TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DaveSenior72 Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by DaveSenior72 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Shortened form of cuckold
/r/MensRights17/12/17 03:49 AM
7

Oh please...A couple years ago, I went to Home Depot with my then-16-yo stepson (tall, dark, handsome football player) and my 3-yo daughter. The greeter asked if we were grandpa, father and daughter. We've had other people since ask if the baby (now 5) is his.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 01:44 AM
3

Communism isn't a political ideology? Hell, how about the American Revolution?
/r/MensRights29/01/16 10:48 PM
6

An outdoor July wedding in Texas is torture for the groom and his party. The bridesmaids can wear short, strapless, "airy" dresses, and the guys are in tuxes. Black tuxes. I'm sweating just recalling it...
/r/MensRights24/07/15 08:59 PM
1

It's a case of knowing your audience. Teachers/profs vs. gang at work, I'm gonna write differently.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:06 PM
1

I've also had mandatory minimum word counts, and had to come up with flowery empty BS once I've said what I need to say. But, yeah, sometimes a five - dollar word gives you more precision in one word than 6 or 7 one-dollar words, even though you may actually be saying the exact same thing. To simplify my paragraph: If you want a precise statement, but at the same time don't want to be seen as running on at the mouth, you can usually find a multi-syllable word to replace several words in a phrase…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 05:10 PM
15

When one is striving for linguistic precision, but simultaneously wishing to not be perceived as nauseatingly verbose, it is usually an increase in syllables that allows the reduction of total word count without a loss of acute definition.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 07:50 AM
3

There are lots of non-underwire bras that aren't sports bras. I've usually encountered them on smaller-chested ladies.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:15 AM
10

I take issue with her initial premise. Yes, Eve was beguiled into defying God and ate the fruit. So, she was tricked into it. Couldn't Adam have not eaten it once she offered it to him? He knew what it would mean. I think he knowingly and willingly went where she was going, out of devotion and love. Sell THAT to a radfem!
/r/MensRights08/09/14 10:56 PM
1

Hateful speech is still protected under the First Amendment unless it is a direct incitement to violence or other imminent illegal acts. The words in and of themselves are undeniably offensive, but not illegal per se. Donald Sterling is facing all sorts of consequences for his idiotic, ignorant, and categorically offensive rant, but he did nothing illegal, and has not been arrested for anything. Also, please point to the amendment or law pertaining to the anti- harassment "real right" you mentio…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 10:00 PM
1

What laws, exactly? What laws are broken in your scenario?
/r/MensRights21/07/14 08:08 PM
2

The Selective Service system has existed since WWI. Check your facts.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 04:41 PM
4

UPI reports that “Moore Police Chief Jerry Stillings has said the use of force was appropriate.” “We’re obligated to detain and investigate,” Stillings said at a press conference. “If someone does not cooperate with that investigation, we have to do what we have to do to get that information.” I'm on mobile, so I'm sorry about the formatting... but this is the most chilling thing to come out of this. How do you get info from a corpse, there, Chief?
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:03 PM
2

Donnez le main,, on prend le bras?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 12:50 AM
19

Am I the only one that doesn't have an issue with her well worn panties? If I've done a good enough job to get a woman like that on her way to naked at a time when she's wearing panties she probably didn't have any intention to let anyone see, then I'm having a pretty good night. Either that, or I'm getting her so worked up her panties are disintegrating. Win either way!
/r/MensRights26/12/13 02:24 AM
20

Change one word and it's fine.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:07 PM
2

"Do or do not; there is no try"--Yoda
/r/MensRights06/12/13 06:02 PM
1

My original decree gave me the deduction for my son, though my ex has always had primary custody. It's also part of the questions in Turbo Tax lol
/r/MensRights05/11/13 05:55 PM
1

In some cases (stipulated in the divorce decree, e.g.), the non custodial parent can claim the child on taxes
/r/MensRights04/11/13 10:39 PM
1

For Texas and California, it's handled at the county level. Best bet is a Google search for child support in your state. That should get you into whatever office you need to go through.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 10:38 PM
15

Dude... go through the court, absolutely! I was sending my ex a direct allotment from my check while I was in the military, and had it not been clearly marked on every les that it was family support, I could have owed 2 years worth that I had paid! You need their record to cya
/r/MensRights04/11/13 05:10 AM
15

When, in the time of Henry VIII, the woman was blamed for failing to produce a son... cost Anne Boleyn her life, I believe... along with Henry's philandering, but... at least in that time they were ignorant of the mechanism of sex determination at conception. That comment just kills me in 2013!
/r/MensRights23/07/13 04:58 PM
2

I'm looking at this asking, "is this news?" I signed up to be a donor in 1990 as a newly-married 18-yo for the extra money. The lab would NOT take a donation from me without a release form signed by my lovely bride...i thought it was just SOP...22 years ago
/r/MensRights28/08/12 09:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter