TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dax420 Archive

View 1 post and 185 comments by Dax420 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I don't think giving everyone points is playing favourites. You want to talk real sexism, 30 years ago when I was in elementary school our gym teacher would divide the gym in half and the boys got to play soccer/ball hockey/kickball on one half and the girls were only allowed to skip rope or play hopscotch. Even as a 8 year old kid it rubbed me the wrong way.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 05:51 PM
23

I was banned from there for posting what essentially boiled down to: "Would you say the same thing if the genders were reversed?" That sub is very sexist, they don't even try to hide it anymore. But hey, as someone with a successful 15 year long marriage, what advice could I possibly offer that would be helpful to someone asking about their relationship? Much better to let the single, lonely bitter women there give the same old "BREAK UP WITH HIM!" advice over and over and over again.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 06:29 PM
4

You need a gun to protect yourself from an old woman?
/r/MensRights20/11/15 02:36 PM
4

The lady doth protest too much, methinks Hamlet, Act III, scene II
/r/MensRights21/11/12 12:04 AM
1

Pick your battles guys.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 05:20 PM
6

Just remember that white knights are the ultimate beta male. Quick to puff out their chest but even quicker to run away. If someone is "threatening to beat you up" they aren't going to beat you up, or they would have just done it already. The trick is not to cower to their tactics. Is someone comes up and says "Don't talk to her like that!" and you try to explain yourself you have already lost. You are now on the defensive and they are on the offensive. The correct response is something along th…
/r/MensRights23/07/12 10:55 PM
4

"All men are pervs. They are constantly staring at my breasts, which are falling out of the ridiculously low-cut tank-top I'm wearing which is 2 sizes too small because of my push-up bra. How DARE they look at me that way!"
/r/MensRights18/07/12 12:36 AM
2

Did you think that one up yourself?
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:13 PM
1

In Canada we get 9 months parental leave, and it can be divided up between the mother and father however you want. So for example the husband could take 3 months and the wife could take 6 months. Or if you are like me and your wife is already a stay-at-home mom you can take the entire 9 months of paid leave for yourself. It's a pretty good system.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 05:16 PM
2

But how is it related to men's rights?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:21 PM
4

I don't understand what the problem is here? And why this is in MensRights? It doesn't paint only males as abusers ("it may be that something's off about Aunt Linda") and it doesn't demonize fathers. Frankly I agree with the general concept the author is trying to convey.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 05:01 PM
2

And now for the rest of his life when he applies for a job he gets to check the "yes" box next to the question "have you ever been arrested". This limits his future employment opportunities. That is real and demonstrable harm done to OP with no recourse against his accuser.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 11:01 PM
21

"School girls groped while men stand by and watch. Film at 11"
/r/MensRights15/06/12 12:37 AM
2

Excellent. Please continue to spout your particular brand of crazy. It just makes feminists seem like a bunch of jealous woman with penis envy. Let them continue to shoot themselves in the foot if they really want to.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 09:29 PM
-3

No, it's not. It's a "syndrome". Go research the difference between a syndrome and a disease and then come back here and tell us it's real. My mother in law has it too, I've been the support group meetings. It's bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 09:51 PM
1

The states wont let us do it ourselves Bullshit. You always have the right to represent yourself. However you would have to be pants on head retarded to do so. The old saying is: A man who represents himself has a fool for a client
/r/MensRights28/05/12 04:41 PM
3

How is that in any way relevant when discussing who is more likely to be a victim of a violent crime?
/r/MensRights25/05/12 11:13 PM
8

Not even like it's "slightly more likely". Men are four times more likely to be the victim of a violent crime than women.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 06:46 PM
0

Funny, I hear "bitches be crazy" all the time, but rarely do you hear "husbands be crazy". Me thinks they have got this one ass-backwards.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 04:41 PM
6

And you clearly lack an understanding of Title IX
/r/MensRights27/04/12 12:16 AM
7

I'll spell it out for you then. Girl does well in a male dominated sport: accolades from everyone. Boy does well in a female dominated sport: Kicked off the team. It's a double-standard.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:43 PM
20

Tl;DR: Thanks for the pageviews guys, keep spreading this around.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 04:28 PM
91

This picture on facebook should make the case in small claims court a slam-dunk. Sue the bitch, ask for punitive damages.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:43 PM
5

This is the real story here. A man can be put in jail for 9 years based solely on the word of a woman. No evidence, no DNA, just a lie.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 12:57 AM
12

Generally there is. When 17 year old David Milgaard was wrongfully convicted of rape and spent 22 years in prison he was awarded $10 million compensation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Milgaard He spoke at our school. He is an utterly broken person. He was an attractive 17 year old boy thrown into general population. He was repeatedly raped during his incarceration.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 08:56 PM
4

How is it less real than other jobs? Read my post again. I never said that, in fact I said the complete opposite: No one said it's not a real job It's just not the "real world" as in, private sector employment. There is no corporate culture. No TPS reports. No shareholders. Working in academia is completely different than working in the private sector, anyone who has done both will tell you that.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 08:49 PM
10

There is a huge disconnect between the world of academia and the private sector. No one said it's not a real job, it's just not the "real world". Which is true. Academia is a microcosm.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 06:51 PM
4

Regardless of the race of the women, the overall tone of that post screams "ghetto culture" to me. The belief that money needs to be spent the moment it comes in, and not saved or spent thriftily. I just feel bad for the kids.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:18 PM
8

So is Youtube a hate group because of one moron posting the N-word as a comment on a video? Is Xbox a hate group because people call each other faggots while playing COD? Just because some assholes can post assholish things in an open forum doesn't make the whole forum responsible for their comments.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 01:43 AM
7

Who is SPLC and who the fuck cares what they think? I've never posted anything here that could be considered hate speech, and if the FBI, DHS or any other 3 letter acronym want to put me on a list solely based on which subreddits I subscribe to, I say confidently come at me bro.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 01:40 AM
12

Sucking of the infants penis? What the ever loving fuck? No that doesn't happen, and I've seen jewish and christian circumcisions. That NEVER happens because it's not only weird it's fucking infectious. You are wrong. You are just plain old, dead fucking, wrong. http://sdjewishjournal.com/site/3513/brooklyn-da-looking-at-infants-death-following-brit-ritual/ The report of the death of the unidentified infant last Sept. 28 at Brooklyn’s Maimonides Medical Center apparently sparked the investigatio…
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:24 PM
3

Islam is not a race. Ergo you are a retard.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:23 AM
7

UK never had that to begin with.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:20 AM
13

Don't argue with idiots.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 01:10 AM
1

This is not the anti-women club. People are trying to put the needs of the child first. Frankly I'm impressed.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:09 PM
3

So much for hiring the right person for the job.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 06:05 PM
3

The real gems are hidden down at the bottom.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 06:19 PM
29

It's so ironic too, because they think they are fighting sexism by leaping to the defense of every woman online, when really they are promoting sexism with the whole "she can't defend herself so I have to do it for her" mentality. White Knights are sexists, who think they are feminists, who think that somehow defending women online is going to get them laid. It's just sad.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 08:05 PM
42

I vote for Internet White Knights as the worst feminists.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:58 PM
1

x-post to TwoX and see what happens. I bet they will be just as pissed off.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 07:56 PM
3

Don't feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 05:40 PM
16

Note to self: Buy more guns
/r/MensRights04/01/12 06:47 PM
6

Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 11:35 PM
1

And again, according to your logic I can commit mass identity theft, steal thousands of dollars from credit card fraud, order everything I need to survive from Amazon.com and as long as I never leave the house I'm completely untouchable by the police? We can keep trading bad analogies all day if you want, none of this changes the fact that an arrest warrant allows police to enter your home by force.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 07:17 PM
0

So again, take yourself out of the situation for a moment. Imagine someone robs a bank, and they know exactly who did it so they get a warrant for his arrest. You think that all the guy has to do is stay home and lock the door and the cops can't touch him? I realize that you don't see yourself on the same level as a bank robber, however as far as the law is concerned, you are.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 06:56 PM
2

Doesn't matter. Like it or not you committed a crime and have a warrant out for your arrest. You can re-phrase it however you wish if it makes you feel better, "unpaid bill" sounds much more innocent. None of that will change the fact that an arrest warrant allows the police to take whatever action is necessary to arrest you. Yes, it sucks, but I really don't see why you feel so outraged that you were arrested. I mean you knew there was a warrant out for you, what were you expecting to happen?
/r/MensRights08/12/11 06:42 PM
1

Yes of course they can come into your home and arrest you. It's called an arrest warrant. Do you seriously think you can just hide in your home and never get arrested? Like, if OJ Simpson had just made it home and locked the door he would be home free? I don't even...
/r/MensRights08/12/11 06:06 PM
3

Facing charges, suspended from work and had his computer seized for looking out his own window. I love how they will take any excuse to seize a computer these days so they can try to find more dirt on you. I can't even fathom how a judge would sign a warrant to seize a computer because someone looked out a window...
/r/MensRights05/12/11 08:30 PM
12

You guys are forgetting the ring. You need to get a cheap $100 ring and "propose" to her, with the condition she get an abortion and you will have a baby after you are married. Engagements have basically no legal weight, but go a long way towards convincing her you want to be with her forever.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 08:15 PM
10

So when Julian Assange has sex with a women and tells her he put on a condom but actually didn't, it's rape and they are going to extradite him for it. But when a women says she's on birth control and really isn't it's "NOT rape"? We're not crazy, just pointing out the double-standard here.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 08:13 PM
34

An ambulance rushed the man to San Francisco General Hospital where he was admitted in critical condition. Wagstaffe said the man has second and third degree burns over 60 percent of his body and is unable to speak due to his injuries. Ho-ly-FUCK. Because she suspected he was cheating on her. Suspected. I can't even... If convicted of the charges she could face life in prison. We can only hope!
/r/MensRights30/11/11 01:00 AM
2

Link? I would like to give kudos for their level-headedness.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 07:35 PM
12

At least the judge had the sense to dismiss the case, however the prosecuting attorney should be fucking disbarred for this.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 10:51 PM
14

Can you even imagine the scenario? It's so laughable. "Haha! The joke is in you woman, I poked a hole in that condom. Now I get to pay you 18 years of rent money! TAKE THAT!"
/r/MensRights15/11/11 10:19 PM
15

My wife got stopped by a security guard at the mall, who wanted to know if "she was OK or if she wanted him to call someone". She was confused as hell until she remembered she poked herself in the eye the other day and gave herself a very minor black eye. Got to love those white knights!
/r/MensRights11/11/11 07:33 PM
5

Get that in writing. Use it against her in court.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:26 PM
1

Yes, because the planet has a shortage of people right now.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 05:44 PM
8

So you can lose your kid for a traffic citation now? Are we going to have CPS hearings for everyone who gets a speeding ticket with a child in the car?
/r/MensRights06/10/11 12:13 AM
3

DON'T FEED THE TROLLS
/r/MensRights22/09/11 12:26 AM
30

So basically the bar's defense strategy is "We're not racist, just sexist!"
/r/MensRights14/09/11 04:27 PM
3

$8000 will buy you a lot of bullets.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 04:40 PM
9

Somehow that makes me feel better.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:54 PM
10

Wait wait wait. /b/ has a profanity filter? After all the nasty shit that's been posted on /b/ over the years they are offended by the word "faggot"?
/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:42 PM
1

Even then his mother still tried to blame us, and would not admit fault. Justifiable homicide IMHO.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 04:59 PM
6

Gender issues aside, that comment thread is fucking funny.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 04:11 PM
8

Wonder what the sentence would have been if a Muslim man did that to his daughter in this country...?
/r/MensRights17/08/11 06:29 PM
0

How is this a Men's Rights issue?
/r/MensRights04/08/11 04:47 PM
2

Heh, I read that as "I'm done with you" and came in here to bitch you out... Everything went better than expected.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 06:21 PM
2

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:56 PM
27

Generally one doesn't stick around long enough to file a police report after decking someone.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 05:52 PM
23

Swear to god the first bitch to give me a hard time for playing with my own child is getting punched square in the jaw.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 05:41 PM
1

If you are going to troll at least attempt to be clever. I've heard better insults from 4th graders.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 06:19 PM
7

Escort, not prostitute. It's a whole industry specializing in exactly this sort of deception.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 10:44 PM
2

I think you've never been kicked in the nuts, so you don't really understand. A leg sweep and a kick to the groin are on totally different levels. Imagine if she threw a drink in his face and he decided to ram a pool cue up her vag and tried to inflict damage on her reproductive system. Not a proportional response. The leg sweep is obviously an escalation of force, and I wouldn't justify it. I certainly wouldn't do it myself. However that still doesn't excuse kicking someone in the balls for spi…
/r/MensRights06/07/11 06:16 PM
2

Both parties are douches in that video. I would hardly call that attempted murder though. A single punch would have done a lot more damage. I suppose the lesson here is you shouldn't randomly assault people.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:56 PM
2

Sure, got a link? I'd love to see how a leg sweep equates to attempted murder in your eyes.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:56 PM
5

It's a simple ad hominem attack. They can't argue with your logic so they call you a troll. Stay classy 2X.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 11:58 PM
13

No, he's saying that a kick to the nuts is not a proportional response to being spat on. If someone spits on you would it be appropriate to pull out a gun and shoot them? Retaliation must be a measured response. Someone slaps you, slap them back. Someone pushes you, push them back. You don't start throwing haymakers because someone pokes you with a finger, and you don't kick someone in the nuts for spitting on you.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 11:56 PM
1

I agree with the article, but the author sounds like a bit of a crack pot. This line especially rubs me the wrong way: Losing just 1 ounce of blood results in hemorrhage, "Hemorrhage" literally means "blood loss". So loosing just a drop of blood is technically a hemorrhage. There are many good reasons not to circumcise, lets not use hyperbole to support our arguments.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 05:04 PM
11

Any you are dating her why?
/r/MensRights15/06/11 12:25 AM
2

Discussing an article written in the Daily Mail is equivalent to discussing the big foot sighting on the front page of the National Enquirer. It's a tabloid made up of lies and half-truths. We are better than this.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 10:03 PM
0

Daily Fail
/r/MensRights10/06/11 05:06 PM
2

Pro-tip: Widows get custody...
/r/MensRights31/05/11 11:46 PM
2

How is it even allowed? Long story short, court documents are public records. I'm not saying it's right, I'm just telling you why.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 12:44 AM
3

Why is discrimination in quotes? That's a little condescending... (In TFA, not the reddit title)
/r/MensRights10/05/11 04:22 PM
2

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 04:20 PM
7

Where else on this site can you go to get a "bro-five"? OneY is full of white knight pussies, we need a new sub-reddit for male bonding...
/r/MensRights12/04/11 10:44 PM
9

Just QFT. You are a stupid bitch who is not willing to accept facts that fall outside of your worldview. You will gain nothing by posting further in this thread.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:19 PM
2

No, guns.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 12:22 AM
2

I think it's because they are loud. Same reason we like things that explode and playing with fire.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 11:11 PM
9

Yeah I couldn't even finish reading that. The premise of the article is basically "men are better than women".
/r/MensRights03/03/11 05:04 PM
12

Might want to re-read that.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 12:02 AM
30

Kind of sad that supporting gender fairness is a novel concept these days.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 08:35 PM
3

It tells me your morons. You don't see the irony in calling someone a moron while misusing the word "your" twice in 2 posts?
/r/MensRights17/02/11 07:58 PM
3

So other than the fact that they assaulted a man, how does this in any way impact "men's rights"? Your not the first person thats told me 'This is not a mensrights issue.' That should tell you something...
/r/MensRights17/02/11 07:52 PM
3

There are 16 posts on /MR in the last 24 hours. I don't think this sub-reddit suffers from a lack of volume. The general bitching about women really detracts from the purpose of this sub-reddit.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 06:25 PM
5

Not a MensRights issue. Sorry, this isn't the "girls are mean" club.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 05:29 PM
2

Could not care less. I wouldn't even care if a full-blown women wanted to use the men's room, power to them. Then again I have no issues with people seeing my junk.
/r/MensRights16/02/11 10:34 PM
3

Put a hit out on the mother. Gain custody and eliminate child support payments all in one shot. (That was a joke, calm down)
/r/MensRights15/02/11 10:39 PM
6

Disturbing how many commenters on that blog think this is totally OK. I wonder if they would have the same opinion if the procedure was a tubo-ligation instead of a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights14/02/11 07:52 PM
9

There are only 20 comments on this post at the moment, and 2/3 of the highest rated ones start with "I'm never getting married". The general consensus on this sub-reddit is that marriage is a trap. I'm a child of a broken home, watched my parents go through a bitter divorce, only saw my father on the weekends and knew all about how much money was handed over for me and my brother's child support. Even after all of that, seeing what happens when a marriage falls apart I still wanted to get marrie…
/r/MensRights09/02/11 06:40 PM
23

I know I'm going against the grain here, but I am happily married. If you find the right women it's a blessing not a curse.
/r/MensRights09/02/11 05:47 PM
2

It's worth pointing out that 2 years less a day is actually preferable to a sentence of 2 years. The reason being that in a provincial prison you are generally required to serve at least 2/3rds of your sentence before being eligible for parole. In a federal penitentiary you are only required to serve 1/3rd before you are eligible for parole.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 06:29 PM
1

Nice "V" reference.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 10:29 PM
1

16 is legal in Canada too.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 05:41 PM
4

Here we are trying to break down gender roles and you go and post an article that says "Want more sex? Act like a man". Sheesh
/r/MensRights27/01/11 09:01 PM
2

If you marry, your life is over - you just don't know it yet. I want a wife, not a free whore. I've always imagined my life together with a woman I can love and trust. Now that I know how things really are, I feel stranded. If you think that's how things really are you're an idiot. I'm married. My life is not over. I love my wife and trust her fully. That's not about her. They're all the same. I don't think the bar skank you picked up 4 months ago is very indicative of women in general.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 07:17 PM
5

Why does it offend you?
/r/MensRights11/01/11 11:45 PM
55

Don't like it? Don't go into the men's washroom. How hard is this?
/r/MensRights11/01/11 05:12 PM
3

Seriously /r/MR STOP FEEDING THE TROLLS You are only giving them money by driving traffic to their site and increasing their google page rank via back-links. They are trolling you and it's working.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 10:31 PM
3

Yes and no. From the point of view of the government this guy ignored 3 harshly worded warnings to pay up. All he had to do was call them and arrange a payment plan and they wouldn't have frozen his license or bank account. They did this to stop the guy from skipping town and skipping out on his support payments after they made several attempts to collect the payment. It actually seems pretty reasonable to me.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 10:18 PM
6

Yeah, this whole mess could have been avoided if he simply called the government agency himself instead of relying on his admittedly psychotic ex-wife.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 09:23 PM
7

It's really a matter of finding the right person.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 05:18 PM
8

Don't like it? Don't read it.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 05:29 PM
4

The gun laws in NJ are completely fucked up. You can get authorization to purchase a gun, but not to possess it... I can provide you with a dozen links of people in NJ who tried to comply with the laws as written and got royally fucked over in the end.
/r/MensRights17/11/10 11:59 PM
4

I offered a friend a ride on the back of my motorcycle and he refused because "that's kinda gay". Some people are stupid.
/r/MensRights15/11/10 11:50 PM
0

This is ludicrous. Agreed. It's perfectly normal for a toddler to sleep in the same bed as their parents. In this case a "parental unit", but it's the same difference. I can't believe that /r/MensRights of all places is buying into the "he has a penis so he is potentially a pedophile" mentality.
/r/MensRights04/11/10 04:20 PM
21

She should be in jail for that. Logging into his email without consent is a Felony (Thank you Sarah Palin) and emailing a naked photo of him has got to fall under some kind of "sexual performance" statute.
/r/MensRights25/10/10 10:35 PM
9

Wear it with pride brother. Being naked is awesome.
/r/MensRights21/10/10 10:02 PM
11

Oh god why did you make me read that XX link. So rage inducing. I love how you can present a concise argument with a link to a peer reviewed source for your data and the response is "I don't have the skills necessary to analyze/digest/interpret/critique all of this statistical data". Pretty hard to argue with someone when they are completely unwilling to accept information that doesn't fit into their "men are evil" worldview.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 07:37 PM
5

Although median hourly pay provides a useful comparison between the earnings of men and women, it does not necessarily indicate differences in rates of pay for comparable jobs. Emphasis mine. This is not an apples to apples comparison. It's not saying that a man in the same position as a women will make more money. It's simply saying the average woman's salary is less than the average man's salary. This is entirely due to job choice.
/r/MensRights30/09/10 07:31 PM
7

I don't hate women. I hate feminism. We should be striving for equality, where as feminism wants to empower women at the cost of men.
/r/MensRights23/09/10 10:30 PM
3

I'm conflicted. A Men's haircut is like $15 where as a Women's haircut is more like $25+ However women's hair takes much longer to cut and style than a Man's. I can justify this. In this case a nail is a nail and a toe is a toe. So it seems wrong.
/r/MensRights23/09/10 09:34 PM
2

"Oh no, people are looking at me!" Please.
/r/MensRights23/09/10 04:37 PM
18

Men can have men-only sports. Actually we can't, that's the whole fucking point.
/r/MensRights22/09/10 07:10 PM
2

Get a life dude.
/r/MensRights14/09/10 05:33 PM
3

I feel the same way. If I have to spend money on a lawyer and months in court I would rather it be on a not guilty by reasons of temporary insanity defense than as the plaintiff in a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights14/09/10 05:11 PM
1

I just find that in-laws value spending time with their grandchildren a lot more than I value free babysitting.
/r/MensRights10/09/10 07:57 PM
7

To be fair that was a long time ago.
/r/MensRights10/09/10 07:40 PM
2

I understand. Every situation is different and I don't know the women the way you do. However in my personal experience the threat of severing contact with grand-children is a very effective strategy of dealing with idiot grandparents. Of course, YMMV.
/r/MensRights10/09/10 05:48 PM
2

Such an impossible situation. Seems pretty easy to me. "Mother-in-law, if you want to continue spending time with your grand-daughter you need to respect my wishes regarding her diet and not feed her fast food while she is in your care. I've packed a sandwich and some veggies for her to take to your house, which you can give her when she is hungry instead of feeding her fast food." I don't think that's unreasonable. I've cared for children before that had strict "no sugar or processed food" orde…
/r/MensRights10/09/10 05:28 PM
3

Even if we take your wild-ass-guess at face value that still over 300 people. Have you never heard of cross-posting?
/r/MensRights10/09/10 01:02 AM
10

So by your logic, the female to male imbalance must result in men raping women. No possibility that the extra men will a) be celibate b) pursue homosexual relationships instead or c) NOT BE FUCKING RAPISTS How does that even work in your mind? Half the guys on Reddit have no hope of getting laid this year, so do you assume they are going to just go out and start raping women instead? WTF?
/r/MensRights09/09/10 11:12 PM
7

Or everything to do with neglecting male children in favor of female children...
/r/MensRights09/09/10 06:01 PM
4

So that people who subscribe to /r/MensRights and don't subscribe to /r/AskReddit can see the original post
/r/MensRights09/09/10 04:44 PM
20

On the fifth floor of the Portal Hotel in the inner suburb of Spring Hill even the staff have to be women, in a bid to improve safety for guests. Allow me to translate: All men are potential rapists.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 06:31 PM
1

The feds use Interstate Commerce to justify everything they do that affects you or I. In theory the feds shouldn't be allowed to regulate individual people, only regulate the states and the states regulate the people. However they use the IS clause to do it every single day. Perfect example is pot dispensaries in California. It's legal at the state level, but the DEA still busts them. Even though it's grown locally, and sold locally the feds still use the IS clause as justification for shutting …
/r/MensRights03/09/10 05:28 PM
2

As a practical matter, virtually any enactment of Congress aimed at private discrimination would be sustained under modern commerce clause analysis. Even localized acts of discrimination may, when considered cumulatively with other such acts around the nation, have a substantial impact on interstate commerce when aggregated. Under contemporary commerce clause theory, that potential aggregate impact would be enough to uphold the legislation. Because Congress's power under the commerce clause is s…
/r/MensRights03/09/10 04:05 PM
3

Again, you are incorrect. I'm not trying to be a dick, but I know what I'm taking about: The wide interpretation of the scope of the Commerce Clause continued following the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which aimed to prevent business from discriminating against black customers. The United States Supreme Court issued several opinions which supported this use of the Commerce Clause. Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964), ruled that Congress could regulate a busin…
/r/MensRights02/09/10 08:01 PM
6

Interstate commerce covers just about everything these days. I would be you $100 that the liquor they serve comes from distilleries outside of their state. Hence interstate commerce, hence subject to federal legislation. Sucks, but that's how it works. The term private has been hashed out in case law, even if it's not defined in the statute. A private club needs to have a membership requirement for entry. Think high-end golf course country club. Charging a cover to enter doesn't make it a privat…
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:58 PM
11

Sorry but you are wrong. A private business can not discriminate against a protected class. You could have a "no douchebags" policy, but not "No fags, no blacks, no women, or no cripples". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964 EDIT: I should mention a night club is not a private club.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:44 PM
10

Just because it's a private business doesn't mean they are allowed to discriminate against a protected class. They couldn't have a "No blacks" policy, so why should they be allowed to discriminate against men?
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:28 PM
6

Here is a quote from the OP in that XX post: Anything that makes a woman feel bad for being human is mysogyny. She obviously doesn't even know what the word means. Ignore the idiot.
/r/MensRights19/08/10 07:36 PM
0

Romance novels. I bet if you compared how much men read to how much women read, and weighed it by reading level men would come out way ahead.
/r/MensRights13/08/10 09:53 PM
3

You obviously didn't read the article. Putting aside your victim mentality for a moment, you would need to be doing something "lewd or obscene" while naked to be convicted. Walking into the shower isn't lewd or obscene, so there is no need to cup your balls in the morning. I agree that what this guy is going through is utter BS, and that if he were female he wouldn't be facing charges at the moment, but I really can't stand the "oh woe is me" mentality of this sub-reddit. There are legitimate is…
/r/MensRights11/08/10 11:26 PM
10

My wife and I do not believe in divorce. We have a standing arrangement that one of us will simply murder the other one in their sleep instead. (No, I'm not joking)
/r/MensRights29/07/10 04:53 PM
0

In a case like this you would be fully justified in hiring a hit man. Easy to get sole custody when you are the only surviving parent.
/r/MensRights23/07/10 05:48 PM
2

"And, she said to me, 'If you do dial 9-1-1, I'm going to say you raped me and tried to kidnap me. Who do you think they're going to believe, a black man or a white woman?" So I shot her, then called 9-1-1 and told them she attacked me. Who do you think they are going to believe, me or the corpse?
/r/MensRights22/07/10 10:21 PM
56

I think you are 100% correct about the pendulum effect. I don't think anyone in /r/mensrights would argue that 100+ years ago women were at a serious disadvantage compared to men. Things like letting women vote, work and speak their mind are all very good things, however as you said we have let the pendulum swing too far. I just wanted to say THANK YOU for being so rational and objective about the subject. It's very easy to turn a blind eye to something when you are on the "winning team" but it …
/r/MensRights22/07/10 08:30 PM
15

The moment she gets pregnant the prenupt is invalid.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 06:23 PM
3

How many more just work themselves to death? I swear some poor bastard in a suit has a heart attack every other week on the commuter train I ride to work.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 04:38 PM
19

Equality would be slapping her upside the head.
/r/MensRights29/06/10 10:13 PM
4

This sucks, but if the mother has custody then she gets to make medical decisions for the child. He needs to appeal the custody arrangement to get joint custody for medical decisions.
/r/MensRights14/06/10 04:38 PM
3

No. I've been known to round down the price of a new toy now and again, but I don't keep "secrets".
/r/MensRights10/06/10 05:33 PM
12

So now having a girlfriend is cause for termination?
/r/MensRights08/06/10 04:32 PM
15

Actually I'm pretty sure his comment is relevant to the discussion we are having. The word you were looking for is anecdotal.
/r/MensRights03/06/10 04:32 PM
1

Oh man, you guys gotta see this: http://www.reddit.com/r/feminisms/comments/c8qqx/crosspost_from_mensrights_whats_so_bad_about_boys/
/r/MensRights27/05/10 09:38 PM
3

This is why I'm not teaching my kid that "never hit a women" crap. The new rule is "never hit a women first. If a women hits you first, go to town".
/r/MensRights27/05/10 05:29 PM
6

"Blowing shit out of proportion" - The problem with Jezebel.com
/r/MensRights26/05/10 05:22 PM
1

Don't be silly, the teacher is a women and the child is a man/boy. We all know that only men can sexually harass someone.
/r/MensRights25/05/10 05:32 PM
10

Playing doctor = Registered sex offender What a world we live in.
/r/MensRights24/05/10 04:39 PM
10

No worries, I wasn't offended. It does however illustrate how simply standing up for basic human rights for pedophiles is enough to get yourself branded as a pedophile by society. When they came for the pedo's I didn't speak up because I'm not a pedo...
/r/MensRights18/05/10 07:29 PM
1

Actually not a pedo. Just aren't blinded by the "someone think of the children" crowd.
/r/MensRights18/05/10 07:23 PM
15

It's cruel and unusual punishment. Therefore unconstitutional. What do I win?
/r/MensRights18/05/10 07:17 PM
29

Umm, there are no laws against being a pedophile. If you replace every instance of pedophile on that page with "Convicted child molester" then we can have a reasonable debate about it. Until then what we are talking about is thought crime.
/r/MensRights18/05/10 07:13 PM
6

I hit back. Make my day.
/r/MensRights04/05/10 05:16 PM
9

You should cross-post this to /r/guns
/r/MensRights23/04/10 06:03 PM
11

In theory you should be better off having 2 incomes, but only one cable bill, one mortgage payment, one utility bill etc.
/r/MensRights09/04/10 06:39 PM
19

How can a federally funded program blatantly discriminate against men like this?
/r/MensRights09/04/10 04:50 PM
7

I admit I have no statistics on this matter. Move along, nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights30/03/10 11:14 PM
10

Charge her with assault. :-)
/r/MensRights30/03/10 10:38 PM
-1

I still don't understand how a fund raiser for breast cancer offends you.
/r/MensRights25/03/10 02:51 PM
8

And here is the sister site which is less female centric. Calm down.
/r/MensRights24/03/10 07:47 PM
2

Men can get breast cancer. Therefor your point in invalid.
/r/MensRights24/03/10 07:45 PM
24

If you cheat on your spouse you are an asshole. I wouldn't like it if my wife slept with another man, so I don't sleep with other women. Fair is fair.
/r/MensRights18/03/10 10:44 PM
4

"Homosexual" is literally "being attracted to the same gender", so it applies to men and women. Lesbians are gay too, even if informally "gay" refers to men. Lesbians are always women, but gay is gender neutral. Maybe MRA should be against the term lesbian?
/r/MensRights18/03/10 08:01 PM
2

Speechless.
/r/MensRights18/03/10 06:30 PM
1

I spent $290 the other day, but I try to shop for 2 weeks worth of meals. I think food prices vary quite a bit depending on where you live.
/r/MensRights12/03/10 04:07 PM
5

How could I have glossed over the fact that we had been spending about $3,000 more than we were earning, month after month after month? What. The. Fuck. Child support aside, this guy is a fucking moron.
/r/MensRights11/03/10 07:46 PM
5

First thought: Every day! After more consideration: 2-3 times per week is a good sustainable level of intimacy. Currently: Not even close to either number
/r/MensRights10/03/10 10:59 PM
3

Yea Canada.
/r/MensRights10/03/10 04:52 PM
6

My intent was not to mislead, but simply to point out that "learned helplessness" isn't just some 'new age' syndrome that her lawyer invented. I personally think she should be in jail right now!
/r/MensRights05/03/10 11:31 PM
13

This is obviously a travisty of justice. However Learned helplessness is actually a well researched and understood phenomenon. In part one of Seligman and Steve Maier's experiment, three groups of dogs were placed in harnesses. Group One dogs were simply put in the harnesses for a period of time and later released. Groups Two and Three consisted of "yoked pairs." A dog in Group 2 would be intentionally subjected to pain by being given electric shocks, which the dog could end by pressing a lever.…
/r/MensRights05/03/10 06:42 PM
5

There is definitely a line that can be crossed, but there is no way to tell from the simply summary given in the article if it has been crossed. I don't really want to live in a world where casual flirting by either sex is considered sexual harassment. It's only when that flirting continues after it has been made clear that it is unwanted that I take issue with it.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 08:12 PM
22

Looking at you != sexual harassment That's not to say that men can't be sexually harassed, but I would define that as unwanted sexual advances. You need to make it clear that this attention is unwanted before you can put a label on it. How hard is it to say "Thanks, but no thanks. I don't shit where I eat"? If it continues after that then go to HR.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 05:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter