DeevenTHEv1per Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
13	Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"?		DeevenTHEv1per	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/02/26 10:53 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
–	Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"? We are arguing defenitons so semantics matter but Its gone to semantics now so yeah we should give it up But it says two subjects being compare based on faulty reasoning So the reasoning has to be faulty itself before the comparison is being made	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/02/26 02:37 PM
–	Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"? The defention i used was the one of wikipedia Word for word it says"A false equivalence or false equivalency is an informal fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed, faulty, or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency" Notive the "based on flawed,fault or false reasoning" But you admit my logic was fine So thats why i draw it to the false analogy fallacy Edit: its defenitely just a defenitions thing because on logicallyfallac…	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/02/26 02:25 PM
–	Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"? The reason i bring up the race analogy is because if a person already refers to all men in their original claim shat stops them from saying yeah and then agreeing with the analogy about assualt i made,now that as apposed to race no one is gonna agree with that.i guess that proves the difference of context which help your argument of false equivalnce however false equivalance is when two subjects are compared based on faulty reasoning,the reasoning isnt flawed based of claiming a group as smth du…	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/02/26 02:07 PM
–	Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"? The analogy is being used to show the Hole in the formulation of the argument,its not false equivalence like you claimed it isnt changing the premise. But if you want a different analogy that stays with gender Men have commited assault against women and men but that doesnt mean all men commit assault against men and women so reffering to all men would be wrong.	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/02/26 01:56 PM
1	Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"? Its not fully a false equivalnce because the reasoning structure is the same Also the person i was arguing reffered to all men It wasnt "the reason why woman are cautious around men is because of crime rates and danger risks" The person was reffering to all men as in cause some men do this that means we refer to all men becausw we dont know which men.it was more of a alienating argument.	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/02/26 01:37 PM
2	Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"? That wasnt the conversation the original comment was making the debate seem like manvswoman So men are more likely to be victims help my point because it proves that it isnt as simple as a problem of a man vs a woman.also we were talking about safety so idk where your getting institutions that exclude you	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/02/26 12:51 PM
2	Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"? Yeah i get that due to the lack of context but the reaction from the original commenter is over the top The analogy can be applied to the argument and the contents of it aswell but that doesnt mean its right it was disproving the appeal of another argument Like "stop bringing black people into this" you could say the same thing with any analogy i couldve used Stop bringing (insert word) into this	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/02/26 12:20 PM
5	Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"? Its an analogy	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/02/26 11:36 AM
3	Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"? im not,i said that because of lack of context of the original comment not being shown	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/02/26 11:20 AM
1	Just came across this post a lil bit ago. How are normal men supposed to react when fear of men is treated as reasonable by default? Like i said the argument has lost credibility because you have brought up masculinity before an actual relevant argument so you by doing that have valued attacking a person over the debate.you keep bringing up education and experience and yet it hasnt showed.for someone with two degrees thats engaged you would think you would have better things to do than argue with lonely old sensitive me right?	/r/MensRights	28/02/26 11:19 AM
1	Just came across this post a lil bit ago. How are normal men supposed to react when fear of men is treated as reasonable by default? Its not relevant,all your doing is just Person 1 states a claim Person 2 "well your lonely and senstive maybe if you fixed yourself woman will be attracted to you" If you want to disprove a point than argue the point not the person becausw if the person making the point is more important than the point than the argument has lost credibility.	/r/MensRights	28/02/26 11:09 AM
5	Why do these arguments always have to go to "your insecure" or "no wonder woman dont like you"? You know what,i just might take Your advice Btw to be clear im not a racist it was just an example	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/02/26 11:04 AM
1	Just came across this post a lil bit ago. How are normal men supposed to react when fear of men is treated as reasonable by default? Wow,again an argument that isnt relevant or adresses the issue,again with an argument that is directed towards the person rather than the argument being made And using joe rogan when no one mentioned him prior And again with masculinity,masculinity isnt relevant whether your a man whether im a man whether im a woman or your a woman.it has no relevance because it doesnt matter who is saying it,what matters is what is being said.	/r/MensRights	28/02/26 11:03 AM
1	Just came across this post a lil bit ago. How are normal men supposed to react when fear of men is treated as reasonable by default? So you used the word "you" 3 times and the word "your" but claimig it as a general claim and not a personal one I would just be wasting my time arguing with someone like you	/r/MensRights	28/02/26 10:55 AM
4	Just came across this post a lil bit ago. How are normal men supposed to react when fear of men is treated as reasonable by default? Thata somewhere to take the argument but commiting ad hominem and idk where im blaming other people and then the assumption that i want woman attraction. Great argument mate. You incaspulated how these arguments work exactly to the tea One person states their claim,another person counter argues and then its straight to personal insults.	/r/MensRights	28/02/26 10:49 AM
2	Just came across this post a lil bit ago. How are normal men supposed to react when fear of men is treated as reasonable by default? "But less woman kill men" No one denued that but the fact that men are more likely to be victims proves that it isnt a case of menvswoman but people like you try to push that agenda	/r/MensRights	28/02/26 09:54 AM
3	Just came across this post a lil bit ago. How are normal men supposed to react when fear of men is treated as reasonable by default? Yeah and multiple black people steal not one	/r/MensRights	28/02/26 09:52 AM
5	Just came across this post a lil bit ago. How are normal men supposed to react when fear of men is treated as reasonable by default? You really didnt get the memo Replace men with black man or jewish man and see how the appeal changes Its exhausting having people like you oversimplfying the issue as if its manvswoman When men are more likely to be victims of assult by other men either way So what is it men vs woman or bad people vs good people But just because one man kills his wife that mean its ok But if one black person steals smth and i make the same argument than im a racist	/r/MensRights	27/02/26 06:16 PM
2	Why do so many think this way when boys are abused by women? Ans the thing is you get those morons That are on about "men and woman arent the same"	/r/MensRights	27/02/26 06:09 PM
1	Did you call yourself a feminist in the past before learning the corrupt truth about feminism? By definition I'm all for feminism,i do believe that women and men should have equal rights, opportunities but over time I've realised(especially with modern feminism)it's just a mask to hide misandry nowadays.	/r/MensRights	02/08/25 09:17 PM