TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Deckhead13 Archive

View 7 posts and 137 comments by Deckhead13 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

Holy shit. Look at the questions they're instructed to ask a victim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/21 06:32 AM
0

I'm not law scholar. But the translated law you posted sounds like he has to provide for her while she's his wife. If you're divorced, she is no longer your wife. There may be a separate alimony law, but the one you posted sounds very much like the "certain changed circumstances" would be, for example, a divorce.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/20 02:21 AM
4

Thanks for the links, this in particular caught my eye: Australian Bureau of Statistics data showed the national male underemployment rate had increased by 3.5% since March, while the female rate had increased by 1.5%. I'm going to have to grab a direct link to this report mentioned and the relevant ABS statistic to have the honourable minister explain what she's on about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/20 01:29 PM
1

It turns out it was raised in regard as to whether the accused believed, or had reason to believe, that he had consent. Turns out he did, and so it wasn't a criminal act. The relevant laws have been updated since though. The question now is whether the accused had a reasonable belief that they had consent. In this case, the ABC is trying its hardest to portray the accused as an egotistical madman, and so believed he had consent, which wouldn't fly had he been charged under the current laws.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/20 12:45 AM
3

Craig McLachlan has been found not guilty. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-12-16/magistrate-criticises-craig-mclachlan-lawyer-over-questioning/12985916 But apparently the magistrate is unhappy with some of the questions his defense team asked the women involved. I wonder what people's thoughts are of this? Should these questions, such as whether they feel proud of their figure, should be allowed. It seems to me that a scorned woman may very well lash out and claim someone touched them as a perv…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/20 08:13 PM
6

Fucking pedos coming out the woodwork up in here. How can anyone be defending this? When I was 14 I was an idiot, incapable of making decisions such as potentially impregnating a woman or having an STD passed on to me. I was not the only idiot 14 year old. I know of no 14 year old boys that aren't idiots. It's why 14 year olds can't vote or drink.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/20 05:29 AM
5

Can you share the permalink? I couldn't find it in /r/Australia EDIT: Don't worry, found it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/20 09:39 PM
11

I tried to post this in /r/Australia but it was removed due to not being a political self-post without discussion on an issue. I haven't really got time to do this today. Would other Australian Men like to help me with this? On Thursday 10th December, I will post a large post on /r/Australia showing this petition, sighting statistics and facts, and asking people to discuss the need for a Minister for Men (that should meet the rules for political self-posts in that subreddit) I will need assistan…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/20 09:14 PM
3

To anyone reading this thread, the evidence is the Men's Referral Website which outlines very clearly what services they provide (spoiler, it's not for victims). https://ntv.org.au/about-us/what-we-do/ (yes, that is their URL, you can check on the page linked to in my OP)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/20 06:17 AM
2

Except you are 100% incorrect. Men's Referral Service is in no way a service for victims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/20 08:40 PM
1

What are you on about? The coercive control bill is right here https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/bill/files/3797/First%20Print.pdf It makes no statements on gender. There have been no proposals to add gender to it. You know why? Because that would be discrimination, and we don't put that into law in Australia.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/20 03:05 AM
4

Too much slacktivism. It costs the same amount of energy to instead complain to someone who can do something about it. I don't know why people put more effort into reddit circlejerks than writing to their representative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/20 02:09 AM
2

They wrap children up with women all the time when discussing these things though. It's always "women and children" never "men and children".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/20 01:25 AM
1

Absolutely. There are far too many men in this subreddit who just want to blame feminism for their problems instead of getting up and fixing them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 10:17 PM
3

Unfortunately, if you try to frame women as abusers as often as men, in Australia, you will be ridculed and silenced. I forget the politicians name who kept fighting the white ribbon Australia guy on his own TV show about it. But he quoted statistics on it and was essentially deplatformed afterwards.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 09:40 PM
6

You think it's fair that they list a hotline for male abusers as a service to help male victims? And that only the page for male victims and abusers feature this hotline? And that no other victims pages, of which there are many, also include information for abusers in that demographic, or any abusers at all? That only the male victims page implies that victims should call abuser services? At best you simply didn't look at the links in question. But I suspect you're trolling. Either way don't bot…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 07:57 PM
5

It's strange because I think services for male abusers are super important. The reality is that men do abuse. It's a fact, and any MRA who tries to deny it, or jump to "but women too" is not helping men. Society has been created to not help men. All domestic abuse from men stems from frustration and unmet expectations, every time. We need services to help men deal with these issues and work out how to live in the world. We need more male only spaces, but even Men's Sheds in Australia have women'…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 07:52 PM
5

Well, yeah. Obviously the perpetrator page silently assumes men are the perpetrators. But I won't fight that battle. The reason is that if you try to say "women can be abusers" you're going to be labeled and silenced. I can get far more traction for far longer but not talking about women. As soon as MRA phrase men's rights in terms of "but women" we fail. I've tried saying that a bunch of times in this sub, only to be downvoted a lot, but it's true. We need to first get to a position of equal tr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 07:39 PM
14

My experience with NSW and Australian government is that they are pretty decent folk. You always get the initial hand-waving. If the message I receive back is more of the same, it's quite easy to send mail to my representative and the relevant minister (I think we have a minister for domestic violence). They have to respond as part of their duties. If the response back is still negative I go to the media with all the responses to date. Perhaps the media won't give a shit, in which case I'd ask h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 07:22 PM
2

They could have all been lizard people too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 07:41 PM
7

Didn't Trump have an all female team too at some point? It's likely a coincidence and they're using it to gain social capital.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 03:55 AM
2

For women and minorities, however, such disparities are inherently due to discrimination and other factors beyond their control For minorities it is the case. Men, and women, span everywhere, and as far as I'm aware, I've never heard anyone try to say unhealthy women are the result of discrimination (I could be wrong, more on that below). But for minorities, health outcomes are often due to discrimination and other factors beyond their control. For example, people in rural communities have less …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/20 12:05 AM
1

No just mentioning the things men face. I see no point in circle jerking so I'll end this there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/20 05:29 AM
1

Those two specific instances are bad. I agree. But it doesn't really relate to what I said, that both sides can benefit from changes for either side. As for your last point, I didn't say it made it okay for feminists to act like that. I specifically said their tactics are bad, multiple times. I get the impression that you're trying to argue with someone you think I am, not the person I am.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/20 04:46 AM
1

Feminists pushed their agenda for like 50 years before they got much headway. Men's rights are relatively new.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/20 04:42 AM
0

We agree. But is male advocacy about fighting feminism or pushing men's rights? Framing men's rights as "anti-feminism" won't work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 11:09 PM
1

If that is the case then why is there so much effort against men trying to be in their children's lives? Yes it would be a good thing if changes were being made that worked for both. Problem is most changes seem to benefit women first and only and if men get something out of it it's a side bonus at best not a main feature. Which sets up the dynamic that changes for women should be pushed through regardless of how they affect men but changes for men have to be examined to make sure they don't aff…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 11:00 PM
1

Okay. So we agree.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 09:10 PM
1

They should be encouraging both. Like I said, their methods suck.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 09:05 PM
0

You have no idea what they want to do. They are trying to achieve equality, but their methods suck. I said as much already.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 09:03 PM
2

They are being praised for different things because that's the only way the norms would be equalised. That's not the same as chastising people for doing what they would ordinarily do, which feminists do a bit of, but I don't see that here at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 09:02 PM
-1

The textbook won't create new norms. People do. Once norms are equalised that textbook will be seen for what it is, bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 09:01 PM
0

Why are you quoting me as though I said anything about socially desirable positions? I said nothing about programs for female victims of domestic abuse either. That has nothing to do with this topic. ​ Yeah but at the same time feminists pushed to erase fathers from the family. fathers in the UK have no rights. I don't know about the UK, I live in Australia. If that's true, then it's bad, very bad. But it doesn't erase the good part of the norms changing. It is something that shouldn't happen, a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 10:37 AM
-6

I'm confused by what you're saying. I'm talking about how we are creating similar norms for men and women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 10:21 AM
-9

Do you think the norms for men are changing? Do you think there should remain only the norm that men need to achieve ever greater status? It seems to me that feminists push to change norms for women (through the ways you mentioned like text books, but also through media and popular culture) because their norms, in the estimation of feminists, were keeping women in subservient roles. I think that this is true insofar as feminists believe it. I have no problem with them doing that. I do see the ch…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/20 09:44 AM
1

I'll PM you my twitter later today when I have access to my non-work computer. In the meantime, just put the screenshots here in reddit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/20 10:41 PM
2

Can you please provide screenshots of these? I would like to ask them directly on social media.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/20 10:17 PM
2

But they don't speak on men's issues. Just out privileges.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/20 08:28 PM
5

Do feminists ever speak on men's issues?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/20 09:37 AM
0

again I think your desire to "help" women comes from an assumption that if women aren't in a luxurious industry there must be some injustice going on? No. You're attributing motives to me that I don't know where you've gotten them from. what if its just their free choice? how close do the percentages need to be before we decide theres no injustice? What if it is their free choice? There's male dominated industries and female dominated industries. Obviously, that domination is going to result in …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/20 06:08 AM
0

I don't know. Why don't you read the relevant studies and tell me?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/20 04:10 AM
0

How do you think social sciences work? They can only ask questions and make a very safe assumption that over a large enough base that the results are indicative of the truth. Tell me, what, in your expert scientific statistical opinion, would a study need to do to qualify as a non worthless bullshit study?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/20 02:28 AM
0

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/half-women-stem-have-experienced-gender-discrimination-work-study-finds-n836116 2 seconds on google, friend.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/20 02:18 AM
-2

Religious leaders say X, therefore X is true. Even physics (less strict than mathematics and computer science) does not work this way. If it did, we wouldn't have special theory of relativity. "Science" usually tries to convince you. When they say stuff like "confidence" and say, that you "measured" it, I'm not convinced. I call bullshit. I don't even bother reading the rest. When you learn algebra, and for example: if you don't understand how matrix multiplication works, you don't just "move on…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/20 10:20 PM
-7

The pay gap is real though. There is plenty of evidence to support it. Most actual academic feminists, i.e not idiots on social media, are at pains to point out that the gap is real, and it's for a whole slew of reasons. For example, they agree that women take time off work to raise children. The result of that is less overall income, and in Australia at least, less money in superannuation. That is a pay gap. EDIT: Nice stealth edit. The confidence gap is real. Misogynistic environments are real…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/20 09:23 PM
-5

You don't need to get hostile, I'm attacking your opinion, not your personality or worth as a man. I didn't claim to know what competitive coding is. Who's gaslighting there? You can claim I was gaslighting in a single paragraph if you want. Truth of the matter is that there is a tonne of research to back my claim, no, I won't provide citations because you've already acknowledged they exist, from researchers, but that because you disagree with their findings on a personal, not scientific level, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/20 08:59 PM
-9

Second, this is not just anecdote. Read codeforces post and comments. This is a situation, that happened. It's a fact, related to this contest showing how unfair it was. Is codeforces an event, a user, a subreddit? How "systemic" this issue is? Companies admit (BOAST), that they use such practices. Citation needed. Feminists defend and motivate them. Citation needed. There are plenty of "diversity statements" (no, it's not "virtue signalling") to read. Citation needed. The point is, this discrim…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/20 08:48 PM
1

Maybe, but whatever you say reflects on the community not just you. It's super easy for male advocacy people to be labeled haters, abusers, etc. Any excuse to justify preconceived notions is used.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/20 07:48 PM
2

What would be the point of being nasty or going ballistic? That won't get results, at best it would get you labelled as a dangerous, violent man. Better to stay calm and rational and assume you're dealing with calm and rational people, until they prove otherwise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/20 07:43 PM
3

I wasn't being aggressive my man. Just a bit of sarcasm. I'm sure you can handle it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/20 06:46 AM
2

Firstly, the article you linked to has links to the government website. I'm sure you can take a break at being outraged by articles written in tabloid magazines and find out for yourself. Secondly, I'll save you the clicks. "No", only asks for expressions of interest in receiving the support.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/20 06:41 AM
7

I'm only using the information available on the NSW parliament website relating to it. It has nothing stated there about Covid and this current economic trouble. If their response is that women are disproportionately impacted I'd expect them to cite their sources for that info. If they don't cite sources, I'd ask them to. Writing to your MP is a long game.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/20 06:35 AM
18

I just sent this to my member: The Honourable Mark Speakman, I am writing to you, my member of parliament, to voice my extreme displeasure to hear about a Return To Work Program initiated by the NSW Government that only applies to women. https://www.service.nsw.gov.au/register-interest-return-work-program. This is, on the surface of it, discriminatory, as it denies anyone who is not a woman equal access to government support services. While at first, this initiative may seem comparable to suppor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/20 06:15 AM
3

This 100%. If punishment worked you wouldn't need so many people in prison and you wouldn't have recidivism. This is in Sweden. If he mutilated a bunch of girls it would have been a similar sentence. It's not bias unless you show some bias.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 08:53 PM
3

Seems like a good opportunity to promote Australian Better Families (formally Australian Brotherhood of Fathers). The fact that they changed their name tells you a lot about the climate in Australia. https://betterfamilies.org.au One Nation is not the only political party who advocates for a minister for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/20 01:18 AM
1

I hope so. And I hope you make it a point to get people to take real action.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/20 08:34 AM
1

I've been on the sub since its inception and while I'll agree it's gone downhill, what you're claiming isn't true. There's quality posts here that are straight male advocacy. I've not seen much of it. But I guess that's not very important. There is also a lot of comparing to and talking about feminists because these guys live in a society that is very clearly prejudiced against them while at the same time insisting that men are the oppressors. I won't argue the fact of the world. But what's the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/20 04:29 AM
1

You can probably figure out if you read it over again. I too am no longer interested in "tweeting" back and forth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/20 03:34 AM
-1

Then don't respond? I made my point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/20 03:21 AM
0

They are paid more. The sacrifice is recognised.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/20 01:22 AM
-1

Honestly, I can't see how that doesn't solve your problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 11:08 PM
-2

Yes I think so. Do you see no problem with the way you frame men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 10:30 PM
1

I can try and get some of you people who agree with these things to do more than complain on reddit. Perhaps I should have said, you can't change anything here in this subreddit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 10:28 PM
-2

Yes, I just wanted you to say it. I wanted you to say that either you're completely framed, or you think men are completely framed by women. Good luck getting equality when you're subservient.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 10:10 PM
1

What personal attack?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 10:07 PM
1

You can't change anything here on reddit. I joined a political party and regular talk with my state and federal representatives to change laws.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 10:06 PM
1

What do you mean "results"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 09:30 PM
0

There are good people that believe stupid things who change their mind when presented with other evidence and perspectives. And how are you doing this? People in this subreddit already agree. Sure, if you partner up with something that is attached to resenting your gender, despite the opportunity to change their mind it is time to move on. But most of us learn and grow. No need to find a perfect person to marry if you can work it out. Sure, fair enough. But partnering up with someone who resents…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 08:54 PM
1

But you're not responding to accusations. You're posting in here and circle-jerking. I'm not your enemy BTW. I 100% agree with you (you can look over my history if you want) but this subreddit is the same as every other one that claims male advocacy. Nothing is done. It's just complains against feminist boogeyman. There's no actual response to feminist publications, there's no counter-analysis. There's no push to message your democratic representatives about unjust laws or inequal funding. There…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 08:52 PM
0

I'll answer your question. Learn that it isn't true that women work more than men overall and say this when someone makes that assumption. So I think we all know this. And I think we do probably all do say this, at least I'd hope so. It is risky, but having a partner, grind, whatever resent you or your gender is harmful to them and harmful to your relationship with them. Wtf? Why would it be risky? Why would you be with someone who would resent you because the woman on TV said so? You're better …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 08:41 PM
0

Cool, let's talk about that. Where is this said in popular media? And what do you propose we should do about it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 08:26 PM
2

Okay. In the past things were unequal for both men and women. I'm not going to "go away", are you unable to take even slight criticism?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 08:23 PM
-2

You don't care. If you cared, like I do, you would be advocating that men work less, such as offering the advice that it's your choice to work more and you don't need to. Instead, you only frame it in reference to what feminists say about women. So tell me, is this subreddit about advocating for men? Or is it for bitching about boogey man feminists?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 08:22 PM
-5

Really? Most of what I see in this subreddit is hyperbole and dumb arguments with no facts. Arguing like a bunch of feminists to be honest. The OPs original argument, and the more recent study is senseless. Who cares if men work more. It's by choice. We can't use the argument that women choose to leave work and become mothers and also say that men work more. They are choosing to do so in the same way women choose not to work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 08:08 PM
4

So that link shows that compared to the OPs '91 study, in 2016: Women work 57 hours Men work 61 hours The work gap is getting lower. Well done, men. Looks like equality is on its way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 08:04 PM
0

Then show me something recent that indicates that. Not a study from 30 years ago.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 08:01 PM
1

What do you mean "get away with"? No one can force you to spend money you don't want to spend.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 08:00 PM
-3

Then don't spend the money...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 09:11 AM
23

This is from 1991. That's 30 years ago, more than the age of most users of reddit. Society has changed so much since then. In fact, that's technically like 2 generations of change.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 07:46 AM
3

Cool no worries. You don't need to remove it. My overall point was maybe not that clear. You now have a race problem, but that only originated from a class problem a very long time ago, the rich needed cheap labour, and that's what they got. The resulting racial problems are a side effect, not intended, but not actively considered. I believe the fact that blacks weren't the only slaves (just the far more common and accessible slaves) shows that. The commonwealth has a long sordid history of slav…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 03:21 AM
3

There's quite a lot of literature on why there's starvation and poor education in the world, I suggest you go read some. It doesn't boil down to classism, although it plays a part. I'm aware of the existence of books. I've read quite a lot of them. My summation is that it 100% boils down to class in every case, including in the USA. Just because you don't agree with me doesn't mean you need to be snide and imply I'm uneducated on the matter. I didn't make any personal references to you and your …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/20 02:57 AM
11

That's not patriarchy at that stage though. Eliminating out of group men and protecting in group women is classism. The patriarchy, race, gender arguments are all distractions. Does anyone here think our owners give a shit if you're black or white, man or woman? They don't. What they care about is whether you too will lose millions if those lower class people are given too much rope. The fact that the rich are predominantly white isn't by design, it's just a result. Keeping black males generally…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/20 09:25 PM
10

Please don't try and tie mens rights with right wing Conservative parties. They do not go hand in hand. In case you haven't noticed, there's a lot of social backlash against anything labeled "right wing". One sure fire way to get people to ignore you is to align yourself with right wing parties. What we should be doing, which I do today, is join or form a men's rights political party and stick to men's rights. Single issue parties don't need a policy on the economy or foreign policy. You can als…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/20 09:10 PM
0

The major one being social constructivism/blank slatism being the only way to discuss gender. But in the race context, critical race theory is increasing the only way to look at race. Universalist, objective, liberal and/or rationalist approaches to gender and race are being removed. "Removed" since when, in what way? This is just rhetoric. The fact that we're discussing it disproves your point. Go onto YouTube and watch any of 10 million videos about these topics being debated on university cam…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/20 05:03 AM
-1

Can you tell me what ideas are being limited? You say it affects things in the real world. Such as? As these impacts negative? You mention family law and domestic violence, can you tell me how these teachings have impacted them?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/20 09:16 AM
3

That's like the definition of hyperbole, my friend. I have met mothers who think it's bullshit. In fact I'd say it's all mothers I've met. I have children, in school, I've met a lot of them. Let's assume you're right. Are all fathers teaching this too? If they are, what does it even matter? Are you going to teach your kids that too?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/20 07:57 AM
-3

Yeah, I live in Australia. So people studying social science are taught about gender studies? I mean, well duh. Let them teach it and let people who want to learn about it learn. It's not a problem. More people will become unemployable barristas, will become disillusioned with the bullshit and the whole thing will eventually go away. It's not some big conspiracy trying to oppress you. It's a bunch of angry whackos. Let them scream and try and change things. TBH it's not all completely bullshit. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/20 07:53 AM
5

Where I live kindergarten is the first year of school. In any case, how would you know what mothers are teaching their kids? Which mothers? All mothers? Hypothetical strawman mothers that you're inventing when pressed on your statements?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/20 07:46 AM
2

What kindergarten? What kid in kindergarten could even understand? Mothers are welcome to teach their children whatever idiodic things they want. There's a lot of hyperbole here in this sub methinks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/20 07:25 AM
1

So you mean people who signed up to study gender studies? What elementary schools?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/20 06:23 AM
4

What schools teach male privilege and patriarchy?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/20 05:18 AM
1

Yeah except with their diets they eat less saturated fat, salt and sugar than western diets.
/r/MGTOW03/11/19 09:10 PM
-1

Okay. Good luck
/r/MGTOW03/11/19 06:58 AM
3

The writer Compton Mackenzie, then a serving soldier, complained about the activities of the Order of the White Feather. He argued that "idiotic young women were using white feathers to get rid of boyfriends of whom they were tired". Fuck are those bitches brutal or what?
/r/MGTOW03/11/19 06:50 AM
-1

Why? Nothing I said there isn't true. Why don't you talk to a doctor if you think that meal is healthy.
/r/MGTOW03/11/19 04:37 AM
2

Yogurt is high in sugar and saturated fat. Yes, bad for you. Cereal, as in oats, not fruit loops, are great for you so long as you don't load up on them. Saying "any food you could eat has risks involved" is unhelpful. Some foods have far greater risks than others.
/r/MGTOW03/11/19 04:18 AM
-4

Saturated Fat is one of the biggest health risks. Egg yolks have saturated fats. Processed foods aren't a problem, unless they are high in salt, sugar, or saturated fat (which they often are). Also dude has bacon and butter there.
/r/MGTOW03/11/19 04:17 AM
-4

This shouldn't be any morning tbh, dude. What you are eating there is poison.
/r/MGTOW03/11/19 04:15 AM
1

Welcome to heart attack land. Seriously, try to eat healthier. No point in going your own way if you die ten steps later.
/r/MGTOW03/11/19 03:59 AM
1

The bit you're quoting is specifically New Zealand laws.
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 07:51 AM
23

This isn't true. There are recent and numerous examples in Australia where a mother had custody taken and was instead given supervised visits due to her attempts and alienating the father. The court only works when men fight. If you're being alienated and don't fight, you're allowing it to happen.
/r/MGTOW25/10/19 06:22 PM
3

8ch on zeronet
/r/MGTOW09/10/19 07:23 PM
1

I've never thought about it that way. But you know what, I think you're onto something.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/19 07:12 AM
2

Yeah, go to management when you're the lowest level employee and complain about gender discrimination. See what happens.
/r/MGTOW27/09/19 03:12 AM
7

Sure. But there's fuck-all you're going to do about it, let allow fuck-all you're able to do about it. That's the same mentality feminists have about the world. You're not going to change everything outside of yourself. So focus on yourself. Don't take shit from the business, play the game. It's set up for players to win, they're betting with employees. Move companies every couple years, get your 10-20% pay raise. Save money. Get passive income. Retire.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/19 07:52 PM
5

They never take accountability of their actions. Take some steps to maintain some distance from her. I can hear Title IX footsteps. As your manager is a female, she will side with her. Good advice You should talk to someone who is above your manager and tell them how your manager is blaming you for being responsible and if the gender were reversed, you wouldn't get to cry about shift change. Fuckin' terrible advice.
/r/MGTOW26/09/19 07:46 PM
7

>Instead we work the same or more, are more productive, and receive less money for it. All while having family life stripped away. Of course we work the same. No one really thought that technology would stop businesses being businesses and treating their employees as bad as they can get away with. These are inevitable facts. Get your situation the way you want it. Be the business, not the employee.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/19 07:41 PM
31

Ted Kaczynski could forsee and articulate how the world around him would continue to devolve. He could see modern problems, and could see where they were headed. And damn it, he was right. He, later, contradicted himself and tried to backpedal, but many people put this down to his new life in prison (i.e. time spent outside of society). One of the most articulate things he said, which is something I think about daily, was that we built technology to serve us; but in reality, we are serving it. A…
/r/TheRedPill26/09/19 06:58 PM
0

I didn't mean to imply anything. But if you try to present the argument as OP did, it's easy to shut down because he framed it as time on field.
/r/MGTOW09/09/19 07:59 PM
3

I agree with your premise. But OP is only presenting time on field.
/r/MGTOW09/09/19 06:14 AM
3

That's not what it should be based on. The worth of an athlete is not the time they spend on the field. It's the amount of sponsorship revenue they generate for the sporting body and networks.
/r/MGTOW09/09/19 06:03 AM
5

I gotta be honest. I take time off like that too. I work in a big corporate place. I have no love for my job, I have no qualms about taking advantage of them. GYOW applies to more than just women.
/r/MGTOW09/09/19 06:00 AM
7

Yeah. And ocassionally murdering you. https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2019-09-09/brendan-mcdowall-shane-heiberg-jailed-for-killing-jade-goodwin/11473262
/r/TheRedPill09/09/19 05:36 AM
8

Thepiratebay.org, where you should watch all your netflix content.
/r/MGTOW04/09/19 06:54 PM
1

Where does it say you have to live together? http://peter.armstronglegal.com.au/you-can-be-de-factos-without-living-together/
/r/MGTOW04/09/19 10:14 AM
1

Just to put this into better perspective: http://peter.armstronglegal.com.au/you-can-be-de-factos-without-living-together/ You can still be defacto without living together. It happens.
/r/MGTOW04/09/19 10:00 AM
1

Did you read the law I posted? There's nothing in there. It even says that the list of considerations does not require them to have occurred, or even that they cover all considerations.
/r/MGTOW04/09/19 09:56 AM
1

Which part of the law that I linked to says that?
/r/MGTOW04/09/19 09:55 AM
4

It's on the front page of The Pirate Bay HD Movies
/r/MGTOW29/08/19 05:28 AM
20

Dude, you gotta get those ads off your website. I legit just went to see if you ship internationally and if you can do custom jobs and I immediately went back to complain here instead. I will give you money for your product. I don't want to have ads as a reward. Msg me when they are gone so I can look for stuff.
/r/MGTOW10/08/19 08:28 AM
4

I'm not going to waste my time asking followup questions and typing out advice if OP doesn't want it.
/r/MGTOW04/08/19 02:39 AM
7

Are you venting or asking for help?
/r/MGTOW03/08/19 11:56 PM
15

Well, it's hard to argue with this response. I concede your points.
/r/MGTOW25/07/19 01:37 AM
-22

In what way do women sacrifice society and men for themselves?
/r/MGTOW24/07/19 11:24 PM
1

Absolutely.
/r/MGTOW24/07/19 03:50 AM
-5

Dude, that isn't what feminism is about. But whatever. You could stay home and clean the house and watch the kids. Or would you then feel like a slave to your wife?
/r/MGTOW24/07/19 03:05 AM
-8

OP presented a binary. Life isnt.
/r/MGTOW24/07/19 12:45 AM
11

Why would it be satire? ​ If I get mugged in the street, it's my fault. ​ I shouldn't have been walking alone I shouldn't have been in that neighbourhood I should've hit the gym more and learned to fight I should've carried my own gun/knife whatever ​ It is my fault. In many, many cases, women's rape is their fault. It was their responsibility to: ​ Not walk alone at night, i.e., take their safety into their own hands Not be in shit neighbourhoods, i.e. marry a rich banker Not dress like a hoe a…
/r/MGTOW23/07/19 11:45 PM
-1

Oh wow guys! This is totally affecting men!
/r/MGTOW11/07/19 05:44 AM
-1

Are you making a point?
/r/MGTOW09/07/19 05:31 AM
18

Okay. So if we had pay equity, we would all be paid however much was needed to lift us all to roughly the same level? Which would mean that you don't get paid the same for the same work. But can get paid because you're poor?
/r/MGTOW09/07/19 05:29 AM
-3

Piss off. It's legal in most of the western world. What is this "marriage contract" you speak of? There's no such thing. Honestly, what are you talking about? How about you go your own way instead of holding onto your bitching phase about how your ex wouldn't fuck you?
/r/MGTOW09/07/19 05:23 AM
4

Hijaking top comment to point out that if this was Australia, she could argue you are defacto, and would have a strong case for half the property value upon the breakdown of the relationship. Doubly so if he had a mortgage that she was helping pay off with her "rent".
/r/MGTOW05/07/19 02:53 AM
4

I know concern trolling gets a ban. Some of the stuff I see on here is from reactionary guys who have just had a bad experience with some bitch. This looks, to an outsider, especially one with an axe to grind, like there is hate here.
/r/MGTOW18/06/19 11:33 PM
7

I think it's important you discuss these things to a degree. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paycheck_Fairness_Act The provisions, honestly, seem pretty straight-forward and sensible. They are ammendments to the 1963, yes '63, bill that made it illegal to pay men and women differently for the same job. Yes, since 1963 it has been illegal in the USA (and similar timeframes for every other western country) to pay women less than men for the same work. However. One of the provisions in the Paycheck F…
/r/MGTOW16/06/19 11:12 PM
10

Jiggle game anal dick?
/r/MGTOW15/06/19 12:10 AM
2

Okay. I read this the other day and it shit me too. So how about you do what I did and write to your (possibly new) member of parliament and the minister for police?
/r/MensRights26/05/19 01:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter