TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Deadly_Duplicator Archive

View 0 posts and 90 comments by Deadly_Duplicator on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Of course! but you have indirectly come to the core issue. Yours is not the only way to approach the problem. And with a worldwide view on the issue, you must take a wholistic and pragmatic approach. The nation structure exists because it is necessary. It is pragmatic. You must build structures to check on one another and ina very real sense, nations keep eachother in check. Yes it is an imperfect process for certain. But the other option... A world government? Staffed by whom? You might suggest…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/21 08:47 AM
1

This ideology only works if its done worldwide and all at once. The problem is that if one nation believes in getting rid of nations but others dont the former just ends up weak. Furthermore having a national identity doesn't actually necessitate sacrificing the poor.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/21 07:55 AM
1

Ah yes so you're for wildly unsustainable world policing. Gotcha. Or taking in so many refugees it fundamentally alters your country. Ok.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/21 05:43 AM
-1

Do you believe it's your nations duty to give housing and healthcare to everyone in the world? You did start this comment chain off talking about refugees. If there's anything that I don't like about the 'modern left' it's taking wildly unsustainable policy stances because of a desire to be the most compassionate to a fault.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/21 05:59 PM
-1

I google trades program diversity and find this right away. https://caf-fca.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Creating-Diversity-in-the-Skilled-Trades.pdf My issue is putting this squarely on the shoulders of "employers" which I feel understates the bougie activist types who push for some employers to behave this way
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/21 07:03 AM
-14

Employers are way more likely to place men on tasks with a risk of physical injury To what degree is this men applying for such jobs? I just find it odd you framed it this way
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/21 04:15 AM
6

Just watched the first 5 minutes, and the caller opens with Society says it's funnier/more acceptable for a man to get hit than a woman (speculative, not followed up with facts, caller pivots to another issue) A study with shocks showed men get shocked more than women blah blah MRA have to do better. Open with a strong case, related to the country the hosts are in rather than some byzantine sterile environment. Open with suicides, workplace injuries, college admissions. I really don't like these…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/21 05:43 PM
1

When they went over his backstory, it was shown that he is overly trusting and despite his hard work to be a rock star, he was manipulated by his manager who took the lion's share of the profits which led to a falling out and change in life direction. With regards to his son he always worries about him and protects him, even going so far as to chase them into space during one arc. With regards to hard working again he runs his own car wash business. He's not perfect though and sometimes disagree…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/21 02:10 AM
1

The lengths you are going to cherry pick regarding SU is pathetic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/21 09:44 PM
1

Watch SU before commenting, his dad was a character, who cared deeply for his family and maintained a business and chose to live in a van. Ned lived for 1 season and was far from the only father (good or bad) in the show. Then you talk about changing opinions, seems like you decided your opinion before even hearing me out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/21 08:51 PM
1

Dad in Steven's Universe, dad in family matters, all the different fathers in game of thrones (ned being the obvious), rugrats parents were fairly down to earth, professor utonium in PPG. Most shows straight up dont even feature a dad dynamic. Hell, there are episodes even in the simpsons where homer is a good dad and the jokes are played elsewhere in the plot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/21 08:34 PM
3

The left wing has been conquered by identity politics, just as the right wing has been for a long time
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/21 06:11 PM
-3

We have come a long way from OP's assertion about males in cartoons to the entirety of media itself. Not falling for it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/21 05:13 AM
-3

Minstrel shows were a symptom, not the cause lmao. Jfc
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/21 04:29 AM
-3

If people believe the simpsons and other cartoons are reality then thats on the viewer being unable to discern fiction from reality. I have NEVER in my life seen any dad treated as a bumbling idiot or had this nonexistent stereotype affect them negatively.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/21 04:14 PM
-4

No it really doesn't. For every incompetent dad on tv there is a strong father figure, or a complex character out there as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/21 11:45 PM
-1

This is problematic logic. Character has property y that does x bad thing? They must mean all y people in real life have x property. No. This is bad when feminists do it, this is bad when anyone does it. Homer is a bumbling idiot because it's funny. End of story.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/21 11:15 PM
1

Did you reply to the right person? I agree with you on each of those points. I'm saying that getting into the semantic weeds over this does nothing, and is usually why feminists or anyone arguing under a super broad umbrella term move goalposts with regards to meaning in the first place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/21 01:09 AM
-5

I gotta say I really don't think the semantics of who is and isn't a feminist is worth getting in a fit over. I would also call 2% rare, though I certainly don't think that just because something is rare it should be summarily dismissed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/21 10:03 PM
2

Fair, counterpoint it would probably only take 10-20 people to derail a thread on a small sub
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/21 06:39 AM
6

If one larger sub storms a subreddit and enforces their worldview, speech is smushed and inorganically disincentivised. I don't know what the nature of the top deleted link is, but if you read it the bot tells you how you can link to other threads in reddit that prevents vote engagement
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/21 06:21 AM
4

Thoughts on https://nypost.com/2021/02/23/coca-cola-diversity-training-urged-workers-to-be-less-white/ and https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/05/20/chicago-mayor-lori-lightfoot-journalists-interviews/5192857001/ ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/21 05:57 PM
5

If you're a little bitch for a woman, she doesn't respect you. Even if she's pressuring you into that behaviour. Classic fitness (shit) test
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/21 07:14 PM
5

Fiction isn't supposed to be realistic, and successful fiction in a free world is going to be the type that's most appealing. Can't beat the ol' lizard brain
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/21 06:10 AM
8

Mods don't control how people vote. And the mod was right, you dismissed that other guy completely. "Read some Wittgenstein and linguistics post frege" is ass advice. make arguments yourself, and if you must reference something, reference something specific.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/21 01:10 AM
6

You can challenge the lizard brain but you will lose. Men are lizards too, in their own way. In a free society, when it comes to mate selection, you play the game or you don't play at all. Took me until I was 22 to realize that, after years of getting nowhere by insisting to just "be myself". Of course there's no hard and fast rule for all of humanity, you may get really lucky. Thing is to find someone who is truly self aware of their lizard brain is a rare thing and those people get snatched up…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 07:13 PM
5

Going to go against the grain here a bit. You should care what people think of you to some degree, it will affect their behaviour towards you. Being a virgin is a big red flag, especially as you get older, and especially to the women you want to court. Biological incentives mean women will instinctively think less of you for being a virgin. I can go into this if you want, but I believe the best attitude to have is something along the lines of it being important to have a relationship, and that y…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 06:39 PM
3

I have known trans people who are definately dysphoric, but I also have known trans people who I suspect because trans in search of an identity, or because being a man and what that comes with was hard for them
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/21 10:00 PM
1

Never go down the comparison route with a feminist, it opens up a window to derail the whole thing easily.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/21 06:15 AM
15

im thinking its time for the mods to put in a rule that if you make a statistical claim you need at least one (1) link in the text to back a claim
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/21 12:36 AM
5

A patriarchy where women are sentenced on an average 63% less than male counterparts for doing same crime. source on this one?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/21 08:48 AM
12

It wasn't the study that was the problem it was the media's take
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/21 05:19 AM
1

Would you say that Islam is gaining legislative power in france? Are any government representatives pushing for islamist policy locally?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/21 12:39 AM
1

A lot of people who were hard core bisexual drug-dealing war-protesting hippies, preaching that Capitalism was about to be transcended by the coming of the Age of Aquarius became union-busting Reagan voters. Hippies wanted freedom. Did they become union busters? No. In 1980, 43mil people voted for Reagan, and 40mil ish voted for Carter or Anderson. This resulted in an electoral college landslide of course, but there was still a ton of people who opposed Reagan and his policies. In 1984 the popul…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/20 02:57 AM
1

You make good content my man. You get right to the premise and use stirring examples. Bless your soul
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/20 10:46 PM
1

it's fiction and the dwarves aren't human. I really don't think the movie was intended nor received as any kind of gender societal analysis
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/20 02:55 PM
8

I don't get that from the title. if no men were killed the title makes sense and is accurate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 02:33 AM
0

yea... i mean if it's true it's awful but it reads like MRA bait
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/20 11:38 AM
2

examples?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/20 04:48 AM
5

I feel like im going crazy here but what i never understood, is why is getting a girl the end goal for any person. We're mammals programmed to reproduce, to say nothing of the obvious social benefits
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/20 05:37 AM
4

In your post, you said "Christina Hoff Summers has done good work debunking feminist propaganda, but she works for a right wing company." This implies that her opinion might be invalid just because she works for a right wing company. OP said: but the American Enterprise Institute that she works for is very right wing and has a history of things like climate change denial. You framed this very misleadingly
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/20 10:16 PM
0

Tell that to op. Women's behaviour doesn't bother me. It makes sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/20 10:19 PM
2

A woman needs to be picky because they invest way more resources into creating a child biologically vs men. This is why 'average' is uninteresting to women, as a trend. Top percent of men only for the womb. Whereas men only have to commit sperm.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/20 09:35 PM
1

Not sure what that sub does that this one doesn't, aside from splinter users
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/20 06:01 PM
0

Paper abortion would allow for both parents to dump children on the state. The state is no substitute for a parent. That system has a huge incentive hole in it. Men do have a choice to be a parent, use a condom or don't have vaginal sex. Unless you live in the USA apparently, but male rape victims paying child support is ridiculous and should be overruled.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/20 02:55 PM
1

You're missing the parts where I have repeatedly said that this system favours the child over the man, and why, and also that its tragic. IOW youre missing what you dont want to hear and pretending there's only one dimension to this issue. I'm repeating myself at this point so I'm out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/20 01:04 PM
1

No. Wish people on this sub would read my words
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/20 03:00 AM
2

Yea I think that the school system should teach family values, especially in an economy that expects dual income households
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/20 02:57 AM
1

No. Never said that. Suggest something better than the status quo that doesn't leave the kids behind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/20 02:53 AM
1

Sounds like a united states problem that would be fixed by a single overruling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/20 01:31 AM
-1

So we should build a system around 10% of the population vs 90%? No. Thanks for proving my point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/20 01:29 AM
1

There are women who get pregnant on purpose knowing full well what they're doing, and then hang everything on the father. Either to force a relationship or to go on assistance. This is bad not only because it forces men into a life of financial slavery but also because you now have a child who only exists in this world as a tool for the mother. Either to fulfill some kind of emotional desire or to be used to justify her selfish lifestyle. Which will result in the child growing up in shaky circum…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/20 09:56 PM
0

It's giving men the option to opt out of any responsibility for a child You can wear a condom or have anal. It's not the same as being able to abort and this is fundamentally inequal, this is true, but to suggest men don't have an option is silly. refuse to offer any aid to men that struggle to pay child support? IANAL but it's my understanding that child support is or should be proportional to income, and that post birth this should be mirrored between the sexes as far as who gets to take care …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/20 09:56 PM
2

we can't expect women to be responsible Didn't say that so we better just put men into poverty under threat of prison We shouldn't do this either - a compromise must be made. This is why we have judges review cases. Yes this is an imperfect system, I know. This is why we come to forums as citizens to seek something better. Women can take care of the child all on their own without assistance from the state or the man! Has this been tried anywhere? It is my belief that a society should be judged o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/20 09:07 PM
-1

Why should a man be disincentivized any more than a woman should? This is the biological difference. Once a woman is impregnated and wants to have the baby, what disincentive do you propose? If a woman is worried that she can't afford to raise a child, then the woman should use any of the plethora of options available to her to not be a parent! Having a child with the express intent that the father will simply subsidize her choice is immoral. Yes. So forced abortions or what? Now you see the pro…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/20 08:45 PM
0

Men who go from woman to woman impregnating along the way with no intention of raising the children should have some disincentive for doing so. Furthermore, in the current system when a single mother (or even a single father) does raise the child alone there is a mechanism in place to at least give more funds to raise the child, and this is good for society. Because of biological difference there will always be some degree of inequality here that laws can not fix. Change my mind all on all 3 of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/20 08:29 PM
3

this post lacks context. does someone have a restraining order against you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/20 02:51 PM
5

lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/20 06:04 AM
1

You're equivocating me using my experience to make a dating strategy with feminists making sweeping generalizations, it doesn't line up. And you can recognize patterns while simultaneously acknowledging that no rule or pattern is absolute.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/20 05:26 PM
1

Sometimes you just have to rely on experience. Men are also creatures with evolutionary wiring. We men act alongside patterns and trends too. It's not wrong to talk about patterns you observe personally. It's not wrong for feminists to do that either. Though I may differ in analysis and nuance of that experience compared to feminists. One will never be satisfied if one needs to back up everything with a study
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/20 05:12 PM
1

Some science on this would be lovely, but to throw my 2c in with this lot, my experience with women has been *universal*. Either explicitly or implicitly through behaviour, weakness expressed in things like crying or shyness is revolting to women. It makes sense from a basic evolutionary standpoint too. Where I digress from the thread is that I think feminists want the world to be an ideal, where we are not descendants of apes but pure beings of consistent philosophy. And then when a man makes t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/20 03:21 AM
19

The reason men don't (or ought not) cry is because women lose all respect for men who do. I have no studies to prove this, only my experience with women. It is an ugly and unattractive thing to women but they will never admit it if asked about it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/20 10:11 PM
3

Oh but stopping people from having premarital sex in the West is likely to happen? I didn't say that Yeah but it's not really an education issue. The highest proportion of single-mothers and fatherless households are among the impoverished. It follows strictly along racial and class lines Class disparity in the USA is at least partially an education issue. But I'm talking about letting people know the value of family as the basis for society which education policy can help with. Well there's als…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/20 02:53 PM
2

If anything research shows that people are happiest when they are in relationships with people roughly equal in attractiveness to themselves. Doesn't mean they will end up in those relationships It doesn't appear less attractive and average women are marrying the top 10% of men. Marriage isn't 1-1 with what how people are spending their time, and some quantification would go a long way here. If you rigidly enforce arranged marriages I don't like that solution either, very low practicability on t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/20 02:30 AM
4

Is it rightfully if it ends up with a huge gap where the top 10% of males end up with 90% of females? I think society might not be able to sustain that
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/20 09:17 PM
8

From the response: Sexual violence against men is treated just as seriously by the law and forcing a man to have penetrative sex, for example, (under section 4(4) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003) carries the same maximum sentence as rape – life in prison.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/20 05:21 PM
9

Seems like the govt responded in good faith and the only 'problem' is semantics
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/20 05:12 PM
3

Apex Fallacy Elaborate pls
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/20 03:22 AM
5

Tough to get a sense of community these days. I feel very similar. Feels like to be part of any community you have to be completely dogmatic. And to be honest as a man about struggles or lonliness is to be shit on by the same people who purport to be woke. I'm pretty checked out these days and I don't see that changing
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/20 06:09 AM
1

You're reading a ton of negativity into a comment about one slogan, chill. I think you may be mistaking me with the person I was replying to or something
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/20 05:32 PM
1

Judging an entire movement based on what fits as a slogan on a sign I did not do that but thanks for the copy pasted post
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/20 05:26 PM
4

I like the idea of reformation but the phrase 'defund the police' came before the left's well meaning rationalization of it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/20 05:14 PM
6

Fuck male circumcision!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/20 03:05 PM
2

link/context?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/20 01:41 AM
6

Confidence is about acceptance of who you are "Who you are" is often the problem, passive men need to change if they want results to change
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/20 12:25 AM
3

You're not the feminists in Canada agitating to remove sexual assault from the normal criminal courts, into quasi-criminal courts of equity where the burden of proof would be lowered, the defendant could be compelled to testify, discovery would go both ways, and defendants would not be entitled to a public defender. Some sources to back up claims like this would be good
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/20 09:33 PM
2

But you alone know the truth about evil feminism? The problem here is semantics. It's like the word art, it's practically useless as a word because it's so vague and encompassing. Feminism is similar because it is so encompassing, but even the people who are knee deep in feminism admit that it has waves of different definition. Context is key, and words mean different things to different people, so your statement that feminism is only ever one thing is just as reactionary as those gender studies…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/20 02:49 AM
1

Feminism is not one thing for everyone. I bet if you asked most people on the street what feminism meant to them it's that people should be treated equally. You've spent so much time reading reactionaries that you've forgot about the silent majority. Get out more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/20 02:24 AM
5

Too many meta complainy posts like this lately. Very low substance, low value
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/20 01:14 AM
15

So that's when I became a vocal intactivist, and my friends (who were all far left like I was at the time) called me fascist, anti-semitic and other shit. I lost friends over it. So gradually I moved further and further to the right I get this but at the same time, your former friends making these sorts of accusations should not have affected where you lie on the political spectrum
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/20 04:35 PM
3

I guess I want to ask what can be done about this? The root of this behaviour is biological. There's nothing to be 'done' about it but compete and be the best man you can be. A female human has to invest lots of resources compared to a male to rear a child, so they must be picky, only the best seed for all they have to put in to actually generate a human. Meanwhile men just need to generate sperm so less time and less biological investment. Simple as
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/20 09:40 AM
2

a buff guy with a plain shirt and shorts will get girls attention. Go work out instead of typing up lame ass posts
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/20 03:45 AM
3

not sure what the point of this post is, aside from giving a platform to some nutter
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/20 01:22 AM
0

I don't get what I'm supposed to take away from that George Bush thread
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/20 12:32 AM
1

Try to be constructive, use the OP's language but your logic, start by acknowledging common ground
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/20 09:18 PM
0

> Be yourself, and you’ll attract someone worth keeping. You assume that people in this thread are good and wholesome and well rounded. They're not, that's why they're here. When being yourself doesn't work, change needs to occur.
/r/seduction20/09/19 09:11 AM
2

I really needed this! Thanks!
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 08:07 PM
38

Sexual strategy is amoral. There is no right or wrong. There are absolutely zero obligations in the sexual marketplace beyond consent/physical safety of the parties directly involved in the actual sex act. This strikes me as inconsistent; why advocate for restraint if I could be careful and get away with rape? Is that which restricts you from rape the fear of legal repurcussion or morality? Sexual strategy is a tool, and tools by themselves are amoral. But tool use can be moral or immoral, or mo…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/14 06:25 AM
0

You have a better alternative than democracy?
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 05:47 PM
2

Not only is it weak and likely faked for the most part, the comments it has inspired in this thread have a subtext of sexism that this sub can't seem to shake. Shame really.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 11:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter