TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Debellatio Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by Debellatio on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

what is the difference in time, then? do they socialize with peers less and with the children more? there are only so many hours in a day, after all. If more time is both going to work AND to children, what is that time taken away from?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:01 AM
2

You aren't really 'paying your ex' in the eyes of the government. You are paying for the children's needs. Because you are seeing them less she is paying a larger proportion of their expenses, thus the additional $800 per month. why wouldn't it be on a sliding scale, then? what's the deal with 50 days visitation = $800 more, but 49 days isn't more, and 51 days isn't less? for that to make sense at all and still be fair, it should be pegged to a sliding scale.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 10:40 PM
10

maybe men are more likely to fight to the end, rather than go for the plea offered?
/r/MensRights13/12/13 02:52 PM
3

just because there's a judgement, though, doesn't mean she's not going to try to get out of it. work under the table / cash-only jobs, and it becomes a lot harder to garnish wages
/r/MensRights20/08/13 04:12 AM
2

Is SRS just a huge trolling club?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 10:01 AM
3

it wouldn't be volunteer if there weren't enough volunteers for the need. there will always be a need for force. it's nice that for a few decades we haven't needed a draft, and that we haven't needed a large enough standing army for compulsory military enrollment to be a thing, but those circumstances can change at any time. I don't know about most countries with compulsory military service other than Israel, but the women there are under the same requirements as the men, as far as I know.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 10:19 PM
2

this is brilliantly succinct, and I am totally saving it.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 05:46 PM
1

God, no. not more nanny-state. people need to accept responsibility for their own actions. if you drink and want to decrease your risk of accidentally interacting with other people in totally unexpected (/s) ways, either drink less so you can actually control yourself, or drink as much as you can, alone, at home, with the doors locked in the basement. although you still might die from alcohol poisoning. but at that point, I'm sure it is the alcohol company's fault somehow for you downing a handl…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 05:43 PM
1

Rape is a lack of consent in sex, and is wrong in all situations. given. that's why it is a word used for a crime (in all places where crime = "wrong," but we're not talking jaywalking here). I don't think it makes sense to try to split hairs on which kind of rape is worse than others, because that attempts to minimize what some victims have gone through. so someone who bursts into your house, puts a gun to your spouse's head, and forces you to have sex with them in front of them is exactly the …
/r/MensRights21/08/12 05:37 PM
1

Perhaps the solution is to separate out forcible rape with an extra-bad word. god damnit. THAT'S WHY THE WORD "forcible" IS THERE!! the people arguing against calling it "forcible" don't WANT an extra word, of any kind, in there. to them, forcible rape is just as (equally) bad as any other kind. no more, no less. I happen to disagree, but I understand that trying to fix this with a word is not going to work for the people who don't want to call it that to begin with, because their whole issue is…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 05:27 PM
1

apparently we have different priorities with the same goal.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 03:42 PM
1

and you don't think it would be easier to stop the harassers if everyone started to be harassed, instead of just a minority of people?
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:15 PM
2

The question that people need to answer is what is more important? A just system or a system that deals with every gender equally, regardless of the legitimacy of the conclusion. In my worldview, a system is not "just" UNLESS it deals with every gender equally, in ALL cases.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:28 PM
0

but therein lies the problem. it currently exists, today, in the real world. until it can be destroyed, should everyone not be held to the same standard? if everyone IS held to the same standard and it is deemed unfair, won't that only hasten the dismantling of it as more people are affected by it? replace man and woman with "black person" and "white person." does that change your position?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:21 PM
2

those are honestly two completely separate approaches to solving this problem in the U.S. to do what he wants would only require acts by individual judges upholding current law and applying things equally to both genders. this is what should be happening to begin with, and can happen much faster than the alternative (below). to do what you want to do would (perhaps?) seem to require acts of the legislative branch to equalize things across the board. we all know how effective getting that herd of…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:18 PM
1

I think it's pretty likely they wanted to wait until the end of the year before dealing with anything. schools know that once summer hits, a hell of a lot less people will be paying attention to / care what happens with something that happened "last year."
/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:12 PM
0

I think (or at least hope) what they are suggesting is applying the maximum penalty to the teacher to bring more awareness to the issue, so more people agree things are screwed up and willing to change them. I do not think (I hope) they want "the book thrown" at the teacher due to some sense of vengeance. I liken it to being on a boat that's starting to tip to the side. Your method says: "hey everybody, there are a few too many people on the left side - we need a few of those people to move to t…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:05 PM
1

there are 3 or 4 replies to this post that all say the same rhetoric that I mocked in my initial reply ... I like when we can get some real discussion going about these topics perhaps, to better foster "some real discussion," you can instead downvote comments that do not add to the discussion rather than provoking those posters via "mocking?"
/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:00 PM
1

We are starting to better understand genetically inherited conditions and diseases and establishing parental certainty is best for the health of the child. That is a wonderful goal. However, I am not personally for mandating things "for the health of the child" in a vast array of other situations, either. For example, mandating all parents remain non-smokers for the 18 years and 9 months they are raising a child. We could also mandate that no soda or candy is allowed to be given to children, as …
/r/MensRights07/06/12 04:33 AM
3

it doesn't need to be mandatory, but people do need to start demanding it to be done if it is important to them. believe me, I know a guy whose wife was fooling around about the time they got pregnant. he forgave her and doesn't WANT to know. he just wants to move on. I think taking away his choice to just let it be an uncertainty is unfair. I do think anyone who wants one should be able to easily get one at time of birth, though.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 03:24 PM
0

so: (for you, at least) the latter then, I take it?
/r/seduction12/05/12 03:12 PM
2

Which books have you written? I'd be interested in checking them out. You have had an interesting life!
/r/seduction18/01/12 12:17 PM
8

"Russian hands and Roman fingers?" Is that a thing, or just a euphemism I am not picking up? Great report man!
/r/seduction06/01/12 12:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter