TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dead__Hand Archive

View 0 posts and 58 comments by Dead__Hand on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Dude, don't though. If you need someone to talk to, I'm happy to chat, or to connect you with other resources.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/18 11:02 PM
4

This is a thorny issue, but there's a lot of truth to the idea that value is societally determined. We accord respect to people we deem valuable. Better genes, more respect, all things being equal.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/18 11:32 PM
1

Actually, general intelligence has steadily been increasing over at least the past 100-120 years so. While people of average and below-average intelligence do outbreed those of above-average intelligence, intelligence is not purely hereditary - education, nutrition, and environment are also factors. People are not getting dumber. I never said that traditionally arousing masculine features such as facial symmetry, musculature, or height should not be preserved. I speculated that other traits (suc…
/r/TheRedPill27/12/17 02:59 PM
1

Admittedly, evolved instincts do not shift immediately. So, while today musculature and height, for example, are no longer as necessary to survival as they once were, and although we once (probably) selected for these traits on this basis, women still are still instinctually aroused by these qualities. That said, height and musculature remain reliable predictors of male reproductive success - even if these traits are no longer being selected for the same reason (survival). It becomes a self-fulf…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/17 04:42 PM
4

Nothing that /u/richpianoooo said implies that he thinks "everyone" is better than him. Nor does he express an inferiority complex. What he said was that this would only "work" if the man's smv is high enough. Which, is true in one sense: if a man is below a certain smv, a woman will "yield" to this sort of behaviour; she will just continue to shit test until she gets what she wants (e.g. attention, resources), or she will ghost. Where /u/richpianoooo is mistaken, though, is that the negative ou…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/17 03:11 AM
1

Except that what is and is not "alpha" is contextual.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/17 09:31 PM
1

Except that what is and is not "alpha" is contextual.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/17 09:31 PM
1

Someday I'll turn it into a full post. Maybe this holiday season, since I have some time off.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/17 09:30 PM
4

Actually the female reproductive strategy (hypergamy) leads to an increase in the genetic quality of successive generations. By only mating with the top portion of the male hierarchies and cuckolding the rest, we end up with successive generations of alpha genes propagating. I often play with the idea that the feminist move in recent decades towards legislated and unrestrained hypergamy is a subconscious response to a watering down of the gene pool in western society as a result of scientific ad…
/r/TheRedPill24/12/17 01:20 PM
1

This is very obviously a troll account. User is probably like 17 and definitely needs to start doing more with his life if he has the time and energy to trololol.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/17 03:42 PM
2

What?
/r/MGTOW09/12/17 01:56 PM
26

Dude wtf with the Hulk size font. Calm down.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/17 03:15 AM
2

Pretty sure you can trust an Endorsed Contributor to know what's been posted on TRP.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/17 07:40 PM
4

Pretty sure you can trust an Endorsed Contributor to know what's been posted on TRP.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/17 07:39 PM
7

"Learning it is a form of cheating to them." This is brilliant, I never realized it but it's so obvious!
/r/TheRedPill17/11/17 01:42 PM
6

This is the correct way to think about the concept of AWALT. AWALT refers only to women's biological evolved nature. But socialization can alter how one's biology plays out, in the same that environmental factors (at least in part) determine how genes are expressed.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/17 01:22 PM
2

TRP and LTR's are not incompatible. Read the sidebar material again - with particular attention to Rollo Tomassi's Rational Male blog.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/17 10:57 PM
4

Do you still fuck each other? Or have you become purely a pragmatic partnership.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/17 01:24 AM
1

A huge percentage of women are on antidepressants. I never made the connection between the cause of that depression and intersexual dynamics. I mean, I figured it was because of the stress of having to work full time and enter careers (and women biologically have higher stress levels; they are higher in trait neuroticism). I never made the straight connection, though, about how men help to regulate women's emotions. Interesting idea, seems eminently plausible. Thanks!
/r/TheRedPill03/11/17 03:18 PM
2

God damn, I never thought about it like that.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/17 03:13 PM
1

Yeah that was pretty obvious. Sleep deprived, not in top form today.
/r/askTRP01/11/17 09:14 PM
5

All of the women who blamed themselves were right. Although men have the burden of keeping themselves physically healthy enough to maintain erections. Right?
/r/askTRP01/11/17 02:36 PM
11

God damn it how did I never realize this. A new layer of conditioning has been revealed.
/r/askTRP01/11/17 02:13 PM
8

Mods - bancannon required over here!
/r/TheRedPill31/10/17 04:34 PM
2

Absolutely - hamster at full speed.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/17 08:15 AM
5

I'd just like to say that I like getting the female perspective on TRP. Of course, there are many more women who come here to deride TRP, but there are that rare few that acknowledge TRP truths - hence why there is now a RPW sub (as an adaptation, or really a reversion to traditionalism). Dudes here, myself included, will always eye with suspicion a female poster/commenter. But in this case you are the one actually towing TRP line - it's well accepted here that no matter what men cannot ultimate…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/17 03:30 PM
1

Ok - I will stop. Is this the sort of thing that would have been better placed in Ask_TRP? I'm not interested in breaking the sub rules, but sometimes I want to get clarification on something and I'm not sure whether it is ok to ask in the comments to a TRP post.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/17 02:17 PM
1

You fuck off - I'm just here trying to learn, and you're just putting me down. Fuck you.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/17 01:12 AM
2

My question was legitimate. I was not here defending that men get married. I was asking specifically how to simultaneously accept both (1) there are some highly authoritative TRP contributors who are happily married and (2) the rule that it's never safe to get married. I thought I knew the answer but I decided to ask an Endorsed Contributor to confirm. My answer is: (a) it's a general rule that very, very few men are Red Pulled enough to successfully navigate the nuance (i.e. like NAWALT), and (…
/r/TheRedPill26/09/17 06:08 PM
2

It's more complicated than that - it's a performative contradiction. They say one thing with their mouth, and one thing with their actions.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/17 05:50 PM
0

Sure, I absolutely agree, re: "Marriage is still a terrible fucking idea for a man." In fact, even /u/RolloTomassi says that men shouldn't get married, despite being happily married himself. If what you were stating was a praxeological general rule of application (e.g. AWALT), with no admission of exception or nuance until the student has become a master, then I agree. If what you were stating was an ideological rule of absolute application, with no exceptions even for the most red-pilled alphas…
/r/TheRedPill26/09/17 05:48 PM
0

I didnt make that up - I'm responding to the commenter above who stated that it's false, and I'm asking how to simultaneously accept that with the knowledge that one of the core RP contributors is married.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/17 05:41 PM
0

Question - how does one reconcile the rejection of the proposition "if you're alpha enough, it's safe to get married" with the recognition of Rollo Tomassi - a married man - as a red pill prophet?
/r/TheRedPill26/09/17 03:13 PM
1

K - maybe you're right, and I welcome an honest critique here, but I am temporarily one of those guys who says he is too busy to lift. Here's my sitch - have at it. I am en route to becoming a corporate lawyer at a top tier law firm. To become a lawyer in my country, you must complete several steps: finish law school, pass the BAR exams, and complete a ten month apprenticeship. At a big corporate firm, apprenticeships are very intense - particularly for those who are gunning to get hired by the …
/r/TheRedPill24/09/17 02:04 PM
1

Right, I understand what you are saying. However, your refusal to redefine love into RP terms is a personal one at odds with sidebar orthodoxy. You do you, I was just putting that out there.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/17 01:40 AM
1

I was simply responding to your assertion that you can either love women, or understand them. That is not what the sidebar material says. We have saying around here - a Red Pill truism: men love women, women love children, children love puppies.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/17 01:02 AM
1

My rebuttal is: (1) You do adjust your conception of love; and (2) I am not "purple pill" for asserting the fucking sidebar material.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/17 02:37 PM
1

Read the fucking sidebar man.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/17 01:17 PM
2

Sounds like someone is still in the anger phase. The sidebar material establishes clearly that women can be loved by a RP-aware man, provided he adjusts his understanding of what loving is. Rollo Tomassi has some great posts on this - particularly "Men in Love" and "Women in Love".
/r/TheRedPill20/09/17 06:18 PM
1

Fascinating point re: fetishization. I wonder if there have been any studies done investigating whether particular fetishes (e.g. cuckolding, domination and especially financial domination, humiliation, etc) are increasing in men. If they are, I wonder if this could be explained as a form of rationalization on the part of men subject to the BB end of AF/BB.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/17 01:11 PM
0

I have seen mixed opinions on funding the first date. And, I myself haven't settled on one method. Sometimes I pay, sometimes I split, and sometimes I have her pay. I wouldn't say splitting on the first date is BP, though. There are factors to consider, e.g. how much was the first date, what did you guys do (was there more than one paid activity), how well did it go, has she been qualifying herself to you and inserting herself into your frame leading up to pay time, etc. It's contextual. But, as…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/17 12:15 PM
9

Dread game seems to work regardless of actual SMV, and can be useful as a man is upping his SMV.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 11:10 PM
3

I agree with all of this except for the part about lying if push comes to shove (re: 'maybe it's not for everyone but this is what works for me'). In my view, if you are "forced" into a lie, you've lost frame. Best to find another way to barrel-roll out of the sitch.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 11:57 AM
1

Except that the media examples lie - they paint a picture of a different, idealized, happy outcome. That's how men swallowed the blue pill in the first place.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 11:44 AM
1

Your analogy isn't quite apt. In the monkey example, he would (at least in principle) be able to look around and see lots of examples of other monkeys not doing what he just did. The same is not true of our (western) culture. It's not like RP-aware men are all around, setting an example. When this guy looks around, I bet he sees lots of other guys doing exactly what he just did - especially in the media he consumes. So, in fact, I don't think it's completely on him (from a moral, not a causal pe…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 11:35 AM
2

Ah, ok. Yes, I agree that we should focus on what we can control. I was speaking, though, in response to people who were holding this guy ultimately and totally responsible for his "choice". That's what I was objecting to. From a general life perspective, yeah, focus on what you can do.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/17 11:10 PM
3

Well, self-limitation (as in self imposed limitation) is certainly part of what restricts our freedom. But I would argue that most of our limitations are external - they are imposed by the past; our history; our genes; our circumstances; our family; our social, political, economic, and religious society; and the environment. Almost all of what we are is limitation. And a good thing too - because without limitation, there is nothing that separates out you from anything else. As Spinoza said: "all…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/17 10:48 PM
7

Exactly - how free is the ordinary mortal western man to resist and counteract the feminine imperative, if he has never been exposed to the manosphere, TRP, and/or strong male role models armed with the relevant knowledge and wisdom? This is why I pause when I hear people say not to try and share RP truth with other men. It's bogus. Yes, you need to be very careful, and no, you cannot help a man who doesn't want to help himself. But my view is that I have a responsibility to pay it forward. I do…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/17 09:01 PM
47

It's his fault in the same way that it's a homeless man's fault that he isn't a millionaire. Sure, no one's stopping him, but he was also probably never taught how in the first place.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/17 02:23 PM
2

It is for these reasons that I am happy to see the RPW sub growing by the day. TRP is a tool for surviving and thriving as an individual man in the decline. But there's only so long individuals are going to be able to survive and thrive when the ship they're on is sinking. A return to some form of traditionalism is the only way for our society to thrive again. I highly recommend the work of Jordan B Peterson on these fronts.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/17 11:35 AM
7

You provide some excellent reasons to be skeptical. However, we are still faced with the fact that sperm counts in western men have dropped by something like 50% in the last 50 years. Now, it is a jump from there to saying that a decrease in testosterone is playing an important role, but assuming that is the case (and I acknowledge that, if this is wrong, the rest does not follow): we need to account for what is lowering population testosterone levels. Plastics and other endocrine disrupters (e.…
/r/TheRedPill08/09/17 10:51 AM
1

Feminism is a female sexual strategy. RedPillWomen offers the traditionalist alternative. I'm sure you're aware of that nuance. I just didn't want readers to think that, in all circumstances, male/female sexual strategy is at odds.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/17 10:27 PM
3

"We are all now dumber for having listened to that." ;)
/r/TheRedPill02/08/17 11:08 AM
0

Even imagining an if/then statement isn't technically holding two ideas "at the same time". You imagine the "if" clause, then imagine the "then" clause. There is a progression forward in time, such that you are only imagining one, then the other. As well, if/then clauses are a singular proposition, with a single truth value. Juuuuust saying.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/17 10:58 AM
13

I've been lurking here for several years and somehow never came across it. Or, at least, not so explicitly. Looking back it's obvious by implication.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/17 12:21 AM
43

This is a brilliant observation.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/17 10:58 PM
2

The food analogy is brilliant!
/r/RedPillWomen27/07/17 10:49 PM
2

Unreal comment - thanks for taking the time!
/r/TheRedPill05/05/17 04:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter