compassion at least but because its a guy who you have an axe to grind against then you don't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bi-polar_disorder In serious cases, in which there is a risk of harm to oneself or others, involuntary commitment may be used. These cases generally involve severe manic episodes with dangerous behavior or depressive episodes with suicidal ideation. There are widespread problems with …
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:34 PM
0

1) Not all men deserve help. Some deserve to suffer for the choices they've made. Of course, vengeance is always so much better than doing the right thing. I know you probably don't give two shits about the bible but I still think that this message applies in this situation. Matthew 5:43-48 43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor[a] and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 that you may be children of your Father in heave…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:31 PM
8

The MRM is about helping men, not throwing them under the bus the first chance we get. He has been diagnosed with Bi-Polar Disorder, give him a break.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 07:56 AM
1

Things like Churches in America always blaming men for divorces, etc, etc. Not to mention it was targeted by Feminists as a "sexist" institution.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:50 AM
10

I feel really sorry for him. He has been diagnosed with Bi-Polar Disorder which is no easy thing to live with. He needs help to get through his problems and he needs support to help learn how to live with it.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:26 AM
3

Feminism pretty much destroyed the Christian community. They are now aiming for you.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 12:39 PM
10

Chris looks at me and asks why that lady was so rude. I have/had no answer for him. "Chris, that is what we call a bitch"
/r/MensRights08/08/13 12:54 PM
3

1.You have no problem with the gender wage gap. But you hate having to pay for dates. Not all men earn more than all women. Also a guy shouldn't have to pay for a date for a girl he is just starting to go out with and doesn't really know. Why should you be entitled to his money when you don't even know the guy? 2.You insist that it’s a scientifically proven fact that men are stronger than women. But you complain about society believing that it’s worse for a man to hit a woman than for a woman to…
/r/MensRights08/08/13 12:23 PM
3

I went to see Despicable Me 2 with my friend (Male) and we're both in our 30's. Those movies aren't just for kids, adults can find them entertaining as well.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 06:09 AM
2

Its classic projection. They say that men need to be trained like dogs, but of course they need to put the blame on us in some way or other.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 11:43 AM
2

I like what this article has to say.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 02:42 PM
32

Of course you then get the fucking idiot who tries to explain it and being rare, therefore it's funny. Newt, no disrespect intended but your comment makes it sound epidemic or at least 'common'. This is the first time I've heard of this sort of manslaughter. I'm not trying to negate the crime. It's just not something one hears as often as sexual crimes against women. I'm very sorry it happens to any man. Wish we could all get along. Yeah I really want to get along with someone who is just going …
/r/MensRights31/07/13 02:34 PM
3

Lol
/r/MensRights31/07/13 10:42 AM
2

And yet, he had to apologise to win his GF back Thats the bit that really gets me. When I first saw the film I was like "Why the fuck does he need to apologise?".
/r/MensRights31/07/13 09:28 AM
1

There is a male rape scene in 40 Days & 40 Nights with Josh Hartnett. He is unconcious in a bed and cuffed to the bed waiting for his new girlfriend, when his old girlfriend walks in and pretty much helps herself in order to win a bet.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 09:26 AM
1

Nothing is rape? Shit I need to do something quick, I'm currently sitting here doing nothing.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 09:03 AM
-8

I'm more concerned about this. The money raised for a legal challenge will now be donated to women's charities the Fawcett Society, Women's Aid and Rape Crisis. I don't actually know much about these particular charities but I'm guessing they are no different from the rest of the fraudsters who make up statistics in order to generate cash.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 11:00 AM
1

I had that particular article in mind when thinking this.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 08:41 PM
1

Hopefully that will be the case.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 07:34 PM
1

Absolutely, but I am mainly talking about the people who will only see one side of the argument and then make a conclusion based upon misrepresented facts.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 07:34 PM
29

Article makes a good point, but unfortunately it will be quote mined by idiots to make Paul Elam look bad. They always are.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 03:03 PM
1

Not really related to Mens Issues, but a great example of a dad and son bonding in a really great way? I think it belongs here just fine. It serves as a good example on how men do care about their kids.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:57 PM
0

Unfortunately I don't have the know how, otherwise I would do it myself.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:41 PM
0

In her particular case I agree.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:35 PM
0

Good idea. We need to edit a clip of this so we can link to it any time we want. :)
/r/MensRights24/07/13 11:54 AM
11

In pornography today, girls must be willing, subservient, and do whatever the male wants her to do. Boys are expected to take the lead, be forceful and push the limits. So rough sex is rape but if the girls consent and enjoy it then that is also rape. Why not just be honest and say you don't like porn.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 11:25 AM
20

More projection. She says that Misandry doesn't come from a place of power but look at the divorce courts that have been set up, look at the Television with its depictions of "bad men", look at the feminist organisations set up to lobby the government and also look at the powers given to the police to be able to remove men from homes based on no evidence. Projection is a classic feminist tactic.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 10:54 AM
1

“Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.” –I Corinthians xiv. 34-5 Actually this passage refers to a particular group of women who were asking too many questions during sermons and thus interupting them. Paul was saying that they should keep quiet just the sa…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:42 PM
1

As a whole, yes I do. Women should fear rapists. Fearing men in general is the question here. Not all men are rapists, but also how does a women practice this effectively without having to fear men in general? Also considering that most rapes of women happen by a person who they know then how can they maintain any male relationships? They should fear rapists much more then men do. Period. That's my view. You do know that there are more prison rapes alone than reported rapes? http://www.loompanic…
/r/MensRights19/07/13 11:28 PM
1

Well its not the only poster going around with this type of message but it plays a part in it. Here is the thing though. Plenty of people here have already told you what they think of this poster. They have already told you that they believe it to be demonising male sexuality. Is it that hard to believe that at least some girls are going to see this and it will give them a bad impression of male sexuality? Of course not. If the people here think it puts men in a bad light then obviously some peo…
/r/MensRights19/07/13 09:56 PM
32

I'm speechless. All I can say is well done Cosmo.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 01:27 PM
1

Personally I think consent is consent.. unless they are passed out ffs. Even then you can't consent when passed out anyway.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 12:04 PM
1

Oh don't you worry, they know this but they don't care. They just want to throw men into prison using any reason they can.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 11:54 AM
2

According to the Department of Justice, an estimated 2-8% of sexual assault reports are false. That means at least 92% are true. Yep, its this shit again. Lets take all those don't know cases and label them all true.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 11:42 AM
2

This is the ridiculous kind of bullshit that makes me hate you pseudo activists. Yeah, well fuck you too. Women don't walk around fearing men. It's a fucking situational thing. Unfortunately, there are asshole men out there that will try to rape women. If a women feels this happening to her, she needs to feel big, not small. Yeah, I'm sure she will feel really big when she sees that posters are needed to inform the men around her that rape is bad. /s I don't think you know how hate cultures come…
/r/MensRights19/07/13 06:46 AM
1

My simple answer for this is, as a man, I'm not intimidated by another man. I was intimidated by other men in my youth. I was taught to be intimidated by other men. The average man is significantly stronger than the average woman. It makes perfect sense, that women would fear more. How would you feel if you knew you had about 0 chance of defending yourself? Right here is the problem. The idea that "men are bigger, so they should be feared" is a common one. Considering that men are actually very …
/r/MensRights19/07/13 06:16 AM
1

I gave you an example. If you put a poster up with a Muslim on it and labelled him as a suicide bomber, then you are creating fear of Muslims. The Nazi's did the same thing with Jews. They put posters up to create a hate culture against Jewish people and look how that turned out. Honestly if you think that women aren't looking at these posters and becoming afraid of men in general then you are unaware of what is actually happening. How do explain this kind of thought process which is quite commo…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:14 PM
1

I get your point and I know what you mean, but I would still argue that its bad to do something like this even if its the only group who commit such crimes. You can do it with anything. For instance you could take a poster with a Muslim on it and then put a label of suicide bomber to go with it. Sure the majority of suicide bombings are probably done by religious extremists, but putting up a poster I feel is fear mongering and then leads to hate and distrust of that group as a whole.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:21 PM
1

Yeah I know what you mean, but I took the title from the actual video. I think it was meant that way though.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:06 PM
1

Here's a hint. Try making the guy in the poster black and then change the label to "thief". Is that any better? Or would you consider that racist?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:39 PM
2

Holy shit. That sounds shocking.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:32 PM
5

Indeed, we have that law as well. We also passed another law banning "discrimination" against people due to sex, age, religion, race, etc. The reason why I put the word discrimination in brackets is because it only applies to certain groups.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:23 AM
29

People who argue against such rules generally portray their opponents as standing on a slippery precipice, tugging at the question “what next?” We can answer that question: Canada, England, France, Germany, The Netherlands, South Africa, Australia and India all ban hate speech. Yet, none of these countries have slipped into totalitarianism. I'm from the UK and this guy is wrong. The UK is pretty much a police state now.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:23 AM
8

Have a look at the comments. Filled with people saying they deserve it because they must have committed a crime in order to be there in the first place. Meanwhile in the UK we are talking about getting rid of womens prisons altogether. So in essence from one extreme to the other.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 11:12 AM
4

That's by Manhood Academy. Most people here don't like that sort of stuff for two reasons. 1) Their idea of what they consider masculinity is too constricting. 2) They are extreme in their viewpoints regarding women. I agree with the above two statements myself but I have seen these videos and did find some parts of them interesting. Specifically the parts showing the double standards.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 06:31 AM
4

Also, the whole part about "genital deformities" is blatant cissexism. It's disgusting to see this shit being said. Please tell me you just didn't fucking say this. Men having properly developed genitals is one of the reasons why the fucking human race exists to begin with. The problem with your statement is you do not grasp the concept of context. It's NOT a bad thing because people with birth defects are immoral, it's a bad thing because the human species is being harmed in the process.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:38 AM
19

We're not talking about punishing women just for making an accusation. We are talking about punishing women whose accusation can be demonstrated to be false. For instance there was a case in Edmonton Canada, where 4 girls falsely accused a taxi driver of rape so they could skip out on their $13 cab fare. The cab driver had CCTV in his cab so the whole entire journey was filmed from point A to point B and the video footage showed that the driver litterally didn't even touch any of the girls and e…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 11:31 AM
8

“I want to make it clear that that is so inaccurate,” said Karen Smith, executive director of the Sexual Assault Centre of Edmonton. “It just doesn’t happen.” “Nobody would report sexual assault needlessly because it is a gruelling process to go through.” How many examples have we seen now? There isn't a single week on this reddit where I don't see an article where someone has falsely accussed someone else of rape.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 11:09 AM
11

People magazine ran a story on the T-shirt, opening with a quote from a then 10-year-old girl, "I want to make boys feel bad because it's fun." I'm sure all the boys at school like her. /s
/r/MensRights03/07/13 11:35 AM
1

Its more to do with the getting treated like a slave part that worries me, or the being trained like a dog. A PUA may pick up chicks but that doesn't mean he is going to put her on a leash of abuse.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 09:46 PM
1

Possibly there would be young males trafficked for sex, but more likely they are trafficked for labour. Yeah, sure they are /s
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:32 PM
0

Would you treat racism with civility?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 11:40 AM
1

The point was that articles like that are being written. As you have pointed out you mention Cosmo being included
/r/MensRights01/07/13 11:39 AM
1

At least your wife is consistent in her beliefs. My wife is a Buddhist so she won't kill any life herself. In the UK in 2004 77% of all abortions were carried out on mothers age 20 or older so the teen birth rate is unimportant. The reason why I mentioned teens was because I feel that they would be the most likely to want an abortion since they would be the most disadvantaged by it. The point I was making is that if there are a considerable number of young girls out there who are choosing to con…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:27 AM
1

Yes, but the general public should be informed just how bad feminism is and what it has caused. Every other movement that was bad for society was not removed without some assertiveness. Even the early Christians stood up to the Romans who were persecuting them and killing them. It wasn't until Constantine, the first Christian Emperor that the Edict of Milan was passed and persecution of Christians was stopped. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Milan
/r/MensRights01/07/13 09:43 AM
1

I'm sorry, but when pointing out a hate movement I don't see why it needs to be treated with civility. That is what this boils down to.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 09:34 AM
4

The trouble is that long ago mens rights did try to work with feminism in order to get their issues heard. The reply was overwhelmingly that they didn't care. If you look up Erin Pizzey, then you will see that she opened up the first domestic violence shelter for female victims in the UK. You will also see how she describes how feminists treated her when she tried to open up a domestic violence shelter for men. They bullied her and they killed her dog. She had to leave the country in exile. That…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:47 PM
5

Don't get me wrong, I appreciate your point of view and I appreciate you taking the time to discuss this. However when you have a movement that does considerable harm to other people its only natural that those other people will want to stand up against it. Its a bit like saying to somebody who doesn't like the corporate elite that if you don't like the fact that the world is controlled by bankers, then you just need to stop using banks and go your own way. Its a difficult to do that when everyt…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:36 PM
1

Same here I usually find. Most of my guy friends are quite open about it. I live in the UK though. I think the above attitude that the op is talking about is actually quite typical in some parts of America.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 12:34 PM
3

I don't see too many of them getting sold.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:05 AM
2

That essentially what the pro-choice movement is about.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 10:28 AM
1

False. There is a huge portion of time while in the womb that the fetus does not have eyes, bones, a brain, a heart, a liver or kidneys. There is a huge amount of time where te fetus is just a clump of cells splitting apart Sorry to tell you but its scientific fact that a human fetus is human. 1) It is a life with human DNA. All the DNA a person has is incorporated with this "clump of cells" as you so speak. 2) Its Part of the human development cycle. Every human being was once a fetus. Nobody s…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 09:41 AM
1

The video has been removed because the user has deleted his youtube account. Is anybody else here suspicious? Why did he close his account?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:37 PM
2

That particular citation yes. However my sentence previously said "feminists like Sheila Jeffries?". I was talking in terms of feminists of her ilk. I remember seeing her name in the report ad the report overall is what is used to deny fathers rights as it goes into that kind of territory also.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:35 PM
1

Some do argue that I agree but their definition of life/child is far to loose to even bother entertaining. The human fetus is a life. It meets all scientific criteria for being one. These people will argue against abortion on the grounds that once fertilized the egg is now a child/ child potential. Or that the fetus is a living human, which it is by scientific fact. They almost never argue against the pill (many of which do not prevent fertilization). What pill? If you mean birth control pill th…
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:12 PM
1

A bit more info on this. Sheila Jeffreys is just one Feminsist whoose work is included in this but the fact she is a radical feminist and that her work is getting taken seriously is very worrisome. http://www.google.co.uk/url?q=http://www.womensforumaustralia.org/_literature_40552/National_council_to_reduce_violence_against_women&sa=U&ei=YVHMUfXgPIvs8gTM84DABQ&ved=0CB8QFjAB&usg=AFQjCNGQQ0t59ahBXgpqpOdOlxEZZ1p-hQ Source number 13 belongs to Sheila Jeffreys. Overall though the work is mostly down …
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:02 PM
2

Right, all those idiots who thought that the Microsoft Xbox One event had a rape joke in it listen up. This is what a REAL rape joke looks like.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 09:32 AM
3

You do realise that this new law which has come into effect was proposed by radical feminists like Sheila Jeffries?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 09:03 AM
1

Once the fire was out, it was clear the third floor, home to the WRC’s library and modest but prized collection of feminist literature, bore the brunt of the fire damage. For some reason I really do believe that this one was an act of God. :)
/r/MensRights27/06/13 08:50 AM
2

Abortion is not murder, That is because the state decides what is murder or not. A fetus is a human life though and it is taken away through abortion. So at basic level it is killing a human. a fetus is not a person with rights, The term person is subjective. You may think a human fetus is not a person but some people do. What objective criteria are using to define a subjective term like person? and I don't really care what you think women should have to be responsible for because they choose ha…
/r/MensRights27/06/13 06:36 AM
1

That's certainly one view. The other view would be taking away a child's life and its future through death and this shouldn't be enforced.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 06:10 AM
2

Perhaps, I always thought that sharing out resources equally between all people was a communist principle. However I could be wrong and it may not be that specifically.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 06:18 PM
1

Depending on who you talk to the pregnancy may involve someone else. You might not believe that but some people do and they argue against abortion on that basis.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 06:12 PM
9

The reason why she lost the male vote was because she disenfranchised men, in her little speach to "Women for Gillard" she threw men under the bus and of course she also gave the thumbs up to a report on family rerform written by radical feminist Sheila Jeffries.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:07 PM
16

It was done already in Canada apparently. The Canadian government started to pay office cleaners the same wage as builders. It resulted in men becoming office cleaners instead of builders and the the building trade had to increase their wages in order to attract workers back to the building trade. SO in the end builders got paid more than the cleaners anyway.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 02:16 PM
6

The appellants, including classroom assistants and nursery nurses, now have won the right to have their jobs compared to those of male manual workers, such as road workers and groundsmen. Sounds an awful like communism to me. They're different jobs, of course they're going to have different pay. With this attitude we may as well well wave capitalism goodbye and just pay everybody the same irregardless of what they do.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 02:11 PM
0

I suppose the answers already been given. It's just not an option yet :) .........perfect the artificial womb and make it and womb transplants for the unborn child both financially viable and feasible.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:20 PM
2

"... carry the child for 9 months, push it out while in excruciating pain..." Who's paying for it for the next 16 to 18 years? "... her body and no one else's. No one should be able to tell you what to do with your own body. In the end, it's your own choice." If it's your body & your choice then why isn't it your responsibility? The law also regulates against people "using their own bodies" all the time. If you use your own body to assault someone it's still a crime. If you use your own body to …
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:04 PM
5

Absolutely, but remember it could be relevant to some of our arguments. So we may need this information to shape our own views.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 11:45 AM
5

About time. Perhaps now they can undo all the damage to Australian family law that was caused when she gave the thumbs up to a report written by radical feminist Sheila Jeffries.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 11:20 AM
10

The number one reason for the suicide rate for men is a marriage break-up. Yet apparently according to this article we're supposed to just jump into the next bed without any thought. Something tells me this is article is a whole load of crap.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 11:07 AM
6

What, because being denied access to your children for no reason isn't a reason to be butthurt? You're missing the context that a lot of guys here have been the victim of a malicious court system that has been used to strip away their rights.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 06:10 AM
1

Shit Reddit Says
/r/MensRights26/06/13 06:06 AM
27

No offence, but this is an AMA. The guy is here to answer questions not for you to argue with him.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:28 PM
5

No offence, but I don't think that this guy should get 6 months probation and then released to the public either. If he did kill his partner and it was proven he was insane then he needs more than just 6 months of therapy and then just released back onto the street again. He will need comprehensive help in a mental institution, which frankly will take years. The thing that you forget is that we have seen too many cases where a woman has committed this sort of act and then they just get 6 months …
/r/MensRights23/06/13 09:53 AM
3

I understand where you are coming from. Change takes time, every society in the world indoctrinates its people and I do mean EVERY society. Overcoming bad indoctrination can take time. We've seen it so many times in the past throughout various different societies. Unfortunately our fight is going to be a longer one than the one for feminism and that's because we don't have the support from government and businesses in order to do it. You need to take a break from it all, you have already put in …
/r/MensRights23/06/13 08:45 AM
85

You've learned rule number 1. Feminism is all about control. Controlling structures, controlling dialogue and controlling labels.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 01:56 PM
1

It's just a troll everyone. Nothing to see here, move along everybody.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 01:16 PM
2

Then you have to petition the city council or whatever it is they have in a country where they don’t know how to spell center .................. Other than the obvious that he was standing up for Radical Feminists with biggoted views I was also surprised at his attack on my nation for the way we spell the word centre. Somebody might want to inform this idiot that the English people invented the English language and so it might not be a good idea to tell us how to spell our own bloody words.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:28 AM
1

You rebel scum........ Oh wait, wrong universe. :)
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:13 PM
2

Well I did get the impression that other people on this sub thought it was a load of bull. I just wasn't sure if they were American or not.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:12 PM
3

Well it's the first time I've ever heard of it being referred to as a rape joke. I've only ever heard this phrase being said by doctors to patients, dentists to patients and parents to their children i.e. When given a shot down at the doctors. I have never heard this in reference to rape. The innuendo's used in rape jokes over here are a lot more clear cut than that.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:09 PM
3

Erm no, I deny it because I honestly didn't see it as a rape joke. I am serious when I say that those words did not enter my mind as being a rape joke. The words "Just let it happen" DO NOT come to mind automatically as meaning rape. Perhaps this is a culture thing. I'm from the UK and we do not use words like that to mean what you think it means. We do not refer to rape in such a manner.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:42 PM
3

Look, I don't know what you're thinking, but when I watched that video for the first time with the heading that some rape joke was made it honestly didn't register with me that this was a rape joke and I still don't think it is. Considering I even looked for a rape joke and I still couldn't see what it was just shows you how far they are stretching with this one.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:31 PM
4

Honestly, this isn't going to stop until all men refrain from having a family and lead separatist lives.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:27 PM
7

I did hear that and I thought he was referencing the actual fight. You know, because I'm reasonable like that and I look at context instead of thinking that someone is making a rape joke for no reason. If the guy said while playing this game "I'm going to stab you with my sword" are you going to assume he is talking his character's sword or are you going to be unreasonable and think he is going to pull his penis out and rape someone. Honestly, this is really basic stuff here. It's called context…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:15 PM
3

That is NOT a rape joke. I don't know what goes on in your filthy mind but when I hear that I don't automatically assume that the person is going to rape me, otherwise I need to have a word with my surgeon.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:09 PM
6

There was no rape joke. When I first watched the video I was absolutely clueless about what this supposed rape joke was supposed to be. I actually falsely identified what they thought it must be. I thought it was where she said "You have a fight stick" and that's only because I was looking for it, the bit before that didn't even register with me at all.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:07 PM
1

Oh here we go, another dumb article by a dumb "journalist" who doesn't get that this wasn't even a rape joke to begin with. For fuck sake, whats next? Will we not be allowed to say "I'm going to stab you with my sword", even if the character in the game has a sword because some over-sensitive ninny is going to misinterpret that as a fucking rape joke.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:00 PM
3

Whey, I see a Space Marine in there. "FOR THE EMPEROR!!!!!!"
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:58 AM
1

I really don't see how some of these can even be justified. Eating fast food at 2am Why? So just because you're eating food at 2 in the morning this makes you immature? I think someone needs to get their priorities checked. Playing videogames Oh sure, but it's OK for girls to keep their teddy bear collectionswell into their 40's. Staying silent during an argument Why? What I am supposed to do? Scream and cry like a little child because I'm not getting my own way? Is that more mature? Sniggering …
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:10 PM
5

You're the second person I have had to ask this. How do you know that rapists say this during rape? Did you witness this at all? Also I guess dentists are all a bunch of rapists for saying this to their patients as well.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 06:27 AM
7

How do you know that a rapist says this during rape? Have you ever witnessed girls getting raped and then this gets said? Also a dentist says this to his customers. As pointed out you can say this about any unpleasant experience. I did not see any rape joke in that at all. The guy said it in accordance to her losing the video game. It's ridiculous that people are trying to see something in this that just isn't there.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 06:17 AM
3

Heart warming and interesting. Usually it's a dog who is a mans best friend but this is incredible.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 06:15 AM
3

It's not a mens rights issue if men are emotionally manipulated and abused within their relationships? Fuck are you in the wrong sub.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:12 PM
2

Yeah, I don't approve of articles like that either. So whats your point?
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:55 PM
4

Not to be a doubting Thomas or anything, but I can get a screenshot of this article. It's just best if we verify what we're seeing here.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 12:29 PM
1

No, he has just reworded the "boys are dogs" book description.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 11:28 AM
6

The second link is quite clear. I don't know how you can misinterpret it when it says the following: "Training a man is like training a dog – you use rewards and punishments to bend him to your will,” says Dr. Jenny Rotondi of Los Angeles. CUT HIM OFF. Sex is the best training tool you’ve got, and denying it to your man is the quickest way to turn him into your slave. For some guys, you’ll have to wait a few days for others, a month or two – but sooner or later, he’ll drop to his knees and promi…
/r/MensRights06/06/13 11:11 AM
23

The thing is this attitude is becoming increasingly common. The idea that Men are like dogs who need to be trained is actually a very serious one. Have a look. http://clclt.com/lovebrittney/archives/2011/04/18/training-your-man-is-like-training-your-dog Apparently training us like dogs is a good way to turn us into slaves. http://weeklyworldnews.com/opinion/34616/8-steps-to-turn-any-man-into-your-slave/ There was even talk of a TV show that was going to do this. They would have couples on it and…
/r/MensRights06/06/13 06:38 AM
1

Don't be a complete idiot.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 11:14 AM
7

I also read some of the comments and my mind nearly blew up due to disbelief. I can't believe the limited view of men that is portrayed in those comments. Just take a look at this one. <As to the boys crying about a lack of "men's studies", we've been studying ourselves for centuries. What we discovered is that we are agressive, think about sex a lot, are big in sports and many of us have inflated egos. I for one am quite comfortable with these faults and try to recognize them for what they are.…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 11:24 AM
2

I saw one on facebook. They tried to argue that she needed mental help and not prison.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:20 PM
12

There is a difference between hearsay and witnesses.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 05:19 PM
1

Pope Francis has just gained a few points of respect from me for this one.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 08:01 PM
14

My thoughts exactly. It's women's mags that use artificial airbrushed pictures on their covers. The ones that make women crave for a completely impossible standard of beauty.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 07:21 PM
7

Sorry, but the guy was aggessive first. You can quite clearly see him kick out at something and cause damage.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 10:45 PM
24

Hopefully this is just the start of media attention on this subject. For our friends elsewhere who don't live in the UK, The Metro is actually a free newspaper that you get on public transport up and down the UK, so it's actually a well read paper. Usually by people making their way to work or something.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 05:49 AM
0

A woman can be sincere when she falsely accuses a guy of rape. That doesn't mean we take her feelings seriously.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:19 AM
2

I can't believe some of the commentary on that article.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:40 PM
1

Millie Tant is a character from the adult comic Viz. I always found it to be an entertaining read.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 06:34 AM
7

Oh yeah, cause I'm sure he doesn't make any of his male characters on his show stupid blubbering idiots. Oh wait, he does.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:41 AM
2

What if, say, one in five men was statistically ensured of having his penis cut off by an assailant......... Well that guy gets laughed at on public television and his pain is disregarded and unthought of.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:44 AM
12

I think thats the point though. It's male behaviour that is being criminalized.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 06:35 AM
8

The section of the movie after this shows Josh Hartnett trying to apologise to his new girlfriend despite the fact the fact he is raped in this scene. Also not to mention the sexual hullucinations bit is completely rediculous anyway.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:49 PM
30

Why Are There No Women in tolkiens World" The Lord of the Rings has a few female characters in it. Of course these would be the same feminists who would complain about women starring in violent films showing to have violence committed against them, even if those characters were still kicking butt. They can't have it both ways.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 06:45 PM
3

Yeah, someone who gets that nervous and denies that false allegations can happen have probably given false allegations themselves. See I can make sweeping claims too. :)
/r/MensRights30/12/12 11:20 AM
1

I suppose it's not really about rights as such, but I still found it quite interesting. It wasn,t just the cheating on her husband but also her admittance that she would rather feed a stray dog than a homeless person. I think her attitude all round is actually pretty rotten.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 05:29 PM
11

Another idiot who thinks that having children is some sort of right. Apparently women who can't have children are being oppressed by nature.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 09:15 PM
-3

Yes, cause trusting all the other feminist biased tabloids would be better.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:08 AM
1

Ever seen 40 days and 40 nights?
/r/MensRights23/11/12 02:47 PM
3

I do not want you. Do you understand?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:16 PM
1

I played a priest in WoW many years ago and I was always told I should be a healer despite the fact that I wanted to do a different path. My character was female but I'm a guy.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 07:48 AM
2

Dying because of natural circumstances is a lot different than from dying because someone purposely had you killed. This is the major flaw in the reasoning here. Nobody gets charged with murder if someone passes away in their sleep naturally, but a murder has been committed if someone has willfully taken away your life. As for "most of heaven's souls never had a neuron or feeling", Biden only mentioned life starting at conception, he didn't mention anything about a soul in the video clip. And ye…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:25 AM
-1

"As the attitude towards women has softened ... it's entirely understandable that the meaning of the word describing that emotional state may also have softened." In other words men are more kinder to women but they must still be misogynists. Afterall they are men /s
/r/MensRights17/10/12 07:55 PM
2

Perverts, someone should dox them and start a real life campaign of harrassment against them. /s
/r/MensRights12/10/12 05:38 AM
5

They will be using false accusations against our mods to ruin their lives and lose their jobs. Of course we are going to take a stand.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:40 AM
30

They have stated that mens rights is next, that is why we are taking this seriously. The doxxing is being done so they can threaten a real life campaign of harrassment. They will write to employers and neighbours and will tell them vicious lies about people in order to ruin their lives.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:39 AM
2

And now that is banned as well.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 10:04 PM
6

My wife is from Thailand. Her father passed away before I even met her but she loves talking about him and loved him a lot.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:29 PM
1

They say at the end of the video. Just watch from 4:20 onwards.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:07 PM
1

Child was born in 1987. So aged 13 in year 2000.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 07:58 PM
1

You've had what the MRM call the moment. The moment in the matrix where Neo is presented with two pills, one red and one blue. One will send you back into ignorance, while the other one will reveal the unfortunate truth to you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=te6qG4yn-Ps
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:48 PM
3

To outsiders this thread must look hilarious, you know what it says to them? 'Those MRAs don't have any real concerns! Their top post is about toilet seats!' You do realise that there are feminist groups out there that talk about this kind of stuff, don't you? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/13/sweden-left-party-toilet-stand_n_1590572.html
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:18 AM
2

relevant. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0yJBmU8yoc Sometimes I think they honestly believe that they will in or something. Lol. Here is the future of things to come. :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=Zu6KXj-vtl8&feature=endscreen
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:06 AM
1

Oh, I remember this. Wacky Races had these characters in it as well as Dick Dastardly and Muttley. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G545AIyszv0
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:22 PM
2

It worries me a little, because you know that misandric feminists worldwide will push for it and try to convince men to do it. "Go on" they'll say, "it'll help you live longer". I know that some here will think that this will lead to a lot more men waking up and start actually standing up for themselves but I worry about those guys who will actually do it because they consider themselves "progressive".
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:14 PM
2

When every man has been completely annihilated by the court system who is left "pay for everything"?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:07 PM
-1

Only in a police state, and not even there, will women be totally safe on the streets. That statement made me shake my head. Hasn't this woman heard of 1984 and A Brave New World?
/r/MensRights23/09/12 05:11 AM
2

If you saw me naked then you would understand. :)
/r/MensRights23/09/12 05:06 AM
11

yeah, cause really she is just a petite little thing. :)
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:56 AM
1

After reading those I understand why you're depressed.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:52 AM
1

I'm not sure, but somewhere in Asia might be a good bet. My wife is from Thailand and she tells me that over there men are leaders and decision makers but not in a total controlling sense.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 09:28 PM
1

This article is pretty correct though. It was on the news as well that "financial control" would be considered abuse. I find it really funny considering that most of the money in the western world is spent by women (between 70-80%). Does that mean men can all make a collective claim. :)
/r/MensRights22/09/12 08:19 PM
1

Fuck the courts even back this up by giving all the finances to the woman in the event of a divorce. So in essence the courts are helping domestic violence against men.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 08:09 PM
4

Notice how in the middle of documentary she states that she doesn't remember doing any of that, and that she doesn't recognize herself, but by the 1 hour mark, when describing her "power games" with the alleged rapist, she manages to vividly recall what she was doing and feeling at the time, since it helps her contextualize the events as a rape - the power of convoluted rhetoric! I see you noticed that. However did you also notice the part where she was supported by NOW. She spoke to them over a…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:58 PM
3

Shame we don't get any songs like that in the west.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 06:01 AM
2

I understand this is not /r/hatingwomen, but the blog post linked to is in regards to men where she discusses the use of "mind warp trivia" to start fights with guys.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:38 AM
5

Exactly, and she should be contributing to the child anyway, so if she is getting $597 on child support then she should be spending the same giving te circumstance that she is earning the same.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 09:48 PM
2

Unfortunately none of these are correct. Regardless of what you choose, the answer won’t be satisfactory because it is a trick question. If you choose (a) she won’t believe you; if you choose (b) she will accuse you of lying; if you choose (c) she will be pissed that you are looking at other girls; and if you choose (d) she will say that’s bullshit. This is a mind warp trap with the only way out being a fight. Even simply breathing will cause a fight when presented with such a question. With tha…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 09:46 PM
15

Not really. Someone clearly says to her to spend it on the kids and her reply is hell naw, mama needs a new pair of coach shoes.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 08:26 PM
1

Do you think that traditionalism is anathema to Men's Rights? Simple answer. No, it shouldn't be left out and of course it shouldn't be what we solely preach either. The reason why is we need to be as flexible as possible. One of the reasons why feminism was so sucessful is because it was so diverse that a lot of women could join it and have a point of view, even if it was an incorrect one. Essentially we all need to realise that we have a greater cause to unite behind despite our small differen…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:53 PM
2

Tell them to keep their fucking misandry to themselves because you don't want to fucking hear it while you're trying to work.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:32 PM
2

Anybody who thinks this is just a fetish article has not read it properly. It clearly says IN BOLD this: Claire is a real person. Nothing in this interview is fictional. Un-fucking-believeable. Shit like this makes me so fucking angry. I can't believe this is the way she fucking treats her husband and of course he accepts it and even grovels and apologises when he does "something wrong" and gets stuff thrown at him for the trouble. And how does this fucking bitch reward him for his "good behavio…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:26 PM
3

Police have warned anybody who lies in the same way Dodd did will be found out Oh man, it's about time the police started to get tough on this. 2 years is still a too light for accusing three men of rape though.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:54 PM
13

Well if we're treating them like children.......... then children don't get to vote.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:42 PM
7

Exactly, when she realised what she did she knew she was going to prison. Of course, now that she has learned it's only 3 years, probably 6 months with "good behaviour" for stabbing a guy while robbing him that will only encourage her to do the same thing in future.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:41 PM
21

Well if women are children then we certainly can't expect them to hold 40% of those CEO positions. Way too much responsibility for them.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:33 PM
13

Buckley, 29, was jailed for three years for her part in the attack on March 23 this year, 3 years for attempted murder, you must be joking. Then you have the part where she tried to stop him from getting medical attention to save his life.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:26 PM
15

Just post up the article from the SPLC which says it hasn't classified us as a hate group. Problem solved and makes them all look stupid.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 05:20 AM
2

Comments are funny. Please link to 1 article by a feminist (not someone saying what a feminist is saying but the actual original source) where they advocate the forced sterilization of men. I don’t believe that it exists. Obviously this person hasn't heard of Allecto A.K.A. Daniel Pynonen
/r/MensRights16/09/12 08:44 PM
2

"When I meet a guy we have mutual respect of the other person's relationship though Lol, I guess this fucking asshole doesn't understand what the word respect means. Kay feels safer meeting a potential partner through the website because she knows anyone she meets also has a relationship they want to protect. Bawawawawa, it gets even funnier. She obviously doesn't understand that the word protect does not mean completely wreck.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 08:16 PM
2

Their is no evidence to suggest that he is an abuser. All the abuse has come from her in this case.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 06:36 AM
3

Thanks to Scatmaster at AVfM I have been able to send a fax to the courts using this online service. http://www.gotfreefax.com/ For those of you who are unable to write this solution might be better to use.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 06:27 AM
5

Did you miss the part where she beats her kids when dads not home and when dad is home he gets hit and punched instead? The kids even admitted to having to hide from their mother. “We hide from mom until dad gets home.” This is abuse. The fact you try to deny it shows your complete bias. I had a good feeling you would be a feminist and after checking your posting history, it is confirmed.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 11:01 PM
10

I have sent e-mails to the media outlets for this. Unfortunately their is no e-mail for the County Court and since I live outside the US, sending them a letter would not be worthwhile as I'm not a US citizen.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 10:43 PM
1

He did indicate he was uncomfortable about it. I stood there, a careful distance away, watching. A "careful distance away" seems to indicate to me that he was a little scared of the situation himself.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 07:08 PM
18

If you're going to be forced into this situation, and I agree that you shouldn't be, then at least take to it with helping the guy out for his own good. Try to calm the guy down and say to him that it's not worth the hassle of going to jail. Re-assure him that he will move on, he'll find another job, etc, etc.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 07:03 PM
18

Remember folks, it's ok as long as they don't hear you. :)
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:55 PM
1

Man, this exchange is pure win. :)
/r/MensRights13/09/12 09:09 PM
1

Makes as much sense as the rest of the crap they spout. You know we should actually write a feminist book along these lines, use a pseudonym and see if we can sell it. Any profits we make we'll contribute to the MRM, Lol. Here is a site to generate a pseudonym. http://www.namegenerator.biz/pseudonym-generator.php I got Bunnie Pinch. :)
/r/MensRights13/09/12 09:08 PM
2

We need to get men to stop buying things when sex is being used to sell it. To me it's just a manipulation of men. I'm not talking about obvious sex products but everything else that doesn't have a connection to sex. i.e When cars are being advertised in mags with half naked women lying on top of them.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 08:56 PM
6

Acpos said the new campaign is designed to be positive and proactive, and aims to promote a sense of responsibility in cases of sexual assault by asking men to consider scenarios where sex would constitute rape. By forcing someone to have sex with you against their will. That's it. If you use another definition how will I know if I am raping someone or not? May as well just avoid sex all together.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 08:39 PM
2

He also drove a car. Also I don't drive. :) (puts on morally superior smug look).
/r/MensRights13/09/12 08:23 PM
2

Damn, my name is not on the list. Must.Try.Harder.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 08:21 PM
2

relevant. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCywGhHQMEw
/r/MensRights13/09/12 08:15 PM
3

I remember one time in the UK the newspapers ran a paedophile name and shame campaign. They had to stop because a man who just so happened to look like one those named in the papers ended up getting murdered in the street. Let me repeat that. He wasn't actually one of the men named in the paper, he just happened to look like one. So an innocent man ended up losing his life because the papers wanted to enact vigilante justice. In the end that is how irresponsible these kind of things are. They do…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 07:41 PM
6

Remember, woman good, men bad. That is the propaganda we are up against.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 07:36 PM
2

Sweet. I'm so going to join that sub reddit and I'm not even an atheist. :)
/r/MensRights12/09/12 09:09 PM
2

I don't know why you were downvoted for this.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 07:58 PM
4

The new science has established a radically new insight: that there is such a strong brain-vagina connection in women that many of the neuroscientists whom I interviewed called it "a single system". Wait, what? Are you seriously telling me that after all these years of being told by certain women that men think with their dicks, that women actually think with their vaginas? Seriously? I think I need to go for a lie down after reading this.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 07:38 PM
3

This is amazing. I like the way it looks like a real propanganda message for feminism.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 07:34 PM
2

Agreed. Even the Alpha males can be victims of abuse soemtimes. There are no excemptions.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 07:32 PM
3

Your sub is banned.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:10 PM
2

Mao was absolutely horrible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chairman_Mao#Great_Leap_Forward During a speech to party cadre in 1958, Mao said he had far outdone Qin Shi Huang in his policy against intellectuals: "He buried 460 scholars alive; we have buried forty-six thousand scholars alive.... You [intellectuals] revile us for being Qin Shi Huangs. You are wrong. We have surpassed Qin Shi Huang a hundredfold." Shudder I can't believe he buried people alive for just being a scholar.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 08:31 PM
2

Today, more women than men see their incomes rise by 25 percent after a marital breakup. You have to be fucking kidding me. As if the fucking alimony wasn't enough.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:50 PM
7

Proving that the people in that video are millions of light years ahead of us.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:19 PM
7

He should have called them all misogynists for tearing down posters advocating decency towards women. Lol. Also call them Racist.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:16 PM
1

For one, only one of them was really severe(Chernobyl) and for two that was a design flaw combined with a procedural flaw that has since never been utilized in other reactor since. Don't forget the blame culture they had. The scientists were forced into doing the experiment under the wrong test conditions by somone who wasn't even a scientist and that was because his superiors were preasuring him for the results. So regards to safety went right out the window on that one.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:58 PM
2

A friend I’ll call Peter shook his head in disbelief when his German girlfriend decided to “train” him to sit while urinating. Things were going quite well between the couple, until the day she saw his upright silhouette through the semi-see-through door to the bathroom and freaked out: “Oh, no! Peter, please sit while using the toilet. Where do you think you are? In the woods?” Just goes to show. If you give them an inch they will take a mile. First its training him to do the toilet sitting dow…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:41 PM
12

Just noticed this: Threatning to take the children away. Lol, this is something that is quite common for women to do. I can't believe they can put this down as abuse, yet ironically fail to realise that this happens all the time when the woman files for divorce.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 10:46 PM
5

Nah, its much better to use stirrups.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 10:40 PM
4

Not as easy as you. Is your back not sore yet? Surely your legs must be getting tired from being in the air for so long. :)
/r/MensRights09/09/12 09:49 PM
11

Yeah, I'm aware its happened and whenever it does happen its always a big deal, which of course it should be, but extending that to men it also means it is a big deal for us also.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 09:32 PM
17

Lol, sex shaming at its finest. You might be surprised to hear this but men DO NOT want sex 100% of the time, with 100% of all women in any given circumstance. Now child, go to your room because the adults here are talking.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 09:30 PM
32

Tell them how they would feel if the hospital called them and told them got their child mixed up at birth and they took home the wrong baby and had raising someone elses child for years. I bet they would throw a fit and start campaigning against the hospital.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:35 PM
18

Thats what I thought when I saw it.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:32 PM
2

The fact that Adam succumbs is Eve's fault and within the blink of a theological eye forbidden knowledge becomes linked to sex. Its impact on policing sexual behaviour was immense. Obviously she has no clue about what that passage means. Yes, Adam blamed Eve, but guess what? Eve also passed blame onto the serpent for her behaviour. They were both punished for their disobedience and both passed the blame for their own actions.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 04:08 PM
2

Standard practice for the radical feminist crew.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 03:58 PM
2

This really needs to be upvoted more. What a great video to show how men can be victims of domestic violence too.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 11:42 AM
0

Yes, this. You are making a difference. Individually, I am very privileged. I’m a tall, straight, white, highly educated male with nice hair...." Oh yes, this man must be very privilaged. He has NICE HAIR!!!!!!!! How do dare you, you privilaged white male for having nice hair. You obviously have that nice hair because you unwittingly oppressed several women in your lifetime. To the members of The He-Man Woman-Haters Club: Since most of you fuckwits are young enough to be my sons, if not grandson…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 11:12 PM
49

Totally sick. Can you imagine if this was reversed. A female victim being dismissed for her rape on this basis. Other women putting up the picture of the perp and then going "Oh, he's hot" and claims of "She must be a lesbian". It would be absolutely sickening. There is no need for this and it's guys doing it because they been brainwashed into thinking that all men, want sex at anytime, with any woman. It's completely wrong and it's completely fucked up. Edit - Spelling
/r/MensRights07/09/12 10:36 PM
4

Why us? Because it's our job to see to it that a boy becomes a man, and we are failing. Well perhaps we should stop separating fathers from their children so they can teach them directly then, shouldn't we. If you want to have some private little club for males only –- like keeping women out of your favorite shooter games –- you're not a man, you're an insecure little boy. A grown-up man has no problem being in the company of women. He knows he's a man. Cool I will go to the local female only gy…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 05:44 AM
2

Yeah, I heard that this was something that actually happened. Although in the original the guy didn't laugh but just stated "I was talking to the dog".
/r/MensRights03/09/12 08:34 PM
11

The guy shouldn't have to give her a penny. He won that money after she filed for divorce, so that is her tough luck. How long after the divorce is this guy supposed to fucking support her. Also considering he used the money to clear off debts from his previous marriage and buy his kids something he has already contributed enough.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 05:30 AM
3

The phrase used was "sexual misconduct". I'm thinking that male teachers can get charged for a lot more things than female teachers and therefore they make up 90% of the stats on that basis. For instance female treachers won't get get charged for hugging a kid but I bet you that male teachers do.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 05:12 AM
2

Ugh, the comments are utterly disgusting. I'm not surprised though. I've seen plenty of this shit before. I am a female supremacist, but I totally disapprove of male castration. A castrated male is totally useless. After castration, a male would lose his sex drive so he would not be able to mate with a woman. I enjoy sex too much to keep a male with no sexual desire. so you are only against castration because you personally get some benefit from it. You make me sick.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 09:19 PM
0

Just do what I do and just don't vote. Why vote for any of them when they are all a bunch of curruptible hypocrites. I live in the UK, so I get get to dismiss even more political parties than you guys do. Labour - Feminist party in disguise Conservatives - Feminist lite party in disguise and destroyers of my country Scotland Liberal Dems - Useless as a condom machine in the vatican. Green Party - Believe that magic fairies supply the country with energy. You mean what is a guy to do?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:47 PM
2

Speak of the devil now.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 07:36 PM
4

What? Really? For fuck sake, they want everything both ways don't they. Its more harmful for a man to hit a woman than for a woman to hit a man because the man is stronger and the woman is weaker, thus it hurts more but then this dick wants to argue that women can handle pain better than men. Really? He really wants to take that fucking route?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:24 PM
6

Fucking hell man. Lets just split and create our own society fast. Lets show them how much they wrong and how much we are needed.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:17 PM
2

Hahahahahaha, when I watched this video at first I thought they were making fun of women who wanted free birth control. When I found out that the video was for unite women, I couldn't stop laughing my ass off. Yeah, cause guys get free contreception, NOT. What a way to make such a fail.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 09:33 PM
4

I don't think the body argument really holds up anyway. If I was to tie someone to a rope and then tie the other end to myself and then throw them over the side of a building, I can't then say "You're using my body to survive, so obviously I have a right to kill you by cutting the rope". Now someone might say that in the above situation I have put that person in that position to begin with, but then babies don't appear by magic. A baby is put in its position by the parents in the first place. So…
/r/MensRights28/08/12 08:54 PM
9

All people that are against abortion are idiots. Yes, I'm sure everybody down at Physicians For Life are wondering how they got their degrees, considering your assertion that they are mentally challenged. If a bunch of doctors can get together and question abortion, then I think that shows that your own position in the matter isn't as obvious as you think it is. http://www.physiciansforlife.org/content/category/4/99/30/
/r/MensRights28/08/12 08:46 PM
2

I'm guessing she is the next one to join up with radical feminists. I don't agree with what that particular Jewish community did to her but they are a far step from all men.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 10:10 PM
5

I didn't have time to stop unfortunately. we were in a rush and we already late enough as it was.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 10:35 PM
1

I feel so sorry for the disabled boy. What the fuck were they thinking?
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:05 PM
1

He might have a point actually. Men get dumped with all the other responsibility. Why not this as well?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 09:43 PM
1

The catholic church will be fine with it because the rates of abortion will go down. The protestant churches will have no complaints whatsoever.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 09:38 PM
11

You need to think harder about yourself and your actions which terrified this young women Apparently opening the door to a public place and walking in terrifies them. Come on, why even leave the fucking house if you're this pathetic.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:55 PM
15

He gets down on his knees while bootlicking and do they even apreciate it? The answer is no. Comment right here. And now he wrote this hackneyed article and wants some ego-stroking for it. And, you’re giving it to him. Because he’s “sorry” (hint: he ISN’T.). I’m sure that poor woman in the laundromat feels tons better knowing that this self-centered, ego-wank article was posted. Typical male Narcissism. I find it ironic that she mentions narcissism. SOmething tells me she is familiar with it.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:27 PM
3

In other words you're trying to paint this guy as a victim of some sort, like he is akin to a defenseless battered woman or senior citizen. The pictures don't lie, he was running away sprinting fast and even show his legs were both in midair while running away. He clearly doesn't need those crutches. He also threatned the author with those same crutches before running away.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 10:38 AM
11

"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig." -- Andrea Dworkin Would you like me to continue and provide more quotations or will you storm out the reddit in a huff now?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 06:57 AM
3

Read what Antz is saying. He is saying he will leave the MRM never to return. Starting again with a new username would break the promise he is giving.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 08:29 AM
1

You're missing the big point that went flying straight over your head. Its fear mongering, because the statistics are over inflated. They also only consider girls and don't consider boys and just ignore them completely.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 07:50 PM
18

A big risk you're taking here Antz. There is always the chance he could've been one of those guys from Manhood Academy.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 07:03 PM
2

Well my wife has a PhD, which she actually worked hard for. Everyone in University was always asking her how to do stuff. So personality wise she is a decent and honest hard worker. She has always been honest with me as well. She could never keep the simpliest of lies from me. However, since she is a Buddhist it is forbidden for me to swat any flies. Lol.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 09:08 PM
3

Absolutely, totally terrifying. I don't have any doubts about my son though, he is the total spitting image of me apart from a few details which he gets off my wife. I married a nice woman from Thailand, not sure if you would consider the cultural differences to be a factor.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:57 PM
2

Another comment. Lol. In addition, it seems completely acceptable and cause for celebration for men to date younger women and, as such, it is no shock that this makes men chase after young girls. One word. Cougars. Honestly, it's like some people look at the world and actually see the opposite of what is happening.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:59 PM
1

From the article that was being criticised within the comment section: Disagree. As a green, I understand this piece with more clarity that any of you, and agree compleley with the intellectual piece. It is a well written piece that strives to put into place the context of these laws. Men should just do what thyey are told, andthey shouldn't have their feelings hurt. They have mysoginised women far too long. Of course we should just do what we're told. Perhaps she could just do what shes told as…
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:41 PM
3

Well what did you expect? You were giving plenty of evidence where feminists not only put policies in place to discrimnate against men but also successfully fought against mens rights and then come here to tell us you have a few bad apples but the majority of the movement is OK. If what you say is the case then how come those minority radicals were able to change the ploitical landscape with their small numbers? I think you know the answer to that is that there are more feminists who are radical…
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:30 PM
2

Lol.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:14 PM
23

The part I thought was unbelieveable was when she told her husband "how can you even ask that?" and now she's on the radio admitting its wrong but still trying to defend it. Kind of shows why guys will ask that question.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 11:48 AM
7

The term trigger warning just wants me to look at it more. I think they use it as sensationalist news speak to drag everyone into gossip.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 11:24 AM
6

This is a mens rights sub reddit, NOT a western mens rights sub reddit. What you are describing is technology that may indeed keep western men slightly more safe during a war but will be absolutely devastating to other men from other countries, nevermind the fact that some of our soldiers still die as well throughout the process.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 10:32 AM
2

very unlikely hypothetical future war, in which the entire world would probably be involved Would those the kind of wars that WW1 and WW2 were based on? Tell this stupid person to go and take a history class.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 10:24 AM
5

Well thats makes more sense. I was only criticising based on what I was seeing other people describe the songs were saying, so I only got part of the picture.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 10:13 AM
2

I think theve got them round the wrong way. Personally I think Matthew Good is fantastic. I love the video for this song. :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWJYVyx5eRw
/r/MensRights17/08/12 06:46 AM
-14

You have to admit its not worded clearly. The song says "can you pay MY bills", if she is asking for the man to make a contribution for himself and what he uses then she should be saying "can you pay YOUR bills".
/r/MensRights17/08/12 06:41 AM
9

She said no and that was enough. She didn't need to then embarrass the guy afterwards by making a blog about how "creepy" he was. How would you feel if you asked a girl out and then she told all her friends you were a creep?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:36 PM
10

Love it. I thought it was really funny.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 07:41 PM
3

Sometimes I do sit to pee, but I'm usually doing something else at the same time. :)
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:51 PM
3

Don't ask, it will involve some twisted logic, or should I say illogic.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:08 PM
1

Personally I think he did nothing wrong. All he did was expose the dirty politics that governments around the world get involved in. Governments shouldn't be holding lots of secrets from their people in the first place.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:06 PM
3

"Victoria Police won’t be laying charges in relation to the report as we do not believe this is in the best interests of the young woman involved." But it would've been in their best interests to go on a witchhunt and arresst some guy without evidence under the circumstance she did not recant her statement.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 11:15 AM
3

Her husband Christopher Colleps is a soldier stationed at Louisiana’s Fort Polk. He is allegedly standing by his wife. Honestly? Your wife cheats on you & disrespects you by having affairs with several of her students, illegally I might add and you stick by her. I would be out of there like a shot.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:15 AM
2

Doesn't matter, we already disagreed with Katie Bakers assessment before we found out that she was bi-polar. The fact she is bi-polar just explains better why she has a warped sense of reality to begin with. Yes, not all bi-polar people have bad opinions and in fact I listen to a canadian political music artist named Matthew Good who also has bi-polar disorder and I agree with him with lots of things. i.e. he is an anti-war protester and I can agree with that big time. However even he recognises…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:00 AM
2

Ieust thought of something. There is a user on youtube who mirrors manwomanmyth's videos. How about we get some people to mirror girlwriteswhat's vdeos?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:37 AM
7

A quick question. I was watching this video on disputing a copyright claim on youtube. I don't see the part where it says that your name and address is handed to the other party. Can someone explain how this works? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ny3pMGFnwMQ&feature=related
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:31 PM
6

Fucking hell, this shit is unbelieveable. I suggest we get a plan together to return the favour and fuck their shit up.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:33 PM
11

Unfortunately youtube is very popular. Its a good way to get awareness raised on mens issues.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:25 PM
1

Well I just have it because its a cool app. I've not had to use it for anything like you have but I guess that shows just how useful it is. You can use it for lots of things.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:15 AM
1

Well I mentioned why they got a non-favourable reply. Their post is a bad carricature of the mens movement. Read the post again and you'll see it's actually a sarcastic carricature used to paint MRA's in a bad light.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:33 AM
1

When I first started dating my wife she contributed to the meals when we ate out.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 08:19 PM
3

According to Men’s Health magazine, married men make more money, have more sex, get promoted faster, and are generally healthier than unmarried men. This will be the same mens health magazine whoose users on their forum did absolutely nothing to help a guy who was talking about suicide. How ironic.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:27 PM
4

Your mistake is you think that the guys in this sub reddit want to pick up girls who treat them like ATM machines. Not the case. If she isn't paying her own way when she has a job and makes her own money, then the guys here are simply not interested in dating her because she is a user.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:16 PM
1

I posted this in a rush last time so I didn't explain my point clearly enough. It depends if the contract itself stipulated that no third parties would be able to get the info, not necessarily give it to them but that they were able to get access to it. However you have giving further info by saying they had the right to use it anywhere, so that kind of suggests that the video was going to get around somehow. Personally, it looks like the woman doesn't have a case as far as I can see.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 06:13 PM
2

I agree pretty much with what you're saying but there is one detail to consider from the article. The video was put together by Meredith Video Studios, part of the Meredith Corporation. Before the shoot, Sahoury said the videographer told her the footage would only be used for the educational video. It depends if it was contracted that the video footage was only for educational purposes only or not.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 04:06 PM
3

This is quickly turning into a soap opera. Lol.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 03:49 PM
2

I also think that anyone who attacks the SPLC has a common ally with the KKK. But if we support the SPLC then we will have a common ally with the radical feminists.......... Yeah, no thanks. I don't want to support a hate group that wants to chop my balls off.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 03:17 PM
3

Poisoning the well requires me to argue first, for one. Erm, well you brought it up first or did you forget that? It's still a standard type of ad hominem argument anyway and thus a logical fallacy. The example shown actually shows an argument made by poisioning the well and then the reply to that argument also being a poisioning the well type of argument. http://www.fallacyfiles.org/poiswell.html Thirdly, I am simply telling the history of anti-feminism, and equating the very people this post l…
/r/MensRights13/08/12 03:01 PM
8

Whoop de do, religious people correctly recognise feminism as a destructive force. So what? All this is, is a "poisioning the well" type of argument, which is a logical fallacy. It assumes that religious people must be wrong about everything for the mere reason that they are religious which is absolutely stupid. You're basically saying this: 1) Religious people are bonkers. Their religion is superstitious. 2) Therefore their religion is wrong 3) Religious people are against feminism 4) Because r…
/r/MensRights13/08/12 12:32 PM
34

Ladies, it’s not such a bad thing to be treated to dinner unless that meal comes with sexual expectations, which is another column. In orther words, men need to grow up and be responsible, but women shouldn't need to be responsible to even pay for their own meals. I like the fact that this author thinks men care that women don't like them because they spend their own time on themselves, doing their own thing.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 12:08 PM
3

Well if you're going to badly carricature a group, then expect to get a non-favourable reply.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 11:49 AM
13

I like the way that lies 1 to 9 are about protecting the woman's feelings so you don't upset her and that number 10 is something that women do as well as they are just as likely as men to cheat on their partners.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 11:44 AM
2

If you've got an android smartphone you can download an app that automatically records all your calls. I have it. :)
/r/MensRights13/08/12 10:32 AM
23

OK, I feel relieved now.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 11:45 AM
29

Is this blog serious? Please someone tell me this is a just some sort of joke.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 11:27 AM
13

Heck, I normally look at the screen funny when I see these words here, but damn, I will say them anyway. What does this have to do with mens rights? I feel so dirty now after saying that. :)
/r/MensRights06/08/12 12:34 PM
1

Cause if a drunk woman goes home willingly with a drunk man then its the man who ends up with rape charges. Feminists are speaking out against this because they want to continually be able to blame men.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 08:31 AM
6

Hang on a minute. Did they just remove a whole load of comments from the article? I'm sure earlier on there were over 100 comments, now there are only 30 odd. Typical feminist journalist, silencing the speech of people.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 09:16 PM
1

Sure he loses his phone, but I don't think the advert makes a deal out of it by hinting he must be stupid. Its just a case of he lost his phone, which any person can do. I know I've lost one and I also found one which I handed back to the person who lost it. Besides the dad was smart enough to back up his pictures and thats the point of the ad. I like the fact that the advert shows the dad to be really caring. Caring enough to say he loves being a dad, best thing in the world to him and he cares…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 09:10 PM
19

Yep. Another lets scare the shit out of women to make them distrust men more campaign.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 09:03 PM
2

I take it this is the same France where a guy was successfully sued for not having sex with his wife? Oh the irony of rape culture.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 09:56 AM
1

I don't know what his doctor was thinking telling him that, when he ended up in prison for breaking the law. Yes, I think it was still something he shouldn't have done, but considering the advice came from his doctor in the first place then his doctor should lose his licence to practice and perhaps more. Also this bit is a complete joke. Every six months, he has to undergo a polygraph test and answer questions, including whether he has had sex with animals or fantasizes about children. Seriously…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:50 AM
9

Basically, Paul Elam tried to help a guy out on the Mens Health Magazine website who made a post showing potential suicidal intentions. The posters there generally weren't very helpful to the guy.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 02:59 PM
1

Well I know we don't know all the details but the articles says that the man was obstructed when he tried to prove he wasn't the correct person. As noted. Dauphin County officials also improperly altered records, then fought his attempts to prove he wasn’t the father, he contends. He claims those alleged acts violated his constitutional rights.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 12:14 PM
3

I wonder is she thinks that prison for boys is not the answer.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 12:09 PM
2

Like you say, it shouldn't have gone to that extent but it did and thats what all the outrage is about. Nobody here would complain if he was arressted, found to be innocent and then released, but it has gone much further than that now. They have gone to the point of falsifying records in order to imprision him, which is just plain corruption in my book.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:57 AM
8

He probably thought it was his but then afterwards noticed it wasn't his. Its a simple thing to do. Once he noticed it wasn't his then he couldn't actually open it since it wasn't his mail. I suppose however he should have notified the delivery company that it wasn't his and that it needed to be resent.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 10:07 PM
2

Thanks for reminding me why I hate Hilarity Clinton.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:55 PM
1

I think its fake. However if this did happen and I witnessed some guy being humilated by her I would throw my drink in her face and call her a bitch.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:30 PM
1

This "open relationship" here was likely just the woman wanting his permission to go screw other men. Not that she would stop if he said no to the whole thing. The man in this situation should be DNA testing "his" kids and making plans to leave the country permanently if it turns out they aren't his. This guy unfortunately is probably a total doormat and has to now put up with his dear wife bringing home guys to fuck while he hears it in another room, while he gets pity sex every other month and…
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:38 PM
68

Two things for me personally. 1) The poster only pictures women as being victims of rape. 2) The poster suggests that women have no responsibility when they are drunk but somehow men do. i.e. If a drunk man and a drunk woman have sex then the man is "responsible" while the "victim" is the woman.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:13 PM
10

Bingo!
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:07 PM
2

Oh look, we did this totally unbiased survey, honest!!!! and we found that big men are mean men to gils. /sarcasm. Fuck that shit.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:00 PM
1

Obviously I would want to grow up with both parents, which I did, but if I had to choose I would actually choose my dad.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 11:57 AM
0

Well what do you expect to happen? Society is built around the better woman being the younger and more attractive woman and all the girly mags support this idea and even further it when they have pictures of air brushed women to a ridiculous standard of beauty on the cover of their magazines. However once they are over the hill they then start complaining because all the suitable men are dating younger and better looking women. Well you reap what you sow.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:40 PM
1

Well there is no point in talking to her then. If she thinks anything you say is automatically wrong because you're a man then just tell her you're not speaking to her anymore.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 12:32 PM
1

Sometimes she’d even slap me in front of our friends and family. It was humiliating. So basically nobody else done or said anything when this happened. Sarah was jailed for four years for wounding with intent and is due for release this month. Four years for attempted murder? What a joke.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 06:39 AM
4

Reading the rest of your comments it seems you're not willing to compromise. In that regards I would advise you not to get married if the situation is unacceptable for you. Also it has been noted that if your mother in law is interferring just now then she might interfere later on in the marriage, so that is also a potential issue. I would just break it off if I were you but state to your fiancee that its because you both just want different things and its not going to work out.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 11:58 AM
6

Its the way of South Park. They take the piss out of everything.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 11:20 AM
2

I'm wondering about situations where neither party can remember who initiated the sex. Some women may think that if they don't remember initiating the sex or even giving consent then that means they were raped.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 11:11 AM
6

Its almost as if they are trying to force you to become a criminal. If they freeze all your money, then what are you supposed to do for food? Simple answer is that you're forced to steal it in order to survive and thus you become a criminal and can be jailed. Its all one big scam to try and force men into either being homeless or thieves and thus they can jail them. Heck, they just jail you anyway for the child support arrears.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 10:34 AM
7

Why wouldn't men who get their income stolen and their bank accounts frozen be angry? Of course they're going to be angry about it. I would.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 10:28 AM
0

Interesting, I admit that this is pretty bad. I don't usually see this in the UK though. Well not since Judge Pickles was active. I suppose I don't usually pay a lot of attention to the media either so maybe that has an effect.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 04:28 PM
12

You're missing the point. Nobody (or very few people, at any rate) is suggesting that women should not know how to defend themselves. What anti-rape activists find frustrating is that every time a rape story makes local or national headlines, there is inevitably a chorus of concern trolls saying that it was tragic and all, but she really should have known better than to wear those clothes, go out on that night, or see those people. The implication is that women, by engaging in certain behaviour,…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 04:13 PM
2

I have discussed with others in other subreddits if that is what you mean.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 03:49 PM
0

Perhaps, but I don't usually see a lot of victim blaming of women in concerns to this. What I do see though is usually men being laughed at when they are a victim of rape.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 11:59 AM
7

How about I carry some flyers on me for the next time I get mugged at the ATM machine. /s
/r/MensRights10/05/12 11:37 AM
41

people are angry that 'rape prevention tips' usually focus on things women should do to avoid being raped, Not this rubbish again. Look, everytime I go to a cash machine to get money there is always a notice on the screen to tell me to make sure that nobody behind me is watching me enter my pin number, who will then mug me and steal my money and use my card to withdraw the rest. They ARE NOT victim blaming me, they are only informing me to be cautious. What I don't do is get into a hissy fit and…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 11:34 AM
2

Yeah, we were told that but actually many feminists want special privillages rather than equal rights.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 11:13 AM
0

The problem is your daughter wants to move in with her mother. I'm sorry to say this but her opinion matters and a lot. It might be best for you to talk to your daughter first. Ask her why she wants to move in with her mother. If she still wants to move after talking to her then let her but also tell her she can come back any time she wants. Try and strike up some arrangement where you don't need to pay for child support. Say to her mother that you will still drive there to see her, you will sti…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 11:45 AM
2

Then people are going to ask what the hell is going on and how can we tackle the issues. I'm absolutely scared to death of the thought of "A Brave New World" actually becoming a reality.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:44 AM
2

If you ask me its a small sacrifice to pay for equality. :) In saying that, I can't complain, I'm not exactly the cleanest person myself. Yes, I do my dishes but my room is a complete disgrace. My problem is I own too much stuff.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:42 AM
1

I wouldn't worry about it. The bot is there ONLY to show where people may have drastically changed their post in order to make the community look bad. So they won't be reading the copied post anyway (unless you drastically change the post to make the community look bad) :)
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:23 AM
1

Fuck man!!!! Did you really have to post that. That was sick and disgusting and now I feel sick.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 08:26 AM
1

look, we'll just drop it. There is no point getting hung up about it.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 01:49 PM
4

Considering he was banging on the cell door and making a racket, I don't buy the story that he was left in the cell by accident. If he was then they would have heard him. It's not he was in a sound proof room or anything.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 01:18 PM
1

I understand, but apparently they are teaching their kids to ignore gender pronouns such as him or her and replace it with a gender neutral version. So it takes away the whole language and the ability to slander any particular gender. So instead of saying things like "He is a rapist", they have to replce "He" with a gender neutral version which fails to highlight that a man is the perpetrator. That works against them and their goal because normally they are quite big at pointing out that men (fa…
/r/MensRights03/05/12 12:27 PM
1

OK, I see what you mean. Yes, in the end she will declare bankruptcy. I suppose it will hurt her credit rating as well as her chances of getting a job.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 12:20 PM
1

You were overanalyzing what I said when you shouldn't have. You decided to pick an argument with me for pretty much no reason.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 12:18 PM
2

I know, I think the same thing when it comes to Transgenders. Basically these feminists are denying transgenders the ability to want to change gender in the first place. Why? There is no gender to change from or to in their delusional worldview.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:29 PM
1

No I understand the point that you're making but it doesn't change the fact that I wasn't being totally serious with my play on words in my replies and then you replied to make an asinine point which doesn't matter in the context I was framing it all. I was framing it in a sense to show that an outrage would occur if the genders were reversed. Even if nobody gives a shit about paternity fraud it doesn't change the fact that if you put a poster on the wall with random womens names on it then they…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:26 PM
2

In the case of the article you are correct. I think however we were talking about if guys did the same thing and put posters up with random womens names on them then it would be cause an outrage.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 12:54 PM
1

Yes, I see what you mean. Any disadvantage that males currently get because of those issues you mentioned will become difficult to fix. However I'm still wondering about this gambit by them because it means that child custody amonst some other things will have to give way towards men. If you ask me, I just think that this is some seriously messed up shit to begin with. Anyone with half a brain let alone a science degree can tell there is more difference between the genders other than just genita…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 12:52 PM
0

exposure to pornography may have caused it to overdose on testosterone experts say. What the fuck? Obviously the word "experts" here is supposed to say "feminists" instead.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 12:46 PM
-5

Whatever, thanks for the downvote, now you can have one too.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 12:10 PM
2

Ah, the old double standard. However teaching people, esepcially kids that gender doesn't exist through the use of language will eventually lead them in a position where they are unable to disciminate based upon gender. It makes it impossible for people to say things like "men are pigs", "men are bastards", "men are......????". Why? Because the simple answer will be "What men? Who are men? We don't know any men", not to mention they don't have any pronouns to describe men any more since they got…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 11:30 AM
2

I think I must be missing something here, but if they teach their whole society to never distinguish between genders because they make them obsolete, then how are they able to continue to assert things like "men are more likely to be rapists" or "it is impossible for men to be raped"?. Because in their society gender doesn't exist then how is gender discrimination possible?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 11:24 AM
2

Fair enough, but it will all come crashing down on them when men start competing for their jobs and get them because companies can start hiring on ability again rather than gender. No more whinning about the bad men because the answer would be simple "What men?".
/r/MensRights02/05/12 10:56 AM
1

But. but.... if they get rid of gender then how are they going to bash men with their misandry. /s
/r/MensRights02/05/12 10:29 AM
2

He wasn't drugged and raped, he took drugs, and had sex a few days later. True, but I'm wondering why she gave drugs to the boy in the first place. What were her intentions here?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 10:08 AM
3

Damn right, she deserved to get hammered by the law. However I don't see how she is going to pay $6 million, thats probably a bit much. Give her a jail sentence instead.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:54 AM
-5

Oh come on! You killed the chain. It was meant to be a long list of "Notice: These Women Are.........." examples. Yeah I know most people don't give a damn about false accusers and paternity fraud. Well men do, but they are under the false impression that it will never happen to them and that its rare, etc, etc.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:29 AM
1

What the fuck?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:52 AM
18

"Notice: These Women Are Potential Paternity Fraudsters"
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:49 AM
18

How about this? "Notice: These Women are Potential False Accusers".
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:23 AM
10

"A lot of people are very upset by it, but I think if a man was secure he wasn't a rapist, he wouldn't be threatened by this list," Ms. Lane said. So basically you call a man a potential rapist so other people can look at him with hate in their eyes, call him names, dodge him, not talk to him, bully him, etc, etc, and he is supposed to be fucking fine with this? I don't know what plannet this bitch is from but its certainly not Earth.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:17 AM
2

So because people know it's not really kosher to be a codified turd, they try and hide their misogynist views under the guise of legitimate arguments. Lol. Isn't that what they do? Notice how her first and last points completely contradict each other?
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:32 AM
3

Translation: No I didn't watch your video but its wrong anyway. Lol.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:07 AM
4

Oh look what I found in the comments What kind of men are these? If a random women you met and willingly went home with wanted to have sex all night, I'd assume that would be a good thing for a man not something to cry about.. The first guy made me laugh so much "She's trying to kill me with sex" . Why did they not just push her aside and walk off I can't imagine she could've been that strong and there's no mention of a weapon. Victim blaming at its finest.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 05:47 AM
1

In addition to what Mahhrat said, it is possible for one person to be at entirely at fault for the failure of a relationship. You statement said this: Please. Sounds like these women are in piss-poor relationships with men who don't much pay attention to them. So yes, it's kind of the man's fault (as well as the woman's). Erm how do you know who is at fault? Do you have a personal crystal ball in your house that you use to spy on everyones relationships? Like I said, it doesn't need to take two …
/r/MensRights28/04/12 12:20 AM
2

Actually this is good to hear. She has given up on that scientologist bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 08:22 AM
6

I think its your fault. Wheyyyyyyy .....see? Throwing blame around for no reason is fun.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 07:56 AM
3

Is everyone watching? Lets look at this little trick. "[Women] may say, ‘OK, I get that he's not romantic, but he doesn't even appreciate what I do for his kids?' Notice now that they're your kids and not hers. Great, can we have custody now? Time for another one. "The women who I have worked with in my private practice, who have had something like this happen, have expressed feelings of ‘just being an incubator' for their husband's children." Look at that again. The children again belong to the…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 07:38 AM
2

For me it is about the things he says and does. He has gone on his self-righteous crusade to try and rid the world of religion. What most Americans don't understand is that over here in the UK, most people don't give a shit about what he has to say and we see what he has to say as just more aggression and division among people which quite frankly we just don't need right now.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 07:30 AM
2

Oh I know, lets call all atheists "brights" since we obviously have the fucking monopoly on intelectualism. While he is at it he can call all religious people "dye in the wool faith heads" in his book. The same book where he totally fucks up the understanding of the Kalam Cosmological argument and then pretends he has given an answer to it when he hasn't. Richard Dawkins is a great biologist, but he should have stuck with that instead of writing that complete trash. Instead he actually embarrass…
/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:07 PM
1

No, I just don't see why labelling him a "botfly" is an accurate description. He is a regular poster in cars and nba, so he seems to be a genuine poster on reddit. You just seem to be having a disagreement on this one issue. I will admit though what he said came off as self righteous.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 10:50 PM
2

What the fuck? Over $500 for getting her hair done but she won't spend $150 on fixing the plumbing. Whats even more worrying about this is that she spent the money on the hair AFTER she found out how much the plumbing would cost her.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 10:35 PM
1

Well the person is hardly a "botfly" are they?
/r/MensRights26/04/12 10:27 PM
2

And you were taught a bunch of shit in your sex, gender & society class.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 10:24 PM
1

The user has been a redditor for a year.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 10:22 PM
1

I'm British and even I find him to be a smug prick.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 10:12 PM
4

As much as Richard Dawkins is right here when he says that you should be able to defend an argument, it doesn't change the fact that something that can be said can be considered offensive. Here are some things that I think would be considerd offensive that shouldn't need any explanation why. "All men are rapists" "All men are bastards" "All religious people are stupid" "All atheists are baby eaters" All offensive and all quite clearly inaccurate.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 09:59 PM
6

The use of words like dick nor bastard aren't bigoted either. The term CIS in this case is different because you're not applying it to an idividual but to a group of people.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:50 AM
4

I don't know why you were downvoted. I gave you an upvote. In Chemistry CIS and TRANS are used to describe the same chemical formula but with a slightly a different structure to it. In other words the functional groups appear differently in each case.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:47 AM
4

I couldn't believe she used the word "priority"! Women fight to have PRIORITY over men? I don't know if she genuinely meant it or it was a slip of the tongue/Freudian slip. You said the guy with his his young son. I'm wondering if anybody gets priority for a seat shouldn't it be a child.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 05:37 AM
2

An often-cited 2007 study estimated one in five college women were victims of an attempted or completed sexual assault Translation: One in five college women were "victims" of a man accidentally bumping into them in a corridor or something.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 07:25 PM
18

Just raking the comments section and found this. We woman have always said men are unbelievably stupid. You go to strip clubs, have lap Danes, look at porn, look at any woman you think is attractive, can't go to sports games without scantily clad "cheerleaders" grinding in front of decent people, including woman and many children. Commercials or movies have to have nudity, violence and suggestive woman or you don't go or put decent ones down to "chick flicks" , as if that is a degrading word. Wh…
/r/MensRights23/04/12 07:04 PM
1

Yeah, but at least that has the word "against" in it to show that its an anti mens right subreddit. This one is just plain deceptive and silly.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 06:55 PM
48

Are men stupid? How else can we explain the endless parade of otherwise successful individuals, who by all appearances seem intelligent and competent, and yet risk destroying their careers and their personal lives over the chance to have a sexual escapade? Oh Yeah, because we all know that women don't have affairs. /s
/r/MensRights23/04/12 04:21 PM
1

Seriously? Who listens to Osbourne? Who takes her seriously? Apparently the whole audience of The Talk who were laughing along with her while she was making her sexist jokes.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 12:02 PM
1

What? Really? For fuck sake how childish can those pricks be.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 11:51 AM
1

If he owns a dog, your man is loyal and can actually commit, because owning a dog is as close to having a child as it comes. Lol. One of my firends has a dog and he says he is never ever getting married and he doesn't want kids either. Complete fail.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 06:41 AM
1

No, but its the message they get.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 08:08 PM
3

Technically speaking this isn't even play rape let alone rape. The bit of the phrase at the end is a dead giveaway. "........until you let him win out". Thats where the consent is given in the scenario. What this is isn't play rape. It's just playing hard to get before giving consent. It's just basic teasing which happens. The advice is given in order to make the woman feel powerful when using her sexuality. Thats all. Now, yes, I understand what a lot of others are saying when a false accusatio…
/r/MensRights21/04/12 06:55 AM
1

You know what some people are like though. They might think he is being genuine, especially since all this hassle we got from the SPLC. People might be expecting us to say this kind of shit based on ignorance of that incident alone. Some people can be very trusting of organisations like that.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 09:14 PM
1

Can somebody else provide another link for this. When I go to the link I'm not getting the correct news story.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 09:06 PM
2

I believe that trolls should be dealt with on a case by case basis. Normally I don't really care for trols but if they are going around bad mouthing us then we need to do something about it. Everybody forgets that femininism gained its power throught the use of such tactics. Bad mouth men, make people believe it and then get the anti-male laws passed.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 11:01 AM
2

Oh this one is even better from her. http://thefemitheist.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/mrm-and-mra-reveal-their-misogyny-war.html The Great Misogynists List: TheAmazingAtheist GirlWritesWhat (Indoctrinated Self-Misogynist) JohntheOther - TheHappyMisogynist Bill1224601 - TFLtruth - TFLwarhammer (This one is especially heinous) Lol, GWW is on the list.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 10:58 AM
4

Ignoring misandry never worked before, so why do it now.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 10:51 AM
3

If this practice were adopted officially all across the world, all war, crime, and violence would end. No it wouldn't, because you would still be committing violence against men you stupid cow. It would also provide them with better health throughout their life, as the testicles are a major cause of health issues in males as they age. So when are going to host a breast cutting day then. Obviously this stupid bitch is completely insane.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 10:36 AM
4

It does when they are trying to make this sub look bad by pretending to be one of us. That is the point.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 10:09 AM
4

Ah yes, you're right. There is a subtle distinction there with the underscore at the end. So I got one from SRS and I got one from SRS_ .
/r/MensRights20/04/12 05:22 AM
1

Actually the article doesn't say it. The article says he hurt himself trying to disarm her. I must have misread that first time around.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 05:13 AM
1

However article states that he tried to disarm her when he was wounded. This to me suggests it may not have been a one sided attack, and she may have armed herself out of fear, not aggression. Em, not to be a buzz kill or anything but if anybody tried to stab me with a knife then I think I would try to disarm them at least.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 04:24 PM
2

Thanks. I consider it a badge of honour. :)
/r/MensRights19/04/12 04:19 PM
2

Interesting. I just got the impression that the kids were under the custody of the mother because of the kids statement.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 04:18 PM
1

In that case. Done.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 12:05 PM
1

I read it and it didn't take me long to see that one of these users is a heartless bitch. http://www.reddit.com/r/antisrs/comments/qotef/srs_drives_man_to_suicide/c3zdb2z?context=3 Yes, I'm heartless for thinking the suffering of women and other marginalized minorities is more important than the suffering of privileged white men. In other news, people who think the suffering of hungry children in the third world are "heartless" for not giving equal consideration to an American boy's broken Xbox.…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:53 AM
10

I got two separate messages the other day telling me I was banned from SRS and I didn't even make a single post in SRS ever. Lol.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:26 AM
1

No mention of a hate group but considering that the SPLC deals with hate groups then it makes you wonder what they're writing about us for.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:18 AM
2

Well the SPLC have yet to list them as a hate group.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:16 AM
1

Ah, so theres the connection then. Just goes to show you where these dirty feminsists get their claws into.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:15 AM
3

Holy shit, she has a son? I didn't realise that Allecto had a son, I've read her site and I found no indication she was even a mother (yet). Can you provide a link for that so I can read up on it. I feel really sorry for the boy now.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:13 AM
2

I don't think you're understanding what I am saying. Watch this, especially from 3mins 30 seconds onward: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZAuqkqxk9A&feature=context&context=C42c604aVDvjVQa1PpcFPe8sKRkcczw50e8LkCzJ8w9tlqBg6LKb8= The word men is usually omitted when men are either responsible for something good or are victims of a crime.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 06:51 PM
4

That is because the arrested were PEOPLE. You yourself said one was a woman. Obviously hugh reading fail on your part. Do you really think if the genders were reversed here that they would say the 24 women being held were "people".
/r/MensRights18/04/12 04:30 PM
3

I've seen A_Nihilist post before. I think he is just being really sarcastic.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 03:50 PM
3

I have a son so I understand that you want to play a hugh role in your kids life, it's only natural. Be careful though, I know you mean well and you truly believe that your ex-gf will make an unfit mother but be careful how you state that across when fighting for custody. If you appear to be too harsh on the matter it could count against you legally and you could end up losing custody. Remember the goal is to get as much access as possible. She is most likely to get main custody, I think the bes…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 03:40 PM
-1

We believed the last one and it was nothing but a waste of our time.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 12:22 PM
1

The only reason why people oppose big government though is because its restrictive of freedoms. If people weren't so greedy & selfish then it would be a better environment to employ one. I suppose others may argue that a competetive market is needed, because in order for people to actually put any work into obtaining University degrees they need to get the benfits out of it (high income). Taking away income from those who earn it to give to those who don't earn as much might discourage people fr…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 12:06 PM
2

Neither have I, but I've seen many others who have been. The only reason I've not been banned though is because I didn't post anything when looking. I know from just reading the page that my opinions would be blocked out and I would be banned.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 12:00 PM
1

I see. I think its a good idea to keep it visible though. Shows the kind of lengths we need to go to in order to not be misrepresented.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:59 AM
1

I'm a small government man. For a guy who comes from the UK it is pretty unusual to have this opinion but I just think that the bigger you make a government then the more power you give it and that means the bigger chance that everything gets fucked up. This is what happened in Argentina. Peron got in power, over invested in social policies, and then when the shit hit the fan because he had pretty much led the country into debt he then took control for himself.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:56 AM
3

Deleting my comment after finding out this may be a troll account who is posting this.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:46 AM
1

Perhaps, so they will take all the money from men then and redistribute it for their own personal gains.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:32 AM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/needadvice/comments/sdtd6/my_crazy_exgirlfriend_assaulted_me_didnt_pay_for/ Apparently jessers25 from this post directed him here.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:30 AM
2

History shows the poster posting this in other subreddits. Once in r/needadvice and also in r/law. Also they have a history of posting in other subreddits. i.e. r/engineering, so I would probably assume its legit for just now.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:28 AM
3

Happens all the time. I don't even bother, its just a waste of time going over there.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:13 AM
3

bathroom stalls with low ceilings to keep men from peeing standing up. What the fuc...........
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:12 AM
1

Why did I have to give rightsbot an upvote because someone else downvoted it? Do we have some srs trolls lurking because they hate it or something?
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:10 AM
8

http://www.splcenter.org/what-we-do/hate-and-extremism The Southern Poverty Law Center monitors hate groups and other extremists throughout the United States and exposes their activities to law enforcement agencies, the media and the public. So why did they write an article on us if we are not considered a "hate group"? Seems to me that they bloody well think so. Personally I'm insulted that they did this as I have never been even remotely considered to be a hateful person. I am actually a very …
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:03 AM
1

It happens. One women took a condom with sperm in it to a fertility clinic and got herself pregnant. The guy was still made to pay child support and has to sue the fertility clinic now. http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/2011/11/hair_balls_is_familiar_with.php And another link to the same story. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2065293/New-father-Joe-Pressil-sues-fertility-clinic-girlfriend-stole-sperm-got-pregnant-gave-birth-twins-IVF.html
/r/MensRights18/04/12 10:31 AM
3

Most likely what will happen is that she will get full custody of the child while you pay child support. If you get visitation then count yourself lucky. However I have a suspicion that she will want to work out a relationship with you. In this instance she will want to partner up with you with the sneaky intention of you paying off her student loans while she looks after the child. If you refuse this then be prepared to have a fight on your hands for visitation rights. Now this is just a suspic…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 10:15 AM
6

I think the op has stated an interest in playing a part in raising the child so I think he wants to keep it from the sounds of things.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 10:08 AM
3

So true. How long do you think it will take before they force people into marriage? Heck, they could just take all the money away from men instead and just hand it out to everyone else like a proper communist instituition would do.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 09:35 AM
3

Well it doesn't make it better just because I'd be the one getting the support... I would include that in your discussion. Tell her that you need to protect yourself for legal reasons. It's also good to add that you want her to have a good career also and so don't want her to become dependent on either the state or you for income.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 09:34 AM
2

Its unfortunate, but rightsbot is needed. We've had too many "undercover agents" infiltrate the Reddit to make a post and then change it to say something different afterwards in order to make us look bad.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 09:29 AM
2

What I find interesting is that the whole argument between the mum and her daughter was centered around the daughter wanting to live with her dad. I think taking into account what happened the daughters wishes should be granted prompto.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 09:20 AM
2

“These guys have had a very arduous tour of Afghanistan and have done a tremendous job but they could get a ticking off from a senior officer. Well that senior officer can just go and fuck themselves.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:01 PM
1

Spermjacking isn't a thing that happens. Yes it is. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrQIs4MuRIo 2 weeks ago I would have bought the line about it being all about women claiming to take pills they never took and poking holes in condoms, but you all fucking flipped over the idea of an evil woman literally jacking sperm. That's why I called it useless horseshit. Because that's what it is. Yes of course. Its a mens issue so it must be useless horseshit. /s If you think that an issue like this means n…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 08:00 AM
2

The bit about Betty Friedan says it all. She stoof up and basically explained that she didn't trust men to take the pill because she thought that men would deliberately want to inpregnate women. Its another instance of projection here, she thinks men won't take the birth control pill because she already knows that in some instances women won't take it.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:54 AM
3

Comprehension fail.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:42 AM
8

Well here is a suggestion for you. Why don't you fuck off? Whats that? You say no because you have a mind of your own and you don't need to do what people tell you. I guess the same can be said about people who get drunk then, perhaps some personal accountability is the key here.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 11:26 PM
1

You said this: True, feminism doesn't get bogged down with useless horseshit like spermjacking and comparing circumcision to female genital mutilation. This was clearly an attempt to belittle mens rights issues. No-one here says that women cannot have problems either. Ironically what we say is that mens issues don't get any recognition and funnily enough you are sweeping them under the rug while belittling them. So you are doing the very thing we claim. So we talk about the things I mentioned wi…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 11:21 PM
2

Worse than that. Just don't sleep with girls you don't know too well and may have had a drink.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:26 PM
2

I read that actually. I even posted in the thread. For the record hardwarequestions has hit the nail on the head. Its certainly a double standard that doesn't get recognised.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:14 PM
98

What the fuck indeed. Its the whole "you're doing something wrong but you don't know it and we're not going to tell you why" routine.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:10 PM
1

Oh my goodness, this is some sick shit. What the hell are they doing shocking a disabled boy 31 times. I've not seen the video as I'm in work. I don't know if I should to be honest it might be to upsetting.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:05 PM
2

About time. I remember reading about this witch ages ago. Quite clearly she is corrupt beyond all measure.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:44 PM
2

Excuse me, but not so long ago you were dimissing mens issues as being unworthy of attention and you were given it the "Women have bigger problems than you" line. Now you admit that men can also be raped and you admit it is horrible. Goodness sake, get your story together will you.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:10 PM
2

Nobody in MR denies that rape is horrible but guess what? Men can also get raped and they get absolutley ignored when it happens. I knew a guy who was nearly raped in a public toilet one time and the general attitude towards this was laughter.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:07 PM
2

Oh sure, because 90% of the homeless being male isn't a big issue or the fact that male suicide rates have been increasing over the years. How about the fact that men die on average 5 years younger then women. Oh no, these aren't big issues at all, are they.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:02 PM
3

Been there, done that. I could actually tell you from experience even BEFORE I became an MRA that feminsists don't give a shit about men. In discussion with feminsists about other things I've still seen them invoke "The Patriarchy" while using slurs against those that disagreed with their points of views because they were anti-male. This was said not only to me but to other males who weren't even MRA's.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 11:59 AM
1

which is more than MR has done, given by the number of rape and death threats that land in my inbox and modqueue on a given day. Rubbish. I don't believe you. Yes I'm a regular poster at MR but I don't think anyone would do that.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 11:52 AM
-3

Well sure, but lets be honest about this. The groups who are trying to fix those things will be cooking up some plan about how they can profit from it through the feminist money making machine. The last thing I want is to see all these other countries being force fed the same bullshit that we have had to digest. Remember they don't fix problems, they only create more so they can justify more funding from governmental bodies.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 03:47 PM
10

He's a mens rights activist. Where is he going to talk about mens rights issues other than the mens rights section? You on the other hand have a whole load of negative Karma which suggests that you like to spend time in sub sections outside of your own interests. i.e. a troll.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 01:11 PM
3

Whatever.... nobody is listening to you since you're talking trash.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 12:02 PM
7

Exactly, the guy is obviously a lunatic. His next argument will be claiming that six month old babies are misogynistic because they depend on their mothers breat milk to be fed. Lol. He's that insane.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:48 AM
-3

Not exactly, but we do crticise feminism for not talking about mens rights, so lets not go down that road shall we. Besides, I don't trust feminist institutions with equality they are just a bunch of money grabbers who like to get paid fat checks off the government. They don't have women's best interests at heart and they don't do women any good at all. They only want to antagonise the problems more in order to increase their own funding. So in essence, if they don't want to help women properly …
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:43 AM
9

If this is true then its pretty disturbing. Wouldn't a one/two child policy be better? And if not because their government doesn't give family hand outs then what is the problem with families having as many children as they want? In saying that though the one child policy in China wasn't exactly great either as it only led to parents wanting to choose the gender of their to begin with because of the type of culture they had so this probably isn't a better idea either. Still this is fucked up bey…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:38 AM
3

Phrases like "asking for it" and "begging for it" are not helpful though since they seem to be encouraging retaliation as if to say it's the standard/norm of what happens. Like I said conservatives are not supposed to be about vigilante justice, so I find the language pretty harsh for this reason. If somebody said those same words about a man who disobeyed his wife who normally abuses him and then got beaten for his disobedient act, do you think the language "he was asking for it" is helpful jus…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:31 AM
4

I would have replied "I didn't realise that you were a MRA". Lol.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:22 AM
7

I read it and there was nothing wrong with what you said. You would have at least have thought this person would try and get better examples than that if they were going to fake a blog about how misogynistic MRA's are supposed to be.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:19 AM
5

I read the posts that this person put as an example. I fail to see the hatred in them that they are talking about. If that wasn't enough they then link to a bunch of video clips of men having accidents hurting them in a sensitive area as if this is supposed to be funny. Sure I know about you've been framed but I just can't help but notice how few people in those videos actually tried to help and instead just sat back laughing.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:13 AM
3

Let me quote you. If someone threw a white sheet over themselves and walked down the middle of Harlem, we would be describing their actions as begging to get hurt/get murdered, would we not? Why are they "begging to get hurt" when you already accept that all people are responsible for their actions. Surely it is also expected that those persons should control their anger without hurting him but inform the authoritites of racial discrimination instead? However for some reason you are expecting th…
/r/MensRights10/04/12 08:59 PM
2

Thats fair enough.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 04:19 PM
1

I'm getting confused here. What did you mean when you said this? For mine, taking responsibility for one's views and actions and the foreseeable consequences of them has s0d-all to do with political leanings. It is simply a tenet of how one lives. I was pointing out that it is an issue that crops up in politics. Simply because there are groups who want to pass and maintain laws that absolve people of responsibility.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 12:20 PM
5

I feel sorry for this guy. This is just insane and I think his life is in danger. He needs to find a way out of this situation. The bitch has the cheek to say this: “Yes!! It’s because you want to go off and take a vacation with your girlfriend!” Well if didn't treat him badly in the first place you psycho-bitch then perhaps he wouldn't be divorcing you to begin with.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 11:53 AM
3

Why do you think female child abusers get such light sentences? It is because they don't get viewed as being responsible for their actions.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 11:31 AM
3

I'm quite a conservative person myself and I agree that people have responsibilities, but I'm sorry I can't agree with this "they are asking for it" or "begging for it" attitude. Its equivalent to saying that an abusive man was "asking for it" or "begging for it". The reason for this is simple. It doesn't absolve the other party of their responsibility. Also conservatives are not big on "vigilante justice" either.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 11:02 AM
3

Technically not true because it is becoming political to pass laws absolving people of peronal responsibility.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 10:58 AM
0

In other news, feminists say that a man who got his balls chppoed off by his wife because he was an abusive asshole was "asking for it". Of course we obviously shouldn't read this to say that the man deserved it. Of course not, that would be silly. /s
/r/MensRights10/04/12 10:20 AM
34

Nowhere in that article did I see the phrase, "those women deserve to be raped." If feminists were to say that a man was "asking for it" if he got his balls chopped off by his wife, I think I would be correctly identifying that as being synonomous with deserving it. There are good men and bad men, just as there are good women and bad women. To get yourself blotto on drinks you cajoled someone you don't know to buy for you with hinted promises of sex, and then go somewhere private with them while…
/r/MensRights10/04/12 10:18 AM
5

Does a man who beats his wife deserve to get his balls chopped off? You see its not as simple as that. Yes people need to be responsible for their behaviours, but guess what? This applies to everyone. So it is also responsible for a man to recognise manipulative behaviour and just say no and walk away instead of buying the drinks. It doesn't give him a right to rape the woman and it also doesn't mean the woman was "asking for it". The same way that a man who beats his wife isn't "asking for it" …
/r/MensRights10/04/12 10:11 AM
1

How about the people who murder the guy with a white sheet over their head? Are they not responsible for their actions as well? In retrospect, is this not similar to saying that a guy deseves to get his balls chopped off because he was an abusive asshole towards a woman? Do we then get to say "He was asking for it" or "He was downright begging for it".
/r/MensRights10/04/12 09:56 AM
0

Exactly. All this person has done is rename the article to say "Just Don't Date".
/r/MensRights09/04/12 10:30 PM
57

So basically the article should be renamed to just say "Don't date men".
/r/MensRights08/04/12 11:16 PM
3

If feminists want to keep pushing things like this then it won't be long before they cause the death of their own movement as even women will start turning their backs on them in droves. Just another reason why feminism isn't good for women. One question though, although it is a topic of interest for me, is it a mens rights issue? Ironically enough this seems like a womens issue that feminism is blundering up.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 11:05 PM
151

Because they are fucking stupid and you should tell them that. When they complain just tell them that its impossible for you to be insulting towards stupid people since they are in the position of ignorant bliss and you're not. See how they like them apples.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 10:16 PM
4

But the truth of the matter is, the world needs your patience in the department store, your holding open of doors, your party escorting services, your propensity to be a sucker for a pretty smile. For all the crazy, insane, absurd things you tolerate, for all the situations where you are the faceless, nameless hero, my accolades, my acknowledgement, and my gratitude go out to you. You do have credibility in this society, and your well deserved vindication is coming. Translation: Just be a slave …
/r/MensRights05/04/12 09:56 PM
5

And feminism taught women that they didn't need to contribute anything to the marriage but they should just sit back and demand things from their husbands while bullying and degrading them with shaming language. Hence the new mental disorder called Princess Entitlement Syndrome. I concur that its not an inherrent problem with women per se but it is a problem with what they have been indoctrinated with.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 09:46 PM
-2

Too bad I tore her article to shreds and lit it on fire. :)
/r/MensRights05/04/12 09:28 PM
3

I'm only posting so I can keep note of this article and look at it when I get home. :) I had a quick look and some of the articles may interest me.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 04:24 PM
2

There is no way to get yourself in a situation where it can't happen, unless you lock yourself in your house and disappear from society all together so nobody knows that you're even alive, but thats probably going to far. The best thing to do is to make sure: 1) You don't have sex with girls who are drunk. 2) Don't have sex with girls who have boyfriends 3) If possible only have sex with girls you know something about 4) Don't have sex with girls who have twisted self entitled attitudes I'm sure…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 04:21 PM
5

That comment is boss. Im especially like "That it's more likely that all 3 billion+ men in the world are losers than that there's something wrong with you or your approach. The arrogance inherent is laughable". Classic.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:04 PM
3

Where are all the normal men? They are being smart enough to stay the hell away from you.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 01:52 PM
2

I think it was more along the lines of indecency in public. Still adding that to a registry that is supposed to be for rapists and paedophiles is certainly fucking ridiculous.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 01:17 PM
1

Yes its possible. I've seen news stories with the same thing happening. The taking a piss in public one is something I would have gotten done for in the past. 4am in the morning. The pubs and clubs are closed. No public toilets around and I'm bursting for a piss. Of course I'm going to look for an allyway to piss in. The ironic thing is, if I just piss my pants, I would probably get arrested on the bus home because I smell like piss and thus being guilty of "anti-social" behaviour. You see, you …
/r/MensRights05/04/12 01:14 PM
3

Its advisable to get evidence. If you qualify as a witness to this i.e. if you have heard the conversations, then stand by him through it all. Be mindful that this women may try and defame your friends character, she might not, but she could if she is vindictive enough and she might do it just to get her new partner by her side on this. So its best to try and get as much legal evidence as possible. Get your friend to install a phone call recorder app on his phone so he automatically gets the cal…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 12:52 PM
36

Oh yeah, I'm sure her back is very sore after lying on a hard mattress so she can trap some guy into a relationship that she wasn't going to uphold. /s
/r/MensRights05/04/12 12:39 PM
5

"its not ok to mistreat girls". Such irony as she then proceeds to kick her boyfriend full force in the head several times. If this little demented psycho is wondering why her boyfriend cheated on her its probably because she is an insufferable cow and he actually doesn't like her. He just didn't dump her because he was afraid of his life or what flase accusations she would bring against him or some other fucked him shit that prevents him from leaving. Now, lets all take bets at what kind of sen…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 12:34 PM
9

She reportedly wanted children, like, immediately, and even secretly stopped taking birth control pills without telling her boyfriend in an attempt to get herself accidentally on purpose pregnant (which is the first odd thing about the story, since I've never once met a 21-year-old college girl who has been just dying to be pumped full of babyjuice, but I digress). Obviously this writer has had their head up their ass for their whole life if they don't think there are some young women out there …
/r/MensRights05/04/12 12:11 PM
1

Fully agree.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:17 AM
1

What evidence would the clerk have to turn over? If you arrest the guy there, there's no evidence and they get off and disappear with the girls. Why do you think the FBI trails known criminals for long periods of time until they have enough evidence? It doesn't matter really. Its not Planned Parenthoods responsibility to gather details on behalf of the FBI. They are only instructed to report the activity. They ARE NOT a criminal investigation unit, so its not their fucking remit to "gather detai…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:29 PM
20

How come I got the feeling that some feminists made some complaints about it and had it removed.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 03:57 PM
159

It all comes down to them having a vagina between their legs. The comment saying "when you can bleed for a week and not die and give birth to babies is when you can have an opinion on women" pretty much shows this. That attitude needs to be fucking sorted out right away. I think we need to start saying things like "When you get looked at like a rapist for just walking down a street is when you're allowed to have an opinion on men" just to show them how stupid their argument is.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 03:54 PM
0

Well I think you're talking bullshit and I gave my reply anyway.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 03:35 PM
0

Actually I'm a British citizen who doesn't give a fuck about American politics. But everytime I had a look at American politics the liberals were always the worse for it, although Republicans aren't exactly great either. At this moment in time it surprises me that there are men rights activists who are liberals considering that the harpy Hilary "Women are the primary victims of war" Clinton is a lead candidate for the Democratic party.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 03:34 PM
2

The way I read it is that he gave the amount usually donated in order to have a clinic named after him. Just let me check that. From the source Max's publicist, Ryan Holiday, claims in a Forbes blog post that when he approached Planned Parenthood Dallas, he learned that it would take a donation of $250,000 to $500,000 to get naming rights and that Planned Parenthood was initially excited by the prospect of a donation of that size from Max. So when you say the following: but turning down the offe…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 03:28 PM
1

Source? Also, I think them turning down Tucker Max's money was stupid. I think any organization should take money from idiots who happen to want to donate and use it for better purposes. Less money for racists, more money to help people. I actually already said the source in the post you responded to. Actually, not only was that a faked stunt by an anti-abortion group, but PP reported the suspected sex trafficking to the FBI. The "agreements" in the video were made so that they could get their i…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 03:15 PM
5

Of course I'll stay married to her, but it is difficult since we have a long distance relationship currently going. It can't be helped but I do love her.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 02:59 PM
2

I suppose. I just find it ironic that they will accept donations from racists but not from sexists when their founder has a notorious reputation for being a racist. Lol
/r/MensRights04/04/12 02:42 PM
0

If pro-choicers want to be pro-choice then they need better organisations than Planned Parenthood to represent them. Obviously as an anti-abortionist that doesn't really concern me but its something they need to sort out for themselves.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:53 PM
14

I agree with this and even I'm married. I was comfortable getting married to my wife but I agree with the fact that if a man isn't comfortable with it then he shouldn't get married. I'm just luckier than a lot of guys here thats all. Not saying my wife is perfect and we still have arguments but at the end of the day if my wife is in the wrong then she will apologise to me, thats one surprising thing about her and also she doesn't try to track my every movement.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:48 PM
1

I've not actually said anything to her yet. I know it takes guts to do what you said but its guts she needs to find. I had no problem telling my parents that I thought they were giving my brother a hard time after his divorce. I got a lot of flak for it but I still did it.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:40 PM
1

If its joking around then thats OK. I thought you were getting serious comments on it.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:31 PM
5

I am anti-abortion but also when looking at Planned Parenthood I saw what kind of shitty organisation they are. I live in the UK so abortion is done on the NHS, so although I am against it, I don't hold any grudges on the NHS for doing it. However Planned Parenthood just have too many fucked up things being associated with them. So far I've seen them: 1) Accept donations from racists who wanted to donate money for the sole purpose for being used to abort African Americans. 2) Agree a deal with a…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:30 PM
1

I agree that her mind was warped by the aunt. She didn't really know what she was doing at the time. I think now what she needs to do now that she has the courage to come forward is to admit the truth to her brothers but also to confront her aunt and mother.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:13 PM
1

Quite a phenomenon considering that more men are living by themselves nowadays. I wonder how they cope. /s
/r/MensRights04/04/12 12:50 PM
2

If that was me I would raise my middle finger and then say "fuck you asshole" and then walk away. :)
/r/MensRights04/04/12 12:48 PM
2

Yeah, you're right. Although this kind of thing personally interests me as I'm anti-planned parenthood, its not really a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 12:33 PM
2

Well there goes the excuse that Planned Parenthood accept donations from racists because they would accept donations from anyone. Edit: And of course I read on to find this. lol. Planned Parenthood reserves the right to decline offers of gifts and grants that may be discriminatory, are for purposes outside of our mission, or are too difficult to administer." Edit 2: And of course I read on even further and found this. But that doesn't change the fact that he has often been accused of being a mis…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 12:28 PM
2

I once read a story about a girl who committed suicide because she couldn't get the remote control off her brother. Here is the story actually. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2009-01-21/bangalore/28013838_1_suicide-vinay-girl
/r/MensRights04/04/12 12:25 PM
1

Stop it. You're abusing me. /s
/r/MensRights04/04/12 12:08 PM
5

Aren't you assuming sanity here? I think the situation the op has presented is possible.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:49 AM
4

All charges were dismissed. It has not been reported whether he now owes years of child support arrears due to imprisonment. That would be fucked up. Your own daughter lies to send to you to prison but you could still end up owing this same daughter money for child support. Wow.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 11:37 AM
1

I would use this app to dodge the women in my area. No offense but I just never thought that dating apps or websites were the best way to find a partner. You're more likely to get your heart broken through these types of things
/r/MensRights03/04/12 11:07 AM
1

The website that is linked to with the same name has several stories attached though. If it is an Aprils Fools then its a damn good one with a lot of effort put into it.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 03:11 PM
3

Actually I think the response would be more like: "You should be ashamed of yourself for taking advantage of two drunk women like that". You see everyone over there is technically one bat short of a belfry.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 10:03 AM
1

No, you're supposed to burn it.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 06:43 AM
3

Its the way that they argue it. They argue it in terms that only men can rape women and that all men do rape women because that magical fairy dust called the patriarchy. You see to them its impossible for a woman to consent to sex with a man because even if she says she does, she is only doing it under the spell of, theres that word again, the patriarchy. Honestly, I'm not making this shit up. I even read one woman saying that she was cheating on her boyfriend because if she was going to be rape…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 02:18 PM
1

Perhaps, but I also know that the catholic church were told by psychologists that paedophilia was a curable disease and they sent their cleargy to be "treated". http://www.scribd.com/doc/55571193/The-US-Catholic-Church%E2%80%99s-Ruinous-Reliance-on-Discredited-Sex-Science
/r/MensRights30/03/12 12:54 PM
2

The command-and-control “Mad Men” of the past. Good riddance! Until the economic collapse comes again and those same mad men will take over as facist leaders. Yeah, good job everyone.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 10:23 AM
6

The thing that bugged me the most was that she claims that men are biologically disadvantaged and need to be fixed. Where have I heard that one before? Oh yeah, the Radical Feminists at Radfem Hub who claim that men should be gentically altered to make them more controllable. And these feminist groups have the DAMN CHEEK to say they are not associated with the radicals. Well from here it looks fucking obvious where they are getting their orders from to me.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 09:35 AM
4

True story. I was walking down the street when I was a younger boy and crossed the road because I didn't like the look of some other boys. The four of them crossed the road and beat the shit out of me. Man, aren't I glad that I don't need to be afraid to walk down the street. /s
/r/MensRights30/03/12 09:28 AM
4

"you're angry because you can't get laid" [reducing a man's frustrations and arguments to one singular drive, removing and denying the possibility of any societal or institutionalized discrimination.] Perfect reponse to this one: I wouldn't touch you with a barge pole. If you were the last woman alive on earth I would use you as bait to catch an animal I would be happier fucking. Lol.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 08:35 AM
0

I just assumed it was a women making the reply because it was an advice column of some sort. My mistake. However the columnist was still trying to label geeks as being extreme which is absolute trash. My original statement might have contained a bit of hyperbole but the point still stays the same. I will rephrase my statement to say this: Wow. So now geeks who play role playing games are supposed to be brainy & "extreme". Fuck this dick. He makes it sound like we belong to Al Qaeda or something.…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 08:22 AM
1

Actually rates of sexual abuse are comparable in these professions. Sexual offenders will always look for positions where they can get into a position to abuse and there is no difference in this instance between the church and schools. To go along with the "higher rates of child abuse" line in the Catholic Church is to go along with the idea that men are somhow sexual beasts who can't control themselves, especially if they avow to a life of celibacy. So I don't believe it for a second. Yes it ha…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:59 AM
4

I’m glad your friend has made an appointment to see a licensed psychotherapist. She may have the beginnings of a mental illness. Men don't get mental illnesses. Men just go to jail. Your experience is not so terribly unusual, especially if you include among your friends the more brainy and extreme of the population. Wow. So now geeks who play role playing games are supposed to be brainy & "extreme". Fuck this bitch. She makes it sound like we belong to Al Qaeda or something.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:37 AM
11

This guy is a disgusting human being. Why is he using up valuable oxygen that could be used by the rest of us?
/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:56 PM
6

This is ridiculous!!!! Only 29 months? She should have got 29 months for supplying alcohol to a minor alone. This is so fucking sickening and disgusting its unbelievable.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:55 PM
1

It's a bit of a cycle. I've spent a lot of time traveling alone. I have been subjected to negative experiences with strangers approaching me while traveling alone, including actual physical harassment and trying to following me home. So I prefer to avoid dealing with strangers in general when I'm out, and will have headphones in and generally a book in my hand reading. Someone who sees that I am occupied and still interrupts me because they just want to chat is going to be extra annoying to me. …
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:24 PM
27

Yep and men get shamed apparently for being sexual deviants yet a lot of women won't even date men who don't have any experience in the sex department. Quite laughable if you ask me.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:14 PM
2

Well I suppose if you're the type of person who gets easily annoyed at people just for talking to you in the first place then I can see what you mean.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 03:47 PM
2

Agreed. Cosmo give the most ridiculous advice to "find out" how a boyfriend is cheating and then also how to get revenge. I say the words "find out" in brackets because it just pretty much assumes that if a man is working late then he is cheating. The revenge will then be something fucked up like keying his car, damaging his property, burning his clothes, put tobasco sauce in his shampoo and other shit like that.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 03:34 PM
2

Rewarding a woman for playing games with you amounts to self-hatred. Not a good look. Agreed, best thing to do in this situation is to just say bye. I never had any of this trouble with my wife, but then again my wife is from Thailand and she wasn't raised in a country that teaches this shit to their women.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 03:30 PM
1

Also, PUA stuff is specific to the bar/hookup scene, not to all women, and Cosmovomitan is more about dating. Actually the stuff I read on pick up theory said that it was easier to pick up a woman away from the bar/hook up scene because women are more likely to have their guard up in a bar. They are expecting it there. meanwhile like say in a supermarket or a cafe their guard is down.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 03:15 PM
2

Most of the PUA courses despite their different directions and ideas, share one unifying concept; they help men gain confidence and self-esteem. That in of itself makes it a salient point for any discussion of men's rights. And why should men only have self esteem if they are considered attractive by women? I've read pick up theory myself. The ultimate end is basically to get laid.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 03:09 PM
28

Who bets that this boy will end up in jail for not paying child support?
/r/MensRights29/03/12 11:27 AM
6

Where women are abusing men, the mode of violence tends to be different. Men abusing women will often choke, or do things which cause concussions - i.e. deadly violence. Women abusing men will often not use deadly violence. Different how? You mean different like how that girl was kicking her boyfriend in the head full force while being recorded doing it on a train. Thats how its different, women can do it in public while people watch and sit by without lifting a finger to help.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 11:22 AM
4

You sir get an upvote for this brilliant piece.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 11:15 AM
2

And yet they still maintain that their ideology be free from criticism. See how that works?
/r/MensRights29/03/12 11:02 AM
4

You obviously didn't read any Mary Daly stuff then. She argued that the message of the Abrahamic religions were twisted and corrupted by men and that the real deity is actually female. So they have some sort of Goddess amonst their ranks for their diety.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 10:24 AM
5

I might just get myself banned on purpose so I can feel part of the group. :)
/r/MensRights29/03/12 10:12 AM
5

Statutory rape laws need to be applied evenly. You are a fucking idiot. If a 16 yr old f and an 18 yr old m couple were caught having sex, he should be tried the same as a 15 yr old f and a 40 yr old m? Sorry, my context wasn't clear. I meant evenly between the sexes, not evenly between age ranges. Or how about when is reversed? an 18 yr old f and a 16 yr old m? The number of years that seperate the couple should DEFINITELY come into play. I would say a 40 yr old man and a 16 yr old girl is most…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:17 PM
3

I was being a bit sarcastic when I said it. Besides if some women do abuse it, then it can't be said as an excuse not to question it in the first place. That was my point.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:14 PM
13

Damn right and good point. Upvoted.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:13 PM
0

It depends on general themes I suppose. All I'm saying is that it is possible to have both misogyny and misandry in pornography, just like in any other TV medium.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:12 PM
1

Please read. IT DEPENDS ON CONTENT. We can't complain that some adverts are Misandric but then deny that no porn can be misogynist at all. That would be clearly a case of special pleading, which is a logical fallacy as you know.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:10 PM
0

Not directly bad to them I suppose, but it dpends on what further effects they have to society in general. I would think that a misandric culture would then be bad for the actor in general.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:08 PM
-1

I would think it was misandric if men were subject to that to be honest. I did do my role reversal when I thought about it.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:06 PM
0

But surely misandric adverts are still misandric adverts even if the male actors in them are doing what they want to do?
/r/MensRights16/03/12 02:32 PM
2

No offense, but when it comes to misandry on TV adverts, do the guys who act in them think "Am I starring in a misandric advert?". No they don't, but that doesn't change the fact that the content is misandric. Like I said, any type of TV media can include either misogyny or misandry. Porn is no exception.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 02:30 PM
1

In some cases it could be. As I said, it is a TV media, so it depends on the content of what is being shown.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 02:27 PM
2

OK, I'm going to contrubute to this one and I'll word it carefully. I can see someones view if they are going to say that pornography is immoral or distatsteful. However misogynistic is a whole different kettle of fish and would seem to imply that women can't be responsible for their own choices when entering the business. For Porn to be misogynistic then I would have to say it depends on what kind of porn it is. It is afterall television media, so it can contain either both misogyny or misandry…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 02:24 PM
5

If we are going to use this infographic, then I do suggest we remove the "lol females" bit. I do think its in bad taste.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 02:10 PM
1

Women often cite mens inability to commit. Yet 75% of divorces are intiated by women. I love this one. You see, its called projection.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 01:48 PM
9

Really? Wish I could get $600 a month just for the sole purpose of blowing it on models. Warhammer is an extremely expensive hobby ya know. /s
/r/MensRights16/03/12 01:41 PM
5

I gave you an upvote because reasoning wise it sounds good, but in all honesty I do agree with the fact that the parents would end responsible for any resulting child, so they do have a say in it as such.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 12:33 PM
2

Good point actually. The parents would end up having to support any child resulting from the situation.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 12:29 PM
9

Well I suppose. It could be just the parents having a go. The boy could have consented to it but we'll see what happens. But for whatever reason laws like statutory rape need to be applied evenly.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 12:26 PM
11

Like I said, basing your sexual preferences and projecting them onto others is a terribly ignorant thing to do.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 12:21 PM
5

Rape victims don't need to be pinned down all the time. That is a terribly ignorant position.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 12:20 PM
23

Those people are so idiotic. They don't actually think before they speak they just go "Duh, its a pretty lady". So what? What if the male victim is gay? What if the male victim does not actually find her personally attractive? He is still forced to have sex with her. So yeah, I'm not surprised that lots of young males find these situations horrible, because guess what? Its called fucking RAPE. Looking at the picture, I don't find the women that attractive to be honest. So I don't see why other m…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 12:15 PM
17

Indeed, but the guys who are in charge don't want it to run that way. They want women to have the money because they spend it on consumer products.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 12:08 PM
37

Well that blows the whole "its for the children" excuse out of the water.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 12:07 PM
2

Yeah, the whole NAWALT deal. I have my own term for that one. I just like to call it "womansplaining".
/r/MensRights16/03/12 11:08 AM
1

Yes, hence the problem.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 11:00 AM
3

Firstly, women get more sympathy, so others are more likely to take them in rather than let them go on the street. Secondly, women get more services to help them with homelessness. Like shelters. Feminsist organisations get money from the government and they use this money to set up homeless shelters for women. Not to mention that domestic violence shelters will also take in homeless women. All they need to do is say that they're in a tricky domestic situation and they will be allowed in. They d…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 09:34 PM
1

Ah, gotcha.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 09:27 PM
1

I'm not sure what you mean here? Can you please clarify? The idiot in the thread who told the girl that those two guys who were given her were MRAs was just some idiot in r/relationships posting in her second post after she found out she was drugged and the guys history. The crosspost is this thread right here. I think it is only good manners that if we are going to crosspost and someone over in that thread then badmouths us then we at least defend ourselves. Thats all I did and I offered her my…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 09:26 PM
1

Some MRAs would and some wouldn't, but the point should be that the MRAs of /r/mensrights who were not supportive of her situation did not air that nonsupport in her thread. I understand and I did voice that. Because by apologizing on all MRAs' behalf, you're implying we have something to apologize for, and we don't. I didn't actually apologise when I replied to her. When I said that on this thread I was under an impression that wasn't actually the case. When I went to the thread to reply to the…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 09:18 PM
6

Agreed. I'm in this because I want to do whats right. Believe it or not, I don't have a personal story as such that made me join mens rights. I could just see what the effect was on some other men. I joined this forum because I am a very compassionate person and I care about people, not just women but men also. When I started reading mens rights articles I realised that a lot of stuff made sense. For instance I learned back in high school in my modern studies class that men had a shorter lifespa…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 09:13 PM
3

and I think to myself, "Do people ACTUALLY have an issue with that?". Yes we have an issue with it because otherwise society will just become even more shitty for men in general and they will just start killing themselves even more. Do you not see how your attitude invites oppression in and others to be domineering of you. Yes, you don't need to get married or do other things but where does it stop? When will it be made mandatory for you to sire a child and pay child support just because you can…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:25 PM
2

I don't know. I feel as if I just CAN'T care about these things, they seem so utterly unimportant. So its unimportant if the courts and government steal money from you or other men? Just why did we fight for democracy in the first place if this is your opinion. If you don't fight for your democracy then you will lose it.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:19 PM
15

Off the top of my head. 1) Men commit suicide 5 times a higher rate than women 2) Over 90% of the homeless are men 3) Bias against dads in courts. Women normally get full custody, even in cases where they are not the better parent. 4) Men die on average 5/6 years younger than women 5) Men, for the moment, retire 5 years later than women. 6) Men make up the majority of work place accidents. 7) Men have been 99.9% of all combat casualties and the armed forces is still currently 97% men. Men are al…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:15 PM
6

Agreed and upvoted. We change for anti male bigots and we may as well join in the chemical castration tests in the uk as we will be impotent in every other way . Not to mention that if feminists win we'll be forced to do this anyway.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:07 PM
3

After all, this is the same organization that keeps tracks of groups such as the KKK, the New Black Panther Party and the Westboro Baptist Church. Did you notice something about this list? Note that Westboro Baptist Church is on the list, NOT Christianity as a whole. The reason for this is simple. Not all Christians are bigots. They have the common sense to only include sub groups of movements who are bigots but then are completely stupid to group all of MRAs together into one big giant group wh…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:41 PM
1

Lol, I need to make a point in seeing that.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:13 PM
1

I'll be amazed if Kyle Bachan actually has a diploma.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:11 PM
1

this is why i really dislike it when people try to control mra speech and tone it down. It depends on the emotion being used I suppose. I think we need to try and generate sympathy for men. Perhaps if we went overboard with appealing to pity type fallacies we might be more successful. :)
/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:07 PM
1

Yes thats him. He is a gay popstar. Considering that gay people shouldn't suffer from the whole "agreeing with women so they could fuck them" meme. I'm surprised that there are still some gay people who will lick their feminist masters boots.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:05 PM
1

Good point. Brians ex-girlfriend, Gillian, was portrayed as really stupid. Family Guy is a bit fairer than most in this regards. However the general attitude of a sitcom seems to be the male lead of the show is a complete idiot, while the long suffering wife has a sensible head on her shoulders. I've head that the show "I hate my teenage daughter" is supposed to have a couple of ditsy mums in it, so perhaps things are starting to even out. I need to remember to watch an episode of that show just…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:01 PM
1

I'm not so sure. The point of her first post was "am I a whore or not?" I can understand the temptation to be supportive and say no, but there is a serious problem if the initial allegation of highly upvoted posters suggesting she conspire to call it rape occurred. It should always be disturbing when perverted people fill in vague details with their imagination and help suggest rape, when the original poster should already know. In the original situation her story says she was unsure what happen…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:54 PM
2

One thing that wasn't mentioned and I thought should be was the nature of the Job of a MP. Nobody mentioned that being an MP involves travelling away from home (in the case you live north of London) and thus staying in London for five days away from your home constituency. It then involves travelling back home at the weekends, which also requires the MP to attend his weekly surgery. You see, a lot of women wouldn't want to do this. They wouldn't want to spend countless days away from their famil…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:31 PM
1

Thought that myself. When I saw this the other night at that point, I slipped into imagination mode with me punching Will Youngs face in repeatedly.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:21 PM
1

I'm guessing you don't see this woman anymore?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:04 PM
1

a good point, but much of the damage of a rape allegation is caused by the accusation/persecution. Indeed, but in an annonymous post I don't really think its much of a problem. The girl herself said she wasn't sure what happened. The best we can do is offer her advice to find out what happened and then come to conclusions after that. As for other posters who suggest rape, then perhaps we can just give them a one liner informing them that she needs to find out what actually happened first. The fi…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:52 PM
5

Mmmmm, perhaps a chat with Miss Andry is in order.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:23 PM
1

Too much in either direction in my opinion can give the general populace a belief thats its true. If it were more equal, then people wouldn't hold one sex up to be smarter than the other or anything else. I've heard a lot of people talk about these kinds of shows and say that its a true representation of reality, even if they do still recognise that its hyperbole.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:22 PM
1

You missed the part where I actually attacked the poster and caller her a liar. Attacking the demented lynch mob forming baselessly is different. Choosing not to believe is different than disbelieving. In the first article yes I agree, but the information posted in the second article is enough to suggest that she should be concerned and suspicious. Also your previous comment in this thread was attacking her. Saying things like "The reasons to suspect its false, is that a whole bunch of retards t…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:15 PM
1

I watch family guy, I think its funny. I just laughed because the article was using it. I do love these kinds of shows, I just wish that the representation was better amongst the sexes. i.e. shows some women as dumb as well as men and even show some men as ugly as well as some women.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:54 PM
1

Dump her ass and leave her. Tell her you don't want to play her "bad guy" anymore.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:02 PM
2

Really? Single mothers are finding it difficult to cope and are short of money? Surely that cannot be the case since women are strong and independent and don't require men for anthing in their lives. Remember everyone, a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle. /s
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:57 PM
11

Holy shit, this comment got 7 fucking upvotes. So, here's how we solve all the problems. We have a massive world-wide sperm collection effort, create an international bank of frozen sperm - enough to keep every woman pregnant who wants to be for the next 20 - 30 years. Then we neuter all the men since they've served their purpose........................ Yeah, thats right, we're fucking dogs who need to be neutered and then you fucking wonder why men are ill talking against women. Hint: We're lea…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:21 PM
5

for example, the way the character of the daughter, Meg, is portrayed in the popular cartoon sitcom, The Family Guy. Meg is frequently the subject of rape “jokes” and cruel jibes about her supposed ugliness; a frequent theme is that she is worthless and beneath contempt because she is not “hot.” Funny how she mentions family guy. She seems completely oblivious to the fact that the main male character, Peter Griffen, is made to look excessively stupid in order to get their jokes. You mean fuck sa…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:13 PM
0

From what I understand women are not necessarily safer drivers, they just tend to drive less and thus are in less risk of an accident. In cases where couples are together, the man usually drives.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:26 AM
1

I appreciated it. I think from the new info she gathered she has a right to be suspicious of this guy. A drug in her system that shouldn't be there and the guy involved has a shady past for this kind of thing. So I recommended her to find more evidence i.e. hotel footage, witnesses to clarrify her behaviour the night before, etc. She should also inform the police as they may be aware of a past history.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:13 AM
2

Quote from the original thread. His next response was anger towards his friend and then he continued to tell me that said friend had a few weird encounters like this back in college and was put on probation from their fraternity for it. So she is tested by a doctor who tells her that a drug was found in her system that shouldn't be there and also the man involved has a shady past in these sort of incidents which led him to being on probation by his fraternity. Does this not warrant some suspicio…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:49 AM
1

If she was tested and a drug was found in her system which shouldn't be there and the guy who was in the bed with her the morning after has a shady history in these regards according to her bf, then I say that warrants suspicion at least.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:43 AM
1

Well I did say to her in my reply that someone else could have drugged her, but considering that her bf is aware of past incidents involving this guy then what the hell is she supposed to think? Lets say you woke up in bed one morning with a girl beside and you didn't know why and you were both naked and you couldn't remember anything the night before. Now lets say you took a drug test and they found drugs in your system that shouldn't be there and now lets say that a friend tells you that this …
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:25 AM
1

Context is important. Her bf is aware of past incidents which may be relevant. Do you not think this changes things?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:16 AM
1

As I have mentioned some idiot told her that the two guys who were critcising her were MRAs, which I replied to dispute. Also not to mention that her thread was crossposted in this fucking subreddit. Do you not think it is wise to at least declare our position on her situation since we are commenting on her fucking thread right here?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:04 AM
2

And what would you do if a guy created an account to ask for help after a situation where he was raped? Would you go balistic at him and call him a liar, picking holes in his story or would you offer your sympathy and give him advice? The reasons for it to be invented include convincing herself that it is true, as well as to illicit sympathy, and practice the lie. In order to practice the lie, someone would need to take into consideration critcism. Criticism only helps those who want to fabricat…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:00 AM
1

The reason why I mentioned that the two guys harrassing her had no history of posting in r/mr was to explain to her that they weren't MRAs. I went on to say that most MRAs would actually be very supportive of her situation. I don't see where you think I was making MRAs look bad in general.The reason why I did this was because some idiot on the thread had informed her that those two idiots were MRAs. I was just clarrifying that they weren't while offering my sympathy.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:45 AM
1

Thats OK, I wasn't saying that we were defintely involved in it, I was just saying IF we were involved in it......... I wasn't sure of the situation that actually happened, so I was conditioning my statement under terms of any possible involvement. Its fine if we weren't involved, no damage done.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:40 AM
-1

I posted a message to offer my sympathy and offer advice. I think the response I got back was very positive. http://www.reddit.com/r/relationships/comments/qvyk8/update_to_i_may_have_cheated_on_bf_with_his_good/c413i56?context=3
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:09 AM
6

Yeah, but a commenter who said they were a medical professional said it was possible, especially if they were given a higher dose than normal, which in a rape situation would be likely.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 07:18 PM
6

I agree. If we start disagreeing with peoples personal stories online without much to go on, then we just come across as looking like a bunch of assholes.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 04:33 PM
0

I think its better if we reserve judgement in these kind of cases. Its difficult to know the whole story based on a single post on Reddit. If MRAs were involved in this then I suggest we get a representative to make an apology within the new thread.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 03:49 PM
2

Yeah I know, but its about public perception and creating animosity between the sexes. They tend to try and paint boy gamers as being lazy and childish, so it matters in that sense.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 03:35 PM
1

Thats true. I remember an article about model development and design and they interviewed a woman who was of the project on that. Some pretty good ideas if I remember correctly as well.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 02:30 PM
1

Although I do see the occasional girl who does play the hobby, my impression is that its usually guys who play. This is my personal experience though, which comes from visitng several different stores Mainly Glasgow, Manchester and Macclesfield. However this doesn't matter, I still think anyone should have whatever hobby they like. As long as it makes them happy.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:21 PM
2

Thats true. I'm just a bit concerned because feminists already attack computer games at it is. If they start attacking this hobby I will go absolutely ballistic.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:07 PM
2

I don't know, they make a complaint about cost in a sense. However I don't see them complaining about the cost of football or the cost of beauty products. I just found it to be slightly demeaning to gamers who participate in these games because they make it look in one instance that its the women who suffer but also the headline of the article seems to be questioning why we get involved in such a thing, as to suggest that this hobby is only for children. They obviously really didn't do a good jo…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 12:51 PM
3

An explanation on why I posted this. I actually play this game and it's one of my favourite hobbies. The headline in this article though I find to be pretty stupid. So what if adult men are playing tabletop games, its a hobby, get over yourselves. Also not to mention this bit. "It's fun and I like spending this time with my dad," she says. Her mother Sue is one of the crop of self-confessed Warhammer Widows who spend all day in the cafe They make this sound like Sue is suffering here in some way…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 12:29 PM
11

I hope he is OK. I have upvoted this thread. Nothing makes me more sad than these kind of situations.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 05:15 PM
2

Lol. Believe it or not, that is the technical term for it over here.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 05:09 PM
-1

WE, the men, and our deranged society, have created these stupid roles that pigeon hole what men and women should or shouldn't do. Obviously another delusional nutcase who doesn't understand how biology works. You'd think it would be fucking obvious that women having children and lactating breast milk is what made them prime care givers in the past and thus stay at home mums. They seem to think that inventions like milk formula have been around for thousands of fucking years.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:25 PM
1

The last one would apply to me since I work in Engineering. Guess what? I can use a washing machine just fucking fine.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:12 PM
2

Also among the clauses is one that will outlaw 'unwanted verbal, non-verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature with the purpose or effect of violating the dignity of a person, in particular when creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment'. The "unwanted verbal" part here is incredibly worrying, especially since the language used here is so vague its unbelievable. I can see ugly guys getting sent to prison in their droves once this becomes law. The thin…
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:05 PM
2

Upvoted for truth.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 12:55 PM
3

I didn't realise it was considered a mjorly offensive term. I only used it for quickness and also cause I was using it in quotation marks. I know technically the girl is not transgender but it is similar in a sense.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 06:36 AM
1

Here you go. http://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/qd1eo/would_4_months_be_long_enough_for_this_crime_if/c3x8w9e?context=3
/r/MensRights07/03/12 06:33 AM
10

I'm from Scotland. Its not unusual to see someone wear a kilt over here, although its usually for a special event like a wedding as it is considered our national dress.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 06:29 AM
-2

I posted this to show that it is possible that a woman can commit fraud. The comment I made in particular was to do with some women in the UK living on benefits and having kids. Seems like this woman has fantasies about it. The people in r/feminism didn't believe me when I said it, so they are obviously teaching the opposite.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:07 PM
1

The schoolgirl victims of a teenage girl who dressed as a boy to date them told of their pain yesterday as their deceiver was jailed for two-and-a-half years. I wonder where all the feminists who say "You're a homophobe if you refuse to have sex with a tranny" are now.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:41 PM
0

Yep and those people down at r/feminism had the nerve to question me when I said to them that some women in the UK were happy to live on benefits.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:08 PM
1

Well, first, you do see the difference between "race" and "ethnicity," right? Russians and Irish are both members of the same race, but very different ethnic traditions. I'm not here argue about what the word race means. Just take what I meant as this dictionary definiton here. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/race a group of persons related by common descent or heredity. a population so related. Anthropology . a. any of the traditional divisions of humankind, the commonest being > the cau…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:01 PM
1

I would probably read this for more info. http://christianthinktank.com/fem09.html A quote The women are to "learn in silence." Despite the negative connotations this phrase brings to our ears, in the first century "silence" (hesychia) was a positive attribute. It did not necessarily entail "not speaking," as is evident in Paul's use of the word earlier in the chapter (I Tim 2.2; compare 2 Thess 3.12). Rather, it implied respect or lack of disagreement (as in Acts 11.18; 21.14). As a result, the…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 07:09 PM
1

Apparently in a conversation I had with a pro-choicer, they said that Sanger being a racist and targetting African Americans with abortion was a big lie. I didn't really care since the conversation we were supposed to be having was to do with Planned Parenthoods current status with it being defunded. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qd2el/is_this_a_joke/c3x2pw0?context=3
/r/MensRights06/03/12 05:33 PM
1

Just because they lost their homeland, it doesn't make them any less of a race or ethinic group (if you insist on using that instead). Would you say that Native Americans are not an ethinic group or race just because they don't own America any more?
/r/MensRights06/03/12 05:20 PM
1

I agree, thats why I put it in commas. I don't think that women were discriminated against either, I was just playing devils advocate with her reasoning.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 05:16 PM
6

Still, I'm not convinced we should focus on What about me, Mom? when (if) your boy asks about girl empowerment. It's about explaining some of the basics, like the historical -- and, let's face it, current -- fight for gender equality. This is what I get out of this. This little boy is asking why he is suffering from sexual discrimination at the hands of women. His mum realises that this is because he doesn't know the history behind "discrimination against women" and so decides to educate him in …
/r/MensRights06/03/12 01:02 PM
1

I agree, which is why I think its important for Christians to study Biblical scholarship in order to determine what the correct Biblical stance on things. I've already mentioned in another post that despite my religious affiliation to Christianity, I can't stand Christians like Joyce Meyer or Joel Olsteen, with their happy clappy trap brand of Christianity and I certainly can't stand the "Thank God when you get a parking space" mentality.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:55 AM
2

Yes, sure, Jesus did break some cultural barriers to talk theology with women, but he also had male disciples as well. If Jesus was around today he would probably break down cultural barriers in order to reach men.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:51 AM
-1

Its all about the arguments. You have to be able to argue your position effectively. And yes, I consider mens rights activists to have a lot of good arguments pertaining to the men today.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:48 AM
1

Indeed, when will they realise that you just can't force people into jobs and positions that they don't want to do.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:41 AM
-1

Yes, but that doesn't change the fact that everyone has some sort of bias and yes, that includes me. The question is if that bias a person contains distorts logic and reality.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:39 AM
1

In the context of history they are a race. They were a race of people who came from Israel. Just because they were religious that doesn't make them any less of a people. If you're a Jew then surely you would be aware of Jewish Atheism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_atheism
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:36 AM
-1

I usually find that everyone has some sort of bias. The question is, is that bias insane. In her case, yes.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:32 AM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:31 AM
-1

If you're boyfriend is still smoking, both tobacco or weed, then he may need help for his addiction. Try to convince to seek help to quit. Show him this post if you need to.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:32 PM
3

Thats a thought.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:27 PM
2

Most issues don't have a clear 'result'............ Despite the fact I showed one case that was. Equality is very easy to measure really. It means even, the same, identical, etc. What you seem to be suggesting here is that men and women cannot be treated equally to begin with and therefore should be treated differently. However its also pretty clear that feminists seem to want everything that men do but are completely against men entering into their previous domain i.e. Child custody.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:26 PM
1

????? Jews are a specific class of people based on race. ANybody can be a feminist, it is a philosophy. A philosophy that says resistence is futile and you'll be assimilated.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:21 PM
3

SO in other words total economic collapse. These companies will end up going bust because of affirmative action policies like you describe.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:20 PM
14

So what happens when these companies don't meet the quotas because they can't find enough women to put on their boards? Or are we assuming that these companies will include secretery workers on their boards just to meet these quotas?
/r/MensRights05/03/12 01:01 PM
0

What exactly would she do? Did she have one to start with?
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:51 PM
-1

Feminists get everwhere. Unfortunately I have seen feminists infiltrate Christianity as well. Its just what they do. In this respects they are the Borg from Star Trek. Resistence is futile and you will be assimilated.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:51 PM
2

Actually equality can be quantified. It is defined as being even and as a percentage between two options it results in 50%. You know, just like how MRA's would like to see divorced fathers get 50% custody of their children.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:46 PM
1

Well not only do some women think we are dogs but they would like to rain us as if we were dogs. I'm sure you've seen that kin of shit about in regards to this as I know you are a veteran on these boards.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:43 PM
5

I can confirm this. I come from Scotland as well and the word "cunt" can be said between guys. Its basically just an insult to someone who is being a dick or asshole.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:36 PM
8

The usual argument is that women are a weaker investment because they may leave to raise a child. Or they did raise a child or had time off to do a second degree. A friend and I were talking about this yesterday. He told me there is a woman in his department who complains about not earning the same as her male counterparts but she had time off to raise a kid and also had time off to do a second degree. The man simply gets more money because he has more EXPERIENCE. There is a woman in my team who…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:22 PM
16

Don't forget the consumer power gap. For some strange reason women actually have more money to spend than men on average despite them earning less. Funny that, isn't it.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:08 PM
6

I hate to tell you this but skeptics are no more or no less biased than everyone else is. In fact I would say she is more biased because she is a self proclaimed feminist.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:03 PM
5

Indeed, but thats because there aren't people with vested interests to misrepresent the A-Team. When it comes to a heavily debated topic then people will edit articles to include their own opinions and the articles may or may not be fact checked later on. Of course feminists will look for positions on wikipedia so they can keep their crap up the page.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 12:25 AM
10

Of course it is. Feminists look for avenues to propagate their nonsense. Wikipedia is useful because so many people use it, think it is completely credible but actually isn't. Now don't get me wrong, wikipedia is useful for looking up run of the mill stuff but when it comes to topics with a vested interest, ther is a chance for misinformation.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:26 PM
1

Not elitist at all. Putting a bear in a trailer away from its natural habitat is actually quite cruel. Its called animal knapping. Trust liberals to be the leaders of such a thing. :)
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:03 PM
0

Collegeyeaaa has started to answer why that footage is worthless as a condemnation of Planned Parenthood, but I'd like to speak to some of your other issues. So undercover footage showing Planned Parenthood breaking the law is worhtless? So I take it in your world video evidence of a crime isn't admissable in court then? Certainly not. The Hyde Amendment prevents any federal money being spent on providing abortions. factcheck.org has some good, unbiased information on how Planned Parenthood spen…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 09:17 PM
6

Will be fiminists first complaint against the male pill, lol. "We want male pills to be banned. It makes their semen taste funny".
/r/MensRights02/03/12 12:11 PM
2

Fuck, even if they did make me grow boobs, I would still eat them and then I could play with my own boobs for fun :). Relax, I'm kidding.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 12:09 PM
3

I agree, lets hope they think it is a responsibility. That way they make it come true and pass it. By the time they realise its a freedom it'll be too late to go back.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 12:07 PM
0

I'm not necessarily talking about the young american foundation alone. I've seen the footage myself. Undercover footage showing that Planned Parenthood breaks the law in order to conduct its buisness. Hence, I can believe that its probably true that the "hope" clinic probably did do that and force a girl to have an abortion she didn't want. Time after time, I've seen Planned Parenthood offer abortions to prostitutes, when they are not supposed to without contacting authorities to report the crim…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:07 AM
-1

The largest threat to women's access to birth control isn't legislation that affects only abortion: it's personhood laws that threaten many kinds of birth control as well, and politicized defunding of Planned Parenthood and programs and organizations like it. Part of the reason why Planned Parenthood is being defunded though is because they on several occasions broke the law. I don't feel sorry for them one iota. They have in the past performed abortions on underage girls who need parental conse…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 06:53 AM
8

Utter bullshit. My wife breast fed our son but we still used formula in bottle as a top up (my wife didn't produce enough milk for all our baby needs but still enough to give him an advantage). So I find this completely unreasonable. As others have stated it could been expressed milk as well. So just because a bottle is being used that doesn't mean the baby isn't getting any breast milk.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:22 PM
2

I agree, this will do her no good because all the politicians will say is that semen is not a human fetus and that is that. She is better off arguing her points instead.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 08:34 PM
1

She is stupid if she thinks this. Vasectomy is pre-fertilisation and abortion is post fertilisation. The debate on abortion is around the issue of a human fetus counting as a human being. Sperm is not a human fetus, so the debate is not around sperm being a human being.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 08:33 PM
4

Yeah, I know, this is ridiculous. She is stupid enough to think that a Vasectomy compares with an abortion. What next, is she going to propose that masturbation be made illegal because all the innocent sperm will die as a result.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 08:30 PM
3

I think what is required is a code of conduct. I am a member of a religious board that has a code of conduct, it welcomes non-religious people to come to the site and debate or talk or whatever just as long as they follow the rules. The rules usually consist of no swearing, no lewd language, etc. Mostly just in case they're are children reading it. We still had trolls though and they still posted because we let them but eventually somewhere along the line they broke the rules enough times to be …
/r/MensRights01/03/12 12:26 PM
0

Some people just don't get jokes. Have your upvote back.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 12:11 PM
2

Actually, its an option on the plate for them and they still suggest it sometimes. The reason why they would still have sex for pregnancy is for is selection purposes only. They want to be able to say "there is a intelligent and high earning professor. He'll do". Apparently they don't trust sperm banks to provide high quality genetics to ensure they will give birth to smart offspring who won't grow up to be "rapists". I put that last part in commas because I've seen how they define rape and porn…
/r/MensRights01/03/12 12:07 PM
3

I wouldn't say that anti-abortionists were radicals. Sure disagree, but I wouldn't call them radicals just because they have a different opinion from you. On the other hand I've seen radical feminists talk about abortion. In their minds abortion shouldn't exist, why?, because women shouldn't even be having sex with men unless they want a child in the first place. Lol.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 09:45 AM
9

The disparity is quite large. I'm fine with needing to pay a bit extra for some extra room in a house for the child to stay since a two bedroom house will cost more than one bedroom house and so on, but these child support payments are all over the place and a lot of the time they are just arbitary amounts. They seem to forget also that the women should also be contributing towards the children.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 06:56 AM
1

Now, I'm going to tie this back to non-faith (since I don't want it to be solely about that): What if they found a beneficial reason for either of the things I've just talked about? Would you support it then or hold to your own beliefs and still say there is nothing beneficial? What if they found that pigs are the cause for human diseases because they are so close to our anatomy physically that morphing viruses can easily jump species... Would you condone or condemn their complete slaughter? Obv…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 10:03 PM
1

I don't necessarily agree with that comparison; however, you are entitled to feel that way. I find that some of the oppression that women claim is very real; although, much of it is self-induced through society in general and not "man keeping the woman down" so to speak. It wasn't a comparison, the example I gave was to show what real oppression is. Women haven't suffered anything near that. They have been minor inconvenienced at best. And now we get to the meat! The problem with thinking it onl…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 10:03 PM
4

Feminists don't cause you not to be able to see your children. you can't blame all your problems on "the feminists". Actually yes they are. It was shown by A Voice For Men and study by Kyle Lovett that Australian Feminists (Sheila Jeffries & Co) were the ones responsible for the new law passed in Australia that allows women to exclude fathers from their kids just because they don't "feel" like the fathers are good fathers. So you are wrong on this one.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 02:03 PM
1

Have an upvote from me. Well thought out argument
/r/MensRights29/02/12 01:56 PM
2

In America that might be an issue but over here in the UK I have worked in a fair share of offices. I have never been in an environment hostile towards gay people. What I normally find is that sexuality issues are never even mentioned and do not even crop up at all in conversation. Hence my remark about gang bangs.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 01:34 PM
10

Edit: For all of you being condescending about my boyfriend being upset over this "object" obviously you've never cared about the sentimental value of anything. I'm sorry your life has been so devoid of anything enjoyable. At least she pointed this out and told them off. Good for her.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 01:23 PM
2

The only way for a man to neutralize the effect of a woman’s privilege in his life is by walking away from the societal obligations designed to support that privilege. Courts just don't allow you to walk away from child support. For instance my brother pays child support and because he is a government employee (prison guard), his child support automatically comes out of his wage. Obviously he needs to learn that kicking up a fuss is an essential when dealing with politics.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 01:01 PM
2

Here is the big question I have. What exactly were to two men involved in? It says they got reduced sentences as well from the charge of murder. So were they there when the woman killed the man? If so, then how come its classified as shooting the guy in self defence when two other men are present to stop anything from happening?
/r/MensRights29/02/12 12:51 PM
2

She must have refused that deal and then they thought what the hell we'll just let them off anyway because its what the woman wants.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 12:48 PM
3

She said it was accepted Irsigler felt she had to dispose of her husband's body fearing no one would believe she acted in self-defence. I need to remember this one if I am ever up for murder. "Your honour, I only disposed of the body because I thought no-one would believe I acted in self defence". I wonder if that excuse will work.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 12:46 PM
6

Second hilarious comment. The equality strategy also proposed schemes to promote equality for homosexuals, such as ‘gay-friendly’ workplaces. I'm not exactly sure how homosexuals are discriminated against at the moment. What else do we have to do to make work places more "gay friendly"? Start having homosexual gang bangs in the conference rooms?
/r/MensRights29/02/12 12:19 PM
4

First hilarious comment right off the bat. These plans are absolutely not about political correctness, or red tape, or quotas,’ she said. Lol, thats exactly what they are Miss Harman. Thanks again for showing everyone how incompetent you are because you can't even understand basic reasoning. Who made this person a politician?
/r/MensRights29/02/12 12:15 PM
1

Just a couple of things: Your particular example is precisely why I support everyone's right to believe what they wish as long as it doesn't oppress others. Indeed, but my view of the word oppression is more like Buddhist monks who are kept in cages in China and are tortured by red guard. I don't really adhere to what "women" say they suffered as oppression. In terms of men, being jailed for not being able to afford child support I would consider oppression. Now, onto the example you used: The e…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 06:53 AM
1

When it all eventually callapses it will be left up to men to fix it all again. The worst thing is the general public will probably blame government without realising where the policies came from.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 06:23 AM
8

Lol, saw this bit and had to laugh. Almost 60 percent of parents are now giving money to their grown kids—an average of $38,340 per child in the years between ages 18 and 34. Whatever happened to the son looking after his mom? Yep, you read that right, it says mum. Apparently dad can go and fuck himself according to this bitch.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:56 PM
7

What? Men are doing things that they like to do and are enjoying themselves!!!! Outrageous, how did these slaves escape their serfdom? /s
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:53 PM
1

Much of the "chip on the shoulder" comes from the reality that society nowadays allows for the religious majority to force their beliefs and morality (or lack thereof) upon those of us who do not share their belief/moral structures. A prime example of this would be birth control and abortion. Neither of which are anyone's business but the person who is in question (the person using the birth control or having to have the abortion for one reason or another). It's this "Moral Highground" that is t…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:29 PM
6

Perhaps your hand to eye co-ordination is not very good to begin with. Mine wasn't brilliant either. Although I would say that I am better now I am certainly still not anywhere near a good a gamer as others.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 07:46 PM
16

Playing video games is better than sitting down and watching telly. At least you develop your hand to eye co-ordination. With TV you do fuck all.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 05:28 PM
-1

lol
/r/MensRights28/02/12 05:26 PM
12

Before feminism, spousal abuse and spousal rape was not considered a crime. Actually it was, it was just classified as assault as it had always been. It has never been legal to beat people up, it just wasn't gendered beforehand. Men are usually physically stronger, therefore mens violence usually does more damage. Don't need to be strong to cause damage. Picking up a weapon usually cause more damage than any fist can do. You don't need to be a wrestler to pick up a knife or a baseball bat. Also …
/r/MensRights28/02/12 12:54 PM
1

There are many things that people "take as a fact" or "take as everyone knows" so to speak without doing the research themselves. I don't think we're (atheists on the internet) all that bad. :) Of course you're not all bad, but there is a large segment nowadays who do seem to have a big massive chip on their shoulder in concerns to religion. I've talked to quite a few internet atheists and I've seen some who are downright insulting to others and/or others who who displayed quite a lot of ignoran…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:56 AM
2

Why sir, I think you are being overly generous with the zero there.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:32 AM
0

Agreed about manwomanmyth. I like the interviews he does as well. Good to show some opinions on it. Sure the amazing atheist is entitled to his beliefs, absolutely, but just like a lot of internet atheists these days they tend to be amateurs on the topic. No offence but the philosophical atheists of the past were better.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 07:44 PM
0

I enjoy manwomanmyth's videos, I don't agree with everything he says but I like the way he approaches it. He explains himself pretty clearly and what he means. As for the amazing atheist, I don't really like him, just call it a clash between different ideological views on religion and chalk it up to that.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:27 PM
1

True, I just think its funny how we are told there is a problem with overcrowding prisons but they still send men to prison for this kind of crap.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:22 PM
1

Are you like her husbands playdate?
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:20 PM
1

Upvoted
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:18 PM
2

They don't care though. They know that false accusations are made but they don't care because their movement isn't about equality, its about futhering women to the point that they are considered superior and they will do anything to reach that goal. If they admit that false allegations can be made then they know that women don't have the power to imprision any man they want.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 01:02 PM
-8

I would say that feminist men are probably more likely to rape. They are the ones who want to paint all men as evil and rapists in order to make themselves feel better about their own deviancies.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:58 PM
-2

Really? Those daughters and granddaughters are likely to face a sexual attacker, Mr. Benen? Probably because he is a sexual attacker and he is only trying to categorise other men in the same light to make himself feel better about it. A bit like what Hugo does. He was a prick earlier on in his life, but now he is trying to make it look like he is one prick out of many men who is trying to change himself for the better. Of course, we all know he is still an asshole.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:55 PM
0

Won't be long till she advocates for the mutilation of all men. Fuck, I feel sorry her husband, he'll be first on the victim list.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:39 PM
11

Don't want to sound like a feminist here but its not her looks you should be judging her by. Now if we correct this score based on her personality then she gets a defeating -10/10.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:38 PM
6

Yeah, I saw that. Obviously she is intentionally leaving out the men who go their own way and who are not interested in having any sort of a relationship with women, even sexual ones.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:32 PM
4

Yes, I think Jessica Valenti probably does have the memory of a goldfish.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:27 PM
-5

Unfortunately God never promised that life would be fair, if it was fair then Jessica Valenti wouldn't have a voice.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:26 PM
3

And so more men will end up in prison for pointless reasons. It would probably cost the government more to have them in prison, what on earth are they thinking?
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:24 PM
1

manwomanmyth made the video.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:11 PM
1

The show you're talking about is Fort Boyard (something like that). The woman was a firefighter and she was involved in a task where she had to slam into a door that was weighted to pull itself back up. Everytime she tried the door didn't go down far enough for her to get through. The guy who did the same task was not a fireman but did it first time, no problem. Although this occured on different shows, the sequence is shown side by side by a video made by manwomanmyth on youtube.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:10 PM
1

I didn't really mind the advert as such. I wouldn't mind an advert encouraging men to apply for nursing positions for instance. As long as it was done gently, without showing any discrimination. However, the reply given in the e-mail was unacceptable and very unprofessional. I would report it if possible and hope that the person who sent it gets the sack.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:59 PM
1

So in essence the customers didn't even know. Well, I've just recieved a big incentive to do all my clothes shopping online now. A bit of a drag considering I won't be able to try them on before buying. ARGHHHHH!!!
/r/MensRights23/02/12 05:16 PM
6

They use this as a loss prevention tactic at the cost of customer privacy. Frecking hell man, and the women still shop there? I wouldn't shop in a place where I thought that staff members were going to be keeping an eye on me through the blinds while I'm changing. That actually is creepy and they have the cheek to ask men why they are hanging around waiting for their SO's.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 12:11 PM
4

Good point. Add this one as well then. No being alone with women.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 06:35 AM
10

It was like a black curtain had been dropped over everyone. All of us got quiet, and did our jobs without looking up. Soon to be added number 4 in the list. No ignoring women, no uncomfortable silences around women, etc,etc.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:12 PM
2

Have a look at the guys other video. He talks about it in the comments in this one and acts superior because he thinks he has had no direct answer and thus MRA's can't complain. He basically asks MRA's a question. That question being "How many men need to go to the emergency room because they were raped by a women". I never realised that to be a disadvantaged group you specifically had to have women rape you so you went to the emrgency room. Somehow I think a lot of black people will want to hav…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 12:04 PM
3

The guy is a dick
/r/MensRights22/02/12 11:53 AM
1

However, if you feel as though the woman should have to pay for the entirety of a car, any food that she eats, and that any money received should just be given to the child then you aren't living in the real world. Did you actually read what I said? My goodness talk about complete ignorance. Why should the father have to pay for her car when he has his own fucking car to look after? This is the point I'm getting at, the father isn't a fucking ATM machine that dispenses money at the drop of a hat…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 09:31 PM
3

To which Liberal MP Sophie Mirabella promptly hollered: "You feminist hypocrite!" Thanks, this really made my day.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 08:59 PM
2

Translation: I have no reply. Thank You Have a nice day :)
/r/MensRights21/02/12 08:20 PM
2

Its the double standard that is at issue really. They are outraged that this MP called her a whinning puppy and they maintain it is insulting but I've seen so many cases now where men are compared to dogs or suggestions to say that we should be treated like them. I think we get the higher end of the insulting bracket on this one because I don't see many men saying that women should be trained like a dog.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 05:18 PM
1

Honestly? Lol, I've not actually seen any of his stuff.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 04:27 PM
1

When I was a boy at school I found it hard as well. The main problem was that nobody actually taught me anything. I was one of those young boys who stared out into space and didn't pay attention, mostly because I was left to fill out my workbook by my own devices and wasn't really helped. When I hit secondary school I realised that I was behind the other students, I was pretty much in foundation classes at the bottom level. After the first two years I decided that I wanted to try better and made…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 12:59 PM
12

"It's completely unacceptable for any man to be comparing any woman to a dog," he said. But its acceptable to compare men to dogs all the time. Heck, they even suggest that we be trained like them.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 12:29 PM
1

Sure, the mom will benefit from it also, of course. Why should she? Shouldn't she be able to look after herself? Money can go to a car, She can get her own damn car just like everybody else does. The guy paying child support doesn't recieve financial aid to help pay for his car, even in the instance where he needs one to look after his kid. a house, At the most if she has full custody of the child then perhaps a contribution towards the extra room in a house would be fair. However, the guy shoul…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 12:19 PM
2

Looks like my comment wasn't too popular but I stand by it. If you're a cop then people will treat you like a cop and will be extra careful not to break the law around you i.e. Speeding. So if you show your ass off to the world then be prepared to have people look at it. I'm not blind, I'm going to end up seeing it whether you want me to or not.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 12:05 PM
0

Honestly, this is completely insane. This is like dressing up like a police officer and then complaining afterwards because people are looking at you treating you as if you're a police officer. Just substitute the words police officer with anything else and its the same all the time. If you're going to dress like it, then expect to be treated like it.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 06:30 AM
1

What else is she going to spend it on? Feeding and clothing a child does not take $100,000 a year. If she spends it on housing then she is also going to benefit from that. In some way she will benefit from the child support, which really demonstrates how false it is to say that child support is purely for the child.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 11:16 PM
1

So how would you propose we maintain order if we can't trust the courts? Morality works independent from courts. The Nazis did what they did using their own legal definitions. That doesn't mean they were correct to do so. What gets me is that he didn't ask for the DNA ten years ago when this case first came up. He would have known that he was obliged to pay child support ten years ago when the case was made. He can also have a court order made to freeze the state's child support requirements unt…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:44 PM
1

Well, it's the standard of living the child would have enjoyed had the father been actively involved in the child's life. Ahem!!! It has yet to be established that he is the father because the woman involved has actively denied the use of a paternity test through HER OWN CHOICE. Now imagine if your landlord wanted to keep your deposit after you left your house and then refused to give you a costed list why he was keeping it, would you let him have the deposit? Would you give him the money? Also,…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 08:05 PM
1

As I've said before myself, if the standard of living is such a big issue for the child then the child can go and live with the parent who makes more money since they are better equiped to look after the child. So in this case DMX should be entitled to his paternity test and then the child can go and live with him. Of course your answer will be that the child never lived with DMX to begin with, so why should he get custody since he was never involved in the childs life, but then of course this c…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 05:31 PM
1

So basically she is not tollerating anybody refusing her access to contraception, meanwhile we are still waiting for companies to stop fucking around and get us the male pill.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:48 PM
5

This is likely because teams with more females demonstrate higher collective intelligence and better problem solving ability. Is this why everything in society is almost entirely invented by wome............. Hey wait, hang on a minute!!!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:45 PM
1

Have a downvote for being stupid. What do you think the word "child" in child support means? Do you really think the mother has spent a million bucks on her kid during that time period? Most likely not, so I don't see why she should get it all.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:27 PM
28

So basically his child is supposed to be some sort of millionaire? Absolute rubbish, its so obvious that this is going to the mother. They don't even try to hide it anymore.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:58 PM
5

meanwhile powerful men to legislate my reproductive rights. Lol, and they legislated that you get complete control over your reproductive rights, meanwhile men have no say whatsoever and are completely forced to go along with whatever the women decides, even if she steals you semen to make herself pregnant.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 12:31 PM
1

I agree. Although people can say that you shouldn't commit a crime in this instance the cops actually encouraged the crime to be committed. Imagine if cops tried to encourage someone into killing another person just so they could arrest the fuy afterwards. It would be outrageous.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 12:19 PM
12

I wonder what those at Jezebel think of this then. Do you think they will turn on their owners? Or do you think they will deny, deflect, deny. I'm betting the second option.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 12:14 PM
2

Really? I already have one son and me and wife have called it quits there. Wish I could get the snip for a cash reward.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 11:33 PM
3

From the article The state has listed targets for sterilization since the programme began in 2010 and according to local reports is more than 700,000 short of its goal. I'm wondering, are women also given the option to have their tubes tied or whatever?
/r/MensRights16/02/12 05:21 PM
2

I would probably suggest that if this route was taken, then to make a copy of the video on a personal storage device. i.e. Computer, flash drive and keep that one at home and even show your parents.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 06:37 AM
4

And the major complaint in the comments about the app? Well apparently the major complaint is that you have to rate it first before playing. Yes, thats right, you heard me. You have to rate it first. Not because its offensive, not because its sexist, not because its considered unethical. No, the major complaint is that you have to rate it first.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 06:41 AM
3

Of course when they change the law like the article says they are planning they will bring in gender specific language to change that.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 12:45 PM
-1

I'm taxed to support a lot of things, so what? I'm also taxed to support the royal family, but do I give a fuck? The answer is no because I understand that I can't get every little thing I want in life.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 09:18 PM
0

In a sense the attitude is the same. As far as I am concerned a proper atheist wouldn't concern himself with arguing online and behaving like a dick. He would just life his life. If he has a problem against policies connected to religion then he should take it up with representative.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 09:16 PM
-2

I'm still waiting for those books against Unicorns. I can see it now. The End of Unicorns, Letter to a Unicorn Nation, The Unicorn Delusion, Unicorns Are Not Great, Why I'm not a Unicornist. Ah, I will be waiting for these splendid titles to be released soon.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 09:10 PM
0

I think it does. How can you have a natural default on something if you admit you don't know the evidence for it?
/r/MensRights07/02/12 09:03 PM
-2

Richard Dawkins is not the leader of atheism. I'm not even sure you are right that he does, as I've heard of no such thing, but even if, that's hardly what "the movement" wants. Well he is not the only one and countless others in this very thread have disagreed with the dictionary definition not to mention the countless other atheists I have talked to in regards to this. I'm taking this as a given that you want it changed. If not then I will continue to use the dictionary version of the word the…
/r/MensRights07/02/12 08:48 PM
-1

Downvoted again for continuing to misunderstand what the guy is saying.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 08:03 PM
0

I understand your point in regards that ancient texts may still include some misandry and misogyny, I was agreeing with you in regards that a lot of religious people may not identify with todays philosophy of feminism.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 08:02 PM
-2

I hope you know that "best" is just the superlative form of "good". But what makes an atheist better than others? I already explained, it was tied in with the heading of this article. "Best", refers to atheists who don't behave in a dogmatic fashion. They are afterall supossed to not believe in God, so worry about it. I'd really like a source for some of those. I've only ever seen him be very polite, and you'll excuse me for not taking your word as completely... unbiased. Fair enough, I take it …
/r/MensRights07/02/12 07:59 PM
0

Let me rewrite what you just said. While that may have been culturally standardized, it does not mean that math is the logical default. After all, absent some degree of mathematical instruction, even in the narrowest sense, one does not develop a belief in maths. Sorry to break the news to you but all things need to be taught before they become culturally standardized.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 05:28 PM
-1

If you look at my reply above, then you will see they are not.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 05:23 PM
-1

Ahem. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism "The term atheism originated from the Greek ἄθεος (atheos), meaning "without god", used as a pejorative term applied to those thought to reject the gods worshipped by the larger society." http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=atheist "1570s, from Fr. athéiste (16c.), from Gk. atheos "without god, denying the gods; abandoned of the gods; godless, ungodly," from a- "without" + theos "a god" (see Thea)." http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/athart3.htm "A…
/r/MensRights07/02/12 05:15 PM
-4

Thats not what he means. He means that the term atheism is defined by the dictionary and if your philosophical defintion doesn't fit it, then it means you are not an atheist. That is what he is saying.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 04:26 PM
-3

Actually the prefix a- means no and theism means god, not "a belief in god" like you stated. The term agnostic means a- no and gnostic meaning knowledge, hence the term meaning we have no knowledge of God.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 04:24 PM
-7

That is simply not true. The definition of atheism has never been someone who actively denies the existence of any and all gods. So your movement is not trying to change the defintion in the dictionary? Because my words stated "Well your movement is trying to change the definition in the dictionary as we speak". Which in fact they are. Richard Dawkins wants the dictionary defintion changed. That is all I was pointing out. Oh by the way. You are wrong. The word athesit comes from greek. a -meanin…
/r/MensRights07/02/12 04:16 PM
0

Indeed, thats because religions predate feminism, so it isn't corrupted by misandric lies. Atheism though tends to be mutable with the times depending on what is going on.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 03:47 PM
-4

What exactly is a "good atheist"? Well I said best atheists, not "good atheists" and in the context of what I was talking about which is related to the article, I was talking about atheists who don't have dogmatic beliefs or a dogmatic mindset. Could you give an example of Dawkins being an asshole? Usually he's very soft-spoken and polite, and usually those calling him assholes just can't handle criticism of their ideas. Soft spoken and polite? I think you are thinking of the wrong guy. I am tal…
/r/MensRights07/02/12 03:35 PM
-4

Do you believe in Santa? Or do you hold the belief that Santa doesn't exist? Is not believing in Santa a religion? No, obviously not. And are kids who believe in Santa practicing a religion when they do so? No they do not. What you're attempting to say is that not playing soccer is a sport, but we all know it's not. However, lets say that you don't play soccer in order to play rugby instead. Just because you don't play soccer that doesn't necessarily mean you don't play sport. It depends on your…
/r/MensRights07/02/12 03:23 PM
-2

First of all, I honestly doubt that's true. Despite the fact that you've not seen the conversations I've had online. Secondly, that would be gnostic atheism, which is still atheism, but that doesn't mean that's the definition of atheism. Well your movement is trying to change the definition in the dictionary as we speak, but its not going to do any good because it will just bring said people who do this their label into question. They will call themselves atheists under the new definition and al…
/r/MensRights07/02/12 03:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter