TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DeanOnFire Archive

View 3 posts and 129 comments by DeanOnFire on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Weird, I would have thought the "14 Women Say Whey They Don't Need Feminism" Buzzfeed article would have scared off people from doing just this, what with how popular it is.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 10:21 AM
60

I hate how that's a typical response against MRAs, no matter who does it. And yet, no one ever calls these people out on it, saying it's ad hominem and is just petty.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 03:23 AM
2

Godwin's Law has just imploded
/r/MensRights03/01/14 01:20 AM
14

I really wonder who planted the idea to do this in her head. Really, how could you not think it would backfire?
/r/MensRights18/11/13 04:50 PM
5

So...which one is it?
/r/MensRights23/07/13 08:01 PM
–

Isn't it fair to say that the mention of a /r/mensrights bestof submission is the target of several downvote brigades though?
/r/MensRights23/07/13 07:58 PM
1

Super duper alpha, I see. You be so popular!
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:50 PM
18

Those guys are also immediately labeled as dumb and lazy, but I agree it is a lot more socially acceptable, and I don't think it's fair either way. Look, most of the comments here think this picture sucks and is inaccurate. I certainly think so. The subreddit still brings up good points of other things.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:30 PM
1

You must be some sort of super alpha, huh?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:28 PM
5

Reporting in. My girlfriend looks more like the woman on the right, and I find her incredibly attractive. I know what I like. True, the game isn't in your favor if you're overweight, fat, or obese, but personality and taking pride in appearance play a factor.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:24 PM
2

Picometres**
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:51 PM
11

Why are you wasting your time here then?
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:49 PM
3

This isn't a debate, where asking someone to respond to a claim he didn't make is bad form. Discussion is different. Just saying "no" is bring any train of thought to a screeching halt. You brought up abortion as a right of women that is being contested, which is now to the point where it's being threatened as a right. Can you or can you not illuminate any rights that a woman in Western civilization does not have?
/r/MensRights08/07/13 03:11 PM
3

A woman does not have the right to "No.". Fascinating.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 03:01 PM
5

I think there's a lot of emphasis on labels and positions in his argument... As a scientist As a civil libertarian Not a libertarian, a civil libertarian ...because I am a civil libertarian I'm not even female But at least there's a response. At least it's accepting that we're not diametrically opposed.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 06:28 PM
1

Do you suppose it's arrogant to come right off the bat and label yourself as intelligent before answering any questions? That just kind of struck me.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 08:26 PM
2

GB2 Tumblr
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:32 PM
2

Depends on how it is handled, is the short answer. You can make the case for political parties, and conservatism and socialism rank high on the list (riiiight up there with communism). The response groups, such as the MRM, are more apt to handle discussion of views and challenge the authority of facts within themselves. Hell, that's usually how they start: They had questions about the movement they were part of and no one wanted to answer them. I haven't seen much blind circle-jerking of an unch…
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:15 PM
3

You're really not seeing the parallel in how they brainwash for the "greater good"?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:02 PM
3

How that ever got into the vernacular outside of Tumblr is absolutely beyond me.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:40 PM
2

I never got how they think this is the solution to the problem. Criminals will commit crimes, and they will figure out how to get what they want. The normal men and women who already know what is/isn't rape don't want the lesson again. This whole safe-space thinking is lining them up for slaughter.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/13 03:59 AM
7

>The discussion began when I was talking about Anita Sarkeesian's videos Maybe you shouldn't bring up such a bad example of a "feminist" con-artist to sell your ideology.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/13 11:36 PM
1

Was going to post that here, glad to see I checked first. I think I'll go try to post it in response to that Facebook picture.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:32 PM
24

This needs more coverage. We need to change the definition of rape to include male victims, and it starts with changing the minds of advocacy groups with basic reasoning.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:33 AM
0

You do realize you can elicit responses based on how you present yourself. Hell, fat guys like me look good with the right clothes.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 01:25 AM
0

Honestly, the only thing that offended me at the Oscars was the amount of times Zero Dark Thirty was nominated. Seth was just being Seth, doing what made him rich and famous in the first place, much to the dismay of people like Amy Davidson.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 09:04 PM
2

SRSSucks I can kinda see, but TiA is different altogether. I sub to the latter. I meant like how we have /r/mrmemes, but for just Facebook posts.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 03:11 AM
4

Classic reversals. Makes me wish we had a Facebook MRA sub, a la /r/facebookwins
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:20 PM
1

Their anger is just so delicious.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:27 PM
1

Which one was that?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:41 PM
1

Then I hope you're prepared to have your two cents discounted.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:37 PM
1

It's the implied after-effect of invoking Godwin's Law. Would you want to entertain someone who just compared you to Nazi's?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:35 PM
1

Now whenever I see her commenting, I'm going full Nazi-German.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:33 PM
1

I understand you don't know/have the rates, otherwise you would have presented them with your post. The Law of Large Numbers is a certain way of logically thinking about it, but we'd have to actually know. Hell, maybe smaller nations (such as Rwanda) have a higher rate of rape and incidents thereof per capita than China or India- we just need to find proof or evidence.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 03:23 PM
1

So what's China's rate of incidents?
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:50 AM
6

Strange. Why do I remember seeing SB's posts moderately high on this board?...
/r/MensRights08/12/12 06:50 AM
1

He's confused. It happens.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 06:42 AM
2

I'm gunna need some context for this
/r/MensRights08/12/12 05:42 AM
1

That's not how you spell Applejack.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:14 AM
1

Silly man, Applejack is clearly visible on his shirt. It must be her.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:13 AM
2

Well, it's common simply because fans are in-your-face about it. Same with why /r/atheism is disliked. That's what I've seen, anyway. That and, well, people are lashing out because ponies. In an instance such as this, I think /r/MR can respect him.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:10 AM
1

Not to mention: aggravated assault. This is attempted murder with a vehicle.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:19 PM
1

Of course not, no one has the authority to. However, your name becomes mud in the Kickstarter world if you fail to deliver. Slowly there have been more responses calling Sarkeesian out, proving how she has effectively scammed donors (though the lack of updates or finished product speaks for itself). I remember posting against Anita in /r/games in a post, but got downvoted to obscurity. Seems the way of truth hasn't reached many ears yet.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:55 AM
2

Oh yeah, of course. That's how fraud is done there. Usually proposers are loyal to some customers, so they made good on their promises. Random strangers can elude a promised group of donors easily. Anita...well, she managed to not provide and still has a strong, supportive "audience".
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:40 AM
3

From what I've seen, Kickstarter now has a policy that you need to demonstrate a prototype and explain what specifically you're using the money for. Anita did both, since she had pre-existing videos, but essentially lied.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:31 PM
0

Which is why someone who has anything less than 30 years or so of experience on the bench wouldn't be approved by Congress. Save for apparently Kagan, which I did not know about. Remember, someone who is new on the job wouldn't be appointed. They need to demonstrate capability in judging. An appellate court judge is usually a good candidate.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 05:39 PM
1

I just want to address the last fragment of your comment. Generally speaking, everyone on or has been nominated for the Supreme Court is done having kids. The reason they're nominated to begin with is that they have an long, extensive record, which points to putting your job above your family or the benefits thereof. I don't think anyone on the bench is getting pregnant anytime soon.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:42 PM
2

The post only focuses on how a female role is what's affecting men, when there is a specific slot a male can fit to be "acceptable" in society. When we step outside of the role, we're feminized, but if we stay in the role, we're acting out a stereotype. We can't win with this kind of thinking.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 05:22 PM
0

Clearly because supporting a child you don't want, regardless of who it is, makes you a mommy, and not a sucker of a parent.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 05:20 PM
19

HaikusYourComment, What? Only three syllables? Better luck next time!
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:39 PM
0

My girlfriend's the same way. You'd think after going through the "trauma" of having your parents unload their mismanagement of money problems, you yourself would be wanting to spend less or reorganize your priorities. Nope. She still wants to eat out and go to the movies/bowling a ton instead of making fun at home.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:26 PM
3

Second picture down, I was already typing no on my keyboard. After it was said and done all I thought was nonononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononono
/r/MensRights19/11/12 09:32 PM
-9

everyone's head Can you verify that? What about someone who grew up being taught that the man always gets his way? Or in a distant future, men are taught to be submissive to every desire a woman wants (hopefully not)? I'm not saying that NO MEANS NO isn't prevalent, but there are some few cases where NO hasn't been taught. I argued this with someone and realized this is the gray area sometimes. In OP's condition, that person should be savvy enough to have heard NO MEANS NO at one time in their l…
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:51 PM
5

I'd hesitate to leave something at a joke when people take it seriously.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:02 PM
3

In some countries, "no" means "yes", like in Italy. It's their machismo. In the US, it's nothing like that, but I'm sure someone could come up with a reason for not being able to say no.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:52 PM
2

The gist of what I'm getting from the comments is that there is no connection between rape and the type of clothing a victim was wearing, which is a very relevant point. So what exactly IS the problem with revealing clothing? Is it unwanted attention? I know some people could construe that as sexual assault... Any arguments?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 06:36 PM
2

She wasn't- she never was meant to be overweight. Just self-conscious and with a little bit of acne. The curviness just kinda...evolved. Plus, his art style doesn't exactly accentuate body detail, so realism is out the window with criticism.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:43 AM
2

There have been cases where the roles were reversed and sexist conversations and pictures posted have stopped when it was brought to management's attention, that you feel threatened in the workplace and you feel as though your value is diminished because you are a different gender. If you complain to HR they will stop
/r/MensRights05/11/12 02:27 PM
3

This doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of implied consent, which is a lot more common and smooth than straight up asking someone if they want sex. This giant gray area of "Well, she didn't say yes explicitly, but she motioned towards yes with me" is what people want to define so that there's no misunderstanding or accusations the day after.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 08:55 PM
4

Even if this was legit, it certainly didn't go the way OP expected it.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 02:18 PM
4

Practically every month is breast cancer awareness month. October is just the one where it's most prevalent.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 02:14 PM
1

That too.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 03:25 PM
1

You know, for presenting such a harsh "statistic", she seems happy about it.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 03:00 PM
-1

Eeyup. Still going to debate feminists. Not going to stop because one crazy bitch made something crazy.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 02:06 PM
0

Thanks! I didn't want to post the original link, since I didn't want to stir up anything. Just the content is enough.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 02:05 PM
1

Pretty much that. I don't have an account, but I do read some people from time to time. Because reasons.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 02:04 PM
2

Really, I'm upvoting this content for visibility. I don't necessarily agree with it since we've heard the story before, but from a more human perspective. She's at least not up in arms, taking legal and physical action, which is what everyone on this board would paint an ideal feminist. She may or may not have been raped; we don't know how drunk the other guy was, they "had sex before she left", and refers to him as a fuckbuddy. This breaks down a couple of barriers some people idealistically ha…
/r/MensRights31/10/12 04:35 AM
4

1 actually makes money in softcore porn. Every other post is either fat discrimination or man-hating. It's quite unsettling to see someone so... uptight.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 04:25 AM
44

[] Heart [] Eyes [X] Intestine-Necklace
/r/MensRights30/10/12 10:13 PM
6

Might have something to do with the slogan on each bottom-right corner "Men can stop rape". As if we're the only gender that does it.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 09:57 PM
1

Whenever I hear that the amount of women in Congress is not representational of the amount of women in the nation, I always ask "Well, why aren't more women running?" It's not meant to be an exclusively male field; there's no inherent gender-bias in running a political race. If women are up in arms about mishandled remarks about rape and pregnancy (which should be chalked up to poor education, if anything), why not just run for office. I live in New York and Gillibrand makes me sick with all of …
/r/MensRights30/10/12 09:54 PM
1

They should be. People are responsible for everything else when they're drunk, especially DUIs, so why shouldn't sex be that way? I've argued this with people before, and I stick to the whole idea of prevention methods. If you're afraid of someone having sex with you while both of you are drunk, why not have someone be your straight-man and pull you out of the situation?
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:02 PM
3

Rape is a fucking problem I'll say it is.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 04:57 PM
20

Now see, THAT'S what I like to see. The page I found this on left that bit out, with how many universities and people surveyed. I'd like to see more recent studies be done too, since all that's given (in typical internet info-graphic form, no less) is numbers and an author.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:59 PM
5

Too many buzzwords to take seriously, even if it is a comedian.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 10:49 PM
1

Well, duh. No one pulls out the race card first thing because it HELPS an argument. It's like using "I'm offended" as a suitable reply to an argument: Does nothing.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 10:25 PM
2

Sounds about right. It's THE top legislation for them and has been ingrained into society for selection. It's about equality, not the best fit.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 10:24 PM
1

Aside from the main point in posting this video, there's a pragmatic truth in what he said in the last 20 seconds. No one can just think of an idea of a utopian society we should all strive for. It should be a collective ideal to make the best society possible, one that if efficient and pleasing to the population. It's up to the population to decide how to do it, to decide where the lines are drawn to make everyone happy. Sometimes I think everyone forgets that and only focuses on their own pers…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 02:40 PM
1

...point taken.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 02:40 PM
1

Really, you're coming off as a dick at this point. Just let it be, I'm not going to know my worth until I get a job.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 03:50 AM
1

The reality of our situation is that she's more marketable as a stage manager even as an undergrad than I am as a risk management & insurance major.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 12:21 AM
1

That is remarkable.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 05:58 PM
2

You realize that they offer more than just a generic theatre degree, right? She's doing stage management. She's gotten more opportunities to work than I have and I'm a business major. She's never complained about wage discrimination. Way to cram your stock response to a raging lunatic down someone's throat who asked a simple question.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 02:22 AM
2

Wagner has that? My girlfriend goes there for theatre, so I've never heard about it.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:02 PM
1

I feel like the knife cuts both ways in that sense. Nothing would get in the way of malicious posters without the downvotes. I think that's really a job for moderators.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:45 AM
1

REVELATION
/r/MensRights16/10/12 01:52 AM
3

True, and this is the problem with Reddit. Voting doesn't mean "this contributes to the discussion", it's an indicator of how popular an opinion is.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:31 PM
3

No worries, man. The pain of freedom stings, but it's worth it. That sounded circle-jerky.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:29 PM
2

I've played around with RES but not much. Don't know how to make the downvote button show where it's been disabled. I CAN see the scores, so I've known it's possible.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:25 PM
2

I can't take anyone seriously that says "Misandry doesn't real". Usually it's SRS and Tumblr, but still.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:27 PM
41

Like how with Feminist subreddits the downvote button is disabled? It's how they work, man. They don't want "negativity" or "opposing views".
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:24 PM
1

I found the thread. I can't believe people are trying to go through route "You shouldn't hit ANYONE!" She was the aggressor. It's already a felony to assault someone working for public transportation. No one should fight, but don't play that card when your gender gets served. The comments on the other hand... I want to cry.... People really argue like this?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:00 PM
5

No more worrying about termites.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 10:54 PM
5

Agreed. I kept chuckling at "So, yes, I can make a misandrous statement like 'All men deserve to die, because, yeah' but that’s a surface level this conversation is way past" as if that's a justification.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:05 PM
1

Sarcasm was needed too. It was a nice touch. This subreddit has been online for more than 4 years, why do people think this one idea will change everything?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:52 AM
2

Annnnd....what about the women who do this to men not affiliated with us? The knife cuts both ways here. We can be the bigger person and just not allow it, and believe me, we inform people with these stories that you don't have to let this affect them or ruin them. That will never stop the girls and mainstream demeaning men, however. I can't stop every man from speaking out against women which tarnishes our side. Personally, I don't want to. They've found a place where we can understand where th…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:49 AM
1

Noted, and people who are rude for no reason should be getting that kind of treatment from their superiors. This particular girl didn't sound like she was high up or maybe she was making a mole out of an anthill, but I assume OP is smart enough to kiss ass when he needs to, to whom he needs to. If he wants to act like a jerk, let him. He'll learn the hard way that people don't like that. If he doesn't get any repercussions, well...
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:42 AM
1

Usually we end posts like that with "/s"
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:37 AM
2

I...don't know what's a joke and what's serious anymore here. This is just meta among the comments.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:32 AM
0

I recognize your point and already realize people and police officers make mistakes, but starting a post with "Omg. are you serious?" isn't doing you any favors.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:22 AM
3

Her response of "it's a girl thing" wasn't exactly informative or constructive. I'm tired of hearing that as an excuse of "you just don't get it." That's not valid, that's just poor communication.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:17 AM
9

Point 2.... Why would he want to build a positive relationship with the girls who approached him? He can pick and choose who is important to him, he's a grown man.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:16 AM
-1

Yes, and that works for your context. But the official goal of feminism shouldn't be using that broad term. I think there needs to be an official term of struggling to get female equality, yet without referring to patriarchy. If you've been on /r/MensRights for a while, you'd see we hate that term since it inherently victimizes us.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 09:28 PM
1

You're using a disputed definition for- oh forget it. I'm not going to repeat myself.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 09:15 PM
0

So then just call it equal rights. Your first example is applicable to women. Don't call it patriarchy.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:54 PM
1

I think some would argue that "the end of patriarchy" would bring about "the dawn of matriarchy". Yknow, for historical recompense. That's just equal rights. The textbook definition. The end of patriarchy is when males do not dominate in every facet of society. Who defines what will that be?
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:34 PM
0

So....an equal-rights activist? Usually people who identify as feminists have a beef with men. Same way that SRS perceives every MRA on this board as a misogynist, when I can tell you that's not the case. Research speakers that have made strides in equal-rights, then compare him/her with every "feminist" on Tumblr.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:13 PM
2

But they're the ones who are defining "patriarchy". They'll end it when they see a woman in a position of power across the globe, regardless of qualifications. At least, that's what I can tell from discussions I've had. I can understand if it's just to prove they can do it and foster equality in applying, but otherwise it goes back to hiring equality and preferences. As far as the second one, I totally agree with you on that. Roles do not equal gender.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:09 PM
-3

I don't think they know what "sensible attire" means. They don't wear that shit to be comfortable or leave anything to the imagination- they do it to send a message about themselves. Virtually all apparel sends a message about yourself to the public. You can't fight that. You just need to understand it.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:05 PM
5

YourPerfectInsanity Sounds about right.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 07:55 PM
2

You know what? Asked and answered. You know the answer to this from my previous responses, I'm not going to repeat myself.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:48 AM
2

No, I believe there's a degree that people can take to prevent things from happening. A correct answer is asking your neighbor for a spare key. Safety in Numbers.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:37 AM
4

This is to illustrate preparedness in a situation where you could have taken care. You locked yourself out of your house as you rushed out the door, insert reason why here.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:35 AM
3

You're only reading this how you want it to be read at this point. If you locked yourself out of your house, do you beat yourself up or say it was a mistake and find a solution?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:32 AM
5

The analogies we've been using aren't something people intentionally DO sometimes, this is stuff that can be overlooked when people don't think. It happens to the best of us since we can't be vigilant 24/7. Rather, people should understand that the way you dress AND behave in public sends out messages. You could be the center of attention and scantily clad, or in the back and reserved, but BOTH of these send messages to DIFFERENT groups of people. Rapists pick up on both of these kinds of signal…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:25 AM
5

Why do I get the feeling inferring is a hobby of yours? It's a matter of reducing your risk. It can be done with any crime, and all it takes is a bit of informing with an ounce of sense to follow it. There are tasteful ways of going out, and you can still have safety-in-numbers, watch your drink, etc. If a rapist wants to rape, they'll do it when you least expect it. There is a degree of care a victim needs to take, but they're never necessarily "asking for it".
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:01 AM
1

I keep hearing the story of the man who dressed lavishly, walked through a poor neighborhood, and wasn't pickpocketed. I wonder why studies haven't been done on this. It just seems to follow that appearing a certain way would cause someone mentally prone to do something illegal would be pushed to the edge...at least, in my mind anyway.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 01:56 AM
6

They've been railing against that? I've seen feminists screaming they want sex yet get offended whenever someone hits on them anonymously. The fuck do they expect?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 01:52 AM
1

The hivemind has its own agenda. Better luck next time, dude.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:40 PM
3

Well...you're agreeing with an unpopular opinion. And not really contributing other than that.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:27 PM
5

It becomes a huge problem when it interferes with school conduct and makes life a living hell for students who are required to attend school. I get that free speech shouldn't be limited if it was in public and no harm was being done, but this is detrimental to student interaction.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:27 PM
8

After a few words in, all I was reminded of was "all men are rapists and need to stop the raping".
/r/MensRights29/09/12 11:18 AM
3

This is pretty much in line with the rest of the Teenage Boy on Xbox Live rhetoric you spew on this site.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:15 AM
3

Obligatory calling for data proving the opposite or the hidden side of each picture's assertion.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:17 AM
1

Implying it's not.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 08:37 PM
5

I took a look at it anyway, but didn't vote. I always do that just to see the discussion in the comments. How people respond to it speaks a lot more than what the article asserts sometimes.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:06 PM
2

In all honesty, I like the fandom, but I'm not going to argue for anyone who feels victimized as a "brony". I'm a fan, but I'm not classifying myself that far. They've gained a reputation as such, but of course that's the loud minority. A lot of the fans that I've seen are nonchalant about it and don't forcibly inject the show into every possible thing they experience. But then again, that's just my view.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:41 PM
3

Yeah, but CANDY so it's okay!
/r/MensRights28/08/12 05:02 PM
28

Any adult interested in something meant for kids has been looked down upon when taken in that context. Things like /r/pokemon, /r/adventuretime, and /r/gravityfalls wouldn't exist if adults didn't enjoy them as well. Hecklers just say they have autism or something. Bronies, however, have the added sling of being interested in something meant for children of the opposite gender. It IS sexist to assume that's wrong, but Faust produced a top-quality cartoon. Haters gonna hate, I guess?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 01:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter