TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DeadBodhisattva Archive

View 0 posts and 50 comments by DeadBodhisattva on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

It's not illegal to drink and smoke while pregnant It should be. You're correct that it doesn't make FAS a definate thing. My scumbag ex drank and smoke all through pregnancy and nothing I did could get her to stop. Even though drinking caused her to have epileptic fits she still didn't stop, because she never remembered the fits just woke up in hospital. Luckily my daughter turned out fine, though low birth weight. And I got full custody of her. There is zilch the state can do before that baby …
/r/MensRights12/08/19 12:09 AM
1

It was an example of someone who understood that if you think the social contract of the society in which you live is too harsh then you can leave. Part of the NK social contract is that you can't leave. Luckily whatever society you live in doesn't have that rule so you can just leave without getting shot. You don't have that excuse. My example is of someone under a much harsher social contract than you setting an example for you.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 01:14 AM
1

Yes it does. Say your living in my house. Then you have to obey my rules. If you don't want to then you can always leave. And if you don't have a different house to go to its not my problem.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 12:53 AM
1

Do you live in NK? No? Then you won't get shot for leaving whatever society you currently live in. You can always leave
/r/MensRights08/08/19 12:51 AM
1

Go live in international waters. Not really my problem. I don't have to let u live in my house just because u don't have a house.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 03:09 PM
0

Leave that society duh. What do North Koreans do when they decide they no longer consent to their social contract with Kim? They leave across the border. They leave that society.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 03:07 PM
1

why should we make them do it? Whose making them do it? it wouldn't be rational to put people in a position where they can't keep up. If a man is not fit enough to do the job does he get forced to do it? Simply have standards and anyone who passes said standards, regardless of gender, does the job That said ten year old boys have proven to be excellent warfighters. If they can do it I'm sure a few women can manage. If women can't keep up to make the special forces then send them out as cannon fo…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:38 AM
0

Wow I really struck a nerve
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:51 PM
1

So we can't expect them to do all the same jobs either Bs Women don't get to have options and be treated like delicate flowers. It's either or gals. Either sit at home in safety but less rites or else have rites but participate fully no frills
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:47 PM
2

I'll be happy if they either get drafted too or alternatively give up suffrage
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:44 PM
-1

Being born into it doesn't. Remaining in that society is your choice that signifies consent
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:43 PM
4

You consented when you turned 18 and did not immediately choose to leave the society in which you live. By remaining you consented. It's terms and conditions of use. Such as for this website. Or a public playground. When you use this site you are taken to have consented to the terms and conditions of this site and your continued use is taken as acceptance of those terms and conditions. If you don't believe me check it out sometime in the small print. Your continued use of society and its service…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:41 PM
1

A subset of male shooters are caused by the confluence of feminism and tradcucks both of whom view males as disposable. However some shooters are just terrorists. ISIS don't blow themselves up because of male disposability and divorce rates. El paso shooter was just another terrorist. He posted his manifesto so we don't have to wonder what that was about. Las Vegas shooter falls into one of those mysterious causes we know nothing about. Maybe these guys just like to kill. Maybe he just wanted to…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:27 PM
0

you make assumptions I have made no assumptions. Learn how probability works. grow a pair Every time u try to use tradcon shaming language I grin. It means I struck a nerve. You're a panty sniffing tradcuck who grovels for female oriface. The feminists hate you, women laugh at you, and the modern men's rights movement is busy discarding you. Enjoy your irrelevence
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:07 PM
0

Woman protects baby not equal to male protects random adult stranger based on what's between her legs and her perceived level of attractiveness. If these men did not select who to protect based on gender then their recipients would show a random distribution of genders after excluding children related parties and couples. They do not. They are all women. Proving they are panty sniffing cucks. Ironically feminists would hate these men too. Because their actions put women in the same class as babi…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 10:51 PM
0

Why are you implying a man's worth is based on his access to female orifaces? You sure you're in the right sub mate?
/r/MensRights06/08/19 10:15 PM
1

incel I find it funny that certain men in a men's rights sub are attempting to shame me based on whether or not I have access to female orifaces. It's funny that's also the go to of the feminists when encountering opposing viewpoints. They immediately call them losers who can't get laid. Losers because they can't get laid. You sure you're in the right sub?
/r/MensRights06/08/19 05:08 PM
1

How would you ever be able to prove or know that they selected who to save based on gender Easy. Because if they were not selecting based on gender then there should be roughly 50 percent of each gender in the saved category. We don't see this. Instead we see that almost all of the saved are female. The odds against this occurring by chance is miniscule. Therefore these men select based on gender. Therefore they are panty sniffers. they should be praised Why should sexism be praised? There is a …
/r/MensRights05/08/19 10:13 PM
1

men voluntarily shielding people from killers SHOULD be praised Not if they select who to save based on gender. Then they are just panty sniffers brainwashed by society into believing men are worth less than women
/r/MensRights05/08/19 08:28 PM
0

data That these men overwhelmingly protect women and not men and women equally and that women do not act to protect anyone but themselves
/r/MensRights05/08/19 04:38 PM
0

it is male nature to protect women No its not. Its brainwashing by society. This has never been a fair deal for men. They were always dying for women. We never lived under a patriarchy but rather a matriachy by proxy. The deal is even less fair now yet you still see men supporting this deal claiming its their nature.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 04:36 PM
0

I specified that it was the men risking their lives for people based on their gender that were cucks. That's said tell me what the soldiers who invaded Iraq protected Americans from?
/r/MensRights05/08/19 04:34 PM
4

are doing it for the opportunity of breeding So panty sniffers. Thank you Some societal conditioning Fancy word for brainwashing
/r/MensRights05/08/19 09:40 AM
1

incel I am not celibate voluntarily or otherwise. You are just trying to find a way to ignore what the data says
/r/MensRights05/08/19 09:39 AM
2

If that person chose to protect a woman because she was a woman then yes he's a cuck. Evidence is that most of the time women get protected. If these men were not panty sniffing cucks then only 50 percent of those they protect would be women and the other half would be men. Include only adults in the data and exclude related parties and the pattern is extremely stark. These men universally choose to protect based on gender.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 09:37 AM
-9

my observations. Youd be wrong but anyway that's a red herring. Exclude children. What pattern do you see then. This is just another version of women and children first. Children first is justified. If women first is also justified then you must by extension imply women are legally and morally children
/r/MensRights05/08/19 09:34 AM
8

Were I in a situation where I could save even one other life--whether the bearer of that life be a woman or a man--I would give mine up in a heartbeat to do so However this is not what we see irl in these scenarios. Irl men throw away their lives protecting almost exclusively women. It's not protecting others that I'm calling out. It's the protection of others based on their gender. If you can't see this is just another version of women and children first I don't know what to tell you.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 09:32 AM
-20

save a fellow person You said women originally. Freudian slip there bud. Very few of these panty sniffers risk their lives to save fellow men. Almost all of them risk their lives to protect women
/r/MensRights05/08/19 03:17 AM
0

Not much of a reach. If they had to choose between a female getting her carryon and a male, which would they choose?
/r/MensRights05/08/19 03:15 AM
12

He excluded it
/r/MensRights05/08/19 03:08 AM
-167

there's several male heroes Cucks. In the old day there used to be stories of faithful slaves who died protecting their masters. These guys are called hero's by society in a bid to get them to do what you just said. Throw away their lives protecting women. You'd have to be retarded to do that. Or brainwashed. These guys, they are brainwashed. Acting the hero carries risk of death and injury. But if they survive the act then they imagine they might get more access to female orifaces. Not these da…
/r/MensRights05/08/19 03:07 AM
28

we wouldn't be discussing this right now because women wouldn't have been granted the right to have these discussions
/r/MensRights05/08/19 03:03 AM
4

They might have asked him because he was a male and so they were privleging women over him.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 02:59 AM
2

that was an aspect of balance It was never balance. It was a proxy matriarchal tyranny where most men died before getting to breed. How the Nazis did it. With majority support of most germans and a hell of a lot of international support also.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 02:59 PM
2

Feminists did not create the vast majority of female unearned privileges. They did not create a male only draft. Or alimony. Or women and children first. Females getting lesser sentences for crime. Women allowed to rape children and get away with it. And so on and so on. Women, as a group, are to blame for most unearned female privilege. Tell me. If most males don't support feminism and supposedly most females don't support feminism then how on earth is it feminists have such political and socia…
/r/MensRights28/07/19 10:10 PM
-2

blaming women for taking some advantage of laws that men continue to enact under feminist pressure and lack of balls, It absolutely is women's fault as a whole however. It may not be the fault of specific individual women but they are to blame as a group. Women hold all power in sex and they use this power to gain unearned privileges using male proxies to enact laws.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 08:19 PM
3

Your comment is what is called concern trolling. Not to mention the unfounded implications and accusations contained in your comment. You probably had a history of accusing MGTOW of such stuff and or concern trolling.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 08:16 PM
1

Put things in boobs and vagina instead
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:42 AM
1

He is clearly being hyperbolic. However in the USA you can indeed own a machine gun with very little effort in many states.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:40 AM
1

Water boarding is water torture used during torture of people. At that force feeding thing is from a movie
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:29 AM
3

He was chemically castrated for the crime of not want g to worship female holes.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 11:41 PM
84

Few nites ago my gf put a cigarette out on my face and then slashed my face with her hand. Then when I did a move I usually use on drunk people (I'm a bouncer) and put her on the ground to stop her abusing me her daughter came over and started hitting me in the head. Afterwards she accused me of abusing her daughter because her daughter hurt her hands hitting me. Then she spent hours hurling insults at me. Accusations of incest with every family member I have. And more. Too much to recount. Then…
/r/MensRights16/07/19 11:32 PM
1

Remember when Alan Turing was chemically castrated for being a homosexual. Homosexuality is the terrible crime of not wanting to fuck women. BTW chemical castration is easily defeated. Just take exogenous sources of testosterone. Steroids. They are very cheap and easy to obtain. I know cause I use them
/r/MensRights16/07/19 10:28 AM
1

I just googled what you said. You are wrong. Chemical castration works on women. When used on females, the effects are similar https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_castration
/r/MensRights16/07/19 10:22 AM
1

they don't fight for men to get equal pay at tennis, which wouldn't be fair if they did because the men bring in less money so they should get paid less Stop being intellectually dishonest. Women complain when they get paid less despite bringing in more but don't complain when women get paid more despite bringing in less.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 02:45 AM
1

not as traditionally attractive This is why they need chromosome checking these days
/r/MensRights12/07/19 02:41 AM
2

Female incels experience life the way almost all men do. They don't experience life the way male incels do
/r/MensRights12/07/19 02:34 AM
2

Bouncer here for nightclub. Women put their hands all over me. I don't mind if they are the usual clientele of younger attractive women but I dislike it when older women do so. It doesn't help that the younger women do so briefly and never crotch grab, more flirting than sexual assault while the older women grab in a possessive manner and touch far more intimate areas do so repeatedly and even follow me around to do so and finally do so for much longer even when it's obvious I'm disinterested. O…
/r/MensRights12/07/19 01:50 AM
1

testosterone makes you too aggressive. I disagree. I am a steroid user. I use high dose testosterone mainly. It has never made me more aggressive. It has however made me more willing to stand up for myself and not backdown wen faced with violence from others. Much more assertive.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 03:58 PM
1

what the hell is so wrong with Psychology because it's all quackery. It's not a real science.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 02:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter