TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Das_Ronin Archive

View 2 posts and 74 comments by Das_Ronin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Sure, but most women aren’t motivated to fuck Chad for the sake of fucking Chad. Usually they want something in return, and it’s up to Chad whether he wants to take the bait or smash and dash.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/20 04:28 AM
1

You're making the mistake of assuming that the woman is explicitly deciding that Chad will be a fling while Billy Beta sticks around for good and raises the child. The far more common scenario is that she was hoping to leave Beta for Chad permanently, but Chad bounced which put a big hole in that plan, leaving her with the choice of being a single mom or cucking Beta. Now, I'm explicitly not making any excuses for cheating; I think it's a despicable practice, but at the end of the day the woman …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 06:59 PM
2

The most peaceful time in history doesn’t mean shit. We’re in a peace bubble, and eventually it’s going to burst.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/20 11:35 PM
1

Fuck people who try to pawn off their responsibilities on other people. Edit: to clarify, I’m referring to the Chads
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/20 11:15 PM
7

Is fishing industry regulations really the root of all your views? I would argue that the root belief for left/right tends to be individualism vs collectivism, which dating does apply to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/20 04:56 PM
3

It's not that they're unempathetic, it's that a lot of men simply can't seem to process the notion that women just don't cum as easily as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 01:45 AM
14

I dont understand why people here (both genders) act like physical strength has any relevance in today’s world The paradox is that violence is still a really good solution to a lot of problems, but it’s unfashionable at the moment. As a result, physical strength doesn’t have much utility at the moment, but it could suddenly become invaluable if violence becomes fashionable again.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 04:21 PM
0

I think you misunderstand what many people mean by settling. If you’re a 7/10, anything less than a 7/10 is settling and anything over an 8/10 means you’re being settled for, where X/10 is representative of whatever arbitrary scale you use to consider value. A fellow 7/10 is a reasonable goal, or it would be if there were no power imbalance between the genders. Obviously both men and women ruin this by overrating themselves, so people think they deserve a 9/10 because they’re a 9/10 when they’re…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 03:44 PM
1

It’ll take centuries of sustainable growth to properly facilitate colonization. One big baby boom won’t do it. It requires multi-generational long-term thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 02:41 AM
1

This is a naïve/shortsighted view. First, happiness and prosperity is contingent upon peacetime. Peace is rather unusual across human history, and likely to come undone if geopolitical power shifts. Right now, diplomacy and trade are more effective tools than militant power, but that could change if we see dramatic demographic changes, and the economic impact that results from that. Second, that's assuming that Earth the only planet we want to inhabit. If we want to successfully colonize other w…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 01:50 AM
2

That’s like saying that climate change isn’t an issue because it’s still cold in parts of the world. You need to look multiple generations ahead. It’s not about how many people are their now, it’s about how many people are going to be their in a century. Also, based on the cities that you listed, you’re ignoring the huge geopolitical shift that will come with replacing Western civilization with the East, and the wars that may come with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 10:38 PM
-1

Robots and automation won't stop us from simply running out of people. That's the current danger of current trends.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 09:45 PM
0

I mean, are you seriously advocating for mass cloning as a solution?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 09:38 PM
1

[Q4MEN] Do you think women should have sex and start families with men they don’t sexually desire for the good of “society”? History tells us that it is perfectly possible to run a society without caring a lot about women’s rights and freedoms. I don’t think it is fair. I don’t think we should go back that way. But truth is... yeah... society was ok when women were taught that their “path to a happy life” was less important than serving men’s happiness and their needs. Women weren’t happy being …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 07:48 PM
1

In theory yes, in practice no. I like the idea of having sex with beautiful women (who doesn’t?) but in reality I wouldn’t regardless of how grand of an opportunity would be presented.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/20 01:28 AM
1

Some guy even said that sex is always, ALWAYS a woman’s #1 value to a guy even when she adds a shit ton of other things to his life. That just feels so damn bleak. How many other things is she adding that she's exclusively contracted to be his sole source of? At the end of Clerks, Silent Bob says "You know, there’s a million fine looking women in the world, dude. But they don’t all bring you lasagna at work. Most of ’em just cheat on you." But what he's missing is that anyone CAN bring me lasagn…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 01:37 AM
3

People always follow up with that whenever social media is criticized, but I don’t think it’s valid. Mostly, when people bitch about social media, they’re referring to IRL-extension media where your IRL self is intended to interact with IRL friends and family, such as Facebook and Instagram and Snapchat. I don’t think Reddit has the same major issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/20 08:13 AM
2

They don’t talk boyfriends how try to shank you because their girl cheated with you Also i’ve never seen a manwhore so vehemently against banging other guys girls as some redpillers are ...it’s a part of the lifestyle Because TRP is largely based on the delusion that all men and all women form staunch gender alliances to screw the other gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 04:09 AM
1

We expect you to be really really good at reading people and detecting ill intent. If it takes you multiple months of dating to ascertain someone’s character, then you’re bad at it. All waiting does is test a guy’s patience, not his intention. We want you to be good at it; we want you to accurately determine if someone is a quality gentleman in 3 dates or less and then either drop them or fuck them for the next few years/decades.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 03:59 AM
6

Where are you from? Sounds like Russia, based on the line about the university professor dismembering his girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 09:33 AM
1

Sure, but creampies are relegated to a niche while the classic cumshot remains the default finish for any porn that doesn’t specify. If vaginal creampies make up 20% of consumption, shouldn’t the market have adjusted?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 10:22 PM
1

Around 80% of all porn consumption is about other things than "reproductive" acts (man ejaculating inside vagina). Ejaculating anywhere else, using toys and machines, weird fetishes, etc account for 4/5 searches. If I’m understanding correctly, does that mean that the corollary is that 20% of porn consumption is vaginal creampies? That seems high.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 07:53 PM
1

Women dont pick men to sleep with based on logic and comfort, that’s how they pick men to marry. Then it’s incorrect to say that they only sleep with high-value men if you’re clearly stating that they disregard value. I agree with your assessment of how women work, but your assessment of how value is assigned is inconsistent and thus unhelpful.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 09:08 PM
1

Sure, but women don’t appraise men in a vacuum. For a man to be high-value, he has to be contrasted with low-value or mid-value men. If all men are high-value then none are. If your point is that valuation is arbitrary and generally useless, then it isn’t correct to say women only sleep with high-value men. Instead, your thesis is that women sleep with mixed-value men and situational exploitation is more important than value.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 07:38 PM
1

You’re casting a stupidly wide net for value then. Regardless of how you want to calculate value, I wouldn’t consider someone high value unless they’re a whole Z above the mean. Otherwise they’re mid-value or low-value. That means about 16% of men can be considered high-value. Even if you assign high value to anyone over the mean, that’s still 50% max. 50% of men aren’t incel virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 06:51 PM
3

Sure, but you said women only fuck high value men. I’m saying that’s not true; they occasionally fuck low value men by mistake. I mean, PUA culture is based around tampering with female decision making.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 05:10 PM
1

That assumes quite incorrectly that women can’t make bad decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 10:14 AM
1

The problem is that high value men aka Chads do not have incentive to leave the market, so this is much worse than job market, for example when advertised job goes to the most competent or the best candidate then that person is not your competition anymore, he is happy with job and will be stuck in there for some time, he wont be applying for the job tomorrow That’s not entirely true. Some industries have very high turnover, which I think is a secondary contributor to the problem. Because the in…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 05:40 PM
2

Slutty men definitely do not want slutty women. TRP is very clear about this. Desperate men want slutty women, and their desperation comes from not being slutty themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 05:36 PM
2

Except nobody wants slutty people anyway. Employers want reliable employees, employees want job security, and both men and women want low to normal n-counts. TRP is certainly not bemoaning a lack of slutty women; they specifically want non-slutty women to pump and dump.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 05:29 PM
3

Also, just by the by, you can read stories about homeless dudes who walk into fortune 500 companies and get hired. If all the companies are rejecting you (this goes for women too) you may just suck at presenting yourself. It isnt always the system holding you back. Perhaps the real problem is that all the failures now have social media to bitch on and spin a jobs crisis that is mostly just their collective imaginings and projections. Not trying to be overly harsh but really, blaming the world is…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 05:27 PM
5

Yes, but my assertion is that people want the Instagram model not because of Instagram warping people’s perceptions, but because everyone now has Instagram models in their pools, when the girl next door used to be the hottest candidate one could actually reach out and talk to.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 06:11 AM
1

You’re correct, I way simplified the values for the sake of making it easy to describe.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 04:34 AM
4

Care to discuss how you take issue with my model?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 03:06 AM
0

You could say the same thing about employers, which are inclined to be more pragmatic than dating adults. Why don’t they do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 03:05 AM
2

What we need is unfettered local capitalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 03:04 AM
1

I actually found my current partner on OKC back in summer of 2017, and have been in a generally happy LTR since. Employment on the other hand... Indeed isn't as bad as Tinder, but it's still quite awful.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 02:38 AM
3

Are you referring to the mathematical models, or fashion models?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 02:36 AM
0

Am I to excuse men sluts because they put so much effort into getting into strangers underwear? Yes A very ugly woman that has to actively pursue men to sleep with her isnt a slut to you? Nope It doesnt matter how hard it is for someone to be a slut. Of course it does. The meritocratic structure is more important that the McGuffin than the sex itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 02:31 AM
0

I agree with it 100%, but it's not exclusive to women. Basically all rules are selective. I challenge you to find one that's perfectly upheld.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 02:15 AM
2

After rereading the post, I actually think the issue is that OP is essentially discounting online dating. Sure, I can swipe on Tinder and get matches easily but my experience with dating apps and the way they’re used by people my age is that they’re pretty much either seen as an app to just swipe through when you’re bored and never actually meet up with anyone or a way to get casual sex exclusively. Welcome to dating in 2019, where everyone would rather waste each other’s time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 02:06 PM
1

I mean, that’s why the consolidated curve is so funky; traits like facial symmetry, BMI, cup size, and more all have different curves, and so their composite curves defy prediction.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 01:55 PM
1

Trying to develop a more or less objective attractiveness distribution curve is a fool's errand anyways, because you have to account for taste as well as for someone's rating habits. Also, because attraction is several traits with their own distribution, combined into one wacky curve. But still I’d argue that young women (young people in general, guys suck just more at it) overwhelmingly have the potential to at least look decent if they put their mind on it. They do, but not to the point where …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 01:33 PM
3

Also let’s not kid ourselves; we all think we do, but none of us have an accurate appraisal of attractiveness distribution. We just kinda assume that 1-10 are either flat or normal distributions when it’s likely either highly skewed or multimodal and average is entirely nebulous.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 01:15 PM
3

Sure, but OP is specifically addressing the widely perceived notion of attractive women being relentlessly pursued by strangers at every turn, which doesn’t seem to be her case. What she’s missing is that she’s probably a 7 (which is perfectly fine; I think 7’s are optimal) and most of that stereotype is based on 9’s because 9’s and 10’s get all the attention from everyone, suitor or debater.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 01:12 PM
14

I mean, everyone does because we all pay more attention to attractive people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/19 11:30 PM
26

I think a major point is that they also have a very inflated idea of average
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/19 11:21 PM
1

Many other comments have already touched upon how there’s an amount of selection bias in play, but I’d like to address a secondary factor; men tend to pursue hobbies much more aggressively than women. That’s not to say that women can’t go all in on a given pursuit, but rather that women are less likely to treat their hobbies as vectors for competition, which probably comes down to testosterone disparity.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/19 07:03 PM
5

You’re both right in a sense, but you’re both looking at the data in the wrong ways. Millennials are having less sex, but the distribution of that sex is fucky because of the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/19 05:52 AM
1

In its current form, Feminism seems to be about eroding masculinity. ​ To my understanding, second wave feminism was about women striving to beat men at their own game, while third wave is about bring an end to such game.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 12:22 AM
3

Don’t forget coconuts!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 06:06 AM
1

Regarding the gift-giving part, it’s because we conflate the word gift with Christmas/birthday gifts which are a completely different ballgame. Last night, I bought dinner and delivered it to my GF at her work. More often, I’ll come by to bring her a chocolate shake as a late night pick-me-up. I don’t think of these as gifts, but they technically qualify. If you’ve seen the movie Clerks, Silent Bob says that they’re are a lot of attractive women in the world but very few will bring you lasagna a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 03:30 PM
1

When I started the project, it was originally an all-purpose dating app. The rating system eventually led me to narrow it down to focus on casual sex because otherwise I figured that the rating system would be completely abused. Rating someone for orgasms delivered (or at least perceived effort) is somewhat straightforward and objective. Rating someone for their personality is much trickier. I’m confident that it would lead to everyone 1-starring each other over absurdly minor traits or opinions…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/19 02:43 PM
1

Still, that’s crazy. If someone told me “hey, I have this dating system where you give women orgasms and it rewards you with the opportunity to give more women orgasms” I’d sign up on the spot.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 10:20 PM
1

Yeah, that was generally idea. A score appeared with user profiles on swipe, and scrolling through to the profile led to the detailed review section. The point remains though that the professor thought it was interesting but all the tentative users gave it a big nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 10:11 PM
1

Oh, I mean, the reviewing was anonymous to the public, but you could see each individual rating, date, and attached comment. Only the reviewed person could see the names for their own feedback.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 09:38 PM
1

At a glance, it seems perfect. It gives women additional filtration and gives men a more straightforward way to compete. The main problem comes in the way that potential partners are appraised; more experience is considered detrimental. As a result, someone with no reviews was considered undesirable, but someone with a bunch of reviews was also undesirable. It turned daring jnto a negative-sum game.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 06:18 PM
1

It wasn’t intended to be merely cumulative. Like Yelp, you’d be able to see all individual user reviews, not just a score.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 06:14 PM
3

With the way I had it intended, nobody could rate someone until after 1. matching and 2. tapping phones together IRL to signify a successful date. For what it’s worth, guys also hated the idea. Everyone of both genders said they didn’t want pressure to perform and they didn’t want to know how many other dates that a potential partner had been on.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 05:25 AM
5

I’ve had probably slightly more sex than the average woman and every guy talks a big game and almost none of them deliver. Guys don’t care if you feel good, have a good time, or get off. In fact, many seem to prefer if you don’t. It’s degrading, often painful, and women on average take way, way longer to finish than men and most men don’t care if you do or not: sex is done when they are. End of story. Funny enough, I’ve heard that enough times that it lead to an idea. I had a design class I took…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 05:17 AM
1

"women are people...and therefore they suck” is an accurate appraisal. The problem with TRP is they treat women as a unified hive mind, failing to realize that the women they resent are all competing with one another, and that the men they think they’re allied with on their sub are all rivals.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/19 11:37 PM
4

I agree with your premise (too large of a dating pool is detrimental) but not your conclusion as to why a larger pool is detrimental. A major consideration is that everyone wants someone from the top of their pool; specifically the top third. OKCupid had a blog post confirming this, that a majority of attention goes to the top third of women. Pretend for a moment that everyone is rated 1-9 with 1 being ugly and 9 being superhot and all values being evenly distributed (there's the same number of …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 02:25 AM
4

Sure. I’m also not seeking a trad woman and am already in a long-term relationship. I just found it amusing how close to home that line landed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 03:05 AM
0

Enlisted. GPA ended up too low for officer consideration.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 02:36 AM
1

Nah, I’m intending to go Nuke.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 02:24 AM
7

Toni Lahren dates a navy seal, not a video game designer. This is funny, because I have a degree in videogame design/production and I’m in the process of trying to join the Navy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 01:19 AM
3

Eh, I'm not exactly aligned with TRP, and when dating I explicitly seek LTR's. My current LTR and the previous one both started with sex on the first date, and took off from there. I wouldn't go so far as to hold the third date as a hard stop, but if it hasn't happened by then it gives the impression that she has very different priorities.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 10:57 PM
0

Yes, it’s certainly more complicated in today’s world, and yes, our genetics have some complexities that further mess with this paradigm (e.g. the decline of the Hapsburgs). Regarding whether natural is automatically right or not, that’s beside the point. You asked what separates a prostitute from an athlete or soldier or stuntman, and I have explained.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 01:16 PM
1

I kinda mucked up the previous sentence by blending literal and figurative language, so let me sort that out here: Men are supposed to compete with other men. Women are supposed to mate with the winners and disregard the losers. Loser men are supposed to either settle for undesirable women and contribute to genetic stratification, or get good and learn to win. When men do sports or fighting or stunts, they’re generally leveraging their masculinity to attract women. They’re supposed to do this. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 05:50 AM
1

Because prostitution derails the natural order of things, while fighting to survive well enough to procreate IS the natural order.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/19 04:41 AM
1

I mean, I’m still confident that I fit the ENTJ profile, so I may just be incorrect with the notion that I’m close to ENTP.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 04:33 PM
1

Oh, nah, I haven’t taken one that orders the functions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 02:39 PM
1

I’ve taken a couple of different tests through psychology courses in college, and then corrected the results based on my own insights. The most accurate one I took actually put me as ENTP, but I know I lean slightly more to J.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 02:33 PM
2

Is there something I don’t know about ENTP? I’m ENTJ but J/P is really close to neutral for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 02:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter