TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DeNeRlX Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by DeNeRlX on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

To inject some positivity, some of the spaces that are strictly lefting spaces as opposed to simply liberal pop-feminist types are the most open to talking about mens issues. Not just repeated clichés, but new ways of framing systemic issues through intersectional lenses with men as victims. Not to say all spaces work like that, but many of the ones that aren't dedicated to mens issues by definition (this sub), but incidentally, are lefting spaces. For example r196. Some misandry from some peopl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/26 08:44 AM
2

I agree regarding oligarchy but there are still remaining patriarchal norms that has lingering effects. Some are more anti-women, some are more anti-man. I absolutely think we shouldn't use the word patriarchy though, as that's an all-or-nothing word that implies way too much. And we can't really say we defeat it until everyhing connected to it is gone, which is unreaslitic. However calling specific norms into question can let us define things no longer part as a dead norm. And thus make it both…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 01:43 AM
5

Ohh and quickly about patriarchy, an important distinction: men are not in power, the people in power are (mostly) men. Men are discriminated against under patriarchal norms, and women are also discriminated against under patriarchal norms (my preferred wording btw, binary definition is harmful to discussions).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 01:24 AM
23

I'll simply answer on the points of sexual harassment/assault from the perspective of an intersectional progressive; Not a single woman who is a victim needs to have their victim status dismissed by equally including men in that discussion as possible victims, and using gender-neutral language both for victims and perpetrators. The single biggest shift in self-reported rape/SA statistics is between when men are asked if they identify as a victim of those things and when acts that constitute rape…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 01:19 AM
2

Yeah that's why I do really think intentions matter when using 'women and children', though what I said was generally more about how that is used more as an emotional appeal to heighten the seriousness. I don't think I've seen many use that as a way to subtly decrease the number. It's usually a way to paint a part of the population as undeniably innocent (and in the process accepting men as potentially non-innocent). I think that emotional connection we have to the innocence of women and childre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/25 05:44 PM
2

Nah you completely misunderstand. First off, 'women and children' rhetoric isn't a driver of culture as much as it's just one aspect of it. One I think should be critically thought about more, but it's not something that would shift culture of male disposability, nor do I think that the language change would happen outside of cultural change. I don't at all agree with the conservative view from any angle, their desired social structure hurts everyone, but in different ways. Gynocentrism has neve…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/25 03:05 PM
3

How justified that language is to me depends on a few things. There is no way around that there is misandrist bias involved at some level. If that language is used by people who don't see the issue at all, they are the problem. But if it's a bigger issue than just gender politics, using that sort of language to softly manipulate those people to a better position is fine imo. Usually it's liberals who dont do introspection and just regurgitate pop-feminist talking points, but sometimes it can als…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/25 10:04 AM
22

The right wing will only ever abuse men's trust for votes and money. At best some small symbolic shit, but nothing that will ever weight up to the damage. Often most the supposed pro-men stuff you see from right-wing propagandists is as directly an oppositional force against feminism and generally more left-wing ideas. Pointing out hypocrisy here and there doesn't mean going the complete other way is correct.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/25 10:05 AM
30

Sometimes universal policy does disproportionately benefit certain groups, so if for a few of these others might also benefit, that's not a bad thing. Like if every homeless person were given a place to stay, but as a gender neutral effort, that would still be a pro-men policy. Dems aren't perfect but no way in hell any of these would be proposed by a republican, supporter or even let through. And if there are policies introduced that are more blatantly pro-men, it's far better to have Democrats…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/24 07:56 PM
2

They absolutely do. To take one issue they have ramped up on a lot lately, immigration. It's almost never that the "evils" are women (although conservatives doesn't like minority women either). When they say immigrants are rapists and criminals, they very much tie that to men doing those things. They don't juxtapose men vs women, but they for sure do use fears against the man+darkskin intersection to stoke up violence against men. I remember many years ago something that stuck with me: far right…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/24 01:37 PM
35

"Hold on a second" calls friend "Ya, what's up Marcus" "Hey Martha, you're on speaker. I'm talking to Sally currently and she said, and I quote "women who don't spend lots of time fighting for women's rights is a disgrace to womanity". Can you, as a woman, make a judgement on if that would fit the definition of internalized misogyny?" Also, this means that women can't judge what is misandrist or not, or if it needs to be addressed or skipped over.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/23 10:30 AM
0

The cost of a high degree of freedom of speech is that in cases like this the victim might not see the ideal outcome. IMO it's probably better than it being very easy to successfully sue someone. For MeToo the initial goal was not to jail every possible offender, it is for the public to be aware of abusive people. Harvey Weinstein being the biggest with the most witnesses made it easy enough to put him to prison, but far from all abusers have or will see a proper punishment due to burden of proo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/22 03:36 PM
1

Vaush every now and then does pro-men segments that are purely supportive, and pushes back against his chat when they spew some harmful neolib talking points. His approach to issues based on intersectionality is quite good and while I think he could talk about it more he doesn't at all base his politics on things that make it worse for men
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/21 11:26 AM
3

While other comments here have correctly pointed out the flaws in this article, I searched up Dan Robitzki, the credited writer, along with some revealing keywords. Along with socialism I found an article in Socialist Heath Association...regarding work for nurses early on during covid...so not related at all. But with capitalism I found an article where he deepthroats a boot to get a good lick in. Article doesn't say anything against it, just parrots the idea that capitalism will be what helps p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/21 10:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter