TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DeathMind Archive

View 0 posts and 60 comments by DeathMind on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

I mistook you responding to a different comment. The comment above u links a cohort study from Denmark with 800.000 participants. "In this national cohort study spanning more than three decades of observation, non-therapeutic circumcision in infancy or childhood did not appear to provide protection against HIV or other STIs in males up to the age of 36 years. Rather, non-therapeutic circumcision was associated with higher STI rates overall, particularly for anogenital warts and syphilis. " So no…
/r/MensRights13/10/22 11:27 PM
17

So you are going to counter a large cohort study of over 800.000 people with one that has less than 200?
/r/MensRights13/10/22 09:14 PM
11

I'm sorry but who thinks this is the smoking gun? They are sued by the state of California after a 2 year investigation with 100s of employees both male and female speaking out on sexual harassment, sexual assault and sexual discrimination. Not just a video from many years ago
/r/MensRights30/07/21 08:43 AM
4

I'm not an active Facebook user so I'm unsure but there are plenty of social web frameworks that use some type of pattern matching to find and censor bad things. This is why people got banned in rainbow six for talking about south park hero/villain the coon as coon is seen as a racial slur where it also refers to a racoon. It would be incorrect to jump the gun blaming anti male censorship without taking automatic algorithms in consideration. Combinations such as middle East and rape for instance…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 04:42 PM
5

Isn't this just a post that uses words that automatically get flagged, such as "marital rape"
/r/MensRights14/08/19 04:11 PM
2

This all depends on the scenario and I'm trying to mitigate them all to some extent. Scenario A: You earn 60k and I earn 20k both full-time and we get a kid. We decide child services are worse than one of us staying at home so one of us takes care of the kids. Me having the lower income seems better suited as this leaves us a higher net income. After four years you don't love me anymore and ask for a divorce. Now you didn't lose anything as you have been gaining more work experience while I didn…
/r/MensRights17/06/19 12:42 AM
2

Guys this is an opinion piece and not an official journalistic article.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 09:29 AM
1

The hit taken to the CV is only for the partner that stays at home. Wether the partner chills at home watching youtube is not the same as taking care of all other issues in and around the house. I'm not talking about child support, that is a seperate issue, but taking care of the kids at home also requires time that could otherwise be spent on advancing careers. I think removing it entirely causes inquity as well as relationships with one people earning all the money and the other taking care of…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 09:12 PM
4

Ye that is what I mean with point C. I wouldn't put it on 5 years but under a shorter timeframe where if you earn under the set living standard (assuming u work full-time) you continue to receive alimony to fill that gap. (Assuming the payer is able to without falling below the set standard
/r/MensRights14/06/19 04:21 PM
15

If as partners you make the decision that one of you stays at home for the kids, long term you will sacrifice a reasonable financial loss as you have less work experience. If you then split up with your partner you are not only financially disadvantaged but lose any source of income you have. I would argue that alimony would be good for society as long as: A alimony is limited to reasonable living standards B alimony payer is not living below that standard C should require the payed, to actively…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 04:05 PM
1

Well how about vasalgel instead of a vasectomy then?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 10:52 PM
1

In the interest of steel manning this shit, HYPOTHETICALLY ​ If vasectomies would be super easy to do and reverse (with almost zero complication possibilities), then in the interest of male reproductive agency, having a free vasecomy at a young age (not sure this is possible) would not be the worst plan. Then if man personally would feel they are in a position suitable for children they could reverse the vasectomy and reproduce with their spouse. Would not be a terrible idea in my opinion. ​ how…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 09:20 PM
2

define brain development. how do you feel about pulling switch on brain dead coma victims? brain dead = dead. so pulling the switch is no problem for me 1)rape abortions account for less than 1 percent of abortions. we make laws that affect the majority, not the minority of cases. related to that, making exceptions for rape also opens the door for many woman to make false rape claims so they may go through an abortion procedure. Not only destroying the life of the child, but the father as well. …
/r/MensRights16/05/19 03:46 PM
5

You didn't respond to his comment but somebody elses. Also it was a quote from someone in the article so even if u did respond you are now asking someone to defend a comment from someone else to defend a quote from the article? Also what I think the second guy was trying to say was that this post is about framing the law makers as all male when this is not the case You can frame the abortion stance as a dichotomy where it's murdering innocent babies but this a far more complex issue. First, ther…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 02:28 PM
1

Which would be even more of a reason to increase female insurance rather than decrease males would it not?
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:28 PM
2

If the market wss really competitive why did every insurance company have different prices for male and female? Wouldn't the ones that didn't do this have a much larger market share? Problem with capitalistic markets is that it can only be competitive if it is transparent, has low barriers to entry and no monopolies or cartels. I highly doubt insurance is perfectly transparent and if everyone raises female prices to match males I'm guessing either a spoken or unspoken tit for tat cartel
/r/MensRights07/01/19 11:47 AM
2

And this is factually incorrect why again? It states men and women are fucked in different ways and this cancels out each other in terms of parity. While women have bad educational chances men have a lower lifespan and life satisfaction. Equally fucked is still equal in some way right? Or is same outcome the only parity that can exist?
/r/MensRights06/01/19 10:57 AM
2

Why do you think the measurement is awful?
/r/MensRights06/01/19 01:50 AM
19

Hitting back is terrible advice imo. You will lose when cops get involved automatically. His advice was pretty reasonable
/r/MensRights25/12/18 01:13 PM
1

What is my argument cuz I don't think you know what it is?
/r/MensRights24/12/18 08:06 PM
1

ROTFLMAO. Ah the idiocy of the modern fully-programmed NPC. No argument just your feelings ROTFLMAO. Bullshit. No argument just your feelings You are insistent on creating a JUSTIFICATION-rationale for WHY they do this I'm not but if we understand the factors that lead to these scenarios we can combat the problem or is your solution that woman should never be allowed near children? in order to try to maintain your own belief that "women are wonderful, they're the MOST nurturing, caring, loving" …
/r/MensRights24/12/18 07:44 PM
2

If your argument is that women spend more time with their children on average and that is linked to higher murder rates that is just wrong It's not. My argument is that the reasons for it are not clear from the data given in this thread and many factors could possibly explain this difference but we are not researchers and thus should not make claims about shit we don't know enough about. Just like the wage gap has factors that would explain differences and thus ascribing it to sexism without ana…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:11 PM
3

the red dots clustered towards the bottom represent children from within the family being killed by women. Compare it with the men's one. As the original thread title states it is specifically looking at in-family homicide rates by gender. Now I'll admit that I interperted this as mothers as it could also refer to grandmothers, sisters, nieces and other family related female members, although I would argue that given the age of the deaths one could argue that it would be predominantly mothers th…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:57 PM
3

This whole thread is about the amount of children killed by family when broken down by gender and that stat wise mothers kill their children at greater rates than fathers. So when the OP of this post brings statistics of male and female perpatrators it does not address the point of parental child homicide and thus is not addressing the issue. I briefly scanned his source but could not find this family murder breakdown in the statistics and thus does not address the thread OP when he claims the f…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:40 PM
1

Can u cite from the actual study linked where it breaks down the % of family child homicide by gender? I only see % of child homicide by gender And % of child homicide by family
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:24 PM
2

MURDER is not something of that type Citation? Unless ur a psych major just asserting this is bad. Who knows maybe crimes of opportunity in stressed parents is an actual thing. Without studying the reasons behind it, it is just some stupid number people will use to boost their own narrative And "cooked" data? All kinds of fraud (and indeed crime, in this case MURDER) get hidden ALL the time in MISLEADING "adjustments" to data. Unless you are educated in the field you do not have the expertise to…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:21 PM
2

But ur making my argument for me man. If we adjust the data for Munchausen syndrome affected mothers and we see that they kill their children equal to fathers than we know the major cause of the problem and if it is treatable and diagnosable we can reduce parental child homicide. There could be many other reasons tho just like the wage gap is not just about time worked and experience. Understanding these reasons is very important as these statistics don't tell us much useful
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:11 PM
2

Worse they seem to actually be saying it's not only a reason but a justification for it. No they don't IOW it's really the dead KID'S fault. That's not what they are saying Apparently then -- if the same (warped) logic of "time around the kids" applies -- once kids pass ~age 5 school teachers (particularly elementary school teachers where a single teacher typically has the same students all day long) should be killing kids at about an equal or higher rate than mothers. False analogy Yes it is a …
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:06 PM
2

Noone says it's ok to kill them! We are trying to understand if there are external factors that when adjusted could close the gender gap. Just like the gender wage gap. It could still be more mothers than fathers after adjusting but it would be a more fair representation.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 12:56 PM
5

The post is about mother's killings their infants more. While male perpetrators might kill 17 and younger more than females as strangers your source doesn't explicitly show a division in the ' by family' area and thus this does not address the issue
/r/MensRights24/12/18 12:41 PM
19

So because the guy says with no source it reduces HIV in terrible African regions we should preemptively mutilate all the baby boys? Aside from the fact that there are tons of other solutions that don't involve a serious medical procedure the argument can also be made for a whole host of issues as pointed out by the breast amputation example. Most people in Europe aren't circumcised and STDs aren't runnings rampant there. Many cultures that have fgm also have medical benefits that they use to ar…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 06:52 AM
8

What arguments?
/r/MensRights24/12/18 06:29 AM
1

Problem is when news articles then spin it into sensational stories that are even further from the reality and implications of the research
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:33 AM
-1

The male reproductive choice is a separate issue here. A valid issue but not in this discussion imo. Noone deems this behaviour acceptable. The argument made is that if woman are caring for the child in 90% of households while the man isn't in the picture or off working. We would expect most deaths to be at the hands of woman. And if the data was adjusted for this we may see an equal amount of infantile homicide among men and women
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:31 AM
4

Source?
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:26 AM
3

Ur kind of proving his point tho. By extending the same multivariant analysis we do on the gender wage gap, the parental infantile homicide gender gap MIGHT also disappear
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:25 AM
0

That's a strawman buddy
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:22 AM
0

Unfortunately you don't understand it buddy. Unadjusted data means nothing. On average the more churches in a city the more crime. This is not due to churches causing crime but because bigger cities have more crime and churches. In the same way if every 1% of parents both male and female are crazy and can potentially kill their kid under equal conditions they would murder kids at equal rate. However just like the wage gap we should look at percentages of parents spending time with their kids. If…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:21 AM
8

While I would like to see sources before I would agree to fathers or general men being far more dangerous to children as this is a claim I don't see evidence for. You have a good argument that this is just unadjusted data and shouldn't be seen as good facts in support of child well-being. I have said it before and I'll say it again: there are lies, damned lies and statistics. We can't jump the gun on the image of some graph and get outraged. We have to rationally analyse the data! Don't fall int…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:13 AM
2

I'm not sure you know what "controlled" means? Maybe it's my fault as English isn't my first language. But I'll try to explain: A lot of factors can influence the outcome of a study. Let's say we want to know how much gender plays a role we have to match males against females. Now there are many things that could influence the results. If more female house parents are poor compared to the males in our study this could skew the data. Some factors I could think of are: socio-economical status, age…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 01:06 AM
1

Assert what as factual? That woman kill more children than men? That it has to do with gender? That mothers are most dangerous thing to their child? These are three totally different claims. When unadjusted for controlling factors I agree with the first premise in first world countries. Aside from that unless he has the background in these sciences and the data and studies to back the other claims up he is just talking with feelings not facts. Unless u want to equate danger to numbers only in wh…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 12:09 AM
18

Just like red philosopher pointed out, there are lies, damned lies and statistics. Unless you are educated on the field of this study and have a comprehensive understanding of the methodology u can't merely assert this as factual. Just like the wage gap there could be a whole host of other influences driving this statistic. Let's not make the same mistake.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 04:05 PM
1

Message me when u do as I'm interested
/r/MensRights06/12/18 04:24 AM
3

I'm mostly critiquing the notion that feminism is this huge threat to society that has turned us into some kind of gynocentric society. The idea of gynocentrism stems from research that both males and females have a preference for female well being and generally consider males disposable which would stem forth from the survivalistic nature of mankind. While feminism isn't the complete evil, as several political mens groups have pointed out that large prominent feminist organisations have been bl…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 04:06 AM
2

But you aren't banned right? I last saw a post for people getting banned from r/feminism for being subscribed to this sub. When people say feminism they specifically mean groups of people that identify as gender feminists often combined with intersectionality that use various tactics to influence political decisions using varying tactics to advance women often at the cost of men. And yes the guy was unnecessarily rude after u called his worldview stupid
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:10 AM
3

As I mentioned I am not from America and judging by your post, you are (correct me if I'm wrong). I'm no expert on how your government is fractured so I'm I might be taking a leap here. If you have a representative government then people will vote indirectly for legislation. So individual approval by gender/sex would be an estimation. Most people do not follow politics more than hot issues on the news and thus will be unaware of.most passing legislation until it hits them in the face. Also isn't…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 02:55 AM
2

that one's biological sex is deterministic of one's behaviour, personality and inclinations. While I agree that biological sex has a significant influence on these factors I don't think it's the sole or even main factor. I'm sure there are people here that feel the way you described it but I would disagree with them on this aspect. I think society plays a huge role here. However wether the societal influences are a bad thing is dependent on the situation tend to pin the blame on all women I thin…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 02:00 AM
3

I think that the effects of hardcore feminism are dramatically overblown outside of niche environments, like very liberal colleges on the coasts and other unusual places. I'm in graduate school in classes full of women, women of color, and almost no men. I don't feel all that compelled to watch what I say beyond the obvious cultural politeness stuff. The problem of a silent minority and loud majority i guess. Take laws. Who is passing them? By and large, men are. Efforts to blame feminists speci…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 12:18 AM
4

First of: what is the sexist red pill ideology? Just so we agree on terms. Secondly from my experience it is 2nd wave feminism that is about equity and that especially young American students at colleges are more third wave with the ideology of intersectionality which focuses on group oppression and most of the ideas I see people in this sub oppose While I don't think any here are opposed to equity in terms of laws and treatment, I think many oppose the methods generally presented as ways of rea…
/r/MensRights05/12/18 08:52 PM
3

Ye but we should make a good distinction between intelligent researchers talking about societal influences that shape our choices (nurture) vs idiots that misconstrue this as just people telling them what choices to make based on their sex I have no doubts about the first one but wether it is something that should be ""fixed"" is a whole different topic
/r/MensRights25/11/18 12:05 PM
1

Which school?
/r/MensRights14/11/18 12:53 AM
2

I honestly feel like to much people make big deals out of this. This is just a marketing strategy. The majority of caretakers of kids is still female and therefore fitting the demographic they aim the app at mothers. This is almost the same as the outrage about science magazines were placed in the men's section. Because men read more science magazines they place it there.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 09:57 PM
1

They only play 3 instead of 5 sets so they play less for the same money right now I believe
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:24 AM
0

My previous girlfriend was an aromantic asexual and my current girlfriend is a semi-sexual, so I know a lot about how different people feel that don't have the same libido / physical attraction that the average person has. It's hard for those people growing up when both men and woman become sexually active at a completely different level and that the average person doesn't have the same expectations in a relationship that they have. So saying that stuff can be very hurtful to them or the fact th…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 05:06 PM
1

Though that might be true (also it would mean the girls trip is partially being payed for by themselves too) it doesn't imply a direct unfairness. At my university different clubs are given money to spend on activities which they may use for different purposes. Some use it to do cool fieldtrips and some use it on getting an icehockeytable in the university club room. Which is why I asked my supply&demand question. As 12obvious explains in the post below, even if males were to pay for the trip th…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:19 AM
0

@1. That depends. If there is genuinely no demand for an all-boys trip or for boys to join the trip in itself I don't think it is a problem itself. If there is however a demand for a boys only trip or to make it available for everyone regardless of gender I do think it would be good to adress that. (I don't know if everyone agrees but I think a fair way of creating more equality by calling out the problem on both sides of the coin) So I suggest you could start by finding out if there are guys wh…
/r/MensRights30/06/15 07:41 PM
2

A fair point there and thanks for the tips on reddit edditing. But how about the idea of mailing concerns to the school project administrator person?
/r/MensRights30/06/15 03:46 PM
0

I'm not trying to fuel the fire here by again displaying my doubts about this. First of it seems to be a psychology paper for school (As I'm not aware of the complete workings of the Australian teaching structure I don't know the level of education so I'll be calling it a school) While I don't like the idea of misused data, to be simply believing the author of the post blindly would be the same mistake that a lot of people which ideas you oppose are constantly making, would it not? Secondly even…
/r/MensRights30/06/15 03:29 PM
-1

I'm not saying everything is good and all, but aren't we jumping to conclusions that he is doing it to bias the results? Maybe he is researching the viewpoint of that group in which his sample is correctly targeted? Maybe aside from that he put his survey at many other places as well? I'm not justifying him here I just think that we lack the context behind all this to make these claims. Not to mention that surveymonkey surveys are offcourse not really scientific and I highly doubt that they can …
/r/MensRights30/06/15 03:08 PM
-1

Aside from a few points of ambiguitity the questions itself aren't so bad in itself. I'm just wondering what the point people are trying to make here? Perhaps the different roles that fathers and mother have in most households? Because my parents have almost mirrored stats (they are both awesome \o/ )
/r/MensRights30/06/15 02:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter