TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Delicious-Agency-824 Archive

View 5 posts and 247 comments by Delicious-Agency-824 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Men should pay for the children they made. But not $250k a month no matter how rich he is. Women should be able to decide amount of child support before conception.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 03:02 AM
1

Is it normal? Yes if you are married. So do not get married.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 05:33 PM
-2

Simple. Child support laws. The true effect is making having children very expensive for rich men. The money is not even spent on the children. The money goes to the mom. Often the father is forced to fund mutilation of his own son. Are there ways a rich man can have children without exposing himself to exorbitant child support? Not that I know off. This is genocide.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 05:32 PM
2

Women initiate divorce because marriage laws are designed to encourage divorce. The true purpose is to prevent rich men from having many children.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 04:17 AM
1

Here is another good advice to get karma. Say men shouldn't get married on MensRights whenever you see people still confused. Easy karma. Why? So many men understand. Purpose of marriage is to bankcrupt rich men and exterminate them. So women pick poor guys instead justifying more welfare.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 10:09 AM
4

Here is a good marriage advice. Don't get married.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 05:48 PM
-3

Not pretty not thin not young. Not a real woman. Had dicks once, no..... Lol
/r/MensRights16/01/24 05:35 PM
1

I am libertarian. Many men right issue benefit men. High alimony? Risky dealing with women? False rape accusations. Those actually hurt many women and benefit poor men. Imagine if rich men can just pay women for sex and child support on agreed terms. The those rich men will get many women. There are many smart pretty women willing to fuck and get knocked up for money. Are they expensive? Compared to alimony, child support, life time in jail for false rape. The costs are nothing for rich men. So …
/r/MensRights27/11/23 06:49 AM
0

What is wrong with wanting smarter children for yourself? You want to knock up ugly women?
/r/MensRights16/11/23 04:32 AM
0

I don't need love. I need sex. And genetically superior children. A woman giving it to me deserves pay irrelevant on whether she does it for money or love.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 05:31 PM
1

Feminism is a lie.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 04:10 PM
1

I mean the meaning is not precise. Paying prostitute is definitely not dehumanizing. Using words like dehumanizing makes prostitution looks like genocide.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 04:59 PM
1

Fixed. Seriously. What does it mean to dehumanized men or women? Give specific samples. Even genocide is not dehumanizing. Dehumanizing means treating humans as if they are not human. We mass murder each other precisely because they are our competitors, threat, or convenient scapegoats and that's precisely because they are humans. Paying women is also not dehumanizing. To the opposite. We pay someone precisely because they are human. Do we pay other species for anything? Nope. To the opposite lo…
/r/MensRights02/11/23 06:59 AM
2

As a man our job is to spread our seed. Not listening to women's problem. If they have a problem they can ask us to solve it. Most of women problems are money. They ask for it we pay for sex problems solved. Win win trades. Somehow society wants to make things complex. So they got bullshit after bullshit. Of course eating shit is problematic.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 06:41 AM
-24

You sound a lot like feminists for men. Dehumanizing what the hell is that? Speak clearly brother. I know dating is shitty for men. It's much easier to just pay and make clear explicit deals. No body is dehumanizing anyone under capitalism. Oh ya. Women will always try to scam first.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 03:20 AM
0

What does respect women mean? Not paying them? Not treating them as sex objects? Then no. Smart pretty women don't mind. Why should I care what ugly women think?
/r/MensRights31/10/23 06:38 AM
2

I would rather be an incel than a simp. I would never want to spend money on useless people.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 06:17 AM
1

It's deliberate. Most men think that women are evil. I think people are evil. However laws pretty much ensure they have incentives to do so. If it's up the woman they will ask for a reasonable amount. Otherwise they don't get you, someone rich. Otherwise they have to settle for someone poorer. Obviously someone poorer would support current child support system. It's hard to compete against rich people if child support isn't fucked.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 06:21 AM
5

You just need to learn how to live like a man. We are blamed for everything. So? We have 2 options Ignore the phenomena and appease. Be a man. Take care of someone else's children bla bla. Realize that most people are assholes. Most see us as competitors. Most women see us as some other dude to loot. So realize it's what they want and AVOID any circumstances where you can be forced to support someone else children. There are many. I chose 2nd one all the way. Realizing people will hate me anyway…
/r/MensRights30/10/23 12:35 AM
1

And it works for women right? Society is encouraging it. Heroes under feminism is not women making money providing sex for men. They celebrate women that can bring down rich smart men to jail.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 01:00 PM
2

Useless for what? For reproduction men are more expendable. For making money women are far less cost effective. Deep inside we want to reproduce. But that's the thing. In most cases the only thing women useful for are sex and reproduction and the only thing men are useful for is make jg money or provide services worth paying. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. What is wrong is thinking it's wrong.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 12:59 PM
2

Because men's right issue actually aren't popular. Many men and women are better of if men and women treated differently even though that's unfair. Take a look at anti polygamy laws. Mainly hurt men because men do polygamy more. Or is it? Most poor men support anti polygamy laws. Make it easier for them to get a wife. Women themselves often prefer money than exclusivity love or sanctity. Such women are often shamed for being shallow. A lot like men are called shallow for wanting beautiful women …
/r/MensRights28/10/23 07:42 PM
4

Interesting. What does this do.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 07:35 PM
1

Because we are weak. We are the weaker sex They want echo chamber so they can figure out the next bullshit to bolster their iron fist powah. We want open debate because we want to show them they're wrong. They don't care they're right or wrong. They care they get what they want. A libertarian once complained. Leftists have goals. We have principles. That's the thing. We don't even have goals. How the fuck we win. If there's anything we can learn from leftists is we too should have a goal. And pr…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 01:31 PM
1

On second thought. Good idea. You can do it in India. And if it's through surrogate you can pay for really good genes. You can pay super smart women with genetically superior iq and beauty.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 10:57 AM
2

I am successful. How? I pick trades that doesn't depend on other humans. Most other humans are disgusting and should be treated at arm length. I trade bitcoin, invent algo. That's it. No need for other humans.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 10:42 AM
1

I think so. But among guys in mensa I am one of the richest. So asd helped. Asd people are over represented in high earning money even if iq is taken into account.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 10:33 AM
1

I have been saying this a lot. Are there ways to keep child support reasonable? For example I have heard that if you have 5 children each will get less. So have one and quitting seems like a bad strategy. It seems that women just like any people response to monetary incentives a lot. But pointing that out is sexist.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 07:23 AM
1

Yes. But raising children as a single father is tricky. My children's mom are busy and we almost don't sleep when our second son cried. Fortunately laws in my country is not shitty. She is better off staying than taking my children and get money from me.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 07:21 AM
3

Check the laws. It depends on the laws not the women.if the law is shitty the women will be shitty.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 07:14 AM
3

Just ask lawyers about child support in your state. You can get that reduced by having many children. In Texas there is a max. I don't understand choosing a woman as rich as I am. I a top 1 percenter and most 1 percenter is men. In south east Asia I just pay women. In US there are laws that makes that simple concept tricky.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 07:14 AM
1

Totally agree. Outside marriage all that can cost you is child support.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 07:12 AM
3

She's just ugly and bitter about it. Explain most feminism. Beautiful women will be pretty without make up.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 06:34 AM
-10

Nope. Beauty fertility pressure is real. Pressure to be rich is real. So? So. That's life. We should just embrace it. As for make up I have a simple solution. Take her to facial or swimming or shower together. Video chat would also reveal that she is below standard. Not wanting video chat? Not submissive. Move on. If women looks ugly without male up, leaves. Also test her iq. Higher iq women have better genes. It's so easy to get women if you already have one. It's as if an extra mistress or con…
/r/MensRights27/10/23 06:31 AM
-4

A lot of benefit in being aspie. If yiu have high iq. I realized faster that I can't read others mind. So I live my life as if those doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 04:39 PM
16

Or stop caring about sympathy. You are on your own. You show your back you are fucked. And the natural response to that is to also stop feeling sympathy for others.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 04:37 PM
1

Seriously. I should say how to be a polygamist cost effectively. How? Just pay women to give you children. More cost effective than marrying them or risking palimony. Some feminists will call me incel for that because I got to pay to get laid. But I don't mind paying. I have a few. I spend less money on those women than other men that hit women of the same quality. In their book, it's incel because I pay.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 04:43 PM
-6

This is what I am concerned with with Dany rape conviction. If Dany just put gun and force the girl to have sex then yea it's rape. But if they have sex regularly and Dany put drug it should be a lesser charge. Imagine if I have an ugly woman drugging me to have sex. That's horrible. But if my gf do that then well. If she is my gf that means she is pretty enough and smart enough for me to have children with. So what?
/r/MensRights25/10/23 04:17 PM
17

Men do only want mainly one thing from women Sex We can get everything else from other men cost effectively Seriously. What else should we want from women? Sure love caring and someone to take care good children and pass on great genes to our children. Those are not main and very related to sex it's usually one package of it. And women? Women do mainly want one thing from men. Money or something that's usually obtained by money. Things like financial support a place to live etc. Financial suppor…
/r/MensRights25/10/23 11:56 AM
1

A lot will. Often it only took one.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 09:44 PM
1

According to who? If I reject a woman it's because she's not good enough for me.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 09:11 PM
8

Intersting tactic. Say you have a few girlfriends and they call you incel.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 08:44 PM
2

They are always welcome to compete against men
/r/MensRights24/10/23 06:43 PM
2

Make sex transactional. That means you will be glad you are rejected. Not wasting time with worthless women that prefer someone else. Money makes women makes decisions more quickly. No means good bye. The problem is not rejection. The problem is wasting time and money on worthless relationship. I would very much prefer being rejected than marrying and pay alimony Marriage sucks anyway. In my country yiu can just pay and there is no reason to spend more.
/r/MensRights23/10/23 03:13 AM
2

Both are okay. For some reasons in some sites like reddit you got this sort of things. In other sites like sugar sites both men and women can have their preferences. But what are their preferences? Men always want young smart thin submissive women with low body count. Women always want, in sugar sites at least, money. And on sugar sites people just say what they want. It's absurd to buy something you don't want right? Ignore marriage and free sex. That is heavily regulated. In marriage most peop…
/r/MensRights23/10/23 01:36 AM
5

Because if you are a man and you show vulnerability they fuck you up. Don't. Be invincible. When that doesn't work. Act invincible. It's like asking why it is okay for me to be old and fat. Well. If you don't wanna date then be whatever you want.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 12:57 PM
1

In south east Asia you can easily stand out by offering money.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 06:56 AM
1

I need to see more detail how some guys end up being declared father outside marriage if it's not his kids.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 08:35 AM
-2

I mean not all women want to destroy your life. Some women just want your money and they are willing to provide value for that money, sex for example. Not necessarily means not all. And I am fine with that. In my country I just pay and financially support and that's it. I know in US it's difficult.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 08:34 AM
-1

I think it should not be up to the states It should be up to the mother themselves which they can agree before conception. If a man says I want 50 percent custody if you leave and the woman look ah the man is rich enough handsome enough compared to alternative, it's her right to agree.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 05:49 AM
1

Ah I missed that. But what does dove and the rest have anything to do?
/r/MensRights21/10/23 03:52 AM
1

Which jurisdiction? Looks like a land mine men should avoid.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 03:48 AM
1

Stop complaining start finding solution. Nvm. Complaining is fine if it helps us see problems. Even if government want to do that they can't easily do that. There has to be loopholes. Usually if there are loopholes there are bullshit covering it. So if they bullshit about it by saying relationship should be based on love or whatever there is a loophole. How do you avoid supporting someone else's children? There has to be a way. In Indonesia you don't even have to be responsible for your own chil…
/r/MensRights21/10/23 03:19 AM
1

Unless the children are my children I really don't care.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 01:17 AM
12

Not my children not my problem.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 01:17 AM
-5

First don't get married. Second exactly as you said. That's the law. It's not what women necessarily want. It's what society expect and insist she should want. Many smart beautiful women want fair win win arrangements they are called whore gold digger and so on. But mess up women that want to backstab you is strong and independent. Marriage is shit. It's society that's shitty. Not women. Lack of capitalism is shitty
/r/MensRights21/10/23 01:15 AM
3

I would protect my family and friends and that's it. But you got a point. That is why everything need to be transactional. It's women's absolute right not to have sex with me. They are often ugly anyway and I can get better ones. It is also my right, in fact, obligation, not to spend money on women or anyone that doesn't provide value. Because what I mainly want from women is sex and only when they are pretty then yea I do practice forsake all others except a few I knock up. Learn to love yourse…
/r/MensRights21/10/23 12:56 AM
1

Totally agreed. Non explicit deals sucks
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:49 PM
1

Let me know the case. Western countries are fucked but I don't think us can be that fucked up yet. So any woman can just put bill gates or Elon musk as father? Would be weird.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:48 PM
2

Let me know the case. Western countries are fucked but I don't think us can be that fucked up yet. So any woman can just put bill gates or Elon musk as father? Would be weird.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:48 PM
2

How exactly that works? If he isn't married under what circumstances government can force men to pay for children not his?
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:42 PM
3

Even if it's due to socialization so what? The sex with money offers from sugar daddies are less likely to work her ass of studying science.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:27 PM
0

Death penalty for adultery in ancient time actually punish paternity fraud Sex that does not involve paternity fraud are not usually punished. Penalty for seducing a girl for example is just marrying her or pay a fine. A proper way is to pay her dad's bride price first. Look it up. It's in the Bible.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:25 PM
31

How would you avoid responsibility toward children that's not yours anyway?
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:23 PM
8

At this rate I start being convinced that just like child support laws and laws against sex while drunk the purpose is not really to protect minors. The main purpose is to make consensual sex expensive or risky. Even if the woman fake an ID and be a porn star as some of the comment say she is not being charged with anything. But the guy that doesn't intent to break any law go. The states go the extra mile in making consensual sex expensive especially with for rich men. It's a common pattern. Enc…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:33 PM
5

It's one of those legal land mine to keep consensual sex absurdly expensive. It's not really to protect the child or the 16 years old. It's one fuck. He didn't know she is 16.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:20 PM
2

It's interesting. Even idiot or poor people have right to have children at least legally and the rest are forced to pay for it. But somehow rich men do deserve right to have children You know what. So what if we don't. We pay someone to do it for us. See?
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:12 PM
-29

What drug? Dove soap is drug?
/r/MensRights19/10/23 05:51 AM
0

I still don't quite understand why this is legal while Danny got life in prison for rape. Cutting condom is far more heinous than just slightly less consensual sex.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:36 AM
1

What?
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:35 AM
3

You can be forced to pay without paternity tests. Close that loopholes
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:35 AM
2

And curiously. If that same woman just want money and explicitly ask for it, it's legally impossible. The one more willing to spend money are the rich and child support laws demand higher amount from those rich men. So the only way women can get money by getting pregnant is non consensually like this Absurd.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:34 AM
2

I understand the down vote. But this nuance. Morally yes it is unfair that men are treated differently than women. However strategically you should have done anything to protect yourself. It's what being a man is. Realize that society want women to backstab men. Men are second class citizen. The more you realize that the more you can anticipate what the law will do. Societies hate men. If women got rewarded or paid for making men happy society are not happy. Society are happy when women make mon…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:31 AM
-2

It's not just there to impoverished men. It's also there to ration females in equal share for everyone. If child support can be agreed before conception women will just pick a rich guy that would easily commit some amount. I don't think guys like Al Pacino or drake has problems committing $5k per month child support. That means poor guys can't have relationships with women. So many people, left right whatever have laws against commercialization and commodification of sex and reproduction. They w…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:25 AM
2

Don't get married
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:20 AM
7

Why women can do that and men don't?
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:18 AM
-10

A lot of men's right issue can be solved by thinking and preventing things. I for once does not want to have sex with women whose genes and specs are below my standard. The kind of women you want to have sex with is always the same with the kind of women you want to have children with. Smart beautiful young pretty Child support sucks. But if you have more children and the children are really yours then each child cost 5 percent I think. Just knock up more women
/r/MensRights19/10/23 03:17 AM
1

I wouldn't marry. In my country men can just pay women. Reasonable gold digging is fine.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 05:55 AM
2

Men are a lot like ugly women. We got to work.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 05:54 AM
3

A rich sugar daddy doesn't care how rich his woman is. Of course don't do stupid things like getting married. Find some ways to keep child support manageable. You are done
/r/MensRights17/10/23 02:40 AM
0

I noticed that evolutionary biology is rarely talked in reddit. That and micro economy explain most life lessons and interpersonal skill to me A lot of men's right issue can be seen through that lense For example men kill other men more. So we would expect society to also favor women in democracy. We can't change the law but we can get equality for ourselves if we avoid government regulations
/r/MensRights17/10/23 02:38 AM
3

Don't get married
/r/MensRights15/10/23 06:26 PM
1

Smart pretty women that are cost effective for me. Exposing my self to alimony is NOT cost effective. Why am I delusional?
/r/MensRights14/10/23 04:28 PM
2

That's what I mean by writing their own marriage contract. I do think all this insanity has a purpose. Equality. Lesbians, and feminists are simply not happy that pretty woman can make tons of money by just picking the rich.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 04:27 PM
6

Settle? Why the fuck would I settle for a woman just because she loves me. What about if she's fat? Love isn't that important at all compared to beauty or iq or rationality. As long as she loves our children and the children are really mine that's good enough. She can love money for all I care and I don't mind. I settle for smart pretty women that I can get cost effectively and ignore the rest. Do they love me? They say they did. I do love them. But that's not what I am counting on. I mainly car…
/r/MensRights13/10/23 05:11 PM
17

Why don't people just write their own marriage contract.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 04:58 PM
1

I stand corrected. But in sugar sites I do not consider message from ugly woman harassments. I consider it legitimate offer that I will reject. But I do not see that as evil or criminal.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 03:28 PM
1

The market will take care of it. What carte Blanche? If you don't provide value of course employer want others.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 01:08 PM
1

Whatever. Let the employer decide. The market is always fair.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 12:31 PM
1

Making sex transactional leaves that issue out. Find women in sugar sites.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 12:21 PM
2

In online dating there is no harassment. That's just guys trying to flirt with woman. If women can just say no and move on or if women say I wanna date of course some one would ask with me? Imagine selling your house and treat offers like it's harassment. If your house is listed in real estate site it's reasonable you want offers
/r/MensRights13/10/23 05:06 AM
2

Everyone should be treated the same way. That means men have to treat women like men and women treat men Make them compete for our money. He he he... Pick the best to hell with the rest.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 05:00 AM
1

You shouldn't love anyone unconditionally. Like cersei in game of thrones say. Your children are the only one you should live conditionally. Everything else should be transactional
/r/MensRights13/10/23 04:57 AM
1

People are penalized for potential all the time. Interest rate are higher for those who potentially don't pay. I don't see how it's unfair. If you have potential to get pregnant you should just have children or tell your boss yiu have tubectomy.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 06:36 PM
1

And marriage pays a lot too. Just not explicitly. So is selling sex if it were legal and the woman are pretty
/r/MensRights11/10/23 06:33 PM
1

You know. I actually believe that wage gap is the other way around. Women earn more money for less work under capitalism. Wage gape actually favors women by a lot. It will be true under more pure capitalism. It is still true now. Except that because we are not fully capitalistic it's hidden. Think about it. Women, pretty women, work less and yet have higher standard of living than men. Just look at Bill gates ex wife? Bill gates work 60 hours a week. His ex wife worked 10 hours a week at most. E…
/r/MensRights11/10/23 06:20 PM
8

That's the neat part. Men don't. Feminism is actually not men vs women. It's the natural fight between competition and capitalism and communism. Between meritocracy and equality. Libertarian feminists would be natural allies to men's right But radical feminists will do anything to hurt men. And those are not a bug. It's a feature for equality. Recently Danny got life in prison for rape supposedly happening 30 years ago. Also Al Pacino are ordered to pay $30k a month child support. Imagine if the…
/r/MensRights11/10/23 06:08 PM
2

Telling women to just pick someone rich is like telling men to just be ceo. So feminist just hate free choices in transactional sex. Because they want equality. Feminism and diversity is just a variant of communism that's somehow more acceptable than normal communism
/r/MensRights11/10/23 02:39 PM
1

It's progressive and give perverse incentive. Just like child support and alimony. It's progressive and give perverse incentive. Child support and alimony gives women incentives to leave. Amount is proportional to men's income. Income tax encourage poverty discourage income. Proportional to men's income. It's not what would happen naturally under free market. If you go to KFC the price of chicken is constant irrelevant of your income and provide incentive for seller to give you what you want, na…
/r/MensRights10/10/23 04:23 PM
1

Yea. But if you have 2 kids will the child support for the first kid reduced? I have heard depends on the state. Would like to know detail.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 04:22 PM
3

What is interesting is that the only other people that end slavery is the Chinese. But that doesn't last long and far less determined. Ultimately it's white people that end slavery. The reasons are similar. Competition among jurisdiction promote freedom among subjects I think. In US, higher technology in the north means without slavery, the northerner can simply pay those slaves better wage. Slavery was desired by slave owners because they can't compete with northern factory owner's salary. It t…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 11:34 PM
3

Slavery is unfair. So is tax and violent crime. Should black people be forced to repay reparation for all the crime they did and the welfare they received?
/r/MensRights08/10/23 11:29 PM
1

But Texas has cap on child support
/r/MensRights08/10/23 12:48 PM
1

I mean it's up to the woman to choose to leave. The amount is up to the court. But that's stupid. Why can't the woman decides the amount before conception? That way men can know how much knocking her up costs. Sorry for the confusion.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 12:47 PM
1

What do you mean by disenfranchisment? If men are paying child support then his responsibility is mainly money. If the mom and child live with him then his responsibility is still mainly money. We are treated like expendable atm because ugly women can't get rich men otherwise. If rich men can just pay why should any women settle for the ugly. Same way poor men would want rich men to pay a lot of alimony and child support because otherwise rich men will just pay many women and poor men don't get …
/r/MensRights08/10/23 12:46 PM
1

I thought the child support for first kid is also reduced. Why should the first kid got more?
/r/MensRights08/10/23 12:43 PM
2

Most people are friendlier to women than men. When city get conquered the men are killed the woman are mated. It's life. However there are ways to make things more equal. Avoid government. Support free market. Turn deals into smaller pieces you can enforce yourself. If you let government decide like marriage you are fucked. The government will decide that she has no obligation and you have a lot. If you are sugar daddy and pay monthly then things are equal. She leaves you pay other sugar babies.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 05:53 PM
2

All people are terrible.. It's like not writing your passport on your desk because not all people are hackers.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:20 AM
2

Kentucky and Texas?
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:19 AM
2

Bad idea. You want smart pretty young women. Adding rich to the list would greatly degrade your ability to get the pretty young and smart. Also that means you do what feminists want. For men to pick the fat and ugly instead of the hot ones. Find other loopholes.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:19 AM
1

Not up to you. Up to the woman
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:17 AM
1

This is what sadly most people think.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:16 AM
2

Why all in? If you are rich why not just pay the cost of children? Why pay 30k a month like Al Pacino?
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:15 AM
2

Me too. What happened if you have 4-5 children?
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:14 AM
2

Totally agree. Can't afford them don't breed them
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:14 AM
3

Can you have surrogate after vasectomy?
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:11 AM
7

Is the daughter really yours
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:10 AM
2

I think true purpose of child support is to prevent rich men from having children. Bill gates and Elon don't mind paying child support. It's when amount doesn't even go to the children it's there to simply punish men.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:08 AM
1

You know that virtually all NBA players are black right? It's just meritocracy. Not racism. I do not think any club even care to hire or consider skin color when hiring. Hell some. May even want to hire non black. Still virtually all runners and all basket ball players are black. Also Nigerian immigrants are disproportionately doctor. Whatever held black people down it's not racism. Perhaps their mom doesn't pick richer guys or pick guys that don't even stay
/r/MensRights04/10/23 04:51 AM
1

Average iq of black in US is around 13 percent lower. Around 87. Army doesn't hire anyone with iq below 83. If average iq of management is say 120 we would expect typical Asians or white to be over represented by 20 times. It's called standard deviation. Each standard deviation cut off number by some number. Let me check the exact math. It's the same reason why math champion is 80 percent Asian or that nobel prize winner is 40 percent Jewish. Slight increase in IQ average create huge disproporti…
/r/MensRights04/10/23 04:41 AM
1

26 percent is too low. Some jobs require learning. Programming and businessmen are a sample. We are talking about 10 times performance. High iq programmer is 10 times more productive than average iq programmers. This is actually written in mythical men month. It's based on programming project in classes. Top students like me finish the project within a week or a few days. Most people cannot code. Also when jobs require iq it tends to pay far more. All tech billionaires is in mensa. Average iq of…
/r/MensRights04/10/23 04:36 AM
2

Price of pussy is low for poor people but still expensive as fuck for the rich. There are pressures to make women pick the poor
/r/MensRights04/10/23 04:01 AM
1

If they actually say her body her choice and be consistent about it then I am a feminist.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 03:43 AM
1

Really? Libertarian feminists are like that radical feminists are not. If mainstream feminist support sex work then I am a feminist. Seriously. But the fact that prostitution is illegal in all states but Nebraska shows that it can't possibly be true.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 03:43 AM
1

Because you can't pay. Once you realize that many smart pretty women (and I really don't care about the rest) want money then it's easy. If she doesn't want to show pussy you move on. Now that kind of sensible advice is very effective and consensual. If she doesn't like it she can say no you move on. If she's really pretty there is no way she doesn't have choice. Think about it. Yea people will call me misogynist, sexist whatever. I do not care. I got enough women to build a biz dynasty. Also mo…
/r/MensRights03/10/23 11:22 AM
1

Non whites except Asians tend to have lower iq. So yes.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 09:52 AM
16

Actually feminism prohibition of porn and prostitution jack up price of sex
/r/MensRights03/10/23 06:56 AM
4

Women can weaponize sex. Men can weaponize money
/r/MensRights03/10/23 06:53 AM
0

I make sex completely and explicitly transactional. Prostitution is legal in my country. I took advantage of it fully. Do small transactions first. Repeat order
/r/MensRights27/09/23 05:03 AM
1

Just curious. So in France, how do you ensure that a child is yours? Can you sign a contract saying that I am only allowed to do child support of the child is mine? Or what?
/r/MensRights19/09/23 02:24 PM
0

Most likely the rape is false or simple misunderstanding. But even if it were true the actual Physical damage is far less that 30 years. I know kids that git beaten up and nobody do a thing.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 07:01 PM
1

I believe sex must be transactional. That being said is it legal? How do you do that?
/r/MensRights11/09/23 06:48 AM
2

His wife and kids. Being a wife and sugar baby is actually a very well paid occupation.
/r/MensRights01/09/23 02:28 AM
6

Feminists think that if men are richer it must be because of some unfair privilege. Also they think if parents encourage more men to make money that is a right men have than female don't have. Namely the right to be encouraged to be rich. The truth is men have far less right than women. There are only 2 ways to make it more equal. Mgtow. But that is evolutionary loser. As much as possible turn everything into smaller transactions. Avoid commitment or anything where government get involved.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 06:20 AM
1

Okay. You are on to something here. Monogamy is the condition we evolved under. Let's suppose it's true. Now welfare recipients with 40 children will outbreed monogamists. So I the future people won't be monogamists too.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 08:14 AM
1

So that means polygamists shouldn't have right to have children? What are you trying to say?
/r/MensRights26/08/23 07:38 AM
-1

What would happen if the sex is reversed? So once meet a woman and turned out she's fat. I run away and face harassment. Since then I alway video chat first.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 03:58 AM
1

Chasing money to pay women lead to happiness and lots of children and grandchildren. When to stop? NEVER
/r/MensRights25/08/23 12:07 AM
0

Define best? What you said is very vague. For example If a woman are proposed by 2 men. One offer money for giving him children another offer monogamy but poorer. Which one the woman should choose so her children are richer and smarter?
/r/MensRights25/08/23 12:06 AM
0

I don't quite understand dating. I used to do that and so inefficient. Think about it. Say you meet a pretty woman. Turns out her iq is good. Then you offer money to do some sexy stuffs. Are there any reason why not go all the way and breed her? Or you video chat and the girl is ugly or have low iq. Are there any reason why you would even want to meet? Whether a girl is a match or not is already decided by quality and price most of which can be decided with a simple video call or at least 1 date…
/r/MensRights23/08/23 04:42 PM
1

When I was poor I just pay for hand job. So what? What is the point it of having children I can't afford.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 07:00 AM
1

I am a millionaire. I date sluts whores strippers and sugar babies. I won't marry them because I am disgusted with marriage. I pay them to give me children. I financially support our children. And I can do so legally in Indonesia.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 06:47 AM
1

If all else are the same then maybe monogamy is best. But if the choice is between sharing someone of high quality or be the only one for someone lower quality both will choose the first. Women are even more so. And they love getting paid. Many smart pretty women want money. Definitely cheaper than marriage.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 04:58 PM
1

When left to free market 80 percent women pick top 20percent men. That's what I think will happen without all these alimony palimony and child support laws. Which women would rather marry someone poor if she can share someone 20 times richer.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 04:57 PM
1

Whatever. If you think that way go mtgow. I won't
/r/MensRights19/08/23 04:55 PM
1

There are many factors that are far more important than monogamy. Such as the wealth of father. You think monogamy is best fine. But we have laws that make, #4 difficult.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 04:35 PM
2

Money is to commerce with strangers? Think of sugar babies like your biz partners. They are not strangers. Yet money matters right. Money always matter. It's disgusting to get a deal based on love only to have women demand alimony latter. She wants money, fine. Just say it and make a fair deal.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 04:07 PM
2

I think there is a difference. #1 and #4 differs significantly. Under #4 there is no limit with number of mates women and men can get. #1 is now very tricky. What you gonna do? Get married? Make yourself liable for alimony and someone else's children knocking up your wife. Nap.... While originally used to promote #1 all these rules hurt those who do #1 too. Might as well aim for #4. I would do my best doing #4. Being the only one or having a few is not a problem for me. What's important is the w…
/r/MensRights19/08/23 04:04 PM
0

It used to be the case. Now even welfare recipients can have 49 children and most of his children will reach adulthood thanks to welfare. You wanna be monogamous go ahead. But when people start making laws against #4 then we have individual freedom problems.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 04:01 PM
1

Precisely. Sex is never free. So why not make transaction clear.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 12:26 PM
1

Even if you want women to give you children it will make far more sense to get the deals explicit. For example in case of separation how much is child support? People should be able to talk about it. However under pretext of child best interests it can't be done. Child support is proportional to a man's income. A woman cannot even decide that before conception.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 12:13 PM
1

What can I get from marriage that I can't get from paying? What exactly I can't get if it were legal.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:49 PM
1

Whatever. You may be on to something. In what way weakness is not equal to vulnerable? And how the fuck getting married is a profitable idea?
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:46 PM
7

It seems that there are patterns Society tend to err in saying that the woman doesn't consent Society down play women's commitment. Women cannot credibly commit on anything Society overplay men's commitment. 2.5 years trial date? You really should have had sugar babies. $250k a year is a lot of money. Many said I am an incel for paying women. Women wanting money is fine. It's the one not wanting money is the one that are truly expensive.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:15 PM
1

Hitting the beach at Normandy is a vulnerable position that us army take because there is no saver alternatives. If there are they wouldn't storm Normandy. Would have saved lots of troops. US defeated the Japanese by killing civilians with napalm and nukes. That is not vulnerable position. Defenders are fighting from inside the wall. That's not cowardice. That's strategy. What is the point of having walls if you don't use it?
/r/MensRights16/08/23 09:51 PM
1

You of course try to avoid that if you can get the same thing without being in vulnerable position. A sniper can safely take a target from far away. If he gets up close to the target he is just stupid. Now why would a rich man that can just pay women marry her?
/r/MensRights16/08/23 09:49 PM
0

In what way being vulnerable is good? Interesting. You are weak when you are vulnerable. It's that simple. Ask any military strategies Vulnerability IS weakness. And the laws are there to encourage backstabbing.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 09:24 PM
1

If a woman can take half your stuff by just walking away from you then you are weak
/r/MensRights16/08/23 04:25 PM
1

I don't blame the state I do blame weak men. How do men become weak men? By getting married. Don't blame the state. Blame any man that still get married
/r/MensRights16/08/23 09:56 AM
1

Do you think welfare recipients should have a wife? What about robbers and burglars? Also many men are gay. If I am not rich I wouldn't mind sharing a beautiful woman than settling for ugly. Many market solutions.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 09:28 AM
2

Oh I see where we disagree. I think white knight are actually benefited for supporting blue spiller and you disagree on that We both agree that many men support feminism. I just explain why. Ugly feminists want to eliminate competitors because prostitute takes away potential husband. The same way many men wants to eliminate competitors too. Yes I agree with your ideal that sex should be transactional or that transactional sex should be legal. But that is out of my personal moral libertarian conc…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 04:23 AM
1

Where do we disagree? I mean I agree completely with everything you said. Sex should be transactional. It should be legal and the transactional ones are simply economically optimal. Most people disagree. The blue spiller disagree. But as I said they have axes to grind.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 04:20 AM
6

Men hate each other more. We compete more. We take risks more. And government spending always favor women. Including those we don't fuck. I wonder why It's easy to blame misandry. Men vote for welfare less than women and tend to want less government. I wonder if there is some scientific explanation on this and why research money go to women?
/r/MensRights10/08/23 05:05 PM
0

Don't
/r/MensRights10/08/23 03:33 PM
2

I disagree. I am successful with women. I knocked them up. However I know the main reason they don't backstab me is because they can't. Show my back and they will. Most relationship fail because one guy show his back.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 03:32 PM
-1

I am single legally. A polygamist in practice with 3 children. 2 with my current sugar baby. Another smart pretty woman I like more say she may be pregnant. Presumably with my baby but I will do paternity test anyway. Is it working? Yes. In Indonesia it's working fine. In US I don't know. The current sugar baby tried to get rid the second one I will not give up. I like the second one more and I have enough money to support 2 and 8 children and more. It's very motivational to make money knowing i…
/r/MensRights10/08/23 03:16 PM
1

A lot of blue pill feminism actually benefit incel. When polygamy and transactional sex is illegal, richer men can't hoard women. So it's normal that many men embrace feminist absurdity
/r/MensRights10/08/23 05:44 AM
13

To fight sexism I would demand they make one with female
/r/MensRights10/08/23 05:41 AM
2

Prenup imply that you plan to get married. DON'T
/r/MensRights09/08/23 04:13 PM
1

I agree.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 04:05 PM
1

That can happen. But rare. I mean only ugly women have to work like men.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 04:01 PM
1

So what if it is? I don't think that way because prostitute fuck many different guys and we are exclusive.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 03:59 PM
1

It's getting ridiculous. So easy to get up votes by just saying don't get married. Sometimes I feel bad I add long explanation. In short. If you are rich don't get married. Many laws in society are there to prevent rich men from having children and pass on money to his children Why So the poor have children and get the rich guy's money instead. If you are married your problem go 10k folds. Most poor men that outnumber the rich 100 to 1 will want to make sure your money go to someone else's child…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 03:51 PM
1

Instead of marrying her why not just pay monthly. If you leave she already have money. If she leaves all she got is the. Money that you gave
/r/MensRights07/08/23 05:35 AM
6

Don't get married.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 01:31 AM
5

What country?
/r/MensRights07/08/23 01:30 AM
5

You don't. But there is actually a way to know. Just pay her. A woman that want to backstab me will want to make it easy to backstab me. They will want marriage. A woman that wants to scam me will want me to make her want to like me. I am open to many kind of scam. A woman that want fair trade will just ask for money. So if you offer money and that's it you attract the right woman. The question is do you like her? Pick the prettiest smartest you can pay cost effectively. Done.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 01:29 AM
-1

Your situation is similar with mine. Date women in their 20 too. So? My advice with you and this is something that you can do in Thailand. Keep things transactional. Do not get married. Want children? Pay them to have children. They will love you if you do that. My experience is the more I want women to like me, the more I respect them, the more they are disgusted. But I'd I don't care if women like me or not and just keep things transactional it sort of work out. Do they really like me or just …
/r/MensRights07/08/23 01:26 AM
1

My loophole is I live in a country that are not woke. As long as I don't get married it's very hard to get my money. I wonder about people in Western countries though.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 04:53 PM
1

It's probably to discourage rich men from living with women. What about if 2 men and 3 women live together? Then it's obvious they're not married because they're not monogamous. How does the palimony works?
/r/MensRights06/08/23 04:18 PM
1

Not even that
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:28 PM
5

That and still don't get married
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:27 PM
3

Why you even want monogamy if you're rich? There are many women who want to share winners.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:27 PM
1

I want pretty woman. I don't care she is poor. Women prefer the rich. Do men prefer poorer women? I don't know. If all else is the same I prefer high class rich women. That being said her beauty is my top consideration. Her income is not. Most men are similar.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:26 PM
2

In states with common law marriage ask lawyers. You either move to other state, don't live with her, or have a deal to nullify common law marriage. Basically saying you don't intent to marry. Do not think I am screwed anyway if I don't get married. That like jews saying I am screwed anyway if I don't enter concentration camp. Marriage is a vapid cesspools no smart men should want. So government want to enforce toxic monogamy outside marriage too. Still there are more loopholes outside than insid…
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:23 PM
5

do not get married If there is pattern on any thing government want is that rich men can only use his money to encourage women to leave him and backstab him in the back. Think about it. Inheritance is taxed. You can't pay women to stay with you. But if majority of voters have their way they want you to pay Alimony Child support even on kids that are not yours. Palimony As usual there are loopholes The purpose is not to protect women or children. Women and men are smart enough to make deals that'…
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:14 PM
0

If you contribute to a business, we have a deal how much your share is. Not like because you flip some burgers you deserve half. This is why democracy made laws sucks and as much as possible you got to make your own deals.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 02:26 AM
1

You shouldn't have to get out
/r/MensRights23/07/23 05:30 AM
0

Yea they shouldn't. But then again what's the choice? Can they make contract that they don't intent to get married?
/r/MensRights23/07/23 05:19 AM
0

Just avoid those states. Also you can make it clear you are not married by deal I think.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 03:09 AM
1

No trial by jury in family court? Interesting?
/r/MensRights23/07/23 02:59 AM
1

No trial by jury in family court? Interesting?
/r/MensRights23/07/23 02:56 AM
1

Rich smart men are the most oppressed group in the world.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 05:17 PM
1

Why it's illegal to charge women higher premium?
/r/MensRights22/07/23 05:17 PM
1

That is why sex must be transactional. She doesn't like me that's her right. It is also my right to make sure I don't waste money on her. What about tax and welfare? Well... Find ways to minimize those too. For that same reason we need capitalism. Fuck welfare.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 05:15 PM
1

Which states?
/r/MensRights22/07/23 05:03 PM
1

No jury?
/r/MensRights22/07/23 05:00 PM
12

What?
/r/MensRights22/07/23 12:56 PM
1

Just legalize prostitution. Allow incel to share a woman. I and my bro share smart beautiful woman. Well I fuck mine he fuck his gf but we do it in front of each other. We are not incel. We just like it that way. The women are pretty and have high iq
/r/MensRights22/07/23 12:49 PM
1

Oh wait. It is relevant. Transmaxing can be done without surgery and without treatment why not? But why you want to really transition?
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:07 AM
1

I am well aware of it. So what is the solution?
/r/MensRights18/07/23 04:55 PM
1

Are there loopholes to avoid this kind of situation? Not getting married is one of them. But even if you don't get married there is this child support. A woman cannot decide the amount before conception. The purpose I think is to give women ability to backstab rich men that knock her up. Such women will then not be able to pick richer men. For example a woman get tabasco from drek. If she can agree on lower amount of child support drake will agree. But she can't
/r/MensRights17/07/23 02:24 PM
1

I read a story in Spain so probably not a Duluth model, that a guy bring a girl to live together. They had a fight and cops arrested him, not her. Even though it's his apartment. She just ransacked his apartment afterward. I want detail story how Duluth model (or any similar laws) cause that. Basically purely disadvantaged men.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 12:57 AM
1

In what way exactly this model hurt men. I bet it is in some way but how exactly it does. Not easy to google
/r/MensRights16/07/23 03:12 PM
1

I did that. I read Wikipedia. It does look sexist for protecting women. But what is the actual detail? Like sample cases? Like a guy fought a woman and then get screwed due to duluth model
/r/MensRights16/07/23 03:11 PM
1

How is this relevant?
/r/MensRights16/07/23 03:09 PM
2

I think it's troubling that there is an exception for underage sex. So a 15 years old girl can have sex with a 15 years old but cannot have sex with say 18 years old. That is because having sex with a 15 years old is even a worse outcome. 15 years old don't have money to raise children yet. As a parent I worry that my daughter or son have sex before she is 18. The fact that her sex partner is also underage will not make me "relieved". If anything, even Eipstein is at least a billionaire that wil…
/r/MensRights16/07/23 01:22 AM
3

It is pretty clear that the girl is comitting fraud claiming to be 14 when she is 12. Why not be charged?
/r/MensRights16/07/23 01:08 AM
1

Don't get married
/r/MensRights16/07/23 12:57 AM
1

Awesome. How to find that post via search?
/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:36 PM
1

It looks misandric. But can you give details?
/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:31 PM
2

In Spain there is a loophole. Without operation or hormone you can just self identify as women
/r/MensRights12/07/23 10:07 AM
25

If not more
/r/MensRights21/05/23 06:58 AM
1

There are people that think men that don't date trans is transphobic.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 04:15 PM
-2

I don't want to fuck a girl with a dick. Do you? How many men would? If that means I am transphobic then I guess I am.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 06:02 PM
-7

To be honest why are people free and even subsidized to change their gender but we don't have a right not to simply think they're nuts? Transphobic are born that way too. In fact most men are transphobic. How many men wants to fuck a woman knowing he is a trans?
/r/MensRights03/05/23 05:37 PM
-18

What about if penalty of these pedophiles are fine proportional to actual damage?
/r/MensRights03/05/23 06:16 AM
-2

Kaoru hit kenshin all the time. I found it funny. But now that I think about it it's unfair. But hell it does feel funny. Kenshin is like number 1 swordsman and the second most powerful guy in the anime Kaoru also hits smaller yahiko.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 06:14 AM
-26

True. Men see each other as competitors. Also sometimes I see that men are being treated unfairly. On the other hand I also see I am getting laid more easily due to men being treated unfairly. For example, if white men can just pay women from Asia I will not get sugar babies as easily
/r/MensRights01/05/23 07:10 AM
1

Both republican and Democrat are leftist in this area. I think the true purpose of child support is to discourage rich men from having children. That is why it's proportional to the man's income The money goes to the mother. What about women that don't want large amount but want to have a child with a rich man? Can such woman agree to lower it before conception? No.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 05:03 PM
1

I want to help both men and women get justice. I hate alimony. Gets in the way of rich men getting many women. I don't like monogamy. Poor men should use prostitute first or share a wife. The rest I agree with men's right. Hate false accusation etc. I see nothing wrong with men and women having preferences. So what if women want money and men want sex with young beautiful smart women. I hate hypocrisy. People should express what they want
/r/MensRights26/04/23 06:18 AM
1

I am a libertarian and that is not a libertarian issues. Most people are poor and will be poor. That's their problem.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 05:22 AM
1

If you can be held responsible for children that's not yours. Don't
/r/MensRights08/04/23 05:19 AM
1

What right? Right to prevent women selling sex to the rich? No. Right to be treated as equal, that's libertarians. Right to customize your own marriage including making it transaction and polygamous? That's libertarian. With such right most men right issue like alimony means nothing
/r/MensRights08/04/23 05:13 AM
1

Or engage in group sex so you got witness that everything is consensual. Also don't be a man.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 06:14 PM
1

Why can't rich men just pay women money and let the deal be explicit? It will be much cheaper. She doesn't worth 30 million dollars. At most $100k
/r/MensRights11/03/23 06:05 PM
1

How should he behave then?
/r/MensRights11/03/23 06:01 PM
1

If you are autistic just make sex transactional. If she refused move on. Basically you women always cost money anyway. But now you are not wasting time and money on women that don't choose you. Simple. If you are a millionaire it's easy. Then pick the prettiest smartest women you can get and offer money for giving you children. I can do it in my country. I have hear that in Western countries lots of things are in the way
/r/MensRights11/03/23 06:00 PM
1

What about if sex is reversed?
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:54 PM
1

Because most of those who die in war are sexy women that fought using acrobatic sexy fighting techniques
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:52 PM
1

To promote equality they need to discriminate against men
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:51 PM
1

If you want to be technical. If we count number of living victim then yes more women becomes victim of men because most men victim is not alive. Technically correct. 😁 So after the war we count number of female victim vs number of male victim that's still alive. Yap there are more female victim Of course the male victims that may have been tortured to death don't count because they're not alive. The woman that became refugee counts. If we look at severity then men are main victim of war.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:45 PM
1

Hillary said that
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:42 PM
1

Any case? Url
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:38 PM
1

And they know it now?
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:36 PM
1

Libertarian give shit
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:35 PM
1

Republican is pro economic freedom too. Less tax and all. The democrats are commies. The problem with republican is they are even more pro monogamy than Democrat. Get in the way of rich men getting lots of mistresses.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:35 PM
-1

Many laws against men are really laws against rich men. Alimony, child support, anti prostitution laws prevent rich men from getting laid far more than poor men. 18-29 years old are usually poor and 60 percent of which are incel. So it's normal that they support laws like prostitution. Evolution is competition
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:33 PM
3

Search dan jailbreak in github
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:29 PM
1

And we men support women's right to be topless
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:27 PM
7

Also an obvious solution is not to get married in the first place.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:26 PM
1

This is obvious. I did it for my first son. Going to do it for my second son
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:26 PM
1

So murder suicide?
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:22 PM
1

It just a way so men that got laid can't share their secret to other men. Women are often scammy. Most women do not care she is the only one or not. Many just want money and financial support. And when men do the normal thing like wanting women to like him he is prone to many scams. So basically they want to prevent men from telling other men how women really are.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:22 PM
4

So there's another case where the guy was 40. How long does the guy get? Also age of consent is 16 and damage is not clear, the 16 years old teenage clearly says he consent and don't even want the teacher is punished. What about the 40 years old guy?
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:17 PM
0

That's how feminist retoric works. They said something that is obviously false. Wage gap. Men have more right. So on so on. It's not true. If you question it and point out the absurdity they just insult you call you misogynist and then that's it. Basically they try to shame censor or kick people that say otherwise.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:13 PM
3

So what was she actually charged with?
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter