TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Decoy_Snail_66 Archive

View 2 posts and 39 comments by Decoy_Snail_66 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
93

Direct from the article: Mr Turner's cause of death was not mentioned by the court. This is the most important part of the article since this directly links the actions of the accused to the man’s death. If it was never revealed, then ruling in favor of the accused is a complete miscarriage of justice.
/r/PussyPass04/04/22 06:22 PM
-1

I mean ... you could just read the subreddit you know? Or I could ask for the subreddit to quantify the position of the sun with valid and objective evidence to support their position… Kinda what you expect feminists to do with theirs? You're simply ignorant. You’re simply ignoring what I asked you to provide evidence for. You’re asserting men do not have equal rights and you’ve managed to come up with are unfair executions of laws… …which is what I mentioned in my original post. I set forth spe…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 02:02 AM
-8

Let’s break this down: you have no reproductive or family rights This falls in line with your third point: institutional bias in the legal and prison system Now, define the rights you think are missing; to be clear, do not create a right to fill in the blank. Find the rights you say you are missing. Even women can’t do this. reduced rights in health care, education, victim services Can you specify which specific rights are being reduced? you're assumed to be guilty if a woman falsely accuses you…
/r/MensRights06/07/21 10:59 PM
0

I don’t think the name of the subreddit helps. When I first heard the name mensrights, my immediate knee jerk reaction was to laugh. I know that sounds bad, but without context the idea of a men’s rights subreddit just felt odd. Feminism certainly doesn’t have a leg to stand on when it comes to the silly idea that women are being oppressed or denied some fundamental right, but equally, men are in the same boat; you have all the rights that women do. What neither side has is distinctly equal trea…
/r/MensRights06/07/21 09:41 PM
1

To be fair, I’ve only had one cup of coffee. I’m sure that isn’t helping lol Anywho, be safe!
/r/MensRights28/06/21 05:31 PM
4

Child support is intended to cover the costs of child care and related expenses, so technically yes, it is meant for the child, but the issue is how it comes about in practical application along with equitable standards. Alimony is just…insidious, for lack of a better word.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 05:30 PM
0

I’m basing my responses off the previous experiences of those I know who have dealt with this; too many friends who have dealt with it, sadly. If I gave the impression my experience was universally applicable, that was not my intention. What I’ve seen is absolutely anecdotal to the experiences of those who went through the system.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 05:12 PM
1

Did I not specify that the payment would go from parent to parent over to a parent to state? I mean, technically it’s set up that way now; one pays the state and the state cuts a check to the custodial parent. An EBT card would just change how the money goes out and how it is utilized. I suppose a better explanation of how you think the card system would help; would it be pre-filled with a court ordered monthly amount that the custodial parent uses and the non-custodial parent pays into?
/r/MensRights28/06/21 05:07 PM
0

I'm not sure what your point of disagreement is really. I was clarifying my use of the word ‘reimbursement’. One is a monthly amount that is given to cover every day normal expenses such as food, clothes and housing. The other is a reimbursement that is billed to the other parent for things like childcare, medical expenses, and school expenses like band or the like Maybe I’m just being pedantic, but ‘to cover expenses’ and ‘reimburse for billing’ sounds pretty much the same. Aren’t they both off…
/r/MensRights28/06/21 04:42 PM
6

In the instances where past friends have gone through this, I’ve watched the courts look at the income of both parents. They use a baseline estimated expenses formula to divide the cost and assign payments from that point; a calculation of averages, if you will. The only time I’ve ever seen anything other than that approach is when unusual circumstances are involved, like one person makes an obscene amount of money per month or there is a severe divide between the incomes. Admittedly, it’s been …
/r/MensRights28/06/21 04:27 PM
-6

You are treating it like a loan to be paid back. The money is used when it's gotten for expenses at the timefor the most part. So as I am to understand, child support is usually paid bi-monthly; once at the beginning of the month and the other usually mid-way through. The amount is usually split into halves, though I’m sure anyone could divide it as need be as long as amount due meets the monthly requirement. The point here is that the custodial parent is paying for the child care expenses regar…
/r/MensRights28/06/21 04:23 PM
-9

I’m actually gonna do something different and argue against this idea. The concept behind child support is that it is ‘intended’ to reimburse the custodial parent for the expenses incurred by the single parent that an otherwise two parent household would share. There are quite a few reasons why this idea is flawed on its face, but for the moment, I’ll stick to this argument. No need to tangent yet. The key word in that statement is reimburse; the custodial parent isn’t waiting for the child supp…
/r/MensRights28/06/21 03:09 PM
11

I would agree that typically both sides will likely view themselves the winner and the other the loser. Furthermore, both sides will likely become more entrenched in their beliefs than prior to the actual discussion. This is because most people enter into the debate with the mindset that their position is inherently correct. To be clear; this isn’t something only feminists do; mensrights people do it, gamers do it, lawyers do it, politicians do it. Most everyone has at one time or another becaus…
/r/MensRights25/06/21 09:29 PM
4

I tend to lean conservative myself, but only because liberalism might as well be fascism these days with feminism, CRT, anti-white, anti-male attitudes that are just accepted but promoted as good virtues to embrace. Being pansexual, it’s equally difficult to connect with conservatives since liking to enjoy the genitals of another person who happens to have the same ones I do is bad and evil and I’m disgusting and vile. I know this view of both sides doesn’t represent the whole, but it certainly …
/r/MensRights25/06/21 03:20 PM
2

I’ve seen so many wildly varying presentations of the “% of rapes/sexual assaults go unreported” it’s almost laughable. The problem in my mind is less about the number they pull or even the source; it’s how they would come about the data in the first place. Unreported assumes the incident of assault is never registered with any law enforcement agency; if this is the case, then you’d have to source your data from other parties. And therein lies the problem. The moment one makes an official report…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 07:08 PM
5

The Don was just trying to be a good man, do just one more good deed for the day after helping those kids at the orphanage. And how does she repay him? With brutality, threats, and torture. The Don deserved better.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/21 05:51 PM
5

Notice also how the thread was about false rape, and they reframed to all sexual assault. Well, an easy to understand the deeper reason why is to look at what they say: 90% of reported sexual assaults are true. What’s important in their statement is the percentage & the word true. The word ‘true’ is very unusual in language as it refers to information that is considered right or accurate, but not necessarily factual. In a way, it’s ‘facts’ that exist ina sort of limbo whose state remains until i…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 02:14 PM
2

I read their comment; not sure why they saw reason to delete it. As long as the conversation is civil and both parties are willing to listen, no reason they should have felt cause to delete it. That said, the link they posted was hard to read. That opening statistic made me roll my eyes so hard they fell out.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 02:26 AM
9

You. I like you. Good points, mate. Kinda jealous I didn’t think of those myself.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 10:53 PM
57

sigh Let’s break this down, shall we? Despite over 90% of sexual assault reports being true mensrights, in its constant misogynistic tendency to downplay systemic female oppression, spreads propaganda that women supposedly constantly falsely make accusations against men despite in reality over 90% of sexual assault reports being true. “90% of sexual assaults being true”. True in what sense? True as in factually proven in a court of law? Where evidence is submitted and verified resulting in a gui…
/r/MensRights23/06/21 09:21 PM
8

I’m mirroring what we’ve seen feminists do with issues like suicide? Like when they tried to build a men’s shelter in Australia (I think) and feminists protested it to the point that it had to be shut down. A single men’s shelter was simply too much for them. Or an advertisement for men dealing with prostate cancer being defaced because ‘women get cancer too’.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 04:03 PM
10

at which point they're accused (among other things) of only bringing it up to detract from helping women. “1 out of 3 victims of suicide are women, we need to do more help women feel safe and secure in today’s world.” “We should consider the 2 out of 3 that men who commit suicide. Shouldn’t we help them too?” “Why are you trying to erase women?”
/r/MensRights06/06/21 03:46 PM
2

I did read the common you were trying to reply to before. Yeah, not sure what to make of that. Already have a headache and that’s making it worse.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 06:29 AM
1

Oh, no worries! It happens!
/r/MensRights06/06/21 06:25 AM
2

What makes you think MRAs aren't egalitarians? What part of my reply gave the implication that I think this would be the case? I do think most average people, men and women, are not as aware of the generally hyperbolic nature of modern social conflicts, but MRA’s and classical feminists would be excluded from that as they are already aware of the issues surrounding these conflicts. Edit: accidentally a word
/r/MensRights06/06/21 06:16 AM
2

I wish more people, not just women, recognized the disingenuous nature of the modern social conflicts. I am curious; I assume with your initial post that you would label yourself as a classical feminist or possibly even an egalitarian. With the nature of modern feminism being what it is, do you think there’s any truth to what we commonly hear from social media activists; the usual ‘women aren’t safe’, ‘all men’, and the like. If so, I’m curious to see your thoughts on it. If not, where do you fe…
/r/MensRights06/06/21 05:20 AM
1

Except the show deliberately framed SWORD as the villains; the writers purposefully framed SWORD as drawing their weapons on her first, keeping Vision’s body from her and trying to infiltrate the place she had created to hide in her pain. The writers wanted Wanda to be seen as a victim, as someone who was misunderstood rather than as the monster she was for enslaving an entire town. Keep in mind you’re focusing on what the in-universe story lays out as opposed to what I’m saying the writers want…
/r/MensRights04/06/21 05:18 AM
1

This was framed by the writers in how her actions were portrayed. Even when it’s revealed to her what’s happening around her, she chooses to continue keeping these people enslaved because her need to deal with the loss of her pain is more important. The fact the series never directly addresses this indicates it was never meant to be viewed as a definitively negative act on her part. Instead, the plot surrounding what she’s done is sidelined by Agatha, who is presented as a villain despite the fa…
/r/MensRights04/06/21 04:24 AM
2

Lt. Ellen Ripley is arguably one of the best written characters in film. A testament to the notion that keeping things simple is better. Alien gave us no backstories, no flashbacks, no filler. Each character was dedicated to actions in the moment which played to the pacing of the story. Not a second was wasted with how each of the characters were presented.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 12:34 AM
2

Keep in mind, the writers control how the story plays out, not the in-universe framework; they could have easily had Wanda framed to be the good guy and still experienced some measure of consequence. Instead they opted to make her actions morally righteous by way of how everything ended. It doesn’t matter what the in-universe characters do as long as their actions play to the established rules that universe has. The writers ultimately control how it all plays out; they either chose to write it t…
/r/MensRights03/06/21 11:12 PM
3

You highlighted a very good point; Alien is a female led franchise and the first two films are universally praised. The remainder garner much deserved criticism for: poorly written scripts inconsistent character details strange or otherwise unintelligent decisions on the part of the characters subpar special effects What you don’t see is criticism of the characters for what they are; no one complains that Ripley is a woman. No one complained that Alexa of AvP was a woman or black for that matter…
/r/MensRights03/06/21 10:42 PM
6

I’ll bite. When the last Charlie’s Angels movie came out and performed poorly at the box office, the failure of the film was attributed purely to ‘misogyny’. Rather than play the reversed genders card, lets look at something else that is likely more concerning. Why is the director assuming that her film would be viewed by the general public as being ‘good’? Now, one could easily argue that when one goes to create anything, they shouldn’t be faulted for thinking that what they have created is goo…
/r/MensRights03/06/21 09:23 PM
21

Women tend toward physical beauty as being the metric that defines their value. Men view strength/prowess/ability as the metric.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/21 09:46 PM
7

Late to the party here but… What would she have done had the child refused to lick the toilet? “Why did you beat your student?” “Because he wouldn’t lick the toilet like I told him to.” “Oh, ok, makes se- wait, what?”
/r/PussyPass15/05/21 05:44 PM
79

So…let me make it worse: Second-degree rape occurs when a person uses forcible compulsion against a victim who is simply incapable of consent by reason of being either physically helpless or mentally incapacitated. It also occurs when a victim, who the defendant is not married to, has a developmental disability. So yeah…there’s that.
/r/PussyPass12/05/21 06:08 AM
132

“Allegedly”...smh
/r/PussyPass06/05/21 02:47 PM
7

Let’s see... Health care. I assume she means abortion since every other form of health care is widely available. lack of representation I assume she means recognition in media, despite the overwhelming amount of representation women get in media. That said, why would a lack of representation be justification for murder and violence? unequal pay Debunked thoroughly. sexism Fair. Sexism still happens, but again, not sufficient justification for violence and murder. Furthermore, sexism comes from a…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/21 08:05 PM
21

“Men are very weak” — says the girl who nearly had to go into therapy for her obsession with Justin Bieber.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/21 09:00 PM
3

r/WhyWereTheyFilming
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/21 03:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter