Delheru Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Kathy Griffin whines about her fee for hosting NYE telecast on CNN, tries to claim gender pay gap, is firmly slapped down. In this particular case, a segment of the liberal base is definitely dumb enough to swallow this. No need for whataboutism, though I'd be careful translating this as showing conservatives as highly intelligent.	/r/PussyPassDenied	22/06/21 03:17 PM
1	Oxford University will 'feminise' its philosophy reading lists to appeal more to women. But more women go to Oxford University than men anyway. A World Class University infiltrated by feminists. Why is it always Oxford? They seem to be the most sexist and racist university in the UK. I've been out for almost a decade now, but back then it never was particularly noticeable to me at least. There were a few SJW types around, but the debates at the union were pretty hard ball certainly still, and often involved topics that'd land you in remarkably hot water on twitter that's for sure. There was that silliness about removing Rhodes from Oriel, which got a "fuck off" response IIRC, though obv…	/r/MensRights	16/03/18 05:43 AM
2	University offers the first ever scholarship for men, in Vet Science a course with over 90% female students. The feminists have a furious meltdown Yet if you destroy any gains from trying, all you have done is guaranteed everyone a shit outcome. Most of those that create enough value to support 10+ people at the average gdp/cap would gtfo from any country with enforced equality of outcome so fast your head would spin.	/r/PussyPassDenied	12/02/17 07:13 AM
3	Mandatory DNA testing at birth could instigate gender equality At 4.3M births per year and $600 for each test, that's just $2.58 billion per year. At such bulk the price will drop fantastically. I wouldn't be surprised if some company could offer the whole thing for $100m to to government. Price certainly won't be an issue.	/r/MensRights	20/09/10 10:28 AM
4	Mandatory DNA testing at birth could instigate gender equality Well. If you foil someone robbing you, they will have no money, and they will have to go get welfare (they wouldn't be mugging you if hey had plenty of money, duh!) Same logic applies.	/r/MensRights	20/09/10 10:22 AM
2	IAmA Guy that has a father that is on the run because my mom wants $13,000 a month, AMA Kudos to your ex-husband for taking a mature approach to it.	/r/MensRights	06/09/10 03:27 PM
3	IAmA Guy that has a father that is on the run because my mom wants $13,000 a month, AMA Oh well that explains some things. Seldom does true evil come in non-devout form... it's just the target of devoutness that varies.	/r/MensRights	06/09/10 02:28 PM
5	IAmA Guy that has a father that is on the run because my mom wants $13,000 a month, AMA Actually it can hurt for the kids to be on one side. Judge's don't like that. This is retarded. I mean I can understand why it'd be alarming if the kids had been excessively exposed to the parent that was being favoured (IE they are all for the mom/dad who had custody 98% of the time), but in a normal relationship? Hell, only retarded judges wouldn't like that. Clean case (or I bet it would be if they both sided with the mom). Every lawyer we've spoken to that we've told them he used our support…	/r/MensRights	06/09/10 01:45 PM
5	IAmA Guy that has a father that is on the run because my mom wants $13,000 a month, AMA I mean if the kids are obviously rational and side with one parent, how does that not put the partner that the kids are against at a serious disadvantage? Facts? Seem to be with the dad. Kids? Seem sane, all that they say about their mom seems accurate, as well as what they say about their dad. Why should I give ridiculous amounts of money to this woman? The whole thing just seems so insane that I probably would have gone to jail for (very genuine) contempt of the court, had I been in your fathe…	/r/MensRights	06/09/10 01:31 PM
3	IAmA Guy that has a father that is on the run because my mom wants $13,000 a month, AMA I can see her becoming religious at some point, as if that would fix things (though I guess it makes sense if your subconscious is trying to hold a big sign saying "if hell is real, we're SO going to end up there!")	/r/MensRights	06/09/10 09:17 AM
10	IAmA Guy that has a father that is on the run because my mom wants $13,000 a month, AMA Curiously - since you out-earned him - did you end up having to pay HIM something? I mean in an equal society and all...	/r/MensRights	06/09/10 09:14 AM
1	IAmA Guy that has a father that is on the run because my mom wants $13,000 a month, AMA How did the judge not find this relevant for sentencing?	/r/MensRights	06/09/10 09:12 AM
19	IAmA Guy that has a father that is on the run because my mom wants $13,000 a month, AMA Under the circumstances I would find anything Vladimir did morally acceptable.	/r/MensRights	06/09/10 09:10 AM
1	"The fact is, it's only 2-year-olds and violent men who use violence to get what they want." - Terry O'Neill, president of the National Organization for Women Only once it starts leaking toward Tier 2. I mean it's merely annoying as long as it doesn't genuinely hurt (and it rather shows that she feels she's your intellectual inferior - if she wasn't, she'd use emotional barbs)... I'd suspect emotional amuse would be a lot bigger problem than the "Tier 3" violence (if incredibly difficult to do anything about).	/r/MensRights	19/08/10 03:02 PM
2	"The fact is, it's only 2-year-olds and violent men who use violence to get what they want." - Terry O'Neill, president of the National Organization for Women The funny thing is it seems to be tiered (no real sources for this) at least in the UK: Tier 1: Homicidal. This is where in the UK it seems to be women stabbing men that rule the tier (in Finland it was men murdering their whole families and then themselves, so it seems more cultural than gender based). Tier 2: Beating-the-shit-out-of. Generally dominated by men simply because it's hard for a woman to manage this level of abuse against a male that is stronger. Tier 3: Just general damage that hu…	/r/MensRights	17/08/10 06:59 AM
2	A Man's Right to Choose? - TIME Admirably fatalistic of him I felt. Martyrdom complex is pretty annoying to see from the sidelines even.	/r/MensRights	26/07/10 10:56 AM
1	Norwegian feminists look to impose European-wide "equality" law that would require all public and private companies to have a minimum of 40% women on all boards If there's a position for which a male is qualified, there will, by any reasonable measure of probability, also be a qualified female Even if the sheer level of interest in high level of business is already VERY tilted. Your claim would make some sense if the major testable stat - founding of successful companies - would be 50/50. So how many of Norway's 50 biggest companies (or fastest growing companies) founders are female? In most countries the percentage is ridiculously low. IF there must be…	/r/MensRights	14/07/10 05:38 PM
2	Norwegian feminists look to impose European-wide "equality" law that would require all public and private companies to have a minimum of 40% women on all boards It leaves an escape clause. When 80% of my company's board must be women, I'll happily convert to Islam, seeing Sharia as the lesser of two evils.	/r/MensRights	14/07/10 05:31 PM