TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DeOogster Archive

View 2 posts and 23 comments by DeOogster on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
89

articleDeOogster/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 08:37 PM
36

discussionDeOogster/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/25 11:28 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

That's pretty accurate. All the statistics are explained properly. Although I should specify that 'occupancy fluctuates' means that the 40 places in the shelter are not constantly occupied. It remains unclear how many more would be needed. It is also unclear what the reason is male victims might me more reluctant to seek refuge in a shelter. The main point is a call for more research into the topic, and more awareness in society. More knowledge about the male perspective would allow institutions…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/26 09:03 AM
2

Contentious politics are best discussed using 'nonviolent communication' strategies. Talk about how things make you feel, rather than accusing or getting stuck in throwing factoids at each other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/26 10:15 AM
-33

That's the UN Women X account! They have a 'general' UN account too and that one references childer and families when posting about the earthquake. This is the equivalent of going to the bakery and being upset they don't sell tomatoes when the supermarket is around the corner. I have heard some valid complaints on this sub about what UN Women does and says... but this thread is kind of pointless and made more political than needed. No offense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 07:27 AM
4

When talking about contentious politics with people that are close to you, I read it is best to apply techniques from 'Non-violent communication'. Simply put: try to ask the other person about how they feel about something and why. And use the same to explain your own point of view. This might feel like less of a conflict than throwing facts and ideological statements at each other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/26 11:55 AM
-5

I did my own research into this a while ago. There are legitimate Men's Rights Activists groups out there. They advocate for change just like other grassroots activist groups. But there are also some very notorious figures who insist that insulting and harassing feminists is a core part of MRA. Paul Elam is that kind of example. He tried to sabotage campaigns from feminists by putting his controversial posters over theirs. It does just not work as a way to expose the public to some really tough …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 08:56 AM
16

Most interpretations of patriarchy I have seen imply some sort of hierarchy, not just men > women. In ancient Rome for example (at least in the upper class), fathers decided much about the lives of their children including who they married. Men would only get the power over themselves and others by getting into the 'tier' of being the oldest man in the household. Women had no way of getting into the highest 'tier'. In modern times the rules and traditions are less strict, but the idea that the r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 06:03 PM
7

There is some nasty rhetoric online, but a tendency to keep repeating negative thoughts yourself might be an indication of serious mental health issues. I would suggest trying to reconnect with some friends or find some sort of club to join. If you can work up the courage, say that you were feeling a bit down when they ask about why you wanted to meet up. It's actually very relatable. You don't have to mention more than that if you don't want to. Anything to get you talking to real people instea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/25 07:09 PM
1

I don't think the two concepts are related by definition, but I agree that both have to do with traditional stereotypes about gender. The idea that men have to be willing to sacrifice their own wellbeing for others is a very common one around the world. Another idea is that men are more suited for holding positions of power because of a supposed natural resilience and that women are more emotional. In practise the terms are used to point to very different things. Male disposability is used to re…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/25 02:10 PM
7

This is one of the rare instances I've seen where an author explicitly connects male disposability with patriotism and morality. I feel like it implies that 'real' men are not meant to question orders or the concept of male disposability. If you go with that assumption you're one step away from accepting that some men (or women) are important enough to not be disposable so those get to give the orders. Be strong but never wield that strength to rebel against authority, that's the vibe I get from…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/25 01:26 PM
8

I looked up stuff about this at one point since I'm already interested in biology. Compared to other primates, the differences between adult men and women are not even that big but sure, there are differences on average. I don't think anthing related to behaviour and hormones counts as sexual dimorphism, the word refers to shape, size and colour. There is of course also a lot of discussion about behaviour, the classic nature vs. nurture. One common misunderstanding is that testosterone is linked…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/25 11:33 AM
16

This is an interesting topic to discuss, an anecdote about men showing up less in a certain public space. But I don't like how the author of the first piece immediately jumps to blaming the internet and how she thinks that most men have just given up on women. That way of looking at the world makes men seem very... simpleminded. The other author then doesn't seem to really want to discuss these assumptions or the anecdote, but rather the reasons the first article was written in the first place. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/25 01:10 PM
14

The good news I have is that in the UK and Netherlands, there's more attention for specifically men: https://www.bps.org.uk/news/governments-first-ever-mens-health-strategy-welcome-says-bps from 2024 This Dutch report from 2022 highlights how boys are not doing as well as girls in high school and higher education in terms of what degrees they are getting and how long it takes them. https://www.onderwijsraad.nl/publicaties/adviezen/2020/10/07/verkenning-sekseverschillen-onderwijs Over here in the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/25 07:37 PM
8

I think the point of the AIBM article is not that malicious. You could argue it actually proves the stereotype that women mostly marry men of higher socioeconomic status, which seems like a bad thing. All the better to have actual data on it. It also points to a growing divide between people who do and don't have a degree. Focusing just on the women's perspective is really odd though, good call to call it out. The other articles under the 'research' tab seem to focus on mostly men. The other art…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/25 07:29 PM
2

"The War on Boys" by Christina Hoff Summers contains real examples of a real feminist lobby group and what policies they were pushing for education in the US. I think it's very emportant to make sure real political movements are part of the conversation. I hear a lot of people use strawman arguments in online political discourse. I also read "Of Boys and Men" by Richard Reeves. It's good to have a more recent look on at the numbers. I did not get around to reading books by Warren Farrell, but as…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/25 08:38 PM
1

A quick glance tells me a lot of work went into that blog. That's why it's for the best to keep track of resources that are good for sharing. While researching this I did get the impression the conversation about men falling behind is repeating itself every six or so years. In 2019 some reports and proposals came up in the UK and Netherlands but then COVID happened so the conversation shifted to making sure students in lockdown didn't fall behind. I hope Richard Reeves releasing his book and get…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/25 09:15 PM
1

Ah thanks, I'll save that page in case I want to keep digging further.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/25 09:06 PM
2

I didn't really have any one group in mind from the start. One of the questions I was hoping to answer is which subgroups of feminism could be considered to be 'in charge' in some way. I think that's why the research by Christina Hoff Summers is so important. She actually looked into which lobby groups were behind what policy. Before I dove into this topic I've already read a lot from investigative journalism on corporate lobbying. I think it is really important to figure out where ideas come fr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/25 09:00 PM
2

Are you referring to historical developments around child custody laws or current activist movements? Finding info on that kind of thing is very hard so if you have anything to share, please do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/25 02:10 PM
6

While we are on the topic, which organisation is the standard for referencing "mainstream feminism"? If I wanted to know EXACTLY what the public agenda for "mainstream feminism" is, which website would I go to? I've only recently been doing research on Mens Rights, and where feminism and equal rights could mean different things. I get that you can find some really strange takes (or just bad jokes) on social media by people calling themselves feminist. But if I were a historian, I'd need more tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/25 05:54 PM
1

I have been trying to research this topic, I have not been brave enough to go on TikTok. I kind of want to know what specific content creators are actually suggesting insecurities are linked to rape. That's quite a big leap from teachers talking about patriarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 05:09 PM
1

Given that Reeves does acknowledge differences between boys and girls, this is meant to be a more general statement to not call any of those differences inherently bad and to not use minor incidents to further the narrative of 'toxic masculinity'. For more info on what Reeves refers to with 'harmful aspects', best to keep reading. He does not seem eager to offer a blanket excuse for the boys on this anecdote, and I would guess he knows more about that incident. He refers to it as 'immature and e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 05:04 PM
2

I would describe it less as anti-male, more as a pro-women rhetoric that led to fighting gender inequality and setting goals on the topic. The problem being that in education, the real gender gap is about young men being at a disadvantage an average. So there is a real disconnect between the push for gender equality in politics and how men in disadvantaged communities look at inequality. I can very well see that men take that as a sign that the ruling class is blind to their struggles. And then …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/25 06:05 PM
3

If you want some numbers, you could compare how many views the youtube grifters get compared to the game trailers. I know the ones you mean, I still get them in my feed sometimes, then I check out the channel out of curiosity. If the channel only has videos about some sort of drama I assume it's one of those grifters. I think it is usually best to assume there is only a small minority who really buy into this, and the algorithms are just pushing those videos onto anyone with an interest in games…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/25 08:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter