TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DelphFox Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by DelphFox on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Saying hateful/racist/mean things on twitter isn't what gets you banned. It's making threats or inciting people to harass/harm others that will get you kicked off the service. Not that I support her or the crap she posts, but consistent application of the TOS isn't a pussypass. It just means she hasn't crossed the line like Milo did.
/r/PussyPass22/07/16 05:47 AM
-2

Enjoy your echo chamber, I'll be out here in the real world!
/r/MensRights01/09/14 10:59 AM
0

Think what you want, but you lost me today; and I've been here a while.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:55 AM
0

Not can't. Won't. I don't feel like arguing religion with zealots.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:42 AM
-2

Rationalize away. I'm done.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:22 AM
0

Because mentally ill people act rationally. Fuck, dude. Have some more kool-aid.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:01 AM
-4

I'm out. We're really scraping the bottom of the issue pile when mental illness is taken as an attack on Men just 'cause the sufferer is a woman. She deserves help, not you all sitting around clucking offense just because her mental illness happened to cause her to fixate on her baby's gender. This place had a good point once. Unsubscribe
/r/MensRights01/09/14 04:29 AM
2

You are absolutely spot-on, on this one. I have nothing more to add but agreement!
/r/MensRights18/07/14 09:23 PM
0

I did not say my words were the whole of the law. Just a quick outline of a force-escalation tree.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 08:25 PM
2

Yep. If they throw a punch, you can hit them back, but not pull a gun unless there are two of 'em. If they pull a knife, you can kill them dead on the spot with your concealed carry spork if that's what you have.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:51 PM
3

Hitting someone who hit you first is a very reasonable way to prevent further harm to yourself. Once they cross the line to physical violence, you no longer have a choice of participation in a physical altercation. You're either choosing to be at their mercy not to continue the violence (hah!), choosing to be at the mercy of luck or situation to stop the violence (yet unlucky enough to already be in the situation), or choosing to defend yourself. Those are your only choices, and I know which one…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:47 PM
6

"I did what I needed to do to end the threat to my person. I tried to deescalate, and he|she pressed their aggression and did not allow me to remove myself from the situation. I did not strike until stricken, and I did so with only the force I felt I needed to use in order to end the threat." Learn it, live it, recite nothing else (through your lawyer if possible) if asked.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:43 PM
2

The internet always ruins everything for me. :(
/r/MensRights13/07/14 02:24 PM
5

You got something for me, Abby?
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:27 AM
6

Post the insults publicly.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 07:15 AM
24

You have been made a moderator of /r/Feminism
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:09 AM
12

I did get a vasectomy. Best decision of my whole life. An idea, though; what's the feasibility of filing a civil lawsuit the woman for 'damages' around the amount the man 'owes' in lifetime child support? Sure, she may get his money; but she would then owe it right back to him.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 03:12 PM
22

I hope so, because it sure didn't help him in the Hospital Room. You can decide which room is more important to you.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:53 PM
1

You're imposing your Sexisim.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 12:53 PM
1

PharmD is not MD. I understand that it is a postgraduate degree. I understand how much training you had to go through to get your degree and I am not saying you don't know your way around pharmaceuticals. But it is not your role to decide "context". I am an adult, purchasing a product legally. That is where your responsibility ends. It's not your place to decide otherwise, unless you have reason to believe there is a dangerous or abusive purpose behind the purchase. Scrutinizing a person based o…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:57 AM
1

Like a Boss.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 02:17 PM
1

/r/lifeprotips needs this.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:50 PM
12

I don't think we care what gender or sexual orientation you are; nor your political viewpoints or your favorite color. All are equal here that support the cause. And you're even welcome here if you don't, as long as you're not a troll or a total dick about it. (No pun intended)
/r/MensRights06/05/12 08:11 PM
5

There are limited cases in which this is legal and even a good idea. Now, before the downboats roll in, I'm NOT SAYING THIS WAS JUSTIFIED and this whole situation was wrong. However, in a situation where a child is believed to be in a position to be coerced by their parent or guardian (to determine if the adult they are with is their parent or guardian, or domestic violence situation for example), questioning a child to determine if a criminal act has occurred is a good thing and legal. However,…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:19 PM
1

I doubt a vasectomy fails suddenly. A yearly visit will tell you if your sperm count has increased, to avoid such accidents. Nothing's 100% foolproof, obviously. But a regular checkup will go a long way in detecting a problem if the vasectomy fails or is in the process of failing.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 01:43 AM
2

Is there a way for someone with no insurance and limited funds to get a vasectomy?
/r/MensRights03/11/11 07:14 PM
1

This is why a responsible person goes back and has his sperm count checked every year. Shit happens, plan for it.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 07:11 PM
1

This is why a responsible person goes back and has his sperm count checked every year. Shit happens, plan for it.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 07:09 PM
3

I completely agree with you. However, those attitudes are things that need to be addressed in different conversations over time. This would have been a good example to degender the emotional response a little bit while still instilling a much more important healthy attitude towards violence of any sort.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 09:37 PM
2

I stopped at "pooping back and forth foreva". That's where you lost me.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 12:27 PM
1

Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice... "Gotta say it 3 times, honey."
/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:56 PM
2

She's 300lbs on her rascal scooter, smokes a pack a day, and has a voice like broken glass that she loves to project across crowded wal-marts. Have at it!
/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:22 PM
1

After Ten Thousand Men, I'm finally FREE!
/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:21 PM
2

You forgot to define your Win Condition.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:32 AM
1

None of us do. But one has to be pragmatic with so much at risk.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 12:59 AM
5

I agree it is quite sexist. But I don't think that a ban on either genders being alone with a child is ridiculous. Because the problem isn't (in the vast majority of the cases) the social worker, nor is it the child. It's the helicopter, paranoid, "concerned", or disgruntled parents who (intentionally or from paranoid ignorance) cry "pedophile" and manufacture memories in their child's minds. However, the Men are very much more at risk of such an unfounded accusation, so the policy makes sense a…
/r/MensRights02/02/11 10:50 AM
29

How about instead, being the guy who fights for none of the staff be alone with a child, no matter the gender of either party?
/r/MensRights02/02/11 07:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter