TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DelScipio Archive

View 7 posts and 120 comments by DelScipio on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
90

ProgressDelScipio/r/MensRights13/08/20 08:38 PM
71

Marriage/ChildrenDelScipio/r/MensRights26/07/19 10:53 PM
60

IntactivismDelScipio/r/MensRights23/07/19 09:16 PM
48

DiscriminationDelScipio/r/MensRights18/09/19 02:14 PM
40

FeminismDelScipio/r/MensRights29/01/19 11:47 AM
6

DelScipio/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:40 PM
1

DelScipio/r/MensRights26/07/19 10:49 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-31

The thing is, the earlier the transition happens, you get better results. Is a race against a clock. Im gonna to tell you a story. One friend of mine, we shared desk when we were 7 till 9 years old. She (was a he at the time) always said she felt like a woman. She didn't know her sexuality, but she felt like a women all the time. Sexuality and gender are different things. She didnt have money (poor family) and her family didn't understand the situation (very low education, lack of social support…
/r/MensRights17/08/20 05:53 PM
2

The "violence against women" court judge saw violence in the situation, and sent the case to the supreme court (only one that can put a sentence on him). He is affiliated with the ruling party and promoted laws "always trust women", and defended that men need worse sentences than women because any crime against a women is a hate (gender) crime. This law created situations that a women punched a man, he defended himself slapping her, and she kicked him. He got 1 year of jail (hate crime gives you…
/r/MensRights13/08/20 08:44 PM
2

For example you have 2 kids, in my country is a full year of work (6months each time). That impacts work, employability, etc. And is a pain in the ass for a woman that wants to have a career. She ends up delaying pregnancy. This may impact her promotions in the long term. But the problem isn't that, the problem is that men don't have the same right. Is very important for the couple to support each other in those times, mainly today that many people live far away from family, and have no support …
/r/MensRights12/08/20 07:42 AM
2

I'm not from USA also :D I agree that lying isn't worse than rape, criminally. I just think that, depending of the situation, lying can be very bad, and in some situation as bad as rape, because victims react differently (I gave the example of the suicide case I know, rape victims also commit suicide). I just replied to you because you said (maybe you didn't explain well) that false accusations don't have long term effects. They have, and can be has serious has rape. Going to prison changes peop…
/r/MensRights11/08/20 02:35 PM
1

I'm not going to compare with rape, there's no need to make my point and is stupid saying this is worse that that when both are bad, and this isn't a competition. But falsely accused man also suffer long effects of that. Going to jail is a very traumatizing experience. Also it will affect your social interactions forever, as you will stop trust people, making impossible to have a normal relationship in some cases. Also you aren't taking into account social stigma. Tired of seeing innocent men be…
/r/MensRights11/08/20 08:36 AM
1

Isn't my objective in life being a sociopath... It makes me very happy help others. I also like when people help me in difficult situations. You get what you give. Being like this I have a ton of people that I can depend on. I have no problems in life related with me being a man, fortunately, but I'm here because I'm aware that some people have. Is called empathy.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 01:41 PM
1

Is good because in many places college is "free", so is a small amount so they can live alone, I know a case that was 300€. He also worked part-time. So he could afford study bare minimum. He just had to have good results.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 01:39 PM
4

Actually most countries are improving the rights of children all the time. Many countries even force the parents of a young adults to pay for college if they have good results.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 08:01 AM
4

Sorry to tell you, but the government has the right to make you comply. If you don't care about others, you have a bigger problem. empathy is a very important characteristic of a human being.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 07:54 AM
3

Ya Johnny Deep isn't perfect. I'm sure he has alcohol problems and drugs. But the problem here isn't the fact that he drinks more than he should, or wherever. The problem is that he was accused of beating on her, and looks like he didn't, but she did. Also looks like she has a lot of problems herself. So, they can both be difficult to live with? Yes. But what is a crime is beating, make false accusations, defamation, etc... From what I saw there's no proof that he did that. But there's proof tha…
/r/MensRights03/08/20 05:28 PM
3

Men, because men have more metabolic diseases (hypertension, obesity, diabetes, etc), smoked more (mainly in the most affected age group, more men smoked thann women, now is more 50-50), had jobs that affected the lungs. Ya, men die more.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 08:33 AM
1

Ya, ya. That's why I replied to you. Otherwise I would pass. If you put and erected penis side by side they would note no difference. The biggest problem with circumcision isn't when things are fine. Is when surgeries go wrong. Insensitive penis, pain during sex (some doctors cut too much), infection that can lead to penis mutilation. These are rare, 2% of circumcision can have important functional problems. But when you do a population circumcision you are creating a problem. Is different 2% of…
/r/MensRights03/03/20 12:29 PM
1

Ya, women orgasm more easily with an uncircumcised penis. There's no difference (statistically) between women orgasms (orgasm before men) in circumcised VS uncircumcised, but having and orgasm faster leads to better sexual satisfaction to women, because friction, etc. The skin in uncircumcised penis increase friction, but being self lubed and reducing the amount of time to make a women orgasm, reduces the injuries that happen in a sex in their vagina. If you have herpes is easy to identify it on…
/r/MensRights03/03/20 11:28 AM
1

The problem is that most of those facts aren't true at all. STD risk reduction is very very low. So low that isn't acceptable in developed countries as effective way to reduce STD. Is só low that isn't even statistical significative in developed countries! An uncircumcised penis is very easy to clean, is the same as yours, water and soap. That is false, the stitches don't rip with an erection. That is as common as losing your penis during a circumcision. Is more painful, because you remember, bu…
/r/MensRights03/03/20 10:58 AM
1

The negative side effects is that some procedures go wrong. Small boys lose their penis for ever. Imagine if you lost your penis, or had a big scare that reduced your sensitivity (can lead to impotence). When you do a "couple" of procedures a year with a very low rate complication rate in a situation like phimosis, you maybe have a complication or two a year. When you mass mutilate the population you get 100-1000 times that. There's no benefit of circumcision. You still have to clean your penis …
/r/MensRights03/03/20 10:31 AM
1

Is not an excuse. You can't just throw money and something that doesn't exist. Prostate cancer is a very difficult cancer because you want a good balnece between treat and not treat, as many men will not die of it, and overtreatment has impact in men lives.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 03:45 AM
1

Yes is true.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 11:24 AM
1

Prostate cancer is a "recent" issue. Only now that people are living till 80 very easily, is being a issue. Till now only very young men died of it, and usually they were very advanced cases, so no one payed attention to it. Also keep in mind that breast cancer research money is because they are developing drugs to target various receptors, thing that we dont have in prostate cancer. Now research is focused in diagnosis, and this kind of research is a lot cheaper.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 11:24 AM
1

Easy if you are gay. If she is a crazy bitch dump her. If she cheated on her ex, she will cheat on you.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 11:13 AM
1

Not the commentor but I don't see how a pregnancy test can ruin a life. Isn't common knowledge but should be, that the real test is an eco. Also if you think you aren't the father, don't sign anything. Shouldn't take more than a couple of days to show that this if false. If is fake, drop her. Easy as that. You cant trust dumb people.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 10:57 AM
1

You say that because you have no idea. How shitty people can be. False accusations, insults, violence are very common in health care. Ahh, but this doesn't matter. Unluckily your opinion doesn't matter and we have protection by law.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 11:37 AM
1

Let me tell you a thing. Most sexual discrimination in a hospital are made from female patients to female doctors/nurses. Women are very sexist, and are the ones that always demand a male doctor/nurse, because they "don't trust female doctors/nurses". I as a men, working in a hospital want to be protected, and have the right to not see a conflictive patient. I know a couple o cases that patients came over, and then accuse you of rape during exploration. They do the samething over and over again,…
/r/MensRights19/02/20 02:00 PM
1

This is why this law only applies to non urgent patients, just to cover those situations. You are talking about a possible situation that never happens. When you ahve to see a women that only want to see a male doctor, claims that her vagina hurts, so you have to explore her, no matter what. She does that because she gets horny, and you cant refuse, you will understand.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 01:43 PM
1

This is actually a good measure. Protects professionals. In my location, healthcare professionals usually prefere male patients as they are less conflictive, even though crazy people exists everywhere. I don't see how this is targets men.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 01:32 PM
1

Is justified in paraphimosis. Can be a medical emergency.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 06:02 PM
1

Erected penis look almost the same. Cleaner... You don't soap your penis in each shower? More sentive is false. Usually makes them less sensitive. Is that so that pornstars use circumcision to last longer. This was used for some to justify as you perform better in bed. Studies now show that while circumcised last longer, they take more time to provide a orgasm to women. In the end, no difference between female orgasms. Also, uncircumcised make female organs earlier, that associated with glans pr…
/r/MensRights21/01/20 05:56 PM
1

That's because breast cancer kills a lot more without treatment. So decision is easy, treat everyone. Prostate cancer don't, so doctors didn know what to do. Now selective screening is the solution. Is important to talk about it with family and friends. Get tested, seek information, and decide about your own treatment.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 01:29 PM
1

Prostate cancer correlates with age. Population is aging. Many studies point that life expentancy parity is only posible if we have better prostate cancer detection and treatment. We need money for research. Prostate cancer only kills 2% of men with prostate cancer. The problem is that +80% of men will have prostate cancer in late ages. This is a lot of men. Prostate cancer screening isn't bulletproof, we need better screening tools. More moeny for research. Is important that people are aware of…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 01:19 PM
1

I'm not even from USA, so I don't know a lot about him, but that wasn't after he said that parents should be given more info to do informed decisions? Okay, not anti Circumsion, but more anti circumcision than any other politician, no?
/r/MensRights27/12/19 11:10 PM
2

Watch the rest of it. In this show men an women are very equal. This is based on 90's books and the author isn't very famous around feminist circles, just saying. In this show women are as bad as men. Feminists hate it. In the first episode you see a bad man, and an equal bad woman. Geralt decides to take either side. Woman goes full crazy, Geralt acts even thought he likes her. In the first episode we see him taking a side because a person actions, not gender or past.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 03:27 PM
3

It costs 250$. No sane person would pay that.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 01:23 PM
-1

Initially cost/benefit. And risk/benefit in men wasn't clear. Now is known that the vaccine is risk free and has better cost/benefit. The probability in men cancer because of hpv is lower than women. Also vaccinating women you lower hpv in men also. There's shortage of vaccines right now, rich countries are buying a lot to vaccinate boys, that isn't as cost effective has vaccinate girls, and many countries cant get the vaccine to their girls (keep in mind men are also protected by women vaccinat…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:16 PM
3

Ya, asymptomatic means it doesn't cause cancer in hpv. The majority of women that get hpv are asymptomatic, because doesn't cause pre cancerous lesions. That is what asymptomatic in this means, you get the virus and you cure, without any more consequences. This applies to men and women alike. When the vaccines was very very expensive, vaccination was only recommended in women because of higher risk of cervix cancer, and indirectly it protected men. Now the cost is reduced, so is already cost eff…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:05 PM
2

And?! Now we should only vaccinate gays? How will we do it? The only way the vaccine is effective is if you use it before sexual activity, that means vaccinate in early ages. Many men don't know they are gay till a lot later. That study says that men should be vaccinated when costs go down. Guess what, many countries are beggining to vaccinate men because costs are low enough to justify the treatment, the same way they approved the vaccine to women years ago.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 11:56 AM
3

Most women are also asymptomatic. Only a small fraction get cervix cancer. That doesn't mean they shouldnt the the vaccine. I agree that the risk of cervix cancer is higher that penis cancer, but doesn't mean men shouldn't be vaccinated. Vaccines protect men and oemen, vaccines doesn't work 100% and everyone should be vaccinated to protect everyone. Isn't like women don't benefit from men vaccination and men don't benefit from women vaccination. The vaccine is now cost effective, so is justified…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 11:53 AM
3

The thing is, she is very unlikable for many people. There's some people that think climate change is a hoax. Many people agree with her views, but don't like her. Then there's people that love her like God. The reality is, she didn't do anything interesting and makes it worse for "non believers" of climate change because her attitude. Now they are even more non believers... Also there's a lot of marketing, all her family are actors, and "decided" to make all her daughters activists. She is an e…
/r/MensRights13/12/19 07:17 AM
7

This is why "small percentage". Isn't a small percentage or a small amount,but I know people that pay a lot more. Looks like the had a good enough attorney.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 01:13 PM
1

The law has some logic, the problem is that some people abuse from it. This is a clear case of her abusing her gender to make false reports and is trying to milk the man all she can. And this doesn't even look very bad for the man as he is a executive and looks like he makes a ton of money, so is a "small percentage", but imagine if he is poor. He would be jailed or without means to survive. A more human law is needed, a law that protects both humans. Also USA marriage laws look shitty if you co…
/r/MensRights09/12/19 12:48 PM
1

Choose well. Better alone than with crazy...
/r/MensRights03/12/19 05:33 PM
-2

Well, that happens everywhere everyday, in all medical systems, private, public, etc. Isn't something exclusive of NHS...
/r/MensRights01/12/19 02:03 AM
1

You lack knowledge it seams. NHS even pays penis prosthesis surgery and those are expensive. Erectile disfunction treatments get the same financing that anticonceptive pills in most places. Also you can get vasectomies for free. You want a pill to avoid pregnancy? Well unfortunately we don't have one, labs are researching a lot about that, but isn't a easy thing. There's a lot of money to be made by pharmaceutical companies in that. Family planning is the general name of education about contrace…
/r/MensRights01/12/19 01:19 AM
-3

Because men die before (less chronic diseases), and during young ages usually requiere 0 medical attention. So a women will requiere always more money, even being healthy as a men. Just giving you context, smoking was very profitable for governments, because killed young people, and smokers payed taxes.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 08:04 PM
1

That is a bad argument. NHS is very good, and give treatments to man issue also. Women could use the same argument in erectile disfunction. Pregnancy care usually benefit men and women alike. Family planning usually benefit men and women. The fact that my GF as access to contraception benefits me. That is the same argument of private healthcare vs public healthcare and is very individualistic.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 08:00 PM
3

Ya, but Gleason 7 (4+3) has a high probability of metastasis, but a Gleason 7 (3+4) doesn't. This is why to make decisions based on probability, and patient opinion. This applies to many cancers. PSA isn't useless. This is why population screening isn't recoommended, but we shouldnt stop to provide information and opportunistic screening, and PSA is an important tool. Only a small percentage die because of prostate cancer, but being such a prevalent issue, even that small percentage is significa…
/r/MensRights30/11/19 07:45 PM
1

That is wrong. PSA is useful, the problem is that prostate cancer grows slow. Because of it, many men died from other causes other than prostate cancer, so a treatment (usually surgery or radiotherapy) was "useless" and lead to erectile disfunction. This is called overtreatment. Because of that American guidelines stopped recommending psa testing, an error that lead to increase of death by prostate cancer. Europeans then came up studies that show that overtreatment is preferable. This changed th…
/r/MensRights30/11/19 06:35 PM
2

In an unnecessary surgery. Like any surgery can have problems. If you cut too much, erection pain. If the patient have develops fibrosis on the cut, can reduce penis sensibility and impotency. Circumcised men can have sex for more time (less sensibility), this was previously thought as a good thing, more orgams to women, now recent studies prove that is false. Uncircumcised men make, because of friction, etc, women orgams quicker. While the number or orgasms don't change a lot between 2 groups, …
/r/MensRights21/11/19 11:17 PM
1

Reduces diseases on 3rd world countries without access to basic hygiene. No proof that in 1st world countries it has any benefit.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 05:24 PM
1

Takes the same time to clean a uncircumcised penis. Or you don't wash your penis like ever?
/r/MensRights21/11/19 05:22 PM
2

If you want is fine, if you have problems ( circumcision can be done for medical issues) is fine. "Enforce" it to general populations isn't fine. Complications are uncommon, but if I told you that you have 0.1% of complications you would want to be that 1000.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 05:20 PM
1

You don't wash your penis with water and soap? Is the same thing.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 05:12 PM
2

Cleaning a uncircumcised penis is soap and water and takes the same effort as a uncircumcised penis. I don't get that argument.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 05:10 PM
4

Days are nice, mainly to promote health issues awareness. This is why they are usually promoted. The TV newsthat I saw today had some time dedicated to men health issues like prostate cancer, works related issues with doctors explaining things. It was nice to see.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 09:42 PM
39

That is nice, and reduce the probability of drama. I hope that one day we can be proud to be men without all drama, is these little details that promote normalization.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 09:33 PM
3

I think that is Angelina Jolly
/r/MensRights15/11/19 06:09 PM
1

Not comparable. This would be the same as vasectomy for insurance fraud without men consent.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 10:15 PM
2

Ya, but they have 0 real propositions that benefit men, they are just anti feminism, because they want to be the reverse of other parties. Just populists being populists. While they are more pro men rights than some parties, I still didn't see any real push from them to men rights, but ambiguous prepositions. Some other parties had more concrete laws to push men parental rights, that would benefit us better.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 12:51 PM
1

http://www.give.org/charity-reviews/national/health/movember-foundation-in-culver-city-ca-20251 click on finances
/r/MensRights05/11/19 11:49 AM
1

The only way is to interact with people. Get to k ow them and know their limits. Also change your concept of friendship. In the end you never choose friendships, they always choose you, because in the end you need that other people like to be with you. I don't know your circumstances, but looks like you didnt interact with people when you were young? Better than reading a book that will not adapt to your circumstances, maybe is better to seek help from a professional to pin point your own social…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 02:56 PM
1

Ya, thats the thing. The ideias maybe aren't bad, but as oc says, those communities are pretty toxic. I understand that their personal experiences sometimes are bad, but entering in a spiral of negativism and hate is worse. But those communities promote that. The thing is, while we can understand those movements, we shouldnt promote or defend those toxic ideias.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 10:11 AM
1

Only you are saying that women are lazy. If that is your conclusion after you read that you have very bad reading comprehension. You are creating misunderstanding interpretations so you can call us bad, when no one is saying anything bad against women. Women are as capable as men, and vice versa. The thing is that we have different interests. Women get so much support, that is descrimination against men, so they get in "dominated" by men work jobs. We men don't get any support to get in women do…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 05:10 PM
1

Bro, the ones that never acknowledged that men have problems too, are feminists. You can't say anything without: women have it worse. Feminism ignores everything that isn't straight related with women.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 12:58 PM
1

Ya, I'm agreeing with you.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 09:32 PM
1

No one in his/her full capacity thinks feminism is fair. Only feminists.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 09:24 PM
1

Nothing wrong with this, the problem is the double standards.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 02:50 PM
1

This humanity in a nutshell. People are very self-centered, and everything that helps them they are fine with it, but if you reverse it they go nuts. It's impossible to have an argument with those, they always try to make you the bad person, because they are so smart.
/r/MensRights20/09/19 04:00 PM
1

What is surprising is that something that's is so common sense only is now getting attention...
/r/MensRights18/09/19 02:15 PM
1

Not wanting to enter in details, but even good movements don't stay true to their roots all the time. Feminism is more about make all men criminals and exclude dem from everything. In my country if a woman accuses me from a crime I'm always guilty, because by law, everything a man does is from a power position, so we deserve more punishment than women. That's fucked up. I don't want less penalty, I want that women get the same penalty as us men.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 11:58 AM
1

I don't give a fuck about girls scouts. Girls scouts are shit, doesn't mean that everyone should be like that. Is ridicule that some people here think that we should be shit just because others are shit... Let's be the same that we criticize...
/r/MensRights16/09/19 07:32 PM
1

Too much drama. If you think that is a problem, nice, but I think is very positive that an organization like that promotes gender equality. Some poeple on this sub should be more open minded and stop seeing only what the others do worse, but see what we do better...
/r/MensRights16/09/19 07:24 PM
1

Good values the girls can learn too.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 07:16 PM
1

But that is completely fine. Boys and girls should be educated together, so they understand each other when they grow up. That understanding is our best weapon against feminism.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 05:26 PM
1

I would like to point some issues. Feminism isn't about equality. But not all people that considere themselves feminists aren't okay with it. Many people are just going after the mainstream definition of feminism, without thinking a lot about it. Now, I think you are overeating over a few points. Usually people don't defend feminism. They defend women. Some people over here go very extreme against females, when the majority of females accept our points. Females aren't our enemy, only the ideolog…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 05:19 PM
1

No one saw Ghostbusters movie. The new James Bond movie we have no fucking idea about the plot. I can figure a couple of good plots that can make all the famale Bond acceptable. You only gave me 2 mainstream situations, one criticized by everyone, and another that we have no idea of the plot. You are the kind of people that gives bad name to the movement, the movement isn't about hating everything women are on, is about defend our rights, and to do it we need the help of all women that agrees wi…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 08:18 AM
1

Please do so. I would love to see where we have lack of movies with male has main char.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 01:07 PM
1

We had all the time movies that a man was the hero. Having a couple of movies that women are the hero is okay if not forced. We still have good action movies with men. John Wick is amazing, love it, entertaining, violence, everything, like a afternoon movie in the 90's, full of violence. Don't worry is not that theres no more mvoies that men lead, also you have old ones.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 08:10 PM
1

To me is very well done. This is the kind of things that make patients ask about issues during their checkups. This is strong data that makes people scared enough. You can't explain the gray areas of prostate cancer in a poster, that makes people to stop seeking treatment. Those things must be explained by professionals. If you work in marketing you should now that you can put anymore text and you need this kind of things to engage people.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 01:54 PM
1

Ya, maybe should have mor info, but I imagine this is part of a bigger campaign.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 11:17 AM
1

Advicing you family to get check ups, being aware of the diseases. Prostate treatment isn't white or black, is very greyish. But people must be conscious of the treatment and act acourdling their decisions. Is important that people are awere that prostate cancer kills. This is the base of all cancer screening promotion: get check up because cancer kills.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 10:11 AM
1

There a reason it was only market to women at first. The risk is a lot bigger to them. The vaccine was very expensive, we didn't know if the benefit/risk was acceptable to men. Even the usage in women was that clear. Then results came out and now we are shifting to universal vaccination, that's excellent. Is a win-win for men and women all over the world.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 08:50 AM
1

You can have an opinion. We men and women live in the same world so we should be active. The problem is that some people aren't constant. Is bad for me but I'm fine if you do it on others. That's the problem. Fgm is comparable with esthetic circumcision. So we should join forces, not say 'mine is worse'. That doesn't fix a thing.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 05:19 PM
1

Can't wait for men using makeup and lips gloss ads xD
/r/MensRights14/08/19 10:52 AM
1

Would a man go to jail for a similar situation? Usually they don't either. That's the point.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:18 AM
1

Well, next time someone check her criminal report: "sexual assault". You are going to put her on jail? For what? The dude is happy with the sentence, so I'm okay with that.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 10:30 AM
1

I hope he gets his million.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 06:29 PM
1

The thing is, most of the women agree with our problems. They want the same shit as we do. Neutral laws, equal rights and duties. The problem is that they aren't vocal as feminazis. That's the difference.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 03:06 PM
1

Autotranslated. Here's the news of the leader that kidnapped her son: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.elmundo.es%2Fespana%2F2019%2F04%2F01%2F5ca1f3affc6c833c0b8b462d.html
/r/MensRights26/07/19 10:53 PM
1

The problem to me is that they are using shitty arguments to gain traction in vocal groups like feminists. Abortion is a concept and moral issue, affects men and women. The problem is that those movements bring flashy slogans and get pissed of that it brings people against abortion with the same level of slogans. It's sad that people can't say things other than: "women right'," it's against god", etc
/r/MensRights22/06/19 09:08 AM
1

You are right, but is the only way to create impact. People are scared of breast cancer and today also should be of prostate cancer. We are living a lot more years, and now prostate cancer is a real issue. Prostate cancer research only gets a fraction of the money of breast cancer. We should create awareness so we can improve treatments and protocols to save more people. The only way to do it is with strong facts.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 02:01 PM
1

Let's make it clear. Breast cancer killed more, but thanks to screening, thank god, women can have a good treatment many time curative. Also it afects younger women that prostate cancer affects men. Prostate cancer is only now a problem, because only now men are living till a age that almost everyone has prostate cancer. Many men die with prostate cancer but not of prostate cancer, because is a very slow cancer. This is the problem with prostate cancer, overtreatment, should we treat and let men…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 01:48 PM
5

Fars are shit no matter if left or right.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 12:01 PM
3

The comments are: 'I don't want to be in a unisex bathroom because men are sexual predators.'
/r/MensRights03/03/19 04:20 PM
5

My experience tells me that it counts but medically they are treated differently. Usually people that trys committing suicide need to be in a safe environment in a hospital, but unless psychiatrists detect real intent to suicide they don't do it. Women and people on the cities try a lot more suicides, but men and people that live in rural places actually commit suicide a lot more. That is the difference. Usually by the way they try to commit suicide you can detect the intention to die or not.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 07:02 PM
63

Also attempts is different from trying to die. Many those attempts are to get attention. In psychiatry trying to suicide 5 minutes before your family gets home is totally different from jump from a 8th floor and survive by miracle. People that wants to die knows how to do it and rarely they don't succeed.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 02:37 PM
6

Just tried to explain why in USA circumcision is pushed like a good thing, giving extra info that other comments didn't supply for future reference. I even upvoted for for visibility, nothing personal. Is a common misconception that we should dismiss and to do it every small amount of info is important. And your prior vision of the issue is pretty valid taking in account the info you had and the way that data was presented to you. Please don't take it personally.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 12:26 PM
1

No health benefits. I'm from Europe and were we only do circumcision for health issues basically, and we learn that there's no study that shows real benefits of circumcision on developed countries. There's a study made in underdeveloped countries that relate circumcision with a reduction with sexual transmitted diseases that is pushed really hard to try to prove that circumcision is good, but with they tried to extrapolate that to developed countries theres no benefits thanks to good hygiene. Al…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 11:23 AM
2

Fulfilled by men and women slaves.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 09:18 AM
1

Because critics suck. You go to the cinema to have fun, not to watch 3 hours of Swedish cinema... Baywatch is a good movie? Ehhhh, but sure is entertaining...
/r/MensRights26/02/19 08:52 AM
1

Lets not forget that Ghost busters shitty reboot got fresh certified on rotten tomatoes. Reviews on those sites of this kind of movies mean nothing because studios buy reviews, and fanboys vote everything with 10. I could agree that the last avengers is a 7.5 but a 8,5? Of course not, to me that score is for very good movies, but Marvel fanboys upvote everything with a 10.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:55 AM
13

But WW is a good character from DC, and it was a good movie with a likable actress.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:45 AM
2

The students claimed the university only spoke to two white women who were at the house when the encounter happened because the school thought the women would band together in favor of the accuser, which they did not. This is fucked up but also shows that people is fair no matter the sex.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 09:21 AM
1

You are a new account and I really don't know if you are trolling or not.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 09:13 AM
1

This is a big social problem in India. Has the article says: In many cases, false rape accusations are simply the result of parents covering up the “shame” of an unmarried daughter having sex. Research carried out in 2015 by journalist Rukmini Shrinivasan, who worked for the Hindu newspaper at the time, revealed that when parents discover their unmarried daughters are in a sexual relationship, their horror at potential “dishonour” to the family name leads many to make spurious allegations of rap…
/r/MensRights12/02/19 11:13 AM
1

Everyone there is disposable if they are poor. Also this applies to women there too. Forcing a 14 years old children marry a 50 years old isn't liberty. We can be pro men rights for awareness of many problems men face in our world, but life in India isn't easy to anyone, and aren't easy to women mainly because of caste system, that is very unfair. Imagine we have many problems in our society with a law that defends 'equal rights' imagine living in a place were you are considered by local law inf…
/r/MensRights10/02/19 06:35 PM
1

You have no fucking idea you are talking about. India is ruled by caste system, and in that system women are always shit compared with men. Also because of that there's a rape culture because poor people are shit so they can be killed, raped, etc. Is a system that affects men and women but women are always shit on comparison. India isn't fair, and to start to change that they need extreme solutions that could bring equality fast enough. It's unacceptable what happens in India to women.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 06:27 PM

They have almost everything just for women,even though they need more. India is a place that being a women is a real problem, because they are considered the low of the lowest. So imagine a country here cows are more important than people being a woman...
/r/MensRights10/02/19 04:41 AM
1

You would like to know that P&G own Gillette, Astra, Permasharp, and many other brands.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 10:33 AM
38

It's good, but in my opinion next time try to remove political point of views and very particular opinions. Why? It reduces the engagement of people that are reading it and have different opinions. Being neutral on those points reduces that problem and let you have the liberty to defend your point of view without being restricted and attacked by opinions/actions associated with those ideologies. Also you start very well, but you should also in the middle focus on issues that are shared with femi…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 10:52 PM
1

Ta after paying lots of money to cover up this history and she cheat on him. A fucked up history.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 12:55 PM
2

Ahh, that's Wilkinson Sword in Europe. I use it instead, same results, and cheaper.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 12:48 PM
7

Avoid doing that, ask help to do it when needed, the same way women do. You shouldn't risk an injury.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 12:33 PM
1

Ya, I agree with you, and I get your point. And the situation is exactly that, we fixed the rights but not the responsibility. But I also like to say that many people that were feminist at that point were actually good people with good intentions. The thing is that today many people (too much) think that being a feminist is a good thing, but the majority of men and women don't think feminism is a good movement. In my friends, except a couple of feminists, think they are a pain in the ass, the pr…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 03:47 PM
1

It my opinion versus your opinion. In my opinion, you need to put everything on context. Those times que context was very different and it made sense. My last point is related with the removal of the context of the 'wage gap' that feminist groups use to 'prove' their point, forgetting the lack of men right in parenting.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 02:37 PM
3

I completely agree, exception to medical conditions, this is mutilation. We need to reduce this practice.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 10:33 AM
4

Witch burning is pretty illegal...
/r/MensRights23/01/19 10:26 AM
1

Gender studies made sense, in some amounts, in the 70-80s. The problem is that it grew out of proportion. Feminism made sense in those times also, everyone would call themself feminists without a problem. Now we are in the other extreme. Now the so called feminists are just a hand full of people and even the majority of women don't agree with them. The funny part is so women can be equal, mainly in work, they need to lose rights, mainly in maternity, and men need to get rights in paternity. But …
/r/MensRights23/01/19 09:59 AM
1

Never denie facts. Even if they go against your argument, because in a conflict that can snowball. I don't know your time-line, or how you have to do the presentation. But when I had to do works like that I dropped many bombshells and ended up with small videos on the PowerPoint super light, that ended with every beutiful images,etc,etc. For example you can you can make a small video of 30secs of what means to be a man: A man crying, a man in a romantic way with a woman, a man working in a bad a…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 12:40 AM
1

Because those people don't reason. They think man rights are no more woman rights because it's their objective with feminism, that's why they fell its something against them. Also to reply any question they just use the same slogans over and over again. They are saying that by memory so they can reason. They don't hear. That is the problem with extremists.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 12:07 AM
1

Is this even real?
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:49 PM
1

Because the ad was negative reinforcement. If they made the same thing but in a positive way everyone would be okay with it, the mesage would be the same. The ad was "Men need to be reeducated", that is a bad idea. If the ad was "This is what a good man is" would be a good ad.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 11:30 AM
44

If you thing we should make politics based on statistics, you are being very unfair to all the minorities that are victims of social problems, and you are indirectly promoting xenophobic and racist actions. An ad that says that the majority of men are toxic and we should be reeducated is a bad ad.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 02:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter