TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Deacon Archive

View 0 posts and 148 comments by Deacon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Downvoted for persistently being an asshole.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 07:17 PM
0

Downvoted for being an asshole. I can keep this up all day.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 06:08 PM
1

I think you're missing the point, here.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 05:44 PM
3

or cry like a little bitch, if that's what you are. Oh, you were doing so well, until this. Downvoted for being an asshole.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 05:42 PM
1

You should not have apologized. Tell your parents about this, and threaten the school with a lawsuit. It's the only thing people like that understand.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 05:41 PM
3

Sorry, but bell hooks has done more harm than good, as far as I'm concerned. She's on my short list of people I absolutely despise.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:10 PM
1

No state officially calls that activity "statutory rape." Officially it's called a variety of other things, according to state law. In Texas, it's "sexual assault of a child."
/r/MensRights23/10/12 06:46 PM
1

I wish I could say I've read either The Structure of Scientific Revolutions or The Essential Tension by Kuhn. They're on my list, but I've read neither one.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:34 AM
2

Only if a person takes his belief system to the level of fanaticism. Not all Christians (Muslims, feminists, MRAs, Marxists, Freudians, etc. etc.) are fundamentalists. The flow chart is a criticism of extremism.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:08 PM
2

Staggeringly accurate.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:06 PM
0

When I got into The Scene, I found it to be very liberating. It revealed a side to me that I didn't know was there. I also found that I wasn't the only one who enjoyed such pursuits, that there were plenty of women out there who enjoyed submission as much as I enjoy Dominance. Fifty Shades of Grey is not a bad primer--although I don't care for the overheated writing style. My current sub is reading it, and her latest comment is "Not enough sex--I wish they'd stop chatting and get on with it."
/r/MensRights20/09/12 11:03 PM
1

1) I can't speak for others, but I know that my "bedroom" personality is the diametrical opposite of my usual personality. Frequently you find type-A businessmen who like being whipped (for instance), even though in their business lives they are bossy and domineering. For many, D/s is a safety valve for a side of themselves they only feel comfortable expressing to those closest to them. 2) This is actually a legitimate concern. Certainly care should be taken not to add to anything negative psych…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 10:46 PM
2

I'm a male Dom. I've had satisfying relationships with female subs. I see nothing wrong with that, since they were consentual. And just because I've had D/s relationships doesn't mean that I believe that all women are inferior to all men.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 12:25 AM
2

Amazing the amount of illiteracy and vulgarity there. I especially like-- He must of drank a whole lot of chemicals as a baby!
/r/MensRights11/09/12 10:39 PM
1

Possibly. It's the same reason I post photos of naked women on MY blog: to piss off wandering feminists.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 02:29 PM
1

I'm not calling transgendered people "freaks"--I just think it's pompous to use the construction "cis-" so I don't.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 02:24 PM
-17

Downvoted for mentioning "cis-" anything, troll. In the regular world out there, normal people don't talk that way.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 11:01 PM
14

she asked if I'd ever had a girlfriend That's not a conversation, that's an insult on the face of it. You should not answer an insult as if it's a request for information, you should ask her if she's ever had a girlfriend. . . .
/r/MensRights09/09/12 10:59 PM
1

Live Journal.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:19 PM
1

Oh, Lord, they've used the "word" HERSTORY! The last time anyone else used that was 1974!
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:39 PM
1

There is NO upvote button! That's hardly fair! (LOL)
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:35 PM
6

Gandhi?
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:31 PM
5

Reddit is a terrible place to have logical opinions which run counter to the groupthink And certain LiveJournal communities, as well.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:28 PM
2

What is SRS?
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:24 PM
21

There is no such thing as "men's rights" or "misandry" to a feminist. We "are incapable of being discriminated against because we have all the power." We are "privileged." Nothing is going to shake that opinion. You can't argue with a fanatic. I've spent the last five days (elsewhere on the Internet) trying to reason with these people. You can't reason with them. I was called a stalker, creepy, an abettor of "rape culture." I was dismissed and vilified by at least seventy people, who ganged-up o…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:23 PM
7

Thank you for this.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 10:08 PM
2

Sorry, you alienated me when you used the word "privilege." I'm sick to death of hearing it, hearing it, hearing it. Whatever meaning it once had has been lost through overuse.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 07:59 PM
4

I've misunderestimated you.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:55 PM
1

I just want to say that I originally read "I am pickier" as "I am pecker."
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:52 PM
5

Hey, hey, hey! Let's not go insane, here.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:51 PM
3

Don't take this the wrong way, madam, but I think you have wandered into the wrong subreddit.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:50 PM
3

She called you an asshole? So what? She was drunk. You did the right thing. You don't need validation from a drunk girl about that. Or us, for that matter.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:48 PM
6

I stopped reading when I got to the phrase "male privilege," since I've heard all this crap before.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:17 PM
2

I'm going to vent my frustration by downvoting your every utterance until I get bored.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 09:32 PM
3

You. I said "how you can't admit you made a mistake."
/r/MensRights24/07/12 09:24 PM
1

It's not women in general that are the problem, it's radical, militant feminism.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 09:07 PM
3

I like how you can't admit you made a mistake.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 08:24 PM
4

are too (LOL)
/r/MensRights24/07/12 06:52 PM
29

The sense of entitlement of most radical feminists beggars description.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 06:52 PM
3

Now, now. The more comments like yours that get posted, the more reasonable the radical feminists seem. If we are reasonable and polite, they look like fanatics by comparison.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 06:50 PM
4

(hug) Get out while you can. She will do it again.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:08 AM
3

I hope she finds peace of mind somewhere.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:02 AM
3

since when did the police know anybody's sexual orientation prior to fielding a rape report I'm guessing that her "orientation" was the first thing she told them. Frankly , while I'm sorry to have to say this , I couldn't help but notice that she's one ugly mutt . The only reason I say this at all is because any male willing to go to jail for decades after being convicted of drugging and raping a woman (a lesbian woman no less) is probably going to make it worth his while . I mean , if I was goi…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:00 AM
3

I'm really, sincerely sorry that "Karen!" was raped, but she is mentally unstable.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 11:55 PM
1

I think your feminist friend is arrogant, condescending, entitled, and that you are better off without her company.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 02:39 PM
5

You only need to be scared of one of those if you've actually been sexually harassin'. Not true. The possibilities for abuse of the system are endless.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 06:01 PM
2

Upvoted for mastery of sarcasm.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 10:52 PM
-4

I think you just need a new girlfriend.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 10:51 PM
1

If you were black and you called a white person a "cracker," for instance, that would be racist. Not as racist as if the white person called the black person a "nigger," but still racist.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 12:35 AM
7

Welcome, troll.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 12:33 AM
-3

Nope.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 10:04 PM
16

How can one be racist against white people? Downvoted for sheer, unmitigated idiocy.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 10:03 PM
5

I can safely say that you bitches are fucked up. Best reply ever. Followed by the inevitable-- I banned him and I am locking this.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 10:00 PM
1

I can see opportunities, but I can also see problems with that. I can see a very basic premise sidetracked and bogged down with attempts to be "politically correct." We are already "politically incorrect" no matter what we do. That doesn't mean we are Neanderthals: just the opposite. But we have a certain latitude that a "politically correct" movement doesn't have and can't have: we are "damned" no matter what we do, so in a way we don't have to be reflexively "correct." It would be a waste of t…
/r/MensRights02/06/12 01:36 AM
2

I agree with Veloqu: this is not the place for this posting. It has nothing to do with men's rights. If it's anti-racist and "anti-classist," take it to those subs, if they exist.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 04:58 PM
2

True.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 06:35 PM
2

so you can focus on what's important --Hundred-dollar bills.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 04:51 PM
8

He tells you that you are attractive/he needs you/he loves you What a bastard! Never admits he is wrong Like the average militant feminist.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 01:33 AM
2

Oh, bullshit. Go troll somewhere else: you've been exposed as an agent provocateur.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:15 PM
2

Well, I understand you wanted clarification. It was such a spur-of-the-moment comment for me that I didn't really want to invest a whole lot of time explaining myself, and then it went on for three comments. I was a little frustrated.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 03:11 PM
3

This was a great comment. And as for my earlier comment about Fox, I just threw it out on the spur of the moment.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 02:21 PM
-8

I made an offhand comment about how Fox "News" did THE EXACT SAME THING YOU REFERENCED IN YOUR COMMENT.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 01:59 PM
-6

They certainly are.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 01:55 PM
-5

no relevance and no point I just explained it. Read it again if you didn't understand what I said.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 01:47 PM
-3

That was not a reference to feminism or men's rights. That was a reference to the (lack of) credibility of Fox "News" and how they do exactly what you said above.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 01:13 PM
-8

(cough) Fox "News" (cough)
/r/MensRights21/05/12 12:53 PM
20

Like most gangs of bullies, radical feminists can simultaneously 1)play the "pity me" victim card, 2)arrogantly demand their "rights," and 3)avoid any acknowledgment for any mistakes or wrongdoing, 4)blame the victim, and 5)hypocritically denounce society for doing everything that they themselves are doing.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 12:51 PM
9

Exactly. Good point. If you accept feminists' blaming tactics, you are letting them define you. (Ironic, considering their rhetoric about being defined by others themselves.)
/r/MensRights19/05/12 04:41 PM
1

No, I was simply expressing my opinion on the subject. I do not agree, however, that the people proposing the center "should give in to any demands the opposition has." That is too broadly worded. Proponents of the Men's Center should be willing to compromise, but "any demands?" That's too broad.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 04:44 PM
5

I would be totally in favor of such a center, if only because of the blatant misandry evident in the video. I would contribute financially to its maintenance. I would be a supporter of such a center unless it advocated illegal or discriminatory activity.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:33 PM
1

Look on the bright side: the guy gets fucked every time. . . .
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:44 PM
1

It's not so big a deal when you get used to it.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 08:18 PM
1

Don't take this the wrong way, but fuck off.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:37 PM
1

Fuck off. If you reread my comment carefully, you'll observe that I didn't say I "didn't have a problem with rape jokes." Fuck off.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:24 PM
2

Don't take this the wrong way, but go fuck off yourself. No one's made a rape joke, least of all me. I haven't trivialized anything. Take your self-righteous buillshit and go troll a feminist forum.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:12 PM
1

Conservapedia.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 06:39 PM
2

I have to admit, that last comment was part bitterness, part tongue-in-cheek.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:57 PM
2

I hate rape and feminism.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:03 PM
1

Do feminists think our lives are just a montage of high fiving, binge drinking, date rape, and call of duty? No, some of us play WOW instead.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:02 PM
3

I don't care. You have come to the wrong community, apparently.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:01 PM
4

Some people believe that a woman cannot rape a man =( Those people are called "feminists."
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:00 PM
3

Why are you all so angry about this? Because it's insulting to men and a little like posting a sign that reads "PLEASE DON'T BASH THE HEAD IN OF THE NEXT PERSON YOU MEET." The message of the sign seems to presume that all men are rapists until they prove they aren't, and that we can't resist raping a woman--unless some idiot posts a stupid sign reminding us not to, of course.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 04:59 PM
1

Don't get flustered. Pick up the straw wrapper and throw it back. As casually as possible. As far as "walking away" is concerned--you were there first. Let them walk away.
/r/seduction19/04/10 12:38 PM
2

When you get confident enough to dismiss the entire "seduction community" as a bunch of poseurs, you will be there: The most useful technique that I know of is to do a ton of approaches without giving a fuck what other people think.
/r/seduction29/03/10 03:11 PM
1

what women want is an objective reality that can be understood Bullshit. You know nothing about women, nineteen-year-old. If you think it is garbage go somewhere else. No, I think I'll stay.
/r/seduction26/03/10 08:37 PM
-3

Think of the women in your life. How long do you think their legs would stay closed in front of george clooney? The women in my life? Well, there's one who really likes Steve Buscemi. (I believe her quote was "I would wreck that man!") There's another who likes James McEvoy (the little guy from Wanted--hardly a sex-god, IMHO). Another is sexually attracted to guys like Rahm Emanuel and Keith Olbermann. What was your point again? No, I wouldn't trade places with you for a million dollars. I would…
/r/seduction25/03/10 09:02 PM
-1

Unlikely. A girl who wants a relationship (rather than a skank who'll fuck anything that moves) is going to be far less harsh and demanding. You are talking about two different kinds of women.
/r/seduction25/03/10 07:59 PM
0

Glib players get laid a lot. By sluts who will sleep with strangers. Congratulations, and I hope you don't get a disease. I wouldn't trade places with you regardless of how much sex you get, because you only have sex with the kind of women who sleep with men they've just met. And you brag about it. I wouldn't be you for a million dollars.
/r/seduction19/03/10 01:37 PM
2

I think you should stop trying to learn from "the seduction community" (what a euphemism) and just do what makes you comfortable. I think your instincts are good, and she seems nice, so my advice would be to rely on your instincts more. I think with time you will develop more confidence in yourself. You need to get out of so-called "seduction theory" and talk about her with confident guys that you know and admire for their strength of character: it will rub off on you. The old canard in "seducti…
/r/seduction14/03/10 07:38 PM
0

You're a fucking idiot.
/r/seduction26/02/10 03:18 AM
0

Idiot.
/r/seduction26/02/10 03:17 AM
1

What image is that: how to fuck as many women that you've just met fifteen minutes ago as you possibly can?
/r/seduction26/02/10 03:12 AM
1

Look, boy, don't take your hostility about women and your failed relationships out on me. I wasn't there.
/r/seduction26/02/10 03:11 AM
1

You are welcome to try the subreddit /r/menwithtinydicks. Tell me how it works out.
/r/seduction26/02/10 03:10 AM
1

Look, boy, don't take your hostility about women and your failed relationships out on me. I wasn't there.
/r/seduction22/02/10 08:31 PM
-1

Yes, dear.
/r/seduction22/02/10 07:48 PM
-2

Thanks for the encouragement. If I'm a self-esteem boost for her, that's fine with me--I just don't want to be her "lapdog."
/r/seduction22/02/10 07:29 PM
4

My goodness, sweetheart. That time of the month? Allow me to get you a Mydol.
/r/seduction22/02/10 07:11 PM
0

"Orbiter." I hadn't heard that before. I might be in a similar situation, except I don't let myself get used into doing things for her. My response, when she tries, is "Why don't you get your boyfriend to do that for you?"
/r/seduction22/02/10 07:04 PM
4

I think you're in the wrong subreddit. Try /r/feminism.
/r/seduction22/02/10 07:01 PM
-5

Not everyone subscribes to your philosophy. I am more than just a bag of chemicals. I can cut-and-paste this all day.
/r/seduction17/02/10 04:59 PM
-5

Not everyone subscribes to your philosophy. I am more than just a bag of chemicals.
/r/seduction15/02/10 07:18 PM
11

Horseshit. Don't create pseudo-science to support your fucked-up view that there's no such thing as love or romance. You don't come across as a stud or a player, just cynical.
/r/seduction14/02/10 08:04 PM
1

Your definition of "high-value" may differ from mine. If your definition of "high-value" is "she'll be great in my bed in an hour from now, and she'll be useful to impress my friends with," then it definitely does. I stand behind my original statement.
/r/seduction08/02/10 05:33 PM
1

Once you know women, you'll stop looking like a hopeless dick on Reddit. Stop cluttering up my in-box before I start downvoting you en masse. I was going to let you off with a chiding, but--
/r/seduction07/02/10 08:15 PM
1

yes, she is that type of girl LOL. Unlikely. Once you know women, you'll know what I mean. Once you know women, you'll stop looking like a hopeless dick on Reddit. Stop cluttering up my in-box before I start downvoting you en masse.
/r/seduction07/02/10 01:09 AM
1

Fuck your Ladder Theory. I thought you might have something worthwhile to contribute to this conversation, but you are merely a shallow douchebag. Downvoted for smug arrogance. I should drop this subreddit: every time I get submerged in the world view of you scumbags, it leaves me feeling like I ought to go take a bath. And yes, she is that type of girl. LOL. You're a pretty astute judge of character from hundreds of miles away. I don't need advice from some errant dipshit who measures his self-…
/r/seduction06/02/10 02:27 AM
3

What if you meet someone for whom your feelings increasingly become more complex? I know a woman that I feel four things for simultaneously: 1) I'm part unofficial older brother, 2) I'm part platonic friend, 3) I'm nursing a potential romantic attraction, and 4) I'd like to fuck her silly. How do I parse feelings like that? (Not only that, but I believe a good deal of it is reciprocated, making it even more complicated. Not only that, she's got a boyfriend. Imagine that tangle of thorns.)
/r/seduction05/02/10 05:19 PM
1

I'm getting bored with the whole routine, frankly. It's beginning to seem like a "Texas sharpshooter contest": wherever the bullet hits the wall, you draw a bullseye around it, then you pretend you meant to do that. Quantity over quality makes it seem as though all women are interchangeable, and that one is just as good as another. I'm getting disillusioned with that. I'd rather have one woman I can trust than ten I can't. And I have no use for women I can't talk to. I'm thinking of a great week…
/r/seduction05/02/10 05:10 PM
2

Pick-up-artists only end up with the kind of women who like pick-up-artists. Think about that. Having said that: there's reason that too nice is a bad quality. You're being too nice. You assume that since "nice" is a positive quality, it cannot be taken too far. But that's a mistake. It's possible to be too nice--and thereby give a negative impression. You must know when to stop being nice. Too much of anything, even "nice," is a turn-off. I know this from personal observation. I was recently di…
/r/seduction05/02/10 03:35 AM
5

It's not really a "seduction" book in the sense the word is used in the "community." All of Greene's books are collections of insights into human psychology, using historical and literary examples. You aren't going to learn "how to get laid in thirty days" from The Art of Seduction.
/r/seduction31/01/10 07:29 PM
2

Good pseudonym.
/r/seduction19/01/10 05:00 AM
2

OT: "tenebrism" = "the theory of darkness"?
/r/seduction17/01/10 01:08 AM
4

I think that's the wrong time to be glib. When she's mortified with embarrassment, smile (don't laugh), and tell her (in so many words) that you do things like that all the time. Adding that nobody was paying attention anyway makes her relieved, and counts as a neg. You can't chat-up a girl who's that drunk anyway. Wrong timing.
/r/seduction15/01/10 11:03 PM
1

One of the hallmarks of an Alpha is to be emotionally self-sufficient enough so that you don't need any woman, regardless of how "hot" she is. This is strength of character, and that's appealing. It's just unfortunate that the Alpha traits are wired very close to the Asshole traits in the brain. You need the hands of a surgeon (or an electrician) not to cross the wrong wire.
/r/seduction10/12/09 09:22 PM
3

Most Alphas have a hard time telling Alpha from Asshole. There is a difference. Being Alpha-but-not-Asshole amounts, in practice, to being the good parent she never had, and it's a lot of work, and most guys (especially Alphas) don't want to work that hard. It's too much like emotional commitment.
/r/seduction10/12/09 09:04 PM
2

One caveat: these don't apply if the woman is beautiful but doesn't believe she is. Low self-image is your friend.
/r/seduction10/12/09 09:01 PM
1

Do you really want to display behavior indicating talking to strangers is a good thing in front of your 7 year old? Daddy is her example. If he's talking to random people, she'll be inclined to do the same; which, at a young age, is probably not a good idea. Something's really wrong with this idea. Would it be equally wrong to, say, drive your seven-year-old around in a car, lest she try to start the car herself and drive it? Or cook on a stove? Some things you model, some things are for grownup…
/r/seduction08/12/09 04:20 AM
0

The more I read of this type of shit, the more the authors all sound like genuine creeps. Women who go off for one-night stands with guys like this are tramps that I wouldn't touch with a ten-foot pole, lest I contract hepatitis-C or HIV.
/r/seduction04/12/09 10:02 PM
4

I disagree. You can interact with women anywhere, every contact improves your social skills, and not every conversation at Target needs to end up in the fitting room. Just keep the heavy-handed stuff for the club--Target requires a lighter touch.
/r/seduction16/11/09 01:38 AM
2

I can empathise, really. Last Wednesday, a good (female) friend of mine got manhandled at a bar by another (supposed) male friend. Then after trying to kiss her in the parking lot, he TOLD her he was coming over to her apartment, drove there, and then pounded on her apartment door as she cowered in terror with all the lights off. I know this because I was in the bar where she bartends the very next evening, Thursday. She told me, but after four drinks I totally forgot and asked her if she would …
/r/seduction18/10/09 07:57 PM
3

"Her type"? What, exactly is that? Women with big chips on their shoulders? Admittedly other people put that chip there, but it is still a chip. demonstrate through words and actions that the men who traumatize and humiliate women are not doing it with your acceptance Oh, if you insist: "men who traumatize and humiliate women are not doing it with my acceptance."
/r/seduction16/10/09 02:18 AM
9

I'm sorry, I can't have sympathy for her. It's still treating all men as if they were stalkers. That's not fair. I'm sorry that she had bad experiences, but I am not responsible for them. I have a good (female) friend who works in a bar. She's been a waitress or bartender for four years, and she encounters douchebags on a daily basis, but it hasn't turned her into a sexless, man-fearing feminist.
/r/seduction14/10/09 08:42 PM
1

That's funny--he sounded pretty cool to me. Not too many television personalities would be so good-natured about someone farting in their faces.
/r/seduction16/09/09 01:17 AM
1

Try "ASSMAN."
/r/seduction03/09/09 08:01 PM
2

There's got to be a better acronym than "IANAL." Just try putting that on a license plate.
/r/seduction03/09/09 07:55 PM
4

I would leave one more message. Sound sincere (if you are). If she does not return your call, I'd suspect she was not originally serious. I may be wrong about this. Nothing's absolute. Anything can happen. But if you get no return contact, I'd seriously suspect cold-feet on her part.
/r/seduction03/09/09 03:48 AM
2

Call her one more time and sincerely convey that you'd like to take her to get coffee (low-risk date). If she does not reply, I'd say that any further contact would be fruitless.
/r/seduction03/09/09 01:36 AM
1

"IANAL"?
/r/seduction02/09/09 09:10 PM
5

Take her to a neighboring state with more liberal sex laws.
/r/seduction20/08/09 12:46 PM
0

Not really on the point, but upvoted nevertheless.
/r/seduction25/07/09 10:45 PM
7

I don't want to be around either of them.
/r/seduction16/07/09 03:01 AM
1

I've seen The Game in the bookstore and read a few pages of it. I agree that a man needs a better hobby than that. I think the real motivation behind these people is not so much having a lot of sex as being known as having a lot of sex. They want everyone to know how "successful" they are with women. It feeds their egos. They have a certain attitude toward "women," and they want all men to share their attitude. It's their "crusade," their core belief about life and people. They have to make as m…
/r/seduction15/07/09 03:27 PM
3

Wisdom I learned from a wiser man: "Dating is for a girl you're already sleeping with. Never before." Vince Vaughn? XD
/r/seduction13/07/09 02:23 PM
2

Yeah, well, with my looks, they are pretty much going to have to be in love with me first, anyway. . . . XD
/r/seduction13/07/09 03:25 AM
-1

Heineken Not the best beer, but in a country full of Budweiser, Michelob, Coors, and Miller, it's probably the best beer in 90% of bars.
/r/seduction12/07/09 06:35 PM
1

What you're saying is that it's a vicious cycle: being alone lowers mood, which makes you less desirable as a partner, which leads to being alone . . . which just makes it worse, and on and on. "A bank will only give you a loan if you don't need one," and so on.
/r/seduction12/07/09 04:17 PM
1

leisure suit I think your stereotype is a little dated. You must mean "douchebag with fake tan, popped collar, and holding a Heineken."
/r/seduction12/07/09 04:02 PM
1

I don't think I agree with the whole Ladder Theory concept, quite frankly.
/r/seduction12/07/09 04:00 PM
1

True. I guess if the advice were packaged that way, instead of "get laid in thirty days with my system," I'd be less jaded.
/r/seduction12/07/09 03:59 PM
1

Er . . . no.
/r/seduction12/07/09 03:55 PM
1

Does there have to be another person involved? XD
/r/seduction11/07/09 11:16 PM
1

I have no problem with "being like that," I just think it ought to serve a greater purpose than mindlessly balling some woman you just met an hour ago in a bar. Call me sentimental, or maybe I'm just old-fashioned.
/r/seduction11/07/09 11:05 PM
1

You'll change your mind after five years of being alone. Sadly, no. Although if the guy had just said "be your best self," I'd have no problem with that. Or "living up to your own standards," or "not being pushed around or acting subservient to anyone (especially women)." Call me sentimental, but I have no use for balling strange women I just met an hour ago in bars. Actually, that's part of "living up to your own standards for yourself."
/r/seduction11/07/09 11:02 PM
9

The more I read of sites written by guys like this, the less I want to be like them. If that means being "alone," then so be it--it's preferable to being like them. I'm only glad most of the men in the world aren't like this, and most of the women in the world aren't attracted to men like this. Who wants to be around someone this one-dimensional? (Only women who are equally one-dimensional.)
/r/seduction11/07/09 05:47 PM
1

I'm not even sure they do get laid like rockstars. I think they just want everyone to think they do. I think that kind of ego trip is more of a gratification than the sex would be. Also, I don't think most of them respect women in general.
/r/seduction09/07/09 09:22 PM
1

I realize that there's a little merit in these sites, but even the ones that give me insight into female psychology leave me feeling I ought to go take a shower. Sex is great. We all agree it feels good. But can't these self-absorbed assholes find another hobby?
/r/seduction27/05/09 07:18 PM
1

This guy is FOS.
/r/seduction14/05/09 11:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter