TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DecantsForAll Archive

View 1 post and 346 comments by DecantsForAll on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

18 year olds attracted to 17 year olds.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 12:02 AM
1

Exactly. If you hire a money manager, who has carte blanche to invest your money or whatever, does that mean they're in a position of power over you? Of course not. Because it's obvious the "power" is one level lower than who is making the decision with what to do with the money. All this feminist horseshit focuses on the wrong level. It's such a naive view of "power." I don't think it's as simple as "women have all the real power" or anything like that, though. But it's clear women do and have …
/r/MensRights10/07/26 04:39 PM
1

If I hire someone to manage my money, do they have the power or do I? But they make all the decisions with what to do with the money!!! They're in a heckin' position of power over the money!
/r/MensRights10/07/26 04:34 PM
–

So your argument is basically that because men "get pussy" (ejaculate to porn) for essentially doing nothing (looking at porn) they expect that same thing to play out in the real world and get mad when it doesn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:19 PM
–

It seems like it would reward porn use, not pursuing women. Anyway, I don't understand what that has to do with OP's point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:06 PM
–

So why don't we see more young men going into pizza delivery and plumbing?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:02 PM
–

That doesn't mean they're dumb enough to think porn is real life. If they do, why don't we see more young men going into pizza delivery and plumbing?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:00 PM
11

Or redditors could learn to read. They weren't even being sarcastic, just giving an example.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 04:30 PM
6

I had a friend whose ex was an absolutely monster and he stayed with her for years. Like, he'd go out to get her dinner just for her, forget to get a fork, and she would absolutely unload on him, like all-out screaming at the top of her lungs. I saw it with my own eyes. And that was what she was like when me and my then-gf were around.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 12:23 AM
1

Do you have an example?
/r/MensRights09/06/26 04:54 PM
1

When I went looking for examples of women who used their bodies to shield men they didn't know from gun fire, or similar acts, I couldn't find any. I did say "certain acts."
/r/MensRights09/06/26 04:30 PM
12

The funny thing is that "not all men, but always a man" is a legitimate claim you could make about certain altruistic displays of heroism, whereas the claim that something like murder/rape/torture is always a man is just flagrantly false.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:47 PM
9

My breakup with my gf of 10 years was way more acutely painful (and by acute I don't mean brief) than living with my mother who has been slowly succumbing to Alzheimer's for the past 9 years. It was 13 years ago and I still dream about it on a weekly basis, despite having absolutely nothing to do with her since almost day 1, not even looking at a picture of her. I completely relate to what he's saying. It's almost like an vicious spiral of betrayal. Because the fact that one person who was suppo…
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:31 PM
10

No, obviously not. Your husband is probably just repeating something he heard someone else say.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 05:01 AM
10

Where are you getting the idea that "men" don't understand this? As a man, it seems pretty fucking obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 04:53 AM
3

Since when does a small minority of a thing define what it means to be a thing?
/r/MensRights02/06/26 07:13 PM
6

Deaths in Gaza: 49% men, 49% boys, 2% women and girls. "mostly women and children"
/r/MensRights02/06/26 12:17 AM
4

Yeah, and it's impossible to find the stats on how many men are killed by male acquaintances of their current/former partners. I would love to know those.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 11:04 PM
24

How about this case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sd0M3YCXgMg Lady enlists her female friend to help poison her husband. That fails. So she gets her male friend to bring her a gun and uses it to shoot her husband. The female friend isn't charged with anything. The wife gets 16 years in prison. And the male friend who gave her the gun gets life in prison!
/r/MensRights01/06/26 07:30 PM
24

They also try to own homophobia victimhood by pretending it stems from misogyny. The idea being that men hate women so much they even hate men with "feminine" traits.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 04:57 AM
35

They say the same thing about society at large, even though it's the same way.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 09:31 PM
6

Even though men are more likely to be attacked/killed/hospitalized by a stranger, they'll never understand how many precautions women have to take to stay safe from the things that don't actually happen to them.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 05:15 PM
12

I think you must have missed part of the post.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 04:52 PM
4

Yeah, and a mild heart attack can be completely painless. Only 66% of people experience pain, and that's not just mild heart attacks, it's all of them. That's like the dumbest point of reference to use. I'm not saying period cramps are painless.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 04:17 PM
26

https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/1/1/e000112 Data from 33 countries distinguishing the perpetrators of parental homicides of children under the age of 18 years showed that mothers committed just over half of all parental homicides (median 54.7%, IQR 36.7–68.8); ... The 12 countries with detailed data on parent as perpetrators showed mothers commit the majority of parental homicides of children under 1 year (71.7% (IQR: 50.2–75.7)). ... If studies only considering parents were examined, 13 co…
/r/MensRights27/05/26 03:41 PM
14

It's amazing how the people parroting these lines apparently cannot comprehend I'm not amazed at all. People are DUMB. I'm convinced there are lots of people who are completely unable to think for themselves.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 10:15 PM
-2

I mean, they kind of have a point ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights25/05/26 08:04 PM
2

80% of US men are circumsized but sure bro it's just (((2% of the population))) that keeps it from being illegal
/r/MensRights25/05/26 07:59 PM
2

Yeah, it's hilarious how you still don't get what that means.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 02:23 AM
1

How do you not understand that that isn't the part I quoted?!?! Also, in 2021, men were 39% of intimate partner homicides. https://bjs.ojp.gov/female-murder-victims-and-victim-offender-relationship-2021 So that's what I'm going with because they actually give you the figures and it's in the US, which is where most of us are from. I don't know what kind of bullshit tactics the UN uses to come up with their stats. It's kinda silly to act like women being murdered in Afghanistan is an issue that fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 02:05 AM
-2

Do you not understand how this: Around 60% of all intentional homicides of women and girls worldwide are perpetrated by intimate partners or family members. Male Victims: Only about 11% of global male homicides are perpetrated by intimate partners or family members is misleading? Like, what do you think that shows? Is it that women are more likely than men to be killed by an intimate partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 01:34 AM
0

The majority of domestic abuse is committed by women. Women are far more likely to be murdered by an intimate partner. Globally, nearly half of all female homicide victims are killed by a family member or partner, compared to less than 10% of male victims. That conclusion doesn't follow from the statistics you cited. This: Globally, nearly half of all female homicide victims are killed by a family member or partner, compared to less than 10% of male victims. tells you nothing about whether or no…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 01:04 AM
7

because men have no in-group bias
/r/MensRights24/05/26 11:01 PM
1

The majority of domestic abuse is committed by women. Men have to deal with that and being lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 10:58 PM
0

the gestalt
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 10:53 PM
1

That's not what it means. It's either solely referring to hooded eyes, where the upper eyelid hangs down and kind of flatten the top contour of the eye, which is normally round. It gives it this sleek "predator" look. It's either solely that or a combination of that and the shape of the orbital bone/brow bone. I think you're talking about positive canthal tilt, which a lot of incels mistakenly think is responsible for hunter eyes because they're too stupid to figure out what they're looking at.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 10:43 PM
1

Omg, you're so cool for having realized this first.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 10:32 PM
0

Get another girlfriend. That's the only thing that will help.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 10:09 PM
11

Children are 22% of the population so 22% of engineers should be children.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 02:28 PM
21

Society is constantly telling men to avoid casual social acknowledgment because they are all potential rapists and killers and any casual social acknowledgement on their part could be construed as a threat to a woman's life.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 02:23 PM
48

How often do you think men interrupt their jog and creepily pursue a woman jogging in the opposite direction because she reciprocated a head nod? I'm guessing never.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 02:13 PM
5

No, I'm talking about how every time a woman does some shit to a man the default assumption is that he must have done something to deserve it.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 05:31 PM
4

The classic "What did he do to deserve this?"
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:32 PM
5

So then how is it dangerous?
/r/MensRights12/05/26 05:33 AM
6

What's the actual prevalence of men attacking women after chatting them up in public during the day?
/r/MensRights12/05/26 05:01 AM
7

I agree that it's false equivalency, but I do like it and I'm not gay. I used to go to this gay after hours club, just because it was the only after hours club in the city. Lots of straight people would go, but it was primarily gay. So this has happened to me a good number of times. I also once gave a guy a ride home who also turned out to be a straight dude and told me he just went there because it helped his self esteem (which isn't why I went).
/r/MensRights12/05/26 04:49 AM
41

No, see, it doesn't matter because if you get murdered it's your fault for being the same gender as the person who murdered you. Remember at the annual men's meeting how we all decided that murder was okay? Now we have only ourselves to blame.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 09:40 PM
2

Doesn't matter what the point is Yeah it does because that's exactly what we're talking about. Was the "point" of those replicating amino acids to replicate or is it just something that happened? Lets say one of them randomly mutated and became a little better at replicating than all the other molecules. Was the "point" to become better at replicating or was it just something that occurred without any point?
/r/MensRights08/05/26 08:27 PM
1

The first forms of "life" were amino acids that started self-replicating Right, and was their "point" to start self-replicating or is it just something that happened?
/r/MensRights08/05/26 07:18 PM
-3

Life in terms of evolution, is absolutely just about reproducing. No, life in terms of evolution isn't about anything. It's like saying the point of hydrogen is to form a spherical mass and then fuse into helium.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 03:38 AM
23

Whoops. Can't let this little doozy get out.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 08:27 PM
15

I've been called an incel for arguing with someone about whether black metal was stagnant before Deafheaven released Sunbather.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 08:26 PM
7

Excuse me ma'am, do you have a moment to talk about our Lord and Savior, Feminism?
/r/MensRights29/04/26 08:25 PM
12

Women also attack you physically. They commit the majority of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 11:21 PM
4

Should women be allowed to vote in this scenario, where the people they vote for can kidnap men and send them to the front lines to die, but can't do the same to women?
/r/MensRights25/04/26 12:12 AM
132

No, I'm a Ukrainian woman partying in Majorca.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 10:32 PM
14

My ex would never take no for an answer. She'd badger me for like an hour and eventually resort to grabbing my hand and pressing it against her vagina. Tbh, I don't think it's a big deal, but I know that the reverse gets counted in sexual assault statistics.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 08:12 AM
7

feminism: women were basically property, slaves with no social power also feminism: go die for me
/r/MensRights22/04/26 12:56 AM
8

Looks like it's only part of the place for one hour, on Mondays and Tuesdays. Relax. It's only "no black people" on Mondays and Tuesdays. What are you so upset about?
/r/MensRights21/04/26 08:51 PM
6

if you're non-binary, don't you not believe in the gender binary, which means you see everyone as non-binary?
/r/MensRights21/04/26 08:49 PM
5

More pretend!
/r/MensRights20/04/26 08:18 PM
7

Oh, so we're just making shit up? Well, guess what, 100% of those sexual assault cases are false. And also women kill 10,000 babies a year in the US.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 07:00 PM
7

What percent of those sexual assaults are some random person pinching their butt at the club?
/r/MensRights20/04/26 06:23 AM
-2

There are women out there not like this. Just gotta be picky.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 02:55 AM
23

51% of perpetrators are men 99.99999% of men aren't perpetrators "Omg, why are men like this?"
/r/MensRights19/04/26 07:12 PM
2

Exactly. They'd have you believe that the average woman who hasn't faced some issue is more affected than the men who have. For instance, intimate partner homicide. They act like it's this burden that all women carry that isn't faced by any men. Meanwhile, in 2021, 1079 men were killed by intimate partners and 1690 women. The number of men killed is almost 2X the difference, but because of the difference, we can completely write off all the male victims, and expand the female victims to include …
/r/MensRights16/04/26 11:41 PM
2

We're talking about standards though, i.e. a level of quality, achievement, performance, etc., that is considered acceptable or desirable For the vast majority of men, small tits are acceptable or desirable for a potential long term partner. It seems like you're confusing standards for a relationship with standards for being considered one of the most beautiful women in the world or something. Even then I think most men wouldn't exclude women with small tits in the running for most beautiful wom…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 09:28 PM
2

I'm not talking about casual flings. I'm talking about long term partner. What percent of men are not partnering up with a woman unless she has big tits?
/r/MensRights16/04/26 06:58 PM
3

I mean, some ideas just don't deserve to be discussed in good faith. The idea that men are setting these standards is just silly. It's incredibly easy for almost any woman to find a partner, so they're clearly not standards for that.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 06:24 PM
2

It doesn't matter what you said. You're just an avatar for the prevailing narrative.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 05:53 PM
3

"Men are perverts who will fuck anything that moves but also set extreme beauty standards that are impossible to meet without surgery." Have you ever actually spoken to a man?
/r/MensRights16/04/26 05:46 PM
28

I just don't want my girl to abandon me just because I have a bad month. Well, hopefully you're tall enough and good enough at making money that that doesn't happen.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 10:06 PM
15

But just to jump ship the moment something is slightly more shiny, I think, is pretty fucked up. It is fucked up, but, again, it's survival of the fittest, not survival of the least fucked up. My point is that people are products of evolution, which produces things that are geared towards survival, not just themselves surviving, but ensuring their genes survive down the genetic line. I don't think it's quite that simple, but I think we tend to downplay the amount that we are that (biological org…
/r/MensRights15/04/26 09:44 PM
22

Of course. It's survival of the fittest, not survival of the most devoted to their current partner.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 08:53 PM
1

I thought with how many victims this would be a safe space. You guys should start a Dunning Kruger meetup group where you can circlejerk to your heart's content.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 10:53 PM
1

No, it's about a woman. When it mentions other sufferers it says "people" not "women."
/r/MensRights14/04/26 10:23 PM
5

Holy fuck what happeend to reddit. They learned what OCD is.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 09:25 PM
7

Someone with P-OCD avoids children as much as can be while someone who actually does do it doesn't care how much hurt they're causing, someone with P-OCD is absolutely not the same as a dangerous predator. Exactly. It stems from almost the complete opposite place. Like, I have intrusive thoughts about committing violence against my dog. I also have never once yelled at him, scolded him, gotten upset with him. I think people who get angry at dogs are insane. I brush his teeth almost every day. I …
/r/MensRights14/04/26 07:03 PM
10

Lots of single digit IQs here talking about things they can't comprehend.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 06:42 PM
1

Which isn't even relevant in this case because someone with pedophilic intrusive thoughts isn't any sort of pedophile at all.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 06:40 PM
9

And what do you think that proves?
/r/MensRights14/04/26 06:39 PM
2

So what? The point of her having Pure Obsessional Type in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder is that it was harder to identify that she had OCD, and that was what was causing the thoughts, not that "well, since she doesn't have compulsions then she's not a danger." Because people with OCD who do have compulsions are still not a danger because intrusive thoughts associated with OCD are unwanted, distressing, and "ego-dystonic" (contrary to a person's true desires, values, or sexual orientation). You'r…
/r/MensRights14/04/26 06:37 PM
16

So even after it's been explained to you, you're incapable of comprehending the difference between suicidal ideation and intrusive thoughts? Yeah, I definitely would not get in a car with you.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 06:24 PM
6

Google
/r/MensRights14/04/26 06:14 PM
11

Yeah, but the compulsions are OCD shit like washing your hands or checking the door locks, not raping kids. "I have to rape 77 kids before I leave the house in the morning."
/r/MensRights14/04/26 06:13 PM
22

Yeah, it's extremely common, like up to 50% of people experience it. I would definitely prefer to get in a car with that person than someone who is afraid that a single fleeting thought might cause a person to drive off a cliff.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 06:10 PM
14

Yeah, I have intrusive thoughts about committing violence against my dog. I also care deeply about my dog's well being and quality of life. It's basically like my brain is like "Hey, wouldn't this be awful?!? Great, well then I'm gonna bring it up all the time!"
/r/MensRights14/04/26 06:05 PM
34

Intrusive thoughts aren't the same as having actual urges. They're like the complete opposite because they are born out of things you don't want to happen. It's that phenomenon where you're driving and you're like "what if I just drove over this cliff?" You think that because it's worst case scenario, not because you have any sort of death wish. It has nothing to do with suicidality, and that thought is completely different that having actual suicidal thoughts. People who think that are not a da…
/r/MensRights14/04/26 05:34 PM
5

It wasn't just not an actual law. It never meant that. Here's a good essay on historical attitudes towards domestic violence: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1404&context=wmjowl Wife beating was seen as so despicable that it was even used in attempts to discredit male witnesses in cases that had nothing to do with domestic violence. Most dramatically, some wife beaters committed suicide. As one reporter surmised, “the humiliation is evidently what caused him to take hi…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 08:53 PM
8

She can go accrue debt and it's the husband's legal obligation to pay it back, and if he doesn't then he goes to jail.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 08:45 PM
9

And it's not like the women close to those men aren't benefiting more than the other 99% of men. MacKenzie Scott got $36 billion in her divorce. I got nothing from that on account of sharing a gender with Jeff Bezos.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 01:46 PM
0

Women bear the physical risk of pregnancy, which explains their selectivity—but that selectivity crushes men who don't meet the threshold. Selectivity actually starts at a more fundamental level. Females (of all species) invest more resources in their eggs - this is actually the essence of being female. Males compete for these resources. For instance, female fish don't get pregnant but males still compete for access. Not that pregnancy doesn't have any effect on competition. It's basically anoth…
/r/MensRights18/03/26 09:00 PM
163

Men are tough. They can handle a little death.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 12:38 AM
41

Men are seen as always wanting it and as the main culprit. Seems like being a man reduces consent boundaries, therefore any sex with a man is rape (of him).
/r/MensRights02/03/26 09:15 PM
3

Or are we just ignoring their problems? Probably. I don't know anything about India, but I assume everyone just thinks things are worse for women everywhere because, ironically, humans simply care more about women and less about men. They report on girls being kidnapped by Boko Haram (and then returned safely). They ignore boys being burned alive by Boko Haram. They report on women being restricted in Saudia Arabia. They ignore Saudi Arabia executing records of numbers of men found guilty in kan…
/r/MensRights28/02/26 10:14 PM
17

Non-binary isn't even an identity anyway. It's a philosophical stance that rejects the gender binary. If you're non-binary, you should think that everyone is non-binary, right? It makes no sense to affirm the philosophical position of non-binaries but not consider everyone non-binary. If you do that, it's like admitting that you're just pretending to go along with them.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 09:19 PM
76

No white gay men either, and don't even think about bisexuals ones. Lmao at gay men being forced out of the LGBTQA+ alliance (at the ridiculous of it, I mean). They're like the entire basis for the LGBTQA+ victim status.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 07:21 PM
69

This exact thing isn't even uncommon: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/dec/12/prominent-sydney-artist-anthony-lister-revealed-as-man-found-not-guilty-of-two-counts-of-rape-ntwnfb
/r/MensRights27/02/26 07:57 PM
30

But, dude, like, I mean, like, what even is consent anyway, you know, like, pfffft?
/r/MensRights27/02/26 07:56 PM
1

We need hundreds of men's studies programs at universities the way women have women's studies. The problem is finding enough men who are completely enamored with themselves enough to study that shit.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 01:15 AM
16

Yeah, they're using someone's real death to make a point about their imaginary enemies, and doing so in a very disrespectful and distasteful way.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 01:14 AM
3

Man, she just looks dumb.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 05:31 AM
10

When a guy with a recessed chin acts like a guy with a strong chin/jaw.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 01:32 AM
15

This is true, but also highlights how stupid the law is. 90 days - a-okay 69 days - jail for 20 years
/r/MensRights06/02/26 01:03 AM
14

The vast majority of violence against women isn't misogyny anyway. It's interpersonal shit. Just search "killed his roommate" to see how often that happens to men living with other men. And of course when you involve romance, children, jealousy, partnership, bills etc. you have a recipe for even more friction. I don't think anyone is like "I hate women and my girlfriend is a woman, so I'm gonna kill her because I hate women."
/r/MensRights30/01/26 10:45 PM
1

I mean I was being sarcastic. I was saying exactly what you said in response to me.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 05:28 AM
1

sarcasm
/r/MensRights27/01/26 05:19 AM
1

No, because rape is both one of the worst things that can possibly be done to a person, one of the worst crimes in existence, and also the type of thing you can't be sure if it even happened.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 03:25 AM
1

I don't know who that is or what his thing is.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 03:23 AM
2

I don't think I'd know of him if it weren't for people talking about him negatively. If he is popular, I imagine it's with like 12-15 year olds, not actual men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 02:03 AM
2

I only wish it were not me doing this, but an actual expert, with experience and resources. Yeah, or an entire department in a university. Or better yet, 276 departments, like women's studies has.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 10:26 PM
2

Yes, and there was some factor that increased prostate cancer deaths but increased mortality for women by an even greater degree, but we used that to make things look more unequal for men!
/r/MensRights26/01/26 08:27 PM
18

Curiously women live longer in every country in the world. In Chad, which has one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the world, women still live 4 years (7.5%) longer than men on average. Also, yeah, it's fucking crazy to base something like "GENDER INEQUALITY!!!" on 2 variables, which might hardly affect anyone. Like, the US, a country of 340 million people, has worse GENDER INEQUALITY! than Europe because 700 women (.0004% of female population) die in childbirth every year. Obviously r…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:52 PM
0

If I thought he were looking for a case, I would have asked him, not you, wouldn't I?
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:38 PM
-1

Yeah, I read the post. I think you're too impaired to drive before you're too impaired to consent to sex. Do you think the girl in the OP should go to prison for 18 years for rape?
/r/MensRights26/01/26 12:25 AM
3

I hope you called the cops to report that. Not like they would do anything. My friend had a bottle broken on his face by some random girl at a bar. Had to go to the hospital and get stitches. He pressed charges and nothing happened to her.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 10:46 PM
1

Yeah, it sounds to me like he consented. He doesn't sound that intoxicated given his recollection of events.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 10:23 PM
-6

If you swapped the genders in your original story, I would say the same thing. There's too much of a difference between what you describe and someone forcing themselves on someone else for them to be considered the same act.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 09:05 PM
-5

I think it does impair your decision making but not to the point that you're completely incapable of making your own decisions, unless you're blackout drunk, which you clearly weren't close to, given the crispness of your memory. Of course it's not okay to drive drunk. The two aren't comparable. It's not okay to text and drive either. Texting doesn't nullify your ability to consent to sex though.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 08:41 PM
6

If you start a fight against someone bigger and/or stronger, you have implicitly accepted the consequences. Almost no one would disagree with this if it were two men. I'm more defenseless against Hafþór or a pro fighter than the average woman is against the average man, but if I walked up to one of them and slapped them in the face, no one would give a fuck if I got knocked out as a result.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 08:03 PM
-19

No, you gave in. She didn't force you to have sex.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 07:41 PM
5

And there's nothing wrong with that if that's how they want to live. Maybe not morally wrong, but if that's the way a large amount or a growing amount want to live, I'd say that's probably a symptom of something being "wrong."
/r/MensRights25/01/26 12:41 AM
2

1788: It was a well judg’d action of a prince I have read of, who took an officer’s commission from him, questioning his courage, upon information that he beat his wife. Porters and carmen are celebrated for such domestic heroism. In short, no man can be a fine gentleman that is not a man of honor, and no man of honor makes a bad husband. https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn83030566/1788-04-29/ed-1/?sp=2&q=beat+his+wife&r=0.616,0.707,0.42,0.147,0 Still not seeing the social acceptability.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 11:46 PM
2

Another good one. 1849: THE LAW IN NEW JERSEY. ESSEX OYER AND TERMINER, MONDAY, SEPT. 3. John Barnhard, a German, from Rahway, was tried for an assault and battery upon his wife. It appeared that she interfered with his punishment of his children, and got slapped in the face, but not very hard. Chief Justice GREEN made a brief but most emphatic charge to the jury, in which he said that there was a time, in the history of common law, in which a man was allowed to beat his wife with a rod not larg…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 11:41 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6_klWFzzgw
/r/MensRights24/01/26 11:15 PM
2

Right, but it speaks to how "socially acceptable" it was, so "socially acceptable" that the community would kidnap you just on suspicion of being a wife beater.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 11:04 PM
1

1817: BARBAROUS TRANSACTION. About two years ago, a number of persons took one Winthrop Hill, of Middlebury, in this county, out of his bed in the night, and carried him some distance on a rail, in a riotous and noisy manner, as a summary punishment for abusing his wife, as alledged. Hill was not able to make proof against the rioters until lately, when one of the party turned state's evidence, and he got 7 or 8 convicted and fined." https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn84024735/1817-08-19/ed-1/?sp=3&…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:08 PM
2

Okay? Also he didn't "gets in trouble for being drunk." He was convicted of whipping his wife, i.e. it was illegal.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:47 PM
4

Find me one instance of a woman being lobotomized because she complained about being beaten by her husband.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:42 PM
1

Stand committed means imprisoned.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:41 PM
2

"Goal" is jail.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:41 PM
2

Now we're getting into pre-US, 1771: We hear from Plymouth, That one Turner, who had been committed to Goal for abusing his Wife, cut his Throat, and half thro’ his Wind-Pipe, and was found wallowing in his Blood some time after, almost expiring; a Surgeon was called, but it is dubious whether he will survive the Wound. https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn83025582/1771-05-10/ed-1/?sp=3&q=abusing+his+wife
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:37 PM
4

1819: At Salem, N. J. one John M'Cormick was convicted of whipping his wife, when probably in a state of intoxication; was sentenced to pay a fine of 25 dollars, to stand committed till paid, and till he gave security for his good behaviour for two years. https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn83026170/1819-10-09/ed-1/?sp=2&q=whipping+his+wife&r=-0.005,0.563,0.706,0.247,0
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:22 PM
3

Oh, now we're getting into pure fantasy?
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:21 PM
-9

cite abuse stats being lower than lesbians I'd be interested in seeing those.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:11 PM
5

Here's an interesting one from 1791. A guy beat another man to death for beating his wife. And then he was executed for that. Doctor Mᴇᴅʟɪᴄᴏᴛ, whose execution at Winchester in Virginia has lately been mentioned, having interfered with a husband who was shamefully beating his wife, sometime last summer, by an unlucky blow unfortunately killed the man. It was for this he suffered an ignominious death. https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn83025587/1791-01-15/ed-1/?sp=3&q=beating+his+wife&r=0.261,0.328,0.…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:09 PM
1

Well, yeah, I used the search function. I can't seem to find which 1829 Kentucky ruling they're referring to.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:06 PM
2

You're free to read the source. I did. It didn't mention which one. So which one? Did 1950s Newspaper Column Ask, 'If a Woman Needs It, Should She Be Spanked?' Yeah, I don't care. Your claim was that wife beating was both legal and socially acceptable, which is clearly false. And this is all against the backdrop of husband beating actually being perfectly legal and socially acceptable (unless you were the husband of course), and still not taken seriously in 2025.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:00 PM
3

one in Kentucky in 1829 Which one?
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:55 PM
3

1823: Caution to bad husbands.—A man named Elijah Wilson, has been sentenced to hard labor in the state prison of New-Jersey, for one year, for the crime of beating his wife. It appeared on the trial that he was in the habit of cuffing as well as whipping her—and he has been very justly punished for his barbarity. https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn82016482/1823-02-11/ed-1/?sp=4&q=beating+his+wife
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:47 PM
2

Here's one from 1854: Wife-Beaters — No less than four disgraces to humanity, in the shape of wife beaters, were yesterday up before acting Recorder Bloomfield. Miss Sullivan and Mike Delaney — two of ’em — were remanded for a future examination. Fred Windeger and Luke Brady were disposed of, the former being fined $10, and the latter being sent to the workhouse for thirty days. https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn83030213/1854-08-28/ed-1/?sp=2&q=wife+beater&r=0.228,1.163,0.374,0.131,0 Again, doesn't…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:32 PM
4

Here's an article from 1870: The Jersey Justices are shrewd and unswerving in the administration of the law. If they happen to make a mistake on the side of mercy, and find a prisoner rather pleased than otherwise at the extent of his sentence, they quickly reconsider the matter. In the Essex County Court yesterday a wife beater was sentenced to six months’ imprisonment, but as he was going out the Judge detected a pleased expression on his face, and heard him say “Thank you, Judge, I can stand …
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:27 PM
4

Here's an article from 1892: https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn84028296/1892-11-17/ed-1/?sp=6&q=wife-beater&r=-0.277,0.09,1.047,0.366,0 The following warning has been posted in the town: To the Riffraff of the Community: Unless certain lazy element their cease cowardly habit of inhumanly beating their wives and children, failing to make suitable provisions for their support, and raising Cain generally, they will be taken from their homes in the dead hour of night, lashed to a tree and horse-whipped…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:00 PM
3

I'm talking about the fact that beating your wife was legal and socially acceptable in most places until the 1900s. This is a pretty good essay on how that's not true: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1404&context=wmjowl “A fine or imprisonment will do such a brute as you are no good,” exclaimed Judge D. A. McKelvey to defendant Louis Sambolia after hearing evidence against him in a Hazelton, Pennsylvania court in 1907. “I am going to give you the punishment you deserve…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 07:29 PM
15

More fun facts: the phrase "rule of thumb" refers to the law that the stick you beat your wife with was only as thick as your thumb. No it doesn't. That's a myth.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:02 AM
45

Men die ~5–7 years earlier on average That's only 20-28 billion less years of human life experienced by the men of the world. No big deal.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 02:15 AM
6

Of course some women do those things, but we're talking about women in general. If we were talking about individuals then the entire conversation would be pointless. Men are still 93% of workplace fatalities. They're still like 99% of combat deaths. Have you never been in a genuine relationship before?? Have you never been a genuine human before? People express those things through physical touch. The article doesn't say "men prefer that their relationships consist only of physical touch and not…
/r/MensRights23/01/26 11:14 PM
4

Yeah, I meant men have literally given up their lives for women, i.e. died. WE ARE ABLE-BODIED ADULTS!!! Until it's time to go down into the mines, then all of a sudden you're just delicate little flower petals. Physical touch is not conversation!! I didn't say it was. I said it's an expression of those things.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 10:47 PM
6

What?? Men give up their lives for women. Women leave JOBS Women LEAVE jobs?!?! Men fucking TAKE jobs for women!!!! AND NO! Genuine connection on a soulful, mental and emotional level is having a SOUL connection that is BEYOND physical, it is what you feel in your SOUL through GENUINE CONVERSATION, CONNECTING through wholesome activities outside of PHYSICAL touch, getting to KNOW someone, OPENING UP emotionally and mentally! Yes, and they express those things through physical touch.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 10:31 PM
9

Men have always treated women like subhuman or like sex objects and playthings. Men have always given up their lives for women. I feel like this article proved that too because instead of craving genuine connection on a soulful, mental and emotional level, it's all about the shallow physical/body. Of course you do because you start with your conclusion and then interpret everything in service of that. Humans express "genuine connection on a soulful, mental and emotional level" through physical a…
/r/MensRights23/01/26 10:17 PM
7

She had some personality disorder or autism or something. Still, she was fueled by this whole "a woman's work is never done" nonsense, when my dad did most of the housework AND the real work.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 07:53 PM
47

Most civilian casualties It's not like people in the military who die aren't dead. Seems like dividing casualties into military and civilian is just another way of minimizing male death and suffering. Many would be civilians if they hadn't been forced to serve.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 06:52 PM
17

My mom used to freak the fuck out over the minimal amount of work she'd do, like full blown breakdowns and sometimes screaming. I remember her making this huge deal over the 3-ingredient fruit salad she'd make 1-2 a week. I'd make it occasionally and it would take me like 10 minutes. She'd act like it was this horrible burden.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 09:21 AM
151

Five women falsely accused this one man. That should tell you something about the frequency and prevalence of false accusations, or at least women's willingness to make them. If there's a 1/100 chance of something, then the chance of 5 in a row of that thing is 1 in 10 billion. Or the probability of that thing turning up 5 times in 10 trials is 1 in 42 million. Now, obviously things are much more complicated than that and the outcomes aren't all independent, but still.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 04:57 AM
7

Because humans are hive insects. Violence against the queen = instant death sentence. Violence against workers/soldiers/drones = no big deal, or even beneficial.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 12:53 AM
7

Yeah, I disagree. I think you're underestimating the effects of culture on shaping people (not necessarily shaping them at a young age either). I think you're underestimating how permeable people are to ideas and how susceptible they are to believing things simply because other people they know believe them. You're taking a more essentialist view of human nature.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 11:46 PM
143

men are human beings Some day people will realize this and there will be a great reckoning.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 11:14 PM
9

Because gay men are unlicensed by the gynocracy.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 09:55 PM
8

Janice is excellent.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 09:51 PM
6

Feminists infect women who like men and turn them into feminists.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 09:51 PM
62

Right. Because who is going to arrest all the other falsely accused men and male victims of abuse if people start falsely accusing police officers?
/r/MensRights18/01/26 08:34 PM
1

It makes perfect sense. That person just doesn't get it.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 11:40 PM
2

No, the CDC didn't actually count it or weigh in on George Floyd. They're just saying that George Floyd's death, which obviously had nothing to do with COVID, would have been counted by the CDC as a COVID death, which goes to show how bad their data is.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 11:09 PM
1

I think their point is about the shitty CDC definition and COVID data, not about George Floyd.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 09:39 PM
6

My ex-gf, we'd sometimes get in arguments over things I thought she did wrong, and if I ever "won" the argument, she'd always like burst into laughter about it, like "well, you got me," like the issue was no longer serious and was suddenly funny. Anyway, I imagine her laughing about this statistic, like "Hahaha, sexual violence was just a big joke the whole time!"
/r/MensRights16/01/26 09:36 PM
3

In reality the type of power that that minority of men had was only one type of power. They act like it's the whole story, like whoever is in power decides how everything is going to be in every aspect of life, according to their whims, with no influence from anything else.
/r/MensRights15/01/26 11:13 PM
4

I don't really know what your point is, but, yes, humans did not inhabit Hawaii long enough to evolve to any meaningful degree.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 11:37 PM
2

Okay, so just disregarding/rejecting the work of feminist study over the last 50 years? Yes What about the history books before that, Which ones? We're already largely disregarding The Fraud of Feminism, 1908. is the argument that we need to refresh study and study on the idea that men and women were biologically driven to their places in society. I think the idea is that we shouldn't subscribe to fictionalized accounts of history that are motivated primarily by grievance.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 10:41 PM
4

Don’t really feel like playing the oppression olympics with you, thanks though. Right, you just mindlessly repeat the fantasies of those who have been perfecting that game for the last 150 years. I’m just trying to understand the complete rejection of understanding history through gender. I don't see anyone doing that. I think OP is rejecting the practice of starting with "women were subjugated by men" and building history around that.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 09:52 PM
4

I can use confine in its place. Like confined in a mine, working to so you can provide food for your wife?
/r/MensRights13/01/26 09:40 PM
7

Because it’s a correct use of the word? No it's not.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 09:38 PM
5

Because they will call you a virgin if you don't.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 08:42 PM
2

Men kill more men than they kill women, and somehow that's misogyny.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 07:52 PM
2

Yeah, if you want to see how easy it is to be a woman, go to a gay bar and just sit there. Or maybe I'm just 1000x more attractive to gay dudes than I am to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 07:56 AM
3

Men keep telling themselves stories (lies) like: Our biology tells us these things. Competing for access to sex is the essence of maleness.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 07:51 AM
3

That's not true. The transplanted follicles aren't susceptible to going bald. What happens is that you'll start losing hair behind the transplant.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 07:55 PM
2

Well you assume that since he still has this problem then he hasn't tried therapy, which implies that you think if he had tried therapy then it would have solved the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 05:14 AM
3

Try drinking more.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 05:04 AM
10

Of course! The magic solution that just magically fixes everything!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 05:04 AM
–

This coming from the gender of "choose better men" and "she had it coming" etc in response to rape victims, femicide, violence, and so forth? This coming from the species of "choose better men" and "she had it coming" etc in response to rape victims, femicide, violence, and so forth? Oh. I find it difficult to extend humanity that I am not extended. Oh, so you're just a terrible person.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 11:34 PM
2

You guys often use your "powers" for evil instead of things like dominating competitive sports. No I don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:13 AM
5

Tbhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...you're just ignoring what this conversation is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:09 AM
2

I couldn't care less. I feel like this is the kind of thing that's important to teens and then gradually becomes less important.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 01:59 AM
–

That's a pretty insane assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 12:56 AM
6

Not only that, but the 1000 men are completely erased. And people act like the 600 difference is 1000% difference and like 50% of women are killed by intimate partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 09:09 PM
7

The thing is that non-binary is more of a philosophical position than an identity anyway. If you don't believe in the gender binary then you don't believe it's true for anyone, which means you aren't really that much different than anyone else in your worldview.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 09:23 PM
-2

Yeah, the art exhibit was based on the same fantasy. There are Nazi bands. Does that make Nazism more credible? The focus is on finding blame in the woman (or child). In actuality most men would go looking for the guy in order to kill him.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 11:59 PM
0

And as long as i see comments of "what was she wearing?" I will also comment "what was he wearing?" because two wrongs make a right!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 11:33 PM
16

E Belfort Bax, a 19th and early 20th century English barrister, argues in The Fraud of Feminism (1913) that women's special treatment under the law is the result of feminism. https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/51877/pg51877-images.html
/r/MensRights01/12/25 12:41 AM
21

And those people and their ideas are informed by the opinions of others. The idea that women don't have any say in anything is stupid.
/r/MensRights01/12/25 12:38 AM
1

I don't like hugging men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 04:18 AM
1

Nope. You're just making up bullshit explanations that fit your pre-conceived ideas about things.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 01:34 AM
-4

Genital mutilation is (for the most part) only happening to one gender Which gender?
/r/MensRights30/10/25 09:01 PM
21

Before that we had "able bodied men," which were basically any "men" over 16, sometimes younger. And if you were an able bodied man, you were expected to do all sorts of shit for the community, including fighting, but all sorts of other dangerous shit, too. Basically everything was dangerous in the past and people were always dying.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 08:58 PM
1

Try redefining benefit and expense so that dying and back breaking labor are benefits instead of expenses, and you'll find that feminism has amazing predictive power.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 07:40 PM
35

Kicking a woman in the groin isn't even equivalent to kicking a man in the groin, but, yes, it would absolutely be seen as some type of heinous sexual assault if there were an equivalent.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 05:44 PM
35

If a man did this it would be seen as some serial killer level sick shit, but when a woman mutilates a man's genitals people are like "Hmm, I wonder what he did wrong" or they laugh about it on TV.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 05:42 PM
5

"Shaming women for murdering kids is misogyny!"
/r/MensRights12/10/25 07:08 AM
15

Probably because of this: I don't think it would be ok to shame women for this kind of thing [i.e. murdering kids] just a guess...
/r/MensRights11/10/25 11:12 PM
2

Yeah, the modern world is so much worse than primordial jungles.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 07:34 PM
1

How about you're in the middle of the woods with two broken legs and no sleeping bag and it's going to go below freezing at night - would you rather be discovered by a random man or a bear?
/r/MensRights29/09/25 09:14 PM
1

Yeah, and you're a piece of shit for not inviting women to participate in the thing you yourself created from the very beginning.
/r/MensRights29/09/25 05:50 PM
7

I truly can't understand how it became so popular when the real world is much more complex. Doesn't matter how complex the real world is when people's brains are simple.
/r/MensRights29/09/25 05:43 PM
2

One in three women (32%) reported never or infrequently achieving orgasm during intercourse, with a corresponding figure of 21% during masturbation. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1617159/?utm_source=chatgpt.com 7.6% reported never experiencing an orgasm during masturbation, whereas 50.3% indicated that they always reached orgasm during autostimulation. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31155389/ I mean, the survival of the human species depends upon men reaching orgasm, whereas female o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 09:08 PM
2

They try and don't succeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 08:37 PM
1

So terrible in bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 08:28 PM
1

The orgasm gap is because men have to actively try not to orgasm whereas some women can't even make themselves orgasm. It's that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 08:19 PM
0

So you're selfish as shit and punish people for being inexperienced? Sounds like you're proving OP right. As a guy, it would never in a million years occur to me to punish a woman because she sucked at sucking dick (that's 80% of women).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 08:17 PM
–

Many are. Look up modified orbital box osteotomy. Or here you go: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isWoiZvGrUQ In case you're having trouble figuring out what's going on. A young man went to Turkey to have a Turkish madman cut his orbital bones out according to a surgical plan designed by a non-doctor looksmaxx celebrity with a Pepe avatar, then shift them around and screw them back into place in order to make his eyes further apart. The ones who aren't probably buy into the myth that women don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 08:11 PM
3

Criticism of any woman for any reason or anything even associated with women = misogyny.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 09:47 PM
1

They can use all the technology and knowledge that men helped create. It's like those dweebs at Burning Man pretending they are radically self reliant and anti-capitalist by taking a bunch of shit that capitalism produced into the desert and using it to survive until they run out and have to flee back to mama capitalism's nurishing bosom.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 07:24 PM
1

Who's Allison?
/r/MensRights30/08/25 09:32 PM
31

My ex's fantasy was to deflower viriginal teen boys, like as an older women showing them the ropes (we were in our mid 20s at the time). She admitted this to me as though there was no chance it might be seen as weird or pedophillic. I also remember her talking about how the players were sexy when we'd watch little league baseball from our backyard.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 10:28 PM
2

I don't use lines.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 07:05 PM
2

I find it fundamentally incompatible with Marxism, if by "feminism" you mean patriarchy theory and the assumption that women are an oppressed second class while men are not.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 10:21 PM
–

da club
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 12:20 AM
3

They also ignore that women control more than half of personal wealth and do 80% of consumer spending, so even though men are earning more on average, the women are still getting the money! Yeah, I wrote that before I finished reading your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 12:18 AM
7

Any efforts of theirs are Herculean and any efforts you do are minimised or ignored entirely This is the essence of every gender conversation - completely erase the value (positive or negative) of anything to do with men, completely exaggerate the importance of anything that has to do with women. Men earn more than women? Money is the most important thing in the world. Men live years less on average, resulting in billions of years less life lived by men? Whatever, dude. It's not like life is imp…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:08 PM
2

It's a word that seems like it's trying to make your personal shit other people's problem, like society owes you some reward for doing "emotional labor."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:03 PM
3

is it opposite day?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:59 PM
3

No, I think it's more like they think assholes don't deserve a reward for being assholes, like it's unjust. You'll find the same sort of thinking with regard to lots of other stuff, not just sex. You see it in sitcoms a lot: Yes — that’s a classic sitcom move: someone pours their heart into something, only for the competition to be judged unfairly or for the award to go to something trivial or silly. It's common because it resonates with our basic human nature, no need for the mental gymnastics …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 07:03 PM
1

Yeah, mine too. No one pays me to walk my own dog, do my own shopping, clean my home, wash my clothes. Smh.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 04:54 PM
3

Yes, it's idiotic. We all know work is harder than domestic "labor." People hate Monday. They don't hate Sunday because it's laundry day or because they have to cook food for themselves. Sometimes I go shopping just for something to do. Sometimes I cook for fun. Know what I never do for fun, go into the office. It's funny because you have all these posts complaining about work and how they'd rather just not live than have to work for the rest of their lives, and everyone agrees about how terribl…
/r/MensRights24/08/25 06:10 PM
14

A extreme minority of men operating on behalf of women. Also evolution.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 06:03 PM
1

I platonically cuddle with my dog.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 06:31 PM
0

What's your point? Do you think people like criminals?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 04:50 AM
-2

Sure. The idea that women were never paid or valued is absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 10:25 PM
1

i don't think that's true at all; laws can definitely impact your day to day life. Yes, but that law in particular does not impact the day-to-day lives of men. "Day-to-day" meaning normal living. It's just some weird feature of how people perceive being penetrated vs. being forced to penetrate. It doesn't really shed any light on anything outside of that, just like marital rape being legal was a weird feature of Christian religious doctrine which considered the man and the woman to be one person…
/r/MensRights20/08/25 08:30 PM
1

Yeah, but my point is actually that the laws in the UK don't mean anything at all in terms of men's status in the UK or their day-to-day lives. do you think that women had it better than men when this proclamation was written Which proclamation?
/r/MensRights20/08/25 08:16 PM
2

i think those laws should be changed so that rape is included under that umbrella But you also agree that since rape of a man by a woman doesn't exist as a concept in the UK (and not just spousal rape but any rape at all) then there's no way men have it better than women, right? Because you can just look at one facet and it tells you everything you need to know about the entire society. Isn't that the way it works? men at least had the right to leave such setups What are you talking about? Men c…
/r/MensRights20/08/25 07:59 PM
3

because this place is so deep in the rabbit hole that they convince themselves that women had it better at a time when spousal rape as a concept didn't exist You mean like a woman raping a man as a concept doesn't exist even today in the UK? You mean like when a man gets expelled for being raped in the present day US: https://reason.com/2017/03/14/female-drake-u-student-initiates-sex-wit/ And was it illegal for a woman to rape her husband back then?
/r/MensRights20/08/25 07:43 PM
2

Yeah, I always go down into the mines to put food on the table for my objects. I always get thrown in jail for not providing for my objects. Don't you hate when your objects shame you into going and dying in a war?
/r/MensRights20/08/25 07:34 PM
1

No, men have always been feminists. "Equal rights" has not always been feminist.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 07:33 PM
-6

Wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 05:24 PM
1

This is what happens when you base your entire worldview on incels and trolls who post on purplepilldebates like they are representative of normal people, and believe shit you hear on femcel subreddits without questioning it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 05:17 PM
1

Don't worry, it's not a major plot point, since men getting raped isn't a big deal.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:50 AM
0

Countless other men on a niche sub that attracts a very specific type of man.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 01:12 AM
5

Why would you believe anyone in some niche sub for lunatics?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 01:07 AM
5

Yeah, and now another man is telling you something different.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 12:49 AM
7

Do you think douchey pickup artists can pick up girls because they're not fun to talk to? Also, yeah, I wouldn't expect reddit purple pill debate women to have the same tastes as the average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 02:18 AM
10

Right, some dudes are just naturally douchey.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:09 AM
1

*Ugly, short, introverted men
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 09:46 PM
58

That's the great irony. Women hate pickup artists, but pickup artists only do what they do because it works. Being a normal person wasn't working for these dudes, so they became manipulative douchebags and started getting laid left and right.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 09:46 PM
8

What you're saying is actually "why do women have to not be morbidly obese to get dates" OR "why do women have to look beautiful to be able to get a date with whomever she wants?"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 09:45 PM
4

I'm reading The Wheel of Time series and there's a scene where one of the male protagonists is raped at knife-point then later has signs of trauma, and both the rape and trauma are played for laughs. Maybe some day people will realize men have the same soul as women, that male pain hurts just as much as female pain, that male sadness is just as sad as female sadness. I think they would be horrified when they realize that everything that has happened to men has actually happened to "women."
/r/MensRights15/08/25 08:06 PM
5

Cool, so what if it was a post "I hate [race of people]" and then people explaining their experiences with that race of people?
/r/MensRights14/08/25 07:21 PM
1

JNCO jeans are back in.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 06:12 PM
121

Her immediate defense was of course "he hit me" and "he's the man." Imagine how often this happened before cameras. Also love how the post about this that made it to the front page was locked. Wouldn't want people to be able to discuss anything on a discussion forum.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 06:01 PM
6

A man in a position of power using it to benefit his female relatives and not men in general? He'll certainly be excommunicated from the patriarchy for this.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 05:59 PM
1

Why would you want these things when she isn't as turned on with you as when she is with chad? Because they want girls to be as turned on with them as with Chad. LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 04:56 AM
7

Im pretty sure that’s a sign of depression, but you can only use that excuse for so long Oh well excuse me for not curing my debilitating mental illness for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 03:51 AM
1

It's not limited to IQ, cognitive traits, or even humans. There are more male psychopaths, narcissists, autists. There are more extremely tall and extremely short men. There are more extremely strong and extremely weak men. Etc. Also, I do just think IQ is correlated with enjoyment of discussing philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 12:52 AM
-1

I reckon in reality, the ratio of ‘normie’ vs ‘non normie’ people is very similar across both genders. Being a man doesn’t inherently make you this intellectual, creative, contemplative being I reckon it isn't because of the "greater male variability hypothesis". This idea suggests that for many human traits—especially cognitive and physical—males tend to show greater variance (i.e., a wider spread of values) than females, even if the averages are similar. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variabili…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 12:35 AM
3

because it's some dumb twitter poll that means nothing
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 06:21 PM
5

The Fraud of Feminism by E Belfort Bax https://www.marxists.org/archive/bax/1913/fraud/index.htm
/r/MensRights02/08/25 09:53 PM
2

I was. Obviously a lot of that is a requirement. However, I think some of it is just priorities. Like, I don't think you need to value fatherhood to any great degree as a single man. It's something you can easily grow into when you become a father. Now, I understand why a woman would want someone who values that from the get go, because she can't be sure he will grow into it (although I think if someone has a strong moral character they probably will), but, still, just because he doesn't value t…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 08:23 PM
3

high-effort, desire to be a great husband and father, to be emotionally present, generous, or committed, great catches with tons of positive qualities, kind, driven, well adjusted, contribute to their social networks and communities, value commitment and family, don't envy criminals, want good for other people even if they don't get what they want themselves, faithful, thoughtful, hardworking, partnership-oriented men who are eager to build families minimum character requirements to get a first …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 06:55 PM
11

or an enlightened Buddhist you can be perpetually shit on and receive not 1/100 of what other people get for free, but unless you unwaveringly want nothing but happiness for all of humanity at all times without ever slipping up, you're not a good person
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 05:20 PM
3

Ooops, feminists just protested their first meeting so it couldn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 03:53 PM
8

"duh dis is proof dat duh redpill is dupid" while not even getting their extremely simple point
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 08:53 PM
5

She was arrested but she was let off with a slap on the wrist because women aren't violent even when they are, and men are tough and can handle their sexual organs being physically assaulted.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 08:01 PM
2

The role of a wife under patriarchy is essentially that of an employee Right, the one who doesn't work is the employee.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 03:36 AM
1

I feel like you're still missing the point, like completely missing it. In my example, the Bible is White Fragility. I'm not saying Robin D'Angelo destroyed the Bible. I'm saying Matt Walsh destroyed the Bible (White Fragility), and then everyone was like "Yeah, no one ever believed that anyway," when actually people believed the fuck out of White Fragility.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 12:34 AM
1

You missed the point. Imagine if someone just completely destroyed the Bible so completely that absolutely no one could be a Christian afterwards, and then all the former Christians were like "Big deal. No one even believed in the Bible."
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:33 PM
1

Okay. You know how you are a human being with feelings and stuff? Men are also that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 05:04 AM
1

I'm not sure what you're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 04:52 AM
2

That's hardly an extreme conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 03:23 AM
1

I'll do you a favor and not drag this out. I was just doing the thing I was accusing you of - pretend no one's ever said or done something we've all seen a million times.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 12:44 AM
-5

Yeah, I'm talking about the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 12:25 AM
-8

Yeah, this is the first time he's brought up feminism. What are you even talking about. No one ever mentions feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 11:36 PM
-7

Anything bad that ever happens to a man is because of the big scary wary feminists. Lol. This is literally the first time anyone has said anything about feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 11:32 PM
2

I love when you finally call these people out on their ridiculous shit they just pretend no one was ever saying that. Reminds me of when Matt Walsh (who I'm not a fan of, not that anyone here is capable of taking someone at their word) completely embarrassed the author of White Fragility and then everyone just pretended she was some fringe lunatic and didn't have one of the best selling most influential books of the last several decades. But I'm guessing none of that happened either.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 11:15 PM
4

You load 16 tons what do you get? A 200 pound single mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 10:50 PM
2

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 10:46 PM
0

Okay? And they are also the ones who enjoy fucking escorts.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 02:55 AM
8

Not being bothered by the fact that the woman you're having sex with doesn't like you, isn't attracted to you, doesn't want to have sex with you, and isn't enjoying it. I have trouble enjoying a movie if I think the person I'm with isn't enjoying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:13 AM
2

"artifice" is the word
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:11 AM
6

Do you think average men can treat average women poorly? Yes, of course. Do you think men always treat women "in their league" well? No, of course not.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 09:07 PM
1

Do you happen to know of any similar essays about marital rape?
/r/MensRights24/07/25 01:24 AM
2

That's it. Thanks a lot.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 10:09 PM
3

Yes, I meant to respond to your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 07:15 PM
5

But that's because there are so many fewer women in college. It's only fair that we should help them. Wait. What's that? Women have been getting more degrees than men for 44 years? Oh, well like, we have to make up for historical injustices. Oh, you're telling me women passed men in the total number of bachelors degrees earned in the entire history of the US in the early 2000s and have been widening their lead ever since? Wellllll...the patriarchy hurts men too!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 07:09 PM
2

Your conclusion doesn't follow from your premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 06:58 AM
4

I have no idea what you're trying to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 04:18 AM
3

It’s disingenuous to compare celebrities to the average person’s experience Not when they are "celebrities" for no other reason than what their bodies look like. Go talk to 100 gay men real quick on any dating app, and get back to me on how safe you’d feel about being alone with them So because of my paranoia that makes the majority of gay men out to be a threat, not being perceived as a threat is a male privilege? That's like a woman saying "As a woman, I'm privileged if a guy doesn't think I'm…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 03:31 AM
6

Exercising gives me a unique look compared to the general population, whereas women kind of have to settle for the fact that being “not overweight” is basically the best they can do Yeah, poor women just have to settle for being able to make millions of dollars a month because men are so obsessed with their "not overweightness." If a woman doesn’t perceive me as dangerous, then I probably am already better than a lot of her other options for a fling. Lol, where do you live? Some sort of prison i…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 03:10 AM
0

Or it's a mutual agreement where everyone benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 06:15 PM
5

Sure, but what I mean is that they suffered in the same way as those women. Right now women act like only women are murdered by their intimate partners.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 04:55 PM
34

Every one of us should acknowledge the fundamental truth that some women suffered greatly at the hands of some men. Everyone does acknowledge that. What most people don't acknowledge is that some men suffered greatly at the hands of women. Sure, maybe not as many as the reverse, but still a significant number, but people act like it's zero or orders of magnitude less, which it is not.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 01:28 AM
9

They seem quite harsh on feminine men there but that’s a good thing imo. What is a feminine man?
/r/MensRights19/07/25 06:52 PM
13

There is no sub that doesn't specifically set out to not be a misandrist shithole that isn't a misandrist shithole.
/r/MensRights19/07/25 06:52 PM
1

Yeah, it's hilarious. "Confidence" has to be the most worthless personality trait, aside from the fact that people respond so well to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 06:30 PM
12

Also Russian literature. They're all crying constantly, the men and the women. I feel like all this gender roles bullshit is things kids learned from cartoon shows or heard other kids say when they were 6 and just never got rid of the idea. Maybe stuff parents made up to shut their kids up for a minute.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 03:10 AM
2

And even given that fact, a lot of women are still caught. Not that many more men kill their partners than women, even if you don't count the ones who got away with it. In 2021 there were like 1600 women killed by an intimate partner and 1000 men. https://bjs.ojp.gov/female-murder-victims-and-victim-offender-relationship-2021 So, that difference of 600 is enough for women to erase the 1000 male victims as though they don't exist, like in the title quote.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 05:47 PM
2

I mean I feel like I'm more likely to be judged negatively by women who eschew traditional gender roles and capitalist values than I am by women who adhere to them, specifically for adhering to them myself, or more accurately by not deviating from them to a great enough degree. But, yeah, I did think you were talking about gender roles like some kind of woke buzzword. I will admit that I spend a lot of time in a cartoonishly woke environment, so my perspective may be skewed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 08:53 PM
10

Men who want to hang out with women who don’t judge them as “losers” for failing to conform with gender roles and capitalist values might be advised hang with women who don’t think those things are important. I gotta tell you, I feel like I'm going to be judged in the exact opposite way in today's world. And just the fact that you brought up capitalist values and gender expression out of the blue makes me think that feeling is accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:34 PM
1

I think even babies do.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:18 PM
10

Study just came out that women favor attractive faces Wow, thank science. I never would have realized this was the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:18 PM
1

A used car dealer telling you a vehicle is likely to start is not the same as saying the car starts reliably. Terrible example. The person I quoted isn't a used car salesman and they mean "likely" when they say "likely." The used car salesman does not, or may not, and that is the problem when he says likely. You suspect he doesn't actually mean likely and he's just using the vagueness of the word as a way to lie while maintaining plausible deniability. Also, if I asked if a car starts and he say…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 09:05 PM
1

And female abusers, too, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 08:40 PM
1

I'm sorry, did she say it was a "reliable indicator? Yes, that's what "likely" means. What relevance does this have to anything? You won't have any evidence of my answer either way Because it's counter evidence to the claim that a man who has gone fishing once is likely to want to spend a lot of time drinking with his friends. And what relevance does some shit your ex said about fishing have? Wow, a verbatim quote from some random guy! You've totally proven me wrong. You don't have any "accurate…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 08:13 PM
1

Okay, thanks for the update on your mental state.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 08:07 PM
1

That's literally your subjective opinion No, one picture of a guy with a fish is not a reliable indicator of how much time he wants to spend getting drunk with his friends. That's an objective fact, not an opinion. My ex has fished on multiple occasions. How long were you with him and on how many occasions did he fish? But once again women have no reason to care about your feelings, much less substitute their own with yours. Coming to more accurate conclusions is a reason, whether you like it or…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 08:01 PM
2

It's just your opinion that the assumption is idiotic and "invalid," and women have no reason to substitute your opinion for their own No, it's literally idiotic and invalid. The pictures we choose and what we're doing in them say something about who we are, whether you like that or not. It's unreasonable to think that they don't or shouldn't. Men understand that perfectly when they tell men to troll her Facebook or Instagram for "clubbing" evidence The dead fish photos are a very specific demog…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 07:50 PM
2

Depends why he gives you pussy tingles. Probably some stock routine he's used on a thousand other women. Or how well he's able to replicate the current memes. My pussy when some guy with tattoos says "YESSSIR. LET'S GO. YESSIR": 💦💦💦
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 07:47 PM
8

If you can't figure out that the dude you're with is one of the bottom 1% of trash who treats cashiers like shit then you're a lost cause. Why is all the advice in this thread for figuring out if a guy is an absolute scumbag or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 07:43 PM
2

Introspection would be a great one. They could think to themselves "Why am I attracted/not attracted to this person?" and then decide whether those are stupid reasons or not. For instance, in a recent post a woman said that a guy having a picture of a fish meant "he's likely to want to spend long periods of time drinking with his friends." She should ask herself "Is this a valid assumption?" If she did, and she were honest with herself, she'd realize that, no, it's actually an idiotic assumption…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 07:36 PM
3

Did you just call the average woman stupid? Misogyny!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 01:12 AM
3

And I'm sure women who have flare on niche subreddits are a good representation of the average.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 12:59 AM
1

She's more likely thinking about something else. Like the amazing vacations that guy could take her on.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 09:10 PM
5

You're conflating gazing wistfully with being attracted to, or not looking down on, or however you want to put it. Also, the point doesn't stand. Millions of women spend hours every day wistfully gazing at travel and food tiktok/instagram.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 07:44 PM
3

A lambo is only one very specific expression of wealth.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 07:31 PM
1

Basically those are like atoms of water evaporating below freezing. While for the top 1% it's like water boiling.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 07:08 PM
2

Because the majority of people arrive at their worldview based on what other people say is true, not from their own observations.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 05:37 PM
4

I can't find it right now, but I think it's somewhere in the writing of E Belfort Bax: https://www.marxists.org/archive/bax/index.htm but someone was complaining about depictions of men as bumbling idiots in comic strips back in the early 20th century, so, yeah, this has been a thing for at least a hundred years. Also, everyone should read Bax: Coming to the present day, the talk of male oppression, in any form or degree is simply the grossest and most impudent piece of cant. Law, custom, and op…
/r/MensRights11/07/25 05:34 PM
6

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db360_tables-508.pdf#1 Among adults ages 20 and over, there are no significant differences in prevalence of obesity by sex or age group
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 05:11 PM
0

I don’t think I’m in the top 20% and I’ve honestly never struggled to go on dates with or hook up with cute girls. I bet you are and you're thinking top 20% = top 1%. And when I say top 1% you are probably thinking male model or some shit, but that's actually like top .01%. Whenever I go traveling, I make a point to look at almost everyone. I feel like walking through and sitting in the airport and riding around on public transportation for hours gives you a pretty good reference frame. On a giv…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 05:02 PM
–

Yeah, and by really ugly/low quality, you mean the bottom 70%. And by vary and depend on preference, you mean 10% of women will find someone in the 70-90% range attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 04:51 PM
-4

half the time she was on a highly restricted diet the horror!
/r/MensRights10/07/25 09:17 PM
1

One dude's taste isn't evidence of what men in general want.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 01:31 AM
4

Kinda reminds me of Dear Zachary where even after murdering her ex a woman was let out on bail and given custody of her infant son who she then murdered.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 05:26 PM
1

Yeah it's no secret women get way more lenient prison sentences. I just watched this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sd0M3YCXgMg Woman shot her husband and got 13 years for second degree murder. The man who supplied the gun got convicted of first degree murder and life in prison. Some lady who knowingly provided the wife with percocet so she could try poisoning him didn't even get charged with a crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 05:15 PM
-4

These women are trading sex for resources and shelter, so yes, you can call these situations predatory. Yes, it's a shame those women are taking advantage of men who are desperate to quell their biological urges smh. But lol at "shelter" like these dudes are going and picking up homeless street urchins in fucking Agrabah.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 07:16 PM
4

I wasn't attracted to my ex-gf for at least a year after the first time I saw her, but that changed completely. Also, you can quickly lose attraction to someone. So, no, this is stupid incel theorizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 07:14 PM
1

I love how the older men are simultaneously supposed to be pathetic losers who can't attract women their own age, and also suave master manipulators who have young women wrapped around their finger. Also, I would love to see that meme play out in real life, some little basement dwelling reddit troll approaching an international supermodel to explain to them how Leonardo is exploiting them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 07:01 PM
–

You broke frame. Never break frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 09:52 PM
2

Uh, yeah, it's comedy.
/r/MensRights29/01/25 03:18 AM
5

because it goes without saying
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:57 AM
1

That is extremely thin. I'm 5'8 with very low bodyfat, not bulky at all, and that's how much I weigh.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 08:44 PM
1

DM me
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 08:19 PM
2

Lol, because you can see people's faces and there's no objective looks measure. Jesus. How many people are swiping right on profiles with zero pictures?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 08:16 PM
3

It's unempathetic to deny someone's reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 08:12 PM
2

because of the intimation factor and also the ability to get away is much easier. Since men by nature run faster, are more agile, and are stronger than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 07:17 PM
4

You actively see the relationship status of every food service worker you interact with?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 07:16 PM
11

Most crimes are actually committed by people without college degrees. Like, there's a bigger disparity between degree havers and non degree havers than there is between men and women. So, yeah, if you're going to put crime on men just because they're men, then we degree havers have an even better argument for putting it on non degree havers. Or, they're both stupid ways to see the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 07:13 PM
2

lol, you mean like civilization? or literally every institution that's ever existed?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 04:58 AM
2

"the" comments. sure, those were "the" comments... like, do people go to some video game chat and listen to a bunch of 12 years olds and then pretend that's how most people feel about things?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 02:14 AM
1

People call criticism of an individual woman for something that has nothing to do with her sex/gender misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 07:03 AM
1

sounds good on paper
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 05:55 AM
–

Then they're lying and it's pointless to try and convince them of something they already know.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 10:12 PM
–

You don't want things for the reason you say you want things, you actually want them for the reason I've invented.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 09:40 PM
1

What game? I 'm admitting you're right. A man who insists "if she did it with an ex, she should do it with me" who let a previous partner peg him who then refuses to let his current partner peg him would be a hypocrite. You sure showed them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 12:08 AM
8

And what if one day that guy no longer desires to be pegged but she still wants to do it, how do you follow the principle then? He'd only not be following the principle if he let one of his past partners peg him, and even then we don't know if the guys who say "if she did it with an ex, she should do it with me" demand that it continue in perpetuity. Assuming he let one of his past partners peg him, then he's already upheld the principle to some degree. Do we have examples of guys who got blowjo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 11:47 PM
1

Okay, so hypothetically the person described, of which you can't produce a single example, would be a hypocrite. Amazing revelation.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 09:55 PM
1

Can you find me a single example of a person arguing "if she did it with an ex, she should do it with me" who also allowed a previous partner to peg them but refuses to allow their current partner to peg them? You're not making the point you think you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 09:34 PM
1

How much this actually is the case is debatable, How is it debatable? If they had the agency to prevent it then they would! It's like thinking a man who gets sucker punched was somehow less defenseless than a woman. If he had any defenses, he would have used them!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 11:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter