TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Deft_one Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by Deft_one on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I've seen your "interpretations," but they're not there in the article. Ranting like a lunatic changes nothing. This kind of misogyny makes Men look bad, and "Men's rights" look like thinly veiled hatred of women, which it seems to be, looking around here and reading these comments and your nonsense.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 11:41 PM
-19

Try reading the article. This isn't just about men nor does it even mention 'female academics,' liar. You either live in a paranoid fantasy land, or you're a flat-out misogynistic liar: neither of which are good, both of which harm the perception of men in general. I.e., you are making men's lives worse by being a lying misogynist. All you're doing is making men's rights look like a joke. Grow up and stop making things worse for the men you pretend to care about.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 11:50 AM
-6

You make "men's rights" look like a joke when you make up misogynistic nonsense like this. What you've done here has nothing to do with men's rights, and everything to do with making men look like lying assholes who will make up reasons to be mad at women (as if they are they cause of men's problems, which is just as false and stupid as your post). You pretend to care about men's rights so you have an 'excuse' to disparage women, which is childish. In other words, great job making men look stupi…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 11:49 AM
1

And? Those are good things. And donating to men's causes among others isn't misandry, it's literally the opposite.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 01:27 AM
-22

Source? This just says not to worry people over normal-aging with too-heavy a word, but instead to wait until things get bad to worry. Also, there is nothing about "female academics," you just made that part up flat-out. Yes, it focuses on prostate cancer, but it explicitly says this is a generalized thing. Misogynist title-making isn't "men's rights" And it's obvious that many people here commented without actually reading the article. It's sad.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 12:53 AM
2

Don't provide more examples if you don't want people to think this of you. You're doing it to yourself. YOU should stfu and think about what I'm saying, if you want to avoid this stuff, or, maybe you like it?
/r/AllPillDebate13/11/23 10:31 PM
2

Then why create this and other incelic posts? It is literally incelic behavior to create a vastly-overgeneralized worldview based on niche, internet nonsense, and then be all brusque like everyone 'gets it,' like it's the truth. This is incel behavior. You also make aggressive comments elsewhere calling people stupid, and you are obsessed with negativity surrounding women and dating: all of which are incelic. Maybe it's time to do some self-reflection if you don't want to give off this vibe. If …
/r/AllPillDebate13/11/23 01:43 PM
1

But groups like this don't account for internal divergence of the group they dislike, they just paint the entire group in the colors of some bad apples. It's just like being racist: maybe you had bad experiences with a few people, but that doesn't justify casting that dislike on the entire group. Anti-Feminism doesn't take into account the good sides of Feminism, nor does being anti-MRA. Hence, the pot calling the kettle black.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 02:12 PM
1

There is certainly no dissonance, if you recognize feminism as a hate group and not those who just oppose it. One could say the same about Men's Rights Activism. That's why it's the Pot calling the Kettle black. It's two equal sides of the same "US vs. THEM" coin. Both sides here are using bad apples and stereotypes to paint entire swaths of people in a negative light, which is just sexism, nothing more. I choose to focus on the fact that Women have to fight for certain rights and Men do too. Th…
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 12:57 PM
1

If not hypocrisy, it's certainly a case of the pot calling the kettle black... whatever you'd call that. Cognitive dissonance?
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 08:35 AM
-8

I could say the same about Men's Rights activism, especially if we're just saying things without backing them up. I don't have issues with Men's Rights or Feminism, but the glaring hypocrisy of the post was too much to pass by.
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/22 01:26 PM
-15

...He posted, in the equal-but-opposite sub, unironically. How is "Against Mens Rights" different than "Anti Feminism"? Spoilers: it isn't. EDIT: "but Feminism isn't women's rights" can be easily countered with "but Men's Rights Activism isn't men's rights" -- if you're not backing up your claims, they're not real claims and I can make those too. Also, Feminism isn't comparable to the Holocaust, wtf.
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/22 12:57 PM
1

Maybe it's downvoted for being a competing idea? ;) kidding - but yes, in my experience, as soon as it turns competitive, there are the two or three ultra-competitive kids who trounce on the thing pretty much ruining it for the rest of the class
/r/MensRights20/10/16 03:17 AM
3

I didn't say that, I just meant to keep in mind that people like me are in some of those classrooms too
/r/MensRights11/10/16 02:00 AM
1

Nice try
/r/MensRights11/10/16 01:59 AM
8

Probably... you win... cry
/r/MensRights10/10/16 08:50 PM
17

In my school experience, this would have made things worse for me. I am not competitive, and I was often made to feel like I was not right, smart, or worthy because I didn't participate well in competitive schooling. Maybe it's good for most people, but let's not forget that thinking all boys or all men are a certain way isn't right even when it's well intended
/r/MensRights10/10/16 05:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter