Death2DrunkSasquatch Archive

Upvotes	Title	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
17	How do I respond to this, without being insulting or condescending?	Death2DrunkSasquatch	/r/MensRights	13/10/11 09:38 PM
12	Alright Guys, you want to help raise Men's Rights Awareness? Here's your chance to help me out.	Death2DrunkSasquatch	/r/MensRights	14/10/11 01:22 AM
10	Trying to start a Men's Law group at my Law School...	Death2DrunkSasquatch	/r/MensRights	04/10/11 06:38 PM
1	Some things I've learned about r/MR recently.	Death2DrunkSasquatch	/r/MensRights	12/10/11 10:11 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
13	This seems slightly sexist to me. Found on campus One sided, yes. Sexist...I'm not so sure. Granted it lacks a lot of information, but it presents a message to a target audience (albeit a target that could be broader). It would be another story if the poster claimed that ONLY women were assaulted. It just doesn't present all of the facts.	/r/MensRights	16/04/12 09:29 PM
2	A response to a stance which seems fairly common among feminists. apologies, I meant to cite that case as a way of showing that a woman who has sex with someone incapable of correctly making an informed decision is not held accountable, and only the man, who has a diminished capacity for reasoning, is convicted.	/r/MensRights	15/08/11 06:30 PM
4	A response to a stance which seems fairly common among feminists. The law doesn't take decision-making capability into account. Statutory rape and bestiality are strict liability crimes: if they happen, you are guilty. But, case history shows that where a mentally disabled person is tricked by a minor, the only one liable is the mentally handicapped person, who arguably lacks the decision-making ability to convict the crime, especially when tricked by the "victim." It sounds like everyone is talking about 2 distinctly different things: 1) Where a man and woman…	/r/MensRights	15/08/11 03:53 PM