TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DeathHamsterDude Archive

View 1 posts and 47 comments by DeathHamsterDude on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
28

DeathHamsterDude/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:37 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

Are we really going to start posting screengrabs about things like this? There's absolutely no way of verifying if this is real, and even if it was, I don't think this is the sub to post it on.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 06:25 PM
3

It was 21-55, which would be the prime nurturing years. a completely unspecified time frame that obviously isn't very long at all. They didn't mention the time frame, if you're talking about junk science, then your supposition there would qualify. As to having 70 guys, yeah, of course it's not ideal. But they might not have had the funding to have 1000 men. Maybe now that this study is out, there'll be more interest in more thorough study.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:47 PM
21

dear God man, don't post memes, please!
/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:11 PM
1

Yeah, I have him at -71.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 10:20 AM
6

Don't bother with him, he's just a hateful person. I've downvoted him dozens of times in the past. I'm not sure if he's really a MRA or if he's trolling at this stage to be honest.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:32 PM
23

Oh OP, what an editorialization! The 'underage' girl in this film is seventeen, and the age of consent in France is fifteen. It's not an issue.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 11:40 AM
4

Yeah, I would consider it quite common. Are you from America? Maybe it's used more here in Europe.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:44 PM
3

Thanks. The support is appreciated!
/r/MensRights19/02/13 12:33 PM
3

I think that most feminists are reasonable, but I think that, yes, the modern feminist movement has been diverted by a select few extremists, without most feminists even being aware of the changes. If, as a feminist, you subscribe to those views, of female supremacy, male disposability etcetera, then you're unreasonable, and probably downright unpleasant as an individual. Any feminist that wants women's rights while acknowledging men's rights, and not seeing one being contradictory to the other,…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 09:28 AM
9

I am not aware that there is a manifesto Exactly. Feminism has no Bible, by which I mean one holy book from which stems all of their beliefs. It annoys me that some of my fellow MRA's here spout that nonsense that all feminists are evil/stupid/what have you. As you've said, I've met plenty of feminists in real life, and on here, that were totally reasonable. Sure, there are quite a few extremists among them, but I feel like the internet is this great sounding board that amplifies the crazy to su…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:02 PM
3

Hey. Welcome to the sub! Firstly, yeah, I agree with you mostly. I think what you need to take from this is that most of the feminists people are talking about on here are the ones who have the most active presence on the Internet, and are who we come into contact/conflict the most. They are the most vocal, and the most vocal are often the most radical. Unfortunately, the most vocal often are the ones who get laws put into place as well, such as VOWA, or who protested the Warren Farrell talk. So…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:51 AM
16

The infographic used the most conservative estimates on false accusations and least conservative on unreported rapes.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 10:01 PM
1

I know. It's really growing into maturity in the last while.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:01 PM
3

That's hardly a victim mindset however.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:46 PM
3

Yeah, that's pretty much exactly where I stand too.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:36 PM
3

I agree with you, but I can understand why a lot of people would be feminists. Most of them are pretty normal in my experience. They're blind to what the radfems are doing. Sure, it'd be better if we all called ourselves egalitarians, but I'm not about to condemn all those people because of what a minority of them think. Feminism is an umbrella term, there are plenty of different types. It is a shame that the radfems are getting the most attention, but I don't for a second think that all my fema…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:11 PM
5

Saying it like that doesn't further the cause. She's illogical. She's an illogical feminist. I think the distinction is an important one to make. I've met plenty of logical feminists. I've never met a logical radfem though.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:02 PM
7

Your mileage may vary. Practically every woman I have ever spoken to on the issue has been for the rights of men as well as women. Do you really think the majority of women think no focus should be put on men? That's more than a tad extreme.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:01 PM
18

Most women (and perhaps contrary to popular opinion on this subreddit, most feminists) would accept men have issues. I look on these radfems as being like the atheism community. The atheist subreddit has a lot of extremist atheists on it who are constantly pouncing on people and incessantly nitpicking them to death. Meanwhile, the majority of us atheists are going about our business, with people not even knowing we're atheists unless they ask us. Radfems are by far the most vocal group in femini…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:05 PM
2

How was he being a victim here?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:57 PM
13

It's funny though, neither OP nor pretty much any thread on the subreddit have ever stated or implied that 'women's issues don't actually exist, or that those issues are trivial in comparison to men's'. I think if you look at the MRM for any length of time in fact you'll see that it is a mostly egalitarian movement. EDIT: face to fact.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:55 PM
2

/s means sarcasm.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:39 PM
20

New band name right there.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 06:54 AM
58

Welcome to the proud land of DoubleStandardia!
/r/MensRights15/07/12 12:54 PM
4

I've heard it said that Big Bang Theory is a show about nerds written by normal people, and Community is a show about normal people written by nerds. Watch Community is what I'm getting at. Also, yes, I rather dislike Big Bang Theory. I always feel like they wrote your bog-standard joke and then got a thesaurus out to make it sound smarter than it is.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 01:27 PM
1

Well, that's your prerogative, but there are a lot of gamers who think differently than you.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 04:22 PM
2

And haven't you noticed that they're quite crude approximations of what men usually are? Understandably an FPS like COD isn't going to be the next War & Peace or anything, but you don't think it'd be nice if you came across an intelligent, well-spoken soldier in these games? Or maybe if these games actually dealt with, even in the tiniest portions, the cruelties and realities of war, instead of this cinematic glorification? Which, in fact, Hollywood very rarely do in war movies at all. Look at a…
/r/MensRights19/06/12 03:46 PM
3

That's erroneous. I didn't say anything about ugly or beautiful. There's a difference between a character being beautiful and a character designed as some sort of horrible caricature of sexuality, with the horribly impractical clothes to match (that evolved out of the chainmail bikini of pen and paper rpgs from yesteryear). Same with the men in most games. I have no problem with them being good looking or really muscley, it's the personality that they're given in most games. They're these mindle…
/r/MensRights19/06/12 04:22 AM
2

I'm really not. This is coming from a guy who's played videogames since I was two consistently. I love the hobby, but there are a lot of really immature parts to it too. Not all, but, yeah, quite a few. What games do you play?
/r/MensRights19/06/12 04:07 AM
11

No dude, you've gotten it wrong. Practically EVERY character, male and female, in games are sexist stereotypes. Women are overly sexualized, and men are treated as hairy gorillas who grunt and kill. Notable exceptions are Alyx and Gordon from Half Life.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 07:38 PM
1

Interesting read. Thanks.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 12:41 PM
1

Agreed to a certain extent. But how is it that in my country where it's almost possible to legally own a gun there are very few who own one illegally, let alone use them? If what you say is true, then surely every other country in the world that don't make weapons legal would still have loads of illegal weapons circulating and being used. That's not the case.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 12:38 PM
1

I agree with you in theory, but statistically America has far far higher amounts of gun deaths and violent deaths per capita than other countries. I can't help but think that easy access to weaponry has a lot to do with that. It's quite a bit harder to stab someone to death with a knife than it is to pull a trigger. In the end though, I really think this is a cultural difference we'll never get over. Americans think it their right to 'bear arms (why not bear legs I ask you?), and most Europeans …
/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:41 AM
3

Yeah. The problem with these situations is that in the heat of the moment it's hard to use the 'least possible force' to subdue someone. I'm a large guy like yourself, so I think I'd be even more careful about hitting anyone, as I know just how ridiculously strong I can be (it amazes even me sometimes). The problem is judging and acting accordingly. It's a hard thing to do. I'm a pacifist in nearly every situation, but I'm also a pragmatist, so I know sometimes you DO have to resort to violence.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:37 AM
3

Yeah. I remember reading about a burglar in America who broke his leg crawling in a window of someone's house, broke his leg, sued, and won a massive amount in court. Only in America. There was a similar case in Ireland (where I live) a while ago. Two people (travellers, if that means anything to you) threatened an old man over the period of a few months. Eventually he moved to an outhouse to sleep because he was so frightened of them. In the end he ended up shooting one of them when they broke …
/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:33 AM
1

Yeah. Okay. Although I still feel that a baseball bat/knife probably isn't reason enough for me (I'd have to judge it based on the actual situation), but yeah, I see your point.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:15 AM
3

You live in America? In my country, it's pretty much only farmers who have guns. You can join a gun club (and I'd like to) but there's a lot to deal with to do even that, and I think you can't take the guns outside the shooting range. Always wanted to try it. I'm a crack shot when it comes to darts/archery/rugby etcetera, so I always thought I'd be good at it. interesting story actually, I once hit a man in the stomach with a hurl from 40-50 feet away when I was younger and he jumped out at me w…
/r/MensRights08/06/12 01:53 AM
2

Ah, well, your idea that he would let her hit him because he had a gun was something that I had thought of too. I remember reading a thing about people saying that you could never let yourself get angry and that you pretty much had to back down from any fight because of the fact you were carrying a gun and would be tempted to use it. Personally, and unlike many/some Americans I feel that not being able to casually own a gun is the better option. That being said, I'd love to head out to a firing …
/r/MensRights08/06/12 01:37 AM
16

Okay, not to disagree with the point of this thread or with you per sé, but are you saying that it'd be okay to shoot someone who hit you? Because that's a lot crazy to me. Source; Not American.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 01:17 AM
1

Can you expand on that point? Do you mean that whatever is the law is moral? Yeah, I'm the one with the messed up morality. In your world, there would be anarchy, with the strongest taking everything that they could.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:21 PM
1

Who said anything about killing somebody? You are putting words in my mouth. Punching someone and killing someone are entirely different things. I would never kill anyone unless they were trying to kill me or my family, and then only if I had exhausted every other possibility. Using the necessary amount of force to stop somebody from taking your property does not mean killing them. So, could I walk into your home and demand that you give me the deeds to your house, and you'd just give it to me a…
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:18 PM
1

And the laws are moral in every circumstance? It might be against the law to do it, but it wouldn't be unethical.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 02:28 PM
1

So, let me get this straight. If someone broke into your house and started stealing left, right, and centre, and you had the ability to stop them, you wouldn't? What about if you were being raped? Does your body count as your property? If so, would you just lay there, because it would be unethical of you to fight back?
/r/MensRights09/04/12 02:24 PM
1

Agreed. That being said, I have only on the rarest occasions hit a man. I try not to hit anyone, but I would definitely reconsider hitting a man who is 5'4" and 110 pounds, being that I'm a foot taller than him and twice his weight. So the same would be said for the majority of women. However, yeah, if I'm provoked by anyone, man or woman, and the only reasonable way out of the situation is to take them down, I will, and I wouldn't feel ashamed of it.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 02:20 PM
3

Thank you!
/r/MensRights09/04/12 01:50 PM
2

That post about the man punching the woman in the stomach was fake? I missed that. Do you have the link to it? Or if not how exactly did they find out it was fake?
/r/MensRights09/04/12 12:07 AM
2

You know what? A lot of these are bullshit. It's a pity too, because a fair number of these are legitimate grievances, and they're clouded by the over-dramatic generalizations of some of the others. For instance 'shitty, low-end job with no career prospects', 'own guns' and 'dump your current partner', among others.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 12:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter