TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DemandJustice2 Archive

View 1 post and 134 comments by DemandJustice2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

FeminismDemandJustice2/r/MensRights12/04/23 01:03 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Never mind her. You tell that other guy to FO, pre-emptively if you have to. Its the same way for most mammals. You don't win the female over. You make the other males get the hell out of Dodge. Then the female "chooses" the male that is still there.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 03:22 AM
1

I throw around the label pedophile because your post history includes your mentioning them, while arguing that because you have trouble controlling your pedophillic tendencies I made no such argument. This is harassment. You will stop this immediately. I cannot help your argumentation is too weak to be supported without your obvious lies.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 01:42 AM
1

The pedophile is incapable of learning. You throw around ad hominems because its the only way to give you argumentation the appearance of legs. But is it Mearsheimer, Bradley, Matlock, Chomsky, Cohen, Benjamin, Prashad, or Kennan you are accusing of being a pedophile? NATO is not expanding in the sense that you are speaking. Me??? I just cited experts who know god damned well how NATO expands! ​ Nations vote to join NATO, so NATO expansion is literally representative democracy at work No. Finlan…
/r/MensRights11/04/23 01:10 AM
1

I don't give a flying F how many pro-NATO Ukrainians can be packed into a Youtube video. That does not represent literally millions of Ukrainians. NATO promised not to expand east toward Russia. This idiocy is leading us to nuclear armageddon. YOu think this is Russian propaganda? Bill Bradley on NATO expansion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-alxZvUCS8 Ambassador Jack Matlock on causes of Ukraine crisis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5F0JSy-HHY Stephen Cohen warned against NATO expansion 12 …
/r/MensRights10/04/23 05:34 PM
1

Keep telling yourself that. Another thing you don't get is that as soon as things go underground they are much harder to control. I suggest you study the prohibition of alcohol and learn the lesson of "The road to hell is paved with good intentions".
/r/MensRights09/04/23 12:49 PM
0

So you think it's absolutely fine to take a child who has not chosen the religion or culture There is no reason to answer this. Its like you have alzheimers.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 11:30 AM
0

Yeah, sorry I was very unclear. I don't agree that all forms of FGM should be illegal by law, and nor would I agree that MGM should be as well. I am sure I already said this a million times, but only religious exceptions should be allowed.....until they die a natural death. That said though, I never heard a proper religious reason for FGM, so I am not worried about it being done on those grounds.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 10:57 AM
1

Can you be specific? In what sect is it obligatory? What sect goes for removal of the clitioris? What Hadith says to do it? (I don't care about mentions) What is your evidence that most Islamic scholars are in favor? Are you saying most Islamic women got FGM???
/r/MensRights09/04/23 10:05 AM
8

Humans will survive but White people are toast, especially Anglos. American as I am I recommend American ways to NOBODY. Its a culture that believes its infallible even while getting everything wrong, especially with regards to gender issues.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 09:25 AM
1

Man, you are going to get a lot further if you accept there are things neither you nor anyone knows for sure. You cannot tell me how many Somali FMGs were performed in the U.S. or abroad. You cannot tell me how many got fmg and how many didn't. You cannot tell me exactly how many were caught trying to do it or having done it. I suspect the number taken away was zero. We will never know the number angry about their fmg or those good with it. But remember this is about mgm, and the numbers doing t…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 07:43 AM
1

Oh, I was talking about both.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 07:20 AM
1

Well, you might also consider that you are going to be jailing a kid's parents and that might not go so well. I can imagine a lot of resentful kids out there who totally agree with their circumscisions.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 07:10 AM
1

Well, that is a surprising number. Meanwhile there were over 6 million Jews in the U.S. in 2000.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 07:08 AM
1

I have way more life experience with ultra religious people than you do. That is probably true. So there you have it. Your way will work out spectactularly. No way it could go wrong. Have a great day.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 07:06 AM
1

You're not the arbitrater of religious belief. None of us are. Yet we are all deciding things for others, aren't we? Well, there has to be some basis for the judgment. This is mine. Don't like it? Don't worry. Nobody here can enforce anything. Its just pixels on the internet. ​ You are aware that babies go to the doctor and pediatrician right? And the doctors are mandatory reporters? Baby shows up with a circumcision. All right report the parents. (sigh) Consider that parents may opt to not seek…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 07:04 AM
1

FGM is not religious. Also, people who do that are not coming to the U.S. in such numbers. Also, you don't really know what is happening. Genital inspections are not a thing.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 06:24 AM
1

I don't know why you think you are going to defeat religous belief and action with legislatation. Lack of life experience seems to be the most likely answer. A total ban will make things worse. There are many examples. It will be much like prohibition, where once there were problems, now there is death. Not smart.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 06:22 AM
1

Also, the whole point of the subreddit is that men should have equal rights to women. No it isn't. Its about men having fair rights and nothing vis-a-vis women. And yep, I am carving out a religious exemption because you can't have everything. If you prefer babies get circumscision's in dirty back alley shops or living rooms, get infections, and lose their penises all together, by all means, push for a total ban. My brother's penis was messed up by a botched circumscision, and that was supposedl…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 06:20 AM
0

No need to get gooey inside. Its little more than a start. But kill it in the crib if you want. That'll help.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 06:13 AM
1

And I don't agree with that. But I repeat, I have seen no religious reason given ever. I have only heard the "men won't want them" excuse.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 06:10 AM
1

but that doesn't cause them anguish because we find a way around it I cannot agree. Male suicide greatly outweights female suicide for reasons, and I think this is a big one. I agree her speech lacks weight, but I don't see the "forget about men" part.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 06:08 AM
1

Oh so because a culture can write a long time ago it's allowed to cut off little kids dicks today? That makes no sense. I specifically said cultural excuses were out. JFC Are you paid to be an annoyance or does it just come natural?
/r/MensRights09/04/23 01:39 AM
1

And the government gets in between families that abuse their children all the time. And with a lot of bad results. ​ Do you just like that they're white or something? WTF? Loads of Jews are totally semitic. They wrote down their beliefs about circumsicion over 2000 years ago, and included clearly religious reasons for it. I don't know if you lack the faculties to absorb the fact or are just stonewalling because you hate to lose a debate, but I have had enough of this crap. Believe what you want.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 01:13 AM
1

Sooner or later people are going to have to cross the aisle or war is simply guaranteed. Do you prefer war? That said though, and no offense to the women here on this sub, but I tend to think there are more male feminists than female MRAs.....so yeah...I think its the feminists holding back....but still....we cannot be so hostile and expect any different. For example, we can criticize Emma Watson without calling her a bitch as someone else here did.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 01:04 AM
1

i found it mad when she said be a more true and complete version. that just sounds so judgmental and messed up to say. what men aren't true and dont strive to be complete everyday lol? Really? You don't think society is forcing men to deny parts of themselves and that is causing them anguish? I think you could find a positive message in there if you truly gave it a shot.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 12:57 AM
0

Lost all respect for that bitch when i heard her say that. I think you have just interpreted what she said as you wish. Looks to me like her biggest fault was to be vague and give you room to do that. Looks to me like she tried to be inclusive, and BOTH sides decided to villify her for it. One might think you could appreciate a feminist mentioning men's problems at all. Nope. And now they won't for a long time until another tries and likely gets villified just the same. You might have more in co…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 12:55 AM
-1

Look, I don't like any of this. All of it pisses me off. But you have to entertain the law of unintended consequences, and when you try and ban religious practices its like pulling a lion's tail. You incite rebellion and even more dangerous practices. Circumscision for males is ordered by God in Genesis. https://biblia.com/bible/esv/genesis/17/9-14 It could not be any more clear. The Yoruba religion has nothing I can see justifying it. As for the children and how judge their future, its the same…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 12:40 AM
0

I looked up the Yoruba. They practice the Yoruba religion, so it has a name...sort of. You should have named the relgion and not just the tribe. And I am not going to look up the basis for your claim that FMG is religious to them. To properly claim this, you need to cite a religious significance, like they can't go to Heaven without it, or their soul is impure or something, anything. I see nothing. So I assume culture until further notice. If you can't provide a religious basis then leave me alo…
/r/MensRights08/04/23 11:50 PM
-1

Good to know you're such an expert on African animist religions. I can only assume that your hostility is the result of your inability to name a specific religion you are attempting to reference. Once again I am not seeing a religious significance but rather a cultural one. FMG has zip to do with Islam even if some African cultures are trying to cram it in sideways.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 11:26 PM
0

You need to name some of those African folk religions, cause I never heard of any of them having a religious reason for FMG.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 10:46 PM
1

I don't think they have a basis to claim its a religious practice. Looks cultural to me.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 10:44 PM
2

If I dig into my heart the Bible goes in the trash can and I write a new one. That's why I don't go there. But at least we know your source. Have fun.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 03:42 PM
-2

Well clearly someone lied. Who was it?
/r/MensRights08/04/23 03:31 PM
-1

I am not aware of any religious rule for female circumsicion. AFAIK that is cultural. But if it can be proven to be religious, I will allow for it. If our way is better, then it will overcome. If we refuse that test, then we are already a failure. At some point, you have to let people raise their own kids. I think religion is a good place to draw that line hard....especially since people are going go back alley if you try to interfere with their religion...and that will get really extra bad resu…
/r/MensRights08/04/23 03:28 PM
-1

So you are saying that is not the word of God/Yahweh?
/r/MensRights08/04/23 03:23 PM
-4

I don't believe in God, but if I did I think he would say: "Did I stutter?"
/r/MensRights08/04/23 03:16 PM
-2

Genesis 17:9–14 Says otherwise. Every male among you shall be circumcised. You shall be circumcised in the flesh of your foreskins, and it shall be a sign of the covenant between me and you. He who is eight days old among you shall be circumcised. Every male throughout your generations, whether born in your house or bought with your money from any foreigner who is not of your offspring, both he who is born in your house and he who is bought with your money, shall surely be circumcised.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 02:54 PM
-2

I am fine with a religious exemption for this. But you better be Jewish for real if you want to hack up your son's penis. And you better have converted since before your son was even conceived.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 02:47 PM
1

Thanks. Good examples. I hope we can a few more that are not offensive like the one I often point to....the office. I also like to point out the thing about walking on eggshells, as if men did not get enough of that just going home and being on dates. And its not just having to take down our Playboy Calendars either. People who lose their self control over words are a detriment to people dealing with everyday harsh reality, I don't care what gender they are.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 12:26 PM
6

If I remember correctly this was a good talk. Basically it was how to stop being a C-word, and shut up, listen and think. Its women like this I hold in high esteem, but they are rare.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 12:12 PM
66

The litmus test is to make it a meme, change men to women, post it, and see how fast your account gets banned.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 11:26 AM
2

Its not very politically correct to accuse someone of being an incel is it? I mean misogynist and bigot might apply because you might have something that amounts to actual evidence for the label even if mistaken. But "incel" is just a straight up ad hominem insult pulled out of the air. On the other hand, I don't think anyone claims to have actual investment in politcal correctness (polite language use) anymore if so minded people ever truly existed. Now its just more about narrative control thr…
/r/MensRights08/04/23 11:18 AM
-10

Not to argue, but what men's spaces got ruined? A good list will boost this line of argument dramatically.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 11:11 AM
1

I don’t see any women doing this. I said "started this". Both do it now, but for different reasons. Men you can take aside and get them to admit this whole situation is whack. But they feel compelled to kowtow to it in groups lest they get labelled. Women on the other hand will usually not budge but will dogmatically insist on things like 1) teenagers are children 2) Even if they look 20 men should not find them attractive because...didn't she just say they were children? 3) Teenagers having sex…
/r/MensRights08/04/23 01:47 AM
1

The what is it seems you have a passing understanding of physical reality. Its a lot easier for a person to jam a finger into someone else's ear than for a person to force another person to jam their finger into their ear....hell...its so oddball even trying to type it out is difficult. Women have less direct control and its not just gender politics.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 01:26 AM
1

Tell me this....if a woman is not sexually active why would she be on the pill for reasons of pregnancy prevention? If she meets a guy and they want to have first time sex right away, can she run down to the pharmacy and get BC pills for sex within an hour? Is the morning after pill as effective as a condom? Does it also prevent STIs? Do you like taking pills for non-medical reasons? Is keeping that schedule convenient? Do you make no mistakes? I never said a woman could do nothing to mitigate h…
/r/MensRights08/04/23 01:16 AM
1

Did you miss the part where I was talking about a teacher taking advantage of a student, even though it's on the title? Did you miss the part where I was not talking about that but rather your popular but still horrific misuse of terms and concepts? (Pedophile, rape, plus one I know will come up here). That automatically invalidates most of your reply. I am not interested in the specific cases. Looking at how you have mishandled a word makes me think you are nowhere near ready to discuss such sp…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 03:56 PM
1

A) young and immature. Completely nebulous concepts that do nothing but muddy any chance of having a meaningful discussion on this topic. And that is further muddied by the fact that trying to determine such things by age alone is patently insane. I have known people with better capacity at 14 than 18 year olds I have met. Years alive in not a meaningful yardstick of anything. Its a sham created by lazy minds. B) No one has a position of authority by age alone. Where do you get these ideas??? Th…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 02:35 PM
0

Women started this. They always throw everything in the same mental box cause they don't want justice. They want to take advantage of the confusion. Men are too often too psychologically weak to tell them to FO.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 01:00 PM
0

I wish you all could figure out what pedophilia actually is, cause this ain't it. The entire debate and discussion can only remain in the realm of mixed up, upside down, inside out and backwards as long as this continues. Also the term "statutory rape" is defunct and has largely been abandoned in legal terminology. Rape is a serious crime of violence, threats of violence, coercion or drugging/incapacitation, and associating what was once consenusal sex with rape, just because someone had a birth…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 12:39 PM
2

If a woman agrees to it then they accept the risk. She is acceping a HELL of a risk. Meanwhile, a man wearing a condom and using it properly essentially has zero direct risk. Also, he holds all the essential cards...if he is smart and responsible. But a woman can do very little to mitigate her risk....either he is a smart, responsible man, or he is a chucklehead. She can try to choose wisely but you never really know until its all said and done. The easy answer here is to educate men. If that is…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 12:17 PM
1

Sperm not more of a "magic bullet" than the egg, both are required for pregnancies. Try putting your egg in me. Good luck.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 12:10 PM
1

Not at all. I think most men are quite happy with less and doing simple activities. Its mostly the women that demand unnecessary luxury. What man wants a gold ring for use of his private parts???
/r/MensRights07/04/23 02:58 AM
2

Cancel culture has always existed. Look at the Red Scare and McCarthyism. Or look up Fatty Arbuckle.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 02:42 AM
3

Fair enough. That woman's silence thing really drives me up the wall. They are obviously dodging responsibility in those moments, and its just plain dirty. Ultra-feminists will say a man should stop all sex at that point, BUT, she already consented and THAT is why the man continues. If she wants to withdraw consent, she MUST open her gums and clearly do so, not expect a man to ask for consent a million times even though he already got it.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 02:37 AM
1

We men have almighty power on this issue and I am never going to plumb the depths of dogma so deep I suggest men throw it away. We have the magic bullet. Its ours. Its called a condom. We wear it. Women don't (not talking about the female condom here). The condom prevents both disease and pregnancy. Its on us. We can wear it with ease. We can check it with ease even during intercourse. We can make sure its on, and unbroken. And dudes, always carry water based lube with your condoms. And put your…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 02:21 AM
4

Never EVER cum inside a woman's vagina if you don't want kids with her. EVER. And definitely don't do so without a CLEAR PRIOR AGREEMENT that that is okay. Cumming inside her is a COMPLETE different keetle of fish compared to putting a dick inside her. Pull out method is risky enough, but just flat out cumming inside her without consideration of my first two points is the height of irresponsibility. Besides which, if the goal is just to finish there are two other holes to use. And all that means…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 02:03 AM
1

The reason is that agreements between people do not trump physical reality.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 01:57 AM
1

Its as if you didn't read my post. I did point out how male activity is largely driven toward pleasing women, did I not?
/r/MensRights06/04/23 11:27 PM
-1

In the west I would say that men are destroying the planet at the beheadst of women. Shabby looking ecowarriors don't get laid. Men who rape the planet for riches and wear a new shirt every day do. Men who keep old things running with blood, sweat and tears don't get laid. Men who themselves use and provide their women with everything new do. So we can blame a handful of greedy capitalists who are mostly male, and pretty much all women who demand ever increasing amounts of wealth to do what coul…
/r/MensRights06/04/23 01:50 PM
7

Well, I have often suggested that a wife has a duty to provide sex and people shot me down for that. So, okay. Wife has no duty to provide sex, then husband has no duty to provide money. Fair. Done.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 05:32 AM
2

Its always been like this.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 08:42 PM
1

You say rights and I say priviledges.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 01:33 PM
1

Traditionalism isn't facism. And now you are just stalking and trolling. Go away.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 01:29 PM
1

I don't need to. You are right. You don't. But I won't suffer your baseless abuse anymore. Goodbye.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 01:25 PM
5

But you aren't interested in that, are you? Hey, if you don't want to talk you can shut up. Just decide which it is, cause if you want to talk, you have to drop these baseless accusations immediately. Consider it a rite of passage.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 01:16 PM
4

Sounds like someone doesnt want others to point out when men are wrong. What are you claiming is wrong???
/r/MensRights05/04/23 01:04 PM
0

This the OP's philosophy and opinion, and it seem to have as much validity to me as many others. How many men does it apply to? 20 percent? 50? 80? IDK Someone would need to put it to test. Until then, I have nothing bad to say. It might be worth trying myself.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 01:01 PM
5

That was uncalled for. If you want to crap on a man like that, why not go join a feminist sub?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 12:58 PM
4

And you don't?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:55 AM
3

Females like you are why women had no legal powers for millenia. Your judgements are just awful. Over-confident, hyper-judgemental, narrow-minded, and condeming of men. You cannot even recognize that YOU, even with your siblings, DO NOT represent human kind. I gave you an average age range for puberty. That is representative. NOT your personal experience of your body. I used to teach at an elementary school with a girl who had bigger boobs than any of the staff from 4th grade. When she got in ju…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:50 AM
4

Right. Cause its not enough that they establish a rapport, make sure they are safe, remember their details, be spontaneous, drive the car, try and figure out if he has to pay or not, make sure not to say anything "offensive" to her, try to impress her, try to figure out if she has a BF or not, out-compete the other guy trying to get her, and I could on and on. Oh, no. Even though she is clearly interested, he also has to somehow determine her age without ruining the whole thing. You know, I thin…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:16 AM
2

Furnished. B is next to N.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:07 AM
5

And the rest are likely damaged.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:02 AM
9

No. The REAL solution would be for courts to convict and jail when actual complaints of abuse have been filed and proven. And also for police to not get involved unless someone is actually believed to be in imminent danger. Police arresting guys because someone made a claim, and courts putting guys in prison by just comparing birth certicates is the actual problem here, not people walking around doing normal human stuff.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 01:05 AM
5

Wow. Traditional attitudes condemned unmarried sex yes. So young teens were married....so they could have married sex. But the REAL issues were pregnancy and the resulting child care. Having single teen mom's raising kids on their own would be trouble....or death. Well, we have control over pregnancy today. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriageable_age
/r/MensRights05/04/23 12:29 AM
3

Yep. On one side there are people who want us miserable and dysfuctional because they are jealous and also misery loving A-holes, and others who want us to be crazy consumers who buy everything in sight thinking it will make us happy, but it won't.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 12:15 AM
-7

I have to disagree. You cannot present someone with so much temptation and expect them to just walk away, and that goes for both genders. Its the prats in society making the actual trouble. They don't need to. They could butt out. But they don't.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 12:11 AM
3

Why would implying she might be younger be offensive? Why are you assuming any female will take it that way but no other?? There must be half a million ways for a female to take offense at that line of questioning.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 11:57 PM
20

Bingo. Now brace for your ban.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 11:36 PM
4

Ask the year they were born in. Right. Cause no female was ever sensitive about her age, so us guys should just feel free to ask about it, while keeping in mind the shit ton of other things females are senstitive about. I think your advice is about as valid as saying "Just give up on females. Think of all the hassle you will miss out on."
/r/MensRights04/04/23 11:35 PM
-4

This pisses me off to no end when young girls do this. Its the system persecuting the men, not the girls. Your anger is misplaced.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 11:30 PM
4

Risky behavior has risks. But windows of opportunity have short life spans. Those who suggest waiting would peer into an old man's coffin and suggest waiting some more. People who wait and pass up opportunities are virgins and incels. Life is not a romantic comedy.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 11:27 PM
-1

that's like saying "I don't approve of tornados". I was thinking it was like saying "I hate that other people would be normal and achieve the happiness and stability that comes with it."
/r/MensRights04/04/23 11:21 PM
1

How many times did she demand he cancel the ride but he didn't?
/r/MensRights04/04/23 11:05 PM
1

Half the reason they are or seem immature is because they are being twarted from being anything else by people who "think" like you do. What makes people mature is EXPERIENCE, not being legally and socially cordoned off from interacting with adults....by judgemental A-holes with big ideas and opinion over-reach. Guys are literally scared to even help a lost child now. Great plan.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 10:46 PM
0

I am talking about the fact that two people can enjoy eachother with no harm done but one is sometimes sent to jail because some douche who does not even know them looked at birth certificates.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 10:41 PM
10

Because, I'm sorry, nobody actually falls for the 14 year old looking like she's eighteen. There's a massive difference between a girl just starting puberty, and an eighteen year old. Sounds me like you are just making stuff up with no actual experience or facts. Age for girls to start puberty is NOT 14. Its more like 8 to 13 and that quite a range. And that range should come as no surprise because humans are the only mammal I know that isn't typically pregnant by 3 years old in the wild. Humans…
/r/MensRights04/04/23 10:37 PM
6

If you feel you have to ask their age, they're probably too young. Too young for what? Too young for who? Plenty of women in their 20s look like teenagers. Should they be lonely because society is a judgemental ass making men paranoid for no good reason? Your advice of "When in doubt don't" only works because society is a judgemental ass with the legal system in its employ. Its heartless though.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 10:24 PM
1

Reasonable. Mature. Those are you words. If you want to retract them, then do so...clearly.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 10:21 PM
2

I am not the one pompously judging your taste in women. I am judging your crap judgmentalism on everyone who is not you. Seriously, how the HELL do you even think this persecution of men got started? This shit right here is your answer....people like you pontificating about what a mature reasonable man should find attractive.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 10:10 PM
2

18 is still way too young for any reasonable mature man Well frankly fk that opinion. Its extremely judgemental. Who the hell are you to determine what is reasonable and mature for any but yourself? Leonard DiCaprio says no. Charlie Chaplin says no. Gen.Douglas MacArthur says no. Thomas Jefferson says no. I could go on.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 10:05 PM
1

The only stupid game is that which is created by people who weren't even there, who just had to stick their noses into a situtation that was not remotely their concern.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 09:59 PM
-1

18 is still way too young for any reasonable mature man imo - in looks and maturity. Personally I prefer someone who's around 30. Judge for yourself and stop judging others using yourself as a yardstick. The rest of us are not you and don't even want to be you.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 09:57 PM
11

Most people will freely dismiss thousands of years of evidence of humanity to try and claim the current situation in Anglo countries is "of course normal and best and always has been." And the mod will be along shortly to enforce that viewpoint. Meanwhile guess which countries in the developed world have more behavioral and other trouble with teenagers than the others, including runaways, death in childbirth, rapes, suicides, etc. Fact is, so many would rather see teens dead than admit they migh…
/r/MensRights04/04/23 09:53 PM
16

This is mostly actually nothing new. What is new is the persecution that is happening with levels of Inquistition glee about it. In the past they would just say she is a slut and go about their day....or perhaps start planning the wedding. Now she is a victim and the males must be nailed to crosses. Even Japan is getting in on the act. https://japantoday.com/category/crime/20-year-old-man-arrested-for-kidnapping-2-teen-sisters
/r/MensRights04/04/23 09:46 PM
2

If you have a point I am sure I don't know what it is. I don't care about nationality. Anyone against free speech is a POS.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 08:46 PM
6

Anyone not for free speech is a POS. Trolls who abuse free speech are also POS's. People who are easily offended need to get out of debate groups, or they are also POS's.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 08:18 AM
8

Feminists believe in equal rights and opportunities. Traditional feminists do (although Dame Diana Rigg claimed women already had too much power when second wave feminism got started). But third and fourth wave feminists do not, even if they say they do. They believe in female hegemony, even if they themselves are confused about what they advocate.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 11:27 PM
7

Which is why he clearly said in the beginning "some here at least".
/r/MensRights03/04/23 11:21 PM
5

While two of the committee members may have taken issue with the email, I think what led to the commitee rescinding the offer was his excessive "request" for sick days and his request to negotiate salary in future years. Still, he could sue them, because they can't just yank back an offer like that once accepted. Its a violation of contract law and he can, and should, sue. Then we will learn for sure what it was about. But this "ladies" situation. Interesting to be lectured about what an educato…
/r/MensRights03/04/23 11:12 PM
29

I was not thinking unprofessional. I was thinking "mild psychosis".
/r/MensRights03/04/23 11:00 PM
1

It is very very far from even similar. All I will tell you here is, any person that says they do not want to fight should not be forced to fight, anytime, ever.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 04:14 PM
1

I live in a country with educated people. You keep your guns in your trailor I am sure there are educated people in your country...but they do seem to have skipped at least one. Hint: "mobile home" is less confusing to spell and is not only more considerate to use, but is also less confusing in its meaning since a trailer (with an "e") can be a variety of very different things, such as the large container on wheels pulled but a semi-truck, or "lorry" in the King's English.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 12:53 PM
8

LOL. Found the Fauci gimp with a tired ad hominem but no link.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 11:19 AM
6

So you too disagree with all the scientists? What did "all the scientists" say? Please link me to a source of the claim "all the scientists" agree on.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 11:06 AM
6

Joe Rogan offered his opinion and he was very clear about that. Yet you treat him like he said "Medical experts agree that....." or as if he was speaking in the capacity of an NIH employee. That’s bad advice and the opposite of what scientists said. Scientists??? What scientists??? Loads of scientists and doctors rejected the idea of "vaccines for others rather than the self" since LOOOONG before Covid. Scientists said that 21 year olds with no comorbities were not at significant risk from Covid…
/r/MensRights02/04/23 10:33 AM
3

The people that trust Joe Rohan Trust him for what? Joe Rogan never said anything that required trust in Joe Rogan. Or, cite 3 examples of Joe Rogan telling people something that required trust in Joe Rogan over scientists or their own mind. Go for it. But I suspect you never watched Joe Rogan and that is the basis for your "claim".
/r/MensRights02/04/23 10:11 AM
11

You dodged a bullet. Loads of people enjoy Joe Rogan's podcast, including myself. People who hate Joe Rogan cannot help but bend over for Uncle Sam and especially Anthony Fauci. They hate Donald Trump but they can't articulate a single solid reason why (I hate him too but have actual reasons). Remember when Trump said he could literally shoot someone on the street and still get elected? Well those people would cheer for Fauci even if he strangled a baby right before their eyes. Ever since CNN to…
/r/MensRights02/04/23 09:15 AM
1

A joke. Yeah. Right.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 11:54 PM
1

Not even a sorry. Wallow in confusion and lonliness. I'm not gonna help you do shiz.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 11:52 PM
2

t I’m never following yr advice. Maybe calm down a little bit. You should maybe take the advice of some pick up artists. They say there are ways to approach that increase your odds of success, and ways that dramatically decrease it. Good luck finding one suggesting this place and situation. Also, you are specifically asking how to approach for a date. And within in the context of this thread, an almost empty parking lot, this is really very, very far from ideal. Thus, its setting one's self up f…
/r/MensRights01/04/23 04:49 PM
0

You said it's not okay to approach women in parking lots. I have no idea what your mental malfunction is but stop replying to me please. I have said none of the things you accuse me. Just stop.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 02:21 PM
1

I never said scared and I never said afraid.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 12:57 PM
1

You said most women are afraid No I didn't.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 11:31 AM
1

In that case you are clear to scream "DO NOT APPROACH ME!"
/r/MensRights01/04/23 10:56 AM
1

Thing is, we only have her word that a man "approached her from 30 feet away". It might never have happened, and she does seem "off" enough to make something like that up.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 10:26 AM
-6

How do I approach a woman? Not in a parking lot or some situation its just you and her and maybe a child around. You approach women at parties, barbeques, picnics, clubs, social gatherings etc....its even better if you bring a friend to introduce as well as yourself. Most women are nervous by nature, its not just social condtioning although that makes it worse. More people around makes her more calm and sure she is protected. Then she can open up to you. This will never change, ever. Roll with i…
/r/MensRights01/04/23 10:25 AM
1

That's his signature on his passport. Apparently his signature on toilet paper would be enough for you. Nobody asked for a GD passport. You need it to travel. They won't let you travel internationally without one. Zero choice in the matter. Its not agreement with the government. Its not a vote. And its not a contract. No one has a duty to protect anything dear to you. Even if one did have such a duty, the separatists clearly renounced Ukraine. Ukraine attacked them. If Ukraine had left them alon…
/r/MensRights01/04/23 09:08 AM
1

It would be no surprise to me to learn that women are generally better at sniping paper targets. The trouble is I think getting them to be consistently murderous and accurately target actual humans.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 03:10 AM
1

I don't think you have any evidence to back up the idea that women's brains can't conventionalize war. You are asking me for evidence of a negative, which is inherently silly. Here, I will give you a chance to provide some evidence...without consulting the internet, name three famous female generals. You have the entire world of nations and all of human history at your disposal. Good luck with that. ​ This is really sexist though dude. And that accusation is nothing but politics trying to squash…
/r/MensRights01/04/23 01:52 AM
24

I suspect your step-mom is a bully. You might want to ask her if she thinks Ukrainian men should be allowed to leave Ukraine if they want. You might contrast that with American men who dodged the Vietnam War draft. I can't think of another issue that is such an obvious violation of innocent men's rights as forcing them to fight in a war they may not even agree with. But I don't know, maybe there is some other issue that might knock her stuck mental gears lose.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 06:32 AM
5

I think there is some misunderstanding of what is happening with some of these, especially the ones that seem to contradict. Most women, if they see a woman, esp. a friend, is feeling down or expect she needs some support in the moment, will take her side in just about anything. And that can lead to establishment of their general politics. Of course men do that too, but I think men are more likely to not be excessive and in fact, offer criticism if they think someone has caused their own misery …
/r/MensRights31/03/23 03:57 AM
4

The trouble with that idea though is it would be like asking a group of fifth graders what it would be like to have a full time job. Meanwhile, show that same group some pictures of tanks, and some of the boys will be able to name some of the tanks, its country of origin, and maybe even what war or wars it was used in. And those same boys will tell you that no girl there wants to hear their stories of tanks and war. I upvoted your comment, but I feel the need to preempt what will happen, because…
/r/MensRights30/03/23 11:24 PM
3

There are different kinds of feminists. But if you ask me, by virtue of evolution, the typical female mind just cannot really conceptualize fighting and war, so you won't get consistent or meaningful answers from them. The majority just cannot reckon with it. I mean, I really think that in their minds, they just cross no man's land with a white flag and say "sorry" and the war will be over. And mostly for that reason, war becomes a "man thing". And fair enough. Most women are simply not equipped…
/r/MensRights30/03/23 11:13 PM
1

He knew what he was getting into. No shame in conning a crook....or in this case...a terrorist organization.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 10:15 PM
11

I salute your colleague that refused to fight in wars of aggression. That is NOT what he signed up for and in fact, I can guarantee he was not properly informed at recruitment that he was expected to perform mercenary duty, so the contract was null and void and he can keep the money.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 09:38 PM
10

Constitutional duty to protect the motherland?? Show me his signature on the Constitution!
/r/MensRights30/03/23 09:32 PM
7

Plus being shipped to the front lines and tossed into the meat grinder.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 09:13 PM
1

The original student got a 6 million dollar settlement from the school district. I think Pandora's box has been opened. (No pun intended)
/r/MensRights30/03/23 04:14 PM
-7

Sounds a bit.....scammy. Methinks they planned it. Cause we all know that comes out of the taxpayer pockets. And in fact, probably motorboating right now...on a bed strewn with $100 dollar bills.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 04:07 PM
1

There are definitely things were are not allowed to talk about or advocate. And why these jerks won't just write those unwritten rules down, who knows? Particularly annoying is when people are allowed to advocate one side of an issue until they are blue in the face, even pushing hate and utterly crazy ideas, but take the counter side and......BAN! A-holes. Wanna know what those things are? Don't ask because if I explain....BAN! A-holes.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 04:01 PM
30

Article says they are "particularly vulnerable to gender based violence". Talk about having a blind spot!
/r/MensRights30/03/23 02:32 PM
29

Is there any situation they wont make all about themselves Hey! You don't even see the dead men complaining do you? Not a word! ---Random ultra feminist I guess
/r/MensRights30/03/23 02:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter