TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Death2Evil Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by Death2Evil on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Sounds like Stephen Crowder. This is the kind of guy who thinks it'll be "funny" or he can "make a point" by throwing on a wig and being a douche bag in the ladies' room. He's also probably a Republican. But what he's really doing is demonstrating how/why nondiscrimination policies for trans people won't protect assholes like him (or assholes much worse than him).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 12:36 AM
1

Oh, that sick burn! Well-played, jkonrad. Very well-played xD
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 07:23 AM
8

As always, MRA/red-piller/whatever are the ultimate hamsters. Complains about misandry: Believes in heirarchy of "alpha>beta>gamma" and strives to be above all the "beta and gamma manginas" Men have it so rough, that they need equality, and the best way to get equality is by... making women sign up for the draft? "Hey guys, let's totally ignore legit issues like the prison industrial complex, and instead we can just whine about that paper we had to sign when we turned 18!!!" Believes he should b…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/14 11:13 PM
0

Methinks you care about 70% of women initiating divorce because you have much confirmation bias. In reality, both parties agreed to marry and be good partners, and both parties are responsible for keeping each other happy to the ends of continuing the marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/14 11:00 PM
1

I believe I already said that somewhere here. Now, the question is: "Who literally owns a fetus?" and the answer is: "The expectant mother." The Next question is: "Who owns the body in which the fetus exists?" and the answer is: "The expectant mother." The next question is: "Does an existing person have right to their own body?" and the answer is "Yes." And that is how it is, unless you try to claim intellectual property rights. And no one does this, because it has been long-established that one…
/r/PussyPass14/04/14 04:22 AM
1

Aaannnd... A fetus is neither a person nor an animal. Like I said, by your train of thought, eating tuna or falling down while pregnant is a harm/assault of said fetus. It's ridiculous.
/r/PussyPass14/04/14 01:04 AM
1

Yep. It's a range of potential disorders. 1) Most mother who consume small or moderate amounts do not have afflicted babies, 2) Of the afflicted, most are not facing severe pain (as they would in, say, congenital neuroplasia). I know you didn't say that. I was citing a simple fact: rights are for people.
/r/PussyPass13/04/14 01:32 PM
1

Your claim that consumption is arguably mental/physical abuse. This argument is not seen in any professional sphere and so is unfounded. And while you may be making a point on rights, your follow through is a non-sequitur: 1) people have rights, 2) fetuses do not, 3) there is no evidence that alcohol consumption causes pain. If you can find scholarly articles on the fetal experience of a hangover, then great. I'll be slightly more open to the idea, Otherwise, it's unfounded.
/r/PussyPass13/04/14 01:09 PM
1

That claim of yours is about as unfounded as a claim that eating tuna fish or listening to opera while pregnant constitutes mental and physical abuse.
/r/PussyPass13/04/14 03:43 AM
1

Not a crime against a fetus, no. A crime of physical and mental harm to an expecting couple, yes.
/r/PussyPass13/04/14 03:42 AM
1

That sounds familiar. I've never cried, but... doe eyes, feigned ignorance, and being stressed/upset got me out of a DUI once. I failed 2/3 field sobriety tests, and the cops wouldn't show me my breathalyzer result... They just told me to go across the street (to a casino) and have a good breakfast before driving home. Still, it was more luck than it was some kind of reliable "pussy pass." I haven't chanced it since, and I wouldn't be confident trying it again.
/r/PussyPass13/04/14 02:48 AM
1

This draws a direct parallel to public indecency laws: men can be barechested, women can't be topless. It's not exactly fair, but surely you see how making breasts out to be super sexy naughty bits would result in skewed interactions like this?
/r/PussyPass13/04/14 02:32 AM
1

I use the girls bathroom and locker rooms all the time. It's never been an issue. I hope you learn about this stuff...
/r/PussyPass13/04/14 02:19 AM
7

I imagine the minors (male or female) would have turned away blushing at the sight of harry legs and moose knuckle...
/r/PussyPass13/04/14 01:33 AM
0

So... you like having a bossy guy because he can be bossier than you...? It sounds like your friends are of the "Why don't we all just be good to each other?" variety... and this is likely an issue to them. There's nothing wrong with being dominant or submissive, but you'll find that most people (RP, BP or unaffiliated) frown on taking it to the level of sexism... because sexism agitates all kinds of people.
/r/RedPillWomen05/04/14 01:42 PM
1

"SHING SHING SHING SHING SHING SHING SHING SHING!" flailing arms wildly
/r/MensRights20/12/12 12:44 PM
1

By all means, be a Buddhist monk if that's what you want to do, but it'll be a shame if chosen because of a distain for other human beings based on MRM anecdotes & propaganda (or Radfem anecdotes & propaganda, for that matter). The Golden Rule is "Treat other as you would like to be treated" and isolating yourself from the other monkeys doesn't sound like that, lol
/r/MensRights20/12/12 12:27 PM
0

Everyone is out to get us, lol: gotta love post-Cold War game theory. Basically, MRAs are blaming women for all their probs, Radfems are blaming men for all their probs, and now we have men and women acting as apologists for their own sex to appeal to members of the opposite sex, and prove that they're not "just like all the others." Absolutely reeks of "You are not trustworthy, because I am projecting my own lack of trust on to you, because you might fuck me over later, because I know I might f…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 12:14 PM
2

Well, at least you're honest. I would argue that most women can defend themselves from most men (by knife/gun/training/whatec), but are not set up to do so by default. I've only made one other post on this subreddit, and it's all about testosterone and androgen derivatives: how they are conducive to muscle, and how that effects our social interactions. Unfortunately, estrogens are the polar opposite: conducive to adipose tissue... -_-
/r/MensRights20/12/12 11:26 AM
-4

Actions are classified as good, great, bad and/or worse by the severity of their consequences. Ex] A person who saves a person is good, a person who saves 10 people is great. A person who murders a person is bad, a person who murders 10 people is worse. Assault falls under bad and/or worse. So... Can we agree that a shattered ego is bad, a shattered (hospitalized) person is worse? Are y'all comprehending the entirely non-sexed premise? Now, let's apply sex. Biology mandates that mean, median and…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 11:16 AM
1

I don't have to, because I can simply tell you to fuck off or look up the American Medical Association, American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association to see what the experts have to say on transgenderism/transsexualism. Wrong. Girls did not want trans woman in the appropriate restroom. If they themselves do not want to be seen by ANYONE for ANY REASON, then they are free to change in a stall, but they DO NOT get to define other people and kick out other people based…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 09:41 AM
1

Sorry, but no. YOU are talking about a man who... whatever... and YOU are WRONG. WE are talking about a woman who did not actualize until a few years ago for any number of reasons and SAT IN A SAUNA. WE are RIGHT (according to science and medicine). And we ARE NOT expecting anyone to have to change in a coed area and we ARE NOT "coed by design." The bottom line is that trans people HAVE TO use the facilities, and we can either have. 1) Head-to-Toe Females plus penises (which are easily missed) i…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 08:10 AM
1

Sorry, but no. YOU are talking about a man who... whatever... and YOU are WRONG. WE are talking about a woman who did not actualize until a few years ago for any number of reasons and SAT IN A SAUNA. WE are RIGHT (according to science and medicine). And we ARE NOT expecting anyone to have to change in a coed area and we ARE NOT "coed by design." The bottom line is that trans people HAVE TO use the facilities, and we can either have. 1) Head-to-Toe Females plus penises (which are easily missed) i…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 08:10 AM
1

In the end, this case is of a trans female going into the females locker room. Because, like I said, whether YOU accept us or not, we are "legally, medically, psychologically, biochemically, biologically the same sex by holistic biological observation of human sexual dimorphism." And NO, I don't find it inappropriate at all, because "inappropriate" is subjective and I am not a hater, projecting my own nefarious ideas on people who are carrying out a most nefarious act of SITTING IN A SAUNA. Gend…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:16 AM
1

Umm... There are a lot of concrete explanations, but the bottom lie is that people need to lay off on freaking out over such minor stuff. Potential reasons include: -feminine Gay guy just prefers the ladies' room (I've seen it). -girl uses the men's room due to the line for the ladies' room. -trans girl uses the ladies' room (I live it). -Drag Queen uses the ladies' room. No one has ever complained about me or confronted me, because I seem to be just another girl (we can even girl talk in front …
/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:56 PM
1

I'm probably the only trans person here, so I'll answer. The most common distinction is medical diagnosis and treatment. Ex] A pre-HRT, pre-op trans person can be required to live a period of RLE (Real Life Experience) before being authorized for those treatments, and often carries a letter from a counselor, therapist, etc. explaining the situation. Then there are pre-op or non-op trans people on HRT, and we may or may not be protected and recognized by the law, but we have to use the facilities…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:34 PM
1

Sorry, but you are wrong, because by your logic, White people have the rights to keep their children free from the eyes of Black people. Whether you accept us or not, we are legally, medically, psychologically, biochemically, biologically the same sex by holistic biological observation of human sexual dimorphism. And yet we accommodate paraplegics with elevators and ramps...? "... but decide to be the other..." valeriekeefe said it best: WILLFUL IGNORANCE. Transexuality is no more a choice than …
/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:12 PM
1

Wrong, she's been on hormones for several years. Believe it or not, that counts for legally changing sex in a number of states. And whether she has legally changed sex or not, it has long since been a practice in the medical establishment to have us live and present 24/7 as our new sex BEFORE we are even eligible for Surgery or (sometimes) Hormone Replacement Therapy. So no, it was a pre-op or non-op trans woman (pre-op or non-op likely due to costs or risks of surgery) sitting in the sauna... W…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:02 PM
1

Except that's wrong, because most feminists DO care. Just not the Radical Feminists (the all men are evil and all evil comes from Patriarchy people). And, tbh, they come off bitter and sad. It makes for a rotten foundation and the counter group (MRA) is built on and opposed to it (sounds like F of G in a physics problem, LOL). Really trans people are the last people y'all should be arguing about because we fundamentally invalidate a lot of the claims of both groups. Ex] -If being a woman is so b…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 02:31 PM
1

Umm... She was sitting in a sauna, and some right wing parents got mad. I don't see the news story.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 02:14 PM
3

Fucking idiot... The reason there are more trans women than trans men is biological, as all fetuses begin as Females. Being MtF is a due to failed masculinization of the brain in utero (masculization itself being a COMMON process for XY fetuses) but not failure of the genitals due to Y Chromosomal data. Being FtM is due to masculinization of the brain in utero (masculinization being a RARE process for XX fetuses) but a failure of the genitals due to lack of Y Chromosomal data. Also, the more mal…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 11:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter