TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Deathbysugar2020 Archive

View 32 posts and 416 comments by Deathbysugar2020 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
811

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists25/04/20 03:03 AM
145

Deathbysugar2020/r/MGTOW02/04/20 08:23 AM
140

Legal RightsDeathbysugar2020/r/MensRights16/08/20 05:04 PM
140

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists20/03/20 07:52 AM
137

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists19/06/20 04:05 AM
117

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists07/09/20 01:48 PM
80

Deathbysugar2020/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/20 03:57 PM
47

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists21/03/20 04:52 PM
34

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists27/04/20 10:46 AM
29

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists15/05/20 07:08 AM
17

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists06/05/20 08:09 PM
12

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists24/06/20 04:23 AM
11

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists03/05/20 06:31 AM
9

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists17/07/20 08:47 AM
8

Deathbysugar2020/r/MGTOW07/03/20 12:07 PM
7

Deathbysugar2020/r/MGTOW01/05/20 07:13 PM
6

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists12/06/20 09:30 AM
6

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists13/06/20 04:45 PM
6

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists29/03/20 05:31 AM
5

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists04/05/20 03:29 PM
3

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists06/07/20 06:33 PM
2

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists24/03/20 02:43 PM
1

Field ReportDeathbysugar2020/r/TheRedPill15/05/20 06:49 AM
1

Deathbysugar2020/r/MGTOW29/03/20 12:41 PM
1

Deathbysugar2020/r/MGTOW29/03/20 12:33 PM
1

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists06/05/20 08:07 PM
1

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists02/05/20 03:37 AM
1

Deathbysugar2020/r/AntiFeminists15/05/20 07:07 AM
0

Deathbysugar2020/r/MGTOW08/03/20 03:23 PM
0

Deathbysugar2020/r/MGTOW23/06/20 04:58 AM
0

Deathbysugar2020/r/askTRP18/09/20 07:38 AM
0

Deathbysugar2020/r/MGTOW09/03/20 04:20 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Good for him, then. People should make decisions based on whether or not the partner is in a good position to help raise a child. The US is absolutely insane in this regard.
/r/MensRights28/11/20 03:19 PM
1

Why didn't she sue for child support? Would've been an easy way to tie him down.
/r/MensRights28/11/20 03:02 PM
1

Jokes on men are funny. Jokes on anything are funny. The patriarchy line was dumb, but there's nothing wrong with jokes on men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/20 12:43 PM
7

This isn't feminism, this is climate change activism. OP, you're a dummy.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen18/10/20 09:58 AM
2

Press charges. Her word shouldn't mean anything in the court because they do not know who lied.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 06:39 AM
1

Oof. Where's the strawman? And what's your source of this statistic?
/r/ExRedPill15/10/20 03:18 PM
-2

The OC said that no woman is like that. That means no exceptions. I, being a humble wise man, merely stated that there are exceptions. My attempt was not to derail your precious conversation about how women are all angels who could never dream of harming a man. I apologise if I showed any disrespect towards your vast knowledge about the elusive species commonly known as women.
/r/ExRedPill15/10/20 01:24 PM
-2

Oh you know a lot about women? Very good, you must be very knowledgeable. When did I say it's a "trend"?
/r/ExRedPill15/10/20 12:47 PM
1

Obviously all humans can be like that. But I didn't say that because firstly, it was a response to the OC saying that no women are like that, so I talked about women. Secondly, I haven't met any man who likes drama and fantasy in a relationship, but I've met quite a few women. Maybe it's just chance, but again it's from my own experience.
/r/ExRedPill15/10/20 08:30 AM
0

I won't ask a woman who lives in a fantasy out, and I don't accept dates with them either, so I rarely have issues in first dates. On the even rarer occassion that I find out that the woman is such late into our relationship, I dump her then.
/r/ExRedPill15/10/20 08:22 AM
1

I guess we have about as much experience as each other, maybe I have more since straight women are more common than gay women. And you say "how women think" as if women are another species 😑 I don't go on dates with women who I won't see again, what's the point of such a date?
/r/ExRedPill15/10/20 08:16 AM
0

I don't even understand what you mean. A straight woman doesn't date women. A straight man dates women. So who would have experience dating women?
/r/ExRedPill15/10/20 08:10 AM
-2

As a man.
/r/ExRedPill15/10/20 08:07 AM
-6

I base this off my own experience.
/r/ExRedPill15/10/20 08:05 AM
6

I'm not into US politics, but if that's what Trump does, then yes.
/r/ExRedPill15/10/20 05:17 AM
-17

Oh, you don't know what some women would do for attention. They love making up stories to get into the spotlight, they want to be in their own little reality show. Not most women, certainly. But some are.
/r/ExRedPill15/10/20 04:43 AM
15

Black people are 3× more likely to be the perpetrator of a violent crime than white people, but I don't see people saying to black victims, "well, black people are more likely to commit violent crimes than white people, so perhaps black people need to change!". Almost as if a group's statistics isn't indicative of an individual's actions. Almost as if a person who is part of a group cannot affect the actions of his entire group.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/20 04:09 AM
5

Sociology? 😑😑😑 I remember how sociology turned one of my best friends into the communist feminist type. It's funny how I told him why most of the things he learnt are wrong in our conversations and it was kind of a revelation to him. Thank god I took science and not humanities.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/20 08:16 PM
9

16 hours isn't something to brag about. I do 2 hours of cleaning, cooking, tidying everyday in my apartment. If I had kids and a wife, it'd go up. This is ridiculous.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/20 04:32 PM
2

Good thing I'm doing medicine. I ain't got time for shit like this 😌
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/20 04:30 PM
-29

Great but this isn't related to men's "rights", right? It's sexist but I see no rights being denied or violated.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 03:20 PM
2

Being a woman shouldn't have anything to do with this. When thinking of solutions, personal biases must be kept aside. No identity politics.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 08:59 AM
31

Which subject is this? This can't really be in any curriculum, can it?
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/20 08:49 AM
1

R.I.P. grammar.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 03:59 PM
4

You're Indian, right? I can feel you, people here just parrot the voice of an echo chamber in all matters - gender equality, secularism, nationalism and shit. They don't think reasonably.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 03:58 PM
1

You did not respond to my comment on why women are more inclined to caregiving than men in general.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/20 06:47 AM
0

Thanks for the pointers. I'll try to read the sidebar when I get time.
/r/askTRP18/09/20 10:06 AM
1

Perhaps you, being a success redpiller, could help me out? Why this happens? How to use this nature of women? Where to start reading about the Red Pill?
/r/askTRP18/09/20 08:10 AM
1

The sidebar seems so complicated and time-consuming. It takes too much time. What do you suggest?
/r/askTRP18/09/20 08:03 AM
3

Frying pans are really bad weapons. If you know basic martial arts, you can deflect it or stop them before they hurt you. A sharp weapon is almost always better.
/r/MensRights17/09/20 10:03 AM
1

I didn't say that women are worthy of special treatment. I don't use incel towards men who call out women's bullshit. I was just trying to point out how the sub has gone to the dumpsters. Look at this post, it has very less to do with feminism. The most well received posts of this sub in the past months are those which make no point and have no purpose. I prefer the men's rights, pro male collective and left wing male advocates subs. They focus on how feminism is actually doing nothing worthwhil…
/r/AntiFeminists17/09/20 09:07 AM
1

Well, try explaining it objectively then?
/r/AntiFeminists17/09/20 08:34 AM
0

I didn't get what you're trying to say dude
/r/AntiFeminists17/09/20 02:07 AM
7

Critical thinking is what's important. Leave personal biases alone. Democratically elect the leaders who you think will be the best choice for such a task, instead of voting according to whether the have a D or R next to their name. Saying that since a group isn't affected by a law it has no rights to make the law is ridiculous. You've elected the leaders because they decide what's best for the nation, not because of their identity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/20 05:00 PM
3

Your mom sure was
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/20 08:36 AM
2

Could you perhaps elaborate?
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/20 04:38 AM
-3

That's r/antifeminists for you, edgy kids or frustrated incels 🤷‍♂️
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/20 04:37 AM
3

"I actually think this post is disturbing. I have punched holes in things and broken items when I was upset. It had nothing to do with my masculinity being challenged. It was because I was dealing with horrific family trauma and that was how I vented my frustration at the time. When someone reaches this point they need help, not ridicule." This was a comment from the thread.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 01:40 PM
1

That's not even the point of the post or my comment. The post and comment were in regards to whether men and women are different in caregiving capacities in general, not whether men and women are treated differently in general in family courts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/20 04:37 PM
1

Must be different in different places. Here in India, the pay is ₹20,000 or 2800$ per month. This is a fourth of my starting income as a resident doctor.
/r/askTRP10/09/20 04:22 PM
1

Must be different in different places. Here in India, the pay is ₹20,000 or 2800$ per month. This is a fourth of my starting income as a resident doctor.
/r/askTRP10/09/20 04:22 PM
1

Yes, it is already accepted that men in general are more productive, and rightly so. Men have evolved to produce and provide more, and women have evolved to nurture and protect. There's a reason men dominate engineering fields and women dominate nursing fields (and it's not gender discrimination). I didn't say that we should actively discriminate against someone. It's the truth that men in general are more suited for more responsible positions, but that doesn't mean that all men are better at re…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/20 04:19 PM
1

You're correct. However, that is more of a sociological outcome, than an evolutionary one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/20 04:13 PM
3

Males’ higher potential rate of reproduction in comparison to females gives rise to a reproductive strategy focused at finding mates, which more strongly fosters male-male competition to gain access to females (Geary, 2000). Due to stronger competition, males are expected to be more prone to risk-taking than females (e.g., Wilson & Daly, 1985), which is likely to be reflected in their parenting behavior. Furthermore, the larger paternal than maternal uncertainty about biological relatedness to o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/20 04:11 PM
-2

Women in general are better caregivers. It comes down to evolution in the savannahs, where humans spent the most time evolving. I'll be happy to explain if people are interested. There's no rule that all woman better at raising kids than all men though. A man can be better at raising kids than a woman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/20 09:42 AM
3

Doesn't firefighting pay very poorly?
/r/askTRP08/09/20 03:23 AM
1

Fat doesn't shift in density across people. Fat takes up the same place, on the peripheral layers of the epidermis. The thin person who you say accumulates fat doesn't accumulate fat, because the effects are supposed to be visible. He does, however, accumulate cholesterol.
/r/AntiFeminists08/09/20 03:00 AM
1

You're right. But at the end, even if they have different BMIs, they will both be healthier with a better diet and exercise.
/r/AntiFeminists08/09/20 02:58 AM
2

No one claims BMI to be a perfect indicator of health. It's a pretty good one though. A bodybuilder's body isn't natural, it's made to have excess muscle tissue. It's not what you would call a normal healthy body. There are only two areas where weight is significantly measured - muscle and fat. So if you know that you obviously have a lot of muscle mass, you know that you're a healthy overweight person. But if you're a fat overweight person, you're unhealthy. Seems pretty straightforward to me. …
/r/AntiFeminists07/09/20 08:25 PM
1

Sorry for the late reply. If you bothered to see the context, I'm saying that the father should have the right to sign away responsibility post-conception and pre-birth, when the fetus is abortable. So there isn't a child in this scenario.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/20 06:18 PM
1

Oscars are usually given to people who can bribe the elite voters the best. An Oscar isn't an indication of how good a film is. This is true for most award shows.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/20 04:54 PM
4

I saw your conversation with the girl who was saying things without making any point. Kudos to you for keeping the conversation logical, instead of resorting to beating a strawman or ad hominen like she did. I like people who make good points. It shows that you are open-minded and think clearly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/20 09:03 PM
2

Tell me one thing first, if the father runs away, why doesn't the mother just go for an abortion? Abortions are legal right now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/20 08:31 PM
4

Because here, the father tells the mother his decision before the child is a functional human being. The mother can then choose to abort the fetus if she feels she cannot raise it herself. Here, she isn't stuck with a child she expected the father to help with, because the decision was conveyed at a time when she could make the choice to keep the child or not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/20 08:23 PM
1

I'm not sure that you're understanding what I'm trying to say. I'm not saying that the father should be able to run away from child support whenever he feels like it. I'm saying that when conception occurs, intentionally or unintentionally, the man should be able to choose whether or not he will support the child. Then the mother can make an informed decision on whether she should keep the fetus or abort it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/20 08:17 PM
1

Why shouldn't economic autonomy be implemented in this scenario? It doesn't interfere with the bodily autonomy you say is above everything else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/20 07:33 PM
1

They have the same result, but they're really not the same. But whatever, this discussion is pointless.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/20 03:39 AM
6

the state did not impregnate a woman. Why should taxpayers fund the child you sired? I do not support this either. But this already happens in welfare programs and safe haven laws, because it's still better than the mother's potential decision to inhumanely kill the child. Why should the father pay for a child he did not want and did not force the mother to give birth to? What incentive would men have to not opt out of EVERY pregnancy? They can still see the child but not be legally on the hook …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/20 03:32 AM
1

It uses the idea of being gay as an insult, not because the woman believes so, but because the man thinks so (apparently). It's playing against the prejudice of the affected party. The line really isn't homophobic.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen17/08/20 03:12 AM
1

The US is one country. And safe haven laws aren't really paper abortions. Paper abortions are supposed to take place when the fetus is abortable, so that the woman can make an informed choice whether or not to carry the child to full term. But once the child is born, that's when safe haven laws come into place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/20 07:44 PM
22

Wait, what bad result? A bad result for the child here happens only in one scenario. If the father withdraws from support, the mother still chooses to keep the fetus despite knowing that she cannot support it, then she is unable to support the child. Even though this is bad for the child, this is not the father's fault. Rather, the state should intervene and help take care of the child, as happens in safe haven and maternal support programs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/20 07:41 PM
6

You didn't understand. The woman can choose to keep the baby or not. But the man, in the case that she decides to keep the baby, has no choice of whether or not he wants to help support the child. He is legally obliged to. The discussion is not about rights postpartum.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/20 07:36 PM
23

You should read my comment in this post. Of course a child results from pregnancies. But if the man is allowed to withdraw responsibility before birth, the woman can them make her own decision about whether or not to keep the fetus. Then it's fair for everyone - everyone is being allowed to make their own decisions, and no one is being forced to do something they did not consent to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/20 07:31 PM
24

There's no alive child when the father signs off any potential responsibility before birth. I'm not talking about child support in postpartum scenarios. In case you didn't notice, we're talking about abortion here, so the things I'm saying are all pre-term.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/20 07:23 PM
32

In either scenarios, the person's consent to sex was taken as consent to supporting a child. And if you saw my post, you'll see that they use the exact same wording which pro-lifers use.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/20 07:03 PM
3

Currently, paper abortions are not allowed in most countries, regardless of gender. Hypothetically if they were, usually paper abortions for women will not be required, since she has the choice of real abortion. But ideally there would be an option, in case the woman agrees with the father to to carry the child to full term, then give full responsibility to the father.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/20 06:42 PM
5

Here's a case for some insight into how unfair the system is for men.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 05:06 PM
2

I do not understand, how is this post discriminatory against homosexuals?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen16/08/20 04:50 PM
12

I do not think this subject should be up for debate. Women who become pregnant should have the choice to abort a child, up to a time limit (8 weeks is the safest and most humane deadline overall, variable in case of anomality - rape, complications etc.). But in case the woman decides to keep the fetus, the man should have the choice to help provide for the child or not. It's not fair to force someone to do something he did not consent to. The best solution I think is: If pregnancy occurs, the wo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/20 04:03 PM
3

Thanks for the answer. But what if I don't have an attorney at the moment? I'm in college now, and pretty much living on my own recently. I don't have a lawyer for any legal matters yet.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 03:42 PM
2

I don't think you understood. You can't be silent and tell them that you want your lawyer at the same time. And ignoring calls seems like a bad move.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 03:40 PM
1

Then why does anything I say to the investigators have any weight? It isn't an authorised or official meeting, right?
/r/MensRights15/08/20 03:39 PM
2

I don't think you understood. You can't be silent and tell them that you want your lawyer at the same time. And ignoring calls seems like a bad move.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 03:37 PM
10

Thanks for the answer. Are investigators official government workers, or hired by the prosecution?
/r/MensRights15/08/20 01:36 PM
11

Just asking, what significance does being a trans woman have here? Support for human rights should be irrespective of gender.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 12:28 PM
12

What exactly are you supposed to do? Ignore the calls? Remain silent? Tell them that you shall not speak about the case without an attorney?
/r/MensRights15/08/20 12:27 PM
1

It doesn't make a difference if it was a guy or a girl who wrote this, if it was written seriously.
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/20 09:49 AM
1

Hey, please link that comment if you can, thank you.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 09:12 AM
3

It's too long and verbose, can I have a synopsis?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/20 05:24 PM
4

What propaganda?
/r/AntiFeminists13/08/20 08:23 AM
9

Thanks!
/r/MensRights12/08/20 05:09 PM
20

Then why discriminate between men and women here? And 6 months off means 6 months off your career, family, education etc. This means an year off formal education.
/r/MensRights12/08/20 04:57 PM
29

Could you give some details please? Names, links etc.?
/r/MensRights12/08/20 04:54 PM
2

No, I mean what are you guys trying to establish it as the icon of?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/20 02:45 PM
6

What exactly is the white feather the icon of?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/20 01:44 PM
5

What's the meaning of toxic masculinity?
/r/AntiFeminists12/08/20 01:36 PM
1

You mean subreddits? My favourites are r/ProMaleCollective, r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates, r/FeMRADebates, r/MensRights.
/r/AntiFeminists12/08/20 01:34 PM
3

No. Children do not have enough experience with the world and aren't smart enough to fully grasp the concept that your actions have consequences. It doesn't apply for children. That's stupid.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/20 09:07 PM
3

Feminism is, by definition, advocating for rights for one group alone. It isn't really equality. Even then, it isn't a bad thing inherently. The main problems with feminism is how it is being practiced and how it's affecting the world in a negative way. This sub is just dumb edgy kids. There are better subs if you really want to meet antifeminists.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/20 06:40 PM
1

So it happens in isolated areas. It doesn't represent Pakistan in general. Do you think women in India are oppressed, because girls in some backwards settings are denied education?
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/20 08:00 AM
2

Pakistan is an Islamic state because the moral grounds in law are layed down according to Muslim practice. Pakistan doesn't enforce Muslim laws, however. For instance, everyone is free to practice their religion according to personal preference by law. And basic rights are applicable to people regardless of their identity. Women are free to vote, drive, pursue their goals etc. It's only in backwards areas where these laws are broken and a patriarchal structure is employed, holding women back.
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/20 07:58 AM
0

Are your friends from the rural areas where illegal and radical Muslim activities take place? Because that discrimination (denying females education, freedom, choice of spouse etc.) is not systematic, but cultural. It is illegal. And it is restricted to the backwards areas. There is requirement for reforms, not systemic change. Or else please tell me how else women are systematically oppressed in Pakistan.
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/20 07:16 AM
1

Wait what? Another article, as in there was an article that claimed that Pakistan is one of the best places for women? That's ridiculous. Could you link it?
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/20 07:09 AM
1

Hindus: 1,414,527. Christians: 1,270,051. Ahmadis: 125,681. Baha'is: 33,734. Sikhs: 6,146. Parsis: 4,020. Buddhists: 1,492. Others: 66,898. The Constitution of Pakistan, in article 25 (1), guarantees that “all citizens are equal before law and are entitled to equal protection of law.” Article 5 provides that “adequate provision shall be made for the minorities to freely profess and practice their religions and develop their cultures,” and article 33 declares that it is the state’s responsibility…
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/20 05:08 AM
1

Nationalist Indian media and Nationalist Indians will tell you that. Pakistan is a secular state with aspects of Muslim morality. For example, pork is banned. It isn't like the stereotypical Muslim state you imagine where women aren't allowed to drive or vote and have to wear a niqab if they don't want to be killed.
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/20 04:23 AM
2

I checked the source you mentioned. Sexual violence is notoriously difficult to measure, and there is no single source of data that provides a complete picture of the crime. On RAINN’s website, we have tried to select the most reliable source of statistics for each topic. The primary data source we use is the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), which is an annual study conducted by the Justice Department. To conduct NCVS, researchers interview tens of thousands of Americans each year to …
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/20 04:18 AM
0

That's irrelevant. What's your point?
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/20 04:11 AM
1

I know. Pakistan is a Muslim majority, but is a secular state with with aspects of Muslim morality. They do not enforce Sharia law by default, it is limited to certain backwards areas, and even then not by the law. It isn't like the many middle Eastern countries people automatically assume when they hear "Islam state".
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/20 04:09 AM
5

You're an idiot. However, I must admit that you are an expert at attacking strawmen.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 07:26 PM
1

There are a lot more aspects to discrimination other than empowerment and pandering. Pakistan has to deal with problems like class and religious disputes over women's rights. Pakistan's judiciary takes elements from Islam for morality, but is largely a secular state. The oppression of women extends beyond simple systematic oppression. Benazir was assassinated because of political tensions, not because she's a woman and everyone in Pakistan hates a woman president.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 07:16 PM
-5

And why do you say so? How are they systematically oppressed?
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 07:00 PM
0

?
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 06:58 PM
-5

Pakistan is oppressed? By whom?
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 06:49 PM
-11

I thought this is common knowledge, but apparently not. These incidents and statistics should be studied differently from those in Western countries. Gendered crimes against women are more easily noticed and studied in Pakistan, but the overall rate is far, far lower than that of most Western countries. These cases are isolated incidents, not the norm. For instance, the rape rate of Pakistan is 0.0000136 compared to the USA's 0.00021 i.e. more than 10× lesser. Also, you didn't answer my question…
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 06:48 PM
-12

When you say "Islamic country", do you mean that a majority of people are Islamic, or the country is an Islamic state?
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 06:28 PM
7

I'm talking about your implication that women in Pakistan are systematically oppressed.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 06:20 PM
7

Women in Pakistan aren't systematically oppressed by the way, only culturally. Pakistan is close to India in culture.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 06:18 PM
1

Insta noodles are made of primarily flour. It's cheaper and more nutritious to just buy rice, make curd and eat it. Rice: ₹10 Curd: ₹10 There, for a third of a dollar you have food which is both more nutritious and cheaper than instant noodles.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 05:11 PM
11

It's not that. It's that when the video with the part where she hits him edited out is posted online, he'll have legal hassles, lawsuits and his job/education ruined. Better to just walk away. Men are fucked legally, both because of the laws and the judging panel. My Karate instructor specifically told me to try to avoid a fight wherever possible, especially with a woman, and try to escape. He told my girl friend to break the bones of the assailant though. Because for the same action, we'll have…
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 04:55 PM
1

You are a wierd person. Why would restaurants sell food for a lesser price than the ingredients cost? These are the costs for one approximate meal of mine. Rice: ₹20 Curd (made at home): ₹10 Dal (Lentils): ₹10 Miscellaneous (spices, salt etc): ₹15 This comes about to ₹60, or about 1 dollar. This is certainly a lot lesser than the fast food, which may cost about ₹180, or 3 dollars.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 04:44 PM
1

I can break down why cooking at home costs lesser than eating outside. I live in India, but I'm sure the relative calculations would be similar. Shall I?
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 08:37 AM
1

The lettuce is more expensive because it's in a larger quantity, not because it's not fast food. 1 pound of lettuce costs 1.3 dollars. The amount of lettuce in a hamburger is lesser than that in a bag of lettuce. Do you know the concept of proportions? Buying vegetables and cooking them is healthier and costs less. It needs more time, however.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 08:20 AM
1

Link?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen08/08/20 08:08 AM
1

A Mcdonalds hamburger weighs 0.3 pounds. There would be no profit for fast food companies if they sold their products for lesser than the ingredients. I don't understand how people can think that buying vegetables and cooking them is more expensive than fast food.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/20 07:48 AM
6

That's not real feminism, feminism aims to help all genders! Have you even used a dictionary???
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/20 11:53 AM
3

I hate this. India has fucked up policies all around. Why are there reservations for women? This will always exclude the girls in backwards areas who are not allowed by their society to pursue their goals, while helping the girls in developed settings to get better treatment than their male counterparts, despite not facing discrimination. Why are there female only buses, and half the seats in normal buses are reserved for women? This is despite the fact that 3/4 of the public transport users are…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/20 09:10 PM
1

Don't fap. Retain your semen. Direct your energy towards constructive things.
/r/MGTOW02/08/20 08:11 PM
1

Okay, you're right.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/20 06:34 PM
2

I wouldn't care if maintenance decided that tampon dispensers in men's bathrooms is a good idea. I'm saying that it's so useless that it's smarter to just not have them. And you didn't say anything about my idea or having tampon dispensers just outside the two bathrooms. And urinals are great because they are space efficient, men can just have a piss and be on their way without taking up a whole stall.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/20 06:27 PM
3

Dude. I can't think how you think a tampon dispenser in the men's bathrooms is a great idea. It will be close to useless, with the number of transitioned men there are. Might as well have candy and diaper dispensers for the practicality. It would be more convenient to have the tampon dispenser just outside the bathrooms if you're so worried.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/20 06:19 PM
3

I've been alive for 19 years, been to 8 different cities, 5 being long term and 4 being outside India. I've acquainted with hundreds of people, met thousands of people. And I've seen only 3 trans people. It's not a stretch to say that trans people are a very small fraction of people. So having tampons in all men's bathrooms is a very inefficient method. It may be more efficient for YOU to have tampons readily available in bathrooms, but very inefficient for the maintenance of the bathrooms. Just…
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/20 05:40 PM
7

If we had tampons in men's bathrooms, they'd be used like once in 5 years. It's just a waste. It's much more efficient to just have the trans man carry a tampon.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/20 04:30 PM
4

Just wanted to point out, transgender is not a noun.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/20 04:28 PM
17

It's not even about which is more offensive. It's that just saying "men should be killed haha" isn't funny. You can make jokes about it. What's the difference between a good meme and a man? It's sad when a good meme dies. They don't get the concept of humour. They think that when men meet they go "women in kitchen no means yes haha let's go rape some bitches" and all the men laugh. I'm not surprised, it's likely that no man has talked to them before.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 10:27 AM
1

Yes, any training is better than no training. But your aggressors could be anyone - an adult assailant, or a fat person a grade above you. Karate is more versatile - throws are harder than a simple strike and run. You don't need to get very close to attack, unlike in Judo. And Karate works well even against multiple opponents. The only scenario I can think Judo would help more than Karate is if you're taken completely by surprise.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 06:27 AM
1

Like you said, it's about skill level. You can't expect an amateur kid to be able to pull off moves like that adult red belt. If it's about defense, Karate is useful to you regardless of how advanced you are in the art.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 04:39 AM
2

If you're big, Judo is the way to defend without injuring the opponent. But if you're small and skinny like I was in school, it won't do you much good. Karate is heavy on finding openings and striking. You can land a blow on their stomach or make them fall over before escaping. Anyone can do Karate.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 04:27 AM
2

Judo isn't a good defensive art. Karate or Kung fu is a better martial art for self defense.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 04:21 AM
27

Women can be proud that they can give birth. But putting themselves on a pedestal and believing that they're superior to men because they can do a natural bodily function? No. The poster of the video missed the point of the statement.
/r/AntiFeminists01/08/20 03:50 AM
2

The commenter's point was that you can't train your boobs to get bigger. You're saying some things about how it isn't wrong to put attractive people with favourable genetics in media.
/r/MGTOW31/07/20 11:38 AM
-2

You missed the point.
/r/MGTOW31/07/20 10:47 AM
1

Stop defending yourself you sausage, just state your point. It's annoying when you say "I'm not a bad person, please don't attack me" every other line. Just say that the UN may be saying that women and children, who are usually exempt from matters of war and conflict somehow make a significant fraction of the casualties.
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/20 07:35 AM
2

I don't care about the downvotes, I'm asking what you tried to say, because I didn't understand it. Reddit loves to circlejerk.
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/20 05:31 AM
1

It's definitely not that.
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/20 05:27 AM
2

Could you elaborate on your point? I don't understand what you're trying to say.
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/20 05:20 AM
4

She's saying that female streamers are disadvantaged because of the large number of male viewers. You little egg, be THANKFUL that your audience is primarily male. You wouldn't be this successful otherwise. Honestly, these female content creators are stupid in general. Like Lilly Singh, who said that she was making less than her male counterparts because she's a woman. You spiceless meatball, YouTube doesn't consider your sex in your monetization.
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/20 04:34 AM
7

I never maintain a relationship with a person who is blinded by his/her own view or mindset, and doesn't bother understanding others. Those types of people rarely make good friends. I had to cut connections with my own parents because of how toxic they were, but I knew that it would be for the best. At least those types of people do not go very far in the real world, because they refuse to learn, grow and help others grow.
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/20 08:31 PM
8

It hurts me when I'm not able to change the mindset of a hateful person. Good for you though, you did the right thing.
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/20 07:59 PM
7

How did the relationship end?
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/20 07:36 PM
2

Instead of helping him out, they decided to ruin his body. The reason we live such comfortable lives is because of aggression which drives us to innovate and progress. But no, masculinity is undesirable! Let's feminize young boys so that they do not show any "disruptive behaviour"!
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/20 08:51 AM
4

I'm from India. About 60% of the people I know are SJWs and feminists. I have friends who believe in the wage gap and rape culture. They participate actively on social media while misinformed in things such as BLM and share views on BoisLockerRoom, while ignoring real issues happening here in India. Some friends I have been able to convert from a feminist, most just tell me that I'm being sexist.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/20 08:38 AM
3

Oh my god. They've permanently ruined his body because of ignorance and stupidity. Stop trying to suppress emotions of children. Teach them to accept and redirect them to improve their aggression and masculinity to constructive work. The reason we live such comfortable lives now are because of men aggressively trying to discover new things and improve things. Don't try to make them feminine.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/20 08:14 AM
1

My home is in Pune, but I'm from Andhra. I don't know Marathi for that reason lol
/r/MensRights09/07/20 05:30 AM
1

My home is in Pune. All of my cousins are getting married, and when I'm a little older my parents will get me to marry too. I haven't told them about my girlfriend yet because they probably won't approve of having a relationship. Could you give me advice on what to do?
/r/MensRights09/07/20 04:53 AM
3

Don't assume both sides are innocent. Assume nothing, be skeptical. Either could be telling the truth, either could be lying.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/20 05:32 PM
1

Congrats mate, be careful who you attach yourself to. What's wrong with being bisexual though?
/r/TheRedPill06/07/20 01:06 PM
4

Just remember to let the hatred pass. Only logic and objective thinking will lead to an unbiased and constructive mindset. You do not need to put labels on yourself or others, because labels are used by whoever likes them. I have friends who identify as feminists but advocate properly for gender equality, and others eho identify as feminists but are morons who can't see their own hypocrisy.
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/20 07:40 AM
1

Here's a hypothetical scenario - imagine you contract the virus from one of your other careless friends. This is a lot more likely to happen because you don't social distance. You go to the store to buy a smoke, and you give the virus to another person over there who came to buy some medicines or something. He goes home to give the medicines to his immunocompromised son, who contracts the virus and has to be hospitalized. This is why it's important to only meet people if necessary, and even then…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/20 09:37 AM
1

You're spreading the virus, even if you don't contract it. You could easily spread it to an immunocompromised person or an old person. Like others could die because of your negligence.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/20 03:18 AM
1

The number of rapes proven false in India are 53%. These are the cases where the complainant actually felt that she has a good chance of winning. Now consider the unreported statistics, do you really think that a considerable amount of real rapes go unreported? The only people who get away with rapes are powerful politicians. Where do you get your statements from? Are you even Indian? Have you ever been to India? Do you get your knowledge from the media which paints India as a 3rd world country …
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/20 07:09 PM
0

First of all, why are you changing the subject? Second, awareness alone doesn't bring good jobs. Education, maturity, privilege, relations, family, finances and other factors also determine it. Do you think that a person from UP born into a poor family which cannot afford to educate them properly can get a good job from "awareness"?
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/20 07:04 PM
3

Of course it's a lot of people. You aren't getting my point. I'm not saying that rape doesn't happen here. I'm saying that ultimately numbers don't matter, rate does. And India has a very low rape rate. Rape is taken very seriously, and no one other than some very powerful politicians get away with it if reported. And India is a country where the major religions other than Islam and Christianity respect women a lot. Most cultures do not disrespect women either; they have changed the few patriarc…
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/20 06:19 PM
1

Ahem you're talking about death rates of women here, so men's statistics don't count. Rape is tolerated in no segment of society in India, if you didn't know. The only people who get away with it are powerful politicians. You need to visit rural areas to see how men and women work now. Girls in rural areas now receive education just as much as boys do, thank you. It's only in the most backwards places that girls are seen as people who won't need education. You really need to visit villages. Uned…
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/20 06:01 PM
4

The rape rate is lesser than the UK, Australia and Canada too, if you like that. India isn't the "rape capital of the world", because the statistics used during that study only took into account the total number of rapes and not the rate, which is obviously skewed due to India's high population.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/20 04:50 PM
8

Umm. Did you know that the rape rate is more than 10× lower than that of the US? And this is not something women have started recently, this is a practice which has been going on since centuries. Women are only culturally mistreated in education here, and even that happens only in the most backwards places. Please don't just get your facts from the media painting India as a 3rd world country which has no food or water and doesn't allow women to step outside the house.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/20 04:33 PM
5

Dude, you're not just barking wrong statistics, you're barking absurd statistics. 27.2% women die from rape in India? 91% of female deaths are caused by diseases and suicides alone. You're just spouting made-up bullshit. And 53% of rapes are proven wrong in India.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/20 04:29 PM
1

We don't complain that men do the dangerous jobs. We say that as a point when someone brings up the wage gap or talks about underrepresentation in those fields. Men going into dangerous jobs is their personal choice. The point of this post is to not discriminate against either gender.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 01:21 PM
2

Some do, yeah. But normal men aren't attracted to children more than adults. There's a reason why the conventionally attractive woman has an hourglass figure and big breasts. Because that signifies maturity and ability to birth a healthy child. Children are not capable to do that.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/20 06:29 AM
1

Wow. What did you do for the money?
/r/MGTOW30/06/20 04:06 PM
7

I agree. Red pill is "misogynistic" by definition, but the sub focuses on self-improvement 90% of the time. TRP changed my life. I was a 17 year old living in my parents' house some months ago, with no proper ambition. Now I'm a student in a great medical college and no worries about my future, because it's all planned out.
/r/MGTOW30/06/20 04:04 PM
11

That isn't nearly as bad. It's just ignorant womenchildren. PinkPillFeminism is hardly at the same level.
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/20 06:06 AM
15

I googled it, that's the only one I found. If you search "forced to have sex", you find men being raped. If you search "rape", you find women being raped.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/20 06:24 PM
4

You're basically saying that you won't elaborate because I'm a man and that automatically means that I'm thick-headed I'll make flawed arguments. Thanks for taking time to answer!
/r/AntiFeminists26/06/20 05:34 PM
5

Which means that transphobes are not all Karens.
/r/AntiFeminists26/06/20 05:32 PM
5

Yeah, what does that have to do with transphobes?
/r/AntiFeminists26/06/20 05:26 PM
3

Could you elaborate?
/r/AntiFeminists26/06/20 05:15 PM
5

You don't know what Karen is used for, do you?
/r/AntiFeminists26/06/20 05:15 PM
1

Then the problem is not that they are objectifying men, but that they are manipulative.
/r/PussyPass26/06/20 04:22 PM
-1

What's wrong with deciding your partner's by their value?
/r/PussyPass26/06/20 11:39 AM
16

He's proven that he was with Gomez when he allegedly assaulted Jennifer. And then she said that he was "discrediting her trauma". 😑
/r/MensRights26/06/20 09:08 AM
17

Did you see her tweet? Beiber shows proof that he didn't assault her, and she accuses him of "discrediting her assault". Yes, he did show evidence that he didn't do it, what else is he supposed to do if he's innocent?
/r/MensRights26/06/20 09:06 AM
6

He's a very nice person. A friend of mine met him in a park once, she went and greeted him, they sat down and chatted for a bit. People change.
/r/MensRights26/06/20 09:02 AM
2

Yes! And this idiocy is spreading everywhere. This is why men are scared of being falsely accused too - people become the judge. They don't care about evidence, word is enough for them.
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/20 10:55 AM
5

You're stupid. You can clearly see that the man is sitting in front, compare it to how the woman is sitting. He's not sitting all the way back.
/r/PussyPass25/06/20 08:25 AM
1

Exactly. They say that they don't want to associate with men, but all the while keep talking about how much they hate men. Why so obsessed? Does your life have no meaning without men?
/r/MGTOW23/06/20 05:19 AM
1

☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/20 01:53 AM
13

Yes, I'm not. This is not the place to discuss porn. If she does stupid shit, boycott her. And you talk almost as if you're proud of being a coomer.
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/20 11:37 AM
12

Please, no.
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/20 11:33 AM
16

BlackPillFeminism has been banned. Next we must hope that PinkPillFeminism gets quarantined. It's at least at the same level of MGTOW.
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/20 11:33 AM
1

You should realise that in their mind, they are right and we are wrong. They have this preconceived notion that men are bad people and women are naturally superior, so they go out of their way to find evidence for it. When we lay down the facts clearly enough so that even an obtuse person can understand it, they can't counter the fact. That's why every hate group exists. not because they like to be bad, but in their mind they are right.
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/20 02:39 AM
1

What is there to be embarassed about for losing your balance in a bus? And I actually could, it's easy. I get it so much, as do so many men. The angry-disgusted-uncomfortable look. It wasn't an annoyed look, like you said for some reason. This didn't happen just once btw, it happens a lot in public, when someone thinks I'm looking at their butt or trying to get close to them or touching them. Anyway, why would I bother lying to you?
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/20 05:10 PM
3

Annoyed at me for what? For basically stopping her from falling down? And I'm pretty sure she thought of it sexually. I live in India, I know enough to understand when someone looks at me like I'm a pervert...
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/20 04:56 PM
2

Hate is a feeling, an opinion. Discrimination is opinions affecting real, living creatures just because of your stereotypes which may not be true. I can hate China, but if I say that Chinese people are bad, it's hateful and discriminatory. You can hate something, it's your opinion. But if your "opinion" can sway someone else's opinion, it isn't an opinion anymore. You're presenting facts, either true or untrue, to make people who don't think much join your propaganda. Because even after they are…
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/20 12:35 PM
2

What you say is that opinions should not be censored. The issue is that those are not opinions but false propaganda. It isn't really that hard to distinguish between statements and opinions. Opinions deal with your personal feelings about a topic. Statements talk about issues based on facts. Statements are never harmful unless they present false facts and/or present opinions as facts. Their focus was not on opinions to "disagree" on, but broad generalizations to push their agenda. You don't need…
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/20 10:10 AM
2

Read comments.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/20 09:49 AM
5

That's pretty dumb. Free speech should not tolerate discrimination, bad generalization and bigotry. Free speech should especially not include unethical practices and spread of false propaganda. The sub advocated for mass genocide, enslavement, dehumanization and forced castration of men. And their complaints were all nitpicking and/or uneducated viewpoints. Their privilege and self-victimization were off the charts. We shouldn't allow their sub to sway the opinions of people when they lie and ha…
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/20 09:47 AM
6

There was a post saying that Disney hates women and portrays them as evil in all their movies. I said that 1/5 of their movies have female villians, 3/5 have male villians. I didn't get banned (I was factually correct, that's why I guess) but my comment got deleted.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/20 07:50 AM
20

Yes. Unfortunately, we still have a long way to go before we achieve true equality. This is just a subreddit. The people who think like that still exist.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/20 05:58 AM
0

Just want to point out, meninism is a made up term. Masculism is the actual term for someone who advocates for men's rights on the ground of equality of sexes. Anyway, thanks for advocating for equality for men!
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/20 01:39 AM
1

It happens everytime? Each one of her hundreds of art pieces gets a few hundred upvotes then gets buried under other posts? Also coincidentally, her only piece with more than 1000 upvotes is this one? Art is always appreciated. Girls are appreciated more.
/r/AntiFeminists15/06/20 08:18 AM
1

Of course, it's possible. But c'mon, do you really believe that's what happened? You know what's more likely? Guys were just scrolling rapidly through the sub like always, not stopping to appreciate any of the art pieces. When they saw a woman with the painting, they thought, "Wow, this hot girl can draw video game characters?", and upvoted it. I say so because the girl has posted paintings in the past too. Paintings without her face never get more than a few hundred upvotes.
/r/AntiFeminists15/06/20 02:23 AM
24

"What if we're talking about kids, is it OK to punch back a kid?" Imma stop you right there. Kids are neither physically nor mentally developed, and cannot be held responsible for their actions all the time. Women, by definition, are adults and should know that there are consequences to their actions. Do not try to pick a fight with a person tougher than you. That is, if you're too cool to not pick a fight at all, like a decent human being. And yes, a lot of the time people do mind retaliation i…
/r/AntiFeminists14/06/20 04:16 PM
27

The meme is lame, the issue is real.
/r/AntiFeminists14/06/20 03:39 PM
28

You'll probably be beaten up by onlookers if you punch back, or have action taken against. I remember one of the times I fought back against a girl 2 years older than me in school. She cried that I had grabbed her breasts and started the fight (I didn't, I wouldn't touch her without a reason. If you saw her, neither would you.). Almost got me rusticated with a permanent record, but my crying parents begged for mercy while I stood there in a corner not able to grasp the gravity of the situation.
/r/AntiFeminists14/06/20 03:38 PM
10

It's a dark joke, brother. It's meant to be offensive.
/r/MGTOW14/06/20 11:45 AM
2

Word of advice, don't stick your dick in crazy.
/r/AntiFeminists14/06/20 09:23 AM
3

Yeah, I've seen the original post. Another gem.
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/20 05:06 PM
1

Idk about you, but I have talked to many feminists who came to this subreddit. Two of them were actually surprised at the wrongdoings of feminism. One of them said that she will be identifying as an egalitarian from then on. We should aim to educate new people on gender discrimination against men in this subreddit. If we do not help people see how modern feminism is bad for everyone, what's the point of posting men's issues on this subreddit?
/r/AntiFeminists10/06/20 11:30 AM
1

You're right. They are united in their bitching on men, like MGTOW is united in their shitting on women. Antifeminists should attempt to spread the hypocrisy and misandry of feminists, and change the minds of people brainwashed into thinking that feminism is required in society. Anti-male abuse should not stay up.
/r/AntiFeminists10/06/20 06:21 AM
2

Look at BlackPillFeminism, or PinkPillFeminism. They are a bunch of whiny women who circlejerk all day. But what does it achieve? Absolutely nothing. People do not join there to learn, because any opposition is struck down. What would happen if it was open and a bunch of people joined and called women dishwashers? People would think of misogyny as an even bigger problem, seeing how non-feminists openly discriminate against women. Is this what you want this sub to become? A group of guys discussi…
/r/AntiFeminists10/06/20 04:08 AM
2

Men don't get a lot of abuse here, that's just bullshit. And you're just saying whatever comes out of your ass. I clearly told you how feminists help us by spewing their nonsense on this subreddit, and your only point is "you just want to be toxic to men". I have seen antifeminism grow so much over the past few years. Before that, everyone identified as a feminist and believed the narrative that women are disadvantaged. People are able to see how feminism is destroying society now, with how much…
/r/AntiFeminists10/06/20 03:29 AM
2

Yes, no one is on Heard's side. But his career was ruined for an year. He was removed from the casting of Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, following the backlash after the allegations. Later, Disney stopped their plans for their sixth Pirates film, because Depp was under so much hate and controversy. All this after an allegation. What happened after Heard was convicted? Nothing! She won 7 million dollars in their divorce settlement, and had no opposition. She was casted for Aquaman w…
/r/AntiFeminists10/06/20 02:52 AM
1

We should not try to make this a safe space for men. That's so pointless. We need traffic to this sub. When more people come onto this sub, people can see what exactly feminists say and do, and how they shut down facts. They are helping out our cause by showing the true colours of feminists. If there is no opposition, people won't join the cause. And how will they realise that the incel label is good? You just sound bitter to me for some reason.
/r/AntiFeminists10/06/20 02:36 AM
1

Those are horrible cases, but they are isolated incidents. I never denied that men get away with rape. And they have already garnered media attention, they are not being glanced over. Do you have any source stating that more men go free despite irrefutable evidence, than men falsely accused of rape?
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/20 08:30 PM
2

Where does the video oppose women's right? All I see is them asking systemic reforms for men to be treated fairly. Of course feminism opposes men's issues. Feminists have managed to legalise domestic violence against men in the UK. They have managed to ruin Depp's career upon accusation, but remain silent on Heard's conviction. Feminists have managed to shut down proposals of female conscription, because "that's not the kind of equality they want". Even after irrefutable proof that employers fav…
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/20 08:26 PM
2

No, it's not needed. It allows us to see if the other person has a good point. The incel label allows me to see if the person has a good argument or not. As soon as s/he says something like "you just say so because you're an incel", I can understand that s/he can't back up what they said.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/20 08:17 PM
1

Can you please state the source about the number of men getting off rape convictions with satisfactory evidence? I see feminists saying this often, but I get no sources.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/20 08:13 PM
8

Lol yeah. Religion fucks up a lot of things, but gets a few principles right.
/r/AntiFeminists08/06/20 07:20 PM
21

Oh really? They want to fix these? Pity, but "wanting" to fix issues does not solve them. You know what feminist groups have managed to do though? They've managed to legalize domestic violence against men in the UK. They've shut down proposals for female conscription, because "that's not the kind of equality they want". They've ruined Depp's career when he was accused, but have been silent when Heard was convicted. Even after proof that employers actually favour women over men, feminists keep up…
/r/AntiFeminists08/06/20 07:01 PM
13

This video has been posted in the sub already.
/r/AntiFeminists08/06/20 05:41 PM
16

Sheesh. Don't have sex unless you've married. The system hates men.
/r/AntiFeminists08/06/20 04:18 PM
4

It's a joke.
/r/AntiFeminists04/06/20 04:22 AM
1

See. This post in this sub was made regarding the bias towards men in the justice system. And then YOU divert the topic, say that you can't say this in response to women facing issues. That's right, but you're doing something similar, diverting attention from the topic. Hypocrisy. And yeah, they're speaking up against toxic masculinity. You don't need to repeat it.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 06:12 PM
38

This woman once fell back on me when the bus braked suddenly, and she shot me a dirty look. Ma'am, if you lost your balance did you expect me to airbend you back up? Obviously the cartoon is made humorously but it talks about a real problem we men face.
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/20 05:27 PM
-8

Well DUH
/r/MensRights27/05/20 12:43 PM
2

Exactly. Hyperboles, irony, jokes are a crucial part of human communication. Talking about rape this sensitively only creates more of a taboo around it. We should talk about rape casually, and take it seriously in the real world. Modern PC culture is ruining society.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/20 05:26 AM
2

Nah. We've been saying "I'll kill you", "Kill me", "I'm dead", "She straight up murdered him" and other such hyperbolic phrases for a long time. Has murder been trivialised because of this?
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/20 05:18 AM
1

Geez, you're either delusional or stupid. I didn't blame women or feminism at all. I blamed the sexist system. Feminism didn't directly cause these sexist laws, but it spectacularly failed to acknowledge discrimination against both sides. Like I said, please stop beating the strawman. I just told you why the rape statistics are biased, they fail to take into account India's population. They only take the number of rape cases. Gather information about rape rates, not rape numbers. I told you that…
/r/ExRedPill26/05/20 07:19 AM
1

It doesn't matter who made the laws in India. The issue is individuals being affected by laws, not groups. They're sexist, were made a long time ago, are harmful in urban marriages and aren't being changed because the bureaucracy is afraid of losing vote banks. Child custody laws are not biased against women. The "patriarchy" has caused the laws to be biased against men, even in cases where the man does nothing wrong. India does not have the highest rape rate in the world. It has the highest num…
/r/ExRedPill26/05/20 06:21 AM
1

You responded to my comment, where I talked about why I hate the sexist judicial system I have to face. MGTOW "lies" are definitely true for me.
/r/ExRedPill26/05/20 05:01 AM
1

I sometimes go to those subreddits to read the comments. Often a popular post has plenty of funny comments too.
/r/askTRP25/05/20 06:59 AM
1

That's what I mean, if you continue training normally your body won't deteriorate. Forget it now, I'm just bad at English. I mean what you said. Trans people have an advantage because their bodies developed like a man's, which is more suited for combat. They need to put in a little effort so that their manly body doesn't deteriorate, but it doesn't automatically start becoming weak.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/20 06:35 AM
3

Of course bones and muscles can atrophy through starvation, surgery, injury, serious inactivity and other means. But notice I said naturally i.e. if you lead a regular life, they don't just "undevelop". The human body doesn't do that. Change in sex hormones won't degrade your build which has already developed.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/20 05:55 AM
5

"Manpower" is not a real physical thing. Trans people's bodies don't produce androgens and estrogens. What's developed is developed. You won't lose bone structure and muscle naturally once you develop it.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/20 05:34 AM
1

43% of children with divorced parents are raised without their father. 90% of divorced mothers have custody of their children. 80% of custodial mother's receive child support, compared to 30% of men. I don't know where you got your 50/50 statistic from. I live in India. There is no provision for prenups here, because of orthodox laws and mindsets. This is good for women in backwards rural areas, but puts men in developed areas at a great and unfair risk. There is nothing wrong with a woman getti…
/r/ExRedPill25/05/20 03:08 AM
1

Actually, the percentage of false accusations is about 8%. And this is only the acquitted - rape is a sensitive crime which unfortunately cannot have a lot of evidence. Lack of the best pieces of evidence - DNA analysis and injuries due to struggling, are often simply put to emotional trauma because of the incident. "Boohoo CPR has a 10% chance of reviving a victim of cardiac arrest, might as well stop giving it." No, 10% is still higher than 0. I never said that sexual harrassment is a non-exis…
/r/ExRedPill25/05/20 02:49 AM
-2

Marriage is a cultural phenomenon uniting two people in a personal relationship. It is not always a religious phenomenon, even atheists get married. I say that people in a romantic relationship deserve protection against emotional, physical and financial abuse, along with a power which can ensure justice in case of the people splitting up, regardless of their identities.
/r/MGTOW22/05/20 07:05 AM
11

The issue is not that they can marry, that's basic human rights. The issue is that they are forcing others to join their community.
/r/MGTOW22/05/20 03:33 AM
1

Yes, the painting is hers and she posted both images. What's your point?
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 05:22 PM
1

Lmao what were you even trying to say
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 04:00 PM
2

Nah, thanks for the resources! I wish I could change someone's mind, but feminists hate admitting they are wrong. Usually when I state an undeniable fact or resource proving a feminist wrong, they just delete their comment, never reply that they were mistaken.
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/20 01:37 PM
2

Review for what? You guys spread less hate for women than BlackPillFeminism does for men. And we're quarantined anyway.
/r/MGTOW15/05/20 11:34 AM
1

Source please? I couldn't find any saying that women are the perpetrators of more than 50% of domestic violence.
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/20 10:54 AM
1

Source stating that women are responsible for more than 50% of DV?
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/20 08:03 AM
3

Why exactly do you bother censoring a bad word in a quarantined sub full of men who regularly call women sluts and whores lmao
/r/MGTOW15/05/20 06:11 AM
6

Feminists will agree with you if you word it like this lmao
/r/MGTOW15/05/20 06:10 AM
7

A legal agreement is still a legal agreement, doesn't have to be a prenup. Make sure you word it with a lawyer's help so that it doesn't seem like you made her sign it by manipulating her or forcing her. And don't care what your mother says. Make your own decisions. Explore, find women you like until you meet someone you bond well with. Intelligent women are everywhere.
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/20 11:45 AM
4

A premarital agreement which dictates a lot of terms of the relationship, and what would happen if it were to fall apart. Saves you the stupid alimony and child support if you divorce. A HVW would sign it because she sees how it is fair for the both of you.
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/20 11:37 AM
6

Or, never be in a relationship with a woman who can't pull her own strings. Shows how much they value themselves and educate themselves. And always sign a prenup.
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/20 11:32 AM
5

They say that since most of the victims are women, it's a gendered issue. And that it should be treated as one. First of all, that's only marginally true. In the UK, at least 40% of DV victims are men. Second, they are essentially discriminating against a minority. Let's remove compensation for female deaths due to work related injuries, because they are a minority. Oh wait, that would be sexist. Third, does it hurt women in any way if all DV victims are treated the same, regardless of gender? I…
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/20 04:31 AM
10

In India and some other countries. Not in all.
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/20 03:57 AM
5

I agree. allyah's mother should have used one.
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/20 03:56 AM
3

That's the case with modern feminism, people fail to see their own sexism while preaching equality. Some of the boys never sent a single message in the group. They were either just observing or didn't even know about it, we don't know. Some girls were also in the group, sending pictures and fooling around. And you say that all 27 being charged are boys.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 03:07 PM
2

That's blatant sexism. There were many girls in the group too. And they aren't being charged? Not to mention that some of the girls were more active than some of the guys.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 02:52 PM
-1

Do the 27 members being charged include all the members, including the girls?
/r/MensRights11/05/20 02:48 PM
-4

She was only responsible for the "rape threat". The creation and management of the group was handled by the admins of the group. The forgery refers to them editing girls' picture obscenely, btw.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 02:44 PM
-2

Sections 465 (forgery), 471(using as genuine a forged document or electronic record), 469 (forgery for purpose of harming reputation), 509 (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman), Section 67 (publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form), Section 67A (publishing or transmitting of material containing sexually explicit act in electronic form). Honestly I can't see her being charged with any of these.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 02:24 PM
-13

What should she have been charged with?
/r/MensRights11/05/20 09:30 AM
24

Exactly. I remember once when we were hanging out, a girl shared an anecdote. She told about this dude who was short and couldn't grow a full beard who asked her out, and how she shot him down. All the girls laughed, and said that everyone deserves a guy she can be proud to show off to everyone. That stuck with me for a long time. Girls don't care about love or mutual happiness. They only want guys for their own personal benefit - whether it's a good face, a tough body, his money, his dick.
/r/MGTOW11/05/20 07:07 AM
1

Well, vegetarians have an average of 10 more IQ points than meat eaters. They include both, but are such vague studies conducted in a small demographic. There's a reason why Americans are protesting against the coronavirus, while there aren't protests in India, despite them having double the population. They're dumb.
/r/MensRights10/05/20 06:33 AM
1

Ah, debunking veganism. I was talking about vegetarianism, if you didn't notice. Veganism obviously does not provide access to calcium, B12 and other essential macronutrients. Vegetarians do not need supplements, their diets consist of all the nutrients they need. And yes, I am perfectly healthy. Vegetarianism is not a meme diet. It's been practiced in many different cultures across history. What you said is blatantly wrong - vegetarians have a higher life expectancy, by about 8 years. Lower sta…
/r/MensRights10/05/20 06:14 AM
1

We never evolved as carnivores. We were herbivorous apes first and then evolved into omnivores as we moved into the savannah and began foraging. Not all other herbivorous animals have 4 stomachs; only ruminants have them. Our efficiency of breaking down plant matter is less than 50% only if you count cellulose, which composes of 33% of plant material. The only reason humans digest meat very well is because it's already been processed once in an animal body. You seem to have read some blog on the…
/r/MensRights10/05/20 04:13 AM
1

Again, what are you saying? I never said I hate women. Have you bothered to read what I wrote? I'm saying that a woman can ruin your life easily. That's why so many people choose the MGTOW path, and their mindset is absolutely justifiable. A percentage of women, just like any other group, are psychotic and unempathetic. It's very easy to choose the wrong person and have your life ruined because the judicial system is biased towards women. That's why I've been very careful in pursuing partners. M…
/r/ExRedPill09/05/20 09:11 PM
1

If feminism aims to reduce slut-shaming, objectification and victim blaming, it has spectacularly failed to do so. Being egalitarian doesn't mean that they'd want men to suffer the same issues (wtf). It means they want to reduce discrimination against both genders, meaning they'd want no one to face those issues. Also, victim blaming happens only in backwards places. No western society blames female victims of abuse and rape. That's unthinkable in modern society. Quite the opposite - if a woman …
/r/AntiFeminists09/05/20 06:21 PM
2

I am not afraid of women. I'm afraid of what a woman could do to my life if I'm not careful. I'm a man of morals, and would not harm anyone unless absolutely required. So if I end up with a woman who lacks morals and abuses me, I have 2 choices - stick with her and be abused, or divorce her and hand over half my assets to her, along with a lifetime of alimony and child support. You not being afraid of women does not mean you can't be abused by women.
/r/ExRedPill09/05/20 03:56 PM
2

Whoa kiddo, stop beating the strawman. When did I say that guys are perfect? I didn't. I didn't say that women have perfect lives either. I don't even get why you brought that up. And it doesn't matter who supported feminism. I'm all for equal rights. What I'm concerned about is that women get favourable treatment by the judicial system in the present (i.e. not equal rights).
/r/ExRedPill09/05/20 03:46 PM
0

You're saying some stupid things here. How does not eating meat lead to perpetrating the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights09/05/20 09:50 AM
2

That's stupid. Bringing up children as vegetarians is abuse? Meat is not necessary for good mental and physical development.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 09:48 AM
4

That's just as bad. Probably let her off because she thinks women are just nicer than men.
/r/PussyPass09/05/20 09:26 AM
4

That's as good as a anti-vaccinator saying that you are "blinded by big pharma". If you would say what in my points is "distorted", we can determine who's wrong. I'm a logical person. I'll agree that I'm wrong if you tell me why people should risk marriage in modern society.
/r/ExRedPill08/05/20 05:02 PM
4

Lol you just said "you're wrong". Please tell me what I said which is wrong.
/r/ExRedPill08/05/20 04:52 PM
5

Agreed. Good gestures aren't worth it if it means risking everything you care about.
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/20 04:25 PM
-2

You're obviously confused. You don't know MGTOW psychology. Women are people. Just like any of us. The thing is that the way modern feminism has worked causes any type of romantic relationship with women to be potentially dangerous to you. She can divorce you and half of your possessions will be gone, even if she contributed nothing to the marriage and didn't look for work because she didn't want to. Not to mention lifetime alimony to "maintain the standards of life during the marriage". Why sho…
/r/ExRedPill08/05/20 04:22 PM
167

"She showed immediate remorse upon conviction." Gee, I wonder why. Couldn't be so that you can weep in front of the white knight judge and get a shorter sentence by pity. Be careful while marrying, guys. Better to GYOW than to marry an entitled dangerous psycho.
/r/PussyPass08/05/20 03:58 PM
8

You're confusing a full on hug with a half hug, something you may do with an acquaintance. You just come close and pat the other person on her back. You're right though. Limit social interaction with people in your office, especially women. It takes one move to collapse your Jenga tower of achievements.
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/20 03:51 PM
86

Companies hiring less women is one thing. The biggest change in workplaces is that men in good positions refrain from interacting and mentoring women much. After all, why risk everything you've built to be ruined by an ungrateful woman who doesn't mean anything to you? I don't get why they see a compliment or a nice gesture as something harmful. Spoilt western women need something to complain about to feel good about themselves I guess.
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/20 03:47 PM
10

It seems like he hugged someone after securing a contract with their company. I'm not sure though. OP, care to explain?
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/20 03:40 PM
-2

Well, this is not that bad actually. Girls are naturally weaker than boys. If a girl enters the boy scouts, she will have to keep up with the boys. If she is capable of doing so, what's the issue? But in the other case, a boy naturally has advantages over the girls. It would be unfair for the girls if they had to compete with boys in woodworking, camping etc. Of course, gender neutral scouts may be a good idea.
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/20 03:34 AM
2

Then by definition, they're egalitarians. See, it doesn't matter what social media pages say. It won't make a difference in the system. The problem with modern feminism is that women are being helped to move forward, while traditional male expectations are still in place. This essentially discriminates against men. If all the negatives of feminism are in a "small toxic bubble", why would the instances I linked above happen? Why would feminist organizations advocate against female conscription be…
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 07:13 PM
3

Not really. First off, that's not even the definition of feminism. Feminism is the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes (though they actually advocate for privileges even men don't have. Equality isn't enough for them.). Also, tell me that feminists are advocating for gender equality here and here.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 06:48 PM
2

They're a bunch of crybabies, imagining that men are sickos in every conceivable way. There was this post linking to an article which said that domestic abuse rates were rising. The comments were all saying that it's in men's nature to abuse. When I pointed out that the article doesn't state anywhere that it was the number of male perpetrators rising, I was instantly downvoted.
/r/AntiFeminists06/05/20 08:11 PM
25

So, they're basically discriminating against a minority. Imagine if someone said that since there are more white people than black people in the UK, black people should not be given the same rights as white people.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 02:44 PM
1

Thanks for taking time out to sort them out. Feminists need something to complain about.
/r/AntiFeminists06/05/20 02:32 PM
17

Man friendly? Oh, you mean reservations for women at high paying jobs/institutions, reducing the possibility of a more deserving man to get the job/seat? Or do you mean the women's sports teams getting a higher portion of the earnings? Maybe you're referring to the fact that if a woman even falsely accuses a man, he is treated guilty until proven innocent? Perhaps you're talking about biased divorce laws, giving women the custody of the child in 90% of cases, and often alimony even if the woman …
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/20 09:50 AM
31

Directly from the article: The men’s team is paid for individual performances in a pay-for-play model, while the women opted for a pay structure that includes more security in the form of negotiated annual salaries, maternity and child-care benefits, and severance pay when they are no longer on the team.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 06:59 PM
9

The mods in the sub are terrible. But the members of the sub are quite good. Look at the comments on the post.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/20 06:34 PM
0

I misread the title. I put the numbers for perpetrators of child abuse instead of homicides. Edited the homicide numbers. Source
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/20 12:01 PM
4

Stop posting data from 2006. Data from 2018 says that the mother is the perpetrator in 54.7% of cases.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/20 10:50 AM
1

How to differentiate between muscle soreness and cramps? I know that muscle soreness is cause due to wear of the muscle and cramps are caused due to lactic acid build-up. But beyond that I don't know how to identify them and treat them.
/r/MGTOW01/05/20 08:26 PM
1

Thanks, I'll have to try that
/r/MGTOW01/05/20 07:47 PM
1

When you say that it can fuck you up, what do you mean? You say not to worry about it, is it unavoidable?
/r/MGTOW01/05/20 07:44 PM
1

Well, you've got a point. I'll bear my current cramps for now, and warm-up before and cooldown after exercise. I'll increase my protein consumption too. Thanks, I really like the self-improvement culture of this subreddit.
/r/MGTOW01/05/20 07:41 PM
1

It was what I used to do earlier, and honestly it didn't cause me any trouble because it was a regular part of my routine. You're right though, I should take it slow at first.
/r/MGTOW01/05/20 07:29 PM
1

I don't masturbate. I've stopped that crap years ago. I'll try dividing my workout as you say. Hopefully I get back into shape soon enough. I don't understand what you're saying about cramps. They happen, and reduce muscle stretchability, don't they?
/r/MGTOW01/05/20 07:27 PM
2

Yeah, I'm Indian
/r/MGTOW01/05/20 07:24 PM
0

No, I'm Indian The picture says that women may soon be required to register in the draft. Isn't that the opposite of a pussy pass?
/r/PussyPass01/05/20 05:46 PM
2

It doesn't say so in the photo. Link?
/r/PussyPass01/05/20 05:40 PM
3

I could make that out, I asked what she said
/r/PussyPass01/05/20 04:29 PM
3

What did she say? I can't make it out.
/r/PussyPass01/05/20 04:27 PM
6

But, where's the PussyPass?
/r/PussyPass01/05/20 04:24 PM
5

Circumcision is fine. The issue is that why do they have a gendered law? Can't they make a law saying that genital mutilation is outlawed? Laws made specific to one group often causes discrimination against another group after discrimination against the first group reduces. Like when gendered divorce and rape laws were made a long time ago, and now they're misused.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 01:02 PM
0

I hope you're not getting your penis whipped, brother. The only common situation I can think of where the penis is subjected to mechanical wear is during sex, and men pull back their foreskin during that anyway. Here's the source which says that female-to-male HIV transmission is actually reduced due to circumcision: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130416102314.htm Again, no source about the desensitisation. At all. You're just stating random things which are inaccurate, without so…
/r/MensRights30/04/20 11:16 AM
-14

The glans gets cornified, and protects the skin from mechanical damage as well as the foreskin. I just told you how the immunological function is pointless in the current era where we take clean baths everyday and don't live in the savannah. Again, there is no scientific source I can find which states that the sensitivity of the glans decreases because of circumcision. Please read something before responding to it.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 11:05 AM
-15

Nah. The female equivalent of the scrotum are the Labia majora. The ovaries are analogous to the testes. The foreskin does not have scores of functions. It protects the sensitive glans from infection and dirt, but it is not needed in this age where we clean ourselves everyday. Also, no source I can find says that the desensitisation is too much. And could you please state your source saying that the most common form of female circumcision is a nick in the hood? Because all the sources I see only…
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:20 AM
2

Source saying that the most common form of female circumcision is a prick on the clitoral hood? All the sources I find only talk about Labial and Clitoral removal. Sure, the foreskin protects against infections. But if I removed all of your penile skin and scrotum, would it cause higher chance of genital infection? Yes, it would. And those are what are homologous to the Labia. Honestly, keratinization and desensitisation aren't those big of issues (at least in my opinion), compared to constant p…
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:13 AM
-34

This is actually right. Female circumcision usually refers to removal of the Labia and clitoris. The Labia are important to protect the vagina and other organs susceptible to opportunistic infection. The Labia majora is analogous to the scrotum, and the Labia minora is analogous to the penile skin. If normal sex can lead to UTIs, imagine the consequences of removing all of the protection. The clitoris is analogous to a penis. Even if removing a clitoris is less dangerous, it causes equal amount …
/r/MensRights30/04/20 08:56 AM
0

https://www.instagram.com/p/B_mJ8DgpgUC/?igshid=1joijx11215ob No matter what the media does, she is genuinely a good person. She may have gotten more attention than she needs, but a she is a beautiful soul. I hope she continues to do what she is doing, and starts to bring direct changes into the world.
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/20 07:52 AM
4

TL;DR: An adult female student convinced her married male professor to exchange flirty e-mails and texts with her for an year. When the professor decided that this was wrong and tried to stop it, the student blackmailed him. He tried to appeal to university administration, who instead decided that he was guilty. The student filed her own complaint and said that it was him who continued to harrass her over e-mail, and she was worried that not complying would negatively impact her education opport…
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/20 03:48 AM
8

Could you explain? I don't know what's the model
/r/MGTOW29/04/20 02:57 PM
2

r/nofap Hope this helps you out in case you need an it
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/20 07:27 PM
6

Being black doesn't make you unattractive, does it? 🤨
/r/MGTOW27/04/20 12:36 PM
3

It may be chance, but I've never met an intelligent woman who isn't overly emotional and has a good sense of humour.
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/20 07:04 AM
-5

Well, politicians are extremely dumb, wouldn't you agree? If they were intelligent enough, we wouldn't have so many biased laws and uneducated policies. They're destroying both society and the environment. How does politicians not getting an education relate to her leaving Sweden?
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/20 05:09 AM
1

Again, that does not make Thunberg a bad person. Look at Hillary Clinton, openly sexist and potentially the death sentence to men in the US. Look at that Japanese woman was a murderer. Then look at Thunberg, a child who tries to raise awareness on climate change. Just because the media gives her too much attention does not mean that she should be put together with such people. Who gets how much attention and coverage is a different issue. Anyway that's not even Thunberg's fault, but the media's.
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/20 05:00 AM
-24

That's unrelated. There being people who've done other things for the good of the world doesn't make Thunberg's contribution useless. The guy above put in Thunberg's name along with controversial and bad women. He's wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/20 08:13 PM
-32

Hey, Greta Thunberg isn't bad! In fact she's done a lot in raising awareness and modifying policies. Why she would skip school though is beyond me.
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/20 07:54 PM
2

Also, in a country where conservative beliefs are so strict, there's no hope for romantic relationships when young, unless you're being married off. Your parents will probably disown you, unless they murder you first. The pent up sexual frustration has to go somewhere. Since they're new to the internet, they don't know that they're not anonymous and anyone can go check their profile. It seems like full freedom when you talk to someone without anyone watching. They don't have an idea of "online e…
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/20 06:11 PM
2

Hi bitiful cn u open up ur pents? Vijina pls
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/20 05:53 PM
11

I'm an Indian too! The stereotype is because India was till very recently underdeveloped, and new access to modern facilities and technology hasn't taught them how to actually use them properly. Also, traditional beliefs coupled with a progressive society has in a way made Indian boys really bad at understanding women. That's why we see so many Indian adolescents simp on women online. But it's great source material for memes, so there's a plus😅
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/20 03:35 PM
3

She's a great artist too, there's no debate on that. You really don't need to see her follower count or whatever, there's no need. The point is clear, being a nubile woman automatically makes life easier for you. As for her using her looks in her posts, she didn't do anything wrong. She needs to make a living, if it takes showing herself off she can do it. It's just unfair that certain people have automatic advantages for something unrelated and out of one's control.
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/20 03:28 PM
3

Yes, she's an artist. https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/f3cp2k/made_a_watercolor_painting_of_geralt_of_rivia/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/20 02:24 PM
10

Oh, it's not just young and attractive women who complain about the patriarchy. It's also fat femcels who have been brought up thinking that they're pretty little princesses. And when people in real life reject them and poke fun of them, it's easier to blame something obscure than to realise the fault in themselves.
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/20 07:15 AM
50

I've lost count of the number of thirsty Indian dudes commenting "I love you" on the picture of ANY woman.
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/20 05:13 AM
2

I just said that watching them actually react to different in-game situations is better than "knowing" how to react to them in the game, especially in fast-paced games. But yeah, if you don't have time there's no need to watch streams.
/r/PussyPass25/04/20 02:48 AM
23

Sometimes you can look at gamers and learn a thing or two. Often, Twitch gamers are better than the average player. It's actually not that bad of a resource. Also, looking at how they react to different situations is better than "knowing" how to react to different situations through guides. Then there are simps who watch Twitch thots because they can't get a woman in real life to love them. They donate lots of money and get off by listening to the thot reading their 100$ donation message.
/r/PussyPass24/04/20 05:03 PM
15

Hide underground? What absolute bullshit. Do they dig holes or something? Or sleep in sewers? If they have temporary shelter, they're safe for that period. No excuses. It only shows better conditions for women because of easier access to shelters. She's more likely to help women? What's wrong with helping whoever needs it? Is this not sexism? If I say "I'm more likely to help men in need" that's not sexism? Also, I'm sure that "skewed statistics" won't change the number by more than 25%.
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/20 05:17 PM
2

Idk man, I feel that having a good sense of humour is the same as being funny. You may disagree but whatever.
/r/MGTOW18/04/20 04:56 PM
1

This. I thought that no one other than the people in r/circlejerk saw through the nature of all of Reddit. Initially I thought that Reddit was the perfect social media. I was wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists13/04/20 04:06 AM
2

Oh. They're just kids, it's fine really. Let r/antifeminists continue to focus on the important issues.
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/20 11:10 AM
1

I did manage to get into another great government college, so my dreams haven't been shattered fortunately. What hurts is that one of my friends whose family was quite well off, went to the same coaching institute as mine and got 10 less marks than me in NEET got into that college. But in some backwards village somewhere, an intelligent but poor boy didn't achieve his dream of becoming a doctor because his parents couldn't afford expensive coaching.
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/20 10:58 AM
1

Sure they may want it. But have we seen feminists take action against it like they take for female issues? We continue to help women move forward, but fail to realise when we give them an advantage over men, as seen in so many reservation policies and biased laws. And feminism continues to push it even when it is no longer needed in an area.
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/20 10:21 AM
3

No, feminism isn't good here. Another example is the huge reservation for women in JEE and NEET, even though more women apply for NEET than men. I failed to get into my first choice college, because their "female quota" hadn't been filled.
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/20 10:07 AM
1

Where did she claim misogyny?
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/20 10:02 AM
0

*lack of respect for sex. Since these guys are in MGTOW, they probably couldn't care less about respect for sex and their sexual partner's opinion.
/r/MGTOW04/04/20 10:46 PM
1

I'm from India. It's far from being considered the best country in the world, but it still has factors in which it beats even most developed nations. America is indeed one of the best countries to live in right now. But Trump, the education system, politics, excess expenditure, radfeminism and other factors combined don't promise a more prosperous future for the country.
/r/MGTOW04/04/20 05:38 PM
2

"Best" is subjective. Which is the best, Pizza or Ice Cream? Different countries are good in different aspects. I'm just saying that America isn't the dreamland the way I've seen many Americans describe it. C'mon, for one, you're in MGTOW. You probably know how messed up the American justice system is.
/r/MGTOW04/04/20 05:26 PM
1

Oh I forgot to consider the beautiful feminist perspective. Sorry for being exclusionary to your unbiased and progressive opinion😭
/r/MGTOW04/04/20 05:11 AM
3

Bro I legitimately exhaled at your comment. I almost never actually do that.
/r/MGTOW04/04/20 04:35 AM
1

Yes, she can't be convicted. But I do not get how the judge, as a human, could think of letting a pedophile rapist raise the child. That's exactly the kind of person who shouldn't be allowed to bring up a child.
/r/MGTOW04/04/20 04:33 AM
5

Don't forget being one of the most debt ridden countries. They seem to be oblivious to the condition of their country.
/r/MGTOW03/04/20 02:30 PM
144

Yeah, they're saying that the purpose of child support is to support the child, not the mother. Imagine if the situation swapped genders. That would be unthinkable. I don't get it, how can they think it's a good idea to leave the child to be raised by a pedophile rapist? The best course of action would be to offer the child to the man to raise, and if refused, send him/her to foster care. Edit: The man doesn't mind raising the child. The court won't give the child to him though. I'm guessing the…
/r/MGTOW03/04/20 02:29 PM
11

Definitely the patriarchy. Must be the stress of her toxic marriage coupled with the burden of surviving in this misogynistic society, she snapped under the stress and showed true girl power.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 12:04 PM
9

"No man wants to have a family with me. Surely it's because of the patriarchy. I'm jealous of women who are better than me, so I'll just convince other women to not raise a family either."
/r/AntiFeminists02/04/20 11:58 AM
19

Yeah. Like who doesn't agree that girls are stinky poos?
/r/MGTOW02/04/20 08:30 AM
3

Done, removed, banned, can't care less
/r/MGTOW02/04/20 04:55 AM
4

Honestly, if a girl asked me how tall I am, I won't mind telling her. But if she gets offended if I ask her weight, that's a red flag.
/r/PussyPass02/04/20 04:44 AM
34

I think you mean "Vertically challenged women aren't attracted to short men".
/r/PussyPass01/04/20 07:40 PM
11

I'm posting this on r/feminism. This will probably be my first and last post there.
/r/MGTOW01/04/20 07:25 PM
1

Oh lol, sorry didn't catch the sarcasm
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/20 12:00 PM
1

That's...not how football works. Getting good at a sport requires years of training, and the boys have been training for years to get as good as they are. No way will the "fem" team learn the sport well enough after 4-5 matches and beat the "sexist" team. Women have got to learn that getting good at anything requires efforts, and less representation of women at many positions is not because they are discriminated against, but because they need to get competent.
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/20 11:30 AM
2

Imagine calling Doctor Who a horrible series because of the first episode
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/20 12:33 PM
2

When will they get that Affirmative action is a horrible practice?
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/20 08:03 AM
2

That's sad, seeing so many people who's relationships didn't work out. That's also happy, seeing so many men who are happy on their own. Thanks for the advice, I'll watch out.
/r/MGTOW30/03/20 07:49 AM
2

RemindMe! 18 months
/r/MGTOW30/03/20 07:40 AM
1

Okay, I'll save this thread and put up a message if it ends badly or she turns out to be psychotic. Thanks for the advice though, will watch out
/r/MGTOW29/03/20 09:11 PM
-2

Not all relationships end that badly. My paternal grandparents are the happiest and most loving couple I've ever seen. Like when I see them sitting together some evenings, I can see how happy they are with each other. They've definitely lived together for more than 4-6 months.
/r/MGTOW29/03/20 09:05 PM
0

You, duh He already implied that feminists are usually wrong, through sarcasm. You just repeated it.
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/20 01:57 PM
3

Exactly. A female friend of mine who's family was about as well off as mine, went to the same coaching centre I went to and got 10 less marks than me made it into that college. I didn't. Guess who didn't make it to the college because of lack of resources? A poor boy from a backwards village who's parents couldn't afford expensive coaching. But no, women need reservations.
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/20 01:55 PM
-1

We haven't moved in because my parents are paying for my college and lodging, and they are very conservative lmao Also I'd not want to live with a person without knowing 100% that she won't cut off my balls if she feels like it. Of course, I know how biased the system is towards women in case things go wrong, so I'm keeping an eye out and taking things slowly
/r/MGTOW29/03/20 01:32 PM
0

r/woooosh?
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/20 01:31 PM
5

I'm in a relationship, but we haven't moved in yet. We regularly Duo. We miss each other, but it's fine. I'm MGTOW at heart in the sense that I understand that men shouldn't marry if the woman brings nothing to the table, but mine is considerate and understanding.
/r/MGTOW29/03/20 12:55 PM
1

Tell her to look in a mirror and tell one reason that anyone would want to take pictures of her. Also, unless she struts around naked in her house, there is no reason for her to be afraid. Pictures are dangerous when they are nudes or track the daily routine, while you have access to only one room.
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/20 12:00 PM
6

It's not exactly wrong. Feminism refers to the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes. The problem isn't that it tries to make the sexes have equal opportunity, but that it gives privileges to women by bashing and pushing behind men.
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/20 11:56 AM
3

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA WHO SAYS WOMEN AREN'T FUNNY AMIRITE
/r/MGTOW29/03/20 10:12 AM
2

I like you bot
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/20 10:07 AM
2

Some fatass femcel posted something about her not being able to find a boyfriend. Women jumped to console her, saying that old bullshit "People often reject expensive things because they can't afford them". I said that even if something is low-cost, people will reject it if it's disgusting and useless. Guess who got banned lmao
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/20 10:06 AM
52

I want to be a personal shopper for 120$ an hour, sign me up! Rent: 0$ Food: 0$ Shelter: 0$ Toilet: 0$ Bed: 0$ Toiletries: 0$ Clothes: 0$ Makeup/Parlours: 0$ Transportation: 0$ Parties: 0$ Eating out: 0$ Electricity: 0$ Phone bill: 0$ Television: 0$ Medical appointments: 0$ Your relatives/friends coming over: 0$ Your boyfriend paying for all your needs because you're a dumbass who won't be offered a job: invaluable
/r/MGTOW29/03/20 09:57 AM
2

For context, he said something about r/MGTOW manipulating women and asked me why I don't like feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/20 05:39 AM
4

"Human trafficking 6 times a day" Naw mate I only got to do it 5 times today The day before was a productive day, did it 7 times
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/20 05:35 AM
3

A "rape" kink would also involve an idea that that the opposite person is fine with sex with them. Not to mention that the protagonist must stop if the opposite person is really resisting you.
/r/AntiFeminists27/03/20 09:26 AM
2

there -> that they're
/r/AntiFeminists27/03/20 09:24 AM
19

If anyone says "most of them enjoyed it", tell them one of these things: If they just seem to be ignorant of the reality, ask them that if a woman wouldn't enjoy being raped, why would a man like to be forced to have sex with someone he doesn't like. If they seem to be a dumbass, fatass, parents' basement-dwelling feminist who hates men because it's the easy way mentally out of her problems, tell her to look in a mirror, and think of one reason anyone would like to have sex with her, let alone b…
/r/AntiFeminists27/03/20 08:51 AM
1

I didn't know the word meritocracy, it's the exact word I needed to explain the system I want. Thanks!
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/20 11:09 AM
2

Ah, you play Pokemon too? I assumed that most MGTOW members are too high-class for childish games
/r/MGTOW26/03/20 06:12 AM
12

Women these days say that men can't decide laws that affect them, like abortion. Women also voted for laws which affect men, and against them too. Wow.
/r/MGTOW24/03/20 05:56 PM
14

Thanks for the detailed explanation. I honestly can't express my shock in words. Outside the radical Islam countries, is there even one political system which does not blatantly discriminate against men? Also, what would happen if a male citizen of Switzerland identifies as a woman?
/r/MGTOW24/03/20 05:49 PM
14

Is stupid feminism rampant in Switzerland too? Also, are men required to serve in the army while women are not? Good luck, stay strong.
/r/MGTOW24/03/20 03:31 PM
3

Is there a word for it though? Like... masculism? Just looked it up, it is masculism.
/r/AntiFeminists24/03/20 03:00 PM
4

You've got the definition of feminism wrong. Feminism refers to the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes. Now it's evolved into getting more rights for women than men, because of biased and incomplete statistics.
/r/AntiFeminists24/03/20 10:17 AM
2

Well technically it's not the same. It has mucus and uterine lining in it.
/r/AntiFeminists24/03/20 06:20 AM
1

I hope your joking. A football team's purpose is to compete with other teams and determine who's the best. If you want to learn football, go take some classes or get someone good to teach you.
/r/AntiFeminists24/03/20 03:13 AM
2

Honestly, she isn't wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists23/03/20 06:07 PM
1

Sauce?
/r/MGTOW23/03/20 01:08 PM
2

For the English speakers of Reddit: It says that the man works. So the woman can choose to stay at home and cook and shit, or she can work too. But fat feminists won't do either. They're equal, so they won't cook. The man is worthless if he doesn't earn enough to support them, so they won't work either.
/r/AntiFeminists23/03/20 01:02 PM
2

Less women go into STEM fields, by their own choice. Because "woke" companies want equal representation to make themselves look more likeable, women as a result have an easier time getting a job.
/r/AntiFeminists23/03/20 07:50 AM
2

Well, I guess each one has their own unique tastes.
/r/MGTOW22/03/20 02:39 PM
3

I agree, beer is potentially destructive. But alcohol in moderation has health benefits, and is quite enjoyable.
/r/MGTOW22/03/20 02:39 PM
19

Corona beer is honestly pretty bad
/r/MGTOW22/03/20 12:02 PM
3

I really hate that they took the name r/feminism, and only focus on women's issues. Can I get them to change their name or report it for using a wrong name?
/r/AntiFeminists22/03/20 05:53 AM
5

You clearly haven't seen r/femaledatingstrategy
/r/AntiFeminists22/03/20 05:43 AM
1

350000 isn't enough though, it's like 1% of viewers
/r/AntiFeminists21/03/20 11:21 PM
2

Exactly. If the partner provides you with basically nothing, emotional, physical or financial, why be in a relationship?
/r/MGTOW21/03/20 07:31 PM
6

We can't do much about it though. The people in power won't risk it in fear that they will be accused of sexism and be stripped of their power. It's much simpler for them to just go with the flow and continue making policies favouring women.
/r/AntiFeminists21/03/20 07:01 PM
14

They're absolute simps.
/r/AntiFeminists21/03/20 04:44 PM
2

It's called a petition https://www.change.org/p/dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2
/r/AntiFeminists21/03/20 02:01 PM
2

Counter offer to what?
/r/AntiFeminists21/03/20 07:04 AM
2

Nice wordplay
/r/AntiFeminists21/03/20 06:59 AM
2

Honestly, the origin of the word doesn't matter. Sir comes from Sire, a title for a Knight. Malaria comes from the Latin word for "Bad air", even though we know it is not an airborne disease but a vector disease.
/r/AntiFeminists21/03/20 06:58 AM
5

Done a long time ago! Where's the petition to cut off her arms so that she will not abuse another person so heinously again?
/r/AntiFeminists20/03/20 01:44 PM
2

Oh it's fine They're divorced now, Heard got 7 million dollars in the settlement.
/r/AntiFeminists20/03/20 12:08 PM
5

Bruh do you live under a rock? Google it once.
/r/AntiFeminists20/03/20 11:58 AM
20

Fuck feminism. I won't call myself a feminist until the movement provides justice to both genders.
/r/AntiFeminists20/03/20 08:57 AM
19

When Heard accused him of domestic abuse, there were worldwide protests and widespread media coverage demanding him to be removed from Pirates of the Caribbean and the Grindelwald movie. They worked. When Heard was proven to be the perpetrator, Depp innocent and the crimes done by her against him much more serious, guess what happened? Nothing. Heard got 7 million dollars in the divorce settlement, she faces no charges now, and she is still in the movies she has been selected for. The media didn…
/r/AntiFeminists20/03/20 08:27 AM
11

No, why should women do the dirty work? Equal representation should be applied only for white collar jobs. Because over-representation of men in big positions is because of the patriarchy. Over-representation of men in blue-collar jobs is choice and chance.
/r/MGTOW15/03/20 04:26 PM
-26

The female Ghostbusters wasn't that bad if a movie...
/r/MGTOW13/03/20 01:50 PM
1

He says that as if the only purpose of a woman is pussy. He got the definition of cuck wrong too.
/r/MGTOW09/03/20 05:03 AM
1

Repeated screenshotting does this to a picture.
/r/MGTOW09/03/20 05:00 AM
1

Exactly, I found this wierd too. I don't know the exact definition of the word cuck, but this seems dumb. Google says that it means someone who's wife is unfaithful to him. I don't see how this fits the definition.
/r/MGTOW09/03/20 04:59 AM
3

Adopt a kid if you want. Just help raise a kid with a proper mindset, not brainwashed into believing the feminist propaganda. If all the smart men go their own way, the next generation will all be brainwashed into believing the patriarchy is real by their radfem moms and simp dads, and they will continue oppressing men. The fighters will be gone because MGTOW, and the cycle continues.
/r/MGTOW08/03/20 04:12 PM
7

Indeed. The accusation gets more attention than the conviction. This is another reason I ask the people of this sub to have kids and raise them right. We complain about how the boomers and feminists have ruined our world, and we have the audacity to say that "Nothing matters after I'm dead, so why try to change this shit society?" Think about the males of the coming generations. They will be forced to labour all day in fields and factories, while fat women watch TV and continue to shitpost on Fa…
/r/MGTOW08/03/20 03:14 PM
16

At least there's a petition to replace Heard in Aquaman. Hope it happens, after Depp was removed from the Harry Potter movie.
/r/MGTOW08/03/20 02:46 PM
-1

It's our responsibility to try and make the next generation smarter. Not having kids or raising them will only worsen it.
/r/MGTOW07/03/20 12:52 PM
-2

Even if she can't support him/her, and you can?
/r/MGTOW07/03/20 12:50 PM
-3

Friends, have sex with some woman you find good enough to carry your genes and raise the child yourself. Raise him to be a good human being without the need to worry what your wife will do to spoil him, or as above, harm him.
/r/MGTOW07/03/20 12:12 PM
4

Even if Bloomberg could give everyone a million dollars, it would simply cause the value of the dollar to drop and everything would be the way it was before, except for the fact that the dollar is a fraction of what it was.
/r/MGTOW07/03/20 11:56 AM
3

This isn't wrong. It doesn't ask what's better. It asks what is sexier. Don't lie, if you could stay at home and play video games all day and get V every night, would you or would you not?
/r/MGTOW04/03/20 03:31 PM
3

He's the first person ever who would say "that bitch ugly, I'm no rapist but even if I was, she'd be the last person I'd rape". And even though he's right, the left spins the story against him.
/r/MGTOW03/03/20 08:24 PM
3

Absolutely. And you've got dumbass women who accuse him of rape after 50 years, because no man will date her and she decides to mooch off the fame of a famous guy.
/r/MGTOW03/03/20 11:27 AM
1

The things I support about him are his immigration policies and that he speaks the truth. Everything else is horrible. He cares jack abouts the world economy, doesn't know enough science to realise that climate change is real, is unnecessarily racist and doesn't seem to think about the consequences of his actions, as evident by him being ready to start WW3. I'd rather vote for nobody than Trump. The democrats may jump off a cliff.
/r/MGTOW03/03/20 04:03 AM
27

Okay I get that Trump over Clinton, but do the people of this sub actually like Trump?
/r/MGTOW02/03/20 06:24 PM
-2

Who is that whale? Why are so many people commenting as if they know her?
/r/MGTOW01/03/20 05:09 AM
1

Were the upvoters banned too?
/r/MGTOW28/02/20 09:58 AM
1

I didn't know that, the message you got didn't say that your comment was deleted. Keep sticking to what's right brother.
/r/MGTOW28/02/20 09:55 AM
1

Link, please. I need to upvote.
/r/MGTOW28/02/20 04:25 AM
1

Agree with all but 5 and 7.
/r/MGTOW25/02/20 12:27 PM
13

Exactly. Fucked up reservations stop deserving men from entering the field in the name of "gender equality" Gender equality is a fucked up term itself. Gender Justice is what we need.
/r/MGTOW23/02/20 06:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter