TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DeepReally Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by DeepReally on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-11

I've never been able to take someone who calls himself "Sargon of Akkad" seriously. He might as well call himself Batman (or perhaps Mr. Blobby?) for gods sake. The "I wouldn't even rape you" comment gained a few chuckles at the time but the reality is its just a stick to hit him with anytime he comes close to gaining any sort of publicity. He'll forever be the "I wouldn't even rape you" Batman and the sooner he crawls back under whatever rock he came from the better.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 09:52 PM
7

Yet seriously considered again in 2015-16 by Labour. Labour isn't in power though.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 05:52 PM
62

That's the Ladies Pond on Hampstead Heath. There is a Men's pond and a Mixed pond as well. The trains appear to be from Islamic countries, which have segregated men and women for centuries. Women only compartments were introduced in England 1874 but were abolished in the 1970s.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 01:49 PM
8

This is statutory rape. This is sex with a minor, different and yes, she is guilty of it. There's no such offense as "statutory rape" in English law. Not everything revolves around America. EDIT: The relevant offense is sexual activity with a child. Rape and 'rape of a child under 13' both require the offender to "intentionally penetrate the vagina, anus or mouth of another person with his penis"
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:22 AM
161

Sadly you have to have a penis to be convicted of rape under English law. Even the DM has levels of journalism where they don't accuse someone of a crime they didn't legally commit.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 09:46 PM
11

I have a feeling if you lawyer up they may well hold that against you. It might also be expensive. However, if you get fired for 'harrassment' that could be expensive too. Either way it sounds like you want to look for another job ASAP as that is no place to work.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:09 AM
16

If you're a member of a union see if they can help with representation.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 12:22 AM
9

It depends on the exact nature of the job. On the whole it is illegal to discriminate against job applicants on the basis of protected characteristics. However, there are some times when it is permissible, such as if the job was caring for disabled women it could be permissible to require someone of the same sex to protect their dignity. You should read this guide to know your rights but as others have said, you dodged a bullet as they would be a terrible employer.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 09:53 PM
8

Are we in agreement that leaving your front door unlocked is not a defense for burglary? But if you don't want to be burgled, then it's best not to leave your front door open. You can be both the victim of a crime and bear some responsibility for being targeted by the criminal.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 12:04 PM
7

No, no, no. You merely go to your doctor's clinic and ask to be diagnosed as a woman.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 01:55 AM
6

"'Yes we did kiss, in the kitchen on the floors, it was consensual but I couldn't get an erection … before I knew it she was up and she left'," he said. I wonder how much this influenced her decision to accuse him of rape. He couldn't get an erection, she feels unsexy so she accuses of rape to make her feel better about the situation.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 05:11 PM
9

The vast majority support equal rights for men and women; only a small minority (less than 7% of Britons, for example) identify as feminists. You have to remember that feminism is an ideology, like every other -ism, and that therefore you are dealing with ideologues. They have to approach everything through the lens of their ideology, which is steeped in signs, symbols and their own 'language'. This makes it hard to discuss topics in a neutral way - if you disagree with the pay gap then you don'…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 03:49 AM
12

Sounds like they're not fighting against equal pension ages, they are campaigning against the specific terms of the transition arrangements. I.e. women who had planned their retirement at 60 who found with short notice they would have to work longer or take a reduced pension.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 08:34 PM
6

She would need to pass GMC fitness to practice before she could continue her course. As she has this conviction for violent behaviour, a history of drug and alcohol abuse (for which she has received treatment) and an eating disorder this would be a very difficult task indeed. In fact, she has reportedly dropped out and is looking to pursue other career options abroad.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 10:15 AM
14

It's unlikely she would pass the GMC fitness to practice screening, which makes the judge's reasoning even more baffling.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:31 PM
22

Speaking to Broadsheet, Handsome Her owner Alex O’Brien clarified the nature of the “premium”, saying the policy ran for one week a month and was an optional choice for male customers when paying. The business says this was an effort to draw attention to the issue of pay equality. So basically it's a viral marketing scam. They call it a 'man tax' in the media to generate controversy but in actuality they ask if you would like to donate an additional 18% of your bill to charity (which many say ye…
/r/MensRights07/08/17 01:09 PM
4

So economists are the reason we have an armed forces. Here's silly old me thinking it was the threat of foreign powers (and their very male soldiers).
/r/MensRights31/03/17 09:04 PM
1

They can justify it if they can show it’s a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. For more see https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/law-and-courts/discrimination/what-are-the-different-types-of-discrimination/justifying-discrimination/
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:05 PM
21

I haven't got any standing (in law) but someone who is directly affected by the discrimination could sue or possibly report to the authorities.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 03:56 PM
75

Quite probably. Under UK law, it's illegal to refuse to provide goods or services, or to provide them under less favourable terms, because you are a man or a woman. However, it is permissible to provide single-sex services if they can objectively justify providing the service in this way.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 03:49 PM
7

Choose examples of modern feminist assertions, preferably by reputable feminists so you can cite them. If you say 'they want to kill everything masculine' who are you talking about? All feminists? Even the person marking the essay? Whereas, 'President Obama claimed women earn 77 cents for every dollar a man earns' is attributable to one highly influential person. You can go and look up the exact quote in context and it is a precise enough claim to analyse critically without being personal. You s…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:42 AM
7

I agree. If, as a juror, I was presented with such one-sided evidence I would be inclined to not only disregard it but to consider why the prosecution felt cross-examination would be so damaging to their case.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 06:22 PM
37

Yep. Someone who kills themselves to avoid cross-examination is clearly telling the truth.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 06:17 PM
3

Just because she doesn't need a reason to grow a moustache...
/r/MensRights02/11/16 11:32 PM
12

It says "more workplace injuries" http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2122&context=key_workplace
/r/MensRights03/10/16 10:40 AM
22

This refers to the action in California, not the ongoing appeal in New York. Remember she is not suing for 'sexual assault', she is suing for relief from her contract with Sony, Kemosabe Records, KMI, Prescription Songs, etc. A contract that she signed having retained the legal advice of a lawyer who was familiar with the music industry. A contract that explicitly states that the legal jurisdiction of the contract shall be New York. Yet she started an action in California anyway. TL'DR: Asking a…
/r/MensRights02/08/16 10:43 AM
7

In his words: The new male studies offer an affirmative alternative to traditional gender scholarship on boys and men. Unlike pervasive men’s-studies research, male studies inquiries are essentially male positive: their methodologies not only celebrate men who embody different masculinities, but also critique —and suggest strategies for overcoming— systemic inhibitors of masculine affirmation. Misandric constructions of masculine identities in gynocentric educational environments have resulted i…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:36 AM
2

48 things that women say to women (that they don't say to men)
/r/MensRights10/12/15 06:29 PM
8

This isn't even a file extension. This is to go in the content-encoding HTTP header. Which means that nobody, literally nobody, is ever going to see this unless they're doing some heavy debugging or maybe stress testing. Bollocks. https://i.imgur.com/jw5rJuI.png
/r/PussyPass12/10/15 03:06 PM
234

#seatgate is nothing more than a smokescreen to deflect away from the real issue of the misogyny faced by women on public transport. Being asked to move your seat is highly problematic for women, especially when men rely on the power imbalance of having prebooked them. This just serves as further evidence of victim blaming amongst the public transport culture as women are refused to be believed and those in power demand "evidence" in the form of pre-booked seat tickets.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/15 02:57 PM
2

Uhm, this would be a sidewalk block though so I think you kind of lost there.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/15 01:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter